NEWS RELEASE | 31 July
2024
Quarterly Report June 2024
Summary:
·
Commencement of
International Arbitration against Spain
During the quarter, Berkeley Energia
Limited (Berkeley or
Company) advised that its
wholly owned subsidiary, Berkeley
Exploration Limited (BEL),
had filed a Request for Arbitration (Request) for its investments in Spain
through its Spanish subsidiary, Berkeley Minera España SA
(BME), initiating
arbitration proceedings against the Kingdom of Spain (Spain) before the International Centre
for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
As part of its Request, BEL alleges
that Spain's actions against BME and the Salamanca project have
violated multiple provisions of the Energy Charter Treaty
(ECT), and that BEL is
seeking preliminary compensation in the order of US$1 billion
(US$1,000,000,000) for these violations.
In November 2022, BEL submitted a
written notification of an investment dispute to the Prime Minister
of Spain and the Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the
Demographic Challenge (MITECO) informing them of the nature of
the dispute and the ECT breaches, and that it proposed to seek
prompt negotiations for an amicable solution pursuant to article
26.1 of the ECT. The Spanish government has not engaged in any
discussions related to the dispute to date, and BEL filed its
Request in order to enforce its rights at the Salamanca project
through international arbitration. The
Request was jointly submitted by specialist teams at Herbert Smith
Freehills Spain LLP and LCS Abogados who will represent BEL in the
arbitration proceedings.
Notwithstanding the investment
dispute, BEL remains committed to the Salamanca project and
continues to be open to a constructive dialogue with Spain. BEL is
ready to collaborate with the relevant Spanish authorities to find
an amicable resolution to the permitting situation and remains
hopeful discussions can take place in the near term.
BEL has now received the Notice of
Registration from ICSID, and in the next phase of proceedings
tribunal members will be selected and appointed, thereby formally
establishing the tribunal.
·
Global Nuclear
Power and Uranium Market:
Global spot market activity declined
in the quarter, resulting in the uranium spot price closing down
for the quarter at US$84 per pound.
During June, the 3-yr Forward Price
weakened to US$94 per pound while the 5-yr Forward Price reported
at US$101 per pound. The Long-Term Price firmed slightly reaching
US$79 per pound.
The outlook for nuclear power and
the uranium market continued to strengthen during the quarter, with
a number of important recent developments, including:
· United
States
o President Biden signing into law the "Prohibiting Russian
Uranium Imports Act" which becomes effective on 11 August 2024,
when imports of Russian uranium into the United States are no
longer allowed, subject to a waiver procedure.
The prohibition allows the Secretary
of Energy (in consultation with the Secretary of State and the
Secretary of Commerce) to waive temporarily the prohibition, and
permits importation of Russian low-enriched uranium (LEU) if the Secretary of Energy
determines that there is no alternative viable source of LEU
available to sustain the continuing operation of a nuclear reactor
or a US nuclear energy company, or importation of LEU is in the
national interest. However, any waiver by the Secretary of Energy
will terminate no later than 1 January 2028 when all Russian
uranium importation will be banned through 2040.
o Public support in the USA for nuclear energy is at a record
high level, according to the latest survey by Bisconti Research
Inc. The results show that for four years in a row, more than
three-quarters of the US public said that they favoured the use of
nuclear energy.
· Canada
o The
Canadian government has announced the release of Building Canada's
Clean Future, an action plan to modernise federal assessment and
permitting processes to help speed up projects to help fight
climate change, create and support jobs, and grow the Canadian
economy. The plan includes, amongst other things, setting an
assessment and permitting target of three years for nuclear
projects.
· European Union
o Leaders from across the European nuclear industry published a
manifesto outlining their priorities for the new European
Commission. Nuclear energy, they note, plays a crucial role in
providing the EU with secure and affordable energy.
· Sweden
o Swedish utility, Vattenfall, announced that the company has
decided to pursue operating lifetime extensions for the Forsmark
and Ringhals reactors, which would allow the units to operate for
80 years as compared to the current 60 years. Vattenfall intends to
invest an estimated US$4-5 billion to replace or renovate systems
and components.
· Italy
o The
Italian Energy Minister voiced the government's support to
investigate the reintroduction of nuclear power, especially small
modular reactors (SMRs), in
the country. He cited the need to meet net zero targets by 2050, as
well as energy independence. Previously, Italy operated four
reactors but the program was shut down following the Chernobyl
accident in 1986.
o Under Italy's new energy and climate plan, nuclear power will
account for 10-11% of the electricity mix, the Environment and
Energy Security Minister told the ANSA news agency. He said the
government was finalising the plan and would submit it to the EU by
the end of the month. The plan covers the period up to
2030.
· Estonia
o Estonian parliament passed a resolution supporting the
adoption of nuclear energy in the country, paving the way for the
creation of the necessary legal and regulatory
framework.
· Norway
o The
Norwegian government appointed a committee to conduct a broad
review and assessment of various aspects of a possible future
establishment of nuclear power in the country. It must deliver its
report by 1 April 2026.
· Georgia
o Georgia Power announced the commercial operation of the
Vogtle-4 reactor, following the completion of the Vogtle-3 reactor
in July 2023. Vogtle Units 1 & 2 have been in operation since
1987 and 1989 respectively and are currently licensed to operate
for 60 years.
·
Balance
Sheet
The Company is in a strong financial
position with A$77 million in cash reserves and no debt.
Classification: 2.2 This announcement contains inside
information
For
further information please contact:
Robert
Behets
Francisco
Bellón
Acting Managing
Director
Chief Operations Officer
+61 8 9322
6322
+34 923 193 903
info@berkeleyenergia.com
Salamanca Project and Background to Dispute
The Salamanca project is being
developed in a historic uranium mining area in Western Spain about
three hours west of Madrid.
The Project hosts a Mineral Resource
of 89.3Mlb uranium, with more than two thirds in the Measured and
Indicated categories. In 2016, Berkeley published the results of a
robust Definitive Feasibility Study (DFS) for Salamanca confirming that the
Project may be one of the world's lowest cost producers, capable of
generating strong after-tax cash flows.
In April 2021, the Spanish
Government approved an amendment to the draft climate change and
energy transition bill relating to the investigation and
exploitation of radioactive minerals (e.g. uranium). The Government
reviewed and approved the amendment to Article 10 under which: (i)
new applications for exploration, investigation and direct
exploitation concessions for radioactive materials, and their
extensions, would not be accepted following the entry into force of
this law; and (ii) existing concessions, and open proceedings and
applications related to these, would continue as per normal based
on the previous legislation. The new law was published in the
Official Spanish State Gazette and came into effect in May
2021.
BEL's wholly owned subsidiary, BME
currently holds legal, valid and consolidated rights for the
investigation and exploitation of its mining projects, including
the 30-year mining licence (renewable for two further periods of 30
years) for the Salamanca project, however any new proceedings
opened by the Company is now not allowed under the aforementioned
new law.
In November 2021, BME received
formal notification from MITECO that it had rejected the
construction of the plant as a radioactive facility (NSC II) at the Company's Salamanca
project following an unfavourable report for the grant of NSC II
issued by the Board of the Nuclear Safety Council (NSC) in July 2021.
BEL strongly refutes the NSC's
assessment and, in its opinion, the NSC adopted an arbitrary
decision with the technical issues used as justification to issue
the unfavourable report lacking in both technical and legal
support.
BME submitted documentation,
including an 'Improvement Report' to supplement its initial NSC II
application, along with the corresponding arguments that address
all the issues raised by the NSC, and a request for its
reassessment by the NSC, to MITECO in July 2021.
Further documentation was submitted
to MITECO in August 2021, in which BME, with strongly supported
arguments, dismantled all of the technical issues used by the NSC
as justification to issue the unfavourable report. BME again
restated that the project is compliant with all requirements for
NSC II to be awarded and requested its NSC II Application be
reassessed by the NSC.
In addition, BME requested from
MITECO access to the files associated with the Authorisation for
Construction and Authorisation for Dismantling and Closure for the
radioactive facilities at La Haba (Badajoz) and Saelices El Chico
(Salamanca), which are owned by ENUSA Industrias Avandas S.A., in
order to verify and contrast the conditions approved by the
competent administrative and regulatory bodies for other similar
uranium projects in Spain.
Based on a detailed comparison of
the different licensing files undertaken by BME following receipt
of these files, it is clear that BME, in its NSC II submission, has
been required to provide information that does not correspond to:
(i) the regulatory framework, (ii) the scope of the current
procedural stage (i.e., at the NSC II stage), and/or (iii) the
criteria applied in other licensing processes for similar
radioactive facilities). Accordingly, BEL considers that the NSC
has acted in a discriminatory and arbitrary manner when assessing
the NSC II application for the Salamanca project.
In BEL's strong opinion, MITECO has
rejected BME's NSC II Application without following the legally
established procedure, as the Improvement Report has not been taken
into account and sent to the NSC for its assessment, as requested
on multiple occasions by BME.
In this regard, BEL believes that
MITECO have infringed regulations on administrative procedures in
Spain but also under protection afforded to BEL under the ECT,
which would imply that the decision on the rejection of BME's NSC
II Application is not legal.
In April 2023, BME submitted a
contentious-administrative appeal before the Spanish National Court
in an attempt to overturn the MITECO decision denying NSC
II.
Further, the BME received formal
notifications in December 2023 which upheld appeals submitted by a
non-governmental organisation, Plataforma Stop Uranio, and the city
council of Villavieja de Yeltes (the appellants) to revoke the first
instance judgements related to the Authorisation of Exceptional
Land Use (AEUL) and the
Urbanism License (UL),
which annuled both the AEUL and UL.
The AEUL and the UL were granted to
BME in July 2017 and August 2020 by the Regional Commission of
Environment and Urbanism, and the Municipality of Retortillo
respectively.
The appellants subsequently filed
administrative appeals against the AEUL and the UL at the first
instance courts in Salamanca. The administrative appeals against
the AEUL and UL were dismissed in September 2022 and January 2023
respectively.
One of the appellants subsequently
lodged appeals before the High Court of Justice of Castilla y León
(TSJ), with the TSJ
delivering judgements in December 2023 to revoke the first instance
judgements and declare the AEUL and the UL null.
BME strongly disagrees with the
fundamentals of the TSJ's judgement and having previously submitted
cassation appeals against the TSJ judgements before the Spanish
Supreme Court, BME has withdrawn the appeals to preserve BEL's
rights under international arbitration.
Salamanca Project Update
During the quarter, the Company
continued with its commitment to health, safety and the environment
as a priority.
During the quarter, an audit of the
Environmental Management System according to ISO 14001 Standards
and Sustainable Mining Management System according to UNE 22470/80
Standards of the Company's activities was carried out. No
compliance issues were identified during the audit and the final
report noted that BME continues to improve its climate change and
sustainability processes.
The Company's 2023 Sustainability
Report was published during the quarter and can be viewed at
https://wp-berkeleyenergia-2020.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/media/2024/06/Sustainable-P-Report-v10r.pdf.
The Company is now working towards setting its sustainability goals
for the upcoming 2024 period.
Solar Power System Study
As previously reported, Berkeley
initiated a study evaluating the design, permitting, construction
and operation of a solar power system at the Project. This study
has been finalised, a formal application submitted to the relevant
authorities in Salamanca, and the permitting process continued
during the quarter.
The decision to pursue a solar power
system is in line with Berkeley's ongoing commitment to
environmental sustainability and to continue to have a positive
impact on the people, environment and society surrounding the
mine.
Exploration
During the quarter, the Company
continued with its initial exploration program focusing on battery
and critical metals in Spain. The exploration initiative is
targeting lithium, cobalt, tin, tungsten, rare earths, and other
battery and critical metals, within the Company's existing
tenements in western Spain that do not form part of Berkeley's main
undertaking being the development of the Salamanca project. Further
analysis of the mineral and metal endowment across the entire
mineral rich province and other prospective regions in Spain is
also being undertaken, with a view to identifying additional
targets and regional consolidation opportunities.
Investigation Permit
Conchas
The Investigation Permit
(IP) Conchas is located in
the very western part of the Salamanca province, close to the
Portuguese border (Figure 1). The tenement covers an area of
~31km2 in the western part of the Ciudad Rodrigo Basin
and is largely covered by Cenozoic aged sediments. Only the
north-western part of the tenement is uncovered and dominated by
the Guarda Batholith intrusion. The tenement hosts a number of
sites where small-scale historical tin and tungsten mining was
undertaken. In addition, several mineral occurrences (tin,
tungsten, titanium, lithium) have been identified during historical
mapping and stream sediment sampling programs.
Billiton PLC undertook exploration
on the IP Conchas between 1981 and 1983, with a focus on tin and
tantalum (lithium was not taken into account). Billiton's work
programs comprised regional and detailed geological mapping,
geochemistry, trenching and limited drilling.
Soil sampling programs completed by
Berkeley in the northern and central portions of the tenement
during 2021 (200m by 200m) and 2022 (100m by 100m) defined a
tin-lithium anomaly covering approximately 1.1km by 0.7km which
correlated with a mapped aplo-pegmatitic leucogranite.
Based on the results of the soil
sampling programs and information gleaned from a review of the
available historical data, a small initial drilling program was
implemented in 2022 to test the tin-lithium anomaly. The drill
program comprised five broad spaced reverse circulation
(RC) holes for a total of
282m. Anomalous results for lithium (Li), tin (Sn), rubidium (Rb),
caesium (Cs), niobium (Nb) and tantalum (Ta) obtained from
multi-element analysis of drill samples were reported in the March
2023 quarter, demonstrating IP Conchas' exploration potential for
several critical and strategic raw materials included in the
European Commission's Critical Raw Materials Act.
The occurrence of these six elements
is observed to be largely associated with a sub-horizontal
muscovitic leucogranite unit that locally outcrops at surface. The
muscovitic leucogranite has a mapped extent of approximately 2km
(in a NE-SW orientation) by 0.4km (in a NW-SE orientation) (Figure
1) and varies in thickness from 7m to over 70m in the drill holes
(Figure 2).
A number of mineralogical studies
have subsequently been undertaken to determine the mineral species
present and understand their characteristics and properties.
Results of these studies indicate the mineralised muscovitic
leucogranite is composed mainly of plagioclase (average content of
55%) and quartz (average content of 25%), with potassium feldspar,
muscovite mica, and Li-mica making up remainder of the rock. The
samples have an average Li-mica content of 3%.
The Company has advanced plans for a
second drilling campaign at IP Conchas focused on improving
confidence in the geology, continuity, and grade distribution of
the zone of multi-element mineralisation.
The planned campaign will comprise
32 RC holes for 1,870m drilled on a 100m-by-100m grid, with depths
ranging from 30m to a maximum of 130m. In addition, four PQ diamond
core holes for 500m will be drilled to collect samples for
metallurgical test work purposes.
The drilling campaign is anticipated
to commence in early August 2024.
Figure 1: IP Conchas
Location Plans and Geology / Drill Hole Location
Plan
Figure 2: IP Conchas Cross
Section A-A1
Oliva and La Majada
Projects
These projects comprise three
tenements within two project areas in Spain which are considered
prospective for tungsten, cobalt, antimony, and other
metals.
The Company has designed exploration
programs for both projects, communicated with the relevant
authorities and commenced any required studies e.g. a birdlife
study at the La Majada Project, to progress the pending grant of
the IPs for two of the tenements.
Additional Information on the Global Nuclear Power and Uranium
Market
The outlook for nuclear power and
the uranium market continued to strengthen during the quarter, with
several important recent developments, including:
· Total
energy investment worldwide is expected to exceed US$3 trillion in
2024 for the first time, with some US$2 trillion set to go toward
clean technologies, the International Energy Agency (IEA) says in its newly released World
Energy Investment 2024. Investments in nuclear power, it says, are
expected to increase in 2024, with its share (9%) in clean power
investments rising after two consecutive years of decline. The IEA
expects total investment in nuclear to reach US$80 billion in 2024,
nearly double the 2018 level, which was "the lowest point in a
decade.
· Unit 1
of the Ascó nuclear power plant in Spain recently reached the
figure of 300,000 GWh contributed to the electrical grid, as
announced by the operator. It becomes the fourth Spanish
electricity production facility to reach this milestone. Ascó I, a
1030 MWe pressurised water reactor, completed 40 years of operation
in August last year. The milestone reached by the plant represents
the generation of as much electrical energy as the city of
Barcelona would consume for 23 years.
· The
European Commission has approved, under EU State aid rules, a
EUR300 million (US$320 million) French measure to support EDF
subsidiary Nuward in researching and developing SMRs. Under the
measure, the aid will take the form of a direct grant that will
cover the R&D project until early 2027. The measure will
support Nuward in sizing the modules and components of the SMRs and
validating their integration in the SMRs by means of numerical
simulators and laboratory tests. The commission said the measure
"will contribute to the achievement of the strategic objectives of
the European industrial strategy and the European Green
Deal.
· French
utility EDF has signed green bank loans for a total amount of about
EUR5.8 billion (US$6.3 billion), which will be used to finance the
life extension of its existing nuclear power plant fleet in
France.
· Speaking at a conference in Athens, Greece's Prime Minister
spoke about the possibility of constructing SMRs for electricity
generation. "There is no way to achieve carbon neutrality without
nuclear energy," he was cited as saying. "So, as Europeans, are we
investing in the next generation of small nuclear
reactors."
· The
European Commission has approved Czechia's proposed public support
package for new nuclear - after modifications were made to address
their concerns during an inquiry which began in June
2022.
· Norsk
Kjernekraft has submitted a proposal to Norway's Ministry of Energy
for an assessment into the construction of a power plant based on
multiple SMRs in Norway. The company said it marks the first step
in the formal process to establish nuclear power plants.
· Polish
industrial group Industria's plan to construct a power plant based
on Rolls-Royce's SMRs was approved by the Ministry of Climate and
Environment.
· The Kyrgyzstan government
passed a draft bill which invalidates the 2019 law
on prohibition of geological exploration and development of uranium
deposits. Adoption of amended law will be accompanied by monitoring
of the latest technologies in extraction of uranium, which will aim
to minimise negative impact of mining on the
environment.
· The
Liberal Party of Australia confirmed that a future Australian
Federal Coalition Government would introduce nuclear energy in the
country, and announced seven locations where plants could be
built.
· Australian attitudes towards energy sources have shifted
markedly, the 20th edition of the Lowy Institute's
annual poll has found, with six in ten now supportive of Australia
using nuclear power to generate electricity.
· US
utilities purchased 27% more uranium in 2023 than 2022, according
to the US Energy Information Administration's latest annual report.
Most of this came from foreign suppliers - US-origin material
accounted for 5% of total deliveries, the same percentage as
2022.
· Thailand's Prime Minister used his first monthly television
address as the country's leader to promote plans for constructing a
nuclear power plant to reduce electricity costs. Nuclear power
would also help Thailand achieve its net-zero carbon emission
pledge, the Prime Minister has said.
· Japan's Nuclear Regulation Authority has approved operating
license extension (20 years) for Kansai Electric Power Company's
Takahama 3 & 4 reactor (2 x 830 Mwe). Previously, Kansai's
Takahama 1 & 2 (2 x 780 Mwe) were the first two reactors in
Japan to receive operating license extensions.
· Reuters reported during the quarter that the UAE / Emirates
Nuclear Power Corporation is planning to construct a second Nuclear
Power Plant following the recent completion of the Barakah
reactors, consisting of four Korean-built APR-1400 reactors
(Barakah-4 was connected to the grid in March 2024). The associated
tender could be distributed sometime this year with the target date
for commercial operations being as early as 2033.
Forward Looking
Statements
Statements regarding plans with respect to Berkeley's mineral
properties are forward-looking statements. There can be no
assurance that Berkeley's plans for development of its mineral
properties will proceed as currently expected. There can also be no
assurance that Berkeley will be able to confirm the presence of
additional mineral deposits, that any mineralisation will prove to
be economic or that a mine will successfully be developed on any of
Berkeley mineral properties. These forward-looking statements are
based on Berkeley's expectations and beliefs concerning future
events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to
risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside
the control of Berkeley, which could cause actual results to differ
materially from such statements. Berkeley makes no undertaking to
subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made
in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after
the date of that report.
Competent Persons
Statement
The information in this report that relates to Exploration
Results is extracted from the March 2023 Quarterly Report which is
available to view on Berkeley's website at
www.berkeleyenergia.com.
Berkeley confirms that: a) it is not aware of any new information
or data that materially affects the information included in the
original announcement; b) all material assumptions and technical
parameters underpinning the Exploration Results in the original
announcement continue to apply and have not materially changed; and
c) the form and context in which the relevant Competent Persons'
findings are presented in this announcement have not been
materially modified from the original
announcement.
The information in this report that relates to the Mineral
Resource Estimate is extracted from the announcement dated 30
August 2023 entitled 'Annual Report 2023', which is available to
view on Berkeley's website at www.berkeleyenergia.com
and is based on,
and fairly represents information compiled by Mr Enrique Martínez,
a Competent Person who is a Member of the Australasian Institute of
Mining and Metallurgy. Berkeley confirms that: a) it is not aware
of any new information or data that materially affects the
information included in the original announcement; b) all material
assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral
Resource Estimate in the original announcement continue to apply
and have not materially changed; and c) the form and context in
which the relevant Competent Persons' findings are presented in
this announcement have not been materially modified from the
original announcement.
The information contained within this announcement is deemed
by the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under
the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of
UK domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act
2018 ('MAR'). Upon the publication of this announcement via
Regulatory Information Service ('RIS'), this inside information is
now considered to be in the public domain.
Appendix 1: Mineral Resource at Salamanca
Deposit
Name
|
Resource Category
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
U3O8
(ppm)
|
U3O8
(Mlbs)
|
Retortillo
|
Measured
|
4.1
|
498
|
4.5
|
|
Indicated
|
11.3
|
395
|
9.8
|
|
Inferred
|
0.2
|
368
|
0.2
|
|
Total
|
15.6
|
422
|
14.5
|
Zona 7
|
Measured
Indicated
|
5.2
10.5
|
674
761
|
7.8
17.6
|
|
Inferred
|
6.0
|
364
|
4.8
|
|
Total
|
21.7
|
631
|
30.2
|
Alameda
|
Indicated
|
20.0
|
455
|
20.1
|
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
657
|
1.0
|
|
Total
|
20.7
|
462
|
21.1
|
Las Carbas
|
Inferred
|
0.6
|
443
|
0.6
|
Cristina
|
Inferred
|
0.8
|
460
|
0.8
|
Caridad
|
Inferred
|
0.4
|
382
|
0.4
|
Villares
|
Inferred
|
0.7
|
672
|
1.1
|
Villares North
|
Inferred
|
0.3
|
388
|
0.2
|
Total Retortillo
Satellites
|
Total
|
2.8
|
492
|
3.0
|
Villar
|
Inferred
|
5.0
|
446
|
4.9
|
Alameda Nth Zone 2
|
Inferred
|
1.2
|
472
|
1.3
|
Alameda Nth Zone 19
|
Inferred
|
1.1
|
492
|
1.2
|
Alameda Nth Zone 21
|
Inferred
|
1.8
|
531
|
2.1
|
Total Alameda
Satellites
|
Total
|
9.1
|
472
|
9.5
|
Gambuta
|
Inferred
|
12.7
|
394
|
11.1
|
Salamanca Project
Total
|
Measured
|
9.3
|
597
|
12.3
|
Indicated
|
41.8
|
516
|
47.5
|
Inferred
|
31.5
|
395
|
29.6
|
Total (*)
|
82.6
|
514
|
89.3
|
Appendix 2: Summary of Mining Tenements
As at 30 June 2024, the Company had
an interest in the following tenements:
Location
|
Tenement Name
|
Percentage
Interest
|
Status
|
Spain
|
|
|
|
Salamanca
|
D.S.R Salamanca 28
(Alameda)
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
D.S.R Salamanca 29
(Villar)
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.C. Retortillo-Santidad
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.C. Lucero
|
100%
|
Pending
|
|
I.P. Abedules
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Abetos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Alcornoques
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Alisos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Bardal
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Barquilla
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Berzosa
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Campillo
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Castaños 2
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Ciervo
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Conchas
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Dehesa
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. El Águila
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. El
Vaqueril
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Espinera
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Horcajada
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Lis
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Mailleras
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Mimbre
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Pedreras
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
E.P. Herradura*
|
100%
|
Granted
|
Cáceres
|
I.P. Almendro
E.C. Gambuta
|
100%
100%
|
Granted
Pending^
|
|
I.P. Ibor
|
100%
|
Granted
|
|
I.P. Olmos
|
100%
|
Granted
|
Badajoz
|
I.P. Los Bélicos
|
100%
|
Granted**
|
|
I.P.A. Ampliación Los
Bélicos
|
100%
|
Pending**
|
Ciudad Real
|
I.P.A. La Majada
|
100%
|
Pending**
|
*An application for a 1-year
extension at E.P. Herradura
was previously rejected however this decision has
been appealed and the Company awaits the decision regarding its
appeal.
^The Company has applied for an
Exploitation Concession from the existing IP Almendro.
**Exploracion de Recuros
Minerales S.L.U (ERM), a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, has entered into a Tenement
Sale and Purchase Agreement and Royalty Deed with COPROMI, to
acquire IP Los Bélicos, IPA Ampliación Los Bélicos, and IPA La Majada.
Appendix 3: Related Party Payments
During the quarter ended 30 June
2024, the Company made payments of $171,000 to related parties and
their associates. These payments relate to existing remuneration
arrangements (director and consulting fees plus statutory
superannuation).
Appendix 4: Exploration and Mining
Expenditure
During the quarter ended 30 June
2024, the Company made the following payments in relation to
exploration and development activities:
Activity
|
A$000
|
Permitting related expenditure
(including legal costs)
|
118
|
Radiological protection, monitoring
and other assays
|
18
|
Consultants and other
expenditure
|
57
|
Payment/(return) of VAT and other
social taxes in Spain
|
(275)
|
Total as reported in the Appendix 5B
|
(82)
|
There were no mining or production
activities and expenses incurred during the quarter ended 30 June
2024.
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity or oil and gas exploration
entity
quarterly cash flow report
Name of entity
|
Berkeley Energia Limited
|
ABN
|
|
Quarter ended ("current
quarter")
|
40 052 468 569
|
|
30 June 2024
|
Consolidated statement of cash flows
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
Year to date
(12 months)
$A'000
|
1.
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
-
|
-
|
1.1
|
Receipts from customers
|
1.2
|
Payments for
|
82
|
(2,212)
|
|
(a) exploration &
evaluation
|
|
(b)
development
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c)
production
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d) staff
costs
|
(371)
|
(1,239)
|
|
(e) administration and
corporate costs
|
(181)
|
(1,067)
|
1.3
|
Dividends received (see
note 3)
|
-
|
-
|
1.4
|
Interest received
|
885
|
3,452
|
1.5
|
Interest and other costs of finance
paid
|
-
|
-
|
1.6
|
Income taxes paid
|
-
|
-
|
1.7
|
Government grants and tax
incentives
|
-
|
-
|
1.8
|
Other (provide details if
material)
(a) Business
Development
(b) Arbitration related
expenses
|
(76)
(122)
|
(212)
(206)
|
1.9
|
Net
cash from / (used in) operating activities
|
217
|
(1,484)
|
|
2.
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
2.1
|
Payments to acquire or
for:
|
|
(a) entities
|
|
(b) tenements
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c) property, plant and
equipment
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d) exploration &
evaluation
|
-
|
-
|
|
(e)
investments
|
-
|
-
|
|
(f) other
non-current assets
|
-
|
-
|
2.2
|
Proceeds from the disposal
of:
|
-
|
-
|
|
(a) entities
|
|
(b) tenements
|
-
|
-
|
|
(c) property, plant and
equipment
|
-
|
-
|
|
(d)
investments
|
-
|
-
|
|
(e) other non-current
assets
|
-
|
-
|
2.3
|
Cash flows from loans to other
entities
|
-
|
-
|
2.4
|
Dividends received (see
note 3)
|
-
|
-
|
2.5
|
Other (provide details if
material)
|
-
|
-
|
2.6
|
Net
cash from / (used in) investing activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
3.
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
3.1
|
Proceeds from issues of equity
securities (excluding convertible debt securities)
|
3.2
|
Proceeds from issue of convertible
debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
3.3
|
Proceeds from exercise of
options
|
-
|
-
|
3.4
|
Transaction costs related to issues
of equity securities or convertible debt securities
|
-
|
-
|
3.5
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.6
|
Repayment of borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.7
|
Transaction costs related to loans
and borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
3.8
|
Dividends paid
|
-
|
-
|
3.9
|
Other (provide details if
material)
|
-
|
-
|
3.10
|
Net
cash from / (used in) financing activities
|
-
|
-
|
|
4.
|
Net
increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the
period
|
|
|
4.1
|
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
|
78,187
|
78,776
|
4.2
|
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9 above)
|
217
|
(1,484)
|
4.3
|
Net cash from / (used in) investing
activities (item 2.6 above)
|
-
|
-
|
4.4
|
Net cash from / (used in) financing
activities (item 3.10 above)
|
-
|
-
|
4.5
|
Effect of movement in exchange rates
on cash held
|
(1,059)
|
53
|
4.6
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
77,345
|
77,345
|
5.
|
Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents
at the end of the quarter (as shown in the
consolidated statement of cash flows) to the related items in the
accounts
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
Previous quarter
$A'000
|
5.1
|
Bank balances
|
77,345
|
78,137
|
5.2
|
Call deposits
|
50
|
50
|
5.3
|
Bank overdrafts
|
-
|
-
|
5.4
|
Other (provide details)
|
-
|
-
|
5.5
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal
item 4.6 above)
|
77,345
|
78,187
|
6.
|
Payments to related parties of the entity and their
associates
|
Current quarter
$A'000
|
6.1
|
Aggregate amount of payments to
related parties and their associates included in
item 1
|
(172)
|
6.2
|
Aggregate amount of payments to
related parties and their associates included in
item 2
|
-
|
Note: if any amounts are shown in items 6.1 or 6.2, your
quarterly activity report must include a description of, and an
explanation for, such payments.
|
7.
|
Financing facilities Note: the term "facility'
includes all forms of financing arrangements available to the
entity.
Add notes as necessary for an understanding of the sources of
finance available to the entity.
|
Total facility amount at
quarter end
$A'000
|
Amount drawn at quarter end
$A'000
|
7.1
|
Loan facilities
|
-
|
-
|
7.2
|
Credit standby
arrangements
|
-
|
-
|
7.3
|
Other (please specify)
|
-
|
-
|
7.4
|
Total financing facilities
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
Unused financing facilities available at quarter
end
|
-
|
7.6
|
Include in the box below a
description of each facility above, including the lender, interest
rate, maturity date and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any
additional financing facilities have been entered into or are
proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include a note
providing details of those facilities as well.
|
Not applicable
|
8.
|
Estimated cash available for future operating
activities
|
$A'000
|
8.1
|
Net cash from / (used in) operating
activities (item 1.9)
|
217
|
8.2
|
(Payments for exploration & evaluation classified as investing
activities) (item 2.1(d))
|
-
|
8.3
|
Total relevant outgoings
(item 8.1 + item 8.2)
|
217
|
8.4
|
Cash and cash equivalents at quarter
end (item 4.6)
|
77,345
|
8.5
|
Unused finance facilities available
at quarter end (item 7.5)
|
-
|
8.6
|
Total available funding
(item 8.4 + item 8.5)
|
77,345
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
Estimated quarters of funding available (item 8.6 divided
by item 8.3)
|
>10
|
Note: if the entity has reported positive relevant outgoings
(ie a net cash inflow) in item 8.3, answer item 8.7 as
"N/A". Otherwise, a figure for the estimated quarters of funding
available must be included in item 8.7.
|
8.8
|
If item 8.7 is less than
2 quarters, please provide answers to the following
questions:
|
|
8.8.1 Does
the entity expect that it will continue to have the current level
of net operating cash flows for the time being and, if not, why
not?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
8.8.2 Has
the entity taken any steps, or does it propose to take any steps,
to raise further cash to fund its operations and, if so, what are
those steps and how likely does it believe that they will be
successful?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
8.8.3 Does
the entity expect to be able to continue its operations and to meet
its business objectives and, if so, on what basis?
|
|
Answer: Not applicable
|
|
Note: where item 8.7 is less than 2 quarters, all of
questions 8.8.1, 8.8.2 and 8.8.3 above must be
answered.
|
Compliance statement
1 This statement has
been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies
which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement
gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Date:
31 July 2024
Authorised by: Company
Secretary
(Name of body or officer authorising
release - see note 4)
Notes
1. This
quarterly cash flow report and the accompanying activity report
provide a basis for informing the market about the entity's
activities for the past quarter, how they have been financed and
the effect this has had on its cash position. An entity that wishes
to disclose additional information over and above the minimum
required under the Listing Rules is encouraged to do so.
2. If
this quarterly cash flow report has been prepared in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and
provisions of, AASB 6:
Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and
AASB 107: Statement of Cash
Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly cash flow
report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting
standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the
corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3.
Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from
operating activities or cash flows from investing activities,
depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
4. If
this report has been authorised for release to the market by your
board of directors, you can insert here: "By the board". If it has
been authorised for release to the market by a committee of your
board of directors, you can insert here: "By the [name of board committee - eg Audit and Risk Committee]". If it
has been authorised for release to the market by a disclosure
committee, you can insert here: "By the Disclosure
Committee".
5. If
this report has been authorised for release to the market by your
board of directors and you wish to hold yourself out as complying
with recommendation 4.2 of the ASX Corporate Governance
Council's Corporate Governance
Principles and Recommendations, the board should have
received a declaration from its CEO and CFO that, in their opinion,
the financial records of the entity have been properly maintained,
that this report complies with the appropriate accounting standards
and gives a true and fair view of the cash flows of the entity, and
that their opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system
of risk management and internal control which is operating
effectively.