UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-KSB
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
Commission file number 001-33543
FIRST CAPITAL BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
11-3782033
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
4222 Cox Road, Suite 200 Glen Allen, Virginia
|
|
23060
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code (804)-273-1160
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $4.00 par value
(Title of Class)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x
Yes
¨
No
Check if no disclosure of
delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB.
x
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
¨
Yes
x
No
State issuers revenues for its most recent fiscal year: $21,165,334.
State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the stock was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified date within the past 60 days.
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates computed based on a sale price of $12.62 for the Banks common stock on March 18, 2008 is approximately $30,796,000.
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS
Check whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required
to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act after the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes
¨
No
¨
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE
ISSUERS
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 2,971,171
Shares of Common Stock, $4.00 par value
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
1. Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (Part III)
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check One): Yes
¨
No
x
FIRST CAPITAL BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-KSB
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I
Company
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company headquartered in Glen Allen, Virginia. We conduct our primary
operations through our wholly-owned subsidiary, First Capital Bank, which opened for business in 1998.
We emphasize personalized service,
access to decision makers and a quick turn around time on lending decisions. Our slogan is Where People Matter. We have a management team, officers and other employees with extensive experience in our primary market which is the
Richmond, Virginia metropolitan area. We strive to develop personal, knowledgeable relationships with our customers, while at the same time offering products comparable to those offered by larger banks in our market area.
First Capital Bank operates six full service branch offices (alternatively referred to herein as branches and offices),
throughout the greater Richmond metropolitan area. Our bank engages in a general commercial banking business, with a particular focus on the needs of small and medium-sized businesses and their owners and key employees and the professional
community. We also offer a wide range of investment products and services through First Capital Investment Group in association with BI Investments, LLC, a registered brokerage firm formed as a joint venture with other Virginia based community
banks.
We continue to experience growth in both assets and profitability. As of December 31, 2007, we had assets of $351.9 million, a
$94.6 million, or 36.8%, increase from December 31, 2006. This followed an increase in assets during 2006 of 22.8% over our December 31, 2005 balance of $209.5 million. For 2007, our net income was $1.7 million, an increase of 10.9%
compared to our net income for 2006. Our earnings per diluted share for 2007 were $0.71 compared to $0.83 and $0.70 for 2006 and 2005, respectively.
CAUTION ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain information contained in this Report on Form 10-KSB may include
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are generally
identified by phrases such as we expect, we believe or words of similar import.
Such forward-looking statements
involve known and unknown risks including, but not limited to, the following factors:
|
|
|
the ability to successfully manage our growth or implement our growth strategies if we are unable to identify attractive markets, locations or opportunities to
expand in the future;
|
|
|
|
our ability to continue to attract low cost core deposits to fund asset growth;
|
|
|
|
changes in interest rates and interest rate policies and the successful management of interest rate risk;
|
|
|
|
maintaining cost controls and asset quality as we open or acquire new locations;
|
|
|
|
maintaining capital levels adequate to support our growth and operations;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic and business conditions in our market area;
|
3
|
|
|
reliance on our management team, including our ability to attract and retain key personnel;
|
|
|
|
risks inherent in making loans such as repayment risks and fluctuating collateral values;
|
|
|
|
competition with other banks and financial institutions, and companies outside of the banking industry, including those companies that have substantially greater
access to capital and other resources;
|
|
|
|
demand, development and acceptance of new products and services;
|
|
|
|
problems with technology utilized by us;
|
|
|
|
changing trends in customer profiles and behavior;
|
|
|
|
changes in banking and other laws and regulations applicable to us; and
|
|
|
|
other factors described in Risk Factors above.
|
Although we believe that our expectations with respect to the forward-looking statements are based upon reliable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, there can be no assurance
that our actual results, performance or achievements will not differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
ITEM 1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
|
General
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company that was incorporated under Virginia law in 2006. Pursuant to a statutory share exchange that was
effective on September 8, 2006, we became a bank holding company. We conduct our primary operations through our wholly owned subsidiary, First Capital Bank, which is chartered under Virginia law. We have one other wholly owned subsidiary, FCRV
Statutory Trust 1, which is a Delaware Business Trust that we formed in connection with the issuance of trust preferred debt in September, 2006.
Our principal executive offices are located at 4222 Cox Road, Suite 200, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060, and our telephone number is (804) 273-1160. We maintain a website at www.1capitalbank.com.
First Capital Bank, a Virginia banking corporation headquartered in Glen Allen, Virginia, was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia
as a state-chartered bank in 1997. The bank is a member of the Federal Reserve System and began banking operations in late 1998. The bank is a community oriented financial institution that offers a full range of banking and related financial
services to small and medium-sized businesses, professionals and individuals located in its market area. This market area consists of the Richmond, Virginia metropolitan area, with a current emphasis on western Henrico County, Chesterfield County,
the City of Richmond, the Town of Ashland, and the surrounding vicinity. The banks goal is to provide its customers with high quality, responsive and technologically advanced banking services. In addition, the bank strives to develop personal,
knowledgeable relationships with its customers, while at the same time it offers products comparable to those offered by larger banks in its market area. We believe that the marketing of customized banking services has enabled the bank to establish
a niche in the financial services marketplace in the Richmond metropolitan area.
The bank currently conducts business from its executive
offices and six branch locations. See Item 2 Description of Property.
4
Products and Services
We offer a full range of deposit services that are typically available in most banks including checking accounts, NOW accounts, savings accounts and other time deposits of various types, ranging from daily money
market accounts to longer-term certificates of deposit. The transaction accounts and time certificates are tailored to our market area at rates competitive to those offered in the area. In addition, we offer certain retirement account services, such
as Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). All deposit accounts are insured by the FDIC up to the maximum amount allowed by law (generally, $100,000 per depositor, subject to aggregation rules).
We also offer a full range of short-to-medium term commercial and consumer loans. Commercial loans include both secured and unsecured loans for working
capital (including inventory and receivables), business expansion (including acquisition of real estate and improvements) and purchase of equipment and machinery. Consumer loans include secured (and unsecured loans) for financing automobiles, home
improvements, education and personal investments. Additionally, we originate fixed and floating-rate mortgage and real estate construction and acquisition loans.
Other services offered by us include safe deposit boxes, certain cash management services, travelers checks, direct deposit of payroll and social security checks and automatic drafts for various accounts,
selected on-line banking services and a small and medium-sized businesses courier service. We also have become associated with a shared network of automated teller machines (ATMs) that may be used by our customers throughout Virginia and other
states located in the Mid-Atlantic region.
In late September, 2004, First Capital Bank introduced First Capital Investment Group, a
division of the bank that provides full service investment services through licensed representatives as well as supporting annuity sales through our retail bank group. The bank owns a minority interest (approximately 1%) in BI Investments, LLC, a
joint venture with the Virginia Bankers Association and many other community banks in Virginia, which provides support to First Capital Investment Group. This interest in BI Investments, LLC is not material to our operations.
Our Market Area
Our primary market is the Richmond,
Virginia metropolitan area, which includes Chesterfield County, Henrico County, Hanover County, the Town of Ashland and the City of Richmond. Richmond is the capital of Virginia. All of our branches are located in the Richmond metropolitan area.
The Richmond metropolitan area is the third-largest metropolitan area in Virginia and is one of the states top growth markets based
on population and median household income. The population of the Richmond metropolitan area has continued to increase in recent years, with current information from the Virginia Employment Commission showing a population in excess of 1,150,000
persons. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the population in the Richmond metropolitan area grew by over 15% from 1990 to 2000, and an increase of 12% is projected for the period between 2000 and 2010. In addition, median household income for the
Richmond metropolitan area grew 23% from 2000 to 2006 and is projected to grow an additional 17% through 2011. In 2006, the Richmond metropolitan area had a median household income approximately 9% higher than the national median household income.
Our market area enjoys a balanced and diversified economy with a broad array of employers and industries which shield the area from any
recessions specific to one sector. Nearly all sectors of the local economy are currently sharing in the areas economic growth, with the driving force behind the economy being private education and healthcare. The unemployment rate for the
Richmond metropolitan area is less than 3%, and has consistently ranked among the five areas with the lowest unemployment rate among the nations 50-largest metropolitan areas.
5
The population of Henrico County, the location of our headquarters and first branch office, increased by
20% between 1990 and 2000 and an additional 10% between 2000 and 2006 to around 290,000 persons. The median household income for Henrico County in 2006 was approximately $60,000, or 17% above the national median, and increased 23% since 2000.
Chesterfield and Hanover Counties each had 2006 median incomes of approximately $72,000. Together with Henrico County, we expect to focus our growth in Chesterfield and Hanover Counties as we build our branch system. Chesterfield and Hanover
Counties have also experienced significant growth in median household income and population from 2000 to 2006, with both counties median household income growing 22% and population growing 16%. Population growth in the City of Richmond has
historically been slow as residents continue to move to the suburbs, but the median household income projections for the City of Richmond are positive with median household income projected to increase 17% from 2006 to 2011.
Major employers in the Richmond metropolitan area include federal and state agencies, major health facilities, educational institutions, and various
medium-sized and large corporations. Philip Morris USA, Universal Corporation, Dominion Resources, CarMax, and Circuit City Group are some of the larger corporations headquartered in Richmond. Other major employers in the private sector include
Alcoa, CSX Corporation, DuPont, Honeywell, Tyson Foods and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, as well as Bon Secours, CJW and Henrico Doctors medical institutions. Richmond also serves as headquarters for the Fifth Federal Reserve District.
Our market area has been subject to large scale consolidation of local banks, primarily by larger, out-of-state financial institutions. We believe that
there is a large customer base in our market area that prefers doing business with a local institution. We seek to fill this banking need by offering timely personalized service, while making it more convenient by continuing to build our branch
network throughout the Richmond metropolitan area where our customers live and work. To that end, in 2002, we initiated a branching strategy to better ensure that our branch network covers more of the markets in which our customers live and conduct
business. We have made significant investments in our infrastructure and believe our current operating platform is sufficient to support a substantially larger banking institution without incurring meaningful additional expenses.
Business Strategy
Hire experienced, local
bankers.
Our strategy has revolved around the hiring of experienced, local banking professionals and relationship managers to originate loans and deposits, call on customers and lead our branches. These officers have been able to attract
customers with which they have built relationships over the years, typically allowing the officers to enhance our deposit and loan production immediately. We currently have 13 commercial loan officers who have an average of 19 years of experience in
the Richmond metropolitan banking market and have operated in our market area through a wide range of economic cycles and lending market conditions. We intend to continue to grow and build our franchise by hiring experienced local lenders and other
bankers. We recently enhanced our market presence by hiring additional lenders in the private banking, business lending and construction lending arenas.
Continue the growth of our delivery system.
Due to the economic growth in the Richmond metropolitan area and the consolidation of our local competitors, management believes that continued expansion of our
delivery system will contribute to long-term growth and increased value. Accordingly, we expect to continue to open branches in the Richmond metropolitan area and anticipate that we will open one to two additional branches each year over the next
five years, with the goal of having a total of
6
10 to 12 branches open at the end of this time frame. In the past twelve months, we opened our James Center office. The James Center office is located in the
heart of downtown Richmonds financial and professional district, strategically placing us within a significant core of clients and prospects uniquely suited for the expansion of our Private Client Group.
A principal component of this expansion program has been to identify attractive locations for opening new branches that either complement our existing
branch system, provide access to new customers within our market area or strategically match the addition of a key lender/leader to our team (as was the case with the James Center Office). We believe that the demographics and growth characteristics
of the Richmond metropolitan area should also provide significant opportunities for us to continue to grow loan and deposit relationships within our existing branch network. We complement this branch network with free online banking services (for
businesses and individuals), our remote deposit initiative and our business courier service. During January 2008, we purchased land across for our leased Innsbrook Office to relocate that office to a free standing building. Construction began in
March 2008 and is estimated to be completed in the third quarter of 2008 at a cost including land of approximately $2.8 million. Also in January 2008, we entered into a contract to purchase land in Chesterfield County need Route 288 for a future
branch location for $1.9 million.
Diversify our product and service offerings with the goal of increasing our non-interest income.
The strength of the Richmond metropolitan area has allowed us to more effectively realize contributions to earnings from non-interest sources, primarily document preparation fees, monthly core deposit service charges and origination fees from
our mortgage operations. We would expect our fees in these areas to grow significantly in 2008 and beyond. In particular, monthly core deposit service charges should see a material increase given our aggressive commitment to capturing small to
medium-sized business deposits through our 2008 remote deposit initiative and our recent key hires in the Private Client Group and Business Banking arenas. We are becoming increasingly sophisticated in our ability to analyze customer relationships,
which improves our ability to recognize opportunities to offer additional products and services that will expand these relationships and our non-interest income. We also expect to continue to grow non-interest income from the sale of investment
products and services through First Capital Investment Group and in association with BI Investments, LLC, a registered brokerage firm formed as a joint venture with other Virginia based community banks.
Maintain our excellent asset quality.
While our loan portfolio has experienced rapid growth, we have consistently maintained excellent asset
quality. We believe that our strong asset quality is the result of a stable local economy, prudent underwriting standards, effective lending processes, timely follow-up on delinquencies, and the experience of our loan officers. We have the unique
advantage of having four former Senior Lending Officers within our lending ranks, each having their own distinct market expertise. At December 31, 2007, we had one nonaccrual loan in the amount of $50,000 and no ninety-day past due loans. The
nonaccrual loan has an SBA $25,000 guarantee and no loss is anticipated. We have also experienced minimal net charge offs over the last five years. Sound asset quality will always remain one of our strategic business objectives.
Emphasize relationship banking.
A cornerstone of our business strategy is a commitment to customer service that is built around a personalized
relationship. We hire local bankers with extensive business relationships who have experience in the Richmond community in originating and administering loans. In fact, all of our senior officers have spent most if not all their lives and banking
careers in Richmond. We leverage our core relationships by providing our customers access to decision makers, customized loan products, and quick turn around time on lending decisions. Our experience indicates that by focusing on the relationship,
Where People Matter, we are able to make good quality, profitable loans which will continue to be the foundation of our approach to business.
7
Employees
As of March 20, 2008, we had a total of 69 full time equivalent employees. We consider relations with our employees to be excellent. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit.
Competition
We compete as a financial intermediary
with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in
the Richmond metropolitan area and elsewhere. Many of our non-bank competitors are not subject to the same extensive federal regulations that govern federally-insured banks and state regulations governing state chartered banks. As a result, such
non-bank competitors may have certain advantages over us in providing certain services.
Our primary market area is a highly competitive,
highly branched banking market. Competition in the market area for loans to small and medium-sized businesses and professionals is intense, and pricing is important. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources and lending limits
than us and offer certain services, such as extensive and established branch networks, that we are not currently providing. Moreover, larger institutions operating in the Richmond metropolitan area have access to borrowed funds at lower cost than
the funds that are presently available to us. Deposit competition among institutions in the market area also is strong. Competition for depositors funds comes from U.S. Government securities, private issuers of debt obligations and suppliers
of other investment alternatives for depositors, among other sources. As a result, we have paid, and may in the future pay, above-market rates to attract deposits.
Governmental Monetary Policies
Our earnings and growth are affected not only by general economic conditions, but also by
the monetary policies of various governmental regulatory authorities, particularly the FRB. The FRB implements national monetary policy by its open market operations in United States Government securities, control of the discount rate and
establishment of reserve requirements against both member and nonmember financial institutions deposits. These actions have a significant effect on the overall growth and distribution of loans, investments and deposits, as well as the rates
earned on loans, or paid on deposits.
Our management is unable to predict the effect of possible changes in monetary policies upon our
future operating results.
Lending Activities
Credit Policies
The principal risk associated with each of the categories of loans in our portfolio is the creditworthiness
of our borrowers. Within each category, such risk is increased or decreased, depending on various factors. The risks associated with real estate mortgage loans, commercial loans and consumer loans vary based on employment levels, consumer
confidence, fluctuations in the value of real estate and other conditions that affect the ability of borrowers to repay indebtedness. The risk associated with real estate construction loans varies based on the supply and demand for the type of real
estate under construction. In an effort to manage these risks, we have loan amount approval limits for individual loan officers based on their position and level of experience.
8
We have written policies and procedures to help manage credit risk. We use a loan review process that
includes a portfolio management strategy, guidelines for underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration, and annual independent third party portfolio reviews to establish loss
exposure and to monitor compliance with policies. Our loan approval process includes our Management Loan Committee, the Loan Committee of the Board of Directors and, for larger loans, the Board of Directors. Our Senior Credit Officer is responsible
for reporting to the Directors monthly on the activities of the Management Loan Committee and on the status of various delinquent and non-performing loans. The Loan Committee of the Board of Directors also reviews lending policies proposed by
management. Our Board of Directors establishes our total lending limit and approves proposed lending policies approved by the Loan Committee of the Board.
Loan Originations
Real estate loan originations come primarily through direct solicitations by our loan officers, continued
business from current customers, and through referrals. Construction loans are obtained by solicitations of our construction loan officers and continued business from current customers. Commercial real estate loan originations are obtained through
broker referrals, direct solicitation by our loan officers and continued business from current customers. We may also purchase loan participations from other community banks in Virginia.
Our loan officers, as part of the application process, review all loan applications. Information is obtained concerning the income, financial condition,
employment and credit history of the applicant. If commercial real estate is involved, information is also obtained concerning cash flow available for debt service. Loan quality is analyzed based on our experience and credit underwriting guidelines.
Real estate collateral for loans in excess of $250 thousand are appraised by independent appraisers who have been pre-approved by meeting the requirement of providing a current and valid license certification and based on the lenders
experience with these appraisers. Evaluations for real estate collateral for loans less than $250 thousand are made by the loan officer.
In the normal course of business, we make various commitments and incur certain contingent liabilities that are disclosed but not reflected in our annual financial statements including commitments to extend credit. At December 31,
2007, commitments to extend credit totaled $147.4 million.
Construction Lending
We make local construction and land acquisition and development loans. Residential houses and commercial real estate under construction and the underlying
land secure construction loans. At December 31, 2007, construction, land acquisition and land development loans outstanding were $79.1 million, or 26.6% of total loans. These loans are concentrated in our local markets. The average life of a
construction loan is less than one year. Because the interest rate charged on these loans usually floats with the market, these loans assist us in managing our interest rate risk. Construction lending entails significant additional risks, compared
to residential mortgage lending. Construction loans often involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the value of the building under construction is only estimable when the loan funds
are disbursed. Thus, it is more difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project and related loan-to-value ratios. To mitigate the risks associated with construction lending, we generally limit loan
9
amounts to 80% of appraised value in addition to analyzing the creditworthiness of the borrowers. We also obtain a first lien on the property as security for
construction loans and typically require personal guarantees from the borrowers principal owners.
Commercial Business Loans
Commercial business loans generally have a higher degree of risk than loans secured by real property but have higher yields. To manage these risks, we
generally obtain appropriate collateral and personal guarantees from the borrowers principal owners and monitor the financial condition of its business borrowers. Residential mortgage loans generally are made on the basis of the
borrowers ability to make repayment from employment and other income and are secured by real estate whose value tends to be readily ascertainable. In contrast, commercial business loans typically are made on the basis of the borrowers
ability to make repayment from cash flow from its business and are secured by business assets, such as commercial real estate, accounts receivable, equipment and inventory. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial
business loans is substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Furthermore, the collateral for commercial business loans may depreciate over time and generally cannot be appraised with as much precision as residential real estate.
We have a loan review and monitoring process to regularly assess the repayment ability of commercial borrowers. At December 31, 2007, commercial loans totaled $44.4 million, or 14.9% of the total loan portfolio.
Commercial Real Estate Lending
Commercial real
estate loans are secured by various types of commercial real estate in our market area including commercial buildings and offices, recreational facilities, small shopping centers, churches and hotels. At December 31, 2007, commercial real
estate loans totaled $86.3 million, or 29.1% of our total loans. We may lend up to 80% of the secured propertys appraised value. Commercial real estate lending entails significant additional risk, compared with residential mortgage lending.
Commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. Additionally, the payment experience on loans secured by income producing properties is typically dependent on the
successful operation of a business or a real estate project and thus may be subject, to a greater extent, to adverse conditions in the real estate market or in the economic environment. Our commercial real estate loan underwriting criteria requires
an examination of debt service coverage ratios, the borrowers creditworthiness and prior credit history and reputation, and we typically require personal guarantees or endorsements of the borrowers principal owners. In addition, we
carefully evaluate the location of the security property.
Residential Real Estate Lending
Residential one-to-four mortgage loans at December 31, 2007, accounts for $83.0 million, or 28.0% of our total loan portfolio. Residential first
mortgage loans represent $47.3 million or 56.9% of total residential real estate loans. Land loans represent $18.0 million or 21.7% of total residential real estate loans. Multifamily and home equity loans represent $4.1 million and $9.1 million,
respectively, and junior liens account for $4.6 million of total residential real estate loans.
All residential mortgage loans originated
by us contain a due-on-sale clause providing that we may declare the unpaid principal balance due and payable upon sale or transfer of the mortgaged premises. In connection with residential real estate loans, we require title insurance,
hazard insurance and if required, flood insurance. We do not require escrows for real estate taxes and insurance.
10
Consumer Lending
We offer various secured and unsecured consumer loans, including unsecured personal loans and lines of credit, automobile loans, boat loans, deposit account loans, installment and demand loans and credit cards. At
December 31, 2007, we had consumer loans of $4.1 million or 1.4% of total loans. Such loans are generally made to customers with whom we have a pre-existing relationship. We currently originate all of our consumer loans in our market area.
Consumer loans may entail greater risk than residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured,
such as loans secured by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. Any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation.
Due to the relatively small amounts involved, any remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrowers continuing
financial stability, and thus are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.
The
underwriting standards we employ to mitigate the risk for consumer loans include a determination of the applicants payment history on other debts and an assessment of their ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed
loan. The stability of the applicants monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment and from any verifiable secondary income. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary
consideration, the underwriting process also includes an analysis of the value of the security in relation to the proposed loan amount.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
General
As a bank holding company, we are subject to regulation under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the examination and reporting requirements of the Board of Governors of the FRB. As a state-chartered
commercial bank, First Capital Bank is subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Virginia State Corporation Commissions Bureau of Financial Institutions (the BFI). It is also subject to regulation, supervision and
examination by the FRB. Other federal and state laws, including various consumer and compliance laws, govern the activities of the bank, the investments that it makes and the aggregate amount of loans that it may grant to one borrower.
The following description summarizes the significant federal and state laws applicable to us and our subsidiary. To the extent that statutory or
regulatory provisions are described, the description is qualified in its entirety by reference to that particular statutory or regulatory provision.
First Capital Bancorp, Inc.
Bank Holding Company Act
. As a bank holding company, we are subject to regulation under
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (BHC Act), and we are registered as such with, and are subject to examination by, the FRB. Pursuant to the BHC Act, we are subject to limitations on the kinds of business in which we can
engage directly or through subsidiaries. We are permitted to manage or control banks. Generally, however, we are prohibited, with certain exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than five percent of any class of
voting shares of an entity engaged in non-banking activities, unless the FRB finds such activities to be so closely related to banking as to be deemed a proper incident thereto within the meaning of the BHC Act. Activities at
the bank holding company level are limited to:
|
|
|
banking, managing or controlling banks;
|
11
|
|
|
furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries; and
|
|
|
|
engaging in other activities that the FRB has determined by regulation or order to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident to these activities.
|
Bank acquisitions by bank holding companies are also regulated. A bank holding company may not acquire more than five
percent of the voting shares of another bank without prior approval of the FRB. The BHC Act subjects bank holding companies to minimum capital requirements. Regulations and policies of the FRB also require a bank holding company to serve as a source
of financial and managerial strength to its subsidiary banks. The FRBs policy is that a bank holding company should stand ready to use available resources for assisting a subsidiary bank. Under certain conditions, the FRB may conclude that
certain actions of a bank holding company, such as a payment of a cash dividend, would constitute an unsafe and unsound banking practice. Some of the activities that the FRB has determined by regulation to be proper incidents to the business of a
bank holding company include making or servicing loans and specific types of leases, performing specific data processing services and acting in some circumstances as a fiduciary or investment or financial adviser. The only activity in which we are
engaged is the operation of First Capital Bank. We have no present intention to engage in any other permitted activities. However, we may determine to engage in additional activities if it is deemed to be in our best interests.
With some limited exceptions, the BHC Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the FRB before:
|
|
|
acquiring substantially all the assets of any bank;
|
|
|
|
acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if after such acquisition it would own or control more than 5% of the voting
shares of such bank (unless it already owns or controls the majority of such shares); or
|
|
|
|
merging or consolidating with another bank holding company.
|
In addition, and subject to some exceptions, the BHC Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with their regulations, require FRB approval prior to any person or company acquiring control of a bank
holding company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of the bank holding company. Control is rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires 10% or more, but
less than 25%, of any class of voting securities and either has registered securities under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or no other person owns a greater percentage of that class of voting securities immediately after the
transaction. The regulations provide a procedure for challenging this rebuttable control presumption.
Financial Holding Companies and
Financial Activities
. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act established a comprehensive framework to permit affiliations among commercial banks, insurance companies, securities firms, and other financial service providers by revising and expanding the BHC
Act framework to permit a holding company system to engage in a full range of financial activities through qualification as a new entity known as a financial holding company. We have not determined whether to become a financial holding company, but
we may consider such a conversion in the future if it appears to be in our best interest.
Dividends
. No Virginia corporation may
make any distribution to stockholders if, after giving it effect, (i) the corporation would not be able to pay its existing and reasonably foreseeable debts, liabilities
12
and obligations, whether or not liquidated, matured, asserted or contingent, as they become due in the usual course of business; or (ii) the
corporations total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus, the amount that would be needed if the corporation were to be dissolved at the time of the distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of
stockholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution.
In a policy statement, the FRB has advised bank
holding companies that it believes that payment of cash dividends in excess of current earnings from operations is inappropriate and may be cause for supervisory action. As a result of this policy, banks and their holding companies may find it
difficult to pay dividends out of retained earnings from historical periods prior to the most recent fiscal year or to take advantage of earnings generated by extraordinary items such as sales of buildings or other large assets in order to generate
profits to enable payment of future dividends.
The primary source of funds for payment of dividends by us to our stockholders will be the
receipt of dividends and interest from First Capital Bank. Our ability to receive dividends from First Capital Bank will be limited by applicable law. The power of the board of directors of an insured depository institution to declare a cash
dividend or other distribution with respect to capital is subject to statutory and regulatory restrictions which limit the amount available for such distribution, depending upon the earnings, financial condition and cash needs of the institution, as
well as general business conditions. Federal law prohibits insured depository institutions from making capital distributions, including dividends, if after such transaction, the institution would be undercapitalized. A bank is undercapitalized for
this purpose if its leverage ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and total risk-based capital ratio are not at least 5%, 6% and 10%, respectively. See Regulatory Capital Requirements below.
The FRB has authority to prohibit a bank holding company from engaging in practices which are considered to be unsafe and unsound. Depending upon the
financial condition of First Capital Bank and upon other factors, the FRB could determine that the payment of dividends or other payments by us or First Capital Bank might constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. Finally, any dividend that would
cause a bank to fall below required capital levels could also be prohibited.
Regulatory Capital Requirements
. State banks and bank
holding companies are required to maintain a minimum risk capital ratio of 10% (at least 5% in the form of Tier 1 capital) of risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheets items. Tier 1 capital consists of common equity, noncumulative perpetual
preferred stock and minority interest in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries and excludes goodwill. Tier 2 capital consists of cumulative perpetual preferred stock, limited-life preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities,
subordinated debt and (subject to a limit of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets) general loan loss reserves. In calculating the relevant ratio, a banks assets and off-balance sheet commitments are risk-weighted: thus, for example, most commercial
loans are included at 100% of their book value while assets considered less risky are included at a percentage of their book value (e.g., 20% for interbank obligations and 0% for vault cash and U.S. treasury securities).
We are subject to leverage ratio guidelines as well. The leverage ratio guidelines require maintenance of a minimum ratio of 3% Tier 1 capital to total
assets for the most highly rated organizations. Institutions that are less highly rated, anticipating significant growth or subject to other significant risks will be required to maintain capital levels ranging from 1% to 2% above the 3% minimum.
Recent federal regulation established five tiers of capital measurement ranging from well capitalized to critically
undercapitalized. Federal bank regulatory authorities are required to take prompt corrective action with respect to inadequately capitalized banks. If a bank does not meet the
13
minimum capital requirement set by its regulators, the regulators are compelled to take certain actions, which may include prohibition on payment of
dividends to its holding company or requiring the adoption of a capital restoration plan which must be guaranteed by the banks holding company.
Cross-Institution Assessments
. Any insured depository institution owned by us can be assessed for losses incurred by the FDIC in connection with assistance provided to, or the failure of, any other depository
institution owned by us.
First Capital Bank
First Capital Bank is subject to various state and federal banking laws and regulations that impose specific requirements or restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight with respect to virtually all aspects of its
operations. The following is a brief summary of the material provisions of certain statutes, rules and regulations that affect First Capital Bank. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory and regulatory
provisions referred to below.
General
. First Capital Bank is under the supervision of, and subject to regulation and examination
by, the BFI and FRB. As such, First Capital Bank is subject to various statutes and regulations administered by these agencies that govern, among other things, required reserves, investments, loans, lending limits, acquisitions of fixed assets,
interest rates payable on deposits, transactions among affiliates and First Capital Bank, the payment of dividends, mergers and consolidations, and establishment of branch offices. As noted previously, First Capital Bank is a member of the Federal
Reserve System. As such, the FRB, as the primary federal regulator of First Capital Bank, has the authority to impose penalties, initiate civil and administrative actions, and take other steps to prevent First Capital Bank from engaging in unsafe
and unsound practices.
Mergers and Acquisitions
. Under federal law, previously existing restrictions on interstate bank
acquisitions were abolished effective September 29, 1995, and since such date bank holding companies from any state have been able to acquire banks and bank holding companies located in any other state. Effective June 1, 1997, the law
allows banks to merge across state lines, subject to earlier opt-in or opt-out action by individual states. The law also allows interstate branch acquisitions and de novo branching if permitted by the host state.
Effective July 1, 1995, Virginia adopted early opt-in legislation which permits interstate bank mergers. Virginia law also permits interstate branch acquisitions and de novo branching if reciprocal treatment is accorded Virginia
banks in the state of the acquirer.
Although the above laws had the potential to have a significant impact on the banking industry, it is
not possible for our management to determine, with any degree of certainty, the impact such laws have had on First Capital Bank.
Financial Services Legislation
. On November 1, 1999, then President Clinton signed into law the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (the GLB Act). The GLB Act implemented fundamental changes in the regulation of the
financial services industry in the United States, further transforming the already converging banking, insurance and securities industries by permitting further mergers and affiliations which will combine commercial banks, insurers and securities
firms under one holding company. Many of these changes are discussed above.
The provisions of the GLB Act have had a significant impact on
the banking industry in general. However, it is not possible for us to determine, with any degree of certainty at this time, the impact that such provisions have had on First Capital Bank and its operations.
14
Dividends
. The amount of dividends payable by First Capital Bank depends upon its earnings and
capital position, and is limited by federal and state law, regulations and policy. In addition, Virginia law imposes restrictions on the ability of all banks chartered under Virginia law to pay dividends. Under such law, no dividend may be declared
or paid that would impair a banks paid-in capital. Each of the BFI and the FDIC have the general authority to limit dividends paid by First Capital Bank if such payments are deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice. In particular,
Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA) would prohibit First Capital Bank from making a dividend if it were undercapitalized or if such dividend would result in the institution becoming
undercapitalized.
Under current supervisory practice, prior approval of the FRB is required if cash dividends declared in any
given year exceed the total of First Capital Banks net profits for such year, plus its retained profits for the preceding two years. In addition, First Capital Bank may not pay a dividend in an amount greater than its undivided profits then on
hand after deducting current losses and bad debts. Federal law further provides that no insured depository institution may make any capital distribution (which would include a cash dividend) if, after making the distribution, the institution would
not satisfy one or more of its minimum capital requirements.
Insurance of Accounts, Assessments and Regulation by the FDIC
The deposits of the bank are insured by the FDIC up to the limits set forth under applicable law. The deposits of First Capital Bank are subject to the
deposit insurance assessments of the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC.
The FDIC recently amended its risk-based deposit assessment
system for 2007 to implement authority granted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005. Under the revised system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital
levels and certain other factors. An institutions assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned. Risk Category I, which contains the least risky depository institutions, is expected to include more than 90% of all
institutions. Unlike the other categories, Risk Category I contains further risk differentiation based on the FDICs analysis of financial ratios, examination component ratings and other information. Assessment rates are determined by the FDIC
and currently range from five to seven basis points for the healthiest institutions (Risk Category I) to 43 basis points of assessable deposits for the riskiest (Risk Category IV). The FDIC may adjust rates uniformly from one quarter to the next,
except that no single adjustment can exceed three basis points.
The FDIC is authorized to prohibit any insured institution from
engaging in any activity that the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the Deposit Insurance Fund. Also, the FDIC may initiate enforcement actions against a bank, after first giving the institutions primary
regulatory authority an opportunity to take such action. The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any depository institution if it determines, after a hearing, that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is
in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations, or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed in writing by the FDIC. It also may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the
permanent termination of insurance, if the institution has no tangible capital. If deposit insurance is terminated, the deposits at the institution at the time of termination, less subsequent withdrawals, shall continue to be insured for a period
from six months to two years, as determined by the FDIC. We are not aware of any existing circumstances that could result in termination of any of First Capital Banks deposit insurance.
Capital Requirements
. The various federal bank regulatory agencies, including the FRB, have adopted risk-based capital requirements for assessing
the capital adequacy of banks and bank holding companies. Virginia chartered banks must also satisfy the capital requirements adopted by the BFI. The
15
federal capital standards define capital and establish minimum capital requirements in relation to assets and off-balance sheet exposure, as adjusted for
credit risk. The risk-based capital standards currently in effect are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profile among bank holding companies and banks, to account for off-balance sheet exposure
and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Assets and off-balance sheet items are assigned to broad risk categories, each with appropriate risk weights. The resulting capital ratios represent capital as a percentage of total
risk-weighted assets and off-balance sheet items.
The minimum requirement for the ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets
(including certain off-balance sheet obligations, such as stand-by letters of credit) is 8%. At least half of the risk-based capital must consist of common equity, retained earnings and qualifying perpetual preferred stock, less deductions for
goodwill and various other tangibles (Tier 1 capital). Tier 2 capital includes the hybrid capital instruments and other debt securities, preferred stock and a limited amount of the general valuation allowance for loan losses. The sum of
Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital is total risk-based capital.
The FRB also has adopted regulations which supplement the
risk-based guidelines to include a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to quarterly average assets (Leverage Ratio) of 3%. The FRB has emphasized that the foregoing standards are supervisory minimums and that a banking organization
will be permitted to maintain such minimum levels of capital only if it receives the highest rating under the regulatory rating system and the banking organization is not experiencing or anticipating significant growth. All other banking
organizations are required to maintain a Leverage Ratio of at least 4% to 5% of Tier 1 capital. These rules further provide that banking organizations experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain capital positions
substantially above the minimum supervisory levels and comparable to peer group averages, without significant reliance on intangible assets. The FRB continues to consider tangible Tier 1 Leverage Ratio as the ratio of a banking organizations
Tier 1 capital, less deductions for intangibles otherwise includable in Tier 1 capital, to total tangible assets.
The Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council establishes the guidelines which banks follow in preparing their quarterly Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) which are filed with their supervisory agency. The guidelines in most respects
follow accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) in presenting the financial condition of each institution. An exception exists in the manner that recognition of deferred tax asset balances are treated for the
purpose of calculating capital adequacy. In preparing the Call Report schedules dealing with regulatory capital, an institution can recognize only that portion of its deferred tax asset balance which equates to projected earnings for the ensuing 12
month period. Any amount in excess of that is disallowed when calculating the institutions capital ratios. All capital ratios reported by First Capital Bank following recognition of its deferred tax asset balance at June 30, 2003, will be
in accordance with the Regulatory Accounting Principles (RAP) noted above. All other financial statements presented by the Bank, including all other Call Report presentations, will be in accordance with GAAP.
Section 38 of the FDIA, as amended by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (FDICIA), requires that the
federal banking agencies establish five capital levels for insured depository institutions well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and
critically undercapitalized and requires or permits such agencies to take certain supervisory actions as an insured institutions capital level falls.
As of December 31, 2007, we and First Capital Bank both exceeded all capital requirements under all applicable regulations.
16
Safety and Soundness
. The federal banking agencies have broad powers under current federal law to
take prompt corrective action to resolve problems of insured depository institutions. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institutions in question are well capitalized, adequately capitalized,
undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized, all such terms are defined under uniform regulations defining such capital levels issued by each of the federal banking agencies.
On December 19, 1991, FDICIA was enacted into law. FDICIA requires each federal banking regulatory agency to prescribe, by regulation
or guideline, standards for all insured depository institutions and depository institution holding companies relating to: (i) internal controls, information systems and audit systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit
underwriting; (iv) interest rate risk exposure; (v) asset growth; (vi) compensation, fees and benefits; and (vii) such other operational and managerial standards as the agency determines to be appropriate. On July 10, 1995,
the federal banking agencies, including the FRB, adopted final rules and proposed guidelines concerning standards for safety and soundness required to be prescribed by regulation pursuant to Section 39 of the FDIA. In general, the standards
relate to (1) operational and managerial matters; (2) asset quality and earnings; and (3) compensation. The operational and managerial standards cover (a) internal controls and information systems; (b) internal audit
systems; (c) loan documentation; (d) credit underwriting; (e) interest rate exposure; (f) asset growth; and (g) compensation, fees and benefits.
Activities and Investments of Insured State-Chartered Banks
. The activities and equity investments of FDIC-insured, state-chartered banks are generally limited to those that are permissible for national banks.
Under regulations dealing with equity investments, an insured state bank generally may not directly or indirectly acquire or retain any equity investment of a type, or in an amount, that is not permissible for a national bank. An insured state bank
is not prohibited from, among other things, (i) acquiring or retaining a majority interest in a subsidiary; (ii) investing as a limited partner in a partnership the sole purpose of which is direct or indirect investment in the acquisition,
rehabilitation or new construction of a qualified housing project, provided that such limited partnership investments may not exceed 2% of the banks total assets; (iii) acquiring up to 10% of the voting stock of a company that solely
provides or reinsures directors, trustees and officers liability insurance coverage or bankers blanket bond group insurance coverage for insured depository institutions; and (iv) acquiring or retaining the voting shares
of a depository institution if certain requirements are met. In addition, an insured state-chartered bank may not, directly, or indirectly through a subsidiary, engage as principal in any activity that is not permissible for a national
bank unless the FDIC has determined that such activities would pose no risk to the insurance fund of which it is a member and the bank is in compliance with applicable regulatory capital requirements. Any insured state-chartered bank directly or
indirectly engaged in any activity that is not permitted for a national bank must cease the impermissible activity. The scope of permissible activities available to FDIC-insured, state chartered banks may be expanded by the recently enacted
financial services legislation. See Supervision and Regulation First Capital Bank Financial Services Legislation.
Regulatory Enforcement Authority
. Applicable banking laws include substantial enforcement powers available to federal banking regulators. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil monetary
penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions against banking organizations and institution-affiliated parties, as defined. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of laws and
regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. Other actions or inactions may provide the basis for enforcement action, including misleading or untimely reports filed with regulatory authorities.
17
Monetary Policy
The commercial banking business is affected not only by general economic conditions but also by the monetary policies of the FRB. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the FRB include open market operations
in United States government securities, changes in the discount rate on member bank borrowing and changes in reserve requirements against deposits held by all federally insured banks. The FRBs monetary policies have had a significant effect on
the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future. In view of changing conditions in the national and international economy and in the money markets, as well as the effect of actions by
monetary fiscal authorities, including the FRB, no prediction can be made as to possible future changes in interest rates, deposit levels, loan demand or the business and earnings of the bank.
Federal Reserve System
In 1980, Congress enacted
legislation that imposed reserve requirements on all depository institutions that maintain transaction accounts or non-personal time deposits. NOW accounts, money market deposit accounts and other types of accounts that permit payments or transfers
to third parties fall within the definition of transaction accounts and are subject to these reserve requirements, as are any non-personal time deposits at an institution. For net transaction accounts in 2007, the first $7.8 million, the same amount
as in 2006, will be exempt from reserve requirements. A 3% reserve ratio will be assessed on net transaction accounts over $7.8 million up to and including $40.5 million, also the same amount as in 2006. A 10% reserve ratio will be applied above
$40.5 million. These percentages are subject to adjustment by the FRB. Because required reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash or in a non-interest-bearing account at, or on behalf of, a Federal Reserve Bank, the effect of the reserve
requirement is to reduce the amount of the institutions interest-earning assets.
Transactions with Affiliates
Transactions between banks and their affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank is any bank or
entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B:
|
|
|
limit the extent to which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such
institutions capital stock and surplus, and maintain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such capital stock and surplus; and
|
|
|
|
require that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the association or subsidiary as those provided to a
nonaffiliate.
|
The term covered transaction includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a
guarantee and other similar types of transactions.
Loans to Insiders
The Federal Reserve Act and related regulations impose specific restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of banks. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, loans to
a director, an executive officer and to a principal shareholder of a bank, and some affiliated entities of any of the foregoing, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such person and affiliated entities, the banks
loan-to-one borrower limit. Loans in the aggregate to insiders and their related interests as a class may not exceed two times the banks unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus until the banks total assets equal or exceed $100,000,000,
at which time the aggregate is limited
18
to the banks unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Section 22(h) also prohibits loans, above amounts prescribed by the appropriate federal
banking agency, to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of a bank or bank holding company, and their respective affiliates, unless such loan is approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the bank with any
interested director not participating in the voting. The FDIC has prescribed the loan amount, which includes all other outstanding loans to such person, as to which such prior board of director approval is required, as being the greater
of $25,000 or 5% of capital and surplus (up to $500,000). Section 22(h) requires that loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders be made on terms and underwriting standards substantially the same as offered in comparable
transactions to other persons.
Community Reinvestment Act
Under the Community Reinvestment Act and related regulations, depository institutions have an affirmative obligation to assist in meeting the credit needs of their market areas, including low and moderate-income
areas, consistent with safe and sound banking practice. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the adoption by each institution of a Community Reinvestment Act statement for each of its market areas describing the depository institutions
efforts to assist in its communitys credit needs. Depository institutions are periodically examined for compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act and are assigned ratings in this regard. Banking regulators consider a depository
institutions Community Reinvestment Act rating when reviewing applications to establish new branches, undertake new lines of business, and/or acquire part or all of another depository institution. An unsatisfactory rating can significantly
delay or even prohibit regulatory approval of a proposed transaction by a bank holding company or its depository institution subsidiaries.
The GLB Act and federal bank regulators have made various changes to the Community Reinvestment Act. Among other changes, Community Reinvestment Act agreements with private parties must be disclosed and annual reports must be made to a
banks primary federal regulatory. A bank holding company will not be permitted to become a financial holding company and no new activities authorized under the GLB Act may be commenced by a holding company or by a bank financial subsidiary if
any of its bank subsidiaries received less than a satisfactory rating in its latest Community Reinvestment Act examination. First Capital Bank received a satisfactory rating during its latest examination.
Fair Lending; Consumer Laws
In addition to the
Community Reinvestment Act, other federal and state laws regulate various lending and consumer aspects of the banking business. Governmental agencies, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Trade Commission and the
Department of Justice, have become concerned that prospective borrowers experience discrimination in their efforts to obtain loans from depository and other lending institutions. These agencies have brought litigation against depository institutions
alleging discrimination against borrowers. Many of these suits have been settled, in some cases for material sums, short of a full trial.
Recently, these governmental agencies have clarified what they consider to be lending discrimination and have specified various factors that they will use to determine the existence of lending discrimination under the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act and the Fair Housing Act, including evidence that a lender discriminated on a prohibited basis, evidence that a lender treated applicants differently based on prohibited factors in the absence of evidence that the treatment was the
result of prejudice or a conscious intention to discriminate, and evidence that a lender applied an otherwise neutral non-discriminatory policy uniformly to all applicants, but the practice had a discriminatory effect, unless the practice could be
justified as a business necessity.
19
Banks and other depository institutions also are subject to numerous consumer-oriented laws and
regulations. These laws, which include the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act, require compliance
by depository institutions with various disclosure requirements and requirements regulating the availability of funds after deposit or the making of some loans to customers.
Bank Secrecy Act
Under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), a financial institution is required
to have systems in place to detect certain transactions, based on the size and nature of the transaction. Financial institutions are generally required to report cash transactions involving more than $10,000 to the United States Treasury. In
addition, financial institutions are required to file suspicious activity reports for transactions that involve more than $5,000 and which the financial institution knows, suspects or has reason to suspect, involves illegal funds, is designed to
evade the requirements of the BSA or has no lawful purpose. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, enacted in response to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, requires bank regulators to consider a financial institutions compliance with the
BSA when reviewing applications from a financial institution. As part of its BSA program, the USA PATRIOT Act also requires a financial institution to follow recently implemented customer identification procedures when opening accounts for new
customers and to review lists of individuals and entities that are prohibited from opening accounts at financial institutions.
Future Regulatory
Uncertainty
Because federal regulation of financial institutions changes regularly and is the subject of constant legislative debate,
we cannot forecast how federal regulation of financial institutions may change in the future and impact our operations. Although Congress in recent years has sought to reduce the regulatory burden on financial institutions with respect to the
approval of specific transactions, we fully expect that the financial institution industry will remain heavily regulated in the near future and that additional laws or regulations may be adopted further regulating specific banking practices.
ITEM 2.
|
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
|
Our banking offices
are listed below. We conduct our business from the properties listed below. Except for our Ashland office, which we own, we lease our other offices under long term lease arrangements. All of such leases are at market rental rates and they are all
with unrelated parties having no relationship or affiliation with us.
|
|
|
Office
Location
|
|
Date
Opened
|
Innsbrook Office
4101 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
|
|
1998
|
|
|
Ashland Office
409 South Washington Highway
Ashland, Virginia 23005
|
|
2000
|
20
|
|
|
Chesterfield Towne Center Office
1580 Koger Center Boulevard
Richmond, Virginia 23235
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Staples Mill Road Office
1776 Staples Mill Road
Richmond, Virginia 23230
|
|
2003
|
|
|
Forest Office Park Branch
1504 Santa Rosa Road
Richmond, Virginia 23229
|
|
2006
|
|
|
James Center Office
One James Center
901 East Cary Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
|
|
2007
|
Our corporate office, which we opened in 2003, is located at 4222 Cox Road, Suite 200,
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060.
All of our properties are in good operating condition and are adequate for our present and anticipated
future needs.
On January 11, 2008, the Company closed on approximately .83 acres at the intersection of West Broad Street and
Dominion Boulevard in Henrico County as a replacement for its Innsbrook Branch. The total purchase price was $1.5 million. Construction commenced in March 2008 and is scheduled to be completed in August 2008. On January 31, 2008, the Company
entered into an agreement to purchase approximately 1.18 acres near the intersection of Route 288 and Midlothian Turnpike in Chesterfield County as a future branch site. The total purchase price is $1.9 with a closing scheduled for March 2008.
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
We are not involved in
any pending legal proceedings other than legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business. Our management does not believe that such legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, are likely to have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations or financial condition.
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report to a vote of security holders of the Company.
PART II
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Our common stock was approved for listing on the Nasdaq Capital Markets as of June 7, 2007 under the symbol FCVA. Trading under that symbol began June 14, 2007. Prior to listing on Nasdaq, our
common stock traded over the counter and under the symbol FPBX, although no established trading market developed.
21
The following table shows high and low sale prices for our common stock, as reported to us, for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
$
|
16.66
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
16.25
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
|
18.50
|
|
|
17.50
|
4th Quarter
|
|
|
18.10
|
|
|
17.95
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
$
|
16.80
|
2nd Quarter
|
|
|
17.50
|
|
|
15.50
|
3rd Quarter
|
|
|
16.00
|
|
|
12.00
|
4th Quarter
|
|
|
14.75
|
|
|
11.00
|
The foregoing transactions may not be representative of all transactions during the indicated
periods or of the actual fair market value of our common stock at the time of such transaction due to the infrequency of trades and the limited market for our common stock.
As of March 19, 2008, there were approximately 703 shareholders of record of our common stock.
Effective December 28, 2005, First Capital Bank completed a three-for-two stock split with respect to the outstanding shares of its common stock.
The information set forth in this Report on Form 10-KSB regarding common stock reflects the changes resulting from the stock split.
22
SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following consolidated summary sets forth our selected financial data for the periods and at the dates indicated. The selected financial data for
fiscal years have been derived from our audited financial statements for each of the five years that ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003. You also should read the detailed information and the financial statements for all of such
periods included elsewhere in this Report on Form 10-KSB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or for the Fiscal Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except ratios and per share amounts)
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
20,356
|
|
|
$
|
15,263
|
|
|
$
|
10,533
|
|
|
$
|
6,740
|
|
|
$
|
5,164
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10,563
|
|
|
|
7,691
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
2,388
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
9,793
|
|
|
|
7,572
|
|
|
|
6,399
|
|
|
|
4,352
|
|
|
|
2,929
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
9,117
|
|
|
|
7,168
|
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
4,006
|
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
7,259
|
|
|
|
5,261
|
|
|
|
4,293
|
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,667
|
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
925
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,742
|
|
|
$
|
1,571
|
|
|
$
|
1,306
|
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data:
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
11.73
|
|
|
$
|
8.72
|
|
|
$
|
7.78
|
|
|
$
|
7.23
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
351,867
|
|
|
$
|
257,241
|
|
|
$
|
209,529
|
|
|
$
|
152,647
|
|
|
$
|
115,148
|
|
Gross loans, net of unearned income
|
|
$
|
296,723
|
|
|
$
|
201,585
|
|
|
$
|
156,062
|
|
|
$
|
108,698
|
|
|
$
|
72,641
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
255,108
|
|
|
$
|
194,302
|
|
|
$
|
162,388
|
|
|
$
|
128,658
|
|
|
$
|
104,726
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
34,859
|
|
|
$
|
15,659
|
|
|
$
|
13,970
|
|
|
$
|
12,990
|
|
|
$
|
9,234
|
|
Average shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
2,414
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
Average shares outstanding, diluted
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
1,849
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
Selected Performance Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
0.69
|
%
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
Return on average equity
|
|
|
6.80
|
%
|
|
|
10.74
|
%
|
|
|
9.69
|
%
|
|
|
5.87
|
%
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio
|
|
|
68.47
|
%
|
|
|
65.46
|
%
|
|
|
64.35
|
%
|
|
|
73.69
|
%
|
|
|
80.61
|
%
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
|
|
3.39
|
%
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
Equity to assets
|
|
|
9.91
|
%
|
|
|
6.09
|
%
|
|
|
6.67
|
%
|
|
|
8.51
|
%
|
|
|
8.02
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
12.98
|
%
|
|
|
10.39
|
%
|
|
|
9.13
|
%
|
|
|
12.46
|
%
|
|
|
12.01
|
%
|
Total risk-based capital ratio
|
|
|
14.44
|
%
|
|
|
12.28
|
%
|
|
|
11.36
|
%
|
|
|
13.51
|
%
|
|
|
12.42
|
%
|
Leverage ratio
|
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.80
|
%
|
|
|
6.98
|
%
|
|
|
8.74
|
%
|
|
|
7.86
|
%
|
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to period-end loans
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
(1)
|
Amounts have been adjusted to reflect the three for two stock split on December 28, 2005.
|
23
ITEM 6.
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion provides information about the results of operations and financial condition, liquidity and capital resources. This discussion
should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements.
Overview
We are headquartered in Glen Allen, Virginia and conduct our primary operations through our wholly owned subsidiary, First Capital Bank (the
Bank). Through its six full service branch offices and courier service, the bank serves the greater Richmond metropolitan area which includes the counties of Henrico, Chesterfield, and Hanover, the Town of Ashland and the City of
Richmond, Virginia. We target small to medium-sized businesses and consumers in our market area and emerging suburbs outside of the greater Richmond metropolitan area. In addition, we strive to develop personal, knowledgeable relationships with our
customers, while at the same time offering products comparable to statewide regional banks located in its market area. We believe that the marketing of customized banking services has enabled it to establish a niche in the financial services
marketplace in the Richmond Metropolitan Area.
We generate a significant amount of our income from the net interest income earned by the
bank. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense. Interest income depends on the amount of interest-earning assets outstanding during the period and the interest rates earned thereon. Interest expense is a
function of the average amount of deposits and borrowed money outstanding during the period and the interest rates paid thereon. The quality of the assets further influences the amount of interest income lost on non-accrual loans and the amount of
additions to the allowance for loan losses.
For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we continued to realize the benefit of
high growth rates in both assets and net interest income. Our total assets increased to $351.9 million at December 31, 2007, compared to $257.2 million at December 31, 2006, representing an increase of $94.6 million or 36.8%. Our total
assets of $257.2 million on December 31, 2006 increased 22.8% from our December 31, 2005 balance of $209.5 million.
Total net
loans at December 31, 2007 were $294.2 million, an increase of $94.5 million, or 47.3%, from the December 31, 2006 amount of $199.8 million. For the year 2006, total loans increased $45.1 million or 29.2%. Loan growth of approximately
$139.6 million for the two years ended December 31, 2007 was accomplished without sacrificing credit quality. Non-accrual loans totaled $50 thousand and $120 thousand at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Excluding nonaccrual loans,
there were no loans delinquent 90 days or more at December 31, 2007 and at December 31, 2006. Additional lenders, a solid local economy and strong underwriting contributed to the superior loan quality and growth we experienced.
Deposits increased $60.8 million to $255.1 million at December 31, 2007 from the balance at December 31, 2006. Certificates of deposit
increased $37.4 million or 30.8% and represent 62.3% of deposits with maturities ranging from six months to five years. Money market accounts and NOW accounts increased $19.7 million or 49.4% with the continued success of the Capital Reserve Account
which has a variable rate tied to the stated Fed funds rate. Low cost demand deposits increased 11.1% or $3.7 million to $36.5 million at December 31, 2007. Over the twenty-four months ended December 31, 2007, prime changed seven times.
For the period January 1, 2006 to June 29, 2007, prime increased four times in 25 basis points increments from 7.25% to 8.25%. From September 18, 2007 to December 31,
24
2007, prime decreased three times from 8.25% back to 7.25% in one 50 basis point drop and two 25 basis point decreases. The steady rise in short term
interest rates over eighteen months of the last two years and the growth of interest bearing deposits resulted in the 37.9% increase in interest expense in 2007.
The net interest margin was 3.54% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 3.41% for the same period in 2006. The increase is attributed to steady rise in shorter interest rates on deposits and borrowed
money for most of the year ended December 31, 2007.
Total non-interest expense increased 38.0% or $2.0 million from $5.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2006 to $7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Additions to staff to support business development and retail branching contributed to the increase in salaries and employee benefits. Two experienced
lenders were hired to support development of the construction division and loan origination function. Occupancy and depreciation expense increased as the result of the opening of the new Forest Office Park branch in the third quarter of 2006 and the
James Center Branch in February 2007. The FDIC assessment increased as the result of changes in the computation of the premium. The Virginia bank franchise tax increased $112 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2007 as the result of
increased investment in First Capital Bank by First Capital Bancorp, Inc. as a result of the stock offering during June 2007.
We remained
well capitalized with capital ratios above the regulatory minimums. Asset quality measures also remained consistently strong throughout the year. The loan loss increased primarily due to loan growth.
Critical Accounting Policies
The financial condition
and results of operations presented in the consolidated financial statements, the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements and this section are, to a large degree, dependent upon our accounting policies. The selection and
applications of these accounting policies involve judgments, estimates, and uncertainties that are susceptible to change.
First Capital
Banks critical accounting policy relates to the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses which is based on managements opinion of an amount that is adequate to absorb losses in the Banks existing portfolio. The allowance for
loan losses is established through a provision for loan loss based on available information including the composition of the loan portfolio, historical loan losses (to the extent available due to limited history), specific impaired loans,
availability and quality of the collateral, age of the various portfolios, changes in local economic conditions, loan performance and quality of the portfolio. Different assumptions used in evaluating the adequacy of the Banks allowance for
loan losses could result in material changes in its financial condition and results of operations. The Banks policies with respect to the methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses involve a high degree of complexity and require
management to make subjective judgments that often require assumptions or estimates about certain matters. This critical policy and its assumptions are periodically reviewed with the Banks Board of Directors.
The Bank evaluates various loans individually for impairment as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan, and SFAS No. 118, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan Income Recognition and Disclosures. Loans evaluated individually for impairment include non-performing loans, loans past
due by 30 days or more, and other loans selected by management. The evaluations are based upon discounted expected cash flows or collateral valuations. If the evaluation shows that a loan is individually impaired, then a specific reserve is
established for the amount of
25
impairment. If a loan evaluated individually is not impaired, then the loan is assessed for impairment under SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies,
with a group of loans that have similar characteristics.
For loans without individual measures of impairment, the Bank makes estimates of
losses for groups of loans as required by SFAS No. 5. Loans are grouped by similar characteristics, including the type of loan and general collateral type. A loss rate range reflecting the expected loss inherent in a group of loans is derived
based upon estimates of default rates for a given collateral type, terms of the loan, borrower and industry concentrations, levels and trends in delinquencies and charge-off and recovery experience.
The amount of estimated impairment of individually evaluated loans and the range of estimated losses for groups of loans are added together for a total
range of estimated loan losses. This range of estimated losses is compared to the allowance for loan losses of the Bank as of the evaluation date and, if the range of estimated losses is greater than the allowance, an additional provision to the
allowance would be made. If the range of estimated losses is less than the allowance, the degree to which the allowance exceeds the range of estimated losses is evaluated to determine whether a reduction to the allowance would be necessary. If
different assumptions or conditions were to prevail and it is determined that the allowance is not adequate to absorb the new estimate of probable losses, an additional provision for loan losses would be made, which amount may be material to the
consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
Net Income
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased 10.9% to $1.7 million from $1.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. Returns on equity and assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 were 6.80% and 0.61%, respectively, compared to 10.74% and 0.69% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The return on equity decreased as
the result of the net increase in equity of $17.1 million due to the stock offering that was completed during 2007. Our continued focus on loan growth resulted in an increase in interest income. Interest on loans increased $5.1 million to $18.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $13.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. Operations have been impacted by increased funding costs due to the general increase in interest rates during 2007 and growth in total
interest bearing liabilities. Total interest expense was $10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to $7.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
For 2007, earnings per diluted share were $0.71 compared to $0.83 and $0.73 for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The weighted average shares outstanding
increased by 618 thousand shares during 2007 as the result of the stock offering in June 2007.
26
The following table reflects an analysis of our net interest income using the daily average balance of
our assets and liabilities as of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Income/
Expense
|
|
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
|
Income/
Expense
|
|
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
$
|
233,808
|
|
|
$
|
18,362
|
|
7.85
|
%
|
|
$
|
177,050
|
|
|
$
|
13,263
|
|
7.49
|
%
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Agencies
|
|
|
23,902
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
4.64
|
%
|
|
|
25,307
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
Mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
9,863
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
4.28
|
%
|
|
|
12,702
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
Municipal securities
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
4.03
|
%
|
|
|
1,012
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
4.05
|
%
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
5.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
6.08
|
%
|
|
|
1,955
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
5.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
37,380
|
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
4.62
|
%
|
|
|
40,976
|
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
4.40
|
%
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
5,084
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
5.24
|
%
|
|
|
3,884
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
$
|
276,272
|
|
|
$
|
20,356
|
|
7.37
|
%
|
|
$
|
221,910
|
|
|
$
|
15,263
|
|
6.88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(2,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,666
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
284,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
228,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
$
|
9,063
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,666
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
Money market deposit accounts
|
|
|
44,698
|
|
|
|
1,798
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
|
|
24,829
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
Statement savings
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
131,912
|
|
|
|
6,783
|
|
5.14
|
%
|
|
|
119,838
|
|
|
|
5,505
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
186,556
|
|
|
|
8,690
|
|
4.66
|
%
|
|
|
152,067
|
|
|
|
6,304
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fed funds purchased
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
5.34
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
4.19
|
%
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
6.99
|
%
|
|
|
3,440
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
6.60
|
%
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
28,348
|
|
|
|
1,213
|
|
4.28
|
%
|
|
|
25,460
|
|
|
|
1,020
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
225,615
|
|
|
|
10,563
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
|
|
183,768
|
|
|
|
7,691
|
|
4.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
32,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
33,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
25,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
284,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
228,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.69
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ration of average interest earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
For purposes of these computations, nonaccrual loans are included in average loans.
|
Net Interest Income
Net interest income represents our principal source of earnings. Net interest
income is the amount by which interest generated from earning assets exceeds the expense of funding those assets. Changes in volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as their respective yields and rates,
have a significant impact on the level of net interest income.
27
Year ended December 31, 2007 compared to year ended December 31, 2006
Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2007 increased 29.3% to $9.8 million from $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The increase in net interest income resulted from a 13 basis point increase in the net interest margin from 3.41% for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 3.54% for the comparable period of 2007.
Average earning assets increased 24.5% to $276.2 million for 2007 from $221.9 million for 2006. Average loans, net of unearned income increased 32.1% for
2007 to $233.8 million. The average rate earned on net loans, increased 36 basis points to 7.85% from 7.49% for the year ended December 31, 2006. Loan growth was more pronounced in the third and fourth quarters of 2007 as $67.7 million, or
71.6%, of the $94.5 million in net new loans were originated during those quarters. The average balance in our securities portfolio decreased by $3.6 million primarily due to repayments on mortgage backed securities of $2.8 million and a $1.4
million reduction in U.S. Agencies, while the yield increased 22 basis points to 4.62% from 4.40%. As the result of these changes, total interest income increased $5.1 million, or 33.4% to $20.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to $15.3 million for the comparable period of 2006.
Total interest expense on deposits increased $2.4 million to $8.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007 from $6.3 million for the same period of 2006. The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased $34.5 million as the cost of deposits increased 51 basis points. The average money market deposit
accounts increased $19.9 million during 2007 to $44.7 million as the average rate increased 99 basis points to 4.02%. The popularity of the Capital Reserve Account with a variable rate tied to fed funds, resulted in the increase in deposits and
costs. Targeted fed funds were high most of 2007 until the decreases beginning in September 2007. The average balance of certificates of deposit increased $12.1 million as the cost of certificates increased 55 basis points to 5.14% for the year
ended December 31, 2007. Due to higher rates during most of 2007 as compared to 2006, deposits were rolling up in rate at maturity through the first three quarters of 2007. The percentage of certificates of deposits to total deposits increased
slightly during 2007 to 62.3%.
Average advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLB) increased $2.9 million
during 2007. The average cost of those advances increased 29 basis points. Advances from the FHLB were used to augment deposits in supporting the loan growth of the Bank. Interest expense of FHLB advances increased $193 thousand or 18.9% over 2006
to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Average subordinated debt and other borrowed money increased $3.7 million
during 2007. During September 2006, $5.2 million of Trust Preferred Capital Notes were issued at a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest (three-Month LIBOR plus 1.70%) which adjusts quarterly. The rate was 6.69% at December 31, 2007, down
from 7.06% at December 31, 2006 and 7.09% upon issuance in September 2006. Subordinated debt of $2.0 million was outstanding all of 2007 and 2006 at a fixed rate of 6.33%. Total interest expense on subordinated debt and other borrowed money
increased $307 thousand during 2007 to $581 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to year
ended December 31, 2005
Net interest income for 2006 increased to $7.6 million, a $1.2 million increase over the $6.4 million
reported for 2005. The increase in our net interest income in 2006 resulted from the 27.6% increase in average earning assets and 82 basis points increase in the average rate earned on average earning assets. The 82 basis points increase in earning
assets yield was offset by a 115 basis point
28
increase in the cost of funding. The net interest margin decreased during 2006 by 27 basis points to 3.41%. The average balance in our securities portfolio
increased by $3.5 million, while the yield increased 50 basis points to 4.40%. Our average loan portfolio volume increase $43.7 million or 32.7%. The average yield on the loan portfolio increased 76 basis points to 7.49%. Loan demand was strong
throughout most of 2006. Growth in the loan portfolio coupled with the increase in loan yields produced a 47.8% increase in loan interest income.
The average balance of interest-bearing deposits increased $30.8 million as the cost of deposits increased 118 basis points. Interest expense on deposits increased $2.7 million or 74.9%, to $6.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. Average balance of certificates of deposit increased $29.5 million as the cost of certificates increased 109 basis points. The percentage of certificates of deposits to total deposits increased from 61.9% in 2005 to 62.5% in 2006. The cost of
money market accounts increased 134 basis points from 1.70% for the year 2005 to 3.04% for the year 2006. Higher short term rates and the introduction of the Capital Reserve Account with a variable rate tied to fed funds, resulted in the increase in
cost. The Capital Reserve Account, which was introduced in June 2006, had a balance of $16.1 million at December 31, 2006.
Average
advances from the FHLB increased $13.6 million during 2006. Average cost of those advances increased 50 basis points. Advances from the FHLB were used to augment deposits in supporting the loan growth of the Bank. Interest expense of FHLB advances
increased $605 thousand or 145.9% over 2005 to $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Average subordinated debt and other
borrowed money increased $3.3 million during 2006. During September 2006, $5.2 million of Trust Preferred Capital Notes were issued at a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest (three-Month LIBOR plus 1.70%) which adjusts quarterly. The rate was
7.06% at December 31, 2006.
29
The following table analyzes changes in net interest income attributable to changes in the volume of
interest-earning assets and interest bearing liabilities compared to changes in interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Changes in:
|
|
|
2006 vs. 2005
Increase (Decrease)
Due to Changes in:
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of unearned income
|
|
$
|
4,252
|
|
|
$
|
847
|
|
|
$
|
5,099
|
|
|
$
|
2,936
|
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
|
$
|
4,292
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
339
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
|
4,159
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
5,093
|
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
1,601
|
|
|
|
4,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
Money market deposit accounts
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
353
|
Statement savings
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
Certilficates of deposit
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
2,341
|
Fed funds purchased
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
5
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
27
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
221
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income
|
|
$
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
($373
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,221
|
|
|
$
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
($220
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2007 was $676 thousand compared to $404 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006. We are committed to making loan loss provisions that
maintain an allowance that adequately reflects the risk inherent in our loan portfolio. This commitment is more fully discussed in the Asset Quality section below.
Non-Interest Income
Year ended December 31, 2007 compared to year ended December 31, 200
6
Non-interest income has been and will continue to be an important factor for increasing profitability. Management continues to consider
areas where non-interest income can be increased.
Non-interest income increased 74.1% to $809 thousand for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to $465 thousand for the same period in 2006.
Fees on deposits increased $54.4 thousand or 32.7% to $221
thousand for the year ended December 31, 2007. Reflecting deposit growth, NSF and Returned Check fees increased $39 thousand and Service Charges on Checking increased $17 thousand. Fees on mortgage loans increased $124 thousand to $158 thousand
for the year 2007 compared to $34 thousand for 2006. A new mortgage origination division was established in late 2006 as an additional source to increase non-interest income. Other noninterest income increased $137 thousand, or 51.8%, for 2007 to
$401 thousand. Loan late fees and miscellaneous loan fees increased $68 thousand; ATM fees increased $16 thousand.
30
Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to year ended December 31, 200
5
Non-interest income increased 70.8% to $465 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $272 thousand for the same period in 2005.
Fees on deposits increased 75.6% to $166 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $95 thousand for the same period
in 2005. NSF and Returned Check fees increased from $74 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2005 to $132 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006 an 79.6% increase. Other non-interest income increased $75 thousand or 39.8% to
$264 thousand as compared to $189 thousand for the comparable period in 2005. ATM fees increased 100.0% to $64 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to $32 thousand for the comparable period in 2005. Fees on mortgage loans
were $34 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006. A new mortgage origination division was established in September 2006.
Non-Interest
Expense
Year ended December 31, 2007 compared to year ended December 31, 2006
Total noninterest expense increased 38.0% to $7.3 million for the year 2007 as compared to $5.3 million for 2006. Noninterest expense was 2.6% of average
assets for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 2.3% for 2006.
Salaries and employee benefits increased 46.3% to $3.8 million
compared to $2.6 million for 2006. The opening and staffing of the Companys sixth branch at the James Center in downtown Richmond and additions to staff to support business development contributed to the increase. The Company also made key
additions to the senior lending team in January 2007 which contributed to the increase.
Occupancy expense increased $138 thousand, or
22.9%, to $740 thousand during 2007 as compared to 2006. The opening of the James Center Branch in February 2007 added $99 thousand in rent during 2007. The Forest Office Park Branch, which opened in the fall of 2006, added $25 thousand for the full
year of 2007 over 2006.
Advertising and marketing increased $113 thousand as a TV marketing campaign was used in 2007 to generate deposits
and name recognition.
FDIC assessments increased $138 thousand to $160 thousand for 2007 from $22 thousand for 2006 due to a change in the
calculation of the premium due for FDIC insurance.
Virginia bank franchise stock tax increased $112 thousand to $296 thousand during 2007
from $184 thousand for 2006. Infusion of an additional $10.0 million of capital in the subsidiary bank in 2007 resulted in the increase in the capital stock tax.
Other expenses increased $149 thousand due to expansion of the bank with cost associated with new branches and operations.
Year ended
December 31, 2006 compared to year ended December 31, 2005
Total non-interest expense increased 22.5% to $5.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006, compared to $4.3 for 2005. When taken as a percentage of total average assets for the year, non-interest expense was 2.3% of average assets for 2006 compared to 2.4% for 2005.
31
Salaries and employee benefits increased 29.3% to $2.6 million compared to $2.0 million for 2005.
Additions to staff to support business development, retail branching and the formation of a construction division team have contributed to the increase in salaries and employee benefits. The staffing and opening of the Forest Office Park Branch in
2006 also contributed to the increases in 2006.
Occupancy expense increased 0.93% during 2006 to $602 thousand as compared to $596
thousand for 2005. The addition of the Forest Office Park branch in September 2006 resulted in additional occupancy expense for 2006.
Data
processing expense increased 1.02% to $428 thousand for 2006 as compared to $423 thousand for 2005. The increase is related to increase cost for the new branch opened in 2006 and volume increases at existing branches.
Other expense increased $138 thousand or 18.9% for 2006 as compared to $728 thousand for 2005. The increase resulted from increases in various expense
categories, including insurance, director fees and office supplies, due to our growth.
Professional fees which include legal, accounting
and audit increased 71.3% to $148 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006 from $86 thousand for 2005. Formation of the holding company, registration with the Security and Exchange Commission and compliance with Sarbanes Oxley contributed
to the increase in professional fees.
Virginia bank franchise tax increased 43.6% to $184 thousand for 2006 as compared to $128 thousand
for 2005. Additional $4.5 million of capital in the subsidiary bank resulted in the increase in the capital stock tax.
Depreciation
expense increased $86 thousand or 36.5% to $323 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to $237 thousand for the comparable period in 2005. The addition of fit-up of the new branch and related equipment and the relocation of
the Ashland leased office to an owned free standing building in Ashland accounted for the increase in depreciation expense. Additional equipment depreciation associated with employee infrastructure also contributed to the increase.
Income Taxes
Our reported income tax expense was
$925 thousand for 2007 and $801 thousand for 2006. Our effective tax rate for 2007 was 34.9% compared to 33.8% for 2006. Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements provides a reconciliation between the amount of income tax expense computed
using the federal statutory rate and our actual income tax expense. Also included in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements is information regarding the principal items giving rise to deferred taxes for the two years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Financial Condition
Assets
Our total assets increased to $351.9 million at December 31, 2007, compared to $257.2 million at
December 31, 2006 representing an increase of $94.6 million or 36.8%. Total average assets increased 24.6% from $228.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 to $284.8 million for the same period of 2007. Average stockholders
equity increased 75.1% or $11.0 million over the same period due to the stock offering conducted during June and July 2007 in which $17.1 million in capital was raised after expenses.
32
Our total assets increased to $257.2 million at December 31, 2006, compared to $209.5 million at
December 31, 2005 representing an increase of $47.7 million or 22.8%. Total average assets increased 26.5% from $180.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 to $228.6 million for the same period of 2006. Average stockholders
equity increased 8.6% or $1.2 million over the same period.
Loans
Our loan portfolio is the largest and most profitable component of our earning assets. Total loans, which exclude the allowance for loan losses and deferred loans fees, at December 31, 2007 were $296.9 million,
an increase of $95.2 million from the December 31, 2006 amount of $201.7 million. We continue to see increases in real estate construction loans, which were $79.1 million at December 31, 2007 or 26.6% of total loans. Residential and
commercial real estate increased $44.1 million during 2007 and represent 57.0% of total loans. Additional lenders and a solid local economy have contributed to the loan growth. The allowance for loan losses was $2.5 million or 0.84% of total loans
outstanding at December 31, 2007.
Major classifications of loans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
44,367
|
|
$
|
22,619
|
|
$
|
15,312
|
|
|
$
|
13,651
|
|
|
$
|
14,275
|
Real estate - residential
|
|
|
83,035
|
|
|
62,166
|
|
|
57,708
|
|
|
|
48,451
|
|
|
|
26,604
|
Real estate - commercial
|
|
|
86,301
|
|
|
63,062
|
|
|
49,775
|
|
|
|
30,741
|
|
|
|
23,907
|
Real estate - construction
|
|
|
79,096
|
|
|
51,450
|
|
|
31,442
|
|
|
|
14,324
|
|
|
|
6,165
|
Consumer
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
2,387
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
1,494
|
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
296,905
|
|
|
201,684
|
|
|
156,036
|
|
|
|
108,661
|
|
|
|
72,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
736
|
Net deferred fees (costs)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
294,234
|
|
$
|
199,751
|
|
$
|
154,602
|
|
|
$
|
107,614
|
|
|
$
|
71,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our loan portfolio totaled 84.6% of average earning assets in 2007, up from 79.8% in 2006 and
76.7% in 2005. Because of the nature of our market, loan collateral is predominantly real estate. At December 31, 2007, we had no concentration of loans in any one industry exceeding 10%.
33
The following table reflects the amount of loans for Commercial loans and Real estate construction as to
fixed and variable and repricing or maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
One Year or
Less
|
|
After One Year
Through
Five Years
|
|
After
Five Years
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
21,629
|
|
$
|
21,680
|
|
$
|
1,058
|
|
$
|
44,367
|
Real estate construction
|
|
|
72,587
|
|
|
5,717
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
79,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
94,216
|
|
$
|
27,397
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
$
|
123,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rates
|
|
$
|
3,398
|
|
$
|
22,437
|
|
$
|
1,010
|
|
$
|
26,845
|
Variable Rates
|
|
|
90,818
|
|
|
4,960
|
|
|
840
|
|
|
96,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
94,216
|
|
$
|
27,397
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
$
|
123,463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Quality
We have policies and procedures designed to control credit risk and to maintain the quality of our loan portfolio. These include underwriting standards for new originations and ongoing monitoring and reporting of
asset quality and adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Non-accrual loans were $50 thousand at December 31, 2007 compared to $120 thousand at December 31, 2006. The non-accrual loan of $50 at December 31, 2007 has an SBA
guarantee of $25 thousand as additional collateral.
Non-performing Assets
We place loans on on-accrual status when the collection of principal and interest is doubtful, generally when a loan becomes 90 days past due. There are
three negative implications for earnings when we place a loan on non-accrual status. First, all interest accrued but unpaid at the date that the loan is placed on non-accrual status is either deducted from interest income or written off as a loss.
Second, accruals on interest are discontinued until it becomes certain that both principal and interest can be repaid. Finally, there may be actual losses that require additional provisions for loan losses to be charged against earnings.
Non-performing Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Non-accrual loans
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Accruing loans greater than 90 days past due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to period end loans
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
For a discussion of our accounting policies with respect to the allowance for loan losses, see Critical Accounting Policies Allowance for Loan Losses above.
34
The following table depicts the transactions, in summary form, that occurred to the allowance for loan losses in each
year presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,834
|
|
|
$
|
1,460
|
|
|
$
|
1,084
|
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
$
|
552
|
|
Loans charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Real estate - residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate - commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate - construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans charged off
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Real estate - residential
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate - commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate - construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
Additions charge to operations
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
2,489
|
|
|
$
|
1,834
|
|
|
$
|
1,460
|
|
|
$
|
1,084
|
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
Ratio of new charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding during the period
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
The allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2007 was $2.5 million compared to $1.8 million
at December 31, 2006. The allowance for loan losses was 0.84% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2007 compared to 0.91% at December 31, 2006. The provision for loan losses was $676 thousand for 2007 compared to $404 thousand
for 2006. Net charge-offs were $21 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2007. The portfolio continues to show considerable quality as there were no loans 30 days to 89 days delinquent at December 31, 2007. We have no exposure to
sub-prime loans in the portfolio. Our constructions loans increased 53.7% to $79.1 million at December 31, 2007. Our typical construction borrower is a seasoned builder in the Richmond metropolitan area. No construction loans were contractually
delinquent at December 31, 2007.
The allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2006 was $1.8 million compared to $1.5 million at
December 31, 2005. The provision was $404 thousand for 2006 compared to $408 thousand for 2005. Net charge-offs were $30 for the year 2006.
35
The following table shows the balance and percentage of our allowance for loan losses allocated to each
major category of loan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial & Industrial
|
|
|
Real Estate Mortgage
|
|
|
Real Estate Construction
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
Allowance
for
Loan
Loss
|
|
Percent of
Loan in
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
for
Loan
Loss
|
|
Percent of
Loan in
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
for
Loan
Loss
|
|
Percent of
Loan in
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
for
Loan
Loss
|
|
Percent of
Loan in
Category to
Total Loans
|
|
|
Allowance
for
Loan
Loss
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
14.94
|
%
|
|
$
|
937
|
|
57.03
|
%
|
|
$
|
591
|
|
26.64
|
%
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,489
|
2006
|
|
|
762
|
|
11.22
|
%
|
|
|
633
|
|
62.09
|
%
|
|
|
437
|
|
25.51
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.18
|
%
|
|
|
1,834
|
2005
|
|
|
556
|
|
9.82
|
%
|
|
|
627
|
|
68.88
|
%
|
|
|
275
|
|
20.15
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.15
|
%
|
|
|
1,400
|
2004
|
|
|
453
|
|
12.56
|
%
|
|
|
469
|
|
72.88
|
%
|
|
|
160
|
|
13.18
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
1,084
|
2003
|
|
|
389
|
|
19.65
|
%
|
|
|
280
|
|
69.54
|
%
|
|
|
65
|
|
8.49
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
|
2.32
|
%
|
|
|
736
|
Securities
We account for securities under FASB Statement No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
. We have designated all securities in the investment portfolio as available
for sale as further defined in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements. Available for sale securities are required to be carried on the financial statements at fair value. The unrealized gains or losses, net of deferred income taxes,
are reflected in stockholders equity.
The market value of the available for sale securities at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was
$32.8 million and $38.7 million, respectively. The unrealized loss after tax on the available for sale securities was $36 thousand at December 31, 2007 as compared to $312 thousand at December 31, 2006. The net market value loss at
December 31, 2007 is reflective of market interest rates.
The carrying values of securities available for sale at the dates indicated
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
U.S. Government securities
|
|
$
|
21,501
|
|
$
|
26,705
|
|
$
|
24,687
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
8,418
|
|
|
11,011
|
|
|
13,944
|
State and political subdivision obligations
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
|
990
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,824
|
|
$
|
38,731
|
|
$
|
39,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted equity securities consist primarily of Federal Reserve Bank stock, Federal Home Loan
Bank of Atlanta stock and Community Bankers Bank stock. An increase in stock of the Federal Reserve Bank was due to increased capital at the subsidiary bank. Increase in stock in the FHLB was due to increased borrowing from the FHLB during 2007.
36
Deposits
The following table is a summary of average deposits and average rates paid on those deposits:
Average Deposits and Rates Paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$
|
32,119
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,783
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
29,168
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
|
9,063
|
|
1.06
|
%
|
|
|
6,666
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
|
6,288
|
|
0.49
|
%
|
Savings
|
|
|
883
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
|
|
734
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
1,039
|
|
0.87
|
%
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
44,698
|
|
4.02
|
%
|
|
|
24,829
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
23,612
|
|
1.70
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
131,912
|
|
5.14
|
%
|
|
|
119,838
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
90,336
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,675
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
179,850
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, deposits were $255.1 million, a $60.8 million increase over
December 31, 2006 deposits of $194.3 million. Average deposits increased 21.6% or $38.8 million compared to average deposits for the year ended December 31, 2006. Average money market accounts increased 80.0% or $19.9 million to $44.7
million from $24.8 million for the comparable period of 2006. Average Certificates of deposit grew $12.1 million for the year to $131.9 million.
Deposits increased $31.9 million to $194.3 million at December 31, 2006 from $162.4 million at December 31, 2005. Average deposits for the year ended December 31, 2006 increased 19.6% or $29.4 million compared to average
deposits for the year ended December 31, 2005. Average Certificates of deposits grew $29.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 to $119.8 million.
During 2006, a new money market account was developed resulting in an increase in money market accounts of $8.5 million to $32.1 million at December 31, 2006. Certificate of deposits increased $21.0 million or
21.0% to $121.5 million at December 31, 2006 from $100.5 million at December 31, 2005. Non-interest bearing accounts increased $2.5 million or 8.1% to $32.9 million at year end 2006 as compared to $30.4 million at year end 2005.
The following table is a summary of the maturity distribution of certificates of deposit equal to or greater than $100,000 as of
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of Certificates of Deposit of $100,000 and Greater
|
|
|
|
Within
Three
Months
|
|
Three to
Twelve
Months
|
|
Over
One
Year
|
|
Total
|
|
Percent
of Total
Deposits
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
14,140
|
|
$
|
33,050
|
|
$
|
21,348
|
|
$
|
68,538
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
37
Borrowings
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, our borrowings and the related weighted average interest rate were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
$
|
9,261
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,026
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,270
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
3.11
|
%
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
|
|
680
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
6.59
|
%
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
6.86
|
%
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
6.33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
58,519
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,848
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased have been a source of funds for the bank. We have various lines of credit
available from certain of our correspondent banks in the aggregate amount of $20.5 million. These lines of credit, which bear interest at prevailing market rates, permit us to borrow funds in the overnight market, and are renewable annually.
Advances from the FHLB constitute convertible advances with contractual maturities of five to ten years. All convertible advances have a call option remaining of various terms.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
The most important element of asset/liability management is the monitoring
of the Companys sensitivity to interest rate movements. The income stream of the Company is subject to risk resulting from interest rate fluctuations to the extent there is a difference between the amount of the Companys interest earning
assets and the amount of interest bearing liabilities that are prepaid, mature or repriced in specific periods. Our goal is to maximize net interest income within acceptable levels of risk to changes in interest rates. We seek to meet this goal by
influencing the maturity and re-pricing characteristics of the various lending and deposit taking lines of business and by managing discretionary balance sheet asset and liability portfolios.
We monitor interest rate levels on a daily basis and meets in the form of the Asset/Liability Sub-Committee. The following reports and/or tools are used
to assess the current interest rate environment and its impact on our earnings and liquidity: monthly and year to date net interest margin and spread calculations, monthly and year to date balance sheet and income statements versus budget, quarterly
net portfolio value analysis, a weekly survey of rates offered by other local competitive institutions and GAP analysis (matching maturities or repricing dates of interest sensitive assets to those of interest sensitive liabilities by periods) and a
Risk Manager model used to measure earnings at risk and economic value of equity at risk.
The data in the following table reflects
repricing or expected maturities of various assets and liabilities. The gap analysis represents the difference between interest-sensitive assets and liabilities in a specific time interval. Interest sensitivity gap analysis presents a position that
existed at one particular point in time, and assumes that assets and liabilities with similar repricing characteristics will reprice at the same time and to the same degree.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1 to 90
Days
|
|
|
90 Days
to 1 Year
|
|
|
1 to 3
Years
|
|
|
3 to 5
Years
|
|
|
Over 5
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans
|
|
$
|
126,819
|
|
|
$
|
17,069
|
|
|
$
|
54,039
|
|
|
$
|
67,613
|
|
|
$
|
31,365
|
|
|
$
|
296,905
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
3,691
|
|
|
|
10,604
|
|
|
|
9,752
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
8,278
|
|
|
|
32,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rate sensitive assets
|
|
$
|
130,510
|
|
|
$
|
27,673
|
|
|
$
|
63,791
|
|
|
$
|
68,113
|
|
|
$
|
39,643
|
|
|
$
|
329,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative totals
|
|
|
130,510
|
|
|
|
158,183
|
|
|
|
221,974
|
|
|
|
290,087
|
|
|
|
329,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest checking
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,710
|
|
|
$
|
4,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,210
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
30,563
|
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
5,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,704
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
36,422
|
|
|
|
75,626
|
|
|
|
26,888
|
|
|
|
19,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,924
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
9,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,261
|
FHLB borrowing and subordinated debt
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,155
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total rate sensitive liabilities
|
|
$
|
83,504
|
|
|
$
|
118,536
|
|
|
$
|
55,057
|
|
|
$
|
19,988
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
277,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative totals
|
|
|
83,504
|
|
|
|
202,040
|
|
|
|
257,097
|
|
|
|
277,085
|
|
|
|
277,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest sensitivity gap
|
|
$
|
47,006
|
|
|
($
|
90,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,734
|
|
|
$
|
48,125
|
|
|
$
|
39,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest sensitivity gap
|
|
|
47,006
|
|
|
|
(43,857
|
)
|
|
|
(35,123
|
)
|
|
|
13,002
|
|
|
|
52,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest sensitive gap as a percentage of earning assets
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
-13.3
|
%
|
|
|
-10.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Resources and Dividends
We have an ongoing strategic objective of maintaining a capital base that supports the pursuit of profitable business opportunities, provides resources to
absorb risk inherent in our activities and meets or exceeds all regulatory requirements.
The Federal Reserve Board has established minimum
regulatory capital standards for bank holding companies and state member banks. The regulatory capital standards categorize assets and off-balance sheet items into four categories that weight balance sheet assets according to risk, requiring more
capital for holding higher risk assets. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, our Tier 1 leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital to average total assets) was 12.50% and 8.80% respectively. Tier 1 risk based capital ratios at December 31, 2007 and 2006
were 12.98% and 10.39% respectively. Total risk based capital to risk weighted assets at December 31, 2007 and 2006 were 14.44% and 12.28%. Our capital structure exceeds regulatory guidelines established for well capitalized institutions, which
affords us the opportunity to take advantage of business opportunities while ensuring that we have the resources to protect against risk inherent in our business.
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Tier 1 capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$
|
11,885
|
|
|
$
|
7,184
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
23,011
|
|
|
|
8,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
34,896
|
|
|
|
15,970
|
|
Trust preferred debt
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tier 1 capital
|
|
|
40,051
|
|
|
|
21,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 2 capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
1,834
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tier 2 capital
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
44,540
|
|
|
$
|
24,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
308,511
|
|
|
$
|
203,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio
|
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.80
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk based capital
|
|
|
12.98
|
|
|
|
10.39
|
|
Total risk based capital
|
|
|
14.44
|
|
|
|
12.28
|
|
Liquidity
Liquidity represents an institutions ability to meet present and future financial obligations through either the sale or maturity of existing assets or the acquisition of additional funds through liability
management. Liquid assets include cash, interest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold, short-term investments, securities classified as available for sale as well as loans and securities maturing within one year. As a result of our
management of liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes we maintain overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy our depositors requirements and meet our clients credit needs.
We also maintain additional sources of liquidity through a variety of borrowing arrangements. The bank maintains federal funds lines with
a large regional money-center banking institution and a local community bankers bank. These available lines currently total approximately $19.5 million, of which $9.3 was outstanding at December 31, 2007. In addition, securities have been
pledged to the local community bankers bank allowing for an additional line of approximately $5.0 million.
We have a credit line at the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta in the amount of approximately $42.0 million which may be utilized for short and/or long-term borrowing. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank totaled $40.0 million at December 31, 2007.
At December 31, 2007, cash, federal funds sold, short-term investments, securities available for pledge or sale were 12.2% of total deposits. At
December 31, 2006, cash, federal funds sold, short-term investments, securities available for pledge or sale were 17.3% of total deposits.
40
ITEM 7.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
The following 2007
Financial Statements of First Capital Bancorp, Inc. are included after the signature pages to this Report on Form 10-KSB:
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition December 31, 2007 and 2006
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the last fiscal year.
ITEM 8A.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Management of the
Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys internal control over financial reporting is
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of the Companys financial reporting and the preparation of published financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework
. Based on managements assessment, management believes that as of December 31, 2007, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting was effective based on criteria set forth by COSO in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework
.
This annual report does not
include an attestation report of the Companys registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by the Companys registered public accounting
firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only managements report in this annual report.
ITEM 8B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None
41
PART III
ITEM 9.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
|
Audit Committee Financial Expert
.
The applicable information contained in the section captioned Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors
Audit Committee in the definitive proxy statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 21, 2008 (the Proxy Statement) is incorporated herein by reference.
Code of Ethics
.
The Bank has adopted (i) A Bankers Professional Code of Ethics, and (ii) a Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest, both
of which are applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller. The codes are filed as exhibits to this Report on Form 10-KSB.
The information contained under the section captioned Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors in the Proxy Statement is incorporated
herein by reference.
Additional information concerning executive officers is included in the Proxy Statement in the section captioned
Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors - Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.
ITEM 10.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
|
The information
contained in the section captioned Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors Executive Compensation in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
|
|
(a)
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
|
Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned Voting Securities and Principal Stockholders in the Proxy Statement.
|
(b)
|
Security Ownership of Management
|
Information required by
this item is incorporated herein by reference to the chart in the section captioned Voting Securities and Principal Stockholders in the Proxy Statement.
|
(c)
|
Management of First Capital Bancorp, Inc. knows of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person of securities of the First Capital Bancorp, Inc., the operation of which may
at a subsequent date result in a change in control of First Capital Bancorp, Inc.
|
ITEM 12.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
|
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned Proposal No. 1 - Election of Directors Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in the Proxy Statement.
42
The following exhibits are filed
as part of this Form 10-KSB.
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as of September 5, 2006, by and between First Capital Bancorp, inc. and First Capital Bank.
1
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of First Capital Bancorp, Inc.
2
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of First Capital Bancorp, Inc.
3
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of First Capital Bancorp, Inc.
4
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
2000 Stock Option Plan (formerly First Capital Bank 2000 Stock Option Plan).
5
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Employment Agreement dated December 20, 2000, between First Capital Bank and Robert G. Watts, Jr.
5
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement dated September 15, 2006 between First Capital Bank and William W. Ranson
|
|
|
24
|
|
Power of Attorney included on signature page
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
List of Subsidiaries.
4
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Robert G. Watts, Jr., Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 21, 2007
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of William W. Ranson, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated March 21, 2007
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
A Bankers Professional Code of Ethics as adopted by First Capital Bank
6
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest as adopted by First Capital Bank
6
|
1
|
Expressly incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K12g-3 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 12, 2006. The Exhibit numbers set forth above correspond to the Exhibit numbers in the Form 8-K12g-3.
|
43
2
|
Expressly incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants report on Form 10-QSB filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2006. The Exhibit number set forth above corresponds to the Exhibit number in the Form 10-QSB.
|
3
|
Expressly incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2007. The Exhibit numbers set forth above correspond to the Exhibit numbers in the Form 8-K.
|
4
|
Expressly incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2007. The Exhibit number set forth above corresponds to the Exhibit number in the Form SB-2.
|
5
|
Expressly incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on
Form SB-2 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 26, 2007. The Exhibit number set forth above corresponds to the Exhibit number in the Amendment No. 1.
|
6
|
Expressly incorporated herein by reference from the Registrants Report on Form 10-KSB/A filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2007. The Exhibit number set forth above corresponds to the Exhibit number in the Form 10-KSB/A.
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
|
The
information contained in the sections captioned 2007 Audit Committee Report and Proposal No. 3 Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by
reference.
Exhibits to Form 10-KSB; Financial Information
A copy of any of the exhibits to this Report on Form 10-KSB and copies of any published annual or quarterly reports will be furnished without charge to the stockholders as of the record date, upon written request to
William W. Ranson, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, 4222 Cox Road, Suite 200, Glen Allen, Virginia 23060.
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
1700 Bayberry Court, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23226-3791
General and SEC Counsel
Cantor Arkema, P.C.
1111 East Main Street, Richmond, VA 23218-0561
Annual Stockholders Meeting
The Annual Meeting of stockholders will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 at the Comfort Suites, 4051 Innslake Drive, Glen Allen, Virginia in Innsbrook.
44
SIGNATURE
The undersigned hereby appoint William W. Ranson and Robert G. Watts, Jr., and each of them, as
attorneys and agents for the undersigned, with full power of substitution, for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, to sign and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
any and all exhibits and amendments to this 10-KSB, and any and all instruments and other documents to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to this 10-KSB, with full power and authority to do and perform any and all acts
and things whatsoever requisite or desirable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIRST CAPITAL BANCORP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Watts, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Watts, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant, in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert G. Watts, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert G. Watts, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William W. Ranson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William W. Ranson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and CFO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ P. C. Amin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. C. Amin, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gerald Blake
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald Blake, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 26, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Grant S. Grayson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant S. Grayson, Director
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Yancey S. Jones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yancey S. Jones, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March , 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jay M. Weinberg, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph C. Stiles, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph C. Stiles, Jr., Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard W. Wright
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard W. Wright, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gerald H. Yospin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald H. Yospin, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Debra L. Richardson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debra L. Richardson, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
March 19, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kamlesh N. Dave, Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kamlesh N. Dave, Director
|
46
FIRST CAPITAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006
FIRST CAPITAL BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Contents
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
And Stockholders
First Capital Bancorp, Inc.
Richmond, Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements
of financial condition of First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash
flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial condition of First Capital
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
|
|
|
Richmond, Virginia
|
March 26, 2008
|
F-2
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
16,779,538
|
|
|
$
|
7,034,047
|
|
Short term debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,997,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
16,779,538
|
|
|
|
12,032,026
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
32,824,537
|
|
|
|
38,730,975
|
|
Restricted, at cost
|
|
|
3,183,739
|
|
|
|
2,389,139
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for losses
|
|
|
294,234,285
|
|
|
|
199,751,483
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,077,820
|
|
|
|
2,119,379
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,807,939
|
|
|
|
1,425,364
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
319,097
|
|
|
|
308,503
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
640,013
|
|
|
|
483,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
351,866,968
|
|
|
$
|
257,240,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
36,541,568
|
|
|
$
|
32,878,408
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
218,566,755
|
|
|
|
161,424,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
255,108,323
|
|
|
|
194,302,435
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
3,380,648
|
|
|
|
2,431,031
|
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,102,939
|
|
|
|
1,667,064
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
9,261,000
|
|
|
|
6,026,000
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
7,155,000
|
|
|
|
7,155,000
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
40,000,000
|
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
317,007,910
|
|
|
|
241,581,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $4.00 par value (authorized 5,000,000shares; shares issued and outstanding, 2,971,171and 1,796,021 at December 31, 2007 and
2006 respectively)
|
|
|
11,884,684
|
|
|
|
7,184,084
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
18,492,528
|
|
|
|
6,010,352
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
4,518,278
|
|
|
|
2,776,277
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
(36,432
|
)
|
|
|
(311,598
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
34,859,058
|
|
|
|
15,659,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
351,866,968
|
|
|
$
|
257,240,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
18,361,582
|
|
$
|
13,262,936
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable interest income
|
|
|
1,543,005
|
|
|
1,646,071
|
Tax exempt interest income
|
|
|
40,715
|
|
|
41,055
|
Dividends
|
|
|
144,553
|
|
|
115,054
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
266,369
|
|
|
198,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
20,356,224
|
|
|
15,263,429
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
8,690,449
|
|
|
6,303,839
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
1,213,239
|
|
|
1,020,170
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
78,896
|
|
|
93,959
|
Subordinated debt and other borrowed money
|
|
|
580,622
|
|
|
273,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
10,563,206
|
|
|
7,691,218
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
9,793,018
|
|
|
7,572,211
|
Provision for loan loss
|
|
|
675,700
|
|
|
404,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan loss
|
|
|
9,117,318
|
|
|
7,167,911
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees on deposits
|
|
|
220,811
|
|
|
166,392
|
Fees on mortgage loans
|
|
|
157,740
|
|
|
34,135
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
29,271
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
401,288
|
|
|
264,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
809,110
|
|
|
464,827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
3,812,216
|
|
|
2,606,344
|
Occupancy expense
|
|
|
739,600
|
|
|
601,684
|
Data processing
|
|
|
526,938
|
|
|
427,599
|
Professional services
|
|
|
172,094
|
|
|
147,890
|
Advertising and marketing
|
|
|
195,247
|
|
|
81,830
|
FDIC assessment
|
|
|
159,638
|
|
|
21,653
|
Virginia capital stock tax
|
|
|
296,000
|
|
|
184,425
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
342,538
|
|
|
323,020
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,015,256
|
|
|
866,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
7,259,527
|
|
|
5,260,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,666,901
|
|
|
2,372,219
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
924,900
|
|
|
801,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,742,001
|
|
$
|
1,571,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive
Income
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
|
|
Balance January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
7,184,084
|
|
$
|
6,004,655
|
|
|
$
|
1,205,058
|
|
($
|
424,183
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,969,614
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,571,219
|
|
|
1,571,219
|
|
|
|
1,571,219
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain arising during period, (net of tax, $57,998)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,585
|
|
|
|
112,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,683,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
7,184,084
|
|
$
|
6,010,352
|
|
|
$
|
2,776,277
|
|
$
|
(311,598
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,659,115
|
|
Stock offering
|
|
|
4,691,600
|
|
|
13,781,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,473,175
|
|
Cost associated with stock offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,396,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,396,330
|
)
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,742,001
|
|
|
1,742,001
|
|
|
|
1,742,001
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain arising during period, (net of tax, $141,752)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,166
|
|
|
|
275,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,017,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
11,884,684
|
|
$
|
18,492,528
|
|
|
$
|
4,518,278
|
|
($
|
36,432
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,859,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,742,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,571,219
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
675,700
|
|
|
|
404,300
|
|
Depreciation of premises and equipment
|
|
|
342,538
|
|
|
|
323,020
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
|
|
81,931
|
|
|
|
5,697
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(152,347
|
)
|
|
|
(94,626
|
)
|
Net amortization of bond premiums/discounts
|
|
|
12,788
|
|
|
|
31,587
|
|
Reduction in equity in VBA Investment Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
(29,271
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other assets
|
|
|
(156,238
|
)
|
|
|
(155,210
|
)
|
Increase in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(382,575
|
)
|
|
|
(324,477
|
)
|
Increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
949,617
|
|
|
|
209,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,084,144
|
|
|
|
1,972,990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
3,040,000
|
|
Proceeds from paydowns of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
2,692,805
|
|
|
|
2,981,939
|
|
Purchase of Federal Reserve Stock
|
|
|
(300,900
|
)
|
|
|
(141,000
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
3,003,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(7,356,245
|
)
|
|
|
(4,992,500
|
)
|
Purchase of FHLB Stock
|
|
|
(493,700
|
)
|
|
|
(653,800
|
)
|
Purchase securities in FCRV Statutory Trust 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155,000
|
)
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(300,979
|
)
|
|
|
(460,717
|
)
|
Net increase in loans
|
|
|
(95,158,502
|
)
|
|
|
(45,554,265
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(89,914,240
|
)
|
|
|
(45,935,343
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in demand, savings and money market accounts
|
|
|
23,382,162
|
|
|
|
10,867,625
|
|
Net increase in certificates of deposit
|
|
|
37,423,726
|
|
|
|
21,047,258
|
|
Stock offering proceeds, net of related expenses
|
|
|
17,076,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
20,000,000
|
|
|
|
12,000,000
|
|
FHLB advances called
|
|
|
(10,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Junior Subordinated Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,155,000
|
|
Increase (decrease) in Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
3,235,000
|
|
|
|
(4,244,000
|
)
|
Net increase in repurchase agreements
|
|
|
435,875
|
|
|
|
986,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
91,577,608
|
|
|
|
45,812,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,747,512
|
|
|
|
1,850,403
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
12,032,026
|
|
|
|
10,181,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
16,779,538
|
|
|
$
|
12,032,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid during the period
|
|
$
|
10,583,123
|
|
|
$
|
7,591,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes paid during the period
|
|
$
|
1,233,533
|
|
|
$
|
1,304,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1 - Summary
of significant accounting policies
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) is the holding company of and successor to First Capital Bank
(the Bank). Effective September 8 , 2006, the Company acquired all of the outstanding stock of the Bank in a statutory share exchange transaction (the Share Exchange) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization
dated September 5, 2006, between the Company and the Bank (the Agreement). The Agreement was approved by the shareholders of the Bank at the annual meeting of shareholders held on May 16, 2006. Under the terms of the Agreement,
the shares of the Banks common stock were exchanged for shares of the Companys common stock, par value $4.00 per share, on a one-for-one basis. As a result, the Bank became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, the Company became the
holding company of the Bank and the shareholders of the Bank became shareholders of the Company. All references to the Company in this annual report for dates or periods prior to September 8, 2006 are references to the Bank.
The Company conducts all of its business activities through the branch offices of its wholly owned subsidiary bank, First Capital Bank. The Company exists primarily for
the purpose of holding the stock of its subsidiary, the Bank, and such other subsidiaries as it may acquire or establish.
The accounting and reporting
policies of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general practices within the financial services industry. The following is a summary of the more
significant of these policies.
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and
its wholly owned subsidiary. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Use of estimates
- The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses. The estimation process may
include management obtaining independent appraisals for significant collateral properties, but the ultimate collectibility and recovery of carrying amounts are susceptible to changes in the local real estate market and other local economic
conditions.
Management uses available information to recognize losses on loans; future additions to the allowances may be necessary based on changes in
local economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Banks allowance for losses on loans. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the
allowances based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. Because of these factors, it is reasonably possible that the allowance for losses on loans may change in the near term.
Cash equivalents
- Cash equivalents include short-term highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase, including
Federal funds sold.
Securities - Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, requires certain securities to be classified as held to maturity, trading or available-for-sale, according to managements intent and ability, at the time of purchase.
F-7
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
Debt securities that are purchased with the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity or call date are classified as held-to-maturity. They are carried and reported
at amortized cost. The amortization of premium and accretion of discount are recognized as adjustments to interest income using the interest method.
Debt
and equity securities classified as available-for-sale are those needed to meet liquidity needs, provide portfolio restructuring, or to minimize interest rate market risk. They are carried at their market value, with unrealized gains and losses
excluded from income and reported net of tax effect as a separate component of stockholders equity.
Debt and equity securities that are bought and
held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities.
The Company as a matter of policy does not trade
securities and therefore does not classify any of its securities as such. Realized gains and losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities are determined using the specific-identification method and recognized on a trade-date basis. Premiums
and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the period to maturity or to call dates.
Due to the nature of, and
restrictions placed upon the Companys common stock investment in the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and Community Bankers Bank, these securities have been classified as restricted equity securities and carried at cost.
These restricted securities are not subject to the investment security classifications of SFAS 115.
Loans and allowances for loan losses
- Loans
are concentrated to borrowers in the Richmond metropolitan area and are stated at the amount of unpaid principal reduced by an allowance for loan losses. Interest on loans is calculated by using the simple interest method on daily balances on the
principal amount outstanding. The accrual of interest on loans is discontinued when, in the opinion of management, there is an indication that the borrower may be unable to meet payments as they become due. The Company defers loan origination and
commitment fees, net of certain direct loan origination costs, and the net deferred fees are amortized into interest income over the lives of the related loans as yield adjustments.
Loans that are 90 days or more past due are individually reviewed for ultimate collectibility. Interest determined to be uncollectible on loans that are contractually past due is charged off, or an allowance is
established based on managements periodic evaluation. The allowance is established by a charge to interest income equal to all interest previously accrued, and income is subsequently recognized only to the extent that cash payments are
received until, in managements judgment, the borrowers ability to make periodic interest and principal payments is returned to normal, in which case the loan is returned to accrual status.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered by management to be adequate to absorb known and expected loan losses currently inherent in the loan
portfolio. Managements assessment of the adequacy of the allowance is based upon type and volume of the loan portfolio, existing and anticipated economic conditions, and other factors which deserve current recognition in estimating loan
losses. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense, and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Managements assessment of the adequacy of the allowance is subject to evaluation and adjustment by
the Banks regulators.
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of
a Loan. A loan is defined as impaired when, based on current information and events, it is
F-8
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1 - Summary of significant accounting policies (continued)
probable that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts of principal and interest due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impairment is
measured either by discounting the expected future cash flows at the loans effective interest rate, based on the net realizable value of the collateral or based upon an observable market price where applicable.
Bank premises and equipment
- Company premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of Company premises and equipment is
computed on the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 10 to 50 years for premises and 5 to 20 years for equipment, furniture and fixtures. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred and major improvements are
capitalized. Upon sale or retirement of depreciable properties, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are netted against the proceeds and any resulting gain or loss is included in the determination of income.
Income taxes
- Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for
the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income tax expense in the period that includes the enactment date.
Advertising costs -
Advertising costs are expensed in the period they are incurred and amounted to $195,247 and $81,830 for December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
Stock Based Compensation
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
, which encouraged companies to recognize expense for stock-based awards based on their estimated value on the date of grant.
SFAS 123 permitted companies to account for stock-based compensation based on provisions prescribed in SFAS 123, or based on the authoritative guidance in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25),
Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees
. The Bank elected to account for its stock-based compensation in accordance with APB 25, which used the intrinsic value method; however, as required by SFAS 123, the Bank disclosed the pro forma impact on the financial
statements assuming the measurement provisions of SFAS 123 had been adopted.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123R,
Shared-Based
Payment
(SFAS 123R). SFAS 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock Based Compensation
, supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 and amends FASB Statement No. 95,
Statement of Cash Flows
. SFAS 123R
eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation using APB Opinion No. 25 and requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as compensation in the financial
statements using a fair value-based method. SFAS 123R is effective for nonpublic companies as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after December 15, 2005. SFAS 123R was adopted by the Bank beginning with the year
ended December 31, 2006.
SFAS 123R requires public companies to adopt the recognition requirements using either a modified prospective
method or a modified retrospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginning with the effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all
shared-based payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R. Under the modified retrospective method, the requirements are the same as
under the modified prospective method, but also permits entities to restate financial statements of previous periods based on pro forma
F-9
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 1 - Summary of significant accounting policies (concluded)
disclosures made in accordance with SFAS 123.
The Bank adopted SFAS 123R
under the modified prospective method effective January 1, 2006. The Bank has begun to recognize compensation expense for options that have been issued but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006. In addition, options issued after
January 1, 2006 will increase compensation expense for 2006 and afterward. In December 2005, the Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of all unvested stock options outstanding prior to December 31, 2005. The Board agreed
to accelerate the vesting of options in order to eliminate the recognition of compensation expense associated with the affected unvested options under SFAS No. 123R. Management determined that the acceleration of vesting did not represent a
renewal or extension which increased the life of the stock options as contemplated by FIN 44,
Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation
and consequently did not result in a new measurement date for purposes of
determining compensation expense. Options that were granted during 2007 and 2006 resulted in additional compensation expense of $81,931. Future levels of compensation cost recognized related to share-based compensation awards may be impacted by new
awards and/or modification, repurchases and cancellations of existing awards after the adoption of this standard.
Comprehensive income
SFAS
No. 130
, Reporting Comprehensive Income
, requires the Company to classify items of Other Comprehensive Income (such as net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities) by their nature in a financial statement
and present the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of a statement of financial position. The Companys other comprehensive income consists of
net income and net unrealized gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale, net on income taxes.
Reclassification -
Certain reclassifications
have been made in the prior years financial statements to conform to the 2007 presentation.
Note 2 Restrictions of cash
To comply with Federal Reserve regulations, the Company is required to maintain certain average cash reserve balances. The daily average cash reserve requirements were
approximately $1,053,000 for the week including December 31, 2007 and $739,000 for the week including December 31, 2006.
Note 3
Investment Securities
The amortized costs, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair values for securities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Values
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
21,455,876
|
|
$
|
50,543
|
|
$
|
5,590
|
|
$
|
21,500,829
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
8,493,006
|
|
|
27,725
|
|
|
102,396
|
|
|
8,418,335
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
1,921,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,722
|
|
|
1,895,125
|
Tax-exempt municipal bonds
|
|
|
1,008,492
|
|
|
3,495
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
1,010,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,879,221
|
|
$
|
81,763
|
|
$
|
136,447
|
|
$
|
32,824,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-10
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 3 Investment Securities (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
Gross Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
Gains
|
|
Losses
|
|
Values
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
26,976,555
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
271,398
|
|
$
|
26,705,157
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
11,214,822
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
|
209,881
|
|
|
11,010,442
|
Tax-exempt municipal bonds
|
|
|
1,011,202
|
|
|
4,790
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
1,015,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,202,579
|
|
$
|
10,291
|
|
$
|
481,895
|
|
$
|
38,730,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost, weighted average yield and estimated fair value of debt securities at December 31, 2007,
by contractual maturity, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
10,105,844
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,100,416
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
10,239,183
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
10,251,288
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
3,889,142
|
|
5.41
|
%
|
|
|
3,891,688
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
8,645,052
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
8,581,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,879,221
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
$
|
32,824,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table details unrealized losses and related fair values in the Companys available-for-sale
investment securities portfolios. All unrealized losses on investment securities are a result of volatility in the market during 2007 and 2006. At December 31, 2007 there were 20 out of 33 mortgage-backed securities with fair values less than
amortized cost. All unrealized losses are considered by management to be temporary given investment security credit ratings, the short duration of the unrealized losses and the intent to hold debt securities in an unrealized loss position greater
than twelve months for the foreseeable future. This information is aggregated by investment category and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
1,497,656
|
|
$
|
2,344
|
|
$
|
3,996,875
|
|
$
|
3,246
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
800,420
|
|
|
2,623
|
|
|
5,292,179
|
|
|
99,773
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
1,895,125
|
|
|
26,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt municipal bonds
|
|
|
459,741
|
|
|
1,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,652,942
|
|
$
|
33,428
|
|
$
|
9,289,054
|
|
$
|
103,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 3 Investment Securities (concluded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
4,981,250
|
|
$
|
11,358
|
|
$
|
21,723,907
|
|
$
|
260,040
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
514,282
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
9,221,048
|
|
|
209,080
|
Tax-exempt municipal bonds
|
|
|
174,386
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,669,918
|
|
$
|
12,775
|
|
$
|
30,944,955
|
|
$
|
469,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains on the sale of available-for-sale securities of $29,271 were realized in the fourth quarter
of 2007.
Restricted equity securities consist of Federal Reserve Bank stock in the amount of $831,600 and $530,700, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta
stock in the amount of $2,262,800 and $1,769,100, and Community Bankers Bank stock in the amount of $62,750 and $62,750 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006. Restricted equity securities are carried at cost. The Federal Home Loan Bank requires the
Bank to maintain stock in an amount equal to 4.5% of outstanding borrowings and a specific percentage of the members total assets. The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond requires the Company to maintain stock with a par value equal to 3% of its
outstanding capital.
The remainder of restricted securities consists of investments in Limited Liability Companies that provide title insurance and
investment services to the Banks customers. Investment in these Limited Liability Companies was $26,589 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Securities with a market value of approximately $18,581,700 and $17,235,900 were pledged as collateral at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively to secure purchases of federal funds, repurchase agreements, collateral for
customers deposits and collateral to secure public deposits.
Note 4 Loans
Major classifications of loans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
Amount
|
|
2006
Amount
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
44,366,926
|
|
$
|
22,619,140
|
Real estate - residential
|
|
|
83,035,119
|
|
|
62,165,461
|
Real estate - commercial
|
|
|
86,301,455
|
|
|
63,062,146
|
Real estate - construction
|
|
|
79,095,777
|
|
|
51,449,972
|
Consumer
|
|
|
4,105,713
|
|
|
2,387,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
296,904,990
|
|
|
201,684,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,489,066
|
|
|
1,833,604
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
181,639
|
|
|
98,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
294,234,285
|
|
$
|
199,751,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-12
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 4 Loans (concluded)
A summary of the transactions affecting the allowance for loan losses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,833,604
|
|
|
$
|
1,460,230
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
675,700
|
|
|
|
404,300
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
3,584
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(23,822
|
)
|
|
|
(31,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
2,489,066
|
|
|
$
|
1,833,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Impaired loans with related allowance
|
|
$
|
800,139
|
|
$
|
862,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance on impaired loans
|
|
$
|
718,572
|
|
$
|
718,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of impaired loans
|
|
$
|
784,876
|
|
$
|
873,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized and collected on impaired loans
|
|
$
|
73,004
|
|
$
|
72,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans. Nonaccrual loans excluded from
impaired loan disclosure under SFAS 114 amounted to $50,000 and $120,000 at December 31, 2007 and 2006. If interest on these loans had been accrued such income would have approximated $4,014 and $7,090, respectively. Excluding the nonaccrual
loan, there were no loans past due 90 days or more at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Note 5 - Premises and equipment
Major classifications of these assets are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Land
|
|
$
|
228,005
|
|
$
|
228,005
|
Building
|
|
|
719,434
|
|
|
719,434
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
1,832,126
|
|
|
1,581,005
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
711,598
|
|
|
661,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,491,163
|
|
|
3,190,183
|
Less acculumated depreciation
|
|
|
1,413,343
|
|
|
1,070,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,077,820
|
|
$
|
2,119,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 5 - Premises and equipment (concluded)
Accumulated depreciation and amortization at December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Building
|
|
$
|
41,506
|
|
$
|
23,059
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
1,040,196
|
|
|
816,190
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
331,641
|
|
|
231,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,413,343
|
|
$
|
1,070,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain Company premises and equipment are leased under various operating leases. Rental expense was $637,426 and
$507,391 in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Future minimum payments, by year and in the aggregate for operating leases with initial or remaining terms in
excess of one year as of December 31, 2007 including leases entered into in 2008 for a future branch are as follows:
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
677,617
|
2009
|
|
|
620,975
|
2010
|
|
|
630,362
|
2011
|
|
|
619,528
|
2012
|
|
|
436,091
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
718,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,703,160
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 - Deposits
Major categories of deposits at December 31, 2007 and 2006 follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Average
Rate
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$
|
36,541,568
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
32,878,408
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market and NOW accounts
|
|
|
59,642,568
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
|
39,923,566
|
|
2.56
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $100,000
|
|
|
90,385,934
|
|
5.04
|
%
|
|
|
68,623,426
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
Greater than $100,000
|
|
|
68,538,253
|
|
5.08
|
%
|
|
|
52,877,035
|
|
5.10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
255,108,323
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,302,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 6 Deposits (concluded)
Time deposits will mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
112,059,778
|
2009
|
|
|
11,477,997
|
2010
|
|
|
15,510,218
|
2011
|
|
|
7,694,870
|
2012
|
|
|
12,181,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
158,924,187
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amount of deposits exceeding $100,000 was $130,187,905 and $96,841,976 at December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
The Bank classifies deposit overdrafts as other consumer loans which totaled $415 thousand at December 31, 2007 and $64 thousand
at December 31, 2006.
In the normal course of business, the Company has received deposits from directors and executive officers. At December 31,
2007 and 2006, deposits from directors and executive officers were approximately $12.4 million and $11.9 million. All such deposits were received in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms and conditions, including interest
rates, as those prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons.
Note 7 FHLB advances, securities sold under
repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased
The Company uses both short-term and long-term borrowings to supplement deposits when they are
available at a lower overall cost to the Company or they can be invested at a positive rate of return.
As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Atlanta, the Company is required to own capital stock in the FHLB and is authorized to apply for advances from the FHLB. Each FHLB credit program has its own interest rate, which may be fixed or variable, and range of maturities. The FHLB advances
are secured by the pledge of FHLB stock and a blanket lien on qualified 1 to 4 family residential real estate loans and a blanket lien on qualified commercial mortgages.
Advances from the FHLB at December 31, 2007 consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advance
Amount
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Call
Provision
|
$
|
5,000,000
|
|
3.95
|
%
|
|
4/13/2015
|
|
4/14/2008
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
8/27/2012
|
|
8/27/2008
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
9/28/2012
|
|
9/28/2008
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
4.50
|
%
|
|
12/1/2011
|
|
12/1/2008
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
12/6/2017
|
|
12/8/2008
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
4.27
|
%
|
|
1/27/2016
|
|
1/27/2009
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
3/6/2012
|
|
3/6/2009
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
3.71
|
%
|
|
6/24/2015
|
|
6/24/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,000,000
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 7 FHLB advances, securities sold under repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased (concluded)
Aggregate annual maturities of FHLB advances (based on final maturity dates) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
5,000,000
|
2012
|
|
|
15,000,000
|
2015
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
2016
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
2017
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank has outstanding securities sold under repurchase agreements. These agreements are generally corporate
cash management accounts for the Banks larger corporate depositors. These agreements are settled on a daily basis and the securities underlying the agreements remain under the Banks control.
The Company uses federal funds purchased for short-term borrowing needs. Federal funds purchased represent unsecured and borrowings secured with securities from other
banks and generally mature daily.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Maximum outstanding during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
$
|
46,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
39,000,000
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
16,375,000
|
|
|
|
14,716,000
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,696,401
|
|
|
|
3,090,798
|
|
Balance outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
40,000,000
|
|
|
|
30,000,000
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
9,261,000
|
|
|
|
6,026,000
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,102,939
|
|
|
|
1,667,064
|
|
Average amount outstanding during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
28,704,110
|
|
|
|
25,871,233
|
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
1,574,501
|
|
|
|
1,861,260
|
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
1,940,445
|
|
|
|
1,060,508
|
|
Average interest rate during the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
|
|
5.05
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
4.33
|
%
|
Average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
3.94
|
%
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
1.88
|
%
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
3.11
|
%
|
|
|
4.83
|
%
|
F-16
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 8 Subordinated debt
On December 15, 2005, $2.0 million of subordinated debt was issued through a pooled underwriting. The securities have a fixed rate for five years and is payable quarterly. The interest rate at December 31,
2007 was 6.33%. The securities may be redeemed at par beginning December 2010 and each quarter after such date until the securities mature on December 31, 2015.
The Subordinated Debt may be included in Tier 2 capital for regulatory capital adequacy determination purposes up to 50% of Tier 1 capital.
Note 9 Trust Preferred Securities
On September 9, 2006, FCRV Statutory Trust (the Trust), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was formed for the purpose of issuing redeemable capital securities. On September 21, 2006, $5,155,000 of Trust Preferred Capital Notes were issued through a pooled underwriting. The Trust issued $155,000
in common equity to the Company. The securities have a LIBOR-indexed floating rate of interest (three-month LIBOR plus 1.70%) which adjusts, and is payable quarterly. The interest rate at December 31, 2007 was 6.69%. The securities may be
redeemed at par beginning on September 15, 2011 and each quarter after such date until the securities mature on September 15, 2036. The principal asset of the Trust is $5,155,000 of the Companys junior subordinated debt securities
with like maturities and like interest rates to the Trust Preferred Capital Notes.
The trust preferred securities issued by the Company may be included in
Tier 1 capital for regulatory adequacy determination purposes up to 25% of Tier 1 capital after its inclusion. The portion of the trust preferred securities, not considered as Tier 1 capital, may be included in Tier 2 capital.
The obligations of the Company with respect to the issuance of the Trust Preferred Capital Notes constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by the Company of the
Trusts obligations with respect to the Trust Preferred Capital Notes. Subject to certain exceptions and limitations, the Company may elect from time to time to defer interest payments on the junior subordinated debt securities, which would
result in a deferral of distribution payments on the related Trust Preferred Capital Notes and require a deferral of common dividends.
Pursuant of FASB
Interpretation No. 46R, the Company does not consolidate the Trust.
F-17
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 10 - Income taxes
In 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income
taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 also prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be taken in an enterprises tax return. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. Accordingly, the Company adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have any
impact on the Companys financial position.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying value of
assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts reported for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Companys deferred income tax liabilities and assets are as follows:
Note 10 - Income taxes (concluded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
747,846
|
|
$
|
536,328
|
Unrealized holding loss on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
18,593
|
|
|
160,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
766,439
|
|
|
696,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
166,657
|
|
|
164,050
|
Deferred loan costs
|
|
|
262,295
|
|
|
202,494
|
Prepaids
|
|
|
14,692
|
|
|
21,286
|
Other
|
|
|
3,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447,342
|
|
|
387,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
319,097
|
|
$
|
308,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the federal taxes at statutory rates to the tax provision for the year ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Federal statutory rate (34%)
|
|
$
|
906,746
|
|
|
$
|
806,554
|
|
Tax-exempt interest income
|
|
|
(11,490
|
)
|
|
|
(13,959
|
)
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
28,899
|
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes expense
|
|
$
|
924,900
|
|
|
$
|
801,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax attributable to income before income tax expense is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Current federal income tax expense
|
|
$
|
1,087,244
|
|
|
$
|
895,626
|
|
Deferred federal income tax expense
|
|
|
(162,344
|
)
|
|
|
(94,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
924,900
|
|
|
$
|
801,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11 - Related party transactions
In the normal course of business, the Company has made loans to its officers and directors. Total loans at December 31, 2007 amounted to approximately $11,831,018 (including a $1,250,000 loan made to a director
in 2002, prior to becoming a director in 2004 and a $50,000 loan made to an officer prior to becoming an employee in 2005) of which approximately $1,800,390 represents unused lines of credit. Total loans to these persons at December 31, 2006
amounted to $9,206,114 of which $1,695,651 represented unused lines of credit. During 2007, new loans to officers and directors amounted to $3,265,076 and repayments amounted to $744,911. In the opinion of management, such loans are consistent with
sound banking practices and are within applicable regulatory bank lending limitations.
F-18
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 11 - Related party transactions (concluded)
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company utilized the services of a law firm for advice on various legal matters. The Chairman of the Board of Directors is also a principal in this law firm.
The law firm was approved to provide various legal services to the Company at a cost of $128,450 and $60,824 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The Company also utilized services of other businesses to acquire office space, furniture and office supplies. Several Board members are involved with the daily activity of these businesses. Total purchases for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $46,118 and $22,628, respectively.
Note 12 - Regulatory requirements and restrictions
The Company is subject to various federal and state regulatory requirements, including regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies to
ensure capital adequacy. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Companys
financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Companys assets, liabilities, and
certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Companys capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors.
The most recent notification from the regulatory agencies categorized the Banks capital position as well-capitalized, and meets the
definition of well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Company must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the
table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed this category.
The Companys actual capital
amounts and ratios are also presented in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
|
|
|
Minimum To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provision
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
44,540
|
|
14.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,681
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
30,851
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
First Capital Bank
|
|
$
|
37,041
|
|
12.01
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,669
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
30,836
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
40,051
|
|
12.98
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,340
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,511
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
First Capital Bank
|
|
$
|
32,552
|
|
10.56
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,334
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,502
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to average adjusted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
40,051
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,815
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,018
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
First Capital Bank
|
|
$
|
32,552
|
|
10.12
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,867
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,083
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
F-19
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 12 - Regulatory requirements and restrictions (concluded)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum
Capital
Requirement
|
|
|
Minimum To Be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provision
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
24,959
|
|
12.28
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,261
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,326
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
First Capital Bank
|
|
$
|
24,402
|
|
12.01
|
%
|
|
$
|
16,241
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,301
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
21,125
|
|
10.39
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,130
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,195
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
First Capital Bank
|
|
$
|
20,568
|
|
10.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,120
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,181
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital to average adjusted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
21,125
|
|
8.80
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,606
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,007
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
First Capital Bank
|
|
$
|
20,568
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,679
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,099
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
The amount of dividends payable by the Company depends upon its earnings and capital position, and is limited by
federal and state law, regulations and policy. In addition, Virginia law imposes restrictions on the ability of all banks chartered under Virginia law to pay dividends. Under such law, no dividend may be declared or paid that would impair a
banks paid-in capital. Each of the Commission and the FDIC has the general authority to limit dividends paid by the Bank if such payments are deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice.
Note 13 - Commitments and contingent liabilities
The Company is a
party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers in the Richmond metropolitan area. These financial instruments include unused lines of credit. These instruments
involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized on the statement of financial condition. Financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused commercial lines of credit
|
|
$
|
104,545,729
|
|
$
|
72,265,492
|
Unused consumer lines of credit
|
|
|
11,711,242
|
|
|
8,016,853
|
Standby and Performance Letters of Credit
|
|
|
8,799,300
|
|
|
3,478,112
|
Loan commitments
|
|
|
22,317,500
|
|
|
38,169,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
147,373,771
|
|
$
|
121,929,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial
instrument for unused lines of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
F-20
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 13 - Commitments and contingent liabilities (concluded)
Unused lines of credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. The Company evaluates each
customers creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but
may include personal property, commercial property, residential property, land, and accounts receivable.
Note 14 - Concentration of credit risk
The Company has a diversified loan portfolio consisting of commercial, real estate and consumer (installment) loans. Substantially all of the
Companys customers are residents or operate business ventures in its market area consisting primarily of the Richmond metropolitan area. Therefore, a substantial portion of its debtors ability to honor their contracts and the
Companys ability to realize the value of any underlying collateral, if needed, is influenced by the economic conditions in this market area.
At
times, cash balances at financial institutions are in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The cash balances are maintained at financial institutions with high credit - quality ratings and the Bank believes no significant risk of loss exists with
respect to those balances.
Note 15 - Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments as disclosed herein:
Cash and due from banks
The carrying amounts of cash and due from banks approximate their fair value.
Available-for-sale securities
Fair values for securities, excluding restricted equity securities, are based on quoted market prices. The carrying values of
restricted equity securities approximate fair values.
Loans receivable
Fair values are based on carrying values for variable-rate loans that
reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk. Fair values for certain mortgage loans (for example, one-to-four family residential) and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction
with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. Fair values for commercial real estate and commercial loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses and interest rates currently being offered for loans
with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The interest rates on loans at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are current market rates for their respective terms and associated credit risk.
Deposit liabilities
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is,
their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate CDs are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies
interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Accrued interest
The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair values.
F-21
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 15 Disclosures about fair value of financial instruments (concluded)
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
The carrying value of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank due within ninety days from the balance sheet
date approximate fair value. Fair values for convertible advances are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on convertible advances with similar remaining maturities.
Federal Funds purchased and repurchase agreements
The carrying value of federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements due within ninety days from the
balance sheet date approximate fair value.
Off-balance-sheet instruments
Fair values for off-balance-sheet lending commitments are based on
fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and counterparties credit standings. These are not deemed to be material at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,780
|
|
$
|
16,780
|
|
$
|
12,032
|
|
$
|
12,032
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
32,825
|
|
|
32,825
|
|
|
38,731
|
|
|
38,731
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
|
294,234
|
|
|
293,028
|
|
|
199,751
|
|
|
199,330
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
1,425
|
|
|
1,425
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
255,108
|
|
$
|
255,313
|
|
$
|
194,302
|
|
$
|
194,004
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
40,122
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
29,508
|
Federal funds purchased
|
|
|
9,261
|
|
|
9,261
|
|
|
6,026
|
|
|
6,026
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
7,318
|
|
|
7,155
|
|
|
7,119
|
Repurchase agreements
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
1,667
|
Unrecognized financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit issued
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
Note 16 Stock option plan
The Company has a First Capital Bancorp, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan (the Plan) pursuant to which options may be granted to Directors, officers and key employees. The Plan authorizes grants of options to purchase up
to 338,484 shares of the Companys authorized, but unissued common stock. All stock options have been granted with an exercise price equal to the stocks fair market value at the date of grant. Stock options generally have 10-year terms,
vest at the rate of 50 percent per year for Directors and 33 1/3 percent per year for employees. In December 2005, the Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of all unvested stock options outstanding prior to December 31, 2005.
F-22
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 16 Stock option plan (continued)
A summary of the status of the Companys unvested stock options as of December 31, 2007 and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested Stock Options
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair
Value
|
Unvested at January 1, 2007
|
|
6,000
|
|
$
|
7.59
|
Granted
|
|
62,275
|
|
|
5.06
|
Vested
|
|
7,258
|
|
|
7.29
|
Forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2007
|
|
61,017
|
|
$
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, there was $276,107 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested
stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a period of 1.79 years.
The weighted-average option price and weighted-average remaining term
of stock options awarded and not exercised were as follows as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Weighted-average price
|
|
$
|
10.25
|
|
$
|
9.02
|
Weighted-average term (in years)
|
|
|
6.17
|
|
|
6.20
|
A summary of the stock option activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
205,875
|
|
$
|
8.74
|
Granted
|
|
6,000
|
|
$
|
18.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding December 31, 2006
|
|
211,875
|
|
$
|
9.02
|
Granted
|
|
62,275
|
|
$
|
14.51
|
Exercised
|
|
2,250
|
|
$
|
10.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding December 31, 2007
|
|
271,900
|
|
$
|
10.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 16 Stock option plan (concluded)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding and Exercisable
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Number Outstanding
and Exercisable
at December 31,
2007
|
|
Weighted - Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|
Weighted - Average
Exercise
Price
|
$5.32 to $7.00
|
|
84,750
|
|
3.4 years
|
|
$
|
6.20
|
$7.07 to $10.00
|
|
83,250
|
|
5.8 years
|
|
$
|
9.45
|
$10.57 to $18.50
|
|
103,900
|
|
8.7 years
|
|
$
|
14.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding was approximately $3.1 million, options exercisable was
approximately $2.4 million, and options unvested and expected to vest was approximately $704,700 at December 31, 2007.
The Company estimates the fair
value of each option grant on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Additional valuation and related assumption information for the Companys stock option plan is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Weighted average per share fair value of options granted during the year
|
|
$
|
5.06
|
|
|
$
|
7.59
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Expected life
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
|
|
6 years
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
24.52
|
%
|
|
|
31.96
|
%
|
Average Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.53
|
%
|
|
|
4.96
|
%
|
Note 17 Other employee benefit plans
During April 1999, the Company instituted a contributory thrift plan through the Virginia Bankers Association, covering all eligible employees. Participants may make contributions to the plan during the year, with
certain limitations. During 2007 and 2006, the Company contributed to the plan an amount equal to seventy-five percent of the first six percent contributed. The participants are 100% vested upon three years of service to the Company. Expenses
amounted to $127,073 and $91,252 in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Note 18 Earnings per share
Basic
EPS excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for
the period.
Diluted
EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock, or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the
earnings of the entity.
F-24
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 18 Earnings per share (concluded)
The basic and diluted earnings per share calculations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
Net income (numerator, basic and diluted)
|
|
$
|
1,742,001
|
|
$
|
1,571,219
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator)
|
|
|
2,414,323
|
|
|
1,796,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share - basic
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,414,323
|
|
|
1,796,021
|
Effect of stock options
|
|
|
56,375
|
|
|
92,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average shares outstanding (denominator)
|
|
|
2,470,698
|
|
|
1,888,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share - assuming dilution
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19 Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (revised 2007). SFAS No. 141R improves reporting by creating greater
consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of business combinations, resulting in more complete, comparable, and relevant information for investors and other users of financial statements. To achieve this goal, the new standard requires
the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all (and only) the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction; establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information they need to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively
to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first fiscal year that commences after December 15, 2008.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. SFAS No. 160 improves the relevance, comparability, and transparency of financial information provided to
investors by requiring all entities to report noncontrolling (minority) interests in subsidiaries in the same wayas equity in the consolidated financial statements. In addition, SFAS No.160 eliminates the diversity that currently exists in
accounting for transactions between an entity and noncontrolling interests by requiring that they be treated as equity transactions. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and is not expected to have a
material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilitiesincluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 provides companies with the option of electing fair value as an alternative measurement for most
financial assets and liabilities. It also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS
No. 159 requires companies to provide additional information that will help investors and other users of
F-25
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 19 Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards (continued)
financial statements to more easily understand the effect of a companys choice to use fair value on its earnings. It also requires entities to display the fair
value of those assets and liabilities for which the company has chosen to use fair value on the face of the balance sheet. Under SFAS No. 159, fair value is used for both the initial and subsequent measurement of the designated assets and/or
liabilities, with the changes in value recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect early adoption of SFAS No. 159, which was permitted as of the
beginning of its 2007 fiscal year.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which, among other things,
defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that
fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be
determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in
measuring fair value as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are based on one or more of three valuation techniques noted in SFAS No. 157. The
three valuation techniques are identified below. Where more than one technique is noted, individual assets or liabilities are valued using one or more of the noted techniques. The valuation techniques are as follows:
|
|
|
Market approach. Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
|
Cost approach. The amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).
|
|
|
|
Income approach. Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on market expectations (including present-value techniques, option pricing,
and excess earnings models).
|
SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim
periods within those fiscal years. The provisions of SFAS No. 157 are to be applied prospectively as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is initially applied, except in limited circumstances. The Company does not anticipate that the
adoption of SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008 will have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations, although additional fair value disclosures will be provided. The portion of the Companys assets and
liabilities with fair values based on unobservable inputs is not significant.
On November 5, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 109, Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings (SAB 109). SAB 109 requires that the expected net future cash flows related to servicing of a loan be included in the
measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. The adoption of SAB 109 is on a prospective basis and effective for the Corporations loan commitments measured at fair value through earnings
which are issued or modified after January 1, 2008. The adoption of
F-26
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 19 Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards (concluded)
SAB 109 is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporations financial condition and results of operations.
Note 20 Subsequent Events
On January 11, 2008, the
Company closed on approximately .83 acres at the intersection of West Broad Street and Dominion Boulevard in Henrico County as a replacement for its Innsbrook Branch. The total purchase price was $1,507,900. On January 31, 2008, the Company
entered into an agreement to purchase approximately 1.18 acres near the intersection of Route 288 and Midlothian Turnpike in Chesterfield County as a future branch site. The total purchase price is $1,875,000 with a closing scheduled for March 2008.
Note 21 Condensed Financial Information Parent Company Only
FIRST CAPITAL BANCORP, INC.
(Parent Corporation Only)
Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash on deposit with subsidiary bank
|
|
$
|
7,433,183
|
|
|
$
|
366,640
|
|
Investment is subsidiary
|
|
|
32,515,697
|
|
|
|
20,256,983
|
|
Investment is special purpose subsidiary
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
|
|
155,000
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
50,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,104,221
|
|
|
$
|
20,829,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred debt
|
|
$
|
5,155,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,155,000
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
90,163
|
|
|
|
15,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,245,163
|
|
|
|
5,170,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
11,884,684
|
|
|
|
7,184,084
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
18,492,528
|
|
|
|
6,010,352
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
|
|
|
(36,432
|
)
|
|
|
(311,598
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
4,518,278
|
|
|
|
2,776,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
34,859,058
|
|
|
|
15,659,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,104,221
|
|
|
$
|
20,829,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 21 Condensed Financial Information Parent Company Only (continued)
FIRST CAPITAL BANCORP, INC.
(Parent
Corporation Only)
Statement of Income
Year Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
123,629
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
11,170
|
|
|
|
3,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income
|
|
|
134,799
|
|
|
|
3,051
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
373,446
|
|
|
|
101,460
|
|
Legal
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
42,659
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
376,214
|
|
|
|
151,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before tax benefit
|
|
|
(241,415
|
)
|
|
|
(148,068
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
81,800
|
|
|
|
50,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss before undistributed equity in subsidiary
|
|
|
(159,615
|
)
|
|
|
(97,868
|
)
|
Undistributed equity in subsidiary
|
|
|
1,901,616
|
|
|
|
1,669,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,742,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,571,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
First Capital Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
Note 21 Condensed Financial Information Parent Company Only (concluded)
FIRST CAPITAL BANCORP, INC.
(Parent
Corporation Only)
Statement of Cash Flows
For the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,742,001
|
|
|
$
|
1,571,219
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of subsidiary
|
|
|
(1,901,616
|
)
|
|
|
(1,669,087
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
50,315
|
|
|
|
(50,656
|
)
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
74,998
|
|
|
|
15,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operations
|
|
|
(34,302
|
)
|
|
|
(133,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in FCRV Statutory Trust 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155,000
|
)
|
Stock offering proceeds, net of related expenses
|
|
|
17,076,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contribution to subsidiary
|
|
|
(10,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
(4,500,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from (used) in investing activities
|
|
|
7,100,845
|
|
|
|
(4,655,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds for issuance of subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,155,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,155,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
7,066,543
|
|
|
|
366,640
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
366,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
7,433,183
|
|
|
$
|
366,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-29
(MM) (NASDAQ:FCVA)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Juin 2024 à Juil 2024
(MM) (NASDAQ:FCVA)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Juil 2023 à Juil 2024