NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Note
1
– Organization
and
Business
Alternative Ethanol Technologies, Inc. (
the “Company”), was incorporated in Delaware on December 20, 1996. Effective August 2, 2007, the Company changed its name to CleanTech Biofuels, Inc. Except where otherwise noted, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” and similar terms, as well as “CleanTech” or the “Company,” refer to CleanTech Biofuels, Inc. and its subsidiaries, collectively.
On March 27, 2007,
the Company acquired SRS Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“SRS Energy”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization. In accordance with the merger agreement, SRS Acquisition Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into SRS Energy. The merger was consummated on May 31, 2007 and resulted in SRS Energy becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. As a result of the merger, the stockholders of SRS Energy surrendered all of their issued and outstanding common stock and received shares of the Company’s common stock, $.001 par value per share (“Common Stock”). The former parent of SRS Energy, Supercritical Recovery Systems, Inc., immediately prior to the merger, distributed 78.8% of its 96% ownership in SRS Energy to its shareholders on a pro rata basis. For accounting purposes, because the Company had been a public shell company prior to the merger, the merger was treated as an acquisition of the Company and a recapitalization of SRS Energy.
The Company is
in its development stage and has been engaged in technology development and pre-operational activities since its formation.
The Company is currently seeking outside sources of funding that will provide the capital for us to design, build, and operate a commercial biomass recovery plant that will allow us to produce biomass feedstock for customer evaluation, trial purchases, and/or be used in equipment selection for power generation and possibly combined heat and power ("CHP") production. Initially, the biomass feedstock output is expected to be sold or provided to electric utilities, power and steam producers, power and CHP equipment suppliers, and biofuel research firms for evaluation. In addition to seeking a source of funding for plant development, the Company hopes to license and/or develop potential commercial projects as they present themselves. All of our developments plan to focus on cleaning and separating MSW into its component parts in order to obtain: (i) a homogenous feedstock of cellulosic biomass for producing energy and other chemical products and (ii) recyclable products (metals, plastics, aluminum). Our plans may also include the possibility of operating a MSW transfer station where we could install our technology.
The
Company has no operating history as a producer of biomass or energy sources and has not constructed any plants to date. We have no revenues and will be required to secure outside funding in order to execute our business plan and commercialize our products. Our current cash is not sufficient to fund our current operations. Our liabilities are substantially greater than our current available funds and current assets. Although we continue to seek additional financing through the sale of additional equity, various government funding opportunities and/or possibly through strategic alliances with larger energy or waste management companies, we have not had recent success securing meaningful amounts of financing. The Company will require substantial additional financing to implement its business plan and it may be unable to obtain the capital required to do so. If we are not able to immediately and successfully raise additional capital and/or achieve profitability or positive cash flow, we may not be able to continue operations.
The accompanying unaudited,
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Articles 8 and 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2017. For further information, refer to the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 31, 2017, as amended by the Company
’s Amendment No. 1 to its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, filed with the SEC on August 2, 2017.
Note
2
–
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2017,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-11 Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). This ASU, changes the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features.
As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share ("EPS") in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. We are currently assessing the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In May 2017,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2017-09 Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. This ASU, which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements, provides guidance on the types of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which an entity would be required to apply modification accounting under ASC 718. Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. We are currently assessing the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In January 2017,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2017-04 Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for goodwill impairment. The guidance requires an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We are currently assessing the impact the guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In
March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation.” This ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases.” This ASU requires lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The guidance requires enhanced disclosures regarding the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases and will be effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The ASU requires adoption based upon a modified retrospective approach. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, “Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.” The guidance requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within the fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.
The adoption of this guidance did not to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In August 2014,
the FASB issued
ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s ability to continue as a Going Concern.” This ASU provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties in the financial statements and requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. This new guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted.
The adoption of this guidance and its impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures is disclosed in Note 13 – Going Concern.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “
Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This ASU will supersede most of the existing revenue recognition requirements in U.S. GAAP and will require entities to recognize revenue at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services to a customer. The new standard also specifies new accounting for costs associated with obtaining or fulfilling contracts with customers and expands the required disclosures related to revenue and cash flows from contracts with customers. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period and can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption, with early application not permitted. In August 2015, the FASB approved a one-year deferral of the effective date of this ASU. This standard will now become effective beginning with the first quarter 2018 and can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or as a cumulative effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.
There were various other accounting standards updates recently issued, most of which represented technical corrections to the accounting literature or were applicable to specific industries, and are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 3
–
Mergers
/
Acquisition
s
25 Van Keuren LLC
On June 23, 2016, the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement with 25 Van Keuren LLC, a New Jersey Limited Liability Company (“Van Keuren”), pursuant to which the Company acquired 99% of the outstanding membership interests in Van Keuren with the former members of Van Keuren retaining a 1% interest.
The New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority has received certification of an amendment to the Solid Waste Management Plan from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) to include the proposed operation of a municipal solid waste transfer station and material recovery facility (“TS/MRF”) at a site located in Jersey City, New Jersey. CleanTech Biofuels and Van Keuren intend to seek the necessary permits and approvals from the New Jersey DEP to build, own and operate the TS/MRF. As part of the acquisition, CleanTech acquired an option to lease the property in Jersey City within 30 days after the final permit issues from the New Jersey DEP. The Company intends to: (1) install its Biomass Recovery Process on the site, and (2) operate the TS/MRF.
Van Keuren has had no operations or revenue since inception and has solely been working towards obtaining the permits required to operate the TS/MRF. As payment for the acquisition, the Company issued in the aggregate 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (par value $0.001) to certain holders of membership interests in Van Keuren. As of the close of business on June 23, 2016, the Company stock quote was $0.05. The total assets of Van Keuren at the time of the acquisition were $51,000 (2.3% of the Company
’s assets). The liabilities and equity consisted of accounts payable of $27,000 and member equity of $24,000. The assets consist solely of costs incurred towards obtaining the required permits and have been recorded as an intangible asset on our consolidated financial statements. This intangible will be expensed if and when the Company and Van Keuren complete the permit process and begin operations.
Biomass North America Licensing, Inc.
On September 15, 2008, the Company consummated the acquisition of Biomass North America Licensing, Inc. (“Biomass”) pursuant to a merger between Biomass and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (with Biomass as the surviving subsidiary of the Company) in accordance with an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between the Company and Biomass. By virtue of the merger, the Company acquired a license agreement pursuant to which the Company holds a license in the United States and Canada to use patent
ed technology licensed from Biomass North America, LLC, the former parent of Biomass (the “Licensor”), to clean and separate MSW (the “Biomass Recovery Process”). In July 2010, the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued US patent number 7,745,208 for this process (the “BRP Patent”).
U
pon consummation of the merger, the Company paid $20,000 in cash and issued a promissory note in the original principal amount of $80,000 bearing interest at an annual rate of 6% to a shareholder of the Licensor. This note has been paid in full. Additionally, the Company issued to the four shareholders of the Licensor a total of 1,895,000 shares of Common Stock and deposited an additional 4,000,000 shares of Common Stock into an escrow account (collectively, the “Shares”). The Shares were issued as part of the merger consideration received by the shareholders of the Licensor. In accordance with a November 2013 amendment, the Company has an exclusive license in the United States and Canada to use the Biomass Recovery Process and includes no performance requirements on the Company; the license agreement is for a term of 21 years from the date of the amendment or the life of any patent issued for the Biomass Recovery Process, including any amendments, modifications or extensions; the license requires that the Company pay a royalty in the amount of $2.00 per ton of MSW used in the Biomass Recovery Process to the Licensor; and the Company released the 4,000,000 shares of common stock to the Licensor previously held in escrow since the merger. The Company has recorded a long-term asset of approximately $1.6 million which it will begin to amortize upon utilizing the license in our operations.
Note 4
– Goodwill and Intangibles
Goodwill
The changes in Goodwill were as follows:
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
26,582
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2017
|
|
$
|
26,582
|
|
The Goodwill recorded was a result of the acquisition of Van Keuren in June 2016 as disclosed previously in Note 3. The amount of Goodwill represents the fair value paid for the acquisition (shares of Company common stock) in excess of the value of the net assets of Van Keuren.
Intangible Asset
The component
s of the Intangible Asset are as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Van Keuren purchase
|
|
$
|
50,914
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
50,914
|
|
|
$
|
50,914
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
50,914
|
|
The Company
’s goodwill and acquired intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are subject to an annual impairment test. The Company performs an impairment analysis on its goodwill and intangible assets at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be fully recoverable. Acquired intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives and are tested for impairment only when impairment indicators are present.
Note
5
– Patent
T
he Company owns US Patent No. 6,306,248 (the “PSC Patent”), which is the underlying technology upon which the BRP Patent is based. The Company acquired the PSC Patent on October 22, 2008 pursuant to a Patent Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with World Waste Technologies, Inc. (“WWT”). As part of the acquisition of the PSC Patent, we also became the licensor of such technology under the existing license agreement between Bio-Products International, Inc., the licensee (“Bio-Products”) and WWT. The Company has paid WWT $600,000 and issued warrants to purchase 1,800,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.10 per share and 500,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.11 per share. WWT assigned all of its rights, title and interest in the note, warrants, security agreement and purchase agreement to Vertex Energy, Inc. (“Vertex”) as a result of a merger in March 2009. The warrants had an exercisable term of five years which expired on October 22, 2014. The cost of the PSC Patent acquisition of $600,000 is recorded as a long-term asset on the Balance Sheet.
O
n September 1, 2010, the Company issued a promissory note to CMS Acquisition, LLC (“CMS”) in the amount of $100,000 and bearing interest at 6.0% per annum. The note is secured with a security interest in the PSC Patent. In connection with the financing, the Company issued a warrant to CMS to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or re-issuance. The note was originally to mature on February 28, 2011. The Company and CMS have entered into various amendments extending the due date, the most recent of which was April 26, 2017, which extended the due date to April 26, 2018. As consideration in these amendments, the Company has: (i) paid $30,000 towards accrued interest to date and principal on the Note, (ii) increased the interest rate to 10% as of May 15, 2011, (iii) re-dated the original warrants to April 26, 2017, (iv) issued new warrants for 300,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.05 and exercisable at any time until April 26, 2022, (v) issued new warrants for 150,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.10 and exercisable at any time until April 26, 2022, and (vi) the Company has approved the assignment of the note by CMS to the WL Meyer Legacy Trust as of the March 17, 2015 amendment.
Note
6
–
Technology Licenses
Biomass North America Licensing, Inc.
We own
an exclusive license in the United States and Canada to use the Biomass Recovery Process (See Note 3 – Mergers/Acquisitions). We have recorded a long-term asset of approximately $1.6 million for the value of this license. Amortization of this asset will begin upon commencement of the use of the Biomass Recovery Process.
In accordance with a November 2013 amendment, the Company has an exclusive license in the United States and Canada to use the Biomass Recovery Process and includes no performance requirements on the Company; the license agreement is for a term of 21 years from the date of the amendment or the life of any patent issued for the Biomass Recovery Process, including any amendments, modifications or extensions;
and the license requires that the Company pay a royalty in the amount of $2.00 per ton of MSW used in the Biomass Recovery Process to the Licensor.
Bio-
Products International, Inc.
As disclosed in Note
5 - Patent, the Company acquired the PSC Patent in 2008 and as a result, became the licensor to Bio-Products for the PSC Patent pursuant to a Master License Agreement dated as of August 18, 2003 (the “PSC License Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the PSC License Agreement, Bio-Products (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Clean Earth Solutions, Inc., “CES”) is the exclusive licensee of the PSC Patent and has the right to sublicense the technology that is part of the PSC Patent (but not the BRP Patent) to any party. In addition, we are entitled to be paid 5% of any revenue derived by Bio-Products from the use of the technology and 40% of any sublicensing fees paid to Bio-Products for the use of the technology. The Master License Agreement is for a term of 20 years that commenced on August 18, 2003. On September 22, 2010, the Company sent a Notice of Breach to Bio-Products, which included removing the exclusivity of the license. We received a response from Bio-Products on November 5, 2010 disputing our claims. In February 2011, we became aware that Bio-Products effected a transfer of the license in violation of the PSC License Agreement. As a result, on March 21, 2011, we sent a notice of termination to Bio-Products and the transferee terminating the License Agreement. In June 2011, Steve Vande Vegte, a shareholder in CES, filed a lawsuit against various parties, including the Company. The only Cause of Action against the Company is for Declaratory Relief seeking to avoid our March 2011 termination of the license to which Mr. Vande Vegte is not a party. On August 5, 2011, the Company filed a demurrer requesting that the court dismiss the case on the grounds that Mr. Vande Vegte lacks standing to pursue a claim concerning the license and that the claim raised in the complaint is not ripe. The court granted our demurrer to dismiss CleanTech from this lawsuit on December 8, 2011.
25 Van Keuren LLC
As discussed
in Note 3 – Mergers/Acquisitions, the Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement with 25 Van Keuren LLC (“Van Keuren”). The total assets of Van Keuren at the time of the acquisition were approximately $51,000. The assets have been recorded as an intangible asset in our consolidated financial statements. This intangible will be expensed if and when the Company and Van Keuren complete the permit process and begin operations.
All i
ntangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or other changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment charge is recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its implied fair value.
Note
7
–
Debt
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable (2009 Offering), which are made up of various individual notes with an aggregate face value of $189,185 and $199,790 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, due one year from date of note, interest at 6.0%
|
|
$
|
189,185
|
|
|
$
|
199,790
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable (11/10 Offering), which are made up of various individual notes with an aggregate face value of $1,877,162 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, due one year from date of note, interest at 6.0%
|
|
|
1,877,162
|
|
|
|
1,877,162
|
|
WL Meyer Legacy Trust (formerly CMS Acquisition LLC) Note Payable, with a face value of $72,696 due on April 26, 2018, interest at 6.0% thru May 15, 2011; 10.0% thereafter
|
|
|
72,696
|
|
|
|
77,696
|
|
Convertible Notes Payable (5/12 Offering), made up of various individual notes with a face value of $583,510, due in 18 months from date of note, interest at 6.0%
|
|
|
583,510
|
|
|
|
583,510
|
|
Convertible Note Payable (2/14 Offering), which is made up of one note with a face value of $100,000 due in 18 months from date of note, interest at 6.0%
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Convertible Note Payable (2015 Offering), which is made up of one note with a face value of $85,000 due in 18 months from date of note, interest at 6.0%
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
|
Note Payable, which is made up of one note with a face value of $50,000 due in six months from the date of note, interest at 9.0%
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Note Payable, which is made up of one note with a face value of $35,000 due in six months from the date of note, interest at 9.0%
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
Note Payable, which is made up of one note with a face value of $15,000 due March 20, 2017, interest at 6.0%
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total debt
|
|
|
3,007,553
|
|
|
|
3,008,158
|
|
Current maturities
|
|
|
(3,007,553
|
)
|
|
|
(3,008,158
|
)
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Convertible Notes
Payable
- Since September 2008, the Company has conducted six offerings of units comprised of a convertible promissory note and a warrant, and one offering of a convertible note (with no warrant), having the terms set forth below:
Offering
|
|
Note Interest
Rate
|
|
|
Note Conversion
Price
|
|
|
Warrant
Exercise Price
|
|
Term
|
|
Closed or
Open
|
2008 Offering
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
One-year
|
|
Closed
|
2009 Offering
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
One-year
|
|
Closed
|
6/10 Offering
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.08
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
One-year
|
|
Closed
|
11/10 Offering
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
One-year
|
|
Closed
|
5/12 Offering
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
18 months
|
|
Closed
|
2/14 Offering
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
18 months
|
|
Closed
|
2015 Offering
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
18 months
|
|
Closed
|
Each note holder retains the option of a cash repayment of the note plus interest, or the note can be converted at any time during the term of the note or prior to the closing of any Qualifying Equity Financing (minimum capital received of $5 million), into shares of Common Stock at the conversion price noted above. All notes have been recorded as debt (notes payable) in the financial statements, net of discounts for the conversion and warrant features (except for the 11/10, 5/12, 2/14
, and 2015 Offerings which carried no discounts). See Subsequent Events footnote for further disclosure regarding our notes.
2008 Offering
- During September 2008, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $642,000 of investment proceeds through March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010, all of these notes had either been converted to shares of our common stock or exchanged into our 2009 Offering (resulting in new notes with a total face value of $539,829, which included the original principal and interest through the date of exchange).
2009
Offering
- During April 2009, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $1,198,500 of investment proceeds through August 2010. Four notes have been converted to shares of Common Stock (one each in 2009, 2010, 2014 and 2017). Beginning in March 2011, certain notes were exchanged into our 11/10 Offering. As a result, as of September 30, 2017, we had $189,185 face value of notes outstanding, which includes the exchanged notes from our 2008 Offering. All of these notes have matured. We plan to work with each remaining note holder to exchange, convert or repay these notes.
6/10
Offering
- During June 2010, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $75,000 of investment proceeds in one note. Upon maturity in June 2011, this note was exchanged into our 11/10 Offering. As a result, the balance due on this offering is $-0-.
11/10
Offering
- During November 2010, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $451,713 of investment proceeds. Three notes were converted to shares of Common Stock during 2011 and four notes were converted to shares of Common Stock in 2012. As of September 30, 2017, we had $1,877,162 face value of notes outstanding, which includes exchanged notes from our 2009 Offering. As of September 30, 2017, all of the notes have matured. We plan to work with each remaining note holder to exchange, convert or repay these notes.
5/12
Offering
- During May 2012, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $583,510 of investment proceeds. As of September 30, 2017, all of these notes were outstanding and matured. We plan to work with each remaining note holder to exchange, convert or repay these notes.
2/14
Offering
- During February 2014, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $100,000 of investment proceeds in one note. As of September 30, 2017, this note is outstanding and has matured. We plan to work with the note holder to exchange, convert or repay this note.
2015 Offering
- During September 2015, the Company commenced an offering of units and raised a total of $85,000 of investment proceeds in one note. As of September 30, 2017, this note is outstanding and matured. We plan to work with the note holder to exchange, convert or repay this note.
WL Meyer Legacy Trust (formerly CMS Acquisition, LLC)
N
ote Payable
- In September 2010, the Company issued a note in the amount of $100,000 (interest at 6.0% per annum through May 15, 2011 and 10.0% thereafter and secured by a security interest in the PSC Patent) and issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 shares of Common Stock at a price of $0.05 per share. The note is due the earlier of: (i) April 26, 2018 pursuant to an amendment on April 26, 2017 or (ii) the date on which $500,000 or more in the aggregate is raised by the Company in future offerings. The warrants are exercisable at any time for five years from the date of issuance or reissuance. The value of these warrants has been recorded as a contra-balance amount discount with the note and was fully amortized (interest expense) as of February 28, 2011 (the original due date). As consideration in these amendments, the Company has: (i) paid $30,000 towards accrued interest to date and principal on the note, (ii) increased the interest rate to 10% as of May 15, 2011, (iii) re-dated the original warrants to April 26, 2017, (iv) issued new warrants for 300,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.05 and exercisable at any time until April 26, 2022, (v) issued new warrants for 150,000 shares of Common Stock with an exercise price of $0.10 and exercisable at any time until April 26, 2022, and (vi) the Company has approved the assignment of the note by CMS Acquisition LLC to the WL Meyer Legacy Trust per the March 17, 2015 amendment. The outstanding face value of the note was $72,696 at September 30, 2017 and $77,696 at December 31, 2016.
June and October
2016 Note Payable
–The Company issued notes payable, with no conversion feature, to a current Board of Directors member, in the amounts of $50,000 and $35,000, respectively. As of September 30, 2017 both notes have matured. We plan to work with the note holder to exchange or repay these notes.
January 2017 Note Payable
– The Company issued a note payable, with no conversion feature, to William Meyer in the amount of $15,000 with a 6% interest rate due March 20, 2017. We plan to work with the note holder to exchange or repay the note.
The discounts on all notes payable have been amortized on a straight-line basis over the
original term of each note. All discounts were fully amortized and expensed as of September 30, 2017. The following is a summary of warrants issued and outstanding as of the dates below, at the exercise price and the amount of shares of Common Stock (these warrants have not been exercised or converted to shares of Common Stock).
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Warrants issued to:
|
|
Price
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Noteholders, 11/10 Offering
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
398,221
|
|
Noteholder in 2015 Offering
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
2,550,000
|
|
|
|
2,550,000
|
|
Investors in Subscription Agreements (a)
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
7,050,000
|
|
|
|
13,725,000
|
|
WL Meyer Legacy Trust
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
2,300,000
|
|
|
|
2,300,000
|
|
WL Meyer Legacy Trust
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,050,000
|
|
|
|
19,123,221
|
|
(a)
|
Warrants issued to investors under these Subscription Agreements can be exercised anytime withinthree years from date of Agreement. These warrants currently expire at various dates from November 2017 through June 2020.
|
Note
8
–
Stockholders'
Equity (
Deficit
)
In August 2013, the Company commenced an offering of units, under a Subscription Agreement, at a purchase price of $1,000 per unit (Equity Offering 8/13). Each unit consists of: (i) 10,000 shares of the Company
’s authorized but unissued restricted Common Stock and (ii) warrants to purchase 30,000 additional shares of Common Stock for a three-year period from the date of issuance of the units at an initial exercise price of $0.15 per share. As of September 30,
2017, the Company issued 7,635,000 restricted shares (at $0.10 per share) of our Common Stock in exchange for $763,500 in investment in this offering. See Subsequent Event footnote for further updates to this offering and other share grants affecting Stockholders’ Equity.
In
February 2016, the Board approved a grant to certain Board members and management for an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of restricted common stock (at $0.013 per share). The Board granted these awards in recognition of the efforts of the recipients towards the furtherance and implementation of the Company’s strategic plan and to induce the recipients to continue those efforts on behalf of the Company. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined such grants were in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.
In June 2016, the Company completed an acquisition of Van Keuren, as previously disclosed in Note 3, and issued in the aggregate 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (at $0.05 per share) to certain holders of membership interests in Van Keuren.
In
August 2016, a note receivable from a former director matured and was not paid. The note was originally issued in August 2007 to purchase shares of our common stock. As a result, 150,000 shares of restricted common stock, issued at $0.15 per share were forfeited and cancelled.
In September 2016, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for business transactions and financing services to be provided over a one-year term.
In May 2017
, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for accounting services provided to the Company.
In July 2017, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for accounting services provided to the Company.
In
August 2017, the Company granted 3,000,000 shares of common stock to consultants for business consulting services regarding the collection and disposal of MSW in the New York and New Jersey markets to be provided over a two-year term. Of the 3,000,000 shares of common stock granted, 2,000,000 were issued.
In September 2017, the Company issued 204,996 shares of Common Stock ($0.08 per share)
to an investor on conversion of a Convertible Note.
Net Loss per
s
hare
– The Company calculates basic loss per share and diluted EPS. EPS is computed as net earnings (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS would reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants and other convertible securities. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had options, warrants and other convertible securities to purchase an aggregate of approximately 85 million and 86 million shares, respectively, of our common stock, that were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as their effects would have been anti-dilutive. Therefore, the Company only presents basic loss per share on the statement of operations.
Note
9
–
Related Party Transactions
T
he Company has entered into stock purchase agreements with its executive officers and certain members of the Board of Directors (“Board”). The executive officers and directors issued notes to the Company in exchange for their stock purchases. These notes and accumulated interest are recorded as notes receivable in Stockholders’ Deficit.
In September 2013, the Company hired, on a part-time basis, a Chief Technology Officer ("CTO") and a VP-Business Development ("VP-BD"). These individuals maintain their engineering firm Fenton Engineering International ("FEI") on a full-time basis
and receive no salary in their part-time positions but are eligible for grants of stock options. We have used and continue to use their services. As of September 30, 2017, all amounts have been paid to FEI except for approximately $47,000.
Two
members of our current Board, James Russell and David Bransby, are parties in investments made in our convertible note offerings. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, their aggregate investment in our note offerings including interest, is approximately $842,000 and $806,000, respectively.
Beginning in
2009, the Company has provided advances to two employees – Ed Hennessey and Mike Kime. Mr. Kime resigned from his position with the Company effective June 21, 2010. As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the aggregate balance of Mr. Hennessey’s advances totaled approximately $14,000 and $13,000, respectively. Mr. Kime’s advance were netted against monies due and paid to him in 2016 pursuant to a settlement agreement following his departure from the Company. The balance of Mr. Hennessey’s advances are included in Prepaids and Other Current Assets on the Balance Sheet.
In June and October of 2016 the Company issued notes payable, with no conversion feature, to a current Board of Directors member, in the amounts of $
50,000 and $35,000, respectively.
In February of 2017 the Company
received $50,000 from a Board Member in exchange for 500,000 shares of common stock.
In June of 2017 the Company received $50,000 fr
om a Board Member in exchange for 500,000 shares of common stock.
Note
10
– Share-based Payments
The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards including
stock options and restricted stock issued to employees, directors and consultants and is measured at the grant date, based on the estimated fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period. The Company has no awards with market or performance conditions.
In March 2007, the Company
assumed and adopted the 2007 Stock Option Plan (“Stock Plan”) for its employees, directors and consultants, which includes an equity compensation plan for non-employee directors pursuant to which stock options and shares of restricted stock may be granted. The Company currently has reserved a maximum of 14,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued for stock options or restricted shares awarded under the Stock Plan.
In September 2013, the Company granted options under the Stock Plan to purchase an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock to two part-time employees (
newly hired CTO and VP–BD) in which one-third will vest ratably beginning in September 2014, with an exercise price of $0.10. As of September 30, 2017, none of these options were cancelled or expired and 1,000,000 shares of these options were vested.
In February 2015, the
Company granted options under the Stock Plan to purchase an aggregate of 350,000 shares of Common Stock to a consultant, with an exercise price of $0.10. As of September 30, 2017, none of these options were cancelled or expired and 350,000 shares of these options were vested.
In February 2016, the Board approved
Common Stock grants to a member of management, and certain board members, for 4.0 million shares, in the aggregate, of restricted Common Stock. Additionally, the Board approved the issuance of stock option agreements to a member of management and certain consultants for the purchase of 3.5 million shares, in the aggregate, of Common Stock. The Board granted these awards in recognition of the efforts of the recipients towards the furtherance and implementation of the Company’s strategic plan and to induce the recipients to continue those efforts on behalf of the Company. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined the grants were in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. All of the share grant awards vest immediately and were issued pursuant to Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “ Securities Act”), or Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, and will therefore be “restricted securities” as such term is used in Rule 144 of the Securities Act. The option agreements were issued outside of the Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan and carry the following terms: seven year agreements, vesting in thirds ratably over three years, and are exercisable at the Company’s closing stock price as of the date of the grant. These options were calculated to have no value. Accordingly, there was no share-based compensation expense recorded in general and administrative expense.
In February 2016, the Company issued a stock option agreement to a consultant for the purchase of 100,000 shares of
Common Stock. The option agreement was issued outside of the Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan and carries the following terms: seven-year agreement, vesting in thirds ratably over three years, and are exercisable at the Company’s closing stock price as of the date of the grant. These options were calculated to have no value. Accordingly, there was no share-based compensation expense recorded in general and administrative expense.
In May 2017, the Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for accounting services provided to the Company.
In July 2017, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for accounting services provided to the Company.
In
August 2017, the Company granted 3,000,000 shares of common stock to consultants for business consulting services regarding the collection and disposal of MSW in the New York and New Jersey markets to be provided over a two-year term. Of the 3,000,000 shares of common stock granted, 2,000,000 were issued.
As of
September 30, 2017, there was $55,383 in prepaids for compensation cost related to all share-based payment arrangements. There were 3,600,000 options granted with 1,200,000 shares vested as of September 30, 2017 and have a weighted-average exercise price of $0.13. The remaining options will vest as follows: 1,200,000 shares in February 2018 and 2019, respectively.
Stock option expense is recognized in the statements of operations ratably over the vesting period based on the number of options that are expected to ultimately vest. Our options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options and changes in the assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates. The Company incurred no share-based compensation expense related to option grants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
The following table summarizes
the Company's stock option activity and related information under the Stock Plan:
|
|
Shares Under Option
|
|
|
Weighted-Avg
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
8,345,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of September 30, 2017
|
|
|
8,345,000
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Options exercisable as of September 30, 2017
|
|
|
8,345,000
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) The weighted-average exercise price at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 for all outstanding and exercisable options was greater than the fair value of the Company's common stock on that date, resuylting in an aggregate intrinsic value of $-0-.
The following table summarizes information about the Company's issuances of restricted stock
under the Stock Plan:
|
|
Restricted shares issued
|
|
|
Weighted-Avg Issuance Price
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
1,020,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2017
|
|
|
1,020,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
In February 2016, the Company
issued to members of management and a consultant 3,600,000 options outside of the Stock Plan. The options granted were in recognition of the efforts of the recipients towards the furtherance and implementation of the Company’s strategic plan and to induce the recipients to continue those efforts on behalf of the Company.
The Company issued
the following grants outside of the Stock Plan: (1) restricted Common Stock: (i) in January 2015 for 500,000 shares to a member of management, (ii) in January 2014 for 500,000 shares to a consultant to provide services regarding the collection, recycling, transfer, and disposal of MSW, (iii) in April 2014, to certain Board members and management for 4,250,000 shares in the aggregate, (iv) in February 2016, to certain Board members and a member of management for 4,000,000 shares in the aggregate, (v) in May 2017 for 100,000 shares to a consultant for accounting services provided, (vi) in July 2017 for 200,000 shares to a consultant for accounting services provided and (vii) in August 2017 for 3,000,000 shares to a consulting group for business consulting services regarding the collection and disposal of MSW in the New York and New Jersey (2) in February 2016, the Board approved the issuance of stock option agreements to a member of management and certain consultants for the purchase of 3,600,000 shares, in the aggregate, of Common Stock. The shares and options issued to Board members and management were in recognition of the efforts of the recipients towards the furtherance and implementation of the Company’s strategic plan and to induce the recipients to continue those efforts on behalf of the Company. Total expense related to these grants for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, was $3,200 and $52,800, respectively (included in our general and administrative expense).
All of the share grant awards vest immediately and were issued pursuant to Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act, or Section 4(a)(2) of the SecuritiesAct, and will therefore be “restricted securities” as such term is used in Rule 144 of the Securities Act. The option agreements carry the following terms: seven year agreements, vesting in thirds ratably over three ye ars, and are exercisable at the Company
’s closing stock price as of the date of the grant.
Note
1
1
– Commitments and Contingencies
Commitment
s
Lease
–
The Company leases approximately 1,800 square feet of office space for use as our corporate office, located at 7386 Pershing Ave. in St. Louis, Missouri. The original lease term expired, however, we are continuing to lease on a month-to-month basis (current term ended December 2016).
Our monthly rent under the lease is $1,800 plus the cost of utilities.
Contingencies
The Company currently has no open litigation and/or claims.
Note
1
2
–
Subsequent Events
All of the promissory notes in our 2009, 5/12, 11/10, 2/14 and 2015 Offerings are now due. As of
November 9, 2017, approximately $4.1 million is currently due, including interest. We plan to work with each remaining note holder to exchange, convert or repay these promissory notes.
In August 2013, the Company commenced an offering of units, under a Subscription Agreement, at a purchase price of $1,000 per unit (Equity Offering 8/13). Each unit consists of: (i) 10,000 shares of the Company
’s authorized but unissued restricted Common Stock and (ii) warrants to purchase 30,000 additional shares of Common Stock for a three-year period from the date of issuance of the units at an initial exercise price of $0.15 per
share. As of November 9
, 2017, the Company has issued 7,635,000 restricted shares of our Common Stock in exchange for $763,500 in investment in this offering.
In October of 2017 the Company issued notes payable, with no conversion feature, to a current Board of Directors member, in the amount of $25,000.
Note
13
– Going Concern
During the
nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company had a net loss of $452,000, negative cash flow from operations of $104,000, and negative working capital of $6.2 million. Additionally, the Company has significant debt currently due. Management has performed its evaluation of the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and was not able to alleviate the substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after November 13, 2017, the date these financial statements were available for issue.