Forsys Metals Corp (TSX:FSY)(FRANKFURT:F2T)(NAMIBIAN:FSY) ("Forsys"
or the "Company") is pleased to announce the completion of an
Engineering Cost Study ("ECS") on its planned Valencia process
plant for the Company's consolidated Norasa uranium project in
Namibia. The ECS, which was completed by the Perth office of
leading engineering group, AMEC Australia Pty Ltd ("AMEC"),
confirms the Company's focus on optimizing the Norasa project's
economics. Completion of the ECS is a significant milestone on the
path to completion of a NI 43-101 Feasibility Study, which is
expected before the end of 2013.
Engineering Cost Study Highlights
-- Differential NPV estimates increased by US$348m(1) before tax.
-- Opex is significantly reduced from the adjusted 2010 engineering cost
study (in 2013 dollars).
-- Capex for the process plant is cost-effective at US$249.7m.
-- Leach residence time reduced significantly by 30%.
-- Increase in plant throughput from 8.7 Mt/a to 11.2 Mt/a.
-- An increase in average annual production from 3.3 Mlb to 4.2 Mlb U3O8.
-- Plant availability increased from 88% to 91%.
-- Plant block model greatly simplified.
Marcel Hilmer, Chief Executive Officer, commented, "We are very
pleased to have delivered a positive engineering cost study which
highlights many positives for the Norasa Uranium Project. It
constitutes an important component for the completion of a
feasibility study, which is planned for release by year's end. As a
consequence of the positive study, we are now accelerating the
drilling programs at Valencia East and Valencia North with a
strategy to release an updated mineral resources statement in Q3
2013. In the near term, we will appoint an engineering firm to
complete the feasibility study, which will incorporate the
optimized processing plant."
The study reviewed the Snowden Group 2008 definitive feasibility
study and 2010 engineering cost study that outlined some
potentially attractive comminution flowsheet changes and
optimizations. The ECS details the results of these investigations
and studies and incorporates the recommended flowsheet changes and
optimizations into the revised and updated capital and operating
costs for the process plant component of the Norasa project.
The ECS will be available for download from
www.forsysmetals.com.
Engineering Study - Key Metrics
AMEC completed a review of a number of alternative comminution
circuits and compared them to an Adjusted Base Case ("ABC"). The
ABC used the existing Snowden Group design; a 8.7 Mt/a, three-stage
crushing and rod milling (3 off) at a grind of P80 = 850
micrometre. Capital and operating Costs were adjusted to reflect
rate changes from 2010 to 2013 costs. Of the options considered,
the most beneficial in overall terms was the semi autogenous
grinding (SAG) Mill. The design is a two-stage crush plus single
stage SAG mill using acidic filtrate at a grind of P80 approx. 600
micrometre.
------------------------------
ABC SAG Mill(1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feed tonnage, Mt/a 8.7 11.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mill grade, g/ t U3O8 194 194
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall U3O8 recovery 85% 85%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual production, Mlb U3O8 3.3 4.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating cost, US$ Tonne $8.60 $7.68
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating cost, US$ lb U3O8 $23.66 $21.11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capital cost, US$ M $241.60 $249.70
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crushing Three-stage Two-stage
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Milling 3 rod mills 1 SAG mill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
U3O8 Price $/lb $70 $70
Total Revenue US$M/LoM $3,504 $4,487
Total Operating Costs US$M/LoM $2,109 $2,314
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Differential NPV $M
(relative to ABC, 8% DR - before tax) $0 $348
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 - The revenue, total operating costs and differential NPV
values were generated by the Company using the capital costs and
indicative operating costs estimated in the ECS, in addition to
other assumptions made by Forsys on items excluded from this study,
such as mining, external infrastructure, owner's costs, etc. which
will be reviewed and estimated as part of the feasibility study.
The differential NPV values in the above table are within 4% of the
AMEC estimated differential NPV values considering the process
plant and site infrastructure only. The differential NPV is a
suitable measure to determine the possible economic improvements
from implementing the SAG mill option as it relates to the
processing plant. There is a +/-25% accuracy associated with the
cost study review.
To view the figure accompanying this press release, please visit
the following link:
http://media3.marketwire.com/docs/870460.jpg
Bruno Modelling (A Metso process optimization tool)
Bruno modelling was conducted to model circulating loads around
the main front end comminution equipment. The basis for the Bruno
modelling is shown in the table below.
------------------------
ABC SAG Mill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secondary, Tertiary Crusher
Circuit
Run time % 75 65
Run rate t/h 1322 1967
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
h (downstream
Fine Ore Stockpile (FOS) capacity) 12
t live 13 076
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mill/Repulp
Type Rod SSSAG
In acid? No Yes
No. of 3 1
Run time % 88 91
Run rate t/h 1127 1400
Water added to mill/repulp
circuit m3/h 628 1372
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leach Circuit
Solids rate t/h 1127 1400
Solids density % 65 48
Water t/h 607 1517
Water m3/h 607 1517
Water SG 1 1
Solids SG 2.7 2.7
Slurry total m3/h 1024 2036
Pulp density t/m3 1.69 1.43
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capex
The capital cost summary for the SAG mill is set out below:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amount
Description (US$)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Buildings 4 172 646
Process plant 186 307 010
Services and utilities 6 127 350
Reagents 8 759 293
Contractor mobilisation and
demobilisation 4 413 834
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direct Construction Costs 209 780 132
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
First fills and spares 9 369 024
Temporary services and facilities 3 219 262
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Costs before EPCM and
Contingency 222 368 418
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPCM allowance 27 362 854
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Costs before Contingency 249 731 272
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Optimization Opportunities, Risks and Next Steps
Opportunities for further project and process improvement that
were identified in the AMEC ECS and warrant further investigation
include:
-- Potential to increase the overall uranium extraction and recovery to
above the present assumed 85% by optimizing leach and filtration
conditions further and also considering the finer grind size associated
with the SAG mill.
-- Leach optimization, especially with regards to using a higher leach
temperature, could result in a significant reduction in the required
leach residence time and associated circuit size.
-- The present study assumed 91% availability for the SAG mill and
downstream circuits, which could potentially be improved, especially
considering the relative simplicity of this comminution circuit.
-- Potential of a higher throughput than the 11.2 Mt/a assumed for the
current study exists, and was cursorily explored and could provide
additional economic benefits.
The main risk identified during the current study is the
potential implications of the iron chemistry on reagent
consumption, which needs better definition.
The Company is defining a scope of work for the purpose of
conducting a tender process to select an engineering firm to
complete the feasibility study. The non-exhaustive scope of work
will include:
-- A detailed design and costing of mine plans and associated Capex.
-- Further testwork including confirming recent testwork that reported
higher uranium recoveries.
-- A review of administration overheads.
-- Detailed flowsheets to integrate with the re-designed mill.
-- Completion of appropriate economic models.
-- Completion of appropriate documentation and drawings.
NORASA - Consolidated Namibian Projects
The Company announced in September 2012 a consolidation of its
various uranium projects in the Erongo region of Namibia (Valencia
and Namibplaas), and in January 2013 the Company announced the
combined projects are now known as the Norasa Uranium Project.
Norasa is an everyday term used by the rich and diverse culture of
the Damara people and means united or putting things together.
Qualified Person
Mr. Dag Kullmann, M.Sc., General Manager and Project Engineer
Norasa Operations, and a Fellow of the Southern African Institute
of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM), is the designated QP responsible
for the reporting of Mineral Reserves.
About Forsys Metals Corp.
Forsys Metals Corp. is an emerging uranium producer with 100%
ownership of the fully permitted Valencia uranium project and the
Namibplaas uranium project in Namibia, Africa a politically stable
and mining friendly jurisdiction. Information regarding current
National Instrument 43-101 compliant Resource and Reserves at
Valencia and Namibplaas are available on our website.
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Forsys Metals Corp.
Marcel Hilmer
Chief Executive Officer
Sedar Profile #00008536
Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains projections and forward-looking
information that involve various risks and uncertainties regarding
future events. Such forward-looking information can include without
limitation statements based on current expectations involving a
number of risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future
performance of the Company. The following are important factors
that could cause Forsys actual results to differ materially from
those expressed or implied by such forward looking statements:
fluctuations in uranium prices and currency exchange rates;
uncertainties relating to interpretation of drill results and the
geology; continuity and grade of mineral deposits; uncertainty of
estimates of capital and operating costs; recovery rates,
production estimates and estimated economic return; general market
conditions; the uncertainty of future profitability; and the
uncertainty of access to additional capital. Full description of
these risks can be found in Forsys Annual Information Form, dated
March 15, 2013, available on the Company's profile on the SEDAR
website at www.sedar.com. These risks and uncertainties could cause
actual results and the Company's plans and objectives to differ
materially from those expressed in the forward-looking information.
Actual results and future events could differ materially from
anticipated in such information. These and all subsequent written
and oral forward looking information are based on estimates and
opinions of management on the dates they are made and expressed
qualified in their entirety by this notice. The Company assumes no
obligation to update forward-looking information should
circumstances or management's estimates or opinions change.
Shares Outstanding: 109,875,422
The Toronto Stock Exchange has not reviewed and does not accept
responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
Contacts: Forsys Metals Corp. Marcel Hilmer Chief Executive
Officer +61 417 177 942mhilmer@forsysmetals.com
www.forsysmetals.com TMX Equicom Joe Racanelli +1 416-815-0700 Ext
243JRacanelli@equicomgroup.com
Forsys Metals (TSX:FSY)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Avr 2024 à Mai 2024
Forsys Metals (TSX:FSY)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mai 2023 à Mai 2024