Background
As previously disclosed, on August 11,
2021, The ExOne Company (ExOne or the Company) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), by and among Desktop Metal, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(Desktop Metal), Texas Merger Sub I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Desktop Metal (Merger Sub I), Texas Merger Sub II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of Desktop Metal (Merger Sub II), and ExOne. The Merger Agreement provides, among other things, that upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub I will merge with and into
ExOne, with ExOne surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Desktop Metal (the First Merger). The Merger Agreement also provides that, immediately following the effective time of the First Merger, ExOne, as the
surviving corporation of the First Merger, will merge with and into Merger Sub II (the Second Merger, and together with the First Merger, the Mergers), with Merger Sub II surviving the Second Merger and
continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of Desktop Metal. The proposed Mergers are described in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, dated October 8, 2021, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) and mailed to
all stockholders of record of ExOne in connection with the Mergers (the Proxy Statement/Prospectus).
Regulatory Matters
On October 20, 2021, ExOne and Desktop Metal received clearance from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, a foreign
investment regulatory authority, that the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement have been cleared pursuant to section 58a paragraph 1 of the German Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance. Additionally, and as previously reported, the
waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, expired on October 28, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Accordingly, ExOne and Desktop Metal have now received all regulatory approvals required as a
condition to consummate the Mergers.
Subject to obtaining ExOne stockholder approval and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions to the
Mergers, ExOne and Desktop Metal expect to complete the Mergers during the fourth quarter of 2021, and, subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, such closing may occur as soon as three days following the date of the special meeting of ExOne
stockholders.
Litigation Update
As previously
disclosed in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, seven purported ExOne stockholders filed lawsuits against ExOne, its board of directors, and Desktop Metal related to the Mergers, one of which was subsequently withdrawn: Stein v. The ExOne
Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-07756, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 16, 2021 (the
Stein Complaint); Kong v. The ExOne Company, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-04165, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania on September 21, 2021 (the Kong Complaint); Vasedevan v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No.
1:21-cv-07984, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 24, 2021 (the Vasedevan
Complaint); Goldstein v. The ExOne Company, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05358, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New
York on September 27, 2021 and subsequently voluntarily dismissed on October 14, 2021 (the Goldstein Complaint); Abramova v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-08091, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 29, 2021 (the Abramova Complaint); Campanella v. The ExOne Company,
et. al, Case No. 2:21-cv-01302, filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on September 29, 2021 (the
Campanella Complaint); McDevitt v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-08249, filed in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York on October 6, 2021 (the McDevitt Complaint). Following the filing of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, five additional purported ExOne stockholders filed lawsuits against the various parties:
Fruster v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-05753, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on October 14,
2021 (the Fruster Complaint); Jones v. The ExOne Company, et. al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01474, filed in the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware on October 20, 2021 (the Jones Complaint); Justice v. The ExOne Company, et. al. Case No. 2:21-cv-04607, filed
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on October 20, 2021 (the Justice Complaint); Coffman v. The ExOne Company, et. al., Case No. 1:21-CV-08648, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 21, 2021 (the Coffman Complaint); Vasudevan v. The ExOne Company,
et. al., Case No. 1:21-cv-08679, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 22, 2021 (the Vasudevan Complaint).