NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
November 30, 2013
1.
ORGANIZATION
The Mariner Hyman Beck Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of shares of beneficial interest of Northern Lights Fund Trust II (the Trust), a trust organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as an open-end management investment company. The Funds investment objective is income and capital appreciation.
The Fund currently offers three classes of shares: Class A, Class C and Class I shares. Class A shares are offered at net asset value plus a maximum sales charge of 5.50%. Class C and Class I shares and are offered at net asset value. Each class of shares of the Fund has identical rights and privileges with respect to arrangements pertaining to shareholder servicing or distribution, class-related expenses, voting rights on matters affecting a single class of shares, and the exchange privilege of each class of shares. The Funds share classes differ in the fees and expenses charged to shareholders. The Funds income, expenses (other than class specific distribution fees) and realized and unrealized gains and losses are normally allocated proportionately each day based upon the relative net assets of each class.
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in preparation of its consolidated financial statements. These policies are in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securities valuation
Securities listed on an exchange are valued at the last reported sale price at the close of the regular trading session of the exchange on the business day the value is being determined, or in the case of securities listed on NASDAQ at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price (NOCP). In the absence of a sale, such securities shall be valued at the mean between the current bid and ask prices on the day of valuation. Debt securities (other than short-term obligations) are valued each day by an independent pricing service approved by the Board of Trustees (the Board) using methods which include current market quotations from a major market maker in the securities and based on methods which include the consideration of yields or prices of securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type. Short-term debt obligations with remaining maturities in excess of sixty days are valued at current market prices by an independent pricing service approved by the Board. Short-term debt obligations having 60 days or less remaining until maturity, at time of purchase, are valued at amortized cost.
MHB Fund Limited (MHB Ltd.) is a wholly-owned and controlled foreign subsidiary of the Fund that invests in Global Diversified Managed Futures Portfolio LLC (GDMF) which operates as a commodity investment pool. RJO Investment Management, LLC (the Advisor) fair values MHB Ltd. daily. The daily valuation is based on the current positions held by the commodity trading advisors (CTAs) which trade on behalf of GDMF. The Advisor calculates an estimated profit and loss which is then used to determine a daily fair value NAV for each CTA. The Advisor receives a daily CTA estimated profit and loss figure from the CTA and accounting agent which is compared to the Advisors estimated profit and loss. If the difference of these estimates exceeds the Advisors threshold, additional procedures are conducted by the Advisor which may include, but are not limited to reviewing prices of the underlying holdings and speaking with the CTA or accounting agent to further review valuation. The Advisor then makes a final determination on the fair value the CTA, using the Advisors estimate. The Advisors fair value NAV is back tested daily and reviewed by the Funds fair valuation committee on a regular basis.
A Fund may hold securities, such as private placements, interests in commodity pools, other non-traded securities or temporarily illiquid securities, for which market quotations are not readily available or are determined to be unreliable. These securities will be valued at their fair market value as determined using the fair value procedures approved by the Board. The Board has delegated execution of these procedures to a fair value team composed of one or more representatives from each of the (i) Trust, (ii) administrator, and (iii) advisor and/or sub-advisor. The team may also enlist third party consultants such as an audit firm or financial officer of a security
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
November 30, 2013
issuer on an as-needed basis to assist in determining a security-specific fair value. The Board reviews and ratifies the execution of this process and the resultant fair value prices at least quarterly to assure the process produces reliable results.
Fair Value Team and Valuation Process.
This team is composed of one or more representatives from each of the (i) Trust, (ii) administrator, and (iii) advisor. The applicable investments are valued collectively via inputs from each of these groups. For example, fair value determinations are required for the following securities:
(i) securities for which market quotations are insufficient or not readily available on a particular business day (including securities for which there is a short and temporary lapse in the provision of a price by the regular pricing source),
(ii) securities for which, in the judgment of the advisor, the prices or values available do not represent the fair value of the instrument. Factors which may cause the advisor to make such a judgment include, but are not limited to, the following: only a bid price or an asked price is available; the spread between bid and asked prices is substantial; the frequency of sales; the thinness of the market; the size of reported trades; and actions of the securities markets, such as the suspension or limitation of trading;
(iii) securities determined to be illiquid;
(iv) securities with respect to which an event that will affect the value thereof has occurred (a significant event) since the closing prices were established on the principal exchange on which they are traded, but prior to a Funds calculation of its net asset value. Specifically, interests in commodity pools or managed futures pools are valued on a daily basis by reference to the closing market prices of each futures contract or other asset held by a pool, as adjusted for pool expenses. Restricted or illiquid securities, such as private placements or non-traded securities are valued via inputs from the advisor based upon the current bid for the security from
two
or more independent dealers or other parties reasonably familiar with the facts and circumstances of the security (who should take into consideration all relevant factors as may be appropriate under the circumstances).
If the advisor is unable to obtain a current bid from
such
independent
dealers
or other independent
parties
, the
fair value team shall determine the fair value of such security using the following factors: (i) the type of security; (ii) the cost at date of purchase; (iii) the size and nature of the Fund's holdings; (iv) the discount from market value of unrestricted securities of the same class at the time of purchase and subsequent thereto; (v) information as to any transactions or offers with respect to the security; (vi) the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition of the security and the existence of any registration rights; (vii) how the yield of the security compares to similar securities of companies of similar or equal creditworthiness; (viii) the level of recent trades of similar or comparable securities; (ix) the liquidity characteristics of the security; (x) current market conditions; and (xi) the market value of any securities into which the security is convertible or exchangeable.
The Fund utilizes various methods to measure the fair value of all of its investments on a recurring basis. GAAP establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation methods. The three levels of input are:
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access.
Level 2
Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Level 3
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Funds own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available.
The availability of observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, the liquidity of markets, and other characteristics particular to the security. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3.
The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety, is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
November 30, 2013
entirety.
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The following table summarizes the inputs used as of November 30, 2013 for the Funds investments measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
Alternative Investment
|
$ -
|
$ 1,445,815
|
$ -
|
$ 1,445,815
|
Bonds & Notes *
|
-
|
1,377,730
|
-
|
1,377,730
|
Money Market Funds
|
3,306,681
|
-
|
-
|
3,306,681
|
Total
|
$ 3,306,681
|
$ 2,823,545
|
$ -
|
$ 6,130,226
|
* Refer to the Consolidated Portfolio of Investments for industry classifications.
The Fund did not hold any Level 3 securities during the fiscal year.
There were no transfers into or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the current year presented. It is the Funds policy to recognize transfers into or out of Level 1 and Level 2 at the end of the reporting year.
Consolidation of Subsidiaries
The consolidated financial statements of the Fund include MHB Ltd. MHB Ltd. has an investment in GDMF. GDMF is a Delaware Limited liability company, which operates as a commodity investment pool. GDMF uses one or more proprietary global macro trading programs (global macro programs), which are often labeled managed futures programs in one or more private investment vehicles or commodity pools (unaffiliated trading companies) advised by one or more CTAs registered with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Global macro programs attempt to earn profits in a variety of markets by employing long and short trading algorithms applied to futures, options, forward contract, and other derivative instruments. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Fund may invest up to 25% of its total assets in MHB Ltd., which acts as an investment vehicle in order to effect certain investments consistent with the Funds investment objectives and policies.
A summary of the Funds investment in MHB Ltd. is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Inception Date of MHB Ltd.
|
MHB Net Assets at November 30, 2013
|
% Of Net Assets at November 30 ,2013
|
MHB Ltd.
|
7/30/2012
|
$1,450,671
|
23.39%
|
As of November 30, 2013, The MHB Ltd. held a 21.50% ownership in GDMF.
A summary of Global Diversified Managed Futures Portfolio LLC as of fiscal Year end November 30, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment
|
|
Realized
|
|
Unrealized
|
Total Assets
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
Income
|
|
Gain/(loss)
|
|
Gain/(loss)
|
$ 6,777,909
|
|
$6,730,636
|
|
$ (159,449)
|
|
$ 533,117
|
|
$ 854,162
|
Security transactions and related income
Security transactions are accounted for on trade date. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized on securities purchased over the lives of the respective securities. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Realized gains or losses from sales of securities are determined by comparing the identified cost of the security lot sold with the net sales proceeds.
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
November 30, 2013
Dividends and distributions to shareholders
Dividends from net investment income, if any, are declared and paid annually in December. Distributable net realized capital gains, if any, are declared and distributed annually in December. Dividends from net investment income and distributions from net realized gains are recorded on ex dividend date and are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. These book/tax differences are considered either temporary (i.e., deferred losses, capital loss carry forwards) or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require reclassification. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets, results from operations or net asset value per share of the Fund.
Federal income tax
It is the Funds policy to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that are applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its taxable income and net realized gains to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required.
The Fund recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is more likely than not to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Funds tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions expected to be taken on returns filed for 2012 or expected to be taken in the Funds 2013 returns. The Fund identifies its major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal, and foreign jurisdictions where the Fund makes significant investments; however the Fund is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months.
For tax purposes, MHB Ltd. is an exempted Cayman investment company. MHB Ltd. has received an undertaking from the Government of the Cayman Islands exempting it from all local income, profits and capital gains taxes. No such taxes are levied in the Cayman Islands at the present time. For U.S. income tax purposes, MHB Ltd. is a CFC and as such is not subject to U.S. income tax. However, a portion of MHB Ltd.s net income and capital gain, to the extent of its earnings and profits, will be included each year in the Funds investment company taxable income.
Expenses
Expenses of the Trust that are directly identifiable to a specific fund are charged to that fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated in such a manner as deemed equitable, taking into consideration the nature and type of expense and the relative sizes of the funds in the Trust.
Indemnification
The Trust indemnifies its officers and Trustees for certain liabilities that may arise from the performance of their duties to the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnities. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the risk of loss due to these warranties and indemnities appears to be remote.
3. INVESTMENT
TRANSACTIONS
For the year ended November 30, 2013, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio securities, other than short-term investments and U.S. Government securities amounted to $1,294,001 and $1,343,913, respectively
.
For the year ended November 30, 2013, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of U.S. Government securities, other than short-term investments, amounted to $1,450,991 and $850,000, respectively.
4. INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT / TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
RJO Investment Management, LLC, serves as the Funds investment advisor. The Fund has employed Gemini Fund
Services, LLC (GFS) to provide administration, fund accounting, and transfer agent services. A Trustee and certain officers of the Fund are also officers of GFS, and are not paid any fees directly by the Fund for serving in such capacities.
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
November 30, 2013
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with the Fund, the Advisor, under the oversight of the Board, directs the daily operations of the Fund and supervises the performance of administrative and professional services provided by others. As compensation for its services and the related expenses borne by the Advisor, the Fund pays the Advisor an investment advisory fee, computed and accrued daily and paid monthly, at an annual rate of 0.96% of the Funds average daily net assets
The Funds Advisor has contractually agreed to reduce its fees and/or absorb expenses of the Fund to ensure that Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses after fee waiver and/or reimbursement (exclusive of any taxes, leverage interest, borrowing interest, brokerage commissions, expenses incurred in connection with any merger or reorganization, dividend expense on securities sold short, acquired fund fees and expenses or extraordinary expenses such as litigation) will not exceed 2.00%, 2.75% and 1.75% for Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively; until at least March 31, 2015, and then will not exceed 3.00%, 3.75% and 2.75% for Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively; until at least March 31, 2024, subject to possible recoupment from the Fund in future years on a rolling three year basis (within the three years after the fees have been waived or reimbursed) if such recoupment can be achieved within the foregoing expense limits. This voluntary limitation may be discontinued without notice at any time. For the year ended November 30, 2014, the Advisor waived fees in the amount of $310,418. As of November 30, 2013 the Advisor may recapture $207,018 and $310,418 through November 30, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
The Board has adopted a Distribution Plan (the Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Plan provides that a monthly service and/or distribution fee is calculated by the Fund at an annual rate of 0.25% and 1.00% of its average daily net assets for Class A and Class C shares, respectively and is paid to Northern Lights Distributors, LLC (the Distributor) to provide compensation for ongoing shareholder servicing and distribution-related activities or services and/or maintenance of the Funds shareholder accounts not otherwise required to be provided by the Advisor. During the year ended November 30, 2013 pursuant to the Plan, Class A and Class C shares paid $8,492, and $53, respectively.
The Distributor acts as the Funds principal underwriter in a continuous public offering of the Funds Class A shares. The Distributor is an affiliate of GFS. During the year ended November 30, 2013, the Distributor received $4,106 in underwriting commissions for sales of Class A shares of which $407 was retained by the principal underwriter or other affiliated broker-dealers.
Pursuant to separate servicing agreements with GFS, the Fund pays GFS customary fees for providing administration, fund accounting and transfer agency services to the Fund. GFS provides Principal Executive Officer and a Principal Financial Officer to the Fund.
In addition, certain affiliates of GFS provide ancillary services to the Fund(s) as follows:
Northern Lights Compliance Services, LLC (
NLCS),
an affiliate of GFS, provides a Chief Compliance Officer to the Trust, as well as related compliance services, pursuant to a consulting agreement between NLCS and the Trust. Under the terms of such agreement, NLCS would receive customary fees from the Fund.
Gemcom, LLC
(Gemcom),
an affiliate of GFS, provides EDGAR conversion and filing services as well as print management services for the Fund on an ad-hoc basis. For the provision of these services, Gemcom would receive customary fees from the Fund.
5. REDEMPTION FEES
The Fund may assess a short-term redemption fee of 1.00% of the total redemption amount if shareholders sell their shares after holding them for less than thirty days. The redemption fee is paid directly to the Fund from which the redemption is made. For the period ended November 30, 2013, the Fund assessed $531, $1 and $98 for Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively.
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
November 30, 2013
6. UNDERLYING INVESTMENT IN OTHER INVESTMENT COMPANIES
The Funds currently invest a portion of its assets in Fidelity Institutional Money Market Fund. The Fund may redeem its investment from the Fidelity Institutional Money Market Fund at any time if the Advisor determines that it is in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders to do so.
The performance of the Fund may be directly affected by the performance of the Fidelity Institutional Money Market Fund. The financial statements of the Fidelity Institutional Money Market Fund may invest in Certificates of Deposit, Commercial Paper, Repurchase agreements, US Government and Agency Debt, including the portfolio of investments, can be found at Fidelity website www.fidelity.com or the Securities and Exchange Commissions website www.sec.gov and should be read in conjunction with the Funds financial statements. As of November 30, 2013 the percentage of the Funds net assets invested in the Fidelity Institutional Money Market Fund was 53.3%.
7. TAX COMPONENTS OF CAPITAL
As of November 30, 2013, the components of accumulated earnings/(deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed
|
|
Undistributed
|
|
Capital Loss
|
|
Post October
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
Ordinary
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
Carry
|
|
& Late year
|
|
Appreciation/
|
|
Book/Tax
|
|
Accumulated
|
Income
|
|
Gains
|
|
Forwards
|
|
Losses
|
|
(Depreciation)
|
|
Differences
|
|
Earnings/(Deficits)
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ (10)
|
|
$ (68,880)
|
|
$ 94,015
|
|
$ (61,904)
|
|
$ (36,779)
|
The difference between book basis and tax basis unrealized appreciation (depreciation), undistributed net investment income (loss) and accumulated net realized gain (loss) from investments is primarily attributable to adjustments for the Funds wholly owned subsidiary.
Late year losses incurred after December 31 within the fiscal year are deemed to arise on the first business day of the following fiscal year for tax purposes. The Fund incurred and elected to defer such late year losses of $68,880.
At November 30, 2013, the Fund had capital loss carry forwards for federal income tax purposes available to offset future capital gains as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Expiring
|
|
Non-Expiring
|
|
|
Short-Term
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
Total
|
$ (10)
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ (10)
|
Permanent book and tax differences, primarily attributable to net operating losses, resulted in reclassification for the period ended November 30, 2013, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
Undistributed
|
|
Accumulated
|
in
|
|
Net Investment
|
|
Net Realized
|
Capital
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
Gains (Loss)
|
$ (3,792)
|
|
$ 3,792
|
|
$ -
|
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
November 30, 2013
8. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11 related to disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities. In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01 which gives additional clarification to ASU 2011-11. The amendments in this ASU require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The guidance requires retrospective application for all comparative periods presented. Management is currently evaluating the impact this amendment may have on the Funds financial statements.
9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent events after the date of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued. Management has concluded that there is no impact requiring adjustment or disclosure in the financial statements other than the following.
Effective December 9, 2013 the Advisor, pursuant to the terms of its investment advisory agreement with the Trust, terminated the Advisory agreement. With previous approval by the Funds Board of Trustees, Monte Capital Group will serve as the Funds interim investment Advisor effective December 2, 2013. The Interim Agreement does differ from the previous investment advisory agreement in that it provides, as required of such agreements by Rule 15a-4 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that the term of the Interim Agreement shall be the earlier of the 150 days from the date of the agreement or the date that a new investment advisory agreement is approved by the shareholders of the fund.
The expense limitation will remain in effect for the interim period but any recoupment of fees waived or reimbursed will be forfeited due to the reorganization.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trustees
Northern Lights Fund Trust II and
Shareholders of
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of assets and liabilities of Mariner Hyman Beck Fund, a series of Northern Lights Fund Trust II (the Trust), including the consolidated portfolio of investments, as of November 30, 2013, and the related consolidated statement of operations for the year then ended, and the consolidated statements of changes in net assets and the consolidated financial highlights for the year then ended and for the period December 16, 2011 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2012. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Trusts management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit includes consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trusts internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Mariner Hyman Beck Fund as of November 30, 2013, and the results of its consolidated operations for the year then ended, and the consolidated changes in its net assets and the consolidated financial highlights for the year then ended and the for the period December 16, 2011 (commencement of operations) through November 30, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
TAIT, WELLER & BAKER LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
January 29, 2014
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
EXPENSE EXAMPLES (Unaudited)
November 30, 2013
As a shareholder of the Mariner Hyman Beck Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges and redemption fees; (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and/or service (12b-1) fees; and other Fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Mariner Hyman Beck Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period from June 1, 2013 through November 30, 2013.
Actual Expenses
The Actual Expenses line in the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below; together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled Expenses Paid During Period to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The Hypothetical line in the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Mariner Hyman Beck Funds actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Funds actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balances or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
The table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds.
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
Annualized
Expense
Ratio
|
Beginning Account Value
6/1/13
|
Ending
Account Value
11/30/13
|
Expense Paid
During Period*
6/1/13 11/30/13
|
Class A
|
2.00%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,000.00
|
$10.03
|
Class C
|
2.75%
|
$1,000.00
|
$ 996.70
|
$13.76
|
Class I
|
1.75%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,001.10
|
$ 8.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hypothetical
(5% return before expenses)
|
Annualized
Expense
Ratio
|
Beginning Account Value
6/1/13
|
Ending
Account Value
11/30/13
|
Expense Paid
During Period*
6/1/13 - 11/30/13
|
Class A
|
2.00%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,015.04
|
$10.10
|
Class C
|
2.75%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,011.28
|
$13.87
|
Class I
|
1.75%
|
$1,000.00
|
$1,016.29
|
$ 8.85
|
* Expenses are equal to the Funds annualized expense ratio multiplied by the number of days in the period (183) divided by the number of days in the fiscal year (365).
FACTORS CONSIDERED BY THE TRUSTEES IN APPROVAL OF AN INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT *
At a Regular meeting (the Meeting) of the Board of Trustees (the Board) of Northern Lights Fund Trust II (the Trust) held on October 24-25, 2013, the Board, including the disinterested Trustees (the Independent Trustees), considered the approval of an Interim Investment Advisory Agreement (Interim Agreement) and New Investment Advisory Agreement (New Advisory Agreement) between the Trust, on behalf of the Mariner Hyman Beck Fund (the Fund) and Monte Capital Group, LLC (Monte).
In advance of the Meeting, the Board requested and received materials to assist them in considering the Interim Agreement and New Advisory Agreement (collectively, the Advisory Agreements). The materials provided contained information with respect to the factors enumerated below, including the Advisory Agreements, a memorandum prepared by the Trusts outside legal counsel discussing in detail the Trustees fiduciary obligations and the factors they should assess in considering the approval of the Advisory Agreements and comparative information relating to the advisory fee and other expenses of the Fund. The materials also included due diligence materials relating to Monte (including due diligence questionnaires completed by Monte, select financial information of Monte, bibliographic information regarding Montes key management and investment advisory personnel, and comparative fee information relating to the Fund) and other pertinent information. Based on their evaluation of the information provided by Monte, in conjunction with the Funds other service providers, the Board, by a unanimous vote (including a separate vote of the Independent Trustees), approved the Investment Advisory Agreement with respect to the Fund.
At the Meeting, the Independent Trustees were advised by counsel that is experienced in Investment Company Act of 1940 matters and that is independent of fund management and met with such counsel separately from fund management.
In considering the approval of the Advisory Agreements with respect to the Fund and reaching their conclusions, the Trustees reviewed and analyzed various factors that they determined were relevant, including the factors enumerated below with respect to the Meeting. In their deliberations considering the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees did not identify any one factor as all important, but rather considered these factors collectively, and each Trustee may have attributed different weights to the various factors.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
. As to the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by Monte to the Fund, the Board first considered the resignation of the Funds current investment adviser, RJO Investment Management, LLC (RJO), and the effect of such resignation on the Fund and its day to day operations. The Trustees then discussed options for the Fund that would be least disruptive to, and in the best interest of, shareholders, including approving a new investment adviser to replace RJO. The Board then reviewed materials provided by Monte related to the Advisory Agreements with the Trust, including a description of the manner in which investment decisions will be made and executed, a review of the professional personnel that would perform services for the Fund, including the team of individuals that would be primarily responsible for monitoring and executing the investment process. The Board then discussed the extent of Montes research capabilities, the quality of its compliance infrastructure and the experience of its fund management personnel. The Board considered Montes specific responsibilities in all aspects of the day-to-day management of the Fund. The Board noted that the day-to-day operations of the Fund had not changed since the advisory agreement with RJO (the Prior Advisory Agreement) was approved and were not anticipated to change. Additionally, the Board received satisfactory responses from the representative of Monte with respect to a series of important questions, including whether Monte was involved in any lawsuits or pending regulatory actions; whether the management of other accounts would conflict with its management of the Fund; and whether Monte has procedures in place to adequately allocate trades among its respective clients. The Board considered that, under the terms of each of the Advisory Agreements, Monte, subject to the supervision of the Board, would continue to provide the Fund with investment advice and supervision and would continuously furnish an investment program for the Fund consistent with the investment objectives and policies of the Fund, subject to the 150 day term in the case of the Interim Agreement and to shareholder approval in the case of the New Advisory Agreement. The Board reviewed the descriptions provided by Monte of its practices for monitoring compliance with the Funds investment limitations, noting that Montes CCO will periodically review the portfolio managers performance of their duties with respect to the Fund to ensure compliance under Montes compliance program. The Board also considered Montes registration as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) with the National Futures Association. Monte informed the Board that they are not yet registered as a CPO, however the firm would be registered by the time the Interim Agreement would be effective. Further, the Board noted that while Monte had not yet obtained D&O/E&O insurance coverage and that Monte was in the process of obtaining such coverage. Monte assured the Board that the firm would have the required D&O/E&O insurance coverage in place by the time the Interim Agreement became effective. The Board then reviewed the capitalization of Monte based on financial information and other materials provided by Monte and discussed such materials with Monte. The Board concluded that Monte was sufficiently well-capitalized, or had the ability to make additional contributions in order to meet its obligations to the Fund. The Board also concluded that Monte had sufficient quality and depth of personnel, resources, investment methods and compliance policies and procedures necessary to perform its duties under each of the Advisory Agreements and that the nature, overall quality and extent of the management services to be provided by Monte were satisfactory. The Board concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to the Fund under the Prior Advisory Agreement and did not expect them to change under the New Advisory Agreement.
Performance.
As to performance, because Monte has not managed a fund or separate accounts with a strategy similar to the Funds, the Board did not consider past performance in evaluating Monte.
Fees and Expenses
. As to the fees and expenses paid by the Fund, the Board reviewed and discussed a comparison of the Funds management fee and overall expense ratio to a peer group of funds constructed by Monte with similar investment objectives and strategies and of similar size to the Fund and noted that the advisory fee is on the lower side of its peer group. The Board also considered any fall-out benefits likely to accrue to Monte or its affiliates from its relationship with the Fund. The Board reviewed the contractual arrangements for the Fund, including a proposed operating expense limitation agreement pursuant to which Monte had agreed to waive or limit its management fee and/or reimburse expenses and to limit net annual operating expenses, exclusive of certain fees, so as not to exceed 2.00%, 2.75%, and 1.75%, of the Funds average net assets, for Class A, Class C, and Class I shares, respectively, through March 31, 2015, and then 3.00%, 3.75% and 2.75% for Class A, Class C and Class I shares, respectively, adjusted annually of the average daily net assets through March 31, 2024 and found such arrangements to be beneficial to shareholders. The Board noted that Monte proposed to charge the Fund an advisory fee at an annual rate of 0.96% based on the average net assets the Fund which is the same fee as was in the Prior Advisory Agreement and in the Interim Agreement. The Board concluded that, based on Montes experience and expertise, and the services to be provided by Monte to the Fund, the fees to be charged by Monte were reasonable.
Profitability.
The Board also considered the level of profits that could be expected to accrue to Monte with respect to the Fund based on break even and profitability reports and analyses reviewed by the Board and the selected financial information of Monte provided by Monte. The Trustees concluded that based on the services provided and the projected growth of the Fund, the fees were reasonable and that anticipated profits from Montes relationship with the Fund were not excessive.
Economies of Scale
. As to the extent to which the Fund will realize economies of scale as it grows, and whether the fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of investors, the Trustees discussed the current size of the Fund, Montes expectations for growth of the Fund and concluded that any material economies of scale would not be achieved in the near term.
Conclusion
. Having requested and received such information from Monte as the Board believed to be reasonably necessary to evaluate the terms of the Interim Agreement and New Advisory Agreement (the Advisory Agreements), and as assisted by the advice of independent counsel, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, determined that (a) the terms of each of the Advisory Agreements are reasonable; (b) the investment advisory fee is reasonable; and (c) each of the Advisory Agreements is in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. In considering the approval of each of the Advisory Agreements, the Trustees did not identify any one factor as all important, but rather considered these factors collectively and determined that approval of the Advisory Agreements was in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. Moreover, the Board noted that each Trustee may have afforded different weight to the various factors in reaching his conclusions with respect to each of the Advisory Agreements.
*Due to the timing of the contract renewal schedule, these deliberations may or may not relate to the current performance results of the Mariner Hyman Beck Fund.
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
November 30, 2013
This chart provides information about the Trustees and Officers who oversee the Fund. Officers elected by the Trustees manage the day
‐
to
‐
day operations of the Fund and execute policies formulated by the Trustees. The following is a list of the Trustees and executive officers of the Trust and each persons principal occupation over the last five years. The address of each Trustee and Officer is 17605 Wright Street, Suite 2, Omaha, Nebraska 68130 unless otherwise noted.
Independent Trustees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address and Year of Birth
|
Position/Term of Office*
|
Principal Occupation
During the Past Five Years
|
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Trustee
|
Other Directorships held by Trustee During the Past Five Years
|
Thomas T. Sarkany
1946
|
Trustee since October 2011
|
President, TTS Consultants, LLC since 2010 (financial services); Director of Marketing and of Asset Management; Director of Index Licensing, Value Line (from 1994 to 2010).
|
25
|
Director, Value Line Funds; Director, Value Line, Inc.; Director, Aquila Distributors, Trustee, Northern Lights ETF Trust
|
Anthony H. Lewis
1946
|
Trustee Since May 2011
|
Chairman and CEO of The Lewis Group USA (executive consulting firm).
|
25
|
Director, Chairman of the Compensation Committee, and Member of the Audit Committee of Torotel Inc. (Magnetics, Aerospace and Defense)
|
Keith Rhoades
1948
|
Trustee Since May 2011
|
Director and then Senior Director, General Ledger/Financial Research, Union Pacific Railroad (from 1988 to 2008). Retired since 2008.
|
25
|
NONE
|
Randal D. Skalla
1962
|
Trustee since May 2011
|
President, L5 Enterprises, Inc. since 2001 (financial services company).
|
25
|
Orizon Investment Counsel (financial services company) Board Member
|
11/30/13-NLII-V1
Mariner Hyman Beck Fund
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)(Continued)
November 30, 2013
Interested Trustees and Officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name, Address and Year of Birth
|
Position/Term of Office*
|
Principal Occupation
During the Past Five Years
|
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex
Overseen by Trustee
|
Other Directorships held by Trustee
During the Past Five Years
|
Brian Nielsen**
1972
|
Trustee
Since May 2011
|
General Counsel and Secretary (since 2001) of CLS Investments, LLC; General Counsel and Secretary (since 2001) of Orion Advisor Services, LLC; Manager (since 2012), General Counsel and Secretary (since 2003) of NorthStar Financial Services Group, LLC; CEO (since 2012), General Counsel and Secretary (since 2003), Manager (since 2005), President (from 2005 to 2013) of Northern Lights Distributors, LLC; Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (since 2003) of AdvisorOne Funds; Director, Secretary and General Counsel (since 2004) of Constellation Trust Company; Manager (since 2008), General Counsel and Secretary (since 2011), Assistant Secretary (from 2004 to 2011) of Northern Lights Compliance Services, LLC; Trustee (since 2011) of Northern Lights Fund Trust II; General Counsel and Secretary (since 2011) and Assistant Secretary (from 2004 to 2011) of Gemcom, LLC; General Counsel and Secretary (since 2012) and Assistant Secretary (from 2003 to 2012) of Gemini Fund Services, LLC; Manager (since 2012) of Arbor Point Advisors, LLC; General Counsel and Secretary (since 2013) of Gemini Hedge Fund Services, LLC; General Counsel and Secretary (since 2013) of Gemini Alternative Funds, LLC; Assistant Secretary (from 2011 to 2013) of Northern Lights Fund Trust; and Assistant Secretary (from 2011 to 2013) of Northern Lights Variable Trust.
|
25
|
NONE
|
Kevin E. Wolf
80 Arkay Drive
Hauppauge, NY 11788
1969
|
President
Since January 2013
|
President, Gemini Fund Services, LLC (since 2012); Director of Fund Administration, Gemini Fund Services, LLC (2006 - 2012); and Vice-President, Gemcom, LLC (since 2004).
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
James P. Ash
80 Arkay Drive.
Hauppauge, NY 11788
1976
|
Secretary
Since May 2011
|
Senior Vice President, Gemini Fund Services, LLC (since 2012); Vice President, Gemini Fund Services, LLC (2011 - 2012); Director of Legal Administration, Gemini Fund Services, LLC (2009 - 2011); Assistant Vice President of Legal Administration, Gemini Fund Services, LLC (2008 - 2011).
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Emile R. Molineaux
80 Arkay Drive
Hauppauge, NY 11788
1962
|
Chief Compliance Officer and Anti Money Laundering Officer
Since May 2011
|
General Counsel, CCO and Senior Vice President, Gemini Fund Services, LLC (2003 - 2011); CCO of Various clients of Northern Lights Compliance Services, LLC, (Secretary 2003-2011 and Senior Compliance Officer since 2011).
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Erik Naviloff
80 Arkay Drive
Hauppauge, NY 11788
1968
|
Treasurer, Since January 2013
|
Vice President of Gemini Fund Services, LLC (since 2012); Assistant Vice President, Gemini Fund Services, (2007 - 2012); Senior Accounting Manager, Fixed Income, Dreyfus Corporation (2002 to 2007).
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
* The term of office for each Trustee and Officer listed above will continue indefinitely.
** Brian Nielsen is an interested person of the Trust as that term is defined under the 1940 Act, because of his affiliation with Gemini Fund Services, LLC, (the Trusts Administrator, Fund Accountant, and Transfer Agent) and Northern Lights Distributors, LLC (the Funds Distributor).
The Funds Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the Trustees and is available free of charge, upon request, by calling toll-free at 1-855-542-4642.
11/30/13-NLII-V1
Privacy Policy
Rev. January 2014
|
|
|
|
|
FACTS
|
WHAT DOES NORTHERN LIGHTS FUND TRUST II (NLFT II) DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION?
|
Why?
|
Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do.
|
What?
|
The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include:
|
·
Social Security number
·
Employment information
·
Account balances
|
·
Account transactions
·
Income
·
Investment experience
|
When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice.
|
How?
|
All financial companies need to share a customers personal information to run their everyday business - to process transactions, maintain customer accounts, and report to credit bureaus. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customer's personal information; the reasons NLFT II chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing.
|
Reasons we can share your personal information
|
Does NLFT II share?
|
Can you limit this sharing?
|
For our everyday business purposes --
such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus
|
Yes
|
No
|
For our marketing purposes --
to offer our products and services to you
|
Yes
|
No
|
For joint marketing with other financial companies
|
Yes
|
No
|
For our affiliates everyday business purposes --
information about your transactions and experiences
|
Yes
|
No
|
For our affiliates everyday business purposes --
information about your creditworthiness
|
No
|
We don't share
|
For nonaffiliates to market to you
|
No
|
We don't share
|
Questions?
|
Call 1-402-493-4603
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Who we are
|
Who is providing this notice?
|
Northern Lights Fund Trust II
|
What we do
|
How does NLFT II protect my personal information?
|
To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings.
|
How does NLFT II collect my personal information?
|
We collect your personal information, for example, when you
|
·
open an account
·
give us your income information
·
provide employment information
|
·
provide account information
·
give us your contact information
|
We also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates, or other companies.
|
Why cant I limit all sharing?
|
Federal law gives you the right to limit only
·
sharing for affiliates everyday business purposesinformation about your creditworthiness
·
affiliates from using your information to market to you
·
sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you
State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing.
|
Definitions
|
Affiliates
|
Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.
The following companies may be considered affiliates of NLFT II
:
·
CLS Investments, LLC
·
NorthStar Financial Services Group, LLC
·
Gemcom, LLC
·
Gemini Fund Services, LLC
·
Gemini Alternative Funds, LLC
·
Gemini Hedge Fund Services, LLC
·
Northern Lights Compliance Services, LLC
·
Northern Lights Distributors, LLC
·
Orion Advisor Services, LLC
·
Constellation Trust Company
|
Nonaffiliates
|
Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.
·
NLFT II does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you.
|
Joint marketing
|
A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products and services to you.
·
Our joint marketing partners include other financial service companies.
|
PROXY VOTING POLICY
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities for the most recent twelve month period ended November 30 as well as a description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-855-542-4MHB (4642), or by referring to the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) website at http://www.sec.gov.
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Form N-Q is available on the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SECs Public Reference Room in Washington, DC (1-800-SEC-0330). The information on Form N-Q is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-855-542-4MHB (4642).
INVESTMENT ADVISOR
RJO Investment Management, LLC
222 S. Riverside Plaza, Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60606
ADMINISTRATOR
Gemini Fund Services, LLC
80 Arkay Drive, Suite 110
Hauppauge, New York 11788