false
0001495825
N-CSRS
0001495825
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:RisksAndOtherConsiderationsMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:BelowInvestmentGradeSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:CorporateBondRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:ShortSalesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
us-gaap:CreditRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:CurrentFixedIncomeAndDebtMarketConditionsMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
us-gaap:InterestRateRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:LeverageRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:LiquidityRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:ManagementRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:MarketRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:MunicipalSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:BuildAmericaBondsRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:SpecialRisksRelatedToCertainMunicipalSecuritiesMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:TaxableMinicipalSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:DebtInstumentsRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:MunicipalConduitBondRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:ProjectFinanceRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:RisksOfInvestingInDebtIssuedByNonProfitInstitutionsMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:SeniorLoansRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:StructuredFinanceInvestmentsRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:AssetBackedSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:MortgageBackedSecuritiesRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:CLOCDOAndCBORiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
0001495825
GBAB:InvestmentFundsRiskMember
2023-06-01
2023-11-30
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
xbrli:pure
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-22437
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond &
Investment Grade Debt Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
227 West Monroe, Chicago, IL, 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Amy J. Lee
227 West Monroe, Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area
code: (312) 827-0100
Date of fiscal year end: May 31
Date of reporting period: June 1, 2023 –
November 30, 2023
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
The registrant's annual report transmitted to shareholders pursuant
to Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), is as follows:
Guggenheim Funds Semiannual Report
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt
Trust
|
|
GuggenheimInvestments.com |
CEF-GBAB-SAR-1123 |
GUGGENHEIMINVESTMENTS.COM/GBAB
... YOUR LINK TO THE LATEST, MOST UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION ABOUT
THE GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST
The shareholder report you are reading right now is just the beginning
of the story.
Online at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab, you will find:
• Daily, weekly and monthly data on share prices, net asset
values, distributions and more
• Monthly portfolio overviews and performance analyses
• Announcements, press releases and special notices
• Trust and adviser contact information
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC and Guggenheim Funds
Investment Advisors, LLC are continually updating and expanding shareholder information services on the Trust’s website in an ongoing
effort to provide you with the most current information about how your Trust’s assets are managed and the results of our efforts.
It is just one more small way we are working to keep you better informed about your investment in the Trust.
|
|
DEAR SHAREHOLDER (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
We thank you for your investment in the Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Trust”). This report covers the Trust’s performance for the six-month period
ended November 30, 2023 (the “Reporting Period”).
To learn more about the Trust’s performance and investment
strategy, we encourage you to read the Economic and Market Overview and the Management’s Discussion of Trust Performance, which
begin on page 5.There you will find information on Guggenheim’s investment philosophy, views on the economy and market environment,
and information about the factors that impacted the Trust’s performance during the Reporting Period.
The Trust’s primary investment objective is to provide current
income with a secondary objective of long-term capital appreciation.
All Trust returns cited—whether based on net asset value
(“NAV”) or market price—assume the reinvestment of all distributions. For the Reporting Period, the Trust provided a
total return based on market price of 0.74% and a total return based on NAV of -0.08%. At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s
market price of $15.65 per share represented a premium of 2.76% to its NAV of $15.23 per share.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All NAV
returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses, and all other Trust expenses. The market price of the Trust’s
shares fluctuates from time to time, and it may be higher or lower than the Trust’s NAV.
During the Reporting Period, the Trust paid a monthly distribution
of $0.12573 per share. The most recent distribution represents an annualized distribution rate of 9.64% based on the Trust’s closing
market price of $15.65 per share at the end of the Reporting Period.
The Trust’s distribution rate is not constant and the amount
of distributions, when declared by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, is subject to change. There is no guarantee of any future distribution
or that the current returns and distribution rate will be maintained. Please see the Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution
Rate table on page 25, and Note 2(g) on page 62 for more information on distributions for the period.
We encourage shareholders to consider the opportunity to
reinvest their distributions from the Trust through the Dividend Reinvestment Plan (“DRIP”), which is described on page
86 of this report. When shares trade at a discount to NAV, the DRIP takes advantage of the discount by reinvesting the monthly
dividend distribution in common shares of the Trust purchased in the market at a price less than NAV. Conversely, when the market
price of the Trust’s common shares is at a premium above NAV, the DRIP reinvests participants’ dividends in newly issued
common shares at the greater of NAV per share or 95% of the market price per share. The DRIP provides a cost-effective means to
accumulate additional shares and enjoy the benefits of compounding returns over time. The DRIP effectively provides an income
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 3
|
|
DEAR SHAREHOLDER (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
averaging technique for shareholders to accumulate a larger number
of Trust shares when the market price is depressed than when the price is higher.
We appreciate your investment and look forward to serving your
investment needs in the future. For the most up-to-date information on your investment, please visit the Trust’s website at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab.
Sincerely,
Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt
Trust
December 31, 2023
4 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
ECONOMIC AND MARKET OVERVIEW (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
With an influx of softer data on economic activity and
inflation coupled with worsening survey results and anecdotal reports, the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) has
continued to shift in a dovish direction as it becomes more cautious about downside risk to the economy than the upside risk to
inflation. The Fed held rates steady at its December 2023 meeting, and in their Summary of Economic Projections, Fed officials
signaled the possibility for 75 basis points of rate cuts in 2024, up from their prior estimate of 50 basis points of cuts. More
importantly, Chair Powell acknowledged that discussion on when to cut rates was beginning, opening the possibility for rate cuts in
as soon as the next few months.
The Fed’s pivot to a dovish stance is unequivocally market
friendly in our view and led rates lower, equity markets to new highs, and credit spreads to their tightest levels since before the hiking
cycle began. The decline in U.S. Treasury yields across the board is fueling a bit of an unexpected improvement in markets, spanning both
risk and government-backed assets. Spreads continued to tighten in asset-backed securities as well, and November 2023 was the best month
for Agency mortgage-backed securities since the 1980s.
Looking forward, we believe investment-grade corporate bond spread
tightening could slow somewhat. Meanwhile, we continue to keep an eye on areas where fundamental trends fail to corroborate the broad
risk-on sentiment, like in the office real estate sector which is struggling from structural demand shifts and the financing environment.
In short, the unexpected improvement, while good news for investors after a challenging year, is predicated on the Fed cutting rates just
in time to reverse the pressure that tightening is actively putting on the most sensitive sectors and consumers. To get more cuts projected
from here, we believe that we will need to see more evidence that the economy is going to slow further.
The opinions and forecasts expressed may not actually come
to pass. This information is subject to change at any time, based on market and other conditions, and should not be construed as a recommendation
of any specific security or strategy.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 5
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
MANAGEMENT TEAM
Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC serves as the investment
adviser to Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Trust”). The Trust is managed by a team
of seasoned professionals at Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC (“GPIM”).
This team includes Anne B. Walsh, CFA, JD, Managing Partner,
Chief Investment Officer of GPIM and Portfolio Manager; Steven H. Brown, CFA, Chief Investment Officer - Fixed Income, Senior
Managing
Director, and Portfolio Manager; Allen Li, CFA, Managing Director
and Portfolio Manager; Adam J. Bloch, Managing Director and Portfolio Manager; and Evan L. Serdensky, Managing Director and Portfolio
Manager.
Discuss the Trust’s return and return of comparative Indices
All Trust returns cited—whether based on net asset value
(“NAV”) or market price—assume the reinvestment of all distributions. For the Reporting Period, the Trust provided a
total return based on market price of 0.74% and a total return based on NAV of -0.08%. At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s
market price of $15.65 per share represented a premium of 2.76% to its NAV of $15.23 per share. At the beginning of the Reporting Period,
the Trust’s market price of $16.32 per share represented a premium of 1.94% to its NAV of $16.01 per share.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. All NAV
returns include the deduction of management fees, operating expenses, and all other Trust expenses. The market price of the Trust’s
shares fluctuates from time to time and maybe higher or lower than the Trust’s NAV.
Please refer to the graphs and tables included within the Trust
Summary, beginning on page 22 for additional information about the Trust’s performance.
The returns for the Reporting Period of indices tracking performance
of the asset classes to which the Trust allocates the largest of its investments were:
Index* |
Total Return |
|
Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index |
2.29 |
% |
Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index |
-1.21 |
% |
Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index |
-0.80 |
% |
Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Index |
5.52 |
% |
Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index |
6.98 |
% |
ICE Bank of America Asset Backed Security Master BBB-AA Index |
2.19 |
% |
ICE Bank of America Build America Bond Index |
-1.49 |
% |
Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”) Index |
10.17 |
% |
*See page 10 for Index definitions |
|
|
6 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Discuss the Trust’s distributions
During the Reporting Period, the Trust paid a monthly distribution
of $0.12573 per share. The most recent distribution represents an annualized distribution rate of 9.64% based on the Trust’s closing
market price of $15.65 per share at the end of the Reporting Period.
The distributions paid consisted of (i) investment company taxable
income taxed as ordinary income, which includes, among other things, short-term capital gain and income from certain hedging and interest
rate transactions, and (ii) return of capital.
There is no guarantee of any future distribution or that the current
returns and distribution rate will be maintained. The Trust’s distribution rate is not constant and the amount of distributions,
when declared by the Trust’s Board of Trustees, is subject to change.
Please see the Distributions to Shareholders & Annualized Distribution
Rate table on page 25, and Note 2(g) on page 62 for more information on distributions for the period.
Payable Date |
|
Amount |
June 30, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
July 31, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
August 31, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
September 29, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
October 31, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
November 30, 2023 |
$ |
0.12573 |
Total |
$ |
0.75438 |
What factors contributed or detracted from the Trust’s
Performance during the Reporting Period?
The Reporting Period was marked by a move tighter in spreads
and a bear steepening of the U.S. Treasury curve. Earned income was the largest contributor to performance. Also, credit spreads
positively contributed as the Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Investment Grade Bond Index and Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond
Index spreads tightened by 34 basis points and 89 basis points, respectively. Duration detracted from performance as the yield curve
bear steepened, meaning yields at the long end of the curve rose more than those at the front end, with yields on 2-year and 30-year
Treasurys finishing 28 basis points and 63 basis points higher, respectively, at the end of the Reporting Period.
Discuss the Trust’s Use of Leverage
At the end of the Reporting Period, the Trust’s leverage
was approximately 28% of Managed Assets, compared with about 26% at the beginning of the Reporting Period. The increase in leverage is
largely due to the increased income opportunity that presented itself as rates rose to cycle-highs.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 7
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
The Trust currently employs financial leverage through reverse
repurchase agreements with five counterparties.
One purpose of leverage is to fund the purchase of additional securities
that may provide increased income and potentially greater appreciation to common shareholders than could be achieved from an unlevered
portfolio. Leverage may result in greater NAV volatility and entails more downside risk than an unleveraged portfolio.
Given negative total returns over the Reporting Period, leverage
detracted from performance.
Investments in Investment Funds (as defined below in the
Risks and Other Considerations section which begins on page 11) frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of financial
leverage and the associated risks, such as the magnified effect of any losses.
How did the Trust use derivatives during the Reporting Period?
The Trust had minimal exposure to derivatives during the Reporting
Period. The Trust held foreign currency forwards to hedge non-USD denominated bond holdings, which detracted a negligible amount as the
dollar marginally depreciated against the Canadian dollar, the euro, and the pound. The Trust utilized credit default swaps to hedge broader
credit risks, though this position was nearly unchanged and only modestly detracted during the period. Lastly, the Trust employed curve
caps to hedge against moves in the yield curve; the performance from these positions over the Reporting Period was negligible.
How was the Trust positioned at the end of the Reporting Period?
As we near the end of 2023, we have come through a period of
unprecedented volatility that has left a wide range of possible outcomes going forward. We are coming off multiple years of poor
returns across fixed income, particularly for longer-duration, high-quality investments. But the past may not resemble the future,
and the worst drawdown for an asset class can prove to be a very attractive entry point for prudent investors as the end of the
Fed’s aggressive rate hiking cycle may provide respite.
We believe the next major policy moves are likely to provide
strong tailwinds for fixed income. We continue to expect elevated volatility in the economy and markets, as well as a policy
response to these conditions. This argues for the importance of diversification in asset allocation and within portfolios. The
heightened probability of a recession over the next 6-12 months as indicated by our models continues to guide our more defensive and
conservative positioning within the Trust, prioritizing quality (which takes multiple forms, including focusing on industry market
leaders, more conservatively positioned balance sheets, stronger credit stipulations, and more creditor-friendly structures) and
industries that may be more resilient to economic downturns.
8 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Though the recent decrease in interest rates and tightening
of credit spreads have likely pulled forward some of the expected future total return potential of parts of fixed income, we still
view the go-forward valuation proposition of fixed income as attractive at current levels and sourceable income levels in high
quality credit as historically high relative to recent history. Our portfolio strategy has remained consistent throughout 2023. This
means continuing to upgrade the credit profile of our portfolios and to seek strong income generation and the potential for capital
appreciation. We have grown our exposure in high quality sectors, particularly in Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
(“RMBS”) and in structured credit investments such as non-Agency RMBS, senior tranches of collateralized loan
obligations, and commercial asset-backed securities.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 9
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Index Definitions
Indices are unmanaged and reflect no expenses. It is not possible
to invest directly in an index.
The Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index is considered representative
of the broad market for investment grade, tax-exempt municipal bonds with a maturity of at least one year.
The Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index tracks performance
of investment-grade fixed income securities issued by state and local governments whose income is not exempt from tax, issued generally
to finance a project or activity that does not meet certain “public purpose/use” requirements.
The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based
flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, U.S. dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market, including U.S. Treasuries,
government-related and corporate securities, mortgage-backed securities or “MBS” (agency fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage, or “ARM”, pass-throughs), asset-backed securities (“ABS”), and commercial mortgage-backed securities
(“CMBS”) (agency and non-agency).
The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate High Yield Index measures
the U.S. dollar-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating
of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB +/BB + or below.
The Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index is an index designed
to mirror the investable universe of the U.S.-dollar-denominated leveraged loan market.
The ICE Bank of America Asset Backed Security Master BBB-AA
Index is a subset of the ICE Bank of America U.S. Fixed Rate Asset Backed Securities Index including all securities rated AA1 through
BBB3, inclusive.
The ICE Bank of America Build America Bond Index is designed
to track the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated Build America Bonds publicly issued by U.S. states and territories, and their political
subdivisions, in the U.S. market.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 (“S&P 500”)
Index is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure the performance of the broad economy, representing all
major industries and is considered a representation of U.S. stock market.
10 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Risks and Other Considerations
Investors should be aware that in light of the current uncertainty,
volatility and state of economies, financial markets, geopolitical tensions, and labor and public health conditions around the world,
the risks below are heightened significantly compared to normal conditions and therefore subject the Trust’s investments and a
shareholder’s investment in the Trust to reduced yield and/or income and sudden and substantial losses.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio
managers only through the report period as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time, based on market and other
conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation of any kind. The material may also include forward looking statements that
involve risk and uncertainty, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass.
There can be no assurance that the Trust will achieve its
investment objectives. The net asset and market values of the Trust’s shares will fluctuate, sometimes independently, based on
market and other factors affecting the Trust and its investments. The market value of Trust shares will either be above (premium) or
below (discount) their net asset value. Although the net asset value of Trust shares is often considered in determining whether to
purchase or sell Trust shares, whether investors will realize gains or losses upon the sale of Trust shares will depend upon whether
the market price of Trust shares at the time of sale is above or below the investor’s purchase price. Market value movements
of Trust shares are thus material to investors and may result in losses, even when net asset value has increased. The Trust is
designed for long-term investors; investors should not view the Trust as a vehicle for trading purposes.
Risk is inherent in all investing, including the loss of your entire
principal. Therefore, before investing you should consider the risks carefully. The Trust is subject to various risk factors, including
investment risk, which could result in the loss of the entire principal amount that you invest. Certain of these risk factors are described
below. Please see the Trust’s Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information (SAI), most recent annual report and guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab
for a more detailed description of the risks of investing in the Trust. Shareholders may access the Trust’s Prospectus, SAI and
most recent annual report on the EDGAR Database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov.
The fact that a particular risk below is not specifically identified
as being heightened under current conditions does not mean that the risk is not greater than under normal conditions.
Below Investment Grade Securities Risk. High yield,
below investment grade and unrated high risk debt securities (which also may be known as “junk bonds”) may present
additional risks because these securities may be less liquid, and therefore more difficult to value accurately and sell at an
advantageous price or time, and present more credit risk than investment grade bonds. The price of high yield securities tends to be
subject to greater volatility due to issuer-specific operating results
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 11
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
and outlook and to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive
industry conditions. This exposure may be obtained through investments in other investment companies. Generally, the risks associated
with high yield securities are heightened during times of weakening economic conditions or rising interest rates.
Corporate Bond Risk. Corporate bonds are debt
obligations issued by corporations and other business entities. Corporate bonds may be either secured or unsecured. Collateral used
for secured debt includes real property, machinery, equipment, accounts receivable, stocks, bonds or notes. If a bond is unsecured,
it is known as a debenture. Bondholders, as creditors, have a prior legal claim over common and preferred stockholders as to both
income and assets of the corporation for the principal and interest due them and may have a prior claim over other creditors if
liens or mortgages are involved. Interest on corporate bonds may be fixed or floating, or the bonds may be zero coupons. Interest on
corporate bonds is typically paid semi-annually and is fully taxable to the bondholder. Corporate bonds contain elements of both
interest-rate risk and credit risk and are subject to the risks associated with other debt securities, among other risks. The market
value of a corporate bond generally may be expected to rise and fall inversely with interest rates and may also be affected by the
credit rating of the corporation, the corporation’s performance and perceptions of the corporation in the marketplace.
Depending on the nature of the seniority provisions, a senior corporate bond may be junior to other credit securities of the issuer.
The market value of a corporate bond may be affected by factors directly related to the issuer, such as investors’ perceptions
of the creditworthiness of the issuer, the issuer’s financial performance, perceptions of the issuer in the marketplace,
performance of management of the issuer, the issuer’s capital structure and use of financial leverage and demand for the
issuer’s goods and services. There is a risk that the issuers of corporate bonds may not be able to meet their obligations on
interest or principal payments at the time called for by an instrument. Corporate bonds of below investment grade quality are often
high risk and have speculative characteristics and may be particularly susceptible to adverse issuer-specific developments.
Short Sales Risk. The Trust may make short sales of securities.
A short sale is a transaction in which the Trust sells a borrowed security. If the price of the security sold short increases between
the time of the short sale and the time the Trust replaces the borrowed security, the Trust will incur a loss. Although the Trust’s
gain is limited to the price at which it sold the security short, its potential loss is theoretically unlimited.
Credit Risk. The Trust could lose money if the issuer or
guarantor of a debt instrument or a counterparty to a derivatives transaction or other transaction is unable or unwilling, or perceived
to be unable or unwilling, to pay interest or repay principal on time or defaults. This risk is heightened in market environments where
interest rates are changing. The risk that such issuer, guarantor or counterparty is less willing or able to do so is heightened in market
environments where interest rates are rising. Also, the issuer, guarantor or counterparty may suffer adverse changes in its financial
condition or be adversely affected by economic, political or social conditions that could lower the credit quality (or the market’s
perception of the credit quality) of the issuer or instrument, leading to
12 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
greater volatility in the price of the instrument and in
shares of the Trust. Although credit quality may not accurately reflect the true credit risk of an instrument, a change in the
credit quality rating of an instrument or an issuer can have a rapid, adverse effect on the instrument’s value and liquidity
and make it more difficult for the Trust to sell at an advantageous price or time. The risk of the occurrence of these types of
events is heightened in market environments where interest rates are changing.
Current Fixed-Income and Debt Market Conditions. Fixed-income
and debt market conditions are highly unpredictable and some parts of the market are subject to dislocations. In response to the inflation
rates in recent periods, governmental authorities have implemented significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, including increasing
interest rates and implementation of quantitative tightening. These actions present heightened risks, particularly to fixed-income and
debt instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes
or reversed. It is difficult to accurately predict changes in the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (“Federal Reserve”) monetary
policies and the effect of any such changes or policies. Certain economic conditions and market environments will expose fixed-income
and debt instruments to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity, which can impact the Trust’s investments and may negatively
impact the Trust’s characteristics, which in turn would impact performance.
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income and other debt
instruments are subject to the possibility that interest rates could change (or are expected to change). Changes in interest rates
(or the expectation of such changes) may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in these instruments, such as the value or
liquidity of, and income generated by, the investments or increase risks associated with such investments, such as credit or default
risks. In addition, changes in interest rates, including rates that fall below zero, can have unpredictable effects on markets and
can adversely affect the Trust’s yield, income and performance. Generally, when interest rates increase, the values of
fixed-income and other debt instruments decline, and when interest rates decrease, the values of fixed-income and other debt
instruments rise. Changes in interest rates also adversely affect the yield generated by certain fixed income and other debt
securities (“Income Securities”) or result in the issuance of lower yielding Income Securities. The Federal Reserve has
increased interest rates at significant levels over recent periods. These actions present heightened risks to fixed-income and debt
instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are unexpectedly or suddenly reversed or are
ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes. It is difficult to accurately predict how long, and whether, the Federal
Reserve’s current stance on interest rates will persist and the impact these actions will have on the economy and the
Trust’s investments and the markets where they trade. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy is subject to change at any
time and potentially frequently based on a variety of market and economic conditions.
Leverage Risk. The Trust’s use of leverage, through
borrowings or instruments such as derivatives, causes the Trust to be more volatile and riskier than if it had not been leveraged. Although
the use of leverage by the Trust may create an opportunity for increased return, it also results in additional risks and can magnify the
effect of any losses. The effect of leverage in a declining market is likely to
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 13
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
cause a greater decline in the net asset value of the Trust
than if the Trust were not leveraged, which may result in a greater decline in the market price of the Trust shares. There can be no
assurance that a leveraging strategy will be implemented or that it will be successful during any period during which it is
employed. When the cost of leverage is no longer favorable, or when the Trust is otherwise required to reduce its leverage, the
Trust may not be able to maintain distributions at historical levels and common shareholders will bear any costs associated with
selling portfolio securities. The Trust’s total leverage may vary significantly over time. To the extent the Trust increases
its amount of leverage outstanding, it will be more exposed to these risks.
Liquidity Risk. The Trust may invest in municipal securities
that are, at the time of investment, illiquid. Illiquid securities are securities that cannot be disposed of within seven days in the
ordinary course of business at approximately the value that the Trust values the securities. Illiquid securities may trade at a discount
from comparable, more liquid securities and may be subject to wide fluctuations in market value. The Trust may be subject to significant
delays in disposing of illiquid securities. Accordingly, the Trust may be forced to sell these securities at less than fair market value
or may not be able to sell them when the Adviser believes it is desirable to do so. Illiquid securities also may entail registration expenses
and other transaction costs that are higher than those for liquid securities. Dislocations in certain parts of markets are resulting in
reduced liquidity for certain investments. It is uncertain when financial markets will improve. Liquidity of financial markets may also
be affected by government intervention, such as the legal restrictions on certain financial instruments’ resale.
Management Risk. The Trust is actively managed, which means
that investment decisions are made based on investment views. There is no guarantee that the investment views will produce the desired
results or expected returns, causing the Trust to fail to meet its investment objective or underperform its benchmark index or funds with
similar investment objectives and strategies.
Market Risk. The value of, or income generated by, the
investments held by the Trust are subject to the possibility of rapid and unpredictable fluctuation. The value of certain
investments (e.g., equity securities) tends to fluctuate more dramatically over the shorter term than do the value of other asset
classes. These movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, or from broader influences, including real or
perceived changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in inflation or expectations about inflation, investor confidence or
economic, political (including geopolitical), social or financial market conditions, tariffs and trade disruptions, recession,
changes in currency rates, natural/environmental disasters, cyber attacks, terrorism, governmental or quasigovernmental actions,
public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics and epidemics), debt crises, actual or threatened
war or other armed conflicts (such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and its risk of expansion or collateral economic and other
effects) or ratings downgrade, and other similar events, each of which may be temporary or last for extended periods. Many economies
and markets have experienced high inflation rates in recent periods. In response to such inflation, government authorities have
implemented significant fiscal and monetary policies such as increasing interest rates and quantitative tightening (reduction of
money available in the
14 l GBAB l
GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
market) which may adversely affect financial markets and the
broader economy, as well as the Trust’s performance. Administrative changes, policy reform and/or changes in law or
governmental regulations can result in expropriation or nationalization of the investments of a company in which the Trust invests.
In addition, adverse changes in one sector or industry or with respect to a particular company could negatively impact companies in
other sectors or industries or increase market volatility as a result of the interconnected nature of economies and markets and thus
negatively affect the Trust’s performance. For example, developments in the banking or financial services sectors (one or more
companies operating in these sectors) could adversely impact a wide range of companies and issuers. These types of adverse
developments could negatively affect the Trust’s performance or operations.
Municipal Securities Risk. The Trust’s holdings
of municipal securities could be significantly affected by events that affect the municipal bond market, which could include
unfavorable legislative or political developments, adverse changes in the financial conditions of issuers of municipal securities,
or other actual or perceived changes in economic, social, or public health conditions. The amount of public information available
about municipal securities is generally less than that for corporate equities or bonds. The secondary market for municipal
securities also tends to be less well-developed or liquid than many other securities markets, which may adversely affect the
Trust’s ability to sell such securities at prices approximating those at which the Trust may currently value them. In
addition, many state and municipal governments that issue securities are under significant economic and financial stress and may not
be able to satisfy their obligations. Issuers of municipal securities might seek protection under bankruptcy laws. In the event of
bankruptcy of such an issuer, holders of municipal securities could experience delays in collecting principal and interest and such
holders may not be able to collect all principal and interest to which they are entitled. Legislative developments may result in
changes to the laws relating to municipal bankruptcies. The income, value and/or risk of municipal securities is often correlated to
specific project or other revenue sources, which can be negatively affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or
changing tastes and values, or increasing vacancies or declining rents resulting from legal, cultural, technological, global or
local economic developments, as well as reduced demand for properties, revenues or goods. Municipalities and municipal projects that
rely directly or indirectly on federal funding mechanisms may be negatively affected by constraints of the federal government
budget. Each of the foregoing may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in municipal securities.
Build America Bonds (“BABs”) Risk. BABs
are a form of municipal financing. The BABs market is smaller and less diverse than the broader municipal securities market. In
addition, because the relevant provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 were not extended, bonds issued
after December 31, 2010 cannot qualify as BABs. It is uncertain whether Congress will renew the program to permit issuance of new
Build America Bonds. As a result, the number of available BABs is limited, which may negatively affect the value of BABs. In
addition, there can be no assurance
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 15
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
that BABs will continue to be actively traded. It is
difficult to predict the extent to which a market for such bonds will continue, meaning that BABs may experience greater illiquidity
than other municipal obligations.
Special Risks Related to Certain Municipal Securities. The
Trust may invest in municipal leases and certificates of participation in such leases, which involve special risks not normally associated
with general obligations or revenue bonds. Leases and installment purchase or conditional sale contracts (which normally provide for title
to the leased asset to pass eventually to the governmental issuer) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property
and equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt. The debt issuance limitations are
deemed to be inapplicable because of the inclusion in many leases or contracts of “non-appropriation” clauses that relieve
the governmental issuer of any obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for such purpose
by the appropriate legislative body on a yearly or other periodic basis. In addition, such leases or contracts may be subject to the temporary
abatement of payments in the event the governmental issuer is prevented from maintaining occupancy of the leased premises or utilizing
the leased equipment.
Taxable Municipal Securities Risk. While interest
earned on municipal securities is generally not subject to federal tax, any interest earned on taxable municipal securities is fully
taxable at the federal level and may be subject to tax at the state level. Additionally, litigation, legislation or other political
events, local business or economic conditions or the bankruptcy of the issuer could have a significant effect on the ability of an
issuer of municipal securities to make payments of principal and/or interest. Political changes and uncertainties in the municipal
market related to taxation, legislative changes or the rights of municipal security holders can significantly affect municipal
securities. Because many securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care,
transportation and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect the overall municipal market. In addition, changes in the
financial condition of an individual municipal issuer can affect the overall municipal market.
Debt Instruments Risk. The value of the Trust’s
investments in debt instruments (including bonds issued by non-profit entities, municipal conduits and project finance corporations)
depends on the continuing ability of the debt issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal when due.
The ability of debt issuers to make timely payments of interest and principal can be affected by a variety of developments and
changes in legal, political, economic and other conditions. Investments in debt instruments present certain risks, including credit,
interest rate, liquidity and prepayment risks. Issuers that rely directly or indirectly on government funding mechanisms or
non-profit statutes, may be negatively affected by actions of the government, including reductions in government spending, increases
in tax rates, and changes in fiscal policy. The value of a debt instrument may decline for many reasons that directly relate to the
issuer, such as a change in the demand for the issuer’s goods or services, or a decline in the issuer’s performance,
16 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
earnings or assets. In addition, changes in the financial condition
of an individual issuer can affect the overall market for such instruments. The risk of the occurrence of these types of unfavorable events
is heightened in market environments where interest rates are rising.
Municipal Conduit Bond Risk. Municipal conduit bonds, also
referred to as private activity bonds or industrial revenue bonds, are bonds issued by state and local governments or other entities for
the purpose of financing the projects of certain private enterprises. Unlike municipal bonds, municipal conduit bonds are not backed by
the full faith, credit or general taxing power of the issuing governmental entity. Rather, issuances of municipal conduit bonds are backed
solely by revenues of the private enterprise involved. Municipal conduit bonds are therefore subject to heightened credit risk, as the
private enterprise involved can have a different credit profile than the issuing governmental entity. Municipal conduit bonds may be negatively
impacted by conditions affecting either the general credit of the private enterprise or the project itself. Factors such as competitive
pricing, construction delays, or lack of demand for the project could cause project revenues to fall short of projections, and defaults
could occur. Municipal conduit bonds tend to have longer terms and thus are more susceptible to interest rate risk.
Project Finance Risk. Project finance is a type of
financing commonly used for infrastructure, industry, and public service projects. In a project finance arrangement, the cash flow
generated by the project is used to repay lenders while the project’s assets, rights and interest are held as secondary
collateral. Investors involved in project finance face heightened technology risk, operational risk, and market risk because the
cash flow generated by the project, rather than the revenues of the company behind the project, will repay investors. In addition,
because of the project-specific nature of such arrangements, the Trust face the risk of loss of investment if the company behind the
project determines not to complete it.
Risks of Investing in Debt Issued by Non-Profit Institutions.
Investing in debt issued by non-profit institutions, including foundations, museums, cultural institutions, colleges, universities,
hospitals and healthcare systems, involves different risks than investing in municipal bonds. Many non-profit entities are tax-exempt
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and risk losing their tax-exempt status if they do not comply with the requirements
of that section. There is a risk that Congress or the IRS could pass new laws or regulations changing the requirements for tax-exempt
status, which could result in a non-profit institution losing such status. Additionally, non-profit institutions that receive federal
and state appropriations face the risk of a decrease in or loss of such appropriations. Hospitals and healthcare systems are highly regulated
at the federal and state levels and face burdensome state licensing requirements. There is a risk that a state could refuse to renew a
hospital’s license or that the passage of new laws or regulations, especially changes to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement, could
inhibit a hospital from growing its revenues. Hospitals and healthcare systems also face risks related to increased competition from other
health care providers; increased costs of inpatient and outpatient care; and increased pressures from managed
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 17
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
care organizations, insurers, and patients to cut the costs of
medical care. There is a risk that nonprofit institutions relying on philanthropy and donations to maintain their operations will receive
less funding during economic downturns.
Senior Loans Risk. The Trust may invest in senior
secured floating rate loans made to corporations and other non-governmental entities and issuers (“Senior Loans”).
Senior Loans typically hold the most senior position in the capital structure of the issuing entity, are typically secured with
specific collateral and typically have a claim on the assets and/or stock of the borrower that is senior to that held by
subordinated debt holders and stockholders of the borrower. The Trust’s investments in Senior Loans are typically below
investment grade and are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. The risks associated with Senior Loans
of below investment grade quality are similar to the risks of other lower grade securities, although Senior Loans are typically
senior in payment priority and secured on a senior priority basis in contrast to subordinated and unsecured securities. Senior
Loans’ higher priority has historically resulted in generally higher recoveries in the event of a corporate reorganization. In
addition, because their interest payments are typically adjusted for changes in short-term interest rates, investments in Senior
Loans generally have less interest rate risk than certain other lower grade securities, which may have fixed interest rates. Loans
and other debt instruments are also subject to the risk of price declines due to increases in prevailing interest rates, although
floating-rate debt instruments are substantially less exposed to this risk than fixed-rate debt instruments. Interest rate changes
may also increase prepayments of debt obligations and require the Trust to invest assets at lower yields. During periods of
deteriorating economic conditions, such as recessions or periods of rising unemployment, or changing interest rates (notably
increases), delinquencies and losses generally increase, sometimes dramatically, with respect to obligations under such loans. An
economic downturn or individual corporate developments could adversely affect the market for these instruments and reduce the
Trust’s ability to sell these instruments at an advantageous time or price. An economic downturn would generally lead to a
higher non-payment rate and, a Senior Loan may lose significant market value before a default occurs. The Trust invests in or is
exposed to loans and other similar debt obligations that are sometimes referred to as “covenant-lite” loans or
obligations, which are generally subject to more risk than investments that contain traditional financial maintenance covenants and
financial reporting requirements.
Structured Finance Investments Risk. The Trust’s
structured finance investments may consist of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and commercial
mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) issued by governmental entities and private issuers, asset-backed securities
(“ABS”), structured notes, credit-linked notes and other types of structured finance securities. Holders of structured
finance investments bear risks of the underlying investments, index or reference obligation and are subject to counterparty risk.
The Trust may have the right to receive payments only from the structured product, and generally does not have direct rights against
the issuer or the entity that sold the assets to be securitized. The Trust may invest in structured finance products collateralized
by low grade or defaulted loans or securities. Investments in such structured finance products are subject to
18 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
the risks associated with below investment grade securities.
Such securities are characterized by high risk. It is likely that an economic recession could severely disrupt the market for such
securities and may have an adverse impact on the value of such securities. Moreover, other types of events, domestic or
international, may affect general economic conditions and financial markets, such as pandemics, armed conflicts, energy supply or
price disruptions, natural disasters and man-made disasters, which may have a significant effect on the underlying assets.
Structured finance securities are typically privately offered and sold, and thus are not registered under the securities laws. As a
result, investments in structured finance securities may be characterized by the Trust as illiquid securities; however, an active
dealer market may exist which would allow such securities to be considered liquid in some circumstances.
Asset-Backed Securities Risk. While traditional
fixed-income securities typically pay a fixed rate of interest until maturity, when the entire principal amount is due, an ABS
represents an interest in a pool of assets, such as automobile loans, credit card receivables, unsecured consumer loans or student
loans, that has been securitized and provides for monthly payments of interest, at a fixed or floating rate, and principal from the
cash flow of these assets. This pool of assets (and any related assets of the issuing entity) is the only source of payment for the
ABS. The ability of an ABS issuer to make payments on the ABS, and the timing of such payments, is therefore dependent on
collections on these underlying assets. The recoveries on the underlying collateral may not, in some cases, be sufficient to support
payments on these securities, or may be unavailable in the event of a default and enforcing rights with respect to these assets or
collateral may be difficult and costly, which may result in losses to investors in an ABS. The collateral underlying ABS may
constitute assets related to a wide range of industries such as credit card and automobile receivables or other assets derived from
consumer, commercial or corporate sectors, and these underlying assets may be secured or unsecured. ABS are particularly subject to
interest rate risk and credit risk. Compared to other fixed income investments with similar maturity and credit, ABS generally
increase in value to a lesser extent when interest rates decline and generally decline in value to a similar or greater extent when
interest rates rise.
Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk. Mortgage-backed
securities (“MBS”) represent an interest in a pool of mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities generally are classified as
either commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”) or residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”),
each of which are subject to certain specific risks. The risks associated with mortgage-backed securities include: (1) credit risk
associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties and of the borrowers owning these properties; (2) risks
associated with their structure and execution (including the collateral, the process by which principal and interest payments are
allocated and distributed to investors and how credit losses affect the return to investors in such MBS); (3) risks associated with
the servicer of the underlying mortgages; (4) adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances, which are more likely to
have an adverse impact on mortgage-backed securities secured by loans on certain types of commercial properties than on those
secured by loans
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 19
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
on residential properties; (5) prepayment risk and extension risks,
which can lead to significant fluctuations in the value of the mortgage-backed security; (6) loss of all or part of the premium, if any,
paid; and (7) decline in the market value of the security, whether resulting from changes in interest rates, prepayments on the underlying
mortgage collateral or perceptions of the credit risk associated with the underlying mortgage collateral. The value of mortgage-backed
securities may be substantially dependent on the servicing of the underlying pool of mortgages. Income from and values of MBS also may
be greatly affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values, or increasing vacancies or declining
rents resulting from legal, cultural technological, global or local economic developments, as well as reduced demand for properties.
In addition, the general effects of inflation on the U.S.
economy can be wide-ranging, as evidenced by rising interest rates, wages and costs of consumer goods and necessities. The long-term
effects of inflation on the general economy and on any individual mortgagor are unclear, and in certain cases, rising inflation may
affect a mortgagor’s ability to repay its related mortgage loan, thereby reducing the amount received by the holders of MBS
with respect to such mortgage loan. Additionally, increased rates of inflation may negatively affect the value of certain MBS in the
secondary market. MBS are also subject to risks similar to those associated with investing in real estate, such as the possible
decline in the value of (or income generated by) the real estate, variations in rental income, fluctuations in occupancy levels and
demand for properties or real estate-related services, changes in interest rates and changes in the availability or terms of
mortgages and other financing that may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or unattractive.
CLO, CDO and CBO Risk. In addition to the general
risks associated with debt securities discussed herein, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), collateralized debt
obligations (“CDOs”), and collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”) are subject to additional risks due to
their complex structure and highly leveraged nature, such as higher risk of volatility and magnified financial losses. CLOs, CDOs
and CBOs are subject to risks associated with the possibility that distributions from collateral securities may not be adequate to
make interest or other payments. The value of securities issued by CLOs, CDOs and CBOs also may decrease because of, among other
developments, changes in market value; changes in the market’s perception of the creditworthiness of the servicer of the
assets, the originator of an asset in the pool, or the financial institution or fund providing the credit support or enhancement;
loan performance and prices; broader market sentiment, including expectations regarding future loan defaults; liquidity conditions;
and supply and demand for structured products. Additionally, the indirect investment structure of CLOs, CDOs and CBOs presents
certain risks to the Trust such as less liquidity compared with holding the underlying assets directly. CLOs, CDOs and CBOs normally
charge management fees and administrative expenses, which would be borne by the Trust. The terms of many structured finance
investments, including CLOs, CDOs and CBOs, are tied to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) or other reference
rates based on SOFR. These
20 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF |
|
TRUST PERFORMANCE (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
relatively new and developing rates may not match the
reference rate applicable to the underlying assets related to these investments. These events may adversely affect the Trust and its
investments in CLOs, CDOs and CBOs, including their value, volatility and liquidity.
Investment Funds Risk. As an alternative to holding
investments directly, the Trust may also obtain investment exposure to securities in which it may invest directly by investing up to
20% of its Managed Assets in other investment companies, including U.S. registered investment companies and/or other U.S. or foreign
pooled investment vehicles (collectively, “Investment Funds”). Investments in Investment Funds present certain special
considerations and risks not present in making direct investments in securities in which the Trust may invest. Investments in
Investment Funds subject the Trust to the risks affecting such Investment Funds and involve operating expenses and fees that are in
addition to the expenses and fees borne by the Trust. Such expenses and fees attributable to the Trust’s investment in another
Investment Fund are borne indirectly by common shareholders. Accordingly, investment in such entities involves expense and fees at
both levels. To the extent management fees of Investment Funds are based on total gross assets, it may create an incentive for such
entities’ managers to employ financial leverage, thereby adding additional expense and increasing volatility and risk. A
performance-based fee arrangement may create incentives for an adviser or manager to take greater investment risks in the hope of
earning a higher profit participation. Investments in Investment Funds frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of
financial leverage and, thus, increase the Trust’s exposure to leverage risk and costs. From time to time, the Trust may
invest a significant portion of its assets in Investment Funds that employ leverage. The use of leverage by these Investment Funds
may cause these Funds’ market price of common shares and/or NAV to be more volatile and can magnify the effect of any
losses.
In addition to the foregoing risks, investors should note that
the Trust reserves the right to merge or reorganize with another fund, liquidate or convert into an open-end fund, in each case subject
to applicable approvals by shareholders and the Trust’s Board of Trustees as required by law and the Trust’s governing documents.
This material is not intended as a recommendation or as
investment advice of any kind, including in connection with rollovers, transfers, and distributions. Such material is not provided
in a fiduciary capacity, may not be relied upon for or in connection with the making of investment decisions, and does not
constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities. All content has been provided for informational or educational
purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be construed as legal or tax advice and/or a legal opinion. Always consult a
financial, tax and/or legal professional regarding your specific situation.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 21
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
Trust Statistics |
|
|
|
Market Price |
|
$15.65 |
|
Net Asset Value |
|
$15.23 |
|
Premium to NAV |
|
2.76 |
% |
Net Assets ($000) |
|
$358,076 |
|
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS FOR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six month |
|
One |
|
Three |
|
Five |
|
Ten |
|
|
|
(non-annualized) |
|
Year |
|
Year |
|
Year |
|
Year |
|
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade Debt Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAV |
(0.08 |
%) |
2.85 |
% |
(5.61 |
%) |
0.09 |
% |
3.66 |
% |
Market |
0.74 |
% |
2.17 |
% |
(6.77 |
%) |
1.40 |
% |
5.45 |
% |
Bloomberg Taxable Municipal Index |
(1.21 |
%) |
3.24 |
% |
(4.67 |
%) |
1.48 |
% |
3.31 |
% |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is
no guarantee of future results and current performance may be lower or higher than the figures shown. All NAV returns include the
deduction of management fees, operating expenses and all other Trust expenses. The deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay
on Trust distributions or the sale of Trust shares is not reflected in the total returns. For the most recent month-end performance
figures, please visit guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab. The investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate with
changes in market conditions and other factors so that an investor’s shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost.
The referenced index is an unmanaged index and not available for
direct investment. Index performance does not reflect transaction costs, fees or expenses.
Portfolio Breakdown |
% of Net Assets |
|
Municipal Bonds |
68.8 |
% |
Corporate Bonds |
31.5 |
% |
Asset-Backed Securities |
11.4 |
% |
Closed-End Mutual Funds |
11.0 |
% |
Senior Floating Rate Interests |
9.3 |
% |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations |
3.4 |
% |
Preferred Stocks |
2.1 |
% |
Money Market Funds |
1.3 |
% |
Foreign Government Debt |
0.2 |
% |
Options Purchased |
0.0 |
%* |
Common Stocks |
0.0 |
%* |
Warrants |
0.0 |
%* |
Total Investments |
139.0 |
% |
Other Assets & Liabilities, net |
(39.0 |
%) |
Net Assets |
100.0 |
% |
|
*Less than 0.1%. |
|
|
22 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
Ten Largest Holdings |
% of Net Assets |
State of West Virginia, Higher Education Policy Commission, Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
Federally Taxable Build America Bonds 2010, 7.65% |
|
3.3 |
% |
BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust |
|
3.2 |
% |
Dallas, Texas, Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation, Hotel Revenue |
|
|
|
Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds, 7.09% |
|
3.1 |
% |
School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A, |
|
|
|
Qualified School Construction Bonds - (Federally Taxable - Direct Subsidy), 6.00% |
|
2.9 |
% |
Oakland Unified School District, County of Alameda, California, Taxable General |
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Qualified School Construction Bonds, |
|
|
|
Series 2012B, 6.88% |
|
2.8 |
% |
Westchester County Health Care Corporation, Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds, 8.57% |
2.7 |
% |
Oklahoma Development Finance Authority Revenue Bonds, 5.45% |
|
2.7 |
% |
Evansville-Vanderburgh School Building Corp. Revenue Bonds, 6.50% |
|
2.5 |
% |
Santa Ana Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, Federal |
|
|
|
Taxable Build America Bonds, 7.10% |
|
2.5 |
% |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, School District, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds, 6.85% |
2.1 |
% |
Top Ten Total |
|
27.8 |
% |
“Ten Largest Holdings” excludes any temporary cash
or derivative investments.
Portfolio breakdown and holdings are subject to change daily.
For more information, please visit guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab. The above summaries are provided for informational purposes only and
should not be viewed as recommendations. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 23
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
Portfolio Composition by Quality Rating1 |
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
Rating |
Investments |
|
Fixed Income Instruments |
|
|
AAA |
1.5 |
% |
AA |
28.9 |
% |
A |
22.7 |
% |
BBB |
17.6 |
% |
BB |
7.2 |
% |
B |
6.5 |
% |
CCC |
0.7 |
% |
CC |
0.0 |
%* |
NR2 |
4.6 |
% |
Other Instruments |
10.3 |
% |
Total Investments |
100.0 |
% |
1 | | Source: BlackRock Solutions. Credit quality ratings are measured on a scale that generally
ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). All securities except for those labeled “NR” have been rated by Moody’s, Standard
& Poor’s (“S&P”), or Fitch, each of which is a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”).
For purposes of this presentation, when ratings are available from more than one agency, the highest rating is used. Guggenheim Investments
has converted Moody’s and Fitch ratings to the equivalent S&P rating. Security ratings are determined at the time of purchase
and may change thereafter. |
2 | | NR (not rated) securities do not necessarily indicate low credit quality. |
24 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
TRUST SUMMARY (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
All or a portion of the above distributions may be characterized
as a return of capital. For the calendar year ended December 31, 2023, 57% of the distributions were characterized as ordinary income,
and 43% of the distributions were characterized as return of capital. The final determination of the tax character of the distributions
paid by the Trust in 2023 will be reported to shareholders in January 2024.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 25
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Value |
COMMON STOCKS† – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figs, Inc. — Class A* |
|
3,754 |
|
|
|
$27,254 |
Vacasa, Inc. — Class A* |
|
511 |
|
|
4,068 |
Total Communications |
|
31,322 |
Industrial – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BP Holdco LLC*,†††,1 |
|
15,619 |
|
|
18,932 |
Vector Phoenix Holdings, LP*,††† |
|
15,619 |
|
|
960 |
Targus, Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
526 |
Targus, Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
526 |
Targus, Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
428 |
Targus , Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
195 |
YAK BLOCKER 2 LLC*,††† |
|
5,183 |
|
|
52 |
YAK BLOCKER 2 LLC*,††† |
|
4,791 |
|
|
48 |
Targus, Inc.*,††† |
|
17,838 |
|
|
2 |
Total Industrial |
|
21,669 |
Financial – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tensor Ltd.*,††† |
|
81,175 |
|
|
8 |
Total Common Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $194,583) |
|
52,999 |
PREFERRED STOCKS†† – 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equitable Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.30% |
|
140,000 |
|
|
2,241,400 |
W R Berkley Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.13% due 03/30/61 |
|
95,975 |
|
|
1,753,463 |
Kuvare US Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 02/17/51*,2 |
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
1,511,250 |
PartnerRe Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.88% |
|
46,000 |
|
|
825,700 |
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13% due 10/15/52 |
|
23,225 |
|
|
607,798 |
Selective Insurance Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.60% |
|
20,000 |
|
|
348,600 |
First Republic Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50%††† |
|
17,750 |
|
|
2 |
4.25%††† |
|
31,650 |
|
|
– |
Total Financial |
|
7,288,213 |
Industrial – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
YAK BLOCKER 2 LLC*,††† |
|
284,756 |
|
|
79,077 |
Total Preferred Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $11,562,726) |
|
7,367,290 |
See notes to financial statements.
26 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Value |
WARRANTS† – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiring 09/16/26* |
9,372 |
|
|
|
$842 |
Acropolis Infrastructure Acquisition Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiring 03/31/26*,5 |
|
12,600 |
|
|
151 |
Pershing Square Tontine Holdings, Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiring 07/24/25*,†††,5 |
23,730 |
|
|
2 |
Total Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $32,105) |
|
995 |
CLOSED-END MUTUAL FUNDS† – 11.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BlackRock Taxable Municipal Bond Trust |
738,712 |
|
|
11,568,230 |
Nuveen Taxable Municipal Income Fund |
471,344 |
|
|
7,159,715 |
Nuveen California Quality Municipal Income Fund |
482,736 |
|
|
5,117,002 |
Invesco Municipal Opportunity Trust |
450,245 |
|
|
4,124,244 |
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals |
382,286 |
|
|
3,616,426 |
Invesco Municipal Trust |
309,052 |
|
|
2,849,459 |
BlackRock MuniVest Fund, Inc. |
394,750 |
|
|
2,676,405 |
Invesco Advantage Municipal Income Trust II |
287,297 |
|
|
2,341,471 |
Total Closed-End Mutual Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $56,469,081) |
|
39,452,952 |
MONEY MARKET FUNDS† – 1.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dreyfus Treasury Securities Cash Management Fund — Institutional Shares, 5.27%6 |
4,102,624 |
|
|
4,102,624 |
Dreyfus Treasury Obligations Cash Management Fund — Institutional Shares, 5.24%6 |
647,931 |
|
|
647,931 |
Total Money Market Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $4,750,555) |
|
4,750,555 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
|
|
|
|
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 68.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
California – 13.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Santa Ana Unified School District, California, General Obligation Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.10% due 08/01/40 |
7,785,000 |
|
|
8,810,659 |
6.80% due 08/01/30 |
2,245,000 |
|
|
2,447,460 |
Oakland Unified School District, County of Alameda, California, Taxable General |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Qualified School Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds, Series 2012B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.88% due 08/01/33 |
10,000,000 |
|
|
10,055,538 |
East Side Union High School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13% due 08/01/427 |
7,500,000 |
|
|
5,530,377 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.14% due 08/15/477 |
3,450,000 |
|
|
3,633,492 |
California Public Finance Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.27% due 10/15/43 |
4,800,000 |
|
|
3,101,104 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 27
SCHEDULE
OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November
30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount~
|
|
|
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL
BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
California
– 13.0% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oakland
Unified School District/Alameda County General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
3.12%
due 08/01/407 |
2,450,000 |
|
|
|
$1,790,621 |
Marin
Community College District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
4.03%
due 08/01/387 |
2,000,000 |
|
|
1,732,395 |
Moreno
Valley Unified School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
3.82%
due 08/01/447 |
2,000,000 |
|
|
1,551,347 |
Hillsborough
City School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
due
09/01/388 |
1,600,000 |
|
|
689,832 |
due
09/01/378 |
1,120,000 |
|
|
514,992 |
due
09/01/408 |
500,000 |
|
|
189,244 |
San
Jose Evergreen Community College District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
3.06%
due 09/01/457 |
1,500,000 |
|
|
1,036,369 |
Placentia-Yorba
Linda Unified School District (Orange County, California), General |
|
|
|
|
|
Obligation
Bonds, Federally Taxable Direct-Pay Qualified School Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds,
Election of 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.40%
due 02/01/26 |
1,000,000 |
|
|
1,007,483 |
Manteca
Redevelopment Agency Successor Agency Tax Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
3.21%
due 10/01/42 |
1,400,000 |
|
|
1,003,451 |
Monrovia
Unified School District, Los Angeles County, California, Election of 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
General
Obligation Bonds, Build America Bonds, Federally Taxable15 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.25%
due 08/01/28 |
805,000 |
|
|
857,901 |
Norman
Y Mineta San Jose International Airport SJC Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.91%
due 03/01/357 |
500,000 |
|
|
392,794 |
3.27%
due 03/01/40 |
250,000 |
|
|
184,480 |
3.29%
due 03/01/417 |
70,000 |
|
|
50,766 |
Alhambra
Unified School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
6.70%
due 02/01/26 |
500,000 |
|
|
511,781 |
California
State University Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.90%
due 11/01/477 |
500,000 |
|
|
399,056 |
Cypress
School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
6.65%
due 08/01/25 |
350,000 |
|
|
355,095 |
Fremont
Unified School District/Alameda County California General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
2.75%
due 08/01/417 |
400,000 |
|
|
279,335 |
Riverside
County Redevelopment Successor Agency Tax Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
3.88%
due 10/01/37 |
250,000 |
|
|
211,744 |
Coast
Community College District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
|
2.98%
due 08/01/397 |
250,000 |
|
|
184,659 |
Total
California |
|
|
|
|
46,521,975 |
Texas
– 11.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas,
Texas, Convention Center Hotel Development Corporation, |
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel
Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.09%
due 01/01/427 |
10,020,000 |
|
|
10,904,483 |
Harris
County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.34%
due 11/15/377 |
8,900,000 |
|
|
7,014,204 |
See notes to financial statements.
28 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Texas – 11.2% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.42% due 09/01/507 |
8,000,000 |
|
$5,208,942 |
City of San Antonio Texas Electric & Gas Systems Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.91% due 02/01/487 |
6,800,000 |
|
4,669,917 |
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.29% due 01/01/427 |
5,250,000 |
|
3,850,115 |
3.27% due 01/01/457 |
1,150,000 |
|
779,421 |
Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.92% due 11/01/507 |
6,500,000 |
|
4,419,810 |
City of Garland Texas Electric Utility System Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.15% due 03/01/51 |
2,400,000 |
|
1,590,554 |
City of Austin Texas Rental Car Special Facility Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.86% due 11/15/427 |
2,200,000 |
|
1,533,615 |
Total Texas |
|
39,971,061 |
Washington – 6.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
Central Washington University Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
6.95% due 05/01/40 |
5,000,000 |
|
5,417,525 |
Central Washington University, System Revenue Bonds, 2010, Taxable |
|
|
|
|
|
Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 05/01/30 |
5,000,000 |
|
5,215,294 |
Washington State Convention Center Public Facilities District, Lodging |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.79% due 07/01/40 |
4,600,000 |
|
4,826,979 |
Washington State University, Housing and Dining System Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.10% due 04/01/32 |
3,325,000 |
|
3,582,230 |
County of Pierce Washington Sewer Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.87% due 08/01/42 |
4,300,000 |
|
3,065,181 |
King County Public Hospital District No. 2 General Obligation Limited |
|
|
|
|
|
3.11% due 12/01/447 |
1,100,000 |
|
745,169 |
Total Washington |
|
22,852,378 |
Pennsylvania – 5.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
School District of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A, |
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified School Construction Bonds – (Federally Taxable – Direct Subsidy) |
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% due 09/01/30 |
10,330,000 |
|
10,543,303 |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, School District, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
6.85% due 09/01/29 |
6,895,000 |
|
7,486,435 |
Doylestown Hospital Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.95% due 07/01/24 |
175,000 |
|
172,017 |
Total Pennsylvania |
|
18,201,755 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 29
SCHEDULE
OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
November
30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~
|
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL
BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
New
York – 4.2% |
|
|
|
|
Westchester
County Health Care Corporation, Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
Taxable
Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
8.57%
due 11/01/40 |
|
10,010,000
|
|
$9,766,365 |
Port
Authority of New York & New Jersey Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
3.14%
due 02/15/51 |
5,000,000 |
|
3,476,728 |
New
York City Industrial Development Agency Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
2.73%
due 03/01/347 |
2,250,000 |
|
1,779,754 |
Total
New York |
|
15,022,847 |
Illinois
– 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
Chicago,
Illinois, Second Lien Wastewater Transmission Revenue Project Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
Taxable
Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
6.90%
due 01/01/407 |
5,100,000 |
|
5,633,130 |
Illinois,
General Obligation Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
7.35%
due 07/01/35 |
4,258,242 |
|
4,486,125 |
Chicago,
Illinois, Second Lien Water Revenue Bonds, Taxable Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
6.74%
due 11/01/407 |
2,990,000 |
|
3,274,798 |
State
of Illinois General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
6.63%
due 02/01/35 |
858,462 |
|
874,370 |
6.73%
due 04/01/357 |
184,615 |
|
188,852 |
Chicago
Board of Education General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
6.14%
due 12/01/39 |
195,000 |
|
176,048 |
Total
Illinois |
|
14,633,323 |
Ohio
– 4.0% |
|
|
|
|
County
of Franklin Ohio Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
2.88%
due 11/01/507 |
8,900,000 |
|
5,615,779 |
American
Municipal Power, Inc., Combined Hydroelectric Projects Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
New
Clean Renewable Energy Bonds |
|
|
|
|
7.33%
due 02/15/287 |
5,000,000 |
|
5,252,061 |
Madison
Local School District, Richland County, Ohio, School Improvement, |
|
|
|
|
Taxable
Qualified School Construction Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.65%
due 12/01/29 |
2,500,000 |
|
2,502,677 |
Toronto
City School District, Ohio, Qualified School Construction Bonds General |
|
|
|
|
Obligation
Bonds |
|
|
|
|
7.00%
due 12/01/28 |
780,000 |
|
780,988 |
Total
Ohio |
|
14,151,505 |
Oklahoma
– 3.4% |
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma
Development Finance Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
5.45%
due 08/15/28 |
10,950,000 |
|
9,617,846 |
Tulsa
Airports Improvement Trust Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
3.10%
due 06/01/45 |
3,700,000 |
|
2,541,989 |
Oklahoma
State University Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
4.13%
due 08/01/48 |
150,000 |
|
120,014 |
Total
Oklahoma |
|
12,279,849 |
See notes to financial statements.
30 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
West Virginia – 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
State of West Virginia, Higher Education Policy Commission, Revenue Bonds, |
|
|
|
|
Federally Taxable Build America Bonds 201015 |
|
|
|
|
7.65% due 04/01/407 |
10,000,000 |
|
$11,777,377 |
Indiana – 3.3% |
|
|
|
|
Evansville-Vanderburgh School Building Corp. Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 01/15/307 |
8,690,000 |
|
8,918,278 |
County of Knox Indiana Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
5.90% due 04/01/34 |
2,920,000 |
|
2,759,451 |
Total Indiana |
|
11,677,729 |
Michigan – 2.4% |
|
|
|
|
Detroit City School District General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
7.75% due 05/01/397 |
2,505,000 |
|
2,856,513 |
Detroit, Michigan, School District, School Building and Site Bonds, Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
Tax General Obligation Bonds, Taxable Qualified School Construction Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.65% due 05/01/297 |
2,640,000 |
|
2,806,018 |
Fraser Public School District, Macomb County, Michigan, General Obligation Federally |
|
|
|
|
Taxable School Construction Bonds, 2011 School Building and Site Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.05% due 05/01/26 |
1,510,000 |
|
1,510,871 |
Oakridge, Michigan, Public Schools, Unlimited Tax General Obligation Bonds |
|
|
|
|
6.75% due 05/01/26 |
1,000,000 |
|
1,001,119 |
Comstock Park Public Schools General Obligation Unlimited |
|
|
|
|
6.30% due 05/01/26 |
415,000 |
|
415,315 |
Total Michigan |
|
8,589,836 |
South Carolina – 1.6% |
|
|
|
|
County of Horry South Carolina Airport Revenue Bonds, Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
7.33% due 07/01/40 |
5,000,000 |
|
5,625,588 |
New Jersey – 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
New Jersey Educational Facilities Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
3.51% due 07/01/427 |
3,500,000 |
|
2,648,070 |
New Jersey Turnpike Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
2.78% due 01/01/407 |
2,500,000 |
|
1,770,274 |
Total New Jersey |
|
4,418,344 |
Massachusetts – 1.2% |
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
2.72% due 07/01/427 |
3,400,000 |
|
2,390,592 |
2.87% due 07/01/51 |
750,000 |
|
481,450 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency Revenue Bonds, Build America Bonds15 |
|
|
|
|
3.52% due 10/01/46 |
2,250,000 |
|
1,500,104 |
Total Massachusetts |
|
4,372,146 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 31
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
MUNICIPAL BONDS†† – 68.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama – 1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
Auburn University Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.68% due 06/01/507 |
6,500,000 |
|
$3,941,168 |
Colorado – 1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado, Building Excellent Schools Today, Certificates of Participation, Taxable |
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified School Construction |
|
|
|
|
|
6.82% due 03/15/28 |
2,500,000 |
|
2,660,062 |
University of Colorado Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.81% due 06/01/487 |
920,000 |
|
603,546 |
Total Colorado |
|
3,263,608 |
Mississippi – 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
Medical Center Educational Building Corp. Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
2.92% due 06/01/417 |
4,500,000 |
|
3,187,279 |
New Hampshire – 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.27% due 05/01/517 |
4,800,000 |
|
3,174,812 |
Louisiana – 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
State of Louisiana Gasoline & Fuels Tax Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.05% due 05/01/387 |
2,500,000 |
|
1,950,741 |
Minnesota – 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
City of State Paul Minnesota Sales & Use Tax Revenue Tax Allocation |
|
|
|
|
|
3.89% due 11/01/35 |
250,000 |
|
215,634 |
Arkansas – 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
University of Arkansas Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
3.10% due 12/01/417 |
250,000 |
|
186,480 |
District of Columbia – 0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Convention & Sports Authority Revenue Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
4.31% due 10/01/407 |
100,000 |
|
87,338 |
Total Municipal Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $277,355,413) |
246,102,773 |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 11.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Central Storage Safety Project Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
4.82% due 02/01/389 |
6,956,064 |
|
5,880,317 |
Wilton RE Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.00% †††,2,3,10 |
3,800,000 |
|
3,356,710 |
Intact Financial Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.46% due 09/22/322,7 |
1,900,000 |
|
1,844,801 |
Blue Owl Finance LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
4.38% due 02/15/322,7 |
2,150,000 |
|
1,791,256 |
See notes to financial statements.
32 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 11.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accident Fund Insurance Company of America |
|
|
|
|
|
8.50% due 08/01/322 |
1,750,000 |
|
$1,727,157 |
Ares Finance Company IV LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
3.65% due 02/01/522,7 |
2,650,000 |
|
1,720,698 |
Maple Grove Funding Trust I |
|
|
|
|
|
4.16% due 08/15/512,7 |
2,500,000 |
|
1,637,183 |
Pershing Square Holdings Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.25% due 10/01/312 |
2,100,000 |
|
1,571,430 |
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.30% due 02/01/612 |
2,700,000 |
|
1,545,783 |
Jefferies Finance LLC / JFIN Company-Issuer Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 08/15/282 |
1,500,000 |
|
1,282,380 |
Global Atlantic Finance Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.70% due 10/15/512,3 |
1,450,000 |
|
1,202,647 |
National Life Insurance Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.50% due 09/15/392 |
900,000 |
|
1,103,230 |
United Wholesale Mortgage LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 11/15/252 |
1,100,000 |
|
1,069,391 |
Prudential Financial, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.13% due 03/01/523 |
1,200,000 |
|
1,066,030 |
FS KKR Capital Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.25% due 07/15/277 |
1,150,000 |
|
1,013,903 |
Stewart Information Services Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.60% due 11/15/317 |
1,350,000 |
|
1,005,410 |
NFP Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.88% due 08/15/282,7 |
1,100,000 |
|
979,391 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.72% due 09/14/333 |
950,000 |
|
946,564 |
Horace Mann Educators Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.25% due 09/15/287 |
900,000 |
|
936,775 |
Macquarie Bank Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.05% due 03/03/362,3 |
1,200,000 |
|
920,972 |
Credit Suisse AG NY |
|
|
|
|
|
7.95% due 01/09/257 |
900,000 |
|
917,487 |
NatWest Group plc |
|
|
|
|
|
7.47% due 11/10/263,7 |
850,000 |
|
871,216 |
Kennedy-Wilson, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 03/01/317 |
1,150,000 |
|
863,011 |
Standard Chartered plc |
|
|
|
|
|
7.78% due 11/16/252,3,7 |
750,000 |
|
762,411 |
Keenan Fort Detrick Energy LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
4.17% due 11/15/482 |
1,000,000 |
|
757,012 |
Toronto-Dominion Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
8.13% due 10/31/823 |
750,000 |
|
754,146 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 33
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 11.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Blue Owl Capital GP LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
7.21% due 08/22/43††† |
750,000 |
|
$736,218 |
Corebridge Financial, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.88% due 12/15/523 |
700,000 |
|
672,221 |
QBE Insurance Group Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.88% 2,3,10 |
650,000 |
|
625,179 |
Bank of Nova Scotia |
|
|
|
|
|
8.63% due 10/27/823 |
550,000 |
|
552,675 |
Nationstar Mortgage Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 02/01/262,7 |
560,000 |
|
533,941 |
HUB International Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.63% due 12/01/292,7 |
550,000 |
|
498,721 |
Belvoir Land LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
5.60% due 12/15/352 |
500,000 |
|
464,406 |
OneMain Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.00% due 01/15/297 |
350,000 |
|
360,969 |
Iron Mountain Information Management Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 07/15/322,7 |
300,000 |
|
260,547 |
Total Financial |
42,232,188 |
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 4.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
JBS USA LUX S.A. / JBS USA Food Company / JBS USA Finance, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% due 04/01/337 |
1,050,000 |
|
991,545 |
4.38% due 02/02/527 |
1,200,000 |
|
823,089 |
Tufts Medical Center, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 01/01/38 |
1,500,000 |
|
1,495,979 |
Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.08% due 07/01/517 |
2,500,000 |
|
1,485,170 |
Post Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 09/15/312 |
1,300,000 |
|
1,131,812 |
Universal Health Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.65% due 01/15/327 |
1,300,000 |
|
1,023,065 |
Altria Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.70% due 02/04/517 |
1,500,000 |
|
1,000,643 |
Reynolds American, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.70% due 08/15/357 |
1,050,000 |
|
985,413 |
HCA, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 03/15/527 |
1,200,000 |
|
950,329 |
Amgen, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.40% due 02/22/62 |
1,200,000 |
|
943,656 |
Sotheby’s |
|
|
|
|
|
7.38% due 10/15/272,7 |
1,000,000 |
|
917,056 |
BAT Capital Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.08% due 08/02/437 |
800,000 |
|
814,231 |
See notes to financial statements.
34 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 4.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
BCP V Modular Services Finance II plc |
|
|
|
|
|
6.13% due 10/30/282 |
GBP 750,000 |
|
$807,118 |
CPI CG, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.63% due 03/15/262 |
601,000 |
|
570,987 |
Baylor College of Medicine |
|
|
|
|
|
5.26% due 11/15/46 |
600,000 |
|
556,616 |
Medline Borrower, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
5.25% due 10/01/292 |
450,000 |
|
407,234 |
Kronos Acquisition Holdings, Inc. / KIK Custom Products, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 12/31/272,7 |
260,000 |
|
240,716 |
Upbound Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.38% due 02/15/292,7 |
250,000 |
|
227,648 |
Performance Food Group, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.88% due 05/01/252,7 |
225,000 |
|
225,118 |
Endo Luxembourg Finance Company I SARL / Endo US, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.13% due 04/01/292,11 |
350,000 |
|
224,875 |
OhioHealth Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
2.83% due 11/15/41 |
300,000 |
|
204,444 |
Total Consumer, Non-cyclical |
|
16,026,744 |
Consumer, Cyclical – 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 05/01/252,7 |
4,019,000 |
|
4,061,294 |
United Airlines, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 04/15/292 |
2,200,000 |
|
1,963,961 |
Warnermedia Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.14% due 03/15/527 |
1,150,000 |
|
919,150 |
6.41% due 03/15/267 |
900,000 |
|
900,816 |
Hyatt Hotels Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% due 04/23/307 |
1,100,000 |
|
1,107,734 |
LKQ Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.25% due 06/15/337 |
950,000 |
|
950,710 |
Air Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 08/15/292 |
CAD 1,050,000 |
|
699,082 |
Evergreen Acqco 1 Limited Partnership / TVI, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.75% due 04/26/282 |
539,000 |
|
559,213 |
PetSmart, Inc. / PetSmart Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.75% due 02/15/282,7 |
600,000 |
|
548,704 |
Polaris, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.95% due 03/15/29 |
450,000 |
|
463,124 |
Wabash National Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 10/15/282,7 |
500,000 |
|
427,486 |
Hanesbrands, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.00% due 02/15/312,7 |
400,000 |
|
377,081 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 35
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer, Cyclical – 3.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suburban Propane Partners Limited Partnership/Suburban Energy Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 06/01/312,7 |
300,000 |
|
$265,500 |
Superior Plus Limited Partnership / Superior General Partner, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 03/15/292,7 |
250,000 |
|
220,149 |
Station Casinos LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 12/01/312 |
200,000 |
|
169,936 |
Total Consumer, Cyclical |
|
13,633,940 |
Industrial – 3.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boeing Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.81% due 05/01/50 |
4,000,000 |
|
3,901,251 |
IP Lending V Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.13% due 04/02/26†††,2 |
1,200,000 |
|
1,142,640 |
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 03/25/527 |
1,300,000 |
|
1,017,084 |
Artera Services LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.03% due 12/04/252,7 |
1,050,000 |
|
958,918 |
LBJ Infrastructure Group LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.80% due 12/31/572 |
1,500,000 |
|
930,870 |
IP Lending X Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.75% due 07/02/29†††,2 |
900,000 |
|
905,440 |
Cellnex Finance Company S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.88% due 07/07/412,7 |
1,250,000 |
|
904,000 |
GrafTech Global Enterprises, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.88% due 12/15/282 |
1,000,000 |
|
785,000 |
Dyal Capital Partners IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.65% due 02/22/41††† |
1,000,000 |
|
768,409 |
Summit Materials LLC / Summit Materials Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 03/15/272,7 |
600,000 |
|
595,500 |
New Enterprise Stone & Lime Company, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.75% due 07/15/282,7 |
575,000 |
|
573,679 |
Deuce FinCo plc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 06/15/272 |
GBP 500,000 |
|
568,861 |
Ardagh Metal Packaging Finance USA LLC / Ardagh Metal Packaging Finance plc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% due 09/01/292,7 |
400,000 |
|
317,865 |
Level 3 Financing, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.00% due 11/15/29††† |
634,257 |
|
1 |
Total Industrial |
|
13,369,518 |
Communications – 2.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
British Telecommunications plc |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.88% due 11/23/812,3 |
1,700,000 |
|
1,403,356 |
T-Mobile USA, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.88% due 02/15/317 |
1,362,000 |
|
1,154,063 |
McGraw-Hill Education, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.00% due 08/01/292,7 |
850,000 |
|
766,063 |
5.75% due 08/01/282 |
300,000 |
|
273,750 |
See notes to financial statements.
36 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications – 2.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
LCPR Senior Secured Financing DAC |
|
|
|
|
|
5.13% due 07/15/292,7 |
1,150,000 |
|
$965,351 |
Charter Communications Operating LLC / Charter Communications Operating Capital |
|
|
|
|
|
5.25% due 04/01/537 |
1,200,000 |
|
960,990 |
Corning, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.38% due 11/15/577 |
1,200,000 |
|
950,048 |
Rogers Communications, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.50% due 03/15/42 |
1,150,000 |
|
947,127 |
Altice France S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 10/15/292,7 |
900,000 |
|
649,375 |
5.13% due 07/15/292,7 |
350,000 |
|
250,323 |
Vodafone Group plc |
|
|
|
|
|
5.13% due 06/04/813 |
1,100,000 |
|
753,165 |
UPC Broadband Finco BV |
|
|
|
|
|
4.88% due 07/15/312,7 |
700,000 |
|
590,625 |
CSC Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
11.25% due 05/15/282,7 |
250,000 |
|
249,561 |
5.25% due 06/01/24 |
100,000 |
|
95,260 |
Telenet Finance Luxembourg Notes SARL |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 03/01/28 |
200,000 |
|
182,500 |
Total Communications |
|
10,191,557 |
Energy – 2.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
Occidental Petroleum Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 11/15/27 |
2,000,000 |
|
2,047,320 |
Valero Energy Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% due 06/01/527 |
2,450,000 |
|
1,782,204 |
ITT Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
6.50% due 08/01/292 |
1,250,000 |
|
1,090,625 |
NuStar Logistics, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
6.38% due 10/01/307 |
1,000,000 |
|
975,000 |
Targa Resources Partners Limited Partnership / Targa Resources Partners Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.88% due 02/01/317 |
1,000,000 |
|
925,732 |
Venture Global LNG, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
9.88% due 02/01/322 |
750,000 |
|
768,631 |
Kinder Morgan, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.20% due 06/01/337 |
400,000 |
|
383,015 |
Parkland Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
4.63% due 05/01/302,7 |
300,000 |
|
267,750 |
Buckeye Partners, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
4.35% due 10/15/247 |
250,000 |
|
244,415 |
Viper Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.38% due 11/01/312,7 |
200,000 |
|
202,400 |
Greensaif Pipelines Bidco SARL |
|
|
|
|
|
6.51% due 02/23/422 |
200,000 |
|
200,268 |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 37
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
CORPORATE BONDS†† – 31.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Energy – 2.5% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
CVR Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.75% due 02/15/282 |
125,000 |
|
$115,589 |
Total Energy |
|
9,002,949 |
Basic Materials – 0.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
Alcoa Nederland Holding BV |
|
|
|
|
|
4.13% due 03/31/292,7 |
1,100,000 |
|
981,096 |
ArcelorMittal S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
6.55% due 11/29/27 |
900,000 |
|
929,363 |
SK Invictus Intermediate II SARL |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00% due 10/30/292,7 |
700,000 |
|
568,844 |
SCIL IV LLC / SCIL USA Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
5.38% due 11/01/262,7 |
600,000 |
|
563,237 |
Mirabela Nickel Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
due 06/24/19†††,9,11 |
96,316 |
|
482 |
Total Basic Materials |
|
3,043,022 |
Technology – 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcom, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.19% due 11/15/362,7 |
1,300,000 |
|
993,297 |
Oracle Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.95% due 03/25/517 |
1,100,000 |
|
813,880 |
CDW LLC / CDW Finance Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.57% due 12/01/317 |
800,000 |
|
688,896 |
Central Parent LLC / CDK Global II LLC / CDK Financing Company, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
8.00% due 06/15/292 |
200,000 |
|
205,158 |
Total Technology |
|
2,701,231 |
Utilities – 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio Edison Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 01/15/332,7 |
950,000 |
|
925,344 |
Alexander Funding Trust II |
|
|
|
|
|
7.47% due 07/31/282,7 |
900,000 |
|
922,105 |
NRG Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
7.00% due 03/15/332 |
450,000 |
|
454,972 |
Black Hills Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
5.95% due 03/15/287 |
200,000 |
|
202,461 |
Total Utilities |
|
2,504,882 |
Total Corporate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost $129,172,712) |
112,706,031 |
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 11.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 3.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Thunderbird A |
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 03/01/37††† |
3,925,948 |
|
3,606,610 |
See notes to financial statements.
38 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 11.4% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial – 3.8% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lightning A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.50% due 03/01/37††† |
3,867,386 |
|
$3,552,812 |
HV Eight LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.10% (3 Month EURIBOR + 3.50%, Rate Floor: 3.50%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
due 12/31/27◊,††† |
EUR 1,607,232 |
|
1,749,785 |
KKR Core Holding Company LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00% due 08/12/31††† |
1,561,248 |
|
1,371,792 |
Project Onyx I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.67% due 01/26/27††† |
1,350,000 |
|
1,349,277 |
Ceamer Finance LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.92% due 11/15/37††† |
966,635 |
|
923,670 |
LVNV Funding LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.80% due 11/05/28††† |
650,000 |
|
650,000 |
Project Onyx II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.67% due 01/26/27††† |
450,000 |
|
449,732 |
Total Financial |
|
13,653,678 |
Transport-Aircraft – 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAIA Aviation Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-1, 3.97% due 12/15/442,4 |
2,382,172 |
|
2,142,001 |
Navigator Aircraft ABS Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1, 2.77% due 11/15/462 |
1,075,149 |
|
917,156 |
Sprite Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1, 3.75% due 11/15/462 |
954,136 |
|
874,437 |
JOL Air Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-1, 3.97% due 04/15/442 |
862,383 |
|
777,378 |
Start Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-1, 4.09% due 05/15/432 |
829,979 |
|
740,880 |
Castlelake Aircraft Structured Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1A, 6.66% due 01/15/462 |
725,290 |
|
596,955 |
Labrador Aviation Finance Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016-1A, 4.30% due 01/15/422 |
573,173 |
|
483,035 |
AASET Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-2A, 2.80% due 01/15/472 |
407,951 |
|
349,288 |
Total Transport-Aircraft |
|
6,881,130 |
Collateralized Loan Obligations – 1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABPCI Direct Lending Fund IX LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021-9A BR, 8.15% (3 Month Term SOFR + 2.76%, Rate Floor: 2.50%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
due 11/18/31◊,2 |
2,500,000 |
|
2,405,639 |
Cerberus Loan Funding XLII LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-3A C, 9.58% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.15%, Rate Floor: 4.15%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
due 09/13/35◊,2 |
1,250,000 |
|
1,249,705 |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 39
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES†† – 11.4% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized Loan Obligations – 1.9% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
ABPCI Direct Lending Fund CLO II LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1A CR, 8.83% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.41%, Rate Floor: 3.15%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 04/20/32◊,2 |
1,000,000 |
|
$963,631 |
Cerberus Loan Funding XL LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2023-1A C, 9.79% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.40%, Rate Floor: 4.40%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 03/22/35◊,2 |
750,000 |
|
751,087 |
KREF Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
2021-FL2 AS, 6.74% (1 Month Term SOFR + 1.41%, Rate Floor: 1.30%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 02/15/39◊,2 |
650,000 |
|
601,857 |
WhiteHorse X Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
2015-10A E, 10.96% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.56%, Rate Floor: 5.30%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 04/17/27◊,2 |
371,135 |
|
371,077 |
WhiteHorse VIII Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
2014-1A E, 10.19% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.81%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 05/01/26◊,2 |
196,225 |
|
165,429 |
BNPP IP CLO Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
2014-2A E, 10.90% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.51%, Rate Floor: 0.00%) |
|
|
|
|
|
due 10/30/25◊,2 |
287,756 |
|
71,737 |
Total Collateralized Loan Obligations |
|
6,580,162 |
Infrastructure – 1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
VB-S1 Issuer LLC - VBTEL |
|
|
|
|
|
2022-1A, 4.29% due 02/15/522 |
5,000,000 |
|
4,431,825 |
Hotwire Funding LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2023-1A, 8.84% due 05/20/532 |
1,900,000 |
|
1,750,238 |
Total Infrastructure |
|
6,182,063 |
Whole Business – 0.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
Applebee’s Funding LLC / IHOP Funding LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2019-1A, 4.72% due 06/05/492 |
990,000 |
|
930,192 |
SERVPRO Master Issuer LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2019-1A, 3.88% due 10/25/492 |
960,000 |
|
886,363 |
2021-1A, 2.39% due 04/25/512 |
48,750 |
|
40,742 |
Sonic Capital LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2021-1A, 2.64% due 08/20/512 |
1,174,000 |
|
893,526 |
Total Whole Business |
|
2,750,823 |
Net Lease – 0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
CARS-DB7, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
2023-1A, 6.50% due 09/15/532 |
997,917 |
|
984,265 |
SVC ABS LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2023-1A, 5.55% due 02/20/532 |
998,125 |
|
921,977 |
CARS-DB4, LP |
|
|
|
|
|
2020-1A, 4.95% due 02/15/502 |
500,000 |
|
407,320 |
Total Net Lease |
|
2,313,562 |
40 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
ASSET-BACKED
SECURITIES†† – 11.4% (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single
Family Residence – 0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FirstKey
Homes Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022-SFR3,
4.50% due 07/17/382 |
1,000,000 |
|
$950,488 |
2020-SFR2,
4.50% due 10/19/372 |
400,000 |
|
368,203 |
2020-SFR2,
4.00% due 10/19/372 |
400,000 |
|
367,018 |
2020-SFR2,
3.37% due 10/19/372 |
250,000 |
|
227,635 |
Total
Single Family Residence |
|
1,913,344 |
|
Insurance
– 0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHEST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.13%
due 03/15/43††† |
500,000 |
|
488,142 |
Total
Asset-Backed Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Cost
$42,664,855) |
|
40,762,904 |
|
SENIOR
FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 9.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer,
Cyclical – 2.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MB2
Dental Solutions LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.45%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 7.00%) due 01/29/27††† |
|
1,492,679 |
|
1,476,415 |
FR
Refuel LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.21%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 11/08/28 |
|
|
|
1,286,353 |
|
1,244,546 |
Zephyr
Bidco Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.19%
(1 Month GBP SONIA + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 6.00%) due 07/31/28 |
|
|
|
GBP
900,000 |
|
1,107,728 |
First
Brands Group LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.88%
(6 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 6.00%) due 03/30/27 |
|
|
|
1,121,250 |
|
1,101,348 |
Alexander
Mann |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.42%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 6.10%, Rate Floor: 6.10%) due 06/29/27 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
971,670 |
Pacific
Bells LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.15%
(3 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 11/10/28 |
752,210 |
|
742,100 |
Accuride
Corp. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.22%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 5.25%, Rate Floor: 6.25%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in-kind
rate was 1.62%) due 05/18/2612 |
698,946 |
|
597,599 |
The
Facilities Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.24%
(3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 5.75%) due 11/30/27††† |
496,343 |
|
486,417 |
NFM
& J LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.23%
(3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 5.75%) due 11/30/27††† |
488,427 |
|
478,658 |
Camin
Cargo Control, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.96%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 6.50%, Rate Floor: 6.50%) due 06/04/26††† |
471,801 |
|
452,929 |
Flutter
Financing B.V. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.90%
(3 Month Term SOFR + 3.25%, Rate Floor: 3.25%) due 07/24/28 |
415,521 |
|
415,662 |
ImageFIRST
Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.47%
((3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%) and (6 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%), |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate
Floor: 4.75%) due 04/27/28 |
419,459 |
|
415,265 |
Total
Consumer, Cyclical |
|
9,490,337 |
|
Consumer,
Non-cyclical – 2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mission
Veterinary Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.46%
(1 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 04/27/28 |
|
|
|
1,225,000 |
|
1,207,899 |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 41
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 9.3% (continued) |
|
|
|
Consumer, Non-cyclical – 2.1% (continued) |
|
|
|
PetIQ LLC |
|
|
|
10.17% (6 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 04/13/28 |
1,054,192 |
$ |
1,038,380 |
Quirch Foods Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
10.45% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 5.25%) due 10/27/27 |
953,880 |
|
947,327 |
Women’s Care Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.05% (6 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 01/17/28 |
1,057,805 |
|
934,180 |
Blue Ribbon LLC |
|
|
|
11.43% (1 Month Term SOFR + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 6.00%) due 05/08/28 |
1,035,000 |
|
882,337 |
LaserAway Intermediate Holdings II LLC |
|
|
|
11.41% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.75%, Rate Floor: 5.75%) due 10/14/27 |
781,187 |
|
766,540 |
Gibson Brands, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.66% (3 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 08/11/28 |
491,250 |
|
437,213 |
Southern Veterinary Partners LLC |
|
|
|
9.46% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 10/05/27 |
424,753 |
|
422,204 |
Endo Luxembourg Finance Company I SARL |
|
|
|
14.50% (Commercial Prime Lending Rate + 6.00%, Rate Floor: 7.75%) due 03/27/28 |
592,500 |
|
380,681 |
Florida Food Products LLC |
|
|
|
10.46% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 10/18/28 |
439,356 |
|
375,649 |
HAH Group Holding Co. LLC |
|
|
|
10.45% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.00%, Rate Floor: 5.00%) due 10/29/27 |
255,153 |
|
251,752 |
Total Consumer, Non-cyclical |
|
|
7,644,162 |
Technology – 1.7% |
|
|
|
Polaris Newco LLC |
|
|
|
8.95% ((1 Month Term SOFR + 3.50%) and (Commercial Prime Lending |
|
|
|
Rate + 2.50%), Rate Floor: 3.50%) due 06/04/26††† |
2,021,000 |
|
1,894,134 |
Sitecore Holding III A/S |
|
|
|
10.98% ((6 Month EURIBOR + 7.75%) and (12 Month EURIBOR + 7.00%), |
|
|
|
Rate Floor: 7.75%) due 03/12/26††† |
EUR 727,995 |
|
789,269 |
11.84% ((3 Month Term SOFR + 6.25%) and (6 Month Term SOFR + 7.75%), |
|
|
|
Rate Floor: 6.25%) due 03/12/26††† |
584,919 |
|
582,520 |
11.84% ((3 Month Term SOFR + 6.25%) and (6 Month Term SOFR + 7.75%), |
|
|
|
Rate Floor: 6.25%) due 03/09/26††† |
111,648 |
|
111,191 |
Aston FinCo SARL |
|
|
|
9.96% (1 Month GBP SONIA + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 10/09/26 |
GBP 780,080 |
|
829,642 |
RLDatix |
|
|
|
13.19% (6 Month Term SOFR + 7.75%, Rate Floor: 7.75%) due 04/27/26††† |
700,000 |
|
685,650 |
24-7 Intouch, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.20% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 08/25/25 |
382,938 |
|
377,512 |
Datix Bidco Ltd. |
|
|
|
12.94% (6 Month GBP SONIA + 7.75%, Rate Floor: 7.75%) due 04/27/26††† |
GBP 300,000 |
|
370,943 |
Sitecore USA, Inc. |
|
|
|
11.84% ((3 Month Term SOFR + 6.25%) and (6 Month Term SOFR + 7.75%), |
|
|
|
Rate Floor: 6.25%) due 03/12/26††† |
286,383 |
|
285,209 |
42 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 9.3% (continued) |
|
|
|
Technology – 1.7% (continued) |
|
|
|
Atlas CC Acquisition Corp. |
|
|
|
9.90% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 05/25/28 |
191,431 |
$ |
177,100 |
Total Technology |
|
|
6,103,170 |
Industrial – 1.7% |
|
|
|
Dispatch Terra Acquisition LLC |
|
|
|
9.79% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 03/27/28 |
1,124,125 |
|
1,053,867 |
Arcline FM Holdings LLC |
|
|
|
10.40% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 06/23/28 |
959,038 |
|
942,974 |
Level 3 Financing, Inc. |
|
|
|
7.21% (1 Month Term SOFR + 1.75%, Rate Floor: 1.75%) due 03/01/27 |
1,000,000 |
|
940,000 |
CapStone Acquisition Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
10.20% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 11/12/27††† |
931,966 |
|
926,725 |
Aegion Corp. |
|
|
|
10.39% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.75%, Rate Floor: 4.75%) due 05/17/28 |
588,174 |
|
580,828 |
Merlin Buyer, Inc. |
|
|
|
9.35% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 12/14/28 |
575,189 |
|
565,123 |
Merlin Buyer, Inc. |
|
|
|
due 12/14/28††† |
300,000 |
|
294,000 |
TK Elevator Midco GmbH |
|
|
|
6.85% (1 Month EURIBOR + 3.00%, Rate Floor: 3.00%) due 01/29/27††† |
EUR 274,012 |
|
282,195 |
Integrated Power Services Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
9.96% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 11/22/28††† |
196,669 |
|
195,270 |
ILPEA Parent, Inc. |
|
|
|
9.96% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 06/22/28††† |
127,173 |
|
124,629 |
Total Industrial |
|
|
5,905,611 |
Communications – 0.6% |
|
|
|
FirstDigital Communications LLC |
|
|
|
9.71% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.25%, Rate Floor: 4.25%) due 12/17/26††† |
1,250,000 |
|
1,214,685 |
Syndigo LLC |
|
|
|
9.96% (1 Month Term SOFR + 4.50%, Rate Floor: 4.50%) due 12/15/27††† |
929,590 |
|
897,055 |
Total Communications |
|
|
2,111,740 |
Financial – 0.6% |
|
|
|
Citadel Securities, LP |
|
|
|
7.96% (1 Month Term SOFR + 2.50%, Rate Floor: 2.50%) due 07/29/30 |
987,399 |
|
986,865 |
Eisner Advisory Group |
|
|
|
10.71% (1 Month Term SOFR + 5.25%, Rate Floor: 5.25%) due 07/28/28 |
711,669 |
|
710,339 |
HighTower Holding LLC |
|
|
|
9.64% (3 Month Term SOFR + 4.00%, Rate Floor: 4.00%) due 04/21/28 |
348,128 |
|
346,099 |
Total Financial |
|
|
2,043,303 |
Utilities – 0.0% |
|
|
|
Oregon Clean Energy LLC |
|
|
|
9.24% (3 Month Term SOFR + 3.75%, Rate Floor: 3.75%) due 03/01/26 |
79,386 |
|
78,096 |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 43
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
|
Amount~ |
|
Value |
SENIOR FLOATING RATE INTERESTS††,◊ – 9.3% (continued) |
|
|
|
Total Senior Floating Rate Interests |
|
|
|
(Cost $34,481,531) |
|
$ |
33,376,419 |
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS†† – 3.4% |
|
|
|
Government Agency – 2.4% |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac |
|
|
|
3.00% due 08/01/527 |
2,930,298 |
|
2,490,280 |
3.00% due 06/01/527 |
2,913,706 |
|
2,471,939 |
Uniform MBS 30 Year |
|
|
|
due 09/14/5314 |
4,411,764 |
|
3,719,346 |
Total Government Agency |
|
|
8,681,565 |
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities – 0.9% |
|
|
|
Imperial Fund Mortgage Trust |
|
|
|
2022-NQM2, 4.20% (WAC) due 03/25/67◊,2 |
1,972,124 |
|
1,719,893 |
GCAT Trust |
|
|
|
2022-NQM5, 5.71% due 08/25/672,4 |
537,125 |
|
521,485 |
OBX Trust |
|
|
|
2022-NQM8, 6.10% due 09/25/622,4 |
434,755 |
|
425,096 |
CFMT LLC |
|
|
|
2022-HB9, 3.25% (WAC) due 09/25/37◊,9 |
500,000 |
|
418,803 |
Total Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities |
|
|
3,085,277 |
Military Housing – 0.1% |
|
|
|
Freddie Mac Military Housing Bonds Resecuritization Trust Certificates |
|
|
|
2015-R1, 0.70% (WAC) due 11/25/55◊,2,13 |
6,787,122 |
|
427,407 |
2015-R1, 5.94% (WAC) due 11/25/52◊,9 |
84,762 |
|
73,758 |
Total Military Housing |
|
|
501,165 |
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations |
|
|
|
(Cost $12,486,511) |
|
|
12,268,007 |
FOREIGN GOVERNMENT DEBT†† – 0.2% |
|
|
|
Panama Government International Bond |
|
|
|
4.50% due 01/19/63 |
1,250,000 |
|
767,983 |
Total Foreign Government Debt |
|
|
|
(Cost $1,242,317) |
|
|
767,983 |
|
Notional |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
OTC OPTIONS PURCHASED†† – 0.0% |
|
|
|
Call Options on: |
|
|
|
Interest Rate Options |
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs International |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring June 2024 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 10,800,000 |
|
19,296 |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring June 2024 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 10,400,000 |
|
18,581 |
Barclays Bank plc |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring June 2024 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 10,300,000 |
|
18,403 |
44 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Value |
Value |
OTC OPTIONS PURCHASED†† – 0.0% (continued) |
|
|
|
Bank of America, N.A. |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring June 2024 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 5,200,000 |
$9,291 |
Goldman Sachs International |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring December 2023 with strike price of $0.20 |
USD 10,800,000 |
396 |
Morgan Stanley Capital Services LLC |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring December 2023 with strike price of $0.10 |
USD 10,400,000 |
381 |
Barclays Bank plc |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring December 2023 with strike price of $0.20 |
USD 10,400,000 |
381 |
Bank of America, N.A. |
|
|
|
10Y-2Y SOFR CMS CAP Expiring December 2023 with strike price of $0.20 |
USD 5,100,000 |
187 |
Total OTC Options Purchased |
|
|
|
(Cost $313,757) |
|
66,916 |
Total Investments – 139.0% |
|
|
|
(Cost $570,726,146) |
$ 497,675,824 |
Other Assets & Liabilities, net – (39.0)% |
(139,600,114) |
Total Net Assets – 100.0% |
$ 358,075,710 |
Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swap Agreements Protection Purchased††
|
|
|
Protection
|
|
|
|
|
Upfront |
|
|
|
|
Premium
|
Payment
|
Maturity
|
Notional
|
|
Premiums
|
Unrealized |
Counterparty
|
Exchange
|
Index
|
Rate
|
Frequency |
Date
|
Amount
|
Value
|
Received
|
Depreciation** |
J.P.
Morgan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
LLC |
ICE
|
ITRAXX.EUR.38.V1
|
1.00% |
Quarterly
|
12/20/27 |
EUR
4,400,000 |
$(81,663)
|
$(33,072) |
$(48,591) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts†† |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Contract |
Settlement |
|
Appreciation |
|
Counterparty |
Currency |
Type |
Quantity |
|
Amount |
Date |
|
(Depreciation) |
|
Barclays Bank plc |
EUR |
Sell |
32,000 |
|
35,060 USD |
12/18/23 |
|
|
|
$200 |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
EUR |
Sell |
2,510,000 |
|
2,733,285 USD |
12/18/23 |
|
|
(1,004 |
) |
Bank of America, N.A. |
CAD |
Sell |
935,000 |
|
682,963 USD |
12/18/23 |
|
|
(6,509 |
) |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
GBP |
Sell |
2,952,000 |
|
3,690,692 USD |
12/18/23 |
|
|
(36,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$(43,626 |
) |
~ | | The face amount is denominated in U.S. dollars unless
otherwise indicated. |
* | | Non-income producing security. |
** | | Includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation).
Variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
† | | Value determined based on Level 1 inputs,
unless otherwise noted — See Note 6. |
†† | | Value determined based on Level 2
inputs, unless otherwise noted — See Note 6. |
††† | | Value determined based on
Level 3 inputs — See Note 6. |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 45
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
◊ | | Variable
rate security. Rate indicated is the rate effective at November 30, 2023. In some instances,
the effective rate is limited by a minimum rate floor or a maximum rate cap established by
the issuer. The settlement status of a position may also impact the effective rate indicated.
In some cases, a position may be unsettled at period end and may not have a stated effective
rate. In instances where multiple underlying reference rates and spread amounts are shown,
the effective rate is based on a weighted average. |
2 | | Security
is a 144A or Section 4(a)(2) security. These securities have been determined to be liquid
under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total market value of 144A or
Section 4(a) (2) securities is $92,016,924 (cost $102,353,536), or 25.7% of total net assets. |
3 | | Security
has a fixed rate coupon which will convert to a floating or variable rate coupon on a future
date. |
4 | | Security
is a step up/down bond. The coupon increases or decreases at regular intervals until the
bond reaches full maturity. Rate indicated is the rate at November 30, 2023. See table below
for additional step information for each security. |
5 | | Special
Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC). |
6 | | Rate indicated
is the 7-day yield as of November 30, 2023. |
7 | | All or
a portion of these securities have been physically segregated in connection with borrowings,
unfunded loan commitments, and reverse repurchase agreements. As of November 30, 2023, the
total value of securities segregated was $152,359,198. |
8 | | Zero coupon
rate security. |
9 | | Security
is a 144A or Section 4(a)(2) security. These securities have been determined to be illiquid
and restricted under guidelines established by the Board of Trustees. The total market value
of 144A or Section 4(a)(2) illiquid and restricted securities is $6,373,360 (cost $7,701,346),
or 1.8% of total net assets — See Note 12. |
11 | | Security
is in default of interest and/or principal obligations. |
12 | | Payment-in-kind
security. |
13 | | Security
is an interest-only strip. |
14 | | Security
is unsettled at period end and does not have a stated effective rate. |
15 | | Taxable
municipal bond issued as part of the Build America Bond program. |
CAD — Canadian Dollar
CMS — Constant Maturity Swap
EUR — Euro
EURIBOR — European Interbank Offered Rate
GBP — British Pound
ICE — Intercontinental Exchange
ITRAXX.EUR.38.V1 — iTraxx Europe Series 38 Index Version
1
plc — Public Limited Company
SARL — Société à Responsabilité
Limitée
SOFR — Secured Overnight Financing Rate
SONIA — Sterling Overnight Index Average
WAC — Weighted Average Coupon
See Sector Classification in Other Information section.
See notes to financial statements.
46 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
The following table summarizes the inputs used to value the Trust’s
investments at November 30, 2023 (See Note 6 in the Notes to Financial Statements):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Investments in Securities (Assets) |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
Total |
Common Stocks |
$ |
31,322 |
$ |
— |
$ |
21,677 |
$ |
52,999 |
Preferred Stocks |
|
— |
|
7,288,211 |
|
79,079 |
|
7,367,290 |
Warrants |
|
993 |
|
— |
|
2 |
|
995 |
Closed-End Mutual Funds |
|
39,452,952 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
39,452,952 |
Money Market Funds |
|
4,750,555 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
4,750,555 |
Municipal Bonds |
|
— |
|
246,102,773 |
|
— |
|
246,102,773 |
Corporate Bonds |
|
— |
|
105,796,131 |
|
6,909,900 |
|
112,706,031 |
Asset-Backed Securities |
|
— |
|
26,621,084 |
|
14,141,820 |
|
40,762,904 |
Senior Floating Rate Interests |
|
— |
|
21,828,525 |
|
11,547,894 |
|
33,376,419 |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations |
|
— |
|
12,268,007 |
|
— |
|
12,268,007 |
Foreign Government Debt |
|
— |
|
767,983 |
|
— |
|
767,983 |
Options Purchased |
|
— |
|
66,916 |
|
— |
|
66,916 |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts** |
|
— |
|
200 |
|
— |
|
200 |
Total Assets |
$ |
44,235,822 |
$ |
420,739,830 |
$ |
32,700,372 |
$ |
497,676,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
Investments in Securities (Liabilities) |
|
Quoted Prices |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
Total |
Credit Default Swap Agreements** |
$ |
— |
$ |
48,591 |
$ |
— |
$ |
48,591 |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts** |
|
— |
|
43,826 |
|
— |
|
43,826 |
Unfunded Loan Commitments (Note 11) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
63,305 |
|
63,305 |
Total Liabilities |
$ |
— |
$ |
92,417 |
$ |
63,305 |
$ |
155,722 |
** This derivative is reported as unrealized appreciation/depreciation
at period end.
Please refer to the detailed Schedule of Investments for a breakdown
of investment type by industry category.
The Trust may hold assets and/or liabilities in which the fair
value approximates the carrying amount for financial statement purposes. As of the period end, reverse repurchase agreements of
$140,564,305 are categorized as Level 2 within the disclosure hierarchy — See Note 7.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 47
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
The following is a summary of significant unobservable inputs
used in the fair valuation of assets and liabilities categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance at |
Valuation |
Unobservable |
Input |
Weighted |
|
Category |
November 30, 2023 |
Technique |
Inputs |
Range |
Average* |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Securities |
|
$ |
9,019,356 |
Yield Analysis |
Yield |
6.7%-7.3% |
7.2 |
% |
Asset-Backed Securities |
|
|
4,472,464 |
Option adjusted spread |
Broker Quote |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
off prior month end |
|
|
|
|
broker quote |
|
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Securities |
|
|
650,000 |
Model Price |
Purchase Price |
— |
— |
|
Common Stocks |
|
|
19,992 |
Enterprise Value |
Valuation Multiple |
2.9x-8.2x |
3.2 |
x |
Common Stocks |
|
|
1,677 |
Model Price |
Liquidation Value |
— |
— |
|
Common Stocks |
|
|
8 |
Third Party Pricing |
Trade Price |
— |
— |
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
3,356,711 |
Third Party Pricing |
Vendor Price |
— |
— |
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
2,410,067 |
Option adjusted spread |
Broker Quote |
— |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
off prior month end |
|
|
|
|
broker quote |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Bonds |
|
|
1,143,122 |
Third Party Pricing |
Broker Quote |
— |
— |
|
Preferred Stocks |
|
|
79,077 |
Enterprise Value |
Valuation Multiple |
5.1x |
— |
|
Preferred Stocks |
|
|
2 |
Third Party Pricing |
Vendor Price |
— |
— |
|
Senior Floating Rate Interests |
|
7,602,952 |
Yield Analysis |
Yield |
10.3%-13.5% |
11.9 |
% |
Senior Floating Rate Interests |
|
2,176,329 |
Model Price |
Purchase Price |
— |
— |
|
Senior Floating Rate Interests |
|
1,474,613 |
Third Party Pricing |
Broker Quote |
— |
— |
|
Senior Floating Rate Interests |
|
294,000 |
Third Party Pricing |
Trade Price |
— |
— |
|
Warrants |
|
|
2 |
Model Price |
Liquidation Value |
— |
— |
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
32,700,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded Loan Commitments |
$ |
63,305 |
Model Price |
Purchase Price |
— |
— |
|
* Inputs are weighted by the fair value of the instruments. |
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in a quote, yield, liquidation value or valuation
multiple would generally result in significant changes in the fair value of the security.
The Trust’s fair valuation leveling guidelines classify
a single daily broker quote, or a vendor price based on a single daily or monthly broker quote, as Level 3, if such a quote or price cannot
be supported with other available market information.
Transfers between Level 2 and Level 3 may occur as markets fluctuate
and/or the availability of data used in an investment’s valuation changes. For the period ended November 30, 2023, the Trust had
securities with a total value of $5,632,227 transfer into Level 3 from Level 2 due to a lack of observable inputs and had securities with
a total value of $4,130,514 transfer out of Level 3 into Level 2 due to the availability of current and reliable market-based data provided
by a third-party pricing service which utilizes significant observable inputs.
48 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Summary of Fair Value Level 3 Activity
Following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant
unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value for the period ended November 30, 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Asset
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
|
Backed |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Floating
Rate |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Preferred |
|
Total |
|
|
Loan |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Warrants |
|
Stocks |
|
|
Stocks |
|
Assets |
|
|
Commitments |
|
Beginning
Balance |
$ |
8,750,965 |
|
$ |
783,421 |
|
$ |
14,301,312 |
|
$ |
2 |
$ |
25,554 |
|
$ |
70,186 |
$ |
23,931,440 |
|
$ |
(98,344 |
) |
Purchases/(Receipts) |
|
5,875,423 |
|
|
1,650,000 |
|
|
1,576,710 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
9,102,133 |
|
|
(86,969 |
) |
(Sales,
maturities and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paydowns)
/Fundings |
|
(180,113 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(1,494,485 |
) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
(1,674,598 |
) |
|
112,772 |
|
Amortization
of premiums/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
discounts |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
51,155 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
51,155 |
|
|
— |
|
Total
realized gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included
in earnings |
|
(3,924 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(78,007 |
) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
(81,931 |
) |
|
11,915 |
|
Total
change in unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appreciation
(depreciation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included
in earnings |
|
(300,531 |
) |
|
(22,871 |
) |
|
188,848 |
|
|
— |
|
(3,877 |
) |
|
8,891 |
|
(129,540 |
) |
|
(2,679 |
) |
Transfers
into Level 3 |
|
— |
|
|
4,499,350 |
|
|
1,132,875 |
|
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
2 |
|
5,632,227 |
|
|
— |
|
Transfers
out of Level 3 |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(4,130,514 |
) |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
(4,130,514 |
) |
|
— |
|
Ending
Balance |
$ |
14,141,820 |
|
$ |
6,909,900 |
|
$ |
11,547,894 |
|
$ |
2 |
$ |
21,677 |
|
$ |
79,079 |
$ |
32,700,372 |
|
$ |
(63,305 |
) |
Net
change in unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
appreciation
(depreciation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
investments in Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities
still held at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November
30, 2023 |
$ |
(300,531 |
) |
$ |
(22,871 |
) |
$ |
50,858 |
|
$ |
— |
$ |
(3,877 |
) |
$ |
8,891 |
$ |
(267,530 |
) |
$ |
(3,604 |
) |
Step Coupon Bonds
The following table discloses additional information related to
step coupon bonds held by the Trust. Certain securities are subject to multiple rate changes prior to maturity. For those securities,
a range of rates and corresponding dates have been provided. Rates for all step coupon bonds held by the Trust are scheduled to increase,
except GAIA Aviation Ltd. which is scheduled to decrease.
|
|
|
|
|
Coupon Rate |
|
|
|
at Next |
|
Next Rate |
Name |
Reset Date |
|
Reset Date |
GAIA Aviation Ltd. 2019-1, 3.97% due 12/15/44 |
2.00 |
% |
11/15/26 |
GCAT Trust 2022-NQM5, 5.71% due 08/25/67 |
6.71 |
% |
10/01/26 |
OBX Trust 2022-NQM8, 6.10% due 09/25/62 |
7.10 |
% |
10/01/26 |
Affiliated Transactions
Investments representing 5% or more of the outstanding voting
shares of a company, or control of or by, or common control under Guggenheim Investments, result in that company being considered an
affiliated issuer.
Transactions
during the period ended November 30, 2023, in which the company is an affiliated issuer, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gain |
|
Appreciation |
|
|
Value |
Shares |
Security Name |
|
05/31/23 |
Additions |
Reductions |
(Loss) |
|
(Depreciation) |
|
|
11/30/23 |
11/30/23 |
Common Stocks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BP Holdco LLC* |
$ |
20,062 |
$ — |
$ — |
$ — |
$ |
(1,130 |
) |
$ |
18,932 |
15,619 |
* Non-income producing security. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 49
|
|
|
|
|
STATEMENT
OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (Unaudited) |
November
30, 2023 |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
Investments
in unaffiliated issuers, at value (cost $570,720,631) |
$
|
497,656,892 |
Investments
in affiliated issuers, at value (cost $5,515) |
|
18,932 |
Foreign
currency, at value |
12,334 |
Cash
|
66,822 |
Segregated
cash due from broker |
89,385 |
Unrealized
appreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
200 |
Prepaid
expenses |
13,753 |
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
5,924,621 |
|
Investments
sold |
751,011 |
|
Fund
shares sold |
185,122 |
|
Dividends
|
81,106 |
|
Tax
reclaims |
7,842 |
|
Variation
margin on credit default swap agreements |
3,060 |
Total
assets |
504,811,080 |
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
Reverse
repurchase agreements (Note 7) |
140,564,305 |
Unfunded
loan commitments, at value (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
(commitment
fees received $85,659) |
63,305 |
Unamortized
upfront premiums received on credit default swap agreements |
33,072 |
Unrealized
depreciation on forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
43,826 |
Interest
due on borrowings |
34,095 |
Payable
for: |
|
|
|
|
Investments
purchased |
5,345,187 |
|
Professional
fees |
241,827 |
|
Investment
advisory fees |
240,928 |
|
Offering
costs |
49,713 |
|
Trustees’
fees and expenses* |
14,050 |
|
Protection
fees on credit default swap agreements |
9,580 |
Other
liabilities |
95,482 |
Total
liabilities |
146,735,370 |
NET
ASSETS |
$
|
358,075,710 |
NET
ASSETS CONSIST OF: |
|
|
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value per share; unlimited number of shares |
|
|
|
authorized,
23,509,549 shares issued and outstanding |
$
|
235,095 |
Additional
paid-in capital |
444,849,762 |
Total
distributable earnings (loss) |
(87,009,147) |
NET
ASSETS |
$
|
358,075,710 |
Shares
outstanding ($0.01 par value with unlimited amount authorized) |
23,509,549 |
Net
asset value |
$
|
15.23 |
*
Relates to Trustees not deemed “interested persons” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
See notes to financial statements.
50 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
For the Six Months Ended November 30, 2023 |
|
|
INVESTMENT INCOME: |
|
|
Interest from securities of unaffiliated issuers |
$ |
14,317,656 |
Dividends from securities of unaffiliated issuers |
1,288,705 |
|
Total investment income |
15,606,361 |
EXPENSES: |
|
|
Interest expense |
3,888,216 |
Investment advisory fees |
1,458,028 |
Professional fees |
463,986 |
Fund accounting fees |
60,738 |
Administration fees |
56,104 |
Printing fees |
37,332 |
Trustees’ fees and expenses* |
33,277 |
Custodian fees |
19,625 |
Insurance |
13,903 |
Registration and filing fees |
11,895 |
Transfer agent fees |
10,134 |
Miscellaneous |
7,565 |
|
Total expenses |
6,060,803 |
Net investment income |
9,545,558 |
NET REALIZED AND UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS): |
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) on: |
|
|
|
Investments in unaffiliated issuers |
(2,239,373) |
|
Swap agreements |
(20,040) |
|
Options purchased |
(14,496) |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
41,761 |
|
Foreign currency transactions |
(145,006) |
Net realized loss |
(2,377,154) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: |
|
|
|
Investments in unaffiliated issuers |
(7,488,380) |
|
Investments in affiliated issuers |
(1,130) |
|
Swap agreements |
(39,174) |
|
Options purchased |
(149,961) |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts |
(65,573) |
|
Foreign currency translations |
210 |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
(7,744,008) |
Net realized and unrealized loss |
(10,121,162) |
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations |
$ |
(575,604) |
*
Relates to Trustees not deemed “interested persons” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act.
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 51
|
|
STATEMENTS
OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
May 31, 2023 |
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS FROM OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income |
$ |
9,545,558 |
|
$ |
20,548,712 |
|
Net realized loss on investments |
|
(2,377,154 |
) |
|
(3,856,986 |
) |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
on investments |
|
(7,744,008 |
) |
|
(35,081,283 |
) |
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations |
|
(575,604 |
) |
|
(18,389,557 |
) |
DISTRIBUTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to shareholders |
|
(17,487,074 |
) |
|
(20,436,420 |
) |
Return of capital |
|
—* |
|
|
(13,351,040 |
) |
Total distributions |
|
(17,487,074 |
) |
|
(33,787,460 |
) |
SHAREHOLDER TRANSACTIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from shares issued through at-the-market offering |
|
7,632,230 |
|
|
17,733,096 |
|
Capital contribution from adviser |
|
— |
|
|
29,557 |
|
Reinvestments of distributions |
|
583,138 |
|
|
1,369,554 |
|
Common shares offering cost charged to paid-in-capital |
|
(46,491 |
) |
|
(108,019 |
) |
Net increase in net assets resulting from shareholder transactions |
|
8,168,877 |
|
|
19,024,188 |
|
Net decrease in net assets |
|
(9,893,801 |
) |
|
(33,152,829 |
) |
NET ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period |
|
367,969,511 |
|
|
401,122,340 |
|
End of period |
$ |
358,075,710 |
|
$ |
367,969,511 |
|
* A portion of the distributions to shareholders may be deemed
a return of capital at fiscal year-end.
See notes to financial statements.
52 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations |
|
$ |
(575,604 |
) |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Operations to |
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on investments |
7,489,510 |
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on options purchased |
149,961 |
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation on forward |
|
|
|
foreign currency exchange contracts |
65,573 |
|
|
Net realized loss on investments |
2,239,373 |
|
|
Net realized loss on options purchased |
14,496 |
|
|
Purchase of long-term investments |
(31,370,184 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of long-term investments |
15,726,007 |
|
|
Net purchases of short-term investments |
(2,083,478 |
) |
|
Net accretion of discount and amortization of premium |
(385,726 |
) |
|
Corporate actions and other payments |
10,508 |
|
|
Commitment fees received and repayments of unfunded commitments |
(30,368 |
) |
|
Increase in interest receivable |
(147,691 |
) |
|
Increase in dividends receivable |
(3,621 |
) |
|
Increase investments sold receivable |
(671,711 |
) |
|
Decrease in variation margin on credit default swap agreements receivable |
343 |
|
|
Increase in prepaid expenses |
(11,479 |
) |
|
Increase in tax reclaims receivable |
(4,350 |
) |
|
Increase in investments purchased payable |
5,235,816 |
|
|
Increase in interest due on borrowings |
20,831 |
|
|
Increase in professional fees payable |
90,970 |
|
|
Decrease in unamortized upfront premiums received on credit default swap agreements |
(4,144 |
) |
|
Decrease in investment advisory fees payable |
(11,877 |
) |
|
Decrease in trustees’ fees and expenses payable* |
(4,951 |
) |
|
Increase in protection fees on credit default swap agreements payable |
43 |
|
|
Increase in other liabilities |
25,825 |
|
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities |
|
$ |
(4,235,928 |
) |
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 53
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) continued |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to common shareholders |
$ |
(16,903,936 |
) |
Proceeds from the issuance of common shares |
7,480,677 |
|
Proceeds from reverse repurchase agreements |
179,017,219 |
|
Payments made on reverse repurchase agreements |
(165,505,148 |
) |
Offering costs in connection with the issuance of common shares |
(2,500 |
) |
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities |
|
$ |
4,086,312 |
|
Net decrease in cash |
(149,616 |
) |
Cash at Beginning of Period (including foreign currency)** |
318,157 |
|
Cash at End of Period (including foreign currency and restricted cash)*** |
|
$ |
168,541 |
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for interest |
|
$ |
6,316,032 |
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non Operating Activity: Dividend reinvestment |
|
$ |
583,138 |
|
* | | Relates to Trustees not deemed “interested persons” within the meaning of Section
2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. |
** | | Includes $104,622 of segregated cash for swap agreements from broker and $57,279 of foreign
currency. |
*** | | Includes $89,385 of segregated cash for swap agreements from broker and $12,334 of foreign
currency. |
See notes to financial statements.
54 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS |
November 30, 2023 |
The information in this table for the fiscal years ended 2023,
2022, 2021, 2020, and 2019 is derived from the Trust’s financial statements and has been audited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November
30, 2023 |
|
Year
Ended |
|
Year
Ended |
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
May
31, 2023 |
May 31, 2022 |
|
May
31, 2021 |
|
|
May
31, 2020 |
|
|
May
31, 2019 |
|
|
Per
Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value, beginning of period |
$ |
16.01 |
|
$ |
18.35 |
|
$ |
|
22.80 |
|
$ |
|
22.09 |
|
$ |
22.71 |
|
$ |
22.69 |
|
Income
from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
investment income(a) |
|
0.41 |
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
1.30 |
|
Net
gain (loss) on investments (realized and unrealized) |
|
(0.44 |
) |
|
(1.75 |
) |
|
|
(4.15 |
) |
|
|
1.03 |
|
|
(0.38 |
) |
|
0.23 |
|
Total
from investment operations |
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
(0.83 |
) |
|
|
(2.94 |
) |
|
|
2.22 |
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
1.53 |
|
Less
distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
investment income |
|
(0.75 |
) |
|
(0.91 |
) |
|
|
(1.32 |
) |
|
|
(1.38 |
) |
|
(1.51 |
) |
|
(1.43 |
) |
Capital
gains |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
Return
of capital |
|
— |
|
|
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(0.00 |
)* |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Total
distributions to shareholders |
|
(0.75 |
) |
|
(1.51 |
) |
|
|
(1.51 |
) |
|
|
(1.51 |
) |
|
(1.51 |
) |
|
(1.51 |
) |
Net
asset value, end of period |
$ |
15.23 |
|
$ |
16.01 |
|
$ |
|
18.35 |
|
$ |
|
22.80 |
|
$ |
22.09 |
|
$ |
22.71 |
|
Market
value, end of period |
$ |
15.65 |
|
$ |
16.32 |
|
$ |
|
19.45 |
|
$ |
|
24.22 |
|
$ |
23.20 |
|
$ |
23.38 |
|
Total
Return(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value |
|
(0.08 |
%) |
|
(4.39 |
%)(g) |
(13.81 |
%)(i) |
10.30 |
% |
|
3.86 |
% |
|
7.11 |
% |
Market
value |
|
0.74 |
% |
|
(8.10 |
%) |
|
|
(13.96 |
%) |
|
|
11.43 |
% |
|
6.03 |
% |
|
16.81 |
% |
Ratios/Supplemental
Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$ |
358,076 |
|
$ |
367,970 |
|
$ |
|
401,122 |
|
$ |
|
472,691 |
|
$ |
414,168 |
|
$ |
395,716 |
|
Ratio
to average net assets of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
expenses, including interest expense(c),(e) |
|
3.41 |
%(f) |
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
1.34 |
% |
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
1.65 |
% |
|
1.68 |
% |
Net
investment income, including interest expense |
|
5.38 |
%(f) |
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
5.52 |
% |
|
|
5.22 |
% |
|
5.61 |
% |
|
5.82 |
% |
Portfolio
turnover rate |
|
3 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
25 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
Senior
Indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
- committed facility agreement (in thousands)(h) |
$ |
140,564 |
|
$ |
127,052 |
|
$ |
|
— |
|
$ |
|
97,360 |
|
$ |
10,510 |
|
$ |
44,510 |
|
Asset
Coverage per $1,000 of indebtedness(d) |
$ |
3,547 |
|
$ |
3,896 |
|
$ |
|
— |
|
$ |
|
5,855 |
|
$ |
40,409 |
|
$ |
9,891 |
|
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 55
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
Year
Ended |
|
|
|
May
31, 2018 |
|
|
May
31, 2017 |
|
|
May
31, 2016 |
|
|
May
31, 2015 |
|
|
May
31, 2014 |
|
|
Per
Share Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value, beginning of period |
$ |
23.30 |
|
$ |
23.30 |
|
$ |
23.35 |
|
$ |
23.26 |
|
$ |
23.61 |
|
Income
from investment operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
investment income(a) |
|
1.48 |
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
1.63 |
|
Net
gain (loss) on investments (realized and unrealized) |
|
(0.58 |
) |
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
0.13 |
|
|
0.27 |
|
|
(0.32 |
) |
Total
from investment operations |
|
0.90 |
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
1.31 |
|
Less
distributions from: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
investment income |
|
(1.35 |
) |
|
(1.55 |
) |
|
(1.64 |
) |
|
(1.48 |
) |
|
(1.60 |
) |
Capital
gains |
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
— |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
(0.18 |
) |
|
(0.06 |
) |
Return
of capital |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Total
distributions to shareholders |
|
(1.51 |
) |
|
(1.55 |
) |
|
(1.66 |
) |
|
(1.66 |
) |
|
(1.66 |
) |
Net
asset value, end of period |
$ |
22.69 |
|
$ |
23.30 |
|
$ |
23.30 |
|
$ |
23.35 |
|
$ |
23.26 |
|
Market
value, end of period |
$ |
21.44 |
|
$ |
23.23 |
|
$ |
22.28 |
|
$ |
21.64 |
|
$ |
21.69 |
|
Total
Return(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
asset value |
|
3.93 |
% |
|
6.81 |
% |
|
7.25 |
% |
|
7.64 |
% |
|
6.15 |
% |
Market
value |
|
(1.23 |
%) |
|
11.62 |
% |
|
10.95 |
% |
|
7.52 |
% |
|
3.54 |
% |
Ratios/Supplemental
Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
assets, end of period (in thousands) |
$ |
395,221 |
|
$ |
405,780 |
|
$ |
405,820 |
|
$ |
406,668 |
|
$ |
405,039 |
|
Ratio
to average net assets of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
expenses, including interest expense(c),(e) |
|
1.65 |
% |
|
1.54 |
% |
|
1.38 |
% |
|
1.32 |
% |
|
1.35 |
% |
Net
investment income, including interest expense |
|
6.42 |
% |
|
6.80 |
% |
|
6.47 |
% |
|
6.26 |
% |
|
7.37 |
% |
Portfolio
turnover rate |
|
8 |
% |
|
6 |
% |
|
7 |
% |
|
11 |
% |
|
10 |
% |
Senior
Indebtedness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
- committed facility agreement (in thousands) |
$ |
44,510 |
|
$ |
47,509 |
|
$ |
61,710 |
|
$ |
35,510 |
|
$ |
30,964 |
|
Asset
coverage per $1,000 of borrowings(d) |
$ |
9,879 |
|
$ |
9,541 |
|
$ |
7,576 |
|
$ |
12,452 |
|
$ |
14,081 |
|
See notes to financial statements.
56 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM
TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS continued |
November 30, 2023 |
(a) | | Based on average shares outstanding. |
(b) | | Total return is calculated assuming a purchase of a common share
at the beginning of the period and a sale on the last day of the period reported either at net asset value (“NAV”)
or market price per share. Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at NAV for
NAV returns or the prices obtained under the Trust’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan for market value returns. Total
return does not reflect brokerage commissions. A return calculated for a period of less than one year is not annualized. |
(c) | | Excluding interest expense, the operating expense ratios for the period ended November 30,
2023 and the years ended May 31, would be: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)(f) |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
1.22% |
1.13% |
1.04% |
1.01% |
0.96% |
0.95% |
0.99% |
1.00% |
0.99% |
1.02% |
1.02% |
(d) | | Calculated by subtracting the Trust’s total liabilities (not including the borrowings) from
the Trust’s total assets and dividing by the borrowings. Effective August 19, 2022, the Trust’s obligations under
reverse repurchase agreement transactions are treated as senior securities representing indebtedness for purposes of
the 1940 Act. Accordingly, for the period ended November 30, 2023 and the year ended May 31, 2023, Asset Coverage is calculated by subtracting the
Trust’s total liabilities (not including the borrowings or reverse repurchase agreements) from
the Trust’s total assets and dividing by the sum of the borrowings and reverse repurchase agreements. |
(e) | | The ratios of total expenses to average net assets applicable to common
shares do not reflect fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the Trust as a result of its investment in
shares of other investment companies. If these fees were included in the expense ratios, for the period ended November 30,
2023 and the years ended May 31,the expense ratios would increase by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)(f) |
|
2023 |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2019 |
|
2018 |
|
2017 |
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
0.35% |
0.31% |
0.20% |
0.26% |
0.32% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
(g) | | The net increase from payments by affiliates totaling $29,557 relating to an operational issue contributed 0.01%
to total return at net asset value for the year ended May 31, 2023. |
(h) | | Effective August 19, 2022, the Trust’s obligations under reverse repurchase
agreement transactions are treated as senior securities representing indebtedness for purposes of the 1940 Act. |
(i) | | The net increase from the payment by the Adviser totaling $383,226 relating to an operational issue contributed 0.08%
to total return at net asset value for the year ended May 31, 2022. |
* Less than (0.01) per share.
See notes to financial statements.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 57
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
Note 1 – Organization
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust
(the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 30, 2010. The Trust is registered as a diversified, closed-end
management investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
The Trust’s primary investment objective is to provide current
income with a secondary objective of long-term capital appreciation. There can be no assurance that the Trust will achieve its investment
objectives. The Trust’s investment objectives are considered fundamental and may not be changed without shareholder approval.
Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies
The Trust operates as an investment company and, accordingly,
follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services – Investment Companies.
The following significant accounting policies are in conformity
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and are consistently followed by the Trust. This requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities, contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results
could differ from these estimates. All time references are based on Eastern Time.
(a) Valuation of Investments
The Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) adopted
policies and procedures for the valuation of the Trust’s investments (the “Fund Valuation Procedures”). The U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act (“Rule 2a-5”) which establishes requirements
for determining fair value in good faith. Rule 2a-5 also defines “readily available market quotations” for purposes of the
1940 Act and establishes requirements for determining whether a fund must fair value a security in good faith.
Pursuant to Rule 2a-5, the Board has designated Guggenheim Funds
Investment Advisors, LLC (“GFIA” or the “Adviser”) as the valuation designee to perform fair valuation determinations
for the Trust with respect to all Trust investments and other assets. As the Trust’s valuation designee pursuant to Rule 2a-5, the
Adviser has adopted separate procedures (the “Valuation Designee Procedures” and collectively with the Fund Valuation Procedures,
the “Valuation Procedures”) reasonably designed to prevent violations of the requirements of Rule 2a-5 and Rule 31a-4. The
Adviser, in its role as valuation designee, utilizes the assistance of a valuation committee, consisting of representatives from Guggenheim’s
investment management, fund administration, legal and compliance departments (the “Valuation Committee”), in determining the
fair value of the Trust’s securities and other assets.
Valuations of the Trust’s securities and other assets are
supplied primarily by pricing service providers appointed pursuant to the processes set forth in the Valuation Procedures. The Adviser,
with the assistance of the Valuation Committee, convenes monthly, or more frequently as needed, to review the valuation of all assets
which have been fair valued. The Adviser, consistent with the monitoring and review responsibilities set forth in the Valuation Procedures,
regularly reviews the
58 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
appropriateness of the inputs, methods, models and assumptions
employed by the pricing service provider.
If the pricing service provider cannot or does not provide a valuation
for a particular investment or such valuation is deemed unreliable, such investment is fair valued by the Adviser.
Equity securities listed or traded on a recognized U.S. securities
exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) will generally be valued on the basis of the last sale price on the primary
U.S. exchange or market on which the security is listed or traded; provided, however, that securities listed on NASDAQ will be valued
at the NASDAQ official closing price, which may not necessarily represent the last sale price.
Open-end investment companies are valued at their net asset value
(“NAV”) as of the close of business, on the valuation date. Exchange-traded funds and closed-end investment companies are
generally valued at the last quoted sale price.
Generally, trading in foreign securities markets is
substantially completed each day at various times prior to the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The values
of foreign securities are determined as of the close of such foreign markets or the close of the NYSE, if earlier. All investments
quoted in foreign currencies are valued in U.S. dollars on the basis of the foreign currency exchange rates prevailing at the close
of U.S. business at 4:00 p.m. Investments in foreign securities may involve risks not present in domestic investments. The Adviser
will determine the current value of such foreign securities by taking into consideration certain factors which may include the
following factors, among others: the value of the securities traded on other foreign markets, American Depositary Receipts
(“ADRs”) trading, closed-end fund trading, foreign currency exchange activity, and the trading prices of financial
products that are tied to foreign securities. In addition, under the Valuation Procedures, the Adviser is authorized to use prices
and other information supplied by a pricing service provider in valuing foreign securities.
Commercial paper and discount notes with a maturity of greater
than 60 days at acquisition are valued at prices that reflect broker-dealer supplied valuations or are obtained from pricing service providers,
which may consider the trade activity, treasury spreads, yields or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as
well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Commercial paper and discount notes with a maturity of 60 days or
less at acquisition are valued at amortized cost, unless the Adviser concludes that amortized cost does not represent the fair value of
the applicable asset in which case it will be valued using an independent pricing service provider.
U.S. Government securities are valued by pricing service providers,
using the last traded fill price, or at the reported bid price at the close of business.
Typically, loans are valued using information provided by a pricing
service provider which uses broker quotes, among other inputs. If the pricing service provider cannot or does not provide a valuation
for a particular loan, or such valuation is deemed unreliable, such investment is valued based on a quote from a broker-dealer or is fair
valued by the Adviser.
Repurchase agreements are valued at amortized cost, provided such
amounts approximate market value.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL
BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 59
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Exchange-traded options are valued at the mean of the bid and ask
prices on the principal exchange on which they are traded. Over-the-counter (“OTC”) options and options on swaps (“swaptions”)
are valued using a price provided by a pricing service provider.
Interest rate swap agreements entered into by the Trust are valued
on the basis of the last sale price on the primary exchange on which the swap is traded. Other swap agreements entered into by the Trust
are generally valued using an evaluated price provided by a pricing service provider.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued daily based
on the applicable exchange rate of the underlying currency.
Investments for which market quotations are not readily
available are fair valued as determined in good faith by the Adviser. Valuations in accordance with these methods are intended to
reflect each security’s (or asset’s or liability’s) “fair value”. Each such determination is based on
a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. Examples of such factors may
include, but are not limited to market prices; sale prices; broker quotes; and models which derive prices based on inputs such as
prices of securities with comparable maturities and characteristics, or based on inputs such as anticipated cash flows or
collateral, spread over U.S. Treasury securities, and other information analysis. In connection with futures contracts and other
derivative instruments, such factors may include obtaining information as to how (a) these contracts and other derivative
investments trade in the futures or other derivative markets, respectively, and (b) the securities underlying these contracts and
other derivative investments trade in the cash market.
(b) Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized
gains and losses on investments are determined on the identified cost basis. Dividend income is recorded net of applicable withholding
taxes on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recorded on an accrual basis. Discounts or premiums on debt securities purchased
are accreted or amortized to interest income using the effective interest method. Interest income also includes paydown gains and losses
on mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, and senior and subordinated loans. Amendment fees are earned as compensation for evaluating
and accepting changes to the original loan agreement.
The Trust may receive other income from investments in senior loan
interests, including amendment fees, consent fees and commitment fees. For funded loans, these fees are recorded as income when received
by the Trust and included in interest income on the Trust’s Statement of Operations. For unfunded loans, commitment fees are included
in realized gain on investments on the Trust’s Statement of Operations at the end of the commitment period.
Income from residual collateralized loan obligations is recognized
using the effective interest method. At the time of purchase, management estimates the future expected cash flows and determines the effective
yield and estimated maturity date based on the estimated cash flows. Subsequent to the purchase, the estimated cash flows are updated
periodically and a revised yield is calculated prospectively.
60 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
(c) Senior Floating Rate Interests and Loan Investments
Senior floating rate interests in which the Trust invests generally
pay interest rates which are periodically adjusted by reference to a base short-term floating rate, plus a premium. These base lending
rates are generally (i) the lending rate offered by one or more major European banks, (ii) the prime rate offered by one or more major
United States banks, or (iii) the bank’s certificate of deposit rate. Senior floating rate interests often require prepayments from
excess cash flows or permit the borrower to repay at its election. The rate at which the borrower repays cannot be predicted with accuracy.
As a result, the actual remaining maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturities disclosed in the Trust’s Schedule
of Investments.
The Trust invests in loans and other similar debt obligations (“obligations”).
A portion of the Trust’s investments in these obligations is sometimes referred to as “covenant lite” loans or obligations
(“covenant lite obligations”), which are obligations that lack covenants or possess fewer or less restrictive covenants or
constraints on borrowers than certain other types of obligations. The Trust may also obtain exposure to covenant lite obligations through
investment in securitization vehicles and other structured products. Many loans and other similar debt obligations have not featured traditional
covenants, which are intended to protect lenders and investors by (i) imposing certain restrictions or other limitations on a borrower’s
operations or assets or (ii) providing certain rights to lenders. The Trust may have fewer rights with respect to covenant lite obligations,
including fewer protections against the possibility of default and fewer remedies in the event of default. As a result, investments in
(or exposure to) covenant lite obligations are subject to more risk than investments in (or exposure to) certain other types of obligations.
The Trust is subject to other risks associated with investments in (or exposure to) obligations, including that obligations may not be
considered “securities” under the federal securities laws and, as a result, the Trust may not be entitled to rely on the anti-fraud
protections under the federal securities laws and instead may have to resort to state law and direct claims.
(d) Interest on When-Issued Securities
The Trust may purchase and sell interests in securities on a when-issued
and delayed delivery basis, with payment and delivery scheduled for a future date. No income accrues to the Trust on such interests or
securities in connection with such transactions prior to the date the Trust actually takes delivery of such interests or securities. These
transactions are subject to market fluctuations and are subject to the risk that the value at delivery may be more or less than the trade
date purchase price. Although the Trust will generally purchase these securities with the intention of acquiring such securities, it may
sell such securities before the settlement date.
(e) Currency Translations
The accounting records of the Trust are maintained in U.S. dollars.
All assets and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are converted into U.S. dollars at prevailing exchange rates. Purchases
and sales of investment securities, dividend and interest income, and certain expenses are translated at the rates of exchange prevailing
on the respective dates of such transactions. Changes in the relationship of these foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar can significantly
affect the value of the investments and earnings of the Trust. Foreign investments may also subject the Trust to foreign government exchange
restrictions, expropriation, taxation, or other political, social, geopolitical or economic developments, all of which could affect the
market and/or credit risk of the investments.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 61
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
The Trust does not isolate that portion of the results of operations
resulting from changes in the foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in the market prices of
securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized gain or loss and unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments.
Reported net realized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from
sales of foreign currencies and currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on investment transactions. Net
unrealized appreciation and depreciation arise from changes in the fair values of assets and liabilities other than investments in securities
at the fiscal period end, resulting from changes in exchange rates.
(f) Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts
The change in value of a forward foreign currency exchange contract
is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation until the contract is closed. When the contract is closed, the Trust records a
realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value at the time the contract was opened and the value at the time it was closed.
(g) Distributions to Shareholders
The Trust intends to declare and pay monthly distributions to common
shareholders. The Trust expects that distributions will generally consist of (i) investment company taxable income taxed as ordinary income,
which includes, among other things, short-term capital gain and income from certain hedging and interest rate transactions, (ii) long-term
capital gain and (iii) return of capital. Any net realized long-term capital gains are distributed annually to common shareholders. To
the extent distributions exceed the amount of the Trust’s earnings and profit available for distribution, the excess will be deemed
a return of capital. A return of capital is generally not taxable and would reduce the shareholder’s tax basis in its shares, which
would reduce the loss (or increase the gain) on a subsequent taxable disposition by such shareholder of the shares, until such shareholder’s
basis reaches zero at which point subsequent return of capital distributions would constitute taxable capital gain to such shareholder.
Shareholders receiving a return of capital may be under the impression that they are receiving net investment income or profit when they
are not.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
The amount and timing of distributions are determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S.
GAAP.
(h) Restricted Cash
A portion of cash on hand relates to collateral received by the
Trust for swap agreements. This amount is presented on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as segregated cash from broker.
(i) Swap Agreements
Swap agreements are marked-to-market daily and the change, if any,
is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Payments received or made as a result of an agreement or termination of an agreement
are recognized as realized gains or losses.
Upon entering into certain centrally-cleared swap transactions,
the Trust is required to deposit with its clearing broker an amount of cash or securities as an initial margin. Subsequent variation margin
62 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
receipts or payments are received or made by the Trust depending
on fluctuations in the fair value of the reference entity and are recorded by the Trust as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. When
the contract is closed, the Trust records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time
it was opened and the value at the time it was closed.
Upfront payments received or made by the Trust on credit default
swap agreements and interest rate swap agreements are amortized over the expected life of the agreement. Periodic payments received or
paid by the Trust are recorded as realized gains or losses. Payments received or made as a result of a credit event or termination of
the contract are recognized, net of a proportional amount of the upfront payment, as realized gains or losses.
(j) Options
Upon the purchase of an option, the premium paid is recorded as
an investment, the value of which is marked-to-market daily. If a purchased option expires, the Trust realizes a loss in the amount of
the cost of the option. When the Trust enters into a closing sale transaction, it realizes a gain or loss depending on whether the proceeds
from the closing sale transaction are greater or less than the cost of the option. If the Trust exercises a put option, it realizes a
gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security and the proceeds from such sale will be decreased by the premium originally paid.
When the Trust exercises a call option, the cost of the security purchased by the Trust upon exercise increases by the premium originally
paid.
When the Trust writes (sells) an option, an amount equal to the
premium received is entered in that Trust’s accounting records as an asset and equivalent liability. The amount of the liability
is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current value of the option written. When a written option expires, or if the Trust enters
into a closing purchase transaction, it realizes a gain (or loss if the cost of a closing purchase transaction exceeds the premium received
when the option was sold).
(k) Indemnifications
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its Trustees
and officers are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. In addition, throughout
the normal course of business, the Trust enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties which provide
general indemnifications. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims
that may be made against the Trust and/or its affiliates that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the Trust expects the
risk of loss to be remote.
(l) Special Purpose Acquisition Companies
The Trust may acquire an interest in a special purpose acquisition
company (“SPAC”) in an initial public offering or a secondary market transaction. SPAC investments carry many of the same
risks as investments in initial public offering securities, such as erratic price movements, greater risk of loss, lack of information
about the issuer, limited operating and little public or no trading history, and higher transaction costs. An investment in a SPAC is
typically subject to a higher risk of dilution by additional later offerings of interests in the SPAC or by other investors exercising
existing rights to purchase shares of the SPAC and interests in SPACs may be illiquid and/or be subject to restrictions on resale. A SPAC
is a publicly traded company that raises investment capital for the purpose of acquiring the equity securities of one or more existing
companies (or interests therein)
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 63
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
via merger, combination, acquisition or other similar transactions.
Unless and until an acquisition is completed, a SPAC generally invests its assets (less a portion retained to cover expenses) in U.S.
government securities, money market securities and cash and does not typically pay dividends in respect of its common stock. SPAC investments
are also subject to the risk that a significant portion of the funds raised by the SPAC may be expended during the search for a target
acquisition or merger and that the SPAC may have limited time in which to conduct due diligence on potential business combination targets.
Because SPACs are in essence blank check companies without operating history or ongoing business other than seeking acquisitions, the
value of their securities is particularly dependent on the ability of the entity’s management to identify and complete a profitable
acquisition. Among other conflicts of interest, the economic interests of the management, directors, officers and related parties of a
SPAC can differ from the economic interests of public shareholders, which may lead to conflicts as they evaluate, negotiate and recommend
business combination transactions to shareholders. This risk may become more acute as the deadline for the completion of a business combination
nears. There is no guarantee that the SPACs in which the Trust invests will complete an acquisition or that any acquisitions that are
completed will be profitable.
Note 3 – Derivatives
As part of its investment strategy, the Trust utilizes a variety
of derivative instruments. These investments involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk and risks in excess of amounts recognized
on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Valuation and accounting treatment of these instruments can be found under
Significant Accounting Policies in Note 2 of these Notes to Financial Statements.
Derivatives are instruments whose values depend on, or are derived
from, in whole or in part, the value of one or more other assets, such as securities, currencies, commodities or indices. Derivative instruments
may be used to increase investment flexibility (including to maintain cash reserves while maintaining exposure to certain other assets),
for risk management (hedging) purposes, to facilitate trading, to reduce transaction costs and to pursue higher investment returns. Derivative
instruments may also be used to seek to mitigate certain investment risks, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk, interest rate
risk and credit risk. U.S. GAAP requires disclosures to enable investors to better understand how and why the Trust uses derivative instruments,
how these derivative instruments are accounted for and their effects on the Trust’s financial position and results of operations.
The Trust utilized derivatives for the following purposes:
Duration: the use of an instrument to manage the interest
rate risk of a portfolio.
Hedge: an investment made in order to reduce the risk of
adverse price movements in a security, by taking an offsetting position to protect against broad market moves.
Income: the use of any instrument that distributes cash
flows typically based upon some rate of interest.
Index Exposure: the use of an instrument to obtain exposure
to a listed or other type of index.
64 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Options Purchased and Written
A call option on a security gives the purchaser of the option the
right to buy, and the writer of a call option the obligation to sell, the underlying security. The purchaser of a put option has the right
to sell, and the writer of the put option the obligation to buy, the underlying security at any time during the option period. The risk
associated with purchasing options is limited to the premium originally paid.
The risk in writing a call option is that the Trust may incur
a loss if the market price of the underlying security increases and the option is exercised. The risk in writing a put option is
that the Trust may incur a loss if the market price of the underlying security decreases and the option is exercised. In addition,
there may be an imperfect correlation between the movement in prices of options and the underlying securities where the Trust may
not be able to enter into a closing transaction because of an illiquid secondary market; or, for OTC options, the Trust may be at
risk because of the counterparty’s inability to perform.
The following table represents the Trust’s use and volume
of call/put options purchased on a monthly basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Notional Amount |
Use |
|
Call |
|
|
Put |
Duration, Hedge |
$ |
73,400,000 |
|
$ |
4,800,000 |
Swap Agreements
A swap is an agreement that obligates two parties to exchange a
series of cash flows at specified intervals based upon or calculated by reference to changes in specified prices or rates for a specified
amount of an underlying asset. When utilizing OTC swaps, the Trust bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under
a swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a swap agreement counterparty or if the underlying asset declines in value.
Certain standardized swaps are subject to mandatory central clearing and are executed on a multi-lateral or other trade facility platform,
such as a registered exchange. There is limited counterparty credit risk with respect to centrally-cleared swaps as the transaction is
facilitated through a central clearinghouse, much like exchange-traded futures contracts. If the Trust utilizes centrally-cleared swaps,
the exchange bears the risk of loss resulting from a counterparty not being able to pay. There is no guarantee that a fund or an underlying
fund could eliminate its exposure under an outstanding swap agreement by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same or another
party.
Credit default swaps are instruments which allow for the full or
partial transfer of third-party credit risk, with respect to a particular entity or entities, from one counterparty to the other. The
Trust enters into credit default swaps as a “seller” or “buyer” of protection primarily to gain or reduce exposure
to the investment grade and/or high yield bond market. A seller of credit default swaps is selling credit protection or assuming credit
risk with respect to the underlying entity or entities. The buyer in a credit default swap is obligated to pay the seller a periodic stream
of payments over the term of the contract provided that no event of default on an underlying reference obligation has occurred. If a credit
event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap agreement, the seller will either (i) pay to the buyer of protection an amount equal
to the notional amount of the swap and take delivery of the referenced obligation or underlying securities comprising the referenced index
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 65
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
or (ii) pay a net settlement amount in the form of cash or securities
equal to the notional amount of the swap less the recovery value of the referenced obligation or underlying securities comprising the
referenced index. The notional amount reflects the maximum potential amount the seller of credit protection could be required to pay to
the buyer if a credit event occurs. The seller of protection receives periodic premium payments from the buyer and may also receive or
pay an upfront premium adjustment to the stated periodic payments. In the event a credit default occurs on a credit default swap referencing
an index, a factor adjustment will take place and the buyer of protection will receive a payment reflecting the par less the default recovery
rate of the defaulted index component based on its weighting in the index. If no default occurs, the counterparty will pay the stream
of payments and have no further obligations to the Trust if it is selling the credit protection. If the Trust utilizes centrally cleared
credit default swaps, the exchange bears the risk of loss resulting from a counterparty not being able to pay. For OTC credit default
swaps, the Trust bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy
of a swap agreement counterparty, or in the case of a credit default swap in which the Trust is selling credit protection, the default
of a third-party issuer.
The quoted market prices and resulting market values for credit
default swap agreements on securities and credit indices serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and
represent the likelihood of an expected liability (or profit) for the credit derivative had the notional amount of the swap agreement
been closed/sold as of the period end. Increasing market values, in absolute terms when compared to the notional amount of the swap, represent
a deterioration of the referenced entity’s credit soundness and a greater likelihood or risk of default or other credit event occurring
as defined under the terms of the agreement.
The following table represents the Trust’s use and volume
of credit default swaps on a monthly basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Notional Amount |
Use |
Protection Sold |
|
Protection Purchased |
Hedge, Index exposure |
$ — |
|
$
4,400,000 |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts
A forward foreign currency exchange contract is an agreement between
two parties to exchange two designated currencies at a specific time in the future. Certain types of contracts may be cash settled, in
an amount equal to the change in exchange rates during the term of the contract. The contracts can be used to hedge or manage exposure
to foreign currency risks with portfolio investments or to gain exposure to foreign currencies.
The market value of a forward foreign currency exchange contract
changes with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Furthermore, the Trust may be exposed to risk if the counterparties cannot
meet the contract terms or if the currency value changes unfavorably as compared to the U.S. dollar.
66 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
The following table represents the Trust’s use and volume
of forward foreign currency exchange contracts on a monthly basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Value |
|
|
Use |
Purchased |
|
|
Sold |
Hedge |
$ — |
|
$ |
6,826,867 |
Derivative Investment Holdings Categorized by Risk Exposure
The following is a summary of the location of derivative investments
on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of November 30, 2023:
|
|
|
Derivative Investment Type |
Asset Derivatives |
Liability Derivatives |
|
Investments in unaffiliated |
|
Interest rate option contracts |
issuers, at value |
— |
|
Unrealized appreciation on forward |
Unrealized depreciation on forward |
Currency forward contracts |
foreign currency exchange contracts |
foreign currency exchange contracts |
|
Variation margin on credit |
Unamortized upfront premiums |
Credit rate swap agreements |
default swap agreements |
received on credit default swap agreements |
The following tables set forth the fair value of the Trust’s
derivative investments categorized by primary risk exposure at November 30, 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivative Investments Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Forward |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps Credit |
|
Interest |
|
Currency |
|
Total Value at |
|
|
Risk* |
|
Rate Risk |
Exchange Risk* |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
$ — |
|
$ 66,916 |
$ |
200 |
|
$ |
67,116 |
|
|
Liability Derivative Investments Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
Forward |
|
|
|
|
|
Written |
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps Credit |
|
Interest |
|
Currency |
|
Total Value at |
|
|
Risk* |
|
Rate Risk |
Exchange Risk* |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
$ 48,591 |
|
$ — |
$ |
43,826 |
|
$ |
92,417 |
* | | Includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) of OTC and centrally-cleared derivatives
contracts as reported on the Trust’s Schedule of Investments. For centrally-cleared derivatives, variation margin is reported within
the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 67
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
The following is a summary of the location of derivative investments
on the Trust’s Statement of Operations for the period ended November 30, 2023:
|
|
Derivative Investment Type |
Location of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives |
Credit rate swap agreements |
Net realized gain (loss) on swap agreements |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation |
|
(depreciation) on swap agreements |
Interest rate options contracts |
Net realized gain (loss) on options purchased |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation |
|
(depreciation) on options purchased |
Currency forward contracts |
Net realized gain (loss) on forward foreign |
|
currency exchange contracts |
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation |
|
(depreciation) on forward foreign currency |
|
exchange contracts |
The following is a summary of the Trust’s realized gain (loss)
and change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivative investments recognized on the Trust’s Statement of Operations
categorized by primary risk exposure for the period ended November 30, 2023:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized Gain(Loss) on Derivative Investments Recognized on the Statement of Operations |
|
|
|
Options |
Forward |
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
Swaps Credit |
|
Interest |
Currency |
|
|
|
|
Risk |
|
Rate Risk |
Exchange Risk |
|
Total |
|
$ |
(20,040 |
) |
$ (14,496) |
$ 41,761 |
$ |
7,225 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation(Depreciation) on Derivative
Investments Recognized on the Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Forward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps Credit |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk |
|
|
Rate Risk |
|
|
Exchange Risk |
|
|
Total |
|
|
$ |
(39,174 |
) |
$ |
(149,961 |
) |
$ |
(65,573 |
) |
$ |
(254,708 |
) |
In conjunction with the use of derivative instruments, the
Trust is required to maintain collateral in various forms. Depending on the financial instrument utilized and the broker involved,
the Trust uses margin deposits at the broker, cash and/or securities segregated at the custodian bank, discount notes or repurchase
agreements allocated to the Trust as collateral.
The Trust has established counterparty credit guidelines and enters
into transactions only with financial institutions rated/identified as investment grade or better. The Trust monitors the counterparty
credit risk.
Foreign Investments
There are several risks associated with exposure to foreign currencies,
foreign issuers and emerging markets. The Trust’s indirect and direct exposure to foreign currencies subjects the Trust to the risk
that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar, or in the case of short positions, that the U.S. dollar will
decline in value relative to the currency being hedged. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods
of time for a number of
68 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
reasons, including changes in interest rates and the imposition
of currency controls or other political developments in the U.S. or abroad. In addition, the Trust may incur transaction costs in connection
with conversions between various currencies. The Trust may, but is not obligated to, engage in currency hedging transactions, which generally
involve buying currency forward, options or futures contracts. However, not all currency risks may be effectively hedged, and in some
cases the costs of hedging techniques may outweigh expected benefits. In such instances, the value of securities denominated in foreign
currencies can change significantly when foreign currencies strengthen or weaken relative to the U.S. dollar.
The Trust may invest in securities of foreign companies
directly, or in financial instruments, such as ADRs and exchange-traded funds, which are indirectly linked to the performance of
foreign issuers. Foreign markets can be more volatile than the U.S. market due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political,
regulatory, market, or economic developments and can perform differently from the U.S. market. Investing in securities of foreign
companies directly, or in financial instruments that are indirectly linked to the performance of foreign issuers, may involve risks
not typically associated with investing in U.S. issuers. The value of securities denominated in foreign currencies, and of dividends
from such securities, can change significantly when foreign currencies strengthen or weaken relative to the U.S. dollar. Foreign
securities markets generally have less trading volume and less liquidity than U.S. markets, and prices in some foreign markets may
fluctuate more than those of securities traded on U.S. markets. Many foreign countries lack accounting and disclosure standards
comparable to those that apply to U.S. companies, and it may be more difficult to obtain reliable information regarding a foreign
issuer’s financial condition and operations. Transaction costs and costs associated with custody services are generally higher
for foreign securities than they are for U.S. securities. Some foreign governments levy withholding taxes against dividend and
interest income. Although in some countries portions of these taxes are recoverable, the non-recovered portion will reduce the
income received by the Trust.
Note 4 – Offsetting
In the normal course of business, the Trust enters into transactions
subject to enforceable master netting arrangements or other similar arrangements. Generally, the right to offset in those agreements allows
the Trust to counteract the exposure to a specific counterparty with collateral received from or delivered to that counterparty based
on the terms of the arrangements. These arrangements provide for the right to liquidate upon the occurrence of an event of default, credit
event upon merger or additional termination event.
In order to better define its contractual rights and to secure
rights that will help the Trust mitigate its counterparty risk, the Trust may enter into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association,
Inc. Master Agreement (“ISDA Master Agreement”) or similar agreement with its derivative contract counterparties. An ISDA
Master Agreement is a bilateral agreement between the Trust and a counterparty that governs OTC derivatives, including foreign exchange
contracts, and typically contains, among other things, collateral posting terms and netting provisions in the event of a default and/or
termination event. The provisions of the ISDA Master Agreement typically permit a single net payment in the event of a default (close-out
netting) or similar event, including the bankruptcy or insolvency of the counterparty.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 69
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral
requirements are typically calculated by netting the mark-to-market amount for each transaction under such agreement and comparing that
amount to the value of any collateral currently pledged by the Trust and the counterparty. For financial reporting purposes, cash collateral
that has been pledged to cover obligations of the Trust and cash collateral received from the counterparty, if any, are reported separately
on the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities as segregated cash with broker/ receivable for variation margin, or payable for
swap settlement/variation margin. Cash and/ or securities pledged or received as collateral by the Trust in connection with an OTC derivative
subject to an ISDA Master Agreement generally may not be invested, sold or rehypothecated by the counterparty or the Trust, as applicable,
absent an event of default under such agreement, in which case such collateral generally may be applied towards obligations due to and
payable by such counterparty or the Trust, as applicable. Generally, the amount of collateral due from or to a counterparty must exceed
a minimum transfer amount threshold (e.g., $300,000) before a transfer is required to be made. To the extent amounts due to the Trust
from its counterparties are not fully collateralized, contractually or otherwise, the Trust bears the risk of loss from counterparty nonperformance.
The Trust attempts to mitigate counterparty risk by only entering into agreements with counterparties that it believes to be of good standing
and by monitoring the financial stability of those counterparties.
For financial reporting purposes, the Trust does not offset derivative
assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to netting arrangements in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The following tables present derivative financial instruments and
secured financing transactions that are subject to enforceable netting arrangements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Amount |
|
|
Gross Amounts Not |
|
|
|
Gross Amounts |
|
|
of Assets |
|
|
Offset in the Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Offset in the |
Presented on |
|
|
of Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
|
Amounts of |
|
|
Statement of |
the Statement |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Assets and |
of Assets and |
|
|
Financial |
|
Collateral |
|
Net |
Instrument |
|
|
Assets1 |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Instruments |
|
Received |
|
Amount |
Forward foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts |
$ |
200 |
|
$ — |
|
$ |
200 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ — |
$ |
200 |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased |
$ |
66,916 |
|
$ — |
|
$ |
66,916 |
|
$ |
(6,509 |
) |
$— |
$ |
60,407 |
70 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Amount |
|
|
Gross
Amounts Not |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Amounts |
|
of
Liabilities |
|
|
Offset
in the Statement |
|
|
|
|
Gross |
Offset
in the |
|
Presented
on |
|
|
of
Assets and Liabilities |
|
|
|
Amounts
of |
Statement
of |
|
the
Statement |
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
Recognized |
Assets
and |
|
of
Assets and |
|
|
Financial |
|
Collateral |
|
Net |
Instrument |
Liabilities1 |
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Instruments |
|
Pledged |
|
Amount |
Forward
foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exchange |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
contracts |
$ |
43,826 |
$
— |
|
$ |
43,826 |
|
$ |
(6,509 |
) |
$
— |
$ |
37,317 |
Reverse |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
repurchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
agreements |
$ |
140,564,305 |
$
— |
$ |
140,564,305 |
|
$ |
(140,564,305 |
) |
$
— |
$ |
— |
1 Exchange-traded or centrally-cleared derivatives
are excluded from these reported amounts.
The Trust has the right to offset deposits against any related
derivative liabilities outstanding with each counterparty with the exception of exchange-traded or centrally-cleared derivatives.
The following table presents deposits held by others in connection
with derivative investments as of November 30, 2023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
Asset Type |
Cash Pledged |
|
Cash Received |
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC |
Credit default |
$ |
89,385 |
|
$ |
— |
|
swap agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5 –Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement between the
Trust and the Adviser, the Adviser furnishes office facilities and equipment, and provides administrative services on behalf of the
Trust, and oversees the activities of Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC (“GPIM” or the
“Sub-Adviser”). The Adviser provides all services through the medium of any directors, officers or employees of the
Adviser or its affiliates as the Adviser deems appropriate in order to fulfill its obligations. As compensation for these services,
the Trust pays the Adviser a fee, payable monthly, at an annual rate equal to 0.60% of the Trust’s average daily Managed
Assets (as defined in this report).
Pursuant to an Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement among the Trust,
the Adviser and GPIM, GPIM, under the oversight and supervision of the Trust’s Board and the Adviser, manages the investment of
the assets of the Trust in accordance with its investment objective and policies, places orders to purchase and sell securities on behalf
of the Trust, and, at the request of the Adviser, consults with the Adviser as to the overall management of the assets of the Trust and
its investment policies and practices. As compensation for its services, the Adviser pays GPIM a fee, payable monthly, at an annual rate
equal to 0.30% of the Trust’s average daily Managed Assets.
For purposes of calculating the fees payable under the foregoing
agreements, “Managed Assets” means the total assets of the Trust, including the assets attributable to the proceeds from financial
leverage, including the issuance of senior securities represented by indebtedness (including through borrowing from financial institutions
or issuance of debt securities, including notes or commercial paper), the issuance of preferred shares, the effective leverage of certain
portfolio transactions such as reverse repurchase agreements, dollar rolls and inverse floating rate securities, or any other form of
financial leverage, minus liabilities, other than liabilities related to any financial leverage.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 71
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
If the Trust invests in a fund that is advised by the Adviser
or an adviser affiliated with the Adviser, the Trust’s Adviser has agreed to waive Trust fees to the extent necessary to
offset the proportionate share of any management fee paid by the Trust with respect to its investment in such fund. Fee waivers will
be calculated at the Trust level without regard to any expense cap, if any, in effect for the Trust. Fees waived under this
arrangement are not subject to reimbursement. For the period ended November 30, 2023, there were no such fees waived.
Certain officers and trustees of the Trust may also be officers,
directors and/or employees of the Adviser or GPIM. The Trust does not compensate its officers who are officers, directors and/or employees
of the aforementioned firms.
GFIA pays operating expenses on behalf of the Trust, such as audit
and accounting related services, legal services, custody, printing and mailing, among others, on a pass-through basis.
On November 11, 2022, the Trust received a one-time payment from
the Adviser for $29,557 relating to an operational issue. This amount is included in Capital contribution from adviser on the Statements
of Changes in Net Assets and the impact of this amount to total return at NAV is included within the Financial Highlights.
MUFG Investor Services (US), LLC (“MUIS”) acts as the
Trust’s administrator and accounting agent. As administrator and accounting agent, MUIS maintains the books and records of the Trust’s
securities and cash. The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (“BNY”) acts as the Trust’s custodian. As custodian, BNY is responsible
for the custody of the Trust’s assets. For providing the aforementioned services, MUIS and BNY are entitled to receive a monthly
fee equal to an annual percentage of the Trust’s average daily Managed Assets and certain out of pocket expenses.
Note 6 – Fair Value Measurement
In accordance with U.S. GAAP, fair value is defined as the
price that the Trust would receive to sell an investment or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. U.S. GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy based on the types of inputs used to
value assets and liabilities and requires corresponding disclosure. The hierarchy and the corresponding inputs are summarized
below:
Level 1 — unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — significant other observable inputs (for example
quoted prices for securities that are similar based on characteristics such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs based on the best
information available under the circumstances, to the extent observable inputs are not available, which may include assumptions.
Rule 2a-5 sets forth a definition of “readily available market
quotations,” which is consistent with the definition of a Level 1 input under U.S. GAAP. Rule 2a-5 provides that “a market
quotation is readily available only when that quotation is a quoted price (unadjusted) in active markets for identical investments that
the Trust can access at the measurement date, provided that a quotation will not be readily available if it is not reliable.”
Securities
for which market quotations are not readily available must be valued at fair value as determined in good faith. Accordingly, any security
priced using inputs other than Level 1 inputs
72 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
will be subject to fair value requirements. The types of inputs
available depend on a variety of factors, such as the type of security and the characteristics of the markets in which it trades, if any.
Fair valuation determinations that rely on fewer or no observable inputs require greater judgment. Accordingly, fair value determinations
for Level 3 securities require the greatest amount of judgment.
Pricing service providers are used to value a majority of the Trust’s
investments. When values are not available from a pricing service provider, they will be determined using a variety of sources and techniques,
including: market prices; broker quotes; and models which derive prices based on inputs such as prices of securities with comparable maturities
and characteristics or based on inputs such as anticipated cash flows or collateral, spread over U.S. Treasury securities, and other information
and analysis. A significant portion of the Trust’s assets and liabilities are categorized as Level 2, as indicated in this report.
Quotes from broker-dealers, adjusted for fluctuations in criteria
such as credit spreads and interest rates, may also be used to value the Trust’s assets and liabilities, i.e. prices provided by
a broker-dealer or other market participant who has not committed to trade at that price. Although quotes are typically received from
established market participants, the Trust may not have the transparency to view the underlying inputs which support the market quotations.
Significant changes in a quote would generally result in significant changes in the fair value of the security.
Certain fixed income securities are valued by obtaining a monthly
quote from a broker-dealer, adjusted for fluctuations in criteria such as credit spreads and interest rates.
Certain loans and other securities are valued using a single daily
broker quote or a price from a pricing service provider based on a single daily or monthly broker quote.
The inputs or methodologies selected and applied for valuing securities
or other assets are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. The suitability, appropriateness
and accuracy of the techniques, methodologies and sources employed to determine fair valuation are periodically reviewed and subject to
change.
Note 7 – Reverse Repurchase Agreements
The Trust may enter into reverse repurchase agreements as
part of its financial leverage strategy. Under a reverse repurchase agreement, the Trust temporarily transfers possession of a
portfolio instrument to another party, such as a bank or broker-dealer, in return for cash. At the same time, the Trust agrees to
repurchase the instrument at an agreed upon time and price, which reflects an interest payment. Such agreements have the economic
effect of borrowings. The Trust may enter into such agreements to invest the cash acquired at a rate higher than the cost of the
agreement, which would increase earned income. When the Trust enters into a reverse repurchase agreement, any fluctuations in the
market value of either the instruments transferred to another party or the instruments in which the proceeds may be invested would
affect the market value of the Trust’s assets. As a result, such transactions may increase fluctuations in the market value of
the Trust’s assets. For the period ended November 30, 2023, the average daily balance for which reverse repurchase agreements
were outstanding amounted to $130,829,419. The weighted average interest rate was 5.75%. As of November 30, 2023, there was
$140,564,305 (inclusive of interest payable) in reverse repurchase agreements outstanding.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 73
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
As of November 30, 2023, the Trust had outstanding reverse repurchase
agreements with various counterparties. Details of the reverse repurchase agreements by counterparty are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Counterparty |
Interest Rate(s) |
Maturity Date(s) |
Face Value |
Barclays Capital, Inc. |
5.65% - 5.90%* |
Open Maturity |
$16,173,033 |
BofA Securities, Inc. |
5.55%* |
Open Maturity |
829,570 |
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. |
5.48%* |
Open Maturity |
4,698,131 |
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC |
(1.50%) - 5.55%* |
Open Maturity |
1,481,553 |
RBC Capital Markets LLC |
5.76% - 5.91% |
12/18/23 - 02/20/24 |
90,188,117 |
RBC Capital Markets LLC |
5.75%* |
Open Maturity |
27,193,901 |
Total |
$140,564,305 |
* The rate is adjusted periodically by the counterparty, subject
to approval by the Adviser, and is not based upon a set of reference rate and spread. Rate indicated is the rate effective at November
30, 2023.
The following is a summary of the remaining contractual maturities
of the reverse repurchase agreements outstanding as of November 30, 2023, aggregated by asset class of the related collateral pledged
by the Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to |
|
Greater than |
|
Overnight and |
|
|
|
|
30 days |
|
31-90 days |
90 days |
|
Continuous |
|
Total |
Corporate Bonds |
$ |
— |
$ |
45,094,357 |
$ — |
$ |
2,311,123 |
$ |
47,405,480 |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations |
|
— |
|
— |
— |
|
4,698,131 |
|
4,698,131 |
Municipal Bonds |
|
45,093,760 |
|
— |
— |
|
43,366,934 |
|
88,460,694 |
Total reverse repurchase agreements |
$ |
45,093,760 |
$ |
45,094,357 |
$ — |
$ |
50,376,188 |
$ |
140,564,305 |
Gross amount of recognized liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for reverse repurchase agreements |
$ |
45,093,760 |
$ |
45,094,357 |
$ — |
$ |
50,376,188 |
$ |
140,564,305 |
Note 8 – Borrowings
The Trust has entered into a $100,000,000 credit facility agreement
with an approved lender. Under the most recent amended terms, the interest rate on the amount borrowed is based on the SOFR plus 95 basis
points, and an unused commitment fee of 25 basis points is charged on the difference between the amount available to borrow under the
credit agreement and the actual amount borrowed. As of November 30, 2023, there was $0 outstanding in connection with the Trust’s
credit facility. The average daily amount of borrowings on the credit facility during the period ended November 30, 2023 was $0 with a
related average interest rate of 0%. The maximum amount outstanding during the period was $0. As of November 30, 2023, the total value
of securities segregated and pledged as collateral in connection with borrowings was $55,238.
The credit facility agreement governing the loan facility includes
usual and customary covenants. These covenants impose on the Trust asset coverage requirements, collateral requirements, investment strategy
requirements, and certain financial obligations. These covenants place limits or restrictions on the Trust’s ability to (i) enter
into additional indebtedness with a party other than the counterparty, (ii) change its fundamental investment policy, or (iii) pledge
to any other party, other than to the counterparty, securities owned or held by the Trust over which the counterparty has a lien. In
addition, the Trust is required to deliver financial information to the counterparty within established deadlines, maintain an asset
coverage ratio (as defined in Section 18(g) of the 1940 Act) greater than 300%, comply with the rules of the stock exchange on which
its shares are listed, and maintain its classification as a “closed-end management investment company” as defined in the
1940 Act.
74 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
There is no guarantee that the Trust’s leverage strategy
will be successful. The Trust’s use of leverage may cause the Trust’s NAV and market price of common shares to be more volatile
and can magnify the effect of any losses.
Note 9 – Federal Income Tax Information
The Trust intends to comply with the provisions of Subchapter M
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), applicable to regulated investment companies
and will distribute substantially all taxable net investment income and capital gains sufficient to relieve the Trust from all, or substantially
all, federal income, excise and state income taxes. Therefore, no provision for federal or state income tax or federal excise tax is required.
Tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of
preparing the Trust’s tax returns are evaluated to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not”
of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be
recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the current year. Management has analyzed the Trust’s tax positions taken, or to be
taken, on U.S. federal income tax returns for all open tax years, and has concluded that no provision for income tax is required in
the Trust’s financial statements. The Trust’s U.S. federal income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal
Revenue Service (“IRS”) for a period of three years after they are filed.
At November 30, 2023, the cost of investments for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, the aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all investments for which there was an excess of value over tax cost,
and the aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all investments for which there was an excess of tax cost over value, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Tax Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
Tax Unrealized |
|
Tax Unrealized |
|
|
Appreciation/ |
|
|
Tax Cost |
|
Appreciation |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(Depreciation) |
|
$ 570,772,807 |
$ 9,195,446 |
$ (82,384,646 |
) |
$ (73,189,200 |
) |
As of May 31, 2023, (the most recent fiscal year end for U.S. federal
income tax purposes) tax components of distributable earnings/(loss) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed |
Undistributed |
|
Net Unrealized |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Ordinary |
Long-Term |
|
Appreciation |
|
|
Capital and |
|
|
|
|
Income |
Capital Gain |
|
(Depreciation) |
|
|
Other Losses |
|
|
Total |
|
$— |
$— |
$ (65,454,206 |
) |
$ (3,492,263 |
) |
$ (68,946,469 |
) |
For the year ended May 31, 2023, (the most recent fiscal year end
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) the tax character of distributions paid to shareholders as reflected in the Statements of Changes
in Net Assets was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term |
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Income |
Capital Gain |
|
Return of Capital |
|
Total Distributions |
$ 20,436,420 |
$— |
$ 13,351,040 |
$ 33,787,460 |
Note: For U.S. federal income tax purposes, short-term capital
gain distributions are treated as ordinary income distributions.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 75
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Note 10 – Securities Transactions
For the period ended November 30, 2023, the cost of purchases and
proceeds from sales of investment securities, excluding short-term investments and derivatives, were $31,370,184 and $15,726,007, respectively.
The Trust is permitted to purchase or sell securities from or to
certain affiliated funds under specified conditions outlined in procedures adopted by the Board. The procedures have been designed to
ensure that any purchase or sale of securities by the Trust from or to another fund or portfolio that is or could be considered an affiliate
by virtue of having a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment advisers), common Trustees and/or common officers complies with
Rule 17a-7 of the 1940 Act. Further, as defined under these procedures, each transaction is effected at the current market price. For
the period ended November 30, 2023, the Trust did not engage in purchases and sales of securities, pursuant to Rule 17a-7 of the 1940
Act.
Note 11 – Unfunded Loan Commitments
Pursuant to the terms of certain loan agreements, the Trust held
unfunded loan commitments as of November 30, 2023. The Trust is obligated to fund these loan commitments at the borrower’s discretion.
The Trust reserves against such contingent obligations by designating cash, liquid securities, illiquid securities, and liquid term loans
as a reserve. As of November 30, 2023, the total amount segregated in connection with unfunded loan commitments and reverse repurchase
agreements was $152,303,960.
The unfunded loan commitments as of November 30, 2023, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Borrower |
Maturity Date |
Face Amount* |
|
Value |
Polaris Newco LLC |
06/04/26 |
329,000 |
$ |
20,653 |
TK Elevator Midco GmbH |
01/29/27 |
EUR 725,988 |
|
42,652 |
Thunderbird A |
03/01/37 |
3,074,052 |
|
– |
Lightning A |
03/01/37 |
3,132,614 |
|
– |
|
|
|
$ |
63,305 |
* | | The face amount is denominated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. |
76 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Note 12 – Restricted Securities
The securities below are considered illiquid and restricted under
guidelines established by the Board:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Securities |
Acquisition Date |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
Central Storage Safety Project Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
4.82% due 02/01/38 |
02/02/18 |
$ |
7,088,897 |
$ |
5,880,317 |
CFMT LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
2022-HB9, 3.25% (WAC) due 09/25/371 |
09/23/22 |
|
440,470 |
|
418,803 |
Freddie Mac Military Housing Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
Resecuritization Trust Certificates |
|
|
|
|
|
2015-R1, 5.94% (WAC) due 11/25/521 |
09/10/19 |
|
84,762 |
|
73,758 |
Mirabela Nickel Ltd. |
|
|
|
|
|
due 06/24/192 |
12/31/13 |
|
87,217 |
|
482 |
|
|
$ |
7,701,346 |
$ |
6,373,360 |
1 Variable rate security. Rate indicated is the rate
effective at November 30, 2023. In some instances, the effective rate is limited by a minimum rate floor or a maximum rate cap established
by the issuer. The settlement status of a position may also impact the effective rate indicated. In some cases, a position may be unsettled
at period end and may not have a stated effective rate. In instances where multiple underlying reference rates and spread amounts are
shown, the effective rate is based on a weighted average.
2 Security is in default of interest and/or principal
obligations.
Note 13 – Capital
Common Shares
The Trust has an unlimited amount of common shares, $0.01 par value,
authorized and 23,509,549 shares issued and outstanding as of November 30, 2023. Transactions in common shares were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended |
|
Year Ended |
|
November 30, 2023 |
|
May 31, 2023 |
Beginning shares |
22,979,362 |
|
21,864,166 |
Shares issued through at-the-market offering |
491,744 |
|
1,032,599 |
Shares issued through dividend reinvestment |
38,443 |
|
82,597 |
Ending shares |
23,509,549 |
|
22,979,362 |
On April 12, 2023, the Trust’s current shelf registration
allowing for delayed or continuous offering of additional shares became effective. The shelf registration statement allows for the issuance
of up to $150,000,000 of common shares. On April 12, 2023, the Trust entered into an at-the-market sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald
& Co. to offer and sell common shares having an aggregated initial offering price of up to $150,000,000 from time to time, through
Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. as agent for the Trust.
As of November 30, 2023, up to $139,672,081 remained available
under the at-the-market sales agreement. For the period ended November 30, 2023, the Trust paid $2,500 for offering costs associated with
the at-the market offering, and will be responsible for additional offering costs in the future of up to 0.60% of the offering price of
common shares sold pursuant to the shelf registration statement.
A portion of the proceeds of the foregoing offering is usually
used to pay distributions and may be a return of capital. If the Trust does not conduct such offering, it may not be able to maintain
distributions at historical levels. There is no guarantee that the Trust will sell all of the common
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 77
|
|
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
shares available for sale under its shelf registration statement
or that there will be any sales of common shares thereunder and, from time to time, the Trust may be unable to sell its common shares
under its shelf registration statement.
Note 14 – Market Risks
The value of, or income generated by, the investments held by the
Trust are subject to the possibility of rapid and unpredictable fluctuation, and loss that may result from various factors. These factors
include, among others, developments affecting individual companies, or from broader influences, including real or perceived changes in
prevailing interest rates (which may change at any time based on various market and other economic conditions), changes in inflation rates
or expectations about inflation rates (which are currently elevated relative to normal conditions), adverse investor confidence or sentiment,
changing economic, political (including geopolitical), social or financial market conditions, increased instability or general uncertainty,
environmental disasters, governmental actions, public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics and epidemics),
debt crises, actual or threatened wars or other armed conflicts (such as the current Russia-Ukraine conflict and its risk of expansion
or collateral economic and other effects) or ratings downgrades, and other similar events, each of which may be temporary or last for
extended periods. Moreover, changing economic, political, geopolitical, social, financial market or other conditions in one country, geographic
region or industry could adversely affect the value, yield and return of the investments held by the Trust in a different country, geographic
region, economy, industry or market because of the increasingly interconnected global economies and financial markets. The duration and
extent of the foregoing types of factors or conditions are highly uncertain and difficult to predict and have in the past, and may in
the future, cause volatility and distress in economies and financial markets or other adverse circumstances, which may negatively affect
the value of the Trust’s investments and performance of the Trust.
Note 15 – Subsequent Events
The Trust evaluated subsequent events through the date the
financial statements are issued and determined there were no material events that would require adjustment to or disclosure in the
Trust’s financial statements.
78 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
Federal Income Tax Information
This information is being provided as required by the Internal
Revenue Code. Amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in the report because of differences in tax and financial reporting
practice.
In January 2024, shareholders will be advised on IRS Form 1099
DIV or substitute 1099 DIV as to the U.S. federal tax status of the distributions received by shareholders in the calendar year 2023.
Delaware Statutory Trust Act-Control Share Acquisition
Under Delaware law applicable to the Trust as of August 1,
2022, if a shareholder acquires direct or indirect ownership or power to direct the voting of shares of the Trust in an amount that
equals or exceeds certain percentage thresholds specified under Delaware law(beginning at 10% or more of shares of the Trust), the
shareholder’s ability to vote certain of these shares may be limited.
Sector Classification
Information in the “Schedule of Investments” is categorized
by sectors using sector-level classifications used by Bloomberg Industry Classification System, a widely recognized industry classification
system provider. In the Trust’s registration statement, the Trust has investment policies relating to concentration in specific
industries. For purposes of these investment policies, the Trust usually classifies industries based on industry-level classifications
used by widely recognized industry classification system providers such as Bloomberg Industry Classification System, Global Industry Classification
Standards and Barclays Global Classification Scheme.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 79
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Trustees
The Trustees of the Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond &
Investment Grade Debt Trust and their principal occupations during the past five years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of |
|
|
Position(s) |
Term
of Office |
|
Portfolios
in |
|
Name,
Address* |
Held
with |
and
Length of |
|
Fund
Complex |
Other
Directorships |
and
Year of Birth |
Trust |
Time
Served** |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
Overseen |
Held
by Trustees*** |
|
Independent
Trustees: |
|
|
|
|
Randall
C. Barnes |
Trustee
and |
Since
2010 |
Current:
Private Investor (2001-present). |
154 |
Current:
Advent Convertible and Income |
(1951) |
Chair
of the |
(Trustee) |
|
|
Fund
(2005-present); Purpose |
|
Valuation |
|
Former:
Senior Vice President and Treasurer, PepsiCo, Inc. (1993-1997); |
|
Investments
Funds (2013-present). |
|
Oversight |
Since
2020 |
President,
Pizza Hut International (1991-1993); Senior Vice President, Strategic |
|
|
|
Committee |
(Chair
of the |
Planning
and New Business Development, PepsiCo, Inc. (1987-1990). |
|
Former:
Guggenheim Energy & Income |
|
|
Valuation |
|
|
Fund
(2015-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore |
|
|
Oversight |
|
|
Energy
Infrastructure Fund (2004-2022); |
|
|
Committee) |
|
|
Guggenheim
Enhanced Equity Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
(2005-2021); Guggenheim Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
Fund (2013-2021). |
Angela
Brock-Kyle |
Trustee |
Since
2019 |
Current:
Founder and Chief Executive Officer, B.O.A.R.D.S. (2013-present); |
153 |
Current:
Bowhead Insurance GP, LLC |
(1959) |
|
|
Member,
Board of Directors, Mutual Fund Directors Forum (2022-present). |
|
(2020-present);
Hunt Companies, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
(2019-present). |
|
|
|
Former:
Senior Leader, TIAA (financial services firm) (1987-2012). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former:
Guggenheim Energy & Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
(2019-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore |
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Infrastructure Fund (2019-2022); |
|
|
|
|
|
Guggenheim
Enhanced Equity Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
(2019-2021); Guggenheim Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
Fund (2019-2021); Infinity |
|
|
|
|
|
Property
& Casualty Corp. (2014-2018). |
80 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM
TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of |
|
|
|
Position(s) |
Term
of Office |
|
Portfolios
in |
|
Name,
Address* |
|
Held
with |
and
Length of |
|
Fund
Complex |
Other
Directorships |
and
Year of Birth |
|
Trust |
Time
Served** |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
Overseen |
Held
by Trustees*** |
Independent
Trustees: |
|
|
|
|
Thomas
F. Lydon, Jr. |
|
Trustee
and |
Since
2019 |
Current:
President, Global Trends Investments (registered investment adviser) |
153 |
Current:
US Global Investors, Inc. |
(1960) |
|
Chair
of the |
(Trustee) |
(1996-present);
CEO, Lydon Media (2016-present); Vice Chairman, VettaFi, a |
|
(GROW)
(1995-present); The 2023 ETF |
|
|
Contracts |
|
wholly
owned subsidiary of The TMX Group (financial advisor content, |
|
Series
Trust (4) (2023-present); The 2023 |
|
|
Review |
Since
2020 |
research,
index and digital distribution provider) (2022-present). |
|
ETF
Series Trust II (1) (2023-present). |
|
|
Committee |
(Chair
of the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts |
Former:
CEO, ETF Flows, LLC (financial advisor education and research |
|
Former:
Guggenheim Energy & Income |
|
|
|
Review |
provider)
(2019-2023); Director, GDX Index Partners, LLC (index provider) |
|
Fund
(2019-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore |
|
|
|
Committee) |
(2021-2023). |
|
Energy
Infrastructure Fund (2019-2022); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guggenheim
Enhanced Equity Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
(2019-2021); Guggenheim Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
Fund (2019-2021); Harvest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility
Edge Trust (3) (2017-2019). |
Ronald
A. Nyberg |
|
Trustee
and |
Since
2010 |
Current:
Of Counsel, Momkus LLP (law firm) (2016-present). |
154 |
Current:
Advent Convertible and Income |
(1953) |
|
Chair
of the |
|
|
|
Fund
(2003-present); PPM Funds (2) |
|
|
Nominating |
|
Former:
Partner, Nyberg & Cassioppi, LLC (law firm) (2000-2016); |
|
(2018-present);
Endeavor Health |
|
|
and |
|
Executive
Vice President, General Counsel, and Corporate Secretary, |
|
(2012-present). |
|
|
Governance |
|
Van
Kampen Investments (1982-1999). |
|
|
|
|
Committee |
|
|
|
Former:
Guggenheim Energy & Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
(2015-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Infrastructure Fund (2004-2022); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guggenheim
Enhanced Equity Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
(2005-2021); Guggenheim Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
Fund (2013-2021); Western |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Inflation-Linked Opportunities & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Fund (2004-2020); Western Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation-Linked
Income Fund |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2003-2020). |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 81
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of |
|
|
Position(s) |
Term
of Office |
|
Portfolios
in |
|
Name,
Address* |
Held
with |
and
Length of |
|
Fund
Complex |
Other
Directorships |
and
Year of Birth |
Trust |
Time
Served** |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
Overseen |
Held
by Trustees*** |
Independent
Trustees: |
|
|
|
|
Sandra
G. Sponem |
Trustee
and |
Since
2019 |
Current:
Retired. |
153 |
Current:
SPDR Series Trust (81) |
(1958) |
Chair
of the |
(Trustee) |
|
|
(2018-present);
SPDR Index Shares |
|
Audit |
|
Former:
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, M.A. |
|
Funds
(30) (2018-present); SSGA Active |
|
Committee |
Since
2020 |
Mortenson-Companies,
Inc. (construction and real estate |
|
Trust
(14) (2018-present). |
|
|
(Chair
of the |
development
company) (2007-2017). |
|
|
|
|
Audit |
|
|
Former:
Guggenheim Energy & Income |
|
|
Committee) |
|
|
Fund
(2019-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore |
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
Infrastructure Fund (2019-2022); |
|
|
|
|
|
Guggenheim
Enhanced Equity Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Fund
(2019-2021); Guggenheim Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation
Fund (2019-2021); SSGA |
|
|
|
|
|
Master
Trust (1) (2018-2020). |
Ronald
E. Toupin, Jr. |
Trustee, |
Since
2010 |
Current:
Portfolio Consultant (2010-present); Member, Governing Council, |
153 |
Former:
Guggenheim Energy & Income |
(1958) |
Chair
of the |
|
Independent
Directors Council (2013-present); Governor, Board of Governors, |
|
Fund
(2015-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore |
|
Board
and |
|
Investment
Company Institute (2018-present). |
|
Energy
Infrastructure Fund (2004-2022); |
|
Chair
of the |
|
|
|
Guggenheim
Enhanced Equity Income |
|
Executive |
|
Former:
Member, Executive Committee, Independent Directors Council |
|
Fund
(2005-2021); Guggenheim Credit |
|
Committee |
|
(2016-2018);
Vice President, Manager and Portfolio Manager, Nuveen Asset |
|
Allocation
Fund (2013-2021); Western |
|
|
|
Management
(1998-1999); Vice President, Nuveen Investment Advisory Corp. |
|
Asset
Inflation-Linked Opportunities & |
|
|
|
(1992-1999);
Vice President and Manager, Nuveen Unit Investment Trusts |
|
Income
Fund (2004-2020); Western Asset |
|
|
|
(1991-1999);
and Assistant Vice President and Portfolio Manager, Nuveen Unit |
|
Inflation-Linked
Income Fund |
|
|
|
Investment
Trusts (1988-1999), each of John Nuveen & Co., Inc. (registered |
|
(2003-2020). |
|
|
|
broker
dealer) (1982-1999). |
|
|
82 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM
TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of |
|
|
|
Position(s) |
Term
of Office |
|
Portfolios
in |
|
Name,
Address* |
|
Held
with |
and
Length of |
|
Fund
Complex |
Other
Directorships |
and
Year of Birth |
|
Trust |
Time
Served** |
Principal
Occupation(s) During Past Five Years |
Overseen |
Held
by Trustees*** |
|
Interested
Trustee: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amy
J. Lee**** |
|
Trustee, |
Since
2018 |
Current:
Interested Trustee, certain other funds in the Fund Complex |
153 |
Former:
Guggenheim Energy & Income |
(1961) |
|
Vice |
(Trustee) |
(2018-present);
Chief Legal Officer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex |
|
Fund
(2018-2023); Fiduciary/Claymore |
|
|
President |
|
(2014-present);
Vice President, certain other funds in the Fund Complex |
|
Energy
Infrastructure Fund (2018-2022); |
|
|
and
Chief |
Since
2014 |
(2007-present);
Senior Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments (2012-present). |
Guggenheim
Enhanced Equity Income |
|
|
Legal
Officer |
(Chief
Legal |
|
|
Fund
(2018-2021); Guggenheim Credit |
|
|
|
Officer) |
Former:
President and/or Chief Executive Officer, certain funds in the Fund |
|
Allocation
Fund (2018-2021). |
|
|
|
|
Complex
(2017-2019); Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant |
|
|
|
|
|
Since
2012 |
Secretary,
Security Benefit Life Insurance Company and Security Benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
(Vice |
Corporation
(2004-2012). |
|
|
|
|
|
President) |
|
|
|
* | | The business address
of each Trustee is c/o Guggenheim Investments, 227 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois
60606. |
** | | Each Trustee elected
shall hold office until his or her successor shall have been elected and shall have qualified.
After a Trustee’s initial term, each Trustee is expected to serve a three year term
concurrent with the class of Trustees for which he or she serves. |
- Messrs. Lydon, Jr. and Nyberg are Class II Trustees.
Class II Trustees are expected to stand for re-election at the Trust’s annual meeting of shareholders for the fiscal year ended
May 31, 2024.
- Mr. Toupin, Jr. and Mses. Lee and Sponem are Class III Trustees. Class III Trustees are expected to stand for re-election
at the Trust’s annual meeting of shareholders for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2025.
- Mr. Barnes and Ms. Brock-Kyle are Class I Trustees. Class
I Trustees are expected to stand for re-election at the Trust’s annual meeting of shareholders for the fiscal year ended May 31,
2026.
*** | | Each Trustee also serves
on the Boards of Trustees of Guggenheim Funds Trust, Guggenheim Variable Funds Trust, Guggenheim
Strategy Funds Trust, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund, Guggenheim Active Allocation
Fund, Rydex Series Funds, Rydex Dynamic Funds, Rydex Variable Trust and Transparent Value
Trust. Messrs. Barnes and Nyberg also serve on the Board of Trustees of Advent Convertible
& Income Fund. |
**** | | This Trustee is deemed
to be an “interested person” of the Trust under the 1940 Act by reason of her
position with the Trust’s Adviser and/or the parent of the Adviser. |
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 83
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Officers
The Officers of the Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond &
Investments Grade Debt Trust, who are not Trustees, and their principal occupations during the past five years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) |
Term
of Office |
|
Name,
Address* |
|
Held
with |
and
Length of |
Principal
Occupation(s) |
and
Year of Birth |
|
Trust |
Time
Served** |
During
Past Five Years |
Brian
E. Binder |
|
President |
Since
2018 |
Current:
President, Mutual Funds Boards, Guggenheim Investments (2022-present); President and Chief Executive Officer, certain other funds
in |
(1972) |
|
and
Chief |
|
the
Fund Complex (2018-present); President, Mutual Funds Boards, and Senior Managing Director, Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, |
|
|
Executive |
|
LLC
and Security Investors, LLC (2018-present); Board Member, Guggenheim Partners Investment Funds plc (2022-present); Board Member, |
|
|
Officer |
|
Guggenheim
Global Investments plc (2022-present); Board Member, Guggenheim Partners Fund Management (Europe) Limited (2018-present). |
|
|
|
|
|
Former:
Senior Managing Director and Chief Administrative Officer, Guggenheim Investments (2018-2022); Managing Director and President, |
|
|
|
|
Deutsche
Funds, and Head of US Product, Trading and Fund Administration, Deutsche Asset Management (2013-2018); Managing Director, |
|
|
|
|
Chairman
of North American Executive Committee and Head of Business Management and Consulting, Invesco Ltd. (2010-2012). |
Joanna
M. Catalucci |
|
Chief |
Since
2012 |
Current:
Chief Compliance Officer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2012-present); Senior Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments |
(1966) |
|
Compliance |
|
(2014-present). |
|
|
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former:
AML Officer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2016-2017); Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary certain other funds
in the |
|
|
|
|
Fund
Complex (2008-2012); Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer, Security Investor, LLC and certain affiliates (2010-2012);
Chief |
|
|
|
|
Compliance
Officer and Senior Vice President, Rydex Advisors, LLC and certain affiliates (2010-2011). |
James
M. Howley |
|
Chief
Financial |
Since
2022 |
Current:
Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments (2004-present); Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer,
certain |
(1972) |
|
Officer,
Chief |
|
other
funds in the Fund Complex (2022-present). |
|
|
Accounting |
|
|
|
|
Officer
and |
|
Former:
Assistant Treasurer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2006-2022); Manager, Mutual Fund Administration of Van Kampen |
|
|
Treasurer |
|
Investments,
Inc. (1996-2004). |
Mark
E. Mathiasen |
|
Secretary |
Since
2010 |
Current:
Secretary, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2007-present); Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments (2007-present). |
(1978) |
|
|
|
|
Glenn
McWhinnie |
|
Assistant |
Since
2016 |
Current:
Vice President, Guggenheim Investments (2009-present); Assistant Treasurer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2016-present). |
(1969 |
|
Treasurer |
|
|
Michael
P. Megaris |
|
Assistant |
Since
2014 |
Current:
Assistant Secretary, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2014-present); Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments |
(1984) |
|
Secretary |
|
(2012-present). |
84 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM
TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Position(s) |
Term
of Office |
|
Name,
Address* |
|
Held
with |
and
Length of |
Principal
Occupation(s) |
and
Year of Birth |
|
Trust |
Time
Served** |
During
Past Five Years |
Kimberly
J. Scott |
|
Assistant |
Since
2012 |
Current:
Director, Guggenheim Investments (2012-present); Assistant Treasurer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2012-present). |
(1974) |
|
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former:
Financial Reporting Manager, Invesco, Ltd. (2010-2011); Vice President/Assistant Treasurer, Mutual Fund Administration for Van Kampen |
|
|
|
|
Investments,
Inc./Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2009-2010); Manager of Mutual Fund Administration, Van Kampen Investments, |
|
|
|
|
Inc./Morgan
Stanley Investment Management (2005-2009). |
Bryan
Stone |
|
Vice |
Since
2014 |
Current:
Vice President, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2014-present); Managing Director, Guggenheim Investments (2013-present). |
(1979) |
|
President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former:
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman Group LLC (2009-2013); Vice President, Morgan Stanley (2002-2009). |
Jon
Szafran |
|
Assistant |
Since
2017 |
Current:
Director, Guggenheim Investments (2017-present); Assistant Treasurer, certain other funds in the Fund Complex (2017-present). |
(1989) |
|
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former:
Assistant Treasurer of Henderson Global Funds and Manager of US Fund Administration, Henderson Global Investors (North America) |
|
|
|
|
Inc.
(“HGINA”), (2017); Senior Analyst of US Fund Administration, HGINA (2014–2017); Senior Associate of Fund Administration,
Cortland |
|
|
|
|
Capital
Market Services, LLC (2013-2014); Experienced Associate, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (2012-2013). |
* The business address of each officer is c/o Guggenheim Investments,
227 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois 60606.
** Each officer serves an indefinite term, until his or her successor is duly elected
and qualified.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 85
|
|
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN (Unaudited) |
November 30, 2023 |
Unless the registered owner of common shares elects to receive
cash by contacting Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the “Plan Administrator”), all dividends declared on common shares of
the Trust will be automatically reinvested by the Plan Administrator for shareholders in the Trust’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan
(the “Plan”), in additional common shares of the Trust. Participation in the Plan is completely voluntary and may be terminated
or resumed at any time without penalty by notice if received and processed by the Plan Administrator prior to the dividend record date;
otherwise such termination or resumption will be effective with respect to any subsequently declared dividend or other distribution. Some
brokers may automatically elect to receive cash on your behalf and may re-invest that cash in additional common shares of the Trust for
you. If you wish for all dividends declared on your common shares of the Trust to be automatically reinvested pursuant to the Plan, please
contact your broker.
The Plan Administrator will open an account for each common shareholder
under the Plan in the same name in which such common shareholder’s common shares are registered. Whenever the Trust declares a dividend
or other distribution (together, a “Dividend”) payable in cash, nonparticipants in the Plan will receive cash and participants
in the Plan will receive the equivalent in common shares. The common shares will be acquired by the Plan Administrator for the participants’
accounts, depending upon the circumstances described below, either (i) through receipt of additional unissued but authorized common shares
from the Trust (“Newly Issued Common Shares”) or (ii) by purchase of outstanding common shares on the open market (“Open-Market
Purchases”) on the New York Stock Exchange or elsewhere. If, on the payment date for any Dividend, the closing market price plus
estimated brokerage commission per common share is equal to or greater than the net asset value per common share, the Plan Administrator
will invest the Dividend amount in Newly Issued Common Shares on behalf of the participants. The number of Newly Issued Common Shares
to be credited to each participant’s account will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the Dividend by the net asset value
per common share on the payment date; provided that, if the net asset value is less than or equal to 95% of the closing market value on
the payment date, the dollar amount of the Dividend will be divided by 95% of the closing market price per common share on the payment
date. If, on the payment date for any Dividend, the net asset value per common share is greater than the closing market value plus estimated
brokerage commission, the Plan Administrator will invest the Dividend amount in common shares acquired on behalf of the participants in
Open-Market Purchases.
For federal income tax purposes, the Trust generally would be able
to claim a deduction for distributions to shareholders with respect to the common shares issued at up to a 5-percent discount from the
closing market value pursuant to the Plan.
If, before the Plan Administrator has completed its
Open-Market Purchases, the market price per common share exceeds the net asset value per common share, the average per common share
purchase price paid by the Plan Administrator may exceed the net asset value of the common shares, resulting in the acquisition of
fewer common shares than if the Dividend had been paid in Newly Issued Common Shares on the Dividend payment date. Because of the
foregoing difficulty with respect to Open-Market Purchases, the Plan provides that if the Plan Administrator is unable to invest the
full Dividend amount in Open-Market Purchases during the purchase period or if the market discount shifts to a market premium during
the purchase period, the Plan Administrator may cease making Open-Market Purchases and may invest the uninvested portion of the
Dividend
86 l GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE
MUNICIPAL BOND & INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT
|
|
DIVIDEND REINVESTMENT PLAN (Unaudited) continued |
November 30, 2023 |
amount in Newly Issued Common Shares at net asset value per common
share at the close of business on the Last Purchase Date provided that, if the net asset value is less than or equal to 95% of the then
current market price per common share; the dollar amount of the Dividend will be divided by 95% of the market price on the payment date.
The Plan Administrator maintains all shareholders’ accounts
in the Plan and furnishes written confirmation of all transactions in the accounts, including information needed by shareholders for tax
records. Common shares in the account of each Plan participant will be held by the Plan Administrator on behalf of the Plan participant,
and each shareholder proxy will include those shares purchased or received pursuant to the Plan. The Plan Administrator will forward all
proxy solicitation materials to participants and vote proxies for shares held under the Plan in accordance with the instruction of the
participants.
There will be no brokerage charges with respect to common shares
issued directly by the Trust. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commission incurred in connection with
Open-Market Purchases. The automatic reinvestment of Dividends will not relieve participants of any Federal, state or local income tax
that may be payable (or required to be withheld) on such Dividends.
The Trust reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan.
There is no direct service charge to participants with regard to purchases in the Plan; however, the Trust reserves the right to
amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants. All correspondence or questions concerning the Plan should
be directed to the Plan Administrator, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box 30170 College Station, TX 77842-3170: Attention:
Shareholder Services Department, Phone Number: (866) 488-3559 or online at www.computershare.com/investor.
GBAB l GUGGENHEIM TAXABLE MUNICIPAL BOND
& INVESTMENT GRADE DEBT TRUST SEMIANNUAL REPORT l 87
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
|
|
TRUST INFORMATION |
November 30, 2023 |
Board of Trustees |
Investment Adviser |
Randall C. Barnes |
Guggenheim Funds Investment |
Angela Brock-Kyle |
Advisors, LLC |
Amy J. Lee* |
Chicago, IL |
Thomas F. Lydon, Jr. |
|
Ronald A. Nyberg |
Investment Sub-Adviser |
Sandra G. Sponem |
Guggenheim Partners Investment |
Ronald E. Toupin, Jr., |
Management, LLC |
Chairman |
Santa Monica, CA |
* Trustee is an “interested person” (as |
|
defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act) |
Administrator and Accounting Agent |
(“Interested Trustee”) of the Trust because of |
MUFG Investor Services (US), LLC |
her affiliation with Guggenheim Investments. |
Rockville, MD |
|
|
Principal Executive Officers |
Custodian |
Brian E. Binder |
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
New York, NY |
|
|
Joanna M. Catalucci |
Legal Counsel |
Chief Compliance Officer |
Dechert LLP |
|
Washington, D.C. |
Amy J. Lee |
|
Vice President and Chief Legal Officer |
Independent Registered Public Accounting |
|
Firm |
Mark E. Mathiasen |
Ernst & Young LLP |
Secretary |
Tysons, VA |
|
|
James M. Howley |
|
Chief Financial Officer, |
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
|
and Treasurer |
|
|
|
TRUST INFORMATION continued |
November 30, 2023 |
Privacy Principles of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond &
Investment Grade Debt Trust for Shareholders
The Trust is committed to maintaining the privacy of its shareholders
and to safeguarding its non-public personal information. The following information is provided to help you understand what personal information
the Trust collects, how we protect that information and why, in certain cases, we may share information with select other parties.
Generally, the Trust does not receive any non-public personal information
relating to its shareholders, although certain non-public personal information of its shareholders may become available to the Trust.
The Trust does not disclose any non-public personal information about its shareholders or former shareholders to anyone except as permitted
by law or as is necessary in order to service shareholder accounts (for example, to a transfer agent or third party administrator).
The Trust restricts access to non-public personal information about
the shareholders to Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC employees with a legitimate business need for the information. The Trust
maintains physical, electronic and procedural safeguards designed to protect the non-public personal information of its shareholders.
Questions concerning your shares of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal
Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust?
• | | If your shares are held in a Brokerage Account, contact your Broker. |
• | | If you have physical possession of your shares in certificate form, contact the Trust’s
Transfer Agent: Computershare Trust Company, N.A., P.O. Box
30170 College Station, TX 77842-3170; (866) 488-3559 or online at www.computershare.com/investor This report is provided to shareholders
of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust for their information. It is not a Prospectus, circular or representation
intended for use in the purchase or sale of shares of the Trust or of any securities mentioned in this report. |
Paper copies of the Trust’s annual and semi-annual shareholder
reports are not sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports are made available on
a website, and you are notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website address to access the report.
You may elect to receive paper copies of all future
shareholder reports free of charge. If you invest through a financial intermediary, you can contact your financial intermediary to
request that you may receive paper copies of your shareholder reports; if you invest directly with the Trust, you may call
Computershare at 1-866-488-3559. Your election to receive reports in paper form may apply to all funds held in your account with
your financial intermediary or, if you invest directly, to all Guggenheim closed-end funds you hold.
The Trust’s Statement of Additional Information includes
additional information about directors of the Trust and is available, without charge, upon request, by calling the Trust at (888) 991-0091.
A description of the Trust’s proxy voting policies and procedures
related to portfolio securities is available without charge, upon request, by calling the Trust at (888) 991-0091 and on the SEC's website
at www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the Trust voted proxies for portfolio
securities, if applicable, during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is also available, without charge and upon request by
calling (888) 991-0091, by visiting the Trust’s website at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab or by accessing the Trust’s Form
N-PX on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) website at www.sec.gov.
The Trust files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings
with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year as an exhibit to its reports on Form N-PORT, and for reporting
periods ended prior to August 31, 2019, on Form N-Q. The Trust’s Forms N-PORT and N-Q are available on the SEC website at
www.sec.gov or at guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab.
Notice to Shareholders
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Section 23(c) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, that the Trust from time to time may purchase shares of its common stock in the open market
or in private transactions.
ABOUT THE TRUST MANAGERS
GUGGENHEIM FUNDS INVESTMENT ADVISORS, LLC
Guggenheim Investments represents the investment management businesses
of Guggenheim Partners, LLC (“Guggenheim”), which includes Guggenheim Funds Investment Advisors, LLC (“GFIA”)
the investment adviser to the referenced fund. Collectively Guggenheim Investments has a long, distinguished history of serving institutional
investors, ultra-high-net-worth individuals, family offices and financial intermediaries. Guggenheim Investments offers clients a wide
range of differentiated capabilities built on a proven commitment to investment excellence.
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC (“GPIM”)
is an indirect subsidiary of Guggenheim Partners, LLC, a diversified financial services firm. The firm provides capital markets services,
portfolio and risk management expertise, wealth management, and investment advisory services. Clients of Guggenheim Partners, LLC subsidiaries
are an elite mix of individuals, family offices, endowments, foundations, insurance companies and other institutions.
Investment Philosophy
GPIM’s investment philosophy is predicated upon the belief
that thorough research and independent thought are rewarded with performance that has the potential to outperform benchmark indices with
both lower volatility and lower correlation of returns over time as compared to such benchmark indices.
Investment Process
GPIM’s investment process is a collaborative effort between
various groups including the Portfolio Construction Group, which utilize proprietary portfolio construction and risk modeling tools to
determine allocation of assets among a variety of sectors, and its Sector Specialists, who are responsible for security selection within
these sectors and for implementing securities transactions, including the structuring of certain securities directly with the issuers
or with investment banks and dealers involved in the origination of such securities.
|
|
Guggenheim Funds Distributors, LLC
227 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60606
Member FINRA/SIPC (01/24) |
|
NOT FDIC-INSURED l NOT BANK-GUARANTEED
l MAY LOSE VALUE
CEF-GBAB-SAR-1123
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
The Schedule of Investments is included as part of Item 1.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for
Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment
Companies.
a) Not applicable for semi-annual reporting period.
b) The following Portfolio Manager has been added to
the list of Portfolio Managers identified in response to paragraph (a)(1) of the Item in the registrant’s most recent annual report
on Form N-CSR: Evan Serdensky. The information required by paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(4) of this Item for Mr. Serdensky
is as follows:
(a)(1) GPIM serves as sub-adviser for the
registrant and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the registrant’s portfolio. GPIM uses a team approach to manage
client portfolios. Day to day management of a client portfolio is conducted under the auspices of GPIM’s Portfolio
Construction Group (“PCG”). PCG’s members include the Chief Investment Officer (“CIO”) and other key
investment personnel. The PCG, in consultation with the CIO, provides direction for overall investment strategy. The PCG performs
several duties as it relates to client portfolios including: determining both tactical and strategic asset allocations; monitoring
portfolio adherence to asset allocation targets; providing sector specialists with direction for overall investment strategy, which
may include portfolio design and the rebalancing of portfolios; performing risk management oversight; assisting sector managers and
research staff in determining the relative valuation of market sectors; and providing a forum for the regular discussion of the
economy and the financial markets to enhance the robustness of GPIM’s strategic and tactical policy directives.
The following individual (in addition to those individuals
disclosed in the registrants most recent annual report on Form N-CSR) shares primary responsibility for the management of the registrant’s
portfolio as of the date of filing of the report.
Name |
Since |
Professional Experience During the Last Five Years |
Evan Serdensky |
2023 |
Guggenheim Partners Investment Management, LLC: Managing Director 2018- Present |
(a)(2)(i-iii) Other Accounts Managed by the Portfolio
Manager
The following table summarizes the information regarding
each of the other accounts managed by Mr. Serdensky as of November 30, 2023:
Type of Account |
Number of Accounts |
Total Assets in the Accounts |
Number of Accounts in Which the Advisory Fee is Based on Performance |
Total Assets in the Accounts in Which the Advisory Fee is Based on Performance |
Registered investment companies |
15 |
$38,765,694,255 |
0 |
$ — |
Other pooled investment vehicles |
3 |
$ 1,586,039,707 |
1 |
$216,934,125 |
Other accounts |
38 |
$19,109,004,737 |
1 |
$104,767,052 |
(a)2)(iv) Potential Conflicts of Interest
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager
has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one fund or other account. More specifically, portfolio managers
who manage multiple funds and/or other accounts may be presented with one or more of the following potential conflicts.
The management of multiple funds and/or other accounts may result in a portfolio
manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each fund and/or other account. GPIM
seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of a
portfolio manager by having the portfolio manager focus on a particular investment discipline. Specifically, the ultimate decision maker
for security selection for each client portfolio is the Sector Specialist Portfolio Manager. They are responsible for analyzing and selecting
specific securities that they believe best reflect the risk and return level as provided in each client’s investment guidelines.
GPIM may have clients with similar investment strategies. As a result, if
an investment opportunity would be appropriate for more than one client, GPIM may be required to choose among those clients in allocating
such opportunity, or to allocate less of such opportunity to a client than it would ideally allocate if it did not have to allocate to
multiple clients. In addition, GPIM may determine that an investment opportunity is appropriate for a particular account, but not for
another.
Allocation decisions are made in accordance with the investment objectives,
guidelines, and restrictions governing the respective clients and in a manner that will not unfairly favor one client over another. GPIM’s
allocation policy provides that investment decisions must never be based upon account performance or fee structure. Accordingly, GPIM’s
allocation procedures are designed to ensure that investment opportunities are allocated equitably among different client accounts over
time. The procedures also seek to ensure reasonable efficiency in client transactions and to provide portfolio managers with flexibility
to use allocation methodologies appropriate to GPIM’s investment disciplines and the specific goals and objectives of each client
account.
In order to minimize execution costs and obtain best execution for clients,
trades in the same security transacted on behalf of more than one client may be aggregated. In the event trades are aggregated, GPIM’s
policy and procedures provide as follows: (i) treat all participating client accounts fairly; (ii) continue to seek best execution; (iii)
ensure that clients who participate in an aggregated order will participate at the average share price with all transaction costs shared
on a pro-rata basis based on each client’s participation in the transaction; (iv) disclose its aggregation policy to clients.
GPIM, as a fiduciary to its clients, considers numerous factors in arranging
for the purchase and sale of clients’ portfolio securities in order to achieve best execution for its clients. When selecting a
broker, individuals making trades on behalf of GPIM clients consider the full range and quality of a broker’s services, including
execution capability, commission rate, price, financial stability and reliability. GPIM is not obliged to merely get the lowest price
or commission but also must determine whether the transaction represents the best qualitative execution for the account.
In the event that multiple broker/dealers make a market in a particular
security, GPIM’s Portfolio Managers are responsible for selecting the broker-dealer to use with respect to executing the transaction.
The broker-dealer will be selected on the basis of how the transaction can be executed to achieve the most favorable execution for the
client under the circumstances. In many instances, there may only be one counter-party active in a particular security at a given time.
In such situations the Employee executing the trade will use his/her best effort to obtain the best execution from the counter-party.
GPIM and the registrant have adopted certain compliance procedures which
are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation
in which a conflict arises.
(a)(3) Portfolio Manager Compensation
GPIM compensates the portfolio managers for their management of the registrant’s
portfolio. Compensation is evaluated based on their contribution to investment performance relative to pertinent benchmarks and qualitatively
based on factors such as teamwork and client service efforts. GPIM’s staff incentives may include: a competitive base salary, bonus
determined by individual and firm wide performance, equity participation, and participation opportunities in various GPIM investments.
All GPIM employees are also eligible to participate in a 401(k) plan to which GPIM may make a discretionary match after the completion
of each plan year.
(a)(4) Portfolio Manager Securities Ownership
The following table discloses the dollar range of equity securities of the
registrant beneficially owned by Mr. Serdensky as of November 30, 2023:
Name of Portfolio Manager |
Dollar Amount of Equity Securities in Registrant |
Evan Serdensky |
none |
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management
Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
None.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The registrant has not made any material changes to the procedures
by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board of Trustees.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial
officer have evaluated the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act)
as of a date within 90 days of this filing and have concluded based on such evaluation, as required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the Investment
Company Act, that the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required
to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act) that occurred during the registrant’s period
covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End
Management Investment Companies.
(a) The registrant has not participated in securities lending activities
during the period covered by this report.
(b) Not applicable
Item 13. Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Compensation.
(a) Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 14. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certification of principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment
Grade Debt Trust
By: /s/ Brian E. Binder
Name: Brian E. Binder
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 2, 2024
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Brian E. Binder
Name: Brian E. Binder
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 2, 2024
By: /s/ James Howley
Name: James Howley
Title: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
Date: February 2, 2024
EXHIBIT (a)(2)
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Brian E. Binder, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations,
changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment
Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940)
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting: and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and
I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 2, 2024
/s/ Brian E. Binder
Brian E. Binder
President and Chief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
CERTIFICATIONS
I, James Howley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR
of Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations,
changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment
Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940)
for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting: and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer
and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: February 2, 2024
/s/ James Howley
James Howley
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer
and Treasurer
EXHIBIT (b)
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR of Guggenheim Taxable
Municipal Bond & Investment Grade Debt Trust (the “Issuer”) for the semi-annual period ended November 30, 2023 (the “Report”),
Brian E. Binder, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, and James Howley, as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting
Officer and Treasurer of the Issuer, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Issuer. |
Dated: February 2, 2024
/s/ Brian
E. Binder
Name: Brian E. Binder
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ James
Howley
Name: James Howley
Title: Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer
v3.24.0.1
N-2
|
6 Months Ended |
Nov. 30, 2023
shares
|
Cover [Abstract] |
|
Entity Central Index Key |
0001495825
|
Amendment Flag |
false
|
Document Type |
N-CSRS
|
Entity Registrant Name |
Guggenheim Taxable Municipal Bond &
Investment Grade Debt Trust
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Investment Objectives and Practices [Text Block] |
The Trust’s primary investment objective is to provide current
income with a secondary objective of long-term capital appreciation.
|
Latest Premium (Discount) to NAV [Percent] |
2.76%
|
Capital Stock, Long-Term Debt, and Other Securities [Abstract] |
|
Outstanding Security, Authorized [Shares] |
23,509,549
|
Document Period End Date |
Nov. 30, 2023
|
Risks And Other Considerations [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Investors should be aware that in light of the current uncertainty,
volatility and state of economies, financial markets, geopolitical tensions, and labor and public health conditions around the world,
the risks below are heightened significantly compared to normal conditions and therefore subject the Trust’s investments and a
shareholder’s investment in the Trust to reduced yield and/or income and sudden and substantial losses. The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio
managers only through the report period as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time, based on market and other
conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation of any kind. The material may also include forward looking statements that
involve risk and uncertainty, and there is no guarantee that any predictions will come to pass. There can be no assurance that the Trust will achieve its
investment objectives. The net asset and market values of the Trust’s shares will fluctuate, sometimes independently, based on
market and other factors affecting the Trust and its investments. The market value of Trust shares will either be above (premium) or
below (discount) their net asset value. Although the net asset value of Trust shares is often considered in determining whether to
purchase or sell Trust shares, whether investors will realize gains or losses upon the sale of Trust shares will depend upon whether
the market price of Trust shares at the time of sale is above or below the investor’s purchase price. Market value movements
of Trust shares are thus material to investors and may result in losses, even when net asset value has increased. The Trust is
designed for long-term investors; investors should not view the Trust as a vehicle for trading purposes. Risk is inherent in all investing, including the loss of your entire
principal. Therefore, before investing you should consider the risks carefully. The Trust is subject to various risk factors, including
investment risk, which could result in the loss of the entire principal amount that you invest. Certain of these risk factors are described
below. Please see the Trust’s Prospectus, Statement of Additional Information (SAI), most recent annual report and guggenheiminvestments.com/gbab
for a more detailed description of the risks of investing in the Trust. Shareholders may access the Trust’s Prospectus, SAI and
most recent annual report on the EDGAR Database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at www.sec.gov. The fact that a particular risk below is not specifically identified
as being heightened under current conditions does not mean that the risk is not greater than under normal conditions.
|
Below Investment Grade Securities Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Below Investment Grade Securities Risk. High yield,
below investment grade and unrated high risk debt securities (which also may be known as “junk bonds”) may present
additional risks because these securities may be less liquid, and therefore more difficult to value accurately and sell at an
advantageous price or time, and present more credit risk than investment grade bonds. The price of high yield securities tends to be
subject to greater volatility due to issuer-specific operating results and outlook and to real or perceived adverse economic and competitive
industry conditions. This exposure may be obtained through investments in other investment companies. Generally, the risks associated
with high yield securities are heightened during times of weakening economic conditions or rising interest rates.
|
Corporate Bond Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Corporate Bond Risk. Corporate bonds are debt
obligations issued by corporations and other business entities. Corporate bonds may be either secured or unsecured. Collateral used
for secured debt includes real property, machinery, equipment, accounts receivable, stocks, bonds or notes. If a bond is unsecured,
it is known as a debenture. Bondholders, as creditors, have a prior legal claim over common and preferred stockholders as to both
income and assets of the corporation for the principal and interest due them and may have a prior claim over other creditors if
liens or mortgages are involved. Interest on corporate bonds may be fixed or floating, or the bonds may be zero coupons. Interest on
corporate bonds is typically paid semi-annually and is fully taxable to the bondholder. Corporate bonds contain elements of both
interest-rate risk and credit risk and are subject to the risks associated with other debt securities, among other risks. The market
value of a corporate bond generally may be expected to rise and fall inversely with interest rates and may also be affected by the
credit rating of the corporation, the corporation’s performance and perceptions of the corporation in the marketplace.
Depending on the nature of the seniority provisions, a senior corporate bond may be junior to other credit securities of the issuer.
The market value of a corporate bond may be affected by factors directly related to the issuer, such as investors’ perceptions
of the creditworthiness of the issuer, the issuer’s financial performance, perceptions of the issuer in the marketplace,
performance of management of the issuer, the issuer’s capital structure and use of financial leverage and demand for the
issuer’s goods and services. There is a risk that the issuers of corporate bonds may not be able to meet their obligations on
interest or principal payments at the time called for by an instrument. Corporate bonds of below investment grade quality are often
high risk and have speculative characteristics and may be particularly susceptible to adverse issuer-specific developments.
|
Short Sales Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Short Sales Risk. The Trust may make short sales of securities.
A short sale is a transaction in which the Trust sells a borrowed security. If the price of the security sold short increases between
the time of the short sale and the time the Trust replaces the borrowed security, the Trust will incur a loss. Although the Trust’s
gain is limited to the price at which it sold the security short, its potential loss is theoretically unlimited.
|
Credit Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Credit Risk. The Trust could lose money if the issuer or
guarantor of a debt instrument or a counterparty to a derivatives transaction or other transaction is unable or unwilling, or perceived
to be unable or unwilling, to pay interest or repay principal on time or defaults. This risk is heightened in market environments where
interest rates are changing. The risk that such issuer, guarantor or counterparty is less willing or able to do so is heightened in market
environments where interest rates are rising. Also, the issuer, guarantor or counterparty may suffer adverse changes in its financial
condition or be adversely affected by economic, political or social conditions that could lower the credit quality (or the market’s
perception of the credit quality) of the issuer or instrument, leading to greater volatility in the price of the instrument and in
shares of the Trust. Although credit quality may not accurately reflect the true credit risk of an instrument, a change in the
credit quality rating of an instrument or an issuer can have a rapid, adverse effect on the instrument’s value and liquidity
and make it more difficult for the Trust to sell at an advantageous price or time. The risk of the occurrence of these types of
events is heightened in market environments where interest rates are changing.
|
Current Fixed Income And Debt Market Conditions [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Current Fixed-Income and Debt Market Conditions. Fixed-income
and debt market conditions are highly unpredictable and some parts of the market are subject to dislocations. In response to the inflation
rates in recent periods, governmental authorities have implemented significant fiscal and monetary policy changes, including increasing
interest rates and implementation of quantitative tightening. These actions present heightened risks, particularly to fixed-income and
debt instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes
or reversed. It is difficult to accurately predict changes in the U.S. Federal Reserve Board’s (“Federal Reserve”) monetary
policies and the effect of any such changes or policies. Certain economic conditions and market environments will expose fixed-income
and debt instruments to heightened volatility and reduced liquidity, which can impact the Trust’s investments and may negatively
impact the Trust’s characteristics, which in turn would impact performance.
|
Interest Rate Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income and other debt
instruments are subject to the possibility that interest rates could change (or are expected to change). Changes in interest rates
(or the expectation of such changes) may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in these instruments, such as the value or
liquidity of, and income generated by, the investments or increase risks associated with such investments, such as credit or default
risks. In addition, changes in interest rates, including rates that fall below zero, can have unpredictable effects on markets and
can adversely affect the Trust’s yield, income and performance. Generally, when interest rates increase, the values of
fixed-income and other debt instruments decline, and when interest rates decrease, the values of fixed-income and other debt
instruments rise. Changes in interest rates also adversely affect the yield generated by certain fixed income and other debt
securities (“Income Securities”) or result in the issuance of lower yielding Income Securities. The Federal Reserve has
increased interest rates at significant levels over recent periods. These actions present heightened risks to fixed-income and debt
instruments, and such risks could be even further heightened if these actions are unexpectedly or suddenly reversed or are
ineffective in achieving their desired outcomes. It is difficult to accurately predict how long, and whether, the Federal
Reserve’s current stance on interest rates will persist and the impact these actions will have on the economy and the
Trust’s investments and the markets where they trade. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy is subject to change at any
time and potentially frequently based on a variety of market and economic conditions.
|
Leverage Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Leverage Risk. The Trust’s use of leverage, through
borrowings or instruments such as derivatives, causes the Trust to be more volatile and riskier than if it had not been leveraged. Although
the use of leverage by the Trust may create an opportunity for increased return, it also results in additional risks and can magnify the
effect of any losses. The effect of leverage in a declining market is likely to cause a greater decline in the net asset value of the Trust
than if the Trust were not leveraged, which may result in a greater decline in the market price of the Trust shares. There can be no
assurance that a leveraging strategy will be implemented or that it will be successful during any period during which it is
employed. When the cost of leverage is no longer favorable, or when the Trust is otherwise required to reduce its leverage, the
Trust may not be able to maintain distributions at historical levels and common shareholders will bear any costs associated with
selling portfolio securities. The Trust’s total leverage may vary significantly over time. To the extent the Trust increases
its amount of leverage outstanding, it will be more exposed to these risks.
|
Liquidity Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Liquidity Risk. The Trust may invest in municipal securities
that are, at the time of investment, illiquid. Illiquid securities are securities that cannot be disposed of within seven days in the
ordinary course of business at approximately the value that the Trust values the securities. Illiquid securities may trade at a discount
from comparable, more liquid securities and may be subject to wide fluctuations in market value. The Trust may be subject to significant
delays in disposing of illiquid securities. Accordingly, the Trust may be forced to sell these securities at less than fair market value
or may not be able to sell them when the Adviser believes it is desirable to do so. Illiquid securities also may entail registration expenses
and other transaction costs that are higher than those for liquid securities. Dislocations in certain parts of markets are resulting in
reduced liquidity for certain investments. It is uncertain when financial markets will improve. Liquidity of financial markets may also
be affected by government intervention, such as the legal restrictions on certain financial instruments’ resale.
|
Management Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Management Risk. The Trust is actively managed, which means
that investment decisions are made based on investment views. There is no guarantee that the investment views will produce the desired
results or expected returns, causing the Trust to fail to meet its investment objective or underperform its benchmark index or funds with
similar investment objectives and strategies.
|
Market Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Market Risk. The value of, or income generated by, the
investments held by the Trust are subject to the possibility of rapid and unpredictable fluctuation. The value of certain
investments (e.g., equity securities) tends to fluctuate more dramatically over the shorter term than do the value of other asset
classes. These movements may result from factors affecting individual companies, or from broader influences, including real or
perceived changes in prevailing interest rates, changes in inflation or expectations about inflation, investor confidence or
economic, political (including geopolitical), social or financial market conditions, tariffs and trade disruptions, recession,
changes in currency rates, natural/environmental disasters, cyber attacks, terrorism, governmental or quasigovernmental actions,
public health emergencies (such as the spread of infectious diseases, pandemics and epidemics), debt crises, actual or threatened
war or other armed conflicts (such as the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict and its risk of expansion or collateral economic and other
effects) or ratings downgrade, and other similar events, each of which may be temporary or last for extended periods. Many economies
and markets have experienced high inflation rates in recent periods. In response to such inflation, government authorities have
implemented significant fiscal and monetary policies such as increasing interest rates and quantitative tightening (reduction of
money available in the market) which may adversely affect financial markets and the
broader economy, as well as the Trust’s performance. Administrative changes, policy reform and/or changes in law or
governmental regulations can result in expropriation or nationalization of the investments of a company in which the Trust invests.
In addition, adverse changes in one sector or industry or with respect to a particular company could negatively impact companies in
other sectors or industries or increase market volatility as a result of the interconnected nature of economies and markets and thus
negatively affect the Trust’s performance. For example, developments in the banking or financial services sectors (one or more
companies operating in these sectors) could adversely impact a wide range of companies and issuers. These types of adverse
developments could negatively affect the Trust’s performance or operations.
|
Municipal Securities Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Municipal Securities Risk. The Trust’s holdings
of municipal securities could be significantly affected by events that affect the municipal bond market, which could include
unfavorable legislative or political developments, adverse changes in the financial conditions of issuers of municipal securities,
or other actual or perceived changes in economic, social, or public health conditions. The amount of public information available
about municipal securities is generally less than that for corporate equities or bonds. The secondary market for municipal
securities also tends to be less well-developed or liquid than many other securities markets, which may adversely affect the
Trust’s ability to sell such securities at prices approximating those at which the Trust may currently value them. In
addition, many state and municipal governments that issue securities are under significant economic and financial stress and may not
be able to satisfy their obligations. Issuers of municipal securities might seek protection under bankruptcy laws. In the event of
bankruptcy of such an issuer, holders of municipal securities could experience delays in collecting principal and interest and such
holders may not be able to collect all principal and interest to which they are entitled. Legislative developments may result in
changes to the laws relating to municipal bankruptcies. The income, value and/or risk of municipal securities is often correlated to
specific project or other revenue sources, which can be negatively affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or
changing tastes and values, or increasing vacancies or declining rents resulting from legal, cultural, technological, global or
local economic developments, as well as reduced demand for properties, revenues or goods. Municipalities and municipal projects that
rely directly or indirectly on federal funding mechanisms may be negatively affected by constraints of the federal government
budget. Each of the foregoing may adversely affect the Trust’s investments in municipal securities.
|
Build America Bonds Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Build America Bonds (“BABs”) Risk. BABs
are a form of municipal financing. The BABs market is smaller and less diverse than the broader municipal securities market. In
addition, because the relevant provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 were not extended, bonds issued
after December 31, 2010 cannot qualify as BABs. It is uncertain whether Congress will renew the program to permit issuance of new
Build America Bonds. As a result, the number of available BABs is limited, which may negatively affect the value of BABs. In
addition, there can be no assurance that BABs will continue to be actively traded. It is
difficult to predict the extent to which a market for such bonds will continue, meaning that BABs may experience greater illiquidity
than other municipal obligations.
|
Special Risks Related To Certain Municipal Securities [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Special Risks Related to Certain Municipal Securities. The
Trust may invest in municipal leases and certificates of participation in such leases, which involve special risks not normally associated
with general obligations or revenue bonds. Leases and installment purchase or conditional sale contracts (which normally provide for title
to the leased asset to pass eventually to the governmental issuer) have evolved as a means for governmental issuers to acquire property
and equipment without meeting the constitutional and statutory requirements for the issuance of debt. The debt issuance limitations are
deemed to be inapplicable because of the inclusion in many leases or contracts of “non-appropriation” clauses that relieve
the governmental issuer of any obligation to make future payments under the lease or contract unless money is appropriated for such purpose
by the appropriate legislative body on a yearly or other periodic basis. In addition, such leases or contracts may be subject to the temporary
abatement of payments in the event the governmental issuer is prevented from maintaining occupancy of the leased premises or utilizing
the leased equipment.
|
Taxable Minicipal Securities Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Taxable Municipal Securities Risk. While interest
earned on municipal securities is generally not subject to federal tax, any interest earned on taxable municipal securities is fully
taxable at the federal level and may be subject to tax at the state level. Additionally, litigation, legislation or other political
events, local business or economic conditions or the bankruptcy of the issuer could have a significant effect on the ability of an
issuer of municipal securities to make payments of principal and/or interest. Political changes and uncertainties in the municipal
market related to taxation, legislative changes or the rights of municipal security holders can significantly affect municipal
securities. Because many securities are issued to finance similar projects, especially those relating to education, health care,
transportation and utilities, conditions in those sectors can affect the overall municipal market. In addition, changes in the
financial condition of an individual municipal issuer can affect the overall municipal market.
|
Debt Instuments Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Debt Instruments Risk. The value of the Trust’s
investments in debt instruments (including bonds issued by non-profit entities, municipal conduits and project finance corporations)
depends on the continuing ability of the debt issuers to meet their obligations for the payment of interest and principal when due.
The ability of debt issuers to make timely payments of interest and principal can be affected by a variety of developments and
changes in legal, political, economic and other conditions. Investments in debt instruments present certain risks, including credit,
interest rate, liquidity and prepayment risks. Issuers that rely directly or indirectly on government funding mechanisms or
non-profit statutes, may be negatively affected by actions of the government, including reductions in government spending, increases
in tax rates, and changes in fiscal policy. The value of a debt instrument may decline for many reasons that directly relate to the
issuer, such as a change in the demand for the issuer’s goods or services, or a decline in the issuer’s performance, earnings or assets. In addition, changes in the financial condition
of an individual issuer can affect the overall market for such instruments. The risk of the occurrence of these types of unfavorable events
is heightened in market environments where interest rates are rising.
|
Municipal Conduit Bond Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Municipal Conduit Bond Risk. Municipal conduit bonds, also
referred to as private activity bonds or industrial revenue bonds, are bonds issued by state and local governments or other entities for
the purpose of financing the projects of certain private enterprises. Unlike municipal bonds, municipal conduit bonds are not backed by
the full faith, credit or general taxing power of the issuing governmental entity. Rather, issuances of municipal conduit bonds are backed
solely by revenues of the private enterprise involved. Municipal conduit bonds are therefore subject to heightened credit risk, as the
private enterprise involved can have a different credit profile than the issuing governmental entity. Municipal conduit bonds may be negatively
impacted by conditions affecting either the general credit of the private enterprise or the project itself. Factors such as competitive
pricing, construction delays, or lack of demand for the project could cause project revenues to fall short of projections, and defaults
could occur. Municipal conduit bonds tend to have longer terms and thus are more susceptible to interest rate risk.
|
Project Finance Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Project Finance Risk. Project finance is a type of
financing commonly used for infrastructure, industry, and public service projects. In a project finance arrangement, the cash flow
generated by the project is used to repay lenders while the project’s assets, rights and interest are held as secondary
collateral. Investors involved in project finance face heightened technology risk, operational risk, and market risk because the
cash flow generated by the project, rather than the revenues of the company behind the project, will repay investors. In addition,
because of the project-specific nature of such arrangements, the Trust face the risk of loss of investment if the company behind the
project determines not to complete it.
|
Risks Of Investing In Debt Issued By Non Profit Institutions [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Risks of Investing in Debt Issued by Non-Profit Institutions.
Investing in debt issued by non-profit institutions, including foundations, museums, cultural institutions, colleges, universities,
hospitals and healthcare systems, involves different risks than investing in municipal bonds. Many non-profit entities are tax-exempt
under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and risk losing their tax-exempt status if they do not comply with the requirements
of that section. There is a risk that Congress or the IRS could pass new laws or regulations changing the requirements for tax-exempt
status, which could result in a non-profit institution losing such status. Additionally, non-profit institutions that receive federal
and state appropriations face the risk of a decrease in or loss of such appropriations. Hospitals and healthcare systems are highly regulated
at the federal and state levels and face burdensome state licensing requirements. There is a risk that a state could refuse to renew a
hospital’s license or that the passage of new laws or regulations, especially changes to Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement, could
inhibit a hospital from growing its revenues. Hospitals and healthcare systems also face risks related to increased competition from other
health care providers; increased costs of inpatient and outpatient care; and increased pressures from managed care organizations, insurers, and patients to cut the costs of
medical care. There is a risk that nonprofit institutions relying on philanthropy and donations to maintain their operations will receive
less funding during economic downturns.
|
Senior Loans Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Senior Loans Risk. The Trust may invest in senior
secured floating rate loans made to corporations and other non-governmental entities and issuers (“Senior Loans”).
Senior Loans typically hold the most senior position in the capital structure of the issuing entity, are typically secured with
specific collateral and typically have a claim on the assets and/or stock of the borrower that is senior to that held by
subordinated debt holders and stockholders of the borrower. The Trust’s investments in Senior Loans are typically below
investment grade and are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. The risks associated with Senior Loans
of below investment grade quality are similar to the risks of other lower grade securities, although Senior Loans are typically
senior in payment priority and secured on a senior priority basis in contrast to subordinated and unsecured securities. Senior
Loans’ higher priority has historically resulted in generally higher recoveries in the event of a corporate reorganization. In
addition, because their interest payments are typically adjusted for changes in short-term interest rates, investments in Senior
Loans generally have less interest rate risk than certain other lower grade securities, which may have fixed interest rates. Loans
and other debt instruments are also subject to the risk of price declines due to increases in prevailing interest rates, although
floating-rate debt instruments are substantially less exposed to this risk than fixed-rate debt instruments. Interest rate changes
may also increase prepayments of debt obligations and require the Trust to invest assets at lower yields. During periods of
deteriorating economic conditions, such as recessions or periods of rising unemployment, or changing interest rates (notably
increases), delinquencies and losses generally increase, sometimes dramatically, with respect to obligations under such loans. An
economic downturn or individual corporate developments could adversely affect the market for these instruments and reduce the
Trust’s ability to sell these instruments at an advantageous time or price. An economic downturn would generally lead to a
higher non-payment rate and, a Senior Loan may lose significant market value before a default occurs. The Trust invests in or is
exposed to loans and other similar debt obligations that are sometimes referred to as “covenant-lite” loans or
obligations, which are generally subject to more risk than investments that contain traditional financial maintenance covenants and
financial reporting requirements.
|
Structured Finance Investments Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Structured Finance Investments Risk. The Trust’s
structured finance investments may consist of residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) and commercial
mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”) issued by governmental entities and private issuers, asset-backed securities
(“ABS”), structured notes, credit-linked notes and other types of structured finance securities. Holders of structured
finance investments bear risks of the underlying investments, index or reference obligation and are subject to counterparty risk.
The Trust may have the right to receive payments only from the structured product, and generally does not have direct rights against
the issuer or the entity that sold the assets to be securitized. The Trust may invest in structured finance products collateralized
by low grade or defaulted loans or securities. Investments in such structured finance products are subject to the risks associated with below investment grade securities.
Such securities are characterized by high risk. It is likely that an economic recession could severely disrupt the market for such
securities and may have an adverse impact on the value of such securities. Moreover, other types of events, domestic or
international, may affect general economic conditions and financial markets, such as pandemics, armed conflicts, energy supply or
price disruptions, natural disasters and man-made disasters, which may have a significant effect on the underlying assets.
Structured finance securities are typically privately offered and sold, and thus are not registered under the securities laws. As a
result, investments in structured finance securities may be characterized by the Trust as illiquid securities; however, an active
dealer market may exist which would allow such securities to be considered liquid in some circumstances.
|
Asset Backed Securities Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Asset-Backed Securities Risk. While traditional
fixed-income securities typically pay a fixed rate of interest until maturity, when the entire principal amount is due, an ABS
represents an interest in a pool of assets, such as automobile loans, credit card receivables, unsecured consumer loans or student
loans, that has been securitized and provides for monthly payments of interest, at a fixed or floating rate, and principal from the
cash flow of these assets. This pool of assets (and any related assets of the issuing entity) is the only source of payment for the
ABS. The ability of an ABS issuer to make payments on the ABS, and the timing of such payments, is therefore dependent on
collections on these underlying assets. The recoveries on the underlying collateral may not, in some cases, be sufficient to support
payments on these securities, or may be unavailable in the event of a default and enforcing rights with respect to these assets or
collateral may be difficult and costly, which may result in losses to investors in an ABS. The collateral underlying ABS may
constitute assets related to a wide range of industries such as credit card and automobile receivables or other assets derived from
consumer, commercial or corporate sectors, and these underlying assets may be secured or unsecured. ABS are particularly subject to
interest rate risk and credit risk. Compared to other fixed income investments with similar maturity and credit, ABS generally
increase in value to a lesser extent when interest rates decline and generally decline in value to a similar or greater extent when
interest rates rise.
|
Mortgage Backed Securities Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk. Mortgage-backed
securities (“MBS”) represent an interest in a pool of mortgages. Mortgage-backed securities generally are classified as
either commercial mortgage backed securities (“CMBS”) or residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”),
each of which are subject to certain specific risks. The risks associated with mortgage-backed securities include: (1) credit risk
associated with the performance of the underlying mortgage properties and of the borrowers owning these properties; (2) risks
associated with their structure and execution (including the collateral, the process by which principal and interest payments are
allocated and distributed to investors and how credit losses affect the return to investors in such MBS); (3) risks associated with
the servicer of the underlying mortgages; (4) adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances, which are more likely to
have an adverse impact on mortgage-backed securities secured by loans on certain types of commercial properties than on those
secured by loans on residential properties; (5) prepayment risk and extension risks,
which can lead to significant fluctuations in the value of the mortgage-backed security; (6) loss of all or part of the premium, if any,
paid; and (7) decline in the market value of the security, whether resulting from changes in interest rates, prepayments on the underlying
mortgage collateral or perceptions of the credit risk associated with the underlying mortgage collateral. The value of mortgage-backed
securities may be substantially dependent on the servicing of the underlying pool of mortgages. Income from and values of MBS also may
be greatly affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values, or increasing vacancies or declining
rents resulting from legal, cultural technological, global or local economic developments, as well as reduced demand for properties. In addition, the general effects of inflation on the U.S.
economy can be wide-ranging, as evidenced by rising interest rates, wages and costs of consumer goods and necessities. The long-term
effects of inflation on the general economy and on any individual mortgagor are unclear, and in certain cases, rising inflation may
affect a mortgagor’s ability to repay its related mortgage loan, thereby reducing the amount received by the holders of MBS
with respect to such mortgage loan. Additionally, increased rates of inflation may negatively affect the value of certain MBS in the
secondary market. MBS are also subject to risks similar to those associated with investing in real estate, such as the possible
decline in the value of (or income generated by) the real estate, variations in rental income, fluctuations in occupancy levels and
demand for properties or real estate-related services, changes in interest rates and changes in the availability or terms of
mortgages and other financing that may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or unattractive.
|
C L O C D O And C B O Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
CLO, CDO and CBO Risk. In addition to the general
risks associated with debt securities discussed herein, collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), collateralized debt
obligations (“CDOs”), and collateralized bond obligations (“CBOs”) are subject to additional risks due to
their complex structure and highly leveraged nature, such as higher risk of volatility and magnified financial losses. CLOs, CDOs
and CBOs are subject to risks associated with the possibility that distributions from collateral securities may not be adequate to
make interest or other payments. The value of securities issued by CLOs, CDOs and CBOs also may decrease because of, among other
developments, changes in market value; changes in the market’s perception of the creditworthiness of the servicer of the
assets, the originator of an asset in the pool, or the financial institution or fund providing the credit support or enhancement;
loan performance and prices; broader market sentiment, including expectations regarding future loan defaults; liquidity conditions;
and supply and demand for structured products. Additionally, the indirect investment structure of CLOs, CDOs and CBOs presents
certain risks to the Trust such as less liquidity compared with holding the underlying assets directly. CLOs, CDOs and CBOs normally
charge management fees and administrative expenses, which would be borne by the Trust. The terms of many structured finance
investments, including CLOs, CDOs and CBOs, are tied to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) or other reference
rates based on SOFR. These relatively new and developing rates may not match the
reference rate applicable to the underlying assets related to these investments. These events may adversely affect the Trust and its
investments in CLOs, CDOs and CBOs, including their value, volatility and liquidity.
|
Investment Funds Risk [Member] |
|
General Description of Registrant [Abstract] |
|
Risk [Text Block] |
Investment Funds Risk. As an alternative to holding
investments directly, the Trust may also obtain investment exposure to securities in which it may invest directly by investing up to
20% of its Managed Assets in other investment companies, including U.S. registered investment companies and/or other U.S. or foreign
pooled investment vehicles (collectively, “Investment Funds”). Investments in Investment Funds present certain special
considerations and risks not present in making direct investments in securities in which the Trust may invest. Investments in
Investment Funds subject the Trust to the risks affecting such Investment Funds and involve operating expenses and fees that are in
addition to the expenses and fees borne by the Trust. Such expenses and fees attributable to the Trust’s investment in another
Investment Fund are borne indirectly by common shareholders. Accordingly, investment in such entities involves expense and fees at
both levels. To the extent management fees of Investment Funds are based on total gross assets, it may create an incentive for such
entities’ managers to employ financial leverage, thereby adding additional expense and increasing volatility and risk. A
performance-based fee arrangement may create incentives for an adviser or manager to take greater investment risks in the hope of
earning a higher profit participation. Investments in Investment Funds frequently expose the Trust to an additional layer of
financial leverage and, thus, increase the Trust’s exposure to leverage risk and costs. From time to time, the Trust may
invest a significant portion of its assets in Investment Funds that employ leverage. The use of leverage by these Investment Funds
may cause these Funds’ market price of common shares and/or NAV to be more volatile and can magnify the effect of any
losses. In addition to the foregoing risks, investors should note that
the Trust reserves the right to merge or reorganize with another fund, liquidate or convert into an open-end fund, in each case subject
to applicable approvals by shareholders and the Trust’s Board of Trustees as required by law and the Trust’s governing documents.
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-2 -Section Item 10
+ Details
Name: |
cef_CapitalStockLongTermDebtAndOtherSecuritiesAbstract |
Namespace Prefix: |
cef_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:stringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-2 -Section Item 8
+ Details
Name: |
cef_GeneralDescriptionOfRegistrantAbstract |
Namespace Prefix: |
cef_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:stringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-2 -Section Item 8 -Subsection 2 -Paragraph b, d
+ Details
Name: |
cef_InvestmentObjectivesAndPracticesTextBlock |
Namespace Prefix: |
cef_ |
Data Type: |
dtr-types:textBlockItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-2 -Section Item 8 -Subsection 5 -Paragraph c
+ Details
Name: |
cef_LatestPremiumDiscountToNavPercent |
Namespace Prefix: |
cef_ |
Data Type: |
dtr-types:percentItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Form N-2 -Section Item 10 -Subsection 5 -Paragraph 2
+ Details
Name: |
cef_OutstandingSecurityAuthorizedShares |
Namespace Prefix: |
cef_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:sharesItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- References
+ Details
Name: |
cef_RiskTextBlock |
Namespace Prefix: |
cef_ |
Data Type: |
dtr-types:textBlockItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionBoolean flag that is true when the XBRL content amends previously-filed or accepted submission.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_AmendmentFlag |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionFor the EDGAR submission types of Form 8-K: the date of the report, the date of the earliest event reported; for the EDGAR submission types of Form N-1A: the filing date; for all other submission types: the end of the reporting or transition period. The format of the date is YYYY-MM-DD.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentPeriodEndDate |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:dateItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe type of document being provided (such as 10-K, 10-Q, 485BPOS, etc). The document type is limited to the same value as the supporting SEC submission type, or the word 'Other'.
+ References
+ Details
Name: |
dei_DocumentType |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:submissionTypeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionA unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityCentralIndexKey |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:centralIndexKeyItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityRegistrantName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_RisksAndOtherConsiderationsMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_BelowInvestmentGradeSecuritiesRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_CorporateBondRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_ShortSalesRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=us-gaap_CreditRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_CurrentFixedIncomeAndDebtMarketConditionsMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=us-gaap_InterestRateRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_LeverageRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_LiquidityRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_ManagementRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_MarketRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_MunicipalSecuritiesRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_BuildAmericaBondsRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_TaxableMinicipalSecuritiesRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_DebtInstumentsRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_MunicipalConduitBondRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_ProjectFinanceRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_RisksOfInvestingInDebtIssuedByNonProfitInstitutionsMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_SeniorLoansRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_StructuredFinanceInvestmentsRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_AssetBackedSecuritiesRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_MortgageBackedSecuritiesRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_CLOCDOAndCBORiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
X |
- Details
Name: |
cef_RiskAxis=GBAB_InvestmentFundsRiskMember |
Namespace Prefix: |
|
Data Type: |
na |
Balance Type: |
|
Period Type: |
|
|
Guggenheim Taxable Munic... (NYSE:GBAB)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Déc 2024 à Jan 2025
Guggenheim Taxable Munic... (NYSE:GBAB)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Jan 2024 à Jan 2025