AVI GLOBAL TRUST
PLC
Monthly Update
AVI Global Trust plc (the "Company")
presents its Update, reporting performance figures for the month
ended 28 February
2025.
This Monthly Newsletter is available
on the Company's website at:
AGT-FEBRUARY-2025.pdf
This investment management report
relates to performance figures to 28 February 2025.
Total Return (£)
|
Month
|
Calendar Yr
to date
|
1Y
|
3Y
|
5Y
|
10Y
|
AGT NAV
|
-0.3%
|
0.4%
|
7.4%
|
32.2%
|
87.7%
|
165.8%
|
MSCI ACWI
|
1.9%
|
2.2%
|
15.6%
|
38.5%
|
85.2%
|
193.4%
|
MSCI ACWI ex US
|
0.1%
|
4.9%
|
10.2%
|
22.0%
|
46.0%
|
96.7%
|
Manager's Comment
AVI
Global Trust's (AGT) NAV declined -0.3% in
February.
Gerresheimer AG ("GXI") - a
relatively new position in the portfolio which we discuss below -
was the top contributor over the month (+30bps), followed by Tokyo
Gas and Entain which added +23bps apiece. Rohto Pharmaceutical was
the most significant detractor (-64bps), with the shares declining
-18% over the month. The company remains undervalued relative to
skincare peers, trading at a forward EV/EBIT of 12x vs the 21x peer
average, despite the business' superior underlying quality and
growth. We continue to engage with the company, seeking to shift
management's focus to the profitable skincare and eye drops
businesses, whilst enhancing capital efficiency and IR
communications. There was one other detractor of note, Symphony
International which detracted -23bps. Symphony is undergoing
managed windup. As such, our ultimate returns will depend on the
prices at which it realises its investments and the timeframe over
which these realisations take place, rather than its share price on
the screen at any particular point in time.
Gerresheimer AG ("GXI")
In recent months we have built a
position in Gerresheimer AG, a £2.3bn German conglomerate that
offers exposure to a leading player in the oligopolistic
pharmaceutical primary packaging market with high barriers to entry
and attractive growth prospects. These merits are not currently
reflected in the group's valuation, with the company trading at a
steep discount to our estimated NAV. We see multiple potential
paths to improve the depressed valuation and unlock value, with the
company currently undertaking a strategic review of its Moulded
Glass division, as well as confirmed private equity interest in the
business.
The origins of the company date back
to 1864, as a small glass factory in Düsseldorf. Today the business
is a leading player in both Containment Solutions ("getting drugs
to the patient"), such as vials and ampoules, and Delivery Systems
("getting drugs into the patient"), such as syringes and injector
pens. Drug containment and delivery is an oligopolistic industry,
benefiting from significant barriers to entry. Switching costs are
high (how drugs are packaged and administered is mission critical
but a low proportion of total cost), whilst the strict regulatory
environment and importance of trust-based relationships entrench
incumbents, as does the capital required to build local
manufacturing presence close to the customer.
The industry also offers attractive
growth with the global injectable drug container market expected to
grow +9% p.a. from 2022 to 2026, underpinned by the rise of
biologics, GLP-1s (obesity drugs), and trends toward increased drug
complexity and high value solutions (e.g. Ready-To-Fill vials). As
such, companies operating within it are typically rewarded with
attractive valuation multiples (peers WestPharma, Stevanato and
Schott Pharma trade at 30x/26x/18x 2025 EV/EBIT
respectively).
The recent history of the company is
defined by Dietmar Siemssen, who was appointed CEO in 2018. Under
his leadership, the business has been on a strategic
transformation, moving up the value chain, to focus on High Value
Solutions, and transitioning away from GXI's historic focus as a
low-cost-high volume supplier. This transition has involved a
considerable capex build, totalling c.14-18% of sales in recent
years, resulting in negative free cash flow.
Evidence would suggest that the
strategy is bearing fruit. Organic growth - which had been an
anaemic +1.9% p.a. from 2013-18 - has accelerated, reaching 6.8%
p.a. from 2018 to 2024 and management are now guiding for long-term
growth of +7-10% (inclusive of the dilutive Bormioli acquisition).
The business mix is shifting to higher margin solutions and capex
payback periods have been greatly reduced. Importantly, and of
great strategic value, GXI have now established deeper
relationships with key pharma companies' and their development
pipelines - as is exemplified by their crucial role in
GLP-1s.
This progress, however, is not
reflected in the shares. When we initiated our position in late
2024, the shares were some -40% below their 52-week high and not
all that much above the level when Dietmar was appointed CEO, back
in 2018. The shares currently trade a 43% discount to our estimated
NAV. With the entire business trading at 7.5x 2025 EV/EBITDA, we
estimate that the Containment & Delivery business is trading at
an implied single digit multiple, once one adjusts for a reasonable
valuation for the under strategic-review Moulded Glass business.
Whilst some discount is warranted, this seems inordinately
wide.
As we see it, there are several
reasons for GXI's undervaluation. 1) a significant conglomerate discount,
where the lower-growth-higher-capital intensity Moulded Glass
business acts as a drag on valuation; 2) a lack of credibility in
communication with the market, as exemplified by the September 2024
profit warning and compounded by the current reporting structure;
3) weak free cash flow
given the multi-year capex spending cycle and scepticism about the
long-term cash generation of the business; 4) investor concerns about the
development of the GLP-1 market generally and Novo Nordisk's
CagriSema specifically and 5) increased leverage (3.8x) following
the acquisition of Bormioli.
In our assessment these problems
are, by and large, internal and fixable. Moreover, with the shares
(then) trading at a >50% discount to our estimated NAV,
significant bad news was embedded in the price, and the market
appeared to be overlooking the potential for management to take
sensible steps to unlock value. In our view, the key here is the
strategic review of the Moulded Glass business, where an exit has
the potential to improve the group financial profile, ameliorate
(part of) the conglomerate group discount and reduce
leverage.
Interestingly, we are not the only
ones to notice the discounted valuation. Two activists have
declared stakes in excess of 5%, and in early February it was
confirmed GXI had received interest from private equity, and
latterly there have been press reports of industrial buyers also
looking at the business. Whilst our investment case was never
predicated on a buyout, this could accelerate the re-rating
process. Alternatively, if a bid fails to materialise, we see
multiple other paths to a re-rating - most notably from the
aforementioned strategic review. We have been adding to the
position over the month such that GXI is a 4.4% weight, and we own
a 2.2% stake in the company across our funds. With attractive
quality assets, a discounted valuation and catalysts on the
horizon, GXI has the ingredients for a successful
investment.
Reckitt
During the month we exited our
position in Reckitt. It was a relatively short and successful
investment, generating an ROI/IRR of +17% and +26%, which compares
to an ROI of +14% and +7% for the MSCI AC World Index and FTSE 100
over that period.
As detailed in our
June 2024 writeup, the
investment case was predicated on the low valuation at which the
company traded, extreme levels of investor pessimism and aversion,
and the growing pressure we felt management were under to unlock
value. Indeed, shortly after we initiated our position, management
launched a sweeping overhaul, with plans to exit the Essential Home
business & Mead Johnson and to boost margins. Combined with
positive news flow on the NEC litigation, this helped the shares
re-rate from a c.40% discount to one in the low 20s.
From the current discount level, we
view the risks as more balanced, particularly with regard to
operational complexity and dyssynergies of asset sales, and a
growing concern over the valuation at which Essential Home can be
monetised. As such we took the opportunity to exit the position. We
believe the investment demonstrates AVI's contrarian approach to
investing in companies undergoing structural and strategic change
to unlock discounted valuations.
Contributors / Detractors (in GBP)
Largest Contributors
|
1- month
contribution
bps
|
% Weight
|
Gerresheimer
|
30
|
4.4
|
Tokyo Gas
|
23
|
3.0
|
Cordiant Digital
Infrastructure
|
23
|
4.3
|
Entain
|
23
|
4.0
|
IAC
|
23
|
3.2
|
Largest Detractors
|
1- month
contribution
bps
|
% Weight
|
Rohto Pharmaceutical
|
-64
|
3.3
|
Symphony International
Holdings
|
-23
|
1.9
|
D'Ieteren
|
-19
|
6.7
|
Dai Nippon Printing
|
-12
|
3.0
|
Christian Dior
|
-12
|
2.9
|
MUFG Corporate Governance Limited
Corporate Secretary
10 March 2025
LEI: 213800QUODCLWWRVI968
The content of the Company's
web-pages and the content of any website or pages which may be
accessed through hyperlinks on the Company's web-pages, other than
the content of the Newsletter referred to above, is neither
incorporated into nor forms part of the above
announcement.