By Robb M. Stewart 
 

MELBOURNE--Cost blowouts at flagship gas-export terminals and a China-backed iron ore project have helped push resources spending in Australia to a record high, even as the number of developments being built fell amid a murky outlook for commodities demand and tighter access to credit.

There were 87 advanced mining and energy projects worth a combined 268.4 billion Australian dollars (US$280.3 billion) by the end of October, up A$8.1 billion on the last estimate made six months ago by the government's Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics, or Bree.

The increase in value was almost entirely accounted for by a A$4 billion budget overrun at BG Group PLC's (BG.LN) Queensland Curtis LNG facility at Gladstone in Queensland state, a A$2 billion overspend at the neighboring GLNG plant operated by Santos Ltd. (STO.AU) and a A$2 billion cost blowout at the Sino Iron mine being built in Western Australia state by Citic Pacific Ltd. (0267.HK).

The pipeline had shrunk by 11 major projects since the last Bree report, as developments reaching completion weren't replaced by new investments after a sharp fall in prices of industrial commodities like iron ore and coal.

Australia's Resources Minister Martin Ferguson welcomed the record level of committed investment, but cautioned the resources sector was entering a challenging phase.

"In the face of lower commodity prices, the delivery of this pipeline of projects is contingent on keeping production costs down, providing access to skilled labor and increasing our productivity and efficiency," Mr. Ferguson said in a statement.

Booming demand for Australia's natural resources has driven economic growth in recent years, shielding the country from the worst of the global economic crisis and helping it avoid recession. But rising operating costs and a slump this year in commodity prices has forced companies to retrench and put at risk the federal government's goal of returning a budget surplus ahead of an election next year.

Major mining companies have been laying off workers, postponing ambitious developments, closing offices and idling equipment in an effort to shield balance sheets from higher costs, a strong local currency and weaker prices. Smaller companies, meanwhile, are struggling to raise money to develop new mines.

"Looking forward, any substantial net increase to the dollar value of projects at the committed stage of the investment program will require either cost increases of larger, existing projects and/or a new final investment decision on a large project within the near future," said Quentin Grafton, Bree's executive director.

Write to Robb M. Stewart at robb.stewart@wsj.com

Subscribe to WSJ: http://online.wsj.com?mod=djnwires

CITIC (PK) (USOTC:CTPCY)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Juin 2024 à Juil 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse CITIC (PK)
CITIC (PK) (USOTC:CTPCY)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Juil 2023 à Juil 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse CITIC (PK)