UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form N-CSR

 

 

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act File Number: 811-08134

 

 

Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

 

 

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

 

Maureen A. Gemma

Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110

(Name and Address of Agent for Services)

 

 

(617) 482-8260

(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

January 31

Date of Fiscal Year End

January 31, 2013

Date of Reporting Period

 

 

 


Item 1. Reports to Stockholders

 


LOGO

 

 

Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

 

Annual Report

January 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

LOGO


 

 

Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.

This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current summary prospectus or prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the investment objective, risks, and charges and expenses of a mutual fund. This and other important information is contained in the summary prospectus and prospectus, which can be obtained from a financial advisor. Prospective investors should read the prospectus carefully before investing. For further information, please call 1-800-262-1122.


Annual Report January 31, 2013

Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

Table of Contents

 

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance

     2   

Performance

     3   

Fund Profile

     4   

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

     5   

Fund Expenses

     6   

Financial Statements

     7   

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     28   

Federal Tax Information

     29   

Management and Organization

     30   

Important Notices

     32   


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance 1

 

 

 

Economic and Market Conditions

Two intertwined forces dominated fixed-income markets during the one-year period ended January 31, 2013: a low interest-rate environment that drove investors to search for yield; and investors’ increased appetite for risk.

Highly accommodative monetary policies instituted by central banks around the world exerted an unusual amount of influence on financial markets, pushing interest rates to historic lows. The U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) acted several times during the period to maintain downward pressure on rates. In the spring of 2012, the Fed extended Operation Twist, the central bank’s swapping of its short-term holdings for long-term Treasury bonds. In September 2012, the Fed began purchasing approximately $40 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) monthly. And in December 2012, it replaced Operation Twist, which was expiring, with outright purchases of another $40 billion or so of Treasuries and agency MBS each month. This downward pressure on yields drove investors to look elsewhere for income. The result was that many investors increased their allocation to higher-yielding bonds, pushing up prices for those securities.

At the same time, improving economic conditions, especially in the second half of the period ending January 31, 2013, made fixed-income investors more comfortable with riskier asset classes. In the United States, unemployment began to gradually decline, and the battered housing market appeared to be finally turning around — in part because of the Fed’s downward pressure on mortgage rates. Overseas, actions by the European Central Bank calmed many investors’ fears that Europe’s debt crisis would lead to a fracturing of the eurozone and drag the U.S. and global economies back into recession.

Against this backdrop, municipal bonds rallied during the one-year period ended January 31, 2013, led by the long end of the yield curve and lower credit-quality bonds. The Fund’s primary benchmark, the Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index (the Index) 2 — an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the United States — returned 4.80% for the period. As yields on high-quality bonds fell, investors moved out on the yield curve, buying longer-maturity municipal bonds to potentially take advantage of higher yields at the long end of the yield curve. In their quest for income, investors also favored lower-quality, higher-yielding issues over higher-quality, lower-yielding bonds. As a result, longer-duration 8 , lower-credit-quality bonds were the best performers in the municipal space during the period.

Municipal bonds offered higher taxable-equivalent yields than Treasuries for much of the period. The ratio of 30-year AAA 7

municipal yields to 30-year Treasury yields — which historically has averaged less than 100% because municipal yields are federally tax-exempt — began the period at 106.8%, making municipal bonds attractive relative to Treasuries. After the election in November 2012, however, investors seemed to view President Obama’s win as an indication that marginal tax rates were likely to go up. That sentiment led to higher demand for tax-exempt municipals, driving the municipal-to-Treasury yield ratio down to 90.2% at period-end on January 31, 2013. For the one-year period ended January 31, 2013, municipal bonds outperformed Treasuries.

Fund Performance

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013, Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund (the Fund) Class A shares at net asset value (NAV) had a total return of 11.23%, outperforming the 4.80% return of the Index.

The Fund invests primarily in bonds with maturities of ten years or more. This was a favorable strategy during the one-year period, as the Fund was overweighted in longer-duration, lower-quality bonds, which were the strongest-performing areas of the municipal market. More specifically, an overweighting and positive security selection in BBB-rated bonds were primary drivers of relative outperformance versus the Index.

Overweights and security selection in zero-coupon bonds and in the hospital and industrial development revenue sectors — all of which performed strongly during the period — aided results as well versus the Index.

Leveraged 6 investments also helped results versus the Index during the period. Management purchases leveraged investments in seeking to enhance the Fund’s tax-exempt income. The use of leveraged investments has the effect of achieving additional exposure to the municipal market, magnifying the Fund’s exposure to its underlying investments in both up and down markets. During this period of strong performance by municipal bonds, leveraged investments contributed to the Fund’s outperformance versus the Index.

Detractors from relative performance versus the Index included underweights in California and Illinois municipal issues, as those two states were the strongest-performing states in the Index during the period.

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

 

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are before taxes unless otherwise noted. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  2  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Performance 2,3

 

Portfolio Managers Thomas M. Metzold, CFA and Cynthia J. Clemson

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Five Years      Ten Years      Since
Inception
 

Class A at NAV

     08/07/1995         11.23      3.95      4.86        

Class A with 4.75% Maximum Sales Charge

             5.89         2.94         4.35           

Class B at NAV

     08/07/1995         10.42         3.18         4.11           

Class B with 5% Maximum Sales Charge

             5.42         2.86         4.11           

Class C at NAV

     06/18/1997         10.35         3.18         4.11           

Class C with 1% Maximum Sales Charge

             9.35         3.18         4.11           

Class I at NAV

     05/09/2007         11.50         4.23                 2.69

Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index

             4.80      5.73      5.17        

Barclays Capital High Yield Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index

             20.26         7.04         7.75           
              
% Total Annual Operating Expense Ratios 4             Class A      Class B      Class C      Class I  

Gross

        1.04      1.79      1.79      0.79

Net of Interest Expense

        0.93         1.68         1.68         0.68   
              
% Distribution Rates/Yields 5             Class A      Class B      Class C      Class I  

Distribution Rate

        4.68      3.91      3.92      4.93

Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate

        8.27         6.91         6.93         8.71   

SEC 30-day Yield

        3.47         2.90         2.90         3.89   

Taxable-Equivalent SEC 30-day Yield

        6.13         5.12         5.12         6.87   
              
% Total Leverage 6                                             

Residual Interest Bond (RIB)

                 11.75

Growth of $10,000

 

This graph shows the change in value of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A of the Fund for the period indicated. For comparison, the same investment is shown in the indicated index.

 

LOGO

 

Growth of Investment    Amount Invested    Period Beginning    At NAV   With Maximum
Sales Charge

Class B

   $10,000    01/31/2003    $14,964   N.A.

Class C

   $10,000    01/31/2003    $14,961   N.A.

Class I

   $250,000    05/09/2007    $291,175   N.A.

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are before taxes unless otherwise noted. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  3  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Fund Profile

 

 

LOGO

The above chart includes the ratings of securities held by special purpose vehicles established in connection with the RIB financing. 6 Absent such securities, credit quality (% of total investments) is as follows: 7

 

AAA

    7.8   

B

    6.5

AA

    17.1      

CCC

    2.3   

A

    16.9      

CC

    0.1   

BBB

    29.6      

Not Rated

    14.9   

BB

    4.8        

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

 

  4  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

 

 

1  

The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio manager(s) and are current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance and the Fund(s) disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. This commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as “forward looking statements”. The Fund’s actual future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward looking statement, depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and other risks discussed from time to time in the Fund’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

2

Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. Barclays Capital High Yield Long (22+) Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of high-yield municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities of 22 years or more. Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

 

3

Total Returns at NAV do not include applicable sales charges. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Total Returns shown with maximum sales charge reflect the stated maximum sales charge. Unless otherwise stated, performance does not reflect the deduction of taxes on Fund distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.

 

4

Total annual operating expense ratios are as stated in the Fund’s most recent prospectus. Net expense ratio excludes interest expense relating to the Fund’s liability with respect to floating rate notes held by third parties in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions by the Fund. The Fund also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense relating to the municipal obligations underlying such transactions and, as a result, net asset value and performance have not been affected by this expense.

5  

The Distribution Rate is based on the Fund’s last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) divided by the Fund’s NAV at the end of the period. The Fund’s distributions may be composed of ordinary income, tax-exempt income, net realized capital gains and return of capital. Taxable-equivalent performance is based on the highest combined federal and state income tax rates, where applicable. Lower tax rates would result in lower tax-equivalent performance. Actual tax rates will vary depending on your income, exemptions and deductions. Rates do not include local taxes. SEC Yield is a standardized measure based on the estimated yield to maturity of a fund’s investments over a 30- day period and is based on the maximum offer price at the date specified. The SEC Yield is not based on the distributions made by the Fund, which may differ.

 

6  

Fund employs RIB financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater volatility of NAV). The cost of leverage rises and falls with changes in short-term interest rates. See “Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held” in the notes to the financial statements for more information about RIB financing. RIB leverage represents the amount of Floating Rate Notes outstanding at period end as a percentage of Fund net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. Floating Rate Notes reflect the effect of RIBs purchased in secondary market transactions.

 

7  

Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. Ratings of BBB or higher by Standard and Poor’s or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody’s) are considered to be investment grade quality.

 

8

Duration is a measure of the expected change in price of a bond — in percentage terms — given a one percent change in interest rates, all else being constant. Securities with lower durations tend to be less sensitive to interest-rate changes.

 

   Fund profile subject to change due to active management.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  5  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Fund Expenses

 

 

Example:  As a Fund shareholder, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and/or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of Fund investing and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (August 1, 2012 – January 31, 2013).

Actual Expenses:  The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes:  The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual Fund return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.

 

      Beginning
Account Value
(8/1/12)
       Ending
Account Value
(1/31/13)
       Expenses Paid
During Period*
(8/1/12 – 1/31/13)
       Annualized
Expense
Ratio
 
                

Actual

  

              

Class A

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,045.60         $ 4.88           0.95

Class B

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,041.70         $ 8.72           1.70

Class C

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,042.10         $ 8.73           1.70

Class I

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,048.10         $ 3.60           0.70
                                          
                

Hypothetical

  

              

(5% return per year before expenses)

  

              

Class A

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,020.40         $ 4.82           0.95

Class B

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,016.60         $ 8.62           1.70

Class C

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,016.60         $ 8.62           1.70

Class I

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,021.60         $ 3.56           0.70

 

* Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for the indicated Class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on July 31, 2012.

 

  6  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities — 109.3%   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Cogeneration — 1.2%

  

Maryland Energy Financing Administration, (AES Warrior Run), (AMT), 7.40%, 9/1/19

  $ 7,000      $ 7,040,600   

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Colver), (AMT), 5.125%, 12/1/15

    850        867,629   

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Northampton Generating), (AMT), 6.50%, 1/1/13 (5)

    900        571,050   

Western Generation Agency, OR, (Wauna Cogeneration), 5.00%, 1/1/21

    250        252,858   
                 
    $ 8,732,137   
                 

Education — 5.8%

  

Harris County, TX, Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp., (Baylor College of Medicine), 5.00%, 11/15/37

  $ 2,445      $ 2,743,388   

Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Washington Christian Academy), 5.50%, 7/1/38 (1)

    800        319,928   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Harvard University), 5.50%, 11/15/36

    12,625        15,193,304   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Cornell University), 5.00%, 7/1/34 (2)

    10,000        11,553,600   

Oregon Facilities Authority, (Lewis & Clark College), 5.625%, 10/1/36

    1,935        2,273,992   

University of Washington, 5.00%, 7/1/33

    10        11,961   

University of Washington,
5.00%, 7/1/33 (2)(3)

    9,880        11,817,171   
                 
    $ 43,913,344   
                 

Electric Utilities — 2.0%

  

Apache County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 4.50%, 3/1/30

  $ 1,715      $ 1,785,024   

Brazos River Authority, TX, Pollution Control Revenue, (Texas Energy Co.), (AMT), 8.25%, 5/1/33

    3,570        638,280   

Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaiian Electric Co.), 6.50%, 7/1/39

    5,920        6,951,146   

Pima County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Tucson Electric Power Co.), 5.25%, 10/1/40

    2,420        2,649,682   

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/42

    2,785        2,743,225   
                 
    $ 14,767,357   
                 

Escrowed / Prerefunded — 0.4%

               

Dawson Ridge, CO, Metropolitan District No. 1, Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 10/1/22

  $ 3,500      $ 2,831,430   
                 
    $ 2,831,430   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations — 6.0%

               

California, 5.50%, 3/1/40

  $ 1,315      $ 1,539,352   

Louisiana, 4.00%, 8/1/30 (2)

    5,200        5,751,616   

Louisiana, 4.00%, 8/1/31 (2)

    5,200        5,715,060   

Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, TX, (AMT), 5.625%, 10/1/38 (2)

    6,480        7,358,299   

Texas Transportation Commission, Highway Improvement, 5.00%, 4/1/42

    7,000        8,178,660   

Washington, 5.25%, 2/1/36 (2)

    10,000        11,788,300   

Will County, IL, Community Unit School District No. 365-U, (Valley View), 5.75%, 11/1/32

    4,355        5,212,979   
                 
    $ 45,544,266   
                 

Health Care – Miscellaneous — 1.2%

               

Illinois Development Finance Authority, (Community Rehabilitation Providers), 5.60%, 7/1/19

  $ 1,690      $ 1,618,800   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 6.75%, 12/1/36 (4)

    471        474,890   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 7.75%, 12/1/36 (4)

    438        442,546   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 7.90%, 12/1/36 (4)

    368        372,361   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 8.25%, 12/1/36 (4)

    69        69,898   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 8.375%, 12/1/36 (4)

    157        158,909   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 8.50%, 12/1/36 (4)

    435        440,314   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 8.70%, 12/1/36 (4)

    182        184,973   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 8.81%, 12/1/36 (4)

    365        366,825   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), 8.875%, 12/1/36 (4)

    109        110,984   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), Series 2,
7.00%, 12/1/36 (4)

    243        245,011   

Tax Revenue Exempt Securities Trust, Community Health Provider, (Pooled Loan Program Various States Trust Certificates), Series 3,
7.00%, 12/1/36 (4)

    201        202,641   
 

 

  7   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Health Care – Miscellaneous (continued)

  

Yavapai County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (West Yavapai Guidance Clinic), 6.25%, 12/1/36

  $ 4,150      $ 4,258,440   
                 
  $ 8,946,592   
                 

Hospital — 15.0%

               

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Sutter Health), 5.25%, 11/15/48

  $ 9,570      $ 10,774,863   

Camden County, NJ, Improvement Authority, (Cooper Health System), 5.00%, 2/15/35

    8,015        8,270,999   

Gaylord, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, (Otsego Memorial Hospital Association), 6.20%, 1/1/25

    905        932,376   

Gaylord, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, (Otsego Memorial Hospital Association), 6.50%, 1/1/37

    875        898,179   

Hawaii Pacific Health Special Purpose Revenue, 5.50%, 7/1/40

    6,555        7,213,515   

Illinois Finance Authority, (Provena Healthcare), 7.75%, 8/15/34

    6,340        8,108,987   

Johnson City, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board, (Mountain States Health Alliance), 6.00%, 7/1/38

    3,335        3,919,392   

Knox County, TN, Health, Educational & Housing Facilities, (Covenant Health), 0.00%, 1/1/40

    12,870        3,403,986   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Tufts Medical Center), 6.75%, 1/1/36

    2,005        2,451,333   

Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Jordan Hospital), 6.75%, 10/1/33

    6,205        6,303,784   

Monroe County, PA, Hospital Authority, (Pocono Medical Center), 5.25%, 1/1/43

    4,500        4,691,115   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), 5.00%, 7/1/36 (2)

    7,470        8,222,976   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 6.125%, 12/1/29

    3,190        3,566,643   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Orange Regional Medical Center), 6.25%, 12/1/37

    2,000        2,217,120   

Oneida County, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (St. Elizabeth Medical Center), 6.00%, 12/1/29

    2,560        2,561,869   

Onondaga Civic Development Corp., NY, (St. Joseph’s Hospital Health Center), 5.00%, 7/1/42

    2,550        2,625,174   

Orange County, FL, Health Facilities Authority, (Orlando Health, Inc.), 5.00%, 10/1/42

    2,985        3,290,306   

South Lake County, FL, Hospital District, (South Lake Hospital), 6.25%, 4/1/39

    3,065        3,531,462   

Sullivan County, TN, Health, Educational and Facilities Board, (Wellmont Health System), 5.25%, 9/1/36

    5,735        6,063,157   

Vermont Educational and Health Buildings Financing Agency, (Fletcher Allen Healthcare Project), 4.75%, 12/1/36

    14,660        15,381,126   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Vernon Memorial Healthcare, Inc.), 5.25%, 3/1/35

    2,800        2,849,280   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Hospital (continued)

  

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare System), 5.25%, 8/15/31

  $ 5,650      $ 6,021,883   
                 
  $ 113,299,525   
                 

Housing — 2.4%

  

Centerline Equity Issuer Trust, TN, 6.00%, 5/15/19 (4)

  $ 4,000      $ 4,760,840   

Jefferson County, MO, Industrial Development Authority, MFMR, (Riverview Bend Apartments), (AMT), 6.75%, 11/1/29

    1,505        1,507,619   

Jefferson County, MO, Industrial Development Authority, MFMR, (Riverview Bend Apartments), (AMT), 7.125%, 11/1/29

    400        400,544   

Oregon Health Authority, (Trillium Affordable Housing), (AMT), 6.75%, 2/15/29

    2,660        2,661,516   

Oregon Health Authority, (Trillium Affordable Housing), Series B, (AMT), 6.75%, 2/15/29

    1,180        1,180,224   

Texas Student Housing Corp., (University of North Texas), 9.375%, 7/1/06 (5)

    860        481,557   

Texas Student Housing Corp., (University of North Texas), 11.00%, 7/1/31 (1)

    2,000        1,119,900   

Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 5.20%, 10/1/26 (2)

    4,265        4,592,680   

Virginia Housing Development Authority, (AMT), 24.378%, 10/1/35 (4)(6)(7)

    1,300        1,721,980   
                 
  $ 18,426,860   
                 

Industrial Development Revenue — 12.8%

  

ABIA Development Corp., TX, (Austin CargoPort Development), (AMT), 6.50%, 10/1/24

  $ 1,735      $ 1,541,166   

ABIA Development Corp., TX, (Austin CargoPort Development), (AMT), 9.25%, 10/1/21

    2,370        2,369,668   

Alabama Industrial Development Authority, (Pine City Fiber Co.), Series 1993, (AMT), 6.45%, 12/1/23

    6,325        6,324,494   

Alabama Industrial Development Authority, (Pine City Fiber Co.), Series 1994, (AMT), 6.45%, 12/1/23

    1,360        1,359,891   

Brazos River Harbor Navigation District of Brazoria County, TX, (Dow Chemical Co.), (AMT), 5.95%, 5/15/33

    9,085        10,376,433   

Butler, AL, Industrial Development Board, (Georgia-Pacific Corp.), (AMT), 5.75%, 9/1/28

    2,150        2,238,322   

Clayton County, GA, Development Authority, (Delta Airlines, Inc.), 8.75%, 6/1/29

    1,180        1,482,953   

Clayton County, GA, Development Authority, (Delta Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 9.00%, 6/1/35

    6,510        7,288,205   

Denver City and County, CO, (United Airlines), (AMT), 5.75%, 10/1/32

    1,300        1,350,986   

Hardeman County, TN, (Correctional Facilities Corp.), 7.75%, 8/1/17

    2,105        2,105,674   
 

 

  8   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Industrial Development Revenue (continued)

  

Illinois Finance Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Waste Management, Inc.), (AMT), 5.05%, 8/1/29

  $ 7,600      $ 8,050,680   

Maine Finance Authority, Solid Waste Disposal, (Casella Waste Systems, Inc.), (AMT),
6.25% to 2/1/17 (Put Date), 1/1/25

    2,175        2,236,009   

Maricopa County, AZ, Pollution Control Corp., (El Paso Electric Co.), 4.50%, 8/1/42

    6,300        6,519,240   

Maryland Economic Development Corp., (AFCO Cargo), (AMT), 6.50%, 7/1/24

    2,350        2,215,909   

Maryland Economic Development Corp., (AFCO Cargo), (AMT), 7.34%, 7/1/24

    470        471,133   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 5.125%, 9/15/23

    2,760        2,843,076   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 5.25%, 9/15/29

    8,285        8,472,158   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Continental Airlines), (AMT), 9.00%, 6/1/33

    635        651,827   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (New Jersey-American Water Co., Inc.), (AMT), 5.70%, 10/1/39

    6,245        7,006,765   

Niagara Area Development Corp., NY, Solid Waste Disposal Facility, (Covanta Energy), 5.25%, 11/1/42

    1,315        1,358,934   

Phenix City, AL, Industrial Development Board Environmental Improvement Revenue, (MeadWestvaco Coated Board), (AMT), 4.125%, 5/15/35

    5,455        5,388,067   

Phoenix, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (America West Airlines, Inc.), (AMT), 6.25%, 6/1/19

    8,200        7,658,308   

Selma, AL, Industrial Development Board, (International Paper Co.), 5.80%, 5/1/34

    4,230        4,816,024   

St. Charles Parish, LA, (Valero Energy Corp.), 4.00% to 6/1/22 (Put Date), 12/1/40

    2,340        2,589,421   
                 
  $ 96,715,343   
                 

Insured – Electric Utilities — 1.9%

  

Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Hawaiian Electric Co.), (FGIC), (AMT), 4.60%, 5/1/26

  $ 5,510      $ 5,715,247   

Matagorda County, TX, Navigation District No. 1, (AEP Texas Central Co.), (NPFG), (AMT), 5.20%, 5/1/30

    8,050        8,760,332   
                 
  $ 14,475,579   
                 

Insured – Other Revenue — 3.3%

  

Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/26

  $ 10,510      $ 5,054,574   

Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/28

    10,000        4,258,800   

Harris County-Houston, TX, Sports Authority, (NPFG), 0.00%, 11/15/34

    12,700        4,289,933   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Other Revenue (continued)

  

New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Queens Baseball Stadium), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/1/31

  $ 695      $ 706,579   

New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Queens Baseball Stadium), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/1/36

    3,215        3,244,417   

New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Queens Baseball Stadium), (AMBAC), 5.00%, 1/1/39

    150        151,160   

New York, NY, Industrial Development Agency, (Yankee Stadium), (AGC), 7.00%, 3/1/49

    5,650        6,981,874   
                 
  $ 24,687,337   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 2.3%

  

Miami-Dade County, FL, Professional Sports Franchise Facilities, (AGC), 7.00%, (0.00% until 10/1/19), 10/1/39

  $ 14,500      $ 12,796,830   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/43

    20,000        3,740,400   

Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., (NPFG), 0.00%, 8/1/45

    5,415        902,735   
                 
  $ 17,439,965   
                 

Insured – Student Loan — 2.2%

  

Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AGC), (AMT), 6.35%, 1/1/30

  $ 6,320      $ 7,055,837   

Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority, (AMBAC), (AMT), 4.70%, 1/1/33

    9,455        9,577,537   
                 
  $ 16,633,374   
                 

Insured – Transportation — 7.7%

  

E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/33

  $ 15,000      $ 4,982,400   

E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/34

    20,000        6,255,800   

E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/37

    6,665        1,910,456   

E-470 Public Highway Authority, CO, (NPFG), 0.00%, 9/1/38

    3,335        902,451   

North Texas Tollway Authority, (AGC),
6.20%, (0.00% until 1/1/15), 1/1/42

    10,000        10,967,100   

San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, (NPFG), 0.00%, 1/15/32

    20,335        7,516,426   

San Jose, CA, Airport, (AGM), (AMBAC), (BHAC), (AMT), 6.00%, 3/1/47

    7,150        8,018,653   

Texas Turnpike Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/25

    19,910        12,489,344   

Texas Turnpike Authority, (AMBAC), 0.00%, 8/15/30

    10,000        4,641,100   
                 
  $ 57,683,730   
                 

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 3.6%

  

Greenville County, SC, School District, 5.00%, 12/1/24 (2)

  $ 21,000      $ 23,959,530   

Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp., NY, 5.75%, 2/15/47

    2,765        3,304,949   
                 
  $ 27,264,479   
                 
 

 

  9   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Nursing Home — 0.4%

  

Mississippi Business Finance Corp., (Magnolia Healthcare), 7.99%, 7/1/25

  $ 970      $ 964,481   

Westmoreland County, PA, Industrial Development Authority, (Highland Health Systems, Inc.), 9.25%, 6/1/22

    2,305        1,789,740   
                 
  $ 2,754,221   
                 

Other Revenue — 11.6%

  

Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 6.00%, 7/15/30

  $ 1,150      $ 1,364,325   

Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 6.25%, 7/15/40

    1,290        1,523,890   

Brooklyn, NY, Arena Local Development Corp., (Barclays Center), 6.375%, 7/15/43

    700        829,927   

Central Falls, RI, Detention Facility Corp., 7.25%, 7/15/35

    6,355        5,527,325   

Children’s Trust Fund, PR, Tobacco Settlement, 0.00%, 5/15/55

    81,635        2,773,141   

Cow Creek Band Umpqua Tribe of Indians, OR, 5.625%, 10/1/26 (4)

    6,000        5,665,020   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Duke Farms Foundation), 5.00%, 7/1/48 (2)(3)

    7,200        7,969,536   

Non-Profit Preferred Funding Trust I, Various States, 5.17%, 9/15/37 (4)

    14,000        9,212,000   

Otero County, NM, Jail Project Revenue, 5.50%, 4/1/13

    145        144,929   

Otero County, NM, Jail Project Revenue, 5.75%, 4/1/18

    840        816,396   

Salt Verde Financial Corp., AZ, Senior Gas Revenue, 5.00%, 12/1/37

    3,135        3,603,244   

Seminole Tribe, FL, 5.25%, 10/1/27 (4)

    9,000        9,644,220   

Seminole Tribe, FL, 5.50%, 10/1/24 (4)

    6,135        6,680,831   

Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp. I, Gas Supply Revenue, 6.25%, 12/15/26

    4,295        5,576,499   

Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corp. III, Gas Supply Revenue, 5.00%, 12/15/32

    3,500        3,793,300   

Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., NJ, 5.00%, 6/1/41

    16,200        14,719,482   

White Earth Band of Chippewa Indians, MN, 6.375%, 12/1/26 (4)

    8,580        7,341,734   
                 
  $ 87,185,799   
                 

Senior Living / Life Care — 7.3%

  

Albermarle County, VA, Economic Development Authority, (Westminster-Canterbury Blue Ridge), 5.00%, 1/1/42

  $ 900      $ 900,657   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Southern California Presbyterian Homes), 4.75%, 11/15/26

    1,575        1,605,240   

California Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Southern California Presbyterian Homes), 4.875%, 11/15/36

    6,000        6,053,280   

Cliff House Trust, (AMT), 6.625%, 6/1/27 (1)

    3,000        1,575,420   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Senior Living / Life Care (continued)

  

Colorado Health Facilities Authority, (Covenant Retirement Communities, Inc.), 5.00%, 12/1/35

  $ 4,150      $ 4,277,281   

Fairfax County, VA, Economic Development Authority, (Goodwin House, Inc.), 5.125%, 10/1/37

    2,710        2,820,893   

Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Kahala Senior Living Community, Inc.), 5.125%, 11/15/32

    525        565,147   

Hawaii Department of Budget and Finance, (Kahala Senior Living Community, Inc.), 5.25%, 11/15/37

    480        519,082   

Indiana Finance Authority, (Marquette), 5.00%, 3/1/39

    1,000        1,046,400   

Kansas City, MO, Industrial Development Authority, (Kingswood United Methodist Manor), 5.875%, 11/15/29

    7,425        7,424,777   

Lee County, FL, Industrial Development Authority, (Shell Point Village/Alliance Community), 5.00%, 11/15/29

    7,000        7,089,740   

Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Edenwald), 5.40%, 1/1/37

    2,600        2,683,616   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (VOA Concord Assisted Living, Inc.), 5.125%, 11/1/27

    1,085        1,087,181   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (VOA Concord Assisted Living, Inc.), 5.20%, 11/1/41

    1,560        1,508,395   

North Miami, FL, Health Care Facilities, (Imperial Club), 7.00%, 1/1/42 (1)

    3,475        347,570   

North Miami, FL, Health Care Facilities, (Imperial Club), 7.625%, (0.00% until 1/1/17), 1/1/41 (1)

    7,315        731,646   

St. Joseph County, IN, Holy Cross Village, 5.70%, 5/15/28

    530        530,323   

St. Joseph County, IN, Holy Cross Village, 6.00%, 5/15/26

    1,225        1,272,530   

St. Joseph County, IN, Holy Cross Village, 6.00%, 5/15/38

    5,460        5,603,270   

Tempe, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Friendship Village of Tempe), 6.00%, 12/1/32

    450        487,463   

Tempe, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Friendship Village of Tempe), 6.25%, 12/1/42

    1,320        1,437,044   

Tompkins County, NY, Development Corp., (Kendal at Ithaca, Inc.), 4.25%, 7/1/32

    1,270        1,265,796   

Tompkins County, NY, Development Corp., (Kendal at Ithaca, Inc.), 4.50%, 7/1/42

    1,270        1,280,147   

Washington Housing Finance Commission, (Wesley Homes), 6.20%, 1/1/36

    2,500        2,690,625   
                 
  $ 54,803,523   
                 

Solid Waste — 0.7%

  

Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority, (American REF-FUEL Co.), (AMT), 6.45%, 11/15/22

  $ 5,610      $ 5,620,042   
                 
  $ 5,620,042   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 7.5%

  

Avelar Creek, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.375%, 5/1/36

  $ 1,260      $ 1,226,471   
 

 

  10   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Special Tax Revenue (continued)

  

Bridgeville, DE, (Heritage Shores Special Development District), 5.125%, 7/1/35

  $ 100      $ 87,013   

Bridgeville, DE, (Heritage Shores Special Development District), 5.45%, 7/1/35

    6,250        5,414,625   

Dupree Lakes, FL, Community Development District, 5.375%, 5/1/37

    3,225        3,031,500   

Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/31

    1,210        1,414,793   

Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/32

    1,165        1,354,592   

Illinois, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/33

    1,240        1,437,792   

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.25%, 7/1/32 (2)

    19,980        26,506,467   

New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), Series 2010A-1, 5.75%, 5/1/38

    550        436,354   

New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), Series 2010A-2,
5.75%, (0.00% until 11/1/14), 5/1/38

    1,390        611,600   

New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), Series 2010B-1, 5.00%, 5/1/15

    835        762,105   

New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), Series 2010B-2,
5.00%, (0.00% until 11/1/14), 5/1/18

    1,085        512,174   

New River, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.00%, 5/1/13 (1)

    1,005        10   

Poinciana West, FL, Community Development District, 6.00%, 5/1/37

    2,230        2,248,018   

River Hall, FL, Community Development District, (Capital Improvements), 5.45%, 5/1/36

    3,055        2,734,133   

Southern Hills Plantation I, FL, Community Development District, Series A1, 5.80%, 5/1/35

    1,383        1,174,890   

Southern Hills Plantation I, FL, Community Development District, Series A2, 5.80%, 5/1/35

    1,020        676,658   

Sterling Hill, FL, Community Development District, 5.50%, 5/1/37 (1)

    3,650        1,059,376   

University Square, FL, Community Development District, 5.875%, 5/1/38

    1,845        1,892,472   

Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, 6.75%, 10/1/37

    3,505        4,133,517   
                 
  $ 56,714,560   
                 

Student Loan — 0.7%

  

New Jersey Higher Education Student Assistance Authority, (AMT), 5.00%, 12/1/27

  $ 4,800      $ 5,187,024   
                 
  $ 5,187,024   
                 

Transportation — 12.7%

  

Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/31

  $ 565      $ 663,745   

Dallas and Fort Worth, TX, (Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport), (AMT), 5.00%, 11/1/38

    5,380        5,866,944   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Transportation (continued)

  

Dallas and Fort Worth, TX, (Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport), (AMT), 5.00%, 11/1/42

  $ 8,585      $ 9,282,188   

Miami-Dade County, FL, (Miami International Airport), 5.00%, 10/1/41

    4,430        4,912,516   

New Jersey Transportation Trust Fund Authority, (Transportation System), 5.875%, 12/15/38

    2,000        2,361,560   

North Texas Tollway Authority, 5.75%, 1/1/38

    7,150        7,943,936   

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Amtrak), (AMT), 5.00%, 11/1/41

    5,540        5,981,926   

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission,
5.35%, (0.00% until 12/1/15), 12/1/30

    560        546,918   

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission,
5.45%, (0.00% until 12/1/15), 12/1/35

    1,125        1,082,981   

Philadelphia, PA, Airport Revenue, (AMT), 5.00%, 6/15/26

    2,815        3,164,679   

Philadelphia, PA, Airport Revenue, (AMT), 5.00%, 6/15/27

    2,790        3,120,531   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 4.50%, 4/1/37 (2)

    10,000        10,921,500   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 4.75%, 4/15/37 (2)

    4,980        5,353,351   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 5.25%, 9/15/23 (2)

    5,025        5,772,418   

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, (AMT), 5.75%, 3/15/35 (2)

    9,990        11,677,211   

Route 460 Funding Corp., VA, 0.00%, 7/1/39

    4,700        1,234,643   

Route 460 Funding Corp., VA, 0.00%, 7/1/40

    9,890        2,463,203   

Route 460 Funding Corp., VA, 0.00%, 7/1/41

    10,630        2,499,219   

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (LBJ Express Managed Lanes Project), 7.00%, 6/30/34

    3,650        4,491,398   

Texas Private Activity Bond Surface Transportation Corp., (North Tarrant Express Managed Lanes Project), 6.875%, 12/31/39

    3,415        4,094,278   

Walker Field, Public Airport Authority, CO, 4.75%, 12/1/27

    1,090        1,136,260   

Walker Field, Public Airport Authority, CO, 5.00%, 12/1/22

    1,040        1,117,865   
                 
    $ 95,689,270   
                 

Water and Sewer — 0.6%

               

Detroit, MI, Sewage Disposal System, 5.00%, 7/1/32

  $ 1,490      $ 1,616,262   

Detroit, MI, Sewage Disposal System, 5.25%, 7/1/39

    2,485        2,711,359   
                 
    $ 4,327,621   
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities — 109.3%
(identified cost $775,951,955)

   

  $ 823,643,378   
   
 

 

  11   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Taxable Municipal Securities — 0.2%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Other Revenue — 0.2%

  

Pueblo of Santa Ana, NM, 15.00%, 4/1/24 (4)

  $ 1,569      $ 1,576,437   
   

Total Taxable Municipal Securities — 0.2%
(identified cost $1,568,500)

   

  $ 1,576,437   
   

Total Investments — 109.5%
(identified cost $777,520,455)

   

  $ 825,219,815   
   

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (9.5)%

  

  $ (71,676,783
   

Net Assets — 100.0%

  

  $ 753,543,032   
   

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.

 

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
AMT     Interest earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax.
BHAC     Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
MFMR     Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.

At January 31, 2013, the concentration of the Fund’s investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of net assets, is as follows:

 

Texas      16.8%   
New York      11.5%   
Others, representing less than 10% individually      81.2%   

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at January 31, 2013, 15.9% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.7% to 5.9% of total investments.

 

(1)

Defaulted security. Issuer has defaulted on the payment of interest or has filed for bankruptcy.

 

(2)

Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1I).

 

(3)  

Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $7,576,707.

(4)  

Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions (normally to qualified institutional buyers) and remain exempt from registration. At January 31, 2013, the aggregate value of these securities is $49,672,414 or 6.6% of the Fund’s net assets.

 

(5)

Defaulted matured bond.

 

(6)  

Security is subject to a shortfall agreement which may require the Fund to pay amounts to a counterparty in the event of a significant decline in the market value of the security held by the trust that issued the residual interest bond. In case of a shortfall, the maximum potential amount of payments the Fund could ultimately be required to make under the agreement is $5,200,000. However, such shortfall payment would be reduced by the proceeds from the sale of the security held by the trust that issued the residual interest bond.

 

(7)  

Security has been issued as a leveraged residual interest bond with a variable interest rate. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at January 31, 2013.

 

 

  12   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

 

 

Assets   January 31, 2013  

Investments, at value (identified cost, $777,520,455)

  $ 825,219,815   

Cash

    21,906,488   

Restricted cash*

    1,275,000   

Interest receivable

    9,069,400   

Receivable for investments sold

    2,326,122   

Receivable for Fund shares sold

    2,209,044   

Total assets

  $ 862,005,869   
Liabilities        

Payable for floating rate notes issued

  $ 95,167,000   

Payable for investments purchased

    8,817,021   

Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts

    139,352   

Payable for Fund shares redeemed

    2,887,947   

Distributions payable

    572,780   

Payable to affiliates:

 

Investment adviser fee

    300,212   

Distribution and service fees

    239,548   

Interest expense and fees payable

    148,949   

Accrued expenses

    190,028   

Total liabilities

  $ 108,462,837   

Net Assets

  $ 753,543,032   
Sources of Net Assets        

Paid-in capital

  $ 944,451,484   

Accumulated net realized loss

    (242,848,571

Accumulated undistributed net investment income

    1,917,108   

Net unrealized appreciation

    50,023,011   

Net Assets

  $ 753,543,032   
Class A Shares        

Net Assets

  $ 411,671,072   

Shares Outstanding

    46,625,616   

Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share

 

(net assets ÷ shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

  $ 8.83   

Maximum Offering Price Per Share

 

(100 ÷ 95.25 of net asset value per share)

  $ 9.27   
Class B Shares        

Net Assets

  $ 14,918,613   

Shares Outstanding

    1,695,143   

Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share**

 

(net assets ÷ shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

  $ 8.80   
Class C Shares        

Net Assets

  $ 165,886,974   

Shares Outstanding

    20,303,052   

Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share**

 

(net assets ÷ shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

  $ 8.17   
Class I Shares        

Net Assets

  $ 161,066,373   

Shares Outstanding

    18,224,550   

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share

 

(net assets ÷ shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

  $ 8.84   

On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.

 

* Represents restricted cash on deposit at the broker for open financial futures contracts.

 

** Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.

 

  13   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Statement of Operations

 

 

Investment Income   Year Ended
January 31, 2013
 

Interest

  $ 42,827,692   

Total investment income

  $ 42,827,692   
Expenses        

Investment adviser fee

  $ 3,466,804   

Distribution and service fees

 

Class A

    978,892   

Class B

    188,077   

Class C

    1,580,627   

Trustees’ fees and expenses

    28,338   

Custodian fee

    220,155   

Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees

    278,639   

Legal and accounting services

    98,662   

Printing and postage

    42,401   

Registration fees

    99,242   

Interest expense and fees

    720,296   

Miscellaneous

    129,731   

Total expenses

  $ 7,831,864   

Deduct —

 

Reduction of custodian fee

  $ 2,002   

Total expense reductions

  $ 2,002   

Net expenses

  $ 7,829,862   

Net investment income

  $ 34,997,830   
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)        

Net realized gain (loss) —

 

Investment transactions

  $ (88,448

Financial futures contracts

    (4,698,306

Net realized loss

  $ (4,786,754

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —

 

Investments

  $ 40,756,452   

Financial futures contracts

    3,942,479   

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

  $ 44,698,931   

Net realized and unrealized gain

  $ 39,912,177   

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 74,910,007   

 

  14   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

 

 

    Year Ended January 31,  
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   2013     2012  

From operations —

   

Net investment income

  $ 34,997,830      $ 37,918,453   

Net realized loss from investment transactions and financial futures contracts

    (4,786,754     (33,107,079

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and financial futures contracts

    44,698,931        104,351,628   

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 74,910,007      $ 109,163,002   

Distributions to shareholders —

   

From net investment income

   

Class A

  $ (19,357,383   $ (20,828,601

Class B

    (795,352     (1,388,597

Class C

    (6,624,499     (7,070,825

Class I

    (7,464,322     (5,846,926

Total distributions to shareholders

  $ (34,241,556   $ (35,134,949

Transactions in shares of beneficial interest —

   

Proceeds from sale of shares

   

Class A

  $ 126,685,379      $ 63,503,662   

Class B

    383,870        1,280,839   

Class C

    33,034,684        17,610,938   

Class I

    87,235,591        69,021,628   

Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

   

Class A

    15,738,852        13,444,013   

Class B

    598,710        783,207   

Class C

    4,644,623        4,099,244   

Class I

    6,055,559        4,567,170   

Cost of shares redeemed

   

Class A

    (135,548,463     (111,482,718

Class B

    (3,692,603     (5,880,584

Class C

    (27,638,412     (31,104,988

Class I

    (65,506,925     (25,653,556

Net asset value of shares exchanged

   

Class A

    6,409,319        7,617,143   

Class B

    (6,409,319     (7,617,143

Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions

  $ 41,990,865      $ 188,855   

Net increase in net assets

  $ 82,659,316      $ 74,216,908   
Net Assets                

At beginning of year

  $ 670,883,716      $ 596,666,808   

At end of year

  $ 753,543,032      $ 670,883,716   
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
included in net assets
               

At end of year

  $ 1,917,108      $ 1,776,475   

 

  15   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Statement of Cash Flows

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities   Year Ended
January 31, 2013
 

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 74,910,007   

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash used in operating activities:

 

Investments purchased

    (205,698,488

Investments sold

    175,173,472   

Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount)

    (5,391,422

Increase in restricted cash

    (1,275,000

Increase in interest receivable

    (212,394

Decrease in payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts

    (149,500

Increase in payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee

    25,837   

Increase in payable to affiliate for distribution and service fees

    21,329   

Decrease in interest expense and fees payable

    (4,893

Increase in accrued expenses

    9,579   

Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments

    (40,756,452

Net realized loss from investments

    88,448   

Net cash used in operating activities

  $ (3,259,477
Cash Flows From Financing Activities        

Proceeds from Fund shares sold

  $ 247,304,836   

Fund shares redeemed

    (231,425,127

Distributions paid, net of reinvestments

    (7,394,487

Proceeds from secured borrowings

    30,510,000   

Repayment of secured borrowings

    (21,630,000

Net cash provided by financing activities

  $ 17,365,222   

Net increase in cash

  $ 14,105,745   

Cash at beginning of year

  $ 7,800,743   

Cash at end of year

  $ 21,906,488   
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        

Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of:

 

Reinvestment of dividends and distributions

  $ 27,037,744   

Cash paid for interest and fees

    725,189   

 

  16   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights

 

 

    Class A  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011     2010     2009  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 8.340      $ 7.410      $ 7.900      $ 6.440      $ 9.780   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income (1)

  $ 0.434      $ 0.491      $ 0.472      $ 0.488      $ 0.504   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    0.481        0.894        (0.479     1.452        (3.351

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 0.915      $ 1.385      $ (0.007   $ 1.940      $ (2.847
Less Distributions                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.425   $ (0.455   $ (0.483   $ (0.480   $ (0.493

Total distributions

  $ (0.425   $ (0.455   $ (0.483   $ (0.480   $ (0.493

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 8.830      $ 8.340      $ 7.410      $ 7.900      $ 6.440   

Total Return (2)

    11.23     19.34     (0.35 )%      31.04     (29.94 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 411,671      $ 376,496      $ 361,171      $ 481,346      $ 407,816   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    0.86     0.93     0.99     1.00     0.97

Interest and fee expense (3)

    0.10     0.11     0.12     0.11     0.35

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.96     1.04     1.11     1.11     1.32

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    0.86     0.93     0.99     1.00     0.96

Net investment income

    5.05     6.35     5.90     6.72     5.97

Portfolio Turnover

    22     19     12     22     35

 

(1)  

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(3)  

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1I).

 

  17   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Class B  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011     2010     2009  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 8.310      $ 7.390      $ 7.880      $ 6.430      $ 9.750   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income (1)

  $ 0.370      $ 0.433      $ 0.410      $ 0.432      $ 0.440   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    0.479        0.883        (0.477     1.448        (3.336

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 0.849      $ 1.316      $ (0.067   $ 1.880      $ (2.896
Less Distributions                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.359   $ (0.396   $ (0.423   $ (0.430   $ (0.424

Total distributions

  $ (0.359   $ (0.396   $ (0.423   $ (0.430   $ (0.424

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 8.800      $ 8.310      $ 7.390      $ 7.880      $ 6.430   

Total Return (2)

    10.42     18.35     (1.09 )%      30.02     (30.42 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 14,919      $ 22,973      $ 31,380      $ 46,335      $ 46,123   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.62     1.68     1.74     1.76     1.72

Interest and fee expense (3)

    0.10     0.11     0.12     0.11     0.35

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.72     1.79     1.86     1.87     2.07

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.62     1.68     1.74     1.76     1.71

Net investment income

    4.34     5.64     5.14     5.99     5.23

Portfolio Turnover

    22     19     12     22     35

 

(1)  

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(3)  

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1I).

 

  18   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Class C  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011     2010     2009  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 7.720      $ 6.860      $ 7.310      $ 5.970      $ 9.050   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income (1)

  $ 0.341      $ 0.400      $ 0.380      $ 0.401      $ 0.408   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    0.442        0.827        (0.437     1.339        (3.095

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 0.783      $ 1.227      $ (0.057   $ 1.740      $ (2.687
Less Distributions                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.333   $ (0.367   $ (0.393   $ (0.400   $ (0.393

Total distributions

  $ (0.333   $ (0.367   $ (0.393   $ (0.400   $ (0.393

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 8.170      $ 7.720      $ 6.860      $ 7.310      $ 5.970   

Total Return (2)

    10.35     18.44     (1.02 )%      29.92     (30.40 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 165,887      $ 146,788      $ 139,798      $ 162,425      $ 123,933   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    1.61     1.68     1.73     1.75     1.72

Interest and fee expense (3)

    0.10     0.11     0.12     0.11     0.35

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.71     1.79     1.85     1.86     2.07

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    1.61     1.68     1.73     1.75     1.71

Net investment income

    4.30     5.60     5.14     5.95     5.23

Portfolio Turnover

    22     19     12     22     35

 

(1)  

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(3)  

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1I).

 

  19   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Class I  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011     2010     2009  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 8.350      $ 7.420      $ 7.910      $ 6.440      $ 9.780   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                        

Net investment income (1)

  $ 0.455      $ 0.504      $ 0.486      $ 0.505      $ 0.520   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)

    0.482        0.900        (0.474     1.461        (3.345

Total income (loss) from operations

  $ 0.937      $ 1.404      $ 0.012      $ 1.966      $ (2.825
Less Distributions                                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.447   $ (0.474   $ (0.502   $ (0.496   $ (0.515

Total distributions

  $ (0.447   $ (0.474   $ (0.502   $ (0.496   $ (0.515

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 8.840      $ 8.350      $ 7.420      $ 7.910      $ 6.440   

Total Return (2)

    11.50     19.60     (0.12 )%      31.48     (29.75 )% 
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 161,066      $ 124,627      $ 64,318      $ 27,780      $ 3,442   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

         

Expenses excluding interest and fees

    0.61     0.68     0.73     0.74     0.71

Interest and fee expense (3)

    0.10     0.11     0.12     0.11     0.35

Total expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.71     0.79     0.85     0.85     1.06

Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees

    0.61     0.68     0.73     0.74     0.70

Net investment income

    5.29     6.49     6.10     6.66     6.57

Portfolio Turnover

    22     19     12     22     35

 

(1)  

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3)  

Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1I).

 

  20   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements

 

 

1  Significant Accounting Policies

Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund seeks to provide high current income exempt from regular federal income tax. The Fund primarily invests in high yield municipal obligations with maturities of ten years or more. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Beginning January 1, 2012, Class B shares are only available for purchase upon exchange from another Eaton Vance fund or through reinvestment of distributions. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

A  Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are valued at the closing settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Fund in a manner that fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker/dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.

B  Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.

C  Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in non-taxable municipal securities, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by the Fund, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.

At January 31, 2013, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $195,870,739 and current year deferred capital losses of $48,252,392 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The capital loss carryforward will expire on January 31, 2014 ($6,453,293), January 31, 2016 ($14,863,328), January 31, 2017 ($49,195,524), January 31, 2018 ($115,791,581) and January 31, 2019 ($9,567,013). The current year deferred capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Fund’s next taxable year and are treated as realized prior to the utilization of the capital loss carryforward.

As of January 31, 2013, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. The Fund files a U.S. federal income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years from the date of filing.

D  Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.

 

  21  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

E  Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.

F  Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.

G  Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

H  Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.

I  Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Fund may invest in residual interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating rate securities, whereby the Fund may sell a variable or fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Fund buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker. The broker deposits a bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the broker by the Fund, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the bond purchased from the Fund (the Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held by the Fund gives the Fund the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Bond held by the SPV to the Fund, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Fund exercise such right, it would generally pay the broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Fund accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in its Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Accordingly, the fair value of the payable for floating rate notes issued approximates its carrying value. If measured at fair value, the payable for floating rate notes would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 11) at January 31, 2013. Interest expense related to the Fund’s liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Fund, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At January 31, 2013, the amount of the Fund’s Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the related collateral were $95,167,000 and $158,959,715, respectively. The range of interest rates on the Floating Rate Notes outstanding at January 31, 2013 was 0.10% to 0.25%. For the year ended January 31, 2013, the Fund’s average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate including fees were $92,777,000 and 0.78%, respectively.

The Fund may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which the Fund agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Fund had no shortfalls as of January 31, 2013.

The Fund may also purchase residual interest bonds from brokers in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.

The Fund’s investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Fund’s investment policies do not allow the Fund to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Fund’s restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Fund’s restrictions apply. Residual interest bonds held by the Fund are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.

 

  22  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

J  Financial Futures Contracts — Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Fund. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.

K  When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Fund may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Fund maintains security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.

L  Statement of Cash Flows — The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Fund is the amount included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any short-term investments.

2  Distributions to Shareholders

The net investment income of the Fund is determined daily and substantially all of the net investment income so determined is declared as a dividend to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Distributions are paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards, if any) are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.

The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended January 31, 2013 and January 31, 2012 was as follows:

 

    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013      2012  

Distributions declared from:

    

Tax-exempt income

  $ 33,462,523       $ 35,033,065   

Ordinary income

  $ 779,033       $ 101,884   

During the year ended January 31, 2013, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $23,647,951, accumulated undistributed net investment income was decreased by $615,641 and paid-in capital was decreased by $23,032,310 due to expired capital loss carryforwards and differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for accretion of market discount and expenditures on defaulted bonds. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.

As of January 31, 2013, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:

 

Undistributed tax-exempt income

  $ 2,845,534   

Capital loss carryforward and deferred capital losses

  $ (244,123,131

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 50,941,925   

Other temporary differences

  $ (572,780

The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders, wash sales, futures contracts, residual interest bonds, expenditures on defaulted bonds, defaulted bond interest and accretion of market discount.

 

  23  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

3  Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

The investment adviser fee is earned by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM), as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement and subsequent fee reduction agreements between the Fund and BMR, the fee is based upon a percentage of average daily net assets plus a percentage of gross income (i.e., income other than gains from the sale of securities) as presented in the following table and is payable monthly.

 

Daily Net Assets   Annual Asset
Rate
     Daily Income
Rate
 

Up to $500 million

    0.3150      3.1500

$500 million but less than $750 million

    0.2925         2.9250   

$750 million but less than $1 billion

    0.2700         2.9250   

$1 billion but less than $1.5 billion

    0.2700         2.7000   

On average daily net assets of $1.5 billion or more, the rates are further reduced. The fee reductions cannot be terminated without the consent of the Trustees and shareholders. For the year ended January 31, 2013, the investment adviser fee amounted to $3,466,804 or 0.49% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. EVM serves as the administrator of the Fund, but receives no compensation. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended January 31, 2013, EVM earned $12,766 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $129,687 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended January 31, 2013. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).

Trustees and officers of the Fund who are members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Fund who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended January 31, 2013, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund are officers of the above organizations.

4  Distribution Plans

The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the Class A Plan, the Fund pays EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended January 31, 2013 amounted to $978,892 for Class A shares.

The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the Class B and Class C Plans, the Fund pays EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended January 31, 2013, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $141,058 and $1,185,470 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets for Class B and Class C shares. At January 31, 2013, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $9,229,000 and $32,129,000, respectively.

Pursuant to the Class B and Class C Plans, the Fund also makes payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts equal to 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended January 31, 2013 amounted to $47,019 and $395,157 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.

5  Contingent Deferred Sales Charges

A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within eighteen months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at

 

  24  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended January 31, 2013, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $2,000, $28,000 and $6,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.

6  Purchases and Sales of Investments

Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $192,466,635 and $173,464,707, respectively, for the year ended January 31, 2013.

7  Shares of Beneficial Interest

The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:

 

    Year Ended January 31,  
Class A   2013      2012  

Sales

    14,609,849         8,170,023   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    1,830,088         1,733,505   

Redemptions

    (15,715,863      (14,468,455

Exchange from Class B shares

    749,767         980,073   

Net increase (decrease)

    1,473,841         (3,584,854
    
    Year Ended January 31,  
Class B   2013      2012  

Sales

    44,726         164,979   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    70,072         101,480   

Redemptions

    (431,682      (767,833

Exchange to Class A shares

    (751,874      (982,879

Net decrease

    (1,068,758      (1,484,253
    
    Year Ended January 31,  
Class C   2013      2012  

Sales

    4,162,312         2,447,498   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    583,536         571,124   

Redemptions

    (3,466,419      (4,381,497

Net increase (decrease)

    1,279,429         (1,362,875

 

  25  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

    Year Ended January 31,  
Class I   2013      2012  

Sales

    10,095,198         8,990,368   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    703,073         586,498   

Redemptions

    (7,505,361      (3,316,956

Net increase

    3,292,910         6,259,910   

8  Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments

The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Fund at January 31, 2013, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:

 

Aggregate cost

  $ 679,110,890   

Gross unrealized appreciation

  $ 84,450,581   

Gross unrealized depreciation

    (33,508,656

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 50,941,925   

9  Line of Credit

The Fund participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $600 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Fund solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.08% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. Because the line of credit is not available exclusively to the Fund, it may be unable to borrow some or all of its requested amounts at any particular time. The Fund did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended January 31, 2013.

10  Financial Instruments

The Fund may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Fund has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.

A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at January 31, 2013 is as follows:

 

Futures Contracts  
Expiration
Month/Year
  Contracts    Position    Aggregate Cost      Value      Net
Unrealized
Appreciation
 
3/13   325
U.S. 10-Year Treasury Note
   Short    $ (43,242,266    $ (42,666,406    $ 575,860   
3/13   268
U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bond
   Short      (40,197,416      (38,449,625      1,747,791   
       $ 2,323,651   

At January 31, 2013, the Fund had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.

The Fund is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective. Because the Fund holds fixed-rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. The Fund purchases and sells U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.

 

  26  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

The fair value of open derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at January 31, 2013 was as follows:

 

    Fair Value  
      Asset Derivative      Liability Derivative  

Futures Contracts

  $ 2,323,651 (1)      $         —   

Total

  $ 2,323,651       $   

 

(1)  

Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable.

The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the year ended January 31, 2013 was as follows:

 

      Realized Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives Recognized
in Income
     Change in Unrealized
Appreciation (Depreciation) on
Derivatives Recognized in  Income
 

Futures Contracts

  $ (4,698,306 ) (1)      $ 3,942,479 (2)  

 

(1)  

Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts.

 

(2)  

Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts.

The average notional amount of futures contracts outstanding during the year ended January 31, 2013, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately $59,300,000.

11  Fair Value Measurements

Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.

 

Ÿ  

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

 

Ÿ  

Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

 

Ÿ  

Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

At January 31, 2013, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments and open derivative instruments, which are carried at value, were as follows:

 

Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities

  $       $ 823,643,378       $         —       $ 823,643,378   

Taxable Municipal Securities

            1,576,437                 1,576,437   

Total Investments

  $       $ 825,219,815       $       $ 825,219,815   

Futures Contracts

  $ 2,323,651       $       $       $ 2,323,651   

Total

  $ 2,323,651       $ 825,219,815       $       $ 827,543,466   

The Fund held no investments or other financial instruments as of January 31, 2012 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs. At January 31, 2013, there were no investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year then ended.

 

  27  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II and Shareholders of Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund:

We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II), including the portfolio of investments, as of January 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund as of January 31, 2013, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 19, 2013

 

  28  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Federal Tax Information (Unaudited)

 

 

The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2014 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2013. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code and/or regulations, shareholders must be notified regarding exempt-interest dividends.

Exempt-Interest Dividends.   The Fund designates 97.72% of dividends from net investment income as an exempt-interest dividend.

 

  29  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Management and Organization

 

 

Fund Management.   The Trustees of Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II (the Trust) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below. Each Trustee oversees 183 portfolios in the Eaton Vance Complex (including all master and feeder funds in a master feeder structure). Each officer serves as an officer of certain other Eaton Vance funds. Each Trustee and officer serves until his or her successor is elected.

 

Name and Year of Birth   

Position(s)

with the

Trust

    

Length of

Service

    

Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships

During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience

Interested Trustee

Thomas E. Faust Jr.

1958

   Trustee      Since 2007     

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 183 registered investment companies. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust.

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) Director of EVC and Hexavest Inc.

            

Noninterested Trustees

Scott E. Eston

1956

   Trustee      Since 2011     

Private investor. Formerly held various positions at Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo and Co., L.L.C. (investment management firm) (1997-2009), including Chief Operating Officer (2002-2009), Chief Financial Officer (1997-2009) and Chairman of the Executive Committee (2002-2008); President and Principal Executive Officer, GMO Trust (open-end registered investment company) (2006-2009). Former Partner, Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P. (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (public accounting firm) (1987-1997).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. None.

Benjamin C. Esty

1963

   Trustee      Since 2005     

Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

Allen R. Freedman

1940

   Trustee      Since 2007     

Private Investor. Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Former Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). Former Chief Executive Officer of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) (1979-2000).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) Director of Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries). Formerly, Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) (1979-2011).

William H. Park

1947

   Trustee      Since 2003     

Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Financial Officer, Aveon Group L.P. (investment management firm) (2010-2011). Formerly, Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (2006-2010). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Asset Management Corporation (investment management firm) (1982-2001). Formerly, Senior Manager, Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm) (1972-1981).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

Ronald A. Pearlman

1940

   Trustee      Since 2003     

Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. Formerly, Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) and Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy), U.S. Department of the Treasury (1983-1985). Formerly, Chief of Staff, Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress (1988-1990).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

 

  30  


Eaton Vance

High Yield Municipal Income Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Management and Organization — continued

 

 

Name and Year of Birth   

Position(s)

with the

Trust

    

Length of

Service

    

Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships

During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience

Noninterested Trustees (continued)

Helen Frame Peters

1948

   Trustee      Since 2008     

Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Formerly, Dean, Carroll School of Management, Boston College (2000-2002). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income, Scudder Kemper Investments (investment management firm) (1998-1999). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Equity and Fixed Income, Colonial Management Associates (investment management firm) (1991-1998).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) Formerly, Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) (2004-2011). Formerly, Trustee of SPDR Index Shares Funds and SPDR Series Trust (exchange traded funds) (2000-2009). Formerly, Director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (a bank for banks) (2007-2009).

Lynn A. Stout

1957

   Trustee      Since 1998     

Distinguished Professor of Corporate and Business Law, Jack G. Clarke Business Law Institute, Cornell University Law School. Formerly, the Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (2006-2012) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law.

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

Harriett Tee Taggart

1948

   Trustee      Since 2011     

Managing Director, Taggart Associates (a professional practice firm). Formerly, Partner and Senior Vice President, Wellington Management Company, LLP (investment management firm) (1983-2006).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. Director of Albemarle Corporation (chemicals manufacturer) (since 2007) and The Hanover Group (specialty property and casualty insurance company) (since 2009). Formerly, Director of Lubrizol Corporation (specialty chemicals) (2007-2011).

Ralph F. Verni

1943

  

Chairman of the Board and

Trustee

     Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005     

Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer (1982-1992), Chief Financial Officer (1988-1990) and Director (1982-1992), New England Life. Formerly, Chairperson, New England Mutual Funds (1982-1992). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street Management & Research (1992-2000). Formerly, Chairperson, State Street Research Mutual Funds (1992-2000). Formerly, Director, W.P. Carey, LLC (1998-2004) and First Pioneer Farm Credit Corp. (2002-2006).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

Principal Officers who are not Trustees

Name and Year of Birth   

Position(s)

with the

Trust

    

Length of

Service

    

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past Five Years

Cynthia J. Clemson

1963

   President      Since 2005      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Payson F. Swaffield

1956

   Vice President      Since 2011      Vice President and Chief Income Investment Officer of EVM and BMR.

Maureen A. Gemma

1960

   Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer      Vice President since 2011; Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

James F. Kirchner (2)

1967

   Treasurer      Since 2013      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Paul M. O’Neil

1953

   Chief Compliance Officer      Since 2004      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

 

(1)  

During their respective tenures, the Trustees (except Mr. Eston and Ms. Taggart) also served as trustees of one or more of the following Eaton Vance funds (which operated in the years noted): Eaton Vance Credit Opportunities Fund (launched in 2005 and terminated in 2010); Eaton Vance Insured Florida Plus Municipal Bond Fund (launched in 2002 and terminated in 2009); and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Trust (launched in 1998 and terminated in 2009).

 

(2)  

Prior to 2013, Mr. Kirchner served as Assistant Treasurer of the Trust since 2007.

The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.

 

  31  


Eaton Vance Funds

 

IMPORTANT NOTICES

 

 

Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:

 

Ÿ  

Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions.

 

Ÿ  

None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers.

 

Ÿ  

Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information.

 

Ÿ  

We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.

Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton Vance Management’s Real Estate Investment Group and Boston Management and Research. In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial advisor/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such advisor’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.

Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial advisor. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial advisor.

Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).

Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122 and by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

 

  32  


Investment Adviser

Boston Management and Research

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

Administrator

Eaton Vance Management

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

Principal Underwriter*

Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

(617) 482-8260

Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company

200 Clarendon Street

Boston, MA 02116

Transfer Agent

BNY Mellon Investment Servicing (US) Inc.

Attn: Eaton Vance Funds

P.O. Box 9653

Providence, RI 02940-9653

(800) 262-1122

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Deloitte & Touche LLP

200 Berkeley Street

Boston, MA 02116-5022

Fund Offices

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

 
* FINRA BrokerCheck.   Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing this program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.


LOGO

 

416-3/13    HYSRC


LOGO

 

 

Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

 

Annual Report

January 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

LOGO


 

 

 

Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.

This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus or summary prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully a Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. A Fund’s current prospectus or summary prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information, please call 1-800-262-1122.


Annual Report January 31, 2013

Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

Table of Contents

 

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance

     2   

Performance and Fund Profile

  
  

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

     4   

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

     6   

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

     8   
  

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

     10   

Fund Expenses

     11   

Financial Statements

     13   

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     47   

Federal Tax Information

     48   

Management and Organization

     49   

Important Notices

     51   


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance 1

 

 

Economic and Market Conditions

Two intertwined forces dominated fixed-income markets during the 12-month period ended January 31, 2013: a low interest-rate environment that drove investors to search for yield; and investors’ increased appetite for risk.

Highly accommodative monetary policies instituted by central banks around the world exerted an unusual amount of influence on financial markets, pushing interest rates to historic lows. The U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) acted several times during the period to maintain downward pressure on rates. In spring 2012, the Fed extended Operation Twist, the central bank’s swapping of its short-term holdings for long-term Treasury bonds. In September 2012, the Fed began purchasing approximately $40 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) monthly. And in December 2012, it replaced Operation Twist, which was expiring, with outright purchases of another $40 billion or so of Treasuries and agency MBS each month. This downward pressure on yields drove investors to look elsewhere for income. The result was that many investors increased their allocation to higher-yielding bonds, pushing up prices for those securities.

At the same time, improving economic conditions, especially in the second half of the period ended January 31, 2013, made fixed-income investors more comfortable with riskier asset classes. In the United States, unemployment began to gradually decline, and the battered housing market appeared to be finally turning around — in part because of the Fed’s downward pressure on mortgage rates. Overseas, actions by the European Central Bank calmed many investors’ fears that Europe’s debt crisis would lead to a fracturing of the eurozone and drag the U.S. and global economies back into recession.

Against this backdrop, municipal bonds rallied during the one-year period ended January 31, 2013, led by the long end of the yield curve and lower credit-quality bonds. The Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index 2 — an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the United States — returned 4.80% for the period. As yields on high-quality bonds fell, investors moved out on the yield curve, buying longer-maturity municipal bonds to potentially take advantage of higher yields at the long end of the yield curve. In their quest for income, investors also favored lower-quality, higher-yielding issues over higher-quality, lower-yielding bonds. As a result, longer-

duration 7 , lower-credit-quality bonds were the best performers in the municipal space during the period.

For the one-year period ended January 31, 2013, municipal bonds outperformed Treasuries and offered higher taxable-equivalent yields.

Fund Performance

For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2013, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies (TABS) Short Term Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies (TABS) Intermediate Term Fund Class A shares at net asset value (NAV) underperformed their respective benchmark indexes. During the same time period, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies (TABS) Long Term Fund Class A shares at NAV outperformed that Fund’s benchmark.

The TABS Short Term, TABS Intermediate Term and TABS Long Term Funds seek after-tax total return. The Funds invest in municipals, Treasury and agency bonds of high quality — generally rated AA 6 and above — and of limited, intermediate or long duration, respectively. Management strives to add value by crossing over from municipals to U.S. government bonds and vice versa, according to which sector is more attractively valued at a given time. Management also pursues after-tax total return through relative value trading to take advantage of inefficiencies within the municipal market. The Funds do not employ leverage or hedging as part of their strategy.

For all three Funds, the strategy of overweighting higher-quality bonds detracted from relative performance versus their respective benchmarks, as lower-rated municipal bonds outperformed higher-rated issues during the 12-month period. In contrast, relative value trading was a positive contributor to relative results versus their respective benchmarks for all Funds.

Because municipal bonds were more attractively valued than Treasuries throughout the period, all Funds were fully invested in municipal bonds during the fiscal year and the crossover strategy was not employed.

All three Funds maintained a duration close to that of their respective benchmarks during the period, and duration was not a material factor in the relative performance of any Fund.

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are before taxes unless otherwise noted. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  2  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance 1 — continued

 

 

Fund-specific Results

Eaton Vance TABS Short Term Fund Class A shares at NAV returned 1.20%, underperforming the 2.41% return of the Fund’s primary benchmark, the Barclays Capital 5 Year Municipal Bond Index.

The primary detractor from the Fund’s performance versus its benchmark during the period was an overweighting in higher-quality issues, as noted earlier. Whereas the Fund had a small investment in bonds rated below AA, the Barclays Index held an average 20% position in A-rated issues and an average 7% position in BBB-rated issues during a period when lower-rated bonds outperformed. In contrast, relative value trading contributed to Fund performance versus its benchmark.

Eaton Vance TABS Intermediate Term Fund Class A shares at NAV returned 2.79%, lagging the 2.99% return of the Fund’s primary benchmark, the Barclays Capital Managed Money Intermediate (1-17 Year) Index.

As with the TABS Short Term Fund, higher credit-quality was the primary detractor from TABS Intermediate Term Fund’s performance relative to its benchmark during the period. Although TABS Intermediate Term Fund and its benchmark were both limited to investing in bonds rated AA and higher, the Fund had an average 47% weighting in AAA issues during the period, while its benchmark had a smaller 23% weighting in that highest-rated category.

In contrast, yield curve positioning aided relative performance versus the Index during the 12-month period. While TABS Intermediate Term Fund’s benchmark is limited to bonds with 17 or fewer years remaining to maturity, the Fund held, on average over the period, 7% of holdings in issues with maturities beyond 17 years — during a period when longer-maturity bonds outperformed. As noted earlier, relative value trading also contributed to results versus the benchmark.

Eaton Vance TABS Long Term Fund Class A shares at NAV returned 6.55%, outperforming the 5.94% return of the Fund’s primary benchmark, the Barclays Capital Managed Money 10+ Year Index.

Relative value trading was the primary contributor to TABS Long Term Fund’s outperformance versus its benchmark during the period. Detractors from relative results versus the benchmark included an overweighting in high-quality issues as well as yield curve positioning. On average over the period, the Fund had 45% of its assets in AAA-rated issues, while

its Barclays benchmark held only 17.5% of its assets in that highest-credit-quality category. With regard to yield curve positioning, the Fund was overweighted in the 15- to 20-year area of the yield curve and underweighted in the 20- to 30-year portion of the yield curve, during a period when longer-maturity bonds outperformed shorter-maturity issues.

 

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are before taxes unless otherwise noted. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  3  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Performance 2,3

 

Portfolio Managers James H. Evans, CFA, Brian C. Barney, CFA and Brian D. Clouser, CFA

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Since
Inception
 

Class A at NAV

     03/27/2009         1.20      3.69

Class A with 2.25% Maximum Sales Charge

             –1.09         3.08   

Class C at NAV

     03/27/2009         0.41         2.94   

Class C with 1% Maximum Sales Charge

             –0.57         2.94   

Class I at NAV

     03/27/2009         1.45         3.94   
                            

Barclays Capital 5 Year Municipal Bond Index

     03/27/2009         2.41      4.99

Barclays Capital Managed Money 1-7 Year Index

     03/27/2009         1.68         4.02   
        
% After-Tax Returns with Maximum Sales Charge    Inception Date      One Year      Since
Inception
 

Class A After Taxes on Distributions

     03/27/2009         –1.43      2.80

Class A After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             0.14         2.55   

Class C After Taxes on Distributions

     03/27/2009         –0.92         2.69   

Class C After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             0.23         2.32   

Class I After Taxes on Distributions

     03/27/2009         1.09         3.66   

Class I After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             1.70         3.28   
        
% Total Annual Operating Expense Ratios 4    Class A      Class C      Class I  
     0.89      1.64      0.64
        
% Distribution Rates/Yields 5    Class A      Class C      Class I  

Distribution Rate

     0.28              0.47

SEC 30-day Yield

     –0.05         –0.79      0.20   

Growth of $10,000

 

This graph shows the change in value of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A of the Fund for the period indicated. For comparison, the same investment is shown in the indicated index.

 

LOGO

 

Growth of Investment    Amount Invested    Period Beginning    At NAV   With Maximum
Sales Charge

Class C

   $10,000    03/27/2009    $11,180   N.A.

Class I

   $250,000    03/27/2009    $290,175   N.A.

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are before taxes unless otherwise noted. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  4  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Fund Profile

 

 

Credit Quality (% of total investments) 6

 

LOGO

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

 

  5  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Performance 2,3

 

Portfolio Managers James H. Evans, CFA, Brian C. Barney, CFA and Christopher J. Harshman

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Since
Inception
 

Class A at NAV

     02/01/2010         2.79      7.76

Class A with 2.25% Maximum Sales Charge

             0.49         6.94   

Class C at NAV

     02/01/2010         1.98         6.96   

Class C with 1% Maximum Sales Charge

             0.98         6.96   

Class I at NAV

     02/01/2010         3.05         8.05   
                            

Barclays Capital Managed Money Intermediate (1-17 Year) Index

     02/01/2010         2.99      5.77

Barclays Capital 7 Year Municipal Bond Index

     02/01/2010         3.24         6.01   
        
% After-Tax Returns with Maximum Sales Charge    Inception Date      One Year      Since
Inception
 

Class A After Taxes on Distributions

     02/01/2010         0.06      6.70

Class A After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             0.82         5.58   

Class C After Taxes on Distributions

     02/01/2010         0.54         6.71   

Class C After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             0.79         5.41   

Class I After Taxes on Distributions

     02/01/2010         2.61         7.81   

Class I After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             2.39         6.51   
        
% Total Annual Operating Expense Ratios 4    Class A      Class C      Class I  

Gross

     1.11      1.86      0.86

Net

     0.95         1.70         0.70   
        
% Distribution Rates/Yields 5    Class A      Class C      Class I  

Distribution Rate

     0.58              0.84

SEC 30-day Yield

     0.41         –0.32      0.67   

Growth of $250,000

 

This graph shows the change in value of a hypothetical investment of $250,000 in Class I of the Fund for the period indicated. For comparison, the same investment is shown in the indicated index.

 

LOGO

 

Growth of Investment    Amount Invested    Period Beginning    At NAV   With Maximum
Sales Charge

Class A

   $10,000    02/01/2010    $12,520   $12,238

Class C

   $10,000    02/01/2010    $12,242   N.A.

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are before taxes unless otherwise noted. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  6  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Fund Profile

 

 

Credit Quality (% of total investments) 6

 

LOGO

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

 

  7  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Performance 2,3

 

Portfolio Managers James H. Evans, CFA, Brian C. Barney, CFA and Christopher J. Harshman

 

% Average Annual Total Returns    Inception Date      One Year      Since
Inception
 

Class A at NAV

     02/01/2010         6.55      10.42

Class A with 4.75% Maximum Sales Charge

             1.52         8.65   

Class C at NAV

     02/01/2010         5.76         9.58   

Class C with 1% Maximum Sales Charge

             4.78         9.58   

Class I at NAV

     02/01/2010         6.82         10.66   
                            

Barclays Capital Managed Money 10+ Year Index

     02/01/2010         5.94      8.02

Barclays Capital 15 Year Municipal Bond Index

     02/01/2010         5.29         7.66   
        
% After-Tax Returns with Maximum Sales Charge    Inception Date      One Year      Since
Inception
 

Class A After Taxes on Distributions

     02/01/2010         –0.52      7.58

Class A After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             2.09         6.83   

Class C After Taxes on Distributions

     02/01/2010         2.65         8.50   

Class C After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             3.66         7.41   

Class I After Taxes on Distributions

     02/01/2010         4.68         9.57   

Class I After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares

             5.27         8.49   
        
% Total Annual Operating Expense Ratios 4    Class A      Class C      Class I  

Gross

     2.16      2.91      1.91

Net

     0.95         1.70         0.70   
        
% Distribution Rates/Yields 5    Class A      Class C      Class I  

Distribution Rate

     1.27      0.55      1.53

SEC 30-day Yield

     1.09         0.33         1.40   

Growth of $10,000

 

This graph shows the change in value of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A of the Fund for the period indicated. For comparison, the same investment is shown in the indicated index.

 

LOGO

 

Growth of Investment    Amount Invested    Period Beginning    At NAV   With Maximum
Sales Charge

Class C

   $10,000    02/01/2010    $13,169   N.A.

Class I

   $250,000    02/01/2010    $339,075   N.A.

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. Returns are before taxes unless otherwise noted. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.

 

  8  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Fund Profile

 

 

Credit Quality (% of total investments) 6

 

LOGO

 

See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.

 

  9  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Endnotes and Additional Disclosures

 

 

1  

The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio manager(s) and are current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance and the Fund(s) disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. This commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as “forward looking statements”. The Fund’s actual future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward looking statement, depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and other risks discussed from time to time in the Fund’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

2  

Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. Barclays Capital 5 Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities ranging from 4-6 years. Barclays Capital Managed Money Intermediate (1-17 Year) Index is an unmanaged, tax-exempt bond market index that measures the 1-17 year maturity component of Barclays Capital Municipal Managed Money Index. Barclays Capital Municipal Managed Money Index is a rules-based, market-value-weighted index engineered for the tax-exempt bond market. Barclays Capital Managed Money Index (10+ year) is an unmanaged, tax-exempt bond market index that measures the 10+ year maturity component of the Barclays Capital Municipal Managed Money Index. Barclays Capital Managed Money 1-7 Year Index is an unmanaged, tax-exempt bond market index that measures the 1-7 year maturity component of the Barclays Capital Municipal Managed Money Index and such Index performance is available as of month end only. Barclays Capital 7 Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities ranging from 6-8 years. Barclays Capital 15 Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. with maturities ranging from 12-17 years. Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

3  

Total Returns at NAV do not include applicable sales charges. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Total Returns shown with maximum sales charge reflect the stated maximum sales charge. Unless otherwise stated, performance does not reflect the deduction of taxes on Fund distributions or redemptions of Fund shares. After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions, including using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state/local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant to shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or shares held by nontaxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no taxable distributions were made during that period. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares may be greater than or equal to Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares.

 

4  

Source: Fund prospectus. Net expense ratio reflects a contractual expense reimbursement for Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund and Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund that continues through 5/31/13. Without the reimbursement, performance would have been lower.

 

5  

The Distribution Rate is based on the Fund’s last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) divided by the Fund’s NAV at the end of the period. The Fund’s distributions may be composed of ordinary income, tax-exempt income, net realized capital gains and return of capital. SEC Yield is a standardized measure based on the estimated yield to maturity of a fund’s investments over a 30-day period and is based on the maximum offer price at the date specified. The SEC Yield is not based on the distributions made by the Fund, which may differ. Yield reflects the effect of fee waivers and expense reimbursements.

 

6  

Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. Ratings of BBB or higher by Standard and Poor’s or Fitch (Baa or higher by Moody’s) are considered to be investment grade quality.

 

7  

Duration is a measure of the expected change in price of a bond — in percentage terms — given a one percent change in interest rates, all else being constant. Securities with lower durations tend to be less sensitive to interest-rate changes.

 

    

Fund profile subject to change due to active management.

 

 

  10  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Fund Expenses

 

 

Example:  As a Fund shareholder, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and/or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of Fund investing and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (August 1, 2012 – January 31, 2013).

Actual Expenses:  The first section of each table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes:  The second section of each table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual Fund return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.

Please note that the expenses shown in each table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of each table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

 

 

      Beginning
Account Value
(8/1/12)
       Ending
Account Value
(1/31/13)
       Expenses Paid
During Period*
(8/1/12 – 1/31/13)
      

Annualized

Expense
Ratio

 
                

Actual

  

Class A

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,004.50         $ 4.43           0.88

Class C

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,000.50         $ 8.20           1.63

Class I

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,004.80         $ 3.17           0.63
                                          
                

Hypothetical

                

(5% return per year before expenses)

                

Class A

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,020.70         $ 4.47           0.88

Class C

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,016.90         $ 8.26           1.63

Class I

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,022.00         $ 3.20           0.63

 

* Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for the indicated Class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on July 31, 2012.

 

  11  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Fund Expenses — continued

 

 

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

 

 

      Beginning
Account Value
(8/1/12)
       Ending
Account Value
(1/31/13)
       Expenses Paid
During Period*
(8/1/12 – 1/31/13)
     Annualized
Expense
Ratio
 
              

Actual

  

Class A

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,010.40         $ 4.80 **       0.95

Class C

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,005.20         $ 8.57 **       1.70

Class I

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,011.70         $ 3.54 **       0.70
                                        
              

Hypothetical

              

(5% return per year before expenses)

              

Class A

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,020.40         $ 4.82 **       0.95

Class C

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,016.60         $ 8.62 **       1.70

Class I

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,021.60         $ 3.56 **       0.70

 

* Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for the indicated Class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on July 31, 2012.

 

** Absent an allocation of expenses to an affiliate, expenses would be higher.

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

 

 

      Beginning
Account Value
(8/1/12)
       Ending
Account Value
(1/31/13)
       Expenses Paid
During Period*
(8/1/12 – 1/31/13)
     Annualized
Expense
Ratio
 
              

Actual

  

Class A

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,025.00         $ 4.84 **       0.95

Class C

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,021.10         $ 8.64 **       1.70

Class I

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,026.30         $ 3.57 **       0.70
                                        
              

Hypothetical

              

(5% return per year before expenses)

              

Class A

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,020.40         $ 4.82 **       0.95

Class C

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,016.60         $ 8.62 **       1.70

Class I

  $ 1,000.00         $ 1,021.60         $ 3.56 **       0.70

 

* Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for the indicated Class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on July 31, 2012.

 

** Absent an allocation of expenses to an affiliate, expenses would be higher.

 

  12  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities — 91.5%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Education — 8.6%

               

Chaska, MN, Independent School District No. 112, 2.00%, 2/1/17

  $ 2,835      $ 2,970,371   

Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Lawrence & Memorial Hospital), Series F, 5.00%, 7/1/18

    85        98,691   

Florida Board of Education, Lottery Revenue, 4.00%, 7/1/14

    5,000        5,260,200   

Florida Board of Education, Lottery Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/18

    19,425        23,188,982   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Columbia University), 5.00%, 10/1/21

    1,750        2,239,457   

New York Dormitory Authority, (State University Educational Facilities), 5.00%, 5/15/19

    3,000        3,643,290   

North Penn, PA, School District, 5.00%, 3/1/21

    3,010        3,634,756   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Temple University), 5.00%, 4/1/19

    750        899,303   

Seminole County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 7/1/20

    1,710        2,049,555   

Texas Tech University, 3.00%, 8/15/16

    500        541,130   

University of Arkansas, 4.00%, 12/1/14

    810        859,993   

University of Arkansas, 4.00%, 12/1/15

    670        730,173   

University of Iowa Facilities Corp., (Medical Education & Biomedical Research Facility), 3.75%, 6/1/17

    1,005        1,125,721   

University of Maryland, Auxiliary Facility & Tuition Revenue, 3.00%, 4/1/14

    3,120        3,222,679   

University of Maryland, Auxiliary Facility & Tuition Revenue, 4.00%, 4/1/14

    400        417,824   

University of Maryland, Auxiliary Facility & Tuition Revenue, 5.00%, 4/1/17

    2,120        2,494,159   

University of North Carolina System, 5.00%, 5/1/18

    1,365        1,633,427   

Vermont Educational & Health Buildings Financing Agency, (Middlebury College), 5.00%, 11/1/20

    1,000        1,250,170   

Vermont Educational & Health Buildings Financing Agency, (Middlebury College), 5.00%, 11/1/21

    960        1,211,011   

Virginia College Building Authority, (21st Century College and Equipment), Series A, 5.00%, 2/1/15

    4,585        5,005,995   

Virginia College Building Authority, (21st Century College and Equipment), Series B, 5.00%, 2/1/15

    3,450        3,766,779   

Virginia College Building Authority, Educational Facilities Revenue, 5.00%, 2/1/14

    5,340        5,596,213   

Virginia College Building Authority, Educational Facilities Revenue, 5.00%, 2/1/17

    1,850        2,161,244   

Virginia College Building Authority, Educational Facilities Revenue, 5.00%, 9/1/20

    12,445        15,470,255   

Virginia Public School Authority, 4.00%, 7/15/13

    245        249,253   

Virginia Public School Authority, 5.00%, 1/15/19

    2,000        2,440,580   
                 
    $ 92,161,211   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Electric Utilities — 2.2%

               

California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Revenue, 4.00%, 5/1/16

  $ 250      $ 276,958   

California Department of Water Resources, Power Supply Revenue, 5.00%, 5/1/14

    735        778,497   

Chula Vista, CA, (San Diego Gas & Electric Co.), 1.65%, 7/1/18

    6,000        6,115,440   

Energy Northwest, WA, (Bonneville Power Administration), 5.00%, 7/1/17

    5,000        5,913,050   

Energy Northwest, WA, (Columbia Generating Station), 5.00%, 7/1/19

    7,500        9,231,525   

Omaha, NE, Public Power District, 3.00%, 2/1/16

    950        1,018,447   

Salt River, AZ, Agricultural Improvements and Power District, 3.00%, 12/1/16

    465        506,339   
                 
    $ 23,840,256   
                 

Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.9%

  

California, Prerefunded to 2/1/14, 5.00%, 2/1/33

  $ 5,000      $ 5,238,250   

Duluth, MN, Escrowed to Maturity, 4.00%, 2/1/13

    370        370,000   

Harris County, TX, Prerefunded to 10/1/18, 5.75%, 10/1/23

    770        969,638   

Louisville/Jefferson County, KY, Metropolitan Government, (Jewish Hospital), Prerefunded to 2/1/18, 6.125%, 2/1/37

    4,425        5,572,447   

Mansfield, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), Prerefunded to 2/15/14, 5.00%, 2/15/29

    15,400        16,153,522   

Massachusetts, Prerefunded to 8/1/13, 5.25%, 8/1/20

    130        133,260   

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Escrowed to Maturity, 4.00%, 7/1/15

    870        947,560   

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, Prerefunded to 7/1/18, 5.00%, 7/1/34

    750        916,650   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy), Prerefunded to 7/1/13, 5.75%, 7/1/33

    1,000        1,032,990   

Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, Escrowed to Maturity, 5.45%, 2/1/13

    10        10,000   

Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, Prerefunded to 8/1/14, 5.00%, 8/1/29

    700        749,721   

Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Escrowed to Maturity, 5.00%, 2/1/13

    1,500        1,500,000   

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (School Facilities Construction), Prerefunded to 9/1/14, 5.25%, 9/1/29

    1,000        1,079,470   

New York, NY, Prerefunded to 10/15/13, 5.25%, 10/15/23

    7,500        7,769,925   

New York, NY, Series C, Prerefunded to 9/15/13, 5.25%, 9/15/33

    5,155        5,317,073   

New York, NY, Series J, Prerefunded to 6/1/13, 5.25%, 6/1/28

    5,000        5,084,650   

New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority, Prerefunded to 8/1/13, 5.00%, 8/1/21

    3,830        3,919,622   
 

 

  13   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Escrowed / Prerefunded (continued)

  

North Carolina, Prerefunded to 3/1/15, 5.25%, 3/1/23

  $ 830      $ 912,975   

Ohio, Prerefunded to 3/15/14, 5.00%, 3/15/24

    1,000        1,053,390   

Ohio Water Development Authority, Pollution Control Revenue, Prerefunded to 6/1/14, 5.00%, 6/1/17

    785        834,691   

Orange County, NC, Prerefunded to 2/1/14, 4.25%, 2/1/20

    1,420        1,477,013   

Palmdale, CA, Community Redevelopment Agency, Escrowed to Maturity, 8.00%, 3/1/16

    1,000        1,225,790   

San Benito, TX, Consolidated Independent School District, Prerefunded to 2/15/14, 5.00%, 2/15/20

    1,095        1,148,929   

Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., VA, Prerefunded to 6/1/15, 5.625%, 6/1/37

    270        300,586   
                 
  $ 63,718,152   
                 

General Obligations — 39.4%

               

Albuquerque, NM, Municipal School District No. 12, 5.00%, 8/1/13

  $ 340      $ 348,231   

Allen County, IA, Juvenile Justice Center Building Corp., 3.00%, 1/1/15

    720        748,454   

Allen County, IA, Juvenile Justice Center Building Corp., 3.00%, 7/1/15

    695        728,874   

Allen County, IA, Juvenile Justice Center Building Corp., 3.00%, 1/1/16

    1,020        1,075,325   

Arlington County, VA, 5.00%, 8/15/21

    4,495        5,673,679   

Arlington, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/13

    1,000        1,001,890   

Atlantic County, NJ, 2.50%, 10/1/14

    730        756,433   

Beaumont, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 2.00%, 2/15/14

    420        427,888   

Beaumont, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 3.00%, 2/15/15

    740        779,309   

Bergen County, NJ, 3.25%, 11/1/16

    2,395        2,627,914   

Bexar County, TX, 5.00%, 6/15/17

    1,050        1,237,667   

Brookhaven, NY, 2.00%, 1/15/17

    1,000        1,046,710   

Brown County, WI, 4.00%, 11/1/21

    620        721,066   

Caledonia, MI, Community Schools, 4.00%, 5/1/17 (1)

    1,000        1,119,410   

Cary, NC, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    195        237,210   

Clark County, WA, 5.00%, 12/1/18

    685        831,083   

Clark County, WA, 5.00%, 12/1/20

    900        1,119,708   

Clark County, WA, School District No. 117 Camas, 3.00%, 12/1/15

    1,015        1,083,716   

Clark County, WA, School District No. 119 Battleground, 4.00%, 12/1/20

    1,000        1,172,560   

Clear Creek, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/19

    1,275        1,560,409   

Collin County, TX, 5.00%, 2/15/19

    1,000        1,221,960   

Columbia County, GA, School District, 5.00%, 4/1/16

    1,000        1,140,180   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations (continued)

               

Columbus, OH, 2.50%, 7/1/13

  $ 4,415      $ 4,457,561   

Comal County, TX, 4.00%, 2/1/18

    2,200        2,508,748   

Crandall, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/14

    380        376,455   

Crandall, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/16

    300        290,229   

Crandall, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/19

    230        205,967   

Crandall, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/20

    105        90,805   

Crandall, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/21

    480        397,594   

Crowley, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/1/18

    1,675        1,552,892   

Dallas, TX, Independent School District, 4.00%, 2/15/13

    1,500        1,502,220   

Dallas, TX, Independent School District, 5.50%, 2/15/18

    240        294,413   

Dare County, NC, 3.00%, 6/1/15

    695        733,322   

Deer Park, TX, Independent School District, 3.00%, 2/15/15

    125        131,394   

DeKalb, Kane, LaSalle, Lee, Ogle, Winnebago and Boone Counties, IL, Community College District No. 523, (Kishwaukee Community College), 0.00%, 2/1/16

    500        485,565   

Del Mar College District, TX, 4.00%, 8/15/16

    1,000        1,121,420   

Denton, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/15

    825        812,584   

Eagle Mountain & Saginaw, TX, Independent School District, 0.00%, 8/15/20

    155        135,160   

Edinburg, TX, Consolidated Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 3.00%, 2/15/17

    1,000        1,084,770   

El Camino, CA, Community College District, 0.00%, 8/1/17

    1,390        1,310,562   

El Camino, CA, Community College District, 0.00%, 8/1/18

    2,280        2,100,906   

El Dorado, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/18

    110        97,778   

El Dorado, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/19

    80        68,826   

El Dorado, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/20

    100        82,137   

El Dorado, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/21

    125        97,251   

El Dorado, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/22

    150        109,554   

Eugene, OR, 3.00%, 6/1/18

    1,380        1,525,024   

Fitchburg, MA, 4.00%, 12/1/16

    570        635,561   

Florida Board of Public Education, Full Faith and Credit, Capital Outlay, 5.00%, 6/1/17

    1,350        1,592,581   

Florida Board of Public Education, Full Faith and Credit, Capital Outlay, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    1,625        1,963,341   

Fort Worth, TX, Independent School District, 5.00%, 2/15/14

    500        524,895   

Fort Worth, TX, Independent School District, 5.00%, 2/15/19

    2,535        3,098,657   

Frisco, TX, 4.00%, 2/15/19

    155        178,889   

Garland, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 2/15/16

    1,525        1,491,419   
 

 

  14   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations (continued)

               

Garland, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 3.00%, 2/15/16

  $ 200      $ 202,658   

Garland, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 3.00%, 2/15/18

    300        303,363   

Garland, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/20

    11,160        13,895,651   

Georgia, 4.00%, 1/1/17

    885        1,001,121   

Georgia, 5.00%, 7/1/14

    1,575        1,681,312   

Georgia, 5.00%, 5/1/15

    315        347,760   

Georgia, 5.00%, 10/1/19

    8,650        10,805,061   

Georgia, 5.50%, 7/1/14

    3,150        3,384,895   

Georgia, 5.75%, 9/1/13

    4,850        5,008,061   

Georgia, 5.75%, 8/1/14

    500        541,305   

Gloucester County, NJ, 2.00%, 9/15/17

    280        291,584   

Guilford County, NC, Series A, 5.00%, 3/1/19

    4,000        4,932,440   

Guilford County, NC, Series A, 5.00%, 8/1/19

    1,265        1,574,470   

Guilford County, NC, Series C, 5.00%, 4/1/18

    1,160        1,404,656   

Guilford County, NC, Series D, 5.00%, 8/1/19

    10,190        12,682,882   

Hartford County, CT, Metropolitan District, 5.00%, 7/15/18

    4,250        5,165,492   

Hartford County, CT, Metropolitan District, 5.00%, 2/1/19 (1)

    1,515        1,835,801   

Henrico County, VA, 5.00%, 8/1/18

    3,225        3,940,918   

Irving, TX, Independent School District, 4.00%, 2/15/17

    420        475,083   

Jackson County, GA, School District, 5.00%, 3/1/19

    5,000        6,087,450   

Kenston Local School District, OH, 4.00%, 12/1/14

    765        813,845   

King County, WA, 4.00%, 12/1/19

    1,500        1,760,550   

King County, WA, School District No. 414 Lake Washington, 4.00%, 12/1/15

    1,755        1,929,043   

King County, WA, School District No. 414 Lake Washington, 4.00%, 12/1/16

    1,790        2,013,893   

King County, WA, School District No. 414 Lake Washington Limited Obligation Bonds, 4.00%, 12/1/16

    2,305        2,588,653   

King County, WA, School District No. 414 Lake Washington Limited Obligation Bonds, 5.00%, 6/1/17

    1,320        1,547,951   

Lamar Consolidated Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 4.00%, 2/15/20

    1,005        1,182,594   

Larimer, Weld & Boulder Countries, CO, School District No. R2-J Thompson, 5.00%, 12/15/20

    5,425        6,775,933   

Las Cruces, NM, School District No. 2, 4.00%, 8/1/15

    1,000        1,083,510   

Lewisville, TX, Independent School District, 0.00%, 8/15/13

    1,615        1,613,110   

Lewisville, TX, Independent School District, 5.00%, 8/15/18

    1,365        1,651,759   

Lexington, MA, 5.00%, 2/15/14

    1,095        1,149,673   

Lone Star College System, TX, 5.00%, 8/15/17

    2,300        2,727,823   

Lone Star College System, TX, 5.00%, 2/15/19

    450        547,245   

Lone Star College System, TX, 5.00%, 2/15/20

    720        882,079   

Loudoun County, VA, 5.00%, 12/1/18

    1,000        1,232,730   

Lower Merion School District, PA, 3.00%, 5/15/14

    4,690        4,856,964   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations (continued)

               

Lubbock, TX, 3.00%, 2/15/17

  $ 2,195      $ 2,380,148   

Lubbock, TX, Independent School District, 4.00%, 2/15/15

    1,000        1,073,410   

Maricopa County, AZ, Community College District, 2.00%, 7/1/14

    2,845        2,914,333   

Maryland, 4.00%, 8/15/21

    10,000        11,968,300   

Maryland, 5.00%, 3/1/13

    60        60,243   

Maryland, 5.00%, 3/1/16

    150        170,702   

Maryland, 5.00%, 3/1/19

    5,465        6,738,946   

Massachusetts, 4.00%, 1/1/15

    500        534,580   

Massachusetts, 5.00%, 8/1/17

    2,500        2,965,025   

Mecklenburg County, NC, 4.00%, 12/1/19

    1,900        2,257,048   

Mecklenburg County, NC, 5.00%, 12/1/19

    7,605        9,532,791   

Medina County, OH, Library District, 5.00%, 12/1/21

    1,000        1,223,390   

Metro, OR, Regional Center, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    2,010        2,443,899   

Metro, OR, Regional Center, 5.00%, 6/1/19

    1,000        1,239,400   

Metro, OR, Regional Center, 5.00%, 6/1/20

    6,495        8,174,737   

Middlesex County, NJ, 2.00%, 6/1/14

    3,510        3,590,414   

Middlesex County, NJ, 2.50%, 6/1/15

    3,295        3,453,555   

Midland, TX, College District, 0.00%, 2/15/16

    845        823,072   

Minneapolis, MN, 2.00%, 12/1/17

    1,625        1,720,680   

Minnesota, 4.00%, 8/1/15

    1,000        1,089,930   

Minnesota, 4.00%, 8/1/16

    1,750        1,960,175   

Minnesota, 4.00%, 8/1/19

    3,000        3,544,110   

Minnesota, 5.00%, 8/1/17

    1,000        1,191,970   

Minnesota, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    1,000        1,216,460   

Minnesota, 5.00%, 8/1/18

    90        109,979   

Mississippi, 5.00%, 10/1/21

    750        892,710   

Missouri, (Water Pollution Control), 5.00%, 10/1/13

    1,000        1,032,230   

Monmouth County, NJ, 4.00%, 12/1/16

    1,095        1,235,959   

Montclair, NJ, 2.00%, 3/1/14

    1,205        1,223,738   

Montclair, NJ, 3.00%, 3/1/15

    1,285        1,344,894   

Montclair, NJ, 3.00%, 3/1/16

    1,365        1,446,054   

Montclair, NJ, (School Bond Revenue Act), 3.00%, 3/1/14

    800        821,072   

Montclair, NJ, (School Bond Revenue Act), 3.00%, 3/1/15

    835        873,919   

Montclair, NJ, (School Bond Revenue Act), 3.00%, 3/1/16

    870        921,661   

Morris County, NJ, 5.00%, 2/15/17

    1,650        1,933,717   

Morris County, NJ, 5.00%, 2/15/19

    1,720        2,111,902   

Mountain View-Los Altos, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/24

    950        672,021   

New Hanover County, NC, 5.00%, 12/1/18

    430        530,074   

North Carolina, 4.00%, 6/1/14 (1)

    10,000        10,503,400   

North Carolina, 5.00%, 5/1/19

    1,240        1,534,847   

Northside, TX, Independent School District, 3.00%, 8/1/15

    265        281,589   

Ocean County, NJ, 3.00%, 9/1/14

    775        804,543   

Ocean County, NJ, 3.00%, 8/1/16

    1,255        1,357,709   
 

 

  15   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations (continued)

               

Ocean County, NJ, 4.00%, 9/1/15

  $ 1,250      $ 1,355,250   

Ohio, 4.00%, 9/1/15

    935        1,019,094   

Ohio, 5.00%, 9/15/15

    900        1,007,550   

Ohio, 5.00%, 3/15/19

    10,000        12,218,600   

Ohio, 5.00%, 8/1/19

    5,000        6,153,700   

Ohio, 5.00%, 8/1/20

    5,000        6,215,750   

Ohio, 5.50%, 6/15/20

    500        600,845   

Ohio, Higher Education Board, 5.00%, 8/1/19

    5,425        6,676,764   

Oklahoma, 5.00%, 7/15/18

    2,045        2,481,873   

Oklahoma County, OK, Independent School District No. 12 Edmond, 0.50%, 3/1/13

    1,975        1,975,415   

Oklahoma County, OK, Independent School District No. 12 Edmond, 2.00%, 3/1/15

    2,500        2,575,100   

Oklahoma County, OK, Independent School District No. 89 Oklahoma City, 2.00%, 7/1/15

    3,670        3,785,018   

Osseo, MN, Independent School District No. 279, 4.00%, 2/1/20

    450        511,011   

Pennsylvania, 5.00%, 2/15/17

    2,500        2,926,275   

Pennsylvania, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    2,000        2,418,740   

Pennsylvania, 5.00%, 2/15/19

    2,000        2,444,700   

Pennsylvania, 5.00%, 6/1/19

    15,000        18,444,450   

Pflugerville, TX, 3.00%, 8/1/17

    2,245        2,451,944   

Pharr-San Juan-Alamo, TX, Independent School District, 3.00%, 2/1/15

    2,020        2,125,464   

Pima County, AZ, 4.00%, 7/1/18

    2,400        2,761,584   

Prosper, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/16

    615        598,709   

Ramsey, NJ, School District, 2.00%, 1/15/16

    1,850        1,920,892   

Richardson, TX, Independent School District, 3.00%, 2/15/13

    1,500        1,501,665   

Richmond County, GA, Board of Education, 3.00%, 10/1/17

    2,425        2,657,776   

Richmond County, GA, Board of Education, 5.00%, 10/1/16

    2,500        2,882,075   

Richmond County, GA, Board of Education, 5.00%, 10/1/17

    2,000        2,374,400   

Roma, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/15

    235        232,471   

Roseville, MN, Independent School District No. 623, 2.00%, 2/1/13

    1,325        1,325,000   

Salt Lake City, UT, 4.00%, 6/15/19

    1,550        1,826,504   

San Antonio, TX, 4.00%, 8/1/15

    800        869,728   

Spring Branch, TX, Independent School District, 5.00%, 2/1/18

    1,875        2,251,650   

St. Louis County, MO, School District C-2 Parkway, 2.50%, 3/1/15

    2,045        2,136,841   

St. Louis County, MO, School District C-2 Parkway, 5.00%, 3/1/21

    645        814,113   

St. Mary’s County, MD, 3.00%, 7/15/13

    935        947,333   

St. Mary’s County, MD, 3.00%, 7/15/15

    920        979,156   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations (continued)

               

Stamford, CT, 4.00%, 12/15/20

  $ 1,215      $ 1,420,578   

Suffolk, VA, 4.00%, 8/1/18

    1,000        1,162,080   

Sumner County, TN, 2.00%, 6/1/15

    1,000        1,036,570   

Sumner County, TN, 3.00%, 6/1/16

    1,000        1,079,530   

Sumner County, TN, 5.00%, 6/1/16

    3,000        3,436,350   

Susquehanna Township, PA, School District, 3.00%, 5/15/18

    690        737,976   

Tomball, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 4.00%, 2/15/20

    50        54,751   

Tomball, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/13

    300        300,561   

Tyler, TX, Independent School District, 4.00%, 2/15/14

    130        135,110   

United Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 8/15/15

    1,755        1,956,825   

United Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 8/15/20

    1,760        2,212,813   

United Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 8/15/21

    1,180        1,498,801   

Utah, 5.00%, 7/1/19

    8,495        10,553,933   

Virginia, 5.00%, 6/1/21

    1,000        1,273,820   

Virginia Beach, VA, 5.00%, 3/15/19

    1,540        1,896,587   

Virginia Beach, VA, 5.00%, 7/15/19

    1,000        1,240,630   

Wake County, NC, 4.00%, 2/1/17

    2,500        2,833,975   

Wake County, NC, 5.00%, 3/1/14

    1,880        1,977,798   

Washington, 5.00%, 2/1/20

    5,845        7,226,700   

Washington, Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, 5.00%, 7/1/19

    2,030        2,498,666   

Whitney, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 8/15/21

    620        515,214   

Wink-Loving, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 4.00%, 2/15/18

    500        517,190   

Wink-Loving, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 4.00%, 2/15/19

    815        842,588   

Wisconsin, 5.00%, 5/1/21

    1,750        2,195,655   

Wylie, TX, Independent School District, 0.00%, 8/15/20

    290        254,301   

Wylie, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 4.00%, 8/15/20

    1,655        1,946,561   
                 
  $ 423,809,813   
                 

Health Care – Miscellaneous — 1.3%

               

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, 5.00%, 1/1/22

  $ 7,000      $ 8,152,690   

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/22

    5,000        5,682,950   
                 
  $ 13,835,640   
                 
 

 

  16   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Hospital — 4.8%

               

Beaver County, PA, Hospital Authority, (Heritage Valley Health System), 5.00%, 5/15/14

  $ 1,895      $ 1,999,130   

Beaver County, PA, Hospital Authority, (Heritage Valley Health System), 5.00%, 5/15/15

    1,435        1,569,388   

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital), 4.00%, 8/15/18

    300        343,221   

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Stanford Hospital and Clinics), 5.00%, 8/15/19

    1,000        1,226,080   

Florence County, SC, Hospital Revenue, (McLeod Regional Medical Center), 5.00%, 11/1/18

    845        1,006,454   

Grand Traverse County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, (Munson Healthcare), 5.00%, 7/1/16

    1,160        1,300,279   

Grand Traverse County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, (Munson Healthcare), 5.00%, 7/1/17

    2,355        2,692,919   

Grand Traverse County, MI, Hospital Finance Authority, (Munson Healthcare), 5.00%, 7/1/20

    445        530,333   

Illinois Finance Authority, (Ascenison Health Credit Group), 5.00%, 11/15/22

    1,000        1,238,210   

Indiana Finance Authority Hospital Revenue, (Indiana University Health), 5.00%, 3/1/19

    5,000        5,815,850   

Indiana Finance Authority Hospital Revenue, (Indiana University Health), 5.00%, 3/1/20

    6,395        7,541,368   

Indiana Finance Authority Hospital Revenue, (Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital), 5.00%, 2/15/18

    1,250        1,409,262   

Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Authority, (Partners Healthcare System), 5.00%, 7/1/22

    1,000        1,150,220   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), 4.00%, 7/1/15

    225        244,147   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), 4.00%, 7/1/16

    225        250,144   

New York Dormitory Authority, (New York Downtown Hospital), 5.00%, 2/15/16

    525        587,953   

North Carolina Medical Care Commission, (North Carolina Baptist Hospital), 5.00%, 6/1/18

    2,000        2,391,920   

Oregon Facilities Authority, (Providence Health System), 5.00%, 10/1/18

    785        940,171   

Oregon Facilities Authority, (Providence Health System), 5.00%, 10/1/19

    575        697,860   

Tarrant County, TX, Hospital District, 5.00%, 8/15/20

    1,655        1,983,931   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Hospital Sisters Services Obligation), 4.00%, 8/15/17

    1,000        1,119,470   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Hospital Sisters Services Obligation), 4.00%, 8/15/19

    1,000        1,139,570   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Hospital Sisters Services Obligation), 5.00%, 8/15/16

    1,000        1,136,600   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Hospital Sisters Services Obligation), 5.00%, 8/15/18

    500        594,255   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Hospital (continued)

               

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (Ministry Health Care), 5.00%, 8/15/18

  $ 1,190      $ 1,377,913   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (ProHealth Care, Inc.), 2.00%, 8/15/15

    330        337,874   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (ProHealth Care, Inc.), 3.00%, 8/15/17

    135        141,963   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (ProHealth Care, Inc.), 3.00%, 8/15/18

    365        386,090   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (ProHealth Care, Inc.), 3.00%, 8/15/19

    510        536,372   

Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, (ProHealth Care, Inc.), 5.00%, 8/15/18

    1,695        1,953,996   

Yavapai County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Northern Arizona Healthcare System), 5.00%, 10/1/17

    1,440        1,666,800   

Yavapai County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Northern Arizona Healthcare System), 5.00%, 10/1/18

    2,185        2,557,062   

Yavapai County, AZ, Industrial Development Authority, (Northern Arizona Healthcare System), 5.00%, 10/1/19

    3,630        4,294,726   
                 
  $ 52,161,531   
                 

Industrial Development Revenue — 0.2%

               

Missouri Redevelopment Finance Board Cultural Facilities, (Nelson Gallery Foundation), 3.00%, 12/1/13

  $ 595      $ 608,096   

Tulsa County, OK, Industrial Authority Capital Improvements, 4.00%, 5/15/15

    2,000        2,155,440   
                 
  $ 2,763,536   
                 

Insured – Education — 0.6%

               

Collier County, FL, School Board, (AGM), 5.00%, 2/15/22

  $ 1,525      $ 1,700,421   

Palm Beach County, FL, School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/22

    3,000        3,429,660   

University of Massachusetts Building Authority, (AMBAC), 5.25%, 11/1/17

    1,275        1,439,335   
                 
  $ 6,569,416   
                 

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.0%

               

Anchorage, AK, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 3/1/15, 5.00%, 3/1/19

  $ 250      $ 273,478   

Central Puget Sound, WA, Regional Transit Authority, Sales and Use Tax Revenue, (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 5/1/15, 5.00%, 11/1/20

    5,750        6,345,240   

Coatesville, PA, School District, (AGM), Prerefunded to 8/15/14, 5.25%, 8/15/19

    6,515        7,014,505   

Cook County, IL, Community High School District No. 219, Niles Township, (FGIC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 12/1/19

    2,000        2,549,760   
 

 

  17   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded (continued)

  

Henderson, NV, (FGIC), (NPFG), Prerefunded to 12/1/14, 5.00%, 6/1/22

  $ 700      $ 760,235   

Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, (AGM), Prerefunded to 7/1/16, 5.00%, 1/1/31

    360        414,612   

Los Angeles, CA, Unified School District, (AGM), Prerefunded to 7/1/13, 5.00%, 7/1/23

    2,050        2,091,185   

Massachusetts, (AGM), Prerefunded to 12/1/14, 5.00%, 11/1/24

    375        406,714   

Mount Union, PA, Area School District, (AGC), Prerefunded to 3/1/14, 4.60%, 3/1/25

    1,000        1,046,670   

Oregon Department of Administrative Services, (AGM), Prerefunded to 5/1/14, 5.00%, 5/1/17

    1,235        1,308,359   

Pennsylvania, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 7/1/13, 5.00%, 7/1/14

    35        35,703   

Pennsylvania, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 1/1/16, 5.00%, 1/1/20

    12,125        13,704,766   

Phoenix, AZ, Civic Improvement Corp., Excise Tax Revenue, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 7/1/13, 5.00%, 7/1/22

    290        295,800   

Seattle, WA, Water System Revenue, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 9/1/13, 5.00%, 9/1/15

    8,005        8,229,780   

Seattle, WA, Water System Revenue, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 9/1/13, 5.00%, 9/1/17

    8,750        8,995,700   
                 
  $ 53,472,507   
                 

Insured – General Obligations — 1.8%

               

Bexar County, TX, (AGM), 4.00%, 6/15/13

  $ 60      $ 60,840   

Forsyth County, GA, School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 2/1/15

    5,000        5,458,000   

Governor Mifflin, PA, School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 3/15/17

    310        354,011   

Pennsylvania, (AGM), 5.00%, 9/1/15

    12,100        12,985,841   

Washington, (XLCA), 0.00%, 12/1/16

    200        193,490   
                 
    $ 19,052,182   
                 

Insured – Health Care – Miscellaneous — 0.1%

  

New Mexico Finance Authority, (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/15/19

  $ 1,050      $ 1,185,366   
                 
  $ 1,185,366   
                 

Insured – Hospital — 0.1%

               

Carbon County, PA, Hospital Authority, (AGM), 3.00%, 11/15/15

  $ 1,000      $ 1,045,590   

Carbon County, PA, Hospital Authority, (AGM), 4.00%, 11/15/17

    535        589,383   
                 
  $ 1,634,973   
                 

Insured – Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.2%

  

Orange County, FL, School Board, (NPFG), 5.00%, 8/1/19

  $ 6,500      $ 7,211,035   

Palm Beach County, FL, School Board, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/23

    4,655        5,321,689   
                 
  $ 12,532,724   
                 
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Other Revenue — 0.0% (2)

               

Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., CA, (Tobacco Settlement Revenue), (AGM), Prerefunded to 6/1/13, 5.00%, 6/1/43

  $ 5      $ 5,080   
                 
    $ 5,080   
                 

Insured – Special Tax Revenue — 0.5%

               

Massachusetts, Special Obligation, Dedicated Tax Revenue, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 1/1/14, 5.25%, 1/1/29

  $ 2,300      $ 2,405,777   

Massachusetts, Special Obligation, Dedicated Tax Revenue, (FGIC), Prerefunded to 1/1/14, 5.75%, 1/1/32

    1,200        1,260,672   

Utah Transit Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, (AGM), Prerefunded to 12/15/15, 5.00%, 6/15/18

    2,000        2,260,560   
                 
    $ 5,927,009   
                 

Insured – Transportation — 0.4%

  

Central Puget Sound, WA, Regional Transportation Authority, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.25%, 2/1/15

  $ 1,865      $ 2,043,163   

Montana Department of Transportation, (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/1/15

    1,880        2,073,546   
                 
  $ 4,116,709   
                 

Insured – Water and Sewer — 0.2%

               

Albuquerque Bernalillo County, NM, Water Utility Authority, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 7/1/16

  $ 1,800      $ 1,990,422   
                 
  $ 1,990,422   
                 

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 2.5%

  

Arizona, 5.00%, 10/1/17 (1)

  $ 920      $ 1,072,720   

Cupertino, CA, 2.00%, 7/1/17

    2,135        2,222,300   

Cupertino, CA, 3.00%, 7/1/19

    1,220        1,333,106   

Montgomery County, MD, Lease Revenue Project, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    2,395        2,857,498   

Montgomery County, MD, Lease Revenue Project, 5.00%, 6/1/19

    2,420        2,934,928   

Montgomery County, MD, Lease Revenue Project, 5.00%, 6/1/20

    660        808,381   

Montgomery County, MD, Lease Revenue Project, 5.00%, 6/1/21

    2,155        2,662,890   

Orange County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 8/1/13

    500        511,680   

Orange County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 8/1/14

    3,320        3,548,018   

Orange County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 8/1/15

    5,000        5,515,850   

Orange County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 8/1/17

    540        620,244   

Orange County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 8/1/18

    675        790,601   
 

 

  18   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation (continued)

  

       

Orange County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 8/1/19

  $ 750      $ 888,413   

Virginia Resources Authority Infrastructure Revenue, (Pooled Funding Program), 4.00%, 11/1/19

    1,000        1,175,760   
                 
  $ 26,942,389   
                 

Other Revenue — 1.9%

               

Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Chicago), 1.875% to 2/12/15 (Put Date), 7/1/36

  $ 3,525      $ 3,577,064   

Illinois Unemployment Insurance Fund Building Receipts Revenue, 5.00%, 12/15/19

    4,000        4,403,240   

Illinois Unemployment Insurance Fund Building Receipts Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/20

    2,040        2,211,156   

New Jersey Environmental Infrastructure Trust, 4.00%, 9/1/19

    2,500        2,944,925   

Virginia Public Building Authority, Public Facilities Revenue, 5.00%, 8/1/14

    550        588,808   

Virginia Public Building Authority, Public Facilities Revenue, 5.00%, 8/1/15

    1,085        1,206,781   

Virginia Public Building Authority, Public Facilities Revenue, 5.00%, 8/1/20

    4,590        5,742,916   
                 
  $ 20,674,890   
                 

Special Tax Revenue — 6.7%

               

Battery Park City Authority, NY, 5.25%, 11/1/22

  $ 1,000      $ 1,037,940   

Catawba, NC, Limited Obligation Bonds, 4.00%, 10/1/16

    1,045        1,152,614   

Catawba, NC, Limited Obligation Bonds, 4.00%, 10/1/17

    1,000        1,121,280   

Collier County, FL, Special Obligation, 5.00%, 10/1/15

    2,605        2,905,539   

Hillsborough County, FL, Capital Improvement Program Revenue, 5.00%, 8/1/21

    5,060        6,282,698   

Hoover, AL, Board of Education, 5.00%, 2/15/19

    2,205        2,659,010   

Los Angeles County, CA, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/15 (1)

    3,000        3,300,960   

Los Angeles County, CA, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/16 (1)

    3,250        3,701,717   

Los Angeles County, CA, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/18 (1)

    5,750        6,892,812   

Los Angeles County, CA, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/19 (1)

    7,500        9,147,975   

Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL, (McCormick Place), 5.00%, 12/15/20

    5,000        6,148,350   

Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL, (McCormick Place), 5.00%, 12/15/22

    1,000        1,158,640   

New Mexico, Severance Tax, 5.00%, 7/1/15

    1,425        1,582,676   

New York State Dormitory Authority Revenue, 5.00%, 8/15/19

    8,500        10,444,375   

New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority, 5.00%, 11/1/19

    6,530        8,047,441   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Special Tax Revenue (continued)

               

Portland, OR, Gas Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 2/1/20

  $ 1,120      $ 1,405,018   

Regional Public Transportation Authority, AZ, Excise Tax Revenue, (Maricopa County Public Transportation Fund), 5.00%, 7/1/17

    145        169,894   

Watauga, NC, Public Facilities Corp., 4.00%, 6/1/19

    2,800        3,179,848   

Westminster, CO, Sales & Use Tax, 5.00%, 12/1/19

    1,135        1,398,536   
                 
  $ 71,737,323   
                 

Transportation — 1.2%

  

Kansas Department of Transportation, 4.00%, 9/1/15

  $ 1,000      $ 1,093,000   

Kansas Department of Transportation, 5.00%, 9/1/15

    1,500        1,678,020   

Maryland Department of Transportation, 4.00%, 5/15/16

    1,305        1,453,261   

Maryland Department of Transportation, 5.25%, 12/15/17

    1,900        2,308,291   

Mesa, AZ, Highway Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/20

    1,225        1,350,072   

Mesa, AZ, Highway Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/21

    1,550        1,706,286   

Ohio, Major New State Infrastructure Project, 5.50%, 6/15/14

    405        433,812   

San Bernardino County, CA, Transportation Authority, 4.00%, 3/1/22

    425        501,305   

Virginia Commonwealth Transportation Board, 5.00%, 4/1/18

    2,000        2,407,420   
                 
  $ 12,931,467   
                 

Water and Sewer — 6.9%

               

Alabama Drinking Water Finance Authority, 3.00%, 8/15/13

  $ 1,000      $ 1,014,240   

Alabama Drinking Water Finance Authority, 3.00%, 8/15/14

    3,135        3,257,171   

Alabama Drinking Water Finance Authority, 4.00%, 8/15/16

    2,880        3,174,912   

East Bay, CA, Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/14 (1)

    1,145        1,209,097   

East Bay, CA, Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/15 (1)

    3,510        3,856,928   

East Bay, CA, Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/16 (1)

    3,815        4,333,954   

East Bay, CA, Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/18 (1)

    1,000        1,199,930   

East Bay, CA, Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/20 (1)

    2,000        2,475,580   

East Bay, CA, Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/21 (1)

    1,500        1,875,030   

Gwinnett County, GA, Water and Sewer Authority, 4.00%, 8/1/16

    350        391,776   

Joliet, IL, Waterworks and Sewage Revenue, 4.00%, 1/1/15

    685        722,367   

Joliet, IL, Waterworks and Sewage Revenue, 5.00%, 1/1/16

    825        908,960   

Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, 5.00%, 8/1/21

    5,410        6,872,810   

Metropolitan Saint Louis Sewer District, MO, 5.00%, 5/1/15

    1,295        1,427,828   

Michigan Finance Authority, (Revolving Fund – Clean Water), 5.00%, 10/1/20

    10,000        12,478,100   
 

 

  19   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Water and Sewer (continued)

               

Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, (Revolving Fund – Clean Water), 5.00%, 10/1/19

  $ 1,975      $ 2,328,466   

Montgomery, AL, Water Works & Sanitary Sewer Board, 4.00%, 3/1/18

    1,000        1,140,690   

New York Environmental Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 6/15/20

    10,870        13,606,088   

New York Environmental Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 8/15/20

    4,485        5,631,590   

Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control, (Water Quality), 5.00%, 12/1/18

    2,370        2,902,373   

Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control, (Water Quality), 5.00%, 12/1/19

    1,020        1,265,086   

Seattle, WA, Solid Waste Revenue, 5.00%, 8/1/19

    275        339,595   

Tucson, AZ, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/18

    1,500        1,809,855   
                 
  $ 74,222,426   
                 

Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities — 91.5%
(identified cost $961,386,108)

   

  $ 985,285,022   
                 
Taxable Municipal Securities — 0.0% (2)   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Education — 0.0% (2)

               

Virginia Public School Authority, 4.167%, 8/1/18

  $ 225      $ 253,208   
                 

Total Taxable Municipal Securities — 0.0% (2)
(identified cost $225,000)

   

  $ 253,208   
                 
Short-Term Investments — 3.8%   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Short-Term Investments – Tax-Exempt — 3.8%

  

Texas, 2.50%, 8/30/13

  $ 40,000      $ 40,542,400   
                 

Total Short-Term Investments — 3.8%
(identified cost $40,522,485)

    $ 40,542,400   
                 

Total Investments — 95.3%
(identified cost $1,002,133,593)

    $ 1,026,080,630   
                 

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 4.7%

    $ 50,202,938   
                 

Net Assets — 100.0%

    $ 1,076,283,568   
                 

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.

AGC     Assured Guaranty Corp.
AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
PSF     Permanent School Fund
XLCA     XL Capital Assurance, Inc.

At January 31, 2013, the concentration of the Fund’s investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of net assets, is as follows:

 

Texas      12.2%   
Others, representing less than 10% individually      83.1%   

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at January 31, 2013, 10.4% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from less than 0.05% to 4.4% of total investments.

 

(1)  

When-issued security.

 

(2)  

Amount is less than 0.05%.

 

 

  20   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 95.2%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Bond Bank — 0.4%

  

New Hampshire Municipal Bond Bank, 5.00%, 1/15/21

  $ 1,330      $ 1,651,927   
   
    $ 1,651,927   
   

Education — 4.4%

  

Illinois Finance Authority, (University of Chicago), 5.00%, 10/1/30

  $ 1,250      $ 1,483,000   

Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board, (Vanderbilt University), 5.00%, 10/1/27

    800        985,224   

Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, TN, Health & Educational Facilities Board, (Vanderbilt University), 5.00%, 10/1/28

    1,000        1,227,450   

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Princeton Theological), 5.00%, 7/1/26

    970        1,180,830   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Cornell University), 5.00%, 7/1/31

    5,650        6,357,436   

Ohio State University, General Receipts, 5.00%, 6/1/28

    1,250        1,531,075   

University of Colorado, Enterprise Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    500        602,370   

University of Colorado, Enterprise Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/26

    1,165        1,403,336   

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 5.00%, 12/1/34

    1,000        1,104,410   

Vermont Educational & Health Buildings Financing Agency, (Middlebury College), 5.00%, 11/1/28

    1,000        1,224,310   

Virginia College Building Authority, (Public Higher Education Financing), 5.00%, 9/1/20

    1,455        1,808,696   
   
    $ 18,908,137   
   

Electric Utilities — 3.1%

  

California Department of Water Resources System, Electric Revenue, 5.00%, 5/1/22

  $ 1,500      $ 1,821,315   

Colorado Springs, CO, Utilities System Revenue, 5.00%, 11/15/23

    1,025        1,227,899   

Energy Northwest, WA, (Columbia Generating Station), 5.00%, 7/1/19

    5,000        6,154,350   

Huntsville, AL, Electric System Revenue, 5.00%, 12/1/24

    1,095        1,330,962   

New York Power Authority, 5.00%, 11/15/29

    500        602,220   

Snohomish County, WA, Public Utility District No. 1, 5.00%, 12/1/18

    1,680        2,040,175   
   
    $ 13,176,921   
   

Escrowed / Prerefunded — 4.9%

  

California, Prerefunded to 2/1/14, 5.00%, 2/1/33

  $ 5,000      $ 5,238,250   

Cypress-Fairbanks, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), Prerefunded to 2/15/14, 5.125%, 2/15/24

    1,320        1,387,003   

Mansfield, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), Prerefunded to 2/15/14, 5.00%, 2/15/29

    8,000        8,391,440   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Escrowed / Prerefunded (continued)

  

New Jersey Economic Development Authority, (Cigarette Tax), Prerefunded to 6/15/14, 5.75%, 6/15/29

  $ 3,620      $ 3,892,912   

Orlando, FL, Utilities Commission, Prerefunded to 4/1/13, 5.00%, 10/1/18

    2,070        2,086,705   

University of Texas, Prerefunded to 8/15/16, 5.00%, 8/15/18

    20        23,042   
   
    $ 21,019,352   
   

General Obligations — 40.9%

  

Alaska, 5.00%, 8/1/25

  $ 2,500      $ 3,156,525   

Anoka County, MN, 3.00%, 2/1/20 (1)

    1,100        1,217,117   

Arlington County, VA, 3.00%, 8/15/13

    3,420        3,472,360   

Arlington County, VA, 5.00%, 8/15/14

    3,565        3,825,958   

Auburn, AL, 5.00%, 8/1/24

    1,000        1,228,040   

Berks County, PA, 5.00%, 11/15/29

    1,020        1,211,729   

Bloomfield, CT, 4.00%, 10/15/20

    140        164,342   

Brazos, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 3.00%, 2/15/20

    405        450,907   

Brazos, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 3.00%, 2/15/21

    415        466,091   

Brenham, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 2/15/29

    1,355        803,122   

Brookhaven, NY, 2.00%, 1/15/19

    3,395        3,511,381   

Brookline, MA, 4.00%, 5/15/21

    1,200        1,434,324   

Cambridge, MA, 5.00%, 1/1/19

    3,430        4,208,541   

Charlotte, NC, 5.00%, 6/1/29

    2,500        3,003,625   

Clark County, WA, Evergreen School District No. 114, 3.00%, 6/1/17

    2,000        2,184,780   

Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 5.00%, 10/1/23

    8,375        10,376,206   

Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 5.00%, 10/1/24

    475        584,336   

Connecticut, 5.00%, 12/1/20

    50        57,984   

Conroe, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/24

    1,000        1,217,380   

Coronado, CA, Unified School District, 5.00%, 8/1/26

    990        1,219,700   

Crandall, TX, Independent School District, 0.00%, 8/15/29

    1,270        770,954   

Dare County, NC, 2.00%, 4/1/19

    805        827,323   

Dare County, NC, 4.00%, 6/1/20

    1,545        1,779,454   

Dare County, NC, 5.00%, 6/1/26

    1,090        1,309,624   

Dare County, NC, 5.00%, 6/1/27

    1,310        1,566,262   

Eagle Mountain & Saginaw, TX, Independent School District, 0.00%, 8/15/18

    100        93,732   

Foothill-De Anza, CA, Community College District, 4.00%, 8/1/19

    550        646,096   

Garland, TX, 5.00%, 2/15/25

    1,000        1,184,520   

Georgia, 5.00%, 7/1/26

    3,000        3,745,590   

Georgia, 5.00%, 7/1/28

    500        619,200   

Georgia, 5.00%, 7/1/30

    1,100        1,346,499   
 

 

  21   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations (continued)

  

Grand Prairie, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 4.00%, 2/15/22

  $ 2,180      $ 2,563,680   

Groton, CT, 4.00%, 7/15/19

    100        117,234   

Hamilton County, TN, 5.00%, 1/1/18

    500        601,180   

Hartford County, CT, Metropolitan District, 5.00%, 2/1/19 (1)

    1,255        1,520,746   

Hempfield, PA, School District, 5.00%, 10/15/27

    1,000        1,181,000   

Houston, TX, Community College System, 5.25%, 2/15/25

    1,000        1,226,900   

Howard County, MD, 4.00%, 2/15/22

    100        113,824   

Howard County, MD, 5.00%, 8/15/19

    2,000        2,491,380   

Lake County, IL, Community Consolidated School District No. 50, 5.50%, 1/1/24

    500        606,920   

Las Vegas Valley Water District, NV, 5.00%, 2/1/27

    1,500        1,718,250   

Louisiana, 5.00%, 7/15/20

    3,000        3,738,960   

Louisiana, 5.00%, 8/1/23

    4,000        5,013,120   

Louisiana, 5.00%, 7/15/24

    2,500        3,106,200   

Louisiana, 5.00%, 9/1/25

    1,500        1,827,045   

Lynchburg, VA, 3.00%, 12/1/16

    750        817,275   

Maryland, 5.00%, 3/1/16

    7,250        8,250,572   

Massachusetts, 5.00%, 6/1/24

    3,000        3,663,360   

Massachusetts, 5.25%, 8/1/22

    1,000        1,290,430   

Mecklenburg County, NC, 5.00%, 3/1/19

    50        61,656   

Menlo Park, CA, City School District, 5.00%, 7/1/29

    1,000        1,223,150   

Minneapolis, MN, 2.00%, 12/1/20

    1,475        1,514,751   

Mountain View-Los Altos, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/25

    2,300        1,557,698   

Mountain View-Los Altos, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/26

    500        323,775   

New Braunfels, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/1/26

    120        142,460   

New Canaan, CT, 4.00%, 4/1/24

    345        388,956   

New York, 5.00%, 2/15/20

    1,285        1,599,028   

North Carolina, 4.00%, 6/1/14 (1)

    8,895        9,342,774   

North Carolina, 5.00%, 6/1/17 (1)

    5,000        5,928,750   

North Carolina, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    1,000        1,216,460   

Nueces County, TX, 5.00%, 2/15/25

    2,390        2,900,862   

Ohio, 5.00%, 8/1/19

    2,500        3,076,850   

Orange Beach, AL, 5.00%, 2/1/24

    1,320        1,620,181   

Oregon, 4.00%, 8/1/20 (1)

    1,200        1,417,368   

Oregon, 5.00%, 11/1/21

    2,910        3,716,972   

Oregon, 5.00%, 8/1/25 (1)

    500        630,725   

Oregon, 5.00%, 8/1/26 (1)

    555        695,787   

Oregon, 5.00%, 8/1/28 (1)

    2,750        3,420,257   

Pennsylvania, 5.00%, 6/1/18

    10,000        12,093,700   

Pennsylvania, 5.00%, 11/15/23

    5,000        6,205,600   

Pima County, AZ, Tucson Unified School District No. 1, 5.00%, 7/1/21

    1,000        1,240,060   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations (continued)

  

Pima County, AZ, Tucson Unified School District No. 1, 5.00%, 7/1/22

  $ 1,000      $ 1,246,590   

Richardson, TX, 5.00%, 2/15/20

    50        62,052   

San Jose, CA, Unified School District, 5.00%, 8/1/26 (1)

    1,000        1,243,100   

Shakopee, MN, Independent School District No. 720, 5.00%, 2/1/21 (1)

    1,000        1,240,200   

St. Louis County, MO, School District C-2 Parkway, 5.00%, 3/1/21

    1,000        1,262,190   

Sumner School District No. 320, Pierce County, WA, 3.00%, 12/1/27

    1,580        1,697,710   

Tamalpais, CA, Union High School District, 5.00%, 8/1/24

    1,225        1,497,771   

Tamalpais, CA, Union High School District, 5.00%, 8/1/25

    1,000        1,223,370   

Tatum, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/30

    515        607,448   

Texas, 5.00%, 4/1/25

    2,000        2,486,000   

United Independent School District, TX, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 8/15/21

    1,000        1,270,170   

Vermont, 5.00%, 8/15/23

    1,185        1,478,785   

Washington, 5.00%, 7/1/24

    950        1,139,003   
   
    $ 174,303,987   
   

Health Care – Miscellaneous — 1.1%

  

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, 5.00%, 1/1/22

  $ 2,225      $ 2,591,391   

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/22

    2,000        2,273,180   
   
    $ 4,864,571   
   

Hospital — 3.3%

  

California Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Memorial Health Services), 5.00%, 10/1/26

  $ 1,000      $ 1,197,980   

Cobb County, GA, Kennestone Hospital Authority, (Wellstar Health System Obligation), 5.00%, 4/1/28

    3,540        4,219,609   

Cobb County, GA, Kennestone Hospital Authority, (Wellstar Health System Obligation), 5.00%, 4/1/30

    325        383,298   

Fairfax County ,VA, Industrial Development Authority, (Inova Health System Obligation Group), 5.00%, 5/15/24

    500        604,455   

Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (Johns Hopkins Health Care), 5.00%, 5/15/18

    1,000        1,191,720   

Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, (Partners Healthcare System), 5.00%, 7/1/26

    1,500        1,782,390   

Pennsylvania Higher Educational Facilities Authority, (University of Pennsylvania Health System), 5.00%, 8/15/26

    2,500        2,981,850   

Tift County, GA, Hospital Authority, 5.00%, 12/1/26

    520        606,289   

Utah County Hospital Revenue, (IHC Health Services, Inc.), 5.00%, 5/15/23

    1,000        1,206,940   
   
    $ 14,174,531   
   
 

 

  22   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Insured – Education — 0.7%

  

Palm Beach County, FL, School District, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/22

  $ 2,725      $ 3,115,275   
   
    $ 3,115,275   
   

Insured – Escrowed / Prerefunded — 5.0%

  

Cook County, IL, Community High School District No. 219, Niles Township, (FGIC), Escrowed to Maturity, 5.50%, 12/1/19

  $ 2,000      $ 2,549,760   

District of Columbia, (FGIC), (NPFG), Prerefunded to 6/1/13, 4.75%, 6/1/23

    9,140        9,278,928   

Richland County, SC, School District No. 1, (AGM), Prerefunded to 3/1/13, 4.75%, 3/1/24

    5,835        5,915,756   

Salt Lake and Sandy, UT, Metropolitan Water District, (AMBAC), Prerefunded to 7/1/14, 5.00%, 7/1/17

    1,230        1,312,656   

Simi Valley, CA, Unified School District, (NPFG), Prerefunded to 8/1/14, 5.00%, 8/1/28

    2,000        2,140,900   
   
    $ 21,198,000   
   

Insured – General Obligations — 0.9%

  

Frisco, TX, (AGM), 5.50%, 2/15/29

  $ 1,190      $ 1,393,300   

West Virginia, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.20%, 11/1/26

    2,000        2,423,800   
   
    $ 3,817,100   
   

Insured – Health Care – Miscellaneous — 0.6%

  

New Mexico Finance Authority, (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/15/19

  $ 1,000      $ 1,128,920   

New Mexico Finance Authority, (NPFG), 5.00%, 6/15/25

    1,275        1,380,557   
   
    $ 2,509,477   
   

Insured – Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.1%

  

Palm Beach County, FL, School Board, (AGM), 5.00%, 8/1/23

  $ 4,000      $ 4,572,880   
   
    $ 4,572,880   
   

Insured – Water and Sewer — 1.5%

  

Massachusetts Water Resources Authority, (AGM), 5.50%, 8/1/20

  $ 2,000      $ 2,568,260   

New Mexico Finance Authority, (AMBAC), 5.00%, 6/1/23

    1,000        1,054,650   

Phoenix, AZ, Civic Improvement Corp., Water System Revenue, (NPFG), 4.75%, 7/1/22

    2,625        2,881,305   
   
    $ 6,504,215   
   
   

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 1.9%

  

Colorado, Building Excellent Schools Today, 5.00%, 3/15/21

  $ 1,870      $ 2,293,480   

Orange County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 8/1/17

    500        574,300   

Orange County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 8/1/18

    500        585,630   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation (continued)

  

Seminole County, FL, School Board, 5.00%, 7/1/22

  $ 1,000      $ 1,216,540   

South Dakota Building Authority, 5.00%, 9/1/20

    1,065        1,287,170   

Virginia Resources Authority Infrastructure Revenue, (Pooled Funding Program), 5.00%, 11/1/26

    1,090        1,341,092   

Watauga, NC, Public Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 6/1/27

    500        591,445   
   
    $ 7,889,657   
   

Miscellaneous — 1.4%

  

Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, (Unemployment Compensation Revenue), 5.00%, 7/1/18

  $ 5,000      $ 6,074,000   
   
    $ 6,074,000   
   

Other Revenue — 1.3%

  

Indiana Finance Authority, 5.00%, 7/1/24

  $ 2,880      $ 3,495,542   

Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District, CA, 5.00%, 9/1/26

    1,205        1,461,195   

Oregon State Department of Administrative Services, Lottery Revenue, 5.00%, 4/1/27

    500        613,910   
   
    $ 5,570,647   
   

Special Tax Revenue — 8.5%

  

Collier County, FL, Special Obligation, 5.00%, 10/1/20

  $ 1,465      $ 1,794,581   

Draper, UT, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 5/1/32

    500        591,535   

Durham, NC, Capital Financing Corp., 5.00%, 6/1/23

    1,145        1,437,880   

Los Angeles County, CA, Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/20 (1)

    10,000        12,364,300   

Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority, IL, (McCormick Place), 5.00%, 12/15/22

    1,500        1,737,960   

New York Dormitory Authority, Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 8/15/13

    4,200        4,310,712   

New York Dormitory Authority, Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 12/15/20

    1,000        1,248,010   

New York Dormitory Authority, Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 2/15/23

    500        605,185   

New York Dormitory Authority, Personal Income Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 3/15/24

    5,000        5,871,500   

New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority, (Future Tax), 5.00%, 11/1/21

    2,250        2,762,145   

New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority, (Future Tax), 5.00%, 11/1/23

    1,000        1,236,700   

Watauga, NC, Public Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 6/1/24

    2,000        2,411,640   
   
    $ 36,372,148   
   
   

Transportation — 1.9%

  

Arizona Department of Transportation, 5.00%, 7/1/26

  $ 1,000      $ 1,217,950   
 

 

  23   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Transportation (continued)

  

Bay Area Toll Authority, CA, Toll Bridge Revenue, 5.00%, 4/1/21

  $ 1,575      $ 1,982,027   

Missouri Highway and Transit Commission, 5.00%, 2/1/22

    2,100        2,426,508   

North Carolina, Grant Anticipation Revenue, 5.25%, 3/1/20

    1,950        2,379,566   
   
    $ 8,006,051   
   

Utilities — 0.0% (2)

  

Foley, AL, Utilities Board, 4.00%, 11/1/16

  $ 75      $ 83,486   
   
    $ 83,486   
   

Water and Sewer — 11.2%

  

Central Utah Water Conservancy District, 5.00%, 10/1/20

  $ 1,000      $ 1,237,220   

Central Utah Water Conservancy District, 5.00%, 10/1/23

    595        714,220   

Central Utah Water Conservancy District, 5.00%, 10/1/24

    1,280        1,530,253   

Columbus, GA, Water & Sewer Revenue, 5.00%, 5/1/25

    1,000        1,218,380   

East Richland County, SC, Public Service District, Sewer System Revenue, 4.00%, 1/1/22

    1,335        1,566,929   

Fairfax County, VA, Water Authority, 5.00%, 4/1/24

    2,000        2,512,200   

Fairfax County, VA, Water Authority, 5.00%, 4/1/25

    2,265        2,832,541   

Grand Rapids, MI, Sanitary Sewer System Revenue, 5.00%, 1/1/30

    680        803,250   

Lafayette, CO, Water Revenue, 5.00%, 12/1/24

    1,080        1,315,624   

Lafayette, CO, Water Revenue, 5.00%, 12/1/27

    665        801,046   

Lakeland, FL, Water and Wastewater Revenue, 5.00%, 10/1/26

    1,070        1,286,300   

Louisville and Jefferson County, KY, Metro Government Board of Water Works, 5.00%, 11/15/16

    5,295        6,160,997   

Louisville and Jefferson County, KY, Waterworks and Water System Revenue, 4.00%, 11/15/21

    75        86,290   

Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, 5.00%, 8/1/22

    2,000        2,561,580   

Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, 5.00%, 8/1/23

    1,700        2,073,932   

Michigan Finance Authority, (Revolving Fund – Clean Water), 5.00%, 10/1/19

    4,385        5,451,037   

Michigan Finance Authority, (Revolving Fund – Drinking Water), 5.00%, 10/1/19

    1,000        1,243,110   

Michigan Finance Authority, (Revolving Fund – Drinking Water), 5.00%, 10/1/20

    1,420        1,771,890   

Missouri Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority, Water Pollution Control, 4.00%, 7/1/13

    2,115        2,148,417   

New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Clean Water and Drinking Water, 4.00%, 6/15/19

    50        58,795   

New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water and Sewer System, 5.00%, 6/15/20

    1,325        1,646,975   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Water and Sewer (continued)

  

North Texas Municipal Water District, Upper East Fork Wastewater Interceptor System, 4.00%, 6/1/24

  $ 2,000      $ 2,275,780   

Rogers, AR, Water Revenue, 2.00%, 11/1/19

    100        103,667   

Rogers, AR, Water Revenue, 2.25%, 11/1/20

    200        209,334   

Rogers, AR, Water Revenue, 2.75%, 11/1/23

    140        148,435   

South Dakota Conservancy District, 5.00%, 8/1/24

    2,505        3,114,517   

Tucson, AZ, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/18

    1,500        1,809,855   

Virginia Resources Authority Water & Sewer System, (Tuckahoe Creek Service District Project), 0.00%, 11/1/31

    2,000        1,029,100   
   
    $ 47,711,674   
   

Water Revenue — 1.1%

  

California Department of Water Resources, (Central Valley Project), 5.00%, 5/1/21

  $ 2,525      $ 3,032,677   

California Department of Water Resources, (Central Valley Project), 5.00%, 12/1/27

    1,315        1,641,054   
   
    $ 4,673,731   
   

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 95.2%
(identified cost $398,177,660)

   

  $ 406,197,767   
   

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 4.8%

  

  $ 20,264,858   
   

Net Assets — 100.0%

  

  $ 426,462,625   
   

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.

 

AGM     Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.
AMBAC     AMBAC Financial Group, Inc.
FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
PSF     Permanent School Fund

At January 31, 2013, the concentration of the Fund’s investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of net assets, is less than 10% individually.

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at January 31, 2013, 10.3% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution ranged from 0.6% to 4.7% of total investments.

 

(1)  

When-issued security.

 

(2)  

Amount is less than 0.05%.

 

 

  24   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments

 

 

Tax-Exempt Investments — 98.7%   
   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Bond Bank — 0.2%

  

New York Environmental Facilities Corp., Revolving Fund Revenue, 5.00%, 6/15/29

  $ 50      $ 59,389   
   
    $ 59,389   
   

Education — 11.8%

  

New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority, (Princeton Theological), 5.00%, 7/1/26

  $ 500      $ 608,675   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Cornell University), 5.00%, 7/1/31

    1,000        1,125,210   

New York Dormitory Authority, (Third Generation Resolution), 5.00%, 5/15/29

    50        59,731   

University of California, 5.125%, 5/15/29

    80        93,660   

University of California, 5.75%, 5/15/27

    500        614,085   

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 5.00%, 12/1/34

    705        778,609   

University of Virginia, 5.00%, 9/1/27

    150        183,841   

Washington State University, 5.00%, 4/1/32

    15        17,311   
   
    $ 3,481,122   
   

Escrowed / Prerefunded — 3.5%

               

Mansfield, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), Prerefunded to 2/15/14, 5.00%, 2/15/29

  $ 1,000      $ 1,048,930   
   
    $ 1,048,930   
   

General Obligations — 40.0%

  

Alaska, 5.00%, 8/1/25

  $ 500      $ 631,305   

Beaumont, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 5.00%, 2/15/28

    100        119,753   

Brenham, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 0.00%, 2/15/28

    1,355        843,311   

Bucks County, PA, 5.25%, 5/1/24

    500        612,455   

Central Utah Water Conservancy District, 5.00%, 4/1/26

    500        604,240   

Chaffey, CA, Community College District, 5.00%, 6/1/29

    500        599,090   

Crandall, TX, Independent School District, 0.00%, 8/15/29

    500        303,525   

Dallas, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 6.25%, 2/15/24

    85        104,514   

Delaware, 5.00%, 7/1/24

    1,100        1,351,064   

Lago Vista, TX, Independent School District, 5.00%, 8/15/33

    200        235,286   

Las Vegas Valley Water District, NV, 5.00%, 2/1/27

    400        458,200   

Loudoun County, VA, 5.00%, 12/1/22

    50        62,239   

Louisiana, 5.00%, 9/1/25

    500        609,015   

Menlo Park, CA, City School District, 5.00%, 7/1/28

    125        153,724   

Menlo Park, CA, City School District, 5.00%, 7/1/30

    1,000        1,218,430   

Mountain View-Los Altos, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/26

    500        323,775   
Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

General Obligations (continued)

  

Mountain View-Los Altos, CA, Union High School District, 0.00%, 8/1/27

  $ 1,000      $ 622,580   

North Carolina, 5.00%, 6/1/23 (1)

    1,400        1,815,464   

Pasadena, TX, Independent School District, 5.00%, 2/15/32

    55        65,890   

Phoenix, AZ, 4.50%, 7/1/24

    200        210,826   

Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, 5.00%, 10/15/29

    100        119,377   

Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, 5.00%, 10/15/30

    500        592,665   

Temple, TX, Independent School District, (PSF Guaranteed), 4.00%, 2/1/22

    100        115,799   
   
    $ 11,772,527   
   

Hospital — 6.2%

  

Charlotte-Mecklenburg, NC, Hospital Authority, 5.125%, 1/15/37

  $ 40      $ 44,907   

Cobb County, GA, Kennestone Hospital Authority, (Wellstar Health System Obligation), 5.00%, 4/1/30

    500        589,690   

Fairfax County, VA, Industrial Development Authority, 5.00%, 5/15/25

    500        600,500   

Tift County, GA, Hospital Authority, 5.00%, 12/1/26

    500        582,970   
   
    $ 1,818,067   
   

Insured – General Obligations — 4.1%

  

West Virginia, (FGIC), (NPFG), 5.20%, 11/1/26

  $ 1,000      $ 1,211,900   
   
    $ 1,211,900   
   

Lease Revenue / Certificates of Participation — 6.2%

  

Virginia Resources Authority Infrastructure Revenue, (Pooled Funding Program), 5.00%, 11/1/29

  $ 1,000      $ 1,240,010   

Watauga, NC, Public Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 6/1/27

    500        591,445   
   
    $ 1,831,455   
   

Special Tax Revenue — 11.3%

  

Dallas, TX, Area Rapid Transit, 5.00%, 12/1/28

  $ 500      $ 613,495   

Draper, UT, Sales Tax Revenue, 5.00%, 5/1/32

    500        591,535   

Durham Capital Financing Corp., NC, 5.00%, 6/1/24

    500        623,645   

Michigan Finance Authority, (Unemployment Obligation Assessment), 5.00%, 7/1/23

    500        531,095   

New York, NY, Transitional Finance Authority, Future Tax Revenue, 5.50%, 11/1/27

    300        369,096   

Watauga, NC, Public Facilities Corp., 5.00%, 6/1/24

    500        602,910   
   
    $ 3,331,776   
   

Transportation — 1.8%

  

Chicago Transit Authority, IL, 5.25%, 12/1/31

  $ 450      $ 530,141   
                 
    $ 530,141   
   
 

 

  25   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

January 31, 2013

 

Portfolio of Investments — continued

 

 

Security   Principal
Amount
(000’s omitted)
    Value  
   

Water and Sewer — 13.6%

  

Charleston, SC, Waterworks and Sewer Revenue, 5.00%, 1/1/29

  $ 100      $ 119,318   

East Bay, CA, Municipal Utility District, Water System Revenue, 5.00%, 6/1/21 (1)

    500        625,010   

Grand Rapids, MI, Sanitary Sewer System Revenue, 5.00%, 1/1/30

    500        590,625   

Lakeland, FL, Water and Wastewater Revenue, 5.00%, 10/1/28

    500        595,770   

Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement Trust, (Revolving Fund), 5.00%, 8/1/32

    500        588,180   

New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.50%, 6/15/22

    25        30,664   

New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.625%, 6/15/24

    50        61,156   

New York, NY, Municipal Water Finance Authority, (Water and Sewer System), 5.625%, 6/15/27

    50        60,074   

Rhode Island Clean Water Finance Agency, (Revolving Fund), 5.00%, 10/1/32

    500        593,275   

Virginia Resources Authority Water & Sewer System, (Tuckahoe Creek Service District Project), 0.00%, 11/1/32

    1,500        732,210   
   
    $ 3,996,282   
   

Total Tax-Exempt Investments — 98.7%
(identified cost $28,371,391)

   

  $ 29,081,589   
   

Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 1.3%

  

  $ 369,358   
   

Net Assets — 100.0%

  

  $ 29,450,947   
   

The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.

 

FGIC     Financial Guaranty Insurance Company
NPFG     National Public Finance Guaranty Corp.
PSF     Permanent School Fund

At January 31, 2013, the concentration of the Fund’s investments in the various states, determined as a percentage of net assets, is as follows:

 

North Carolina      15.1%   
California      14.4%   
Texas      11.7%   
Others, representing less than 10% individually      57.5%   

The Fund invests primarily in debt securities issued by municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. In order to reduce the risk associated with such economic developments, at January 31, 2013, 4.2% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies.

 

(1)

When-issued security.

 

 

  26   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Statements of Assets and Liabilities

 

 

    January 31, 2013  
Assets   Short Term Fund     Intermediate Term Fund     Long Term Fund  

Investments —

     

Identified cost

  $ 1,002,133,593      $ 398,177,660      $ 28,371,391   

Unrealized appreciation

    23,947,037        8,020,107        710,198   

Investments, at value

  $ 1,026,080,630      $ 406,197,767      $ 29,081,589   

Cash

  $ 94,594,580      $ 55,816,923      $ 2,336,103   

Interest receivable

    12,404,469        4,404,561        228,659   

Receivable for investments sold

    1,614,675        5,946,450          

Receivable for Fund shares sold

    1,824,703        2,386,224        348,536   

Receivable from affiliate

           31,116        17,428   

Total assets

  $ 1,136,519,057      $ 474,783,041      $ 32,012,315   
Liabilities                        

Payable for investments purchased

  $ 2,919,908      $ 8,391,150      $   

Payable for when-issued securities

    52,050,452        38,624,761        2,431,786   

Payable for Fund shares redeemed

    4,274,499        815,085        66,271   

Distributions payable

    61,095        138,148        5,918   

Payable to affiliates:

     

Investment adviser and administration fee

    498,288        213,535        15,033   

Distribution and service fees

    300,092        72,510        7,038   

Accrued expenses

    131,155        65,227        35,322   

Total liabilities

  $ 60,235,489      $ 48,320,416      $ 2,561,368   

Net Assets

  $ 1,076,283,568      $ 426,462,625      $ 29,450,947   
Sources of Net Assets                        

Paid-in capital

  $ 1,051,139,714      $ 417,132,298      $ 28,080,158   

Accumulated net realized gain

    1,257,912        1,316,084        660,418   

Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income

    (61,095     (5,864     173   

Net unrealized appreciation

    23,947,037        8,020,107        710,198   

Net Assets

  $ 1,076,283,568      $ 426,462,625      $ 29,450,947   
Class A Shares                        

Net Assets

  $ 515,694,406      $ 115,170,188      $ 14,339,900   

Shares Outstanding

    48,370,307        9,729,863        1,240,543   

Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share

     

(net assets ÷ shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

  $ 10.66      $ 11.84      $ 11.56   

Maximum Offering Price Per Share

     

(100 ÷ 97.75, 97.75 and 95.25, respectively, of net asset value per share)

  $ 10.91      $ 12.11      $ 12.14   
Class C Shares                        

Net Assets

  $ 223,991,974      $ 57,816,456      $ 4,763,740   

Shares Outstanding

    21,050,947        4,886,031        412,325   

Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share*

     

(net assets ÷ shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

  $ 10.64      $ 11.83      $ 11.55   
Class I Shares                        

Net Assets

  $ 336,597,188      $ 253,475,981      $ 10,347,307   

Shares Outstanding

    31,562,020        21,394,389        895,489   

Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share

     

(net assets ÷ shares of beneficial interest outstanding)

  $ 10.66      $ 11.85      $ 11.55   

 

On sales of $50,000 or more for Long Term Fund and $100,000 or more for Short Term Fund and Intermediate Term Fund, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.

 

* Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge.

 

  27   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Statements of Operations

 

 

    Year Ended January 31, 2013  
Investment Income   Short Term Fund     Intermediate Term Fund     Long Term Fund  

Interest

  $ 15,196,258      $ 5,395,387      $ 825,109   

Total investment income

  $ 15,196,258      $ 5,395,387      $ 825,109   
Expenses                        

Investment adviser and administration fee

  $ 5,824,586      $ 1,851,593      $ 198,905   

Distribution and service fees

     

Class A

    1,277,420        229,945        35,593   

Class C

    2,127,784        433,257        23,089   

Trustees’ fees and expenses

    42,540        13,970        1,649   

Custodian fee

    270,162        145,623        34,734   

Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees

    356,102        119,867        8,768   

Legal and accounting services

    44,597        29,552        27,326   

Printing and postage

    45,782        16,039        7,224   

Registration fees

    100,188        120,591        49,691   

Miscellaneous

    77,988        37,887        19,805   

Total expenses

  $ 10,167,149      $ 2,998,324      $ 406,784   

Deduct —

     

Reduction of custodian fee

  $ 60,379      $ 22,429      $ 2,661   

Allocation of expenses to affiliate

           149,112        113,972   

Total expense reductions

  $ 60,379      $ 171,541      $ 116,633   

Net expenses

  $ 10,106,770      $ 2,826,783      $ 290,151   

Net investment income

  $ 5,089,488      $ 2,568,604      $ 534,958   
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)                        

Net realized gain (loss) —

     

Investment transactions

  $ 19,105,172      $ 6,464,341      $ 2,405,379   

Net realized gain

  $ 19,105,172      $ 6,464,341      $ 2,405,379   

Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) —

     

Investments

  $ (11,728,330   $ (574,781   $ (1,170,036

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)

  $ (11,728,330   $ (574,781   $ (1,170,036

Net realized and unrealized gain

  $ 7,376,842      $ 5,889,560      $ 1,235,343   

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 12,466,330      $ 8,458,164      $ 1,770,301   

 

  28   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

 

 

    Year Ended January 31, 2013  
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   Short Term Fund     Intermediate Term Fund     Long Term Fund  

From operations —

     

Net investment income

  $ 5,089,488      $ 2,568,604      $ 534,958   

Net realized gain from investment transactions

    19,105,172        6,464,341        2,405,379   

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments

    (11,728,330     (574,781     (1,170,036

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 12,466,330      $ 8,458,164      $ 1,770,301   

Distributions to shareholders —

     

From net investment income

     

Class A

  $ (2,546,955   $ (736,166   $ (217,242

Class C

           (36,636     (15,564

Class I

    (2,581,332     (1,797,045     (302,160

From net realized gain

     

Class A

    (10,942,374     (1,498,701     (942,098

Class C

    (4,692,814     (792,885     (266,911

Class I

    (7,323,305     (3,410,231     (633,247

Total distributions to shareholders

  $ (28,086,780   $ (8,271,664   $ (2,377,222

Transactions in shares of beneficial interest —

     

Proceeds from sale of shares

     

Class A

  $ 218,033,312      $ 92,779,675      $ 14,341,807   

Class C

    92,953,312        40,053,914        5,250,645   

Class I

    199,276,992        221,623,303        3,945,276   

Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

     

Class A

    11,599,965        1,708,118        1,155,789   

Class C

    3,966,200        424,279        280,200   

Class I

    6,248,529        1,366,309        303,757   

Cost of shares redeemed

     

Class A

    (198,884,167     (47,335,562     (16,854,795

Class C

    (54,553,263     (8,008,614     (1,156,254

Class I

    (174,901,332     (77,161,588     (19,746,810

Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions

  $ 103,739,548      $ 225,449,834      $ (12,480,385

Net increase (decrease) in net assets

  $ 88,119,098      $ 225,636,334      $ (13,087,306
Net Assets                        

At beginning of year

  $ 988,164,470      $ 200,826,291      $ 42,538,253   

At end of year

  $ 1,076,283,568      $ 426,462,625      $ 29,450,947   
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income included in net assets                        

At end of year

  $ (61,095   $ (5,864   $ 173   

 

  29   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Statements of Changes in Net Assets — continued

 

 

    Year Ended January 31, 2012  
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   Short Term Fund     Intermediate Term Fund     Long Term Fund  

From operations —

     

Net investment income

  $ 6,133,876      $ 1,016,464      $ 180,213   

Net realized gain from investment transactions

    10,775,556        1,982,518        647,903   

Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments

    42,521,320        10,221,558        1,949,773   

Net increase in net assets from operations

  $ 59,430,752      $ 13,220,540      $ 2,777,889   

Distributions to shareholders —

     

From net investment income

     

Class A

  $ (3,491,098   $ (198,715   $ (29,450

Class C

    (34,877     (42,833     (2,242

Class I

    (2,652,713     (779,485     (148,480

From net realized gain

     

Class A

    (2,055,852     (175,778     (8,285

Class C

    (751,012     (83,892     (931

Class I

    (1,312,967     (348,736     (60,141

Total distributions to shareholders

  $ (10,298,519   $ (1,629,439   $ (249,529

Transactions in shares of beneficial interest —

     

Proceeds from sale of shares

     

Class A

  $ 184,081,337      $ 67,611,433      $ 16,123,546   

Class C

    75,912,059        23,351,759        573,719   

Class I

    174,648,561        108,904,400        21,909,751   

Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared

     

Class A

    4,156,903        223,392        33,062   

Class C

    644,387        46,155        2,565   

Class I

    2,296,323        153,594        8,225   

Cost of shares redeemed

     

Class A

    (195,740,602     (6,805,645     (679,740

Class C

    (50,472,643     (748,641     (209,089

Class I

    (127,256,740     (60,913,171     (350

Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions

  $ 68,269,585      $ 131,823,276      $ 37,761,689   

Net increase in net assets

  $ 117,401,818      $ 143,414,377      $ 40,290,049   
Net Assets                        

At beginning of year

  $ 870,762,652      $ 57,411,914      $ 2,248,204   

At end of year

  $ 988,164,470      $ 200,826,291      $ 42,538,253   
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income included in net assets                        

At end of year

  $ (134,821   $ (5,257   $ 173   

 

  30   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights

 

 

    Short Term Fund — Class A  
    Year Ended January 31,    

Period Ended

January 31, 2010 (1)

 
      2013     2012     2011    

Net asset value — Beginning of period

  $ 10.810      $ 10.230      $ 10.260      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                

Net investment income

  $ 0.060      $ 0.078      $ 0.090      $ 0.082 (2)  

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.069        0.626        0.084 (3)       0.363   

Total income from operations

  $ 0.129      $ 0.704      $ 0.174      $ 0.445   
Less Distributions                                

From net investment income

  $ (0.054   $ (0.078   $ (0.090   $ (0.140

From net realized gain

    (0.225     (0.046     (0.114     (0.045

Total distributions

  $ (0.279   $ (0.124   $ (0.204   $ (0.185

Net asset value — End of period

  $ 10.660      $ 10.810      $ 10.230      $ 10.260   

Total Return (4)

    1.20     6.92     1.69     4.49 % (5)  
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                

Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)

  $ 515,694      $ 492,264      $ 473,976      $ 230,414   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

       

Expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.88     0.89     0.90     0.90 % (6)(7)  

Expenses after custodian fee reduction

    0.87     0.89     0.89     0.90 % (6)(7)  

Net investment income

    0.54     0.74     0.83     0.94 % (6)  

Portfolio Turnover

    72     80     107     129 % (5)(8)  

 

(1)  

For the period from the start of business, March 27, 2009, to January 31, 2010.

 

(2)  

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(3)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(4)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(5)  

Not annualized.

 

(6)  

Annualized.

 

(7)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.11% of average daily net assets for the period ended January 31, 2010. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

(8)  

Excluding the value of portfolio securities delivered in payment of redemptions in-kind, the portfolio turnover would have been 120%.

 

  31   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Short Term Fund — Class C  
    Year Ended January 31,    

Period Ended

January 31, 2010 (1)

 
      2013     2012     2011    

Net asset value — Beginning of period

  $ 10.820      $ 10.240      $ 10.270      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                

Net investment income (loss)

  $ (0.020   $ (0.001   $ 0.011      $ 0.019 (2)  

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.065        0.629        0.085 (3)       0.372   

Total income from operations

  $ 0.045      $ 0.628      $ 0.096      $ 0.391   
Less Distributions                                

From net investment income

  $      $ (0.002   $ (0.012   $ (0.076

From net realized gain

    (0.225     (0.046     (0.114     (0.045

Total distributions

  $ (0.225   $ (0.048   $ (0.126   $ (0.121

Net asset value — End of period

  $ 10.640      $ 10.820      $ 10.240      $ 10.270   

Total Return (4)

    0.41     6.14     0.93     3.93 % (5)  
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                

Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)

  $ 223,992      $ 185,291      $ 150,490      $ 59,381   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

       

Expenses before custodian fee reduction

    1.63     1.64     1.64     1.65 % (6)(7)  

Expenses after custodian fee reduction

    1.62     1.64     1.63     1.65 % (6)(7)  

Net investment income (loss)

    (0.21 )%      (0.01 )%      0.08     0.22 % (6)  

Portfolio Turnover

    72     80     107     129 % (5)(8)  

 

(1)  

For the period from the start of business, March 27, 2009, to January 31, 2010.

 

(2)  

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(3)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(4)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(5)  

Not annualized.

 

(6)  

Annualized.

 

(7)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.11% of average daily net assets for the period ended January 31, 2010. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

(8)  

Excluding the value of portfolio securities delivered in payment of redemptions in-kind, the portfolio turnover would have been 120%.

 

  32   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Short Term Fund — Class I  
    Year Ended January 31,    

Period Ended

January 31, 2010 (1)

 
      2013     2012     2011    

Net asset value — Beginning of period

  $ 10.810      $ 10.230      $ 10.260      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                                

Net investment income

  $ 0.088      $ 0.105      $ 0.119      $ 0.129 (2)  

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.068        0.626        0.082 (3)       0.338   

Total income from operations

  $ 0.156      $ 0.731      $ 0.201      $ 0.467   
Less Distributions                                

From net investment income

  $ (0.081   $ (0.105   $ (0.117   $ (0.162

From net realized gain

    (0.225     (0.046     (0.114     (0.045

Total distributions

  $ (0.306   $ (0.151   $ (0.231   $ (0.207

Net asset value — End of period

  $ 10.660      $ 10.810      $ 10.230      $ 10.260   

Total Return (4)

    1.45     7.18     1.94     4.71 % (5)  
Ratios/Supplemental Data                                

Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted)

  $ 336,597      $ 310,609      $ 246,296      $ 127,546   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

       

Expenses before custodian fee reduction

    0.63     0.64     0.65     0.65 % (6)(7)  

Expenses after custodian fee reduction

    0.62     0.64     0.64     0.65 % (6)(7)  

Net investment income

    0.79     0.99     1.09     1.48 % (6)  

Portfolio Turnover

    72     80     107     129 % (5)(8)  

 

(1)  

For the period from the start of business, March 27, 2009, to January 31, 2010.

 

(2)  

Computed using average shares outstanding.

 

(3)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(4)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(5)  

Not annualized.

 

(6)  

Annualized.

 

(7)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.11% of average daily net assets for the period ended January 31, 2010. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

(8)  

Excluding the value of portfolio securities delivered in payment of redemptions in-kind, the portfolio turnover would have been 120%.

 

  33   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Intermediate Term Fund — Class A  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 11.780      $ 10.380      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                        

Net investment income

  $ 0.097      $ 0.152      $ 0.131   

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.231        1.451        0.406 (1)  

Total income from operations

  $ 0.328      $ 1.603      $ 0.537   
Less Distributions                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.097   $ (0.152   $ (0.131

From net realized gain

    (0.171     (0.051     (0.026

Total distributions

  $ (0.268   $ (0.203   $ (0.157

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 11.840      $ 11.780      $ 10.380   

Total Return (2)

    2.79     15.58     5.38
Ratios/Supplemental Data                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 115,170      $ 67,785      $ 3,972   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

     

Expenses before custodian fee reduction (3)

    0.96     0.95     0.96

Expenses after custodian fee reduction (3)

    0.95     0.95     0.95

Net investment income

    0.80     1.14     1.26

Portfolio Turnover

    103     125     202

 

(1)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(2)

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(3)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.05%, 0.16% and 0.68% of average daily net assets for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

  34   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Intermediate Term Fund — Class C  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 11.780      $ 10.380      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                        

Net investment income

  $ 0.008      $ 0.071      $ 0.057   

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.225        1.451        0.406 (1)  

Total income from operations

  $ 0.233      $ 1.522      $ 0.463   
Less Distributions                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.012   $ (0.071   $ (0.057

From net realized gain

    (0.171     (0.051     (0.026

Total distributions

  $ (0.183   $ (0.122   $ (0.083

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 11.830      $ 11.780      $ 10.380   

Total Return (2)

    1.98     14.73     4.63
Ratios/Supplemental Data                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 57,816      $ 25,215      $ 1,216   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

     

Expenses before custodian fee reduction (3)

    1.71     1.70     1.71

Expenses after custodian fee reduction (3)

    1.70     1.70     1.70

Net investment income

    0.04     0.45     0.58

Portfolio Turnover

    103     125     202

 

(1)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(3)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.05%, 0.16% and 0.68% of average daily net assets for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

  35   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Intermediate Term Fund — Class I  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 11.790      $ 10.380      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                        

Net investment income

  $ 0.127      $ 0.181      $ 0.155   

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.231        1.461        0.406 (1)  

Total income from operations

  $ 0.358      $ 1.642      $ 0.561   
Less Distributions                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.127   $ (0.181   $ (0.155

From net realized gain

    (0.171     (0.051     (0.026

Total distributions

  $ (0.298   $ (0.232   $ (0.181

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 11.850      $ 11.790      $ 10.380   

Total Return (2)

    3.05     15.97     5.62
Ratios/Supplemental Data                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 253,476      $ 107,826      $ 52,224   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

     

Expenses before custodian fee reduction (3)

    0.71     0.70     0.71

Expenses after custodian fee reduction (3)

    0.70     0.70     0.70

Net investment income

    1.04     1.58     1.24

Portfolio Turnover

    103     125     202

 

(1)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.05%, 0.16% and 0.68% of average daily net assets for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

  36   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Long Term Fund — Class A  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 11.710      $ 9.810      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                        

Net investment income

  $ 0.182      $ 0.249      $ 0.268   

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.582        1.929        0.056 (1)  

Total income from operations

  $ 0.764      $ 2.178      $ 0.324   
Less Distributions                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.182   $ (0.249   $ (0.267

From net realized gain

    (0.732     (0.029     (0.247

Total distributions

  $ (0.914   $ (0.278   $ (0.514

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 11.560      $ 11.710      $ 9.810   

Total Return (2)

    6.55     22.53     3.21
Ratios/Supplemental Data                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 14,340      $ 16,143      $ 149   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

     

Expenses before custodian fee reduction (3)

    0.96     0.95     0.95

Expenses after custodian fee reduction (3)

    0.95     0.95     0.95

Net investment income

    1.53     1.57     2.65

Portfolio Turnover

    211     239     200

 

(1)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(3)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.35%, 1.21% and 7.17% of average daily net assets for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

  37   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Long Term Fund — Class C  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 11.710      $ 9.810      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                        

Net investment income

  $ 0.093      $ 0.172      $ 0.192   

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.573        1.929        0.056 (1)  

Total income from operations

  $ 0.666      $ 2.101      $ 0.248   
Less Distributions                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.094   $ (0.172   $ (0.191

From net realized gain

    (0.732     (0.029     (0.247

Total distributions

  $ (0.826   $ (0.201   $ (0.438

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 11.550      $ 11.710      $ 9.810   

Total Return (2)

    5.76     21.54     2.44
Ratios/Supplemental Data                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 4,764      $ 547      $ 141   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

     

Expenses before custodian fee reduction (3)

    1.71     1.70     1.70

Expenses after custodian fee reduction (3)

    1.70     1.70     1.70

Net investment income

    0.66     1.36     1.88

Portfolio Turnover

    211     239     200

 

(1)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges.

 

(3)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.36%, 1.21% and 7.17% of average daily net assets for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

  38   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Financial Highlights — continued

 

 

    Long Term Fund — Class I  
    Year Ended January 31,  
      2013     2012     2011  

Net asset value — Beginning of year

  $ 11.710      $ 9.810      $ 10.000   
Income (Loss) From Operations                        

Net investment income

  $ 0.212      $ 0.274      $ 0.294   

Net realized and unrealized gain

    0.572        1.929        0.056 (1)  

Total income from operations

  $ 0.784      $ 2.203      $ 0.350   
Less Distributions                        

From net investment income

  $ (0.212   $ (0.274   $ (0.293

From net realized gain

    (0.732     (0.029     (0.247

Total distributions

  $ (0.944   $ (0.303   $ (0.540

Net asset value — End of year

  $ 11.550      $ 11.710      $ 9.810   

Total Return (2)

    6.82     22.71     3.47
Ratios/Supplemental Data                        

Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted)

  $ 10,347      $ 25,848      $ 1,958   

Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets):

     

Expenses before custodian fee reduction (3)

    0.71     0.70     0.70

Expenses after custodian fee reduction (3)

    0.70     0.70     0.70

Net investment income

    1.83     2.05     2.86

Portfolio Turnover

    211     239     200

 

(1)  

The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time.

 

(2)  

Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested.

 

(3)  

The investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses equal to 0.34%, 1.21% and 7.17% of average daily net assets for the years ended January 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower.

 

  39   See Notes to Financial Statements.


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements

 

 

1  Significant Accounting Policies

Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II (the Trust) is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Trust presently consists of four funds, three of which, each diversified, are included in these financial statements. They include Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund (Short Term Fund), Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund (Intermediate Term Fund) and Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund (Long Term Fund), (each individually referred to as the Fund, and collectively the Funds). The Funds’ investment objective is to seek after-tax total return. The Funds offer three classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Funds. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

A  Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of a Fund in a manner that fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker/dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.

B  Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.

C  Federal Taxes — Each Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Each Fund intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in non-taxable municipal securities, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by each Fund, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.

As of January 31, 2013, the Funds had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each Fund files a U.S. federal income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years from the date of filing.

D  Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.

E  Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Funds. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance each Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce each Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statements of Operations.

F  Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.

G  Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

  40  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

H  Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, each Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. Each Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Fund that have not yet occurred.

I  When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Funds may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Funds maintain security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.

2  Distributions to Shareholders

The net investment income of each Fund is determined daily and substantially all of the net investment income so determined is declared as a dividend to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Distributions are paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of a Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Funds distinguish between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.

The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended January 31, 2013 and January 31, 2012 was as follows:

 

    Year Ended January 31, 2013  
      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Distributions declared from:

       

Tax-exempt income

  $ 4,993,610       $ 2,569,749       $ 534,966   

Ordinary income

  $ 2,355,153       $ 4,383,037       $ 1,741,879   

Long-term capital gains

  $ 20,738,017       $ 1,318,878       $ 100,377   
       
    Year Ended January 31, 2012  
      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Distributions declared from:

       

Tax-exempt income

  $ 6,119,121       $ 1,020,761       $ 180,172   

Ordinary income

  $ 1,388,257       $ 597,942       $ 65,096   

Long-term capital gains

  $ 2,791,141       $ 10,736       $ 4,261   

 

  41  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

During the year ended January 31, 2013, the following amounts were reclassified due to the Funds’ use of equalization and differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for accretion of market discount and dividend redesignations:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Change in:

       

Paid-in capital

  $ 2,195,826       $ 646,270       $ 480,362   

Accumulated net realized gain

  $ (2,308,351    $ (646,906    $ (480,370

Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income

  $ 112,525       $ 636       $ 8   

Tax equalization accounting allows the Funds to treat as a distribution that portion of redemption proceeds representing a redeeming shareholder’s portion of undistributed taxable income and net capital gains. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Funds.

As of January 31, 2013, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Undistributed ordinary income

  $ 592,992       $ 942,864       $ 371,529   

Undistributed tax-exempt income

  $       $ 132,284       $ 6,091   

Undistributed long-term capital gains

  $ 643,947       $ 373,096       $ 288,806   

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 23,968,010       $ 8,020,231       $ 710,281   

Other temporary differences

  $ (61,095    $ (138,148    $ (5,918

The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to accretion of market discount, tax treatment of short-term capital gains and the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders.

3  Investment Adviser and Administration Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates

The investment adviser and administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory and administrative services rendered to each Fund. The fee is based upon a percentage of average daily net assets as presented in the following table and is payable monthly.

 

    Annual Asset Rate  
Daily Net Assets   Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Up to $500 million

    0.55      0.60      0.60

$500 million up to $1 billion

    0.54      0.60      0.60

On average daily net assets of $1 billion or more, the rates are reduced. For the year ended January 31, 2013, investment adviser and administration fees incurred by the Funds and the effective annual rates, as a percentage of average daily net assets, were as follows:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Investment Adviser and Administration Fee

  $ 5,824,586       $ 1,851,593       $ 198,905   

Effective Annual Rate

    0.54      0.60      0.60

For Intermediate Term Fund and Long Term Fund, EVM has agreed to reimburse the Fund’s expenses to the extent that total annual operating expenses (relating to ordinary operating expenses only) exceed 0.95%, 1.70% and 0.70% of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively. These agreements may be changed or terminated after May 31, 2013. Pursuant to these agreements, EVM was allocated $149,112 and $113,972, respectively, of Intermediate Term Fund’s and Long Term Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended January 31, 2013.

 

  42  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of each Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Funds’ principal underwriter, received a portion of the sales charges on sales of Class A shares of the Funds. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5). Sub-transfer agent fees earned by EVM and Class A sales charges that the Funds were informed were received by EVD for the year ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

EVM’s Sub-Transfer Agent Fees

  $ 6,968       $ 1,655       $ 418   

EVD’s Class A Sales Charges

  $ 94,928       $ 32,461       $ 17,670   

Trustees and officers of the Funds who are members of EVM’s organization receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser and administration fee. Trustees of the Funds who are not affiliated with EVM may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended January 31, 2013, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Funds are officers of EVM.

4  Distribution Plans

Each Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the Class A Plan, each Fund pays EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to each Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended January 31, 2013 for Class A shares amounted to the following:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Class A Distribution and Service Fees

  $ 1,277,420       $ 229,945       $ 35,593   

Each Fund also has in effect a distribution plan for Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Pursuant to the Class C Plan, each Fund pays EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Funds. For the year ended January 31, 2013, the Funds paid or accrued to EVD the following distribution fees, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of each Fund’s Class C shares:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Class C Distribution Fees

  $ 1,595,838       $ 324,943       $ 17,327   

Pursuant to the Class C Plan, the Funds also make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts equal to 0.25% per annum of the average daily net assets attributable to Class C shares. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended January 31, 2013 amounted to the following:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Class C Service Fees

  $ 531,946       $ 108,314       $ 5,762   

5  Contingent Deferred Sales Charges

A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) of 1% generally is imposed on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within eighteen months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may

 

  43  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

be waived under certain other limited conditions. For the year ended January 31, 2013, the Funds were informed that EVD received approximately the following amounts of CDSCs paid by Class A and Class C shareholders:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Class A

  $ 82,000       $ 15,000       $ 6,000   

Class C

  $ 55,000       $ 600       $ 30   

6  Purchases and Sales of Investments

Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, for the year ended January 31, 2013 were as follows:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Purchases

  $ 845,086,226       $ 507,833,011       $ 66,611,120   

Sales

  $ 684,122,956       $ 293,235,576       $ 80,826,889   

7  Shares of Beneficial Interest

Each Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Funds) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:

 

Short Term Fund

                   
    Year Ended January 31, 2013  
      Class A      Class C      Class I  

Sales

    20,177,050         8,600,444         18,440,022   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    1,083,552         372,064         583,067   

Redemptions

    (18,427,121      (5,051,897      (16,186,917

Net increase

    2,833,481         3,920,611         2,836,172   
       
    Year Ended January 31, 2012  
      Class A      Class C      Class I  

Sales

    17,413,013         7,169,107         16,505,290   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    391,517         60,146         216,329   

Redemptions

    (18,611,742      (4,800,303      (12,071,451

Net increase (decrease)

    (807,212      2,428,950         4,650,168   

 

  44  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

 

Intermediate Term Fund

                   
    Year Ended January 31, 2013  
      Class A      Class C      Class I  

Sales

    7,852,159         3,384,641         18,699,007   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    143,921         35,725         114,942   

Redemptions

    (4,021,803      (675,023      (6,567,181

Net increase

    3,974,277         2,745,343         12,246,768   
       
    Year Ended January 31, 2012  
      Class A      Class C      Class I  

Sales

    5,945,552         2,085,152         9,675,839   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    19,608         4,055         13,490   

Redemptions

    (592,232      (65,672      (5,570,690

Net increase

    5,372,928         2,023,535         4,118,639   
       

Long Term Fund

                   
    Year Ended January 31, 2013  
      Class A      Class C      Class I  

Sales

    1,211,724         438,357         332,944   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    98,982         24,064         26,010   

Redemptions

    (1,448,945      (96,844      (1,671,590

Net increase (decrease)

    (138,239      365,577         (1,312,636
       
    Year Ended January 31, 2012  
      Class A      Class C      Class I  

Sales

    1,422,998         51,270         2,007,701   

Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares

    2,955         237         771   

Redemptions

    (62,332      (19,148      (31

Net increase

    1,363,621         32,359         2,008,441   

At January 31, 2013, EVM owned approximately 21% of the value of the outstanding shares of Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund.

8  Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments

The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of each Fund at January 31, 2013, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:

 

      Short Term
Fund
     Intermediate
Term Fund
     Long Term
Fund
 

Aggregate cost

  $ 1,002,112,620       $ 398,177,536       $ 28,371,308   

Gross unrealized appreciation

  $ 24,137,564       $ 8,421,789       $ 768,301   

Gross unrealized depreciation

    (169,554      (401,558      (58,020

Net unrealized appreciation

  $ 23,968,010       $ 8,020,231       $ 710,281   

 

  45  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Notes to Financial Statements — continued

 

 

9  Line of Credit

The Funds participate with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $600 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Funds solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to each Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.08% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. Because the line of credit is not available exclusively to the Funds, a Fund may be unable to borrow some or all of its requested amounts at any particular time. The Funds did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended January 31, 2013.

10  Fair Value Measurements

Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.

 

Ÿ  

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

 

Ÿ  

Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)

 

Ÿ  

Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

At January 31, 2013, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Funds’ investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:

 

Short Term Fund

                          
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities

  $         —       $ 985,285,022       $         —       $ 985,285,022   

Taxable Municipal Securities

            253,208                 253,208   

Short-Term Investments

            40,542,400                 40,542,400   

Total Investments

  $       $ 1,026,080,630       $       $ 1,026,080,630   
          

Intermediate Term Fund

                          
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 406,197,767       $       $ 406,197,767   

Total Investments

  $       $ 406,197,767       $       $ 406,197,767   
          

Long Term Fund

                          
Asset Description   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Tax-Exempt Investments

  $       $ 29,081,589       $       $ 29,081,589   

Total Investments

  $       $ 29,081,589       $       $ 29,081,589   

The Funds held no investments or other financial instruments as of January 31, 2012 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs. At January 31, 2013, there were no investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year then ended.

 

  46  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund, and Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund:

We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund, and Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund (the “Funds”) (certain of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II), including the portfolios of investments, as of January 31, 2013, and the related statements of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended and for the period from the start of business, March 27, 2009, to January 31, 2010 for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of January 31, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial positions of Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund, and Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund as of January 31, 2013, the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended and for the period from the start of business, March 27, 2009, to January 31, 2010 for Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

March 20, 2013

 

  47  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Federal Tax Information (Unaudited)

 

 

The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2014 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2013. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code and/or regulations, shareholders must be notified regarding exempt-interest dividends and capital gains dividends.

Exempt-Interest Dividends.   The Funds designate the following percentages of dividends from net investment income as exempt-interest dividends:

 

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

    99.87

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

    99.99

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

    100.00

Capital Gains Dividends.   The Funds hereby designate the following amounts as capital gains dividends with respect to the taxable year ended January 31, 2013, or if subsequently determined to be different, the net capital gain of such year:

 

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

  $ 21,381,964   

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

  $ 1,691,974   

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

  $ 389,183   

 

  48  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Management and Organization

 

 

Fund Management.   The Trustees of Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II (the Trust) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust hold indefinite terms of office. The “noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below. Each Trustee oversees 183 portfolios in the Eaton Vance Complex (including all master and feeder funds in a master feeder structure). Each officer serves as an officer of certain other Eaton Vance funds. Each Trustee and officer serves until his or her successor is elected.

 

Name and Year of Birth   

Position(s)

with the
Trust

     Length of
Service
    

Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships

During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience

Interested Trustee

Thomas E. Faust Jr.

1958

   Trustee      Since 2007     

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 183 registered investment companies. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust.

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) Director of EVC and Hexavest Inc.

Noninterested Trustees

Scott E. Eston

1956

   Trustee      Since 2011     

Private investor. Formerly held various positions at Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo and Co., L.L.C. (investment management firm) (1997-2009), including Chief Operating Officer (2002-2009), Chief Financial Officer (1997-2009) and Chairman of the Executive Committee (2002-2008); President and Principal Executive Officer, GMO Trust (open-end registered investment company) (2006-2009). Former Partner, Coopers and Lybrand L.L.P. (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (public accounting firm) (1987-1997).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. None.

Benjamin C. Esty

1963

   Trustee      Since 2005     

Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

Allen R. Freedman

1940

   Trustee      Since 2007     

Private Investor. Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Former Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). Former Chief Executive Officer of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) (1979-2000).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) Director of Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries). Formerly, Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) (1979-2011).

William H. Park

1947

   Trustee      Since 2003     

Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Financial Officer, Aveon Group L.P. (investment management firm) (2010-2011). Formerly, Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (2006-2010). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Asset Management Corporation (investment management firm) (1982-2001). Formerly, Senior Manager, Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm) (1972-1981).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

Ronald A. Pearlman

1940

   Trustee      Since 2003     

Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. Formerly, Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) and Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy), U.S. Department of the Treasury (1983-1985). Formerly, Chief of Staff, Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress (1988-1990).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

 

  49  


Eaton Vance

Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Funds

January 31, 2013

 

Management and Organization — continued

 

 

Name and Year of Birth   

Position(s)

with the
Trust

     Length of
Service
    

Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships

During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience

Noninterested Trustees (continued)

Helen Frame Peters

1948

   Trustee      Since 2008     

Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Formerly, Dean, Carroll School of Management, Boston College (2000-2002). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income, Scudder Kemper Investments (investment management firm) (1998-1999). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Equity and Fixed Income, Colonial Management Associates (investment management firm) (1991-1998).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) Formerly, Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) (2004-2011). Formerly, Trustee of SPDR Index Shares Funds and SPDR Series Trust (exchange traded funds) (2000-2009). Formerly, Director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (a bank for banks) (2007-2009).

Lynn A. Stout

1957

   Trustee      Since 1998     

Distinguished Professor of Corporate and Business Law, Jack G. Clarke Business Law Institute, Cornell University Law School. Formerly, the Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (2006-2012) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law.

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1) None.

Harriett Tee Taggart

1948

   Trustee      Since 2011     

Managing Director, Taggart Associates (a professional practice firm). Formerly, Partner and Senior Vice President, Wellington Management Company, LLP (investment management firm) (1983-2006).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. Director of Albemarle Corporation (chemicals manufacturer) (since 2007) and The Hanover Group (specialty property and casualty insurance company) (since 2009). Formerly, Director of Lubrizol Corporation (specialty chemicals) (2007-2011).

Ralph F. Verni

1943

   Chairman of the Board and Trustee      Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005     

Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer (1982-1992), Chief Financial Officer (1988-1990) and Director (1982-1992), New England Life. Formerly, Chairperson, New England Mutual Funds (1982-1992). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street Management & Research (1992-2000). Formerly, Chairperson, State Street Research Mutual Funds (1992-2000). Formerly, Director, W.P. Carey, LLC (1998-2004) and First Pioneer Farm Credit Corp. (2002-2006).

Directorships in the Last Five Years. (1 ) None.

Principal Officers who are not Trustees

Name and Year of Birth    Position(s)
with the
Trust
    

Length of

Service

    

Principal Occupation(s)

During Past Five Years

Cynthia J. Clemson

1963

   President      Since 2005      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Payson F. Swaffield

1956

   Vice President      Since 2011      Chief Income Investment Officer of EVC. Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Maureen A. Gemma

1960

   Vice President, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer      Vice President since 2011; Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

James F. Kirchner

1967

   Treasurer      Since 2013      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

Paul M. O’Neil

1953

   Chief Compliance Officer      Since 2004      Vice President of EVM and BMR.

 

(1)  

During their respective tenures, the Trustees (except Mr. Eston and Ms. Taggart) also served as trustees of one or more of the following Eaton Vance funds (which operated in the years noted): Eaton Vance Credit Opportunities Fund (launched in 2005 and terminated in 2010); Eaton Vance Insured Florida Plus Municipal Bond Fund (launched in 2002 and terminated in 2009); and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Trust (launched in 1998 and terminated in 2009).

The SAI for the Funds includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Funds and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.

 

  50  


Eaton Vance Funds

 

IMPORTANT NOTICES

 

 

Privacy.   The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:

 

Ÿ  

Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions.

 

Ÿ  

None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker-dealers.

 

Ÿ  

Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information.

 

Ÿ  

We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com.

Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton Vance Management’s Real Estate Investment Group and Boston Management and Research. In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial advisor/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such advisor’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.

Delivery of Shareholder Documents.   The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial advisor. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial advisor.

Portfolio Holdings.   Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).

Proxy Voting.   From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122 and by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

 

  51  


 

 

This Page Intentionally Left Blank


Investment Adviser and Administrator

Eaton Vance Management

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

Principal Underwriter*

Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

(617) 482-8260

Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company

200 Clarendon Street

Boston, MA 02116

Transfer Agent

BNY Mellon Asset Servicing (US) Inc.

Attn: Eaton Vance Funds

P.O. Box 9653

Providence, RI 02940-9653

(800) 262-1122

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Deloitte & Touche LLP

200 Berkeley Street

Boston, MA 02116-5022

Offices of the Funds

Two International Place

Boston, MA 02110

 
* FINRA BrokerCheck.   Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.


LOGO

 

6096-3/13   TABS-SILTSRC


Item 2. Code of Ethics

Not required in this filing.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert

The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is a consultant and private investor. Previously, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of Aveon Group, L.P. (an investment management firm), as the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company), as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm), as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager at Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm).

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund, and Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund (the “Fund(s)”) are series of Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II (the “Trust”), a Massachusetts business trust, which, including the Funds, contains a total of 4 series (the “Series”). The Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end management investment company.

The following tables present the aggregate fees billed to each Fund for the Fund’s fiscal years ended January 31, 2012 and January 31, 2013 by the Fund’s principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), for professional services rendered for the audit of the Fund’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T during such periods.

Eaton Vance High Yield Municipal Income Fund

 

Fiscal Years Ended

   1/31/12      1/31/13  

Audit Fees

   $ 72,243       $ 74,870   

Audit-Related Fees (1)

   $ 0       $ 0   

Tax Fees (2)

   $ 13,880       $ 14,540   

All Other Fees (3)

   $ 300       $ 0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 86,423       $ 89,410   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 


Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Intermediate Term Fund

 

Fiscal Years Ended

   1/31/12      1/31/13  

Audit Fees

   $ 16,700       $ 18,170   

Audit-Related Fees (1)

   $ 0       $ 0   

Tax Fees (2)

   $ 8,080       $ 8,590   

All Other Fees (3)

   $ 300       $ 0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 25,080       $ 26,760   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Long Term Fund

 

Fiscal Years Ended

   1/31/12      1/31/13  

Audit Fees

   $ 16,700       $ 18,170   

Audit-Related Fees (1)

   $ 0       $ 0   

Tax Fees (2)

   $ 8,080       $ 8,590   

All Other Fees (3)

   $ 300       $ 0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 25,080       $ 26,760   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Bond Strategies Short Term Fund

 

Fiscal Period Ended

   1/31/12      1/31/13  

Audit Fees

   $ 31,850       $ 33,640   

Audit-Related Fees (1)

   $ 0       $ 0   

Tax Fees (2)

   $ 8,080       $ 8,590   

All Other Fees (3)

   $ 300       $ 0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 40,230       $ 42,230   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)  

Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees.

(2)  

Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation.

(3)  

All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services.


The Funds comprised all of the series of the Trust at 1/31/2013, and have the same fiscal year end (January 31). The following table presents the aggregate audit, audit-related, tax, and other fees billed to all of the Series in the Trust by D&T for the last two fiscal years of each Series.

 

Fiscal Years Ended

   1/31/12      1/31/13  

Audit Fees

   $ 137,493       $ 144,850   

Audit-Related Fees (1)

   $ 0       $ 0   

Tax Fees (2)

   $ 38,120       $ 40,310   

All Other Fees (3)

   $ 1,200       $ 0   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 176,813       $ 185,160   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)  

Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees.

(2)  

Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation.

(3)  

All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services.

(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the pre-approval of services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant (the “Pre-Approval Policies”). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee in the proper discharge f its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit and non-audit service fees. Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee.

The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must be reviewed and ratified by the registrant’s audit committee at least annually. The registrant’s audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the registrant’s principal accountant.

(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to the “de minimis exception” set forth in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.

(f) Not applicable.

(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed for services rendered to all of the Series in the Trust by D&T for the last two fiscal years of each Series; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by D&T for the last two fiscal years of each Series.


Fiscal Years Ended

   1/31/12      1/31/13  

Registrant (1)

   $ 39,320       $ 40,310   

Eaton Vance (2)

   $ 414,561       $ 544,549   

 

(1)  

Includes all of the Series of the Trust.

(2)  

The investment adviser to the Series, as well as any of its affiliates that provide ongoing services to the Series, are subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp.

(h) The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrant’s principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrant

Not required in this filing.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments

Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Not required in this filing.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies

Not required in this filing.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers

Not required in this filing.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No Material Changes.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures

(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and


that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits

 

(a)(1)

   Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2).

(a)(2)(i)

   Treasurer’s Section 302 certification.

(a)(2)(ii)

   President’s Section 302 certification.

(b)

   Combined Section 906 certification.


Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Eaton Vance Municipals Trust II

 

By:  

/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson

  Cynthia J. Clemson
  President

Date: March 14, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:  

/s/ James F. Kirchner

  James F. Kirchner
  Treasurer

Date: March 14, 2013

 

By:  

/s/ Cynthia J. Clemson

  Cynthia J. Clemson
  President

Date: March 14, 2013

Netspend Holdings, Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:NTSP)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mai 2024 à Juin 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse Netspend Holdings, Inc. (MM)
Netspend Holdings, Inc. (MM) (NASDAQ:NTSP)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Juin 2023 à Juin 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse Netspend Holdings, Inc. (MM)