As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
May 22, 2008
Registration No.
333-149920
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY,
INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
New York
(State of
incorporation)
|
|
3829, 3629
(Primary Standard
Industrial
Classification Code No.)
|
|
14-1462255
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
431 New Karner Road
Albany, New York 12205
(518) 533-2200
(Address, including zip code and
telephone number, including area code of registrants
principal executive offices)
Cynthia A. Scheuer
Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer & Secretary
431 New Karner Road
Albany, New York 12205
(518) 533-2200
(Address, including zip code and
telephone number, including area code of registrants
principal executive offices)
with copies to:
|
|
|
Antonios C. Backos, Esq.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
666 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10103-0001
(212) 506-5325
|
|
Robert S. Kant, Esq.
Scott K. Weiss, Esq.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
2375 E. Camelback Road
Phoenix, AZ 85016
(602) 445-8000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public:
As soon as practicable after this
registration statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the
following
box:
o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer
o
|
Accelerated
filer
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer
o
|
Smaller reporting
company
þ
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this registration statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration
statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
Subject to Completion,
Dated May 22, 2008
7,000,000 Shares of Common
Stock
and
Warrants to
Purchase Shares
of Common Stock
We are offering 7,000,000 shares of our common stock and
warrants to
purchase shares
of our common stock in units. For each unit
purchased in the offering, investors will receive one share
of common stock and warrants to
purchase shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of
$ per share. Upon the closing of
the offering, the units will separate and the common stock and
warrants will be issued separately. The warrants may be
exercised at any time during the period commencing on the
closing date of this offering and ending on the fifth
anniversary of the closing date. Our common stock trades on The
Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol MKTY (until
June 13, 2008 our symbol will be MKTYD,
denoting our reverse stock split on May 15, 2008). The last
reported sale price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Global
Market on May 21, 2008 was $3.60 per share.
Investing in our securities involves risks.
See Risk Factors beginning on page 6 of this
prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Proceeds to us (before expenses)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to an additional 1,050,000 units
(consisting of 1,050,000 shares
and warrants)
to cover over-allotments.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares and warrants to
purchasers on or
about ,
2008.
Merriman Curhan
Ford & Co.
|
|
|
Ardour Capital Investments,
LLC
|
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2008
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information that is different. We are offering to sell, and
seeking offers to buy, units only in jurisdictions where offers
and sales are permitted. The information contained in this
prospectus is accurate only as of the date of this prospectus,
regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or of any
sale of units. It is important for you to read and consider all
information contained in this prospectus in making your
investment decision. You should also read and consider the
information in the documents we have referred you to in
Where You Can Find Additional Information below.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Unless the context requires otherwise, in this prospectus the
terms we, us, and our refer
to Mechanical Technology, Incorporated, a New York corporation,
MTI Micro refers to MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc., a
Delaware corporation and our majority owned subsidiary, and
MTI Instruments refers to MTI Instruments, Inc., a
New York corporation and our wholly owned subsidiary. We have a
registered trademark in the United States for
Mobion. Other trademarks, trade names, and service
marks used in this prospectus are the property of their
respective owners.
i
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary provides an overview of selected information
contained elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all
of the information you should consider in making an investment
decision. You should read carefully the entire prospectus,
including the section entitled Risk Factors,
beginning on page 6 and our financial statements and the
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before
making an investment decision.
Our
Company
We are developing and commercializing off-the-grid rechargeable
portable power source products that generate electrical power,
using up to 100% methanol as fuel, for consumer electronic
devices. Our portable power source products, utilizing our
patented, proprietary direct methanol fuel cell technology
platform called Mobion, offer a compelling alternative to
lithium-ion and similar rechargeable battery systems currently
used by original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, in many
handheld electronic devices, such as mobile phones, digital
cameras, and portable media players. We believe our rechargeable
portable power source products will offer substantial
advantages, such as smaller size, lower weight, longer power
life, higher reliability, and greater convenience of use,
without the environmental concerns of lithium-ion batteries. Our
portable power solution can be implemented as three different
product options: a compact external charging device, a snap-on
or attached power accessory, or an embedded fuel cell power
solution. We have strategic arrangements with Samsung
Electronics, with Duracell, part of the Procter & Gamble
Company, and with a global Japanese consumer electronics
company. We intend to commercialize our first Mobion products in
2009. According to Frost and Sullivan, the global rechargeable
battery market for portable electronic devices exceeds
$5 billion.
We also design, manufacture, and sell high-performance test and
measurement instruments and systems serving primarily the
general dimensional gauging, semiconductor, and aviation
industries. These products consist of electronic, computerized
gauging instruments for position, displacement and vibration
applications for the design, manufacturing and test markets;
semiconductor products for wafer characterization; and engine
balancing and vibration analysis systems for military and
commercial aircraft.
Our
Markets and Opportunities
Consumers demand portable electronics that offer an enhanced
experience through expanded memory, improved display
technologies, constant connectivity, robust software, and a
reduced form factor. In addition, technological advances in
semiconductor manufacturing, LED displays, memory costs and
availability, wireless technologies, and software applications
have resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of portable
electronic devices, their usage, and power requirements. As a
result of these consumer demands and technological advances,
there are a number of handheld electronic devices that have been
introduced into the market. This trend towards increased
functionality in portable electronic devices has led to a
power gap, which is the disparity between a
devices power supply, typically a rechargeable lithium-ion
battery, and its power need. This power gap leads to a need for
the end user to plug-in their devices to the electrical grid on
a regular basis, which limits their ability to use these
electronic devices where and when the need arises.
Improvements in rechargeable battery technology have not kept
pace with the evolution of consumer electronic device
performance. Over the last ten years, device performance as
measured by silicon processor speed has increased by a factor of
128 times, while the energy density of lithium-ion technology
has only doubled. In addition to their performance shortfalls,
lithium-ion battery technology poses an environmental risk as
the various heavy metals incorporated in these batteries require
special disposal to prevent contamination of waste disposal
sites.
OEMs are actively seeking improved power sources to replace
existing rechargeable lithium-ion batteries and to power
additional improvements to their mobile electronic devices.
1
Our
Solution and Strategies
At the core of our solution is our proprietary Mobion Chip
engine, a design architecture that embodies a reduction in the
size, complexity, and cost of fuel cell construction, which
results in a reliable, manufacturable, and affordable power
solution that we believe provides improved energy density and
portability over competing rechargeable battery technologies.
Our proprietary fuel cell power solution consists of two primary
components integrated in an easily manufactured device: the
direct methanol fuel cell power engine, which we refer to as our
Mobion Chip, and the methanol replacement cartridge. Our current
Mobion Chip weighs less than one ounce and is small enough to
fit in the palm of ones hand. For these reasons, we
believe that our Mobion platform is ideally suited to provide a
replacement for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Based upon
our ability to provide a compact, efficient, clean, safe, and
long-lasting power source for lower power applications, we
intend to initially target power solutions for handheld consumer
electronic applications. Our goal is to become a leading
provider of portable power for handheld electronic devices. Key
elements of our strategy designed to achieve this objective
include the following:
Business Focus.
We are focusing our efforts on the
development and commercialization of our portable power source
products. We believe this business provides a higher potential,
higher growth opportunity than our test and measurement
instrumentation business.
Design for Mass Manufacturing.
Our portable power source
products will be manufactured using standard processes, such as
injection molding and automated test and assembly, which are
broadly employed throughout the electronics manufacturing
industry. In preparing Mobion for commercialization, our current
Mobion Chip is injection molded and is being designed for mass
manufacturing.
Outsource Manufacturing.
We plan to outsource
manufacturing to expand rapidly and diversify our production
capacity. This strategy will allow us to maintain a variable
cost model in which we do not incur most of our manufacturing
costs until our proprietary fuel cell power solution has been
shipped and billed to our customers.
Utilize our Technology to Provide Compelling Products.
We
plan to utilize our intellectual property portfolio and
technological expertise to develop and offer portable power
source products across multiple electronic device markets. We
intend to employ our technological expertise to reduce the
overall size and weight of our portable power source products
while increasing their ease of manufacturing, power capacity,
and power duration, and decreasing their cost.
Capitalize on Growth Markets.
We intend to capitalize on
the growth of the electronic device markets, including new
products that may be brought about by the convergence of
computing, communications, and entertainment devices. We believe
our portable power source products will address the growing need
for portability, connectivity, and functionality in the evolving
electronic device markets. We plan to offer these power
solutions to OEM customers to enable them to offer products that
have advantages in terms of size, weight, power duration, and
environmental friendliness.
Develop Strong Customer Relationships.
We plan to develop
strong and long-lasting customer relationships with leading
electronic device OEMs and to provide them with power solutions
for their products. We believe that our portable power source
products will enable our OEM customers to deliver an enhanced
user experience and to differentiate their products from those
of their competitors. We will attempt to enhance the competitive
position of our customers by providing them with innovative,
distinctive, and high-quality portable power supply products on
a timely and cost-effective basis.
2
Our
Competitive Strengths
We believe that our portable power source products will offer
the following advantages:
|
|
|
Off-the-grid power source.
Our products provide users of
consumer electronic devices with extended mobility by providing
power without having to attach to a wall outlet to recharge
their devices.
|
|
|
Small size and low weight.
The dimensions of our products
will enable our OEM customers to reduce the overall size and
weight of their products.
|
|
|
Power density.
Our products will have power density of
over 50
mW/cm
2
and high energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of methanol.
|
|
|
Power duration.
Our products will offer longer run time
than currently available portable charging systems.
|
|
|
Ease of manufacturing.
Our products will be manufactured
using traditional injection molding techniques that will easily
transfer to mass manufacturing production lines.
|
|
|
Safety.
Our products will utilize methanol fuel, which
does not require storage under pressure or at low temperatures.
|
|
|
Environmentally friendly.
Our products will utilize fully
biodegradable methanol fuel.
|
Corporate
Information
We were incorporated in New York in 1961. We operate two
businesses: our new energy business that is conducted through
MTI Micro, a majority owned subsidiary, and our test and
measurement instrument business that is conducted through MTI
Instruments, a wholly owned subsidiary. We maintain our
principal executive offices at 431 New Karner Road, Albany, New
York 12205, and our telephone number is
(518) 533-2200.
Our website is located at www.mechtech.com. The information
contained in, or that can be accessed through, our website does
not constitute part of this prospectus.
3
The
Offering
|
|
|
Securities Offered
|
|
7,000,000 units. Each unit will consist of one share of our
common stock and warrants to
purchase shares of common stock.
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
7,000,000 shares.
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
Warrants to purchase shares of
common stock. The warrants will be exercisable on or after the
closing date of this offering through and including the fifth
anniversary of the closing date and will be exercisable at a
price of $ per share
of common stock.
|
|
|
|
Common Stock to be outstanding after this offering
|
|
11,771,861 shares.
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment Option
|
|
1,050,000 units (consisting of 1,050,000 shares
and warrants).
|
|
|
|
Use of Proceeds
|
|
We expect to use the net proceeds from this offering for
research, design, tooling and capital expenditures to support
the commercialization of our Mobion portable power source
products, and working capital needs and general corporate
purposes. We believe the net proceeds of this offering will
provide sufficient funds to commercialize our portable power
source products. See Use of Proceeds.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
You should carefully consider all of the information contained
in this prospectus, and in particular, you should evaluate the
specific risks set forth under Risk Factors.
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq Global Market Symbol
|
|
MKTY (until June 13, 2008 our symbol will be
MKTYD, denoting our reverse stock split on
May 15, 2008).
|
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding after
this offering is based on 4,771,861 shares issued and
outstanding as of March 31, 2008, but does not include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
172,521 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance
under our equity incentive plans. As of December 31, 2007,
there were 762,391 options outstanding and 625 shares of
restricted stock issued under our equity incentive plans;
|
|
|
|
|
|
378,472 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding warrants as of March 31, 2008, with an exercise
price of $18.16 per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares of common stock that will
be issued upon exercise of warrants at an exercise price of
$ per share sold as part of the
units in this offering.
|
Except as otherwise indicated, the information contained in this
prospectus
|
|
|
|
|
includes adjustments in the number of shares of our issued
common stock as a result of the reverse split of our common
stock that was approved by our stockholders at a meeting held
May 15, 2008, pursuant to which every eight shares of our
common stock were combined into one share of our common
stock; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise of the underwriters option to purchase
from us an aggregate of 1,050,000 additional units (consisting
of 1,050,000 shares of common stock and warrants to
purchase an
additional shares
of common stock).
|
4
SUMMARY
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth our summary consolidated
financial data for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007, which was derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The summary consolidated balance sheet data as of
March 31, 2008 and the summary consolidated statements of
operations data for each of the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2008 have been derived from the
unaudited consolidated financials that are included elsewhere in
this prospectus. You should read the following summary
consolidated financial data together with the information under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements (including the related notes thereto).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data (in thousands except share and
per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
$6,012
|
|
|
|
$7,667
|
|
|
|
$9,028
|
|
|
|
$1,701
|
|
|
|
$1,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on product revenue
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
|
5,598
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and product development expenses
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
12,921
|
|
|
|
11,765
|
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(15,098
|
)
|
|
|
(17,737
|
)
|
|
|
(13,349
|
)
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(15,094
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,667
|
)
|
|
|
$(9,575
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,156
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
$(3.93
|
)
|
|
|
$(3.46
|
)
|
|
|
$(2.01
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.66
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
3,842,201
|
|
|
|
3,952,793
|
|
|
|
4,763,547
|
|
|
|
4,754,868
|
|
|
|
4,771,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted (1)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,560
|
|
|
$
|
27,504
|
|
Securities available for sale (2)
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
7,634
|
|
|
|
30,578
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
14,812
|
|
|
|
37,756
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
Total stockholders equity (3)(4)
|
|
|
10,045
|
|
|
|
32,989
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The as adjusted column reflects the sale of 7,000,000 units
by us in this offering at an assumed public offering price of
$3.60 per unit, which is based on the last reported sale price
of our common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market on May 21,
2008, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us, and after giving
effect to our receipt of the estimated net proceeds. A $1.00
increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price of
$3.60 per unit would increase (decrease) each of cash and
equivalents, working capital, total assets, and total
stockholders equity by $6.4 million, assuming the
number of units offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents shares of Plug Power Inc., or Plug Power, a
Nasdaq-listed company, held for sale by us, classified as
current assets, and such amount reflects the fair value of these
shares. Through the sale of Plug Power shares, we generated
proceeds of $6.2 million during 2006 and $5.1 million
during 2007 that we have used to fund the development and
commercialization of our portable power source business.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Our ownership percentage of MTI Micro will increase as a result
of this offering since proceeds from the offering will be used
to make further investments in MTI Micro. Over the last three
years, we have increased our ownership in MTI Micro from 89% in
2004 to 96% in 2008.
|
5
RISK
FACTORS
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors and all
other information contained in this prospectus before purchasing
our securities. The risks and uncertainties described below are
not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties
of which we are unaware, or that we currently deem immaterial,
also may become important factors that affect us. If any of the
following risks occur, our business, financial condition, or
results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock
could decline, and you may lose some or all of your
investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Industry
We have
incurred recurring net losses and anticipate continued net
losses as we execute our commercialization plan for our portable
power source business.
We have incurred recurring net losses, including net losses of
$15.1 million in 2005, $13.7 million in 2006,
$9.6 million in 2007, and $3.2 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2008, which includes a net
gain of $2.5 million from the sale of securities available
for sale and a net gain of $3.0 million on derivatives in
2007 and a net gain of $333,000 on derivatives during the first
three months of 2008. As a result of ongoing operating losses,
we had an accumulated deficit of approximately
$108.3 million as of March 31, 2008. We expect to
continue to make significant expenditures and incur substantial
expenses as we develop and commercialize our proposed portable
power source products; develop our manufacturing, sales, and
distribution networks; implement internal systems and
infrastructure; and hire additional personnel. As a result, we
expect to continue to incur continued significant losses as we
execute our plan to commercialize our portable power source
business and may never achieve or maintain profitability. We
will be unable to satisfy our current obligations solely from
cash generated from operations or become profitable until we
successfully commercialize our portable power source business.
If we continue to incur substantial losses and are unable to
secure additional sources of funding, we could be forced to
discontinue or curtail our business operations; sell assets at
unfavorable prices; or merge, consolidate, or combine with a
company with greater financial resources in a transaction that
may be unfavorable to us.
We have
received a going concern report from our independent
auditors.
Our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their
opinion that accompanies our audited consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2007, indicating that our
recurring losses from operations, net capital deficiency, and
current liquidity position raise substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Our
common stock may be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market,
which may adversely affect our ability to raise capital and
stockholders ability to sell their shares.
Nasdaq notified us on January 9, 2008 that our common stock
could be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market for failure to
maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00 and that we had until
July 7, 2008 to regain compliance with the listing
standards of such market. To regain compliance, the closing bid
price of our common stock must meet or exceed $1.00 per share
for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days. If compliance is
not regained, Nasdaq will notify us of its determination to
delist our common stock, which we may appeal to its listings
qualification panel. We may alternatively apply to transfer our
common stock to The Nasdaq Capital Market if we satisfy all of
its requirements, other than the minimum bid price, for initial
inclusion on such market. If we elect
6
to apply for such a transfer and if such application is
approved, we will be afforded the remainder of a second 180
calendar day-period to regain compliance with the minimum bid
price rule while listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market.
The eight-to-one reverse stock split of common stock that was
approved by our stockholders at a meeting held May 15, 2008
may not, by itself, result in our compliance with the minimum
bid price requirement of The Nasdaq Global Market. Furthermore,
the market may react negatively to the dilutive effects of this
offering, causing a decline in the price of our common stock
below the price required by the minimum bid price rule. A
delisting from The Nasdaq Global Market may result in a further
decline of the price of our common stock and adversely affect
our ability to raise capital through the sale of common stock.
We
currently derive all of our product revenue from our test and
measurement instrumentation business, but our principal focus is
the development and commercialization of our portable power
source business.
We currently derive all of our product revenue from our test and
measurement instrumentation business, but our principal focus is
the development and commercialization of our portable power
source business. Our test and measurement instrumentation
business is subject to a number of risks, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
a slow down or cancellation of sales to the military as a result
of a potential redeployment of governmental funding;
|
|
|
|
a failure to expand or maintain the business as a result of
competition, a lack of brand awareness, or market
saturation; and
|
|
|
|
an inability to launch new products as a result of intensive
competition, uncertainty of new technology development, and
developmental timelines.
|
In addition, our test and measurement instrumentation products
can be sold in quantity to a relatively few number of customers,
resulting in a customer concentration risk. The loss of any
significant portion of such customers or a material adverse
change in the financial condition of any one of these customers
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We have
not generated any product revenue from our portable power source
business and currently have no portable power source commercial
products.
We have not generated any product revenue from our portable
power source business and currently have no portable power
source commercial products. The successful development and
commercialization of our portable power source products will
depend on a number of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
continuing our research and development efforts;
|
|
|
|
finalizing the design of our portable power source products;
|
|
|
|
securing OEM customers to incorporate our portable power source
products into products sold by them;
|
|
|
|
arranging for adequate manufacturing capabilities; and
|
|
|
|
completing, refining, and managing our supply chain and
distribution channels.
|
Additionally, our technology is new and complex, and there may
be technical barriers to the development of our portable power
source products. The development of our portable power source
products may not succeed or may be significantly delayed. Our
portable power source products will be produced through
manufacturing arrangements that have not been finalized or
tested on a commercial scale. If we fail to successfully develop
or experience significant delays in the
7
development of our portable power source products, or if there
are significant delays in commercialization, we are unlikely to
recover those losses, thus making it impossible for us to become
profitable through the sales of these products. This would
materially and adversely affect our business and financial
condition. If adequate funds are not available, we may have to
delay development or commercialization of our portable power
source products or license to third parties the rights to
commercialize products or technologies that we would otherwise
seek to commercialize. Any of these factors could harm our
business and financial condition.
Any revenue derived in the relatively near-term relating to our
portable power source business likely will result from
governmental contracts or other governmental funding. We can
offer no assurance that we will be able to secure continued
government funding. The loss of such contracts or the inability
to obtain additional contracts could materially harm our
business.
Although
we believe the net proceeds of this offering will provide
sufficient funds to commercialize our portable power source
products, it is possible that additional funds will be required
and we have no commitments for additional financing.
Although we believe the net proceeds of this offering will
provide sufficient funds to commercialize our portable power
source products, it is possible that we may need to raise
capital above the net proceeds of this offering to fund the
commercialization of our portable power source business. We have
no commitments for any additional financing should the need
arise. If we are unable to secure any necessary additional
financing or to raise funds from the sale of our test and
measurement instrumentation business should we determine to do
so, we may need to delay further commercialization plans. In
order to conserve cash and extend operations while we pursue any
additional necessary financing, we would be required to reduce
operating expenses. There is no assurance that funds raised in
any such financing will be sufficient, that the financing will
be available on terms favorable to us or to existing
stockholders and at such times as required, or that we will be
able to obtain the additional financing required for the
continued operation and growth of our business. If we raise
additional funds by issuing equity securities, our stockholders
will experience dilution. Debt financing, if available, may
involve restrictive covenants. Any debt financing or additional
equity financing may contain terms that are not favorable to us
or our stockholders. If we raise additional funds through
collaboration and licensing arrangements with third parties, it
may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies
or our products, or grant licenses on terms that are not
favorable to us. If we are unable to raise adequate funds, we
may have to liquidate some or all of our assets or delay, reduce
the scope of or eliminate some or all of our research and
development programs.
A primary asset of our company is the Plug Power common stock we
own. As of March 31, 2008, we owned 1,137,166 shares
of Plug Power common stock. Plug Power common stock is traded on
The Nasdaq Global Market. The market price of our Plug Power
common stock may fluctuate as a result of market conditions and
other factors over which we have no control. Fluctuations in the
market price of Plug Powers common stock may result in a
reduction of resources available to fund operations, which could
result in our requiring additional funding sooner than
anticipated.
If
current airline and certain international regulations do not
change, passengers will be unable to carry methanol in the
passenger compartments of airplanes, which would adversely
affect our sales and results of operations.
Current airline and certain international laws, regulations, and
treaties limit the amount and concentration of methanol that any
passenger can carry onboard passenger planes. We believe that
these regulations must change for mass commercialization of
Mobion technology products to be possible. There are several
major markets, most notably within the European Union, that have
not adopted the global regulations adopted by the International
Civil Aviation Organization. If these
8
regulations are not implemented, it would materially and
adversely affect our ability to achieve mass commercialization
of Mobion technology products and have a material adverse effect
on our business plans, prospects, results of operations, and
financial condition.
Our
portable power source products may not be accepted by the
market.
Any portable power source products that we develop may not
achieve market acceptance. The development of a successful
market for our proposed portable power source products and our
ability to sell those products at favorable prices may be
adversely affected by a number of factors, many of which are
beyond our control, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our failure to produce portable power source products that
compete favorably against other products on the basis of price,
quality, performance, and life;
|
|
|
|
competition from conventional lithium-ion or other rechargeable
battery systems;
|
|
|
|
the ability of our technologies and product solutions to address
the needs of the electronic device markets, the requirements of
OEMs, and the preferences of end users;
|
|
|
|
our ability to provide OEMs with portable power source products
that provide advantages in terms of size, weight, peak power,
power duration, reliability, durability, performance, and
value-added features compared to alternative solutions; and
|
|
|
|
our failure to develop and maintain successful relationships
with OEMs, manufacturers, distributors, and others as well as
strategic partners.
|
Target markets for our proposed portable power source products,
such as those for mobile phones (including smart phones) and
mobile phone accessories, digital cameras, portable media
players, personal digital assistants, or PDAs, and global
positioning systems, or GPS devices, are volatile, cyclical, and
rapidly changing and could continue to utilize existing
technology or adopt other new competing technologies. The market
for certain of these products depends in part upon the
development and deployment of wireless and other technologies,
which may or may not address the needs of users of these new
products.
Many manufacturers of portable electronic devices have
well-established relationships with competitive suppliers.
Penetrating these markets will require us to offer better
performance alternatives to existing solutions at competitive
costs. The failure of any of our target markets to continue to
expand, or our failure to penetrate these markets to a
significant extent, will impede our sales growth. We cannot
predict the growth rate of these markets or the market share we
will achieve in these markets in the future.
If our proposed portable power source products fail to gain
market acceptance, it could materially and adversely affect our
business and financial condition.
Market
acceptance of our customers products that utilize our
portable power source products may decline or may not develop
and, as a result, our sales will be harmed.
We currently do not anticipate selling our portable power source
products directly to end users. Instead, we plan to produce
portable power source products that our OEM customers
incorporate into their products. As a result, the success of our
proposed portable power source products will depend upon the
widespread market acceptance of the products of our OEM
customers. We will not control or influence the manufacture,
promotion, distribution, or pricing of the products that
incorporate our portable power source products. Instead, we will
depend on our OEM customers to manufacture and distribute
products incorporating our portable power source products and to
generate consumer demand through their marketing and promotional
activities.
9
Even if our technologies and products successfully meet our
customers price and performance goals, our sales would be
harmed if our OEM customers do not achieve commercial
success in selling their products to consumers that incorporate
our portable power source products.
Any lack of adoption in the use of our portable power source
products by OEM customers in the electronic device markets, the
reduced demand for our OEM customers products, or a
slowdown in their markets would adversely affect our sales.
If we
fail to build and maintain relationships with our customers and
do not satisfy our customers, we may lose future sales and our
revenue may stagnate or decline.
Because our success depends on the widespread market acceptance
of our customers products, we must develop and maintain
our relationships with leading global OEMs of electronic
devices, such as mobile phones (including smart phones) and
mobile phone accessories, digital cameras, portable media
players, PDAs, and GPS devices. In addition, we must identify
areas of significant growth potential in other markets,
establish relationships with OEMs in those markets, and assist
them in developing products that use our portable power source
products and technologies. Our failure to identify potential
growth opportunities, particularly in new markets, or establish
and maintain relationships with OEMs in those markets, would
prevent our business from growing in those markets.
Our ability to meet the expectations of our customers will
require us to provide portable power source products for
customers on a timely and cost-effective basis and to maintain
customer satisfaction with our product solutions. We must match
our design and production capacity with customer demand,
maintain satisfactory delivery schedules, and meet specific
performance goals. If we are unable to achieve these goals for
any reason, our customers could reduce their purchases from us
and our sales would decline or fail to develop.
Our customer relationships also can be affected by factors
affecting our customers that are unrelated to our performance.
These factors can include a myriad of situations, including
business reversals of customers, determinations by customers to
change their product mix or abandon business segments, or
mergers, consolidations, or acquisitions involving our customers.
We have
no experience manufacturing portable power source products on a
commercial scale.
To date, we have focused primarily on research, development, and
pilot production, and we have no experience manufacturing any
portable power source products on a commercial scale. Our pilot
production efforts to date have been limited in scale. It is our
intent to manufacture our portable power source products through
OEM customers and third-party manufacturers. Failure to secure
manufacturing capabilities could materially and adversely affect
our business and financial condition.
We will
rely on others for our production, and any interruptions of
these arrangements could disrupt our ability to fill our
customers orders.
We plan to rely on others for all of our production requirements
for our portable power source products. The majority of this
manufacturing is anticipated to be conducted in Asia by
manufacturing subcontractors that also perform services for
numerous other companies. We do not expect to have a guaranteed
level of production capacity with any of our manufacturing
subcontractors. Qualifying new manufacturing subcontractors is
time consuming and might result in unforeseen manufacturing and
operating problems. The loss of any relationships with our
manufacturing subcontractors or assemblers or their inability to
conduct their manufacturing and assembly services for us as
anticipated in terms of cost, quality, and timeliness could
adversely affect our ability to fill customer orders in
accordance with required delivery, quality, and performance
requirements. If this were to occur, the resulting decline in
revenue would harm our business.
10
We will
depend on third parties to maintain satisfactory manufacturing
yields and delivery schedules, and their inability to do so
could increase our costs, disrupt our supply chain, and result
in our inability to deliver our portable power source products,
which would adversely affect our results of
operations.
We will depend on our manufacturing subcontractors to maintain
high levels of productivity and satisfactory delivery schedules
for our portable power source products from manufacturing and
assembly facilities likely located primarily in Asia. We plan to
provide our manufacturing subcontractors with rolling forecasts
of our production requirements. We do not, however, anticipate
having long-term agreements with any of our manufacturing
subcontractors that guarantee production capacity, prices, lead
times, or delivery schedules. Our manufacturing subcontractors
will serve other customers, many of which will have greater
production requirements than we do. As a result, our
manufacturing subcontractors could determine to prioritize
production capacity for other customers or reduce or eliminate
deliveries to us on short notice. We may experience lower than
anticipated manufacturing yields and lengthening of delivery
schedules. Lower than expected manufacturing yields could
increase our costs or disrupt our supply chain. We may encounter
lower manufacturing yields and longer delivery schedules while
commencing volume production of any new products. Any of these
problems could result in our inability to deliver our product
solutions in a timely manner and adversely affect our operating
results.
We plan
to rely on third-party suppliers for most of our manufacturing
equipment.
We plan to rely on third-party suppliers for most of the
manufacturing equipment necessary to produce our portable power
source products. The failure of suppliers to supply
manufacturing equipment in a timely manner or on commercially
reasonable terms could delay our commercialization plans and
otherwise disrupt our production schedules or increase our
manufacturing costs. Further, our orders with certain of our
suppliers may represent a very small portion of their total
orders. As a result, they may not give priority to our business,
leading to potential delays in or cancellation of our orders. If
any single-source supplier were to fail to supply our needs on a
timely basis or cease providing us with key components, we would
be required to substitute suppliers. We may have difficulty
identifying a substitute supplier in a timely manner and on
commercially reasonable terms. If this were to occur, our
business would be harmed.
Shortages
of components and raw materials may delay or reduce our sales
and increase our costs, thereby harming our results of
operations.
The inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and
other materials, including platinum and ruthenium, necessary for
the production of our portable power source products could
result in reduced or delayed sales or lost orders. Any delay in
or loss of sales could adversely impact our operating results.
Many of the materials used in the production of our portable
power source products will be available only from a limited
number of foreign suppliers, particularly component suppliers
located in Asia. In most cases, neither we nor our manufacturing
subcontractors will have long-term supply contracts with these
suppliers. As a result, we will be subject to economic
instability in these Asian countries as well as to increased
costs, supply interruptions, and difficulties in obtaining
materials. Our customers also may encounter difficulties or
increased costs in obtaining the materials necessary to produce
their products into which our product solutions are incorporated.
From time to time, materials and components necessary for our
portable power source products or in other aspects of our
customers products may be subject to allocation because of
shortages of these materials and components. Shortages in the
future could cause delayed shipments, customer dissatisfaction,
and lower revenue.
11
We will
be subject to lengthy development periods and product acceptance
cycles, which can result in development and engineering costs
without any future revenue.
We plan to provide portable power source solutions that are
incorporated by OEMs into the products they sell. OEMs will make
the determination during their product development programs
whether to incorporate our portable power source solutions or
pursue other alternatives. This process may require us to make
significant investments of time and resources in the design of
portable customer-specific power source solutions well before
our customers introduce their products incorporating our product
solutions and before we can be sure that we will generate any
significant sales to our customers or even recover our
investment. During a customers entire product development
process, we will face the risk that our portable power source
products will fail to meet our customers technical,
performance, or cost requirements or that our products will be
replaced by competing products or alternative technological
solutions. Even if we complete our design process in a manner
satisfactory to our customer, the customer may decide to delay
or terminate its product development efforts. The occurrence of
any of these events could cause sales to not materialize, to be
deferred, or to be cancelled, which would adversely affect our
operating results.
We will
not have long-term purchase commitments from our customers, and
their ability to cancel, reduce, or delay orders could reduce
our revenue and increase our costs.
Customers for our portable power source products will not
provide us with firm, long-term volume purchase commitments, but
instead will issue purchase orders to buy a specified number of
units. As a result, customers may be able to cancel purchase
orders or reduce or delay orders at any time. The cancellation,
delay, or reduction of customer purchase orders could result in
reduced revenue, excess inventory, and unabsorbed overhead. We
currently have no presence in the electronic device markets. Our
success in the electronic device markets will require us to
establish the value added proposition of our products to OEMs
that have traditionally used other portable power solutions. All
of the markets we plan to serve are subject to severe
competitive pressures, rapid technological change and product
obsolescence, which may increase our inventory and overhead
risks, resulting in increased costs.
Variability
of customer requirements resulting in cancellations, reductions,
or delays may adversely affect our operating results.
We will be required to provide rapid product turnaround and
respond to short lead times. A variety of conditions, both
specific to individual customers and generally affecting the
demand for OEMs products, may cause customers to cancel,
reduce, or delay orders. Cancellations, reductions, or delays by
a significant customer or by a group of customers could
adversely affect our operating results. Customers may require
rapid increases in production, which could strain our resources
and reduce our margins.
If we are
unable to adequately protect our intellectual property, our
competitors and other third parties could produce products based
on our intellectual property, which would substantially impair
our ability to compete.
Our success and ability to compete depends in part upon our
ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technologies.
We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright, and
trademark law and license agreements, as well as nondisclosure
agreements, to protect our intellectual property. These legal
means, however, afford only limited protection and may not be
adequate to protect our intellectual property rights. We cannot
be certain that we were the first creator of inventions covered
by pending patent applications or the first to file patent
applications on these inventions. In addition, we cannot be sure
that any of our pending patent applications will issue. The
United States Patent and Trademark Office, or other foreign
patent and trademark offices
12
may deny or significantly narrow claims made under our patent
applications and, even if issued, these patents may be
successfully challenged, designed around, or may otherwise not
provide us with any commercial protection.
We may in the future need to assert claims of infringement
against third parties to protect our intellectual property.
Regardless of the final outcome, any litigation to enforce our
intellectual property rights in patents, copyrights, or
trademarks could be highly unpredictable and result in
substantial costs and diversion of resources, which could have a
material and adverse effect on our business and financial
condition. In the event of an adverse judgment, a court could
hold that some or all of our asserted intellectual property
rights are not infringed, or are invalid or unenforceable, and
could award attorneys fees to the other party.
We may
become subject to claims of infringement or misappropriation of
the intellectual property rights of others, which could prohibit
us from selling our products, require us to obtain licenses from
third parties or to develop non-infringing alternatives, and
subject us to substantial monetary damages and injunctive
relief.
We may receive notices from third parties that the manufacture,
use, or sale of any products we develop infringes upon one or
more claims of their patents. Moreover, because patent
applications can take many years to issue, there may be
currently pending applications, unknown to us, which may later
result in issued patents that materially and adversely affect
our business. Third parties could also assert infringement or
misappropriation claims against us with respect to our future
product offerings, if any. Whether or not such claims are valid,
we cannot be certain that we have not infringed the intellectual
property rights of such third parties. Any infringement or
misappropriation claim could result in significant costs,
substantial damages, and our inability to manufacture, market,
or sell any of our product offerings that are found to infringe.
Even if we were to prevail in any such action, the litigation
could result in substantial cost and diversion of resources that
could materially and adversely affect our business. If a court
determined, or if we independently discovered, that our product
offerings violated third-party proprietary rights, there can be
no assurance that we would be able to re-engineer our product
offerings to avoid those rights or obtain a license under those
rights on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. As a result,
we could be prohibited from selling products that are found to
infringe upon the rights of others. Even if obtaining a license
were feasible, it may be costly and time-consuming. A court
could also enter orders that temporarily, preliminarily, or
permanently enjoin us from making, using, selling, offering to
sell, or importing our portable power source products, or could
enter orders mandating that we undertake certain remedial
activities. Further, a court could order us to pay compensatory
damages for such infringement, plus prejudgment interest, and
could in addition treble the compensatory damages and award
attorneys fees. These damages could materially and
adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Confidentiality
agreements with employees and others may not adequately prevent
disclosure of our trade secrets and other proprietary
information, which could limit our ability to compete.
We rely on trade secrets to protect our proprietary technology
and processes. Trade secrets are difficult to protect. We enter
into confidentiality and intellectual property assignment
agreements with our employees, consultants, and other advisors.
These agreements generally require that the other party keep
confidential and not disclose to third parties confidential
information developed by the party or made known to the party by
us during the course of the partys relationship with us.
However, these agreements may not be honored and enforcing a
claim that a party illegally obtained and is using our trade
secrets is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the
outcome is unpredictable. The failure to obtain and maintain
trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive
position.
13
Our
efforts to develop new technologies may not result in commercial
success, which could cause a decline in our revenue and could
harm our business.
Our research and development efforts with respect to our
technologies may not result in customer or market acceptance.
Some or all of those technologies may not successfully make the
transition from the research and development lab to
cost-effective production as a result of technology problems,
competitive cost issues, yield problems, and other factors. Even
when we successfully complete a research and development effort
with respect to a particular technology, our customers may
decide not to introduce or may terminate products utilizing the
technology for a variety of reasons, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties with other suppliers of components for the products;
|
|
|
|
superior technologies developed by our competitors and
unfavorable comparisons of our solutions with these technologies;
|
|
|
|
price considerations; and
|
|
|
|
lack of anticipated or actual market demand for the products.
|
The nature of our business will require us to make continuing
investments for new technologies. Significant expenses relating
to one or more new technologies that ultimately prove to be
unsuccessful for any reason could have a material adverse effect
on us. In addition, any investments or acquisitions made to
enhance our technologies may prove to be unsuccessful. If our
efforts are unsuccessful, our business could be harmed.
We may
not be able to enhance our product solutions and develop new
product solutions in a timely manner.
Our future operating results will depend to a significant extent
on our ability to provide new portable power source products
that compare favorably with alternative solutions on the basis
of time to introduction, cost, performance, and end-user
preferences. Our success in attracting customers and developing
business will depends on various factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
innovative development of new portable power source products for
customer products;
|
|
|
|
utilization of advances in technology;
|
|
|
|
maintenance of quality standards;
|
|
|
|
efficient and cost-effective solutions; and
|
|
|
|
timely completion of the design and introduction of new portable
power source products.
|
Our inability to commercialize our proposed portable power
source solutions and develop new product solutions on a timely
basis could harm our operating results and impede our growth.
If we do
not keep pace with technological innovations, our products may
not be competitive and our revenue and operating results may
suffer.
Technological advances, the introduction of new products, and
new design techniques could adversely affect our business
prospects unless we are able to adapt to the changing
conditions. Technological advances could render our proposed
portable power source products obsolete, and we may not be able
to respond effectively to the technological requirements of
evolving markets. As a result, we will be required to expend
substantial funds for and commit significant resources to
|
|
|
|
|
continue research and development activities on portable power
source products;
|
|
|
|
hire additional engineering and other technical
personnel; and
|
|
|
|
purchase advanced design tools and test equipment.
|
14
Our business could be harmed if we are unable to develop and
utilize new technologies that address the needs of our
customers, or our competitors do so more effectively than we do.
New
technology solutions that achieve significant market share could
harm our business.
New portable power source solutions could be developed. Existing
electronic devices also could be modified to allow for a
different power source solution. Our business could be harmed if
our products become noncompetitive as a result of a
technological breakthrough that allows a new power source
solution to displace our solution and achieve significant market
acceptance.
Our
inability to respond to changing technologies will harm our
business.
The electronics industry is subject to constant technological
change. Our future success will depend on our ability to respond
appropriately to changing technologies and changes in product
function and quality. If we rely on products and technologies
that are not attractive to consumers, we may not be successful
in capturing or retaining any significant market share. In
addition, any new technologies utilized in our portable power
source products may not perform as expected or as desired, in
which event our adoption of such products or technologies may
harm our business.
International
sales and manufacturing risks could adversely affect our
operating results.
We anticipate that the manufacturing and assembly operations for
our portable power source products will be conducted primarily
in Asia by manufacturing subcontractors. We also believe that
many of our OEM customers will be located and much of our sales
and distribution operations will be conducted in Asia. These
international operations will expose us to various economic,
political, and other risks that could adversely affect our
operations and operating results, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties and costs of staffing and managing a multi-national
organization;
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
|
|
|
|
differing labor regulations;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences;
|
|
|
|
tariffs and duties and other trade barrier restrictions;
|
|
|
|
possible employee turnover or labor unrest;
|
|
|
|
greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
the burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign
laws;
|
|
|
|
potentially reduced protection for intellectual property
rights; and
|
|
|
|
political or economic instability in certain parts of the world.
|
The risks associated with international operations could
negatively affect our operating results.
Our
business may suffer if international trade is hindered,
disrupted, or economically disadvantaged.
Political and economic conditions abroad may adversely affect
the foreign production and sale of our portable power source
products. Protectionist trade legislation in either the United
States or foreign countries, such as a change in the current
tariff structures, export or import compliance laws, or other
trade policies, could adversely affect our ability to sell our
portable power source products in foreign markets and to obtain
materials or equipment from foreign suppliers.
Changes in policies by the U.S. or foreign governments
resulting in, among other things, higher taxation, currency
conversion limitations, restrictions on the transfer of funds,
or the expropriation of private enterprises also could have a
material adverse effect on us. Any actions by
15
countries in which we conduct business to reverse policies that
encourage foreign investment or foreign trade also could
adversely affect our operating results. In addition,
U.S. trade policies, such as most favored
nation status and trade preferences for certain Asian
nations, could affect the attractiveness of our products to our
U.S. customers and adversely impact our operating results.
Our
operating results could be adversely affected by fluctuations in
the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign
currencies.
We plan to transact our portable power source business
predominantly in U.S. dollars and bill and collect our
sales in U.S. dollars. A weakening of the dollar could
cause our overseas vendors to require renegotiation of either
the prices or currency we pay for their goods and services. In
the future, customers may negotiate pricing and make payments in
non-U.S. currencies.
If our overseas vendors or customers require us to transact
business in
non-U.S. currencies,
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could affect our
cost of goods, operating expenses, and operating margins and
could result in exchange losses. In addition, currency
devaluation can result in a loss to us if we hold deposits of
that currency. Hedging foreign currencies can be difficult,
especially if the currency is not freely traded. We cannot
predict the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations on our
operating results.
We expect
that a majority of our manufacturing subcontractors will be
located in Asia, increasing the risk that a natural disaster,
labor strike, war, or political unrest in those countries would
disrupt our operations.
We expect that a majority of our manufacturing subcontractors
will be located in Asia. Events out of our control, such as
earthquakes, fires, floods, or other natural disasters, or
political unrest, war, labor strikes, or work stoppages in Asia
could disrupt their operations, which would impact our business.
In addition, there is political tension between Taiwan and China
that could lead to hostilities. If any of these events occur, we
may not be able to obtain alternative manufacturing capacity.
Failure to secure alternative manufacturing capacity could cause
a delay in the shipment of our products, which would cause our
revenue to fluctuate or decline.
Continuing
uncertainty of the U.S. economy may have serious implications
for the growth and stability of our business and may negatively
affect our stock price.
The revenue growth and profitability of our business will depend
significantly on the overall demand for electronic devices.
Softening demand in these markets caused by ongoing economic
uncertainty may result in decreased revenue or earnings levels
or growth rates. The U.S. economy has been historically
cyclical, and market conditions continue to be challenging,
which has resulted in individuals and companies delaying or
reducing expenditures. Further delays or reductions in spending
could have a material adverse effect on demand for our products,
and consequently on our business, financial condition, results
of operations, prospects, and stock price.
The
electronics industry is cyclical and may result in fluctuations
in our operating results.
The electronics industry has experienced significant economic
downturns at various times. These downturns are characterized by
diminished product demand, accelerated erosion of average
selling prices, and production overcapacity. In addition, the
electronics industry is cyclical in nature. We will seek to
reduce our exposure to industry downturns and cyclicality by
providing design and production services for leading companies
in rapidly expanding industry segments. We may, however,
experience substantial period-to-period fluctuations in future
operating results because of general industry conditions or
events occurring in the general economy.
16
Our
strategic alliances may not achieve their objectives, and their
failure to do so could impede our growth.
Our prospects depends to a significant extent on our strategic
alliances with Samsung and Duracell. In addition, we plan to
explore additional strategic alliances designed to enhance or
complement our technology or to work in conjunction with our
technology; to provide necessary know-how, components, or
supplies; and to develop, introduce, and distribute products
utilizing our technology. Any strategic alliances may not
achieve their intended objectives, may be cancelled by either
party, and parties to our strategic alliances may not perform as
contemplated. The failure of our current alliances or our
inability to form additional alliances may impede our ability to
introduce new products and enter new markets.
Product
liability claims against us could result in adverse publicity
and potentially significant monetary damages.
As a seller of consumer products using a flammable material such
as methanol, we will face an inherent risk of exposure to
product liability claims in the event that injuries result from
product usage by customers. It is possible that our products
could result in injury, whether by product malfunctions,
defects, improper installation, or other causes. If such
injuries or claims of injuries were to occur, we could incur
monetary damages and our business could be adversely affected by
any resulting negative publicity. The successful assertion of
product liability claims against us could result in potentially
significant monetary damages and, if our insurance protection is
inadequate to cover these claims, could require us to make
significant payments from our own resources.
We expect
to face intense competition that could result in failing to gain
market share and suffering reduced revenue from our portable
power source products.
We plan to serve intensely competitive markets that are
characterized by price erosion, rapid technological change, and
competition from major domestic and international companies.
This intense competition could result in pricing pressures,
lower sales, reduced margins, and lower market share. Most of
our competitors have greater market recognition, larger customer
bases, and substantially greater financial, technical,
marketing, distribution, and other resources than we possess and
that afford them competitive advantages. As a result, they may
be able to devote greater resources to the promotion and sale of
products, to negotiate lower prices for raw materials and
components, to deliver competitive products at lower prices, and
to introduce new product solutions and respond to customer
requirements more quickly than we can. Our competitive position
could suffer if one or more of our customers determine not to
utilize our portable power source products and instead decide to
contract with our competitors or to use alternative technologies.
Our ability to compete successfully will depend on a number of
factors, both within and outside our control. These factors
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our success in designing and introducing new portable power
source products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to predict the evolving needs of our customers and
to assist them in incorporating our technologies into their new
products;
|
|
|
|
our ability to meet our customers requirements for small
size, low weight, peak power, long power duration, ease of use,
reliability, durability, and small form factor;
|
|
|
|
the quality of our customer services;
|
|
|
|
the rate at which customers incorporate our products into their
own products;
|
|
|
|
product or technology introductions by our competitors; and
|
|
|
|
foreign currency fluctuations, which may cause a foreign
competitors products to be priced significantly lower than
our products.
|
17
We depend
on key personnel who would be difficult to replace, and our
business will likely be harmed if we lose their services or
cannot hire additional qualified personnel.
Our success will depend substantially on the efforts and
abilities of our senior management and key personnel. The
competition for qualified management and key personnel,
especially engineers, is intense. Although we maintain
non-competition and non-disclosure covenants with most of our
key personnel, we do not have employment agreements with most of
them. The loss of services of one or more of our key employees
or the inability to hire, train, and retain key personnel,
especially engineers and technical support personnel, and
capable sales and customer-support employees outside the United
States, could delay the development and sale of our products,
disrupt our business, and interfere with our ability to execute
our business plan.
Our
operating results may experience significant
fluctuations.
In addition to the variability resulting from the short-term
nature of our customers commitments, other factors will
contribute to significant periodic and seasonal quarterly
fluctuations in our results of operations. These factors include
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the cyclicality of the markets we serve;
|
|
|
|
the timing and size of orders;
|
|
|
|
the volume of orders relative to our capacity;
|
|
|
|
product introductions and market acceptance of new products or
new generations of products;
|
|
|
|
evolution in the life cycles of our customers products;
|
|
|
|
timing of expenses in anticipation of future orders;
|
|
|
|
changes in product mix;
|
|
|
|
availability of manufacturing and assembly services;
|
|
|
|
changes in cost and availability of labor and components;
|
|
|
|
timely delivery of product solutions to customers;
|
|
|
|
pricing and availability of competitive products;
|
|
|
|
introduction of new technologies into the markets we serve;
|
|
|
|
pressures on reducing selling prices;
|
|
|
|
our success in serving new markets; and
|
|
|
|
changes in economic conditions.
|
Accordingly, you should not rely on period-to-period comparisons
as an indicator of our future performance. Negative or
unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results may result
in a decline in the price of our stock.
Risks
Related to this Offering
As a new
investor, you will incur substantial dilution in net tangible
book value as a result of this offering.
The assumed public offering price will be substantially higher
than the net tangible book value per share of our outstanding
shares of common stock. If you purchase securities in this
offering, your interest will be diluted by the amount by which
the offering price per share exceeds our pro forma net tangible
book value per share following the offering. Net tangible book
value
18
equals total tangible assets minus total liabilities. As of
March 31, 2008, our net tangible book value per share was
$2.11. After giving effect to this offering and assuming an
initial offering price of $3.60, our pro forma net tangible book
value per share would be $2.80, or $2.85 if the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option in full. The exercise of
outstanding options and warrants and future equity issuances,
including future public offerings or future private placements
of equity securities and any additional shares issued in
connection with acquisitions, could result in further dilution
to investors.
You may
not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you pay
for them in this offering.
Our common stock is currently traded on The Nasdaq Global
Market. The daily trading volume of our common stock is
relatively low. During the year ended December 31, 2007,
the daily volume for our common stock was as low as 3,844 and as
high as 155,701 and averaged 19,994 shares per day as
reported by Nasdaq. Because of this limited trading volume,
stockholders may be unable to sell their shares. Moreover, sales
or purchases of relatively small blocks of stock can have a
significant impact on the price at which our stock is traded.
The market price of our common stock also has fluctuated
substantially in the past and is likely to continue to be highly
volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in the future. For
example, as of December 31, 2007, the 52-week high closing
sales price of our common stock was $14.40 per share, which
compares to a 52-week low closing sales price of our common
stock of $5.68 per share. These fluctuations have occurred in
the past and may occur in the future in response to various
factors, many of which we cannot control, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
variations in our quarterly results;
|
|
|
|
changes in expectations relating to our products, plans, and
strategic position or those of our competitors or customers;
|
|
|
|
announcements of technological innovations or new products by
our competitors, our customers, or us;
|
|
|
|
market conditions within our market;
|
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from
time to time;
|
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
technology companies in general and alternative energy companies
in particular;
|
|
|
|
changes in investor perceptions;
|
|
|
|
the level and quality of any research analyst coverage of our
common stock;
|
|
|
|
changes in earnings estimates or investment recommendations by
securities analysts or our failure to meet such estimates;
|
|
|
|
the financial guidance we may provide to the public, any changes
in such guidance, or our failure to meet such guidance;
|
|
|
|
various market factors or perceived market factors, including
rumors, whether or not correct, involving us, our customers, our
subcontractors, or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
introductions of new products or new pricing policies by us or
by our competitors;
|
|
|
|
acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or by our competitors;
|
|
|
|
litigation involving us, our industry, or both;
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments in the United States or abroad;
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant customers;
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of significant orders;
|
|
|
|
recruitment or departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
developments with respect to intellectual property rights;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in our industry, the industries of our
customers, and economy as a whole;
|
|
|
|
acquisitions or strategic alliances by us or our
competitors; and
|
|
|
|
general global economic and political instability.
|
In addition, the market prices of securities of technology
companies have experienced significant price and volume
fluctuations that often have been unrelated or disproportionate
to their operating performance. In the past, companies that have
experienced volatility in the market price of their securities
have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If
we were the object of a securities class action litigation, it
could result in substantial losses and divert managements
attention and resources from other matters.
Nasdaq notified us on January 9, 2008 that our common stock
could be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market for failure to
maintain a minimum bid price of $1.00. The
eight-to-one
reverse stock split of common stock which was approved by our
stockholders at a meeting held May 15, 2008, may not, by
itself, result in our compliance with the minimum bid price
requirement of The Nasdaq Global Market. Furthermore, the market
may react negatively to the dilutive effects of this offering,
causing a decline in the price of our common stock below the
price required by the minimum bid price rule. As a result of the
foregoing and other factors, you may not be able to resell your
shares of common stock at or above the price you paid.
Sales of
large numbers of shares could adversely affect the price of our
common stock.
All of the 4,771,861 shares of our common stock outstanding
as of March 31, 2008 are eligible for resale in the public
markets. Of these shares, 120,729 shares held by affiliates
are eligible for resale in the public markets subject to
compliance with the volume and manner of sale requirements of
Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
the balance of the shares are eligible for resale in the public
markets either as unrestricted shares or pursuant to
Rule 144. In general, under Rule 144 as currently in
effect, any person (or persons whose shares are aggregated for
purposes of Rule 144) who beneficially owns restricted
securities with respect to which at least six months has elapsed
since the later of the date the shares were acquired from us, or
from an affiliate of ours, is entitled to sell within any
three-month period a number of shares that does not exceed the
greater of 1% of the then outstanding shares of our common stock
and the average weekly trading volume in common stock during the
four calendar weeks preceding such sale. Sales under
Rule 144 also are subject to certain manner-of-sale
provisions and notice requirements and to the availability of
current public information about us. A person who is not an
affiliate, who has not been an affiliate within three months
prior to sale, and who beneficially owns restricted securities
with respect to which at least six months has elapsed since the
later of the date the shares were acquired from us, or from an
affiliate of ours, is entitled to sell such shares under
Rule 144 without regard to any of the volume limitations or
other requirements described above. Sales of substantial amounts
of common stock in the public market could adversely affect
prevailing market prices.
We do not
expect to pay any dividends for the foreseeable
future.
We do not anticipate paying any dividends to our stockholders
for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, you may have to sell
some or all of your common stock in order to generate cash flow
from your investment. You may not receive a gain on your
investment when you sell our common stock and may lose some or
all of the amount of your investment. Any determination to pay
dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our
board of directors and will depend on our results of operations,
financial conditions, contractual restrictions, restrictions
imposed by applicable law, and other factors our board of
directors deems relevant.
20
If our
securities become ineligible for trading on Nasdaq, they might
be subject to
Rule 15g-9
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which imposes additional
sales practice requirements on broker-dealers that sell such
securities to persons other than established customers and
accredited investors.
While our common stock is now listed on The Nasdaq Global
Market, continued listing on Nasdaq will depend on our ability
to meet certain eligibility requirements established from time
to time by The Nasdaq Global Market. Loss of Nasdaq eligibility
could result from material operating losses, or if the market
price of our common stock falls below $1.00 per share for a
substantial period of time. For transactions covered by the
rule, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability
determination for the purchaser and receive the purchasers
written consent to the transaction prior to the sale. The rule
may adversely affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our
securities, and consequently may limit the public market for,
and the trading price of, our common stock.
We have
broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds from this
offering and could spend the proceeds in ways with which you
might not agree.
We have broad discretion to allocate the net proceeds of this
offering, and you will be relying on the judgment of our
management regarding the application of those proceeds. We
currently expect to use these proceeds to conduct research and
development, and the commercialization of our portable power
source products. The timing and amount of our actual
expenditures, however, are subject to change and will be based
on many factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the results of our research and development and product testing;
|
|
|
|
manufacturing, marketing, and other costs associated with
commercialization of our products; and
|
|
|
|
the costs involved in preparing, filing, prosecuting,
maintaining and enforcing patents or defending ourselves against
competing technological and market developments.
|
We may
experience an ownership change in connection with
this offering (or in the future), which would result in a
limitation of the use of our net operating losses.
As of March 31, 2008, we had approximately $57 million
of net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. Our ability to
utilize these NOL carryforwards, including any future NOL
carryforwards that may arise, may be limited by Section 382
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if we undergo
an ownership change as a result of the sale of units
in this offering or as a result of subsequent changes in the
ownership of our outstanding common stock. A corporation
generally undergoes an ownership change when the
ownership of its stock, by value, changes by more than 50
percentage points over any
three-year
testing period. In the event of an ownership change,
Section 382 imposes an annual limitation on the amount of
post-ownership
change taxable income a corporation may offset with
pre-ownership
change NOL carryforwards and certain recognized
built-in
losses.
The
warrants could adversely affect stock price and future
financings.
We are offering 7,000,000 shares of our common stock and
warrants to
purchase shares of our
common stock in units. We are also granting the
underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to an additional 1,050,000 units
(consisting of 1,050,000 shares
and
warrants) to cover over-allotments. The existence of such
warrants may adversely affect the market price of our common
stock and terms on which we can obtain additional financing, and
the holders of such warrants can be expected to exercise them at
a time when we, in all likelihood, would be able to obtain
additional capital by offering shares of our common stock on
terms more favorable to us than those provided by the exercise
of such warrants.
21
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements
that are forward-looking in nature. Examples of forward-looking
statements include statements regarding our belief that the fuel
cell industry will continue to develop, our future financial
results, operating results, business strategies, projected
costs, products under development, competitive positions, and
our plans and objectives for future operations. Words such as
may, will, should,
would, expects, plans,
anticipates, intends,
believes, estimates,
predicts, potential,
continue, or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology, as well as statements in future tense,
identify forward-looking statements. Any expectations based on
these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties and other important factors, including the
Risk Factors discussed herein. These and many other
factors could affect our future operating results and financial
condition and could cause actual results to differ materially
from expectations based on forward-looking statements made in
this document or elsewhere by us or on our behalf.
Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of
future performance or results, and will not necessarily be
accurate indications of the times at, or by which, that
performance or those results will be achieved. Forward-looking
statements are based on information available at the time they
are made or our good faith belief as of that time with respect
to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual performance or results to differ
materially from those expressed in or suggested by the
forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause
these differences include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our history of recurring net losses and the risk of continued
net losses;
|
|
|
|
our independent auditors raising substantial concern about our
ability to continue as a going concern;
|
|
|
|
the potential delisting of our common stock from The Nasdaq
Global Market;
|
|
|
|
sales revenue growth of our test and measurement instrumentation
business may not be achieved;
|
|
|
|
the dependence of our test and measurement instrumentation
business on a small number of customers and potential loss of
government funding;
|
|
|
|
risks related to developing Mobion direct methanol fuel cells
and whether we will ever successfully develop reliable and
commercially viable Mobion fuel cell solutions;
|
|
|
|
our need to raise additional financing;
|
|
|
|
risks relating to the market price of Plug Power common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that certain European Union regulations will not
be changed to permit methanol to be carried onto airplanes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our portable power source products or our customers
products that utilize our portable power source products may not
be accepted by the market;
|
|
|
|
our inability to build and maintain relationships with our
customers;
|
|
|
|
our limited experience in manufacturing fuel cell systems on a
commercial basis;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on others for our production requirements for our
portable power source products;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on our manufacturing subcontractors to provide
high levels of productivity and satisfactory delivery schedules
for our portable power source products;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on third-party suppliers for most of the
manufacturing equipment necessary to produce our portable power
source products;
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and
other materials, including platinum and ruthenium, necessary for
the production of our portable power source products;
|
|
|
|
our dependence on OEMs integrating Mobion fuel cell systems into
their devices;
|
|
|
|
our lack of long-term purchase commitments from our customers
and the ability of our customers to cancel, reduce, or delay
orders for our products;
|
|
|
|
risks related to protection and infringement of intellectual
property;
|
|
|
|
our new technologies may not result in customer or market
acceptance;
|
|
|
|
our ability to commercialize our proposed portable power source
solutions and develop new product solutions on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop and utilize new technologies that address
the needs of our customers;
|
|
|
|
intense competition in the direct methanol fuel cell and
instrumentation businesses;
|
|
|
|
change in policies by U.S. or foreign governments that
hinder, disrupt, or economically disadvantage international
trade;
|
|
|
|
the impact of future exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
uncertainty of the U.S. economy;
|
|
|
|
the historical volatility of our stock price;
|
|
|
|
the cyclical nature of the electronics industry;
|
|
|
|
failure of our strategic alliances to achieve their objectives
or perform as contemplated and the risk of cancellation or early
termination of such alliance by either party;
|
|
|
|
product liability or defects;
|
|
|
|
risks related to the flammable nature of methanol as a fuel
source;
|
|
|
|
the loss of services of one or more of our key employees or the
inability to hire, train, and retain key personnel;
|
|
|
|
significant periodic and seasonal quarterly fluctuations in our
results of operations; and
|
|
|
|
other factors discussed under the headings Risk
Factors, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and
Business.
|
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are
made. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking
statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or
changes in other factors affecting forward-looking information,
except to the extent required by applicable securities laws. If
we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no
inference should be drawn that we will make additional updates
with respect to those or other forward-looking statements.
23
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of 7,000,000
units in this offering will be approximately $22.9 million,
based on an assumed offering price of $3.60 per unit, based on
the last reported sale price of our common stock on The Nasdaq
Global Market on May 21, 2008, and after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
We currently intend to use the net proceeds from this offering
as follows:
|
|
|
|
Commercialization of our portable power source products (1)
|
|
$
|
19,325,000
|
Capital equipment (2)
|
|
|
2,285,000
|
General corporate purposes, including working capital
|
|
|
1,334,000
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,944,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Expected to consist of activities to commercialize our portable
power source products for portable handheld electronic devices
(including further enhancements to our Mobion Chip) and
activities to achieve manufacturing readiness (including design
for manufacturability, design for assembly, design for
testability, and design for serviceability).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Expected to consist of expenditures for equipment and tooling to
support engineering design and commercialization of our Mobion
portable power source products.
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $3.60 per unit would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to
us from this offering by approximately $6.4 million,
assuming the number of units offered by us, as set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, remains the same and after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. We may also increase or
decrease the number of units we are offering. An increase
(decrease) of 1,000,000 units in the number of units
offered by us would increase (decrease) the net proceeds to us
from this offering by approximately $3.6 million.
We believe the net proceeds of this offering will provide
sufficient funds to commercialize our portable power source
products. It is possible, however, that changing circumstances
could require us to raise capital above the net proceeds of this
offering to fund the commercialization of our portable power
source business. We may raise this additional capital through
one or more financings or by selling our test and measurement
instrumentation business should we determine to do so.
The amounts and timing of our actual expenditures will depend
upon numerous factors, including the amount of proceeds actually
raised in this offering, cash flows from operations, and the
growth of our business. We will, from time to time, evaluate
these and other factors to determine if the allocation of our
resources, including the proceeds of this offering, is being
optimized and we must therefore retain broad discretion to
allocate the net proceeds from this offering.
Pending use of the net proceeds as described above, we intend to
invest the net proceeds of this offering in U.S. government
and short-term investment grade securities.
24
PRICE
RANGE OF OUR COMMON STOCK
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol MKTY. Following the reverse stock split that
became effective May 16, 2008, our common stock will trade
under the symbol MKTYD until June 13, 2008,
when it will revert to MKTY. The following table
sets forth the high and low sale prices of our common stock as
reported by The Nasdaq Global Market for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
31.20
|
|
$
|
21.60
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
|
16.00
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
19.92
|
|
|
10.16
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
23.68
|
|
|
12.40
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
15.44
|
|
|
10.56
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
14.40
|
|
|
9.60
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
11.28
|
|
|
7.20
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
10.80
|
|
|
5.76
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
7.44
|
|
|
3.76
|
Second Quarter (through May 21, 2008)
|
|
|
7.80
|
|
|
2.11
|
We estimate that there were approximately 530 holders of our
common stock as of May 21, 2008, which does not include an
indeterminate number of stockholders whose shares may be held by
brokers in street name.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our capital
stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund
the development and expansion of our business, and therefore do
not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our
financial condition, results of operations, capital
requirements, restrictions contained in financing instruments,
and other factors our Board of Directors deems relevant.
25
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our capitalization as of
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis, which reflects our actual capitalization as
of March 31, 2008 on a historical basis, giving effect to
our eight-to-one reverse stock split that was approved by our
stockholders at a meeting held May 15, 2008; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to give effect to our receipt of the
estimated net proceeds from the sale of 7,000,000 units at
the assumed offering price of $3.60 per unit, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$4,560
|
|
|
$
|
27,504
|
|
Securities available for sale (2)
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
Stockholders equity (3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 75,000,000 shares
authorized, actual and as adjusted; 5,777,578 shares
issued, actual; 12,777,578 shares issued, as adjusted (4)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
132,449
|
|
|
|
155,323
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(108,253
|
)
|
|
|
(108,253
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 1,005,092 shares
|
|
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
$10,045
|
|
|
$
|
32,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $3.60 per unit, which is based on the last reported sale
price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market on
May 21, 2008, would increase (decrease) total
stockholders equity by $6.4 million, assuming the
number of units offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us and after giving effect to our receipt of
the estimated net proceeds.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents shares of Plug Power held for sale by us, classified
as current assets, and such amount reflects the fair value of
these shares. Through the sale of Plug Power shares, we
generated proceeds of $6.2 million during 2006 and
$5.1 million during 2007 that we have used to fund the
development and commercialization of our portable power source
business.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The table includes adjustments in the number of shares of our
issued common stock as a result of the reverse split of our
common stock that was approved by our stockholders at a meeting
held May 15, 2008, pursuant to which every eight shares of
our common stock were combined into one share of our common
stock.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Excludes the following as of March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,521 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance
under our equity incentive plans. As of March 31, 2008,
there were 762,391 options outstanding and 625 shares of
restricted stock issued under our equity incentive plans;
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
378,472 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding warrants as of March 31, 2008, with an exercise
price of $18.16 per share; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
of common stock that will be issued upon exercise of warrants at
an exercise price of $ per share
sold as part of the units in this offering.
|
Please read the capitalization table together with the sections
of this prospectus entitled Selected Consolidated
Financial Data and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
27
DILUTION
If you purchase units in this offering, and assuming no value is
attributed to the warrants, your interest will be diluted
immediately to the extent of the difference between the assumed
public offering price of $3.60 per unit and the as adjusted net
tangible book value per share of our common stock immediately
following this offering.
Our net tangible book value as of March 31, 2008 was
$10.1 million, or approximately $2.11 per share. Net
tangible book value per share represents our total tangible
assets less total liabilities, divided by the number of shares
of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2008.
Net tangible book value dilution per unit to new investors
represents the difference between the amount per unit paid by
purchasers in this offering and the as adjusted net tangible
book value per share of common stock immediately after
completion of this offering, assuming that no value is
attributed to the warrants. After giving effect to our sale of
7,000,000 units in this offering at an assumed public offering
price of $3.60 per unit, and after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses, our
as adjusted net tangible book value as of March 31, 2008
would have been $33.0 million, or $2.80 per share. This
represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of
$0.69 per share to existing stockholders and an immediate
dilution in net tangible book value of $0.80 per unit to
purchasers of units in this offering, as illustrated in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed public offering price per unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
Net tangible book value per share as of March 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in net tangible book value per unit attributable to new
investors
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net tangible book value per share as of March 31,
2008, after giving effect to this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per unit to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 increase (decrease) in the assumed public offering price
of $3.60 per unit which is the last reported sale price of our
common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market on May 21, 2008
would increase (decrease) (a) our as adjusted net tangible
book value by approximately $6.4 million, (b) our as
adjusted net tangible book value per share by $0.55, and
(c) the dilution to new investors by $0.45 per unit,
assuming no value is attributed to the warrants and that the
number of units offered by us, as set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses payable by us and after giving effect to our receipt of
the estimated net proceeds.
We may also increase or decrease the number of units we are
offering. An increase (decrease) of 1,000,000 units in the
number of units offered by us would increase (decrease) our as
adjusted net tangible book value by approximately
$3.6 million.
The above discussion and tables do not include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
172,521 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance
under our equity incentive plans. As of March 31, 2008,
there were 762,391 options outstanding and 625 shares of
restricted stock issued under our equity incentive plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
378,472 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
outstanding warrants as of March 31, 2008, with an exercise
price of $18.16 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
of common stock that will be issued upon exercise of warrants at
an exercise price of $ per share
sold as part of the units in this offering.
|
28
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth our summary consolidated
financial data for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007, which was derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The summary consolidated balance sheet data as of
March 31, 2007 and 2008 and the summary consolidated
statements of operations data for each of the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2008 have been derived from the
unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus. We derived the consolidated financial data
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 from our
audited consolidated financial statement that is not included in
this prospectus. You should read the following summary
consolidated financial data together with the information under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements, including the related notes thereto.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data (in thousands except share and
per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
$5,547
|
|
|
|
$7,530
|
|
|
|
$6,012
|
|
|
|
$7,667
|
|
|
|
$9,028
|
|
|
|
$1,701
|
|
|
|
$1,980
|
|
Gross profit on product revenue
|
|
|
3,165
|
|
|
|
4,653
|
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
4,767
|
|
|
|
5,598
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
2,311
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Research and product development expenses
|
|
|
8,348
|
|
|
|
12,960
|
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
12,921
|
|
|
|
11,765
|
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(8,709
|
)
|
|
|
(13,592
|
)
|
|
|
(15,098
|
)
|
|
|
(17,737
|
)
|
|
|
(13,349
|
)
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,678
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(559
|
)
|
|
|
$(4,191
|
)
|
|
|
$(15,094
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,667
|
)
|
|
|
$(9,575
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,156
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
$(0.16
|
)
|
|
|
$(1.15
|
)
|
|
|
$(3.93
|
)
|
|
|
$(3.46
|
)
|
|
|
$(2.01
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.66
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
3,456,999
|
|
|
|
3,645,147
|
|
|
|
3,842,201
|
|
|
|
3,952,793
|
|
|
|
4,763,547
|
|
|
|
4,754,868
|
|
|
|
4,771,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$12,380
|
|
|
|
$22,545
|
|
|
|
$11,230
|
|
|
|
$14,545
|
|
|
|
$7,650
|
|
|
|
9,885
|
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
Securities available for sale (1)
|
|
|
44,031
|
|
|
|
17,678
|
|
|
|
18,947
|
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
|
|
8,184
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
49,053
|
|
|
|
33,663
|
|
|
|
33,045
|
|
|
|
23,076
|
|
|
|
11,347
|
|
|
|
15,927
|
|
|
|
7,634
|
|
Current ratio
|
|
|
4.2:1
|
|
|
|
4.0:1
|
|
|
|
4.9:1
|
|
|
|
3.9:1
|
|
|
|
3.9:1
|
|
|
|
3.9:1
|
|
|
|
2.8:1
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
65,838
|
|
|
|
66,830
|
|
|
|
41,267
|
|
|
|
33,811
|
|
|
|
18,716
|
|
|
|
26,310
|
|
|
|
14,812
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
16,761
|
|
|
|
8,826
|
|
|
|
8,222
|
|
|
|
7,071
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
Long-term obligations
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
$48,266
|
|
|
|
$55,584
|
|
|
|
$32,916
|
|
|
|
$22,871
|
|
|
|
$13,803
|
|
|
|
17,839
|
|
|
|
10,045
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents shares of Plug Power held for sale by us, classified
as current assets, except for 2004 when approximately
$16.5 million shares were classified as restricted shares,
and such amount reflects the fair value of these shares. Through
the sale of Plug Power shares, we generated proceeds of
$6.2 million during 2006 and $5.1 million during 2007
that we have used to fund the development and commercialization
of our portable power source business.
|
29
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition and
results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes included
elsewhere in this prospectus. This discussion contains
forward-looking statements, which involve risk and
uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from
those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result
of certain factors including those discussed in Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are developing and commercializing off-the-grid rechargeable
power sources for portable electronics. We have developed a
patented, proprietary direct methanol fuel cell technology
platform called Mobion, which generates electrical power using
up to 100% methanol as fuel. Our proprietary fuel cell power
solution consists of two primary components integrated in an
easily manufactured device: the direct methanol fuel cell power
engine, which we refer to as our Mobion Chip, and methanol
replacement cartridges. Our current Mobion Chip weighs less than
one ounce and is small enough to fit in the palm of ones
hand. The methanol used by the technology is fully
biodegradable. We believe we are the only micro fuel cell
developer to have demonstrated power density of over 50
mW/cm
2
with high energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of methanol for
handheld consumer electronic applications. For these reasons, we
believe our technology offers a compelling alternative to
current lithium-ion and similar rechargeable battery systems
currently used by original equipment manufacturers and branded
partners, or OEMs, in many handheld electronic devices, such as
mobile phones (including smart phones) and mobile phone
accessories, digital cameras, portable media players, PDAs, and
GPS devices. We believe our platform will facilitate the
development of numerous product advantages, including small
size, environmental friendliness, and simplicity of design, all
critical for commercialization in the consumer market, and can
be implemented as three different product options: a compact
external charging device, a snap-on or attached power accessory,
or an embedded fuel cell power solution. We have strategic
arrangements with Samsung Electronics, an OEM of mobile phones
and mobile phone accessories, with Duracell, part of the Procter
& Gamble Company, and with a global Japanese consumer
electronics company. Our goal is to become a leading provider of
portable power for handheld electronic devices and we intend to
commercialize Mobion products beginning in 2009.
Our Mobion technology eliminates the need for active water
recirculation pumps or the inclusion of water as a fuel
dilutant. The water required for the electrochemical process is
transferred internally within the Mobion Chip from the site of
water generation on the air-side of the cell. This internal flow
of water takes place without the need for any pumps, complicated
re-circulation loops or other micro-plumbing tools. Our Mobion
technology is protected by a patent portfolio that includes over
90 U.S. patent applications covering five key technologies
and manufacturing areas.
We also design, manufacture, and sell high-performance test and
measurement instruments and systems serving three markets:
general dimensional gauging, semiconductor, and aviation. These
products consist of: electronic, computerized gauging
instruments for position, displacement and vibration
applications for the design, manufacturing and test markets;
semiconductor products for wafer characterization; and engine
balancing and vibration analysis systems for military and
commercial aircraft.
30
Our cash requirements depend on numerous factors, including
completion of our portable power source products development
activities, our ability to commercialize our portable power
source products, market acceptance of our portable power source
products, and other factors. We expect to pursue the expansion
of our operations through internal growth and strategic
partnerships. Several key indicators of our liquidity are
summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$11,230
|
|
|
|
$14,545
|
|
|
|
$7,650
|
|
|
|
9,885
|
|
|
|
4,560
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
18,947
|
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
|
|
8,184
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
24,465
|
|
|
|
20,820
|
|
|
|
11,347
|
|
|
|
15,927
|
|
|
|
7,634
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(15,094
|
)
|
|
|
(13,667
|
)
|
|
|
(9,575
|
)
|
|
|
(3,156
|
)
|
|
|
(3,187
|
)
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(12,572
|
)
|
|
|
(12,706
|
)
|
|
|
(11,683
|
)
|
|
|
(4,610
|
)
|
|
|
(2,988
|
)
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
(1,574
|
)
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
From inception through March 31, 2008, we have incurred an
accumulated deficit of $108.3 million and we expect to
incur losses for the foreseeable future as we continue micro
fuel cell product development and commercialization programs. We
expect that losses will fluctuate from year to year and that
such fluctuations may be substantial as a result of, among other
factors, sales of securities available for sale as well as the
operating results of our business.
Results
of Operations
Results
of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31,
2007.
Product Revenue.
Product revenue in our test and
measurement instrumentation business increased by $279,000, or
16.4%, to $2.0 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 from $1.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2007. The revenue increase was primarily a
result of a $220,000 increase in commercial aviation sales,
coupled with smaller increases in our semiconductor and general
dimensional products.
As a result of general global economic conditions, our test and
measurement instrumentation business is currently experiencing
weaker than expected demand in Japan for photolithography
equipment. This weakness in demand may negatively impact OEM
capacitance sales over the remainder of 2008.
Information regarding government contracts included in product
revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue For
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
the
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Orders
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
Received
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
to Date
|
|
to Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
Contract (1)
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
$2.3 million Air Force New PBS-4100 Systems
|
|
|
07/28/2010 (2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
$8.8 million Air Force Retrofit and Maintenance of PBS-4100
Systems
|
|
|
06/19/2008 (3
|
)
|
|
$
|
346
|
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
|
$
|
7,703
|
|
$
|
7,703
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Contract values represent maximum potential values and may not
be representative of actual results.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Date represents expiration of contract, including all three
potential option extensions.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Expiration date was extended during May 2008 from May 19,
2008 to June 19, 2008.
|
Funded Research and Development Revenue.
Funded research
and development revenue in our new energy business during 2008
decreased by $442,000, or 71.9%, to $173,000 during the three
31
months ended March 31, 2008 from $615,000 during the three
months ended March 31, 2007. The decrease in revenue was
primarily a result of the completion of the SAFT America, Inc.,
or SAFT, contract during the first quarter of 2007, which
accounted for $418,000 of revenue in 2007. Revenue during 2008
for the U.S. Department of Energy, or the DOE, contract,
which had its funding reinstated during May 2007, increased by
$170,000, while revenue recognized under the alliance agreement
with Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., or Samsung, decreased by
$194,000 during 2008 over 2007 as a result of the
contracts completion in 2007.
Information regarding our contracts included in funded research
and development revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
% of 2007
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
% of 2008
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
Contract (1)
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.0 million DOE (2)
|
|
|
03/31/09
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,019
|
|
$1.0 million Samsung (3)
|
|
|
07/31/07
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
$418,000 SAFT (4)
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
68.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
615
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final
billing.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The DOE contract is a cost-share contract. DOE funding for this
contract was suspended during January 2006 and reinstated during
May 2007. During 2007, we received notifications from the DOE of
funding releases totaling $1.0 million and also received an
extension of the termination date for the contract from
July 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. During 2008, we
received notifications of funding releases totaling $825,000 and
also received an extension of the termination date for the
contract from September 30, 2008 to March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Samsung contract is a research and prototype contract. This
contract included one up-front payment of $750,000 and two
milestone payments of $125,000 each for the delivery of
prototypes. The contract was amended on October 22, 2007 as
we agreed to issue a credit in the amount of the last invoice in
recognition of our continuing collaboration with Samsung.
Therefore, revenue under this contract totaled $875,000.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The SAFT contract is a fixed-price contract. This is a
subcontract with SAFT under the U.S. Army CECOM contract. The
purchase order received in connection with this subcontract was
revised on November 14, 2006, eliminating one milestone. As
a result, the contract value was reduced from $470,000 to
$418,000 and the expiration date was extended from
September 30, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
|
Cost of Product Revenue.
Cost of product revenue in our
test and measurement instrumentation business increased by
$102,000, or 7.0%, to $840,000 during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 from $738,000 during the three months ended
March 31, 2007. As a percentage of product revenue, the
quarterly cost of product revenue declined by one percentage
point as a result of a more favorable product sales mix.
Gross profit as a percentage of product revenue increased by
0.9% to 57.5% during the three months ended March 31, 2008
from 56.6% during the three months ended March 31, 2007.
Funded Research and Product Development Expenses.
Funded
research and product development expenses in our new energy
business increased by $132,000, or 13.8%, to $356,000 during the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from $224,000 during the
three months ended March 31, 2007. This change was
primarily a result of costs for the DOE contract increasing by
$351,000, reflecting its reinstatement during 2007, while cost
for the Samsung contract decreased by $194,000, as that contract
was completed during July 2007.
32
Unfunded Research and Product Development Expense.
Unfunded research and product development expenses decreased by
$1.4 million, or 40.6%, to $2.0 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2008 from $3.4 million
during the three months ended March 31, 2007. This decrease
reflects a $1.5 million decrease in development costs in
our new energy business related to (a) cost savings from
the decision to suspend work on our high power program during
March 2007, and (b) the DOE contract that resumed during
May 2007, which increased funded research and product
development expense, which were partially offset by the effects
of the completion of work under the Samsung alliance agreement,
which increased unfunded research and product development. This
decrease was also partially offset by a $129,000 increase in
product development expenses for our test and measurement
instrumentation business, reflecting increased staffing and
external product development costs focused on the development of
our photovoltaic thickness module and certain redesigns of our
general gauging and aviation solutions.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased by $162,000, or
6.6%, to $2.6 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 from $2.5 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2007. This increase was primarily a
result of (a) a $715,000 increase related to decreases in
liquidations to unfunded research and development costs, which
was primarily due to the elimination of our high power program,
partially offset by increased liquidations in connection with
the DOE program, (b) a $400,000 decrease in administrative
salaries and benefits as a result of our March 2007
restructuring, (c) a $266,000 decrease in severance costs,
which was also attributable to the 2007 restructuring,
(d) a $139,000 increase in salaries, benefits, and
commissions, reflecting increased sales and marketing efforts in
our test and measurement instrumentation business, (e) a
$42,000 increase in non-cash equity compensation primarily
related to performance grants, (f) a $78,000 decrease in
depreciation costs, and (g) a $10,000 increase in other
expenses, net.
Operating Loss.
Operating loss decreased by $822,000, or
18.3%, to $3.7 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2008 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2007 as a result of the factors noted above.
Gain on Derivatives.
Our gain on derivative treatment of
the freestanding warrants issued in conjunction with our
December 2006 capital raise decreased by $636,000, or 65.6%, to
$333,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared to $969,000 during the three months ended
March 31, 2007. The decrease in derivative income was
attributable to valuation changes of the underlying warrants
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit.
Our income tax rate for
both the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008 was
0.3%. These tax rates were primarily a result of losses
generated by operations, changes in the valuation allowance,
state
true-ups,
and permanent deductible differences for derivative valuations.
The valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets were
$24.2 million at March 31, 2008 and $22.3 million
at December 31, 2007. We determined that it was more likely
than not that ultimate recognition of certain deferred tax
assets would not be realized.
Results
of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared
to December 31, 2006.
Product Revenue.
Product revenue in our test and
measurement instrumentation business increased by
$1.4 million, or 17.8%, to $9.0 million for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2007 from $7.7 million for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. This performance was
primarily the result of a $602,000 increase in activity by the
U.S. Air Force, driven by the New PBS-4100 systems
contract. Also contributing were increased purchases by our
Japanese distributor (particularly OEM capacitance), as well as
increased volume in semiconductor product shipments. Total
product revenue for general dimensional gauging products
increased $298,000, or 7.2%, to $4.5 million, while total
product revenue for the segments semiconductor products
increased by $364,000, or 71.2%, to $875,000.
33
In our test and measurement instrumentation business, during
2007 the U.S. Air Force accounted for $2.4 million, or
26.3%, of product revenue while during 2006, the U.S. Air
Force accounted for $1.8 million, or 23.1%, of product
revenue. Additionally, during 2007, Koyo Precision, our Japanese
distributor, represented $2.5 million, or 27.7%, of product
revenue while during 2006, Koyo Precision represented
$1.8 million, or 22.9%, of product revenue.
Information regarding government contracts included in product
revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Orders
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue For The
|
|
Contract to
|
|
Received to
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
Contract (1)
|
|
Expiration
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
$2.3 million Air Force New PBS-4100 Systems
|
|
07/28/2010 (2)
|
|
$
|
|
$1,596
|
|
$1,596
|
|
$1,596
|
$8.8 million Air Force Retrofit and Maintenance of
PBS-4100
Systems
|
|
06/19/2008 (3)
|
|
$1,417
|
|
$738
|
|
$7,365
|
|
$7,365
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Contract values represent maximum potential values and may not
be representative of actual results.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Date represents expiration of contract, including all three
potential option extensions.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Expiration date was extended during December 2007 from
December 20, 2007 to May 19, 2008, and in May 2008 it
was extended from May 19, 2008 to June 19, 2008.
|
Funded Research and Development Revenue.
Funded
research and development revenue in our new energy business
during 2007 increased $1.1 million, or 218.2%, to
$1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$489,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase
in revenue was primarily the result of billings under the DOE
contract, which had its funding reinstated during May 2007 after
it had been suspended during 2006. This DOE funding resumption
contributed an additional $613,000 to revenue during 2007.
Revenue during 2007 also included $418,000 from the SAFT
contract, for which revenue recognition had been deferred until
the delivery under the contract was accepted during the first
quarter of 2007. Revenue recognized under the Samsung alliance
agreement increased $21,000 during 2007 over 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For The Year Ended
|
|
For The Year Ended
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
Contract to Date
|
Contract
|
|
Expiration (1)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Percent
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Percent
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
$3.0 million DOE (2)
|
|
|
03/31/09
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
12.7%
|
|
$
|
675
|
|
|
43
|
.4%
|
|
$
|
1,846
|
$1.0 million Samsung (3)
|
|
|
07/31/07
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
87.3
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
28
|
.8
|
|
|
875
|
$418,000 SAFT (4)
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
26
|
.9
|
|
|
418
|
$15,000 NCMS (5)
|
|
|
06/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
0
|
.9
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$
|
1,556
|
|
|
100
|
.0%
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final
billing.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The DOE contract is a cost share contract. DOE funding for this
contract was suspended during January 2006 and reinstated during
May 2007. During 2007, we received notifications from the DOE of
funding releases totaling $1.0 million and also received an
extension of the termination date for the contract from
July 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. During February
2008, we received notification from the DOE of a funding release
of $500,000, and during May 2008 we received notification of a
funding release of $325,000.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The Samsung contract is a research and prototype contract. This
contract included one up-front payment of $750,000 and two
milestone payments of $125,000 each for the delivery of
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
prototypes. The contract was amended on October 22, 2007 as
we agreed to issue a credit in the amount of the last invoice in
recognition of our continuing collaboration with Samsung.
Therefore, revenue under this contract totaled $875,000.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The SAFT contract is a fixed price contract. This is a
subcontract with SAFT under the U.S. Army CECOM contract. The
purchase order received in connection with this subcontract was
revised on November 14, 2006 eliminating one milestone. As
a result, the contract value was reduced from $470,000 to
$418,000 and the expiration date was extended from
September 30, 2006 to December 31, 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This contract was a cost plus catalyst research contract with
the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, or NCMS.
|
Cost of Product Revenue.
Cost of product revenue in
our test and measurement instrumentation business increased by
$530,000, or 18.3%, to $3.4 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $2.9 million during the year
ended December 31, 2006. As a percentage of product
revenue, the annual cost of product revenue remained relatively
consistent with 2006, and this increase was consistent with the
higher revenue during 2007.
Gross profit as a percentage of product revenue decreased by
0.2% to 62.0% during the year ended December 31, 2007,
remaining relatively consistent with 2006.
Funded Research and Product Development
Expenses.
Funded research and development expenses in
our new energy business increased $739,000, or 64.1%, to
$1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
While the active contracts were relatively consistent between
periods, costs for the DOE contract increased $1.3 million,
reflecting its reinstatement during May 2007, while costs for
the Samsung contract increased by $22,000. These increases were
partially offset by a decrease in costs for the SAFT contract of
$576,000, as that contract was completed during the first
quarter of 2007.
Unfunded Research and Product Development
Expenses.
Unfunded research and product development
expenses decreased $1.9 million, or 16.1%, to
$9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
This decrease reflects a $2.2 million decrease in
development costs related to (a) the DOE contract that
resumed during May 2007, which related increase is reflected in
funded research and product development expenses, and
(b) cost savings from the decision to suspend work on our
high power program during March 2007. This decrease was
partially offset by a $317,000 increase in product development
expenses in our test and measurement instrumentation business,
reflecting increased staffing and external product development
costs focused on the development of the divisions new
stand-alone measurement and data acquisition solution,
stand-alone laser head, as well as other precision measurement
solutions.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased by $1.3 million, or 13.2%, to $8.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
This decrease was primarily the result of (a) a $387,000
decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation charges reflecting
the difference between sign on and promotion grants during 2006
compared with primarily annual compensation grants during 2007
and the reversal of expense during 2007 related to certain
cancelled executive stock-based performance grants where
performance goals were not met, (b) a $528,000 decrease in
outside services, including audit, legal, and consulting fees,
(c) a $345,000 decrease in recruiting and relocation costs,
(d) a $178,000 increase in severance costs attributable to
employees terminated as a result of our March 2007
restructuring, (e) a $632,000 decrease in wages and
benefits, which was also attributable to our March 2007
restructuring, (f) a $227,000 decrease in other operating
expenses, primarily insurance and laboratory operating fees,
(g) a $647,000 increase related to a decrease in
allocations of expense from SG&A to funded and unfunded
research and development costs for overhead and other costs
allocable to research and development programs, and (h) a
$40,000 savings in other expenses, net.
Operating Loss.
Operating loss for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared with the operating loss for the
year ended December 31, 2006 decreased by $4.4 million
to $13.3 million, a 24.7% decrease, as a result of the
factors noted above.
35
Gain on Sale of Securities Available for Sale.
The
gain on sale of securities available for sale for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $2.5 million compared with a
gain of $4.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. During 2007, we sold 1,452,770 shares of Plug Power
common stock at a weighted average price of $3.53 per share,
with gross proceeds to us of $5.1 million.
Gain (loss) on Derivatives.
We recorded a gain on
derivative accounting of $3.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and a gain of $182,000 on derivative
accounting for the year ended December 31, 2006. Both the
2007 and 2006 gains are the result of derivative treatment of
the freestanding warrants issued to investors in conjunction
with our December 2006 capital raise.
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit.
Our income tax rate
for the year ended December 31, 2007 was 33%, while the
income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 was
15%. These tax rates were primarily the result of losses
generated by operations, changes in the valuation allowance,
state
true-ups
upon tax return filings, permanent deductible differences for
the derivative valuation, and disproportionate effects of
reclassification of gains on Plug Power security sales included
in operating loss.
The valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets at
December 31, 2007 was $22.3 million and at
December 31, 2006 was $18.9 million. We determined
that it was more likely than not that the ultimate recognition
of certain deferred tax assets would not be realized.
Results
of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared
to December 31, 2005.
Product Revenue.
Product revenue in our test and
measurement instrumentation business increased by
$1.7 million, or 27.5%, to $7.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006 from $6.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005. This performance was primarily the
result of (a) an increase of $1.5 million, or 55.0%,
in dimensional gauging sales, particularly direct capacitance
sales through our Japanese distributor, (b) increases in
semiconductor sales of $200,000, as 18 manual, one automatic,
and one semi-automated metrology tool systems were sold during
the year, compared to seven manual, one semi-automated, and four
OEM systems during 2005, (c) commercial aviation equipment
sales increases of $539,000, and (d) lower revenue from the
U.S. Air Force of $611,000 as a result of fewer purchases
of new equipment and reduced activity under the existing repair
contract.
In our test and measurement instrumentation business, the
U.S. Air Force accounted for $1.8 million, or 23.1%,
of product revenue during the year ended December 31, 2006
compared with $2.4 million, or 39.7% of product revenue
during the year ended December 31, 2005. During 2006, Koyo
Precision, our Japanese distributor, represented
$1.8 million, or 22.9%, of product revenue.
Information regarding government contracts included in product
revenue is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Orders
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Contract to
|
|
Received to
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
Contract (1)
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
$8.8 million Air Force Retrofit and Maintenance of
PBS-4100
Systems
|
|
|
06/19/2008 (1
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,552
|
|
|
$
|
1,417
|
|
|
$6,627
|
|
$
|
6,637
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Expiration date was extended from December 20, 2007 to
May 19, 2008, and in May 2008 it was extended from
May 19, 2008 to June 19, 2008.
|
Funded Research and Development Revenue.
Funded
research and development revenue in our new energy business
decreased $1.3 million, or 73.3%, to $489,000 for the year
ended December 31, 2006 from $1.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005. The decrease in revenue was
primarily
36
the result of the suspension of previously approved DOE funding
for 2006 and the completion of other programs that were active
in 2005, including programs with the New York State Energy
Research and Development Authority, the Army Research Labs, the
Marine Corps, the Cabot Superior Micro Powders subcontract with
the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and Harris.
This decrease was partially offset by $427,000 of revenue
recognized from the Samsung alliance agreement during 2006.
Information regarding government and private company development
contracts included in funded research and development revenue is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
For The Year Ended
|
|
For The Year Ended
|
|
Contract to
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Date
|
Contract
|
|
Expiration (1)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Percent
|
|
Revenue
|
|
Percent
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
$3.0 million DOE (2)
|
|
|
03/31/09
|
|
$
|
930
|
|
|
50
|
.8%
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
12
|
.7%
|
|
$
|
1,171
|
$1.3 million NYSERDA (3)
|
|
|
06/30/06
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
18
|
.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,135
|
$1.0 million Samsung (4)
|
|
|
07/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
87
|
.3
|
|
|
427
|
$418,000 SAFT (5)
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$250,000 ARL
|
|
|
09/30/05
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
13
|
.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
$210,000 NIST (6)
|
|
|
06/30/05
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
5
|
.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
$150,000 Harris (7)
|
|
|
06/25/04
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
8
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
$70,000 Marine Corps
|
|
|
03/31/05
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
3
|
.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,829
|
|
|
100
|
.0%
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
100
|
.0%
|
|
$
|
3,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final
billing.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The DOE contract is a cost-share contract. DOE funding for this
contract was suspended during January 2006 and reinstated during
May 2007. During 2007, we received notifications from the DOE of
funding releases totaling $1.0 million and also received an
extension of the termination date for the contract from
July 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008. During February
2008, we received notification from the DOE of a funding release
of $500,000, and during May 2008 we received notification of a
funding release of $325,000.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
The total contract value for this cost shared contract is
$1.3 million consisting of four Phases: Phase I for
$500,000 was from March 12, 2002 through September 30,
2003; Phase II for $200,000 was from October 28, 2003
through October 31, 2004; Phase III for $348,000 was
from August 23, 2004 through August 31, 2005; and
Phase IV for $202,000 which commenced on December 14,
2004 and expired on June 30, 2006. Phases I, II,
and III have been completed, while Phase IV expired
before it was completed.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
The Samsung contract is a research and prototype contract. This
contract included one up-front payment of $750,000 and two
milestone payments of $125,000, each for the delivery of
prototypes. The contract was amended on October 22, 2007 as
we agreed to issue a credit in the amount of the last invoice in
recognition of our continuing collaboration with Samsung.
Therefore, revenue under this contract totaled $875,000.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Represents a fixed price subcontract with SAFT under the U.S.
Army CECOM contract. The purchase order received in connection
with this subcontract was revised on November 14, 2006
eliminating one milestone. As a result, the contract value was
reduced from $470,000 to $418,000 and the expiration date was
extended from September 30 to December 31, 2006.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Represents a fixed price subcontract with CSMP under NIST and
includes the original contract for $200,000 and a contract
amendment for $10,000.
|
37
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Represents a fixed price contract that includes the original
contract for $200,000, an amendment for $50,000, and a 2005
amendment reducing the contract by $100,000.
|
Cost of Product Revenue.
Cost of product revenue in
our test and measurement instrumentation business increased by
$519,000, or 21.8%, to $2.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from $2.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. This increase is consistent with higher
product revenue during 2006 compared with 2005.
Gross profit as a percentage of product revenue increased by
1.8% to 62.2% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
improvement in gross margin during 2006 was primarily the result
of a five point rise in average margins on capacitance product
sales resulting from higher sales volume and improved pricing
strategies.
Funded Research and Product Development
Expenses.
New energy funded research and development
expenses decreased by $2.4 million, or 67.6%, to
$1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 from
$3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. The
decreased costs were attributable to active contracts during
2005, which were no longer active during 2006. During 2006, we
had active contracts with Samsung, DOE, and SAFT, while during
2005 we had active contracts with DOE, NYSERDA, SAFT, NIST, ARL,
and the Marine Corps.
Unfunded Research and Product Development
Expenses.
Unfunded research and product development
expenses increased by $5.7 million, or 92.4%, to
$11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006
from $6.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2005. This increase reflected a $5.4 million increase in
our new energy business related to increased internal costs for
the development of micro fuel cell systems and costs in
connection with developing prototypes and product intent
prototypes, including a $512,000 non-cash charge for share-based
compensation resulting from the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R, which requires that the fair value of
share-based compensation be expensed. This increase also
included a $208,000 increase in product development expenses in
our test and measurement instrumentation business for projects
related to the development of a glass thickness gauge,
improvements to the portable engine vibration and balancing
system, and updated industrial balancing software.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expense.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased by $815,000, or 7.5%, to $10.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from $10.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005. This decrease was
primarily the result of (a) an $892,000 increase in
non-cash equity compensation charges resulting from the adoption
of SFAS No. 123R, which required that the fair value
of share-based compensation be expensed, (b) a
$1.1 million decrease in salaries and engineering
management costs, partially a result of an increase in costs
directly charged to research and product development and the
elimination of the government systems group during the second
quarter of 2005, (c) a $640,000 decrease related to
increases in liquidations to unfunded research and development
costs, which was a result of having charged more time to
internal development projects for low power and high power
technology platform developments, the development of prototypes
for Samsung, and the development of the Mobion 30M product,
(d) a $259,000 decrease in the Los Alamos National
Laboratory license fees as a result of an amendment of the
license agreement, which resulted in reduced minimum annual
license payments, (e) a $152,000 decrease in depreciation
costs primarily related to the renewal of the lease on our main
office, (f) a $104,000 increase in commission costs at MTI
Instruments, (g) a $131,000 increase in incentive
compensation primarily related to new executive employment
agreements, (h) a $261,000 increase in marketing costs as
MTI Micro raised its emphasis on marketing and business
development and MTI Instruments underwent a major rebranding
campaign during 2006, and (i) a $39,000 decrease in other
expenses, net.
Operating Loss.
Operating loss increased by
$2.6 million, or 17.5%, to $17.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006 compared with the year ended
December 31, 2005 as a result of the factors noted above.
38
Gain on Sale of Securities Available for Sale.
The
gain on sale of securities available for sale for the year ended
December 31, 2006 was $4.3 million compared with
$10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, we sold
1,103,500 shares of Plug Power common stock at a weighted
average price of $5.66 per share, with gross proceeds to us of
$6.2 million.
On June 24, 2005, Fletcher International Ltd., or Fletcher,
notified us of its election to exercise in full its right to
purchase from us an amount of common stock of Plug Power. As a
result of this election, Fletcher purchased
1,799,791 shares of Plug Power common stock from us at a
price of $0.7226 per share, with proceeds to us of
$1.3 million. In connection with this exercise, we
recognized a loss on this embedded derivative immediately prior
to exercise of $7.2 million and a gain on the sale of Plug
Power common shares of $9.6 million.
Gain (loss) on Derivative
s. We recorded a gain on
derivative accounting of $182,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and a loss of $10.4 million on
derivative accounting for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The 2006 gain was the result of derivative treatment of the
freestanding warrants issued in conjunction with our December
2006 capital raise, while the 2005 result related to an embedded
derivative for the purchase of Plug Power common stock, which
was issued as part of the 2004 private placement transaction.
The warrant derivative was valued using the Black-Scholes
Pricing model, as was the embedded derivative prior to its
exercise on June 24, 2005. Upon exercise, the embedded
derivative was valued at its intrinsic value.
Income Tax (Expense) Benefit.
Our income tax expense
rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 was 15%, while
the income tax expense rate for the year ended December 31,
2005 was 11%. These tax rates were primarily the result of
losses generated by operations, changes in the valuation
allowance, and disproportionate effects of reclassification of
gains on Plug Power security sales included in operating loss.
The valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets at
December 31, 2006 was $18.8 million and at
December 31, 2005 was $10.9 million. We determined
that it was more likely than not that the ultimate recognition
of certain deferred tax assets would not be realized.
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table presents unaudited quarterly financial
information for each of the 12 quarters ended March 31,
2008. We believe this information contains all adjustments,
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation. The quarterly operating results
39
are not necessarily indicative of results for any future
periods. Quarter-to-quarter comparisons should not be relied
upon as indicators of future performance. Our operating results
are subject to quarterly fluctuations as a result of a number of
factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
Sep. 30
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
Sep. 30
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
Sep. 30
|
|
|
Dec. 31
|
|
|
Mar. 31
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
$1,285
|
|
|
|
$1,428
|
|
|
|
$1,896
|
|
|
|
$1,513
|
|
|
|
$1,700
|
|
|
|
$1,693
|
|
|
|
$2,761
|
|
|
|
$1,701
|
|
|
|
$2,275
|
|
|
|
$2,196
|
|
|
|
$2,856
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
Gross profit on product revenue
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
2,913
|
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
|
|
2,005
|
|
|
|
2,560
|
|
|
|
3,252
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
2,677
|
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(4,273
|
)
|
|
|
(2,623
|
)
|
|
|
(3,633
|
)
|
|
|
(4,601
|
)
|
|
|
(4,961
|
)
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
(3,975
|
)
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
(2,688
|
)
|
|
|
(2,661
|
)
|
|
|
(3,678
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(2,793
|
)
|
|
|
$(1,909
|
)
|
|
|
$(4,338
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,431
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,222
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,678
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,336
|
)
|
|
|
$(3,156
|
)
|
|
|
$(2,487
|
)
|
|
|
$(2,481
|
)
|
|
|
$(1,451
|
)
|
|
|
(3,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted loss per share
|
|
|
$(0.73
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.50
|
)
|
|
|
$(1.12
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.89
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.93
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.82
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.66
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.30
|
)
|
|
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We have incurred significant losses as we continue to fund the
development and commercialization of our portable power source
business. We expect that losses will fluctuate from year-to-year
and that such fluctuations may be substantial as a result of,
among other factors, sales of securities available for sale, our
operating results, the availability of equity financing,
including warrants issued in connection with the December 2006
capital raise, and the ability to attract government funding
resources to offset research and development costs. As of
March 31, 2008, we had an accumulated deficit of
$108.3 million. During the three months ended
March 31, 2008, our results of operations resulted in a net
loss of $3.2 million and cash used in operating activities
totaling $3.0 million. This cash use in 2008 was funded
primarily by cash and cash equivalents on hand as of
December 31, 2007 of $7.7 million. We expect to
continue to incur losses as we seek to develop and commercialize
our portable power source products. We expect to continue
funding our operations from current cash and cash equivalents,
the sales of securities available for sale, proceeds, if any,
from equity financings, including warrants issued in connection
with the December 2006 capital raise, and government funding. We
expect to spend approximately $11.7 million on research and
development of Mobion technology and $1.8 million in
research and development on our test and measurement
instrumentation products during 2008.
Additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable
terms, if at all. Cash used to support operations is expected to
total approximately $11.8 million, and cash used for
capital expenditures is expected to total approximately
$1.1 million. Capital expenditures will consist of
purchases of manufacturing and laboratory equipment, software,
computer equipment, and furniture. Proceeds from our sale of
securities available for sale are subject to fluctuations in the
market value of Plug Power Inc., or Plug Power. We may also seek
to supplement our resources through additional equity offerings,
sales of assets (including MTI Instruments). Additional
government revenue could also provide more resources.
40
As of March 31, 2008, we owned 1,137,166 shares of
Plug Power common stock. Potential future sales of Plug Power
securities will generate taxable income or loss, which is
different from book income or loss, as a result of the tax bases
in these assets being significantly different from their book
bases. Book and tax bases as of March 31, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Book
|
|
Average Tax
|
Security
|
|
Shares Held
|
|
Cost Basis
|
|
Cost Basis
|
|
Plug Power
|
|
|
1,137,166
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
Plug Power stock is currently traded on The Nasdaq Global Market
and is therefore subject to stock market conditions. When
acquired, these securities were unregistered. Our Plug Power
securities are considered restricted securities as
defined under the securities laws and may not be sold in the
future without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, unless in compliance with an available exemption from
registration. While our Plug Power shares remain
restricted securities, these shares are now freely
transferable in accordance with Rule 144(d) under the
Securities Act of 1933, subject to the limitations associated
with such rule.
Working capital was $7.6 million at March 31, 2008, a
$3.7 million decrease from $11.3 million at
December 31, 2007. This decrease was primarily a result of
the use of cash in operations and a decline in the value of our
Plug Power common stock.
At March 31, 2008, our order backlog was $1.9 million
compared to $445,000 at December 31, 2007.
Our inventory turnover ratios and accounts receivable days sales
outstanding for the trailing 12-month periods and their changes
at March 31, 2007 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Inventory turnover
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Average accounts receivable days sales outstanding
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
10
|
|
The decline in inventory turnover stemmed from a 15% higher
inventory balance needed at March 31, 2008, compared to
March 31, 2007, to support new product initiatives as these
products gain acceptance in their targeted markets, as well as
to build higher stock levels to facilitate delivery upon our
increased order backlog.
The increase in average accounts receivable days sales
outstanding in 2008 compared to 2007 was primarily attributable
to our decision to grant our largest commercial customer
90-day
payment terms during 2007.
Cash used by operating activities was $3.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to
$4.6 million in 2007. This cash use decrease of
$1.6 million reflects a net decrease in cash expenditures
to fund operations of $743,000, coupled with net balance sheet
changes, which decreased cash expenditures by $879,000,
reflecting the timing of cash payments and receipts,
particularly recognition of deferred revenue and the accrual of
certain accrued liabilities.
Capital expenditures were $102,000 during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, an increase of $52,000 from the comparable
period in prior year. Capital expenditures in 2008 included
manufacturing, laboratory and demonstration equipment.
Outstanding commitments for capital expenditures as of
March 31, 2008 totaled $5,000 and included commitments for
laboratory equipment. We expect to finance these expenditures
with current cash and cash equivalents, the sale of securities
available for sale, equity financing and other sources, as
appropriate and to the extent available.
Cash flow used by operating activities was $11.7 million
during 2007 compared with $12.7 million during 2006. This
cash use decrease of $1.0 million reflected a net decrease
of
41
$3.5 million in cash expenditures to fund operations
coupled with net balance sheet changes, which increased cash
expenditures by $2.5 million, reflecting the timing of cash
receipts and payments, particularly recognition of deferred
revenue and payment of certain accrued liabilities.
Capital expenditures were $414,000 during 2007, a decrease of
$1.2 million from the prior year. Capital expenditures
during 2007 included computer equipment, software, and
manufacturing and laboratory equipment. Outstanding commitments
for capital expenditures as of December 31, 2007 totaled
$35,000 and included expenditures for laboratory and computer
equipment. We expect to finance these expenditures and other
capital expenditures during 2008 with current cash and cash
equivalents, the sale of securities available for sale, equity
financing, and other sources, as appropriate and to the extent
available.
During 2007, we sold 1,452,770 shares of Plug Power common
stock with proceeds totaling $5.1 million and gains
totaling $2.5 million. These proceeds reflect our
previously announced strategy to raise additional capital
through the sale of Plug Power stock to fund our micro fuel cell
operations. We expect the net gains to be offset by our
operating losses for purposes of computing taxable income. We
estimate that as of December 31, 2007, our remaining net
operating loss carry forwards were approximately
$54 million.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
Pursuant to a financing transaction between us and certain
investors on December 15, 2006, we issued warrants to
purchase up to an aggregate 3,027,778 shares of our common
stock exercisable at any time until December 19, 2011 at an
exercise price per share of $2.27. The shares issuable upon
exercise of these warrants would be issued under a shelf
registration statement covering the resale of such shares. The
terms of the warrant agreement permit a cash settlement with the
holders of the warrants if we are acquired by, or merge with, a
private company. Because of the possibility of such a
settlement, we have classified this agreement as an
asset/liability derivative in accordance with SFAS No. 133
and
EITF 00-19.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and
Estimates
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations is based upon our consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. Note 2 to the consolidated audited
financial statements includes a summary of our most significant
accounting policies. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and
expenses, and related disclosure of assets and liabilities. On
an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments,
including those related to revenue recognition, inventories,
securities available for sale, income taxes, share-based
compensation and derivatives. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Periodically, we review our critical accounting estimates with
the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
The significant accounting policies that we believe are most
critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our
financial statements include the following:
Revenue Recognition.
We recognize revenue from
development contracts based upon the relationship of actual
costs to estimated costs to complete the contract. These types
of contracts typically provide development services to achieve a
specific scientific result relating to direct methanol fuel cell
technology. Some of these contracts require us to contribute to
the development effort. The customers for these contracts are
commercial customers and various state and federal government
agencies. While government agencies are providing revenue, we do
not expect the
42
government to be a significant end user of the resulting
products. Therefore, we do not reduce funded research and
product development expense by the funding received. When it
appears probable that estimated costs will exceed available
funding on fixed price contracts and we are not successful in
securing additional funding, we record the estimated additional
expense before it is incurred.
We apply the guidance in SAB No. 104,
Revenue
Recognition
, in the evaluation of commercially funded fuel
cell research and prototype agreements to determine when to
properly recognize income. Payments received in connection with
commercial research and prototype agreements are deferred and
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
agreement for service-related payments. For milestone and
prototype delivery payments, if and when achieved, revenue is
deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the
remaining term of the agreement. When revenue qualifies for
recognition it will be recorded as funded research and
development revenue. The costs associated with research and
prototype-producing activities are expensed as incurred.
Expenses in an amount equal to revenue recognized are
reclassified from unfunded research and product development to
funded research and product development.
We also recognize revenue from product sales in accordance with
SAB No. 104. We recognize product revenue when there
is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery of the
product to the customer or distributor has occurred, at which
time title generally is passed to the customer or distributor,
and we have determined that collection of a fixed fee is
probable, all of which occur upon shipment of the product. If
the product requires installation to be performed by us, all
revenue related to the product is deferred and recognized upon
the completion of the installation.
Inventory.
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or
the current estimated market value of the inventory. We
periodically review inventory quantities on hand and record a
provision for excess or obsolete inventory based primarily on
our estimated forecast of product demand, as well as based on
historical usage. Demand and usage for products and materials
can fluctuate significantly. A significant decrease in demand
for our products could result in a short-term increase in the
cost of inventory purchases and an increase of excess inventory
quantities on hand. Therefore, although we make every effort to
assure the accuracy of our forecasts of future product demand,
any significant unanticipated changes in demand could have a
significant impact on the value of our inventory and our
reported operating results.
Share-Based Payments.
We grant options to purchase our
common stock and award restricted stock to our employees and
directors under our equity incentive plans. The benefits
provided under these plans are share-based payments subject to
the provisions of SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based
Payment
, and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 107,
Share-Based Payments
. Effective January 1, 2006, we
use the fair value method to apply the provisions of
FAS 123R with the modified prospective application, which
provides for certain changes to the method for valuing
share-based compensation. The valuation provisions of
FAS 123R apply to new awards and to awards that are
outstanding on the effective date and subsequently modified.
Under the modified prospective application, prior periods are
not revised for comparative purposes. Share-based compensation
expense recognized under FAS 123R for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 was $389,000 and for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was $1.6 million. At March 31,
2008, total unrecognized estimated compensation expense related
to non-vested awards granted prior to that date was
$1.3 million, which is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.27 years.
Upon adoption of FAS 123R, we began estimating the value of
share-based awards on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R,
the value of each share-based award was estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes model for the pro forma
information required to be disclosed under FAS 123. The
determination of the fair value of share-based payment awards on
the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected
43
by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of
complex and subjective variables. These variables include our
expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards,
actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors,
risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends.
If factors change and we employ different assumptions in the
application of FAS 123R during future periods, the
compensation expense that we record under FAS 123R may
differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current
period. Therefore, we believe it is important for investors to
be aware of the high degree of subjectivity involved when using
option-pricing models to estimate share-based compensation under
FAS 123R. Option-pricing models were developed for use in
estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or
hedging restrictions, are fully transferable and do not cause
dilution. Because our share-based payments have characteristics
significantly different from those of freely traded options, and
because changes in the subjective input assumptions can
materially affect our estimates of fair values, in our opinion,
existing valuation models, including the Black-Scholes Option
Pricing model, may not provide reliable measures of the fair
values of our share-based compensation. Consequently, there is a
risk that our estimates of the fair values of our share-based
compensation awards on the grant dates may bear little
resemblance to the intrinsic values realized upon the exercise,
expiration, cancellation
,
or forfeiture of those
share-based payments in the future. Certain share-based
payments, such as employee stock options, may expire worthless
or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the
fair values originally estimated on the grant date and expensed
in our financial statements. Alternatively, value may be
realized from these instruments that are significantly in excess
of the fair values originally estimated on the grant date and
expensed in our financial statements. There currently is neither
a market-based mechanism nor other practical application to
verify the reliability and accuracy of the estimates stemming
from these valuation models, nor a way to compare and adjust the
estimates to actual values. Although the fair value of employee
share-based awards is determined in accordance with
FAS 123R and SAB 107 using a qualified option-pricing
model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value
observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction.
Estimates of share-based compensation expenses are significant
to our financial statements, but these expenses are based on the
aforementioned option valuation model and will never result in
the payment of cash by us.
The guidance in FAS 123R and SAB 107 is still
relatively new, and best practices are not well established. The
application of these principles may be subject to further
interpretation and refinement over time. There are significant
differences among valuation models, and there is a possibility
that we will adopt different valuation models in the future.
This may result in a lack of consistency in future periods and
materially affect the fair value estimate of share-based
payments. It may also result in a lack of comparability with
other companies that use different models, methods
,
and
assumptions.
Theoretical valuation models and market-based methods are
evolving and may result in lower or higher fair value estimates
for share-based compensation. The timing, readiness, adoption,
general acceptance, reliability, and testing of these methods is
uncertain. Sophisticated mathematical models may require
voluminous historical information, modeling expertise, financial
analyses, correlation analyses, integrated software and
databases, consulting fees, customization
,
and testing
for adequacy of internal controls.
For purposes of estimating the fair value of stock options
granted during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and
the year ended December 31, 2007 using the Black-Scholes
model, we used the historical volatility of our stock for the
expected volatility assumption input to the Black-Scholes model,
consistent with the guidance in FAS 123R and SAB 107.
The risk-free interest rate is based on the risk-free
zero-coupon rate for a period consistent with the expected
option term at the time of grant. We do not currently pay nor do
we anticipate paying dividends, but we are required to assume a
dividend yield as an input to the Black-Scholes model. As such,
we use a zero dividend rate. The expected option term is
estimated using both historical term measures and projected
termination estimates.
44
Income Taxes.
As part of the process of preparing our
consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate
our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we
operate. This process involves the estimation of our actual
current tax exposure together with assessing temporary
differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax
and accounting purposes. Included in this assessment is the
determination of net operating loss carry forwards. These
differences result in a net deferred tax asset. We must assess
the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered
from future taxable income and, to the extent that we believe
that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation
allowance.
Significant management judgment is required in determining our
provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and
liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against our
net deferred tax assets. We have recorded a valuation allowance
as a result of uncertainties in our ability to realize certain
net deferred tax assets, primarily consisting of net operating
losses being carried forward. In the event that actual results
differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in
future periods, we may need to adjust the recorded valuation
allowance, which could materially impact our financial position
and results of operations. We have recorded a full valuation
allowance against our net deferred tax assets of
$22.3 million as of December 31, 2007. In the event
actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these
estimates in future periods, we may need to adjust our valuation
allowance which could materially impact our financial position
and results of operations.
During June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109
or FIN 48, which became effective for us
beginning in fiscal 2007. FIN 48 addresses the
determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be
claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial
statements. Under FIN 48, we must recognize the tax benefit
from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than
not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by
the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the
position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such a position are measured based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate resolution. The impact of our
reassessment of our tax positions in accordance with FIN 48
did not have a material impact on our results of operations,
financial condition
,
or liquidity.
Derivative Instruments.
We account for derivative
instruments and embedded derivative instruments in accordance
with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
, as amended. The amended
standard requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as
either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial
position and measure these instruments at fair value. Fair value
is estimated using the Black-Scholes Pricing model. We also
follow EITF Issue
No. 00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to
and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock
,
which requires freestanding contracts that are settled in a
companys own stock, including common stock warrants, to be
designated as an equity instrument, asset or a liability. Under
the provisions of EITF Issue
No. 00-19,
a contract designated as an asset or a liability must be carried
at fair value, with any changes in fair value recorded in the
results of operations. A contract designated as an equity
instrument can be included in equity, with no fair value
adjustments are required.
The asset/liability derivatives are valued on a quarterly basis
using the Black-Scholes Pricing model. Significant assumptions
used in the valuation included exercise dates, closing prices
for our common stock, volatility of our common stock, and a
proxy risk-free interest rate. Gains (losses) on derivatives are
included in Gain (loss) on derivatives in our
consolidated statement of operations.
45
BUSINESS
We are developing and commercializing off-the-grid rechargeable
power sources for portable electronics. We have developed a
patented, proprietary direct methanol fuel cell technology
platform called Mobion, which generates electrical power using
up to 100% methanol as fuel. Our proprietary fuel cell power
solution consists of two primary components integrated in an
easily manufactured device: the direct methanol fuel cell power
engine, which we refer to as our Mobion Chip, and methanol
replacement cartridges. Our current Mobion Chip weighs less than
one ounce and is small enough to fit in the palm of ones
hand. The methanol used by the technology is fully
biodegradable. We believe we are the only micro fuel cell
developer to have demonstrated power density of over 50
mW/cm
2
with high energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of methanol for
handheld consumer electronic applications. For these reasons, we
believe our technology offers a compelling alternative to
current lithium-ion and similar rechargeable battery systems
currently used by original equipment manufacturers and branded
partners, or OEMs, in many handheld electronic devices, such as
mobile phones (including smart phones) and mobile phone
accessories, digital cameras, portable media players, PDAs, and
GPS devices. We believe our platform will facilitate the
development of numerous product advantages, including small
size, environmental friendliness, and simplicity of design, all
critical for commercialization in the consumer market, and can
be implemented as three different product options: a compact
external charging device, a snap-on or attached power accessory,
or an embedded fuel cell power solution. We have strategic
arrangements with Samsung Electronics, an OEM of mobile phones
and mobile phone accessories, with Duracell, part of the Procter
& Gamble Company, and with a global Japanese consumer
electronics company. Our goal is to become a leading provider of
portable power for handheld electronic devices and we intend to
commercialize Mobion products beginning in 2009.
Our Mobion technology eliminates the need for active water
recirculation pumps or the inclusion of water as a fuel
dilutant. The water required for the electrochemical process is
transferred internally within the Mobion Chip from the site of
water generation on the air-side of the cell. This internal flow
of water takes place without the need for any pumps, complicated
re-circulation loops or other micro-plumbing tools. Our Mobion
technology is protected by a patent portfolio that includes over
90 U.S. patent applications covering five key technologies
and manufacturing areas.
We also design, manufacture, and sell high-performance test and
measurement instruments and systems serving three markets:
general dimensional gauging, semiconductor, and aviation. These
products consist of: electronic, computerized gauging
instruments for position, displacement and vibration
applications for the design, manufacturing and test markets;
semiconductor products for wafer characterization; and engine
balancing and vibration analysis systems for military and
commercial aircraft.
The
Portable Power Source Industry
Industry
Background
Consumers demand portable electronics that offer an enhanced
experience through expanded memory, improved display
technologies, constant connectivity, robust software, and a
reduced form factor. In addition, technological advances in
semiconductor manufacturing, LED displays, memory costs and
availability, wireless technologies, and software applications
have resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of portable
electronic devices, their usage, and power requirements. As a
result of these consumer demands and technological advances,
there are a number of handheld electronic devices, such as
mobile phones (including smart phones) and mobile phone
accessories, digital cameras, portable media players, PDAs, and
GPS devices, that have been introduced into the market. Many of
these devices provide consumers and mobile professionals with
the ability to communicate any time, anywhere and have
effectively enabled the creation of an always-on
environment independent of the end users location. This
trend towards increased
46
functionality in portable electronic devices has led to a
power gap in which the disparity between a
devices power supply, typically a rechargeable lithium-ion
battery, and its power need are not being met. This power gap
leads to a need for the end user to plug-in their devices to the
electrical grid on a regular basis, which limits their ability
to use these electronic devices where and when the need arises.
The Power
Source Bottleneck
Improvements in rechargeable battery technology have not kept
pace with the evolution of consumer electronic device
performance. Over the last ten years, device performance as
measured by silicon processor speed has increased by a factor of
128 times, while the energy density of lithium-ion technology
has only doubled. We believe that further gains in lithium-ion
technology for portable electronics will be incremental at best,
as any achievable benefits may be outweighed by the decreasing
stability, availability, integrity, and relative safety of these
higher energy output batteries. In addition to their performance
shortfalls, lithium-ion battery technology poses an
environmental risk as the various heavy metals incorporated in
these batteries require special disposal to prevent
contamination of waste disposal sites.
According to Frost and Sullivan, an independent research firm,
the global battery market was approximately $14.3 billion
in 2006 and is projected to increase to roughly
$21.4 billion by 2012. The market for batteries can be
divided into three segments: consumer, industrial, and military.
Consumer battery sales represented approximately 81% of this
market and are projected to represent an overwhelming majority
of sales through at least 2012. The same study estimates that
rechargeable batteries accounted for approximately
$5.4 billion of this market in 2006.
OEMs are actively seeking improved power sources to replace
existing rechargeable lithium-ion batteries and to power
additional improvements to their mobile electronic devices. The
development of new products using technologies that already
exist, such as radio frequency technologies and 4G wireless
capabilities, but cannot be effectively commercialized on mobile
devices, will result from the availability of portable, compact,
economical, rechargeable/replaceable higher energy density power
sources, including micro fuel cells.
Our
Solution
At the core of our solution is our proprietary Mobion Chip
engine, a design architecture that embodies a reduction in the
size, complexity, and cost of fuel cell construction, which
results in a reliable, manufacturable, and affordable power
solution that we believe provides improved energy density and
portability over competing rechargeable battery technologies.
Our proprietary fuel cell power solution consists of two primary
components integrated in an easily manufactured device: the
direct methanol fuel cell power engine, which we refer to as our
Mobion Chip, and methanol replacement cartridges. Our Mobion
Chip weighs less than one ounce and is small enough to fit in
the palm of ones hand. For these reasons, we believe that
our Mobion platform is ideally suited to provide a replacement
for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Based upon our ability
to provide a compact, efficient, clean, safe, and long-lasting
power source for lower power applications, we intend to
initially target power solutions for applications, such as
mobile phones (including smart phones) and mobile phone
accessories, digital cameras, portable media players, PDAs, and
GPS devices.
For handheld consumer electronic applications, we believe we are
the only micro fuel cell developer to have demonstrated power
density of over 50
mW/cm
2
with energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of fuel, which is a direct
result of our Mobion platforms ability to use 100%
methanol a widely available, environmentally
friendly, inexpensive, and biodegradable fuel. These advantages
result in higher energy density and reduced size, cost, and
complexity of our power solution offering consumers portable
on-demand power, independence from power outlets, and freedom
from the need to constantly recharge their devices.
47
Our
Strategy
Our goal is to become a leading provider of portable power for
handheld electronic devices. Key elements of our strategy
designed to achieve this objective include the following:
Business Focus.
We are focusing our efforts on the
development and commercialization of our portable power source
products. We believe this business provides a higher potential,
higher growth opportunity than our test and measurement
instrumentation business. We will continue to evaluate our test
and measurement instrumentation business, which contributes
positive operating results and cash flows, but may consider its
eventual sale or other disposition.
Design for Mass Manufacturing.
Our portable power source
products will be manufactured using standard processes, such as
injection molding and automated test and assembly, which are
broadly employed throughout the electronics manufacturing
industry. In preparing Mobion for commercialization, our current
Mobion Chip is injection molded and is being designed for mass
manufacturing. In addition, we have continued integrating more
functionality into our Mobion Chip while reducing its part count
to one molded piece. Our current Mobion Chip is 9cc in size,
which is small enough to fit in the palm of a hand.
Outsource Manufacturing.
We plan to outsource
manufacturing to expand rapidly and diversify our production
capacity. This strategy will allow us to maintain a variable
cost model in which we do not incur most of our manufacturing
costs until our proprietary fuel cell power solution has been
shipped and billed to our customers. We intend to concentrate on
our core competencies of research and development and product
design. This approach should reduce our fixed capital
expenditures and allow us to efficiently scale production.
Utilize our Technology to Provide Compelling Products.
We
plan to utilize our intellectual property portfolio and
technological expertise to develop and offer portable power
source products across multiple electronic device markets. We
intend to employ our technological expertise to reduce the
overall size and weight of our portable power source products
while increasing their ease of manufacturing, power capacity,
and power duration and decreasing their cost. We believe that
these efforts will enable us to meet customer expectations and
to achieve our goal of supplying on a timely and cost-effective
basis the most environmentally friendly portable power source
products to our target markets. We believe our products will
offer advantages in terms of performance, functionality, size,
weight, and ease of use. We plan to continue enhancing our
customers industrial design alternatives and device
functionality through innovative product development based on
our existing capabilities and technological advances.
Capitalize on Growth Markets.
We intend to capitalize on
the growth of the electronic device markets, including new
products that may be brought about by the convergence of
computing, communications, and entertainment devices. We believe
our portable power source products will address the growing need
for portability, connectivity, and functionality in the evolving
electronic device markets. We plan to offer these power
solutions to OEM customers to enable them to offer products that
have advantages in terms of size, weight, power duration, and
environmental friendliness. We plan to utilize our existing
technologies, as well as aggressively pursue new technologies
and evolving markets that demand enhanced power solutions.
Develop Strong Customer Relationships.
We plan to develop
strong and long-lasting customer relationships with leading
electronic device OEMs and to provide them with power solutions
for their products. We believe that our portable power source
products will enable our OEM customers to deliver a more
positive user experience and to differentiate their products
from those of their competitors. We will attempt to enhance the
competitive position of our customers by providing them with
innovative, distinctive, and high-quality portable power supply
products on a timely and cost-effective basis. We will work
continually to improve our portable power source products, to
reduce costs, and to speed the delivery of our products. We will
endeavor to streamline our designs
48
and delivery processes through ongoing design, engineering, and
production improvement efforts. We will also devote considerable
effort to support our customers after the purchase of our
portable power source products.
Pursue Strategic Relationships.
We intend to develop and
expand strategic relationships to enhance our ability to offer
value-added customer solutions, penetrate new markets, and
strengthen the technological leadership of our portable power
source products.
Products
Portable
Power Source Products
We are developing three product categories of our Mobion
technology: (i) external power charger products,
(ii) snap-on or attached power source products, and
(iii) embedded power source products. In addition, we are
working with our strategic partners and suppliers to develop
disposable methanol cartridges that will be used to fuel our
portable power source products. Through our alliance with
Duracell, we are developing fuel cartridges that will be
designed and branded for mass market commercialization. Duracell
has experience in the sale and distribution of portable power
through its battery products, as well as in the development,
distribution, and sale of liquid products with similar safety
and packaging requirements as the 100% methanol cartridges.
External Power Charger:
Our design for an external power
charger is a standalone device that uses a standard and widely
used universal serial bus, or USB, interface as a power output
connector that can be used to recharge handheld mobile devices.
Our current design for the device is roughly the size of two
decks of playing cards (see photo below) and employs a 100%
methanol fuel cartridge, which occupies the same volume as a
pack of chewing gum. Our current prototype external power
charger provides up to one month of power for the typical mobile
phone. It can also be designed to enable a professional
photographer to take over 5,000 pictures using a high end
digital camera from a single fuel tank. Our device is designed
to provide 2.5 watts of power from its USB interface and also
offer fast charge, ultra-long run time and self-charging modes.
Mobion external power charger prototypes
Snap-on or Attached Power Source Products:
Similar to
aftermarket battery attachments, our snap-on direct methanol
fuel cell power solution is an attached power supply that is
compatible with existing portable electronic devices and offers
users extended run-time power. In this category, we envision a
number of product applications, including attachments for
digital cameras, portable media players, GPS devices, and other
consumer and electronic products. Our initial design is a direct
methanol fuel cell camera-grip (see photo below) that replaces
comparable rechargeable lithium-ion battery-pack grips and is
designed to provide twice as much energy as similar
49
rechargeable lithium-ion battery-based products. Our Mobion
direct methanol fuel cell camera grip allows photographers the
benefits of extended usage plus the freedom to refill using a
methanol cartridge rather than by plugging into a wall outlet.
Sample Mobion attached power
source camera-grip prototype
Embedded power source products:
Our goal is to produce
direct methanol fuel cells that can be embedded into portable
electronic devices in order to increase their run time and to
provide fast charge capability by hot-swapping 100% methanol
cartridges. We have developed an embedded fuel cell prototype
for a GPS unit that we believe will generate three times as much
usage time as GPS devices powered by conventional disposable AA
batteries (see photos below.)
We have also developed an embedded fuel cell concept model
designed for a smart phone (see photos below) and believe that
this concept model highlights the anticipated future product
direction for our portable power source products in the consumer
market.
Prototype of a GPS unit with an
embedded Mobion power source
Concept model of a smart phone with an
embedded Mobion power source
Advantages of our Portable Power Source Products
We believe that our portable power source products will offer
the following advantages:
|
|
|
|
|
Off-the-grid power source.
Our products provide users of
consumer electronic devices with extended mobility by providing
power without having to attach to a wall outlet to recharge
their devices.
|
|
|
|
Small size and low weight.
The dimensions of our products
will enable our OEM customers to reduce the overall size and
weight of their products.
|
|
|
|
Power density.
Our products will have power density of
over 50
mW/cm
2
and high energy efficiencies of 1.4 Wh/cc of methanol.
|
|
|
|
Power duration.
Our products will offer longer run time
than currently available portable charging systems.
|
|
|
|
Ease of manufacturing.
Our products will be manufactured
using traditional injection molding techniques that will easily
transfer to mass-manufacturing production lines.
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Safety.
Our products will utilize methanol fuel, which
does not require storage under pressure or at low temperatures.
|
|
|
|
Environmentally friendly.
Our products will utilize fully
biodegradable methanol fuel.
|
Codes and
Standards
In 2004, we became the worlds first company to obtain
micro fuel cell safety compliance certifications for a fuel cell
product from Underwriters Laboratory and CSA
International. In addition, we received United Nations packaging
certification and our methanol cartridges were deemed compliant
by the U.S. Department of Transportation for worldwide
cargo shipment. Certification is required for every commercial
product prior to its shipment. Based upon our previous
experiences with these regulatory agencies, we do not anticipate
delays associated with seeking Underwriters Laboratory and
CSA International product certifications for our commercial
products, which are anticipated to begin shipping in 2009.
Also, we helped to develop a proposal adopted by the United
Nations to provide methanol fuel cartridges a separate
classification and we worked with other micro fuel cell
companies, and the appropriate regulatory bodies, to generate
the first draft of the international standards for methanol
safety and use related to transport on commercial airplanes.
As a result of our industry coalition efforts, the International
Civil Aviation Organization technical instructions and the
International Air Transport Association Dangerous Goods
Regulations now permit airline passengers and crew to carry on
and use certain fuel cell power systems and fuel cell cartridges
containing methanol. On April 30, 2008, the U.S. Department
of Transportation issued a final ruling adopting the
International Civil Aviation Organization, or ICAO, regulations
permitting commercial aircraft passengers and crew to bring in
their carry-on baggage methanol fuel cell cartridges and fuel
cell systems designed for portable electronic devices. The
effective date of this ruling is October 1, 2008, although
voluntary compliance with this ruling may begin as soon as
May 30, 2008.
Test and
Measurement Instrumentation Products
We are a global supplier of computerized gauging instruments,
metrology systems for semiconductor wafers, and jet engine
balancing systems.
General Dimensional Gauging:
Our gauging instruments
employ fiber optic, laser, and capacitance technologies to make
precision measurements in product design, production, and
quality related processes. Our gauging instruments include
capacitance gauging systems offering ultra-high precision
measurement, a fiber-optic based vibration sensor system with
extremely high frequency response, a high-speed laser sensor
system utilizing the latest complementary metal-oxide
semiconductor/charge-coupled device technology, and a
stand-alone data acquisition system that incorporates multiple
sensor technologies. These products are targeted towards the
data storage, semiconductor, and automotive industries.
Semiconductor:
Our family of wafer metrology systems
range from manually operated units to fully automated systems,
which test key wafer characteristics critical to producing
high-quality chips used in the semiconductor industry. These
units are used as quality control tools delivering highly
precise measurements for thickness variations, bow, warp,
resistivity, and flatness. These systems can be used on
substrates varying widely in size and materials. Our wafer
metrology systems include an automated wafer characterization
system, a semi-automated, full wafer surface scanning system,
and a device that provides for manual, non-contact measurements.
Jet Engine Balancing Systems:
Our portable and test cell
balance systems automatically collect and record aircraft engine
vibration data, identify vibration or balance issues in an
engine, and calculate a solution to the problem. These units are
used by major aircraft engine manufacturers, the U.S. Air
Force, other military and commercial airlines and gas turbine
manufacturers.
51
Technology
A fuel cell is an electrochemical energy conversion device,
which is similar to a battery, that produces electricity from a
liquid or gaseous fuel, such as methanol, and an oxidant, such
as oxygen. Fuel cells are different from batteries in that they
consume a reactant, which must be replenished, while batteries
store electrical energy chemically in a closed system.
Generally, the reactants flow in and reaction products flow out
of the fuel cell. While the electrodes within a battery react
and change as a battery is charged or discharged, a fuel
cells electrodes are catalytic and relatively stable.
The direct methanol fuel cell relies upon the reaction of water
with methanol at the catalytic anode layer to release protons
and electrons, and form carbon dioxide. The electrons pass
through a circuit and generate electricity that can be used to
power external devices. The protons generated through this
reaction pass through the proton exchange membrane to the
cathode, where they combine to form water. The anode and cathode
layers of a direct methanol fuel cell are usually made of
platinum particles and platinum ruthenium particles embedded on
either side of a proton exchange membrane.
52
Methanol fuel cells need water at the anode and therefore pure
methanol cannot be used without the provision of water via
either active transport, such as the pumping of water generated
at the cathode back to the anode layer (see Chart A), or a
passive recirculation mechanism that incorporates pressurized
internal ducts or piping. Without either an active or a passive
recirculation mechanism, a direct methanol fuel cell would
require the inclusion of water as a dilutant in the methanol
fuel, which limits the energy content of the diluted fuel (see
Chart B).
Direct
Methanol Fuel Cell with Active Water Transport (Chart
A)
Methanol
Fuel Cell With Water As A Fuel Dilutant (Chart B)
53
Our Mobion technology eliminates the need for active water
recirculation pumps or the inclusion of water as a fuel
dilutant. The water required for reaction at the anode is
transferred internally within the Mobion Chip from the site of
water generation on the air-side of the cell through a
proprietary, passive design that eliminates the need for water
movement by external pumps, complicated re-circulation loops or
other micro-plumbing tools (see Chart C).
Our
Mobion Technology with 100% Methanol and Passive Water
Recirculation (Chart C)
Our Mobion solution contains a passive water recirculation
sub-system that allows for the consumption of 100% methanol,
results in a reduced parts count design and offers the advantage
of higher energy density than competing fuel cell technologies
for portable electronic devices.
Strategic
Agreements
On April 28, 2008, we entered into a development agreement
with a global Japanese consumer electronics company to evaluate
the feasibility, development, and production of our Mobion
products. This agreement will enable us and this developer to
collaborate in evaluating and adopting our Mobion technology for
use in various precision imaging applications, including digital
cameras. On May 12, 2008, we announced that we delivered a
Mobion prototype to this company for their evaluation.
On May 16, 2006, we entered into an alliance with Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd., or Samsung, to develop next-generation
fuel cell prototypes for Samsungs mobile phone business.
We developed, and together with Samsung we jointly tested and
evaluated, our Mobion technology for several Samsung mobile
phone applications. We are continuing to work with Samsung on a
non-exclusive collaboration under which we continue to refine
our Mobion baseline product design. We will share development
updates with Samsung and loan them prototypes for evaluation.
Samsung may also request changes to product specifications until
December 2008 and may purchase commercial samples as soon as
they become available.
On September 19, 2003, we entered into a strategic alliance
agreement with Duracell, now part of the Procter & Gamble
Company, under which we agreed to work with Duracell to develop
and commercialize complementary methanol fuel cell products to
power mass market, high-volume portable consumer devices. The
agreement provides for a multi-year partnership for the design,
development, and commercialization of a low power direct
methanol fuel cell power system and a compatible fuel refill
system. The arrangement provides for us to receive a percentage
of net revenues related to Duracells sale of fuel refills
for methanol fuel cells. The agreement gives Duracell the
ability to make equity investments in MTI Micro. Duracell has
made an initial $1.0 million investment in MTI Micro common
stock and may make additional investments of up to
$4.0 million, subject to agreed upon milestones related to
technical and marketing progress. Any further investment by
Duracell in MTI Micro will effectively dilute our ownership
interest in MTI Micro, although we do not believe that such
dilution will be substantial.
54
On August 1, 2004, we entered into a $6.1 million
cost-shared development contract with the U.S. Department
of Energy, or the DOE, for the development of manufacturing
techniques and the optimization of our Mobion product solutions.
Through May 2008, the DOE has authorized $6.1 million of
spending on a cost-shared basis.
On December 13, 2007, we entered into an agreement with
Trident Systems, Inc. to pursue opportunities to leverage our
consumer market platform into low-power military markets.
Teaming opportunities include demonstrations of unattended
ground sensor prototypes powered by Mobion and evaluations and
potential submissions of proposals for military programs.
Manufacturing
We plan to outsource manufacturing of our portable power source
products through third-party relationship contract
manufacturers. We believe this strategy will provide us with a
business model that allows us to concentrate on our core
competencies of research and development and technological
know-how and reduce our capital expenditures. In addition, this
strategy will significantly reduce our working capital
requirements for inventory because we will not incur most of our
manufacturing costs until we have actually shipped our portable
power source products to our customers and billed those
customers for those products. To date, we have established an
internal developmental pilot production line to test our design
and engineering capabilities. Although we have developed an
internal developmental pilot production line, we intend to rely
upon third parties to forecast production requirements and have
established the basic design, function, and performance of our
in-house engineering capabilities to foster the successful
commercialization of our products.
The commercialization of our Mobion power solution will depend
upon our ability to reduce the costs of our portable power
source products, as they are currently more expensive than
existing rechargeable battery technologies. In addition, we
continue to work on enhancing our Mobion power source, including
our injection molded Mobion Chip, design to ensure its
manufacturability (including engineering, verification and
product testing), design for assembly, design for testability,
and design for serviceability, all of which are critical to
successful high-volume production.
We assemble and test our test and instrumentation measurement
products at our facilities located in Albany, New York. We
believe that our existing assembly and test capacity is
sufficient to meet our current needs and short-term future
requirements. We believe that most of the raw materials used in
our test and measurement products are readily available from a
variety of vendors.
Sales and
Marketing
We plan to sell our portable power source products for
incorporation into the products of our OEM customers or to be
sold as accessories through them. We plan to generate sales to
OEM customers through direct sales employees as well as outside
sales representatives and distributors. We have recently
established sales representatives in South Korea and Japan.
We build awareness in our target markets through a series of
targeted campaigns, which include our website,
e-mails,
conferences, tradeshows, and other standard marketing efforts.
In addition, we monitor developments in the portable power
industry through subscriptions with well known firms such as
Frost and Sullivan, a wide array of publications, active public
relations, updates with industry analysts and the investment
community, and speaking engagements.
We market our test and measurement instrumentation products
through a combination of direct sales personnel and domestic and
international distributors.
Customers
We expect that our customers for our portable power source
products will include a number of the worlds largest
electronic device OEMs.
Revenue from our test and measurement instrumentation products
to Koyo, our Japanese distributor, and the U.S. Air Force
accounted for 20.1% and 18.3%, respectively, of product revenue
for the three months ended March 31, 2008. In 2007, sales
to Koyo and the U.S. Air Force accounted for 26.4% and
27.8%, respectively, of product revenue. In 2006, sales to Koyo
and the U.S. Air Force accounted for 22.9% and 23.1%,
respectively, of product revenue. No other single customer
accounted for greater than 10% of product revenue in 2006, 2007
or 2008.
55
Competition
We expect that the primary competitive factor in our portable
power source business will be market acceptance of our portable
power source products as an alternative power source to
conventional lithium-ion and other rechargeable batteries.
Market acceptance of our portable power source products will
depend on a wide variety of factors, including the compatibility
of direct methanol fuel cell power sources with portable
electronic devices and the markets assessment of the
advantages offered by our products in terms of size, weight,
power density and duration, safety, reliability, and
environmental friendliness when measured against price
disadvantages. We anticipate direct competition from large
Asian-based companies and some of our potential OEM customers.
Competition in the sale of our measurement and instrumentation
products is based on product quality, performance, price, and
timely delivery. Our competitors for test and measurement
instrumentation products include National Instruments,
KLA-Tencor, Capacitec, Sigma Tech, Corning Tropel,
Chadwick-Helmuth, ACES Systems, Micro-Epsilon, and Keyence.
Product
Development
Over the past two years, we have developed and built a number of
engineering prototypes used to validate our technology and to
generate discussions with potential customers about the
inclusion of our technology in new products. During the same
period, we have created three generations of external power
charger prototypes, each of which has shown a dramatic size
reduction over the previous generation. Our latest external
power charger prototype achieved a 60% reduction in volume over
our first generation prototype.
We have improved the capabilities of our Mobion Chip technology
during the last two years, which we expect will continue to
evolve as we integrate greater functionality into our designs.
This continuous iterative integration process is intended to
reduce the size, simplify the design and construction, and
reduce assembly complexity of our technology. We continue to
improve the product design of the Mobion Chip and believe that
future product generations will deliver performance improvements
in terms of energy density, size, weight, and power duration and
should be able to power wireless electronic devices for longer
periods of time than rechargeable lithium-ion batteries.
Intellectual
Property and Proprietary Rights
We rely on a combination of patent (both national and
international), trade secret, trademark, and copyright
protection to protect our intellectual property. Our strategy is
to apply for patent protection for all significant design
requirements. Additionally, we systematically analyze the
existing intellectual property landscape for direct methanol
fuel cells to determine where the greatest opportunities for
developing intellectual property exist. We also enter into
standard confidentiality agreements with our employees,
consultants, vendors, partners and potential customers and seek
to control access to and distribution of our proprietary
information.
As of December 31, 2007, we had filed over 90
U.S. patent applications, 43 of which have been awarded. Of
the awarded patents, 34 are assigned to us and 9 are assigned to
Duracell as part of our strategic alliance agreement with them.
We have filed 22 Patent Cooperation Treaty Applications and have
filed for National Phase Patent Protection for 12 pieces of
intellectual property in multiple countries, including Japan,
the European Union, and South Korea. We have developed a
portfolio of patent applications in areas including fuel cell
systems, components, controls, manufacturing processes, and
system packaging.
Research
and Development
Our research and development team is responsible for advanced
research, product planning, design and development, and quality
assurance. Through our supply chain, we are also working with
subcontractors in developing specific components of our
technologies.
56
The primary objective of our research and development program is
to advance the development of our direct methanol fuel cell
technology to enhance the commercial value of our products and
technology, as well as to develop next generation fuel cell
products.
We have incurred research and development costs of approximately
$9.7 million, $12.9 million and $11.8 million for
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007,
respectively. We incurred research and development costs of
approximately $2.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2008. We expect to continue to invest in research
and development in the future.
Employees
As of March 31, 2008, we had 106 employees. Of these
employees, 45 were involved in our portable power source
business (including 24 scientists and engineers, of whom 18 had
advanced degrees) and 46 were involved in our test and
measurement instrumentation business. Fifteen of our employees
are involved in corporate functions.
Properties
We presently lease two premises, one located at 325 Washington
Avenue Extension, Albany, New York and the other at 431 New
Karner Road, Albany, New York. Both leases expire at the end of
2009. The 325 Washington Avenue Extension premise consists of
approximately 20,700 useable square feet of space, and the 431
New Karner Road consists of approximately 23,500 useable square
feet of space. Together, the premises are adequate for our
current and foreseeable needs.
Legal
Proceedings
We are not currently involved in any legal proceeding that we
believe would have a material adverse effect on our business or
financial condition.
57
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information regarding our
executive officers and directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position or Capacity
|
|
Peng K. Lim
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Cynthia A. Scheuer
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
Robert J. Kot
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Vice President and General Manager, MTI Instruments
|
James K. Prueitt
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Vice President of Engineering and Operations, MTI Micro
|
Thomas J. Marusak
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
Director
|
E. Dennis OConnor
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Director
|
William P. Phelan
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Director
|
Dr. Walter L. Robb
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
Director
|
Peng K. Lim
was elected as our Chairman on May 15,
2008 and has served as our Chief Executive Officer since
December 2006. Between May 2006 and December 2006, Mr. Lim
served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of MTI
Micro. From July 2005 to April 2006, Mr. Lim served on
numerous boards of private and public companies. From 2001 to
2005, Mr. Lim served as the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Tapwave, Inc., a handheld and entertainment platform
company. Mr. Lim served as Vice President, Worldwide
Product Development of Palm, Inc., a handheld and wireless
computer company, from April 1999 until May 2001. Mr. Lim
served as Vice President of Engineering of Fujitsu Personal
Systems, a pen-based and wireless computer company and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Fujitsu Limited, from June 1997 until
March 1999. From July 1996 to June 1997, Mr. Lim was an
Engineering Platform Director for Texas Instruments, a
semiconductor company. Mr. Lim holds a B.S. and an M.S. in
Electrical Engineering from University of Windsor (Ontario,
Canada) and a Master of Engineering Management from Northwestern
University. Mr. Lim is an alumnus of the Stanford Executive
Program for Growing Companies at Stanford University.
Cynthia A. Scheuer
has served as our Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer since November 1997 and as our Secretary
since March 2005. From June 1983 to October 1997,
Ms. Scheuer served as a Senior Business Assurance Manager
at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP where she was responsible for the
planning and delivery of audit and financial consulting services
to a diverse group of clients in manufacturing, high technology,
retail, and government. Ms. Scheuer holds a B.A. in
Accounting and Economics from Ohio Wesleyan University and is a
Certified Public Accountant.
Robert J. Kot
has served as a Vice President of MTI
Instruments since March 2007 and has served as General Manager
in that division since December 2005. Mr. Kot previously
served as MTI Instruments Vice President of Marketing and
Sales from August 2005 to December 2005. From June 2001 to July
2005, Mr. Kot served as Vice President of Sales for Sierra
Monitor Corporation, a company with independent business units
serving the industrial, building automation, and
telecommunications industries. During 1998, Mr. Kot founded
OnCuity, a software company that marketed advanced alarm
management systems for the process controls, building, and
security markets. Mr. Kot served as Chief Executive Officer
of OnCuity from 1998 to 2001. Prior to that time, Mr. Kot
served in various capacities with Honeywell, EMC Controls,
Azonix, and several venture capital backed technology companies
focused upon rapid growth within the process, measurement, and
building automation markets.
James K. Prueitt
has served as Vice President of
Engineering and Operations of MTI Micro since November 2007 and
served as MTI Micros Senior Director of Engineering
between April 2006 and November 2007. Mr. Prueitt manages
research and development, purchasing, quality, operations and
program management. Prior to joining our company,
Mr. Prueitt spent 20 years at Polaroid Corporation
where he served most recently as Divisional Vice President of
Hardware and Software research and development. Mr. Prueitt
also holds an M.B.A. from the University of West Florida and an
M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kentucky.
58
Thomas J. Marusak
has served as a director since December
2004. Since 1986, Mr. Marusak has served as President of
Comfortex Corporation, an internationally recognized
manufacturer of window blinds and specialty shades.
Mr. Marusak served with New Yorks Capital Region
Center for Economic Growth as Chairman of the Technology Council
from June 2001 to July 2004 and Chairman of the Board of
Directors from July 2004 until December 2005. Mr. Marusak
has served as a director for the New York State Energy and
Development Authority since September 1999. Mr. Marusak
also represented the interests of small- and medium- sized
manufacturing businesses of New York as a delegate at the White
House in 1995. He was previously a member of the Advisory Board
of Directors for Key Bank of New York from 1996 through 2004,
and served on the Advisory Boards of Dynabil Industries Inc. and
Clough Harbour Associates Technology Services Company of Albany
from 2000 through 2005. Mr. Marusak received a B.S. in
Engineering from Pennsylvania State University, and an M.S. in
Engineering from Stanford University.
E. Dennis OConnor
has served as a director
since 1993, and is a retired attorney specializing in
intellectual property. From 1984 until his retirement in June
2000, Mr. OConnor served as the Director of New
Products and Technology for Masco Corporation, a diversified
manufacturer of building, home improvement, and other specialty
products for the home and family. Mr. OConnor holds a
J.D. degree from George Washington University and a B.S. in
Mechanical Engineering from Notre Dame University.
William P. Phelan
has served as a director since December
2004. Mr. Phelan is the co-founder and Chief Executive
Officer of Bright Hub, Inc., a software company founded in 2006,
which focuses on the development of online commerce for
software. Since May 2004, Mr. Phelan has acted as Chairman
and CEO of Chatham Capital Management, Inc. In May 1999,
Mr. Phelan founded OneMade, Inc., an electronic commerce
marketplace technology systems and tools provider.
Mr. Phelan served as Chief Executive Officer of OneMade,
Inc. from May 1999 to May 2004. OneMade, Inc. was sold to
America Online in May 2003. Mr. Phelan also serves on the
Board of Trustees, and Chairman of the Audit Committee, of the
Paradigm mutual fund family. In addition, Mr. Phelan served
as a member of the Board of Directors of Florists
Transworld Delivery, the largest floral services organization in
the world, from January 1995 through December 1999. He has also
held numerous executive positions at Fleet Equity Partners,
Cowen & Company, and UHY Advisors Inc., formerly
Urbach Kahn & Werlin, PC. Mr. Phelan has a B.A.
in Accounting and Finance from Siena College, an M.S. in
Taxation from City College of New York, and is a Certified
Public Accountant.
Dr. Walter L. Robb
has served as a director since
1997. Dr. Robb has served as President of Vantage
Management, Inc., a management consulting company, since 1993.
Prior to that time, Dr. Robb served in various executive
positions with General Electric Company. Dr. Robb served as
Senior Vice President for Corporate Research and Development
with General Electric from 1986 until his retirement in December
1992, directing the General Electric Research and Development
Center, one of the worlds largest and most diversified
industrial laboratories, while also serving on its Corporate
Executive Council. Dr. Robb served on the Board of
Directors of Plug Power Inc., from 1997 through October 2002,
and currently serves on the board of directors of Celgene
Corporation, a publicly held integrated biopharmaceutical
company, and a number of privately held companies.
Classification
of our Board of Directors
Our certificate of incorporation provides for a Board of
Directors consisting of three classes serving three-year
staggered terms. Messrs. Lim, and Robb serve as our
Class I directors, with the term of office of the
Class I directors expiring at the annual meeting of
stockholders in fiscal 2010. The Class II directors consist
of Messrs. Marusak and OConnor, with the term of
office of the Class II directors expiring at the annual
meeting of stockholders in fiscal 2011. The Class III
director is Mr. Phelan, with the term of office of the
Class III director expiring at the annual meeting of
stockholders in 2009. Officers serve at the pleasure of the
Board of Directors.
59
Information
Relating to Corporate Governance and the Board of
Directors
Our Board of Directors has determined, after considering all the
relevant facts and circumstances, that Messrs. Marusak,
OConnor and Phelan, and Dr. Robb are independent
directors, as independence is defined by the listing
standards of Nasdaq Stock Market and the SEC, because they have
no relationship with us that would interfere with their exercise
of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities
as a director.
Our bylaws authorize our Board of Directors to appoint among its
members one or more committees, each consisting of one or more
directors. Our Board of Directors has established two standing
committees: an Audit Committee and a Governance, Nominating and
Compensation Committee, each consisting entirely of independent
directors.
The Audit
Committee
The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to select the
independent registered public accounting firm to conduct the
independent audit of the financial statements of our company;
review the annual financial statements, any significant
accounting issues, and the scope of the audit with the
independent registered public accounting firm; and discuss with
such firm any other audit-related matters that may arise during
the year. The Audit Committee currently consists of
Messrs. Phelan and OConnor and Dr. Robb, each of
whom is an independent director of our company under The Nasdaq
Stock Market Inc. as well as under rules adopted by the SEC.
The
Governance, Nominating, and Compensation Committee
The Governance, Nominating, and Compensation Committee reviews
and acts on matters relating to compensation levels and benefit
plans for our key executives; assists our Board of Directors in
fulfilling its responsibility to nominate and approve qualified
new members to our Board of Directors in accordance with our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws; develops and recommends
to our Board of Directors a set of corporate governance
principles; and oversees the selection and compensation of
committees of our Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee
currently consists of Messrs Marusak and OConnor and
Dr. Robb, with Mr. OConnor serving as Chairman.
Executive
Compensation
Compensation
Philosophy
The primary objectives of our compensation policies are to
attract, retain, motivate, develop, and reward our management
team for executing our strategic business plan thereby enhancing
stockholder value, while recognizing and rewarding individual
and company performance. These compensation policies include
(i) an overall management compensation program that is
competitive with national and regional companies of similar size
or within our industry; and (ii) long-term incentive
compensation in the form of stock-based compensation that will
encourage management to continue to focus on stockholder return.
Our executive compensation program ties a substantial portion of
each executives overall compensation to key strategic,
financial, and operational goals, including establishing and
maintaining customer relationships, signing OEM agreements;
meeting revenue targets and profit and expense targets;
introducing new products; progressing products towards
manufacturing; and improving operational efficiency.
We believe that potential equity ownership in our company is
important to provide executive officers with incentives to build
value for our stockholders. We believe that equity awards
provide executives with a strong link to our short- and
long-term performance, while creating an ownership culture to
maintain the alignment of interests between our executives and
our stockholders. When implemented responsibly, we also believe
these equity incentives can function as a powerful executive
retention tool.
60
Our Governance, Compensation, and Nominating Committee consists
entirely of independent directors, administers our compensation
plans and policies, including the establishment of policies that
govern base salary as well as short- and long-term incentives
for our executive management team.
Summary
of Cash and Other Compensation
The following table sets forth the total compensation received
for services rendered in all capacities to our company during
the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007 by our
three named executive officers, namely our Chief
Executive Officer and our other two most highly compensated
executive officers during fiscal 2007.
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus (3)
|
|
Awards (4)
|
|
Awards (5)
|
|
Compensation (6)
|
|
Compensation (7)
|
|
Total
|
|
Peng K. Lim
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
$
|
21,041
|
|
$
|
67,000
|
|
|
$
|
509,750
|
|
$
|
120,000
|
|
$
|
10,769
|
|
$
|
1,028,560
|
Chief Executive
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
196,154
|
|
|
38,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
610,448
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
143,243
|
|
|
1,048,804
|
Officer
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cynthia A. Scheuer
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,001
|
)
|
|
|
92,485
|
|
|
10,500
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
314,384
|
Vice President,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
207,500
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
10,447
|
|
|
|
116,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,300
|
|
|
362,557
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James K. Prueitt
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
184,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,909
|
|
|
286,529
|
Vice President of Engineering and Operations, MTI
Micro
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Lim commenced employment as the Chief Executive Officer
of MTI Micro on May 8, 2006, becoming our Chief Executive
Officer on December 1, 2006.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Prueitt did not become a named executive officer until
2007.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Mr. Lim received a $60,000 guaranteed bonus in 2007 at the
conclusion of his first year of employment. The bonus amount for
2006 reflects the proportionate amount of his bonus accrued
through December 31, 2006 and the amount for 2007 reflects
the remainder of the bonus accrued and then paid in 2007.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Valuations based upon the dollar amount of stock awards
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes pursuant
to FAS 123R. During 2007, Ms. Scheuer forfeited a 625
restricted stock grant that did not vest, which resulted in
compensation expense recovery of $10,493, and was awarded a 625
restricted stock grant that will vest upon successful completion
of a financing objective by June 30, 2008, which resulted
in compensation expense of $3,492.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Valuations based upon the dollar amount of option grants
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes pursuant
to FAS 123R with respect to 2006 and 2007. The assumptions
we use in calculating these amounts are discussed in
Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Mr. Lim received a $60,000 bonus in 2007 based upon
successful completion of performance objectives, and we have
accrued, as of December 31, 2007, a $120,000 bonus related
to his successful completion of performance objectives
established for
2007-2008.
We have accrued for Ms. Scheuer, as of December 31,
2007, a $10,500 bonus related to successful completion of
certain of her
2007-2008
performance objectives.
|
|
(7)
|
|
The following is a recap of the major categories included in
All Other Compensation:
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 All Other Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
401(k)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Matching
|
|
|
Relocation
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Peng K. Lim
|
|
|
$10,385
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$384
|
|
|
|
$10,769
|
Cynthia A. Scheuer
|
|
|
8,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,400
|
James K. Prueitt
|
|
|
6,240
|
|
|
|
40,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,909
|
Base
Salary and Cash Incentives of the Chief Executive
Officer
Mr. Lim joined our company during May 2006 as President and
Chief Executive Officer of MTI Micro at an annual salary of
$300,000 and was promoted to our Chief Executive Officer during
December 2006, receiving no base salary change. During our
annual Chief Executive Officer compensation review during 2007,
we engaged Radford to review the compensation package of our
Chief Executive Officer based upon competitive market data.
After consideration of the analysis and information provided by
and the recommendations from Radford, we determined that no base
salary adjustment was required for Mr. Lim during 2007.
Mr. Lim participates in an annual cash incentive
compensation plan with a bonus targeted at 40% of base salary as
prescribed in his current employment agreement.
During May 2007, Mr. Lim was awarded his first year bonus
payouts: a cash bonus of $60,000 in connection with his first
year guaranteed bonus and a cash bonus of $60,000 in connection
with the completion of performance objectives for his first year
of employment as established during 2006 by our Board of
Directors.
In concert with our milestones, we included the following
objectives in Mr. Lims
2007-08
performance plan:
|
|
|
|
|
completion of low-power prototypes to Samsung;
|
|
|
|
introduction of the next generation of MTI Instruments
precision instrumentation products;
|
|
|
|
addition of at least one OEM agreement for our low power
platform;
|
|
|
|
at least a 15% increase in MTI Instruments annual revenue during
fiscal year 2007 compared with fiscal year 2006; and
|
|
|
|
maintenance of key affiliate relationships, among other
individual goals.
|
The Governance, Compensation, and Nominating Committee has
determined that Mr. Lim met these performance objectives for
fiscal 2007 and has approved a $120,000 bonus to be paid during
2008. Any future bonus compensation to Mr. Lim will be
contingent solely upon the determination of the Governance,
Compensation, and Nominating Committee that set objectives for
Mr. Lim have been satisfied.
Base
Salary and Cash Incentives of Other Named Executive
Officers
We evaluated other named executive officer base salaries during
2007. We maintained current base salary levels for most of our
named executive officers, but adjustments to the following
executives base salaries were made to recognize either
high performance or an increase in responsibility.
On October 8, 2007, James Prueitt was promoted to Vice
President of Engineering and Operations at MTI Micro.
Mr. Prueitt had received a base salary increase from
$175,000 to $188,300 during April 2007 when he was appointed the
acting leader of engineering and operations. We believed that
Mr. Prueitts total compensation package required a
greater emphasis on equity
62
participation in congruence with compensation packages offered
by other early stage technology companies. Thus,
Mr. Prueitts base salary was not changed at his
promotion date and he received additional equity incentive
awards.
The base salary of Cynthia Scheuer, Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary, has not increased since April
2006 and remains at $210,000.
In addition to base salary compensation, we consider short-term
cash incentives to be an important tool in motivating and
rewarding near-term performance against established short-term
goals. We do not utilize a specific formula, but executive
management is eligible for cash awards contingent upon
achievement of individual, financial, or company-wide
performance criteria. The criteria are established to ensure
that a reasonable portion of an executives total annual
compensation is performance based.
We believe that the higher an executives level of
responsibility, the greater the portion of that executives
total earnings potential should be tied to the achievement of
critical technological, operational and financial goals. Our
Chief Executive Officer generally is eligible for annual cash
incentive awards of up to 40% of his base salary, with other
named executive officer eligibility between 5% and 10% of base
salary. We believe this strategy places the desired
proportionate level of risk and reward on performance by the
Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers.
During June 2007, our Board of Directors initiated individual
executive cash incentive programs for Ms. Scheuer.
Ms. Scheuer became eligible for a bonus of up to 10% of her
annual base salary based upon achievement of certain operating
expense and administrative goals to be achieved by May 2008. The
Governance, Compensation, and Nominating Committee has
determined that Ms. Scheuer met these goals by May 2008,
and has approved a $21,000 bonus to be paid during 2008. In
connection with his promotion to Vice President,
Mr. Prueitt became eligible for a bonus of 5% of his annual
salary based upon certain commercial prototype technical
advances to be achieved by May 2008.
While performance targets are established at levels that are
intended to be achievable, we believe that we have structured
these incentives so that maximum bonus payouts would require a
substantial level of both individual and company performance.
Long-Term
Equity Incentive Compensation
Equity awards typically take the form of stock option and
restricted stock grants. Authority to make equity awards to
executive officers rests with our Governance, Compensation and
Nominating Committee. In determining the size of awards for new
or current executives, we consider the competitive market,
strategic plan performance, contribution to future initiatives,
benchmarking of comparative equity ownership for executives in
comparable positions at similar companies, individual option
history, recommendations of our Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer.
We generally base our criteria for performance-based equity
awards on one or more of the following long-term measurements:
|
|
|
|
|
procurement and maintenance of OEM alliance/strategic agreements;
|
|
|
|
manufacturing readiness;
|
|
|
|
financing targets;
|
|
|
|
gross revenue and profit goals;
|
|
|
|
operating expense improvements; and
|
|
|
|
product launches, new product introductions or improvements to
existing products or product-intent prototypes.
|
63
These performance measurements support various initiatives
identified by our Board of Directors as critical to our future
success, and are either expressed as absolute in terms of
success or failure, or will be measured in more qualitative
terms.
The timing of all equity awards for our Chief Executive Officer
and our Chief Financial Officer in the past have generally
coincided with either employment anniversary dates or the annual
meeting dates. Other executive officer equity awards have
occurred in conjunction with completion or assignment of
objectives, promotions, commencement of employment, or coincide
with our annual meeting date. We do not time option grants to
our executives in coordination with the release of material
non-public information, nor do we impose any equity ownership
guidelines on our executives.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
options held and value of each such officers unexercised
options as of December 31, 2007.
OUTSTANDING
EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR END 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
or Units
|
|
|
Securities Underlying
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
Stock That
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
Unexercised Options (#)
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Have Not
|
|
That Have
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
Date
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
Not Vested ($)
|
|
P. Lim
|
|
|
20,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.44
|
|
|
5/7/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,235
|
|
|
25,390(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.44
|
|
|
5/7/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,313
|
|
|
35.44
|
|
|
5/7/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
6/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,438(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
6/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
6/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
6/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Scheuer
|
|
|
3,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.08
|
|
|
12/17/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.04
|
|
|
12/14/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.28
|
|
|
3/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.36
|
|
|
6/19/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.36
|
|
|
3/29/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.36
|
|
|
6/22/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.92
|
|
|
8/17/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.40
|
|
|
7/16/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.40
|
|
|
3/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
1,823(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.40
|
|
|
5/17/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
6/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,094(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
6/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
3,750
|
J. Prueitt
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
2,187(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
3/16/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
9.84
|
|
|
10/7/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,750(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.84
|
|
|
10/7/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
35.04
|
|
|
4/18/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
2,343(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.04
|
|
|
4/18/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The options vest at a rate of 6.25% per quarter, becoming fully
exercisable on May 8, 2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The options vest at a rate of 8.33% per quarter, becoming fully
exercisable on February 18, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The options vested 50% immediately on the grant date, with the
remaining options vesting at a rate of 25% annually, becoming
fully exercisable on March 17, 2009.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The options vest at a rate of 25% annually, becoming fully
exercisable on April 19, 2010.
|
64
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
The options vest at a rate of 6.25% per quarter, starting
January 1, 2008, becoming fully exercisable on
October 1, 2011.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The options vest at a rate of 25% at the first anniversary of
the grants date and 6.25% on each quarterly anniversary
thereafter, becoming fully exercisable on October 8, 2011
unless performance targets for accelerated vesting of this grant
are achieved.
|
Equity
Awards to Officers
Chief Executive Officer.
On May 21, 2008, we awarded
Mr. Lim the following:
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 57,500 shares of common stock that will
vest upon attainment of a commercial shipment volume goal by
December 31, 2009, and if such goal is not met, the options
will be cancelled; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 57,500 shares of common stock that will
vest annually over a
two-year
period, with the first vesting event on May 21, 2009.
|
During June 2007, we awarded Mr. Lim the following:
|
|
|
|
|
6,250 shares of restricted stock that vested immediately;
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 8,750 shares of common stock that
vested immediately;
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 6,563 shares of common stock that will
vest upon achievement of all of our 2007 publicly disclosed
milestones, as well as maintenance of existing relationships
with our strategic alliance partners;
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 12,500 shares of common stock that will
vest upon attainment of our financing goal during 2008, and if
such goals are not achieved by June 30, 2008, the options
will be cancelled; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 28,438 shares of common stock that will
vest quarterly over a four-year period, with the first vesting
event on January 1, 2008.
|
All stock options awarded to Mr. Lim during 2007 have a
seven-year term.
Other Named Executive Officers.
On May 21, 2008, we
awarded Mr. Prueitt the following:
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 27,500 shares of common stock that will
vest upon attainment of a commercial shipment volume goal by
December 31, 2009, and if such goal is not met, the options
will be cancelled; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 27,500 shares of common stock that will
vest annually over a
two-year
period, with the first vesting event on May 21, 2009.
|
During October 2007, in recognition of his promotion to Vice
President of Engineering and Operations, Mr. Prueitt was
awarded the following performance-based stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 6,250 shares of common stock options
that will vest upon attainment of a commercialization shipment
volume goal to be achieved by March 31, 2010, and if the
goals are not met, the options will be cancelled; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 18,750 shares of common stock that will
vest 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date and 6.25% on
each quarterly anniversary thereafter; this grant will
accelerate vest upon the achievement of a specific unit shipment
target.
|
During March 2007, as part of a non-executive retention
initiative following suspension of our high power program,
Mr. Prueitt was granted options to purchase
4,375 shares of common stock that vest as follows: 2,188
vested immediately; while 1,094 will vest during March 2008 and
1,093 during March 2009.
65
The awards to Mr. Prueitt reflect his performance and
increasing responsibility through the year, as well as our
expectations of future performance and retention needs for early
stage organizations where significant equity awards take the
place of cash compensation.
During June 2007, Ms. Scheuer was awarded the following:
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 1,875 shares of common stock that
vested immediately;
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 1,406 shares of common stock that will
vest upon achievement of all our 2007 publicly disclosed
milestones, as well as maintenance of existing relationships
with our strategic alliance partners; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
options to purchase 6,094 shares of common stock that will
vest quarterly over a four-year period, with the first vesting
event on January 1, 2008.
|
Concurrently, Ms. Scheuer was awarded 625 shares of
restricted stock that will vest upon attainment of certain
financing goals during 2008. If such goals are not achieved by
June 30, 2008, the stock will be forfeited. On
July 31, 2007, Ms. Scheuer forfeited a separate award
of 625 shares of restricted stock, which would have vested
upon achievement of certain financing goals by that date.
We believe the size of the awards to Ms. Scheuer is
appropriate and necessary to retain and motivate her to meet
these challenging but obtainable short and longer term
objectives.
All 2007 option grants to Mr. Prueitt and Ms. Scheuer
have a seven-year term.
Equity
Incentive Plans
As of December 31, 2007, we have three equity compensation
plans: 1) 1996 Stock Incentive Plan; 2) 1999 Employee
Stock Incentive Plan; and 3) 2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
The Governance, Compensation, and Nominating Committee
administers all equity compensation plans, and has the authority
to determine the terms and conditions of the awards granted
under the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan.
1996 Stock Incentive Plan.
The 1996 Stock Incentive Plan,
or 1996 Plan, was approved by our stockholders during December
1996. Under the 1996 Plan, our Board of Directors was authorized
to award stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock, and other stock-based incentives to our officers,
employees and others. As of December 31, 2007, there were
166,202 options outstanding under the 1996 Plan, of which
155,444 were exercisable, with an additional 30,112 shares
reserved for future grants.
1999 Employee Stock Incentive Plan.
The 1999 Employee
Stock Incentive Plan, or 1999 Plan, was approved by our
stockholders during March 1999. Under the 1999 Plan, our Board
of Directors is authorized to award stock options and restricted
stock to our officers, employees and others. The 1999 Plan
expires on March 18, 2009. As of December 31, 2007,
options to purchase 454,180 shares of our common stock were
outstanding under the 1999 Plan, of which 372,110 were
exercisable with an additional 41,293 shares reserved for
future grants.
Options issued under both the 1996 Plan and 1999 Plan terminate
between seven and ten years after the date of grant. Stock
option grants or restricted stock awards under these plans can
be issued to vest immediately, vest over a certain period, vest
based upon successful completion of a performance measure
specified by our Governance, Compensation, and Nominating
Committee, or a prescribed combination of performance and time
vesting (i.e. a time vesting option accelerated by achievement
of a performance objective or a performance vesting option that
will vest at a certain date in the future).
The 1996 Plan and 1999 Plan provide that in the event of a
change of control all unexercised and outstanding options and
restricted stock shall become fully vested and exercisable as of
the date
66
of the change of control, provided the optionee is employed by
us at the date of the change. This is commonly referred to as a
single trigger acceleration of option vesting.
2006 Equity Incentive Plan.
The 2006 Equity Incentive
Plan, or 2006 Plan, was approved by our stockholders during May
2006. Up to 250,000 shares of our common stock may be
issued under the 2006 Plan to our employees, officers,
directors, consultants and advisors. As of December 31,
2007, 156,938 options to purchase our common stock were
outstanding under the 2006 Plan, of which 51,052 were
exercisable with an additional 86,813 shares reserved for
future grants.
The 2006 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options
intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, nonqualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units
and other stock-based awards.
Our Governance, Compensation, and Nominating Committee selects
the recipients of awards and determines (i) the number of
shares of common stock covered by options and the dates upon
which such options become exercisable, (ii) the exercise
price of options (which may not be less than 100% of fair market
value of the common stock), (iii) the duration of options
(which may not exceed seven years), and (iv) the number of
shares of common stock subject to any stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock award, restricted stock unit award or other
stock-based awards and the terms and conditions of such awards,
including conditions for forfeiture, repurchase, issue price and
repurchase price, if any.
Upon a Substantial Corporate Change, as such term is
defined in the 2006 Plan, the 2006 Plan and any unexercised or
forfeitable awards will terminate unless either (i) an
award agreement with a participant provides otherwise or
(ii) provision is made in writing in connection with such
transaction for the assumption or continuation of outstanding
awards, or the substitution for such awards with awards covering
the stock or securities of a successor employer entity, or a
parent or subsidiary of such successor. If an award would
otherwise terminate under the preceding sentence, we will either
provide that optionees or holders of stock appreciation rights
or other exercisable awards will have the right, at such time
before the completion of the transaction causing such
termination as we reasonably designate, to exercise any
unexercised portions of the options or stock appreciation rights
or other exercisable awards, including portions of such awards
not already exercisable, or for any awards including the
foregoing, cause us, or agree to allow the successor, to cancel
each award after payment to the participant of an amount, if
any, in cash, cash equivalents, or successor equity interests
substantially equal to the fair market value of the
consideration (as valued by the administrator) paid for our
shares, under the transaction minus, for options and stock
appreciation rights or other exercisable awards, the exercise
price for the shares covered by such awards (and, for any
awards, where we determine it is appropriate, any required tax
withholdings), and with such allocation among cash, cash
equivalents, and successor equity interests as we determine or
approve.
Perquisites
and Other Benefits
Our executive officers are eligible to participate in similar
benefit plans available to all our other employees including
medical, dental, vision, group life, disability, accidental
death and dismemberment, paid time off, and 401(k) plan
benefits. In addition, we pay 100% of Mr. Lims group
term life insurance premiums, representing an additional cost in
2007 of $384.
We also maintain a standard directors and officers liability
insurance policy with coverage similar to the coverage typically
provided by other small publicly held technology companies.
As prescribed in his employment agreement, Mr. Lim was
reimbursed for his relocation, associated tax
gross-ups
and certain legal fees in connection with joining our company
during 2006. These amounts totaled $133,063 in relocation,
$16,637 in tax
gross-ups
and $10,000 in legal fees.
67
We reimbursed Mr. Prueitt his relocation costs and
associated tax
gross-ups
in
connection with joining our company during 2006. These amounts
totaled $31,103 in relocation and $8,463 in tax
gross-ups.
Severance,
Change in Control and Non-Compete Agreements
Most of the our executive officers are entitled to receive
severance payments equal to a specified number of months of base
salary and benefits in the event their employment is terminated
without cause or in Mr. Lims case, if he
is terminated without cause or if he terminates his
employment with us for good reason.
Mr. Lims stock options are also subject to
acceleration or a continuation of vesting should we terminate
his employment without cause or if he terminates his employment
with us for good reason.
A change in control will accelerate the vesting of outstanding
stock options issued under the 1996 and 1999 Stock Incentive
Plans; however options outstanding under the 2006 Equity Plan
will not automatically accelerate vesting unless provided in an
employment agreement. See Employment Agreements.
We believe these severance and change in control arrangements
are reasonable and mitigate some of the risk that exists for
executives working in small technology companies by maintaining
employee engagement and encouraging retention in an environment
with substantial challenges and changes. This is especially true
considering each executive officer has signed a Non-Competition
and Non-Solicitation Agreement limiting future opportunities in
the event the executives employment is terminated for any
reason. These agreements specify that the executive will not
compete with our businesses for a period of one year following
such termination.
Employment
Agreements
Peng K. Lim.
We entered into an employment agreement
Mr. Lim effective May 8, 2006, that provides he will
serve as the President and Chief Executive Officer of MTI Micro
for an initial term of two years at an annual salary of
$300,000. In December 2006, Mr. Lim was promoted to our
Chief Executive Officer, receiving no salary change. Following
his initial term, the agreement will be automatically renewed
for successive one year terms, subject to our right, or his
right, not to renew the agreement upon at least ninety
(90) days written notice prior to the expiration of
the initial two year term or any one year renewal term
thereafter. Mr. Lim participates in an annual cash
incentive compensation plan with a bonus targeted at 40% of base
salary as prescribed in his current employment agreement. During
May 2007, Mr. Lim was awarded his first year bonus payouts:
a cash bonus of $60,000 in connection with his first year
guaranteed bonus and a cash bonus of $60,000 in connection with
the completion of performance objectives for his first year of
employment as established during 2006 by our Board of Directors.
In concert with our milestones, we included the following
objectives in Mr. Lims
2007-08
performance plan:
|
|
|
|
|
completion of low-power prototypes to Samsung;
|
|
|
|
introduction of the next generation of MTI Instruments
precision instrumentation products;
|
|
|
|
addition of at least one OEM agreement for our low power
platform;
|
|
|
|
at least a 15% increase in MTI Instruments annual revenue during
fiscal year 2007 compared with fiscal year 2006; and
|
|
|
|
maintenance of key affiliate relationships, among other
individual goals.
|
The Governance, Compensation, and Nominating Committee has
certified that Mr. Lim met these performance objectives for
fiscal 2007, and has approved a $120,000 bonus to be paid during
2008. Any future bonus compensation to Mr. Lim will be
contingent solely upon the determination of the Governance,
Compensation, and Nominating Committee that set objectives for
Mr. Lim have been satisfied.
68
In connection with our hiring of Mr. Lim, we also granted
to Mr. Lim options to purchase 81,250 shares of common
stock at an exercise price of $35.44 that vest as follows:
a) options to purchase 20,313 shares vested
immediately; b) options to purchase 40,625 shares vest
in equal quarterly amounts over a four-year period at the rate
of 6.25% per quarter; and c) options to purchase
20,313 shares vest upon the earlier of the determination by
our Board of Directors or a committee of the Board of Directors,
that the performance milestones for the grant with respect to
2007 had been satisfied or December 31, 2008. All of such
options will vest immediately upon a change of
control as defined in the agreement.
The agreement also provides that if we terminate
Mr. Lims employment without cause or if Mr. Lim
terminates his employment for good reason he will receive
1) his accrued salary, business expenses, and earned bonus
through the date of termination; 2) 100% of his regular
base salary and target bonus (in monthly installments) for
12 months, and certain other benefits for one year from the
date of termination; 3) the first year premium for
converting his group life insurance coverage to an individual
policy; and 4) continued vesting of his outstanding options
at the rate described in the each respective option agreement
(including the full acceleration of the vesting of the
performance-based options) for one year from the date of
termination, with continued exercisability for all vested
options for 90 days following the period ending one year
after the date of termination.
If Mr. Lims employment is terminated for
cause, Mr. Lim will receive his accrued salary,
business expenses, and earned bonus through the date of
termination. If Mr. Lims employment is terminated by
reason of death or disability, in addition to these accrued
entitlements, Mr. Lim will receive a pro-rata bonus,
continuation of vesting of outstanding time-based options for
one additional quarter, vesting of performance-based options as
of the date of termination (if such date is after
September 30, 2008), and all vested options will remain
exercisable for one year.
For purposes of this agreement, cause means gross
misconduct, gross negligence, theft, dishonesty, fraud, or gross
dereliction of duties; or indictment on any felony charge or
misdemeanor charge involving theft, moral turpitude; or a
violation of the federal securities laws whether or not related
to his conduct at work. Good reason means our
failure to renew the agreement at substantially equivalent or
greater salary and target bonus; a significant diminution of
Mr. Lims job title, responsibilities or reporting
relationship; or relocation of the job to a location outside a
50 mile radius of MTI Micros office location on the
commencement date.
Other Named Executive Officers.
We have employment
agreements with our other named executive officers. Those
employment agreements continue unless modified or terminated,
with severance benefits where noted, provided employment
terminations are without cause.
Our employment agreement with Ms. Scheuer provides her a
current base annual salary of $210,000. If we terminate
Ms. Scheuers employment without cause, she will
continue to receive her base salary and benefits for a six-month
period. During June 2007, our Board of Directors initiated an
individual executive cash incentive program for
Ms. Scheuer. Ms. Scheuer became eligible for a bonus
of up to 10% of her annual base salary based upon achievement of
certain operating expense and administrative goals to be
achieved by May 2008. The Governance, Compensation, and
Nominating Committee has determined that Ms. Scheuer met these
goals by May 2008, and has approved a $21,000 bonus to be paid
during 2008.
Our employment agreement with Mr. Prueitt provides him a
current base salary of $188,300. Mr. Prueitt had received a
base salary increase from $175,000 to $188,300 during April 2007
when he was appointed the acting leader of engineering and
operations. In connection with his promotion to Vice President,
Mr. Prueitt became eligible for a bonus of 5% of his annual
salary based upon certain commercial prototype technical
advances to be achieved by May 2008. During his first two years
with us, a period ending on April 18, 2008,
Mr. Prueitt will receive three months of base salary and
benefits as a severance benefit. During this period, if
Mr. Prueitts employment is terminated within
90 days following a change in control of our company, he
will receive his base salary and benefits for six months as a
severance benefit.
69
Potential
Payments upon Termination
The following table sets forth a breakdown of termination
payments and the net realizable value of stock and stock options
if the employment of any of our named executive officers had
been terminated as of December 31, 2007. The information
assumes a price of $6.00 per share of our common stock as
December 31, 2007. Severance payments are made either on a
salary continuation basis paid over the severance period or on a
lump sum basis payable upon a fixed date subsequent to
termination of employment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health & Life
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranteed
|
|
Insurance
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Severance Term
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Continuation
|
|
at Separation
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Peng K. Lim
|
|
One year salary and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
benefits
|
|
|
$300,000
|
|
|
$120,000
|
|
|
$11,512
|
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
431,512
|
|
Cynthia A. Scheuer
|
|
Six months salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and benefits
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,673
|
|
James K. Prueitt (1)
|
|
Three months salary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and benefits
|
|
|
47,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,771
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Pursuant to Mr. Prueitts employment agreement,
beginning April 19, 2006, for the first two years of
employment, we will provide three months of base salary and
benefits as a severance benefit in the event his employment is
terminated without cause. During this period, if
Mr. Prueitts employment is terminated within
90 days following a change in control of our company, he
will receive his base salary and benefits for six months as a
severance benefit.
|
Directors
Compensation
On April 20, 2007, our Board of Directors adopted a new
compensation plan for non-management directors that eliminated
the quarterly cash retainer compensation of $12,000 per year,
after reducing it from $16,000 per year, on March 13, 2007.
Beginning in 2007, non-employee directors annually receive the
following: 1) options to purchase 6,250 shares of our
common stock, 2) the Chairman of the Audit Committee, the
Chairman of the Governance, Compensation,and Nominating
Committee and the Chairman of the Technical Committee of our MTI
Micro subsidiary each receive additional options to purchase
938 shares of our common stock, and 3) members of the
Audit Committee, the Governance, Compensation, and Nominating
Committee and the Technical Committee of our MTI Micro
subsidiary each receive additional options to purchase
625 shares of our common stock. Future compensation will be
issued on an annual basis thereafter on the third Monday of each
March. These options are priced based on the closing price of
our common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market System on the date
of grant, vest immediately and have a seven-year term. Each
non-employee director is also reimbursed for reasonable travel
and related expenses incurred on our behalf.
On March 12, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company
approved the deferral of the issuance of annual stock option
compensation for the Companys non-management directors
until a later date in 2008. Under the Companys current
compensation plan for its non-management directors, annual
option compensation was scheduled to be issued on March 17,
2008.
70
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Awards(1)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Steven N. Fischer (2)
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
$9,403
|
|
|
$
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
113,403
|
|
Thomas J. Marusak (3)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
51,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,558
|
|
E. Dennis OConnor (4)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
53,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,706
|
|
William P. Phelan (5)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
49,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,410
|
|
Dr. Walter Robb (6)
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
55,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,855
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Valuations are based upon the dollar amount of option grants
recognized for financial statement purposes pursuant to
FAS 123R with respect to 2007. The assumptions and
methodologies were utilized in calculating these amounts are
discussed in Note 13 to the financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Mr. Fischer retired from our Board of Directors on
May 15, 2008. As of December 31, 2007,
Mr. Fischer had 55,980 options outstanding and exercisable.
During 2007, Mr. Fischer was paid $100,000 in cash and
received $4,000 in 401(k) matching contributions related to his
executive position, forfeited 12,500 performance based stock
options that did not vest and was granted 12,500 performance
based stock options that will vest upon attainment of certain
financing goals during 2008. If such goals are not achieved by
June 30, 2008, the options will be forfeited.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Marusak had 16,147
options outstanding and exercisable.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, Mr. OConnor had 41,262
options outstanding and exercisable.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, Mr. Phelan had 18,127 options
outstanding and exercisable.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, Dr. Robb had 40,857 options
outstanding and exercisable.
|
71
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Review,
Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related
Persons
In early 2007, we formalized the process by which we review and
approve transactions in which we or one or more related persons
participate. Although we have always had procedures in place, we
strengthened our current procedures by adopting a written policy
requiring that all related person transactions, be reported to
our Chief Financial Officer and approved or ratified by the
Governance, Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board
of Directors. In completing our review of proposed related
person transactions, the Governance, Compensation, and
Nominating Committee considers the aggregate value of the
transaction, whether the transaction was undertaken in the
ordinary course of business, the nature of the relationships
involved, and whether the transaction is on terms comparable to
those that could be obtained in arms length dealings with
an unrelated third party.
We believe transactions among related parties are as fair to us
as those obtainable from unaffiliated third parties. During our
December 2006 capital raise, Sidney V. Gold, a stockholder in
MTI Micro purchased 5,000 units consisting of
62,500 shares our common stock and warrants exercisable for
five years to purchase an additional 31,250 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $18.16 per share. The
purchase price per unit was $180.00.
72
DESCRIPTION
OF SECURITIES
The following is a description of the material provisions of our
capital stock, as well as other material terms of our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws as they will be in
effect as of the consummation of the offering. The following
description is intended to be a summary and does not describe
all provisions of our certificate of incorporation or bylaws or
New York law applicable to us. For a more thorough understanding
of the terms of our securities, you should read the following
together with our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, which
are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which
this prospectus forms a part.
General
As of March 31, 2008, our total authorized capital stock
consisted of 75,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share. As of March 31, 2008,
4,771,861 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding. As of March 31, 2008, options to purchase
762,391 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase
378,472 shares of common stock were outstanding.
Common
Stock
The holders of outstanding shares of our common stock are
entitled to receive dividends out of assets legally available
therefore at such time and in such amounts as our Board of
Directors may from time to time determine subject to the prior
rights of the holders of any preferred stock. The holders of our
common stock have no preemptive or subscription rights to
purchase any of our securities. Upon our liquidation,
dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock are
entitled to receive, pro rata, our assets which are legally
available for distribution, after payment of all debts and other
liabilities and subject to the rights of any holders of
preferred stock. Each outstanding share of common stock is
entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders. There is no cumulative voting with respect to any
shares of capital stock.
Our common stock is quoted on The Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol MKTY. Following the reverse stock split that
became effective May 16, 2008, our common stock will trade
under the symbol MKTYD until June 13, 2008,
when it will revert to MKTY.
Warrants
Warrants for the issuance of 378,472 shares of our common
stock are outstanding, all of which are exercisable at a price
of $18.16 per share. These warrants became exercisable on
June 20, 2007 and are exercisable through December 19,
2011.
The descriptions of the warrants are only a summary and are
qualified in their entirety by the provisions of the forms of
the warrant, which are attached or referenced to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Unit
Warrants
In connection with this offering, we will issue warrants to
purchase shares
of common stock. Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase at
any time for a period of five years, a specified number of
shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$ per share. After the expiration
of the exercise period, unit warrant holders will have no
further rights to exercise such unit warrants.
The unit warrants may be exercised only for full shares of
common stock, and may be exercised on a cashless
basis. We will not issue fractional shares of common stock or
cash in lieu of fractional shares of common stock. Unit warrant
holders do not have any voting or other rights as a stockholder
of our company. The exercise price and the number of shares of
common stock purchasable upon the exercise of each unit warrant
are subject to adjustment upon the happening of certain events,
such as stock dividends, distributions, and splits. No
adjustment in the exercise price will be required unless
cumulative adjustments require an adjustment of at least $0.01.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in case of any consolidation,
merger, or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of our
company, the holder of each of the unit warrants will have only
the right, upon
73
the subsequent exercise thereof, to receive the kind and amount
of shares and other securities and property, including cash,
that the holder would have been entitled to receive by virtue of
such transaction had the unit warrants been exercised
immediately prior to such transaction.
Limitation
of Liability and Indemnification of Officers and
Directors
Pursuant to the statutes of the State of New York, a director or
officer of a corporation is entitled, under specified
circumstances, to indemnification by our company against
reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees, incurred by
him/her in connection with the defense of a civil or criminal
proceeding to which
he/she
has
been made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of the
fact that
he/she
was
such director or officer. In certain circumstances, indemnity is
provided against judgments, fines, and amounts paid in
settlement. In general, indemnification is available where the
director or officer acted in good faith, for a purpose
he/she
reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the
corporation. Specific court approval is required in some cases.
The foregoing statement is subject to the detailed provisions of
Sections 715, 717 and
721-725
of
the New York Business Corporation Law.
Under provisions of our certificate of incorporation, we will
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending, or completed action,
proceeding or suit (including one by or in the right of us to
procure a judgment in its favor), whether civil or criminal, by
reason of the fact that he, his testator or intestate is or was
one of our directors or officers, or is or was serving any other
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit
plan, or other enterprise in any capacity at our request,
against judgments, fines, amounts paid in settlement, and
expenses, including attorneys fees, actually incurred as a
result of or in connection with any such action, proceeding or
suit, or any appeal therefrom, if such director or officer acted
in good faith for a purpose which he reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to our best interests, and, in criminal
actions or proceedings, in which he had no reasonable cause to
believe that his conduct was unlawful. No indemnification will
be made, however, to or on behalf of any director or officer if
a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to the director
or officer establishes that
his/her
acts
were committed in bad faith or were the result of active and
deliberate dishonesty and were material to the cause of action
so adjudicated, or that
he/she
personally gained a financial profit or other advantage to which
he/she
was
not legally entitled.
Our directors and officers are covered by insurance policies
indemnifying against certain liabilities, including certain
liabilities arising under the Securities Act that might be
incurred by them in such capacities.
Our certificate of incorporation further provides that directors
of our company will not be personally liable to us or our
stockholders for any breach of duty in such capacity, however,
such provision will not operation to eliminate or limit the
liability of any director if a judgment or other final
adjudication adverse to such director establishes that the
directors acts or omissions were in bad faith or involved
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law or that the
director personally gained in fact a financial profit or other
advantage to which the director was not legally entitled or that
the directors acts violated certain provisions of the New
York Business Corporation Law.
Indemnification
for Securities Act Liabilities
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or
persons controlling our company pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the
Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is
therefore unenforceable.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock and
warrants placed through this offering is American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, located at 59 Maiden
Lane, Plaza Level, New York, NY 10038.
74
PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of May 21, 2008
by each of our directors and named executive officers and all of
our executive officers and directors as a group. We are not
aware of any stockholders that beneficially own more than 5% of
our common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Percent
|
|
Name (1)
|
|
Owned (2)
|
|
Before Offering
|
|
After Offering
|
|
|
Robert J. Kot (3)
|
|
9,769
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
Peng K. Lim (4)
|
|
105,476
|
|
|
2.2%
|
|
|
*
|
|
Thomas J. Marusak (5)
|
|
17,022
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
E. Dennis OConnor (6)
|
|
60,824
|
|
|
1.3%
|
|
|
*
|
|
William P. Phelan (7)
|
|
18,127
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
James K. Prueitt (8)
|
|
6,096
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Walter L. Robb (9)
|
|
97,107
|
|
|
2.0%
|
|
|
*
|
|
Cynthia A. Scheuer (10)
|
|
38,439
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
All present directors and officers as a group
(8 persons) (11)
|
|
352,860
|
|
|
7.0%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Unless otherwise indicated, each of the stockholders has sole
voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common
stock beneficially owned by the stockholder. The address of all
listed stockholders is
c/o Mechanical
Technology, Incorporated, 431 New Karner Road, Albany, New York
12205.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
The number of shares beneficially owned by each stockholder is
determined under rules promulgated by the SEC and includes
voting or investment power with respect to securities. Under
these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to
which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power
or investment power and includes any shares as to which the
individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial
ownership within 60 days after May 21, 2008, through
the exercise of any warrant, stock option or other right. The
inclusion in this schedule of such shares, however, does not
constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct
or indirect beneficial owner of such shares. The number of
shares of common stock outstanding used in calculating the
percentage for each listed person includes the shares of common
stock underlying options held by such person, which are
exercisable within 60 days of May 21, 2008, but
excludes shares of common stock underlying options held by any
other person. Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on
4,771,861 shares of common stock outstanding as of
May 21, 2008.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 9,769 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes 94,089 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes 16,147 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Includes 41,262 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 18,127 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 4,846 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes 40,857 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 33,596 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
Includes 258,693 shares of common stock issuable upon
exercise of stock options.
|
75
UNDERWRITING
Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. and Ardour Capital
Investments, LLC are acting as the representatives of the
underwriters. We and the underwriters named below intend to
enter into an underwriting agreement with respect to the units
being offered by this prospectus. In connection with this
offering and subject to certain conditions, each of the
underwriters named below has severally agreed to purchase, and
we have agreed to sell, the number of units set forth opposite
the name of each underwriter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Merriman Curhan Ford & Co
|
|
|
|
|
Ardour Capital Investments, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement is subject to a number of terms and
conditions and provides that the underwriters must buy all of
the units if they buy any of them (other than those units
covered by the over-allotment option described below).
The underwriters have advised us that they do not intend to
confirm sales of the units to any account over which they
exercise discretionary authority in an aggregate amount in
excess of 5% of the total securities offered by this prospectus.
We have granted to the underwriters an option, exercisable as
provided in the underwriting agreement and expiring 30 days
after the effective date of this offering, to purchase up to an
additional 1,050,000 units at the public offering price set
forth on the cover page of this prospectus, less underwriting
discounts and commissions. The underwriters may exercise this
option only to cover over-allotments made in connection with the
sale of units offered by this prospectus, if any. To the extent
that the underwriters exercise this option, each of the
underwriters will become obligated, subject to certain
conditions, to purchase approximately the same percentage of
these additional units as the number of units to be purchased by
it in the above table bears to the total number of units offered
by this prospectus. We will be obligated, pursuant to the
option, to sell these additional units to the underwriters to
the extent the option is exercised. If any additional units are
so purchased, the underwriters will offer the additional units
on the same terms as those on which
the units
are being offered.
The underwriting agreement provides that we will pay Merriman
Curhan Ford & Co. a non-accountable expense allowance
equal
to %
of the total proceeds of this offering, or
$ ,
of which $20,000 has already been paid. In addition, we have
agreed to reimburse the underwriters for up to $125,000 of their
legal fees incurred in connection with this offering if the
offering is not completed.
The underwriters propose initially to offer the units to the
public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus and to the dealers at that price less a
concession not in excess of $ per
unit. The underwriters may allow, and the dealers may reallow, a
discount not in excess of $ per
unit to other dealers. After the public offering, the public
offering price, concession and discount may be changed.
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Market under the
symbol MKTY. Following the reverse stock split that
became effective May 16, 2008, our common stock will trade
under the symbol MKTYD until June 13, 2008,
when it will revert to MKTY. We have been notified
by Nasdaq that our common stock could be delisted for failure to
maintain a bid price of $1.00 and that we have until
July 7, 2008 to regain compliance with the listing
standards of The Nasdaq Global Market. See Risk
Factors.
76
The underwriting discounts and commissions per unit are equal to
the public offering price per unit less the amount paid by the
underwriters to us per unit. The underwriting discounts and
commissions
are %
of the public offering price. We have agreed to pay the
underwriters the following discounts and commissions, assuming
either no exercise or full exercise by the underwriters of the
underwriters over-allotment option:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With Full Exercise
|
|
|
Without Exercise of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Over-Allotment
|
|
|
Over-Allotment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Per Unit
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate that our share of the total expenses of this
offering, excluding underwriting discounts and commissions, will
be approximately
$240,000 .
Each of our directors and executive officers have agreed with
the underwriters not to offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell,
sell any option or contract to purchase, purchase any option or
contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to
purchase, lend, or otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock or any securities
convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for shares of
our common stock, or enter into any swap or other arrangement
that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the
economic consequences of ownership of shares of our common
stock, for a period of at least 180 days after the date of
the final prospectus relating to this public offering, without
the prior written consent of Merriman Curhan Ford &
Co. on behalf of the underwriters. This consent may be given at
any time without public notice. In addition, if we issue an
earnings release or material news or a material event relating
to us occurs during the last 17 days of the
180-day
lock-up
period or if prior to the expiration of the
180-day
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
180-day
lock
up period, the restrictions imposed by underwriters
lock-up
agreements will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event, as
applicable, unless Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. waives,
in writing, such extension. The
lock-up
agreements do not apply to the exercise of options or warrants
or the conversion of a security outstanding on the date of this
prospectus and which is described in this prospectus, nor do
they apply to transfers or dispositions of shares made
(i) as a bona fide gift or gifts, provided that the donee
or donees thereof agree to be bound by the restrictions set
forth in the
lock-up
agreements, (ii) to any trust for the direct or indirect
benefit of a signatory to a
lock-up
agreement or the immediate family of such signatory, provided
that the trustee of the trust agrees to be bound by the
restrictions set forth in the
lock-up
agreements, (iii) by will or intestate succession provided
the transferee agrees to be bound by the restrictions set forth
in the
lock-up
agreements, or (iv) to the underwriters pursuant to the
underwriting agreement. There are no agreements between the
underwriters and any of our stockholders or affiliates releasing
them from these
lock-up
agreements prior to the expiration of the
180-day
period. In addition, we have agreed with the underwriters not to
make certain issuances or sales of our securities for a period
of at least 180 days after the date of the final prospectus
relating to this public offering, without the prior written
consent of Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. on behalf of the
underwriters.
The underwriting agreement provides that we will indemnify the
underwriters against specified liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act. We have been advised that,
in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission,
indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is
therefore unenforceable.
In connection with the offering, Merriman Curhan
Ford & Co., on behalf of the underwriters, may
purchase and sell shares of our common stock in the open market.
These transactions may include short sales, syndicate covering
transactions and stabilizing transactions. Short sales involve
syndicate sales of common stock in excess of the number of units
to be
77
purchased by the underwriters in the offering, which creates a
syndicate short position. Covered short sales are
sales of shares made in an amount up to the number of shares
underlying the units represented by the underwriters
over-allotment option. In determining the source of shares to
close out the covered syndicate short position, the underwriters
will consider, among other things, the price of shares available
for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at
which it may purchase units through the over-allotment option.
Transactions to close out the covered syndicate short involve
either purchases of the common stock in the open market after
the distribution has been completed or the exercise of the
over-allotment option. The underwriters may also make
naked short sales of units in excess of the
over-allotment option. The underwriters must close out any naked
short position by purchasing shares of common stock in the open
market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if
the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward
pressure on the price of the shares in the open market after
pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in
the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of bids for or
purchases of shares in the open market while the offering is in
progress.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. Penalty bids
permit the underwriters to reclaim a selling concession from a
syndicate member when Merriman Curhan Ford & Co.
repurchases shares originally sold by that syndicate member in
order to cover syndicate short positions or make stabilizing
purchases.
Any of these activities may have the effect of preventing or
retarding the decline in the market price of the common stock.
They may also cause the price of the common stock to be higher
than the price that would otherwise exist in the open market in
the absence of these transactions. The underwriters may conduct
these transactions on The Nasdaq Global Market or in the
over-the-counter market, or otherwise. If the underwriters
commence any of these transactions, they may discontinue them at
any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on
Internet sites or through other online services maintained by
one or more of the underwriters or selling group members
participating in this offering, or by their affiliates. In those
cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and,
depending on the particular underwriter or selling group member,
prospective investors may be allowed to place orders online. The
underwriters may agree with us to allocate a specific number of
units for sale to online brokerage account holders. Any such
allocation for online distributions will be made by the
underwriters on the same basis as other allocations.
From time to time, Merriman Curhan Ford & Co., Ardour
Capital Investments, LLC, and their affiliates may in the future
provide investment banking, commercial banking, and financial
advisory services to us, for which they may in the future
receive, customary fees. We have also entered into a six-month
exclusive agreement with Merriman Curhan Ford & Co.,
pursuant to which Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. will act
as our financial advisor in connection with the potential sale
or other disposition of certain of our assets. Other than the
foregoing, Merriman Curhan Ford & Co. does not have
any material relationship with us or any of our officers,
directors or controlling persons, except with respect to their
contractual relationship with us entered into in connection with
this offering.
78
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been a limited public market
for our common stock. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that
sales of our common stock or the availability of our common
stock for sale will have on the market price of our common stock
prevailing from time to time. Sales of shares of our common
stock in the public market, or the perception that those sales
may occur, could cause the prevailing market price to decrease
or to be lower than it might be in the absence of those sales or
perceptions. These factors could also make it more difficult to
raise funds through future offerings of common stock.
Sale of
Restricted Shares
Upon the closing of this offering, we will have an aggregate of
11,771,861 shares of common stock outstanding. The shares
of common stock as part of the units sold in this offering will
be freely tradeable without restriction or further registration
under the Securities Act. However, if shares are purchased by
affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act, their sales of shares of common stock
would be subject to volume limitations and other restrictions
that are described below. In addition, 11,771,861 outstanding
shares of common stock are freely tradeable without restriction
or further registration under the Securities Act.
Our shares of common stock, outstanding upon closing of this
offering or issued in the future on exercise of warrants to
purchase additional shares of common stock, will be eligible for
sale into the public market as follows:
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
who is one of our affiliates or has purchased restricted
securities and has beneficially owned those shares of
common stock for at least six months, would be entitled to sell,
within any three-month period, a number of shares that does not
exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the total number of our shares of common stock then
outstanding, which is expected to equal approximately
117,719 shares of common stock immediately after the
closing of this offering (or approximately 128,219 shares
of common stock assuming full exercise of the underwriters
over-allotment option); or
|
|
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our shares of common stock
on The Nasdaq Global Market during the four calendar weeks
preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect
to that sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to other requirements
regarding the manner of sale, notice filing and the availability
of current public information about us.
A person who is not an affiliate of ours, has not been an
affiliate of ours at any time during the 90 days preceding
a sale and who has beneficially owned our shares of common stock
for at least six months, including the holding period of any
owner other than an affiliate, is entitled to sell those shares
without regard to volume limitations, manner of sale provisions
or information requirements under Rule 144. Therefore,
unless subject to a
lock-up
agreement or otherwise restricted, these shares may be sold
immediately upon the closing of this offering.
Stock
Options and Other Stock-Based Awards
As of March 31, 2008, options to purchase
762,391 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding,
of which options to purchase 594,067 shares of common stock
were exercisable. Shares of common stock issued upon exercise of
a stock option or other stock-based award and registered
79
under a
Form S-8
registration statement will, subject to Rule 144 volume
limitations applicable to our affiliates, be available for sale
in the public market, immediately following the expiration of or
release from the
lock-up
agreements.
Warrants
In addition to the stock options described above, warrants for
the issuance of 378,472 shares of our common stock are
outstanding, all of which are exercisable at a price of $18.16
per share. These warrants became exercisable on June 20,
2007 and are exercisable through December 19, 2011.
None of the shares issued upon exercise of these warrants will
be eligible for resale until such time as they are registered
under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration is
available, including the exemption provided by Rule 144
described above.
Lock-Up
Agreements
We and each of our directors and executive officers have agreed,
with limited exceptions, that we and they will not, without the
prior written consent of Merriman Curhan Ford & Co.,
during the period ending 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, among other things, directly or indirectly, offer to
sell, sell or otherwise dispose of any of our shares of common
stock or file a registration statement with the SEC relating to
the offering of any of our shares of common stock. However, in
the event that either (1) during the last 17 days of
the
180-day
restricted period, we issue an earnings release or material news
or a material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to
the expiration of the
180-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
180-day
period, then the
lock-up
restrictions, subject to certain exceptions, will continue to
apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event.
80
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby has
been passed upon for us by our counsel, Orrick,
Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York.
Certain legal matters in connection with this offering will be
passed upon for the underwriters by Greenberg Traurig, LLP,
Phoenix, Arizona.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2007 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2007 included in this
prospectus have been so included in reliance on the report
(which contains an explanatory paragraph relating to our ability
to continue as a going concern as described in Note 1 to
the financial statements) of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly, current and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, or SEC, under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. You may read and copy this information at
the following location of the SEC:
Public Reference Room
100 F Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 20549
You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC also maintains an Internet web site that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
about issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address
of that site is www.sec.gov.
We have filed a registration statement on
Form S-1
with the SEC that covers the sale of the units offered by this
prospectus. This prospectus is a part of the registration
statement, but the prospectus does not include all of the
information included in the registration statement. You should
refer to the registration statement for additional information
about us and the units being offered in this prospectus.
Statements that we make in this prospectus relating to any
documents filed as an exhibit to the registration statement may
not be complete and you should review the referenced document
itself for a complete understanding of its terms.
This prospectus contains market data and industry forecasts that
were obtained from industry publications, third-party market
research and publicly available information. These publications
generally state that the information contained therein has been
obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the accuracy
and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. While we
believe that the information from these publications is
reliable, we have not independently verified and make no
representation as to the accuracy of such information.
81
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2005, 2006, and 2007
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
Statements of Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
(Loss) for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31,
2005, 2006, and 2007
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
F-7 to F-47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-48
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-49
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
and Comprehensive Loss Three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-50
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-51
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
F-52 to F-64
|
|
F-1
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and
of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Mechanical Technology, Incorporated and
its subsidiaries at December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these
statements in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As
discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the
Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has a
net capital deficiency that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. Managements plans
in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Buffalo, New York
February 28, 2008, except for the effects of the reverse
stock split discussed in Note 20 to the consolidated
financial statements, as to which the date is May 15, 2008.
F-2
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2006 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
$14,545
|
|
|
|
$7,650
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
27,891
|
|
|
|
15,213
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,926
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
$33,811
|
|
|
|
$18,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
$651
|
|
|
|
$273
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
7,071
|
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain tax position liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term-Liabilities
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
10,735
|
|
|
|
4,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, authorized 75,000,000;
5,760,585 issued in 2006 and 5,777,578 issued in 2007
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Paid-in-capital
|
|
|
130,968
|
|
|
|
132,065
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(95,385
|
)
|
|
|
(105,066
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 1,005,092 shares in 2006
and 2007
|
|
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
22,871
|
|
|
|
13,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
|
$33,811
|
|
|
|
$18,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-3
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share)
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
$6,012
|
|
|
|
$7,667
|
|
|
|
$9,028
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
7,841
|
|
|
|
8,156
|
|
|
|
10,584
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
2,381
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
3,430
|
|
Research and product development expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded research and product development
|
|
|
3,555
|
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
Unfunded research and product development
|
|
|
6,116
|
|
|
|
11,769
|
|
|
|
9,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and product development expenses
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
|
|
12,921
|
|
|
|
11,765
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,887
|
|
|
|
10,072
|
|
|
|
8,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(15,098
|
)
|
|
|
(17,737
|
)
|
|
|
(13,349
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on derivatives
|
|
|
(10,407
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
Gain on sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
10,125
|
|
|
|
4,289
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
(14,949
|
)
|
|
|
(12,980
|
)
|
|
|
(7,609
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense)
|
|
|
(1,587
|
)
|
|
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
|
(2,548
|
)
|
Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(15,094
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,667
|
)
|
|
|
$(9,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per Share (Basic and Diluted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share
|
|
|
$(3.93
|
)
|
|
|
$(3.46
|
)
|
|
|
$(2.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-4
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
|
$48
|
|
|
|
$49
|
|
|
|
$58
|
|
Issuance of shares capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares stock options
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
|
$49
|
|
|
|
$58
|
|
|
|
$58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
|
$121,371
|
|
|
|
$122,436
|
|
|
|
$130,968
|
|
Private placement, net of expenses
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital raise and warrant issuance, net of expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares stock options
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
MTI MicroFuel Cell investment
|
|
|
(301
|
)
|
|
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
|
(521
|
)
|
Elimination of unearned compensation due to change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
|
$122,436
|
|
|
|
$130,968
|
|
|
|
$132,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
|
$(66,624
|
)
|
|
|
$(81,718
|
)
|
|
|
$(95,385
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(15,094
|
)
|
|
|
(13,667
|
)
|
|
|
(9,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
|
$(81,718
|
)
|
|
|
$(95,385
|
)
|
|
|
$(105,066
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain (loss) on Securities Available for Sale, Net of
Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
|
$14,542
|
|
|
|
$5,983
|
|
|
|
$984
|
|
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for
sale (net of taxes of $0 in 2005, 2006, and 2007)
|
|
|
(3,620
|
)
|
|
|
(3,212
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
Less reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income (net of taxes of $3,293 in 2005, $1,913 in 2006 and
$2,518 in 2007)
|
|
|
(4,939
|
)
|
|
|
(1,787
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
|
$5,983
|
|
|
|
$984
|
|
|
|
$500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of unearned compensation due to change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants amortization
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
|
$(80
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
|
$(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
|
$(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
$32,916
|
|
|
|
$22,871
|
|
|
|
$13,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(15,094
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,667
|
)
|
|
|
$(9,575
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classification adjustment for gains included in net income, net
of taxes
|
|
|
(4,939
|
)
|
|
|
(1,787
|
)
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for
sale, net of taxes
|
|
|
(3,620
|
)
|
|
|
(3,212
|
)
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss)
|
|
|
$(23,653
|
)
|
|
|
$(18,666
|
)
|
|
|
$(10,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-5
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the
Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(15,094
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,667
|
)
|
|
|
$(9,575
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivatives
|
|
|
10,407
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
(2,967
|
)
|
Gain on sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(10,125
|
)
|
|
|
(4,289
|
)
|
|
|
(2,549
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
(1,442
|
)
|
|
|
(1,208
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
Allowance for bad debts
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
2,518
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
(614
|
)
|
|
|
244
|
|
Other receivables related parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
(749
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities related parties
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
|
|
(12,572
|
)
|
|
|
(12,706
|
)
|
|
|
(11,683
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
(1,574
|
)
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
6,249
|
|
|
|
5,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
4,677
|
|
|
|
4,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross proceeds from capital raise and warrants issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of private placement
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of capital raise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(744
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
1,188
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
11,344
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(11,315
|
)
|
|
|
3,315
|
|
|
|
(6,895
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
22,545
|
|
|
|
11,230
|
|
|
|
14,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of year
|
|
|
$11,230
|
|
|
|
$14,545
|
|
|
|
$7,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-6
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Nature
of Operations
Description
of Business
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated, (MTI or the
Company), a New York corporation, was incorporated
in 1961. MTI operates in two segments, the New Energy segment
which is conducted through MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (MTI
Micro), a majority owned subsidiary, and the Test and
Measurement Instrumentation segment, which is conducted through
MTI Instruments, Inc. (MTI Instruments), a wholly
owned subsidiary.
At its MTI Micro subsidiary, the Companys
Mobion
®
cord-free power packs are being developed to replace current
lithium ion and similar rechargeable battery systems in many
handheld electronic devices for the military and consumer
markets.
Mobion
®
power packs are based on direct methanol fuel cell technology
which has been recognized as enabling technology for advanced
portable power sources by the scientific community and industry
analysts. As the need for advancements in portable power
increases, MTI Micro is developing
Mobion
®
cord-free rechargeable power pack technology as a superior
solution for powering the multi-billion dollar portable
electronics market.
At its MTI Instruments subsidiary, the Company continues to be a
worldwide supplier of precision non-contact physical measurement
solutions, condition based monitoring systems, portable
balancing equipment and semiconductor wafer inspection tools.
MTI Instruments products use a comprehensive array of
technologies to solve complex real world applications in
numerous industries including manufacturing, semiconductor,
commercial/military aviation, automotive and data storage. The
Companys products consist of electronic gauging
instruments for position, displacement and vibration
applications within the design, manufacturing/production, test
and research markets; semiconductor products for wafer
characterization of semi-insulating and semi-conducting wafers
within the semiconductor industry; and engine balancing and
vibration analysis systems for both military and commercial
aircraft.
Liquidity
and Going Concern
The Company has incurred significant losses as it continues to
fund MTI Micros direct methanol fuel cell product
development and commercialization programs, and has an
accumulated deficit of $105,066 thousand and working capital of
$11,347 thousand at December 31, 2007. Because of these
losses, limited current cash, cash equivalents and securities
available for sale, negative cash flows and accumulated deficit,
the report of the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2007
expressed substantial doubt about the Companys ability to
continue as a going concern.
During 2007, the Company sold 1,452,770 shares of Plug
Power Inc. (Plug Power) common stock with proceeds
totaling $5,130 thousand and gains totaling $2,549 thousand.
These proceeds reflect the Companys previously announced
strategy to raise additional capital through the sale of Plug
Power stock in order to fund MTI Micro operations.
Based on the Companys projected cash requirements for
operations and capital expenditures for 2008 and its current
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $12,142
thousand at December 31, 2007, management believes it will
have adequate resources to fund operations and capital
expenditures for the next twelve months based on current cash
and cash equivalents, current cash flow requirements, revenue
and expense projections and the potential sale of securities
available for sale at current market values.
F-7
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
1. Nature
of Operations (Continued)
However, the Company may need to do one or more of the following
to raise additional resources, or reduce its cash requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
reduce its current expenditure run-rate;
|
|
|
|
sell additional shares of Plug Power;
|
|
|
|
obtain additional government or private funding of the
Companys direct methanol fuel cell research, development,
manufacturing readiness and commercialization;
|
|
|
|
sell operating divisions of the Company; or
|
|
|
|
secure additional equity financing.
|
There is no guarantee that such resources will be available to
the Company on terms acceptable to it, or at all, or that such
resources will be received in a timely manner, if at all, or
that the Company will be able to reduce its expenditure run-rate
without materially and adversely affecting its business.
2. Accounting
Policies
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant
inter-company transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Minority interest in subsidiaries consists of equity securities
issued by a subsidiary of the Company. No gain or loss was
recognized as a result of the issuance of these securities, and
the Company owned a majority of the voting equity of the
subsidiary both before and after the transactions. The Company
reflects the impact of the equity securities issuances in its
investment in subsidiary and additional
paid-in-capital
accounts for the dilution or anti-dilution of its ownership
interest in the subsidiary.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (U.S. GAAP) which
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist of cash and
cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable,
unbilled contract costs and fees, derivatives and accounts
payable. The estimated fair values of these financial
instruments approximate their carrying values at
December 31, 2006 and 2007. The estimated fair values have
been determined through information obtained from market
sources, where available, or Black-Scholes Option Pricing model
valuations.
F-8
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
Accounting
for Derivative Instruments
The Company accounts for derivative instruments and embedded
derivative instruments in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities,
as amended. The amended standard requires an
entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure
these instruments at fair value. Fair value is estimated using
the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model. The Company also follows
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-19,
Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to
and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock
,
which requires freestanding contracts that are settled in a
companys own stock, including common stock warrants, to be
designated as an equity instrument, asset or a liability. Under
the provisions of EITF Issue
No. 00-19,
a contract designated as an asset or a liability must be carried
at fair value, with any changes in fair value recorded in the
results of operations. A contract designated as an equity
instrument can be included in equity, with no fair value
adjustments are required.
The asset/liability derivatives are valued on a quarterly basis
using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model. Significant
assumptions used in the valuation include exercise dates,
closing market prices for the Companys common stock,
volatility of the Companys common stock, and proxy
risk-free interest rates. Gains (losses) on derivatives are
included in Gain (loss) on derivatives in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount
and do not bear interest. An allowance for doubtful accounts, if
necessary, represents the Companys best estimate of the
amount of probable credit losses in its existing accounts
receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on
historical write-off experience and current exposures
identified. The Company reviews its allowance for doubtful
accounts monthly. Past due balances over 90 days and over a
specified amount are reviewed individually for collectability.
All other balances are reviewed on a pooled basis by type of
receivable. Account balances are charged off against the
allowance when the Company believes it is probable the
receivable will not be recovered. The Company does not have any
off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out) or market. The Company provides estimated inventory
allowances for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventory as
well as inventory whose carrying value is in excess of net
realizable value.
Property,
Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated
using primarily the straight-line method over their estimated
useful lives:
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Lesser of the life of the lease or the useful life of the
improvement
|
Computers and related software
|
|
3 to 5 years
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 to 10 years
|
Office furniture, equipment and fixtures
|
|
2 to 10 years
|
F-9
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
Significant additions or improvements extending assets
useful lives are capitalized; normal maintenance and repair
costs are expensed as incurred. The costs of fully depreciated
assets remaining in use are included in the respective asset and
accumulated depreciation accounts. When items are sold or
retired, related gains or losses are included in net (loss)
income.
Income
Taxes
The Company accounts for taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes
(SFAS No. 109), which requires the use
of the asset and liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income
taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary
differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates
applicable for future years to differences between financial
statement and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities.
Under SFAS No. 109, the effect of tax rate changes on
deferred taxes is recognized in the income tax provision in the
period that includes the enactment date. The provision for taxes
is reduced by investment and other tax credits in the years such
credits become available. A valuation allowance is recorded to
reduce the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets unless it is
more likely than not those assets will be realized.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the
provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
. FIN 48
contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring
uncertain tax positions (tax contingencies) accounted for in
accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to
evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the
weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than
not that the position will be sustained on audit, including
resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any.
The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest
amount which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon
ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when
evaluating and estimating its tax positions and tax benefits,
which may require periodic adjustments and which may not
accurately forecast actual outcomes.
Revenue
Recognition
The Company applies the guidance within SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 104,
Revenue Recognition
(SAB No. 104) in the evaluation of its
contracts to determine when to properly recognize revenue. Under
SAB No. 104, revenue is recognized when title and risk
of loss have passed to the customer, there is persuasive
evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable,
delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the sales
price is determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.
Product
Revenue
Product revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence
of an arrangement, the collection of a fixed fee is probable or
determinable, delivery of the product to the customer or
distributor has occurred, at which time title generally is
passed to the customer or distributor, all of which generally
occur upon shipment of the product. If the product requires
installation to be performed by the Company, all revenue related
to the product is deferred and recognized upon the completion of
the installation. If the product requires specific customer
acceptance, revenue is deferred until customer acceptance occurs
or the acceptance provisions lapse, unless the Company can
objectively and reliably demonstrate that the criteria specified
in the acceptance provisions are satisfied.
F-10
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
MTI Instruments currently has distributor agreements in place
for the international sale of general instrument and
semiconductor products in certain global regions. Such
agreements grant a distributor the right of first refusal to act
as distributor for such products in the distributors
territory. In return, the distributor agrees to not market other
products which are considered by MTI Instruments to be in direct
competition with MTI Instruments products. The distributor
is allowed to purchase MTI Instruments equipment at a
price which is discounted off the published
domestic/international list prices. Such list prices can be
adjusted by MTI Instruments during the term of the distributor
agreement, but MTI Instruments must provide advance notice at
least 90 days before the price adjustment goes into effect.
Generally, payment terms with the distributor are standard
net 30 days; however, on occasion, extended payment
terms have been granted. Title and risk of loss of the product
passes to the distributor upon delivery to the independent
carrier (standard
free-on-board
factory), and the distributor is responsible for any required
training
and/or
service with the end-user. The sale (and subsequent payment)
between MTI Instruments and the distributor is not contingent
upon the successful resale of the product by the distributor.
Distributor sales are covered by MTI Instruments standard
one-year warranty and there are no special return policies for
distributors.
Some of MTI Instruments direct sales, particularly sales
of semi-automatic and fully-automated semiconductor metrology
equipment, or rack-mounted vibration systems, involve
on-site
customer acceptance
and/or
installation. In those instances, revenue recognition does not
take place at time of shipment. Instead, MTI Instruments
recognizes the sale after the unit is installed
and/or
an
on-site
acceptance is given by the customer.
Agreed-upon
acceptance terms and conditions, if any, are negotiated at the
time of purchase.
Funded
Research and Development Revenue
The Company performs funded research and development for
government agencies under both cost reimbursement and
fixed-price contracts. Cost reimbursement contracts provide for
the reimbursement of allowable costs. On fixed-price contracts,
revenue is generally recognized on the percentage of completion
method based upon the proportion of costs incurred to the total
estimated costs for the contract. Revenue from reimbursement
contracts is recognized as the services are performed. In each
type of contract, the Company generally receives periodic
progress payments or payments upon reaching interim milestones.
When the current estimates of total contract revenue for
commercial development contracts indicate a loss, a provision
for the entire loss on the contract is recorded. Any losses
incurred in performing funded research and development projects
are recognized as research and development expense as incurred.
When government agencies are providing funding they do not
expect the government to be the only significant end user of the
resulting products. These contracts do not require delivery of
products that meet defined performance specifications, but are
best efforts arrangements to achieve overall research and
development objectives. Included in accounts receivable are
billed and unbilled
work-in-progress
on contracts. Billings in excess of contract revenues earned are
recorded as deferred revenue. While the Companys
accounting for government contract costs is subject to audit by
the sponsoring entity, in the opinion of management, no material
adjustments are expected as a result of such audits. Adjustments
are recognized in the period made.
F-11
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
Commercial
Research and Prototype Agreement Income
The Company also applies the guidance in SAB No. 104
in the evaluation of commercially funded fuel cell research and
prototype agreements in order to determine when to properly
recognize income. Payments received in connection with
commercial research and prototype agreements are deferred and
recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the
agreement for service-related payments, and for milestone and
prototype delivery payments, if and when achieved, revenue is
deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the
remaining term of the agreement. Under this policy, when revenue
qualifies for recognition it will be recorded in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line Funded
research and development revenue. The costs associated
with research and prototype-producing activities are expensed as
incurred. Expenses in an amount equal to revenues recognized are
reclassified from Unfunded research and product
development to Funded research and product
development in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Information regarding MTI Micros government and commercial
funded research and development contracts is as follows:
|
|
|
Contract Name
|
|
Expiration (1)
|
|
$3,000 thousand DOE (2)
|
|
09/30/08
|
$1,250 thousand NYSERDA (3)
|
|
06/30/06
|
$1,000 thousand Samsung (4)
|
|
07/31/07
|
$418 thousand SAFT (5)
|
|
12/31/06
|
$250 thousand ARL
|
|
09/30/05
|
$210 thousand NIST (6)
|
|
06/30/05
|
$150 thousand Harris (7)
|
|
06/25/04
|
$70 thousand Marine Corps
|
|
03/31/05
|
$15 thousand NCMS (8)
|
|
06/30/07
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Dates represent expiration of contract, not date of final
billing.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The DOE contract is a cost share contract. DOE funding for this
contract was suspended during January 2006 and reinstated during
May 2007. During 2007, the Company received notifications from
the DOE of funding releases totaling $1.0 million and also
received an extension of the termination date for the contract
from July 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The total contract value for this cost shared contract is
$1.3 million consisting of four Phases: Phase I for
$500,000 was from March 12, 2002 through September 30,
2003; Phase II for $200,000 was from October 28, 2003
through October 31, 2004; Phase III for $348,000 was
from August 23, 2004 through August 31, 2005; and
Phase IV for $202,000 which commenced on December 14,
2004 and expired on June 30, 2006. Phases I, II,
and III have been completed, while. Phase IV expired
before it was completed.
|
|
(4)
|
|
The Samsung contract is a research and prototype contract. This
contract included one up-front payment of $750,000 and two
milestone payments of $125,000 each for the delivery of
prototypes. The contract was amended on October 22, 2007 as
MTI Micro agreed to issue a credit in the amount of the last
invoice in recognition of the Companys continuing
collaboration with Samsung. Therefore, revenue under this
contract totaled $875,000.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The SAFT contract is a fixed price contract. This is a
subcontract with SAFT under the U.S. Army CECOM contract. The
purchase order received in connection with this subcontract was
revised
|
F-12
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
on November 14, 2006 eliminating one milestone. As a
result, the contract value was reduced from $470,000 to $418,000
and the expiration date was extended from September 30,
2006 to December 31, 2006.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Represents a fixed price subcontract with CSMP under NIST and
includes the original contract for $200,000 and a contract
amendment for $10,000.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Represents a fixed price contract that includes the original
contract for $200,000, an amendment for $50,000, and a 2005
amendment reducing the contract by $100,000.
|
|
(8)
|
|
This contract was a cost plus catalyst research contract with
the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences
(NCMS).
|
The Companys cost-shared contracts require that MTI Micro
conduct research, deliver direct methanol fuel cell prototypes,
and other deliverables pursuant to predefined work plans and
schedules. For cost-shared contracts spanning multiple years,
the following table summarizes as of December 31, 2007 the
total expenditures incurred or expected to be incurred by MTI
Micro along with the related funded research and development
revenue received or expected to be received:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contract Value
|
Contract
|
|
Funded Expense
|
|
Funded Revenue
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
DOE
|
|
$6,144
|
|
$3,000
|
NYSERDA
|
|
2,702
|
|
1,250
|
MTI Micro retains ownership of the intellectual property
(IP) generated by MTI Micro under each of its
federal government contract and under the contract with Samsung.
Each federal government agency retains a government use license
and march-in rights if MTI Micro fails to commercialize
technology generated under the contract. In addition, under the
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
(NYSERDA) contract, MTI Micro has the right to elect
to retain any invention made under the NYSERDA contract within
six months of invention. NYSERDA also retains rights to a
government use license for New York State and its political
subdivisions for any inventions made under the contract.
Additionally, MTI Micro agreed to pay NYSERDA a royalty of 5.0%
of the sales price of any product sold incorporating IP
developed pursuant to the NYSERDA contract. If the product is
manufactured by a New York State manufacturer, this royalty is
reduced to 1.5%. Total royalties are subject to a cap equal to
two times the total contract funds paid by NYSERDA to MTI Micro,
and may potentially be reduced to reflect any New York State
jobs created by MTI Micro.
Cost of
Product Revenue
Cost of product revenue includes material, labor and overhead.
Costs incurred in connection with funded research and
development arrangements are included in funded research and
product development expenses.
Deferred
Revenue
Deferred revenue consists of payments received from customers in
advance of services performed, completed installation or
customer acceptance.
F-13
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
Warranty
The Company records a warranty reserve at the time product
revenue is recorded based on a historical rate. The reserve is
reviewed during the year and is adjusted, if appropriate, to
reflect new product offerings or changes in experience. Actual
warranty claims are tracked by product line.
Accounting
for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets include patents and trade names. Goodwill and
other intangible assets are accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets
. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are
amortized over those periods. Indefinite life intangible assets
are tested for impairment annually, and will be tested for
impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or
circumstances change that would indicate that the carrying
amount may be impaired. Definite life assets are tested for
impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that a
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An
impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of
an asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows used in
determining the fair value of the asset. The amount of the
impairment loss to be recorded is calculated by the excess of
the assets carrying value over its fair value. Fair value is
generally determined using a discounted cash flow analysis.
Costs related to internally-developed intangible assets are
expensed as incurred.
Accounting
for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
The Company accounts for impairment or disposal of long-lived
assets in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
. This
Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the
impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and specifies how
impairment will be measured and how impaired assets will be
classified in the consolidated financial statements. On a
quarterly basis, the Company analyzes the status of its
long-lived assets at each subsidiary for potential impairment.
As of December 31, 2007, the Company does not believe that
any of its long-lived assets have suffered any type of
impairment that would require an adjustment to that assets
recorded value.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid
short-term investments with original maturities of less than
three months.
Securities
Available for Sale
Management determines the appropriate classification of its
investments in marketable securities at the time of purchase and
reevaluates such determinations at each balance sheet date.
Marketable securities for which the Company does not have the
intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as
available for sale. Securities available for sale are carried at
fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of income
taxes, reported as a separate component of stockholders
equity. The Company has had no investments that qualify as
trading or held to maturity. Realized gains and losses are
included in the caption Gain (loss) on sale of securities
available for sale in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific
identification method.
F-14
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
Net
(Loss) Income per Common Share
The Company reports net (loss) income per basic and diluted
common share in accordance with SFAS No. 128,
Earnings Per Share
, which establishes standards for
computing and presenting (loss) income per share. Basic earnings
(loss) per common share are computed by dividing net (loss)
income by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted (loss) income
per share reflects the potential dilution, if any, computed by
dividing net (loss) income by the combination of dilutive common
share equivalents, comprised of shares issuable under
outstanding investment rights, warrants and the Companys
share-based compensation plans, and the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the reporting period.
Dilutive common share equivalents include the dilutive effect of
in-the-money stock options, which are calculated based on the
average share price for each period using the treasury stock
method. Under the treasury stock method, the exercise price of a
stock option, the amount of compensation cost, if any, for
future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the
amount of windfall tax benefits that would be recorded in
additional paid-in capital, if any, when the stock option is
exercised are assumed to be used to repurchase shares in the
current period.
Share-Based
Payments
The Company has three share-based employee compensation plans
and MTI Micro has one share-based employee compensation plan,
all of which are described more fully in Note 13, Stock
Based Compensation.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) revised SFAS No. 123
(FAS 123R),
Share-Based Payment
, which
establishes accounting for share-based awards exchanged for
employee services and requires companies to expense the
estimated fair value of these awards over the requisite employee
service period. The accounting provisions of FAS 123R were
adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2006. In March
2005, the SEC issued SAB 107,
Share-Based Payment
(SAB 107) to assist filers by simplifying
some of the implementation challenges of FAS 123R. In
particular, SAB 107 provides supplemental implementation
guidance on FAS 123R, including guidance on valuation
methods, classification of compensation expense, inventory
capitalization of share-based compensation cost, income tax
effects, disclosures in Managements Discussion and
Analysis and several other issues. The Company applied the
principles of SAB 107 in conjunction with its adoption of
FAS 123R.
Under FAS 123R, share-based compensation cost is measured
at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the
award, and is recognized as expense over the employees
requisite service period. The Company has awards with
performance conditions, but no awards with market conditions.
The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 123R on
January 1, 2006, the first day of the Companys fiscal
year, using the modified prospective application, which provided
for certain changes to the method for valuing share-based
compensation. Under the modified prospective application, prior
periods were not revised for comparative purposes. The valuation
provisions of FAS 123R apply to new awards and to awards
that are outstanding on the effective date and subsequently
modified or cancelled. Estimated compensation expense for awards
outstanding at the effective date will be recognized over the
remaining service period using the compensation cost calculated
for pro forma disclosure purposes under the original FASB
Statement No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation
(FAS 123).
In November 2005, the FASB issued Staff Position
No. FAS 123(R)-3,
Transition Election Related to
Accounting for Tax Effects of Share-Based Payment Awards
.
The Company elected to adopt the
F-15
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
alternative transition method provided in this FASB Staff
Position for calculating the tax effects of share-based
compensation pursuant to FAS 123R. This method included a
simplified method to establish the beginning balance of the
additional paid-in capital pool related to the tax effects of
employee share-based compensation, which is available to absorb
tax deficiencies recognized subsequent to the adoption of
FAS 123R.
Prior to the adoption of FAS 123R, the Company accounted
for stock-based awards to employees and directors using the
intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles
Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees
, and related Interpretations as
permitted under FAS 123. Under the intrinsic value method,
stock-based compensation was typically only recognized by the
Company due to modifications in option provisions, since the
exercise price of the Companys and MTI Micros common
stock options granted to employees and directors generally
equaled the fair market value of the underlying stock at the
date of grant.
Stock-based compensation represents the cost related to
stock-based awards granted to employees and directors. The
Company measures stock-based compensation cost at grant date
based on the estimated fair value of the award, and recognizes
the cost as expense on a straight-line basis (net of estimated
forfeitures) over the options requisite service period.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock-based awards using
a Black Scholes valuation model. Stock-based compensation
expense is recorded in Selling, general and administrative
expenses and Unfunded research and product
development expenses in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations based on the employees respective functions.
The Company records deferred tax assets for awards that
potentially can result in deductions on the Companys
income tax returns based on the amount of compensation cost
recognized and the Companys statutory tax rate.
Differences between the deferred tax assets recognized for
financial reporting purposes and the actual tax deduction
reported on the Companys income tax return are recorded in
Additional Paid-In Capital (if the tax deduction exceeds the
deferred tax asset) or in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations (if the deferred tax asset exceeds the tax deduction
and no historical pool of windfall tax benefits exists). Since
the adoption of FAS 123R, no tax benefits have been
recognized related to share-based compensation since the Company
has incurred net operating losses and has established a full
valuation allowanced to offset all potential tax benefits
associated with these deferred tax assets. The Company continues
to record the fair market value of stock options and warrants
granted to non-employees and
non-directors
in exchange for services in accordance with EITF Issue
No. 96-18,
Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other
Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling,
Goods or Services
, in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
Advertising
The costs of advertising are expensed as incurred. Advertising
expense was approximately $45, $110, and $102 thousand for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations
of credit risk principally consist of cash equivalents,
marketable securities, trade accounts receivable and unbilled
contract costs.
F-16
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
The Companys trade accounts receivable and unbilled
contract costs and fees are primarily from sales to commercial
customers, the U.S. government and state agencies. The
Company does not require collateral and has not historically
experienced significant credit losses related to receivables or
unbilled contract costs and fees from individual customers or
groups of customers in any particular industry or geographic
area.
The Company deposits its cash and invests in marketable
securities primarily through commercial banks and investment
companies. Credit exposure to any one entity is limited by
Company policy.
Research
and Development Costs
The Company expenses research and development costs as incurred.
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income
Comprehensive (loss) income includes net (loss) income, as well
as changes in stockholders equity, other than those
resulting from investments by stockholders (i.e., issuance or
repurchase of common shares and dividends).
Effect of
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 141
(SFAS No. 141R), which significantly
changes the principles and requirements for how the acquirer of
a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also
provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill
acquired in the business combination and determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective
prospectively, except for certain retrospective adjustments to
deferred tax balances, for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. This statement will be effective for the
Company for fiscal year 2009. The Company has not yet determined
the impact, if any, of this statement on its Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendments of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
requires that accounting and reporting for minority interests
will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and
classified as a component of equity. SFAS No. 160 also
establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient
disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling
owners. SFAS No. 160 applies to all entities that
prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an
outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries
or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective
as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement will be
effective for the Company for its
F-17
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2. Accounting
Policies (Continued)
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. Based upon the
December 31, 2007 balance sheet, the impact of adopting
SFAS No. 160 would be to reclassify from $143 thousand
minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries to
stockholders equity as a separate component of
stockholders equity.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
provides companies with an option to report selected financial
assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting
date. SFAS No. 159 is effective beginning
January 1, 2008. The adoption of the provisions of
SFAS No. 159 is not expected to have a material effect
on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to
United States generally accepted accounting principles guidance
requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair
value measurements. This Statement is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. This statement will be
effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2008. The adoption of the provisions of
SFAS No. 157 is not expected to have a material effect
on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)
(SFAS No. 158). Among other items,
SFAS No. 158 requires recognition of the over-funded
or under-funded status of an entitys defined benefit
postretirement plan as an asset or liability in the financial
statements, requires the measurement of defined benefit
postretirement plan assets and obligations as of the end of the
employers fiscal year, and requires recognition of the
funded status of defined benefit postretirement plans in other
comprehensive income. This Statement is effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2006. Since the Company
does not maintain any defined benefit or other postretirement
plans, the adoption of this Statement for fiscal year 2007 did
not have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets
an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 140
(SFAS No. 156) that provides guidance
on accounting for separately recognized servicing assets and
servicing liabilities. In accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 156, separately recognized servicing assets
and servicing liabilities must be initially measured at fair
value, if practicable. Subsequent to initial recognition, the
Company may use either the amortization method or the fair value
measurement method to account for servicing assets and servicing
liabilities within the scope of this Statement. The adoption of
this Statement by the Company in fiscal year 2007 did not have a
material effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments
an amendment of FASB
Statements
No. 133 and 140
(SFAS No. 155),
to permit fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial
instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise
would require bifurcation in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.
The adoption of this Statement by
the Company in fiscal year 2007 did not have a material effect
on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-18
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
3. Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Receivables consist of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
U.S. and State Government:
|
|
|
|
|
Amount billable
|
|
$194
|
|
$0
|
Amount billed
|
|
9
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. and State Government
|
|
203
|
|
79
|
Commercial
|
|
1,410
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$1,613
|
|
$1,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 and 2007, the Company concluded
that a reserve for doubtful trade accounts receivable was not
considered necessary.
4. Issuance
of Stock by Subsidiary
MTI Micro was formed on March 26, 2001 and as of
December 31, 2007, the Company owns approximately 96% of
MTI Micros outstanding common stock.
On December 31, 2005, as a result of an option exchange
between the Company and MTI Micro, MTI Micro issued
105,701 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.22 per
share to the Company as compensation for minority stockholder
benefit in connection with the transaction. Additionally, on
December 31, 2005, MTI Micro issued 1,103,604 shares
of its common stock at a price of $2.22 per share to the Company
in connection with the conversion of its $2,450 thousand loan
receivable to equity.
On December 31, 2006, MTI Micro issued
3,772,727 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.10
per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of
its $4,150 thousand loan receivable to equity; on
December 1, 2006, MTI Micro issued 739 shares of its
common stock at a price of $1.61 per share to the Company as
compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in connection
with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees;
on November 11, 2006, MTI Micro issued
1,960,506 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.06
per share to the Company in connection with the transfer of
$2,070 thousand worth of Plug Power common stock to MTI Micro;
on September 30, 2006, MTI Micro issued
2,574,627 shares of its common stock at a price of $1.34
per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of
its $3,450 thousand loan receivable to equity; on
September 1, 2006, MTI Micro issued 56,055 shares of
its common stock at a price of $3.10 per share to the Company as
compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in connection
with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees;
on May 27, 2006, MTI Micro issued 50,158 shares of its
common stock at a price of $2.32 to the Company as compensation
for the minority stockholder benefit in connection with the
Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees; between
April 11 and April 18, 2006, MTI Micro issued
1,662,400 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.50
per share to the Company in connection with the transfer of
$4,156 thousand worth of Plug Power common stock to MTI Micro;
and on March 31, 2006, MTI Micro issued
1,400,000 shares of its common stock at a price of $2.50
per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of
its $3,500 thousand loan receivable to equity.
F-19
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
4. Issuance
of Stock by Subsidiary (Continued)
Between October 10 and October 25, 2007, MTI Micro issued
4,050,488 shares of its common stock at a price between
$0.37 and $0.41 per share to the Company in connection with the
transfer of $2,808 thousand worth of Plug Power common stock to
MTI Micro; on November 16, 2007, MTI Micro issued
1,630,339 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.33
per share to the Company in connection with the transfer of
$1,113 thousand worth of Plug Power common stock to MTI Micro;
on September 1, 2007, MTI Micro issued 35,625 shares
of its common stock at a price of $0.62 per share to the Company
as compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in
connection with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro
employees; on September 30, 2007, MTI Micro issued
2,740,715 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.69
per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of
its $1,900 thousand loan receivable to equity; on June 1,
2007, MTI Micro issued 8,653 shares of its common stock at
a price of $0.94 per share to the Company as compensation for
the minority stockholder benefit in connection with the Company
issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees; on June 30,
2007, MTI Micro issued 6,083,334 shares of its common stock
at a price of $0.60 per share to the Company in connection with
the conversion of its $3,650 thousand loan receivable to equity;
on March 1, 2007, MTI Micro issued 682 shares of its
common stock at a price of $0.98 per share to the Company as
compensation for the minority stockholder benefit in connection
with the Company issuing Company options to MTI Micro employees;
and on March 31, 2007, MTI Micro issued
4,243,721 shares of its common stock at a price of $0.84
per share to the Company in connection with the conversion of
its $3,550 thousand loan receivable to equity.
The decrease in the Companys
paid-in-capital
of $301, $1,284, and $521 thousand in 2005, 2006, and 2007,
respectively, represents the changes in the Companys
equity investment in MTI Micro, which resulted from the
anti-dilutive impact of the Companys investments into and
third-party stock transactions in MTI Micro stock.
Inventories, net consist of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
$279
|
|
|
$467
|
Work in process
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
168
|
Raw materials, net
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,216
|
|
|
$1,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
$1,213
|
|
|
$1,213
|
Computers and related software
|
|
|
2,186
|
|
|
2,241
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
3,895
|
Office furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,327
|
|
|
7,652
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
4,401
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,926
|
|
|
$2,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $1,253, $1,101, and $1,129 thousand for
2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. Repairs and maintenance
expense was $105, $75, and $82 thousand for 2005, 2006, and
2007, respectively.
|
|
7.
|
Securities
Available for Sale
|
Securities available for sale are classified as current assets
and accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) are charged to
other comprehensive income (loss).
The principal components of the Companys securities
available for sale consist of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Fair
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
Basis
|
|
Gain
|
|
Value
|
|
Per NASDAQ
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except stock price and share data)
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plug Power
|
|
|
$4,602
|
|
|
$5,473
|
|
|
$10,075
|
|
|
$3.89
|
|
|
2.99%
|
|
|
2,589,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plug Power
|
|
|
$2,021
|
|
|
$2,471
|
|
|
$4,492
|
|
|
$3.95
|
|
|
1.29%
|
|
|
1,137,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The book basis roll forward of Plug Power securities as of
December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Securities available for sale, beginning of period
|
|
|
$6,562
|
|
|
|
$10,075
|
|
Sale of shares
|
|
|
(1,960
|
)
|
|
|
(8,054
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities book basis
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
|
|
|
5,473
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale, end of period
|
|
|
$10,075
|
|
|
|
$4,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Securities
Available for Sale (Continued)
|
Accumulated unrealized gains related to securities available for
sale for each of the years ended December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized gains
|
|
|
$5,473
|
|
|
|
$2,471
|
|
Accumulated deferred tax expense on unrealized gains
|
|
|
(4,489
|
)
|
|
|
(1,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net unrealized gains
|
|
|
$984
|
|
|
|
$500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains related to Plug Power securities available for
sale sold during each of the years ended December 31 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except shares)
|
|
Shares sold
|
|
|
1,103,500
|
|
|
1,452,770
|
Proceeds
|
|
|
$6,249
|
|
|
$5,130
|
Total net gain on sales
|
|
|
$4,289
|
|
|
$2,549
|
The Company regularly reviews its securities available for sale
to determine if any declines in value of those securities
available for sale are other than temporary. The Company
assesses whether declines in the value of its securities in
publicly traded companies, measured by comparison of the current
market price of the securities to the carrying value of the
Companys securities, are considered to be other than
temporary based on factors that include the length of time
carrying value exceeds fair market value, the Companys
assessment of the financial condition and the near term
prospects of the companies and the Companys intent with
respect to the securities.
Income tax (expense) benefit for each of the years ended
December 31 consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operations before minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
State
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(1,641
|
)
|
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
|
|
(2,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$(1,587
|
)
|
|
|
$(1,895
|
)
|
|
|
$(2,548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Income
Taxes (Continued)
|
Income tax benefit (expense) allocated directly to
stockholders equity for each of the years ended December
31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Change in unrealized (gain) loss on securities available for
sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
$1,448
|
|
|
|
$1,285
|
|
|
|
$(27
|
)
|
Valuation allowance (expense)
|
|
|
(1,448
|
)
|
|
|
(1,285
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Tax effect of reclassification adjustment for gains included
in
net income (loss)
|
|
|
3,293
|
|
|
|
1,913
|
|
|
|
2,518
|
|
Expenses for employee stock options recognized differently for
financial reporting/tax purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal tax benefit
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance (expense)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3,293
|
|
|
|
$1,913
|
|
|
|
$2,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant components of deferred income tax (expense)
benefit from operations before minority interest for each of the
years ended December 31 consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
$238
|
|
|
|
$1,158
|
|
|
|
$1,181
|
|
Net operating loss carry forward
|
|
|
5,673
|
|
|
|
3,983
|
|
|
|
3,069
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
(5,118
|
)
|
|
|
(4,250
|
)
|
Disproportionate tax effect of reclassification adjustment for
gains included in net income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,293
|
)
|
|
|
(1,913
|
)
|
|
|
(2,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(1,641
|
)
|
|
|
$(1,890
|
)
|
|
|
$(2,518
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective income tax rate from operations
before minority interest differed from the Federal statutory
rate for each of the years ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
|
34
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal tax effect
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Disproportionate tax effect of reclassification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustment for gains included in net income (loss)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Permanent tax difference on derivative valuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Rate
|
|
|
(11
|
)%
|
|
|
(15
|
)%
|
|
|
(33
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Income
Taxes (Continued)
|
Pre-tax loss before minority interests was $14,949, $12,980, and
$7,609 thousand for 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. The
deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31 consist of
the following tax effects relating to temporary differences and
carry forwards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Current deferred tax (liabilities) assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory valuation
|
|
|
$60
|
|
|
|
$73
|
|
Inventory capitalization
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
|
|
(1,362
|
)
|
Vacation pay
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Warranty and other sale obligations
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other reserves and accruals
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,738
|
)
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(256
|
)
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
$(2,994
|
)
|
|
|
$(1,344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss
|
|
|
$19,661
|
|
|
|
$21,037
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
Other
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development tax credit
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Alternative minimum tax credit
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,553
|
|
|
|
23,377
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(18,559
|
)
|
|
|
(22,033
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
$2,994
|
|
|
|
$1,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation allowance at December 31, 2006 and 2007 was
$18,815 and $22,333 thousand, respectively. The net change in
the valuation allowance was $7,892 thousand in 2006 and $3,518
thousand in 2007. The valuation allowance at December 31,
2006 and 2007 reflects the estimate that it is more likely than
not that the net deferred tax assets may not be realized. In
addition to changes in valuation allowance of $4,250 thousand
reflected in continuing operations, the valuation allowance was
increased by $1,201 thousand reflected in stockholders
equity and decreased by $1,933 thousand as a result of the
adoption of FIN 48.
At December 31, 2007, the Company has unused Federal net
operating loss carry forwards of approximately $53,918 thousand.
Of these carry forwards, $1,325 thousand represents windfall tax
benefits from stock option transactions, the tax effect of which
are not included in the Companys net deferred tax assets.
The Federal net operating loss carry forwards, if unused, will
begin to expire in 2010. As of December 31, 2007, the
Company has approximately $459 thousand of research and
development tax credit carry forwards, which begin to expire in
2018, and approximately $54
F-24
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
8.
|
Income
Taxes (Continued)
|
thousand of alternative minimum tax credit carry forwards, which
have no expiration date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
determined based on the temporary differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities as
measured by the enacted tax rates.
The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on
January 1, 2007, the first day of its 2007 fiscal year. As
a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company
recorded a $106 thousand increase in the net liability for
uncertain tax positions, which was recorded as an adjustment to
the Companys opening balance of retained earnings on
January 1, 2007. Additionally, the same tax position that
triggered the Companys FIN 48 adoption charge caused
the Company to reclassify $80 thousand from current income taxes
payable to non-current liabilities for uncertain tax positions.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits for 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2007
|
|
|
$2,024
|
|
Additions for tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
20
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
$2,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In future periods, if $1,836 thousand of these unrecognized
benefits become supportable, the Company may not recognize a
change in its effective rate as long as it remains in a full
valuation allowance position, $208 thousand of these
unrecognized tax benefits would affect the Companys
effective tax rate if recognized. Included in the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits at January 1, 2007 is $239
thousand related to tax positions for which it is reasonably
possible that the total amounts could significantly change
during the next twelve months. This amount represents
unrecognized tax benefits comprising potential recognition for
tax purposes of losses in a partnership in which the Company
held a minority stake. In accordance with the Companys
accounting policy, it recognizes interest and penalties related
to uncertain tax positions as a component of tax expense. This
policy did not change as a result of the adoption of
FIN 48. As of January 1, 2007, accrued interest
included in Uncertain Tax Position Liability totaled $34
thousand. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the
Company recognized $15 thousand in potential interest expense on
uncertain tax positions, and the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheet as of that date includes total interest of $49
thousand associated with these positions.
The Company files income tax returns, including returns for its
subsidiaries, with federal and state jurisdictions. The Company
is no longer subject to IRS examination for its federal returns
for any periods prior to 2003, although carryforward attributes
that were generated prior to 2004 may still be adjusted
upon examination by the IRS if they either have been or will be
used in a future period. The Company has an ongoing tax
examination by New York State for the years 2002 through 2004.
The Company does not believe that the net outcome of this
examination will have a material impact on its financial
statements.
F-25
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued liabilities consist of the following at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Salaries, wages and related expenses
|
|
|
$781
|
|
|
$937
|
Acquisition and disposition costs
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
363
|
Legal and professional fees
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
230
|
Warranty and other sale obligations
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
72
|
Commissions
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
95
|
Other
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2,470
|
|
|
$2,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Shares
Changes in common shares are as follows for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
|
4,831,369
|
|
|
4,870,742
|
|
|
5,760,585
|
|
Issuance of shares for stock option exercises
|
|
|
18,571
|
|
|
89,974
|
|
|
10,743
|
|
Issuance of shares for private placement shares
|
|
|
8,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for restricted and unrestricted stock grants
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
9,510
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
Issuance of shares for capital raise
|
|
|
|
|
|
756,956
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for anti-dilution penalty
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,414
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock grants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
|
4,870,742
|
|
|
5,760,585
|
|
|
5,777,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
Changes in treasury stock are as follows for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
|
1,005,092
|
|
|
1,005,092
|
|
|
1,005,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
|
1,005,092
|
|
|
1,005,092
|
|
|
1,005,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Stockholders
Equity (Continued)
|
Sale of
Common Stock
Capital Raise:
On December 15, 2006, the Company
entered into agreements with certain investors to sell
756,944 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase
378,472 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase
price of $10,900 thousand. The common stock and warrants were
sold in units, with each unit consisting of 12.5 shares of
common stock and a warrant to purchase 6.25 shares of
common stock, at an exercise price of $18.16 per share. Each
non-certificated unit was sold at a negotiated price of $180.00.
The shares of common stock and warrants are immediately
separable and were issued separately (see Warrants Issued
below). The common stock, the warrants and shares issuable upon
exercise of the warrants are registered with the SEC on the
Companys filed and effective registration statement.
In connection with the 2006 capital raise, in December 2006, the
Company paid Rodman & Renshaw, LLC placement fees,
recorded in equity against the proceeds of the capital raise, of
$570 thousand.
Private Placement:
The Company entered into a financing
transaction with Fletcher on January 29, 2004 and amended
the terms of such transaction on May 4, 2004. Fletcher
purchased 335,084 shares of the Companys common stock
for $18,000 thousand pursuant to such financing
transaction 177,355 shares at $56.384 per
share and 157,729 shares at $50.72 per share. In
addition, Fletcher had the right to purchase an additional
$20,000 thousand of the Companys common stock, on one or
more occasions, at a price of $48.184 (adjusted from $50.72) per
share at any time prior to December 31, 2006. Fletcher had
the right to receive Company shares without payment upon the
occurrence of certain events, including but not limited to,
failing to register for resale with the SEC shares purchased by
Fletcher on the agreed upon time table, a restatement of the
Companys financial statements, change of control of the
Company and issuance of securities at a price below
Fletchers purchase price. The Company has filed
registration statements covering all of the shares purchased by
Fletcher.
The Company filed a registration statement on January 6,
2005 covering the resale of 157,729 shares of the
Companys common stock purchased by Fletcher on
December 22, 2004. The Company failed to meet its
contractual obligation with Fletcher to have such registration
statement declared effective by March 22, 2005 and
therefore under the terms of the Fletcher agreement the Company
was required to issue additional shares of common stock to
Fletcher and the exercise price for the Fletcher additional
investment rights has been reduced to $48.184 per share.
The Company was required to issue a number of shares of common
stock that resulted in Fletcher having effectively made its
December 2004 investment at a price per share that was lower
than the actual price paid. The Company refers to this reduced
exercise price as the deemed exercise price. More
specifically, for each month during which the Company failed to
satisfy the registration requirement, the deemed exercise price
was reduced by $2.536 per share. As a consequence, on
April 20, 2005 the Company issued 8,302 shares of
common stock to Fletcher without any additional payment required
by Fletcher, representing a deemed exercise price for
Fletchers December 2004 investment of $48.184 per
share. In addition, since the Company was required to file a
registration statement covering the resale of any such
additional shares issued to Fletcher, the Company amended the
registration statement initially filed in January 2005 to
include the additional 8,302 shares of common stock. That
registration statement, covering the resale of
166,030 shares of common stock, was declared effective by
the SEC on April 21, 2005.
Dilutive Issuances:
If, after December 31, 2004 and
ending December 31, 2006, the Company issued any equity
securities at a price below $56.384 as it relates to the initial
$10,000 thousand investment and $50.72 as it relates to any
additional investments which have been made, the
F-27
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Stockholders
Equity (Continued)
|
exercise price for the additional investment rights would have
been adjusted to provide Fletcher weighted average
anti-dilution protection and the Company would have had to issue
to Fletcher a number of additional shares such that all prior
investments would have been effectively made at such adjusted
exercise price.
On December 7, 2006, Fletcher agreed to lower the dilutive
issuance provision by 25% of the original calculation for the
remainder of the provisions original term and in
connection with the issuance of common stock in the
Companys December 2006 capital raise, the Company issued
Fletcher 33,414 of its common shares. Through a release dated
January 5, 2007, between the Company and Fletcher, the
Company is not required to register these shares with the SEC
since these shares may be sold by Fletcher pursuant to
Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The Company does not presently have any outstanding agreements
with Fletcher concerning additional investment rights or
dilutive stock issuance.
Warrants
Issued
On December 20, 2006, the Company issued warrants to
investors to purchase 378,472 shares of the Companys
common stock at an exercise price of $18.16 per share.
These warrants will be fair valued by the Company until
expiration or exercise of the warrants. The warrants became
exercisable on June 20, 2007 and expire on
December 19, 2011.
Reservation
of Shares
The Company has reserved common shares for future issuance as
follows as of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding
|
|
|
776,696
|
Stock options available for issuance
|
|
|
158,217
|
Warrants outstanding
|
|
|
378,474
|
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares reserved
|
|
|
1,313,387
|
|
|
|
|
Completion
of Option Exchange with MTI Micro Option Holders
On December 30, 2005, the Company issued options to acquire
127,652 shares of MTI common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, to certain employees, officers and directors of MTI and
MTI Micro who previously held MTI Micro options (the
Optionees). The options have an exercise price per
share of $22.40 (the closing price of the Companys common
stock on December 30, 2005). The Company issued the options
pursuant to a November 28, 2005 stock option exchange
offer. MTI Micro options outstanding for a purchase of a total
of 2,392,947 shares of MTI Micro common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, were tendered by the Optionees and then
cancelled by MTI Micro as a result of this exchange. Each option
is exercisable for one share of MTI common stock. The exchange
rate was 0.125 options for each two MTI Micro options,
rounded down to the nearest whole option, or if an individual
had an MTI Micro option balance in excess of 150,000 options,
then at a rate of 0.125 options for each four MTI Micro
options in excess of 150,000 options. The exchange was accounted
for in accordance with
EITF 00-23
Issue 1,
Issues Related to the Accounting for Stock
Compensation under APB Opinion No. 25 and FASB
Interpretation No. 44
and no compensation expense was
recorded.
F-28
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company maintains a voluntary savings and retirement plan
under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k) covering
substantially all employees. Employees must complete six months
of service and have attained the age of twenty-one prior to
becoming eligible for participation in the plan. The Company
plan allows eligible employees to contribute a percentage of
their compensation on a pre-tax basis and the Company matches
employee contributions dollar for dollar up to a discretionary
amount, currently 4%, of the employees salary, subject to
annual tax deduction limitations. Company matching contributions
vest at a rate of 25% annually for each year of service
completed. Company matching contributions were $272, $269, and
$283 thousand for 2005, 2006, and 2007, respectively. The
Company may also make additional discretionary contributions in
amounts as determined by management and the Board of Directors.
There were no additional discretionary contributions by the
Company for the years 2005, 2006, or 2007.
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the
numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share
computations for continuing operations for the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except shares)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
$(15,094
|
)
|
|
|
$(13,667
|
)
|
|
|
$(9,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
3,826,277
|
|
|
|
3,865,650
|
|
|
|
4,755,493
|
|
Weighted average common shares issued during the period
|
|
|
15,924
|
|
|
|
87,533
|
|
|
|
9,111
|
|
Weighted average restricted shares forfeited during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
Less Weighted average non-vested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per common shares
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
3,842,201
|
|
|
|
3,952,793
|
|
|
|
4,763,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
3,826,277
|
|
|
|
3,865,650
|
|
|
|
4,755,493
|
|
Weighted average common shares issued during the period
|
|
|
15,924
|
|
|
|
87,533
|
|
|
|
9,111
|
|
Weighted average restricted shares forfeited during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
Less Weighted average non-vested restricted stock due to
anti-dilutive effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(390
|
)
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per common shares
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
3,842,201
|
|
|
|
3,952,793
|
|
|
|
4,763,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming
dilution for the year ended December 31, 2005 were options
to purchase 630,155 shares of the Companys common
stock, additional investment rights to purchase approximately
415,076 shares of the Companys common stock, warrants
to purchase 3,547 shares of the Companys common stock
and options to purchase
F-29
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12.
|
Earnings
per Share (Continued)
|
78,461 shares of MTI Micros common stock. These
potentially dilutive items were excluded because the Company
incurred a loss for this period and their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive. The additional investment rights expired on
December 31, 2006.
Not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming
dilution for the year ended December 31, 2006 were options
to purchase 688,649 shares of the Companys common
stock, 625 unvested restricted shares of the Companys
common stock and options to purchase 33,668 shares of MTI
Micros common stock. These potentially dilutive items were
excluded because the Company incurred a loss for this period and
their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The MTI options expire
between January 4, 2007 and November 9, 2016, while
the MTI Micro options expire between September 29, 2012 and
September 18, 2015. The Company also has
378,472 warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2006;
however, these were excluded in the computation earnings per
share because they were not eligible to be exercised until
June 20, 2007.
Not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming
dilution for the year ended December 31, 2007 were options
to purchase 776,696 shares of the Companys common
stock, warrants to purchase 378,472 shares of the
Companys stock, 625 unvested restricted shares of the
Companys common stock and options to purchase
22,668 shares of MTI Micros common stock. These
potentially dilutive items were excluded because the Company
incurred a loss for this period and their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation
|
MTI
Option Plans
Stock-based incentive awards are provided to employees and
directors under the terms of the Companys 1996 Stock
Incentive Plan (1996 Plan), 1999 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan (1999 Plan) and 2006 Equity Incentive
Plan (2006 Plan), the (collectively, the
Plans). Awards under the Plans have generally
included at-the-money options and restricted stock grants. MTI
Micro also issued awards under the MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. 2001
Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Option Plan (2001
MTI Micro Plan). During 2005, MTI Micro ceased making
grants under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan and determined that it
would make no new awards under this plan in the future.
The 1996 Plan was approved by stockholders during December 1996.
The 1996 Plan provided an initial aggregate number of
500,000 shares of common stock to be awarded or issued. The
number of shares available to be awarded under the 1996 Plan and
awards outstanding were adjusted for stock splits and rights
offerings. The total number of shares which may be awarded under
the 1996 Plan was 468,352 during 2005, 2006, and 2007. Under the
1996 Plan, the Board of Directors was authorized to issue stock
options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other
stock-based incentives to officers, employees and others.
The 1999 Plan was adopted by the Companys Board of
Directors and approved by stockholders on March 18, 1999.
The 1999 Plan provides that an initial aggregate number of
1,000,000 shares of common stock may be awarded or issued.
The number of shares which may be awarded under the 1999 Plan
and awards outstanding have been adjusted for stock splits, and
during 2005, 2006, and 2007, the total number of shares which
may be awarded under the 1999 Plan was 562,500 shares.
Under the 1999 Plan, the Board of Directors is authorized to
issue stock-based awards to officers, employees and others.
F-30
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation (Continued)
|
The 2006 Plan was adopted by the Companys Board of
Directors on March 16, 2006 and approved by stockholders on
May 18, 2006. The 2006 Plan provides that an initial
aggregate number of 2,000,000 shares of common stock may be
awarded or issued. The number of shares which may be awarded
under the 2006 Plan and awards outstanding have been adjusted
for stock splits and other similar events. Under the 2006 Plan,
the Board of Directors is authorized to issue stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other
stock-based incentives to officers, employees and others.
Stock-based compensation expense for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was generated from stock options and
restricted stock grants. Stock options are awards which allow
holders to purchase shares of the Companys common stock at
a fixed price. Stock options issued to employees generally vest
25% per year beginning one year after grant. Options issued
to non-employee members of the MTI Board of Directors generally
vest upon grant. Certain options granted may be fully or
partially exercisable immediately, may vest on other than a four
year schedule or vest upon attainment of specific performance
criteria. Restricted stock awards generally vest one year after
the date of grant; however, certain awards may vest immediately
or vest upon attainment of specific performance criteria. Option
exercise prices are generally equivalent to the closing market
value price of the Companys common stock on the date of
grant. Unexercised options generally terminate either seven or
ten years after date of grant.
Share-Based
Compensation Information under FAS 123 and
APB 25
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company had elected to follow
APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees (APB Opinion No. 25)
and related
Interpretations in accounting for employee stock-based
compensation and to provide the disclosures required under
FAS 123. APB Opinion No. 25 requires no recognition of
compensation expense for most of the stock-based compensation
arrangements provided by the Company, namely, broad-based
employee option grants where the exercise price is equal to
market value at the date of grant. However, APB Opinion
No. 25 requires recognition of compensation expense for
variable award plans over the vesting periods of such plans,
based upon the then-current market values of the underlying
stock. In contrast, FAS 123 requires recognition of
compensation expense for grants of stock, stock options, and
other equity instruments, over the vesting periods of such
grants, based on the estimated grant-date fair values of those
grants. Under the intrinsic-value-based method, compensation
cost is the excess, if any, of the market value of the stock at
grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.
During 2005, the Company awarded 6,250 shares each of
common stock and restricted common stock which vested over a
one-year period. Presented below is a summary of compensation
expense related to the intrinsic value of performance-based,
time-based and unrestricted awards, which is included in the
summary of the Companys compensation expense under all
share-based awards, for the Plans which was recorded in the
financial statement line Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
45
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation (Continued)
|
The 2005 stock-based compensation expense included $438 thousand
of stock-based compensation expense recorded as a result of
accelerating the vesting
and/or
extending the time to exercise options after termination but not
in excess of the original contractual life of the options. These
changes were made in connection with employment, termination and
change in status (employee to consultant) arrangements.
Pro
Forma Information under FAS 123 for Periods Prior to Fiscal
2006
Prior to adopting the provisions of FAS 123R, the Company
recorded estimated compensation expense for employee stock
options based upon their intrinsic value on the date of grant
pursuant to APB Opinion No. 25 and provided the required
pro forma disclosures of FAS 123. Because the Company
generally established the exercise price based on the fair
market value of the Companys stock at the date of grant,
the stock options generally had no intrinsic value upon grant,
and therefore compensation expense was recorded primarily for
grant modifications prior to adopting FAS 123R. Each
accounting period, the Company reported the potential dilutive
impact of stock options in its diluted earnings per common share
using the treasury-stock method.
Out-of-the-money
stock options (i.e., the average stock price during the period
was below the strike price of the stock option) were not
included in diluted earnings per common share as their effect
was anti-dilutive.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures under FAS 123 for the
year ended December 31, 2005, the estimated fair value of
the stock options was assumed to be amortized to expense over
the stock options vesting periods. The pro forma effects
of recognizing estimated compensation expense under the fair
value method on net (loss) and (loss) per common share for the
year ended December 31 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands,
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Net loss, as reported
|
|
|
$(15,094
|
)
|
Add: Total stock-based employee compensation expense already
recorded in financial statements, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of
related tax effects
|
|
|
(2,963
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss
|
|
|
$(17,054
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted as reported
|
|
|
$(3.93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted pro forma
|
|
|
$(4.44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Fair value of each option granted
|
|
|
$22.80
|
Number of options granted
|
|
|
183,485
|
Fair value of all options granted
|
|
|
$4,187,301
|
F-32
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation (Continued)
|
The fair value of options granted, which is amortized to expense
over the option vesting period in determining the pro forma
impact, is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes Option Pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions for each of the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expected life of option
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.28%
|
|
Expected volatility of the Companys stock
|
|
|
77.3%
|
|
Expected dividend yield on the Companys stock
|
|
|
0%
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of stock awarded and
vested for each of the year ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Fair value of each share granted
|
|
|
$19.92
|
|
Number of shares granted
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
Fair value of all shares granted
|
|
|
$124,500
|
|
The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock
awarded for each of the year ended December 31 is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Fair value of each restricted share granted
|
|
|
$19.92
|
|
Number of restricted shares granted
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
Fair value of all restricted shares granted
|
|
|
$124,500
|
|
Share-Based
Compensation Information under FAS 123R
As discussed in Note 2 Significant Accounting
Policies, effective January 1, 2006, the Company
adopted the fair value recognition provisions for stock-based
awards granted to employees using the modified prospective
application method provided by FAS 123R. Stock-based
compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair
value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the
employee requisite service period.
The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using a
Black Scholes valuation model consistent with the provisions of
FAS 123R and SAB 107. Key inputs and assumptions used
to estimate the fair value of stock options include the grant
price of the award, the expected option term, volatility of the
Companys stock, an appropriate risk-free rate, and the
Companys dividend yield. Estimates of fair value are not
intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately
realized by employees who receive equity awards, and subsequent
events are not indicative of the reasonableness of the original
estimates of fair value made by the Company.
F-33
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation (Continued)
|
The fair value of each stock option grant was estimated at the
date of grant using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model. The
following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used
for options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Option term (years) A
|
|
|
4.26
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
Volatility B
|
|
|
73.14
|
%
|
|
|
72.76
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate range C
|
|
|
4.60 - 5.29
|
%
|
|
|
3.23 - 5.04
|
%
|
Dividend yield D
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Weighted-average fair value per option granted
|
|
|
$22.08
|
|
|
|
$6.16
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
The option term is the number of years that the Company
estimates, based upon historical experience and the full
contractual term of the options outstanding, those options will
be outstanding prior to exercise.
|
|
B
|
|
The expected stock price volatility as of the grant date is
based on the historical volatility of the Companys common
stock price over a period corresponding to the expected term of
the option, adjusted for activity that is not expected to occur
in the future.
|
|
C
|
|
The risk-free interest rate is the implied yield on
U.S. Treasury zero coupon issues with a remaining term
equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.
|
|
D
|
|
The dividend yield assumption is based on the Companys
history and expectation of future dividend payouts, which may be
subject to substantial change in the future.
|
Share-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations is based on awards ultimately expected
to vest, therefore, awards are reduced for estimated
forfeitures. FAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated
at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense All Accounting
Treatments
Total share-based compensation expense, related to all of the
Companys share-based awards, recognized for the years
ended December 31, was comprised as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except eps)
|
|
|
Unfunded research and product development
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$512
|
|
|
|
$216
|
|
Selling, general and administrative-B
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense before taxes
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
1,558
|
|
Related income tax benefits-A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense, net of taxes
|
|
|
$1,003
|
|
|
|
$2,406
|
|
|
|
$1,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on basic and diluted EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(0.61
|
)
|
|
|
$(0.33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
Income tax effect is zero due to the Company maintaining a full
valuation allowance.
|
|
B
|
|
Compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2005
was calculated under APB 25.
|
F-34
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation (Continued)
|
As of January 1, 2006, the adoption of FAS 123R
resulted in the elimination of unearned compensation related to
restricted stock (contra equity account) against additional
paid-in capital totaling approximately $80 thousand. Total
unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested awards as
of December 31, 2007 is $1,595 thousand and is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of
approximately 1.31 years.
Presented below is a summary of the Companys stock option
plans activity for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Shares under option, beginning
|
|
|
469,008
|
|
|
|
630,155
|
|
|
|
688,649
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
183,485
|
|
|
|
195,594
|
|
|
|
231,731
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(18,572
|
)
|
|
|
(89,974
|
)
|
|
|
(10,743
|
)
|
Canceled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,266
|
)
|
|
|
(21,887
|
)
|
|
|
(65,115
|
)
|
Expired
|
|
|
(2,500
|
)
|
|
|
(25,239
|
)
|
|
|
(67,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares under option, ending
|
|
|
630,155
|
|
|
|
688,649
|
|
|
|
776,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
524,629
|
|
|
|
506,661
|
|
|
|
578,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining shares available for granting of options
|
|
|
170,402
|
|
|
|
262,020
|
|
|
|
158,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average exercise price is as follows for each of
the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Shares under option, beginning
|
|
|
32.48
|
|
|
|
30.08
|
|
|
|
32.32
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
22.80
|
|
|
|
32.32
|
|
|
|
10.96
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
17.60
|
|
|
|
13.20
|
|
|
|
5.60
|
|
Canceled/Forfeited
|
|
|
34.08
|
|
|
|
34.32
|
|
|
|
28.40
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
49.36
|
|
|
|
42.40
|
|
|
|
41.04
|
|
Shares under option, ending
|
|
|
30.08
|
|
|
|
32.32
|
|
|
|
25.92
|
|
Options exercisable, ending
|
|
|
30.80
|
|
|
|
32.96
|
|
|
|
28.40
|
|
The following table summarizes information for options
outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
Price Range
|
|
Number
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
$6.08 - $9.04
|
|
|
19,250
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
$7.04
|
|
|
9,375
|
|
|
$7.36
|
$9.84 - $14.24
|
|
|
247,837
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
$11.20
|
|
|
129,478
|
|
|
$11.68
|
$15.28 - $22.64
|
|
|
145,400
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
$20.64
|
|
|
139,157
|
|
|
$20.64
|
$22.88 - $33.36
|
|
|
163,583
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
$29.04
|
|
|
151,768
|
|
|
$29.04
|
$34.40 - $50.24
|
|
|
175,313
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
$41.60
|
|
|
123,453
|
|
|
$44.16
|
$74.00 - $103.76
|
|
|
25,313
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
$84.40
|
|
|
25,313
|
|
|
$84.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776,969
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
$25.92
|
|
|
578,544
|
|
|
$28.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation (Continued)
|
The aggregate intrinsic value (i.e. the difference between the
closing stock price and the price to be paid by the option
holder to exercise the option) is zero for both the
Companys outstanding and exercisable options as of
December 31, 2007. The amounts are based on the
Companys closing stock price of $0.75 as of
December 31, 2007.
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years
ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 was $217, $1,307,
and $44 thousand, respectively. The total cash received by the
Company as a result of stock option exercises for the year ended
December 31, 2007 was approximately $60 thousand. In
connection with these exercises, there was no tax benefit or
expense realized by the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2007. The Company settles employee stock
option exercises with newly issued shares of Company common
stock.
The number and weighted average grant-date fair value of
unvested restricted stock for the period ended December 31,
2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Unvested restricted stock, beginning
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
$32.40
|
Granted
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
32.40
|
Vested
|
|
|
(6,250
|
)
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock, ending
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
$10.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value of restricted stock vested during
the year ended December 31, 2007 was $67 thousand.
MTI Micro
Option Plan
The 2001 MTI Micro Plan was approved by MTI Micros
stockholders in 2001 and provided an initial aggregate number of
1,766,000 shares of MTI Micro common stock to be awarded.
The number of shares which may be awarded under the 2001 MTI
Micro Plan and awards outstanding have been adjusted for a 2004
reverse stock split, and during 2005, 2006, and 2007, the total
number of shares which may be awarded under the 2001 MTI Micro
Plan were 3,416,667 shares. Under the 2001 MTI Micro Plan,
the MTI Micro Board of Directors was authorized to award stock
options to officers, directors, employees and consultants. No
further grants will be made under this plan.
Options issued to employees generally vest 25% per year
beginning one year after grant. Option exercise prices were
determined by MTI Micros Board of Directors. Unexercised
options generally terminate ten years after date of grant. Up
until January 1, 2006, MTI Micro followed APB Opinion
No. 25 and related Interpretations, in accounting for
employee stock-based compensation and to provide the disclosures
required under SFAS No. 123. APB Opinion No. 25
requires no recognition of compensation expense for most of the
stock-based compensation arrangements provided by MTI Micro,
namely, broad-based employee stock purchase plans and option
grants where the exercise price is equal to or not less than the
market value at the date of grant. However, APB Opinion
No. 25 requires recognition of compensation expense for
variable award plans over the vesting periods of such plans,
based upon the then-current market values of the underlying
stock. As of January 1, 2006, MTI Micro is accounting for
employee stock-based compensation under FAS 123R.
F-36
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation (Continued)
|
Presented below is a summary of compensation expense, which is
included in the summary of the Companys compensation
expense under all share-based awards above, for the MTI Micro
plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Stock options
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented below is a summary of the 2001 MTI Micro stock option
plans activity for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Shares under option, beginning
|
|
|
2,876,881
|
|
|
|
78,461
|
|
|
|
33,668
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
358,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled/Forfeited
|
|
|
(3,156,410
|
)
|
|
|
(44,793
|
)
|
|
|
(11,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares under option, ending
|
|
|
78,461
|
|
|
|
33,668
|
|
|
|
22,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
35,752
|
|
|
|
17,003
|
|
|
|
18,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining shares available for granting of options
|
|
|
3,280,403
|
|
|
|
3,325,196
|
|
|
|
3,336,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average exercise price for MTI Micro options is as
follows for each of the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Shares under option, beginning
|
|
$
|
3.00
|
|
|
$
|
3.22
|
|
|
$
|
3.61
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled/Forfeited
|
|
|
3.12
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
Shares under option, ending
|
|
|
3.22
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
Options exercisable, ending
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
The fair value of MTI Micro options granted in 2005, which is
amortized to expense over the option vesting period in
determining the pro forma impact, was estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing model with the
following weighted average assumptions for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Expected life of option
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.28%
|
|
Expected volatility of the MTI Micros stock
|
|
|
77.3%
|
|
Expected dividend yield on MTI Micros stock
|
|
|
0%
|
|
F-37
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Stock
Based Compensation (Continued)
|
The weighted average fair value of MTI Micro options granted for
the year ended December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Fair value of each option granted
|
|
|
$3.68
|
|
Fair value of all options granted
|
|
|
$930,890
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 123, the weighted average
fair value of stock options granted is required to be based on a
theoretical statistical model using the preceding Black-Scholes
Option Pricing model assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
Price Range
|
|
Number
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Number
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
$2.39 - $2.55
|
|
|
6,500
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
$
|
2.44
|
|
|
5,375
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
$2.76 - $3.80
|
|
|
4,501
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
$
|
3.03
|
|
|
4,501
|
|
$
|
3.03
|
$4.06 - $4.66
|
|
|
11,667
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
$
|
4.66
|
|
|
8,750
|
|
$
|
4.66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,668
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
$
|
3.70
|
|
|
18,626
|
|
$
|
3.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based upon an estimated common stock price of $0.51 at
December 31, 2007, the intrinsic value of all MTI
Micros outstanding and exercisable options are zero, since
all exercise prices are above the estimated common stock fair
value price.
On December 30, 2005, the Company granted options to
acquire 1,021,213 shares of MTI common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, to certain Optionees. The options have an
exercise price per share of $2.80 (the closing price of the
Companys common stock on December 30, 2005). The
Company issued the options pursuant to a November 28, 2005
stock option exchange offer. MTI Micro options outstanding for a
purchase of a total of 2,392,947 shares of MTI Micro common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, were tendered by the
Optionees and then cancelled by MTI Micro as a result of this
exchange. Each option is exercisable for one share of MTI common
stock. The exchange rate was 0.125 options for each two MTI
Micro options, rounded down to the nearest whole option, or if
an individual had an MTI Micro option balance in excess of
150,000 options, then at a rate of 0.125 options for each four
MTI Micro options in excess of 150,000 options. The exchange was
accounted for in accordance with
EITF 00-23
Issue 1 and no compensation expense was recorded.
|
|
14.
|
Cash
Flows Supplemental Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in investment and paid-in capital resulting from other
investors activity in MTI Micro stock
|
|
$
|
(301
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,284
|
)
|
|
$
|
(521
|
)
|
Cash Payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes paid (tax refunds), net
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
F-38
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Cash
Flows Supplemental Information
(Continued)
|
The Company held or has outstanding as of December 31, the
following derivative financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Derivatives issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, exercisable beginning June 20, 2007, to purchase
the Companys common stock issued to three investors at a
purchase price of $18.16 per share
|
|
378,474
|
|
378,474
|
|
12/19/2011
|
Plug Power Investment Right Derivative:
The
Company placed 2,700,000 shares of Plug Power common stock
in escrow that was available for purchase by Fletcher in certain
instances. Fletcher could, on one or multiple occasions, from
June 1, 2005 to December 31, 2006, exercise its right
to purchase from the Company a number of shares of Plug Power
common stock totaling $10,000 thousand divided by the prevailing
price (as defined below) per share of Plug Power common stock,
but only to the extent of the number of shares remaining in
escrow. Commencing immediately after the SEC declared effective
on May 20, 2004 the registration statement relating to
shares of the Companys common stock owned by Fletcher, the
Company had the right to have 250,000 of such shares released
from escrow to the Company, on a monthly basis, in the event
that on any day during such month, the prevailing price of the
Companys common stock exceeds $50.744 (which price may
have been adjusted to reflect stock splits, recombinations,
stock dividends or the like).
The exercise price for the Plug Power investment right was
$10,000 thousand less the positive difference between $18,000
thousand and the product of the sum of 335,084 shares
multiplied by the prevailing price per share of the
Companys common stock on the date Fletcher elected to
exercise such right, all divided by the quotient obtained by
dividing $10,000 thousand by the prevailing price of Plug Power
common stock on the date.
Fletcher elected to exercise such right. As used herein, a
prevailing price is the average of the daily volume-weighted
average price per share of common stock during the
sixty-business-day period ending three days prior to the date
Fletcher elects to exercise such right, provided however that
the price may not exceed the average of the daily
volume-weighted average prices for any ten business days within
such sixty-business day period.
On June 24, 2005, Fletcher notified the Company of their
election to exercise in full its right to purchase from the
Company certain shares of common stock of Plug Power. As a
result of this election, Fletcher purchased
1,799,791 shares of Plug Power common stock from the
Company at a price of $0.7226 per share, with proceeds to the
Company of $1,301 thousand. This transaction closed on
June 28, 2005 and, in connection with this exercise, the
Company recognized a loss based on the intrinsic value of the
derivative immediately prior to exercise of $7,173 thousand and
a gain on the sale based on the fair value of the underlying
Plug Power common shares of $9,635 thousand.
Warrant Derivative to Purchase MTI Common
Stock:
The warrants issued during the
Companys December 2006 capital raise were legally
freestanding, detachable and transferable by the holders. The
features of the warrant allowed both straight cash exercises as
well as cashless exercises. Due primarily to a stipulation in
the warrant agreement which allowed a potential cash settlement
with the holders if the Company was acquired by, or merged with
a private company, these warrants were classified as an
asset/liability derivative in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 (paragraph 11) and
EITF 00-19.
F-39
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Derivatives
(Continued)
|
The estimated fair value of this warrant at the date issued was
$10.16 per share, using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model and
assumptions similar to those used for valuing the Companys
employee share-based compensation. The fair value of the
derivative is recorded in the Derivative Liability
line on its financial statements, and is valued quarterly using
the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The assumptions used for
the valuations as of December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
Expected life of option (days)
|
|
1,815
|
|
1,450
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.70%
|
|
3.45%
|
Expected volatility of stock
|
|
80.34%
|
|
73.46%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
None
|
|
None
|
The Company recognizes changes in fair value in its Consolidated
Statements of Operations in the line titled Gain on
derivatives.
|
|
16.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Lawrence
Litigation
On September 9, 1998, Barbara Lawrence, the Lawrence Group,
Inc. (Lawrence) and certain other Lawrence-related
entities (Plaintiffs) initially filed suit in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New
York (Bankruptcy Court) and the United States
District Court for the Northern District of New York
(District Court), which were subsequently
consolidated in the District Court, against First Albany
Corporation, now known as Broadpoint Capital, Inc.
(BCI), the Company, Dale Church, Edward Dohring,
Beno Sternlicht, Alan Goldberg and George McNamee (Church,
Dohring, Sternlicht, Goldberg and McNamee are former Directors
of the Company), Marty Mastroianni (former President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company) and 33 other individuals
(Defendants) who purchased a total of
820,909 shares (307,841
post-split)
of the Companys stock from the Plaintiffs. The case
concerns the Defendants 1997 purchase of the
Companys common stock from the Plaintiffs at the price of
$2.25 per share ($6.00 per share post split). BCI acted as
Placement Agent in connection with the negotiation and sale of
the shares, including in proceedings before the Bankruptcy
Court, which approved the sale in September 1997.
Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants failed to disclose material
inside information to the Plaintiffs in connection with the sale
and that the $2.25 per share ($6.00 per share post split)
purchase price was unfair. Plaintiffs are seeking damages of
$5 million plus punitive damages and costs. In April 1999,
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint,
which was denied by the Bankruptcy Court. On appeal in October
2000, Plaintiffs claims were dismissed by the District
Court. In November 2000, Plaintiffs filed an appeal of that
dismissal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit. In June 2002, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
reversed the District Court decision in part and remanded the
case for further consideration of the Plaintiffs claims as
motions to modify the Bankruptcy Court sale order. The
Plaintiffs claims have now been referred back to
Bankruptcy Court for such consideration. By order and decision
dated September 30, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court allowed
certain limited discovery to proceed, and this process is still
underway.
F-40
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
16.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (Continued)
|
The Company believes the claims have no merit and intends to
defend them vigorously. The Company cannot predict the outcome
of the claims nor reasonably estimate a range of possible loss
given the current status of the litigation. Accordingly, no
amounts have been reserved for this matter.
Leases
The Company and its subsidiaries lease certain manufacturing,
laboratory and office facilities. The leases generally provide
for the Company to pay either an increase over a base year level
for taxes, maintenance, insurance and other costs of the leased
properties or the Companys allocated share of insurance,
taxes, maintenance and other costs of leased properties. The
leases contain renewal provisions.
Future minimum rental payments required under non-cancelable
operating leases are (dollars in thousands): $694 in 2008, $659
in 2009, $1 in 2010 and $0 in 2011 and 2012. Rent expense under
all leases was $746, $748, and $687 thousand for 2005, 2006, and
2007, respectively. Contingent rent included in the rent expense
was $11, $3, and $3 thousand for 2005, 2006, and 2007,
respectively.
Warranties
Below is a reconciliation of changes in product warranty
liabilities at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
$20
|
|
|
|
$19
|
|
Accruals for warranties issued
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
Accruals related to pre-existing warranties (including changes
in estimates)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
$19
|
|
|
|
$72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licenses
On January 24, 2008, the Company cancelled its
non-exclusive licensing agreement with Los Alamos National
Laboratory (LANL) covering certain direct methanol
fuel cell technology. This agreement, which was last amended on
May 17, 2006, prescribed annual license fees ranging from
$35,000 in 2008 to $100,000 in 2019. The Company paid a one-time
fee of $50,000 to cancel the agreement, and no future royalties
will be paid. The Company cancelled this agreement because it no
longer considers the direct methanol fuel cell technology
licensed from LANL to be applicable to its future products.
F-41
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
16.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (Continued)
|
Under the NYSERDA contract, MTI Micro agreed to pay NYSERDA a
royalty of 5.0% of the sales price of any product sold
incorporating IP developed pursuant to the NYSERDA contract. If
the product is manufactured by a New York State manufacturer,
this royalty is reduced to 1.5%. Total royalties are subject to
a cap equal to two times the total contract funds paid by
NYSERDA to MTI Micro, and may be reduced to reflect any New York
State jobs created by MTI Micro.
Employment
Agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain employees
that provide severance payments, certain other payments,
accelerated vesting and exercise extension periods of certain
options upon termination of employment under certain
circumstances, as defined in the applicable agreements. As of
December 31, 2007, the Companys potential minimum
obligation to these employees was approximately $753 thousand.
Contract
Losses
During 2005, MTI Micro entered into a fixed price contract with
Saft America, Inc. (SAFT) under the U.S. Army
CECOM contract. The total fixed price to be paid at the
completion was amended on November 14, 2006 from $470
thousand to $418 thousand, in recognition of the elimination of
Milestone 4. As of December 31, 2006, MTI Micro forecasted
costs in excess of this revised contract value of $66 thousand,
and accrued this amount for the anticipated cost overrun for
this project. The project was completed during February 2007.
|
|
17.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Management believes transactions among related parties are as
fair to the Company as obtainable from unaffiliated third
parties.
The Company purchases materials from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and
Company (DuPont), a stockholder in MTI Micro. Such
purchases totaled $130 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
During the Companys December 2006 capital raise, Sidney V.
Gold, a stockholder in MTI Micro, purchased 5,000 units
consisting of 62,500 shares of the Companys common
stock and warrants exercisable for five years to purchase an
additional 31,250 shares of the Companys common stock
at an exercise price of $18.16 per share. The purchase
price per unit was $180.00.
F-42
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Geographic
and Segment Information
|
The Company sells its products on a worldwide basis with its
principal markets listed in the table below where information on
product revenue and funded research and development revenue is
summarized by geographic area for the Company as a whole for
each of the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Product revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$4,751
|
|
$4,737
|
|
$5,453
|
Japan
|
|
628
|
|
1,762
|
|
2,516
|
Singapore
|
|
31
|
|
355
|
|
286
|
Other Pacific Rim
|
|
202
|
|
279
|
|
307
|
Europe
|
|
96
|
|
175
|
|
161
|
Rest of World
|
|
304
|
|
359
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product revenue
|
|
$6,012
|
|
$7,667
|
|
$9,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded research and development revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Korea
|
|
$
|
|
$427
|
|
$448
|
United States
|
|
1,829
|
|
62
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total funded research and development revenue
|
|
$1,829
|
|
$489
|
|
$1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$7,841
|
|
$8,156
|
|
$10,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues are attributed to regions based on the location of
customers.
The Company operates in two business segments
,
New Energy
and Test and Measurement Instrumentation. The New Energy segment
is focused on commercializing DMFCs. The Test and Measurement
Instrumentation segment designs, manufactures, markets and
services computer-based balancing systems for aircraft engines,
high performance test and measurement instruments and systems,
and wafer characterization tools for the semiconductor industry.
The Companys principal operations are located in North
America.
The accounting policies of the New Energy and Test and
Measurement Instrumentation segments are similar to those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies (See
Note 2). The Company evaluates performance based on profit
or loss from operations before income taxes, accounting changes,
items management does not deem relevant to segment performance,
and interest income and expense. Inter-segment sales are not
significant.
F-43
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Geographic
and Segment Information (Continued)
|
Total product revenues contributed by the Test and Measurement
Instrumentation products segment and their percentage of total
product revenues for each of the years ended December 31 are
shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Aviation
|
|
|
$3,013
|
|
|
50.12
|
%
|
|
|
$2,990
|
|
|
39.00
|
%
|
|
|
$3,664
|
|
|
40.58
|
%
|
General Gauging
|
|
|
2,688
|
|
|
44.71
|
|
|
|
4,165
|
|
|
54.32
|
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
49.72
|
|
Semiconductor
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
6.68
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$6,012
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
$7,667
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
$9,028
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Foreign-Based Revenue
|
|
|
$1,261
|
|
|
20.97
|
%
|
|
|
$2,930
|
|
|
38.22
|
%
|
|
|
$3,557
|
|
|
39.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment, the
U.S. Air Force accounted for $2,385 thousand or 30.4% of
total revenue in 2005, $1,774 thousand or 23.1% of total product
revenue in 2006, and $2,375 thousand or 26.3% of total product
revenue in 2007. Sales to a Japanese distributor accounted for
$1,757 thousand or 22.9% of total product revenue in 2006, and
$2,501 thousand or 27.7% of total product revenue in 2007.
In the New Energy segment, the DOE accounted for $930 thousand
or 11.9% of total funded research and development revenue in
2005, $63 thousand or 12.8% of total funded research and
development revenue in 2006, and $675 thousand or 43.4% of total
funded research and development revenue in 2007. Samsung
accounted for $426 thousand or 87.2% of total funded
research and development revenue in 2006 and $448 thousand or
28.9% of total funded research and development revenue in 2007,
while SAFT accounted for $418 thousand or 26.8% of total funded
research and development revenue in 2007.
Summarized financial information concerning the Companys
reportable segments is shown in the following table. The
Other column includes corporate related items and
items such as income taxes or unusual items, which are not
allocated to reportable segments. The Reconciling
Items column includes minority interests in a consolidated
subsidiary. In addition, segments non-cash items include
any depreciation and amortization in reported profit or loss.
The New Energy
F-44
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Geographic
and Segment Information (Continued)
|
segment figures include the Companys direct micro fuel
cell operations, equity securities of Plug Power, gains on the
sale of these securities, and (losses) gains related to the
embedded derivative for the purchase of Plug Power common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
New Energy
|
|
|
Instrumentation
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Items
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$6,012
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$6,012
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,829
|
|
Research and product development expenses
|
|
|
8,546
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,671
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
2,188
|
|
|
|
4,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,887
|
|
Gain on securities available for sale
|
|
|
10,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125
|
|
Loss on derivatives
|
|
|
(10,407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,407
|
)
|
Segment (loss) profit from continuing operations before income
taxes, equity in holdings losses and minority interests
|
|
|
(13,708
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(1,167
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,949
|
)
|
Segment (loss) profit
|
|
|
(13,708
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(2,754
|
)
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
(15,094
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
20,996
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
18,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,267
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
18,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,947
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
783
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$7,667
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$7,667
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Research and product development expenses
|
|
|
11,588
|
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,921
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
2,457
|
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,072
|
|
Gain on securities available for sale
|
|
|
4,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,289
|
|
Segment (loss) profit from continuing operations before income
taxes, equity in holdings losses and minority interests
|
|
|
(12,847
|
)
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
(795
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,980
|
)
|
Segment (loss) profit
|
|
|
(12,847
|
)
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
(2,690
|
)
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
(13,667
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
15,565
|
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,811
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,075
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,574
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
F-45
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Geographic
and Segment Information (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
|
|
Reconciling
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
New Energy
|
|
|
Instrumentation
|
|
Other
|
|
Items
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$9,028
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$9,028
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
Research and product development expenses
|
|
|
10,115
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,765
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
1,921
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,738
|
|
Gain on securities available for sale
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
Segment (loss) profit from continuing operations before income
taxes, equity in holdings losses and minority interests
|
|
|
(11,189
|
)
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
2,791
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,609
|
)
|
Segment (loss) profit
|
|
|
(11,189
|
)
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
(9,575
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8,128
|
|
|
|
3,018
|
|
|
7,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,716
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
414
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
715
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,129
|
|
The following table presents the details of Other
segment (loss) profit for each of the years ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Corporate and other (expenses) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
$(608
|
)
|
|
|
$(403
|
)
|
|
|
$(297
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
Gain on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
2,967
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(1,587
|
)
|
|
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
|
(2,548
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
(1,060
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total (expense) income
|
|
|
$(2,754
|
)
|
|
|
$(2,690
|
)
|
|
|
$243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2007, the Company announced the suspension of MTI
Micros high power direct methanol fuel cell program in
response to decreased funding and sales opportunities in the
military market. In connection with this action, the Company
accrued restructuring charges of $344 thousand pre-tax,
consisting primarily of cash-based employee severance and
benefit costs related to the reduction of 23 positions within
its New Energy segment and Corporate staff. Restructuring
expenses were classified as selling, general and administrative
expenses within the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the period. As of December 31, 2007, all
employees participating in this reduction in force had been
terminated. For the year ended December 31, 2007,
F-46
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Restructuring
(Continued)
|
the Company paid $330 thousand in employee severance, benefits
and job placement assistance costs. The remaining accrual at
December 31, 2007 was $10 thousand, reflecting a $3
thousand reduction in estimated remaining liability from the
Companys original restructuring accrual due to benefit
elections made by employees participating in this action. This
remaining liability is expected to be paid by the end of the
first quarter of 2008.
On March 27, 2008, the Company filed a registration
statement on
Form S-1
with the SEC for a proposed underwritten public offering, with
proceeds of up to $30 million, of units consisting of
shares of the Companys common stock and warrants to
purchase shares of the Companys common stock.
On April 8, 2008, the Company filed a definitive proxy
statement seeking stockholder approval for a reverse split of
its issued and outstanding common stock at a rate of
1-for-8.
On
May 15, 2008, the Companys stockholders approved the
reverse split, which became effective on May 16, 2008. All
share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated in
the consolidated financial statements and those accompanying
notes for all fiscal periods presented.
F-47
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,650
|
|
|
$
|
4,560
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
4,492
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
Inventories, net
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
15,213
|
|
|
|
11,804
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
18,716
|
|
|
$
|
14,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
518
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
3,866
|
|
|
|
4,170
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain tax position liability
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
696
|
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term-Liabilities
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
4,770
|
|
|
|
4,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, authorized 75,000,000;
5,777,578 issued in both 2007 and 2008
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
Paid-in-capital
|
|
|
132,065
|
|
|
|
132,449
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(105,066
|
)
|
|
|
(108,253
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of tax
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
Common stock in treasury, at cost, 1,005,092 shares in both
2007 and 2008
|
|
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
13,803
|
|
|
|
10,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
18,716
|
|
|
$
|
14,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-48
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share)
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
2,316
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
Research and product development expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded research and product development
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Unfunded research and product development
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total research and product development expenses
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(4,500
|
)
|
|
|
(3,678
|
)
|
Gain on derivatives
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and minority interests
|
|
|
(3,390
|
)
|
|
|
(3,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per Share (Basic and Diluted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.66
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.67
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-49
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
$
|
130,968
|
|
|
$
|
132,065
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
MTI MicroFuel Cell investment
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$
|
131,088
|
|
|
$
|
132,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
$
|
(95,385
|
)
|
|
$
|
(105,066
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(3,156
|
)
|
|
|
(3,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$
|
(98,647
|
)
|
|
$
|
(108,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
$
|
984
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for
sale (net of taxes of $0 in 2007 and 2008)
|
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
|
|
(955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$
|
(906
|
)
|
|
$
|
(455
|
)
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
$
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$
|
17,839
|
|
|
$
|
10,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,187
|
)
|
Other comprehensive (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on securities available for
sale, net of taxes
|
|
|
(1,890
|
)
|
|
|
(955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive (loss)
|
|
$
|
(5,046
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,142
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-50
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 and
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,187
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on derivatives
|
|
|
(969
|
)
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
Minority interests in losses of consolidated subsidiary
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(333
|
)
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
245
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by operating activities
|
|
|
(4,610
|
)
|
|
|
(2,988
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(4,660
|
)
|
|
|
(3,090
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
14,545
|
|
|
|
7,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
9,885
|
|
|
$
|
4,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
F-51
1. Nature
of Operations
In the opinion of management of Mechanical Technology,
Incorporated (the Company), the accompanying
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and
contain all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring
adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of results for such
periods. The results of operations for the interim periods
presented are not necessarily indicative of results for the full
year.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included
in the annual consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (U.S. GAAP) have been
condensed or omitted. These unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
Companys audited consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The information presented in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 has been
derived from the Companys audited consolidated financial
statements but does not include all disclosures required by
U.S. GAAP. All other information has been derived from the
Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements for the periods as of and for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 and 2008.
Liquidity
and Going Concern
The Company incurred significant losses as it continued to fund
the direct methanol fuel cell product development and
commercialization programs of its majority owned subsidiary, MTI
MicroFuel Cells Inc. (MTI Micro), and had an
accumulated deficit of $108,253 thousand and working capital of
$7,634 thousand at March 31, 2008. Because of these losses,
limited current cash, cash equivalents and securities available
for sale, negative cash flows and accumulated deficit, the
report of the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2007
expressed substantial doubt about the Companys ability to
continue as a going concern.
During 2007, the Company sold 1,452,770 shares of Plug
Power Inc. (Plug Power) common stock with proceeds
totaling $5,130 thousand and gains totaling $2,549 thousand.
These proceeds reflect the Companys previously announced
strategy to raise additional capital through the sale of Plug
Power common stock in order to fund MTI Micro operations.
Based on the Companys projected cash requirements for
operations and capital expenditures for 2008 and its current
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $8,097
thousand at March 31, 2008, management believes it will
have adequate resources to fund operations and capital
expenditures through October 2008 based on current cash and cash
equivalents, current cash flow requirements, revenue and expense
projections and the potential sale of securities available for
sale at current market values.
However, the Company may need to do one or more of the following
to raise additional resources, or reduce its cash requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
reduce its current expenditure run-rate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
sell additional shares of Plug Power;
|
|
|
|
|
|
obtain additional government or private funding of the
Companys direct methanol fuel cell research, development,
manufacturing readiness and commercialization;
|
F-52
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
1. Nature
of Operations (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
sell operating divisions of the Company; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
secure additional equity financing.
|
There is no guarantee that such resources will be available to
the Company on terms acceptable to it, or at all, or that such
resources will be received in a timely manner, if at all, or
that the Company will be able to reduce its expenditure run-rate
without materially and adversely affecting its business.
Changes in significant accounting policies since
December 31, 2007 are as follows:
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
provides companies with an option to report selected financial
assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains
and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected are reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting
date. The adoption of this statement on January 1, 2008 did
not have a material effect on the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements as the Company did not elect to implement
the fair value option for its marketable equity securities.
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
applies to all financial instruments that are being measured and
reported on a fair value basis. This includes financial assets
including Securities available for sale (see
Note 5) and financial liabilities including
Derivative liability (see Note 16) on the
balance sheet. As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair
value is the price that would be received to sell an asset
or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. The Company utilizes
valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs
and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Based on the
observability of the inputs used in the valuation methods, the
Company is required to provide the following information
according to the fair value hierarchy as specified by
SFAS No. 157. This hierarchy ranks the quality and
reliability of the information used to determine fair values.
Financial assets and liabilities are classified and disclosed in
one of the following three categories:
|
|
Level 1:
|
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities, which includes listed equities.
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are
corroborated by market data. These items are typically priced
using models or other valuation techniques. These models are
primarily financial industry-standard models that consider
various assumptions, including the time value of money, yield
curves, volatility factors, as well as other relevant economic
measures.
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
These use unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by
market data. These values are generally estimated based upon
methodologies utilizing significant inputs that are generally
less observable from objective sources.
|
F-53
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Accounting
Policies (Continued)
|
In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs a
detailed analysis of financial assets and liabilities that are
subject to SFAS No. 157. At each reporting period, all
assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurements are
based upon significant unobservable inputs are classified as
Level 3.
The following is a summary of the Companys fair value
instruments categorized by their associated fair value input
level:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
Balance Sheet Classification
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Mar. 31, 2008
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
$3,537
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$3,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of assets
|
|
$3,537
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$3,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$363
|
|
$363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$363
|
|
$363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a rollforward of Level 3 fair value
instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Gains /
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
Issuances,
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Balance as of
|
|
Realized and
|
|
Sales and
|
|
Balance as of
|
Instrument
|
|
Jan. 1, 2008
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
Settlements
|
|
Mar. 31, 2008
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
$696
|
|
$(333)
|
|
$
|
|
$363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Level 3 instruments
|
|
$696
|
|
$(333)
|
|
$
|
|
$363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable balances consist of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
U.S. and State Government
|
|
$79
|
|
$449
|
Commercial
|
|
1,290
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$1,369
|
|
$1,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, a
single commercial customer represented 31.9% and 20.1%,
respectively, and a U.S. governmental agency represented
21.4% and 18.3%, respectively, of the Companys
instrumentation segment product revenue. As of December 31,
F-54
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts (Continued)
|
2007 and March 31, 2008, this commercial customer
represented 46.8% and 29.0%, respectively, and
U.S. governmental agency represented 0.2% and 27.2%,
respectively, of the Companys instrumentation segment
accounts receivable.
Inventories, net consist of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$467
|
|
$421
|
Work in process
|
|
168
|
|
280
|
Raw materials, net
|
|
738
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,373
|
|
$1,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Securities
Available for Sale
|
Securities available for sale are classified as current assets
and accumulated net unrealized gains (losses) are charged to
other comprehensive income (loss).
The principal components of the Companys securities
available for sale consist of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Market Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security
|
|
Cost Basis
|
|
Unrealized Gain
|
|
Recorded Fair Value
|
|
Per NASDAQ
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except market price and share data)
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plug Power
|
|
$
|
2,021
|
|
$
|
2,471
|
|
$
|
4,492
|
|
$
|
3.95
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
1,137,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plug Power
|
|
$
|
2,021
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
$
|
3,537
|
|
$
|
3.11
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
1,137,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The book basis roll forward of Plug Power securities is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities available for sale, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
4,602
|
|
|
$
|
2,021
|
Sale of shares
|
|
|
(2,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities cost basis
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net of taxes
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale, end of period
|
|
$
|
4,492
|
|
|
$
|
3,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Securities
Available for Sale (Continued)
|
Accumulated unrealized gains related to Plug Power securities
available for sale are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Accumulated unrealized gains
|
|
$
|
2,471
|
|
|
$
|
1,516
|
|
Accumulated deferred tax expense on unrealized gains
|
|
|
(1,971
|
)
|
|
|
(1,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated net unrealized gains
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated deferred tax expense on unrealized gains
includes allocated taxes for the disproportionate effect of
unrealized gains recorded prior to the Company recording a full
valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets during 2006.
The Companys effective income tax (expense) rate from
operations differed from the Federal statutory rate for each of
the three months ended March 31 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Federal statutory tax rate
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
|
|
34.00
|
%
|
State taxes, net of federal tax effect
|
|
|
5.79
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(51.43
|
)
|
|
|
(44.03
|
)
|
Permanent tax difference on derivative valuation
|
|
|
11.43
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Rate
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit for the three months ended March 31
consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operations before minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation allowance at December 31, 2007 and
March 31, 2008 was $22,333 thousand and $24,170 thousand,
respectively, and represents a full valuation allowance. The
valuation allowance reflects the estimate that it is more likely
than not that the net deferred tax assets in excess of deferred
tax liabilities may not be realized.
F-56
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Changes in common shares issued and treasury stock outstanding
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2007
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
5,760,585
|
|
5,777,578
|
Issuance of shares for stock option exercises
|
|
10,743
|
|
|
Issuance of shares for restricted and unrestricted stock grants
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted stock grant
|
|
(625)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
5,777,578
|
|
5,777,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
On December 20, 2006, the Company issued warrants to
investors to purchase 378,472 shares of the Companys
common stock at an exercise price of $18.16 per share. These
warrants will be fair valued by the Company until expiration or
exercise of the warrants. The warrants became exercisable on
June 30, 2007 and expire on December 19, 2011.
Reservation
of Shares
The Company has reserved common shares for future issuance as of
March 31, 2008 as follows:
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding
|
|
762,391
|
Stock options available for issuance
|
|
172,521
|
Warrants outstanding
|
|
378,472
|
|
|
|
Number of common shares reserved
|
|
1,313,384
|
|
|
|
F-57
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the
numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per share
computations for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except shares)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(3,156
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
4,755,493
|
|
|
|
4,772,486
|
|
Less weighted average non-vested restricted stock
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
4,754,868
|
|
|
|
4,771,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
4,755,493
|
|
|
|
4,772,486
|
|
Less weighted average non-vested restricted stock due to
anti-dilutive effect
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
(625
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
|
|
|
4,754,868
|
|
|
|
4,771,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming
dilution for the three months ended March 31, 2007 were
options to purchase 697,092 shares of the Companys
common stock, warrants to purchase 378,472 shares of the
Companys stock, 625 unvested restricted shares of the
Companys common stock and options to purchase
29,168 shares of MTI Micros common stock. These
potentially dilutive items were excluded because the Company
incurred a loss for this period and their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
Not included in the computation of earnings per share-assuming
dilution for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were
options to purchase 762,391 shares of the Companys
common stock, warrants to purchase 378,472 shares of the
Companys stock, 625 unvested restricted shares of the
Companys common stock and options to purchase
22,668 shares of MTI Micros common stock. These
potentially dilutive items were excluded because the Company
incurred a loss for this period and their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
|
|
9.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
During the three month period ended March 31, 2008, the
Company granted approximately 563 stock options with a
weighted average fair value per share of $3.68. The total number
of outstanding non-vested restricted stock awards was 625 at
both December 31, 2007 and March 31, 2008.
F-58
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
9.
|
Stock-Based
Compensation (Continued)
|
Total stock-based compensation expense related to all of the
Companys stock-based awards, recognized for the three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2008, was comprised as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Unfunded research and product development
B
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense before taxes
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
Related income tax benefits
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
Income tax effect is zero due to the Company maintaining a full
valuation allowance.
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
Expense was negative for period due to the impact of option
forfeiture expense reversals for unvested options exceeding the
recurring expense for the period.
|
Unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested awards as
of March 31, 2008 is $1,252 thousand for stock options and
$2 thousand for restricted stock, and is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average vesting period of
approximately 1.27 years.
The fair value of stock option awards is estimated on the date
of grant using a Black-Scholes Pricing Model with the following
weighted average assumptions for the three months ended
March 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Expected life of options (years)
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
Risk free interest rate range
|
|
|
4.50-4.51
|
%
|
|
|
2.58-3.13
|
%
|
Expected volatility of stock
|
|
|
75.23
|
%
|
|
|
76.00
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined using
the intrinsic value of the award on the date of grant.
|
|
10.
|
Cash
Flows Supplemental Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-cash Operating, Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in investment and
paid-in-capital
resulting from other investors activity in MTI Micro stock
|
|
$
|
(180
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company operates in two business segments
,
New Energy
and Test and Measurement Instrumentation. The New Energy segment
is focused on commercializing direct methanol fuel cells. The
Test and Measurement Instrumentation segment designs,
manufactures, markets and services
F-59
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Segment
Information (Continued)
|
computer-based balancing systems for aircraft engines, high
performance test and measurement instruments and systems, and
wafer characterization tools for the semiconductor industry. The
Companys principal operations are located in North America.
The accounting policies of the New Energy and Test and
Measurement Instrumentation segments are similar to those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies in
the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The Company evaluates performance based on profit or loss from
operations before income taxes, accounting changes, items
management does not deem relevant to segment performance, and
interest income and expense. Inter-segment sales and expenses
are not significant.
Summarized financial information concerning the Companys
reportable segments is shown in the following table. The
Other column includes corporate related items and
items such as income taxes or unusual items, which are not
allocated to reportable segments. The Reconciling
Items column includes minority interests in a consolidated
subsidiary. In addition, segments non-cash items include
any depreciation and amortization in reported profit or loss.
The New Energy segment figures include the Companys equity
securities of Plug Power and gains on the sale of these
securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Test and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
New Energy
|
|
|
Instrumentation
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
Research and product development expenses
|
|
|
3,269
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Segment loss from operations before income taxes and minority
interests
|
|
|
(4,058
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,390
|
)
|
Segment (loss) profit
|
|
|
(4,058
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
|
|
805
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(3,156
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
10,833
|
|
|
|
2,752
|
|
|
|
12,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,310
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
8,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,184
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
Funded research and development revenue
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
Research and product development expenses
|
|
|
1,891
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,373
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
Segment loss from operations before income taxes and minority
interests
|
|
|
(3,394
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,303
|
)
|
Segment (loss) profit
|
|
|
(3,394
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
(3,187
|
)
|
Total assets
|
|
|
6,406
|
|
|
|
3,076
|
|
|
|
5,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,812
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,537
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
F-60
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Segment
Information (Continued)
|
The following table presents the details of Other
segment (loss) profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Corporate and other (expenses) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Gain on derivatives
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (expense)
|
|
$
|
805
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2007, the Company announced the suspension of MTI
Micros high power direct methanol fuel cell program in
response to decreased funding and sales opportunities in the
military market. In connection with this action, the Company
accrued and paid restructuring charges of $340 thousand pre-tax,
consisting primarily of cash-based employee severance and
benefit costs related to the reduction of 23 positions within
its New Energy segment and corporate staff. Restructuring
expenses were classified as selling, general and administrative
expenses within the Companys Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the period.
|
|
13.
|
Effect of
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161
changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments
and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide
enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses
derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and
related hedging items are accounted for under
SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and
(c) how derivative instruments and related hedging items
affect an entitys financial position, financial
performance, and cash flows. This statement is effective as of
the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year beginning
after November 15, 2008. This statement will be effective
for the Company for its fiscal year beginning January 1,
2009. The Company has not yet determined the impact, if any, of
this statement on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R,
Business Combinations a replacement of FASB
Statement No. 141
(SFAS No. 141R), which significantly
changes the principles and requirements for how the acquirer of
a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The statement also
provides guidance for recognizing and measuring the goodwill
acquired in the business combination and determines what
information to disclose to enable users of the financial
statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the
business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective
prospectively, except for certain retrospective adjustments to
deferred tax
F-61
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Effect of
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements (Continued)
|
balances, for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. This statement will be effective for the Company for its
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. The Company has not
yet determined the impact, if any, of this statement on its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
requires that accounting and reporting for minority interests
will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and
classified as a component of equity. SFAS No. 160 also
establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient
disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling
owners. SFAS No. 160 applies to all entities that
prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit
organizations, but will affect only those entities that have an
outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries
or that deconsolidate a subsidiary. This statement is effective
as of the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year
beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement will be
effective for the Company for its fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2009. Based upon the March 31, 2008 balance
sheet, the impact of adopting SFAS No. 160 would be to
reclassify $25 thousand from minority interests in consolidated
subsidiaries to the Companys stockholders equity
section as a separate component of stockholders equity.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Lawrence
Litigation
On September 9, 1998, Barbara Lawrence, the Lawrence Group,
Inc. (Lawrence) and certain other Lawrence-related
entities (Plaintiffs) initially filed suit in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of New
York (Bankruptcy Court) and the United States
District Court for the Northern District of New York
(District Court), which were subsequently
consolidated in the District Court, against First Albany
Corporation, now known as Broadpoint Capital, Inc.
(BCI), the Company, Dale Church, Edward Dohring,
Beno Sternlicht, Alan Goldberg and George McNamee (Church,
Dohring, Sternlicht, Goldberg and McNamee are former Directors
of the Company), Marty Mastroianni (former President and Chief
Operating Officer of the Company) and 33 other individuals
(Defendants) who purchased a total of
820,909 shares (307,841 post-split) of the Companys
stock from the Plaintiffs. The case concerns the
Defendants 1997 purchase of the Companys common
stock from the Plaintiffs at the price of $2.25 per share ($6.00
per share post split). BCI acted as Placement Agent in
connection with the negotiation and sale of the shares,
including in proceedings before the Bankruptcy Court, which
approved the sale in September 1997.
Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants failed to disclose material
inside information to the Plaintiffs in connection with the sale
and that the $2.25 per share ($6.00 per share post split)
purchase price was unfair. Plaintiffs are seeking damages of
$5 million plus punitive damages and costs. In April 1999,
Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint,
which was denied by the Bankruptcy Court. On appeal in October
2000, Plaintiffs claims were dismissed by the District
Court. In November 2000, Plaintiffs filed an appeal of that
dismissal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit. In June 2002, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals
reversed the District Court decision in part and remanded the
case for further consideration of the Plaintiffs claims as
motions to modify the Bankruptcy Court sale order. The
Plaintiffs claims have now been
F-62
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (Continued)
|
referred back to Bankruptcy Court for such consideration. By
order and decision dated September 30, 2003, the Bankruptcy
Court allowed certain limited discovery to proceed, and this
process is still underway.
The Company believes the claims have no merit and intends to
defend them vigorously. The Company cannot predict the outcome
of the claims nor reasonably estimate a range of possible loss
given the current status of the litigation. Accordingly, no
amounts have been reserved for this matter.
Leases
The Companys future minimum rental payments required under
non-cancelable operating leases are (dollars in thousands): $537
remaining in 2008, $652 in 2009, $1 in 2010 and $0 in years 2011
through 2013.
Warranties
Below is a reconciliation of changes in product warranty
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
Accruals for warranties issued
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licenses
On January 24, 2008, the Company cancelled its
non-exclusive licensing agreement with Los Alamos National
Laboratory (LANL) covering certain direct methanol
fuel cell technology. This agreement, which was last amended on
May 17, 2006, prescribed annual license fees ranging from
$35,000 in 2008 to $100,000 in 2019. The Company paid and
recognized a one-time expense of $50,000 to cancel the
agreement, and no future license fees or royalties will be owed
to LANL. The Company cancelled this agreement because it no
longer considers the direct methanol fuel cell technology
licensed from LANL to be applicable to its future products.
Employment
Agreements
The Company has employment agreements with certain employees
that provide severance payments, certain other payments,
accelerated vesting and exercise extension periods of certain
options upon termination of employment under certain
circumstances, as defined in the applicable agreements. As of
March 31, 2008, the Companys potential minimum cash
obligation to these employees was approximately $810 thousand.
F-63
MECHANICAL
TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Issuance
of Stock by Subsidiary
|
MTI Micro was formed on March 26, 2001 and as of
March 31, 2008, the Company owns approximately 96% of MTI
Micros outstanding common stock.
On March 1, 2008, MTI Micro issued 8,653 shares of its
common stock at a price of $0.68 per share to the Company as
compensation for the minority shareholder benefit in connection
with the Company issuing its options to MTI Micro employees.
The decrease in the Companys
paid-in-capital
of $180 thousand and $5 thousand in 2007 and 2008, respectively,
represents the changes in the Companys equity investment
in MTI Micro, which resulted from the anti-dilutive impact of
the Companys investments into and any third-party stock
transactions in MTI Micro stock.
The Company held or has outstanding the following derivative
financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Derivatives issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants, exercisable beginning June 20, 2007, to purchase
the Companys common stock issued to three investors at a
purchase price of $18.16 per share
|
|
|
378,472
|
|
|
|
378,472
|
|
|
|
12/19/2011
|
|
The estimated fair value of this warrant at the date issued was
$10.16 per share, using a Black-Scholes Option Pricing model and
assumptions similar to those used for valuing the Companys
employee stock-based compensation. The fair value of the
derivative is recorded in the Derivative Liability
line on its financial statements, and is valued quarterly using
the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. The assumptions used for
the valuations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Expected life of option (number of days)
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
Expected volatility of stock
|
|
|
73.46
|
%
|
|
|
74.86
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
The Company recognizes changes in fair value in its Consolidated
Statements of Operations in the line titled Gain on
derivatives.
From April 1 through May 9, 2008, the Company sold
securities available for sale as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Proceeds
|
Security
|
|
Shares Sold
|
|
from Sales
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Plug Power
|
|
|
427,209
|
|
|
$
|
1,437
|
|
F-64
7,000,000 Shares
of Common Stock
and
Warrants to
Purchase Shares
of Common Stock
Mechanical
Technology, Incorporated
Merriman
Curhan Ford & Co.
Ardour Capital Investments,
LLC
,
2008
PART II. INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
expenses of issuance and distribution.
|
The following table sets forth all expenses payable by us in
connection with the offering of the units being registered,
other than underwriting discounts and commissions. All of the
amounts shown are estimates except the Securities and Exchange
Commission registration fee.
|
|
|
SEC registration fee
|
|
$1,179
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
$3,500
|
NASDAQ additional listing fee
|
|
$65,000
|
Printing and engraving
|
|
$40,000
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
$80,000
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
$40,000
|
Transfer agent and registrar fees
|
|
$3,500
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
$6,821
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$240,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of directors and officers.
|
Pursuant to the statutes of the State of New York, a director or
officer of a corporation is entitled, under specified
circumstances, to indemnification by the corporation against
reasonable expenses, including attorneys fees, incurred by
him/her in connection with the defense of a civil or criminal
proceeding to which
he/she
has
been made, or threatened to be made, a party by reason of the
fact that
he/she
was
such director or officer. In certain circumstances, indemnity is
provided against judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement. In general, indemnification is available where the
director or officer acted in good faith, for a purpose
he/she
reasonably believed to be in the best interests of the
corporation. Specific court approval is required in some cases.
The foregoing statement is subject to the detailed provisions of
Sections 715, 717 and
721-725
of
the New York Business Corporation Law.
Under provisions of our certificate of incorporation, MTI shall
indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to
be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action,
proceeding or suit (including one by or in the right of MTI to
procure a judgment in its favor), whether civil or criminal, by
reason of the fact that he, his testator or interstate is or was
a director or officer of MTI, or is or was serving any other
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit
plan or other enterprise in any capacity at the request of MTI,
against judgments, fines, amounts paid in settlement and
expenses, including attorneys fees, actually incurred as a
result of or in connection with any such action, proceeding or
suit, or any appeal therefrom, if such director or officer acted
in good faith for a purpose which he reasonably believed to be
in or not opposed to the best interests of MTI, and, in criminal
actions or proceedings, in which he had no reasonable cause to
believe that his conduct was unlawful; provided, however, that
no indemnification shall be made to or on behalf of any director
or officer if a judgment or other final adjudication adverse to
the director or officer establishes that his acts were committed
in bad faith or were the result of active and deliberate
dishonesty and were material to the cause of action so
adjudicated, or that he personally gained a financial profit or
other advantage to which he was not legally entitled.
The directors and officers of MTI are covered by insurance
policies indemnifying against certain liabilities, including
certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act that might
be incurred by them in such capacities.
II-1
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
sales of unregistered securities.
|
In connection with provisions of a private placement agreement
entered into with Fletcher International, Ltd. or Fletcher, in
2004, we were required to issue shares of our common stock
without payment to Fletcher upon the occurrence of certain
events, including subsequent dilutive equity issuances. Pursuant
to a letter agreement dated as of December 7, 2006, the
dilutive issuance provision of Fletchers private placement
agreement was amended to reduce by 25% the number of shares to
be issued under any subsequent dilutive issuances. The capital
raise that occurred in December 2006 was considered a dilutive
issuance under the Fletcher agreement, so we issued
33,414 shares of our common stock to Fletcher. We issued
these shares of common stock to Fletcher in reliance upon
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as a transaction
by an issuer not involving a public offering. We did not pay or
give, directly or indirectly, any commission or other
remuneration, including underwriting discounts or commissions,
in connection with any of the issuances of the shares listed
above. In addition, each of the share certificates issued in the
transaction listed above at the time of issuance bore a
restrictive legend permitting the transfer thereof only in
compliance with applicable securities laws. The recipients of
securities in each of these transactions listed above
represented to us their intention to acquire the securities for
investment only and not with view to or for sale in connection
with any distribution thereof. All recipients had adequate
access, through their relationship with us or through other
access to information provided by us, to information about our
company.
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
|
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by
reference:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant, as
amended. (22)(23)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
By-Laws of the registrant, as amended and restated. (21)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (December 2006
offering). (17)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant.
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan. (1)
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 1999 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan. (2)
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Lease dated August 10, 1999 between Carl E. Touhey and
Mechanical Technology, Inc. (3)
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
Lease dated April 2, 2001 between Kingfisher LLC and
Mechanical Technology, Inc. (4)
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
First Amendment to lease dated March 13, 2003 between
Kingfisher LLC and Mechanical Technology, Inc. (5)
|
|
10
|
.119
|
|
Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated as of September 19,
2003, between The Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells
Inc. (6)
|
|
10
|
.123
|
|
Amendment to the Strategic Alliance Agreement between The
Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. dated
August 18, 2004. (8)
|
|
10
|
.131
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Strategic Alliance Agreement between
The Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. dated
June 20, 2005. (9)
|
|
10
|
.132
|
|
Second Amendment to lease dated December 12, 2005 between
Kingfisher, LLC and Mechanical Technology,
Incorporated. (10)
|
|
10
|
.136
|
|
Employment Agreement dated September 25, 2002 between
Cynthia A. Scheuer and Mechanical Technology, Incorporated and
MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (11)
|
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.139
|
|
Employment Agreement dated May 4, 2006 between Peng K. Lim
and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (13)
|
|
10
|
.140
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the 1996 and 1999
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated Stock Incentive
Plans. (14)
|
|
10
|
.141
|
|
Alliance Agreement dated May 16, 2006 between MTI MicroFuel
Cells Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (15)
|
|
10
|
.142
|
|
Third Amendment to lease dated August 7, 2006 between
Kingfisher, LLC and Mechanical Technology,
Incorporated. (15)
|
|
10
|
.143
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Strategic Alliance Agreement dated
September 13, 2006, between MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. and
The Gillette Company. (16)
|
|
10
|
.145
|
|
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 2006 Equity Incentive
Plan. (12)
|
|
10
|
.146
|
|
Separation Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between Russel
Marvin and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (18)
|
|
10
|
.148
|
|
Fourth Amendment to lease dated August 6, 2007 between
Kingfisher LLC and Mechanical Technology, Incorporated. (19)
|
|
10
|
.150
|
|
Future Collaboration Agreement dated October 22, 2007
between MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. (20)
|
|
10
|
.151
|
|
Employment Agreement dated April 3, 2006 between James K.
Prueitt and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (22)
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (7)
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
(contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of attorney (contained on Signature Page to this
Registration Statement)*
|
* Previously filed.
|
|
|
Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
|
Certain exhibits were previously filed (as indicated below) and
are incorporated herein by reference. All other exhibits for
which no other filing information is given are filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Filed as Appendix A to the registrants Definitive
Proxy Statement Schedule 14A filed November 19, 1996.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants Proxy Statement,
Schedule 14A, dated February 13, 1999.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2002.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its quarter ended September 30, 2004.
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated June 20, 2005.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated December 12, 2005.
|
|
|
(11)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
(12)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants Proxy Statement,
Schedule 14A, dated April 3, 2006.
|
|
(13)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated May 4, 2006.
|
|
(14)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated May 18, 2006.
|
|
(15)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its quarter ended June 30, 2006.
|
|
(16)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its quarter ended September 30, 2006.
|
|
(17)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated December 15, 2006.
|
|
(18)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated March 22, 2007.
|
|
(19)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its quarter ended June 30, 2007.
|
|
(20)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated October 25, 2007.
|
|
(21)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated December 14, 2007.
|
|
(22)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
(23)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants Form 8-K
Report dated May 15, 2008.
|
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other
than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid
by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes the following:
(1) for purposes of determining any liability under
the Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in the form of
prospectus filed by the Registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective; and
(2) for the purpose of determining any liability
under the Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that
contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new
registration statement relating to the securities offered
therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall
be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-4
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the city of Albany, state of New York, on
May 22, 2008.
|
|
|
Date: May 22, 2008
|
|
MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY, INCORPORATED
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
/s/ Peng
K. Lim
Peng
K. Lim
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed by the following persons
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peng
K. Lim
Peng
K. Lim
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
May 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Cynthia
A. Scheuer
Cynthia
A. Scheuer
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
May 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
J. Marusak*
Thomas
J. Marusak
|
|
Director
|
|
May 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William
P. Phelan*
William
P. Phelan
|
|
Director
|
|
May 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ E.
Dennis OConnor*
E.
Dennis OConnor
|
|
Director
|
|
May 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Walter
L. Robb*
Dr. Walter
L. Robb
|
|
Director
|
|
May 22, 2008
|
|
|
|
*by:
/s/ Cynthia
A. Scheuer
Cynthia
A. Scheuer, Attorney-in-fact
|
|
|
II-5
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement.
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the registrant, as
amended. (22)(23)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
By-Laws of the registrant, as amended and restated. (21)
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (December 2006
offering). (17)
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant.
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP.
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan. (1)
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 1999 Employee Stock
Incentive Plan. (2)
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Lease dated August 10, 1999 between Carl E. Touhey and
Mechanical Technology, Inc. (3)
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
Lease dated April 2, 2001 between Kingfisher LLC and
Mechanical Technology, Inc. (4)
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
First Amendment to lease dated March 13, 2003 between
Kingfisher LLC and Mechanical Technology, Inc. (5)
|
|
10
|
.119
|
|
Strategic Alliance Agreement, dated as of September 19,
2003, between The Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells
Inc. (6)
|
|
10
|
.123
|
|
Amendment to the Strategic Alliance Agreement between The
Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. dated
August 18, 2004. (8)
|
|
10
|
.131
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Strategic Alliance Agreement between
The Gillette Company and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. dated
June 20, 2005. (9)
|
|
10
|
.132
|
|
Second Amendment to lease dated December 12, 2005 between
Kingfisher, LLC and Mechanical Technology,
Incorporated. (10)
|
|
10
|
.136
|
|
Employment Agreement dated September 25, 2002 between
Cynthia A. Scheuer and Mechanical Technology, Incorporated and
MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (11)
|
|
10
|
.139
|
|
Employment Agreement dated May 4, 2006 between Peng K. Lim
and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (13)
|
|
10
|
.140
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the 1996 and 1999
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated Stock Incentive
Plans. (14)
|
|
10
|
.141
|
|
Alliance Agreement dated May 16, 2006 between MTI MicroFuel
Cells Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (15)
|
|
10
|
.142
|
|
Third Amendment to lease dated August 7, 2006 between
Kingfisher, LLC and Mechanical Technology,
Incorporated. (15)
|
|
10
|
.143
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the Strategic Alliance Agreement dated
September 13, 2006, between MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. and
The Gillette Company. (16)
|
|
10
|
.145
|
|
Mechanical Technology, Incorporated 2006 Equity Incentive
Plan. (12)
|
|
10
|
.146
|
|
Separation Agreement dated March 20, 2007 between Russel
Marvin and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (18)
|
|
10
|
.148
|
|
Fourth Amendment to lease dated August 6, 2007 between
Kingfisher LLC and Mechanical Technology, Incorporated. (19)
|
|
10
|
.150
|
|
Future Collaboration Agreement dated October 22, 2007
between MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co.,
Ltd. (20)
|
|
10
|
.151
|
|
Employment Agreement dated April 3, 2006 between James K.
Prueitt and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc. (22)
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant. (7)
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
(contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of attorney (contained on Signature Page to this
Registration Statement)*
|
* Previously filed.
|
|
|
Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
|
Certain exhibits were previously filed (as indicated below) and
are incorporated herein by reference. All other exhibits for
which no other filing information is given are filed herewith.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Filed as Appendix A to the registrants Definitive
Proxy Statement Schedule 14A filed November 19, 1996.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants Proxy Statement,
Schedule 14A, dated February 13, 1999.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2002.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2003.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its quarter ended September 30, 2004.
|
|
|
(9)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated June 20, 2005.
|
|
|
(10)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated December 12, 2005.
|
|
|
(11)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
Report for the year ended December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
(12)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants Proxy Statement,
Schedule 14A, dated April 3, 2006.
|
|
(13)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated May 4, 2006.
|
|
(14)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated May 18, 2006.
|
|
(15)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its quarter ended June 30, 2006.
|
|
(16)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its quarter ended September 30, 2006.
|
|
(17)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated December 15, 2006.
|
|
(18)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated March 22, 2007.
|
|
(19)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-Q
Report for its quarter ended June 30, 2007.
|
|
(20)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated October 25, 2007.
|
|
(21)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 8-K
Report dated December 14, 2007.
|
|
(22)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
(23)
|
Filed as an Exhibit to the registrants Form 8-K
Report dated May 15, 2008.
|
Mechanical Technology (MM) (NASDAQ:MKTYD)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Oct 2024 à Nov 2024
Mechanical Technology (MM) (NASDAQ:MKTYD)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Nov 2023 à Nov 2024