UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-21833

HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

THREE WORLD FINANCIAL CENTER, 200 VESEY STREET, 24 TH FLOOR

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10281-1010

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

KIM G. REDDING, PRESIDENT

HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

THREE WORLD FINANCIAL CENTER, 200 VESEY STREET, 24 TH FLOOR

NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10281-1010

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-800-497-3746

Date of fiscal year end: March 31, 2013

Date of reporting period: September 30, 2012


Item 1. Reports to Shareholders.


LOGO


IN PROFILE

 

Brookfield is a global alternative asset manager with approximately $150 billion in assets under management as of September 30, 2012. We have over a 100-year history of owning and operating assets with a focus on property, renewable power, infrastructure and private equity. We offer a range of public and private investment products and services, which leverage our expertise and experience and provide us with a distinct competitive advantage in the markets where we operate. On behalf of our clients, Brookfield is also an active investor in the public securities markets, where our experience extends nearly 40 years. Over this time, we have successfully developed several investment operations and built expertise in the management of institutional portfolios, retail mutual funds, and structured product investments.

Through our SEC-registered investment advisor, Brookfield Investment Management Inc., our public market activities complement our core competencies as a direct investor. These activities encompass global listed real estate and infrastructure equities, corporate high yield investments, opportunistic credit strategies and a dedicated insurance asset management division. Headquartered in New York, NY, Brookfield Investment Management Inc. maintains offices and investment teams in Toronto, Chicago, Boston and London.


TABLE OF CONTENTS         
Letter to Stockholders      1   
Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.      2   

Management Discussion of Fund Performance

     2   

Portfolio Characteristics

     6   

Schedule of Investments

     7   
Helios High Income Fund, Inc.      12   

Management Discussion of Fund Performance

     12   

Portfolio Characteristics

     16   

Schedule of Investments

     17   
Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.      22   

Management Discussion of Fund Performance

     22   

Portfolio Characteristics

     26   

Schedule of Investments

     27   
Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.      32   

Management Discussion of Fund Performance

     32   

Portfolio Characteristics

     36   

Schedule of Investments

     37   
Notes to Schedules of Investments      43   
Statements of Assets and Liabilities      44   
Statements of Operations      45   
Statements of Changes in Net Assets      46   
Statements of Cash Flows      48   
Financial Highlights      52   
Notes to Financial Statements      56   
Compliance Certifications      72   
Board Considerations Relating to the Investment Advisory Agreements      73   
Dividend Reinvestment Plan      75   

 

This report is for stockholder information. This is not a prospectus intended for the use in the purchase or sale of Fund Shares.

 

NOT FDIC INSURED    MAY LOSE VALUE      NOT BANK GUARANTEED   

© Copyright 2012. Brookfield Investment Management Inc.


LETTER TO STOCKHOLDERS

 

 

Dear Stockholders,

I am pleased to provide the Semi-Annual Report for Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc., Helios High Income Fund, Inc., Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc. and Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc. (each a “Fund” and, collectively, the “Funds”) for the six month period ended September 30, 2012.

The high yield market delivered impressive performance in recent months, reflecting improved investor confidence as well as continued demand for yield. Prior concerns over the health of the European Union began to subside over the period, following the announcement of new monetary policy actions by the European Central Bank. Additionally, the ongoing recovery in the U.S. housing market led to enhanced optimism regarding the U.S. economy overall. This return to confidence led to strong demand within the high yield market, which continues to benefit from robust corporate credit quality and liquidity in addition to meaningful current income.

We continue to maintain our positive view of high yield credit fundamentals. Furthermore, we continue to believe that yield spreads in the high yield market remain attractive. However, we note that the market is now trading above par and nominal yields are trending below historical averages. Accordingly, while we believe the current market represents value for investors, the potential for future price appreciation may be limited.

Importantly, our experience suggests that a diversified portfolio of income producing corporate bonds with a conservative risk profile should support an attractive dividend stream for investors. We continue to believe the Funds are well-positioned to generate sustainable yields over the course of an entire market cycle.

In addition to performance information, this report provides an overview of market conditions and a discussion of factors affecting the Funds’ investment performance, together with the Funds’ unaudited financial statements and schedule of investments as of September 30, 2012.

We welcome your questions and comments, and encourage you to contact our Investor Relations team at (800) 497-3746 or visit us at www.brookfieldim.com for more information. Thank you for your support.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

Kim G. Redding

President

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

1


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

OBJECTIVE & STRATEGY

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc. seeks a high level of current income. The Fund seeks capital growth as a secondary investment objective when consistent with its primary investment objective. The Fund invests a majority of its total assets in below-investment grade debt securities that offer attractive yield and capital appreciation potential. The Fund also may invest in investment grade debt securities, up to 15% of its total assets in foreign debt and foreign equity securities and up to 25% of its total assets in domestic equity securities, including common and preferred stocks. The Fund invests in a wide range of below-investment grade debt securities, including corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities and municipal and foreign government obligations, as well as securities of companies in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings or otherwise in the process of debt restructuring. (Below-investment grade debt securities are rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., BB+ or lower by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, comparably rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization or, if unrated, determined by the Fund’s investment advisor to be of comparable quality.) The Fund may use leverage through bank borrowings, reverse repurchase agreements or other transactions involving indebtedness or through the issuance of preferred shares. The Fund may leverage one third of its total assets (in each case including the amount borrowed.) The Fund may vary its use of leverage in response to changing market conditions.

Investment Risks: Investors in any bond fund should anticipate fluctuations in price. Bond prices and the value of bond funds decline as interest rates rise. Bonds with longer-term maturities generally are more vulnerable to interest rate risk than bonds with shorter-term maturities. Below-investment grade bonds involve greater credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer will not make interest or principal payments when due. An economic downturn or period of rising interest rates could adversely affect the ability of issuers, especially issuers of below-investment grade debt, to service primary obligations and an unanticipated default could cause the Fund to experience a reduction in value of its shares. The Fund’s investments in mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities that are “subordinated” to other interests in the same pool may increase credit risk to the extent that the Fund, as a holder of those securities, may only receive payments after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. Below-investment grade bonds also are subject to greater price volatility and are less liquid, especially during periods of economic uncertainty or change, than higher-rated debt securities. The value of U.S. and foreign equity securities in which the Fund invests will change based on changes in a company’s financial condition and in overall market and economic conditions. Leverage creates an opportunity for an increased return to common stockholders, but unless the income and capital appreciation, if any, on securities acquired with leverage proceeds exceed the costs of the leverage, the use of leverage will diminish the investment performance of the Fund’s shares. Use of leverage also may increase the likelihood that the net asset value of the Fund and market value of its common shares will be more volatile, and the yield and total return to common stockholders will tend to fluctuate more in response to changes in interest rates and creditworthiness.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

For the six months ended September 30, 2012, Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc. (NYSE: HAV) had a total return based on net asset value of 6.98% and a total return based on market price of 3.28%, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and is exclusive of brokerage commissions. Based on the NYSE closing price of $9.21 on September 30, 2012, the Fund’s shares had a dividend yield of 8.14%. The dividend yield is calculated as the annualized amount of the reporting period’s most recent monthly dividend declared divided by the stated stock price.

Individual contributors of performance included Marina District Finance, Pultegroup, and Niska Gas Storage. Marina District Finance owns the Borgata Hotel/Casino in Atlantic City whose bonds rallied as investors realized that competition in that market would not negatively impact the property. Pultegroup is a residential homebuilder benefitting from the apparent bottoming in the housing sector and Niska Gas Storage which benefited from high volumes of natural gas injections as new gas production came online this period.

Detractors of performance included Insight Communications, General Motors’ equity, and AK Steel. Insight Communications is a cable TV company whose bonds were called when the company was acquired by Time Warner Cable. General Motors’ equity was down in the period as investors worried about the possible impact of a

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

2


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

sale of the U.S. government’s shares acquired during the recession. AK Steel is a large North American steel producer whose bonds were lower on softer steel prices resulting from a reduction in Chinese demand.

HIGH YIELD MARKET ENVIRONMENT

The high yield market delivered robust returns for the six-month period ended September 30, 2012. Early in the period, markets corrected lower as, for the third year in a row, investors held a negative view beginning in May 2012. This was primarily attributed to concerns over the health of the European Union and slowing economic growth in China. Unlike prior years, however, the correction was short-lived, confined mostly to the month of May. Every other month during the period saw strong positive returns in excess of 1% per month cumulating to a six-month return of 6.5% despite the correction in May. The high yield bond market’s enthusiasm was not matched by equity returns, which were up only 1.6% as measured by the Russell 2000 Index.

The spread between high yield corporate bonds and the 10-Year U.S. Treasury compressed modestly during the six-month period from 594 basis points to 569 basis points. We view this compression as a positive because the underlying 10-year U.S. Treasury rate fell from 2.21% to 1.64%.

Current spreads of 569 basis points remain wider than the 400-500 basis points we would normally expect to see at this point in the credit cycle, although that has diminished somewhat as spreads continue to narrow. Therefore, while the high yield market continues to represent value to investors, further price appreciation is likely to be limited as the sector, as a whole, is trading above par.

Corporate credit has been sound for the past couple of years, and we saw stable credit this period with the default rate declining slightly from 1.9%. 1 to 1.8%. 2 Note that this period’s default rate of 1.8% remains well below the market’s 25-year average default rate of 4.2% 3

Credit ratings agencies confirm the stable trend in corporate credit by upgrading 1.0 times as many high yield companies as they downgraded in the past 12 months. 4 We noted that companies reported acceptable (but not strong) earnings through the second quarter of 2011, (the latest reporting period) and we saw more management teams taking a cautious view of the future.

Supply and demand was generally positive during the period with high yield mutual funds seeing strong inflows. 5 New issue volume was strong following May’s correction, accelerating to an all-time quarterly record of $98.5 billion, in the third quarter of calendar 2012, above the previous record of $96.8 billion posted in the first quarter of 2012. September’s new issue volume of $46 billion was an all-time record. Overall, with money flooding into mutual funds, deals were oversubscribed and traded higher in the aftermarket. Traders report that there seems to be ample cash available to buy issues and report that some challenges exist in purchasing good quality paper in the secondary market. The bulk of new issues are used to refinance debt which has the effect of improving credit quality by eliminating near term maturities. We note with some concern, however, a rise in the number of riskier new issues late in the period when some companies took advantage of the robust buying appetite and issued lower quality paper, PIK or pay-in-kind bonds, and financing to pay dividends to owners. While the volume of these riskier transactions is not yet concerning, we note that it is the first time since the downturn that we have seen a significant increase in such paper.

OUTLOOK

Brookfield has been positive on the high yield market, noting the robust credit quality, good corporate liquidity and excellent progress on the part of corporate treasurers in managing their debt structures. The high yield market agreed and returns were excellent. As these fundamentals remain in place, our outlook for this asset class over the next 12 months or so remains positive.

 

1  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, April 2, 2012 p 1

 

2  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 4.

 

3  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 2

 

4  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 10

 

5  

Credit Suisse “Leveraged Finance Strategy Update” October 1, 2012, p. 2.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

3


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

However, we also believe that significant further potential upside appreciation is limited due to the decline in spreads from 737 to 569 basis points in 2012, and with the return of the market above par. While normally we would expect the spread to be 50 to 100 basis points narrower than current levels, we note the unusually depressed level of the benchmark treasury yields, which may be artificially depressed due to actions by the Federal Reserve. With the high yield market trading at yields near all time lows, our enthusiasm is tempered at this point. We are carefully watching the quality of new issues coming to market as a possible negative going forward.

Given our expectation of modest economic growth, modestly increasing defaults, although no general recession, we believe that high yield investors are adequately, but not generously compensated at current yield spread levels. While we would normally be targeting yield spreads of 400 to 500 basis points at this point in the credit cycle, we remain skeptical that the problems in Europe are permanently addressed, and are increasingly concerned with the health of the U.S. balance sheet which will need to be addressed shortly after the November election. With these risks outstanding we expect high yield investors will continue to demand a premium to historical spreads, at least for the next few quarters. For investors seeking to clip the current coupon offered in the high yield market, the investment landscape remains attractive.

Forward-Looking Information

This management discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements that are based on various assumptions (some of which are beyond our control) may be identified by reference to a future period or periods or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “should,” “intend,” or similar terms or variations on those terms or the negative of those terms. Although we believe that the expectations contained in any forward-looking statement are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to publicly release any update or supplement to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Disclosure

The Fund’s portfolio holdings are subject to change without notice. The mention of specific securities is not a recommendation or solicitation for any person to buy, sell or hold any particular security. There is no assurance that the Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc. currently holds these securities.

The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index covers the U.S. dollar denominated, non-investment grade, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The index excludes emerging markets debt. The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index is part of the Barclays Capital U.S. Universal and Global High Yield Indices. The index is unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, is not affected by cash flows or trading and other expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not predict or depict the performance of the Fund.

The Fund may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value of its common stock, through bank borrowings, issuance of short-term debt securities or shares of preferred stock, or a combination thereof. However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments. While leverage may result in a higher yield for the Fund, the use of leverage involves risk, including the potential for higher volatility of the NAV, fluctuations of dividends and other distributions paid by the Fund and the market price of the Fund’s common stock, among others. Certain funds may invest assets in securities of issuers domiciled outside the United States, including issuers from emerging markets. Foreign investing involves special risks, including foreign currency risk and the possibility of substantial volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments.

Performance data quoted represents past performance results and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

4


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

These views represent the opinions of Brookfield Investment Management Inc. and are not intended to predict or depict the performance of any investment. These views are as of the close of business on September 30, 2012 and subject to change based on subsequent developments.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

5


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

Portfolio Characteristics (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

 

 

Annualized dividend yield 1

  

8.14%

Weighted average coupon

  

8.08%

Weighted average life

  

4.75 years

Percentage of leveraged assets

  

27.85%

Total number of holdings

  

134

 

 

CREDIT QUALITY

 

 

BBB

     3

BB

     16

B

     56

CCC

     19

Unrated

     2

Cash

     4

Total

     100

ASSET ALLOCATION 2

 

 

Investment Grade Corporate Bonds

     5

High Yield Corporate Bonds

     94

Common Stocks and Warrants

     1

Total

     100

 

1  

Dividends may include net investment income, capital gains and/or return of capital. The dividend yield referenced above is calculated as the annualized amount of the most recent monthly dividend declared divided by September 30, 2012 stock price.

 

2  

Includes only invested assets; excludes cash.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

6


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS – 5.9%

          

Automotive – 1.2%

          

Ford Motor Co. 2
(Cost – $596,132)

     6.50     08/01/18       $ 650       $ 750,750   
          

 

 

 

Basic Industry – 1.1%

          

Georgia-Pacific LLC

     7.25        06/01/28         230         291,053   

Georgia-Pacific LLC

     7.38        12/01/25         270         357,370   
          

 

 

 

Total Basic Industry
(Cost – $468,993)

             648,423   
          

 

 

 

Energy – 1.5 %

          

Pioneer Natural Resources Co.

     6.65        03/15/17         500         593,541   

SESI LLC 2

     6.88        06/01/14         299         299,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Energy
(Cost – $736,646)

             892,541   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 2.1%

          

Qwest Corp. 2
(Cost – $887,906)

     6.88        09/15/33         1,225           1,240,312   

Total INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS
(Cost – $2,689,677)

                               3,532,026   

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS – 126.0%

          

Automotive – 7.4%

          

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc . 2

     7.88        03/01/17         1,000         1,042,500   

Chrysler Group LLC/CG Co-Issuer, Inc.

     8.25        06/15/21         775         825,375   

General Motors Financial Company, Inc. 3,4

     4.75        08/15/17         250         256,328   

Jaguar Land Rover PLC 3,4,6

     8.13        05/15/21         575         626,031   

Motors Liquidation Co. 8,9

     7.13        07/15/13         250         25   

Motors Liquidation Co. 8,9

     8.38        07/15/33           1,750         175   

Pittsburgh Glass Works LLC 3,4

     8.50        04/15/16         765         711,450   

Tenneco, Inc. 2

     6.88        12/15/20         775         848,625   

Visteon Corp.

     6.75        04/15/19         110         115,500   
          

 

 

 

Total Automotive
(Cost – $4,112,085)

             4,426,009   
          

 

 

 

Basic Industry – 22.3%

          

AK Steel Corp. 2

     7.63        05/15/20         775         678,125   

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.

     6.25        06/01/21         625         520,313   

Arch Coal, Inc.

     8.75        08/01/16         550         539,000   

Associated Materials LLC/AMH New Finance, Inc. 2

     9.13        11/01/17         700         686,000   

Building Materials Corporation of America 3,4

     6.75        05/01/21         375         410,625   

Cascades, Inc. 6

     7.75        12/15/17         275         288,063   

Cascades, Inc. 6

     7.88        01/15/20         500         523,750   

CONSOL Energy, Inc. 2

     8.25        04/01/20         275         288,063   

FMG Resources August 2006 Property Ltd. 3,4,6

     6.88        04/01/22         500         457,500   

Hexion US Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance ULC

     9.00        11/15/20         700         624,750   

Huntsman International LLC 2

     8.63        03/15/21         1,000         1,145,000   

Ineos Group Holdings SA 3,4,6

     8.50        02/15/16         775         732,375   

Ineos Finance PLC 3,4,6

     9.00        05/15/15         400         423,000   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

7


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Masonite International Corp. 2,3,4,6

     8.25     04/15/21       $ 775       $ 817,625   

Ply Gem Industries, Inc. 2

     8.25        02/15/18         775         808,906   

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

     7.63        03/15/20         550         596,750   

Tembec Industries, Inc. 2,6

     11.25        12/15/18         775         813,750   

United States Steel Corp. 2

     7.00        02/01/18           1,400         1,403,500   

USG Corp. 2

     9.75        01/15/18         475         513,000   

Verso Paper Holdings LLC/Verso Paper, Inc. 3,4

     11.75        01/15/19         550         580,250   

Xerium Technologies, Inc.

     8.88        06/15/18         550         486,750   
          

 

 

 

Total Basic Industry
(Cost – $13,078,875)

             13,337,095   
          

 

 

 

Capital Goods – 12.7%

          

AAR Corp. 3,4

     7.25        01/15/22         300         312,000   

Berry Plastics Corp. 2

     9.50        05/15/18         775         850,562   

Casella Waste Systems, Inc. 3,4

     7.75        02/15/19         1,000         980,000   

Coleman Cable, Inc. 2

     9.00        02/15/18         550         585,750   

Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. 2

     7.38        12/15/26         975         1,070,062   

Mueller Water Products, Inc.

     7.38        06/01/17         775         794,375   

Owens-Illinois, Inc.

     7.80        05/15/18         575         662,687   

Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc./Reynolds Group Issuer LLC 2

     9.00        04/15/19         775         790,500   

Tekni-Plex, Inc. 3,4

     9.75        06/01/19         425         454,750   

Terex Corp.

     6.50        04/01/20         300         312,000   

Terex Corp. 2

     8.00        11/15/17         475         491,625   

Trimas Corp.

     9.75        12/15/17         276         318,780   
          

 

 

 

Total Capital Goods
(Cost – $7,134,404)

             7,623,091   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical – 7.5%

          

DineEquity, Inc. 2

     9.50        10/30/18         750         845,625   

Levi Strauss & Co. 2

     7.63        05/15/20         750         810,000   

Limited Brands, Inc.

     7.60        07/15/37         475         486,875   

Limited Brands, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19         300         361,500   

Michaels Stores, Inc.

     7.75        11/01/18         600         643,500   

Sally Holdings LLC/Sally Capital, Inc.

     6.88        11/15/19         475         528,437   

The Neiman Marcus Group Inc. 2

     10.38        10/15/15         375         382,500   

YCC Holdings LLC/Yankee Finance, Inc. 7

     10.25        02/15/16         400         414,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Consumer Cyclical
(Cost – $4,202,513)

             4,472,437   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Non-Cyclical – 5.0%

          

B&G Foods, Inc. 2

     7.63        01/15/18         1,000         1,080,000   

C&S Group Enterprises LLC 3,4

     8.38        05/01/17         630         661,500   

Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. 2

     9.75        12/01/16         650         702,812   

Jarden Corp. 2

     7.50        05/01/17         500         572,500   
          

 

 

 

Total Consumer Non-Cyclical
(Cost – $2,806,283)

             3,016,812   
          

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

8


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Energy – 20.0%

          

BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P./BreitBurn Finance Corp. 2

     8.63     10/15/20       $ 775       $ 846,687   

Calfrac Holdings L.P. 2,3,4

     7.50        12/01/20         700         693,000   

Crosstex Energy L.P./Crosstex Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.88        02/15/18         675         722,250   

EV Energy Partners L.P./EV Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.00        04/15/19         775         804,062   

Frac Tech Services LLC/Frac Tech Finance, Inc. 3,4

     8.13        11/15/18         455         484,575   

GMX Resources, Inc. 7

     11.00        12/01/17         286         268,178   

Hercules Offshore, Inc. 2,3,4

     10.50        10/15/17         750         790,313   

Hilcorp Energy ILP/Hilcorp Finance Co. 3,4

     8.00        02/15/20         550         611,875   

Key Energy Services, Inc.

     6.75        03/01/21         500         507,500   

Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.63        04/15/20         775         848,625   

McJunkin Red Man Corp. 2

     9.50        12/15/16         650         701,187   

Niska Gas Storage US LLC/Niska Gas Storage Canada ULC 2

     8.88        03/15/18         750         774,375   

Petroleum Geo-Services ASA 3,4,6

     7.38        12/15/18         325         346,937   

Plains Exploration & Production Co.

     7.63        06/01/18         550         585,750   

Precision Drilling Corp. 2,6

     6.63        11/15/20         750         798,750   

Quicksilver Resources, Inc. 2

     11.75        01/01/16         450         454,500   

Trinidad Drilling Ltd. 3,4,6

     7.88        01/15/19         760         820,800   

Venoco, Inc. 2

     8.88        02/15/19         750         652,500   

W&T Offshore, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19         255         277,950   
          

 

 

 

Total Energy
(Cost – $11,573,352)

             11,989,814   
          

 

 

 

Healthcare – 9.3%

          

DJO Finance LLC/DJO Finance Corp. 3,4

     9.88        04/15/18         400         395,000   

HCA, Inc. 2

     8.00        10/01/18         775         895,125   

Health Management Associates, Inc. 2,3,4

     7.38        01/15/20         775         840,875   

inVentiv Health, Inc. 3,4

     10.25        08/15/18         300         264,000   

Kindred Healthcare, Inc.

     8.25        06/01/19         400         389,000   

Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. 2,3,4

     9.50        12/01/19         775         869,938   

Polymer Group, Inc. 2

     7.75        02/01/19         750         798,750   

Service Corporation International 2

     6.75        04/01/16           1,000         1,117,500   
          

 

 

 

Total Healthcare
(Cost – $5,127,760)

             5,570,188   
          

 

 

 

Media – 10.6%

          

American Reprographics Co. 2

     10.50        12/15/16         750         787,500   

Cablevision Systems Corp. 2

     8.63        09/15/17         800         930,000   

CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp. 2

     8.13        04/30/20         975         1,101,750   

Cenveo Corp.

     8.88        02/01/18         350         331,625   

Clear Channel Communications, Inc. 2

     9.00        03/01/21         750         667,500   

Cumulus Media Holdings, Inc.

     7.75        05/01/19         775         753,688   

Deluxe Corp. 2

     7.38        06/01/15         600         610,500   

Mediacom LLC/Mediacom Capital Corp. 2

     9.13        08/15/19         775         856,375   

National CineMedia LLC 3,4

     6.00        04/15/22         275         290,125   
          

 

 

 

Total Media
(Cost – $6,130,906)

             6,329,063   
          

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

9


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Real Estate – 1.4%

          

RealogyCorp. 3,4
(Cost – $700,999)

     7.88     02/15/19       $ 775       $ 813,750   
          

 

 

 

Services – 17.4%

          

AMC Entertainment, Inc. 2

     8.75        06/01/19         875         964,688   

Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc. 2

     8.25        01/15/19         775         843,781   

Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc.

     9.75        03/15/20         200         228,500   

Beazer Homes USA, Inc.

     9.13        06/15/18         300         303,000   

Boyd Gaming Corp. 3,4

     9.00        07/01/20         400         408,000   

Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. 3,4

     8.50        02/15/20         300         300,000   

Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. 2

     11.25        06/01/17         600         645,000   

CityCenter Holdings LLC/CityCenter Finance Corp. 2

     7.63        01/15/16         750         800,625   

FTI Consulting, Inc.

     7.75        10/01/16         500         513,750   

Iron Mountain, Inc.

     8.38        08/15/21         325         359,938   

Marina District Finance Company, Inc. 2

     9.88        08/15/18         400         401,000   

MGM Resorts International 2

     7.63        01/15/17         775         821,500   

MGM Resorts International 3,4

     8.63        02/01/19         225         245,250   

MTR Gaming Group, Inc.

     11.50        08/01/19         578         608,319   

Palace Entertainment Holdings LLC/Palace Entertainment Holdings Corp. 3,4

     8.88        04/15/17         750         793,125   

PulteGroup, Inc. 2

     6.38        05/15/33         750         697,500   

Standard Pacific Corp. 2

     8.38        05/15/18         550         634,563   

UR Merger Sub Corp.

     8.25        02/01/21         450         493,875   

UR Merger Sub Corp. 2

     10.25        11/15/19         325         370,500   
          

 

 

 

Total Services
(Cost – $9,644,018)

             10,432,914   
          

 

 

 

Technology & Electronics – 2.6%

          

First Data Corp. 2,3,4

     8.25        01/15/21         750         748,125   

First Data Corp.

     9.88        09/24/15         71         72,420   

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 2

     8.05        02/01/20         775         763,375   
          

 

 

 

Total Technology & Electronics
(Cost – $1,574,602)

             1,583,920   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 7.6%

          

Cincinnati Bell, Inc.

     8.25        10/15/17         345         368,288   

Cincinnati Bell, Inc.

     8.75        03/15/18         430         436,450   

Frontier Communications Corp. 2

     7.13        03/15/19           1,300         1,384,500   

Level 3 Communications, Inc. 3,4

     8.88        06/01/19         775         813,750   

PAETEC Holding Corp.

     9.88        12/01/18         500         572,500   

Windstream Corp. 2

     7.00        03/15/19         1,000         1,020,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Telecommunications
(Cost – $4,243,407)

             4,595,488   
          

 

 

 

Utility – 2.2%

          

Calpine Corp. 2,3,4

     7.25        10/15/17         650         693,875   

NRG Energy, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19         550         594,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Utility
(Cost – $1,195,337)

                               1,287,875   

Total HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS
(Cost – $71,524,541)

                               75,478,456   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

10


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

TERM LOANS – 0.4%

          

Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC 1,4

     4.74     10/10/17       $ 288       $ 197,597   

Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC 1,4

     4.94        10/10/17         46         31,750   

Total TERM LOANS
(Cost – $276,817)

                               229,347   
                        Shares      Value
(Note 2)
 

COMMON STOCKS – 1.4%

          

Basic Industry – 1.0%

          

Huntsman Corp.
(Cost – $379,531)

          37,905         565,922   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 0.4%

          

Frontier Communications Corp.

          21,644         106,056   

Windstream Corp.

          11,050         111,716   
          

 

 

 

Total Telecommunications
(Cost – $325,638)

                               217,772   

Total COMMON STOCKS
(Cost – $705,169)

                               783,694   

WARRANTS – 0.3%

          

Automotive – 0.3%

          

General Motors Co. 5

          

Expiration: July 2019

          

Exercise Price: $18.33

          7,393         61,066   

General Motors Co. 5

          

Expiration: July 2016

          

Exercise Price: $10.00

          7,393         101,876   
          

 

 

 

Total Automotive
(Cost – $432,026)

                               162,942   

Total WARRANTS
(Cost – $432,026)

                               162,942   

Total Investments – 134.0%
(Cost – $75,628,230)

             80,186,465   

Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets – (34.0)%

                               (20,324,979

TOTAL NET ASSETS – 100.0%

           $ 59,861,486   

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

11


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

OBJECTIVE & STRATEGY

Helios High Income Fund, Inc. seeks a high level of current income. The Fund seeks capital growth as a secondary investment objective when consistent with its primary investment objective. The Fund invests a majority of its total assets in below-investment grade debt securities that offer attractive yield and capital appreciation potential. The Fund also may invest in investment grade debt securities, up to 15% of its total assets in foreign debt and foreign equity securities and up to 25% of its total assets in domestic equity securities, including common and preferred stocks. The Fund invests in a wide range of below-investment grade debt securities, including corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities and municipal and foreign government obligations, as well as securities of companies in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings or otherwise in the process of debt restructuring. (Below-investment grade debt securities are rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., BB+ or lower by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, comparably rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization or, if unrated, determined by the Fund’s investment advisor to be of comparable quality.) The Fund may use leverage through bank borrowings, reverse repurchase agreements or other transactions involving indebtedness or through the issuance of preferred shares. The Fund may leverage one third of its total assets (in each case including the amount borrowed.) The Fund may vary its use of leverage in response to changing market conditions.

Investment Risks: Investors in any bond fund should anticipate fluctuations in price. Bond prices and the value of bond funds decline as interest rates rise. Bonds with longer-term maturities generally are more vulnerable to interest rate risk than bonds with shorter-term maturities. Below-investment grade bonds involve greater credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer will not make interest or principal payments when due. An economic downturn or period of rising interest rates could adversely affect the ability of issuers, especially issuers of below-investment grade debt, to service primary obligations and an unanticipated default could cause the Fund to experience a reduction in value of its shares. The Fund’s investments in mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities that are “subordinated” to other interests in the same pool may increase credit risk to the extent that the Fund as a holder of those securities may only receive payments after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. Below-investment grade bonds also are subject to greater price volatility and are less liquid, especially during periods of economic uncertainty or change, than higher-rated debt securities. The value of U.S. and foreign equity securities in which the Fund invests will change based on changes in a company’s financial condition and in overall market and economic conditions. Leverage creates an opportunity for an increased return to common stockholders, but unless the income and capital appreciation, if any, on securities acquired with leverage proceeds exceed the costs of the leverage, the use of leverage will diminish the investment performance of the Fund’s shares. Use of leverage also may increase the likelihood that the net asset value of the Fund and market value of its common shares will be more volatile, and the yield and total return to common stockholders will tend to fluctuate more in response to changes in interest rates and creditworthiness.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

For the six months ended September 30, 2012, Helios High Income Fund, Inc. (NYSE: HIH) had a total return based on net asset value of 6.92% and a total return based on market price of 3.60%, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and is exclusive of brokerage commissions. Based on the NYSE closing price of $8.84 on September 30, 2012, the Fund’s shares had a dividend yield of 8.14%. The dividend yield is calculated as the annualized amount of the reporting period’s most recent monthly dividend declared divided by the stated stock price.

Individual contributors of performance included Frontier Communications, Cablevision Systems, and AMC Entertainment. Frontier Communications offers telephonic communications services in rural areas to small business and residential customers. Their bonds rallied on expectations that the company may seek to refinance at today’s lower interest rates. Cablevision Systems is a cable TV company whose bonds rallied on general market strength assisted by attractive call protections. AMC Entertainment is a movie exhibition company whose bonds rallied when the company was acquired.

Detractors of performance included Insight Communications, General Motors’ equity and AK Steel. Insight Communications is a cable TV company whose bonds were called when the company was acquired by Time

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

12


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

Warner Cable, General Motors’ equity was down in the period as investors worried about the possible impact of a sale of the U.S. government’s shares acquired during the recession. AK Steel is a large North American steel producer whose bonds were lower on softer steel prices resulting from a reduction in Chinese demand.

HIGH YIELD MARKET ENVIRONMENT

The high yield market delivered robust returns for the six-month period ended September 30, 2012. Early in the period, markets corrected lower as, for the third year in a row, investors held a negative view beginning in May 2012. This was primarily attributed to concerns over the health of the European Union and slowing economic growth in China. Unlike prior years, however, the correction was short-lived, confined mostly to the month of May. Every other month during the period saw strong positive returns in excess of 1% per month cumulating to a six-month return of 6.5% despite the correction in May. The high yield bond market’s enthusiasm was not matched by equity returns, which were up only 1.6% as measured by the Russell 2000 Index.

The spread between high yield corporate bonds and the 10-Year U.S. Treasury compressed modestly during the six-month period from 594 basis points to 569 basis points. We view this compression as a positive because the underlying 10-year U.S. Treasury rate fell from 2.21% to 1.64%.

Current spreads of 569 basis points remain wider than the 400-500 basis points we would normally expect to see at this point in the credit cycle, although that has diminished somewhat as spreads continue to narrow. Therefore, while the high yield market continues to represent value to investors, further price appreciation is likely to be limited as the sector, as a whole, is trading above par.

Corporate credit has been sound for the past couple of years, and we saw stable credit this period with the default rate declining slightly from 1.9%. 1 to 1.8%. 2 Note that this period’s default rate of 1.8% remains well below the market’s 25-year average default rate of 4.2%. 3

Credit ratings agencies confirm the stable trend in corporate credit by upgrading 1.0 times as many high yield companies as they downgraded in the past 12 months. 4 We noted that companies reported acceptable (but not strong) earnings through the second quarter of 2011, (the latest reporting period) and we saw more management teams taking a cautious view of the future.

Supply and demand was generally positive during the period with high yield mutual funds seeing strong inflows. 5 New issue volume was strong following May’s correction, accelerating to an all-time quarterly record of $98.5 billion, in the third quarter of calendar 2012, above the previous record of $96.8 billion posted in the first quarter of 2012. September’s new issue volume of $46 billion was an all-time record. Overall, with money flooding into mutual funds, deals were oversubscribed and traded higher in the aftermarket. Traders report that there seems to be ample cash available to buy issues and report that some challenges exist in purchasing good quality paper in the secondary market. The bulk of new issues are used to refinance debt which has the effect of improving credit quality by eliminating near term maturities. We note with some concern, however, a rise in the number of riskier new issues late in the period when some companies took advantage of the robust buying appetite and issued lower quality paper, PIK or pay-in-kind bonds, and financing to pay dividends to owners. While the volume of these riskier transactions is not yet concerning, we note that it is the first time since the downturn that we have seen a significant increase in such paper.

OUTLOOK

Brookfield has been positive on the high yield market, noting the robust credit quality, good corporate liquidity and excellent progress on the part of corporate treasurers in managing their debt structures. The high yield market agreed and returns were excellent. As these fundamentals remain in place, our outlook for this asset class over the next 12 months or so remains positive.

 

1  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, April 2, 2012 p 1

 

2  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 4.

 

3  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 2

 

4  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 10

 

5  

Credit Suisse “Leveraged Finance Strategy Update” October 1, 2012, p. 2.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

13


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

However, we also believe that significant further potential upside appreciation is limited due to the decline in spreads from 737 to 569 basis points in 2012, and with the return of the market above par. While normally we would expect the spread to be 50 to 100 basis points narrower than current levels, we note the unusually depressed level of the benchmark treasury yields, which may be artificially depressed due to actions by the Federal Reserve. With the high yield market trading at yields near all time lows, our enthusiasm is tempered at this point. We are carefully watching the quality of new issues coming to market as a possible negative going forward.

Given our expectation of modest economic growth, modestly increasing defaults, although no general recession, we believe that high yield investors are adequately, but not generously compensated at current yield spread levels. While we would normally be targeting yield spreads of 400 to 500 basis points at this point in the credit cycle, we remain skeptical that the problems in Europe are permanently addressed, and are increasingly concerned with the health of the U.S. balance sheet which will need to be addressed shortly after the November election. With these risks outstanding we expect high yield investors will continue to demand a premium to historical spreads, at least for the next few quarters. For investors seeking to clip the current coupon offered in the high yield market, the investment landscape remains attractive.

Forward-Looking Information

This management discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements that are based on various assumptions (some of which are beyond our control) may be identified by reference to a future period or periods or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “should,” “intend,” or similar terms or variations on those terms or the negative of those terms. Although we believe that the expectations contained in any forward-looking statement are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to publicly release any update or supplement to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Disclosure

The Fund’s portfolio holdings are subject to change without notice. The mention of specific securities is not a recommendation or solicitation for any person to buy, sell or hold any particular security. There is no assurance that the Helios High Income Fund, Inc. currently holds these securities.

The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index covers the U.S. dollar denominated, non-investment grade, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The index excludes emerging markets debt. The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index is part of the Barclays Capital U.S. Universal and Global High Yield Indices. The index is unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, is not affected by cash flows or trading and other expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not predict or depict the performance of the Fund.

The Fund may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value of its common stock, through bank borrowings, issuance of short-term debt securities or shares of preferred stock, or a combination thereof. However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments. While leverage may result in a higher yield for the Fund, the use of leverage involves risk, including the potential for higher volatility of the NAV, fluctuations of dividends and other distributions paid by the Fund and the market price of the Fund’s common stock, among others. Certain funds may invest assets in securities of issuers domiciled outside the United States, including issuers from emerging markets. Foreign investing involves special risks, including foreign currency risk and the possibility of substantial volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments.

Performance data quoted represents past performance results and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

14


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

These views represent the opinions of Brookfield Investment Management Inc. and are not intended to predict or depict the performance of any investment. These views are as of the close of business on September 30, 2012 and subject to change based on subsequent developments.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

15


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Portfolio Characteristics (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

 

 

Annualized dividend yield 1

  

8.14%

Weighted average coupon

  

8.08%

Weighted average life

  

4.68 years

Percentage of leveraged assets

  

28.68%

Total number of holdings

  

131

 

 

CREDIT QUALITY

 

 

BBB

     4

BB

     15

B

     55

CCC

     20

Unrated

     2

Cash

     4

Total

     100

ASSET ALLOCATION 2

 

 

Investment Grade Corporate Bonds

     6

High Yield Corporate Bonds

     93

Common Stocks and Warrants

     1

Total

     100

 

1  

Dividends may include net investment income, capital gains and/or return of capital. The dividend yield referenced above is calculated as the annualized amount of the most recent monthly dividend declared divided by the September 30, 2012 stock price.

 

2  

Includes only invested assets; excludes cash.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

16


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS – 7.2%

          

Automotive – 1.3%

          

Ford Motor Co. 2
(Cost – $435,635)

     6.50     08/01/18       $ 475       $ 548,625   
          

 

 

 

Basic Industry – 1.5%

          

Georgia-Pacific LLC

     7.25        06/01/28         220         278,398   

Georgia-Pacific LLC

     7.38        12/01/25         255         337,516   
          

 

 

 

Total Basic Industry
(Cost – $445,475)

             615,914   
          

 

 

 

Energy – 1.5%

          

Pioneer Natural Resources Co.

     6.65        03/15/17         350         415,479   

SESI LLC 2

     6.88        06/01/14         224         224,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Energy
(Cost – $525,869)

             639,479   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 2.9%

          

Qwest Corp. 2
(Cost – $933,945)

     6.88        09/15/33           1,225         1,240,313   

Total INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS
(Cost – $2,340,924)

                                 3,044,331   

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS – 126.3%

          

Automotive – 7.6%

          

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.

     7.75        11/15/19         200         220,500   

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. 2

     7.88        03/01/17         550         573,375   

Chrysler Group LLC/CG Co-Issuer, Inc.

     8.25        06/15/21         550         585,750   

General Motors Financial Company, Inc. 3,4

     4.75        08/15/17         175         179,429   

Jaguar Land Rover PLC 3,4,6

     8.13        05/15/21         400         435,500   

Motors Liquidation Co. 8,9

     7.13        07/15/13         250         25   

Motors Liquidation Co. 8,9

     8.38        07/15/33         1,250         125   

Pittsburgh Glass Works LLC 3,4

     8.50        04/15/16         545         506,850   

Tenneco, Inc. 2

     6.88        12/15/20         550         602,250   

Visteon Corp.

     6.75        04/15/19         80         84,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Automotive
(Cost – $2,938,896)

             3,187,804   
          

 

 

 

Basic Industry – 23.4%

          

AK Steel Corp. 2

     7.63        05/15/20         580         507,500   

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.

     6.25        06/01/21         475         395,437   

Arch Coal, Inc. 2

     8.75        08/01/16         500         490,000   

Associated Materials LLC/AMH New Finance, Inc. 2

     9.13        11/01/17         525         514,500   

Building Materials Corporation of America 3,4

     6.75        05/01/21         275         301,125   

Cascades, Inc. 2,6

     7.75        12/15/17         550         576,125   

CONSOL Energy, Inc. 2

     8.25        04/01/20         225         235,687   

FMG Resources August 2006 Property Ltd. 3,4,6

     6.88        04/01/22         375         343,125   

Hexion US Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance ULC

     9.00        11/15/20         550         490,875   

Huntsman International LLC 2

     8.63        03/15/21         500         572,500   

Ineos Finance PLC 3,4,6

     9.00        05/15/15         285         301,387   

Ineos Group Holdings SA 3,4,6

     8.50        02/15/16         550         519,750   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

17


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Masonite International Corp. 2,3,4,6

     8.25     04/15/21       $ 575       $ 606,625   

Ply Gem Industries, Inc. 2

     8.25        02/15/18         550         574,062   

Steel Dynamics, Inc. 2

     7.63        03/15/20         500         542,500   

Tembec Industries, Inc. 2,6

     11.25        12/15/18         550         577,500   

United States Steel Corp. 2

     7.00        02/01/18           1,000         1,002,500   

USG Corp. 2

     9.75        01/15/18         500         540,000   

Verso Paper Holdings LLC/Verso Paper, Inc. 3,4

     11.75        01/15/19         375         395,625   

Xerium Technologies, Inc.

     8.88        06/15/18         415         367,275   
          

 

 

 

Total Basic Industry
(Cost – $9,668,649)

               9,854,098   
          

 

 

 

Capital Goods – 13.0%

          

AAR Corp. 3,4

     7.25        01/15/22         200         208,000   

Berry Plastics Corp. 2

     9.50        05/15/18         550         603,625   

Casella Waste Systems, Inc. 3,4

     7.75        02/15/19         775         759,500   

Coleman Cable, Inc.

     9.00        02/15/18         300         319,500   

Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. 2

     7.38        12/15/26         700         768,250   

Mueller Water Products, Inc.

     7.38        06/01/17         625         640,625   

Owens-Illinois, Inc.

     7.80        05/15/18         425         489,813   

Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc./Reynolds Group Issuer LLC 2

     9.00        04/15/19         550         561,000   

Tekni-Plex, Inc. 3,4

     9.75        06/01/19         300         321,000   

Terex Corp.

     6.50        04/01/20         200         208,000   

Terex Corp. 2

     8.00        11/15/17         350         362,250   

Trimas Corp. 2

     9.75        12/15/17         208         240,240   
          

 

 

 

Total Capital Goods
(Cost – $5,143,976)

             5,481,803   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical – 6.6%

          

DineEquity, Inc. 2

     9.50        10/30/18         525         591,938   

Levi Strauss & Co.

     7.63        05/15/20         500         540,000   

Limited Brands, Inc.

     7.60        07/15/37         300         307,500   

Limited Brands, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19         250         301,250   

Michaels Stores, Inc.

     7.75        11/01/18         450         482,625   

The Neiman Marcus Group Inc. 2

     10.38        10/15/15         260         265,200   

YCC Holdings LLC/Yankee Finance, Inc. 7

     10.25        02/15/16         300         310,500   
          

 

 

 

Total Consumer Cyclical
(Cost – $2,629,361)

             2,799,013   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Non-Cyclical – 3.7%

          

B&G Foods, Inc. 2

     7.63        01/15/18         500         540,000   

C&S Group Enterprises LLC 3,4

     8.38        05/01/17         472         495,600   

Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. 2

     9.75        12/01/16         475         513,594   
          

 

 

 

Total Consumer Non-Cyclical
(Cost – $1,470,092)

             1,549,194   
          

 

 

 

Energy – 20.4%

          

BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P./BreitBurn Finance Corp. 2

     8.63        10/15/20         550         600,875   

Calfrac Holdings L.P. 2,3,4

     7.50        12/01/20         525         519,750   

Crosstex Energy L.P./Crosstex Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.88        02/15/18         500         535,000   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

18


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

EV Energy Partners L.P./EV Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.00     04/15/19       $ 550       $ 570,625   

Frac Tech Services LLC/Frac Tech Finance, Inc. 2,3,4

     8.13        11/15/18         340         362,100   

GMX Resources, Inc. 2,7

     11.00        12/01/17         202         188,966   

Hercules Offshore, Inc. 2,3,4

     10.50        10/15/17         325         342,469   

Hilcorp Energy I LP/Hilcorp Finance Co. 2,3,4

     8.00        02/15/20         500         556,250   

Key Energy Services, Inc.

     6.75        03/01/21         400         406,000   

Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.63        04/15/20         550         602,250   

McJunkin Red Man Corp.

     9.50        12/15/16         475         512,406   

Niska Gas Storage US LLC/Niska Gas Storage Canada ULC 2

     8.88        03/15/18         525         542,063   

Petroleum Geo-Services ASA 3,4,6

     7.38        12/15/18         225         240,188   

Plains Exploration & Production Co.

     7.63        06/01/18         500         532,500   

Precision Drilling Corp. 6

     6.63        11/15/20         450         479,250   

Quicksilver Resources, Inc. 2

     11.75        01/01/16         350         353,500   

Trinidad Drilling Ltd. 2,3,4,6

     7.88        01/15/19         550         594,000   

Venoco, Inc. 2

     8.88        02/15/19         525         456,750   

W&T Offshore, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19              190         207,100   
          

 

 

 

Total Energy
(Cost – $8,322,083)

               8,602,042   
          

 

 

 

Healthcare – 9.4%

          

DJO Finance LLC/DJO Finance Corp. 3,4

     9.88        04/15/18         300         296,250   

HCA, Inc. 2

     8.00        10/01/18         550         635,250   

Health Management Associates, Inc. 2,3,4

     7.38        01/15/20         550         596,750   

inVentiv Health, Inc. 3,4

     10.25        08/15/18         215         189,200   

Kindred Healthcare, Inc.

     8.25        06/01/19         300         291,750   

Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. 3,4

     9.50        12/01/19         500         561,250   

Polymer Group, Inc. 2

     7.75        02/01/19         525         559,125   

Service Corporation International 2

     6.75        04/01/16         750         838,125   
          

 

 

 

Total Healthcare
(Cost – $3,659,342)

             3,967,700   
          

 

 

 

Media – 11.5%

          

American Reprographics Co. 2

     10.50        12/15/16         525         551,250   

Cablevision Systems Corp. 2

     8.63        09/15/17         750         871,875   

CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp. 2

     8.13        04/30/20         750         847,500   

Cenveo Corp.

     8.88        02/01/18         250         236,875   

Clear Channel Communications, Inc. 2

     9.00        03/01/21         525         467,250   

Cumulus Media Holdings, Inc.

     7.75        05/01/19         550         534,875   

Deluxe Corp. 2

     7.38        06/01/15         500         508,750   

Mediacom LLC/Mediacom Capital Corp. 2

     9.13        08/15/19         550         607,750   

National CineMedia LLC 3,4

     6.00        04/15/22         200         211,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Media
(Cost – $4,684,345)

             4,837,125   
          

 

 

 

Real Estate – 1.4%

          

Realogy Corp. 2,3,4
(Cost – $497,483)

     7.88        02/15/19         550         577,500   
          

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

19


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Services – 16.2%

          

AMC Entertainment, Inc. 2

     8.75     06/01/19       $ 800       $ 882,000   

Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc. 2

     8.25        01/15/19              550         598,812   

Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc.

     9.75        03/15/20         150         171,375   

Beazer Homes USA, Inc. 3,4

     6.63        04/15/18         300         320,625   

Beazer Homes USA, Inc. 2

     9.13        06/15/18         250         252,500   

Boyd Gaming Corp. 3,4

     9.00        07/01/20         300         306,000   

Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. 3,4

     8.50        02/15/20         200         200,000   

Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. 2

     11.25        06/01/17         450         483,750   

CityCenter Holdings LLC/CityCenter Finance Corp.

     7.63        01/15/16         100         106,750   

Iron Mountain, Inc. 2

     8.38        08/15/21         250         276,875   

Marina District Finance Company, Inc. 2

     9.88        08/15/18         300         300,750   

MGM Resorts International 2

     7.63        01/15/17         550         583,000   

MGM Resorts International 3,4

     8.63        02/01/19         150         163,500   

MTR Gaming Group, Inc.

     11.50        08/01/19         428         450,422   

Palace Entertainment Holdings LLC/Palace Entertainment Holdings Corp.  3,4

     8.88        04/15/17         525         555,188   

Standard Pacific Corp. 2

     8.38        05/15/18         500         576,875   

UR Merger Sub Corp.

     8.25        02/01/21         300         329,250   

UR Merger Sub Corp. 2

     10.25        11/15/19         250         285,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Services
(Cost – $6,288,596)

               6,842,672   
          

 

 

 

Technology & Electronics – 2.6%

          

First Data Corp. 2,3,4

     8.25        01/15/21         525         523,688   

First Data Corp.

     9.88        09/24/15         53         54,060   

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

     8.05        02/01/20         550         541,750   
          

 

 

 

Total Technology & Electronics
(Cost – $1,112,472)

             1,119,498   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 7.9%

          

Cincinnati Bell, Inc. 2

     8.25        10/15/17         250         266,875   

Cincinnati Bell, Inc.

     8.75        03/15/18         300         304,500   

Frontier Communications Corp. 2

     7.13        03/15/19         950         1,011,750   

Level 3 Communications, Inc. 3,4

     8.88        06/01/19         550         577,500   

PAETEC Holding Corp.

     9.88        12/01/18         300         343,500   

Windstream Corp. 2

     7.00        03/15/19         800         816,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Telecommunications
(Cost – $3,070,043)

             3,320,125   
          

 

 

 

Utility – 2.6%

          

Calpine Corp. 2,3,4

     7.25        10/15/17         500         533,750   

NRG Energy, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19         500         540,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Utility
(Cost – $995,348)

                               1,073,750   

Total HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS
(Cost – $50,480,686)

                               53,212,324   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

20


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

TERM LOANS – 0.4%

          

Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC 1,4

     4.74     10/10/17       $ 226       $ 155,255   

Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC 1,4

     4.94        10/10/17         36         24,947   

Total TERM LOANS
(Cost – $217,498)

                               180,202   
                        Shares      Value
(Note 2)
 

COMMON STOCKS – 1.4%

          

Basic Industry – 1.0%

          

Huntsman Corp.
(Cost – $275,862)

          27,370         408,634   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 0.4%

          

Frontier Communications Corp.

          15,508         75,989   

Windstream Corp.

          8,300         83,913   
          

 

 

 

Total Telecommunications
(Cost – $273,230)

                               159,902   

Total COMMON STOCKS
(Cost – $549,092)

                               568,536   

WARRANTS – 0.3%

          

Automotive – 0.3%

          

General Motors Co. 5

          

Expiration: July 2019

          

Exercise Price: $18.33

          5,546         45,810   

General Motors Co. 5

          

Expiration: July 2016

          

Exercise Price: $10.00

          5,546         76,424   
          

 

 

 

Total Automotive
(Cost – $336,206)

                               122,234   

Total WARRANTS
(Cost – $336,206)

                               122,234   

Total Investments – 135.6%
(Cost – $53,924,406)

             57,127,627   

Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets – (35.6)%

                               (15,000,067

TOTAL NET ASSETS – 100.0%

           $ 42,127,560   

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

21


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

OBJECTIVE & STRATEGY

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc. seeks a high level of current income. The Fund seeks capital growth as a secondary investment objective when consistent with its primary investment objective. The Fund invests in a diversified portfolio consisting primarily of debt securities that offer attractive yield and capital appreciation potential. Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests a majority of its total assets in below-investment grade debt securities, including up to 20% of the Fund’s total assets in distressed securities. The Fund maintains the flexibility to invest up to 50% of its total assets in investment grade debt securities. The Fund invests up to 30% of its total assets in equity securities of both domestic and foreign issuers and up to 15% of its total assets in a combination of foreign debt and foreign equity securities. The Fund invests in a wide range of debt securities including, corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, convertible debt securities, distressed securities, including securities of companies in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings or otherwise in the process of debt restructuring, U.S. government and municipal obligations and foreign government obligations. (Below-investment grade debt securities are rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., BB+ or lower by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, comparably rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization or, if unrated, determined by the Fund’s investment advisor to be of comparable quality.) The Fund may use leverage through bank borrowings, reverse repurchase agreements or other transactions involving indebtedness or through the issuance of preferred shares. The Fund may leverage one third of its total assets (in each case including the amount borrowed.) The Fund may vary its use of leverage in response to changing market conditions.

Investment Risks: Investors in any bond fund should anticipate fluctuations in price. Bond prices and the value of bond funds decline as interest rates rise. Bonds with longer-term maturities generally are more vulnerable to interest rate risk than bonds with shorter-term maturities. Below-investment grade bonds involve greater credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer will not make interest or principal payments when due. An economic downturn or period of rising interest rates could adversely affect the ability of issuers, especially issuers of below investment-grade debt, to service primary obligations and an unanticipated default could cause the Fund to experience a reduction in value of its shares. The Fund’s investments in mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities that are “subordinated” to other interests in the same pool may increase credit risk to the extent that the Fund as a holder of those securities may only receive payments after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. Below-investment grade bonds also are subject to greater price volatility and are less liquid, especially during periods of economic uncertainty or change, than higher-rated debt securities. The value of U.S. and foreign equity securities in which the Fund invests will change based on changes in a company’s financial condition and in overall market and economic conditions. Leverage creates an opportunity for an increased return to common stockholders, but unless the income and capital appreciation, if any, on securities acquired with leverage proceeds exceed the costs of the leverage, the use of leverage will diminish the investment performance of the Fund’s shares. Use of leverage also may increase the likelihood that the net asset value of the Fund and market value of its common shares will be more volatile, and the yield and total return to common stockholders will tend to fluctuate more in response to changes in interest rates and creditworthiness.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

For the six months ended September 30, 2012, Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc. (NYSE: HMH) had a total return based on net asset value of 6.96% and a total return based on market price of 9.74%, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and is exclusive of brokerage commissions. Based on the NYSE closing price of $6.39 on September 30, 2012, the Fund’s shares had a dividend yield of 7.98%. The dividend yield is calculated as the annualized amount of the reporting period’s most recent monthly dividend declared divided by the stated stock price.

Individual contributors of performance included Frontier Communications, USG Corp., and Pultegroup. Frontier Communications offers telephonic communications services in rural areas to small business and residential customers. Their bonds rallied on expectations the company may seek to refinance at today’s lower interest rates. USG Corp., a manufacturer of building materials, benefitted from a recovery in new housing construction and Pultegroup, a residential homebuilder benefitted from the apparent bottoming in the housing sector

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

22


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

Detractors of performance included Insight Communications, General Motors’ equity and AK Steel. Insight Communications is a cable TV company whose bonds were called when the company was acquired by Time Warner Cable. General Motors’ equity was down in the period as investors worried about the possible impact of a sale of the U.S. government’s shares acquired during the recession. AK Steel is a large North American steel producer whose bonds were lower on softer steel prices resulting from reduction in Chinese demand.

HIGH YIELD MARKET ENVIRONMENT

The high yield market delivered robust returns for the six-month period ended September 30, 2012. Early in the period, markets corrected lower as, for the third year in a row, investors held a negative view beginning in May 2012. This was primarily attributed to concerns over the health of the European Union and slowing economic growth in China. Unlike prior years, however, the correction was short-lived, confined mostly to the month of May. Every other month during the period saw strong positive returns in excess of 1% per month cumulating to a six-month return of 6.5% despite the correction in May. The high yield bond market’s enthusiasm was not matched by equity returns, which were up only 1.6% as measured by the Russell 2000 Index.

The spread between high yield corporate bonds and the 10-Year U.S. Treasury compressed modestly during the six-month period from 594 basis points to 569 basis points. We view this compression as a positive because the underlying 10-year U.S. Treasury rate fell from 2.21% to 1.64%.

Current spreads of 569 basis points remain wider than the 400-500 basis points we would normally expect to see at this point in the credit cycle, although that has diminished somewhat as spreads continue to narrow. Therefore, while the high yield market continues to represent value to investors, further price appreciation is likely to be limited as the sector, as a whole, is trading above par.

Corporate credit has been sound for the past couple of years, and we saw stable credit this period with the default rate declining slightly from 1.9%. 1 to 1.8%. 2 Note that this period’s default rate of 1.8% remains well below the market’s 25-year average default rate of 4.2%. 3

Credit ratings agencies confirm the stable trend in corporate credit by upgrading 1.0 times as many high yield companies as they downgraded in the past 12 months. 4 We noted that companies reported acceptable (but not strong) earnings through the second quarter of 2011, (the latest reporting period) and we saw more management teams taking a cautious view of the future.

Supply and demand was generally positive during the period with high yield mutual funds seeing strong inflows. 5 New issue volume was strong following May’s correction, accelerating to an all-time quarterly record of $98.5 billion, in the third quarter of calendar 2012, above the previous record of $96.8 billion posted in the first quarter of 2012. September’s new issue volume of $46 billion was an all-time record. Overall, with money flooding into mutual funds, deals were oversubscribed and traded higher in the aftermarket. Traders report that there seems to be ample cash available to buy issues and report that some challenges exist in purchasing good quality paper in the secondary market. The bulk of new issues are used to refinance debt which has the effect of improving credit quality by eliminating near term maturities. We note with some concern, however, a rise in the number of riskier new issues late in the period when some companies took advantage of the robust buying appetite and issued lower quality paper, PIK or pay-in-kind bonds, and financing to pay dividends to owners. While the volume of these riskier transactions is not yet concerning, we note that it is the first time since the downturn that we have seen a significant increase in such paper.

OUTLOOK

Brookfield has been positive on the high yield market, noting the robust credit quality, good corporate liquidity and excellent progress on the part of corporate treasurers in managing their debt structures. The high yield market

 

1  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, April 2, 2012 p 1

 

2  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 4.

 

3  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 2

 

4  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 10

 

5  

Credit Suisse “Leveraged Finance Strategy Update” October 1, 2012, p. 2.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

23


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

agreed and returns were excellent. As these fundamentals remain in place, our outlook for this asset class over the next 12 months or so remains positive.

However, we also believe that significant further potential upside appreciation is limited due to the decline in spreads from 737 to 569 basis points in 2012, and with the return of the market above par. While normally we would expect the spread to be 50 to 100 basis points narrower than current levels, we note the unusually depressed level of the benchmark treasury yields, which may be artificially depressed due to actions by the Federal Reserve. With the high yield market trading at yields near all time lows, our enthusiasm is tempered at this point. We are carefully watching the quality of new issues coming to market as a possible negative going forward.

Given our expectation of modest economic growth, modestly increasing defaults, although no general recession, we believe that high yield investors are adequately, but not generously compensated at current yield spread levels. While we would normally be targeting yield spreads of 400 to 500 basis points at this point in the credit cycle, we remain skeptical that the problems in Europe are permanently addressed, and are increasingly concerned with the health of the U.S. balance sheet which will need to be addressed shortly after the November election. With these risks outstanding we expect high yield investors will continue to demand a premium to historical spreads, at least for the next few quarters. For investors seeking to clip the current coupon offered in the high yield market, the investment landscape remains attractive.

Forward-Looking Information

This management discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements that are based on various assumptions (some of which are beyond our control) may be identified by reference to a future period or periods or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “should,” “intend,” or similar terms or variations on those terms or the negative of those terms. Although we believe that the expectations contained in any forward-looking statement are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to publicly release any update or supplement to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Disclosure

The Fund’s portfolio holdings are subject to change without notice. The mention of specific securities is not a recommendation or solicitation for any person to buy, sell or hold any particular security. There is no assurance that the Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc. currently holds these securities.

The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index covers the U.S. dollar denominated, non-investment grade, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The index excludes emerging markets debt. The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index is part of the Barclays Capital U.S. Universal and Global High Yield Indices. The index is unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, is not affected by cash flows or trading and other expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not predict or depict the performance of the Fund.

The Fund may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value of its common stock, through bank borrowings, issuance of short-term debt securities or shares of preferred stock, or a combination thereof. However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments. While leverage may result in a higher yield for the Fund, the use of leverage involves risk, including the potential for higher volatility of the NAV, fluctuations of dividends and other distributions paid by the Fund and the market price of the Fund’s common stock, among others. Certain funds may invest assets in securities of issuers domiciled outside the United States, including issuers from emerging markets. Foreign investing involves special risks, including foreign currency risk and the possibility of substantial volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments.

 

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

24


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

Performance data quoted represents past performance results and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted.

These views represent the opinions of Brookfield Investment Management Inc. and are not intended to predict or depict the performance of any investment. These views are as of the close of business on September 30, 2012 and subject to change based on subsequent developments.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

25


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Portfolio Characteristics (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

 

 

Annualized dividend yield 1

  

7.98%

Weighted average coupon

  

8.12%

Weighted average life

  

4.85 years

Percentage of leveraged assets

  

28.75%

Total number of holdings

  

133

 

 

CREDIT QUALITY

 

 

BBB

     3

BB

     15

B

     56

CCC

     20

Unrated

     2

Cash

     4

Total

     100

ASSET ALLOCATION 2

 

 

Investment Grade Corporate Bonds

     5

High Yield Corporate Bonds

     94

Common Stocks and Warrants

     1

Total

     100

 

1  

Dividends may include net investment income, capital gains and/or return of capital. The dividend yield referenced above is calculated as the annualized amount of the most recent monthly dividend declared divided by the September 30, 2012 stock price.

 

2  

Includes only invested assets; excludes cash.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

26


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS – 6.3%

          

Automotive – 1.3%

          

Ford Motor Co.
(Cost – $481,491)

     6.50     08/01/18       $ 525       $ 606,375   
          

 

 

 

Basic Industry – 1.4%

          

Georgia-Pacific LLC

     7.25        06/01/28         240         303,707   

Georgia-Pacific LLC

     7.38        12/01/25         285         377,224   
          

 

 

 

Total Basic Industry
(Cost – $492,476)

             680,931   
          

 

 

 

Energy – 1.5%

          

Pioneer Natural Resources Co.

     6.65        03/15/17         400         474,833   

SESI LLC 2

     6.88        06/01/14         249         249,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Energy
(Cost – $597,586)

             723,833   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 2.1%

          

Qwest Corp. 2
(Cost – $725,517)

     6.88        09/15/33         1,000         1,012,500   

Total INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS
(Cost – $2,297,070)

                               3,023,639   

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS – 127.5%

          

Automotive – 7.6%

          

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.

     7.75        11/15/19         275         303,187   

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. 2

     7.88        03/01/17         550         573,375   

Chrysler Group LLC/CG Co-Issuer, Inc.

     8.25        06/15/21         625         665,625   

General Motors Financial Company, Inc. 3,4

     4.75        08/15/17         200         205,062   

Jaguar Land Rover PLC 3,4,6

     8.13        05/15/21         475         517,156   

Motors Liquidation Co. 8,9

     7.13        07/15/13         250         25   

Motors Liquidation Co. 8,9

     8.38        07/15/33           1,500         150   

Pittsburgh Glass Works LLC 3,4

     8.50        04/15/16         625         581,250   

Tenneco, Inc. 2

     6.88        12/15/20         625         684,375   

Visteon Corp.

     6.75        04/15/19         95         99,750   
          

 

 

 

Total Automotive
(Cost – $3,360,051)

                3,629,955   
          

 

 

 

Basic Industry – 22.1%

          

AK Steel Corp. 2

     7.63        05/15/20         790         691,250   

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.

     6.25        06/01/21         525         437,062   

Arch Coal, Inc. 2

     8.75        08/01/16         675         661,500   

Associated Materials LLC/AMH New Finance, Inc. 2

     9.13        11/01/17         600         588,000   

Building Materials Corporation of America 3,4

     6.75        05/01/21         300         328,500   

Cascades, Inc. 2,6

     7.75        12/15/17         625         654,687   

CONSOL Energy, Inc. 2

     8.25        04/01/20         225         235,687   

FMG Resources August 2006 Property Ltd. 3,4,6

     6.88        04/01/22         400         366,000   

Hexion US Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance ULC

     9.00        11/15/20         850         758,625   

Huntsman International LLC 2

     8.63        03/15/21         550         629,750   

Ineos Finance PLC 3,4,6

     9.00        05/15/15         325         343,687   

Ineos Group Holdings SA 3,4,6

     8.50        02/15/16         625         590,625   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

27


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Masonite International Corp. 2,3,4,6

     8.25     04/15/21       $ 625       $ 659,375   

Ply Gem Industries, Inc. 2

     8.25        02/15/18         625         652,344   

Steel Dynamics, Inc. 2

     7.63        03/15/20         675         732,375   

Tembec Industries, Inc. 2,6

     11.25        12/15/18         625         656,250   

USG Corp. 2

     9.75        01/15/18         675         729,000   

Verso Paper Holdings LLC/Verso Paper, Inc. 3,4

     11.75        01/15/19         425         448,375   

Xerium Technologies, Inc.

     8.88        06/15/18         470         415,950   
          

 

 

 

Total Basic Industry
(Cost – $10,559,882)

              10,579,042   
          

 

 

 

Capital Goods – 12.5%

          

AAR Corp. 3,4

     7.25        01/15/22         225         234,000   

Berry Plastics Corp. 2

     9.50        05/15/18         625         685,937   

Casella Waste Systems, Inc. 3,4

     7.75        02/15/19         825         808,500   

Coleman Cable, Inc.

     9.00        02/15/18         300         319,500   

Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. 2

     7.38        12/15/26         775         850,562   

Mueller Water Products, Inc.

     7.38        06/01/17         625         640,625   

Owens-Illinois, Inc.

     7.80        05/15/18         475         547,437   

Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc./Reynolds Group Issuer LLC 2

     9.00        04/15/19         625         637,500   

Tekni-Plex, Inc. 3,4

     9.75        06/01/19         350         374,500   

Terex Corp.

     6.50        04/01/20         225         234,000   

Terex Corp. 2

     8.00        11/15/17         400         414,000   

Trimas Corp. 2

     9.75        12/15/17         228         263,340   
          

 

 

 

Total Capital Goods
(Cost – $5,620,597)

             6,009,901   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical – 9.1%

          

DineEquity, Inc. 2

     9.50        10/30/18              600         676,500   

Levi Strauss & Co. 2

     7.63        05/15/20         675         729,000   

Limited Brands, Inc.

     7.60        07/15/37         375         384,375   

Limited Brands, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19         250         301,250   

Mead Products LLC/ACCO Brands Corp. 3,4

     6.75        04/30/20         500         521,250   

Michaels Stores, Inc.

     7.75        11/01/18         475         509,437   

Rite Aid Corp. 2

     9.75        06/12/16         275         301,125   

Sally Holdings LLC/Sally Capital, Inc.

     6.88        11/15/19         250         278,125   

The Neiman Marcus Group Inc. 2

     10.38        10/15/15         300         306,000   

YCC Holdings LLC/Yankee Finance, Inc. 7

     10.25        02/15/16         325         336,375   
          

 

 

 

Total Consumer Cyclical
(Cost – $4,091,136)

             4,343,437   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Non-Cyclical – 3.9%

          

B&G Foods, Inc. 2

     7.63        01/15/18         675         729,000   

C&S Group Enterprises LLC 3,4

     8.38        05/01/17         540         567,000   

Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. 2

     9.75        12/01/16         525         567,656   
          

 

 

 

Total Consumer Non-Cyclical
(Cost – $1,764,492)

             1,863,656   
          

 

 

 

Energy – 20.2%

          

BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P./BreitBurn Finance Corp. 2

     8.63        10/15/20         625         682,812   

Calfrac Holdings L.P. 2,3,4

     7.50        12/01/20         600         594,000   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

28


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Crosstex Energy L.P./Crosstex Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.88     02/15/18       $ 550       $ 588,500   

EV Energy Partners L.P./EV Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.00        04/15/19         625         648,438   

Frac Tech Services LLC/Frac Tech Finance, Inc. 2,3,4

     8.13        11/15/18         390         415,350   

GMX Resources, Inc. 2,7

     11.00        12/01/17         229         214,733   

Hercules Offshore, Inc. 2,3,4

     10.50        10/15/17         375         395,156   

Hilcorp Energy I LP/Hilcorp Finance Co. 2,3,4

     8.00        02/15/20         675         750,938   

Key Energy Services, Inc.

     6.75        03/01/21         375         380,625   

Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.63        04/15/20         660         722,700   

McJunkin Red Man Corp.

     9.50        12/15/16         525         566,344   

Niska Gas Storage US LLC/Niska Gas Storage Canada ULC 2

     8.88        03/15/18         600         619,500   

Petroleum Geo-Services ASA 3,4,6

     7.38        12/15/18         275         293,563   

Plains Exploration & Production Co. 2

     7.63        06/01/18         675         718,875   

Precision Drilling Corp. 6

     6.63        11/15/20         225         239,625   

Quicksilver Resources, Inc. 2

     11.75        01/01/16         375         378,750   

Trinidad Drilling Ltd. 2,3,4,6

     7.88        01/15/19         625         675,000   

Venoco, Inc.

     8.88        02/15/19              600         522,000   

W&T Offshore, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19         220         239,800   
          

 

 

 

Total Energy
(Cost – $9,309,286)

                9,646,709   
          

 

 

 

Healthcare – 9.3%

          

DJO Finance LLC/DJO Finance Corp. 3,4

     9.88        04/15/18         325         320,938   

HCA, Inc. 2

     8.00        10/01/18         625         721,875   

Health Management Associates, Inc. 2,3,4

     7.38        01/15/20         625         678,125   

inVentiv Health, Inc. 3,4

     10.25        08/15/18         245         215,600   

Kindred Healthcare, Inc.

     8.25        06/01/19         325         316,063   

Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. 2,3,4

     9.50        12/01/19         625         701,563   

Polymer Group, Inc. 2

     7.75        02/01/19         600         639,000   

Service Corporation International 2

     6.75        04/01/16         750         838,125   
          

 

 

 

Total Healthcare
(Cost – $4,121,178)

             4,431,289   
          

 

 

 

Media – 10.7%

          

American Reprographics Co. 2

     10.50        12/15/16         600         630,000   

Cablevision Systems Corp. 2

     8.63        09/15/17         750         871,875   

CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp. 2

     8.13        04/30/20         675         762,750   

Cenveo Corp.

     8.88        02/01/18         275         260,563   

Clear Channel Communications, Inc. 2

     9.00        03/01/21         600         534,000   

Cumulus Media Holdings, Inc.

     7.75        05/01/19         625         607,813   

Deluxe Corp. 2

     7.38        06/01/15         500         508,750   

Mediacom LLC/Mediacom Capital Corp. 2

     9.13        08/15/19         625         690,625   

National CineMedia LLC 3,4

     6.00        04/15/22         225         237,375   
          

 

 

 

Total Media
(Cost – $4,952,719)

             5,103,751   
          

 

 

 

Real Estate – 1.4%

          

Realogy Corp. 3,4
(Cost – $565,322)

     7.88        02/15/19         625         656,250   
          

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

29


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Services – 17.2%

          

AMC Entertainment, Inc. 2

     8.75     06/01/19       $ 600       $ 661,500   

Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc. 2

     8.25        01/15/19         625         680,469   

Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc.

     9.75        03/15/20         175         199,938   

Beazer Homes USA, Inc. 2

     9.13        06/15/18         275         277,750   

Boyd Gaming Corp. 3,4

     9.00        07/01/20         325         331,500   

Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. 3,4

     8.50        02/15/20         225         225,000   

Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. 2

     11.25        06/01/17         500         537,500   

CityCenter Holdings LLC/CityCenter Finance Corp. 2

     7.63        01/15/16         600         640,500   

Iron Mountain, Inc. 2

     8.38        08/15/21         275         304,563   

Marina District Finance Company, Inc. 2

     9.88        08/15/18         325         325,813   

MGM Resorts International 2

     7.63        01/15/17         625         662,500   

MGM Resorts International 3,4

     8.63        02/01/19         200         218,000   

MTR Gaming Group, Inc.

     11.50        08/01/19         478         503,442   

Palace Entertainment Holdings LLC/Palace Entertainment Holdings Corp.  3,4

     8.88        04/15/17         600         634,500   

PulteGroup, Inc. 2

     6.38        05/15/33         600         558,000   

Standard Pacific Corp. 2

     8.38        05/15/18         675         778,781   

UR Merger Sub Corp.

     8.25        02/01/21         350         384,125   

UR Merger Sub Corp. 2

     10.25        11/15/19         275         313,500   
          

 

 

 

Total Services
(Cost – $7,567,265)

                8,237,381   
          

 

 

 

Technology & Electronics – 2.7%

          

First Data Corp. 2,3,4

     8.25        01/15/21              600         598,500   

First Data Corp.

     9.88        09/24/15         61         62,220   

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.

     8.05        02/01/20         625         615,625   
          

 

 

 

Total Technology & Electronics
(Cost – $1,270,390)

             1,276,345   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 8.1%

          

Cincinnati Bell, Inc. 2

     8.25        10/15/17         265         282,888   

Cincinnati Bell, Inc.

     8.75        03/15/18         360         365,400   

Frontier Communications Corp. 2

     7.13        03/15/19         1,050         1,118,250   

Level 3 Communications, Inc. 3,4

     8.88        06/01/19         625         656,250   

PAETEC Holding Corp.

     9.88        12/01/18         375         429,375   

Windstream Corp. 2

     7.00        03/15/19         1,000         1,020,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Telecommunications
(Cost – $3,578,550)

             3,872,163   
          

 

 

 

Utility – 2.7%

          

Calpine Corp. 2,3,4

     7.25        10/15/17         550         587,125   

NRG Energy, Inc. 2

     8.50        06/15/19         675         729,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Utility
(Cost – $1,218,274)

                               1,316,125   

Total HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS
(Cost – $57,979,142)

                               60,966,004   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

30


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

TERM LOANS – 0.4%

          

Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC 1,4

     4.74     10/10/17       $ 247       $ 169,369   

Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC 1,4

     4.94        10/10/17         40         27,215   

Total TERM LOANS
(Cost – $237,249)

                               196,584   
                        Shares      Value
(Note 2)
 

COMMON STOCKS – 1.4%

          

Basic Industry – 1.0%

          

Huntsman Corp.
(Cost – $309,392)

          30,900         461,337   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 0.4%

          

Frontier Communications Corp.

          17,743         86,941   

Windstream Corp.

          9,200         93,012   
          

 

 

 

Total Telecommunications
(Cost – $285,725)

                               179,953   

Total COMMON STOCKS
(Cost – $595,117)

                               641,290   

WARRANTS – 0.3%

          

Automotive – 0.3%

          

General Motors Co. 5
Expiration: July 2019
Exercise Price: $18.33

          6,469         53,434   

General Motors Co. 5
Expiration: July 2016
Exercise Price: $10.00

          6,469         89,143   
          

 

 

 

Total Automotive
(Cost – $384,117)

                               142,577   

Total WARRANTS
(Cost – $384,117)

                               142,577   

Total Investments – 135.9%
(Cost – $61,492,695)

             64,970,094   

Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets – (35.9)%

                               (17,177,682

TOTAL NET ASSETS – 100.0%

           $ 47,792,412   

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

31


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

OBJECTIVE & STRATEGY

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc. seeks a high level of current income. The Fund seeks capital growth as a secondary investment objective when consistent with its primary investment objective. The Fund invests in a diversified portfolio of securities that offers attractive yield and capital appreciation potential and consists primarily of debt securities and secondarily of equity securities. The Advisor will continually analyze the markets for income-producing securities and will periodically reallocate the Fund’s investments among various fixed-income and equity asset classes and between investment grade and below-investment grade debt securities to pursue its investment objectives. As a result, a majority of the Fund’s total assets may be invested in investment grade securities at some times and in below-investment grade debt securities at other times. The Fund invests in a wide range of debt securities, including corporate bonds, mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, and municipal and foreign government obligations, as well as securities of companies in bankruptcy reorganization proceedings or otherwise in the process of debt restructuring. The Fund also invests in other securities providing the potential for high income or a combination of high income and capital growth. (Below-investment grade debt securities are rated Ba1 or lower by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., BB+ or lower by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group, comparably rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization or, if unrated, determined by the Fund’s investment advisor to be of comparable quality.) The Fund may use leverage through bank borrowings, reverse repurchase agreements or other transactions involving indebtedness or through the issuance of preferred shares. The Fund may leverage up to one third of its total assets (in each case including the amount borrowed.) The Fund may vary its use of leverage in response to changing market conditions.

Investment Risks: Investors in any bond fund should anticipate fluctuations in price. Bond prices and the value of bond funds decline as interest rates rise. Bonds with longer-term maturities generally are more vulnerable to interest rate risk than bonds with shorter-term maturities. Below-investment grade bonds involve greater credit risk, which is the risk that the issuer will not make interest or principal payments when due. An economic downturn or period of rising interest rates could adversely affect the ability of issuers, especially issuers of below-investment grade debt, to service primary obligations and an unanticipated default could cause the Fund to experience a reduction in value of its shares. The Fund’s investments in mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities that are “subordinated” to other interests in the same pool may increase credit risk to the extent that the Fund, as a holder of those securities, may only receive payments after the pools’ obligations to other investors have been satisfied. Below-investment grade bonds are subject to greater price volatility and are less liquid, especially during periods of economic uncertainty or change, than higher-rated debt securities. The value of U.S. and foreign equity securities in which the Fund invests will change based on changes in a company’s financial condition and in overall market and economic conditions. Leverage creates an opportunity for an increased return to common stockholders, but unless the income and capital appreciation, if any, on securities acquired with leverage proceeds exceed the costs of the leverage, the use of leverage will diminish the net investment performance of the Fund’s shares. Use of leverage also may increase the likelihood that the net asset value of the Fund and market value of its common shares will be more volatile, and the yield and total return to common stockholders will tend to fluctuate more in response to changes in interest rates and creditworthiness.

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE

For the six months ended September 30, 2012, Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc. (NYSE: HSA) had a total return based on net asset value of 7.70% and a total return based on market price of 10.95%, which assumes the reinvestment of dividends and is exclusive of brokerage commissions. Based on the NYSE closing price of $6.37 on September 30, 2012, the Fund’s shares had a dividend yield of 6.59%. The dividend yield is calculated as the annualized amount of the reporting period’s most recent monthly dividend declared divided by the stated stock price.

Individual contributors of performance included B&G Foods’ equity, Frontier Communications, and Anheuser-Busch. B&G Foods produces shelf-stable foods to grocery markets and benefitted from strong cost controls and improved profit margins. Frontier Communications offers telephonic communications services in rural areas to small business and residential customers whose bonds rallied on expectations the company may seek to refinance at today’s lower interest rates. Anheuser-Busch is an international beer company that experienced strong business trends.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

32


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

Detractors of performance included Insight Communications, General Motors’ equity and Windstream’s equity. Insight Communications is a cable TV company whose bonds were called when the company was acquired by Time Warner Cable. General Motors’ equity was down in the period as investors worried about the possible impact of a sale of the U.S. government’s shares acquired during the recession. Windstream, a rural telecommunications company, saw its equity move lower on disappointing earnings announced in May, followed by a management shakeup.

HIGH YIELD MARKET ENVIRONMENT

The high yield market delivered robust returns for the six-month period ended September 30, 2012. Early in the period, markets corrected lower as, for the third year in a row, investors held a negative view beginning in May 2012. This was primarily attributed to concerns over the health of the European Union and slowing economic growth in China. Unlike prior years, however, the correction was short-lived, confined mostly to the month of May. Every other month during the period saw strong positive returns in excess of 1% per month cumulating to a six-month return of 6.5% despite the correction in May. The high yield bond market’s enthusiasm was not matched by equity returns, which were up only 1.6% as measured by the Russell 2000 Index.

The spread between high yield corporate bonds and the 10-Year U.S. Treasury compressed modestly during the six-month period from 594 basis points to 569 basis points. We view this compression as a positive because the underlying 10-year U.S. Treasury rate fell from 2.21% to 1.64%.

Current spreads of 569 basis points remain wider than the 400-500 basis points we would normally expect to see at this point in the credit cycle, although that has diminished somewhat as spreads continue to narrow. Therefore, while the high yield market continues to represent value to investors, further price appreciation is likely to be limited as the sector, as a whole, is trading above par.

Corporate credit has been sound for the past couple of years, and we saw stable credit this period with the default rate declining slightly from 1.9%. 1 to 1.8%. 2 Note that this period’s default rate of 1.8% remains well below the market’s 25-year average default rate of 4.2%. 3

Credit ratings agencies confirm the stable trend in corporate credit by upgrading 1.0 times as many high yield companies as they downgraded in the past 12 months. 4 We noted that companies reported acceptable (but not strong) earnings through the second quarter of 2011, (the latest reporting period) and we saw more management teams taking a cautious view of the future.

Supply and demand was generally positive during the period with high yield mutual funds seeing strong inflows. 5 New issue volume was strong following May’s correction, accelerating to an all-time quarterly record of $98.5 billion, in the third quarter of calendar 2012, above the previous record of $96.8 billion posted in the first quarter of 2012. September’s new issue volume of $46 billion was an all-time record. Overall, with money flooding into mutual funds, deals were oversubscribed and traded higher in the aftermarket. Traders report that there seems to be ample cash available to buy issues and report that some challenges exist in purchasing good quality paper in the secondary market. The bulk of new issues are used to refinance debt which has the effect of improving credit quality by eliminating near term maturities. We note with some concern, however, a rise in the number of riskier new issues late in the period when some companies took advantage of the robust buying appetite and issued lower quality paper, PIK or pay-in-kind bonds, and financing to pay dividends to owners. While the volume of these riskier transactions is not yet concerning, we note that it is the first time since the downturn that we have seen a significant increase in such paper.

 

1  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, April 2, 2012 p 1

 

2  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 4.

 

3  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 2

 

4  

JP Morgan, High Yield Default Monitor, October 1, 2012 p 10

 

5  

Credit Suisse “Leveraged Finance Strategy Update” October 1, 2012, p. 2.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

33


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

OUTLOOK

Brookfield has been positive on the high yield market, noting the robust credit quality, good corporate liquidity and excellent progress on the part of corporate treasurers in managing their debt structures. The high yield market agreed and returns were excellent. As these fundamentals remain in place, our outlook for this asset class over the next 12 months or so remains positive.

However, we also believe that significant further potential upside appreciation is limited due to the decline in spreads from 737 to 569 basis points in 2012, and with the return of the market above par. While normally we would expect the spread to be 50 to 100 basis points narrower than current levels, we note the unusually depressed level of the benchmark treasury yields, which may be artificially depressed due to actions by the Federal Reserve. With the high yield market trading at yields near all time lows, our enthusiasm is tempered at this point. We are carefully watching the quality of new issues coming to market as a possible negative going forward.

Given our expectation of modest economic growth, modestly increasing defaults, although no general recession, we believe that high yield investors are adequately, but not generously compensated at current yield spread levels. While we would normally be targeting yield spreads of 400 to 500 basis points at this point in the credit cycle, we remain skeptical that the problems in Europe are permanently addressed, and are increasingly concerned with the health of the U.S. balance sheet which will need to be addressed shortly after the November election. With these risks outstanding we expect high yield investors will continue to demand a premium to historical spreads, at least for the next few quarters. For investors seeking to clip the current coupon offered in the high yield market, the investment landscape remains attractive.

Forward-Looking Information

This management discussion contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements that are based on various assumptions (some of which are beyond our control) may be identified by reference to a future period or periods or by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “may,” “will,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “should,” “intend,” or similar terms or variations on those terms or the negative of those terms. Although we believe that the expectations contained in any forward-looking statement are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. We do not undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to publicly release any update or supplement to any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Disclosure

The Fund’s portfolio holdings are subject to change without notice. The mention of specific securities is not a recommendation or solicitation for any person to buy, sell or hold any particular security. There is no assurance that the Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc. currently holds these securities.

The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index covers the U.S. dollar denominated, non-investment grade, fixed-rate, taxable corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch, and S&P is Ba1/BB+/BB+ or below. The index excludes emerging markets debt. The Barclays Capital U.S. Corporate High Yield Index is part of the Barclays Capital U.S. Universal and Global High Yield Indices. The index is unmanaged and, unlike the Fund, is not affected by cash flows or trading and other expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not predict or depict the performance of the Fund.

The Fund may utilize leverage to seek to enhance the yield and net asset value of its common stock, through bank borrowings, issuance of short-term debt securities or shares of preferred stock, or a combination thereof. However, these objectives cannot be achieved in all interest rate environments. While leverage may result in a higher yield for the Fund, the use of leverage involves risk, including the potential for higher volatility of the NAV, fluctuations of dividends and other distributions paid by the Fund and the market price of the Fund’s common

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

34


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

 

 

stock, among others. Certain funds may invest assets in securities of issuers domiciled outside the United States, including issuers from emerging markets. Foreign investing involves special risks, including foreign currency risk and the possibility of substantial volatility due to adverse political, economic or other developments.

Performance data quoted represents past performance results and does not guarantee future results. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted.

These views represent the opinions of Brookfield Investment Management Inc. and are not intended to predict or depict the performance of any investment. These views are as of the close of business on September 30, 2012 and subject to change based on subsequent developments.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

35


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Portfolio Characteristics (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

PORTFOLIO STATISTICS

 

 

Annualized dividend yield 1

  

6.59%

Weighted average coupon

  

7.64%

Weighted average life

  

4.94 years

Percentage of leveraged assets

  

27.46%

Total number of holdings

  

131

 

 

CREDIT QUALITY

 

 

BBB

     26

BB

     9

B

     38

CCC

     17

Unrated

     7

Cash

     3

Total

     100

ASSET ALLOCATION 2

 

 

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

     15

Investment Grade Corporate Bonds

     14

High Yield Corporate Bonds

     65

Common Stocks and Warrants

     6

Total

     100

 

1  

Dividends may include net investment income, capital gains and/or return of capital. The dividend yield referenced above is calculated as the annualized amount of the most recent monthly dividend declared divided by the September 30, 2012 stock price.

 

2  

Includes only invested assets; excludes cash.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

36


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES – 20.6%

  

       

Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities

          

Series 2006-PW14, Class A4

     5.20     12/11/38       $ 625       $ 720,185   

Series 2007-T28, Class A4 1

     5.74        09/11/42         670         798,161   

Citigroup/Deutsche Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust
Series 2007-CD4, Class A4

     5.32        12/11/49           1,000         1,138,624   

Commercial Mortgage Pass Through Certificates
Series 2007-C9, Class A4
1

     6.00        12/10/49         500         595,297   

Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp.
Series 2007-GG9, Class A4

     5.44        03/10/39         1,000         1,141,822   

JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
Series 2006-LDP7, Class A4
1

     6.06        04/15/45         650         749,672   

LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust

          

Series 2006-C1, Class A4

     5.16        02/15/31         670         751,314   

Series 2006-C6, Class A4

     5.37        09/15/39         670         773,822   

Morgan Stanley Capital I
Series 2007-T27, Class A4
1

     5.82        06/11/42         660         780,619   

Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust
Series 2007-C30, Class A5

     5.34        12/15/43         890         1,007,395   

Total COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES
(Cost – $7,862,839)

                                  8,456,911   

INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS – 18.9%

          

Automotive – 1.3%

          

Ford Motor Co. 2
(Cost – $412,707)

     6.50        08/01/18         450         519,750   
          

 

 

 

Basic Industry – 6.9%

          

Alcoa, Inc. 2

     5.55        02/01/17         1,000         1,120,321   

ArcelorMittal 2,6

     6.13        06/01/18         500         496,725   

The Dow Chemical Co. 2

     5.70        05/15/18         1,000         1,203,756   
          

 

 

 

Total Basic Industry
(Cost – $2,266,712)

             2,820,802   
          

 

 

 

Capital Goods – 1.5%

          

Tyco Electronics Group S.A. 2,6
(Cost – $472,278)

     6.55        10/01/17         500         604,658   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical – 0.7%

          

International Game Technology
(Cost – $285,284)

     7.50        06/15/19         250         299,871   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Non-Cyclical – 3.9%

          

Altria Group, Inc. 2

     9.70        11/10/18         169         242,059   

Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc. 2

     7.75        01/15/19         1,000         1,352,876   
          

 

 

 

Total Consumer Non-Cyclical
(Cost – $1,207,018)

             1,594,935   
          

 

 

 

Energy – 0.5%

          

SESI LLC 2
(Cost – $207,494)

     6.88        06/01/14         211         211,000   
          

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

37


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Media – 1.6%

          

Time Warner Cable, Inc. 2
(Cost – $497,326)

     8.25     04/01/19       $ 500       $ 671,111   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 2.5%

          

Qwest Corp. 2
(Cost – $965,730)

     6.88        09/15/33           1,000            1,012,500   

Total INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BONDS
(Cost – $6,314,549)

                               7,734,627   

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS – 86.7%

          

Automotive – 5.6%

          

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.

     7.75        11/15/19         175         192,937   

American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc. 2

     7.88        03/01/17         500         521,250   

Chrysler Group LLC/CG Co-Issuer, Inc.

     8.25        06/15/21         525         559,125   

Jaguar Land Rover PLC 3,4,6

     8.13        05/15/21         400         435,500   

Motors Liquidation Co. 8,9

     7.13        07/15/13         250         25   

Motors Liquidation Co. 8,9

     8.38        07/15/33         1,250         125   

Pittsburgh Glass Works LLC 3,4

     8.50        04/15/16         520         483,600   

Visteon Corp.

     6.75        04/15/19         80         84,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Automotive
(Cost – $2,095,452)

             2,276,562   
          

 

 

 

Basic Industry – 13.6%

          

AK Steel Corp. 2

     7.63        05/15/20         200         175,000   

Alpha Natural Resources, Inc.

     6.25        06/01/21         325         270,562   

Arch Coal, Inc. 2

     8.75        08/01/16         475         465,500   

Associated Materials LLC/AMH New Finance, Inc. 2

     9.13        11/01/17         500         490,000   

Building Materials Corporation of America 3,4

     6.75        05/01/21         150         164,250   

Cascades, Inc. 2,6

     7.88        01/15/20         525         549,937   

CONSOL Energy, Inc. 2

     8.25        04/01/20         175         183,312   

FMG Resources August 2006 Property Ltd. 3,4,6

     6.88        04/01/22         450         411,750   

Hexion US Finance Corp./Hexion Nova Scotia Finance ULC

     9.00        11/15/20         575         513,187   

Ineos Finance PLC 3,4,6

     9.00        05/15/15         275         290,813   

Ineos Group Holdings SA 2,3,4,6

     8.50        02/15/16         525         496,125   

Masonite International Corp. 2,3,4,6

     8.25        04/15/21         530         559,150   

PlyGem Industries, Inc.

     8.25        02/15/18         245         255,719   

Verso Paper Holdings LLC/Verso Paper, Inc. 3,4

     11.75        01/15/19         375         395,625   

Xerium Technologies, Inc. 2

     8.88        06/15/18         395         349,575   
          

 

 

 

Total Basic Industry
(Cost – $5,652,204)

             5,570,505   
          

 

 

 

Capital Goods – 10.6%

          

Berry Plastics Corp. 2

     9.50        05/15/18         525         576,187   

Casella Waste Systems, Inc. 3,4

     7.75        02/15/19         725         710,500   

Coleman Cable, Inc.

     9.00        02/15/18         100         106,500   

Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. 2

     7.38        12/15/26         500         548,750   

Mueller Water Products, Inc. 2

     7.38        06/01/17         350         358,750   

Owens-Illinois, Inc. 2

     7.80        05/15/18         400         461,000   

Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc./Reynolds Group Issuer LLC 2

     9.00        04/15/19         525         535,500   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

38


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Tekni-Plex, Inc. 3,4

     9.75     06/01/19       $ 275       $ 294,250   

Terex Corp.

     6.50        04/01/20              200         208,000   

Terex Corp. 2

     8.00        11/15/17         325         336,375   

Trimas Corp. 2

     9.75        12/15/17         196         226,380   
          

 

 

 

Total Capital Goods
(Cost – $4,060,476)

                4,362,192   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Cyclical – 3.3%

          

DineEquity, Inc.

     9.50        10/30/18         85         95,837   

Levi Strauss & Co. 2

     7.63        05/15/20         475         513,000   

Limited Brands, Inc.

     7.60        07/15/37         350         358,750   

Michaels Stores, Inc.

     7.75        11/01/18         175         187,687   

YCC Holdings LLC/Yankee Finance, Inc. 7

     10.25        02/15/16         200         207,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Consumer Cyclical
(Cost – $1,298,890)

             1,362,274   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Non-Cyclical – 1.2%

          

C&S Group Enterprises LLC 3,4
(Cost – $448,342)

     8.38        05/01/17         450         472,500   
          

 

 

 

Energy – 13.5%

          

BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P./BreitBurn Finance Corp. 2

     8.63        10/15/20         525         573,562   

Calfrac Holdings L.P. 2,3,4

     7.50        12/01/20         525         519,750   

Crosstex Energy L.P./Crosstex Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.88        02/15/18         475         508,250   

EV Energy Partners L.P./EV Energy Finance Corp. 2

     8.00        04/15/19         525         544,688   

Frac Tech Services LLC/Frac Tech Finance, Inc. 3,4

     8.13        11/15/18         225         239,625   

GMX Resources, Inc. 2,7

     11.00        12/01/17         190         178,468   

Hercules Offshore, Inc. 2,3,4

     10.50        10/15/17         300         316,125   

Hilcorp Energy I LP/Hilcorp Finance Co . 2,3,4

     8.00        02/15/20         475         528,438   

Linn Energy LLC/Linn Energy Finance Corp.

     8.63        04/15/20         140         153,300   

McJunkin Red Man Corp. 2

     9.50        12/15/16         450         485,438   

Niska Gas Storage US LLC/Niska Gas Storage Canada ULC 2

     8.88        03/15/18         250         258,125   

Petroleum Geo-Services ASA 3,4,6

     7.38        12/15/18         225         240,188   

Trinidad Drilling Ltd. 2,3,4,6

     7.88        01/15/19         310         334,800   

Venoco, Inc. 2

     8.88        02/15/19         500         435,000   

W&T Offshore, Inc.

     8.50        06/15/19         185         201,650   
          

 

 

 

Total Energy
(Cost – $5,373,054)

             5,517,407   
          

 

 

 

Healthcare – 5.6%

          

DJO Finance LLC/DJO Finance Corp. 3,4

     9.88        04/15/18         300         296,250   

HCA, Inc. 2

     8.00        10/01/18         525         606,375   

Health Management Associates, Inc. 2,3,4

     7.38        01/15/20         525         569,625   

inVentiv Health, Inc. 3,4

     10.25        08/15/18         205         180,400   

Kindred Healthcare, Inc.

     8.25        06/01/19         300         291,750   

Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. 3,4

     9.50        12/01/19         300         336,750   
          

 

 

 

Total Healthcare
(Cost – $2,167,828)

             2,281,150   
          

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

39


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

Media – 8.6%

          

American Reprographics Co. 2

     10.50     12/15/16       $ 500       $ 525,000   

Cablevision Systems Corp. 2

     8.63        09/15/17         475         552,188   

CCO Holdings LLC/CCO Holdings Capital Corp. 2

     8.13        04/30/20         550         621,500   

Cenveo Corp.

     8.88        02/01/18         225         213,188   

Clear Channel Communications, Inc. 2

     9.00        03/01/21         500         445,000   

Cumulus Media Holdings, Inc.

     7.75        05/01/19         400         389,000   

Mediacom LLC/Mediacom Capital Corp. 2

     9.13        08/15/19         525         580,125   

National CineMedia LLC 3,4

     6.00        04/15/22         175         184,625   
          

 

 

 

Total Media
(Cost – $3,407,363)

                3,510,626   
          

 

 

 

Real Estate – 1.3%

          

Realogy Corp. 2,3,4
(Cost – $474,871)

     7.88        02/15/19              525         551,250   
          

 

 

 

Services – 13.1%

          

AMC Entertainment, Inc. 2

     8.75        06/01/19         600         661,500   

Avis Budget Car Rental LLC/Avis Budget Finance, Inc. 2

     8.25        01/15/19         525         571,594   

Beazer Homes USA, Inc. 2

     9.13        06/15/18         250         252,500   

Boyd Gaming Corp. 3,4

     9.00        07/01/20         300         306,000   

Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. 3,4

     8.50        02/15/20         125         125,000   

Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc. 2

     11.25        06/01/17         525         564,375   

Cedar Fair LP/Canada’s Wonderland Co./Magnum Management Corp.

     9.13        08/01/18         100         113,625   

Iron Mountain, Inc.

     8.38        08/15/21         225         249,188   

Marina District Finance Company, Inc. 2

     9.88        08/15/18         275         275,688   

MGM Resorts International 2

     7.63        01/15/17         525         556,500   

MGM Resorts International 3,4

     8.63        02/01/19         125         136,250   

MTR Gaming Group, Inc.

     11.50        08/01/19         403         423,951   

Palace Entertainment Holdings LLC/Palace Entertainment Holdings Corp.  2,3,4

     8.88        04/15/17         500         528,750   

UR Merger Sub Corp.

     8.25        02/01/21         275         301,813   

UR Merger Sub Corp. 2

     10.25        11/15/19         250         285,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Services
(Cost – $5,003,837)

             5,351,734   
          

 

 

 

Technology & Electronics – 2.6%

          

First Data Corp. 2,3,4

     8.25        01/15/21         500         498,750   

First Data Corp.

     9.88        09/24/15         51         52,020   

Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. 2

     8.05        02/01/20         525         517,125   
          

 

 

 

Total Technology & Electronics
(Cost – $1,061,654)

             1,067,895   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 6.5%

          

Cincinnati Bell, Inc.

     8.25        10/15/17         240         256,200   

Cincinnati Bell, Inc. 2

     8.75        03/15/18         285         289,275   

Frontier Communications Corp. 2

     7.13        03/15/19         725         772,125   

Level 3 Communications, Inc. 3,4

     8.88        06/01/19         525         551,250   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

40


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Interest
Rate
    Maturity      Principal
Amount
(000s)
     Value
(Note 2)
 

HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS (continued)

          

PAETEC Holding Corp.

     9.88     12/01/18       $ 250       $ 286,250   

Windstream Corp. 2

     7.00        03/15/19              500         510,000   
          

 

 

 

Total Telecommunications
(Cost – $2,466,465)

                2,665,100   
          

 

 

 

Utility – 1.2%

          

NRG Energy, Inc. 2
(Cost – $468,600)

     8.50        06/15/19         475         513,000   

Total HIGH YIELD CORPORATE BONDS
(Cost – $33,979,036)

                               35,502,195   

TERM LOANS – 0.4%

          

Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC 1,4

     4.74        10/10/17         205         141,141   

Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC 1,4

     4.94        10/10/17         33         22,679   

Total TERM LOANS
(Cost – $197,707)

                               163,820   
                        Shares      Value
(Note 2)
 

COMMON STOCKS – 7.7%

          

Basic Industry – 0.9%

          

Huntsman Corp.
(Cost – $257,286)

          25,696         383,641   
          

 

 

 

Consumer Non-Cyclical – 1.5%

          

B&G Foods, Inc.
(Cost – $247,294)

          20,000         606,200   
          

 

 

 

Energy – 1.3%

          

BreitBurn Energy Partners LP

          13,075         254,047   

Crosstex Energy LP

          7,800         120,120   

Niska Gas Storage Partners LLC

          12,500         156,750   
          

 

 

 

Total Energy
(Cost – $594,148)

             530,917   
          

 

 

 

Telecommunications – 3.7%

          

AT&T, Inc.

          8,500         320,450   

CenturyLink, Inc.

          9,500         383,800   

Frontier Communications Corp.

          41,180         201,782   

Verizon Communications, Inc.

          7,500         341,775   

Windstream Corp.

          26,350         266,399   
          

 

 

 

Total Telecommunications
(Cost – $1,529,133)

             1,514,206   
          

 

 

 

Utility – 0.3%

          

Ferrellgas Partners L.P.
(Cost – $123,019)

                      6,750         130,950   

Total COMMON STOCKS
(Cost – $2,750,880)

                               3,165,914   

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

41


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

                     Shares      Value
(Note 2)
 

WARRANTS – 0.3%

           

Automotive – 0.3%

           

General Motors Co. 5

           

Expiration: July 2019

           

Exercise Price: $18.33

           5,546       $ 45,810   

General Motors Co. 5

           

Expiration: July 2016

           

Exercise Price: $10.00

           5,546         76,424   
           

 

 

 

Total Automotive
(Cost – $336,207)

                        122,234   

Total WARRANTS
(Cost – $336,207)

                        122,234   

Total Investments – 134.6%
(Cost – $51,441,218)

              55,145,701   

Liabilities in Excess of Other Assets – (34.6)%

                        (14,168,314

TOTAL NET ASSETS – 100.0%

            $ 40,977,387   

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Schedules of Investments and Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

42


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Schedules of Investments (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

The following notes should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Schedules of Investments.

 

1

         Variable rate security – Interest rate shown is the rate in effect as of September 30, 2012.

2

         Portion or entire principal amount pledged as collateral for credit facility.

3

         Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may only be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. As of September 30, 2012, the total values of all such investments were as follows:

 

Fund      Value        % of Net Assets  

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

     $ 18,646,747           31.15

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

       13,600,474           32.28   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

       15,730,013           32.91   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

       11,157,889           27.23   

 

4

         Private Placement.

5

         Non-Income producing security.

6

         Foreign security or a U.S. security of a foreign company.

7

         Payment in kind security.

8

         Security fair valued in good faith pursuant to the fair value procedures adopted by the Board of Directors. As of September 30, 2012, the total values of all such securities were as follows:

 

Fund      Value        % of Net Assets  

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

     $ 200           0.00

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

       150           0.00   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

       175           0.00   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

       150           0.00   

 

9

         Issuer is currently in default on its regularly scheduled interest payment.

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

43


HELIOS FUNDS

Statements of Assets and Liabilities (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

       Helios
Advantage
Income Fund,
Inc.
    Helios High
Income Fund,
Inc.
    Helios Multi-
Sector High
Income Fund,
Inc.
    Helios
Strategic
Income Fund,
Inc.
 

Assets:

        

Investments in securities, at value (Note 2)

   $ 80,186,465      $ 57,127,627      $ 64,970,094      $ 55,145,701   

Cash

     3,190,562        2,422,386        2,512,595        1,953,147   

Interest and dividends receivable

     1,702,979        1,197,256        1,380,722        968,491   

Prepaid expenses

     20,869        14,690        16,651        14,259   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

     85,100,875        60,761,959        68,880,062        58,081,598   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities:

        

Payable for credit facility (Note 6)

     23,700,000        17,425,000        19,800,000        15,950,000   

Payable for credit facility interest (Note 6)

     4,100        2,939        3,376        2,744   

Payable for investments purchased

     1,398,725        1,073,962        1,148,798        1,024,126   

Investment advisory fee payable (Note 4)

     44,734        31,881        36,183        30,427   

Administration fee payable (Note 4)

     10,323        7,357        8,350        7,022   

Accrued expenses

     81,507        93,260        90,943        89,892   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     25,239,389        18,634,399        21,087,650        17,104,211   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Assets

   $ 59,861,486      $ 42,127,560      $ 47,792,412      $ 40,977,387   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Composition of Net Assets:

        

Capital stock, at par value ( $0.0001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized) (Note 8)

   $ 655      $ 485      $ 759      $ 593   

Additional paid-in capital (Note 8)

     455,758,794        338,132,746        493,858,337        402,153,392   

Undistributed (overdistribution of ) net investment income

     366,315        (4,821     386,178        436,141   

Accumulated net realized loss on investment transactions

     (400,822,513     (299,204,071     (449,930,261     (365,317,222

Net unrealized appreciation on investments

     4,558,235        3,203,221        3,477,399        3,704,483   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net assets applicable to capital stock outstanding

   $ 59,861,486      $ 42,127,560      $ 47,792,412      $ 40,977,387   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investments at cost

   $ 75,628,230      $ 53,924,406      $ 61,492,695      $ 51,441,218   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Shares Outstanding and Net Asset Value Per Share:

        

Shares outstanding

     6,547,746        4,850,531        7,592,570        5,930,400   

Net asset value per share

   $ 9.14      $ 8.69      $ 6.29      $ 6.91   

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

44


HELIOS FUNDS

Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

For the Six Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

       Helios
Advantage
Income Fund,
Inc.
     Helios High
Income Fund,
Inc.
     Helios Multi-
Sector High
Income Fund,
Inc.
     Helios
Strategic
Income Fund,
Inc.
 

Investment Income (Note 2):

           

Interest

   $ 3,104,256       $ 2,207,684       $ 2,501,620       $ 1,835,486   

Dividends

     17,435         12,726         14,329         66,105   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment income

     3,121,691         2,220,410         2,515,949         1,901,591   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Expenses:

           

Investment advisory fees (Note 4)

     267,399         190,669         216,227         181,128   

Administration fees (Note 4)

     61,707         44,001         49,899         41,799   

Legal fees

     51,883         37,498         41,821         36,207   

Fund accounting fees

     24,612         24,015         24,257         23,955   

Audit and tax services

     22,061         22,061         22,061         22,061   

Directors’ fees

     21,559         21,559         21,559         21,559   

Reports to stockholders

     14,369         14,845         15,623         14,746   

Transfer agent fees

     13,131         13,162         13,065         13,079   

Insurance

     11,974         8,446         9,524         8,136   

Registration fees

     11,908         11,908         11,908         11,908   

Miscellaneous

     5,278         4,725         5,603         5,603   

Custodian

     4,234         4,223         4,416         4,388   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

     510,115         397,112         435,963         384,569   

Interest expense on credit facility (Note 6)

     164,158         117,233         134,881         109,784   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total expenses

     674,273         514,345         570,844         494,353   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net investment income

     2,447,418         1,706,065         1,945,105         1,407,238   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments (Note 2):

           

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     189,979         172,137         169,854         168,728   

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments

     1,330,990         864,102         1,105,003         1,413,007   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net realized and unrealized gain on investments

     1,520,969         1,036,239         1,274,857         1,581,735   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

   $ 3,968,387       $ 2,742,304       $ 3,219,962       $ 2,988,973   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

45


HELIOS FUNDS

Statements of Changes in Net Assets

 

 

     Helios Advantage Income
Fund, Inc.
    Helios High Income
Fund, Inc.
 
       For the Six
Months Ended
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
    For the
Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2012
    For the Six
Months Ended
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
    For the
Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2012
 

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations:

        

Net investment income

   $ 2,447,418      $ 4,974,374      $ 1,706,065      $ 3,518,337   

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     189,979        3,200,883        172,137        3,496,946   

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments

     1,330,990        (448,526     864,102        (1,350,148
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

     3,968,387        7,726,731        2,742,304        5,665,135   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends and Distributions to Stockholders (Note 2):

        

Net investment income

     (2,454,168     (4,722,655     (1,745,034     (3,484,189
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions paid

     (2,454,168     (4,722,655     (1,745,034     (3,484,189
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital Stock Transactions (Note 8):

        

Reinvestment of dividends and distributions

     67,808        31,898        61,092        59,021   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total increase in net assets

     1,582,027        3,035,974        1,058,362        2,239,967   

Net Assets:

        

Beginning of period

     58,279,459        55,243,485        41,069,198        38,829,231   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period

   $ 59,861,486      $ 58,279,459      $ 42,127,560      $ 41,069,198   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(including undistributed (overdistribution of) net investment income of)

   $ 366,315      $ 373,065      $ (4,821   $ 34,148   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
                                    

Share Transactions (Note 8):

        

Reinvested shares

     7,615        3,584        7,184        7,063   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

46


HELIOS FUNDS

Statements of Changes in Net Assets (continued)

 

 

     Helios Multi-Sector High Income
Fund, Inc.
    Helios Strategic Income
Fund, Inc.
 
       For the Six
Months Ended
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
    For the
Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2012
    For the Six
Months Ended
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
    For the
Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2012
 

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations:

        

Net investment income

   $ 1,945,105      $ 3,946,745      $ 1,407,238      $ 2,765,054   

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     169,854        3,981,749        168,728        2,511,064   

Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments

     1,105,003        (903,870     1,413,007        465,630   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

     3,219,962        7,024,624        2,988,973        5,741,748   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends and Distributions to Stockholders (Note 2):

        

Net investment income

     (1,935,432     (3,661,470     (1,245,384     (2,490,768
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions paid

     (1,935,432     (3,661,470     (1,245,384     (2,490,768
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Capital Stock Transactions (Note 8):

        

Reinvestment of dividends and distributions

     24,696                        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total increase in net assets

     1,309,226        3,363,154        1,743,589        3,250,980   

Net Assets:

        

Beginning of period

     46,483,186        43,120,032        39,233,798        35,982,818   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period

   $ 47,792,412      $ 46,483,186      $ 40,977,387      $ 39,233,798   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(including undistributed net investment income of)

   $ 386,178      $ 376,505      $ 436,141      $ 274,287   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
                                    

Share Transactions (Note 8):

        

Reinvested shares

     4,032                        
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

47


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the Six Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash:

  

Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:

  

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

   $ 3,968,387   

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities

  

Purchases of long-term investments

     (13,074,352

Proceeds from disposition of long-term portfolio investments

     11,601,539   

Increase in interest and dividends receivable

     (62,026

Increase in prepaid expenses

     (10,763

Increase in payable for investments purchased

     1,398,725   

Increase in payable for credit facility interest

     1,317   

Decrease in investment advisory fee payable

     (492

Decrease in administration fee payable

     (114

Decrease in accrued expenses

     (1,179

Net amortization on investments

     (53,931

Unrealized appreciation on investments

     (1,330,990

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     (189,979
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     2,246,142   
  

 

 

 

Cash flows used for financing activities:

  

Dividends and distributions paid to stockholders

     (2,386,360
  

 

 

 

Net cash used for financing activities

     (2,386,360
  

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash

     (140,218

Cash at the beginning of period

     3,330,780   
  

 

 

 

Cash at the end of period

   $ 3,190,562   
  

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

Interest payments for the six months ended September 30, 2012, totaled $162,841.

Non-cash financing activities included reinvestment of dividends of $67,808.

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

48


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the Six Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash:

  

Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:

  

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

   $ 2,742,304   

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities

  

Purchases of long-term investments

     (9,651,249

Proceeds from disposition of long-term portfolio investments

     8,531,978   

Increase in interest and dividends receivable

     (30,826

Increase in prepaid expenses

     (7,560

Increase in payable for investments purchased

     1,073,962   

Increase in payable for credit facility interest

     950   

Decrease in investment advisory fee payable

     (393

Decrease in administration fee payable

     (91

Increase in accrued expenses

     6,254   

Net amortization on investments

     (37,225

Unrealized appreciation on investments

     (864,102

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     (172,137
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     1,591,865   
  

 

 

 

Cash flows used for financing activities:

  

Dividends and distributions paid to stockholders

     (1,683,942
  

 

 

 

Net cash used for financing activities

     (1,683,942
  

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash

     (92,077

Cash at the beginning of period

     2,514,463   
  

 

 

 

Cash at the end of period

   $ 2,422,386   
  

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

Interest payments for the six months ended September 30, 2012, totaled $116,283.

Noncash financing activities included reinvestment of dividends of $61,092.

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

49


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the Six Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash:

  

Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:

  

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

   $ 3,219,962   

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities

  

Purchases of long-term investments

     (11,069,964

Proceeds from disposition of long-term portfolio investments

     9,064,835   

Increase in interest and dividends receivable

     (62,541

Increase in prepaid expenses

     (8,619

Increase in payable for investments purchased

     1,148,798   

Increase in payable for credit facility interest

     1,088   

Decrease in investment advisory fee payable

     (402

Decrease in administration fee payable

     (93

Increase in accrued expenses

     5,980   

Net amortization on investments

     (25,489

Unrealized appreciation on investments

     (1,105,003

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     (169,854
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     998,698   
  

 

 

 

Cash flows used for financing activities:

  

Dividends and distributions paid to stockholders

     (1,910,736
  

 

 

 

Net cash used for financing activities

     (1,910,736
  

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash

     (912,038

Cash at the beginning of period

     3,424,633   
  

 

 

 

Cash at the end of period

   $ 2,512,595   
  

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

Interest payments for the six months ended September 30, 2012, totaled $133,793.

Non-cash financing activities included reinvestment of dividends and distributions of $24,696.

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

50


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the Six Months Ended September 30, 2012

 

 

 

Increase (Decrease) in Cash:

  

Cash flows provided by (used for) operating activities:

  

Net increase in net assets resulting from operations

   $ 2,988,973   

Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided by operating activities

  

Purchases of long-term investments

     (7,770,902

Proceeds from disposition of long-term portfolio investments

     6,999,247   

Increase in interest and dividends receivable

     (17,068

Increase in prepaid expenses

     (7,400

Increase in payable for investments purchased

     1,024,126   

Increase in payable for credit facility interest

     882   

Decrease in investment advisory fee payable

     (22

Decrease in administration fee payable

     (4

Increase in accrued expenses

     6,447   

Net amortization and paydown losses on investments

     37,615   

Unrealized appreciation on investments

     (1,413,007

Net realized gain on investment transactions

     (168,728
  

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     1,680,159   
  

 

 

 

Cash flows used for financing activities:

  

Dividends and distributions paid to stockholders

     (1,245,384
  

 

 

 

Net cash used for financing activities

     (1,245,384
  

 

 

 

Net increase in cash

     434,775   

Cash at the beginning of period

     1,518,372   
  

 

 

 

Cash at the end of period

   $ 1,953,147   
  

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:

Interest payments for the six months ended September 30, 2012, totaled $108,902.

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

51


HELIOS ADVANTAGE INCOME FUND, INC.

Financial Highlights

 

 

     For the
Six Months Ended
September 30, 2012

(Unaudited)
    For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31,  
         2012     2011     2010     2009 2,3     2008* ,2,3
(Unaudited)
 

Per Share Operating Performance

            

Net asset value, beginning of period

   $ 8.91      $ 8.45      $ 7.50      $ 6.20      $ 15.55      $ 66.45   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investment income

     0.38        0.76        0.74        0.70        1.75        6.15   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

     0.23        0.42        0.93        1.40        (8.85     (49.85
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

     0.61        1.18        1.67        2.10        (7.10     (43.70
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

     (0.38     (0.72     (0.72     (0.70     (1.20     (6.55

Return of capital distributions

                          (0.10     (1.05     (0.65
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions paid

     (0.38     (0.72     (0.72     (0.80     (2.25     (7.20
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net asset value, end of period

   $ 9.14      $ 8.91      $ 8.45      $ 7.50      $ 6.20      $ 15.55   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Market price, end of period

   $ 9.21      $ 9.30      $ 7.70      $ 7.00      $ 5.00      $ 16.70   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investment Return

     3.28 % 4       32.08     21.39     58.73     (61.80 )%      (73.61 )% 

Ratios to Average Net Assets / Supplementary Data:

            

Net assets, end of period (000s)

   $ 59,861      $ 58,279      $ 55,243      $ 49,017      $ 40,676      $ 100,299   

Gross operating expenses

     1.74 % 5       1.93     2.30     2.22     2.44     3.66

Interest expense

     0.56 % 5       0.55     0.37     0.52     0.03     N/A 1  

Total expenses

     2.30 % 5       2.48     2.67     2.74     2.47     3.66

Net expenses, including fee waivers and reimbursement and excluding interest expense, debt issuance costs and extraordinary expenses

     1.74 % 5       1.93     2.24     1.40     1.23     3.49

Net investment income

     8.37 % 5       8.89     9.44     9.97     19.66     15.69

Net investment income, excluding the effect of fee waivers and reimbursement

     8.37 % 5       8.89     9.38     9.15     18.91     15.52

Portfolio turnover rate

     15 % 4       29     62     45     89     76

 

*

By correspondence dated May 27, 2010, the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, informed the Fund that it’s audit report dated May 29, 2008 on the Fund’s financial statements should no longer be relied upon. Based upon the actions of the Fund’s former independent registered public accounting firm, the financial highlights for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 should not be relied upon.

 

 

Total investment return is computed based upon the New York Stock Exchange market price of the Fund’s shares and excludes the effect of brokerage commissions. Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at the prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan.

 

1  

Not available. During this period, interest expense was not reported separately from operating expenses.

 

2  

The Fund had a 1:5 reverse stock split with ex-dividend and payable dates of August 31, 2009 and September 1, 2009, respectively. Prior year net asset values and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of the reverse stock split. (See Notes to Financial Statements). The net asset value and market price reported at the original dates prior to the reverse stock split were as follows:

 

For the Years Ended March 31,    2009      2008
(Unaudited)
 

Net Asset Value (prior to reverse stock split)

   $ 1.24       $ 3.11   

Market Price (prior to reverse stock split)

   $ 1.00       $ 3.34   

 

3  

Brookfield Investment Management, Inc. became the Adviser of the Fund on July 29, 2008.

 

4  

Not Annualized

 

5  

Annualized

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

52


HELIOS HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Financial Highlights

 

 

     For the
Six Months Ended
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
    For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31,  
         2012     2011     2010     2009 2,3     2008* ,2,3
(Unaudited)
 

Per Share Operating Performance

            

Net asset value, beginning of period

   $ 8.48      $ 8.03      $ 7.66      $ 6.25      $ 15.60      $ 65.90   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investment income

     0.35        0.73        0.69        0.72        1.95        5.80   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

     0.22        0.44        0.40        1.49        (9.05     (48.90
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations

     0.57        1.17        1.09        2.21        (7.10     (43.10
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

     (0.36     (0.72     (0.69     (0.72     (1.40     (6.30

Return of capital distributions

                   (0.03     (0.08     (0.85     (0.90
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions paid

     (0.36     (0.72     (0.72     (0.80     (2.25     (7.20
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net asset value, end of period

   $ 8.69      $ 8.48      $ 8.03      $ 7.66      $ 6.25      $ 15.60   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Market price, end of period

   $ 8.84      $ 8.90      $ 7.62      $ 7.19      $ 4.95      $ 17.55   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investment Return

     3.60 % 4       27.89     17.00     64.29     (64.25 )%      (72.40 )% 

Ratios to Average Net Assets/ Supplementary Data:

            

Net assets, end of period (000s)

   $ 42,128      $ 41,069      $ 38,829      $ 37,040      $ 30,190      $ 74,539   

Gross operating expenses

     1.93 % 5       2.13     2.51     2.28     2.30     3.73

Interest expense

     0.58 % 5       0.57     0.38     0.49     0.04     N/A 1  

Total expenses

     2.51 % 5       2.70     2.89     2.77     2.34     3.73

Net expenses, including fee waivers and reimbursement and excluding interest expense, debt issuance costs and extraordinary expenses

     1.93 % 5       2.13     2.36     1.30     1.24     3.56

Net investment income

     8.28 % 5       8.92     8.91     10.10     22.35     14.81

Net investment income, excluding the effect of fee waivers and reimbursement

     8.28 % 5       8.92     8.75     9.12     21.37     14.64

Portfolio turnover rate

     16 % 4       29     60     48     88     74

 

*

By correspondence dated May 27, 2010, the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, informed the Fund that it’s audit report dated May 29, 2008 on the Fund’s financial statements should no longer be relied upon. Based upon the actions of the Fund’s former independent registered public accounting firm, the financial highlights for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 should not be relied upon.

 

 

Total investment return is computed based upon the New York Stock Exchange market price of the Fund’s shares and excludes the effect of brokerage commissions. Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at the prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan.

 

1  

Not available. During this period, interest expense was not reported separately from operating expenses.

 

2  

The Fund had a 1:5 reverse stock split with ex-dividend and payable dates of August 31, 2009 and September 1, 2009, respectively. Prior year net asset values and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of the reverse stock split. (See Notes to Financial Statements). The net asset value and market price reported at the original dates prior to the reverse stock split were as follows:

 

For the Years Ended March 31,    2009      2008
(Unaudited)
 

Net Asset Value (prior to reverse stock split)

   $ 1.25       $ 3.12   

Market Price (prior to reverse stock split)

   $ 0.99       $ 3.51   

 

3  

Brookfield Investment Management, Inc. became the Adviser of the Fund on July 29, 2008.

 

4  

Not Annualized

 

5  

Annualized

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

53


HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

Financial Highlights

 

 

     For the
Six Months Ended
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
    For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31,  
         2012     2011     2010     2009 2,3     2008* ,2,3
(Unaudited)
 

Per Share Operating Performance

            

Net asset value, beginning of period

   $ 6.13      $ 5.68      $ 5.38      $ 4.40      $ 13.55      $ 70.50   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investment income

     0.26        0.52        0.49        0.50        1.50        6.40   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

     0.16        0.41        0.29        1.01        (8.35     (54.35
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net asset value resulting from operations

     0.42        0.93        0.78        1.51        (6.85     (47.95
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

     (0.26     (0.48     (0.48     (0.50     (1.20     (7.75

Distributions from net realized gains

                                        (0.35

Return of capital distributions

                          (0.03     (1.10     (0.90
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions paid

     (0.26     (0.48     (0.48     (0.53     (2.30     (9.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net asset value, end of period

   $ 6.29      $ 6.13      $ 5.68      $ 5.38      $ 4.40      $ 13.55   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Market price, end of period

   $ 6.39      $ 6.07      $ 5.15      $ 5.00      $ 3.55      $ 16.65   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investment Return

     9.74 % 4       28.69     13.33     58.59     (72.05 )%      (72.67 )% 

Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplementary Data:

            

Net assets, end of period (000s)

   $ 47,792      $ 46,483      $ 43,120      $ 40,852      $ 33,460      $ 98,627   

Gross operating expenses

     1.87 % 5       2.06     2.43     2.23     2.59     3.71

Interest expense

     0.57 % 5       0.57     0.39     0.51     0.06     N/A 1  

Total expenses

     2.44 % 5       2.63     2.82     2.74     2.65     3.71

Net expenses, including fee waivers and reimbursement and excluding interest expense, debt issuance costs and extraordinary expenses

     1.87 % 5       2.06     2.32     1.30     1.20     3.55

Net investment income

     8.33 % 5       8.90     9.00     10.03     20.53     15.28

Net investment income, excluding the effect of fee waivers and reimbursement

     8.33 % 5       8.90     8.89     9.10     19.65     15.11

Portfolio turnover rate

     15 % 4       30     64     49     75     68

 

*

By correspondence dated May 27, 2010, the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, informed the Fund that it’s audit report dated May 29, 2008 on the Fund’s financial statements should no longer be relied upon. Based upon the actions of the Fund’s former independent registered public accounting firm, the financial highlights for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 should not be relied upon.

 

 

Total investment return is computed based upon the New York Stock Exchange market price of the Fund’s shares and excludes the effect of brokerage commissions. Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at the prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan.

 

1  

Not available. During this period, interest expense was not reported separately from operating expenses.

 

2  

The Fund had a 1:5 reverse stock split with ex-dividend and payable dates of August 31, 2009 and September 1, 2009, respectively. Prior year net asset values and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of the reverse stock split. (See Notes to Financial Statements). The net asset value and market price reported at the original dates prior to the reverse stock split were as follows:

 

For the Years Ended March 31,    2009      2008
(Unaudited)
 

Net Asset Value (prior to reverse stock split)

   $ 0.88       $ 2.71   

Market Price (prior to reverse stock split)

   $ 0.71       $ 3.33   

 

3  

Brookfield Investment Management, Inc. became the Adviser of the Fund on July 29, 2008.

 

4  

Not Annualized

 

5  

Annualized

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

54


HELIOS STRATEGIC INCOME FUND, INC.

Financial Highlights (Unaudited)

 

 

     For the
Six Months Ended
September 30, 2012
(Unaudited)
    For the Fiscal Year Ended March 31,  
         2012     2011     2010     2009 2,3     2008* ,2,3
(Unaudited)
 

Per Share Operating Performance

            

Net asset value, beginning of period

   $ 6.62      $ 6.07      $ 5.90      $ 5.05      $ 14.35      $ 64.45   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net investment income

     0.23        0.47        0.48        0.51        2.20        6.00   

Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investment transactions

     0.27        0.50        0.17        1.00        (9.10     (48.90
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net asset value resulting from operations

     0.50        0.97        0.65        1.51        (6.90     (42.90
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Dividends from net investment income

     (0.21     (0.42     (0.45     (0.51     (1.70     (6.40

Return of capital distributions

                   (0.03     (0.15     (0.70     (0.80
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total dividends and distributions paid

     (0.21     (0.42     (0.48     (0.66     (2.40     (7.20
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net asset value, end of period

   $ 6.91      $ 6.62      $ 6.07      $ 5.90      $ 5.05      $ 14.35   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Market price, end of period

   $ 6.37      $ 5.94      $ 5.31      $ 5.46      $ 4.10      $ 15.90   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Investment Return

     10.95 % 4       20.55     6.24     51.23     (65.85 )%      (74.01 )% 

Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplementary Data:

            

Net assets, end of period (000s)

   $ 40,977      $ 39,234      $ 35,983      $ 34,970      $ 29,816      $ 82,734   

Gross operating expenses

     1.94 % 5       2.14     2.54     2.34     2.24     3.86

Interest expense

     0.55 % 5       0.55     0.37     0.47     0.21     N/A 1  

Total expenses

     2.49 % 5       2.69     2.91     2.81     2.45     3.86

Net expenses, including fee waivers and reimbursement and excluding interest expense, debt issuance costs and extraordinary expenses

     1.94 % 5       2.14     2.38     1.30     1.27     3.69

Net investment income

     7.08 % 5       7.38     7.60     9.05     26.85     15.79

Net investment income, excluding the effect of fee waivers and reimbursement

     7.08 % 5       7.38     7.44     8.02     25.93     15.62

Portfolio turnover rate

     13 % 4       36     55     43     71     73

 

*

By correspondence dated May 27, 2010, the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, informed the Fund that it’s audit report dated May 29, 2008 on the Fund’s financial statements should no longer be relied upon. Based upon the actions of the Fund’s former independent registered public accounting firm, the financial highlights for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 should not be relied upon.

 

 

Total investment return is computed based upon the New York Stock Exchange market price of the Fund’s shares and excludes the effect of brokerage commissions. Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at the prices obtained under the Fund’s dividend reinvestment plan.

 

1  

Not available. During this period, interest expense was not reported separately from operating expenses.

 

2  

The Fund had a 1:5 reverse stock split with ex-dividend and payable dates of August 31, 2009 and September 1, 2009, respectively. Prior year net asset values and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the impact of the reverse stock split. (See Notes to Financial Statements). The net asset value and market price reported at the original dates prior to the reverse stock split were as follows:

 

For the Years Ended March 31,    2009      2008
(Unaudited)
 

Net Asset Value (prior to reverse stock split)

   $ 1.01       $ 2.87   

Market Price (prior to reverse stock split)

   $ 0.82       $ 3.18   

 

3  

Brookfield Investment Management, Inc. became the Adviser of the Fund on July 29, 2008.

 

4  

Not Annualized

 

5  

Annualized

 

 

See Notes to Financial Statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

55


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

1. Organization

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc., Helios High Income Fund, Inc., Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc. and Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc. (each a “Fund” and, collectively, the “Funds” or the “Helios Funds”) were organized as separate Maryland corporations on September 7, 2004, April 16, 2003, November 14, 2005 and January 16, 2004, respectively. Each Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as a diversified, closed-end management investment company with its own investment objective.

Brookfield Investment Management Inc. (“BIM” or “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Brookfield Asset Management Inc., is registered as an investment Adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, and serves as investment adviser to the Funds.

Each Fund’s primary investment objective is to seek a high level of current income with capital growth as a secondary investment objective. No assurances can be given that each Fund’s investment objective will be achieved.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Valuation of Investments: Debt securities, including U.S. government securities, listed corporate bonds, other fixed income and asset-backed securities, and unlisted securities and private placement securities, are generally valued at the latest price furnished by an independent pricing service or, if not valued by an independent pricing service, using prices obtained from at least two active and reliable market makers in any such security or a broker-dealer. Short-term debt securities with remaining maturities of sixty days or less are valued at cost with interest accrued or discount accreted to the date of maturity, unless such valuation, in the judgment of the Adviser’s Valuation Committee, does not represent market value.

Investments in equity securities listed or traded on any securities exchange or traded in the over-the-counter market are valued at the last quoted price as of the close of business on the valuation date. Equity securities for which no sales were reported for that date are valued at “fair value” as determined in good faith by the Adviser’s Valuation Committee. Investments in open-end registered investment companies, if any, are valued at the net asset value (“NAV”) as reported by those investment companies.

The Boards have adopted procedures for the valuation of the Funds’ securities and has delegated the day to day responsibilities for valuation determinations under these procedures to the Adviser. Securities are valued using unadjusted quoted market prices, when available, as supplied primarily by third party pricing services or dealers. When price quotations for certain securities are not readily available or cannot be determined, a significant event has occurred that would materially affect the value of the security, or if the available quotations are not believed to be reflective of the market value by the Adviser, those securities will be valued at “fair value” as determined in good faith by the Adviser’s Valuation Committee using procedures adopted by and under the supervision of each Fund’s Board of Directors. The Valuation Committee is comprised of senior members of the Adviser’s management team. There can be no assurance that a Fund could purchase or sell a portfolio security at the price used to calculate a Fund’s NAV.

Fair valuation procedures may be used to value a substantial portion of the assets of each Fund. A Fund may use the fair value of a security to calculate its NAV when, for example, (1) a portfolio security is not traded in a public market or the principal market in which the security trades is closed, (2) trading in a portfolio security is suspended and not resumed prior to the normal market close, (3) a portfolio security is not traded in significant

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

56


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

volume for a substantial period, or (4) the Adviser determines that the quotation or price for a portfolio security provided by a broker-dealer or an independent pricing service is inaccurate.

The “fair value” of securities may be difficult to determine and thus judgment plays a greater role in the valuation process. The fair valuation methodology may include or consider the following guidelines, as appropriate: (1) evaluation of all relevant factors, including but not limited to, pricing history, current market level, supply and demand of the respective security; (2) comparison to the values and current pricing of securities that have comparable characteristics; (3) knowledge of historical market information with respect to the security; (4) other factors relevant to the security which would include, but not be limited to, duration, yield, fundamental analytical data, the Treasury yield curve, and credit quality. Significant increases or decreases in any of these factors in isolation may result in higher or lower fair value measurement.

The values assigned to fair valued investments are based on available information and do not necessarily represent amounts that might ultimately be realized, since such amounts depend on future developments inherent in long-term investments. Changes in the fair valuation of portfolio securities may be less frequent and of greater magnitude than changes in the price of portfolio securities valued at their last sale price, by an independent pricing service, or based on market quotations. Imprecision in estimating fair value can also impact the amount of unrealized appreciation or depreciation recorded for a particular portfolio security and differences in the assumptions used could result in a different determination of fair value, and those differences could be material.

The Funds have established methods of fair value measurements in accordance with GAAP. Fair value denotes the price that a Fund would receive upon selling an investment in a timely transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market of the investment. A three-tier hierarchy has been established to maximize the use of observable market data and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk, for example, the risk inherent in a particular valuation technique used to measure fair value including such a pricing model and/or the risk inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. Inputs may be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.

 

  

Level 1 -

 

quoted prices in active markets for identical investments

  

Level 2 -

 

quoted prices in markets that are not active or other significant observable inputs (including, but not limited to: quoted prices for similar investments, quoted prices based on recently executed transactions, interest rates, credit risk, etc.)

  

Level 3 -

 

significant unobservable inputs (including each Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)

The Adviser’s valuation policy, as previously stated, establishes parameters for the sources and types of valuation analysis, as well as, the methodologies and inputs the Adviser uses in determining fair value, including the use of the Adviser’s Valuation Committee. If the Valuation Committee determines that additional techniques, sources or inputs are appropriate or necessary in a given situation, such additional work will be undertaken.

To assess the continuing appropriateness of security valuations, the Adviser (or its third party service provider who is subject to oversight by the Adviser), compares daily its prior day prices, prices on comparable securities and sale prices to the current day prices and challenges those prices that either remain unchanged or exceeds certain tolerance levels with the third party pricing service or broker source. For those securities valued by fair valuations, the Valuation Committee reviews and affirms the reasonableness of the valuations based on such methodologies and fair valuation determinations on a regular basis after considering all relevant information that is reasonably available.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

57


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of September 30, 2012 in valuing the Fund’s investments carried at fair value:

 

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

 
Valuation Inputs    Investment
Grade
Corporate
Bonds
     High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    

Term

Loans

     Common
Stocks
     Warrants      Total  

Level 1 — Quoted Prices

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 783,694       $ 162,942       $ 946,636   

Level 2 — Quoted Prices in Inactive Markets or Other Significant Observable Inputs

     3,532,026         51,543,644         —           —           —           55,075,670   

Level 3 — Significant Unobservable Inputs

     —           23,934,812         229,347         —           —           24,164,159   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 3,532,026       $ 75,478,456       $ 229,347       $ 783,694       $ 162,942       $ 80,186,465   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table provides quantitative information about the Fund’s Level 3 values, as well as its inputs, as of September 30, 2012. The table is not all-inclusive, but provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs. The range below is the range of prices denoted as a percentage of par.

 

       Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Assets    Fair Value as of
September 30, 2012
     Valuation
Methodology
   Significant
Unobservable
Input
  Range

High Yield Corporate Bonds

   $ 23,934,812       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   0.01 (2)  - 112.25

Term Loans

     229,347       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   68.69
  

 

 

         

Total Fair Value for Level 3 Investments

   $ 24,164,159           
  

 

 

         

 

(1)  

The Fund generally uses prices provided by an independent pricing service, or broker non-binding indicative bid prices (NBIB) on or near the valuation date as the primary basis for the fair value determinations for high yield corporate debt. These bid prices are non-binding, and may not be determinative of fair value. Each bid price is evaluated by the Valuation Committee in conjunction with additional information compiled by the Adviser.

 

(2)

The Fund holds two securities that are priced at $0.01 causing the range shown above to be large.

The following is a reconciliation of assets in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value:

 

Investments in Securities    High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    Term
Loans
    Total  

Balance as of March 31, 2012

   $ 18,920,655      $ 185,210      $ 19,105,865   

Accrued Discounts (Premiums)

     4,694        2,975        7,669   

Realized Gain/(Loss)

     105,502        —          105,502   

Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

     169,206        41,162        210,368   

Purchases at cost

     9,439,560        38,156        9,477,716   

Sales proceeds

   $ (4,516,430   $ (38,156   $ (4,554,586

Transfers into Level 3

     652,500        —          652,500 (a)  

Transfers out of Level 3

     (840,875     —          (840,875 ) (a)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2012

   $ 23,934,812      $ 229,347      $ 24,164,159   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at reporting date

   $ 191,324      $ 41,162      $ 232,486   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a)  

Transfers in and out of Level 3 are due primarily to increases or decreases in trade basis information versus dealer quotes.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

58


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of September 30, 2012 in valuing the Fund’s investments carried at fair value:

 

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

 
Valuation Inputs    Investment
Grade
Corporate
Bonds
     High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    

Term

Loans

     Common
Stocks
     Warrants      Total  

Level 1 — Quoted Prices

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 568,536       $ 122,234       $ 690,770   

Level 2 — Quoted Prices in Inactive Markets or Other Significant Observable Inputs

     3,044,331         35,694,609         —           —           —           38,738,940   

Level 3 — Significant Unobservable Inputs

     —           17,517,715         180,202         —           —           17,697,917   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 3,044,331       $ 53,212,324       $ 180,202       $ 568,536       $ 122,234       $ 57,127,627   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table provides quantitative information about the Fund’s Level 3 values, as well as its inputs, as of September 30, 2012. The table is not all-inclusive, but provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs. The range below is the range of prices denoted as a percentage of par.

 

       Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Assets    Fair Value as of
September 30, 2012
     Valuation
Methodology
   Significant
Unobservable
Input
  Range

High Yield Corporate Bonds

   $ 17,517,715       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   0.01 (2)  - 112.25

Term Loans

     180,202       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   68.69
  

 

 

         

Total Fair Value for Level 3 Investments

   $ 17,697,917           
  

 

 

         

 

(1)  

The Fund generally uses prices provided by an independent pricing service, or broker non-binding indicative bid prices (NBIB) on or near the valuation date as the primary basis for the fair value determinations for high yield corporate debt. These bid prices are non-binding, and may not be determinative of fair value. Each bid price is evaluated by the Valuation Committee in conjunction with additional information compiled by the Adviser.

 

(2)

The Fund holds two securities that are priced at $0.01 causing the range shown above to be large.

The following is a reconciliation of assets in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value:

 

Investments in Securities    High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    Term
Loans
    Total  

Balance as of March 31, 2012

   $ 13,709,679      $ 145,522      $ 13,855,201   

Accrued Discounts (Premiums)

     1,585        2,338        3,923   

Realized Gain/(Loss)

     122,431        —          122,431   

Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

     108,602        32,342        140,944   

Purchases at cost

     6,868,240        29,979        6,898,219   

Sales proceeds

     (3,152,822     (29,979     (3,182,801

Transfers into Level 3

     456,750        —          456,750 (a)  

Transfers out of Level 3

     (596,750     —          (596,750 ) (a)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2012

   $ 17,517,715      $ 180,202      $ 17,697,917   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at reporting date

   $ 153,176      $ 32,342      $ 185,518   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a)  

Transfers in and out of Level 3 are due primarily to increases or decreases in trade basis information versus dealer quotes.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

59


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of September 30, 2012 in valuing the Fund’s investments carried at fair value:

 

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

 
Valuation Inputs    Investment
Grade
Corporate
Bonds
     High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    

Term

Loans

     Common
Stocks
     Warrants      Total  

Level 1 — Quoted Prices

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 641,290       $ 142,577       $ 783,867   

Level 2 — Quoted Prices in Inactive Markets or Other Significant Observable Inputs

     3,023,639         40,690,771         —           —           —           43,714,410   

Level 3 — Significant Unobservable Inputs

     —           20,275,233         196,584         —           —           20,471,817   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 3,023,639       $ 60,966,004       $ 196,584       $ 641,290       $ 142,577       $ 64,970,094   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table provides quantitative information about the Fund’s Level 3 values, as well as its inputs, as of September 30, 2012. The table is not all-inclusive, but provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs. The range below is the range of prices denoted as a percentage of par.

 

       Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Assets    Fair Value as of
September 30, 2012
     Valuation
Methodology
   Significant
Unobservable
Input
  Range

High Yield Corporate Bonds

   $ 20,275,233       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   0.01 (2)  - 112.25

Term Loans

     196,584       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   68.69
  

 

 

         

Total Fair Value for Level 3 Investments

   $ 20,471,817           
  

 

 

         

 

(1)  

The Fund generally uses prices provided by an independent pricing service, or broker non-binding indicative bid prices (NBIB) on or near the valuation date as the primary basis for the fair value determinations for high yield corporate debt. These bid prices are non-binding, and may not be determinative of fair value. Each bid price is evaluated by the Valuation Committee in conjunction with additional information compiled by the Adviser.

 

(2)

The Fund holds two securities that are priced at $0.01 causing the range shown above to be large.

The following is a reconciliation of assets in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value:

 

Investments in Securities    High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    Term
Loans
    Total  

Balance as of March 31, 2012

   $ 15,840,232      $ 158,751      $ 15,998,983   

Accrued Discounts (Premiums)

     860        2,551        3,411   

Realized Gain/(Loss)

     123,917        —          123,917   

Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

     128,208        35,282        163,490   

Purchases at cost

     8,000,110        32,701        8,032,811   

Sales proceeds

     (3,661,969     (32,701     (3,694,670

Transfers into Level 3

     522,000        —          522,000 (a)  

Transfers out of Level 3

     (678,125     —          (678,125 ) (a)  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2012

   $ 20,275,233      $ 196,584      $ 20,471,817   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at reporting date

   $ 137,850      $ 35,282      $ 173,132   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a)  

Transfers in and out of Level 3 are due primarily to increases or decreases in trade basis information versus dealer quotes.

 

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

60


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

The following is a summary of the inputs used as of September 30, 2012 in valuing the Fund’s investments carried at fair value:

 

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

 
Valuation Inputs    Commercial
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
     Investment
Grade
Corporate
Bonds
     High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    

Term

Loans

     Common
Stocks
     Warrants      Total  

Level 1 — Quoted Prices

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 3,165,914       $ 122,234       $ 3,288,148   

Level 2 — Quoted Prices in Inactive Markets or Other Significant Observable Inputs

     —           7,734,627         20,895,064         —           —           —           28,629,691   

Level 3 — Significant Unobservable Inputs

     8,456,911         —           14,607,131         163,820         —           —           23,227,862   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 8,456,911       $ 7,734,627       $ 35,502,195       $ 163,820       $ 3,165,914       $ 122,234       $ 55,145,701   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table provides quantitative information about the Fund’s Level 3 values, as well as its inputs, as of September 30, 2012. The table is not all-inclusive, but provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs. The range below is the range of prices denoted as a percentage of par.

 

       Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Assets    Fair Value as of
September 30, 2012
     Valuation
Methodology
  

Significant

Unobservable
Input

  Range

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

   $ 8,456,911       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   112.14 - 119.13

High Yield Corporate Bonds

     14,607,131       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   0.01 (2)  -112.25

Term Loans

   $ 163,820       Unadjusted quoted
market prices
   NBIB (1)   68.69
  

 

 

         

Total Fair Value for Level 3 Investments

   $ 23,227,862           
  

 

 

         

 

(1)

The Fund generally uses prices provided by an independent pricing service, or broker non-binding indicative bid prices (NBIB) on or near the valuation date as the primary basis for the fair value determinations for commercial mortgage-backed securities and high yield corporate debt. These bid prices are non-binding, and may not be determinative of fair value. Each bid price is evaluated by the Valuation Committee in conjunction with additional information compiled by the Adviser.

 

(2)

The Fund holds two securities that are priced at $0.01 causing the range shown above to be large.

The following is a reconciliation of assets in which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value:

 

Investments in Securities    Commercial
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
    High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    Term
Loans
    Total  

Balance as of March 31, 2012

   $ 8,205,705      $ 11,827,302      $ 132,293      $ 20,165,300   

Accrued Discounts (Premiums)

     (34,916     2,807        2,125        (29,984

Realized Gain/(Loss)

     —          120,311        —          120,311   

Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)

     286,122        48,775        29,402        364,299   

Purchases at cost

     —          5,822,305        27,251        5,849,556   

Sales proceeds

     —          (3,079,744     (27,251     (3,106,995

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

61


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

Investments in Securities    Commercial
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
     High Yield
Corporate
Bonds
    Term
Loans
     Total  

Transfers into Level 3

     —           435,000        —           435,000 (a)  

Transfers out of Level 3

     —           (569,625     —           (569,625 ) (a)  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance as of September 30, 2012

   $ 8,456,911       $ 14,607,131      $ 163,820       $ 23,227,862   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at reporting date

   $ 286,122       $ 100,477      $ 29,402       $ 416,001   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(a)  

Transfers in and out of Level 3 are due primarily to increases or decreases in trade basis information versus dealer quotes.

For the six months ended September 30, 2012, there was no security transfer activity between Level 1 and Level 2 for any of the Funds.

Investment Transactions and Investment Income: Securities transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are calculated on the identified cost basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Discounts and premiums on securities are accreted and amortized, respectively on a daily basis, using the effective yield to maturity method adjusted based on management’s assessment of the collectability of such interest. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date.

Taxes: Each Fund intends to continue to meet the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its taxable income to its stockholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. Each Fund may incur an excise tax to the extent it has not distributed all of its taxable income on a calendar year basis.

GAAP provides guidance for how uncertain tax positions should be recognized, measured, presented and disclosed in the financial statements. An evaluation of tax positions taken in the course of preparing the Funds’ tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the taxing authority is required. Tax benefits of positions not deemed to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be booked as a tax expense in the current year and recognized as: a liability for unrecognized tax benefits; a reduction of an income tax refund receivable; a reduction of a deferred tax asset; an increase in deferred tax liability; or a combination thereof. As of September 30, 2012, the Funds have determined that there are no uncertain tax positions or tax liabilities required to be accrued.

The Funds have reviewed all taxable years that are open for examination ( i.e., not barred by the applicable statute of limitations) by taxing authorities of all major jurisdictions, including the Internal Revenue Service. As of September 30, 2012, open taxable years consisted of the taxable years ended March 31, 2009 through March 31, 2012. No examination of any of the Fund’s tax returns is currently in progress.

Expenses: Expenses directly attributable to a Fund are charged directly to that Fund, while expenses which are attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets.

Dividends and Distributions: Each Fund declares and pays dividends monthly from net investment income. To the extent that these distributions exceed net investment income, they may be classified as return of capital. Each Fund also pays distributions at least annually from its net realized capital gains, if any. Dividends and distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. All common shares have equal dividend and other distribution rights. A notice disclosing the source(s) of a distribution will be provided if payment is made from any source other than net investment income. Any such notice would be provided only for informational purposes in order to comply with the requirements of Section 19(a) of the 1940 Act and not for tax reporting purposes. The tax composition of each Fund’s distributions for each calendar year is reported on IRS Form 1099-DIV.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

62


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

Dividends from net investment income and distributions from realized gains from investment transactions have been determined in accordance with Federal income tax regulations and may differ from net investment income and realized gains recorded by each Fund for financial reporting purposes. These differences which could be temporary or permanent in nature may result in reclassification of distributions; however, net investment income, net realized gains and losses and net assets are not affected.

When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Transactions: The Funds may engage in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions. The Funds record when-issued securities on the trade date and maintain security positions such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payment for the securities purchased. Securities purchased on a when issued or delayed delivery basis are marked to market daily and begin earning interest on the settlement date. Losses may occur on these transactions due to changes in market conditions or the failure of counterparties to perform under the contract.

Cash Flow Information: Each Fund invests in securities and distributes dividends and distributions which are paid in cash or are reinvested at the discretion of stockholders. These activities are reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets. Additional information on cash receipts and cash payments is presented in the Statement of Cash Flows. Cash, as used in the Statement of Cash Flows, is the amount reported as “Cash” in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities, and does not include short-term investments.

Accounting practices that do not affect reporting activities on a cash basis include carrying investments at value and accreting discounts and amortizing premiums on debt obligations.

3. Risks of Investing in Asset-Backed Securities and Below-Investment Grade Securities

The value of asset-backed securities may be affected by, among other factors, changes in: interest rates, the market’s assessment of the quality of the underlying assets, the creditworthiness of the servicer for the underlying assets, information concerning the originator of the underlying assets, or the creditworthiness or rating of the entities that provide any supporting letters of credit, surety bonds, derivative instruments, or other credit enhancement. The value of asset-backed securities also will be affected by the exhaustion, termination or expiration of any credit enhancement.

The Funds have investments in below-investment grade debt securities. Below-investment grade securities involve a higher degree of credit risk than investment grade debt securities. In the event of an unanticipated default, the Funds would experience a reduction in their income, a decline in the market value of the securities so affected and a decline in the NAV of their shares. During an economic downturn or period of rising interest rates, highly leveraged and other below-investment grade issuers frequently experience financial stress that could adversely affect their ability to service principal and interest payment obligations, to meet projected business goals and to obtain additional financing. The market prices of below-investment grade debt securities are generally less sensitive to interest rate changes than higher-rated investments but are more sensitive to adverse economic or political changes or individual developments specific to the issuer than higher-rated investments. Periods of economic or political uncertainty and change can be expected to result in significant volatility of prices for these securities. Rating services consider these securities to be speculative in nature.

Below-investment grade securities may be subject to market conditions, events of default or other circumstances which cause them to be considered “distressed securities.” Distressed securities frequently do not produce income while they are outstanding. The Funds may be required to bear certain extraordinary expenses in order to protect and recover their investments in certain distressed securities. Therefore, to the extent the Funds seek capital growth through investment in such securities, the Funds’ ability to achieve current income for its stockholders may be diminished. The Funds also are subject to significant uncertainty as to when and in what manner and for what value the obligations evidenced by distressed securities will eventually be satisfied ( e.g. , through a liquidation of the obligor’s assets, an exchange offer or plan of reorganization involving the securities or a payment of some amount in satisfaction of the obligation). In addition, even if an exchange offer is made or a plan of reorganization is adopted with respect to distressed securities held by the Funds, there can be no

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

63


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

assurance that the securities or other assets received by the Funds in connection with such exchange offer or plan of reorganization will not have a lower value or income potential than may have been anticipated when the investment was made. Moreover, any securities received by the Funds upon completion of an exchange offer or plan of reorganization may be restricted as to resale. As a result of the Funds’ participation in negotiations with respect to any exchange offer or plan of reorganization with respect to an issuer of such securities, the Funds may be restricted from disposing of distressed securities.

4. Investment Advisory Agreements and Affiliated Transactions

Each Fund has entered into a separate Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreements”) with the Adviser under which the Adviser is responsible for the management of each Fund’s portfolio and provides the necessary personnel, facilities, equipment and certain other services necessary to the operations of each Fund. The Advisory Agreements provide, among other things, that the Adviser will bear all expenses of its employees and overhead incurred in connection with the performance of its duties under the Advisory Agreements, and will pay all salaries of the Funds’ directors and officers who are affiliated persons (as such term is defined in the 1940 Act) of the Adviser. The Advisory Agreements provide that each Fund shall pay the Adviser a monthly fee for its services at an annual rate of 0.65% of each Fund’s average daily total assets minus liabilities (other than aggregate indebtedness entered into for purposes of leverage).

Each Fund previously entered into a separate expense limitation agreement (the “Expense Limitation Agreements”) under which the Adviser contractually agreed to waive its fees and/or reimburse each Fund for its expenses to the extent necessary to ensure each Fund’s annual operating expenses (excluding brokerage, interest expenses and taxes, and acquired fund fees and expenses) did not exceed 1.30% of average annual net assets of each Fund. The Expense Limitation Agreements terminated effective July 29, 2010. Pursuant to the Expense Limitation Agreements, the Adviser retains its right to receive reimbursement of any payments made by it, or to recoup any fees waived by it during the prior three fiscal years, provided that after giving effect to such repayment or recoupment, such adjusted total annual operating expenses (expressed as a percentage of average net assets) for each Fund would not exceed the percentage limitations listed above.

The amount of investment advisory fees waived and expenses reimbursed available to be recouped and the year of expiration for each Fund are listed in the table below:

 

Fund    March 31, 2013      Up to
July 29, 2013
 

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 374,959       $ 32,427   

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

     337,154         58,511   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

     353,979         44,492   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

     341,483         57,099   

During the six months ended September 30, 2012, the Adviser earned the following in investment advisory fees under the Advisory Agreements.

 

Fund   

Investment

Advisory Fees

 

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 267,399   

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

     190,669   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

     216,227   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

     181,128   
  

 

 

 
   $ 855,423   
  

 

 

 

The Funds have entered into an Administration Agreement with the Adviser. The Adviser entered into a sub-administration agreement with U.S. Bancorp Fund Services, LLC (the “Sub-Administrator”). The Adviser and Sub-Administrator perform administrative services necessary for the operation of the Funds, including maintaining

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

64


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

certain books and records of the Funds and preparing reports and other documents required by federal, state, and other applicable laws and regulations, and providing the Funds with administrative office facilities. For these services, each Fund pays to the Adviser a monthly fee at an annual rate of 0.15% of each Fund’s average daily total assets minus liabilities (other than the aggregate indebtedness entered into for purposes of leverage). The Adviser is responsible for any fees due the Sub-Administrator.

During the six months ended September 30, 2012, the Adviser earned the following in Administration fees:

 

Fund    Administration Fee  

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 61,707   

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

     44,001   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

     49,899   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

     41,799   
  

 

 

 
   $ 197,406   
  

 

 

 

Certain officers of the Funds are officers and/or directors of the Adviser.

5. Purchases and Sales of Investments

Purchases and sales of investments, excluding short-term securities, credit facility and U.S. Government securities, for the six months ended September 30, 2012 were as follows:

 

Fund    Purchases      Sales  

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 13,074,352       $ 11,601,539   

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

     9,651,249         8,531,978   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

     11,069,964         9,064,835   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

     7,770,902         6,999,247   

For the six months ended September 30, 2012, there were no transactions in U.S. Government securities.

6. Borrowings

Credit facility: The Funds established a line of credit with BNP Paribas for investment purposes subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act for borrowings by registered investment companies. Each Fund pays interest in the amount of 0.80% plus the 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate on the amount outstanding and 0.80% on the line of credit that is unused. For the six months ended September 30, 2012, the average interest rate paid on the amounts outstanding under the line of credit was 1.25% for each of the Funds.

 

       Helios Advantage
Income Fund, Inc.
     Helios High
Income Fund, Inc.
     Helios Multi-Sector
High Income Fund, Inc.
     Helios Strategic
Income Fund, Inc.
 

Total line of credit amount available

   $ 27,000,000       $ 19,000,000       $ 22,000,000       $ 18,000,000   

Line of credit outstanding at September 30, 2012

     23,700,000         17,425,000         19,800,000         15,950,000   

Line of credit amount unused at September 30, 2012

     3,300,000         1,575,000         2,200,000         2,050,000   

Average balance outstanding during the period

     23,700,000         17,425,000         19,800,000         15,950,000   

Interest expense incurred on line of credit during the period

     164,158         117,233         134,881         109,784   

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

65


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

7. Reverse Stock Split

Effective September 1, 2009, each Fund affected a 1 for 5 reverse stock split for its respective shares. All share transactions in capital stock and per share data prior to September 1, 2009, have been restated to give effect of the reverse stock split. The reverse stock split had no impact on the overall value of a stockholder’s investment in each Fund.

8. Capital Stock

Each Fund is authorized to issue 1,000,000,000 shares of capital stock with a par value of $0.0001 per share. The Funds’ Boards of Directors are authorized to classify and reclassify any unissued shares of capital stock from time to time by setting or changing any preferences, conversion or other rights, voting powers, or, restrictions, limitations as to dividends, qualifications, or terms or conditions for the redemption of such shares by the Funds. The common shares have no preemptive, conversion, exchange or redemption rights. All common shares have equal voting, dividend, distribution and liquidation rights. The common shares, when issued, will be fully paid and non-assessable. Common stockholders are entitled to one vote per share and all voting rights for the election of directors are non-cumulative. The Funds have no present intentions of offering additional shares, except as described in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan on page 75.

9. Federal Income Tax Information

Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.

The tax character of distributions for the six months ended September 30, 2012 is expected to be from ordinary income but will be determined at the end of each Fund’s current fiscal year.

The tax character of distributions paid for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 were as follows:

 

       Helios Advantage
Income Fund, Inc.
     Helios High
Income Fund, Inc.
     Helios Multi-Sector
High Income Fund, Inc.
     Helios Strategic
Income Fund, Inc.
 

Ordinary income (1)

   $ 4,722,655       $ 3,484,189       $ 3,661,470       $ 2,490,768   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total distributions

   $ 4,722,655       $ 3,484,189       $ 3,661,470       $ 2,490,768   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1)  

For tax purposes, short-term capital gain distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.

At March 31, 2012, each Fund’s most recently completed tax year-end, the components of net assets (excluding paid-in capital) on a tax basis were as follows:

 

       Helios Advantage
Income Fund, Inc.
    Helios High
Income Fund, Inc.
    Helios Multi-Sector
High Income Fund, Inc.
    Helios Strategic
Income Fund, Inc.
 

Undistributed ordinary income

   $ 373,065      $ 34,148      $ 376,505      $ 276,511   

Capital loss carryforward (1)

     (401,012,492     (299,376,208     (450,100,115     (365,491,429

Unrealized appreciation

     3,227,245        2,339,119        2,372,396        2,294,731   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ (397,412,182   $ (297,002,941   $ (447,351,214   $ (362,920,187
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1)

To the extent future capital gains are offset by capital loss carryforwards, such gains will not be distributed.

As of March 31, 2012, the Funds’ capital loss carryforwards were as follows:

 

Fund    Expiring in
2014
     Expiring in
2015
     Expiring in
2016
     Expiring in
2017
     Expiring in
2018
 

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $ —         $ —         $ 54,307,610       $ 175,931,140       $ 170,773,742   

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

     —           —           42,347,138         130,227,458         126,801,612   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

     —           —           61,500,585         205,725,325         182,874,205   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

     1,362,197         193,592         59,889,208         152,878,553         151,167,879   

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

66


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

Federal Income Tax Basis: The federal income tax basis of the Funds’ investments at September 30, 2012 was as follows:

 

Fund   

Cost of

Investments

     Gross Unrealized
Appreciation
     Gross Unrealized
Depreciation
    Net Unrealized
Appreciation
 

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 75,628,230       $ 5,728,864       $ (1,170,629   $ 4,558,235   

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

     53,924,406         4,137,669         (934,448     3,203,221   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

     61,492,695         4,544,659         (1,067,260     3,477,399   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

     51,441,218         4,716,333         (1,011,850     3,704,483   

Capital Account Reclassifications: Because federal income tax regulations differ in certain respects from GAAP, income and capital gain distributions, if any, determined in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. These differences are primarily due to differing treatments for wash sales and return of capital. Permanent book and tax differences, if any, relating to stockholder distributions will result in reclassifications to paid-in-capital or to undistributed capital gains. These reclassifications have no effect on net assets or NAV per share.

10. Indemnification

Under each Fund’s organizational documents, its officers and directors are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to each Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts with their vendors and others that provide for indemnification. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, since this would involve the resolution of certain claims, as well as future claims that may be made, against the Funds. Thus, an estimate of the financial impact, if any, of these arrangements cannot be made at this time.

11. New Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-11 “Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” ASU 2011-11 requires disclosures to make financial statements that are prepared under U.S. GAAP more comparable to those prepared under IFRS. The new disclosure requirements mandate that entities disclose both gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the Statements of Assets & Liabilities as well as instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. In addition, ASU 2011-11 requires disclosure of collateral received and posted in connection with master netting agreements or similar arrangements. New disclosures are required for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.

Management is currently evaluating the impact ASU No. 2011-11 will have on the Funds’ financial statements and disclosures.

12. Pending Litigation

Beginning in late 2007, lawsuits were filed in state and federal courts in Tennessee, Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Mississippi, Louisiana, New York and Texas relating to certain fixed income funds managed by the Adviser, including the Funds. Certain of the cases were filed as putative class actions on behalf of investors who purchased shares of the Funds from December 2004 through February 2008 and other cases were filed as actions on behalf of one or more individuals or trusts. The complaints name various entities and individuals as defendants including, among others, the Funds, the former Adviser, Morgan Asset Management, Inc. (“MAM”), Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc. (“Morgan Keegan”), Regions Financial Corporation and several affiliates (“Regions”), certain former directors and former officers of the Funds and the Funds’ former portfolio managers. The complaints generally allege that the defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose material facts relating to portfolio composition, fair valuation, liquidity and risk in Fund registration statements and other documents. The

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

67


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

plaintiffs seek damages in amounts to be determined at trial and reasonable costs and, in some cases, attorneys’ fees. Each of the cases is at a preliminary stage. An answer was filed in a state court case, Burke v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. pending in the circuit court of Jefferson County, Alabama, on behalf of Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc. and Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc. Other than the Burke case and the motions to dismiss filed in the actions discussed below, no responses to the complaints have been filed in the actions pending against the Funds, and no classes have been certified in any of the putative class actions filed against the Funds. As discussed further below, the Funds moved to dismiss the consolidated class action related to the Closed-End funds, but the Court denied the motion as it relates to the Funds. The parties in this action substantially reached a settlement and filed a Stipulation of Settlement for the Court’s preliminary approval as discussed further below.

On March 13, 2008, a derivative action was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee seeking damages on behalf of Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc. against MAM and certain former directors of the Fund. The complaint in this action alleged, among other things, that defendants MAM and certain former directors of the Fund breached their fiduciary duties and mismanaged the Fund in connection with portfolio composition, fair valuation, liquidity, risk management and disclosure. The complaint sought damages in an amount to be determined at trial and reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. Motions to dismiss the complaint were filed by the respective defendants. The Board of the Fund underwent an investigation of the underlying allegations in the complaint to determine whether pursuit of such claims is in the best interest of the Fund. The Fund moved to dismiss the action without prejudice, or alternatively, to stay the action pending the completion of the Board’s investigation of the underlying allegations and its determination as to proceeding on behalf of the Fund. On March 10, 2010, the court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissed the action without prejudice to the Fund’s right to seek remuneration for any perceived wrongs on the completion of its Board’s investigation.

Subsequently, on March 18, 2010, four derivative actions were filed on behalf of each of the Funds. The complaints in these actions allege, among other things, that defendants MAM, and certain former officers and directors of the Funds breached their fiduciary duties and mismanaged the Funds in connection with portfolio composition, fair valuation, liquidity, risk management and disclosure. The complaints seek equitable relief, damages in an amount to be determined at trial and reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. The proceedings are at a preliminary stage. On November 5, 2010, the Court granted plaintiff’s unopposed motion for consolidation of these actions, and on December 6, 2010, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. The Boards of the Funds have undertaken an investigation of the underlying allegations in the consolidated amended complaint to determine whether pursuit of such claims is in the best interest of the Funds. On January 24, 2011, the Funds filed a motion for a stay of the action pending the completion of the Boards’ investigation or, in the alternative, until April 6, 2011. Also on January 24, 2011, the non-Fund defendants filed motions to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. On February 9, 2011, the Court granted the Funds’ motion and stayed the case until April 6, 2011. On April 6, 2011, the Funds and derivative plaintiffs filed a joint, unopposed motion for a sixty-day extension of the stay of the case to facilitate their discussion of a possible resolution of the issues in this action. The Court granted this motion on April 8, 2011, staying the case until June 6, 2011. Per the Court’s June 28, 2011 Scheduling Order, derivative plaintiffs filed their motion in opposition to the non-Fund defendants’ motion to dismiss on July 19, 2011. Non-Fund defendants filed their reply on August 18, 2011. On September 9, 2011, the Court entered an order granting non-Fund defendants’ motion to dismiss without prejudice. Following the Board’s investigation, the Board has authorized derivative plaintiffs’ counsel to pursue the derivative claims on behalf of the Closed-End funds. On October 21, 2011, derivative plaintiffs filed a verified shareholder derivative complaint, with plans to file an amended complaint soon thereafter. Subsequently, on November 15, 2011, derivative plaintiffs filed a verified amended shareholder derivative complaint. On January 13, 2012, non-Fund defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended derivative complaint. Derivative plaintiffs filed their opposition brief on February 27, 2012, and defendants’ replies were filed on March 28, 2012. On May 8, 2012, the parties notified the Court that a settlement in principle had been reached in the derivative action, and on May 9, 2012 the Court granted the parties’ joint motion to stay the action pending finalization and documentation of the settlement terms.

 

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

68


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

Claims substantially similar to those described above have been made in lawsuits filed in the United States Federal and state courts concerning certain open-end funds formerly managed by the Adviser. Motions to dismiss the open-end derivative and open-end class actions were filed by the respective defendants. The open-end fund defendants moved to dismiss the open-end derivative action without prejudice, or alternatively, to stay such action pending the completion of the Board investigation described above. On September 24, 2010, the Court denied defendants’ motions to dismiss but granted a stay of the action pending receipt by October 25, 2010 of a report by the Board regarding the status of its investigation; on October 22, 2010, the Board filed a status report, and requested that the stay be extended until November 30, 2010. The open-end fund defendants separately moved to dismiss the open-end class actions for failure to state a claim. On September 30, 2010, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss. Defendants’ time to answer the surviving claims was extended until November 30, 2010. On November 30, 2010, the open-end funds filed an additional status report in the open-end derivative action, including a proposed memorandum of understanding between the open-end funds and derivative plaintiffs regarding the resolution of some of the issues in the open-end derivative and class actions and the realignment of the open-end funds as plaintiffs in the open-end derivative action (the “MOU”). The open-end funds and derivative plaintiffs also filed a motion for an extension of the stay to facilitate the steps necessary to seek approval of the MOU and the proposed settlement. On December 10, 2010, the Court granted the joint motion and stayed the action until April 6, 2011. On December 16, 2010, the Court entered a scheduling order in the open-end class action that gave plaintiffs until April 6, 2011 to file the necessary motions seeking approval of the proposed partial settlement. On March 14, 2011, the open-end funds and derivative plaintiffs filed a joint motion for approval of the proposed notice to the open-end funds’ shareholders and final approval of the MOU in the open-end derivative action. On that same date, the open-end funds and lead plaintiffs filed a joint motion for preliminary approval of the proposed partial settlement and approval of notice to the settlement class members in the open-end class action. Non-Fund defendants filed opposition papers on April 18, 2011. On June 21, 2011 the Funds and plaintiffs executed an amended MOU (the “Amended MOU”), which was submitted to the Court together with the reply papers of the Funds and plaintiffs on June 24, 2011. The non-Fund defendants filed their sur-reply papers on August 1, 2011. On August 12, 2011, plaintiffs and the Funds filed a motion with the Court requesting leave to file sur-sur-reply briefs in response to the non-Fund defendants’ sur-reply briefs. On September 6, 2011, plaintiffs and the Funds filed a joint motion to strike the Declaration of Nancy J. Moore (the “Moore Declaration”), submitted in support of the non-Fund defendants’ opposition to final approval of the Amended MOU and partial settlement. Non-Fund defendants filed their opposition brief September 20, 2011, and plaintiffs and the Funds filed their reply brief on October 27, 2011. The Court held a hearing on the motion to strike the Moore Declaration on December 7, 2011, and on January 4, 2012, the Court entered an order denying the motion to strike. On March 26, 2012, the Court granted plaintiffs’ and the Funds’ joint motion for leave to file a sur-sur-reply on the Amended MOU briefing. On April 18, 2012, plaintiffs and the Funds each filed their respective sur-sur-reply briefs. On June 6, 2012, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint, and attached the proposed amended complaint to the filing. On July 12, 2012, the Court granted the parties’ joint motion to extend the time for defendents to file a response to plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint until 30 days after a ruling from the Court on the motion to approve the AMOU and partial settlement, which is still pending.

On September 23, 2008, most of the cases pending in federal court in the Western District of Tennessee in which the Funds are defendants, and other cases pending in that court involving the same or similar claims against other defendants, were consolidated into a single proceeding encaptioned In re Regions Morgan Keegan Closed End Fund Litigation . On December 15, 2010, the Court entered an order appointing lead plaintiffs and lead counsel and consolidating the various actions in this proceeding. On February 22, 2011, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint, alleging Section 11 and Section 12 securities violations against Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, and Section 10b securities violations against all four Closed-End Funds. On April 13, 2011, the Funds filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint with prejudice. The non-Fund defendants filed separate motions to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint on April 13, 2011. Per the Court’s May 20, 2011 Scheduling Order, plaintiffs filed their brief in opposition to the Funds’ and non-Fund defendants’ separate motions to dismiss on June 17, 2011. The Funds and non-Fund defendants filed their replies in support of their separate motions to dismiss on August 12, 2011. On March 30, 2012, the Court entered

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

69


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

an order granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss. The Court dismissed certain claims against the Officer Co-Defendants, but denied dismissal of all other claims. On April 13, 2012, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint. On May 7, 2012, the Court granted co-defendants’ and the Funds’ joint, unopposed motion for an extension on the filing of an answer to the amended class action complaint until June 11, 2012. On May 8, 2012, the parties notified the Court that a settlement in principle had been reached in the securities class action, and on May 9, 2012 the Court granted the parties’ joint motion to stay the action pending finalization and documentation of the settlement terms.

On February 12, 2009, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“Judicial Panel”) issued an order transferring related actions pending in other federal courts to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee and directing that the transferred cases be coordinated or consolidated with the above-described actions relating to the Funds (the “MDL proceeding”).

On June 18 and June 23, 2010, respectively, two actions were filed in the Northern District of Alabama against Morgan Keegan, MK Holding, Inc., the Funds, and certain other defendants. These complaints generally allege that the defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose material facts relating to portfolio composition, fair valuation, liquidity and risk in Fund prospectuses and registration statements. The plaintiffs seek damages in amounts to be determined at trial and attorneys’ fees. On July 28, 2010, joint motions were filed by plaintiffs, Morgan Keegan and MK Holding, Inc. in these proceedings for temporary stays pending transfer to the Western District of Tennessee for consolidated or coordinated pretrial proceedings as part of the MDL proceeding. The Court entered the MDL transfer order consolidating the actions on August 31, 2010.

On July 12, 2010, a putative class action was filed in the Western District of Tennessee against MAM, Morgan Keegan, Regions, MK Holding, Inc., the Funds, and certain other defendants. The action purports to assert claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), on behalf of all ERISA plans for which Regions Bank serves or served as trustee, custodian or agent that owned or held shares of certain investment funds, which are subject of the multidistrict litigation discussed above. The Funds, together with certain open-end funds formerly managed by the Adviser, are sued as Nonfiduciary Parties in Interest, and are alleged to be liable, and subject to equitable remedies, for allegedly knowingly participating in breaches of ERISA fiduciary duties by other defendants, or wrongfully obtaining or receiving assets from the Regions ERISA Trusts. Plaintiffs also allege that the Funds are liable for the conduct of certain other defendants who allegedly acted as agents of the Funds. The action seeks equitable remedies, including a constructive trust and/or restitution of assets allegedly wrongfully obtained or received, as well as fees, profits, bonuses, dividends or other remuneration, together with damages in an amount to be determined at trial and reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. On September 9, 2010, the non-Fund defendants filed a motion to consolidate this action with other ERISA cases in which the Funds are not named as defendants. On April 25, 2011, the Court granted defendants’ motion to consolidate the ERISA actions. On May 20, 2011, the ERISA plaintiffs filed a Third Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint that no longer names the Funds as defendants in the action.

No estimate of the effect, if any, of these lawsuits on the Funds can be made at this time.

13. Subsequent Events

Recent Litigation Updates

The Funds and the other parties to In re Helios Closed-End Funds Derivative Litigation , (the “Litigation”) have filed with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee a Stipulation of Settlement. The Stipulation was submitted to the Court together with a proposed Preliminary Approval Order, which if signed by the Court, will preliminarily approve the settlement of the derivative claims filed on behalf of the Closed-End Funds in the Litigation in exchange for a settlement payment to the Closed-End Funds by the Regions Financial Corp. and several Morgan Keegan affiliated entities, as defined in the stipulation, in the amount of $6.0 million, less an attorneys’ fee award in the amount of $1.8 million. After a hearing on the settlement, if the Court grants final approval of the settlement, it is expected that each of the Closed-End Funds’ share of the settlement, after the

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

70


HELIOS FUNDS

Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

attorneys’ fee award is deducted, will be approximately the amounts reflected below, based upon an allocation of the settlement to the Closed-End Funds approved by the Closed-End Funds’ Boards of Directors:

 

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $1,150,000 ($0.18 per share)

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

   $1,225,000 ($0.16 per share)

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

   $   850,000 ($0.17 per share)

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

   $   975,000 ($0.16 per share)

The Preliminary Approval Order, once signed by the Court, will provide for further notice of the settlement to the shareholders of the Closed-End Funds (at the Closed-End Funds’ expense), and the scheduling of a hearing and any remaining proceedings. The amount of the settlement is subject to modification by the Court prior to final approval and, therefore, the amount to be paid to each Closed-End Fund is subject to change.

Concurrent with the filing of the Stipulation of Settlement of the Litigation, the parties to In re Regions Morgan Keegan Closed-End Fund Litigation , (the “Class Action Litigation”) have also filed with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee a Stipulation of Settlement. The Stipulation attaches a Preliminary Approval Order, which if signed by the Court, will preliminarily approve the settlement, including a release of securities claims alleged against the Closed-End Funds and the other defendants pursuant to the terms of the Stipulation of Settlement of the Class Action Litigation. The Stipulation of Settlement filed in the Class Action Litigation (which also is subject to Court approval) requires that certain of the defendants make a payment of $62.0 million to a class of Closed-End Fund shareholders and does not require any payments to be made by the Closed-End Funds in connection with the settlement of the Class Action Litigation.

The Preliminary Approval Order in the Class Action Litigation, once signed by the Court, will provide for further notice of the settlement to the class members, and the scheduling of a hearing and any remaining proceedings.

Other Subsequent Events

GAAP requires recognition in the financial statements of the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. For non-recognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading, the Funds are required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of their financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made.

Dividends: The Funds’ Boards of Directors declared the following monthly dividends:

 

Fund    Dividend Per Share      Record Date      Payable Date  

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 0.0625         October 17, 2012         October 25, 2012   

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 0.0600         October 17, 2012         October 25, 2012   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 0.0425         October 17, 2012         October 25, 2012   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 0.0350         October 17, 2012         October 25, 2012   
Fund    Dividend Per Share      Record Date      Payable Date  

Helios Advantage Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 0.0625         November 15, 2012         November 29, 2012   

Helios High Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 0.0600         November 15, 2012         November 29, 2012   

Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 0.0425         November 15, 2012         November 29, 2012   

Helios Strategic Income Fund, Inc.

   $ 0.0350         November 15, 2012         November 29, 2012   

Management has evaluated subsequent events in the preparation of the Funds’ financial statements and has determined that other than the items listed herein, there are no events that require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

71


HELIOS FUNDS

Compliance Certifications (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

On August 20, 2012, the Funds submitted a CEO annual certification to the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) on which the Funds’ principal executive officer certified that he was not aware, as of that date, of any violation by the Funds of the NYSE’s Corporate Governance listing standards. In addition, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC rules, the Funds’ principal executive and principal financial officers have made quarterly certifications, included in filings with the SEC on Forms N-CSR and N-Q relating to, among other things, the Funds’ disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, as applicable.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

72


HELIOS FUNDS

Board Considerations Relating to the Investment Advisory Agreements (Unaudited)

September 30, 2012

 

 

At a meeting held on May 22, 2012, the Board, including a majority of the Disinterested Directors, considered and approved the continuation of the investment advisory agreements (the “Advisory Agreements”) between Brookfield Investment Management Inc. (the “Adviser”) and the Funds. In approving the Advisory Agreements, the Board, including a majority of the Disinterested Directors, determined that the fee structures were fair and reasonable and that approval of the Advisory Agreements was in the best interests of each Fund and its shareholders. The Board of Directors considered a wide range of information, including information regularly received from the Adviser at the quarterly Board meetings. While attention was given to all information furnished, the following discusses the primary factors relevant to the Board’s decision.

NATURE, EXTENT AND QUALITY OF SERVICES. The Board considered the level and depth of knowledge of the Adviser. In evaluating the quality of services provided by the Adviser, the Board took into account its familiarity with the Adviser’s management through board meetings, conversations and reports. The Board noted that the Adviser is responsible for managing the Funds’ investment programs, the general operations and the day-to-day management of the Funds and for compliance with applicable laws, regulations, policies and procedures. The Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the overall services provided by the Adviser and its affiliates are satisfactory. The Board’s conclusion was based, in part, upon services provided to the Funds such as quarterly reports provided by the Adviser: 1) comparing the performance of each Fund with a peer group, 2) showing that the investment policies and restrictions for each Fund were followed, and 3) covering matters such as the compliance of investment personnel and other access persons with the Adviser’s and the Funds’ codes of ethics, the adherence to fair value pricing procedures established by the Board, the monitoring of portfolio compliance and presentations regarding the economic environment. The Board also considered the experience of the Adviser as an investment adviser and the experience of the team of portfolio managers that manages the Funds and its current experience in acting as an investment adviser to other investment funds and institutional clients.

INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE. The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of the Funds in view of its importance to shareholders. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions at Board meetings throughout the year, particular attention in assessing the performance was given to presentations that compared each of the Funds’ performance with its Morningstar category peers for the 1, 3 and 5 year periods ending April 30, 2012, as well as the year-to-date period. The Board noted that each Fund performed below the median of its Morningstar category peers for the 3 and 5 year periods, while each Fund performed above the median for the 1 year period. The Board further noted that Helios Advantage Income Fund and Helios Multi-Sector High Income Fund performed above the median, while Helios High Income Fund and Helios Strategic Income Fund performed below the median for the year-to-date period. The Board noted the improvement in the performance of each Fund since July 29, 2008, when the Adviser began managing the Funds. Based on the Adviser’s discussion of the current market and its positioning of each Fund’s portfolio, the Board concluded that each Fund’s performance after the Adviser began its services as investment manager was adequate.

PROFITABILITY. The Board also considered the level of profits expected to be realized by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with the operation of the Funds. In this regard, the Board reviewed the Fund profitability analysis addressing the overall profitability of the Adviser for its management of the Helios fund family, as well as its expected profits and that of its affiliates for providing administrative support for the Funds. The Board further noted that the methodology followed in allocating costs to the Funds appeared reasonable, while also recognizing that allocation methodologies are inherently subjective. The Board concluded that the expected profitability to the Adviser from the Funds was reasonable.

MANAGEMENT FEES AND TOTAL EXPENSES. The Board also placed significant emphasis on the review of each Fund’s expenses. The Board compared the advisory fees and total expense ratios of each of the Funds with various comparative data that it had been provided. The Board noted that each Fund’s total expenses were higher than the median, while each Fund’s total advisory and administrative fee was at the median of the Funds’ peer group. The Board further noted that the fees and expenses payable by the Funds were comparable to those payable by other client accounts managed by the Adviser and concluded that each Fund’s management fees and total expenses were reasonable.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

73


HELIOS FUNDS

Board Considerations Relating to the Investment Advisory Agreements (Unaudited) (continued)

September 30, 2012

 

 

ECONOMIES OF SCALE. The Board considered the potential economies of scale that may be realized if the assets of the Funds grow. The Board noted that shareholders might benefit from lower operating expenses as a result of an increasing amount of assets being spread over the fixed expenses of the Funds, but noted that, as closed-end funds, the Funds were unlikely to grow significantly.

In considering the approval of the Advisory Agreements, the Board, including the Disinterested Directors, did not identify any single factor as controlling. Based on the Board’s evaluation of all factors that it deemed to be relevant, the Board, including the Disinterested Directors, concluded that the Adviser has demonstrated that it possesses the capability and resources necessary to perform the duties required of it under the Advisory Agreements; performance of the Funds is adequate; and the proposed Advisory fees are fair and reasonable, given the nature, extent and quality of the services to be rendered by the Adviser.

After carefully reviewing all of these factors, the Board, including the Disinterested Directors, unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

74


HELIOS FUNDS

Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Unaudited)

 

 

The Funds offer a dividend reinvestment plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to which stockholders, unless they elect otherwise, automatically have dividends and other distributions reinvested in common shares of the Fund by Computershare Trust Company, N.A. and Computershare Shareholder Services, Inc. (together, the “Plan Agent”). Stockholders who elect not to participate in the Plan receive all distributions in cash paid by wire or check mailed directly to the recordholder by the Plan Agent.

How the Plan Works

After a Fund declares a dividend or determines to make other distributions, the Plan Agent will acquire shares for the participants’ accounts, depending upon the circumstances described below, either (i) through receipt of newly-issued shares of the Fund or (ii) by open-market purchases as follows:

 

 

If, on the payment date, the NAV is equal to or less than the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions, the Plan Agent will invest the distribution amount in newly-issued shares on behalf of the participants. The number of newly-issued shares to be credited to each participant’s account will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the distribution by the NAV on the date the shares are issued. However, if the NAV is less than 95% of the market price on the payment date, the dollar amount of the distribution will be divided by 95% of the market price on the payment date. Because common shares may be issued at less than their market price, Plan participants may get a benefit that non-participants do not.

 

 

If, on the payment date, the NAV is greater than the market value per share plus estimated brokerage commissions, the Plan Agent will invest the distribution amount in shares acquired on behalf of the participants in open-market purchases, which may be made on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), in the over-the-counter market or in negotiated transactions and may be on such terms as to price, delivery and otherwise as the Plan Agent shall determine. It is possible that the market price for the shares may increase before the Plan Agent has completed its purchases. Therefore, the average purchase price per share the Plan Agent pays may exceed the market price thereof on the payment date. If the market price per share increases so that it equals or exceeds the NAV per share (minus estimated brokerage commissions), the Plan Agent will cease its purchases. Otherwise, the Plan Agent will use all distributions received in cash to purchase shares in the open market on or shortly after the payment date, but in no event more than thirty (30) days after the payment date, except where temporary curtailment or suspension of purchases is necessary to comply with applicable provisions of the federal securities laws. If the Plan Agent is unable to invest the full amount through open-market purchases during the purchase period, the Plan Agent will request that, with respect to the uninvested portion of such amount, the Fund issue new shares at the close of business on the earlier of the last day of the purchase period or the first day during the purchase period on which the NAV per share (minus estimated brokerage commissions) equals or is less than the market price per share.

Costs of the Plan

The Plan Agent’s fees for the handling of the reinvestment of dividends and other distributions will be paid by the Funds. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agent’s open-market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of dividends and other distributions. If a participant elects to have the Plan Agent sell part or all of his or her shares and remit the proceeds, the participant will be subject to a $15.00 service fee and a $0.12 per share sold processing fee (which includes applicable brokerage commissions the Plan Agent is required to pay). The participant will not be charged any other fees for this service. However, each Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service fee payable by the participant.

Tax-Implications

The automatic reinvestment of dividends or other distributions does not relieve participants of any taxes that may be payable on such distributions. Participants will receive tax information annually for their personal records and to help them prepare their federal income tax returns. For further information as to the tax consequences of participation in the Plan, participants should consult with their own tax advisors.

 

2012 Semi-Annual Report

 

75


HELIOS FUNDS

Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Unaudited)

 

 

Right to Withdraw

Participants may withdraw from the Plan by calling the Plan Agent at 800-426-5523, writing to the Plan Agent at 250 Royall Street, Canton, Massachusetts 02021 or completing and returning the transaction form attached to each Plan statement. The withdrawal will be effective immediately if the participant’s notice is received by the Plan Agent not less than ten days prior to any dividend or other distribution record date. Otherwise, the withdrawal will be effective the first trading day after the payment date for the dividend or other distribution with respect to any subsequent dividend or other distribution.

 

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

 

76


CORPORATE INFORMATION

 

 

Investment Advisor and Administrator

Brookfield Investment Management Inc.

Three World Financial Center

200 Vesey Street

New York, New York 10281-1010

www.brookfieldim.com

Please direct your inquiries to:

Investor Relations

Phone: 1-800-497-3746

E-mail: funds@brookfield.com

Transfer Agent

Stockholder inquiries relating to distributions, address changes and stockholder account information should be directed to the Fund’s transfer agent:

Computershare Shareholder Services, Inc.

250 Royall Street

Canton, Massachusetts 02021

1-800-426-5523

Sub-Administrator and Fund Accounting Agent

U.S. Bank Fund Services

615 East Michigan Street

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202

Legal Counsel

Paul Hastings LLP

75 East 55th Street

New York, New York 10022

Custodian

U.S. Bank National Association

1555 North River Center Drive, Suite 302

Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53212

Directors of the Funds

Rodman L. Drake    Chairman
Louis P. Salvatore    Audit Committee Chairman
Stuart A. McFarland    Director
Diana H. Hamilton    Director
Officers of the Funds
Kim G. Redding    President
Dana E. Erikson    Vice President
Richard M. Cryan    Vice President
Mark Shipley    Vice President
Steven M. Pires    Treasurer
Jonathan C. Tyras    Secretary
Seth Gelman    Chief Compliance Officer
Lily Wicker    Assistant Secretary
 

The Funds will file their complete schedules of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Funds’ Form N-Q will be available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Funds’ Form N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

You may obtain a description of the Funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures, and information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-497-3746, or go to the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.


LOGO


Item 2. Code of Ethics.

Not applicable for semi-annual reports.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

Not applicable for semi-annual reports.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Not applicable for semi-annual reports.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrant.

Not applicable for semi-annual reports.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments.

Please see Item 1.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End

     Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable for semi-annual reports.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

There has been no change as of the date of this filing, in the portfolio manager identified in response to paragraph (a)(1) of this Item in the Registrant’s most recently filed annual reports N-CSR.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated

     Purchasers.

None.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.


Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

 

(a) The Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Registrant’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective, based on their evaluation of such Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing of this report on Form
N-CSR.

 

(b) As of the date of filing this Form N-CSR, the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no changes in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

 

(a)(1) None.

 

  (2) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 is attached as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.

 

  (3) None.

 

(b) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 is attached as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

HELIOS MULTI-SECTOR HIGH INCOME FUND, INC.

 

By:

 

/s/ Kim G. Redding

  Kim G. Redding
  President and Principal Executive Officer

Date: December 6, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

By:

 

/s/ Kim G. Redding

  Kim G. Redding
  President and Principal Executive Officer

Date: December 6, 2012

 

By:

 

/s/ Steven M. Pires

  Steven M. Pires
  Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer

Date: December 6, 2012

Helios Multi-Secto (NYSE:HMH)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mai 2024 à Juin 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse Helios Multi-Secto
Helios Multi-Secto (NYSE:HMH)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Juin 2023 à Juin 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse Helios Multi-Secto