Neuberger Berman
High Yield Strategies Fund Inc. (the Fund) generated a -21.70%
total return on a net asset value (NAV) basis for the 12 months
ended October 31, 2022 (the reporting period), underperforming its
benchmark, the ICE BofA U.S. High Yield Constrained Index (the
Index), which provided a -11.45% total return for the same period.
(Fund performance on a market price basis is provided in the table
immediately following this commentary.) The use of leverage
(typically a performance enhancer in up markets and a detractor
during market retreats) detracted from the Fund’s performance
during the reporting period.
The overall high
yield market, as measured by the Index, generated weak results
during the reporting period. The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (Fed)
initially characterized rising inflation as being “transitory,”
however this was not the case. Robust consumer spending, supply
chain bottlenecks, a tight labor market, repercussions from the war
in Ukraine, and other factors combined to push U.S. inflation to a
40-year high. Against this backdrop, the Fed began an aggressive
rate hike campaign in March 2022, which we expect to continue until
inflation is under control, possibly leading to a recession. U.S.
credit spreads significantly widened due to periods of risk
aversion and the Fed’s monetary tightening campaign.
From a sector
perspective, security selection within media-cable, security
selection within and an overweight to real estate &
homebuilders versus the Index, and security selection within and an
overweight to technology & electronics were the worst
performers. In contrast, security selection within and an
overweight to gas distribution, security selection within
diversified financial services, and security selection within and
an underweight to healthcare were the top performers.
In terms of the
Fund's portfolio credit quality, an overweight to non-rated, and
overweight to CCC and below versus the Index were the worst
performers. Conversely, security selection within CCC and below,
security selection within and an underweight to BB, an overweight
to and security selection within B were the best
performers.
The Fund’s use of
swap contracts contributed positively to performance during the
reporting period.
As it became
increasingly clear that the Fed would have to become more
aggressive with tightening monetary policy, we selectively
increased the Fund’s exposure to shorter duration BB and B rated
issuers, while reducing exposure to CCC and below rated issuers. As
credit spreads widened over the reporting period, we subsequently
looked to decrease the Fund’s exposure to higher
beta1
(risk) issuers,
particularly in the CCC and below credit tier.
Looking ahead, we
believe current high yield valuations offer investors an attractive
opportunity, especially given our below average default outlook.
While the tightening of financial conditions, still-elevated
inflation and challenging news out of Europe have been creating
incremental volatility, real growth is slowing but still positive,
with supply chains mostly back to normal. We see these factors
acting to mitigate inflationary pressures, which could eventually
lead to a less aggressive path for Fed policy. In our view, healthy
consumer and business balance sheets, growing nominal gross
domestic product and solid job growth should remain supportive for
issuer fundamentals. While inventories are building as a result of
slowing demand, we remain focused on sector dynamics and
idiosyncratic risks to individual issuers. Despite short-term
volatility resulting from heightened uncertainty in commodity
prices, central bank tightening and negative news flow out of
Europe, we believe our bottom-up, fundamental credit research that
focuses on security selection, avoiding credit deterioration, and
putting only our “best ideas” into portfolios, will position us
well to take advantage of the increased volatility.
Sincerely,
Joe
Lind and Chris Kocinski
Portfolio Co-Managers
1 Beta
is a measure of the systematic risk of a portfolio. It is the
covariance of the portfolio and a market index divided by the
variance of the market index. Beta measures the historical
sensitivity of a portfolio's returns to movements in the market
index. The beta of the market index