UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed
by the Registrant ☒
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check
the appropriate box:
☐ |
Preliminary
Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
☒ |
Definitive
Proxy Statement |
☐ |
Definitive
Additional Materials |
|
|
☐ |
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 |
Bridgford
Foods Corporation
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
N/A
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ |
No
fee required. |
☐ |
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
(5) |
Total
fee paid: |
☐ |
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ |
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
Amount
Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Filing
Party: |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Date
Filed: |
BRIDGFORD
FOODS CORPORATION
NOTICE
OF 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To
Be Held On March 27, 2024
2:00
p.m. Central Time
To
the Shareholders of BRIDGFORD FOODS CORPORATION:
You
are cordially invited to attend the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders of Bridgford Foods Corporation, a California corporation with
principal executive offices located in Texas, on Wednesday, March 27, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. The annual meeting will be held
virtually via live internet webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BRID2024.
We
are holding the annual meeting for the following purposes, as described in greater detail in the accompanying Proxy Statement:
|
(1) |
Election
of Directors. To elect eight directors to hold office for one year or until their successors are elected and qualified. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Ratification
of Appointment of Accountants. To ratify the appointment of Baker Tilly US, LLP as the Company’s independent registered
public accountants for the fiscal year ending on November 1, 2024. |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Shareholder
Proposal. To consider and vote upon on the shareholder proposal contained in the Proxy Statement if properly presented at the
meeting. |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Other
Business. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, or at any postponements or adjournments thereof. |
The
board of directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees referenced in Proposal
1, “FOR” Proposal 2 and “AGAINST” Proposal 3.
Only
shareholders of record at the close of business on February 2, 2024, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the virtual annual meeting
or any postponements or adjournments thereof.
The
annual meeting will be a completely virtual meeting of shareholders, which will be conducted via a live webcast. We believe hosting a
virtual annual meeting will encourage increased shareholder attendance and participation while reducing the cost of holding the annual
meeting for our Company and the cost of attending the annual meeting for our shareholders. You will be able to attend the annual meeting
online, submit your questions and vote your shares electronically during the meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BRID2024.
Your
vote is extremely important. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual annual meeting, the board of directors respectfully urges
you to complete, date, sign and return the proxy mailed to you, or vote over the internet or by telephone as instructed in these materials,
as promptly as possible in order to ensure your representation at the annual meeting. Even if you have voted by proxy, you may still
vote online if you virtually attend the annual meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held of record by a broker, bank
or other agent and you wish to vote at the annual meeting, you must follow the instructions from such organization and will need to obtain
a proxy issued in your name from that record holder.
By
order of the Board of Directors |
|
/s/
Cindy Matthews-Morales |
|
Cindy
Matthews-Morales, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|
Dallas,
Texas |
|
February
27, 2024 |
|
Important
Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on Wednesday, March 27, 2024.
Pursuant
to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have elected to provide access to the proxy materials both by sending you
a full set of proxy materials, including this Notice, the accompanying Proxy Statement and Proxy Card, and the 2023 Annual Report to
Shareholders and by notifying you of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice, Proxy Statement, Proxy Card
and 2023 Annual Report to Shareholders are available at https://materials.proxyvote.com/108763.
BRIDGFORD
FOODS CORPORATION
1707
South Good-Latimer Expressway, Dallas, Texas 75226
PROXY
STATEMENT
FOR
THE 2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To
Be Held On March 27, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time
GENERAL
INFORMATION
The
enclosed proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors of Bridgford Foods Corporation, a California corporation with principal executive
offices located at 1707 South Good-Latimer Expressway, Dallas, Texas 75226, which we refer to as “the Company,” “we,”
“us,” or “our,” for use at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company, or the Annual Meeting, to
be held virtually via a live webcast, on Wednesday, March 27, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time, and at any postponements or adjournments
thereof. All shareholders of record at the close of business on February 2, 2024, are entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting.
This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy are being mailed to the shareholders on or about February 27, 2024.
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING
The
following questions and answers are intended to briefly address potential questions that our shareholders may have regarding this Proxy
Statement and the Annual Meeting. They are also intended to provide our shareholders with certain information that is required to be
provided under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. These questions and answers may not address
all of the questions that are important to you as a shareholder. If you have additional questions about the Proxy Statement or the Annual
Meeting, please see “Whom should I contact with other questions?” below.
1. |
What
is the purpose of the Annual Meeting? |
At
the Annual Meeting, our shareholders will be asked to consider and vote upon the matters described in this Proxy Statement and in the
accompanying Notice, as well as any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.
2. |
What
is a proxy statement and what is a proxy? |
A
proxy statement is a document that the SEC regulations require us to give you when we ask you to sign a proxy designating individuals
to vote on your behalf. A proxy is your legal designation of another person to vote the stock you own. That other person is called a
proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document also is called a proxy or a proxy card.
3. |
Why
did I receive these proxy materials? |
We
are providing these proxy materials in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors of the Company of proxies to be voted
at the Annual Meeting, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof. This Proxy Statement contains important information for you
to consider when deciding how to vote on the matters brought before the Annual Meeting. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting
virtually to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. However, you do not need to attend the Annual Meeting to vote your
shares. Instead, you may vote your shares using one of the other voting methods described in this Proxy Statement.
Whether
or not you expect to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, please vote your shares as soon as possible in order to ensure your representation
at the Annual Meeting and to minimize the cost to the Company of proxy solicitation.
4. |
What
am I being asked to vote upon at the Annual Meeting? |
At
the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to:
|
● |
Vote
on the election of eight director nominees to serve for one year or until their successors are elected and qualified (Proposal 1);
|
|
|
|
|
● |
Ratify
the appointment of Baker Tilly US, LLP, or Baker Tilly, as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the
fiscal year ending on November 1, 2024 (Proposal 2); |
|
|
|
|
● |
Consider
and vote upon the shareholder proposal described in this Proxy Statement if properly presented at the Annual Meeting (Proposal 3);
and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Act
upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting, or at any postponements or adjournments thereof. |
5. |
How
does the Board of Directors recommend voting on the proposals? |
The
Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote your shares:
|
● |
“FOR”
each of the director nominees (Proposal 1); |
|
|
|
|
● |
“FOR”
the ratification of the appointment of Baker Tilly as the Company’s independent registered public accountants for the fiscal
year ending on November 1, 2024 (Proposal 2); and |
|
|
|
|
● |
“AGAINST”
the shareholder proposal (Proposal 3). |
6. |
Who
can vote at the Annual Meeting? |
Shareholders
of Record
Only
our “shareholders of record” at the close of business on February 2, 2024, or the Record Date, will be entitled to vote at
the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 9,076,832 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each share
of common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote on each matter to be voted upon by such shareholders and, upon prior notice,
to cumulate votes for the election of directors as discussed in Proposal 1 below.
Beneficial
Owners
If,
on the Record Date, your shares were held in an account at a bank, broker, dealer, or other nominee, then you are the “beneficial
owner” of shares held in “street name” and this Proxy Statement is being forwarded to you by that nominee. The nominee
holding your account is considered the “shareholder of record” for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial
owner, you have the right to direct your nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual
Meeting virtually. However, since you are not the “shareholder of record,” you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting
unless you request and obtain a valid legal proxy or obtain a 16-digit control number from your nominee. Please contact your nominee
directly for additional information.
Banks,
brokers, dealers or other nominees holding shares of record for their respective customers generally are not entitled to vote on the
election of directors unless they receive voting instructions from their customers. As used herein, “uninstructed shares”
means shares held by a nominee who has not received instructions from its customers on a particular matter. As used herein, “broker
non-vote” means the votes that could have been cast on the matter by nominees with respect to uninstructed shares if the nominees
had received instructions. The effect of proxies marked “withheld” as to any director nominee or “abstain” as
to any other proposal, and the effect of broker non-votes on each of the proposals, is discussed in each proposal below.
7. |
What
are the voting requirements to approve the proposals? |
All
proxies, which are properly completed, signed and returned to the Company prior to the Annual Meeting and not revoked, will be voted
in accordance with the instructions given in the proxy. Please see each proposal below for voting requirements to approve the proposals.
8. |
What
happens if I do not vote? |
Please
see each proposal below for the effect of not voting, as well as the effect of withholdings, abstentions and broker non-votes.
9. |
What
is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting? |
The
presence at the Annual Meeting, virtually (even if not voting) or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders of record who are
present at the Annual Meeting and who abstain or withhold their vote, including banks, brokers, dealers or other nominees holding shares
of their respective customers of record who cause abstentions to be recorded at the Annual Meeting, are considered shareholders who are
present and entitled to vote and count toward the quorum. If a quorum is not present, the Annual Meeting will be adjourned until a quorum
is obtained.
10. |
How
can I vote my shares? |
Shareholders
of Record
If
you are shareholder of record, you may vote by proxy or by attending the virtual Annual Meeting where votes can be submitted electronically
via live webcast. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting virtually, we urge you to vote by proxy to ensure that your vote
is counted.
If
you wish to vote at the Annual Meeting virtually by live webcast you must visit the following website: www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BRID2024.
You will need to log in to the webcast using the 16-digit control number located on the proxy card that was mailed to you. All shares
that have been properly voted and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting. However, even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting
virtually, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance via one of the methods listed below so that your vote will be counted if
you later decide not to attend the meeting or if you experience technical difficulties during the meeting.
If
you wish to vote by proxy, you can do so through the internet, by mail, or by telephone as described below:
| ● | To
vote through the internet, go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions provided
on the website. You will need the 16-digit control number from the proxy card that was mailed
to you. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 26, 2024. |
| ● | To
vote by mail using a proxy card, simply complete, sign and date the proxy card and return
it promptly, but no later than by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 26, 2024, in
the postage-paid envelope provided. |
| ● | To
vote by telephone, call toll-free 1-800-690-6903 from any touch-tone telephone and follow
the instructions. You will need the 16-digit control number from the proxy card that was
mailed to you. Telephonic voting is available 24 hours a day and will be accessible until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 26, 2024. |
The
method you use to vote by proxy will not limit your right to virtually attend or vote at the Annual Meeting. If you are a shareholder
of record and you indicate when voting that you wish to vote as recommended by the Board of Directors, or if you sign and return a proxy
card without giving specific voting instructions, the proxy holders will vote your shares as recommended by the Board of Directors on
all matters presented in this Proxy Statement, and as the proxy holders may determine in their discretion with respect to any other matters
properly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial
Owners
If
you are a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your bank, broker, dealer or other nominee, the nominee holding your shares
is considered the holder of record for purposes of voting at the virtual Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to
direct your nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. If you are a beneficial owner, you should have received the Notice and
a proxy card and voting instructions with this Proxy Statement from your bank, broker or other nominee rather than from us. Simply complete,
sign and date the proxy card and return it promptly in the postage-paid envelope provided to ensure that your vote is counted. You may
be eligible to vote your shares electronically over the internet or by telephone. A large number of banks and brokerage firms offer internet
and telephonic voting. Please contact your nominee directly if you have any questions about voting your shares.
As
a beneficial owner of shares registered in the name of your bank, broker, dealer or other nominee, you are invited to attend the Annual
Meeting virtually. However, since you are not the holder of record, you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you request
and obtain a valid legal proxy or a 16-digit control number from your nominee. Please contact your nominee for additional information
about attending the Annual Meeting virtually.
If
you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not provide the nominee that holds your shares with specific voting instructions,
the nominee may generally vote in its discretion on “routine” matters. However, if the nominee that holds your shares does
not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares on a “non-routine” matter, it will be unable to vote your shares
on that matter. Whether a particular matter is considered “routine” or “non-routine” is determined pursuant to
applicable stock exchange rules.
11. |
How
may I attend the Annual Meeting? |
The
Annual Meeting will be held virtually via live webcast at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BRID2024. You will be able to attend
the Annual Meeting online, submit your questions, and vote your shares electronically during the meeting. In order to attend and participate
in the Annual Meeting, you will need to log in to the webcast using the 16-digit control number located on your proxy card or within
the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. The webcast will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m. Central Time on Wednesday, March
27, 2024.
We
will answer as many shareholder questions during the Annual Meeting as time permits and in accordance with our rules for the meeting.
However, we reserve the right to exclude questions that are not pertinent to the Annual Meeting matters or that are otherwise inappropriate.
If we receive substantially similar questions, we will group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition.
Online
access will begin at approximately 1:45 p.m. Central Time on the day of the meeting to provide you ample time to log in, test your device,
and review the rules and procedures for the meeting. We encourage you to access the webcast prior to the designated start time.
We
will have technical support ready to assist you with any difficulties you may experience accessing the live webcast. A technical support
phone number will be posted at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/BRID2024. Please call that phone number if you experience technical
difficulties prior to or during the webcast.
12. |
What
can I do if I change my mind after I vote my shares? |
You
may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before the polls are closed at the Annual Meeting. The procedures for revoking
your proxy or changing your vote will depend on whether you are a shareholder of record, or a beneficial owner of shares held in street
name.
Shareholders
of Record
If
you are a shareholder of record, you may change your vote in one of the following ways:
| ● | Subsequently
casting a new vote via the internet or by telephone using your 16-digit control number, up
until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 26, 2024, which is the deadline for internet
or telephone voting; |
| ● | Submitting
another properly completed proxy card prior to the Annual Meeting reflecting the subsequent
date of completion; |
| ● | Sending
a written notice that you are revoking your proxy to Bridgford Foods Corporation, 1707 South
Good-Latimer Expressway, Dallas, Texas 75226, Attention: Corporate Secretary, to be received
prior to the Annual Meeting; or |
| ● | Attending
the virtual Annual Meeting and voting via live webcast (although attendance will not in and
of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy). |
Beneficial
Owners
If
you are a beneficial owner of shares and you have instructed your bank, broker, dealer or other nominee to vote your shares, you may
change your vote by following the instructions provided to you by your nominee, or by attending the virtual Annual Meeting and voting
via live webcast, provided you have obtained a valid legal proxy or a 16-digit control number from your nominee as described in “How
can I vote my shares?” above.
Your
most current internet or telephone proxy, or proxy card, will be the one that is counted at the Annual Meeting. If you revoke your proxy
via the internet or by telephone, please make sure to do so by the deadline as described above. If you send a written notice of revocation,
please make sure to do so with enough time for it to arrive by mail prior to the Annual Meeting.
Subject
to any revocation, all shares represented by properly executed proxies will be voted in accordance with the instructions on the applicable
proxy, or, if no instructions are given, in accordance with the recommendation of our Board of Directors as described above.
13. |
Could
other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting? |
As
of the date this Proxy Statement went to press, the Board of Directors did not know of any matters which will be brought before the Annual
Meeting other than those specifically set forth in the Notice hereof. However, if any other matter properly comes before the Annual Meeting,
it is intended that the proxies, or their substitutes, will vote on such matters in accordance with their discretion.
14. |
Who is paying for the cost of this proxy solicitation? |
The
solicitation of proxies is being made on behalf of the Board of Directors. We will pay all of the costs of soliciting these proxies.
In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mail, our directors, officers and other employees may solicit proxies in person
or by telephone, email, or otherwise, but will not receive any additional compensation for these services, although we may reimburse
them for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with such solicitation. Although we have not retained a proxy solicitor
to assist in the solicitation of proxies, we may do so in the future, and do not believe the cost of any such proxy solicitor will be
material. We may reimburse banks, brokers, dealers and other institutions, nominees and fiduciaries for their reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses in forwarding these proxy materials to beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons and in obtaining authority
to execute proxies.
15. |
I
share an address with another shareholder, and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How may I obtain an additional
copy of the proxy materials? |
SEC
rules permit brokers and other persons who hold the Company’s shares for beneficial owners to participate in a practice known as
“householding,” which means that only one copy of the Proxy Statement and Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended November 3, 2023, or the 2023 Annual Report, will be sent to multiple shareholders who share the same address unless
other instructions are provided to the Company. Householding is designed to reduce printing and postage costs and therefore results in
cost savings for the Company. If you receive a household mailing this year and would like to have additional copies of this Proxy Statement
and/or the 2023 Annual Report mailed to you, or if you would like to opt out of this practice for future mailings, please contact your
bank, broker, dealer or other nominee record holder, or submit your request to:
Bridgford
Foods Corporation
1707
South Good-Latimer Expressway
Dallas,
Texas 75226
Attention:
Corporate Secretary
Phone:
(214) 428-1535
Upon
receipt of any such request, the Company will promptly deliver a copy of this Proxy Statement and/or the 2023 Annual Report to you. In
addition, if you are currently a shareholder sharing an address with another shareholder and wish to receive only one copy of future
proxy materials for your household, please contact us using the contact information set forth above.
16. |
Where
can I find voting results of the Annual Meeting? |
We
will announce preliminary voting results with respect to each proposal at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with SEC rules, final voting
results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K within four business days following the Annual Meeting, unless final results
are not known at that time in which case preliminary voting results will be published within four business days of the Annual Meeting
and final voting results will be published once they are known by the Company.
17. |
What
is the deadline to submit shareholder proposals or director nominations for the 2025 Annual Meeting? |
Requirements
for shareholder proposals to be considered for inclusion in our proxy materials.
Proposals
of shareholders intended to be included in the proxy statement and presented at the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
must be received at the Company’s principal office no later than October 30, 2024. However, if the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the 2024 Annual Meeting, then the deadline is a reasonable time
before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials. Matters pertaining to such proposals, including the number and length
thereof, eligibility of persons entitled to have such proposals included and other aspects are regulated by the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the SEC.
Requirements
for shareholder proposals or director nominations to be brought before an annual meeting.
Additionally,
any shareholder desiring to submit a proposal for action or to nominate one or more persons for election as directors at our 2025 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders must submit a notice of the proposal or nomination including the information required by our Amended and Restated
Bylaws, or our Bylaws, to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, c/o Bridgford Foods Corporation, 1707 South Good-Latimer Expressway,
Dallas, Texas 75226, between November 29, 2024 and December 29, 2024, or else it will be considered untimely and ineligible to be properly
brought before the Annual Meeting. However, if the Company’s 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is not held within 30 days of
the first anniversary of the 2024 Annual Meeting, under the Bylaws, this notice must be provided not later than the close of business
on the tenth day following the date on which notice of the date of the 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is first mailed to shareholders
or otherwise publicly disclosed, whichever first occurs.
18. |
Where
can I find information about the 2023 Annual Report? |
The
Company will furnish without charge to each person whose proxy is being solicited, upon request of any such person, a copy of the 2023
Annual Report, as such was filed with the SEC, including financial statements and associated schedules. Such report was filed with the
SEC on January 26, 2024, and is available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, as well as the Company’s website at
www.bridgford.com. References to our website address in this Proxy Statement are inactive textual references only and information
contained on or accessed through our website does not constitute part of this Proxy Statement. Requests for copies of such report should
be directed to:
Bridgford
Foods Corporation
1707
South Good-Latimer Expressway
Dallas,
Texas 75226
Attention:
Corporate Secretary
19. |
Whom
should I contact with other questions? |
If
you have additional questions about this Proxy Statement or the Annual Meeting, or if you would like additional copies of this Proxy
Statement, please contact:
Bridgford
Foods Corporation
1707
South Good-Latimer Expressway
Dallas,
Texas 75226
Attention:
Corporate Secretary
Phone:
(214) 428-1535
PROPOSAL
1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
The
directors of the Company are elected annually to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their respective successors
are elected and duly qualified, or until their earlier death, resignation or removal. At the Annual Meeting, eight directors have been
nominated for election. The election of directors shall be by the affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of the shares voting
virtually or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. Every shareholder, or his or her proxy, entitled to vote upon the election of directors
may cumulate his or her votes and give one candidate a number of votes equal to the number of directors to be elected multiplied by the
number of votes to which his or her shares are entitled, or distribute his or her votes on the same principle among as many candidates
as he or she deems appropriate. No shareholder or proxy, however, shall be entitled to cumulate votes unless such candidate or candidates
have been nominated prior to the voting and the shareholder has given notice at the meeting, prior to the voting, of the shareholder’s
intention to cumulate such shareholder’s votes. If any shareholder gives such notice, all shareholders may cumulate their votes
for candidates in nomination. All nominees are presently directors of the Company. All directors were elected to the Board of Directors
by the Company’s shareholders at the 2023 Annual Meeting. All current directorships are being filled.
Unless
otherwise instructed, shares represented by the proxies will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the nominees listed below.
Broker non-votes and proxies marked “WITHHELD” as to one or more of the nominees will have no effect on the election of the
nominees.
Each
nominee has indicated that he is willing and able to serve as director if elected. In the event that any of such nominees shall become
unavailable for any reason, an event which management does not anticipate, it is intended that proxies will be voted for substitute nominees
designated by management.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED BELOW.
The
following table and biographical summaries set forth, with respect to each nominee for director, his or her age as of February 23, 2024,
his or her principal occupation and the year in which he or she first became a director of the Company. Data with respect to the number
of shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned by each of such persons as of February 2, 2024, appears under the caption
“PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT” below.
Name |
|
Age |
|
Principal
Occupation |
|
Year
First Became a Director |
William
L. Bridgford |
|
69 |
|
Vice
President(1)(4) |
|
2004 |
Allan
L. Bridgford, Sr. |
|
88 |
|
Retired
Vice President and Former Chairman of the Executive Committee (1)(4) |
|
1952 |
Todd
C. Andrews |
|
58 |
|
Retired
Vice President and Controller of Public Storage (2)(3)(4) |
|
2004 |
Raymond
F. Lancy |
|
70 |
|
Retired
Chief Financial Officer and Former Member of the Executive Committee (4)(5) |
|
2013 |
Keith
A. Ross |
|
61 |
|
Real
Estate Consultant (4) |
|
2016 |
Mary
Schott |
|
63 |
|
Financial
Executive Services Consultant (2)(3)(4) |
|
2019 |
D.
Gregory Scott |
|
67 |
|
Managing
Director of Peak Holdings, LLC (2)(3)(4) |
|
2006 |
John
V. Simmons |
|
68 |
|
Vice
President (4) |
|
2011 |
(1) |
William
L. Bridgford is the father of Michael W. Bridgford, our Chairman of the Board, a cousin to Baron R.H. Bridgford II, our President,
and is a nephew of Allan L. Bridgford, Sr. |
(2) |
Member
of the Compensation Committee. |
(3) |
Member
of the Audit Committee. |
(4) |
Member
of the Nominating Committee. |
(5) |
Effective
February 1, 2023, Mr. Lancy retired from his employment with the Company, but remains as a director and continues to provide consulting
services to the Company. |
Directors
William
L. Bridgford
William
L. Bridgford has served as Vice President since October 2021. He previously held positions as Chairman of the Executive Committee from
October 2021 to November 2023, Chairman of the Board from March 2006 to October 2021, President from June 2004 until March 2006, and
Secretary from 1995 to 2006. Mr. Bridgford has been a full-time employee of the Company since 1981. He has also served as a member of
the Executive Committee from 2004 until November 2023. Mr. Bridgford is a graduate of California State University, Fullerton with a degree
in Business Management.
Mr.
Bridgford is one of the principal owners of Bridgford Industries Incorporated, the Company’s majority shareholder. He brings to
the Board extensive experience in the operations of the Company and provides strong leadership skills that provide strategic business
guidance to the Company. The Board believes his executive managerial experience and Company knowledge base combined with his understanding
of corporate values and culture qualify him to serve as a member of the Board.
Allan
L. Bridgford, Sr.
Allan
L. Bridgford, Sr. has served on the Board since his reappointment in August 2019, and previously served on the Board from 1952 until
October 2011. He was an employee of the Company since 1957, a member of the Executive Committee since 1972, and most recently served
as Vice President and Chairman of the Executive Committee from 2011 until his retirement from employment effective October 29, 2021.
He previously served as Senior Chairman of the Board from March 2006 to October 2011. From March 1995 through March 2006, Mr. Bridgford
served as Chairman of the Board. He is a graduate of Stanford University with a degree in Economics.
Mr.
Bridgford is one of the principal owners of Bridgford Industries Incorporated, the Company’s majority shareholder. He has extensive
knowledge of the Company’s business and experience in the food industry developed during his long tenure with the Company. The
Board believes he is qualified to serve as a director based on these experiences as well as his other valuable attributes and skills.
In addition to his service on the Board, Mr. Bridgford continues to provide business consulting services to the Company.
Todd
C. Andrews
Todd
C. Andrews is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and retired in April 2021 as Senior Vice President and Controller of Public Storage,
an international self-storage company and a member of the S&P 500, headquartered in Glendale, California. Mr. Andrews had been employed
by Public Storage since 1997. Mr. Andrews graduated cum laude with a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with an emphasis
in accounting and finance from California State University, Northridge, and received an Elijah Watt Sells award with high distinction
on the November 1988 CPA exam.
Mr.
Andrews has over 30 years of experience with responsibilities including financial reporting, strategic financial planning and analysis,
capital markets, treasury operations, SEC reporting, Sarbanes Oxley internal controls and procedures, operational analysis, operational
control design, real estate acquisition and development underwriting, and system design and implementation. In addition, Mr. Andrews
brings a diverse set of perspectives to the Board from serving in positions in multiple industries, including public accounting, entertainment,
retail, and real estate. The Board believes his skills and extensive experience qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. Mr. Andrews
also qualifies as an audit committee financial expert and is financially sophisticated within the meaning of the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
Raymond
F. Lancy
Raymond
F. Lancy served as Chief Financial Officer from 2003 to October 2022, as Treasurer from 1995 to February 2023, as Vice President from
2001 to February 2023, and as a member of the Executive Committee from 2001 to October 2022. Mr. Lancy was an employee of the Company
from July 1992 until his retirement in February 2023. Mr. Lancy is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and prior to his employment
with the Company worked for ten years as an auditor at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
He
earned a Bachelor of Science degree with a major in Administration with high honors from California State University, San Bernardino.
The Board believes that Mr. Lancy’s extensive knowledge of the Company’s business and his experience in the areas of finance
and management qualify him to serve as a member of the Board. In addition to his service on the Board, Mr. Lancy continues to provide
business consulting services to the Company.
Keith
A. Ross
Since
2005 Keith A. Ross has served as President of KR6, Inc., a commercial real estate consulting firm, and since 2001 has been a Founder
and Principal of Centra Realty Corporation, ranked as one of the most active real estate development companies in Orange County, California,
where he oversees Centra’s land acquisitions, capital raises of both equity and debt, architectural design, engineering, construction
and sales/leasing efforts. From August 2013 to 2018, Mr. Ross served as Executive Vice President of CT Realty, or CTR, a real estate
investment, development and management company based in Newport Beach, California. At CTR, Mr. Ross oversaw all development and was responsible
for sourcing, evaluating, and closing on all commercial development opportunities. In addition, Mr. Ross served on CTR’s Executive
Committee and Investment Committee. CTR was founded in 1994 and together with its affiliates and principals have developed, acquired
and managed over $8 billion in industrial and office properties. Prior to joining CTR, from June 2009 to January 2014, Mr. Ross was Founder,
President and CEO of Peligroso Spirits which was sold to Diageo in London (the world’s largest spirits company).
Mr.
Ross began his professional career at the Koll Company, a full-service real estate company, where he worked for over a decade serving
in various roles from project manager to marketing before leading the real estate development efforts of the company in Southern California.
He currently serves on the Board of Directors and is a Co-Founder of Miocean, a nonprofit foundation that applies proven business approaches
to curb the harmful effects of urban run-off pollution to the Ocean. Mr. Ross attended San Diego State University.
Mr.
Ross has extensive real estate acquisition and development experience as well as project management and marketing expertise, which the
Board believes qualifies him to serve as a member of the Board. In addition to his service on the Board, Mr. Ross continues to provide
real estate consulting services to the Company.
Mary
Schott
Mary
Schott serves as a consultant in the financial services industry. Previously, from March 2014 through January 2020 she was Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary of California Commerce Club, Inc., a privately held gaming and hospitality company. Prior to California
Commerce Club, from 2007 to 2013 Ms. Schott served as Chief Financial Officer of San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, a sovereign American
Indian tribe, and from 2003 to 2007 she was the Chief Accounting Officer of First American Title Insurance Company, a publicly traded
financial services company. Ms. Schott holds an EMBA from Claremont Graduate University and a bachelor’s degree in Accounting from
Cal Poly Pomona University. She is also a Certified Public Accountant (active) and a member of the California Society of Certified Public
Accountants and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Ms.
Schott possesses leadership skills and a vast knowledge base on finance, accounting, strategic planning, risk management as well as decision
support for portfolio development, acquisitions, divestures, and establishing governance protocols. The Board believes that these skills
and experiences qualify her to serve as a member of the Board. Ms. Schott also qualifies as an audit committee financial expert and has
financial sophistication as described in the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
D.
Gregory Scott
D.
Gregory Scott is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and serves as the Managing Director of Peak Holdings, LLC, an investment management
company based in Beverly Hills, California. Mr. Scott has been with Peak Holdings, LLC for more than the past five years. Peak Holdings,
LLC and its affiliates own and manage in excess of three million square feet of office, retail and warehouse space throughout the United
States.
Mr.
Scott has extensive financial and managerial experience, which the Board believes qualifies him to serve as a member of the Board. Mr.
Scott also qualifies as an audit committee financial expert and has financial sophistication as described in the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
John
V. Simmons
John
V. Simmons has served as Vice President since November 2021. He previously served as President from 2006 to November 2021, as a member
of the Executive Committee from 2006 to November 2023, and as Vice President from 2000 until 2006. Mr. Simmons earned a Bachelor of Arts
degree in Psychology from the University of Wisconsin.
Mr.
Simmons has extensive knowledge and experience in the areas of marketing, product research and development, trade relations and operations
developed as an employee of the Company since 1979. The Board believes these skills and experiences qualify him to serve as a member
of the Board.
Public
Company Directorships
None
of the directors have been a director of any other public company in the past five years.
Involvement
in Certain Legal Proceedings
None
of the directors have been involved in any legal events reportable under Item 401(f) or Item 103(c)(2) of Regulation S-K during the last
ten years.
Board
Meetings
During
fiscal year 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors held ten regularly scheduled monthly meetings. All directors attended at least
75% of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board of Directors and meetings of committees upon which they served.
Arrangements
or Understandings with Directors
There
are no agreements or understandings pursuant to which any of the directors was or is to be elected to serve as a director or nominee.
Further,
none of our directors have agreements or arrangements with any person or entity, other than the Company, relating to compensation or
other payments in connection with such director’s service to the Company.
Controlled
Company Status and Director Independence
The
Company is considered a “controlled company” within the meaning of Rule 5615(c)(1) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules based on the
approximate 80% beneficial ownership of its outstanding common stock by Bridgford Industries Incorporated and is therefore exempted from
various NASDAQ Listing Rules pertaining to certain “independence” requirements of its directors, including the requirement
to maintain a majority of independent directors on the Company’s Board of Directors and certain requirements with respect to the
committees of the Board. Nevertheless, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Andrews and Scott, and Ms. Schott who together
comprise the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee, are all “independent directors” within the meaning of Rule 5605
of the NASDAQ Listing Rules, and Messrs. Bridgford and Simmons who are employees of the Company, Messrs. Bridgford Sr. and Lancy who
are retired executives of the Company, and Mr. Ross, who is a consultant to the Company, are not “independent directors.”
Board
Committees
The
Board of Directors maintains three committees, the Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee and the Nominating Committee.
Compensation
Committee
The
Compensation Committee currently consists of Messrs. Scott (Chairman) and Andrews and Ms. Schott.
Each
of the current members of the Compensation Committee is a non-employee director, and notwithstanding that the Company is a “controlled
company” within the meaning of the NASDAQ Listing Rules, each member is independent as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ
Listing Rules. The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing and administering the Company’s compensation arrangements
for all executive officers.
The
Compensation Committee meets no less frequently than annually (and more frequently as circumstances dictate) to discuss and determine
executive officer and director compensation. The Compensation Committee does not generally retain the services of any compensation consultants.
However, from time to time it utilizes compensation data from companies that the Compensation Committee deems to be competitive with
the Company in connection with its annual review of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee has the power to form and delegate
authority to subcommittees when appropriate, provided that such subcommittees are composed entirely of directors who would qualify for
membership on the Compensation Committee pursuant to applicable NASDAQ Listing Rules. See “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS”
and “Director Compensation” for further discussion regarding executive officer and director compensation.
The
Compensation Committee held one meeting during fiscal year 2023. No additional compensation is typically paid to directors for participation
on the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter, which was adopted on October 11, 2010, and
is attached as Exhibit A to the proxy statement filed for the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders. The charter is not available
on the Company’s website.
Audit
Committee
The
Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. Scott (Chairman) and Andrews and Ms. Schott.
The
Audit Committee has been established in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC and each of the current members of the Audit
Committee is an “independent director” as defined in Rule 5605(c)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. In addition, the Board
has determined that each of Messrs. Andrews and Scott, and Ms. Schott qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as such
term is used in the rules and regulations of the SEC.
The
Audit Committee meets periodically with the Company’s independent registered public accountants and reviews the Company’s
accounting policies and internal controls. It also reviews the scope and adequacy of the independent registered public accountants’
examination of the Company’s annual financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee selects the firm of independent registered
public accountants to be retained by the Company, subject to shareholder approval, pre-approves services rendered by its independent
registered public accountants and pre-approves all related-party transactions.
The
Audit Committee held seven meetings during fiscal year 2023. Each of the members of the Audit Committee receives $350 to $550 per meeting
depending on the length of each meeting attended. In addition, the Audit Committee holds a pre-earnings release conference with the Company’s
independent registered public accountants on a quarterly basis. The Audit Committee operates under an Amended and Restated Audit Committee
Charter, which was approved on October 11, 2021. The charter is available on the Company’s website at www.bridgford.com
under “Governance.”
Nominating
Committee
The
Board of Directors has decided that the full Board should perform the functions of a Nominating Committee for the Company. It made that
decision because the Board believes that selecting new Board nominees is one of the most important responsibilities the Board members
have to the Company’s shareholders, and for that reason, all of the members of the Board should have the right and responsibility
to participate in the selection process. Because of its status as a “controlled company” within the meaning of Rule 5615(c)(1)
of the NASDAQ Listing Rules, the Company is not required to have a Nominating Committee comprised solely of independent directors. The
Nominating Committee does not act pursuant to a written charter.
In
its role as Nominating Committee, the full Board identifies and screens new candidates for Board membership. Nevertheless, actions of
the Board, in its role as Nominating Committee, can be taken only with the affirmative vote of a majority of the independent directors
on the Board, as defined by the NASDAQ Listing Rules.
Director
Nomination Process
In
identifying new Board candidates, the Board will seek recommendations from existing Board members and executive officers. In addition,
the Board will consider any candidates that may have been recommended by any of the Company’s shareholders who have made those
recommendations in accordance with the shareholder nomination procedures described below. The Board, in its capacity as Nominating Committee,
does not evaluate nominees recommended by shareholders differently from its evaluation of other director nominees. The Board also has
the authority to engage an executive search firm and other advisors as it deems appropriate to assist in identifying qualified candidates
for the Board.
Any
shareholder desiring to submit a recommendation for consideration by the Board of a candidate that the shareholder believes is qualified
to be a Board nominee at any upcoming shareholders meeting may do so by submitting that recommendation in writing, and in accordance
with the time periods and information requirements set forth in our Bylaws, to the Company’s Corporate Secretary, c/o Bridgford
Foods Corporation, 1707 South Good-Latimer Expressway, Dallas, Texas 75226. No director nominations by shareholders have been received
as of the filing of this Proxy Statement.
In
assessing and selecting Board candidates, the Board will consider such factors, among others, as: the candidate’s independence,
experience, knowledge, skills and expertise, as demonstrated by past employment and board experience; the candidate’s reputation
for integrity; and the candidate’s participation in local community and local, state, regional or national charitable organizations.
When selecting a nominee from among candidates considered by the Board, it will conduct background inquiries of and interviews with the
candidates the Board members believe are best qualified to serve as directors. The Board members will consider a number of factors in
making their selection of a nominee from among those candidates, including, among others: whether the candidate has the ability, willingness
and enthusiasm to devote the time and effort required of members of the Board; whether the candidate has any conflicts of interest or
commitments that would interfere with the candidate’s ability to fulfill the responsibilities of directors of the Company, including
membership on Board committees; whether the candidate’s skills and experience would add to the overall competencies of the Board;
and whether the candidate has any special background or experience relevant to the Company’s business. The Board believes that
directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term
interests of the Company’s shareholders. Each director must also be able to dedicate the time and resources sufficient to ensure
the diligent performance of his or her duties.
Board
Consideration of Diversity
The
Board believes that differences in experience, knowledge, skills and expertise enhance the performance of the Board. Accordingly, the
Board, in its capacity as Nominating Committee, considers such diversity in selecting and evaluating proposed Board nominees. However,
the Board has not implemented a formal policy with respect to the consideration of diversity for the composition of the Board.
Board
Diversity Matrix
In
accordance with the NASDAQ Listing Rules, the following table reflects our Board diversity matrix as of February 23, 2024:
Total
Number of Directors |
|
8 |
|
|
Female |
|
Male |
|
Non-Binary |
|
Did
Not Disclose Gender |
Part
I: Gender Identity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
- |
|
- |
Part
II: Demographic Background |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
African
American or Black |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Alaskan
Native or Native American |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Asian |
|
1 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Hispanic
or Latinx |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Native
Hawaiian or Pacific Islander |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
White |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
Two
or More Races or Ethnicities |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
|
- |
LGBTQ+ |
|
- |
Did
Not Disclose Demographic Background |
|
7 |
To
see our Board diversity matrix as of August 31, 2023, please see the proxy statement filed with the SEC on September 5, 2023.
Board
Leadership Structure and the Role of the Board in Risk Management Oversight
Board
Leadership Structure
The
Board is currently comprised of a total of eight directors. Michael W. Bridgford, who is not a director, serves as the Chairman of the
Board. In this capacity, he is principally charged with fulfilling the following duties:
|
● |
Presiding
as the Chairman of the meetings of the Board of Directors; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Serving
as a conduit of information between the independent directors and members of management; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Approving
Board of Directors meeting agendas and schedules; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Calling
executive session meetings of the independent directors, as needed; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Reviewing
information sent to the Board of Directors; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Working
with the Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary to ensure the Board has adequate resources to support its decision-making
obligations; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Meeting
with shareholders as appropriate; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Such
other responsibilities and duties as the Board of Directors shall designate. |
The
Company has not appointed a Chief Executive Officer. Instead, the Company has historically utilized an Executive Committee to serve in
the capacity of Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that the Executive Committee structure is appropriate for the Company because
it requires a full committee of officers, each of whom bring their own experiences and perspectives to bear on their decision making,
to discuss and vote on important decisions affecting the Company. The Company has utilized an Executive Committee in lieu of appointing
a Chief Executive Officer for more than twenty years. See “Executive Officers” for further discussion about the role and
membership of the Executive Committee.
The
Chairman of the Board serves on the Executive Committee. Thus, the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are intertwined
to some extent. However, none of the members of the Executive Committee are also directors. The Board believes that this structure properly
maintains the independence of the Board as a whole, and of the Chairman of the Board, from the Executive Committee.
The
Board’s Role in Risk Management Oversight
The
responsibility for the day-to-day management of risk lies with the Executive Committee. Risk management is not viewed by the Executive
Committee as a separate function, but rather is viewed as part of the day-to-day process of running the Company. It is the Board’s
responsibility to oversee the Executive Committee with respect to its risk management function and to ensure that the Company’s
risk management system is well-functioning and consistent with the Company’s overall corporate strategy and financial goals. In
fulfilling that oversight role, the Board focuses on the adequacy of the Company’s overall risk management system. The Board believes
that an effective risk management system will adequately identify the material risks to the Company’s business, monitor the effectiveness
of the risk mitigating policies and procedures, and provide the Executive Committee with input with respect to the risk management process.
Employee,
Director and Officer Hedging
We
have not adopted any practice or policy regarding the ability of our employees (including officers) or directors, or any of their designees,
to purchase financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds), or otherwise
engage in transactions, that hedge or offset, or are designed to hedge or offset, any decrease in the market value of our equity securities.
The Company’s insider trading policy does not allow insiders to enter into any corresponding or hedging transaction or position
with respect to the Company’s securities.
Code
of Ethics
The
Company adopted a code of ethics that is applicable to, among other individuals, its principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, and posted the code of ethics on its website
at www.bridgford.com under “Governance” (and designated therein as the Code of Conduct - Governance). Any amendment
or waiver to the Company’s code of ethics that applies to its directors or executive officers will be posted on its website or
in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
Communications
with the Board
Shareholders
may communicate with the Board or any of the directors by sending written communications addressed to the Board of Directors generally,
or to any director(s), to Bridgford Foods Corporation, 1707 South Good-Latimer Expressway, Dallas, Texas 75226, Attention: Corporate
Secretary. All communications are compiled by the Corporate Secretary and forwarded to the Board or the individual director(s) accordingly.
Director
Attendance at Annual Meetings
The
Company does not currently have a specific policy regarding director attendance at annual shareholder meetings. However, directors are
strongly encouraged to attend annual shareholder meetings. All of the directors then serving on the Board of the Company attended the
Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders virtually.
Executive
Officers
Members
of the Company’s Executive Committee, comprised of the three executive officers named below as of February 23, 2024, act in the
capacity of Chief Executive Officer of the Company. For the fiscal year ended November 3, 2023, the Company’s Executive Committee
consisted of five members and included William L. Bridgford and John V. Simmons in addition to the officers referenced below. The biographies
of William L. Bridgford and John V. Simmons are set forth in the section titled “PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF DIRECTORS.”
The
following three executive officers are elected annually to serve on the Executive Committee at the pleasure of the Board of Directors:
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position(s)
with our company |
Baron
R. H. Bridgford II (1) |
|
41 |
|
President
and Chairman of the Executive Committee |
Cindy
Matthews-Morales |
|
53 |
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary and Member of the Executive Committee |
Michael
W. Bridgford (1) |
|
42 |
|
Chairman
of the Board and Member of the Executive Committee |
|
(1) |
Michael
W. Bridgford is the son of William L. Bridgford, our Vice President, is a cousin of Baron R.H. Bridgford II and is director Allan
Bridgford Sr.’s great nephew. Baron R.H. Bridgford II is Allan Bridgford Sr.’s great nephew and a cousin of Michael W.
Bridgford. |
Cindy
Matthews-Morales
Cindy
Matthews-Morales has served as Chief Financial Officer and a member of the Executive Committee since October 2022. Ms. Matthews-Morales
has also served as Secretary since 2006. She previously served as Corporate Controller from 2000 until October 2022. Ms. Matthews-Morales
has been a full-time employee of the Company since 2000. She earned a Master of Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting
from California State University, Fullerton.
Ms.
Matthews-Morales has extensive knowledge in accounting, cash management and financial competency as well as a strong understanding of
Company operations.
Michael
W. Bridgford
Michael
W. Bridgford has served as Chairman of the Board and a member of the Executive Committee since October 2021. He previously served as
Vice President from March 2015 until November 2021 and as Assistant Secretary from March 2007 until November 2021. Mr. Bridgford has
been a full-time employee of the Company since 2002. He graduated from Vanguard University in 2004 with a degree in Business with an
emphasis in Organizational Management.
Mr.
Bridgford has overseen sandwich and lunch meat production in the Anaheim and Frozen-Rite plants, led the Anaheim Deli Route division,
worked as a Regional Sales Manager in the Frozen Foods division, and most recently been responsible for leading the entire Frozen Foods
division’s sales efforts. He also has extensive experience controlling inventory, administering payroll, managing employees, and
working with customers.
Baron
R. H. Bridgford II
Baron
R. H. Bridgford II has served as President and a member of the Executive Committee since October 2021. He previously served as Vice President
of the Chicago Meat Snack division from 2008 to 2021 and works closely in the Chicago plant with his father, Baron Bridgford Sr., and
brothers, Brian and Richard Bridgford. Mr. Bridgford earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from the University of Colorado.
Mr.
Bridgford is a member of the fourth generation of the Bridgford family and has worked for the Company throughout its operations from
an early age. He served as a DSD route driver and Route Specialist during the early part of his career, gaining hands-on experience with
the Company’s unique DSD distribution model. He has worked closely with Senior Vice President Chris Cole making headquarter calls
on the Company’s largest customers. In addition to retail headquarter calls, Mr. Bridgford has developed and grown the Company’s
co-packing and warehouse business out of the Chicago plant.
Agreements
or Understandings with Officers
There
are no agreements or understandings pursuant to which any of the executive officers was or is selected to serve as an executive officer.
PRINCIPAL
SHAREHOLDERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
following table sets forth certain information known to the Company with respect to the beneficial ownership of the Company’s common
stock as of February 2, 2024, by each shareholder known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Company’s
common stock, by each director and nominee for director, by each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and by all
executive officers and directors as a group. The information as to each person or entity has been furnished by such person or group.
Amount
and Nature of Shares Beneficially Owned
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | |
Sole Voting and Investment Power | | |
Total Beneficially Owned(3) | | |
Percentage of Outstanding Shares Beneficially Owned(3) | |
Bridgford Industries Incorporated 1707 South Good-Latimer Expressway Dallas, TX 75226 | |
| 7,156,396 | (2) | |
| 7,156,396 | | |
| 78.8 | % |
Allan L. Bridgford, Sr. | |
| 155,882 | | |
| 155,882 | | |
| 1.7 | % |
William L. Bridgford | |
| 7,461 | | |
| 7,461 | | |
| * | % |
Michael W. Bridgford | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Baron R.H. Bridgford II | |
| 305 | | |
| 305 | | |
| * | |
Raymond F. Lancy | |
| 242 | | |
| 242 | | |
| * | |
John V. Simmons | |
| 363 | | |
| 363 | | |
| * | |
Todd C. Andrews | |
| 200 | | |
| 200 | | |
| * | |
D. Gregory Scott | |
| 4,446 | | |
| 4,446 | | |
| * | |
Keith A. Ross | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Mary Schott | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
Cindy Matthews-Morales | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | |
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons) | |
| 7,325,295 | | |
| 7,325,295 | | |
| 80.7 | % |
* |
Represents
ownership of less than one percent (1%) of the outstanding shares. |
(1) |
Unless
otherwise indicated, the address of such beneficial owner is the Company’s principal executive offices, which are located at
1707 South Good-Latimer Expressway, Dallas, Texas 75226. |
(2) |
Represents
shares beneficially owned by Bridgford Industries Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“BII”) as reported on Amendment
No. 1 to Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on February 7, 2017. Other than ownership of these shares, BII does not presently have any
significant business or assets. Allan L. Bridgford, Sr., William L. Bridgford, Baron R.H. Bridgford, Michael W. Bridgford and Baron
R.H. Bridgford II presently own 18.47%, 7.77%, 9.34%, 0.58% and 0.60%, respectively, of the outstanding voting capital stock of BII.
The remaining shares of BII capital stock are owned of record, or beneficially, by 32 additional members of the Bridgford family.
The directors of BII jointly vote all of the Company’s shares held by BII. |
(3) |
Applicable
percentage of ownership as of February 2, 2024 is based upon 9,076,832 shares of common stock outstanding. Beneficial ownership is
determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares shown as beneficially
owned. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to community property laws where applicable, to the knowledge of the Company the
persons listed above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. |
Changes
in Control
We
are not aware of any arrangements that have resulted, or may at a subsequent date result, in a change in control of the Company.
REPORT
OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
Pursuant
to a meeting of the Audit Committee on January 15, 2024, the Audit Committee reports that it has: (i) reviewed and discussed the Company’s
audited financial statements with management; (ii) discussed with the independent registered public accountants the matters (such as
the quality of the Company’s accounting principles and internal controls) required to be discussed by the applicable requirements
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and the Commission; and (iii) received the written disclosures and the letter from Baker
Tilly required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding its communications with the Audit
Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with Baker Tilly its independence. Based on the review and discussions referred
to in items (i) through (iii) above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in
the Company’s 2023 Annual Report.
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
D.
Gregory Scott, Chairman
Mary
Schott
Todd
C. Andrews
The
foregoing Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed soliciting material, shall not be deemed filed with the SEC and shall not be incorporated
by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Compensation
of Executive Officers
Compensation
Overview
This
section provides information regarding the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, or NEOs, all of whom are
members of the Executive Committee. The Company has historically been and continues to be principally managed by the Executive Committee.
For
fiscal year 2023, the Executive Committee consisted of the following five members:
|
● |
William L. Bridgford, Vice
President and Chairman of the Executive Committee |
|
● |
Michael W. Bridgford, Chairman
of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
● |
Baron R.H. Bridgford II,
President |
|
● |
John V. Simmons, Vice President |
|
● |
Cindy Matthews-Morales,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer) |
For
fiscal year 2024, the Executive Committee consists of the following three members:
|
● |
Baron R.H.
Bridgford II, President and Chairman of the Executive Committee |
|
● |
Michael W. Bridgford, Chairman
of the Board (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
● |
Cindy Matthews-Morales,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer) |
The
Company’s executive compensation program is overseen by the Compensation Committee, which is comprised of certain non-employee
members of the Board and, notwithstanding that the Company is a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NASDAQ Listing
Rules, each member is independent as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Listing Rules. The Compensation Committee currently consists
of three members, including of Messrs. Scott (Chairman) and Andrews and Ms. Schott. The basic responsibility of the Compensation Committee
is to review the performance of the officers and key employees toward achieving the Company’s strategic goals and to help ensure
that the Company is able to attract and retain individuals who can lead the Company to achieve those goals.
One
of the Company’s primary strategic goals is to increase shareholder value while meeting its objectives for customer satisfaction,
improved sales and financial performance, sound corporate governance, and competitive advantage. The Company’s current emphases
on controlling costs and improving profit margins on a consistent basis are also important factors which affect the Company’s compensation
decisions. The Compensation Committee’s goal is to work with management to balance the Company’s financial goals and circumstances
with the need to attract, motivate and retain the fully qualified and capable individuals the Company needs to meet and surpass its customers’
and shareholders’ expectations in a highly competitive industry.
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
The
core of the Company’s executive compensation philosophy is to pay for performance. To that end, incentive bonus targets are set
each year to reward excellent executive performance based upon the achievement of profit objectives by business units and the Company’s
overall profitability based on pretax income, thus stimulating all executives to assume broad responsibility for the Company’s
overall financial welfare and financial performance.
The
Compensation Committee’s guiding principles are as follows:
|
● |
Work with management to
provide a compensation program that recognizes individual contributions as well as the Company’s overall business results; |
|
● |
Provide reasonable levels
of total compensation which will enable the Company to attract and retain qualified and capable executive talent within its industry,
while also considering the Company’s current goals of controlling costs and effecting consistent improvements in its overall
financial condition; |
|
● |
Motivate executive officers
to deliver optimum individual and business unit performance; |
|
● |
Develop and retain a leadership
team that is capable of successfully operating and growing an increasingly competitive and complex business in a rapidly changing
industry; and |
|
● |
Ensure that executive compensation-related
disclosures are made to the public on a timely basis. |
Role
of the Compensation Committee
The
compensation of all NEOs and other executive officers is determined by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee met one
time during fiscal year 2023. The primary responsibilities of the Compensation Committee include, without limitation, the following:
|
● |
Determine the compensation
of the members of the Executive Committee, after taking into account the Board’s assessment of the performance of the Executive
Committee, as well as any other executive officers of the Company. |
|
● |
Determine the compensation
of the Chairman of the Board and the directors of the Company. |
|
● |
Assess the performance
of the executive officers of the Company other than the members of the Executive Committee (whose performance is assessed by the
Board). |
|
● |
Review and make recommendations
to the Board regarding the Company’s compensation policies and philosophy. |
|
● |
Review and make recommendations
to the Board with respect to the employment agreements, severance agreements, change of control agreements and other similar agreements
between the Company and its executive officers. |
|
● |
Administer the Company’s
equity incentive plans, including the review and grant of stock option and other equity incentive grants. |
|
● |
Review and discuss the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, or CD&A, section of the Company’s annual proxy statement with management, and recommend
to the Board that the CD&A be included in the Company’s proxy statement as required. |
|
● |
Produce an annual report
on executive compensation for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement. |
|
● |
As requested by Company
management, review, consult and make recommendations and/or determinations regarding employee compensation and benefit plans and
programs generally, including employee bonus and retirement plans and programs. |
|
● |
Assist the Board and management
in developing and evaluating potential candidates for executive officer positions. |
|
● |
Advise the Board in its
succession-planning initiatives for the Company’s executive officers and other senior officers. |
Role
of Management in the Compensation Determination Process
The
Company’s senior management team, particularly the Chairman of the Board and the Chairman of the Executive Committee, support the
Compensation Committee in the executive compensation decision-making process. At the request of the Compensation Committee, one or more
members of the Executive Committee may present a performance assessment and recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding base
salaries, bonus payments, incentive plan structure and other compensation-related matters for the Company’s executive officers
(other than with respect to their own compensation).
Role
of Compensation Consultant
The
Compensation Committee has decided not to utilize the services of a paid compensation consultant after concluding that such a
consultant would provide insufficient value compared to the cost.
Total
Compensation for Executive Officers
The
compensation packages offered to the Company’s executive officers are comprised of one or more of the following elements:
|
● |
Base salary; |
|
● |
Discretionary cash bonuses; and |
|
● |
Post-retirement healthcare and pension benefits. |
The
Company does not have any formal policies which dictate the amount to be paid with respect to each element, nor does it have any policies
which dictate the relative proportion of the various elements. The Company also does not have any formal policies for allocating between
cash and non-cash compensation and short-term and long-term compensation. Instead, the Company relies on the judgment of the Compensation
Committee and input and feedback from the management team, including in particular members of the Executive Committee. The Compensation
Committee has no plans to adopt any such formulas, ratios or other such targets that might artificially dilute the Company’s effectiveness
in achieving its overall profit objectives. In fact, all of the Company’s compensation policy decisions are made in the context
of its current financial position and are subordinated to the Company’s current goal of achieving overall profitability on an annual
basis. Each of the compensation components is described in more detail below.
Base
Salary
The
Company provides executive officers and other employees with base salary to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year.
The purpose of base salary is to reward effective fulfillment of an executive’s assigned job responsibilities, and to reflect the
position’s relative value to the Company and competitiveness of the executive job market. Base salaries for executive officers
are determined based on the nature and responsibility of the position, salary norms for comparable positions at similar companies, the
expertise and effectiveness of the individual executive, and the competitiveness of the market for the executive officer’s services.
The
Company has successfully held most base salaries at the low end of the competitive range in order to reduce its overall cost structure
and to achieve systematic improvement in the financial performance of the business without incurring a large turnover in executive talent
and leadership.
Any
“merit increases” for the Company’s executive officers are subject to the same budgetary constraints that apply to
all other employees. Executive officer salaries are evaluated as part of the Company’s annual review process and may be adjusted
where justified in the context of the Company’s current focus on profitability and controlling expenses.
For
fiscal year 2024, the Compensation Committee set a base salary of $6,180 per week for each Executive Committee member, reduced on a pro-rata
basis for any member working less than a full-time schedule. For fiscal year 2023, the Compensation Committee set a base salary of $6,000
per week for each Executive Committee member, reduced on a pro-rata basis for any member working less than a full-time schedule.
Discretionary
Cash Bonuses
The
Company’s policy is to make a significant portion of each NEO’s total compensation contingent upon the Company’s financial
performance. The Compensation Committee believes that the payment of cash bonuses based on the Company’s financial success allows
the Company to offer a competitive total compensation package despite relatively lower base salaries, while aligning a significant portion
of executive compensation with the achievement of positive Company financial results. However, while the payment of these cash bonuses
to the NEOs is generally correlated with the achievement of positive Company financial results, there are no specific performance targets
communicated to the NEOs in advance, and the bonuses are ultimately paid at the discretion of the Compensation Committee after receiving
input from the Chairman of the Board. For the fiscal year ended November 3, 2023, discretionary bonuses were awarded to the members of
the Company’s Executive Committee as disclosed in detail in the Summary Compensation Table.
Long-Term
Equity-Based Incentive Compensation
The
Compensation Committee has concluded that long-term stock-related compensation has very limited value as an employee incentive or retention
tool because the Company’s equity-based incentive awards have historically provided little or no value to the recipient. In addition,
beginning in 2005, U.S. accounting rules required the Company to expense any stock option awards according to a formula which could impose
a costly charge on the Company’s income statements, thereby burdening or erasing its profit margins. Because of these factors,
the Company has not granted stock options or restricted stock awards for many years. Instead, the Compensation Committee aims to align
the interests of the NEOs with those of the Company’s shareholders by creating a link between the payment of executive compensation
and the achievement of Company financial goals as described above. The Company’s 1999 Stock Incentive Plan expired by its own terms
on April 29, 2009. No stock options remain outstanding and no additional stock options or restricted stock may be granted thereunder.
Pension
and Retirement Benefits
Retirement
Plan for Administrative and Sales Employees of Bridgford Foods Corporation. The Company has a defined benefit plan, or the Primary
Benefit Plan, for certain of its employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements. The Primary Benefit Plan, administered by
a major life insurance company, presently provides that participants receive an annual benefit on retirement equal to 1.5% of their total
compensation from the Company during their period of participation from 1958. Benefits are not reduced by Social Security payments or
by payments from other sources and are payable in the form of a monthly lifetime annuity commencing at age 65 or the participant’s
date of retirement, whichever is later. Effective May 12, 2006, future benefit accruals under the Primary Benefit Plan were frozen.
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan. Retirement benefits otherwise available to certain key executives under the Primary Benefit Plan have
been limited by the effects of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (“TEFRA”) and the Tax Reform Act of 1986
(“TRA”). To offset the loss of retirement benefits associated with TEFRA and TRA, the Company has adopted a non-qualified
“makeup” benefit plan (the “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan”). Benefits will be provided under the Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan in an amount equal to 60% of each participant’s final average earnings minus any pension benefits and
primary insurance amounts available to them under Social Security. Benefits provided under this plan for William L. Bridgford are calculated
at 50% of final average earnings, capped at $200,000 per year, without offsets for other pension or Social Security benefits.
Bridgford
Foods Retirement Savings 401(k) Plan. The Company implemented a 401(k)-plan effective May 13, 2006. The Company makes a matching
contribution to each employee’s account based on pretax contributions in an amount equal to 100% of the first 3% of compensation
and 50% of the next 2% of compensation contributed to the Plan. Certain limitations on optional pre-tax contributions to the plan are
imposed pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No amounts are contributed by the Company unless the employee elects
to make a pretax contribution to the Plan.
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
Effective
January 1, 1991, the Company adopted a deferred compensation savings plan for certain key employees. Under this arrangement, selected
employees contributed a portion of their annual compensation to the plan. The Company contributed an amount to each participant’s
account by computing an investment return equal to Moody’s Average Seasoned Bond Rate plus 2%. The purpose of the plan was to provide
tax planning and supplemental funds upon retirement or death for certain selected employees and to aid in retaining and attracting employees
of exceptional ability. Separate accounts are maintained for each participant to properly reflect his or her total vested account balance.
No contributions or salary deferrals have been made in the past ten years.
Perquisites
and Other Benefits
The
Company provides its executive officers with various health and welfare programs and other employee benefits which are generally available
on the same cost-sharing basis to all of its employees. However, in keeping with the Company’s policy of controlling costs in connection
with its profitability objectives, it does not provide any significant perquisites or other special benefits to its executive officers
including, but not limited to, payment of club memberships, fees associated with financial planning, executive dining rooms or special
transportation rights. The Company does not own an airplane and does not provide aircraft for executives for business or personal purposes.
The
Company provides post-retirement healthcare benefits for certain executives and their spouses (who are within fifteen years of age of
the employee) who have reached normal retirement age. This coverage is secondary to Medicare. Coverage for spouses continues upon the
death of the employee. The maximum benefit under the plan is $100,000 per year per retiree. The combined loss on this plan was $9,000
and $3,000 during fiscal year 2023 and 2022, respectively, for all active and retired participants.
The
Company paid life and disability insurance premiums on policies for John V. Simmons under which he is the named owner and beneficiary.
No further premiums are due on these policies.
Employment
and Consulting Agreements
The
Company currently does not have any employment agreements with any of its NEOs. However, on August 12, 2019, the Company entered into
a consulting agreement with Allan L. Bridgford, Sr., pursuant to which the Company has engaged Mr. Bridgford to provide consulting services
to the Company, which commenced effective October 30, 2021 upon his retirement from employment with the Company on October 29, 2021.
Under the terms of the consulting agreement, Mr. Bridgford provides to the Company consulting services, including, but not limited to,
business development and strategic partnering, commencing on the date of his retirement and until such agreement is terminated by either
party upon at least thirty (30) days’ notice to the other party. Mr. Bridgford will be compensated at a rate of $20,833.33 per
month and will be reimbursed for all reasonable out of pocket expenses incurred in rendering such services. Additionally, upon the retirement
of Raymond F. Lancy on February 1, 2023, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Lancy to provide as needed consulting
services to the Company. Mr. Lancy is compensated at an hourly rate of $157.50 and is reimbursed for all reasonable out of pocket expenses
incurred in rendering such services.
Payments
Upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control
The
Company currently does not have any severance, change of control or similar agreements with any of its NEOs. Refer to the compensation
discussion below for information on pension, deferred compensation, and benefit-related payments payable in the event of a qualifying
event such as employment termination, disability, death, or sale/merger/acquisition.
Tax
and Accounting Implications
The
Compensation Committee is responsible for considering the deductibility of executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code, which in fiscal year 2023 provided that it could not deduct compensation of more than $1,000,000 that is paid to its executive
officers. The Company believes that the compensation paid under the current management incentive programs is fully deductible for federal
income tax purposes. In certain situations, the Compensation Committee may approve compensation that will not meet the requirements for
deductibility in order to ensure competitive levels of compensation for its executives and to meet its obligations under the terms of
various incentive programs. However, the issue of deductibility has not come before the Compensation Committee in recent years and is
not expected to be a concern for the foreseeable future.
Shareholder
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation and Frequency of Advisory Vote
Pursuant
to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the Company held a shareholder vote on the frequency of an
advisory (non-binding) shareholder vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs (commonly known as a “say-on-pay”
proposal) at its 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. At such meeting, the shareholders of the Company elected to hold a say-on-pay vote
every three years. The Company’s shareholders most recently approved the overall compensation of the Company’s NEOs at the
2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Compensation Committee considers the results of the shareholders’ advisory say-on-pay
vote in its determination of NEO compensation. The Company’s next say-on-pay shareholder vote shall be at the 2026 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders and the next shareholder vote on frequency shall be at the 2029 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Summary
Compensation Table
The
table below provides summary information concerning cash and certain other compensation paid to or accrued for the Company’s NEOs
during fiscal years 2023 and 2022, respectively. Each of the NEOs named below were also members of the Executive Committee during the
referenced periods, which Committee acts in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
See
“COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS” for further discussion of compensation arrangements pursuant to which the amounts
listed in the table below were paid or awarded and the criteria for such payment or award.
Name and Principal
Position | |
Year | | |
Base Salary($)(1) | | |
Bonus($) | | |
Stock Awards($)(2) | | |
Option Awards($)(3) | | |
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation($)(4) | | |
Change
in Pension Value
and Non- Qualified
Deferred Compensation Earnings($)(5) | | |
All Other Compensation($)(6) | | |
Total($) | |
Michael W. Bridgford
(7) | |
| 2023 | | |
| 312,000 | | |
| 165,351 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 21,200 | | |
| 498,551 | |
Chairman of the Board | |
| 2022 | | |
| 297,050 | | |
| 153,392 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 20,200 | | |
| 470,642 | |
Baron R. Bridgford II (8) | |
| 2023 | | |
| 312,000 | | |
| 165,351 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 21,200 | | |
| 498,551 | |
President | |
| 2022 | | |
| 297,050 | | |
| 153,392 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 20,200 | | |
| 470,642 | |
William L. Bridgford (7) | |
| 2023 | | |
| 312,000 | | |
| 165,351 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 21,200 | | |
| 498,551 | |
Vice President | |
| 2022 | | |
| 297,050 | | |
| 153,392 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 20,200 | | |
| 470,642 | |
John V. Simmons (8) | |
| 2023 | | |
| 312,000 | | |
| 165,351 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 21,200 | | |
| 498,551 | |
Vice President | |
| 2022 | | |
| 297,050 | | |
| 153,392 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 20,200 | | |
| 470,642 | |
Cindy Matthews-Morales | |
| 2023 | | |
| 312,000 | | |
| 165,351 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 43,378 | | |
| 21,200 | | |
| 520,729 | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
| 2022 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
(1) |
Fiscal year 2023 was 53
weeks and fiscal year 2022 was 52 weeks. |
(2) |
The Company did not grant
any stock awards to any of the NEOs during fiscal years 2023 or 2022. |
(3) |
The Company did not grant
any option awards to any of the NEOs during fiscal years 2023 or 2022. |
(4) |
The Company did not utilize
any non-equity incentive plans in order to pay compensation to its NEOs in fiscal years 2023 or 2022. While it is the Company’s
policy to provide each of the NEOs with an opportunity to earn cash bonuses that are correlated with the Company’s financial
performance, the payment of the bonuses is ultimately subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee. See “COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Total Compensation for Executive Officers – Discretionary Cash Bonuses.” |
(5) |
This column includes the
aggregate positive change in actuarial present value of each NEO’s accumulated benefit under all defined benefit and supplemental
pension plans. In accordance with SEC rules, to the extent the aggregate change in present value of all defined benefit and supplemental
pension plans for a particular fiscal year would have been a negative amount, the amount has instead been reported as $0 and the
aggregate compensation for the NEO in the “Total” column has not been adjusted to reflect the negative amount. In addition,
to the extent that the change in present value of any particular defined benefit or supplemental pension plan for a particular year
was a negative amount, the negative amount has not been used to offset the positive change in present value associated with the other
applicable defined benefit or supplemental pension plans. The aggregate change in the present value of the non-qualified deferred
compensation plan and pension and retirement benefits for the NEOs in fiscal years 2023 and 2022 was as follows: (i) for fiscal year
2023, William L. Bridgford (-$47,447), John V. Simmons (-$40,876), Michael W. Bridgford (-$1,173), Baron R.H. Bridgford II (-$62,138)
and Cindy Matthews-Morales ($43,378), and (ii) for fiscal year 2022, William L. Bridgford (-$238,754) and John V. Simmons (-$212,407).
|
(6) |
Consists of matching contributions
of the Bridgford Foods Retirement Savings 401(k) plan made by the Company on behalf of each of the NEO’s. $8,000 is offset
to cancellation of health benefits. |
(7) |
Effective October 30, 2021,
Michael W. Bridgford succeeded William L. Bridgford as Chairman of the Board. Effective the same date, William L .Bridgford was appointed
as Vice President and Chairman of the Executive Committee. |
(8) |
Effective October 30, 2021,
Baron R.H. Bridgford II succeeded John V. Simmons as President and Mr. Simmons was appointed Vice President. |
(9) |
Effective October 29, 2022,
Cindy Matthews-Morales succeeded Raymond F. Lancy as Chief Financial Officer. |
Narrative
to Summary Compensation Table
See
“COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS” for further discussion of compensation arrangements pursuant to which amounts listed
under the Summary Compensation Table were paid or awarded and the criteria for such payment or award.
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
There
were no stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units or equity or non-equity-based performance awards granted to the Company’s
NEOs during fiscal years 2023 or 2022. The Company’s 1999 Stock Incentive Plan expired by its own terms on April 29, 2009, and
no additional stock options or restricted stock may be granted thereunder.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
There
were no outstanding options or stock awards held by any NEOs as of November 3, 2023.
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
There
were no shares acquired upon the exercise of stock options or vesting of stock awards by any NEOs during fiscal years 2023 or 2022.
Pension
Benefits
The
tables below provide information concerning retirement plan benefits for each NEO and payments due upon certain termination scenarios.
Retirement
Plan for Administrative and Sales Employees of Bridgford Foods Corporation
Normal
Retirement: Benefits commence upon reaching the “Normal Retirement Date”, which is the first day of the month on or after
attainment of age 65. Pension benefit payments begin on the normal retirement date and continue until death.
Early
Retirement: A participant may choose to retire up to ten years before the normal retirement date. If a participant retires early,
the accrued pension will be reduced by a percentage to reflect the longer period over which pension benefits will be received. If a participant
is married for at least one year and dies before retirement, a pension benefit will be payable to the surviving spouse for his or her
life, provided certain eligibility requirements have been met.
Death
Benefits: Payments to a surviving spouse will begin on the first day of the month following a participant’s death but not sooner
than the earliest date a participant could have elected to retire.
Disability
Benefits: A disability benefit is the accrued pension credited to a participant as of the date of disability.
The
years of credited service, present value of accumulated plan benefits and payments made during the fiscal year were as follows:
For
the Fiscal Year ended November 3, 2023:
Name | |
Number of Years Credited Service | | |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) | | |
Payments During Fiscal Year | |
William L. Bridgford | |
| 50 | | |
$ | 610,240 | | |
$ | - | |
John V. Simmons | |
| 44 | | |
$ | 524,135 | | |
$ | - | |
Michael Bridgford | |
| 21 | | |
$ | 10,733 | | |
$ | - | |
Baron R. H. Bridgford II | |
| 18 | | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Cindy Matthews-Morales | |
| 23 | | |
$ | 43,378 | | |
$ | - | |
(1) |
The assumed discount rate
used was 5.96% to compute the present value of the accumulated benefit. The Pri-2012 Total Dataset Mortality Table with MP- 2021
Scaling was used and an expected return on assets of 7.00% was assumed. |
For
the Fiscal Year ended October 28, 2022:
Name | |
Number of Years Credited Service | | |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) | | |
Payments During Fiscal Year | |
William L. Bridgford | |
| 49 | | |
$ | 657,686 | | |
$ | - | |
John V. Simmons | |
| 43 | | |
$ | 565,012 | | |
$ | - | |
(1) |
The assumed discount rate
used was 5.44% to compute the present value of the accumulated benefit. The Pri-2012 Total Dataset Mortality Table with MP- 2021
Scaling was used and an expected return on assets of 7.00% was assumed. |
Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)
Payment
of Retirement Benefit: All retirement, disability and death benefits shall be paid in monthly installments beginning on the commencement
date following the participant’s retirement, disability or death and shall continue for a period of fifteen years.
Normal
Retirement: Benefits commence upon reaching the “Normal Retirement Date”, which means the date on which the participant
has both attained age 65 and completed at least ten years of participation. SERP benefit payments begin at the normal retirement date
or later depending on the election of the participant.
Early
Retirement: A participant may choose to retire up to ten years before the normal retirement date if the participant has completed
at least five years of participation. If a participant retires early, the SERP benefit will be determined based on the vested percentage
attained as the time of retirement.
Death
Benefits: If a participant dies prior to having commenced receipt of benefits and is eligible for benefits hereunder, the participant’s
beneficiary shall be entitled to receive an annual death benefit equal to the Normal Retirement Benefit determined as if the participant
attained Normal Retirement Age on the date of his death, or, if after the Participant’s Normal Retirement Date, equal to the Late
Retirement Benefit. If a participant dies after having commenced receipt of benefits, benefits shall continue to be paid but to the Participant’s
Beneficiary at the same time and in the same form as the benefits would have been payable to the participant. No benefit will be payable
to a participant’s beneficiary if the participant terminates employment with the Company before he is eligible for a retirement
benefit and thereafter dies.
Disability
Benefits: A disability benefit is the vested percentage of SERP benefit credited to a participant as of the date of disability.
The
present value of accumulated plan benefits and payments made during the fiscal year were as follows:
For
the Fiscal Year ended November 3, 2023:
Name | |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) | | |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year | |
William L. Bridgford | |
$ | 2,009,854 | | |
$ | _ | |
John V. Simmons | |
$ | _ | | |
$ | _ | |
(1) |
A 5.96% discount rate was
used to compute the present values. |
For
the Fiscal Year ended October 28, 2022:
Name | |
Present Value of Accumulated Benefit (1) | | |
Payments During Last Fiscal Year | |
William L. Bridgford | |
$ | 2,074,456 | | |
$ | _ | |
John V. Simmons | |
$ | _ | | |
$ | _ | |
(1) |
A 5.44% discount rate was
used to compute the present values. |
The
following table estimates the present value of SERP benefits under different employment termination scenarios as of November 3, 2023:
Name | |
Present Value of Benefit Upon Voluntary Termination of Employment (1) | | |
Present Value of Benefit if Disabled (1) | | |
Present Value of Benefit Upon Death(1) | | |
Present Value of Benefit Upon Involuntary Termination of Employment due to Sale/Merger/ Acquisition (1) | |
William L. Bridgford (2) | |
$ | 2,009,854 | | |
$ | 2,009,854 | | |
$ | 2,009,854 | | |
$ | 2,009,854 | |
John V. Simmons | |
$ | _ | | |
$ | _ | | |
$ | _ | | |
$ | _ | |
(1) |
In each scenario above,
the benefit amount shown is calculated on November 3, 2023. A 5.96% discount rate was used to compute the present values. In the
case of a voluntary termination, the participant shall be entitled to the vested portion of any such early retirement benefit but
shall not commence receipt of such early retirement benefit until the commencement date following the date the participant would
have attained the early retirement date had the participant remained employed by the Company. Upon a finding that the participant
(or, after the participant’s death, a beneficiary) has suffered an unforeseeable emergency, the Committee may at the request
of the participant or beneficiary, and subject to compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, accelerate distribution of
benefits under the SERP in the amount reasonably necessary to alleviate such unforeseeable emergency. |
|
|
(2) |
Death benefits for William
L. Bridgford are paid in the form of a monthly annuity. The actual payment amount for William L. Bridgford would be determined using
a discount rate similar to the rate required for qualified plans. The rate assumed for these estimates is 5.96%. |
The
following table estimates future SERP payments under different termination scenarios as of November 3, 2023:
Name |
|
Payment
Upon
Voluntary
Termination
of
Employment |
|
Payment
if
Disabled
(1) |
|
Death
Benefit
from
Plan (2) |
|
Involuntary
Termination
of
Employment
Due
to
Sale/Merger/
Acquisition |
William L. Bridgford |
|
$16,666.67 per month for
180 months beginning on 11/03/23 |
|
$16,666.67 per month for
180 months commencing after disability |
|
$16,666.67 per month for
180 months beginning just after death |
|
Lump Sum payment due at
termination of $2,009,854 |
John V. Simmons |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
(1) |
Disability amount is decreased
by any Company paid disability insurance policies, Social Security disability benefits, or other Federal or State disability programs.
In the case of a voluntary termination, the participant shall be entitled to the vested portion of any such early retirement benefit
but shall not commence receipt of such early retirement benefit until the commencement date following the date the participant would
have attained the early retirement date had the participant remained employed by the Company. Upon a finding that the participant
(or, after the participant’s death, a beneficiary) has suffered an unforeseeable emergency, the Committee may at the request
of the participant or beneficiary, and subject to compliance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, accelerate distribution of
benefits under the SERP in the amount reasonably necessary to alleviate such unforeseeable emergency. |
|
|
(2) |
Assumes death on November
3, 2023. The discount rate used to calculate the lump sum amount is 5.96%. |
See
“COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Total Compensation for Executive Officers — Pension and Retirement Benefits”
for further discussion of the pension benefits contained in the tables above.
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
The
table below provides information concerning deferred compensation plan benefits for each NEO during the fiscal year ended November 3,
2023.
Name | |
Executive
Contributions
in
Fiscal Year
| | |
Company
Contributions
in
Fiscal Year
| | |
Aggregate
Earnings in
Fiscal Year
| | |
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
| | |
Aggregate
Balance at
Fiscal Year
End
| |
William L. Bridgford | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
John V. Simmons | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
The
table below provides information concerning deferred compensation plan benefits for each NEO during the fiscal year ended October 28,
2022.
Name | |
Executive
Contributions
in
Fiscal Year
| | |
Company
Contributions
in
Fiscal Year
| | |
Aggregate
Earnings in
Fiscal Year
| | |
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
| | |
Aggregate
Balance at
Fiscal Year
End
| |
William L. Bridgford | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
John V. Simmons | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
The
following table estimates the present value of non-qualified deferred compensation benefits under different employment termination scenarios
as of November 3, 2023:
Name | |
Present
Value
of Benefit at
Termination
of
Employment
| | |
Present
Value
of Benefit if
Disabled
| | |
Present
Value
of Benefit
Upon Death
| | |
Present Value
of Benefit Upon
Involuntary
Termination of
Employment Due to Sale/Merger/
Acquisition
| |
William L. Bridgford | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
John V. Simmons | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | |
The
deferred compensation amounts are calculated using a crediting rate equal to Moody’s Average Seasoned Bond Rate, plus 2%. This
rate is subject to fluctuation. Upon death, the deferred compensation benefits are paid in a lump sum equal to the individual’s
remaining account balance.
See
“COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Total Compensation for Executive Officers – Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation”
for further discussion of the non-qualified deferred compensation benefits contained in the tables above.
Pay
Versus Performance Disclosure
Pursuant
to Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act, the following table sets forth information about the relationship between the compensation
actually paid to our principal executive officer, or PEO, and non-PEO named executive officers, or Non-PEO NEOs, and certain performance
metrics of the Company. For further information regarding executive compensation for our named executive officers, refer to “COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Compensation Of Executive Officers.”
Year | |
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO(1) | | |
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(1)(2) | | |
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs(3) | | |
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(2)(3) | | |
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on Total Shareholder Return(4) | | |
Net
Income(5) | |
2023 | |
$ | 496,951 | | |
$ | 496,951 | | |
$ | 507,796 | | |
$ | 496,951 | | |
$ | 89.51 | | |
$ | 3,474,000 | |
2022 | |
$ | 470,042 | | |
$ | 470,042 | | |
$ | 447,520 | | |
$ | 447,520 | | |
$ | 106.05 | | |
$ | 45,066,000 | |
(1) |
Michael
W. Bridgford, our Chairman of the Board, was our PEO for fiscal years 2022 and 2023. |
|
|
(2) |
The
dollar amounts reflected in this column represent the compensation actually paid to the PEO and the non-PEO NEOs, respectively, computed
in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. There were no adjustments made to compensation actually paid on account of equity
awards since no such awards were made or remain outstanding as of the fiscal years covered. However, a reduction to a Non-PEO NEO’s
compensation actually paid in the amount of $43,378 was made for fiscal year 2023 to reflect the aggregate positive change in the
present value of the non-qualified deferred compensation plan and pension and retirement benefits for such individual reflected in
the Summary Compensation Table. |
|
|
(3) |
The Non-PEO NEOs for each year reported were as follows: |
|
● |
2023:
William L. Bridgford, John V. Simmons, Baron R. Bridgford II and Cindy Matthews-Morales. |
|
● |
2022: William L. Bridgford, John V. Simmons,
Raymond F. Lancy and Baron R. Bridgford II. |
(4) |
The
total shareholder return, or TSR, is determined based on the value of an initial fixed investment of $100 on October 29, 2021, the
last day of fiscal year 2021, through the last day of each fiscal year in the table. |
|
|
(5) |
The
Net Income for fiscal years 2022 and 2023 as reported in our 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 3,
2023. |
Relationship
Between Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative Total Shareholder Return
As
shown in the graph below, the compensation actually paid to our PEO, Michael W. Bridgford, and the average amount of compensation actually
paid to our Non-PEO NEOs during the covered fiscal years are directly correlated with each other since the PEO and each of the Non-PEO
NEOs are members of the Executive Committee, which Committee acts in the capacity of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Each
member of the Executive Committee receives the same base salary and discretionary cash bonus (if any), reduced on a pro-rata basis for
any member working less than a full-time schedule (as was the case for Raymond F. Lancy during fiscal year 2022). While we utilize several
performance measures to align executive compensation with the Company’s performance, they tend not to be directly tied to TSR.
For example, part of the compensation our PEO and Non-PEO NEOs are eligible to receive consists of annual discretionary performance-based
cash bonuses, which are designed to incentivize our executives to achieve positive Company financial results among other things and reward
them for achievement of these results.
The
graph below compares the compensation actually paid to our PEO, the average of the compensation actually paid to our Non-PEO NEOs, and
the cumulative TSR. The TSR amounts in the graph assume that $100 was invested on October 29, 2021, and that all distributions or dividends,
if any, were reinvested on a quarterly basis.
Relationship
Between Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income
The
graph below compares the compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average of the compensation actually paid to our Non-PEO NEOs
with our net income as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 3, 2023.
Director
Compensation
The
following table summarizes the total compensation paid and accrued by the Company to directors who were not employees during fiscal year
2023, other than Raymond F. Lancy who retired from employment with the Company effective February 1, 2023. Directors who were employees
did not receive any additional compensation for their services as directors while they were also employees of the Company.
Name | |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash | | |
Stock Awards | | |
Option Awards | | |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | | |
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | | |
All Other Compensation | | |
Total | |
Todd C. Andrews | |
$ | 28,450 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 28,450 | |
Keith A. Ross | |
$ | 25,800 | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
| — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 25,800 | |
D. Gregory Scott | |
$ | 22,940 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 22,940 | |
Mary Schott | |
$ | 28,450 | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 28,450 | |
Allan L. Bridgford, Sr. | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 250,000 | (1) | |
$ | 250,000 | |
Raymond F. Lancy | |
$ | 20,640 | (2) | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | — | | |
$ | 96,774 | (3) | |
$ | 117,414 | |
(1) |
Allan L. Bridgford, Sr.
did not receive any fees for his services as a director. Rather, Mr. Bridgford, Sr.’s compensation consisted solely of $250,000
paid pursuant to his consulting agreement for consulting services rendered to the Company in fiscal year 2023. See “CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS” for further details. |
(2) |
The amount consists of
fees for Mr. Lancy’s services as a director following his retirement from employment effective February 1, 2023. |
(3) |
The amount consists of
(x) a pro-rated base salary ($57,600), bonus ($23,211) and matching contribution by the Company to the Bridgford Foods Retirement
Savings 401(k) plan ($13,600) paid to Mr. Lancy for fiscal year 2023 prior to his retirement from employment with the Company effective
February 1, 2023, as well as (y) $2,363 paid to Mr. Lancy pursuant to his consulting agreement for services rendered to the Company
in fiscal year 2023 after his retirement from employment. |
Narrative
to Director Compensation Table
The
Company uses cash compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on its Board of Directors. In setting director compensation,
the Compensation Committee considers the demands that have been placed and will continue to be placed on the directors and the skill-level
required by its directors. In addition, as with the Company’s executive officers, compensation decisions for directors are made
in the context of the Company’s focus on controlling costs and increasing profitability.
The
directors are not paid an annual retainer for their service on the Board. Instead, each non-employee director, other than Allan L. Bridgford,
Sr., was paid $2,580 for each of the Board meetings attended during fiscal year 2023. Members of the Audit Committee were paid $350 to
$550 for each Audit Committee meeting attended in fiscal year 2023 depending on the length of the meeting. Directors were not paid any
additional compensation for their service on the Nominating Committee or the Compensation Committee in fiscal year 2023.
DELINQUENT
SECTION 16(A) REPORTS
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and shareholders who own more than ten percent of any registered
class of our equity securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, or Reporting Persons, to file with reports of ownership
and reports of changes in ownership of securities with the SEC. Based solely on our review of the reports that have been filed by or
on behalf of such Reporting Persons in this regard, and the representations made by our directors and executive officers to us, we believe
that there has been compliance with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to such Reporting Persons with respect to the fiscal
year ended November 3, 2023, except for a late Form 3 filing for Cindy Matthews-Morales and late Form 4 filings for Richard E. Bridgford
(two reports and two purchase transactions, also missing Form 3), Brian E. Bridgford (two reports and five purchase transactions, also
missing Form 3), Baron R. Bridgford II (one report and three purchase transactions), Allan L. Bridgford Jr. (one report and seven purchase
transactions), Baron Bridgford (one report and five purchase transactions, also missing Form 3), Travis Robbins (one report and two purchase
transactions, also missing Form 3), D. Gregory Scott (one report and two purchase transactions), Juan Luis Silva (one report and two
purchase transactions, also missing Form 3) and Christopher W. Cole (one report and one purchase transaction, also missing Form 3).
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Related
Transactions
The
Company’s general legal counsel is Richard K. Bridgford, the son of director Allan L. Bridgford, Sr. For his legal counsel, he
currently is paid a fee of $2,580 for each Board of Directors meeting attended. Total fees paid for attending Board of Directors meetings
were $25,800 in fiscal year 2023 and $28,180 in fiscal year 2022. In addition, legal services are performed on behalf of the Company
and billed by a firm in which he is a partner. Total fees billed for legal services under this arrangement for each of fiscal years 2023
and 2022 were approximately $88,000 and $87,000, respectively.
Former
director Allan L. Bridgford, Jr., son of director Allan L. Bridgford, Sr., is providing consulting services to the Chicago plant and
management pursuant to a consulting agreement with the Company. The contract on behalf of the Company with Allan L. Bridgford, Jr. is
for consulting services at $1,260 per day. Total fees billed under this arrangement were approximately $130,800 in fiscal year 2023 and
$100,800 in fiscal year 2022. Under an arrangement with Allan L. Bridgford, Jr., we accrued $203,336 in profit sharing for fiscal year
2023 and we accrued $100,800 in profit sharing for fiscal year 2022.
Director
Allan L. Bridgford, Sr. is providing consulting services to the Company pursuant to his consulting agreement with the Company. Total
fees billed under this arrangement were approximately $250,000 in fiscal year 2023. See “COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS –
Employment and Consulting Agreements.”
Director
Keith A. Ross did not provide any real-estate consulting services to the Board and management during fiscal year 2023. Fees of approximately
$4,960 were paid for consulting services in fiscal year 2022. Additionally, in connection with the closing of the sale of the Company’s
Green Street property in June 2022, the Company paid $300,000 to KR6, Inc., an entity controlled by Mr. Ross.
Other
than the relationships noted above, the Company is not aware of any related party transactions that would require disclosure as a related
party transaction under SEC rules.
Review,
Approval or Ratification of Transactions With Related Persons
The
Company’s executive officers, directors, nominees for directors and principal shareholders, including their immediate family members
and affiliates, are prohibited from entering into related party transactions with the Company that would be reportable under Item 404
of Regulation S-K without the prior approval of its Audit Committee (or other independent committee of the Board of Directors in cases
where it is inappropriate for the Audit Committee to review such transaction due to a conflict of interest). Any request for the Company
to enter into a transaction with an executive officer, director, or nominee for director, principal shareholder or any of such persons’
immediate family members or affiliates that would be reportable under Item 404 of Regulation S-K must first be presented to the Audit
Committee for review, consideration and approval. In approving or rejecting the proposed agreement, the Audit Committee will consider
the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant, including but not limited to, the risks, costs, and benefits to the
Company, the terms of the transactions, the availability of other sources for comparable services or products, and, if applicable, the
impact on director independence. The Audit Committee shall only approve those agreements that, in light of known circumstances, are in
or are not inconsistent with the Company’s best interests, as determined in good faith by the Audit Committee (or other independent
committee, as applicable). The requirement for the Audit Committee to review related-party transactions (defined as those transactions
required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K) is set forth in the Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter, which was
approved on October 11, 2021.
PROPOSAL
2
RATIFICATION
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
The
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has, subject to ratification by the shareholders, appointed Baker Tilly as the Company’s
independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending November 1, 2024.
The
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on any matter
is required to ratify the appointment of Baker Tilly. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” this proposal.
Brokers have discretion to vote uninstructed shares with respect to this proposal. Accordingly, broker non-votes are not likely to occur
with respect to this proposal.
Proxies
received in response to this solicitation will be voted “FOR” the approval of Baker Tilly unless otherwise specified in the
proxy. In the event of a negative vote on such ratification, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors will reconsider its selection;
provided, however, that the Audit Committee may select Baker Tilly notwithstanding the failure of the shareholders to ratify its selection.
Representatives of Baker Tilly will be present at the meeting and available to respond to questions. They will have the opportunity to
make a statement if they so desire.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BAKER TILLY AS THE COMPANY’S
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING NOVEMBER 1, 2024.
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
Audit
Fees
Fees
charged by Baker Tilly for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included
in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for fiscal years 2023 and 2022 were approximately $218,500 and $212,000, respectively.
Audit-Related
Fees
Audit-related
fees typically consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit
or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” These services
may include consultations related to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
There were no audit-related fees billed by Baker Tilly for fiscal year 2023 or fiscal year 2022.
Tax
Fees
Tax
fees are comprised of services that include assistance related to state tax compliance services and consultations regarding federal and
state research and development tax credits. No fees were billed by Baker Tilly for tax consulting during fiscal year 2023 or fiscal year
2022.
All
Other Fees
All
other fees are comprised of fees for initial planning for certification of internal controls over financial reporting. No such fees were
billed by Baker Tilly for fiscal year 2023 or fiscal year 2022.
Policy
on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit Services and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Accountants
The
Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent registered
public accountants. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. During fiscal
years 2023 and 2022, the Audit Committee approved all such services rendered by its independent registered public accountants. For audit
services, the independent registered public accountants provide the Audit Committee with an audit plan including proposed fees in advance
of the annual audit. The Audit Committee approves the plan and fees for the audit.
For
non-audit services, the Company’s senior management will submit from time to time to the Audit Committee for approval non-audit
services that it recommends the Audit Committee engage the independent registered public accountants to provide during the fiscal year.
The Company’s senior management and the independent registered public accountants will each confirm to the Audit Committee that
each non-audit service is permissible under all applicable legal requirements. A budget, estimating non-audit service spending for the
fiscal year, will be provided to the Audit Committee along with the request. The Audit Committee must approve both permissible non-audit
services and the budget for such services.
PROPOSAL
3
SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSAL
We
have been notified that Mr. Mark Krieger, 9832 Brentwood Dr., Santa Ana, California 92705, who reports that he was the beneficial owner
of at least $25,000 of our common stock for at least one year as of December 31, 2023 and intends to hold his shares of our common stock
through the date of the Annual Meeting, intends to present the proposal below for consideration and a shareholder vote at the Annual
Meeting. The proposal, along with Mr. Krieger’s supporting statement, appear below as received by us. The accuracy and content
contained in the shareholder proposal and supporting statement are Mr. Krieger’s sole responsibility.
For
the reasons set forth following the proposal and supporting statement, the Board and management disagree with Mr. Krieger’s proposal
and supporting statement.
Approval
of Mr. Krieger’s proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting
and entitled to vote on any matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes “AGAINST” this proposal.
Mr.
Krieger’s Proposal and Supporting Statement
Proposal:
requires the company to return a minimum of 20% of annual net earnings to shareholders via a cash dividend, share buyback or a combination
of both.
Supporting
statement: The reason behind this proposal is to help boost shareholder value. Once this occurs, the marketplace should have more
confidence in the company and logically price the shares accordingly- to reflect less uncertainty.
To
illustrate: Shareholder’s equity per share on 11/3/2017 was $6.17 and five years later it has risen to $13.92 (fiscal year ended
11/3/2022). That represents a 125% increase in shareholder’s equity during that five-year timeframe, with the company producing
approximately $7.75 of retained earnings.
The
issue? Not one penny of those earnings has translated into shareholder value via share appreciation. In fact, the share price has actually
fallen 13.40% from $12.80 per share in November of 2017 to a closing price of $11.09 as of January 12, 2024. These facts are difficult
to face in comparison to the S&P 500 index which rose 83% during the same timeframe.
The
proposal is in effect, a safeguard from preventing this unfortunate narrative from perpetuating itself. It is by far, the best single
option for all shareholders. It will ensure shareholder value is enhanced in a punctual manner.
Board
of Directors’ Statement in Opposition to Proposal 3 (Shareholder Proposal)
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “AGAINST” THIS PROPOSAL.
The
Board of Directors remains committed to enhancing shareholder value and achieving a fair return for our shareholders through developing,
producing, selling and distributing superior quality food products that provide a consistent value to our customers. Members of the Bridgford
family own or control more than 80% of our outstanding common stock, and many members of the extended Bridgford family hold key management
positions in the Company. While the Board regularly considers the return of capital to its shareholders through a cash dividend and through
repurchases of its outstanding shares of common stock, the Board and management are currently dedicated to generating shareholder value
by reinvesting in growth in the Company’s business, striving to maintain a competitive edge through forward thinking, and minimizing
debt, rather than through distributing dividends or repurchasing outstanding shares. The Bridgford family is the largest shareholder
group of the Company and would stand to benefit the most from a dividend declaration. By reinvesting in the Company, the Board, management
and the Bridgford family are demonstrating their commitment to long-term growth and a strategic mindset to poise the Company for sustained
success.
Reinvestment
in Growth — During fiscal year 2023, we spent $2.6 million on property, plant, and equipment to fund the acquisition of equipment,
upgrade facilities to maintain operating efficiency and invest in cost-effective technologies to lower costs and support future growth.
We have invested over $66.0 million in infrastructure since fiscal year 2017 to develop a state-of-the-art production and warehousing
facility in Chicago, Illinois in support of these strategic objectives. We funded these investments with our operating income and the
proceeds from the sale of the Green Street property in Chicago in June 2022 for $60.0 million, and paid off $37.0 million in debt using
these sales proceeds, efforts that not only improved our liquidity position and balance sheet, but also positioned us to achieve meaningful
growth. The development of this production and warehousing facility, for example, increased our operating capacity and laid the groundwork
to achieve $251.6 million in sales during fiscal year 2023, the second highest amount of annual sales in the Company’s history.
A mandatory dividend or share repurchase requirement may handicap us from pursuing our strategic objectives and executing our growth
strategy.
Stock
Repurchase Plan Consideration — Since 1999, we have had a stock repurchase program, one of the primary objectives of which
has been to distribute cash to shareholders. As of the end of fiscal year 2023, we had cumulatively repurchased 1,879,887 shares of common
stock under the stock repurchase program for an aggregate purchase price of $20.6 million. The current program authorizes the repurchase
of up to an additional 120,113 shares of common stock at a purchase price not to exceed $10.00 per share with an aggregate expenditure
of up to $1,201,130. During fiscal year 2023, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock pursuant to our stock repurchase program.
However, the Board regularly evaluates whether we should use our cash flow to repurchase shares along with the consideration of dividends
described below.
Dividend
Consideration — Under California law, the declaration and payment of dividends is within the discretion of the Board, whose
members are elected by the shareholders to exercise sound business judgment in deciding such matters. The Board has fiduciary responsibilities
and must evaluate various factors to help determine when, whether and in what amounts dividends should be declared, compared to other
business priorities. The decision should seek to balance anticipated future capital needs of the business to allow for financial flexibility
and investment opportunities with the most effective means to enhance shareholder value given the current business environment. In historical
periods, the Company has experienced significant volatility in commodity costs, which materially impact input costs specific to our products
and business, and we must have sufficient capital resources to respond to sudden changes in commodity costs in future periods. Other
factors we must prepare for and ensure we have the liquidity to address include volatile business cycles affecting customer demand, pressure
from potential competitors, and our need to invest in marketing, technical innovation, capital expansion, and key personnel, to support
our scaling business. The Company has not paid dividends on its common stock since 2013. Rather, the Company has returned value to its
shareholders by increasing retained earnings for reinvestment in discovering new and innovative products, personnel, marketing and distribution
channel opportunities.
Mr.
Krieger’s proposal would impede the Board’s capability to analyze all the relevant factors properly. The proposal could adversely
impact the Company’s long-term competitiveness, financial stability and return on shareholder investment. The Board has determined
that, at present, it is in the best interests of the Company and the shareholders to continue to use our cash flow to reinvest in growth.
The Board continues, however, to actively review how we deploy our available cash, including the possibility of paying cash dividends
in the future and/or returning capital to the shareholders through repurchases of shares of our common stock. The Board’s current
approach to actively evaluate the appropriate use of capital from time to time rather than have a set distribution policy is consistent
with its long-standing historical practice.
For
the above reasons, the Board does not believe that establishing a formulaic requirement to pay dividends or to make share repurchases
is appropriate and that our shareholders’ interests are best served when the Board retains the flexibility to select the appropriate
use of capital based on the needs of the Company at any given time.
THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “AGAINST” MR. KRIEGER’S PROPOSAL.
PROXIES
RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO THIS SOLICITATION WILL BE VOTED “AGAINST” THE PROPOSAL UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE PROXY.
Bridgford Foods (NASDAQ:BRID)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Déc 2024 à Jan 2025
Bridgford Foods (NASDAQ:BRID)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Jan 2024 à Jan 2025