UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant x
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
|
Check the appropriate box:
¨
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement
|
¨
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
¨
|
Definitive Proxy Statement
|
x
|
Definitive Additional Materials
|
¨
|
Soliciting Material under Rule 14a-12
|
SCOPUS BIOPHARMA INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its
Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x
|
No fee required.
|
¨
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total fee paid:
|
|
|
¨
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
¨
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
|
(1)
|
Amount previously paid:
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing Party:
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date Filed:
|
|
|
December 7, 2021
Dear Scopus Stockholders,
Scopus will reconvene its Annual Meeting of
Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) on Monday, December 20, 2021, at 11:30 a.m. Eastern time. At the Annual Meeting, we
are asking you to re-elect the Company’s director nominees – Raphael (“Rafi”) Hofstein, Ph.D. and David
S. Battleman, M.D.
Unfortunately, Morris C. Laster, M.D. has commenced
a proxy contest by nominating two hand-picked candidates to stand for election to the board. Your board views Dr. Laster’s candidates
as unqualified and believes that they will be committed to advancing Dr. Laster’s interests – not yours.
If you have not already voted your shares, please
vote “FOR ALL” of Scopus’ director nominees today by telephone, by Internet or by signing, dating and
returning the enclosed WHITE proxy card in the postage-paid envelope. If you have already voted and do not wish to change
your vote, you do not need to vote again. Your vote matters regardless of how many shares you own!
SCOPUS IS DEVELOPING TRANSFORMATIONAL THERAPEUTICS
BASED ON GROUNDBREAKING SCIENTIFIC AND MEDICAL DISCOVERIES
In September 2021, we launched Duet Therapeutics
(“Duet”) to advance the immuno-oncology assets of Scopus and Olimmune, Inc.i
|
·
|
Duet has a powerful portfolio of bi-functional cancer-targeting molecules that simultaneously activate
the body’s immune system by stimulating TLR9 receptors and turning off the STAT3 gene.
|
|
·
|
The STAT3 gene plays a major role in maintaining immunosuppression and allowing tumors to grow,
and it is frequently characterized as the holy grail of treating and curing cancer.
|
|
·
|
Our technologies have the potential to create unprecedented treatments, and potentially cures, for
many different types of cancer.
|
|
·
|
We’ve significantly enhanced Scopus’ leadership team by appointing individuals with
experience in company building and clinical development. These individuals include Alan Horsager, Ph.D.; Marcin Kortylewski, Ph.D.;
John Rossi, Ph.D.; and Nagy Habib, Ch.M., F.R.C.S.
|
o
We continue to strengthen the Company’s management team.
SCOPUS’ HIGHLY QUALIFIED AND EXPERIENCED
DIRECTOR NOMINEES STANDING FOR RE-ELECTION
Scopus’ highly qualified and experienced
candidates – Dr. Hofstein and Dr. Battleman – have track records of guiding early-stage life science companies as
they develop and commercialize scientific breakthroughs and their highly accomplished careers are built upon distinguished academic
backgrounds. Your board believes they are the right candidates to continue overseeing Scopus.
|
·
|
Dr. Hofstein has broad experience across multiple scientific and medical sectors for numerous
public and private biopharmaceutical, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies.
|
|
o
|
He previously served as President and CEO of Toronto Innovation Acceleration Partners (“TIAP”),
a consortium of leading universities, teaching hospitals and other institutions and research institutes with the mandate of identifying
life sciences and other technology research. Industry partners of TIAP include Amgen, Baxter, GlaxoSmithKlein, Johnson & Johnson,
Merck, Pfizer, and Takeda.
|
|
o
|
During Dr. Hofstein’s tenure with TIAP, he helped launch and/or finance over 50 new life sciences
and other healthcare-related companies.
|
|
o
|
Dr. Hofstein’s education includes a B.Sc. in Chemistry and Physics from Hebrew University, M.Sc.
and Ph.D. in Life Sciences and Chemistry from the Weizmann Institute of Science and post-doctoral training and research in the
Department of Neurobiology at Harvard Medical School.
|
|
·
|
Dr. Battleman has extensive experience spanning across academia, the pharmaceutical industry
and management consulting, as well as widespread investor relationships resulting from advising investors in connection with
biotech-related and other healthcare investments.
|
|
o
|
He has served as the Founding Principal of TrueNorth Lifesciences, a Senior Principal at IMS
Health Holdings, Inc., a consultant at Bain & Company, and a director at Pfizer Inc.
|
|
o
|
Dr. Battleman’s education includes a B.A. in Biology from The Johns Hopkins University,
an M.D. from the Weill Medical College of Cornell University, a MSc. from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
and an M.B.A. from The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.
|
SCOPUS
RECENTLY RAISED $9.75 MILLION IN NON-DILUTIVE FINANCING
Scopus recently raised $9.75 million in funding
via a private placement, providing the cash runway to reach near-term value creation milestones that we expect to reach between
now and the fourth quarter of 2022 and the first quarter of 2023.
|
·
|
The financing was non-dilutive to stockholders other than members of the Executive Committee of
your board (the “Executive Committee”) and HCFP, their investment affiliate.
|
o
HCFP is the co-founder of the Company and provided substantially all of the necessary start-up capital.
|
·
|
HCFP fully absorbed the dilution of the financing by contributing back to the Company warrants to purchase
six million shares of common stock.
|
|
·
|
HCFP contributed these securities because it was acting in the best interests of Scopus and its stockholders.
|
|
·
|
Dr. Laster has chosen to obfuscate the facts surrounding the financing in support of his false
narrative:
|
o
Dr. Laster falsely states the financing is dilutive. The truth is the six million shares contributed
by HCFP fully cover the shares and warrants issued to investors in the private placement.
o
Dr. Laster falsely claims the transaction is an example of self-dealing by HCFP. The truth is the
financing would not have occurred without HCFP’s contribution, which benefitted all of the other stockholders but was extremely
costly to HCFP.
o
Dr. Laster falsely suggests that Scopus did not speak to other financing sources. The truth is the
Company sought to raise funds from multiple potential parties. Almost all such parties declined to invest due to Dr. Laster’s proxy
contest and litigation against the Company.
YOUR BOARD BELIEVES DR. LASTER’S NOMINEES
ARE NOT QUALIFIED TO SERVE AS DIRECTORS
Dr. Laster would have you believe that his actions
are designed to benefit all Scopus stockholders. However, your board believes Dr. Laster is being disingenuous and that his campaign
is self-serving. Dr. Laster previously resigned from Scopus’ board and at no time expressed any interest in re-joining.
Instead, he has nominated Mordechai Saar Hacham and Joshua Levine, two unqualified individuals who your board believes will be more
focused on advancing Dr. Laster’s agenda than on the interests of all stockholders. Here is some important additional context
to consider about Dr. Laster’s handpicked candidates:
|
·
|
Mr. Hacham and Mr. Levine are not truly independent from Dr. Laster:
|
o
Mr. Hacham serves as Chief Financial Officer at OncoHost, where Dr. Laster is Chairman; and
o
Mr. Levine served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Proteologics at the same time Dr. Laster served on its board.
|
·
|
Mr. Hacham to our knowledge has never served as an officer or on the board of a publicly traded
company in the United States. The private biotechnology incubator run by Mr. Hacham had a mixed track record, at best.
|
|
·
|
Mr. Levine has extremely limited experience as an officer or director of publicly traded
companies in the United States. He oversaw substantial value destruction at the few public companies where he served as an officer
or a director, including XTL Biopharmaceuticals, an Israeli-based company that trades on Nasdaq, and three small Israeli-based companies.
|
o
One of these companies, SCNV Acquisition, had the registration of its securities revoked by the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
|
·
|
Mr. Levine overstates his credentials while simultaneously attempting to hide his past affiliation
with disgraced stockbroker Patterson Travis, Inc. (“Patterson Travis”), a firm that was expelled by the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
|
o
Mr. Levine’s biography in Dr. Laster’s proxy statement states he was head of corporate finance at a US-based
investment bank without identifying the investment bank. We believe this refers to Patterson Travis.
o
In a February 2001 article by the Australian Financial Review, Patterson Travis told the publication
Mr. Levine “was never an employee”ii.
To avoid continuing distraction and expense, Scopus
was willing to consider adding qualified nominees proposed by Dr. Laster to the Company’s board. Dr. Laster refused to entertain
this proposal and has also failed to articulate how his nominees are suited to serve as directors of a public company.
SUPPORT SCOPUS AND YOUR INVESTMENT BY VOTING
“FOR ALL” OF SCOPUS’ NOMINEES AND “FOR” THE APPOINTMENT OF ITS ACCOUNTING FIRM ON THE WHITE
PROXY CARD
Your board is committed to acting in the best
interests of all stockholders and urges you to support the Company by voting “FOR ALL” of its director nominees
– Raphael (“Rafi”) Hofstein, Ph.D. and David S. Battleman, M.D. – and “FOR” the
appointment of Citrin Cooperman & Company, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2021 fiscal year on the
WHITE proxy card today.
Your support is greatly appreciated as we progress
towards our milestones.
Sincerely,
Joshua R. Lamstein
Chairman of Scopus
Morrow Sodali
509 Madison Avenue, Suite 1206
New York, New York 10022
Call Collect: (203) 658-9400
Call Toll Free: (800) 662-5200
Email: SCPS@investor.morrowsodali.com
i
Scopus acquired Olimmune, Inc. in June 2021.
ii
Permission to use quotation neither sought nor obtained.
Scopus BioPharma (NASDAQ:SCPS)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Fév 2025 à Mar 2025
Scopus BioPharma (NASDAQ:SCPS)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mar 2024 à Mar 2025