(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile
number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered
pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Securities registered or to be registered
pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
Securities for which there is a reporting
obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
Indicate the number of outstanding shares
of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant
is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
If this report is an annual or transition
report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant
is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large
accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
If an emerging growth
company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected
not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
† The term
“new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board
to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report
on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting
under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued
its audit report. ☐
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting
the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
If “Other” has been checked
in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
If this is an annual report, indicate by
check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
As a result of the global outbreak of the COVID-19, SPI
Energy Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) was unable to meet the original filing deadline of this Annual Report on Form
20-F (the “Annual Report”). The Company’s business and facilities are located in Australia, Italy, US,
Greece, Hong Kong and Japan. In order to avoid the risk of the virus spreading, the Company has been following the
recommendations of local health authorities to minimize exposure risk for its employees, including the temporary closures of
its corporate offices, having employees work remotely and travel restrictions or suspension. As a result, the Annual Report
could not be completed by the original filing deadline.
Because the outbreak of COVID-19 prevented the Company from
filing the Annual Report on a timely basis, the Company relied on the order issued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
dated March 25, 2020 (Release No. 34-88465) (the “SEC Order”), providing conditional relief to public companies that
are unable to timely comply with their filing obligations as a result of the outbreak of COVID-19 and extending the original due
date by 45 days as permitted by the SEC Order.
Unless otherwise indicated and except where
the context otherwise requires, references in this annual report on Form 20-F to:
Names of certain companies
in this annual report are translated or transliterated from their original Chinese legal names.
Discrepancies in any
table between the amounts identified as total amounts and the sum of the amounts listed therein are due to rounding.
Share and per share
amounts reflect a one-for-ten reverse stock split that took place in November 2017 and a one-for-ten reverse stock split that took
place on November 2018.
The conversion of amounts of Australian Dollars, Euros and Renminbi, respectively, into U.S. dollars in
this annual report, made solely for the convenience of readers, is based on the noon buying rates in the city of New York for
cable transfers of Australian Dollars, Euros, British Pounds, Japanese Yen and Renminbi, respectively, as certified for customs
purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as of December 31, 2019, which was AUD 0.7030 to $1.00, EUR0.8907 to $1.00, GBP0.7536
to $1.00, JPY108.67 to $1.00 and RMB6.9618 to $1.00, respectively, unless indicated otherwise. No representation is intended to
imply that the Australian Dollar, Euro, British Pounds, Japanese Yen or Renminbi could have been, or could be, converted, realized
or settled into U.S. dollars at the foregoing rates or any other rate.
PART I
Safe Harbor
This annual report
on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, and information we provide in our press releases, telephonic reports
and other investor communications, including those on our website, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”), which are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. All statements in this annual
report on Form 20-F, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
are made pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The forward-looking
statements include statements, among other things, with respect to anticipated future events, including anticipated trends and
developments in and management plans for our business and the markets in which we operate and plan to operate; future financial
results, operating results, revenues, gross profit, operating expenses, projected costs, and capital expenditures; sales and marketing
initiatives; competitive position; and liquidity, capital resources, and availability of future equity capital on commercially
reasonable terms.
Forward-looking statements
can be identified by the use of words such as “expect,” “plan,” “will,” “may,”
“anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “should,” “intend,” “forecast,”
“project” the negative or plural of these words, and other comparable terminology. Our forward-looking statements are
only predictions based on our current expectations and our projections about future events. All forward-looking statements included
in this annual report on Form 20-F are based upon information available to us as of the filing date of this annual report
on Form 20-F. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update
any of these forward-looking statements for any reason.
We have identified
factors that could cause actual plans or results to differ materially from those included in any forward looking statements. These
factors include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
·
|
an inability to realize expected benefits of the restructuring within the anticipated time frame, or at all;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
changes in tax law, tax treaties or tax regulations or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, including
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
taxing authorities not agreeing with our assessment of the effects of such laws, treaties and regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
an inability to execute any of our business strategies; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
such other risk factors as may be discussed in our reports filed with the SEC.
|
These forward-looking
statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity,
performance, or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. These factors include the
matters discussed in the section entitled “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual
report on Form 20-F. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under this section.
ITEM 1.
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not Applicable.
ITEM 2.
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not Applicable.
ITEM 3.
KEY INFORMATION
A.
|
Selected Financial Data
|
Our Selected Consolidated Financial
Data
The following selected
consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 and the selected consolidated balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2018 and 2019 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in
this annual report. The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2016 and
the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 are derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements not included in this annual report. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with, and
are qualified in their entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and “Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” included elsewhere in this annual report. Our consolidated financial statements
are prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S.
GAAP. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future periods.
On January 1, 2017,
we deconsolidated Sinsin Renewable Investment Limited, a Malta company (“Sinsin”) due to loss of control.
On December 10, 2018,
the SPI China (HK) Limited and all China business were divested.
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
190,510
|
|
|
|
114,602
|
|
|
|
121,520
|
|
|
|
125,582
|
|
|
|
97,883
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
|
190,510
|
|
|
|
114,602
|
|
|
|
121,520
|
|
|
|
125,582
|
|
|
|
97,883
|
|
Cost of goods sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
176,469
|
|
|
|
102,147
|
|
|
|
111,428
|
|
|
|
114,525
|
|
|
|
90,693
|
|
Provision for losses on contracts
|
|
|
5,932
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total cost of goods sold
|
|
|
182,401
|
|
|
|
102,532
|
|
|
|
111,428
|
|
|
|
114,525
|
|
|
|
90,693
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
8,109
|
|
|
|
12,070
|
|
|
|
10,092
|
|
|
|
11,057
|
|
|
|
7,190
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
76,747
|
|
|
|
13,728
|
|
|
|
13,994
|
|
|
|
12,225
|
|
|
|
15,158
|
|
Sales, marketing and customer service
|
|
|
39,428
|
|
|
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
2,944
|
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
Provision (reverse) for doubtful accounts, notes and other receivables
|
|
|
45,328
|
|
|
|
7,106
|
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
4,115
|
|
Impairment charges on property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
10,853
|
|
|
|
79,598
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
Impairment charges on project assets
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
172,356
|
|
|
|
103,670
|
|
|
|
19,371
|
|
|
|
14,009
|
|
|
|
26,361
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(164,247
|
)
|
|
|
(91,600
|
)
|
|
|
(9,279
|
)
|
|
|
(2,952
|
)
|
|
|
(19,171
|
)
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,275
|
)
|
|
|
(3,494
|
)
|
|
|
(8,087
|
)
|
|
|
(6,665
|
)
|
|
|
(3,923
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Gain on extinguishment of convertible bonds
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(15,650
|
)
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
Reversal (accrual) of tax penalty
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(9,670
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6,890
|
|
Gain on troubled debt restructuring
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Loss on investment in affiliates
|
|
|
(2,493
|
)
|
|
|
(6,296
|
)
|
|
|
(2,214
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Net foreign exchange gain(loss)
|
|
|
4,412
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
(5,141
|
)
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
Others
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(20,160
|
)
|
|
|
(9,823
|
)
|
|
|
(17,098
|
)
|
|
|
(2,853
|
)
|
|
|
4,115
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(184,407
|
)
|
|
|
(101,423
|
)
|
|
|
(26,377
|
)
|
|
|
(5,805
|
)
|
|
|
(15,056
|
)
|
Income taxes expense
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(185,080
|
)
|
|
|
(102,029
|
)
|
|
|
(26,514
|
)
|
|
|
(6,137
|
)
|
|
|
(15,148
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(118,939
|
)
|
|
|
(64,445
|
)
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(185,080
|
)
|
|
|
(220,968
|
)
|
|
|
(90,959
|
)
|
|
|
(12,259
|
)
|
|
|
(15,148
|
)
|
Net loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.20
|
)
|
Net loss from continuing operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.20
|
)
|
Net loss from discontinued operations per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares used in computing per share:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Dilutive
|
|
|
6,120,471
|
|
|
|
6,415,616
|
|
|
|
6,826,633
|
|
|
|
7,262,023
|
|
|
|
12,733,062
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents continuing
|
|
|
6,021
|
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
4,141
|
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
Current assets of continuing operations
|
|
|
91,869
|
|
|
|
70,160
|
|
|
|
78,879
|
|
|
|
73,883
|
|
|
|
56,489
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
301,700
|
|
|
|
84,173
|
|
|
|
52,433
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
393,569
|
|
|
|
154,333
|
|
|
|
131,312
|
|
|
|
73,883
|
|
|
|
56,489
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
709,570
|
|
|
|
361,818
|
|
|
|
317,311
|
|
|
|
188,728
|
|
|
|
178,853
|
|
Current liabilities of continued operations
|
|
|
156,976
|
|
|
|
160,449
|
|
|
|
172,990
|
|
|
|
166,531
|
|
|
|
170,017
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
316,575
|
|
|
|
170,079
|
|
|
|
213,316
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
473,551
|
|
|
|
330,528
|
|
|
|
386,306
|
|
|
|
166,531
|
|
|
|
170,017
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
493,012
|
|
|
|
374,746
|
|
|
|
414,955
|
|
|
|
188,658
|
|
|
|
184,328
|
|
Total equity (deficit)
|
|
|
216,558
|
|
|
|
(12,928
|
)
|
|
|
(97,644
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(5,475
|
)
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
|
709,570
|
|
|
|
361,818
|
|
|
|
317,311
|
|
|
|
188,728
|
|
|
|
178,853
|
|
* The China business was discontinued operations
after the disposal, the consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017 were reclassified to conform to current year presentation, while the
consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 was not reclassified as management considered it not
cost-effective to do so.
**The shares are presented on a retroactive
basis to reflect the Company’s Reverse Stock Splits.
Exchange Rate Information
Not Applicable.
B.
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness
|
Not Applicable.
C.
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
|
Not Applicable.
Our business, financial
condition and results of operations are subject to various changing business, competitive, economic, political and social conditions
worldwide. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this annual report, the following are some of the important factors
that could adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and business prospects, and cause our actual results to
differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements.
Risks Related to Our Business and
Industry
We have incurred net losses,
experienced net cash outflows from operating activities and recorded working capital deficit. If we do not effectively manage our
cash and other liquid financial assets and execute our liquidity plan, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.
We incurred net losses
of $91.0 million, $12.3 million and $15.1 million in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $585.4
million as of December 31, 2019. We also had a working capital deficit of $113.5 million as of December 31, 2019. In addition,
we have substantial amounts of debts that became due in 2017, 2018 and 2019.
Historically, we have
relied primarily on cash from our operations, bank borrowings, private placements and financial leases to fund our operations.
We expect that our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash flows from operating and financing activities will be sufficient
to meet our anticipated working capital requirements and capital expenditure for at least the next 12 months, but generally inadequate
to pursue new project acquisition or development initiatives without additional capital. The timing and amount of our working capital
and capital expenditure requirements may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, such as the timeliness of payments from
our customers. We have filed liens to secure customer payments for each of our solar projects, but there is no assurance that such
payments will be timely collected. We have also enhanced our collection efforts and undertaken various measures to collect outstanding
payments from customers, damages from legal actions and other payments due to us. The volatility and potential deterioration of
the PV market conditions and the overall global economies have also added uncertainties regarding the sustainability of the PV
industry and adverse impact on the demand for our products. Without access to sufficient level of capital from operations or through
bank borrowings or other sources, we may not be able to execute our growth strategy or pursue additional projects, or may not even
be able to continue as a going concern. These doubts and uncertainties may create concerns for our creditors, suppliers, customers
and other counterparties, and cause them to make it more difficult for us to raise our financing, conduct our business and meet
our debt and other obligations.
The report of our independent
registered public accounting firm on our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 includes discussions
on our ability to continue as a going concern. Although we have formulated a liquidity plan as summarized under Note 2 to our
consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this annual report, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully
execute this liquidity plan. The amount of liquidity that we need may be greater than we currently anticipate as a result of additional
factors and events beyond our control, such as global economic slowdown, continued downturn in the global PV market, potential
financial crises globally or in any region where we conduct a significant portion of our business, changes in the regulatory and
business environments, including international trade-related sanctions, which may prevent us from operating normally or from effectively
competing in the PV industry. All of these and other factors and occurrences may increase our cash requirements and make us unable
to satisfy our liquidity requirements and we may, as a result, be unable to continue as a going concern.
We have revised the
assumptions underlying our existing operating plans and recognized the fact that additional actions were needed to reposition our
operations to minimize our cash outflows. Therefore, we are undertaking a number of initiatives in order to conserve or generate
cash on an incremental basis in 2019. For a detailed discussion of these initiatives and strategies, please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources— Capital Resources and Material Known Facts on Liquidity.”
However, there is no
assurance that these initiatives and strategies will be successfully implemented, or even if successfully implemented, our cash
position and our operational efficiency will be improved. In the event that our business initiatives and strategies do not achieve
the expected results, our business, financial conditions, results of operations and liquidity position may be materially and adversely
affected. Furthermore, we have identified several business related risk factors, such as compliance with laws and regulations,
contingent liabilities arising from litigations, suspected related party transactions and unusual transactions, which could cause
cash position to further deteriorate.
We are in default on a number
of our obligations, which could result in our being forced to cease operations if we are unable to reach satisfactory settlement
with applicable counterparties.
We have outstanding
convertible bonds of $55.0 million under a convertible bond agreement (“Convertible Bond Agreement”) with certain bond
holders, which were defaulted in June 2016 and not repaid through December 31, 2017. On February 12, 2017, we entered into
the first amendment agreement (the “1st Amendment”) with Union Sky Holding Group Limited (“Union Sky”),
one of the holders of our convertible bonds, to extend the maturity date of the bonds, pursuant to which the repayment of US$6.6
million, US$6.7 million and US$6.7 million of the principal amount of the convertible bond were due by April 30, 2017, January
30, 2018 and January 30, 2019, respectively. Union Sky has the option to convert those outstanding amounts under the Convertible
Bond Agreement and its 1st Amendment into the equity interest in our company at a conversion price of $1.372 per share. We were
not able to make the first payment as of April 29, 2017. We have been in communications with the holders of our convertible bonds,
including Union Sky, to further extend the maturity date of the bonds, and subsequently on June 29, 2018, the Company entered into
another amendment agreement (the “2nd Amendment”) with the Union Sky and Magical Glaze Limited (the “MGL”),
a company incorporated under the laws of British Virgin Islands, pursuant to which the Union Sky transferred all the rights and
obligations under the Convertible Bond Agreement and 1st Amendment to MGL, and the maturity date of such bond was extended. According
to the 2nd Amendment, the repayments of US$6.6 million, US$6.7 million and US$6.7 million of the principal amount of the bond and
interest thereon should be due by December 2019, June 2020 and December 2020, respectively. As of the date of this annual report,
we missed the December 2019 repayment and expect to miss the June 2020 repayment. We have been working on negotiating a third
amendment to the Convertible Bond Agreement but have not yet obtained a further extension from the bond holders.
If we are unable to
enter into settlement arrangements with all of the parties with whom we are in default, we could be forced to cease operations.
Certain minority
stockholders of Solar Juice Pty Ltd (“Solar Juice Australia”), our 80% owned subsidiary in Australia, took
certain actions that, if effective, would result in us owning only a minority interest in Solar Juice Australia, which would
mean that we no longer have control of Solar Juice Australia and no longer be able to consolidate its financial results into
our financial statements.
In May, 2020, certain
minority stockholders of Solar Juice Australia took certain actions that, if effective, would result in our owning only a minority
interest in Solar Juice Australia, which could cause us to no longer be able to control Solar Juice Australia or consolidate its
financial results into our financial statements. This would result in a material adverse effect on our financial results since
Solar Juice Australia accounts for 82.3% of our revenues and 15.7% of our assets.
In May 2020, Solar
Juice Co. Ltd. (“Solar Juice Co”),a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, in its capacity as shareholder of Solar
Juice Australia together with Mr. Kun Fong Lee and Mr. Jinhan Zhou (who hold shares in Solar Juice as trustee for Solar Juice Co)
("SPI Shareholders") commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia as plaintiffs against its other shareholders
and some of its other directors and purported directors and against Solar Juice Australia ("Defendants") in relation
to a purported new rights issue undertaken by Solar Juice Australia, the purported removal by those other shareholders of Mr. Kun
Fong Lee and Mr. Jinhan Zhou as directors of Solar Juice Australia and the purported appointment of an additional director. The
SPI Shareholders allege that the purported new rights issue and the subsequent purported removal and appointment of directors are
invalid and ineffective and therefore should be set aside. If effective, the purported rights issue will result in the SPI Shareholders'
shareholding in Solar Juice Australia being reduced from 80% to 40%.
If
our lawsuit is not successful, our financial results and stock price will be materially adversely affected.
We conduct our business in
diverse locations around the world and are subject to economic, regulatory, social and political risks internationally and in the
regions where we operate.
We currently conduct
our business operations in the U.S., Japan, U.K., Greece, Italy and Australia, and as of June 29, 2020, we own and operate 16.8
MW of solar projects and have 19.636 MW of solar projects under construction across the world. Our business is therefore subject
to diverse and constantly changing economic, regulatory, social and political conditions in these markets.
Operating internationally
exposes us to a number of risks globally and in each of the markets where we operate, including, without limitation:
|
·
|
global economic and financial conditions, including the stability of credit markets, foreign currency exchange rates and their
fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the supply and prices of other energy products such as oil, coal and natural gas in the relevant markets;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
changes in government regulations, policies, taxes and incentives, particularly those concerning the electric utility industry
and the solar industry;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reconciling heterogeneous, complex or contradictory regulations across different jurisdictions, international trade policies,
including trade restrictions, embargoes and local sourcing or service requirements;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
political risks, including risks of expropriation and nationalization of assets, potential losses due to civil unrests, acts of
terrorism and war, regional and global political or military tensions, strained or altered foreign relations;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
compliance with diverse and complex local environmental, safety, health, labor and other laws and regulations, which can be onerous
and costly, as the magnitude, complexity and continuous amendments to the laws and regulations are difficult to predict and liabilities,
costs, obligations and requirements associated with these laws and regulations may be substantial;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
dependence on local governments, utility companies and other entities for electricity, water, telecommunications, transportation
and other utilities or infrastructure needs;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
difficulties associated with local operating and market conditions, particularly regarding customs, taxation and labor;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
difficulties for our senior management to effectively supervise local management teams in diverse locations;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
increased difficulty in protecting our intellectual property rights and heightened risk of intellectual property disputes;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
failure of our contractual counter-parties to honor their obligations to us, and potential disputes with regulatory authorities,
customers, contractors, suppliers, local residents or communities;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
obtaining fair access and legal remedies or benefits through local judicial or administrative bodies; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
failure to adapt to effectively to local competitive environments.
|
If economic recovery
is slow in the markets where we operate, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially
and adversely affected. Moreover, as we expand into additional markets, we may face unfamiliar regulatory regimes, business practices,
governmental policies and industry conditions. As a result, our experience and knowledge of our existing markets may not be applicable
to new markets that we enter, requiring significant time and resources to adapt our business to these unfamiliar markets. To the
extent that our diverse business operations are affected by unexpected and adverse economic, regulatory, social and political conditions,
we may experience business disruptions, loss of assets and personnel and other indirect losses and our business, financial condition
and results of operations both locally and internationally could be materially and adversely affected.
The reduction, modification,
delay or discontinuation of government subsidies and other economic incentives for the solar industry may reduce the profitability
or viability of our solar projects and materially adversely affect our business.
At present, solar power
is not cost competitive with other energy sources in our existing markets and the new markets we plan to expand into. For a variety
of technological and economic reasons, the cost of generating electricity from solar energy in these markets currently exceeds
and, absent significant changes in technological or economic circumstances, will continue to exceed the cost of generating electricity
from conventional and certain other competing energy sources. Therefore, government subsidies and incentives, primarily in the
form of feed-in tariffs, or FIT, price support schemes, tax credits, net metering and other incentives to end users, distributors,
system integrators and manufacturers of solar products are generally required to enable companies such as us to successfully operate
in these markets.
Government subsidies
and incentives vary by geographic market. The availability and size of such subsidies and incentives depend, to a large extent,
on political and policy developments relating to environmental concerns and other macro-economic factors. These government subsidies
and incentives are expected to gradually decrease in scope or be discontinued as solar power technology improves and becomes more
affordable relative to other types of energy. Reductions have occurred in certain countries where we have operations, and subsidies
and incentives may be further reduced or discontinued in countries where we currently or intend to operate. Reductions may apply
retroactively to existing solar projects, which could significantly reduce the value of our existing solar projects and other businesses.
Even if reductions in government subsidies and economic incentives apply only to future solar projects, our operations in that
country could be materially and adversely affected as we would not be able to leverage our existing presence to drive further growth.
Moreover, certain solar subsidies and incentives are designed to expire or decline over time, are limited in total funding, require
renewal from regulatory authorities or impose certain investment or performance criteria on our business partners or us, which
we may not be able to satisfy. In addition, we may not be able to upgrade our technologies rapidly enough to compensate for foreseeable
reductions in government subsidies and incentives. As a result, a significant reduction in the scope or discontinuation of government
incentive programs in our existing and target markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects.
Misconduct and errors by our
employees could harm our business and reputation.
We are exposed to
many types of operational risks, including the risk of misconduct, errors and fraud by our employees and key management personnel.
Our training, resources, technologies and fraud detection tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent fraud. Significant
increases in fraudulent activity could negatively impact our brand and reputation, which could increase our costs and expenses.
High profile fraudulent activity could even lead to regulatory intervention, and may divert our management’s attention and
cause us to incur additional expenses and costs. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our results of operations and financial
condition could be materially and adversely affected.
Changes to our business strategy
provide a limited history on which to base our prospects and anticipated results of operations. Our historical operating results
may not serve as an adequate basis to evaluate our future prospects and results of operations.
For the past
few years, we have expanded our global project development business under our independent power producer model, or IPP model, or
our build-and-transfer model, or BT model, by ramping up our portfolio of solar projects. This limited operating history of developing
and operating solar projects under our IPP and BT model may not be a reliable indicator of our future performance.
Given our limited operating
history under the current business model, we may not be able to ascertain and allocate the appropriate financial and human resources
necessary to grow these new business areas. We may invest considerable capital into growing these businesses but fail to address
market or customer demands or otherwise fail to achieve satisfactory financial return. In particular, our results of operations,
financial condition and future success depend largely on our ability to continue to identify suitable projects that complement
our solar project pipeline through acquisitions and secondary development, as well as our ability to obtain the required regulatory
approvals, financing and cost-effective construction services for these acquisitions. We must also sustainably manage and operate
the solar projects that we acquire, develop and hold under our IPP model, or successfully identify buyers for solar projects under
our BT model. In addition, in expanding into these new business areas, we may be competing against companies that have substantially
more experience than we do with respect to solar projects under our IPP and BT models. If we are unable to achieve growth in these
new business areas, our overall growth and financial performance may be inferior to our competitors and our operating results could
be adversely impacted.
Due to the change
in our strategic focus and revenue generating efforts in 2014, our prior operating history and historical operating results may
not provide a meaningful basis for evaluating our business, financial performance and prospects.
Period-to-period comparisons
of our operating results and our results of operations for any period should not be relied upon as an indication of our performance
for any future period. We have incurred net losses since our inception and as of December 31, 2019, we had an accumulated deficit
of approximately $585.4 million. While we have had decreasing losses year over year, we may not be able to achieve or maintain
profitability in the near future.
We may not be able to acquire
additional solar projects to grow our project portfolio, or effectively integrate or realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions.
Our current business
strategy includes plans to further increase the number of solar projects we own and operate. Since 2014, we have significantly
expanded our operations through acquisitions of solar projects across different development stages in Japan, the U.S., the U.K.,
Greece and Italy, and we may acquire additional businesses, products or technologies or enter into joint ventures or other strategic
initiatives in the future. Accordingly, our ability to execute our expansion strategies depends on our ability to identify suitable
investment or acquisition opportunities, which is subject to numerous uncertainties. We may not be able to identify favorable geographical
markets for expansion or assess local demand for solar power, identify a sufficient number of projects as contemplated, or secure
project financing and refinancing on reasonable terms for the contemplated acquisitions. In addition, our competitors may have
substantially greater capital and other resources than we do, and may be able to pay more for the acquisition targets we identify
and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and acquire a greater number of projects than our resources permit.
Furthermore, we may
not realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions and each transaction involves numerous risks, including, among others:
|
·
|
difficulty in assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired business;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
difficulty in effectively integrating the acquired assets, technologies or products with our operations;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
difficulty in maintaining controls, procedures and policies during the transition and integration;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
disruption of our ongoing business and distraction of our management from daily operations;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
inability to retain key technical and managerial personnel and key customers, suppliers and other business partners of the acquired
business;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
inability to achieve the financial and strategic goals for the acquired and combined businesses as a result of insufficient capital
resources or otherwise;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
incurring acquisition-related costs or amortization costs for acquired intangible assets that could impact our operating results;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
potential failure of the due diligence processes to identify significant issues with product quality, legal and financial liabilities,
among others;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
potential failure to comply with local regulatory requirements or to obtain construction, environmental and other permits and
approvals from governmental authorities in a timely manner or at all, which could delay or prevent such acquisitions; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
potential failure to connect the acquired solar projects to the local grid on schedule and within budget, to ensure sufficient
grid capacity for the life of the solar projects, or to collect FIT payments and other economic incentives as expected from local
government authorities.
|
Acquisitions of companies
are inherently risky, and ultimately, if we do not generate expected economic returns from the acquired businesses, or become responsible
for any preexisting liabilities related to the acquired businesses, we may not fully realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions,
which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our substantial indebtedness
could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We require a significant
amount of cash to meet our capital requirements and fund our operations, including payments to suppliers for PV modules and components
and to bank for project loan. As of December 31, 2019, we had $2.9 million in outstanding short-term borrowings (and the current
portion of long-term borrowings) and $6 million in outstanding long-term borrowings (excluding the current portion).
Our existing debt may
have significant consequences on our operations, including:
|
·
|
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate
purposes as a result of our debt service obligations;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
making us more vulnerable to changes in our business, our industry and the general economy;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
potentially increasing the cost of any additional financing; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
limiting our ability to make future acquisitions.
|
Any of these factors
and other consequences that may result from our substantial indebtedness could have an adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations as well as our ability to meet our payment obligations under our existing debt facilities.
Our ability to meet our payment obligations under our existing debt facilities depends on our ability to generate significant
cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory
factors as well as other factors that are beyond our control.
Our results of operations may
be subject to fluctuations.
Before we achieve economies
of scale in terms of our IPP projects and receive steady electricity generation income, our revenue in a given period will depend
on the number of solar projects sold under our BT model and sale of PV modules and solar component, and therefore is subject to
significant fluctuations. For instance, we may generate a significant portion of our revenues from the one-time sale of solar projects
for certain periods. Moreover, certain aspects of our operations will also be subject to seasonal variations. For example, we may
schedule significant construction activities to connect solar projects to the grids prior to a scheduled decrease in FIT rates
in order to qualify for more favorable FIT policies.
Failure to manage our evolving
business could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We intend to expand
our business within our existing markets and in a number of selected new locations in the future. We also intend to expand our
global project development business in the future. As our operations evolve, we expect to encounter additional challenges in our
internal management, construction contracting management, investment and acquisition management, project management, project funding
infrastructure and financing capabilities. Our existing operations, personnel, systems and internal control may not be adequate
to support our business expansion and may require new investments in our internal management infrastructure. To manage the future
growth of our operations, we will be required to improve our administrative, operational and financial systems, procedures and
controls, and maintain, expand, train and manage a growing number of employees. In addition, we will need to hire and train additional
project development personnel to manage our growing portfolio of IPP and BT projects. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively,
we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, execute our business strategies successfully or respond to competitive
pressures. As a result, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected.
We act as the general contractor
for our customers for the provision of EPC services, and are subject to risks associated with construction, delays and other contingencies,
which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and results of operations.
Historically, we have
generated a significant portion of our revenue from the provision of EPC services. We generally enter into fixed-price EPC contracts
under which we act as the general contractor for our customers in connection with the installation of their solar power systems.
All essential costs are estimated at the time of entering into the EPC contracts for a particular project, and are reflected in
the overall fixed-price that we charge our customers. These cost estimates are preliminary and may or may not be covered by contracts
between us or our subcontractors, suppliers or other parties to the project. In addition, we engage qualified and licensed subcontractors
for the construction of our EPC projects. Shortages of such skilled labor could significantly delay a project or otherwise increase
our costs. Should miscalculations in project planning or delay in execution occur (including those due to unexpected increases
in inflation, commodity prices or labor costs), we may not be able to achieve our expected margins or recover our costs.
In addition, our EPC
contracts generally provide for performance milestones. Delays in supply of PV module or components, construction delays, unexpected
performance problems in electricity generation or other events may cause us to fail to meet these performance criteria, resulting
in unanticipated and severe revenue and earnings losses and financial penalties. If we are unable to complete the development of
a solar project, or fail to meet one or more agreed target construction milestone dates, any agreed upon system-level capacity
or energy output guarantees or warranties (including, for some projects, twenty-five year performance warranties) or other terms
under our EPC contracts, or the solar projects we develop cause grid interference or other damage, we may be subject to termination
of such contracts or significant damages, penalties and/or other obligation under the EPC agreements or other agreements relating
to the projects (including obligations to repair, replace and/or supplement additional modules and balance of system materials
for the projects), particularly if our liabilities are not capped under the terms of such agreements, and we may not be able to
recover our investment in the project. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation,
business and results of operations.
We generally recognize revenue
from EPC services on a “cost-based input method” and payments are due upon the achievement of contractual milestones
and any delay or cancellation of a project could adversely affect our business.
We generally recognize
revenue from our EPC services on a “cost-based input method,” and as a result, revenues from our EPC services are driven
by the performance of our contractual obligations, which is in turn generally driven by timelines of the installation of solar
power systems at customer sites. Such arrangement could result in unpredictability of revenue and in the near term, a revenue decrease.
As with any project-related business, there is potential for delays within any particular customer project. Variation of project
timelines and estimates may impact our ability to recognize revenue in a particular period. In addition, certain EPC contracts
may provide for payment milestones due at specified stages throughout the development of a project. Because we must invest substantially
in a project in advance of achieving these milestones and receiving payments, delay or cancellation of a project could adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
We may fail to comply with
laws and regulations in the markets we operate.
The development, construction
and operation of solar projects are highly regulated. We conduct our operations in many jurisdictions and are subject to different
laws and regulations, including national and local regulations relating to building codes, taxes, safety, environmental protection,
utility interconnection, metering and other matters. Our establish subsidiaries also have operations in these countries and jurisdictions
that are required to comply with various local laws and regulations. While we strive to work with our local counsel and other advisers
to comply with the laws and regulations of each jurisdiction where we operate, there have been, and may continue to be, instances
of non-compliances such as late filings of annual accounts with the appropriate governmental authorities, failure to notify governmental
authorities of certain transactions, failure to hold annual meetings as required, failure to register director or address changes
or other local requirements which may result in fines, sanctions or other penalties against our non-complying subsidiaries and
its directors and officers. While we do not believe our past and continuing non-compliances, singularly or in the aggregate, will
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, we cannot assure you that similar
or other non-compliances will not occur in the future which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition
or results of operations.
We are responsible
for obtaining a variety of approvals, permits and licenses from various authorities for our solar projects. The procedures for
obtaining such approvals, permits and licenses vary from country to country, making it onerous and costly to adhere to the varying
requirements and standards of individual localities. Failure to obtain the required approvals, permits or licenses or to comply
with the conditions associated therewith may result in fines, sanctions, suspension, revocation or non-renewal of approvals, permits
or licenses, or even criminal liabilities, which could material and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results
of operations. In addition, new government regulations pertaining to our business or solar projects may result in significant additional
expenses. We cannot assure you that we will be able to promptly and adequately respond to changes of laws and regulations in various
jurisdictions, or that our employees and contractors will act in accordance with our internal policies and procedures. Failure
to comply with laws and regulations where we develop, own and operate solar projects may materially and adversely affect our business,
results of operations and financial condition. The market demand for solar power is strongly influenced by government regulations
and policies concerning the electric utility industry as well as by policies promulgated by electric utilities in each of the markets
we operate. These regulations and policies often relate to electricity pricing and technical interconnection of electricity generation.
Customer purchases of alternative energy sources, including solar power technology, could be deterred by these regulations and
policies, which may significantly reduce the demand for our PV solutions. For example, without a regulatory-mandated exception
for solar power systems, utility customers are often charged interconnection or standby fees for putting distributed power generation
on the electric utility grid or limit the production capacity to the grid. The county-level government may also levy additional
tax related to land use or potential plants recovery that was not initially included during the development or construction phase.
These fees could increase, rendering solar power less cost competitive in these markets and our PV solutions less desirable.
It is difficult to
ensure ongoing compliance with the changing requirements of individual markets. Any new government regulations or utility policies
pertaining to solar projects may result in significant additional expenses to us or other industry participants and as a result
could cause a significant reduction in demand for our PV solutions.
The solar industry faces competition
from both conventional power industries and other renewable power industries.
The solar industry
faces intense competition from all other players within the energy industry, including both conventional energy providers such
as nuclear, natural gas and fossil fuels and other renewable energy providers, such as geothermal, hydropower, biomass, wind and
nuclear energy. Other energy sources may benefit from innovations that reduce their costs and increase safety, and therefore improve
their competitiveness. New natural resources may be discovered, or global economic, business or political developments may disproportionately
benefit conventional energy sources or other renewable energy sources at the expense of solar. Governments may strengthen their
support for other renewable energy sources and reduce their support for the solar industry. Changes in supply and demand of conventional
energy sources or other energy sources may reduce the cost of such sources and render solar power less attractive. For instance,
the recent decline in oil prices and prolong low prices have adversely impacted the competitiveness of solar energy. Failure for
our customers, other business partners or us to compete with the providers of other energy sources may materially and adversely
affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The market for solar project
development is highly competitive.
There is currently
intense competition in the solar industry, particularly in the downstream project development segment. Solar projects encounter
competition from utilities, industrial companies and other independent power producers. In recent years, there has been increasing
competition for the award of PPAs, which has in some markets resulted in an excess supply above designated reserve margins and
has been contributing to the declining electricity prices in many markets. In light of these conditions, we may not be able to
obtain PPAs for our new solar projects under our IPP model, and we may not be able to renew PPAs on the same terms and conditions
upon expiration, particularly in terms of securing an electricity sale price that enables profitable operation or the sale of a
project at anticipated value, if at all.
We have expanded our
business to include global project development and may not have the same level of expertise and customer base as our competitors,
which may affect our ability to successfully establish our presence in the global market. Our current or potential competitors
may have greater operational, financial, technical, market share, scale, management or other resources than us in our existing
or target markets. Our competitors may also enter into strategic alliances with other competitors to our detriment, or may ally
with our suppliers or contractors, thereby limiting our procurement choices and our flexibility in project development. Our current
or potential competitors may offer PV solutions comparable or superior to ours at the same or lower prices, or adapt more quickly
to industry trends than we do. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market
share.
Technological advances in the
solar industry could render our PV solutions uncompetitive or obsolete.
The solar industry
is characterized by its rapid adoption and application of technological advances. This requires us to develop new PV solutions
and enhance our existing PV solutions to keep pace with and respond effectively to evolving technologies, market conditions and
customer demands. Our competitors may develop technologies more advanced and cost-effective than ours. We will need to invest substantially
in research and development to maintain our market position and effectively compete in the future. Our failure to further refine
or enhance our technologies could render our technologies uncompetitive or obsolete, which could reduce our market share and cause
our revenues to decline.
In addition, we may
invest in and implement newly-developed, less-proven technologies in our project development or in maintaining or enhancing our
existing projects. There is no guarantee that these new technologies will perform or generate customer demand as anticipated. The
failure of our new technologies to perform as anticipated may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
If sufficient demand for solar
projects develops slower than we anticipate, develops in ways inconsistent with our strategy, or fails to develop at all, our business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
The solar power market
worldwide is at a relatively early stage of development compared to conventional power markets and other renewable power markets,
such as that for hydropower. Thus, trends in the solar industry are based only on limited data and may be unreliable. Many factors
may affect the demand for solar projects worldwide, including:
|
·
|
the cost and availability of project financing for solar projects;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
fluctuations in economic and market conditions that improve the viability of competing energy sources;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the cost-effectiveness, performance and reliability of solar projects compared to conventional and other non-solar energy sources;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the availability of grid capacity allocated to solar power;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
political opposition to solar power due to environmental, land use, safety or other local concerns;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the availability of government subsidies and incentives to support the development of the solar industry;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
public perceptions of the utility, necessity and importance of solar power and other renewable energies;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the success of other alternative energy generation technologies, such as fuel cells, wind power and biomass; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
utility and grid regulations that present unique technical, regulatory and economic barriers to the development, transmission
and use of solar energy.
|
Our analysis and predictions
concerning the future growth of the solar industry are based on complex facts and circumstances and may be incorrect. If market
demand for solar projects in our existing or target markets fails to develop according to our expectations, our business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
Our growth prospects and future
profitability and our ability to continue to acquire solar projects depends on the availability of sufficient financing on terms
acceptable to us.
The development of
solar projects requires significant upfront cash investments, including the costs of permit development, construction and associated
operations. Since 2014, we have been expanding our solar project portfolio primarily by acquiring solar projects across different
development stages. Such expansion strategy requires significant upfront capital expenditures which, depending on the respective
development stages of the acquired projects, may not be recouped for a significant period of time. As a result, we are required
to pursue a wide variety of capital resources to fund our operations, including private placements, bank loans, financial leases
and other third-party financing options.
Our ability to obtain
sufficient financing is subject to a number of uncertainties, including:
|
·
|
our future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the general condition and liquidity of global equity and debt capital markets;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
local regulatory and government support for solar power in markets where we operate, such as through tax credits and FIT schemes;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the availability of credit lines from banks and other financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
economic, political, social and other conditions in the markets where we operate;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
our level of indebtedness and ability to comply with financial covenants under our debt financing; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
tax and securities laws which may hamper our ability to raise capital.
|
Due to these or other
reasons, we may not be successful in obtaining the required funds for future acquisitions. Furthermore, we may be unable to refinance
our bank borrowings on favorable terms, or at all, upon the expiration or termination of our existing loan facilities. In addition,
rising interest rates could adversely affect our ability to secure financing on favorable terms. Our failure in securing suitable
financing sources in a timely manner or at all, or on commercially acceptable terms, could significantly limit our ability to execute
our growth strategies or future acquisitions, and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows.
The significant period of time
between our upfront investments in solar projects and their commencement of revenue generation could materially and adversely affect
our liquidity, business and results of operations.
We have since 2014
commenced our global project development business under our IPP or BT models by ramping up our portfolio of solar projects. There
is a significant gap between the time that we make significant upfront investments in the solar projects and the time that we receive
any revenue from the electricity generated by these solar projects after grid connection (under our IPP model) or from the sale
of these projects (under our BT model). These upfront investments include, among others, legal, accounting and other professional
fees, costs associated with feasibility studies and due diligence, payments for land use rights, construction costs, government
permits and deposits for grid connection agreements and PPAs, none of which may be refundable if a project fails to achieve completion.
We have historically relied on private placements, bank loans and financial leases to cover costs and expenses incurred during
project development.
In particular, there
could be an especially long gap between the initial assessment of a project, the first steps of acquiring land use rights and negotiating
interconnection agreements and the obtaining of governmental approvals for construction. Acquisition of land use rights can be
particularly time-consuming if we are engaged in primary development and need to negotiate with land owners or government entities.
The significant development time increases the risk for adverse events during such process, whether they be economic, environmental,
political, social or otherwise, that could cause further delays in project development or increase the overall development costs.
Due to such adverse developments or unanticipated delays, we may be unable to recoup our initial investment in the solar projects,
which may materially and adversely affect our liquidity, profitability and results of operations.
We may encounter unexpected
difficulties when developing solar power projects.
In 2014, we
commenced our global project development business by ramping up our portfolio of solar projects under both our IPP, BT and
EPC models. The attributable capacity of our projects in
operation is 16.8 MW, projects under construction 19.636 MW, and had an aggregate of 10.24MW of projects in announced
pipeline as of June 29, 2020. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business
Overview—Our Global Project Development Business.” The development of solar projects involves numerous risks
and uncertainties and require extensive research, planning and due diligence. Before we can determine whether a solar project
is economically, technologically or otherwise feasible, we may be required to incur significant capital expenditure for land
and interconnection rights, preliminary engineering, permitting, legal and other work. Success in developing a particular
solar project is contingent upon, among others:
|
·
|
securing the rights to suitable project locations with access to the grid, necessary rights of way, and satisfactory land use
permissions;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
rezoning land, as necessary, to support a solar project;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
negotiating and receiving on schedule the required permits and approvals for project development from government authorities;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
completing all required regulatory and administrative procedures needed to obtain permits and agreements;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
obtaining rights to interconnect the solar project to the grid or to
transmit energy;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
paying interconnection and other deposits, some of which are non-refundable;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
negotiating favorable payment terms with module and other equipment suppliers and contractors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
signing PPAs or other off-take arrangements that are commercially acceptable and adequate for providing financing;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
obtaining construction financing, including debt financing and equity contributions, as appropriate; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
satisfactorily completing construction on schedule.
|
Successful completion of a
particular solar project may be adversely affected by numerous factors, including, without limitation:
|
·
|
unanticipated delays or changes in project plans;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
changes to laws and regulations requiring additional permits, licenses and approvals, or difficulties in obtaining and maintaining
existing governmental permits, licenses and approvals;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the inability to obtain adequate financing with acceptable terms;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
unforeseeable engineering problems, construction or other unexpected delays and contractor performance issues;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
delays, disruptions or shortages of the supply of labor, equipment and materials, including work stoppages;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
defective PV module or other components sourced from our suppliers;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
adverse weather, environmental and geological conditions, force majeure and other events out of our control; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
cost overruns due to any one or more of the foregoing factors.
|
Accordingly, some of
the solar projects in our portfolio may not eventually commence operation and connect to the grid, or even proceed to construction.
If a number of our solar projects are not completed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially
and adversely affected.
Our construction activities
may be subject to cost overruns or delays.
We engage third-party
contractors for the construction of solar projects. Construction of solar projects involves numerous risks and uncertainties, and
may be adversely affected by circumstances outside of our control, including seasonal changes, inclement weather, failure to receive
regulatory approvals on schedule or third-party delays in supplying PV modules or other materials. We may not be able to negotiate
satisfactory construction agreements with third-party contractors, or our third-party contractors may not be able to contract with
their subcontractors on a timely basis. In addition, if our contractors fail to adhere to our quality standards or otherwise fail
to meet their contractual obligations, or if there is a shortage of contractors or labor strikes that prevents our contractors
from completing their construction work on schedule or within budget, the solar projects may experience significant delays or cost
overruns. Increases in the prices of solar products and components may also increase our procurement costs. Labor shortages, work
stoppages and labor disputes could significantly delay a project or otherwise increase our costs. In addition, delays in obtaining
or failure to obtain required construction permits could also delay or hinder the construction of our solar projects. A lack of
proper construction permits, or post-construction approvals could delay or prevent our solar projects from commencing operation
and connecting to the grid.
We may not be able
to recover any of our losses resulting from construction cost overruns or delays. In addition, since the FIT applicable to a solar
project generally depends on its lead time to grid connection, construction and connection delays may lead to a lower-than-expected
FIT, which would adversely affect the long-term value and potentially the viability of the project. Many PPAs also require our
solar projects to connect to the grid by a certain date. If the construction of solar project is significantly delayed, we may
be in violation of our PPAs or may only be entitled to reduced FIT payments, if at all. A reduction or forfeiture of FIT payments
would materially and adversely affect the profitability for a solar power project. Any of the above contingencies could lead to
our failure to generate expected return from our solar projects and result in unanticipated and significant revenue and earnings
losses.
We rely on third-party suppliers
and contractors when developing our solar power projects.
We source PV modules
and other balance-of-system components from a wide selection of third-party suppliers and engage third-party contractors for the
construction of solar projects. We typically enter into contracts with our suppliers and contractors on a project-by-project basis
and do not maintain long-term contracts with our suppliers or contractors. Therefore, we are generally exposed to price fluctuations
and availability of PV modules and balance-of-system components sourced from our suppliers and construction services procured from
our contractors. For example, in light of changing market dynamics and government policies, the price and availability of PV modules
have been subject to significant volatility in recent years. Increases in the prices of PV modules or balance-of-system components,
decreases in their availability, fluctuations in construction, labor and installation costs, or changes in the terms of our relationship
with our suppliers and contractors may increase the cost of procuring equipment and engaging contractors and hence materially adversely
affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Furthermore, the delivery
of defective products or products or construction services by our suppliers or contractors which are otherwise not in compliance
with contract specifications, or the late supply of products or construction services, may cause construction delays or solar power
projects that fail to adhere to our quality and safety standards, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations, financial condition and cash flow.
Warranties provided by our
suppliers and contractors may be limited or insufficient to compensate for our losses, or may not cover the nature of our losses
incurred.
We expect to benefit
from various warranties, including product quality and performance warranties, provided by our suppliers and contractors. These
suppliers and contractors, however, may file for bankruptcy, cease operations or otherwise become unable or unwilling to fulfill
their warranty obligations. Even if a supplier fulfills its warranty obligations, the warranty may not be sufficient to compensate
us for all of our losses. In addition, the warranty for inverters and transformers generally expire after 5 to 10 years from the
date such equipment is delivered or commissioned and is subject to liability limits. Where damages are caused by defective products
provided by our suppliers or construction services delivered by our contractors, our suppliers or contractors may be unable or
unwilling to perform their warranty obligations as a result of their financial conditions or otherwise. Or if the warranty has
expired or a liability limit has been reached, there may be a reduction or loss of warranty protection for the affected projects,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our solar projects have short
operating histories and may not perform up to our expectations.
The projects in our
solar project portfolio are relatively new with expected operating life of more than 20 years. The majority of our projects in
operation as of December 31, 2019 commenced operations since 2014. In addition, the projects we acquire in the future may not have
commenced construction or operation or otherwise have a limited operating history. As a result, our assumptions and estimates regarding
the future performance of these projects are, and will be, made without the benefit of a meaningful operating history, which may
impair our ability to accurately assess the potential profitability of the projects. The performance of these projects will also
be subject to risks inherent in newly constructed renewable energy projects, including breakdowns and outages, latent defects,
equipment that performs below our expectations and system failures. Failure of some or all of our projects to perform up to our
expectations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to obtain
long-term contracts for the sale of electricity generated by our solar projects under our IPP model at prices and on other terms
favorable to attract financing and other investments.
Since 2014, we started
acquiring solar projects across different stages of development globally and to hold some of these acquired projects under our
IPP model. Obtaining long-term contracts for the sale of electricity generated by our solar projects under our IPP model at prices
and on other terms favorable to us will be essential for obtaining financing or completing construction of these projects. We must
compete for PPAs against other developers of solar and renewable energy projects. Furthermore, other sources of power, such as
natural gas-fired power plants, have historically been cheaper than the cost of solar power and power from certain types of projects,
such as natural gas-fired power plants, can be delivered on a firm basis. The availability of PPAs is subject to a number of economic,
regulatory, tax and public policy factors. The inability to compete successfully against other power producers or otherwise enter
into PPAs favorable to us would negatively affect our ability to develop and finance our projects and negatively impact our revenue.
We may be subject to unforeseen
costs, liabilities or obligations when providing O&M services.
We provide ongoing
O&M services to third-party solar projects under fixed-price long-term service agreements, pursuant to which we generally perform
all scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and operating and other asset management services for the system. Our costs to perform
these services are estimated at the time of entering into the O&M agreement for a particular project, and these are reflected
in the fixed-price that we charge our customers under the O&M agreement. Should miscalculations in estimating these costs occur
(including those due to unexpected increases in inflation or labor costs), our O&M services may not be profitable and our growth
strategy and results of operations could be adversely affected. Because of the long-term nature of these O&M agreements, the
adverse impacts on results of operations could be significant, particularly if our liabilities are not capped or subject to an
above-market liability cap under the terms of the O&M agreement. In addition, we may be subject to substantial costs, liabilities
or obligations in the event that the solar projects we maintain and operate do not meet any agreed-upon system-level availability
or performance warranties.
We have limited insurance coverage.
Our insurance policies
cover employee-related accidents and injuries, property damage, machinery breakdowns, fixed assets, facilities and liability deriving
from our activities, including environmental liability. We consider our current insurance coverage to be adequate, but we cannot
assure you that our insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to
which we may be subject. Furthermore, our insurance coverage is subject to deductibles, caps, exclusions and other limitations.
A loss for which we are not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. Furthermore, due to rising insurance costs and changes in the insurance markets, we cannot assure you
that our insurance coverage will continue to be available at comparable rates or on similar terms, if at all. We may also reduce
or cancel our insurance coverage at any time. We may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount we desire
at reasonable rates and we may elect to self-insure a portion of our solar project portfolio. Any losses not covered by insurance
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, the insurance
industry in many parts of the world is still in an early stage of development. As we continue to expand our global presence, we
cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage in each of the new markets we enter. To the extent
that our operations are not adequately insured in these markets, our business, financial condition and results of operations may
be materially and adversely affected.
We may be subject to product
or strict liability claims if the provision of our EPC services or the solar projects we sell result in injury or damage, and we
have limited insurance coverage to protect against such claims, as well as losses that may result from business interruptions or
natural disasters.
Solar projects are
highly sophisticated and generate and transfer large volumes of electric charge with the potential to harm or kill, whether by
improper installation or other causes. We are therefore exposed to an inherent risk of product liability claims or class action
suits in the event that the installation of the solar power systems during the provision of our EPC services, or the solar projects
we sell under our BT model, results in injury or damage, and we may even be liable in some jurisdictions under a strict liability
theory, where liability holds even if we are not negligent or at fault. Moreover, to the extent that a claim is brought against
us, we may not have adequate resources to defend ourselves. We rely on our general liability insurance to cover product liability
and other liability claims and have not separately obtained product liability insurance. The unfavorable settlement of product
or strict liability claims against us could result in significant monetary damages and significant payments in excess of our insurance
coverage could have a materially adverse effect on our financial results. Any such business disruption could result in substantial
costs and diversion of resources.
Solar energy generation depends
heavily on suitable meteorological conditions. If weather conditions are unfavorable, our power generation output, and therefore
the revenue from our solar projects, may be substantially below our expectations.
The electricity produced
and revenues generated by solar projects are highly dependent on suitable solar conditions and associated weather conditions. Such
conditions are beyond our control. Furthermore, components of these generation systems, including solar panels and inverters, can
be damaged by severe weather, such as heavy snowstorms, hailstorms, ice storms, lightning strikes, extreme winds, earthquakes or
tornadoes. Replacement and spare parts for key components may be difficult costly or unavailable. Unfavorable weather and atmospheric
conditions could reduce the electricity output of our solar projects to below projected generation, damage or impair the effectiveness
of our projects or require shutdown of key equipment, impeding operation of our projects and our ability to achieve forecasted
revenues and cash flows.
The amount of electricity
solar projects produce is dependent in part on the amount of sunlight, or insolation, where the projects are located. Because shorter
daylight hours in winter months results in less insolation, the generation of particular projects will vary depending on the season.
We base our investment
decisions with respect to solar power generation assets on the findings of related solar studies conducted prior to construction
or based on historical conditions at existing projects. However, actual climatic conditions at an asset site may not conform to
the findings of these studies. For example, unexpected development of climate conditions that was not taken into consideration
during the investment decision-making process, such as smog and sand storms may significantly reduce the solar power generation.
Therefore, our solar projects may not meet anticipated production levels or the rated capacity of our projects, which could adversely
affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The operation of solar projects
involves significant inherent risks and hazards that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows.
The operation of solar
projects involves numerous hazardous activities, including delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. We
are subject to natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, snow obscuration, high temperatures, lightning, hurricanes, long-term
climate changes, volcanoes and wind risks, as well as other inherent risks affecting resource availability such as fire, explosion,
soil and ice buildup, structural collapse and equipment failure. Moreover, we may suffer from negligent acts by our PPA counterparties
or other third parties. Our rooftop projects could cause damage to the building roof, resulting in claims due to water damages
or replacement of roofing materials. These and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage
to, and destruction of, property and equipment and contamination of, or damage to, the environment, wildlife takes or fatalities
and suspension of operations. The occurrence of any of these events may result in lawsuits against us asserting claims for substantial
damages, including for environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and property damage and fines and/or penalties.
In addition, the ongoing
operation of solar projects face risks that include the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes or performance below expected
levels of output or efficiency due to wear and tear, latent defect, design error or operator error or force majeure events, among
others. Unplanned outages, including extensions of scheduled outages, occur from time to time and are an inherent risk of our business.
Unplanned outages typically increase our operation and maintenance expenses and may reduce our revenues as a result of generating
and selling less electricity.
If we fail to properly
operate and maintain our solar projects, these projects may experience decreased performance, shortened operating life or shut
downs. Our solar projects may also require periodic upgrading and improvement. Changes in our own operation or local conditions
may increase the costs of operating the project, including costs related to labor, equipment, insurance and taxes. If we cause
damage to third parties, we may become liable for the consequences of any resulting damage. We may also experience equipment malfunction
or failure, leading to unexpected maintenance needs, unplanned outages or other operational issues. In addition, inconsistencies
in the quality of solar panels, PV modules, balance-of-system components or maintenance services for our solar projects may affect
the system efficiency of our projects.
Any unexpected operational
or mechanical failure, including failure associated with breakdowns and forced outages, and any decreased operational or management
performance, could reduce our solar projects’ power generating capacity below expected levels, reducing our revenues and
profitability. Degradation of the performance of our solar projects above levels provided for in the relevant PPAs may also reduce
our revenues. Unanticipated capital expenditures associated with maintaining, upgrading or repairing our projects may also reduce
our profitability. In addition, damage to our reputation due to system failure or accidents could negatively impact our relationships
with customers and local government authorities, which could also materially adversely affect our business. Negative public or
community response to solar energy projects could adversely affect the approval for and construction of our projects. We maintain
insurance coverage that we consider adequate but we cannot assure you that our insurance will be sufficient or effective under
all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject.
Environmental, health and safety
laws and regulations subject us to extensive and increasingly stringent operational requirements, as well as potentially substantial
liabilities arising out of environmental contamination.
We are subject to,
in each of the jurisdictions we operate, numerous national and local laws, regulations, guidelines, policies, directives and other
requirements governing or relating to, among others, land use and zoning matters and protection of human health and the environment,
including those limiting the discharge and release of pollutants into the environment, and the protection of certain wildlife.
These laws and regulations require our solar projects to, among others, obtain and maintain approvals and permits, undergo environmental
impact assessments and review processes and implement environmental, health and safety programs and procedures to control risks
associated with the construction, operation and decommissioning of solar projects. If our solar projects do not comply with applicable
environmental laws, regulations or permit requirements, we may be required to pay significant fines or penalties or suspend or
cease operations of the affected projects. Violations of environmental and other laws, regulations and permit requirements may
also result in criminal sanctions or injunctions.
Our solar projects
may experience malfunctions and other unplanned events that result in personal injury and property damage. As such, the operation
of our projects carries an inherent risk of environmental, health and safety liabilities (including potential civil actions, compliance
or remediation orders, fines and other penalties), and may subject us to administrative and judicial proceedings. In addition,
certain environmental laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on past and present owners and operators of sites,
related to the cleaning up of sites where hazardous wastes or materials were disposed or released.
We may continue to conduct
acquisitions and enter into joint ventures, investments or other strategic alliances which may be unsuccessful.
We may continue to
grow our operations through acquisitions, as well as joint ventures or other strategic alliances when appropriate opportunities
arise. Such acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances may expose us to additional operational, regulatory, market and
geographical risks as well as risks associated with additional capital requirements and diversion of management attention. In particular,
any future strategic alliances may expose us to the following risks:
|
·
|
There may be unforeseen risks relating to our counterparty’s business and operations or liabilities that were not discovered
by us through our legal and business due diligence prior to our investment. Such undetected risks and liabilities could have a
material adverse effect on our reputation, business and results of operations in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
We may not have experience acquiring, managing or investing in other
companies. Business acquisitions may generally divert a significant portion of our management and financial resources from our
existing business and the integration of the target’s operations may pose significant business challenges, potentially straining
our ability to finance and manage our existing operations.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
There is no assurance that the expected synergies from any business acquisition, joint venture or strategic alliances will materialize.
If we are not successful in the integration of a target’s operations, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue
from its operations to recover costs and expenses of the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Acquisition or participation in a new joint venture or strategic alliance
may involve us in the management of operation in which we do not possess extensive expertise.
|
The materialization of any
of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We rely substantially
on our senior management team and our ability to attract, train and retain qualified personnel for our current and future success.
The industry experience,
expertise and contributions of our chairman, Mr. Xiaofeng Peng, is essential to our continuing success. We will continue to rely
on our senior management, regional management and other key employees to manage our business operations and implement our growth
plans. If they cannot work together effectively or efficiently, our business may be severely disrupted. If one or more of our senior
or regional management personnel were unable or unwilling to continue to hold their present positions, we might not be able to
recruit, train and retain personnel with comparable qualifications, and our results of operations and financial condition may be
materially and adversely affected.
Our qualified and experienced
project development teams are critical to our success. We may not be able to continue to attract, train and retain qualified personnel,
including executive officers, project development personnel, project management personnel and other key personnel with the necessary
experience and expertise. In particular, as we enter into new markets, we face challenges to recruit and retain qualified personnel
who are familiar with local regulatory regimes and have adequate experiences in project development and operations. In particular,
we have experienced a lack of accounting personnel with an appropriate level of knowledge and experience in U.S. GAAP.
There is substantial
competition for qualified personnel in the downstream PV industry. Our competitors may offer more competitive packages or otherwise
attract our personnel. Our costs to retain qualified personnel may also increase in response to competition. If we fail to continue
to attract and retain a sufficient number of personnel with suitable managerial, technical or marketing expertise, our business
operations could be adversely affected and our future growth and expansions may be inhibited.
Our failure to protect our
intellectual property rights may undermine our competitive position, and litigation to protect our intellectual property rights
may be costly.
We rely primarily on
trade secrets, know-how and other proprietary information to protect our intellectual property. Nevertheless, these afford only
limited protection and the actions we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to provide us with meaningful
protection or commercial advantage. Third parties may be able to use the technologies that we have developed and compete with us,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our failure to protect
our intellectual property and proprietary rights may undermine our competitive position. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate
our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property and proprietary rights. Policing the unauthorized use of proprietary
technology can be difficult and expensive. In particular, the laws and enforcement procedures certain markets where we operate
are uncertain or do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws and enforcement procedures of the
United States. We may need to resort to court proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights in the future. Litigation
relating to our intellectual property might result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention away
from our business. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual property rights and adversely affect
our business, prospects and reputation.
We may be exposed to infringement
or misappropriation claims by third parties which, if determined adversely to us, could cause us to pay significant damage awards.
Our success depends
largely on our ability to use and develop our technology and know-how without infringing the intellectual property rights of third
parties. The validity and scope of claims relating to solar technology involve complex scientific, legal and factual questions
and analysis and, therefore, may be highly uncertain. As we continue to expand internationally, we face a heightened risk of becoming
the subject of claims for intellectual property infringement. We may be subject to litigation involving claims of patent infringement
or violation of intellectual property rights of third parties. An adverse determination in any such litigation or proceedings against
us could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, including requiring us to seek licenses from third parties, to
pay ongoing royalties or to pay monetary and punitive damages. Protracted litigation could also result in our customers or potential
customers deferring or limiting their procurement of our PV solutions until resolution of such litigation, which could result in
losses and adversely affect our reputation and results of operations.
Our management has identified
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and we may not be able to remediate these weaknesses. Additionally,
our management may identify material weaknesses in the future that could adversely affect investor confidence, impair the value
of our securities and increase our cost of raising capital.
Our management identified
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and our chief executive officer concluded that our disclosure
and internal controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2019. See “Item 15. Controls and Procedures”
for more information. There can be no assurance as to how quickly or effectively we can remediate the material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting or that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future.
Any failure to remedy
additional weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that may be discovered in the future or
to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in the implementation of such controls, could harm our operating
results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any
such failure could, in turn, affect the future ability of our management to certify that our internal control over financial reporting
is effective. Ineffective internal control over financial reporting could also subject us to the scrutiny of the SEC and other
regulatory bodies which could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and subject us to civil
or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation, which could have an adverse effect on the trading price of our securities.
In addition, if we
identify additional deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly
remedied, could reduce the market’s confidence in our financial statements and harm our share price. Furthermore, additional
deficiencies could result in future non-compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”).
Such non-compliance could subject us to a variety of administrative sanctions, including review by the SEC or other regulatory
authorities.
The preparation of our consolidated
financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates, judgments
and assumptions that may ultimately prove to be incorrect.
The accounting estimates
and judgments that management must make in the ordinary course of business affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented.
If the underlying estimates are ultimately proven to be incorrect, subsequent adjustments could have a material adverse effect
on our operating results for the period or periods in which the change is identified.
The global cryptocurrency mining
services market is highly competitive and fragmented with low barriers to market.
Although the market
for providing services to cryptocurrency miners is new and evolving, the barriers to entry are quite low. Except for having the
financial resources to set up a facility, no specialized technology or know-how required. Therefore, if cryptocurrency mining remains
profitable, we expect additional competitors to enter the market, some of whom may have greater resources than we do.
The prices of Bitcoin and other
cryptocurrencies have been fluctuating wildly in the last few months. If there is fewer people who want to conduct cryptocurrency
mining operations due to the wild fluctuation, the demand for our services will decline.
The prices of cryptocurrencies
have been fluctuating wildly in the last few months. Such fluctuation may make cryptocurrency mining less profitable. If the price
of cryptocurrencies falls or does not increase, fewer people are likely to conduct cryptocurrency mining operations, which would
reduce the demand for our services.
Blockchain technology and cryptocurrency
are in the early stages of development and it is difficult to predict how the market for cryptocurrencies will develop.
Blockchain technology
and cryptocurrency are in the early stages of development and it is difficult to predict how the market for cryptocurrencies will
develop. There are significant factors which may inhibit the growth of these markets, including:
|
·
|
volatility in the market price of cryptocurrencies;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the implementation of regulations on cryptocurrency markets or technology; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the erosion or loss of user confidence in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies could.
|
Any of these factors
could significantly limit the growth of our business.
We need to access a large quantity
of power at a reasonable cost in order to provide our cryptocurrency mining services; if we are unable to access such power sources,
we will not be able to continue providing cryptocurrency mining services profitably.
We need to access a
large quantity of power at a reasonable cost in order to provide our cryptocurrency mining services, and we do not have any long-term
contract for the provision of power at specified prices. As competition in this area increases, we may not be able to access power
at reasonable costs or at all. If we are unable to access new power sources, or the price of our current power sources significantly
increase, we will not be able to continue providing cryptocurrency mining services profitably.
The hemp and CBD
industries are evolving yet highly regulated and we must anticipate and respond to changes and risks.
In September 2019,
the Company launched a hemp and Cannabidiol (“CBD”) businesses and as of the date of this annual report, our hemp and
CBD businesses have no revenue derived from this business. The hemp and CBD industries are not yet well-developed, and many aspects
of the industries’ development and evolution cannot be accurately predicted. In addition, the hemp and CBD businesses are
heavily regulated in the jurisdiction(s) where we carry on such businesses. Although the hemp and CBD businesses contribute nil
to our total revenue,our hemp and CBD businesses are subject to various laws, regulations and guidelines by governmental authorities
relating to, among other things, the manufacture, marketing, management, transportation, storage, sale, pricing and disposal of
cannabis, U.S. hemp and cannabis-based products, and also including laws, regulations and guidelines relating to health and safety,
insurance coverage, the conduct of operations and the protection of the environment. You should carefully consider that there are
other risks that cannot be foreseen or are not described herein, which could affect Company’s business and financial performance.
DEA Regulation
of CBD Varies Depending on the Concentration of THC
Under Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) regulations, marijuana is a Schedule 1 drug not approved as a medication in the United States; however, hemp
has been distinguished from marijuana under the definition revised in 2018. Hemp is defined as the plant Cannabis sativa L. and
any part of that plant — including the seeds and all derivatives, extracts, cannabinoids, isomers, acids, salts, and salts
of isomers, whether growing or not — with a THC concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis.
U.S. Food and Drug
Administration ( FDA) Regulations Do Not Permit CBD as a Food Additive or Dietary Supplement
Analysis of the potential
for regulatory impact on any type of CBD product is fact-specific and requires close evaluation of several factors, including the
type of product (e.g., food, dietary supplement, or cosmetic), product’s labeling, and the existing compliance structure
of the product developer or manufacturer. The FDA regulates CBD if it is used as a food additive, a dietary supplement or in cosmetic
products, or if it is advertised as a drug.
Rapidly Changing
State Laws May Impose Further Restrictions on CBD Products
Where CBD products are
sold or manufactured, it is important to review applicable state law to determine any further restrictions on CBD. For instance,
the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services recently announced it would send letters to businesses notifying
them that the sale of CBD in food, drinks and animal food violates state and federal law. Further, in February 2019, Maine and
New York announced that restaurants and other retailers may not sell products containing CBD and that the states would begin enforcing
these restrictions. These state restrictions may significantly impact overall sales of CBD products as the regulatory landscape
continues to evolve.
Avoid Certain Advertising
and Labeling Claims for CBD Products
Marketing claims about
the therapeutic benefits of CBD may inadvertently subject CBD product manufacturers to FDA’s drug regulations. Claims that
CBD can treat or mitigate a disease or condition, for instance, may run afoul of FDA’s position on CBD product marketing.
To date, the FDA has approved only one drug directly using CBD - Epidiolex - which treats two rare forms of childhood epilepsy.
The FDA has not determined that CBD is safe or effective for treating any other particular disease or condition. Accordingly, companies
should avoid making claims that CBD will aid in the treatment of any particular disease or condition or provide any particular
health benefits. FDA further clarified that it will continue to aggressively pursue companies marketing CBD products with “egregious
and unfounded claims that are aimed at vulnerable populations.”
Federal Regulation
of CBD Will Continue to Evolve
The FDA’s position
on CBD is not static, and potential investors should continue to monitor the evolving federal landscape. The FDA recently held
a public hearing to obtain scientific data and information about the safety, manufacturing, product quality, marketing, labeling
and sale of products containing cannabis or cannabis-derived compounds. The FDA also announced that it is forming a high-level
internal agency working group to explore potential pathways for dietary supplements and/or conventional foods containing CBD to
be lawfully marketed. The group will consider what statutory or regulatory changes might be needed and the likely impact of such
marketing on public health. As stakeholders weigh in on thisissue, FDA’s position on this topic likely will continue to evolve.
Covid-19 continues
to impact on alfalfa hay transportation
With Asia’s increasing
demand for American alfalfa hay, we have recognized the importance of exporting to the Asian market. However, the uncertainty around
the coronavirus has disrupted global markets and the U.S. market has not been immune. Major oceanic carriers have reduced the frequency
of their shipments, disrupting our supply chain. This required U.S. exporters to reschedule shipments and work to find boat space
for new shipments. Fortunately, there is sustained demand from major importing countries, but logistics will be a challenge in
the coming months.
U.S.-China trade
disruption remains unclear
The outcome of the U.S.-China
trade war remains unclear. There might be future disruptions in the market with potential for tariffs being set on our products.
This will affect the Chinese demand for our products if our products become more expensive than Chinese local producers when tariffs
are added to our prices. However, alfalfa hay is exempted from tariffs since September 2019 for one year so we are currently unaffected.
Weather Condition
may lead to decline in Hay production
Weather conditions
are a huge factor affecting alfalfa hay production. Increasingly random weather patterns due to global warming could post a potential
risk to production levels.
Risks Related to COVID-19
Our business and financial results may
be materially adversely affected by the current COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.
The pandemic of a novel
coronavirus (COVID-19) has resulted in a widespread health crisis that has adversely affected the economies and financial markets
worldwide. Government efforts to contain the spread of the coronavirus through lockdowns of cities, business closures, restrictions
on travel and emergency quarantines, among others, and responses by businesses and individuals to reduce the risk of exposure to
infection, including reduced travel, cancellation of meetings and events, and implementation of work-at-home policies, among others,
have caused significant disruptions to the global economy and normal business operations across a growing list of sectors and countries.
Our operating results
substantially depend on revenues derived from sales of PV project assets, provision of electricity and our Australian subsidiary’s
trading of PV components. As the COVID-19 spread continues, the measures implemented to curb the spread of the virus have resulted
in supply chain disruptions, insufficient work force and suspended manufacturing and construction works for solar industry. One
or more of our customers, partners, service providers or suppliers may experience financial distress, delayed or defaults on payment,
file for bankruptcy protection, sharp diminishing of business, or suffer disruptions in their business due to the outbreak. These
preventative measures have also impacted our daily operations. The efforts enacted to control COVID-19 have placed heavy pressure
on our marketing and sales activities. Moreover, due to the decrease in prices of crude oil, the demand for solar energy can decrease
in the near future. We continue to assess the related risks and impacts COVID-19 pandemic may have on our business and our financial
performance. In light of the rapidly changing situation across different countries and regions, it remains difficult to estimate
the duration and magnitude of COVID-19 impact. Until such time as the COVID-19 pandemic is contained or eradicated and global business
return to more customary levels, our business and financial results may be materially adversely affected.
Risks Related to Our International
Operations
We are subject to risks associated
with foreign currency exchange rates, fluctuations of which may negatively affect our revenue, cost of goods sold and gross margins
and could result in exchange losses.
We currently operate
in a number of jurisdictions including the U.S., Japan, U.K., Greece, Italy and Australia, and our local operations are generally
conducted in the functional currency of the home jurisdiction. The FIT and other subsidies granted are also denominated in local
currencies. Thus, we deal on a regular basis in several currencies concurrently, which exposes us to significant currency exchange
risks. Any increased costs or reduced revenue as a result of foreign exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our profit
margins. The fluctuation of foreign exchange rates also affects the value of our monetary and other assets and liabilities denominated
in local currencies. Generally, an appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the relevant local currencies could result in a foreign
exchange loss for assets denominated in such local currencies and a foreign exchange gain for liabilities denominated in such local
currencies. Conversely, a devaluation of the U.S. dollar against the relevant local currencies could result in a foreign exchange
gain for assets denominated in such local currencies and a foreign exchange loss for liabilities denominated in such local currencies.
We may also expand
into emerging markets, some of which may have an uncertain regulatory environment relating to currency policy. Conducting business
in such emerging markets could increase our exposure to foreign exchange risks. Although we access a variety of financing solutions
that are tailored to the geographic location of our projects and to local regulations, we have not entered into any hedging transactions
to reduce the foreign exchange risks, but may do so in the future when appropriate. However, if we decide to hedge our foreign
exchange exposure in the future, we cannot assure you that we will be able to reduce our foreign currency risk exposure in an effective
manner, at reasonable costs, or at all.
The ongoing debt crisis in
the Eurozone and market perceptions concerning the instability of the Euro and the European economy could adversely affect our
business, results of operations and financing.
Concerns persist regarding
the debt burden of certain Eurozone countries and their ability to meet future financial obligations, the overall stability of
the Euro and the suitability of the Euro as a single currency given the diverse economic and political circumstances in individual
Eurozone countries. These concerns or market perceptions concerning these and related issues could adversely affect the value of
our Euro-denominated assets and obligations and lead to future economic slowdowns.
Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares
We have significant “equity
overhang” which could adversely affect the market price of our Shares and impair our ability to raise additional capital
through the sale of equity securities.
As of the date of this annual report, we had 14,837,469 ordinary shares outstanding, including 4,289,340 ordinary shares,
or approximately 28.9% of our total ordinary shares outstanding, held by Mr. Xiaofeng Peng, our director, executive chairman
of the board of directors and chief executive officer. The possibility that substantial amounts of our outstanding ordinary shares
may be sold by Mr. Xiaofeng Peng or the perception that such sales could occur, or “equity overhang,” could adversely
affect the market price of our ordinary shares, and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity
securities in the future.
We are subject to litigation
risks, including securities class actions and shareholder derivative actions, which may be costly to defend and the outcome of
which is uncertain.
From time to time,
we are subject to legal claims, with and without merit, that may be costly, and which may divert the attention of our management
and our resources in general. In addition, our solar projects may be subject to litigation or other adverse proceedings that may
adversely impact our ability to proceed with construction or grid connection or sell a given project, which would adversely affect
our ability to recognize revenue with respect to such project. We are currently involved in various legal proceedings. See “Item 8. Financial Information —Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal and Administrative Proceedings.”
The results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Lawsuits filed against us may assert types of claims that, if
resolved against us, could give rise to substantial damages, and an unfavorable outcome or settlement of one or more of these lawsuits,
or any future lawsuits, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Even
if these lawsuits are not resolved against us, the costs of defending such lawsuits may not be covered by our insurance policies.
We cannot assure you that additional litigation will not be filed against us in the future.
It may be difficult to effect
service of process on, or to enforce any judgments obtained against us, our directors, or our senior management members.
There is no statutory
enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the federal or state courts of the United States (and the Cayman Islands
are not a party to any treaties for the reciprocal enforcement or recognition of such judgments), a judgment obtained in such jurisdiction
will be recognized and enforced in the courts of the Cayman Islands at common law, without any re-examination of the merits of
the underlying dispute, by an action commenced on the foreign judgment debt in the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands, provided
such judgment (a) is given by a foreign court of competent jurisdiction, (b) imposes on the judgment debtor a liability to pay
a liquidated sum for which the judgment has been given, (c) is final, (d) is not in respect of taxes, a fine or a penalty, and
(e) was not obtained in a manner and is not of a kind the enforcement of which is contrary to natural justice or the public policy
of the Cayman Islands. However, the Cayman Islands courts are unlikely to enforce a judgment obtained from the U.S. courts under
civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities law if such judgment is determined by the courts of the Cayman Islands
to give rise to obligations to make payments that are penal or punitive in nature. Because such a determination has not yet been
made by a court of the Cayman Islands, it is uncertain whether such civil liability judgments from U.S. courts would be enforceable
in the Cayman Islands.
Our shareholders may experience
future dilution.
Our amended and restated
memorandum and articles of association permits our board of directors, without shareholder approval, to authorize the issuance
of preferred shares. The board of directors may classify or reclassify any preferred shares to set the preferences, rights and
other terms of the classified or reclassified shares, including the issuance of preferred shares that have preference rights over
our ordinary shares with respect to dividends, liquidation and voting rights. Furthermore, substantially all of our ordinary shares
for which our outstanding stock options are exercisable are, once they have been purchased, eligible for immediate sale in the
public market.
We may from time to
time distribute rights to our shareholders, including rights to acquire our securities. However, we cannot make these rights available
in the United States unless we register the rights and the securities to which the rights relate under the Securities Act or an
exemption from the registration requirements is available. We are under no obligation to file a registration statement with respect
to any such rights or securities or to endeavor to cause a registration statement to be declared effective. Moreover, we may not
be able to establish an exemption from registration under the Securities Act. Accordingly, you may be unable to participate in
our rights offerings and may experience dilution in your holdings.
The issuance of additional
shares in our capital or the exercise of stock options or warrants could be substantially dilutive to your shares and may negatively
affect the market price of our ordinary shares.
The price of our securities
has been and may continue to be highly volatile.
The price of our ordinary
shares has been and may continue to be subject to wide fluctuations in the future in response to many events or factors, including
those discussed in the preceding risk factors relating to our operations, as well as:
|
·
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in operating results, actual or anticipated gross profit as a percentage of net sales, our
actual or anticipated rate of growth and our actual or anticipated earnings per share;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
changes in expectations as to future financial performance or changes in financial estimates;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
changes in governmental regulations or policies in the countries in which we do business;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
our, or a competitor’s, announcement of new products, services or technological innovations;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
news and commentary emanating from the media, securities analysts or government bodies relating to us and to the industry in general;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
changes in the general condition of the global economy and credit markets;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
general market conditions or other developments affecting us or our industry;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
announcements regarding patent litigation or the issuance of patents to us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
release or expiry of lock-up or other transfer restrictions on our outstanding ordinary shares;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
sales or perceived sales of additional ordinary shares; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation.
|
Any of these factors
may result in large and sudden changes in the volume and price at which our ordinary shares will trade. We cannot give any assurance
that these factors will not occur in the future again. In addition, the securities market has from time to time experienced significant
price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations
may also have a material adverse effect on the market price of our ordinary shares. In the past, following periods of volatility
in the market price of their stock, many companies have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we become involved
in similar securities class action litigation in the future, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s
attention and resources and could harm our stock price, business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to meet the applicable
listing requirements, NASDAQ may delist our ordinary shares from trading on its exchange in which case the liquidity and market
price of our securities could decline and our ability to raise additional capital would be adversely affected.
Our ordinary shares
are currently listed for trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. If we remain listed, there are a number of requirements that
must be met in order for our ordinary shares to remain listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, and the failure to meet any of
these listing standards could result in the delisting of our ordinary shares from NASDAQ. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to timely file all required reports or comply with all other NASDAQ Listing Rules at all times in the future, or regain compliance
in a timely manner in case of a default and avoid any subsequent adverse action taken by the Listing Qualifications Department,
including but not limited to delisting.
Our articles of association
contain anti-takeover provisions that could prevent a change in control even if such takeover is beneficial to our shareholders.
Our articles of association
contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of us that could be beneficial to our shareholders. These
provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors and
take other corporate actions. As a result, these provisions could limit the price that investors are willing to pay for the ordinary
shares. These provisions might also discourage a potential acquisition proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition proposal
or tender offer is at a price above the then current market price of our ordinary shares. These provisions provide that our board
of directors has authority, without any further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and
to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications,
limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences,
any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with the ordinary shares. The board of directors may decide to issue
such preferred shares quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of us or make the removal of our management
more difficult. If the board of directors decides to issue such preferred shares, the price of our ordinary shares may fall and
the voting and other rights of holders of our ordinary shares may be materially adversely affected.
You may not receive dividends
or other distributions on our ordinary shares and you may not receive any value for them, if it is illegal or impractical to make
them available to you.
Under Cayman Islands
law, we may only pay dividends out of our profits or share premium account subject to our ability to pay our debts as they fall
due in the ordinary course of our business. Our ability to pay dividends will therefore depend on our ability to generate sufficient
profits. We cannot give any assurance that we will declare dividends of any amounts, at any rate or at all in the future. We have
not paid any dividends in the past. Future dividends, if any, will be paid at the discretion of our board of directors, subject
to requirements under Cayman Islands law and our memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from time to time,
and will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital expenditure requirements, general financial conditions, legal
and contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.
We are treated as a U.S. corporation
for U.S. federal tax purposes.
Due to the circumstances
of our formation and the application of Section 7874(b) of the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”),
we are treated as a U.S. corporation for all purposes of the Code. As a result, we are subject to U.S. federal corporate income
tax on our worldwide income. In addition, if we pay dividends to a Non-U.S. Holder, as defined in the discussion “Item 10.
Additional Information—E. Taxation—U.S. Federal Income Taxation,” U.S. income tax will be withheld at the rate
of 30%, or, subject to certain conditions, such lower rate as may be provided in an applicable income tax treaty. Each investor
should consult its own tax adviser regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding the ordinary shares in its particular
circumstances.
We rely on the foreign private
issuer exemption for certain corporate governance requirements under the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules, or the NASDAQ Rules, including
the majority independent board requirement. This may afford less protection to holders of our ordinary shares and ADSs.
As a foreign private
issuer, we are exempt from certain corporate governance requirements of NASDAQ. We are required to provide a brief description
of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the corporate governance practices required to be
followed by U.S. domestic issuers under the NASDAQ Rules. The standards applicable to us are considerably different from those
applied to U.S. domestic issuers. For instance, we are not required to:
|
·
|
have a majority of the board of directors be comprised of independent directors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
have a compensation committee that is comprised solely of independent directors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
having a nomination and corporate governance committee that is comprised solely of independent directors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
have executive compensation be determined by independent directors or a committee of independent directors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
have director nominees be selected, or recommended for selection by the board of directors, by independent directors or a committee
of independent directors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
hold an annual meeting of shareholders no later than one year after the end of our fiscal year-end; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
have shareholder approval for private placement of Company’s common stocks at a price less than the greater of book or market
value which together with sales by officers, directors or Substantial Shareholders of the Company equals 20% or more of common
stock or 20% or more of the voting power outstanding before the issuance.
|
We are not required
to, and will not voluntarily meet, these requirements. For example, our board of directors currently consists of five directors,
three of whom satisfy the “independence” requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ
Rules. The law of our home country, the Cayman Islands, does not require a majority of our board of directors be composed of independent
directors. We intend to follow our home country practice with regard to the composition of the board of directors.
As a result, holders
of our ordinary shares may not have the same protection afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of NASDAQ’s
corporate governance requirements. For a description of the material corporate governance differences between the NASDAQ Rules
and Cayman Islands law, see “Item 16G. Corporate Governance.”
ITEM 4.
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A.
|
History and Development of the Company
|
Our legal and commercial
name is SPI Energy Co., Ltd. Our principal executive office is located at #1128, 11/F, No. 52 Hung To Road, Kwun Tong, Kowloon,
Hong Kong SAR, China. Our telephone number at this address is +852 2291 6020 and our fax number is +852 2291 6030. Our registered
office is situated at 4th Floor, Harbour Place, 103 South Church Street, PO Box 10240, George Town, Cayman Islands.
The Company was incorporated
by SPI as a company limited by shares in the Cayman Islands on May 4, 2015. On January 4, 2016, we completed the redomiciliation
of SPI to the Cayman Islands, whereby SPI merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the holders of SPI
common stock received ADS representing ordinary shares of the Company. As a result, the former shareholders of SPI became the beneficial
owners of the capital stock of the Company, and the Company, together with our subsidiaries, now own and continue to conduct SPI’s
business in substantially the same manner as was conducted by SPI and its subsidiaries. The Company is also managed by substantially
the same board of directors and executive officers that managed SPI previously.
We raised a significant
amount of cash for our working capital purposes from the issuance of shares of SPI’s common stock and convertible notes in
2014, 2015 and 2016 to non-U.S. investors in private placements. In those periods, we entered into various private placement share
purchase agreements and option agreements with a number of non-U.S. investors and issued approximately 14.6 million unregistered
shares or options to purchase shares of SPI’s common stock in reliance on Regulation S of the Securities Act, or Regulation
S, mostly at a per share purchase price benchmarked to the prevailing trading price of SPI’s shares at the respective dates
of these agreements, and raised an aggregate of $401.58 million. We also raised $55.0 million of cash by issuing unregistered convertible
notes to non-U.S. investors in reliance of Regulation S promulgated under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Regulations
S”) in 2014 and 2015. In January 2016, we raised $5 million by issuing 2.5 million ordinary shares, in reliance on Regulation
S, to a non-U.S. investor who exercised an option to purchase our ordinary shares pursuant to an option agreement with our Company.
In September 2016, we entered into share purchase agreements with certain existing shareholders, including certain members of our
management and other investors, pursuant to which we agreed to issue and sell an aggregate of 386.1 million ordinary shares for
a total consideration of approximately $100 million. In January 2017, we completed approximately $0.881 million of its $100 million
private placement. The investors in these transactions have advised us that they no longer wish to close on these transactions.
On January 17, 2019,
we entered into share purchase agreements with certain existing shareholders (including certain key management personnel of the
Company) and other investors (collectively, the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Purchasers agreed to purchase
an aggregate of 6,600,000 ordinary shares of the Company at a price of US$1.16 per Share, for a total consideration of approximately
$7.7 million. The transaction was closed on April 12, 2019. Those shares were being offered and sold to private investors, on a
private placement basis in reliance on Regulation S. Those shares have not been and will not be registered under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from
registration. Net proceeds from the sale of those shares are intended to be used for expansion of our global PV project activities
and general corporate purposes.
Between January 19,
2016 and September 18, 2017, our ADSs were listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol of “SPI”. The
Bank of New York Mellon, the depositary bank for the ADS facility, terminated our ADS facility on September 18, 2017. Following
such termination, we listed our ordinary shares, par value US$0.0001 per share, for trading on NASDAQ Global Select Market in substitution
for our ADSs. On September 19, 2017, our ordinary shares began trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol of “SPI”.
On January 1, 2017,
we deconsolidated Sinsin due to loss of control.
In September 2017, we
entered into a framework share purchase agreement to acquire 100% equity interests of three Greek companies, namely THERMI SUN
S.A, HELIOHRISI S.A., and HELIOSTIXIO S.A., from THERMI TANEO Venture Capital Fund (“TTVCF”), for a total consideration
of EUR 16.8 million, subject to certain adjustments. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions. These three
companies own a total of four PV plants with 7.4MWp PV installations in northern Greece. The closing of the transaction took place
in three separate stages (one for each company under acquisition). The acquisition of HELIOSTIXIO S.A. was closed in December 2017.
The Company completed the second-stage acquisition of 100% of the equity interest of HELIOHRISI S.A., which owns 1.988 MW of photovoltaic
projects in Greece on March 20 2019. The last of three acquisitions of 100% of the equity interest of THERMI SUN S.A., which owns
4.4 Megawatts (“MW”) of photovoltaic (“PV”) projects in Greece, was closed in November 1, 2019. With 7.4MWp
PV installations added to SPI Energy’s existing PV portfolio in Greece, the Company becomes one of the significant PV owners
in Greece.
On December 10, 2018,
we divested all our business and operations in China for nominal consideration due to the significant liabilities in the business.
On July 23 2019,
the Company entered into a framework agreement to acquire up to eight solar PV projects, totaling 21MW in the State of Oregon
(the “Oregon Portfolio”). On August 26, 2019, the Company completed the closing of Manchester and Waterford solar
projects with a total of approximately 5.4MW. On September 10, 2019, the Company completed the closing on the Belvedere project
with approximately 3.56MW of clean energy for the local community. On September 24, 2019, the Company completed the closing of
the Dover and Clayfield solar projects with a total of approximately 5.45MW. On April 22, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition
of the Cork project with a total of approximately 1.5MW. The Company has now closed 6 of the 8 projects within the Oregon Portfolio.
On September 26, 2019,
the Company completed the closing on the sale of Sun Roof II and Sun Roof V to Theia Investments (Italy) S.r.l. (“Theia”)
a company established by an infrastructure fund managed by Stafford Capital Partners (“Stafford”), a leading private
markets investment and advisory group. Sun Roof II, comprised of three rooftop solar projects totaling 1.83 MW located in Sassari,
Italy, and Sun Roof V, a 1 MW rooftop solar project located in Cisterna di Latina, Italy, have been in operation since 2012. Theia
paid approximately EUR4.3 million to complete the transaction. On March 16, 2020, the Company completed the closing of the
sale of its Sun Roof I assets, a 479 kWp rooftop solar project located in Aprilia, Italy, that has been in operation since 2012.
Proceeds from the sale were approximately EUR 1.1 million before transaction fees, strengthening the Company’s balance sheet
and providing additional capital for the development of solar assets in the US and Greece. After the sale of Sun Roof II, Sun Roof
V and Sun Roof I, the Company currently owns only 1 PV asset with a capacity of 0.993 MW in Italy.
Nasdaq Compliance
On March 23, 2020,
the Company received a notification letter from Nasdaq indicating that the Company is not in compliance with NASDAQ Listing Rule
5450(b)(3)(C) for continued listing because the market value of its publicly held shares (“MVPHS”) was less than $15
million. Normally, the Company would be eligible for a 180 day compliance period to regain the compliance. On April 17, 2020, the
Company received a notification letter from Nasdaq indicating that the Company will have 156 calendar days from July 1, 2020, or
until December 3, 2020 to regain compliance with the Nasdaq’s market value of publicly held shares (“MVPHS”)
requirement. The Notice also stated that Nasdaq has determined to toll the compliance periods for bid price and MVPHS requirements
(collectively, the “Price-based Requirements”) through June 30, 2020. As a result, companies presently in compliance
periods for any Price-based Requirements will remain at that same stage of the process and will not be subject to being delisted
for these concerns. Starting on July 1, 2020, companies will receive the balance of any pending compliance period in effect at
the start of the tolling period to regain compliance. Accordingly, since the Company had 156 calendar days remaining in its MVPHS
compliance period as of April 16, 2020, it will, upon reinstatement of the Price-based Requirements, still have 156 calendar days
from July 1, 2020, or until December 3, 2020, to regain compliance. The Notices have no immediate effect on the listing of the
Company’s securities. The Company can regain compliance at any time before December 3, 2020 by evidencing compliance with
the MVPHS requirement for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days.
On April 28, 2020,
the Company received a notification letter from Nasdaq notifying the Company that its bid price per ordinary share had been below
$1.00 for a period of 30 consecutive business days and, therefore, that the Company did not meet the minimum bid price requirement
set forth in Rule 5450(a)(1) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules. Normally, the Company would be eligible for a 180 day compliance period
to regain the compliance.
Given current market
conditions, Nasdaq previously determined to toll the compliance periods for Price-based Requirements through June 30, 2020. As
a result, the Company will, upon reinstatement of the Price-based Requirements, still have 180 calendar days from July 1, 2020,
or until December 28, 2020, to regain compliance.
The Notices have no
immediate effect on the listing of the Company’s securities. The Company can regain compliance at any time before December
28, 2020 by evidencing compliance with the bid price requirement for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days.
We are a global provider
of PV solutions for business, residential, government and utility customers and investors. We provide a full spectrum of EPC services
to third party project developers, as well as develop, own and operate solar projects that sell electricity to the grid in multiple
countries, including the U.S., the U.K., Greece, Japan and Italy. Prior to 2014, we were primarily engaged in providing EPC services
to developers in the U.S. We were also engaged in the development, manufacture and marketing of a variety of PV modules, the key
components of solar parks that convert sunlight into electricity, and balance-of-system components, including our in-house brand.
We have discontinued our manufacturing business and liquidated our research and development function. Beginning in 2014, we expanded
our global project development business by ramping up our portfolio of global solar projects, including projects that we plan to
hold in the long term and derive electricity generation revenue from our independent power producer model, or IPP model, and projects
that we plan to sell in the future when we are presented with attractive opportunities under our build-and-transfer model, or BT
model. We grow our project portfolio primarily through acquisitions and act as a secondary developer for the projects which are
under construction or in pipeline upon acquisition. Solar projects in our current portfolio include projects at all stages of development,
including projects in operation, projects under construction and projects in pipeline. See “—Our Global Project Development Business—Our Solar Project Portfolio.”
For our EPC service
business, the scope of our work encompasses engineering design procurement of technical components from PV module and panel manufacturers
and contracting of construction and installation, which reaches both upstream and downstream along the spectrum of the solar business
value chain. Our rigorous design and supply chain management as well as construction quality control enable us to design, build
and deliver world-class solar system configurations with components that can work optimally together.
For our global project development
business, as of June 29, 2020, we had completed a series of acquisitions of solar projects that were in operation, consisting
of (i) 26.6 MW of projects in Greece, acquired in December 2014 for a total consideration of $79.330 million including the rights
to be awarded up to 360MW EPC contracts, (ii) 4.3 MW of projects in Italy, acquired in February 2015 for a total consideration
of $11.8 million, (iii) 1.082 MW, 1.988 MW and 4.4MW of projects in Greece, acquired in December 2017, March 2019 and November
2019 respectively, for a total consideration of EUR 12.88 million ($14.46 million), (iv) 0.2744 MW of projects in Japan, acquired
in July 2017 for a total consideration of JPY 110 million ($ 0.98 million) and (v) a total of 15.77 MW DC of projects in the state
of Oregon, US, acquired in August, September 2019 and April 2020 respectively for a total consideration of $1.3 million.
From January 2019
to December 31, 2019, we sold 1 solar project in Japan (1.99MW) to a third party at the consideration of $9.56 million, which
has been recognized as revenue accordingly. On September 26, 2019, we sold Sun Roof II comprised of three rooftop solar
projects totaling 1.83 MW, and Sun Roof V with1 MW rooftop solar project in Italy at the consideration of EUR4.3 million. On
March 16, 2020, we sold Sun Roof I, a 479 kWp rooftop solar project located in Italy at the consideration of EUR1.1 million
before transaction fees. After the sale of Sun Roof II, Sun Roof V and Sun Roof I, the Company currently owns only 1 PV asset
with a capacity of 0.993 MW in Italy.
As of the date of this
report, we are constructing an aggregate of 19.636 MW of projects in the U.S. under our BT model. We anticipate that the U.S. project
will be connected to the grid in 2021.
We had 10.24MW of projects
in announced pipeline as of June 29, 2020. See “—Our Global Project Development Business—Our Solar Project Portfolio.”
We expect to complete the acquisition of, or commence permitting processes for, our projects in announced pipeline as soon as practicable.
We believe these new additions, combined with our existing project portfolio, demonstrate our broad geographic reach and established
presence across key solar markets and mitigate country-specific risks.
We divested all our
operations in China in December 2018 for nominal consideration due to the significant liabilities in the business.
Deconsolidation
On January 1, 2017,
we deconsolidated Sinsin due to loss of control.
Disposition of China Assets
On August 30, 2018,
the Company entered into a share purchase agreement (the “SPA”) with Lighting Charm Limited (the “Buyer”),
an affiliate of Ms. Shan Zhou, the spouse of Xiaofeng Peng, the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer. The SPA was approved by an independent committee of the Company’s Board of Directors and the transactions contemplated
by the SPA closed on December 10, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the SPA, the Company sold to the Buyer 100% of the shares of SPI
China (HK) Limited (“SPI China”), which held all of the Company’s assets and liabilities related to its business
in China (the “Acquired China Business”). These assets include EPC business, PV projects, Internet finance lease related
business, and E-commerce in China.
In connection with
the transaction, a pre-closing restructuring was accomplished. The pre-closing restructuring resulted in: (1) SolarJuice Co., Ltd.,
a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquiring 80% of the equity interests in Solar Juice Pty Limited, a holding company
which holds all the assets of the Company in Australia; (2) the Company acquiring all of the equity interests in Solar Power Inc.
UK Service Limited, a holding company which holds all the assets of the Company in UK; (3) SPI Orange Power (Cyprus) Limited, a
100% wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquiring all of the equity interests in SPI Renewable Energy (Luxembourg) Private
Limited Company S.a.r.l., a holding company which holds part of the assets of the Company in Italy; (4) SPI Orange Power (Cyprus)
Limited acquiring all the equity interests in ItalsolarS.r.l, a company which holds a portion of the assets of the Company in Italy;
(5) the Company acquiring all of the equity interests of Sinsin, a holding company which held all the assets of the Company in
Greece; and (6) SPI Group Holding Co., Ltd., a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquiring 97% of the equity interests
in SPI Solar Japan G.K.
On December 10, 2018,
the Company and the Buyer executed the bought and sold notes and instrument of transfer relating to the shares in SPI China. Upon
the execution of the bought and sold notes, the equitable title to the shares in SPI China past to the Buyer and until the legal
title is transferred, the Company held the shares in SPI China on trust for the Buyer. On April 30, 2019, the legal title transfer
was completed and the Buyer became the owner of the shares in SPI China.
Crypto Mining Hosting
In early 2018, we launched
www.umining.io, a turnkey solution offering global crypto-mining hosting, training, sales, and repair services. As of December
31, 2019, we had 2 pilot mining sites in Canada and the U.S. We continue to look for potential investments to increase our mining
capacity by the end of 2020
Hemp and CBD Business
In September 2019,
the Company launched its newly established hemp and CBD business. The Company has executed a management services agreement with
the Native American Agricultural Company (“NAAC”) to cultivate hemp in the Navajo Nation; and obtained licenses from
the Navajo Nation to engage in lab testing, cultivation, processing, wholesale distribution, and retail sales of hemp. In January
2020, the Company completed the installation of its cannabidiol extraction and milling equipment at an approximately 25,000-sqft
facility in Orange Cove, Fresno County in California. The newly installed CBD processing equipment is designed to enable the production
of Hemp dry flower and Pre-roll, CBD crude oil, distillate, and isolate, serving the growers in California. The pre-production
test runs of its CBD crude oil extraction and Hemp try flower and Pre-roll production process and quality control review have been
completed. Currently, the Company is taking the orders from customers.
Business of Alfalfa and Other Related
Agriculture Products
In May 2019, the Company announced to explore
agriculture business for productions, sales or marketing of alfalfa and other related agriculture products in Arizona. Knight Holding
Corporation is focused on becoming one of the largest global providers of alfalfa hay and other forage types. With China’s
increasing demand for American alfalfa hay, we have recognized the importance of exporting to the Asia market. Committing ourselves
to successfully becoming a major supplier of alfalfa, we have established a processing facility in Tonopah, Arizona. Our alfalfa
pressing facility sits in the center of the Harquahala Valley, located in Western Maricopa County.
Engineering Design
As a critical first
step in the EPC process, engineering design involves the planning of the entire solar project, from feasibility studies of the
land and irradiation levels to efficient arrangement of mounting, modules and connection systems. Our technical team takes responsibility
over initial solar project engineering with support from third-party contractors. The engineering design process includes the site
layout and the electrical design, as well as assessment of a variety of factors in order to choose appropriate technologies and
equipment for the project, particularly modules and inverters. Throughout the engineering design phase, we aim to reduce the risks,
control the costs and improve the performance of our EPC projects.
Procurement and Construction
In order to focus on
our core downstream development and EPC service businesses, we no longer manufacture PV modules or produce other equipment such
as controllers, inverters and balance of system components. Rather, we procure them from third-party manufacturers and install
them in our PV systems as part of our EPC business.
We procure PV modules
and other key equipment for project construction from independent suppliers and contract work to third-party EPC contractors in
areas such as logistics, installation, construction and supervision. We believe this allows us to focus our resources on higher
value-added tasks. We maintain an updated list of qualified and reliable global suppliers and local third-party contractors in
the areas where we operate with a proven track record and with which we have established relationships.
We choose our suppliers
and third-party EPC contractors through a competitive bidding process. The relevant departments of our headquarters organize and
collect bids, communicate with bidders and coordinate with our regional development teams to meet local technical and legal requirements.
This helps ensure that we have a strong, reliable and experienced supplier and construction team working with us on each of our
EPC project.
Procurement of PV
Modules and Other Equipment
We apply stringent
quality assurance protocols to select components with a long useful life that are compatible with a variety of parameters of the
project, including local topography and local solar irradiation.
PV modules, the primary
equipment of our solar projects, typically contribute to a substantial portion of the overall system costs. We procure our PV modules
from a wide array of suppliers including Trina Solar Limited, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd., Xiexin Integration Technology Co.,
Ltd., JA Solar Holding Co., Ltd., LG Electronics, and Chint, among others.
We consider the following
factors when we procure project equipment: technical specifications (such as size, type and power output), bid prices, warranty
and insurance programs, spectral response, performance in low light, nominal power tolerance levels, degradation rate, technical
support and reputation of suppliers. We typically require 10-year warranties for defects in materials or workmanship and 25-year
warranty for module capacity under normal testing conditions (2-3% of capacity for the first year with a 0.5-0.8% linear degradation
in capacity every year thereafter).
We are generally required
to pay 100% of the purchase price within a period ranging from three months to six months after receipt, inspection and acceptance
of the PV modules. We typically pay manufacturers deposits that represent 10% to 50% of the total purchase price.
Construction Contracting
When acting as a general
contractor, we generally outsource the construction of our PV power plants to third-party construction companies and closely monitor
their execution of our designs. Most of these companies are specialized EPC construction subcontractors. Our construction oversight
teams conduct constructability reviews, provide construction support, contract administration and document control services, construction
inspection, engineering support, instrumentation installation and monitoring, and on-site construction supervision and monitoring.
We utilize a number
of metrics to manage and monitor the performance of our third-party contractors in terms of both quality and delivery time and
to ensure compliance with applicable safety and other requirements. For instance, we may delegate qualified representatives to
review, supervise, organize and provide comments on the third-party contractor’s design, construction plan, construction
guidelines, materials and documentations. We also conduct periodic inspections to examine project implementation and quality against
our project planning and quality standards and prepare periodic reports for review and approval by our relevant departments. If
we identify any quality or progress issues that are attributable to the work of our third-party contractors, we will follow-up
with them and monitor their rectification work.
Those third-party contractors
are responsible for the quality of the project and must maintain relevant insurance designating us as the beneficiary. They must
ensure the project complies with all local safety, labor and environmental laws and regulations. We examine and keep records of
the production-related safety documentation and insurance policies of our third-party contractors. All production-related tools
and equipment used by our third-party contractors must be compliant with and certified by applicable regulatory standards. The
contractors submit detailed quality assurance procedures and regularly updates us on the progress, quality and safety of the project.
Our third-party contractors utilize a variety of measures to protect the project location, including the transmission line, built
facilities and infrastructure, from damage during the construction process.
We are generally entitled
to damages if our third-party contractors fail to meet the prescribed requirements and deadlines under our contracts. We usually
negotiate to pay our third-party contractors the remaining 5% or 10% of the contract price after the expiration of the quality
warranty period, which generally ranges from one to two years. If we pay the full contract price upon completion of a project,
we require the contractor to provide a performance guarantee in respect of the warranty obligations for such project.
Commissioning and
Warranties
We assess and evaluate
our solar projects before completion. Upon completion of construction, we conduct commissioning tests prior to grid connection.
The tests include a detailed visual inspection of all significant aspects of the plant, an open circuit voltage test and a short
circuit current test, and then a direct-current test after connecting to the grid. We focus commissioning tests on the quality
of the construction and major equipment. These tests are conducted in order to ensure that the plant is structurally and electrically
safe, and is sufficiently robust to operate as designed for the specified project lifetime.
After grid connection,
we also conduct commissioning tests on electricity generation performance. As grid connection requires approval from power companies,
post-grid connection commissioning tests are also conducted by local quality supervisors or third-parties approved by the power
companies. In addition to the warranties provided by the manufacturers of modules and balance-of-system components, EPC contractors
also typically provide a limited warranty against defects in workmanship, engineering design, and installation services under normal
use and service conditions for a period of one to two years following the energizing of a section of a solar power plant or upon
substantial completion of the entire solar power plant. In resolving claims under the workmanship, design and installation warranties,
the new owner has the option of remedying the defect to the warranted level through repair, refurbishment, or replacement.
Our Global Project Development Business
We develop and sell
or own and operate solar projects which sell electricity to the grid in multiple countries, including the U.S., the U.K., Greece,
Japan and Italy. In 2014, we expanded our global project development business by ramping up our portfolio of global solar projects,
including projects that we plan to hold in the long term for electricity generation revenue under our IPP model, as well as projects
which we plan to sell in the future when we are presented with attractive opportunities under our BT model. We grow our project
portfolio primarily through acquisitions and our project acquisition strategy is based on rigorous market research and due diligence
on the target project’s capacity, local energy demands, applicable tariff regime, supporting infrastructure, local government
support and topography for construction in the case of projects under construction and projects in pipeline. We also consider available
financing options, internal rate of return, key technical components, terms of the grid connection agreements and power purchase
agreements, or PPAs, as well as guarantees on performance for projects in all development stages. We act as secondary developer
for the projects under construction or in pipeline when they are acquired. We either hold these projects in the long term for electricity
generation revenue or sell them when presented with attractive opportunities.
We had an aggregate
46.676 MW of projects in the U.S., the U.K., Greece, Japan and Italy as of June 29, 2020. We divested all of our business in China
in December 2018.
Most of our solar projects
are subject to the FIT or PPA policies of the countries or regions where they operate. FIT refers to the national and local subsidies
to solar power generation supported by the government. PPA refers to power purchase agreement with electricity company. For the
FIT terms of our projects, please refer to “—Our Solar Project Portfolio.”
Our Solar Project Portfolio
We expect our solar
projects to have operational lives of 25 to 27 years. As of June 29, 2020, our solar project portfolio consisted of:
|
·
|
Projects in Operation — “Projects in operation” refers to projects connected to the grid and selling electricity.
As of June 29, 2020, we have projects in operation with an attributable capacity of 16.8 MW in the U.K., Greece, Japan and Italy.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Projects under Construction — “Projects under construction” refers to projects at the construction stage. We
generally complete construction in three to six months after obtaining all the permits required for construction, if local climate
and topographical conditions permit. We have 19.636 MW of projects under construction in the US as of June 29, 2020 and we expect
substantially all of them to be connected to the grid by 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Projects in Announced Pipeline — “Projects in announced pipeline” refers to projects that we have entered into
definitive agreements to develop with a third party in which we expect to own a majority of the equity interest, and projects
we have entered into definitive agreements to acquire. We have 10.24 MW project pipeline in the state of Hawaii, U.S. as of June
29, 2020.
|
The following summary
sets forth our solar projects in operation, solar projects under construction and solar projects in announced pipeline as of June
29, 2020. For more recent development of the solar projects portfolio and potential sale of our solar projects, please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Resources and Material Known Facts on Liquidity.”
Solar
Projects in Operation*
Country
|
|
Project
name
|
|
Gross
capacity (MW)
|
|
Our
equity holding
|
|
Attributable
capacity (MW)
|
|
Ground/
Rooftop
|
|
Connection
date
|
|
FIT
terms
|
Greece
|
|
HELIOSTIXIO
SA
|
|
1.082
|
|
100%
|
|
1.082
|
|
Ground
|
|
September
2012
|
|
EUR0.215/kWh
|
Greece
|
|
HELIOHRISI SA
|
|
1.988
|
|
100%
|
|
1.988
|
|
Ground
|
|
June
2012
|
|
EUR0.215/kWh
|
Greece
|
|
THERMI SUN SA
|
|
4.400
|
|
100%
|
|
4.400
|
|
Ground
|
|
June
2012
|
|
EUR 0.215/KWh for the 3.4MW
and EUR 0.25/KWh for the 0.7MW
|
Japan
|
|
Ibaraki
|
|
0.2744
|
|
100%
|
|
0.2744
|
|
Ground
|
|
December 2014
|
|
JPY36/kWh
|
Italy
|
|
ItalsolarS.r.l.
|
|
0.993
|
|
100%
|
|
0.993
|
|
Ground
|
|
December 2009
|
|
EUR0.325/kWh
|
U.K.
|
|
CairnhillSolarfield Limited
|
|
3.0906
|
|
100%
|
|
3.0906
|
|
Ground
|
|
February 2016
|
|
1.3 ROCs
|
U.K.
|
|
Emotion energy Solar One
Limited
|
|
4.971
|
|
100%
|
|
4.971
|
|
Ground
|
|
March 2016
|
|
1.3 ROCs
|
Total
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________
* The
PPA agreements fix the FIT during the first 20 years of operation and will drop to EUR 0.09/ KWh after the 20th year for the next
7 subsequent years. The FIT will be charged based on the relevant law in force in Greece. The current law in force is law4254/2014.
According the monthly FIT statements by the electricity supply bureau in Greece, the FIT range of the PV plants was EUR0.19~0.20/kWh
in 2014. Sinsin was deconsolidated in the year of 2017 due to loss of control.
Solar
Projects Under Construction*
Country
|
|
Our
equity
holding
|
|
Number
of solar projects
|
|
Attributable
capacity (MW)
|
|
Ground/Rooftop
|
|
Scheduled
Connection
date
|
|
FIT
terms
|
US
|
|
100%
|
|
2
|
|
1.996
|
|
Ground
|
|
2021
|
|
<500kW: $0.238/kWh>500kW: $0.236/kWh
|
US
|
|
100%
|
|
4
|
|
12.5
|
|
Ground
|
|
2021
|
|
N/P
|
US
|
|
100%
|
|
2
|
|
5.14
|
|
Ground
|
|
2021
|
|
N/P
|
Total
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
19.636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_______________
|
*
|
Intended by us to be BT projects in 2018 and 2019 and may be held as our IPP projects upon completion
of construction if we determine that the return of owning the projects and selling electricity is more attractive.
|
As of December 31,
2019, we had capital commitments of approximately $5.1 million. As the total capital expenditure may be affected by various factors
including, among others, increases in cost of key equipment and materials, failure to obtain sufficient financing, unexpected engineering
or environmental issues as well as changes in regulatory requirements, the actual total capital expenditure may deviate significantly
from such estimates. We expect to finance construction of these projects using cash from our operations and private placements,
bank borrowings, financial leases as well as other third-party financing options.
Solar
Projects in Announced Pipeline*
As of June 29, 2020, we were in the process
of obtaining relevant regulatory approvals for the following self-developed and acquired solar projects:
|
·
|
a 10.24 MW project in the state of Hawaii, U.S.;
|
_______________________
|
*
|
Our project portfolio excludes projects for which we provide EPC services but in which we do not
own any equity interest or do not expect to acquire and excludes projects we have disposed of.
|
We sold all of our
solar projects in China in connection with the sale of our Chinese business in December 2018.
Featured Markets
|
·
|
U.S. We have been present in the U.S. market since the commencement of our business. As of June 29, 2020, we have
19.636MW of projects under construction and 10.24 MW of projects in announced pipeline.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
U.K. We entered the U.K. market in 2014. As of June 29, 2020, we owned 2 solar projects in operation with a total
capacity of 8.1MW. In the U.K., all of the projects in our portfolio are eligible for FIT.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Greece. We entered the Greek market in 2014. As of June 29, 2020, we own twelve (12) operating solar projects with
a total capacity of 33.8 MW, all of which belong to seven (7) different Greek societe anonymes. Four (4) societe anonymes, owned
by Sinsin which was deconsolidated in 2017, collectively own eight (8) of the twelve (12) operating solar projects. In Greece,
all of the projects in our portfolio are eligible for FIT. In March 2019 and November 2019, we acquired solar projects of 1.988
MW and 4.4 MW, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Japan. We entered the Japanese market in 2014. As of June 29, 2020, we have 0.2744 MW of solar project in operation.
In Japan, all of our projects are eligible to receive FIT.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Italy. We entered the Italian market in 2015. As of June 29, 2020, we have 0.993 MW of solar projects in operation.
In Italy, all of our projects are eligible to receive FIT.
|
The following table
sets forth a breakdown of our net sales by geographic location of customers for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands except percentage)
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
6,903
|
|
|
|
5.7%
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
0.7%
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
112,174
|
|
|
|
92.3%
|
|
|
|
91,381
|
|
|
|
72.8%
|
|
|
|
80,518
|
|
|
|
82.3%
|
|
United States
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
18,721
|
|
|
|
14.9%
|
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
4.4%
|
|
Greece
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
0.3%
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
1.2%
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
0.4%
|
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
|
|
9.9%
|
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
|
|
9.8%
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
121,520
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
125,582
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
97,883
|
|
|
|
100%
|
|
Acquisition of Solar Projects
We made
significant acquisitions of solar projects since 2017. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects—Operating Results—Recent Acquisition Activities” on the projects we have acquired or expect
to acquire. We may keep acquiring completed solar projects or other assets from independent third-parties which we believe
will synergize with our existing operations and expansion strategies. Those acquisitions would be preapproved by our
board.
Our board of directors
has formulated a uniform standard for assessing target assets with respect to the acquisition of solar projects, and such standard
may be adjusted based on our Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations from time to time. Our board
of directors considers the following criteria when assessing potential acquisitions, among others:
|
·
|
the internal rate of return of the project prior to leverage, taking into consideration applicable FIT or PPA rate, and other
applicable government incentives;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
our ratio of debt-service coverage;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the solar irradiation hours of the project, after discounting for performance;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the use of financeable and reliable brands for and technical specifications of the key components, including modules, invertors,
mounting systems, racks/tracking systems, and EPC integration services;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
any performance guarantees required, as well as any compensation for failing to perform;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
clear and trustworthy opinions from third-party professionals after detailed technical, financial, tax and legal due diligence;
and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reasonable payment terms matching relevant milestones.
|
Market Due Diligence
We aim to select solar
projects located at sites with long solar irradiation hours, high energy demand, good supporting infrastructure, favorable tariff
regimes, local government support and appropriate topography for construction. We systematically analyze land cost, solar irradiation,
grid connection capacity, land and property status, government support, availability of project financing and any other project
information that would impact the overall economic return of the project. We target projects that we believe to have appropriate
balance of financial returns, costs and risks.
Permit Development Process
The permit development
process is the process of obtaining all required permits, certifications and approvals from relevant government authorities for
solar project development. As of December 31, 2019, most of our solar projects in operation had been undertaken by us as a secondary
developer.
We acquire solar projects
under development by third parties which have secured land use rights, development permits, or even begun construction. We typically
learn about potential projects suitable for secondary development from our business partners, national or local governments, industry
publications, overseas engineering exhibitions or overseas business liaison organizations. Our criteria for sourcing solar projects
include land cost, solar irradiation, availability of FIT benefits or other government incentives, grid connection capacity, local
financing opportunities and other project information. The selection process involves detailed due diligence into those third parties’
relevant company documentation, financial projections and the legal status of permits already secured by the project.
After an acquisition,
we continue to develop the project through grid connection as our own. We pursue secondary permit development in markets with relatively
liquid markets for energy permits transfer, thus allowing a smooth transfer of pre-operational solar assets from third-party developers
to us. Under certain circumstances, we negotiate site acquisition, preliminary permits, grid connection agreements and PPAs for
projects under our secondary development model depending on the development stage when we acquire them.
Permit Development Steps
The following sets
forth each step of our permit development:
|
·
|
Evaluating project sites and location—The critical factors for evaluating the site of a solar project include
its solar irradiation, its proximity to a grid connection point, zoning regulations and its general geographic and topographic
features. If a project site is suitable for development or acquisition, our regional development team submits a site assessment
report on the land and other related information to our management for evaluation and approval.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Due diligence—Our in-house technical and EPC team, along with third-party experts we contract as needed, examine
project items such as engineering and design specifications, technical risks and solar irradiation and environmental analyses.
We pay special attentions to potential delays and cost overruns, grid capacity and additional costs which may not be captured
in the technical design. We also ensure that a project has clean legal titles to the permits and other permissions it has secured.
In all cases, we ensure that local regulations allow us to properly carry out our business intentions for a project, whether by
allowing us to hold the project under our IPP model or transfer it under our BT model.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Market considerations—We target projects which have appropriate balance of financial returns, costs and risks.
Important factors include, the costs of maintenance, local taxes and fees, and the availability of applicable FIT, local credit
or other refinancing options. Our financial teams conduct financial forecasts based on information about the financial prospects
of the solar project and the local energy market to make a profitability estimate and adjust our capital plan accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
Permitting—Permit and licensing requirements vary depending on the jurisdiction of the solar project, but
the key permits, licenses and agreements typically required for solar projects include land acquisition or lease contracts, environmental
impact assessments, building or rezoning permits, planning consents, grid connection contracts and PPAs. We work closely with
relevant government and private stakeholders to secure all necessary permits to develop a project, including local or regional
planning authorities, electric utilities, local communities, environmental agencies, as well as health and safety agencies.
|
Project Financing
A solar project sponsor
typically sets up a project company as a special purpose vehicle to own a particular solar project and arrange for project financing.
We typically enter into contracts and other agreements under the name of the project company, which facilitates project financing
by isolating the project and its assets, and any potential securitization requirements, from our broader global business.
The construction cost
of a project is mainly funded by our working capital, and to a lesser extent, funded through bank borrowings in the year ended
December 31, 2019. We seek to negotiate favorable credit terms with our equipment suppliers and EPC contractors when possible,
such that payment is not due until several months after construction and grid connection are complete. While the exact mix of external
and internal financing varies from project to project, we estimate that as of December 31, 2019, approximately 50% to 60% of the
total costs of our solar projects under construction were funded by our working capital, with the remainder funded through bank
borrowings. Our working capital dedicated towards a particular project would be generally available to us for other purposes if
needed, and would not be considered restricted cash isolated at that project. We also have given guarantees to the lenders on certain
project financings. However, none of our cash and cash equivalents have been collateralized to guarantee such project financings.
We generally seek to
arrange debt financing for our solar projects from local banks and financial leasing companies in countries that are more open
and receptive to renewable energy investments.
Engineering, Procurement and
Construction
Given the multi-jurisdiction
coverage of our project portfolio, we choose to utilize our EPC capabilities or contract third party EPC contractors to service
our own projects, based on our cost analysis taking into consideration of locations, topographical conditions as well as the quality
and competition of local EPC service providers. For detailed information on our EPC capabilities, see “—Our Engineering,
Procurement and Construction Service Business.”
Operation and Maintenance Business
We operate and maintain
solar projects connected to the grid, especially those we have provided EPC services to. We may choose to contract third party
O&M contractors to service our own projects, based on our cost analysis taking into consideration of locations, topographical
conditions as well as the quality and competition of local EPC service providers. We regularly maintain solar projects for our
customers to ensure that these projects operate in good condition and comply with the recommendations issued by the grid company
in order to remain connected.
By operating the projects
effectively and efficiently, we reduce down time and increase electricity output. A project’s major lifecycle costs mainly
consist of maintenance fee and depreciation of modules, inverters and transformers. We monitor electricity production and any incidents
or abnormalities which may impede normal operation. We adjust production levels based on the available capacity of the grid.
Our Australia Distribution Business
Solar Juice Pty Limited
or Solar Juice Australia is a wholesale distributor of Solar PV panels, solar inverters, components and complete solar systems,
which was established in Australia in September 2009. It is one of the largest importers of solar related products in Australia
with over 5000 B2B customers in every state and territory of Australia, New Zealand and Southeast Asia. As of the date of this
annual report, Solar Juice Australia has nine warehouses located around Australia.
Solar Juice Australia,
as a wholesale supplier, has developed key partners which have supported the growth of its brands throughout Australia, New Zealand
and SEA Countries. Solar Juice Australia aligns itself with the most popular brands SMA, Fronius, ABB, Solax, LG Electronics, LG
Chem, Trina,JA and Chint, which have the same values as Solar Juice Australia, namely service and support, quality and value for
money. Solar Juice Australia’s products are backed by warranties held in Australia, experience and knowledge which set it
apart from the competition, and commitment to serving the customer’ needs. Solar Juice Australia’s own branded products
Opal Panels, Opal Switch and Opal storage provided customers with more value for money choices.
After years’
continuous rapid growth, Solar Juice Australia faced a few external and internal challenges including PV market price fluctuation,
limited working capital and suppliers’ credit in 2018. Solar Juice Australia’s management actively undertook an operational
restructure to meet market changes, adjusted inventory level to fit working capital, cut operation costs and general expenses to
keep profit margin. Solar Juice Australia’s inventory and trade payable balances were reduced by 14% and 38% respectively,
borrowings decreased 17% after a replacement of previous trade finance with new debt finance from December 31, 2018 to December
31, 2019. As a result, Solar Juice Australia successfully improved its operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness, achieved
$0.55 million net profit target, with a stronger financial position by the end of 2019.
Solar Juice Australia
will benefit from these improvements in long term and keep its leadership in premium PV market in Australia. In the meantime, Solar
Juice Australia’s traditional strengths such as outstanding customer services, technical supports and warranty services will
keep differentiating it from the competitors.
In May 2020, Solar
Juice Co. Ltd (“Solar Juice Co”),a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, in its capacity as shareholder of Solar
Juice Australia (an Australian company) together with Mr. Kun Fong Lee and Mr. Jinhan Zhou (who hold shares in Solar Juice Australia
as trustee for Solar Juice Co) ("SPI Shareholders") commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia as plaintiffs
against its other shareholders and some of its other directors and purported directors and against Solar Juice Australia ("Defendants")
in relation to a purported new rights issue undertaken by Solar Juice Australia, the purported removal by those other shareholders
of Mr. Lee and Mr. Zhou as directors of Solar Juice Australia and the purported appointment of an additional director. The SPI
Shareholders allege that the purported new rights issue and the subsequent purported removal and appointment of directors are
invalid and ineffective and therefore should be set aside. If effective, the purported rights issue will result in the SPI Shareholders'
shareholding in Solar Juice Australia being reduced from 80% to 40%. If our lawsuit is not successful, we will not control
Solar Juice Australia or be able to consolidate its financial results in our financial statements and our financial results and
stock price will be materially adversely affected. Solar Juice currently accounts for 82.3% of our revenues and 15.7%
of our total assets.
Competition
Solar Power Market
The solar power market
is intensely competitive and rapidly evolving, and we compete with major international and domestic companies over the development
of solar projects. Our major competitors include leading global players such as SunPower Corporation, First Solar, Inc., Canadian
Solar, Inc., SunEdison, Inc., SolarCity Corporation, Lightsource Renewable Energy Limited, and regional players such as West Holdings
Corporation, Looop Inc., and other regional and international developers.
We believe that we
can compete favorably with our competitors given that the key competitive factors for solar project development and operation include,
without limitation:
|
·
|
industry reputation and development track record;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
site selection and acquisition;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
permit and project development experience and expertise;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
relationship with government authorities and knowledge of local policies;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
ability to secure high-quality PV modules and balance-of-system components at favorable prices and terms;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
ready access to project financing;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
control over the quality, efficiency and reliability of project development;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
expertise in permit and project development; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
expertise in providing EPC and O&M services.
|
However, we cannot
guarantee that some of our competitors do not or will not have advantages over us in terms of greater operational, financial, technical,
management or other resources in particular markets or in general. In terms of the broader energy sector, the entire solar industry
faces competition from other power generation sources, including conventional sources as well as other emerging technologies. Solar
power has certain advantages and disadvantages when compared to other power generating technologies. The advantages include the
ability to deploy products in many sizes and configurations, install products almost anywhere in the world, provide reliable power
for many applications and reduce air, water and noise pollution. Yet other energy sources have advantages which may result in electric
utilities, grid companies or other off-takers to enter PPAs or other electricity purchase arrangements with companies specializing
in those energy sources rather than us or other companies specializing in solar power.
Cryptocurrency Hosting Services
Cryptocurrencies and
cryptocurrency mining are new industries, the competitive landscapes are still developing. Although the barriers to entry in this
market are low, most of the large cryptocurrency mining farms such as HIVE Blockchain, Hut8Mining, NVIDIA, Bitfury Mines, Bcause
LLC and Bitmain, cater to large investors.
However, cryptocurrency
mining still requires large amounts of energy to sustain. Our competitive advantage as a green energy producing company in this
industry would be being able to offset the high electrical bills required in the mining process by providing energy from our own
energy grids and solar farms.
Hemp and CBD Business
Hemp and CBD are also relatively new industries
that sprung up due to the legalization of recreational marijuana in many states across the United States. Being one of the first
energy companies to venture into this industry, our competitive advantage in this area is being able to supplement energy needs
of CBD and Hemp production from our own energy grids or solar farms. This will offset a significant portion of the costs required
for production that can potentially help us to price more competitively against other companies in the industry. However, the CBD
and Hemp industry is still in its early stages of development. The demand of these products have not solidified and the growth
of the industry is not as strong as its recreational marijuana counterpart.
Business of Alfalfa and Other Related
Agriculture Products
Our in-depth research into this market
has shown that there is a growing demand for Alfalfa grass, especially in Eastern countries like China. Alfalfa grass is commonly
used as stock feed for farmed animals like cows. Our history of operations in China has helped us to gain partners and grow a solid
customer base over the years. Our knowledge of the Chinese market will also prove to be valuable in this venture.
Suppliers
There are numerous
suppliers of PV modules in the solar power industry, and we have adopted a supplier-neutral approach. For both our EPC service
business and global project development business, we select the suppliers based on whether we could obtain high-quality PV modules
and balance-of-system components at favorable prices and payment terms. For both our EPC service and global project development
business, we procure our PV modules from a broad range of suppliers including Trina Solar Limited, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.,
Xiexin Integration Technology Co., Ltd., JA Solar Holding Co., Ltd., LG Electronics, and Chint, among others.
Our major suppliers of our alfalfa business
and CBD and hemp is the local growers near our hay processing facilities in the state of Arizona and also CBD & hemp processing
facility in the state of California.
Customers and Marketing
We have historically
provided EPC and O&M services, a line of business we are still engaged in. We are also selling electricity to the grid under
our IPP model as well as selling solar projects under our BT model. Customers of our EPC services include independent power developers
and producers as well as commercial and industrial companies. For our global project development business, we sell electricity
to power companies and other electricity off-takers, including government-owned utility companies, operating in the United States,
Greece and Italy under our IPP model. Purchasers of our BT projects included utility companies, independent power developers and
producers, commercial and industrial companies as well as investors in the solar business. Further, customers of our Australia
distribution business include residential ones, towards which we distribute PV modules, balance of system components, solar monitoring
systems and inverters.
From the year 2018
to 2019, there is a slightly decrease in the proportion of revenue from sales of PV solar systems, the figures for sales of PV
solar components also saw a slight downwards trend.
We promote our reputation
by participating in industry conferences worldwide and aggressively sourcing development opportunities in markets with strong growth
potential. Members of our senior and local management team routinely meet with industry players and interested investors. Our business
development teams around the world have significant experience building business in local markets and actively pursue growth opportunities
around the world. We intend to continue to increase our marketing efforts going forward.
We historically
engaged in high-profile marketing activities focused on developing our brand awareness not just among the solar business
developers who have traditionally been our customers, but also among the general public. Since we have been in solar business
for 14 years, we have built our brand awareness and lately we have not engaged in marketing activities.
Seasonality
Demand for solar power
products tends to be weaker during the winter months partly due to adverse weather conditions in certain regions, which complicate
the installation of solar power systems. Our operating results may fluctuate from period to period based on the seasonality of
industry demand for solar power products. Certain aspects of our operations are also subject to seasonal variations. For example,
we may schedule significant construction activities to connect solar projects to the grids prior to a scheduled decrease in FIT
rates in order to qualify for more favorable FIT policies.
Likewise to hemp and
CBD business, demand and our operating results for hemp and CBD products fluctuate from period to period based on the seasonality
of industry demand for solar power products.
Insurance
We maintain the types
and amounts of insurance coverage that we believe are consistent with customary industry practices in all the countries where we
operate. Our insurance policies cover employee-related accidents and injuries, property damage, machinery breakdowns, fixed assets,
facilities and liability deriving from our activities, including environmental liability. We maintain business interruption insurance
for interruptions resulting from incidents covered by insurance policies. We have not had any material claims under our insurance
policies that would either invalidate our insurance policies or cause a material increase to our insurance premiums. We cannot
assure you, however, that our insurance coverage will adequately protect us from all risks that may arise or in amounts sufficient
to prevent any material loss.
Regulations
We operate in multiple
jurisdictions, including the U.S., Japan, the U.K, Greece, Italy and Australia. We are therefore subject to complex laws, regulations
and policies promulgated by the governments and government-run utilities of these jurisdictions, including FIT regulations, clean
energy incentive rules and programs, laws and regulations that apply to all power producers, regulations that specifically apply
to solar power project operators, EPC service providers as well as solar kit distributors, tax regulations and intellectual property
laws, among others. Likewise, our hemp and CBD businesses are subject to various laws, regulations and guidelines by governmental
authorities relating to, among other things, the manufacture, marketing, management, transportation, storage, sale, pricing and
disposal of cannabis, U.S. hemp and cannabis-based products, and also including laws, regulations and guidelines relating to health
and safety, insurance coverage, the conduct of operations and the protection of the environment.
C.
|
Organizational Structure
|
The following table
sets out our principal subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019:
Subsidiaries
|
Place of Incorporation
|
Percentage of ownership
|
Solar Juice (HK) Limited
|
Hong Kong
|
100%
|
SPI Group Holding Co., Ltd.
|
Hong Kong
|
100%
|
SP Orange Power (HK) Limited
|
Hong Kong
|
100%
|
SPI Investment Holding Limited
|
British Virgin Islands
|
100%
|
SolarJuice Co., Ltd.
|
Cayman
|
100%
|
SPI Orange Co., Ltd.
|
Cayman
|
100%
|
Knight AG Holding Co., Ltd.
|
Cayman
|
100%
|
Knight Holding Corporation
|
U.S.
|
100%
|
Knight AG Sourcing Inc.
|
U.S.
|
100%
|
CBD and Hemp Group Co.,Ltd.
|
U.S.
|
100%
|
1215542 B.C. LTD.
|
Canada
|
100%
|
SPI Solar, Inc.
|
U.S.
|
100%
|
SPI Orange Power (HK) Limited
|
Hong Kong
|
100%
|
SPI Renewable Energy (Luxembourg) Private Limited Company S.a.r.l.(1)
|
Luxembourg
|
100%
|
Italsolar S.r.l.
|
Italy
|
100%
|
Heliostixio S.A.
|
Greece
|
100%
|
Helioxrisi S.A.
|
Greece
|
100%
|
THERMI SUN S.A.
|
Greece
|
100%
|
Solar Juice (MY) SdnBhd
|
Malaysia
|
100%
|
Solar Juice (SG) Pte Ltd
|
Singapore
|
100%
|
Solar Juice Holding Pte Ltd.
|
Singapore
|
100%
|
Calwaii Power Holding, LLC
|
U.S.
|
100%
|
Solar Juice USA Inc.
|
U.S.
|
100%
|
Solar Juice Pty Limited
|
Australia
|
80%
|
SPI Solar Japan G.K.(2)
|
Japan
|
97%
|
Solar Power Inc. UK Services Limited
|
U.K.
|
100%
|
Emotion Energy Solar One Limited
|
U.K.
|
100%
|
Cairnhill Solar field Limited
|
U.K.
|
100%
|
SP Orange Power (Cyprus) Limited
|
Cyprus
|
100%
|
Manchester Solar, LLC
|
US
|
100%
|
Belvedere Solar LLC
|
US
|
100%
|
Dover Solar LLC
|
US
|
100%
|
Waterford Solar LLC
|
US
|
100%
|
Clayfield Solar LLC
|
US
|
100%
|
_____________________
Notes:
|
(1)
|
SPI Renewable Energy (Luxembourg) Private Limited Company S.a.r.l. holds two solar power project
entities in Italy and one entity in Germany.
|
|
(2)
|
SPI Solar Japan G.K. holds one solar power project entities in Japan.
|
D.
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
|
Our global corporate
headquarters are located in Hong Kong SAR, China, which is under a one-year lease that expires on May 3, 2021. We occupy approximately
3,332 square feet of office space in Santa Clara, California, for legal and business development, under a lease that expires in
June 30, 2021. We occupy approximately 10.5 acre industrial property in Orange Cove, California, under a lease that expires in
December 31 2049, and be granted an option to purchase the property. We owned approximately 120 acre land in Arizona, US. We occupy
approximately 114 square meters of office space in Athens, the headquarters of the four Greek SPVs, under a monthly lease that
expires on June 30, 2020. We occupy approximately 80 square feet of office space in London for operations and business development
under a lease which renews every six months. We lease approximately 2,155 square meters of office space and warehouse space in
Wetherill Park, Sydney, which expires on July 31, 2021.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 5. OPERATING
AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
You should read the
following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes appearing elsewhere in this
annual report on Form 20-F. This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based on current expectations that involve
risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as
a result of various factors, including those set forth under “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors” or in
other parts of this annual report on Form 20-F.
We are a global provider of photovoltaic (PV) solutions for business,
residential, government and utility customers and investors. We develop solar PV projects which are either sold to third party
operators or owned and operated by us for selling of electricity to the grid in multiple countries in Asia, North America and
Europe. In Australia, we primarily sell solar PV components to retail customers and solar project developers. Since 2018, we have
engaged in the sale of bitcoin mining equipment, providing hosting services to mine bitcoins. In 2019, we began selling hay from
the United States to China.
Our liquidity
position has deteriorated since 2015. We suffered losses of $91.0 million, $12.3 million and $15.1 million for the
years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. We also had an accumulated deficit of $585.4 million and a
working capital deficit of $113.5 million as of December 31, 2019. For a detailed discussion, please see “Item
5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Capital Resources and Material
Known Facts on Liquidity.”
These may raise
substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We have developed a liquidity plan, including cost saving
measures and improvements in working capital management. We believe this liquidity plan, if executed successfully, will
provide sufficient liquidity to meet our obligations for a reasonable period of time. However, we cannot assure you that this
liquidity plan will be successfully executed.
Principal Factors
Affecting Our Results of Operations
We believe that the
following factors have had, and we expect that they will continue to have, a significant effect on the development of our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
COVID-19
The pandemic of a novel
coronavirus (COVID-19) has resulted in a widespread health crisis that has adversely affected the economies and financial markets
worldwide. Government efforts to contain the spread of the coronavirus through lockdowns of cities, business closures, restrictions
on travel and emergency quarantines, among others, and responses by businesses and individuals to reduce the risk of exposure to
infection, including reduced travel, cancellation of meetings and events, and implementation of work-at-home policies, among others,
have caused significant disruptions to the global economy and normal business operations across a growing list of sectors and countries.
Our operating results
substantially depend on revenues derived from sales of PV project assets, provision of electricity and our Australian subsidiary’s
trading of PV components. As the COVID-19 spread continues, the measures implemented to curb the spread of the virus have resulted
in supply chain disruptions, insufficient work force and suspended manufacturing and construction works for solar industry. One
or more of our customers, partners, service providers or suppliers may experience financial distress, delayed or defaults on payment,
file for bankruptcy protection, sharp diminishing of business, or suffer disruptions in their business due to the outbreak. These
preventative measures have also impacted our daily operations. The efforts enacted to control COVID-19 have placed heavy pressure
on our marketing and sales activities. Moreover, due to the decrease in prices of crude oil, the demand for solar energy can decrease
in the near future. We continue to assess the related risks and impacts COVID-19 pandemic may have on our business and our financial
performance. In light of the rapidly changing situation across different countries and regions, it remains difficult to estimate
the duration and magnitude of COVID-19 impact. Until such time as the COVID-19 pandemic is contained or eradicated and global business
return to more customary levels, our business and financial results may be materially adversely affected.
Market Demand
Our revenue and profitability
depend substantially on the demand for our PV solutions, which is driven by the economics of PV systems, including the availability
and size of government subsidies and other incentives, government support, cost improvements in solar power, as well as environmental
concerns and energy demand. The world PV market in terms of new annual installations is expected to grow significantly in the next
five years, providing EPC service providers and solar project developers like us with significant opportunities to grow our business.
Many markets in the
PV industry continue to be affected by government subsidies and economic incentives. A number of countries have introduced highly
favorable FIT price support regimes. For example, Japan, which has a high demand for power and low domestic fossil fuel reserves,
faces relatively high energy costs. As a result, the Japanese government has introduced an attractive FIT price support regime
to encourage the development of solar parks. In 2016, the United Kingdom reduced its FIT for all technologies by 65% at the national
level. In Asia, several countries reduced their FIT rates. For example, Japan reduced its solar FIT by 12.5% for 2017 and aims
for cuts of 10% or more in the next two years. While governments generally ratchet down PV subsidies over time to reflect anticipated
declines in the system costs of solar parks, the ratchet down schedules often underestimate our actual realized decrease in costs
thus their effect on our margins is manageable. To foster our growth, we have shifted our focus away from countries with less favorable
subsidy regimes and towards countries with more favorable subsidy regimes.
In the long term, as
PV technology advances and the average system costs of solar projects decrease, we expect the market for electricity in a growing
number of countries to achieve grid parity. As the PV industry becomes more competitive against other energy industries and widespread
grid parity strengthens demand for solar projects, we expect our costs of sales to decrease and our revenue and profitability to
increase.
Government Subsidies and Incentive
Policies
We believe that the
growth of the solar power industry in the short term will continue to depend largely on the availability and effectiveness of government
incentives for solar power products and the competitiveness of solar power in relation to conventional and other renewable energy
resources in terms of cost. Countries in Europe, notably Italy, Germany, France, Belgium and Spain, certain countries in Asia,
including Japan, India and South Korea, as well as Australia and the United States have adopted favorable renewable energy
policies. Examples of government sponsored financial incentives to promote solar power include capital cost rebates, FIT, tax credits,
net metering and other incentives to end users, distributors, project developers, system integrators and manufacturers of solar
power products.
Governments may reduce
or eliminate existing incentive programs for political, financial or other reasons, which will be difficult for us to predict.
Reductions in FIT programs may result in a significant fall in the price of and demand for solar power related products. Our revenue
and operating results may be adversely impacted by unfavorable policy revisions, such as reductions FIT in the United States, our
largest market, and certain major markets for our PV solutions. Electric utility companies or generators of electricity from fossil
fuels or other renewable energy sources could also lobby for a change in the relevant legislation in their markets to protect their
revenue streams. Government economic incentives could be reduced or eliminated altogether.
Our Solar Power Generation
and Operations Capabilities
Our financial condition
and results of operations depend on our ability to successfully continue to develop new solar projects and operate our existing
solar projects. We expect to build and manage a greater number of solar projects, which we expect to present additional challenges
to our internal processes, external construction management, working capital management and financing capabilities. Our financial
condition, results of operations and future success depend, to a significant extent, on our ability to continue to identify suitable
sites, expand our pipeline of projects with attractive returns, obtain required regulatory approvals, arrange necessary financing,
manage the construction of our solar projects on time and within budget, and successfully operate solar projects.
Selected Statement of Operations Items
Revenue
Our revenue for the
years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 was mainly derived from sales of PV project assets, sales of pre-development solar
project, and sales of PV components.
The following table
sets forth a breakdown of our revenue from continuing operation by category of activities for the periods indicated:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands except percentage)
|
|
Sales of PV components
|
|
|
111,795
|
|
|
|
92.0
|
%
|
|
|
93,547
|
|
|
|
74.5
|
%
|
|
|
80,941
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
%
|
Sales of PV project assets
|
|
|
6,042
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
10,809
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
%
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Electricity revenue with PPAs
|
|
|
2,793
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
Sales of pre-development solar project
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
15,794
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
(2,835
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)%
|
Bitcoin mining related business
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
4,197
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
Sales of hays and others
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
121,520
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
125,582
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
97,883
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of Goods Sold
Our cost of goods sold
consist primarily of raw materials and labor cost. In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, we had cost of goods
sold of $111.4 million, $114.5 million and $90.7 million from our continuing operation, respectively.
Operating Expenses
In the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, our operating expenses consisted of (1) general and administrative expenses, (2) sales,
marketing and customer service expenses, (3) impairment charges and (4) provision (reverse) for doubtful accounts, notes
and other receivables.
General and administrative
expenses. Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and share based compensation expense, professional
service fees, rental and office supplies expenses. In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, our general and administrative
expenses from our continuing operations were $14.0 million, $12.2 million and $15.2 million, respectively.
Sales, marketing
and customer service expenses. Our sales, marketing and customer service expenses consist primarily of advertising expense,
business development expense and salaries. In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, our sales, marketing and customer
service expenses from continuing operation were $2.9 million, $2.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
Impairment charges.
Our impairment charges consist of impairment charges for project assets, goodwill and intangible assets, property, plant and equipment
and etc. In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, our impairment charges from our continuing operations were $0.7 million,
$nil and $4.7 million, respectively.
Provision (reverse)
for doubtful accounts, notes and other receivables. In the year ended December 31, 2017, our provision for doubtful accounts
and notes from continuing operations were $1.7 million. In the year ended December 31, 2018, we reversed the provision of $0.5
million. In the year ended December 31, 2019 our provision for doubtful accounts were of $4.1 million.
Other Income (Expense)
In the years ended
December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, our other income (expense) includes interest expense, interest income, gain on extinguishment
of convertible bonds, change in fair value of derivative liability, loss on investment in affiliates, reversal (accrual) of tax
penalty, gain on trouble debt restructuring, net foreign exchange gain and others.
Interest expense.
Our interest expense arises from borrowings. In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, our interest expense from continuing
operations was $8.1 million, $6.7 million and $3.9 million, respectively.
Interest income.
Our interest income arises from cash deposited in banks. In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, our interest income
from continuing operations was $0.4 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
Gain on extinguishment
of convertible bonds. We recorded a gain on extinguishment of convertible bonds of $7.1 million from continuing operations
in the year ended December 31, 2017, due to the extension of a convertible bond agreement that we entered into with Union Sky Holdings
Group Limited (“Union Sky”).
Tax penalty.
We recorded a $9.7 million expected tax penalty in the year ended December 31, 2017 for late filing of Federal and State income
tax returns from continuing operations for the tax year ended December 31, 2016. On May 27, 2019 and February 20, 2020, the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) issued notices which assessed penalties for Federal income tax for the tax years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016 in the amount of $1. 2 million and $1.3 million plus an immaterial amount of interest, respectively. The state portion
of tax penalty is re-estimated in the amount of $0.3 million. Thus, we reversed $6.9 million of tax penalty for the year ended
December 31, 2019.
Gain on trouble
debt restructuring. We recorded a gain of $1.9 million on trouble debt restructuring from continuing operations for the year
ended December 31, 2018. We defaulted the first amendment agreement with Union Sky Holding Group Limited (“Union Sky”).
On June 29, 2018, we entered into another amendment agreement with the Union Sky and Magical Glaze Limited (“MGL”)
to further extend the payment term. A gain was recognized for the difference between the future undiscounted cash flow of the second
amended convertible bond of $20.0 million and the carrying amount of the first amended convertible bond of $21.9 million as of
June 29, 2018.
Loss on investment
in affiliates. We recorded a loss on investment in affiliates of $2.2 million which mainly arose from further impairment on
our investment in ENS in the year ended December 31, 2017.
Income Tax
The following table
sets forth our loss before income taxes for continuing operations attributable to the relevant geographic locations for the periods
indicated:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(24,757
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,926
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,620
|
)
|
|
|
(1,141
|
)
|
|
|
(10,130
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(26,377
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,805
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,056
|
)
|
Cayman Islands
We are incorporated
in the Cayman Islands. Under the current laws of the Cayman Islands, we are not subject to income or capital gains tax in the Cayman
Islands. Payments of dividends and capital in respect of our Shares will not be subject to taxation in the Cayman Islands and no
withholding will be required on the payment of a dividend or capital to any holder of our Shares, nor will gains derived from the
disposal of our Shares be subject to Cayman Islands income or corporation tax. The Cayman Islands currently have no income, corporation
or capital gains tax and no estate duty, inheritance tax or gift tax.
United States
We and our subsidiaries
organized in the United States are subject to U.S. federal income tax at a rate of up to 35% for the year ended December 31, 2017.
On December 22, 2017,
the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA” or the “Act”) (which is commonly referred to as “U.S.
tax reform”). Among other provisions, the Act reduces the top U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, requires companies
to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, changes the rules
related to uses and limitations of net operating loss carryforwards created in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and
creates new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. The Company reflected the changes resulting from the Act in the financial
statements for the period of enactment, the year ended December 31, 2017. The change in corporate rate resulted in a $22.8 million
decrease in the Company’s gross deferred tax assets, with an offsetting decrease in valuation allowance of the same amount.
The Company was not subject to a one-time repatriation tax as no aggregate foreign accumulated earnings and profits existed in
the foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. The Company will account for future tax liability arising from Global
Intangible Low-Taxed Income, if any, as a period cost. The Company has accounted for additional tax liability in 2018 arising from
Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income of $0.9 million which accounted for as a period cost. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 118, the Company determined that the measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities, as noted above, was accurate and no
other adjustments relating to the Act were necessary. The Company has recognized no income on account of GILTI as no aggregate
foreign earnings existed in the foreign subsidiaries for 2019.
Hong Kong
Our subsidiaries incorporated
in Hong Kong were subject to the uniform tax rate of 8.25% for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively. They were
exempted from the Hong Kong income tax on its foreign-derived income and there were no withholding taxes in Hong Kong on the remittance
of dividends. No provision for Hong Kong tax has been made in our consolidated financial statements, as our Hong Kong subsidiary
had not generated any assessable income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019.
See “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation” for more information.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial
statements include the financial statements of our Company, our subsidiaries, and consolidated VIEs. All material inter-company
transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. For consolidated subsidiaries where our ownership in the subsidiary
is less than 100%, the equity interest not held by us is shown as noncontrolling interests. We account for investments over which
it has significant influence but not a controlling financial interest using the equity method of accounting. We deconsolidate a
subsidiary when we cease to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. When control is lost, the parent-subsidiary
relationship no longer exists and the parent derecognizes the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary.
Revenue Recognition
On January 1, 2018,
we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC
606” or “Topic 606”) and applied the modified retrospective method to all contracts that were not completed as
of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period
amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the Group’s historical accounting practices under
ASC Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”.
We have determined
that the impact of the transition to the new standard is immaterial to our revenue recognition model. Accordingly, we have not
made any adjustment to opening retained earnings.
Our accounting practices
under ASC Topic 606 are as followings:
The Company
generates revenue from sales of PV components, electricity revenue with power purchase agreements (“Electricity revenue
with PPAs”), sales of PV project assets, bitcoin mining equipment sales and hosting service, sales of pre-development solar
projects, revenue from bitcoin mining and sales of hays.
Sale of PV components.
Revenue on sale of PV components is recognized at a point in time following the transfer of control of such products to the
customer, which typically occurs upon shipment or acceptance of the customer depending on the terms of the underlying contracts.
Electricity revenue
with PPAs. We sell energy generated by PV solar power systems under PPAs. For energy sold under PPAs, we recognize revenue
each period based on the volume of energy delivered to the customer (i.e., the PPAs off-taker) and the price stated in the PPAs.
We have determined that none of the PPAs contains a lease since (i) the purchaser does not have the rights to operate the PV solar
power systems, (ii) the purchaser does not have the rights to control physical access to the PV solar power systems, and (iii)
the price that the purchaser pays is at a fixed price per unit of output.
Sale of PV project
asset. Our sales arrangements for PV projects do not contain any forms of continuing involvement that may affect the revenue
or profit recognition of the transactions, nor any variable considerations for energy performance guarantees, minimum electricity
end subscription commitments. The Company therefore determined its single performance obligation to the customer is the sale of
a completed solar project. We recognize revenue for sales of solar projects at a point in time after the solar project has been
grid connected and the customer obtains control of the solar project.
Bitcoin mining equipment sales and hosting service. Revenue on sale of bitcoin mining equipment
is recognized at a point in time following the transfer of control of such products to the customer, which typically occurs upon
delivery of the products to the hosting site or receipt place assigned by the customer, installation and setting up the products.
Revenue for hosting service is recognized over time as services are performed and based on the output method related to the time
incurred during the service period.
Sales of pre-development
solar projects. For sales of pre-development solar projects in which we transfer 100% of the membership interest in solar projects
to a customer, we recognize all of the revenue for the consideration received at a point in time when the membership interest was
transferred to the customer, which typically occurs when we delivered the membership interest assignment agreement to the customer.
The contract arrangements
may contain provisions that can either increase or decrease the transaction price. These variable amounts generally are resolved
upon achievement of certain performance or upon occurrence of certain price reduction conditions. Variable consideration is estimated
at each measurement date at its most likely amount to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative
revenue recognized will not occur and true-ups are applied prospectively as such estimates change.
Changes in estimates
for sales of pre-development solar projects occur for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to (i) EPC construction plan
accelerations or delays, (ii) product cost forecast changes, (iii) change orders, or (iv) occurrence of purchase price reduction
conditions. The cumulative effect of revisions to transaction prices are recorded in the period in which the revisions to estimates
are identified and the amounts can be reasonably estimated.
Revenue from
bitcoin mining. We entered into a digital asset mining pool to provide computing power to the mining pool.
Providing computing power in crypto asset transaction verification services is an output of our ordinary activities. The
provision of computing power is the only performance obligation in the contracts with mining pool. The transaction
consideration we receive, if any, is noncash consideration, which we measure at fair value on the date received, which is not
materially different than the fair value at contract inception. The consideration is all variable. Because it is not probable
that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue will not occur, the consideration is constrained until we receive the
consideration, at which time revenue is recognized. There is no significant financing component in these transactions.
Fair value of the digital
asset award received is determined using the average U.S. dollar spot rate of the related digital currency at the time of receipt.
Sale of Alfalfa
hay. Revenue on sale of alfalfa hay is recognized at a point in time following the transfer of control of such products
to the customer, which typically occurs upon the acceptance of the products made by the customer.
Product Warranties
We offer the industry
standard warranty up to 25 years for PV modules and industry standard warranty for five to ten years on inverter and balance of
system components. Due to the warranty period, we bear the risk of extensive warranty claims long after products have been shipped
and revenues have been recognized. We provide a limited warranty to the original purchasers of its solar modules, inverters and
cables for trading business for one to five years, in relation to defects in materials and workmanship. For our cable, wire and
mechanical assemblies business, historically the related warranty claims have not been material. For our solar PV business, the
greatest warranty exposure is in the form of product replacement.
During the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2010, we installed own manufactured solar panels and accrued
warranty based on our own historical data. Since 2011, due to the absence of historical material warranty claims and identical
warranty terms, we have not recorded any additional warranty provision relating to solar energy systems sold. PV construction contracts
entered into during the recent years included provisions under which we agreed to provide warranties to the customers. The warranty
we offer to its customers is identical to the warranty offered to us by its suppliers, therefore, we pass on all potential warranty
exposure and claims, if any, with respect systems sold by us to our suppliers.
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
Our long-lived assets
include property, plant and equipment, project assets and other intangible assets with finite lives. We evaluate long-lived assets
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment, we first compare undiscounted cash
flows expected to be generated by that asset or asset group to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset
or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying
amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models,
quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. Any impairment write-downs would be treated
as permanent reductions in the carrying amounts of the assets and a charge to operations would be recognized.
Inventories
Inventories are carried
at the lower of cost or net realizable value, determined by the weighted average cost method. Provisions are made for obsolete
or slow-moving inventories based on management estimates. Inventories are written down based on the difference between the cost
of inventories and the net realizable value based upon estimates about future demand from customers, specific customer requirements
on certain projects and other factors. Inventory provision charges establish a new cost basis for inventory that subsequently cannot
be marked up based on changes in underlying facts and circumstances.
Share-Based Compensation
Our share-based payment
transactions with employees, such as restricted shares and share options, are measured based on the grant-date fair value of the
equity instrument issued. The fair value of the award is recognized as compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, over
the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is generally the vesting period.
Accounts Receivables and Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We grant open credit
terms to credit-worthy customers. Accounts receivable are primarily related to our sales of pre-development solar project contracts
and sales of PV components. For sales of pre-development solar projects, the payment is typically due in installments over the
contract term, which are both before and after the performance by the Company. Payment for sales of PV components and electricity
revenue with PPAs are typically due in full within 30 to 90 days of shipping of the products or the start of the contract term.
We maintain allowances
for doubtful accounts. We regularly monitor and assess the risk of not collecting amounts owed by customers. This evaluation is
based upon a variety of factors, including an analysis of amounts current and past due along with relevant history and facts particular
to the customer. We do not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers. Contractually, we may charge interest
for extended payment terms and require collateral.
Project Assets
We acquire or construct
PV solar power systems (“solar system”) that are (i) held for development and sale or (ii) held for our own
use to generate income or return from the use of the solar system. Solar systems are classified as either held for development
and sale within “project assets” or as held for use within “property, plant and equipment” based on our
intended use of solar systems. We determine the intended use of the solar systems upon acquisition or commencement of project construction.
Classification of the
solar systems affects the accounting and presentation in the consolidated financial statements. Transactions related to the solar
systems held for development and sale are classified as operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows and reported
as sales and costs of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations upon the sale of the project assets and fulfillment
of the relevant recognition criteria. Incidental electricity income generated from the solar systems held for development and sale
prior to the sale of the projects is recorded in other operating income in the consolidated statement of operations. The solar
systems held for use are used by us in its operations to generate income or a return from the use of the assets. Income generated
from the solar systems held for use are included in net sales in the consolidated statement of operations. The costs to construct
solar system intended to be held for own use are capitalized and reported within property, plant and equipment on the consolidated
balance sheets and are presented as cash outflows from investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The proceeds
from disposal of solar system classified as held for own use are presented as cash inflows from investing activities within the
consolidated statements of cash flows. A net gain or loss upon the disposal of solar system classified as held for own use is reported
in other operating income or expense in the consolidated statement of operation.
Solar systems costs
consist primarily of capitalizable costs for items such as permits and licenses, acquired land or land use rights, and work-in-process.
Work-in-process includes materials and modules, construction, installation and labor, capitalized interests and other capitalizable
costs incurred to construct the PV solar power systems.
The solar systems held
for development and sale named as “project assets”, are reported as current assets on the consolidated balance sheets
when upon completion of the construction of the solar systems, we initiate a plan to actively market the project assets for immediate
sale in their present condition to potential third party buyers subject to terms that are usual and customary for sales of these
types assets and it is probable that the project assets will be sold within one year. Otherwise, the project assets held for development
and sale are reported as noncurrent assets. No depreciation expense is recognized while the project assets are under construction
or classified as held for sale.
For solar systems held
for development and sale, named as “project assets”, we consider a project commercially viable if it is anticipated
to be sold for a profit once it is either fully developed or fully constructed. We also consider a partially developed or partially
constructed project commercially viable if the anticipated selling price is higher than the carrying value of the related project
assets plus the estimated cost to completion. We consider a number of factors, including changes in environmental, ecological,
permitting, market pricing or regulatory conditions that affect the project. Such changes may cause the cost of the project to
increase or the selling price of the project to decrease. We record an impairment loss of the project asset to the extent the carrying
value exceed its estimated recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is estimated based on the anticipated sales proceeds reduced
by estimated cost to complete such sales.
Income Taxes
We account for income
taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective
tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax
rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of a deferred
tax asset will not be realized.
The Company recognizes
in the consolidated financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained
upon examination, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold, management presumes that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that has full
knowledge of all relevant information. In addition, a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is
measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement. Our tax liability associated with unrecognized
tax benefits is adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of the tax audits, case law developments
and new or emerging legislation. Such adjustments are recognized entirely in the period in which they are identified. We record
interest and penalties related to an uncertain tax position, if and when required, as part of income tax expense in the consolidated
statements of operations. No reserve for uncertainty tax position was recorded by us for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018
and 2017. We do not expect that the assessment regarding unrecognized tax positions will materially change over the next 12 months.
The Company is not currently under examination by an income tax authority, nor has been notified that an examination is contemplated.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting
Standards
In May 2014, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Topic 606, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605. The Group
adopted Topic 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were
not completed as of January 1, 2018.
In February 2016, the
FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Leases (ASC Topic 842), which amends the leases requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases. The Group adopted
ASC Topic 842 using the modified retrospective transition method effective January 1, 2019. There was no cumulative effect of initially
applying ASC Topic 842 that required an adjustment to the opening retained earnings on the adoption date nor revision of the balances
in comparative periods.
In November 2016, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): “Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU
2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and
amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This update is effective in fiscal years, including
interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will result in
the inclusion of the restricted cash balances within the overall cash balance and removal of the changes in restricted cash activity,
as a result, the Company no longer presents transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in the statement of
cash flows. Furthermore, an additional reconciliation will be required to reconcile cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
reported within the Consolidated Balance Sheets to sum to the total shown in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Group
has already disclosed the restricted cash separately on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. Beginning January 1, 2018, the Group has
adopted and included the restricted cash balances on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and reconciliation of cash, cash
equivalent, and restricted cash within its Consolidated Statements of Balance Sheet and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. This
guidance has been applied retrospectively to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, which
required the Company to recast each prior reporting period presented.
In January 2017,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-01, “Business Combination (Topic 805): Clarifying the
Definition of a Business”. The Company adopted ASU 2017-01 on January 1, 2018 and applied the new definition of a business
prospectively for acquisitions made subsequent to December 31, 2017. Upon the adoption of ASU 2017-01, a new screen test is introduced
to evaluate whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition and/or disposal of a business versus assets. In order
for a purchase to be considered an acquisition of a business, and receive business combination accounting treatment, the set of
transferred assets and activities must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute
to the ability to create outputs. If substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single
identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, then the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business.
The adoption of this standard requires future purchases to be evaluated under the new framework.
Accounting Pronouncements Issued
But Not Yet Adopted
In August 2018, the
FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)-Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for
Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 removes the amounts and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements; modifies certain disclosure requirements in Topic 820;
and require additional disclosures such as the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level
3 measurements etc. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. We do not
expect this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
On December 18, 2019,
the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income taxes (Topic 740), Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. This guidance amends ASC
Topic 740 and addresses several aspects including 1) evaluation of step-up tax basis of goodwill when there is not a business combination,
2) policy election to not allocate consolidated taxes on a separate entity basis to entities not subject to income tax, 3) accounting
for tax law changes or rates during interim periods, 4) ownership changes from equity method investment to subsidiary or vice versa,
5) elimination of exception to intraperiod allocation when there is gain in discontinued operations and a loss from continuing
operations, 6) treatment of franchise taxes that are partially based on income. The guidance is effective for calendar year-end
public entities on January 1, 2021 and other entities on January 1, 2022. We are evaluating the impact of this guidance on its
consolidated financial statements.
We do not believe other
recently issued but not yet effective accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the consolidated
financial position, statements of operations and cash flows.
Recent Acquisition Activities
When making solar project
acquisitions, we focus on attractive targets based on our assessment of the rate of return, taking into consideration a target
project’s irradiation hours, applicable FIT rate, key technical components used as well as our cost of financing for the
acquisition. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Our Global Project Development Business—Acquisition of Solar Projects” for more information on the criteria we apply when making project acquisitions.
When we pursue a target
engaged in a solar business, such as a distribution business or a rooftop EPC business, we primarily select targets with higher
gross profit margins, or in the case of a target engaged in a line of business complementary to our existing operations, with high
potentials for us to realize synergies.
The following summary
outlines the major acquisitions we completed, or for which have entered into definitive agreements since 2017:
Solar Projects
In March 2017,
our wholly owned subsidiary, SPI Solar Japan GK entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of its interest in the land and
project development rights in its two solar PV projects with total capacity of 4.4 MW in Shibayama city, Chiba. SPI Japan will
also provide engineering, procurement and construction service to complete the projects. The solar plants are located approximately
50 kilometres east of Tokyo in Chiba and each with capacity of 2.2 MW and with an estimated total capacity of 5,200,000 kWh annually.
In May 2017, we entered
into an agreement to sell all of our interest in Todderstaffe Solar Limited, one of the solar PV system in UK, to Capital Stage
AG. The Todderstaffe project has a capacity of 4.4MW.
In September 2017, we entered into a framework share purchase agreement
to acquire 100% equity interests of three Greek companies, namely THERMI SUN S.A, HELIOHRISI S.A., and HELIOSTIXIO S.A., from
THERMI TANEO Venture Capital Fund (“TTVCF”), for a total consideration of EUR €12.88 million, subject to certain
adjustments. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions. These three companies own a total of four PV plants with
7.4MWp PV installations in northern Greece. The closing of the transaction will take place in three separate stages (one for each
company under acquisition). The acquisition of HELIOSTIXIO S.A. was closed in December 2017. The Company completed the second-stage
acquisition of 100% of the equity interest of HELIOHRISI S.A., which owns 1.988 MW of photovoltaic projects in Greece on March
20, 2019. The Company has completed its last of the three acquisitions of 100% of the equity interest of THERMI SUN S.A., which
owns 4.4 Megawatts ("MW") of photovoltaic (“PV”) projects in Greece in November 2019. With 7.4MWp PV installations
added to SPI Energy’s existing PV portfolio in Greece, the Company becomes one of the significant PV owners in Greece.
By the year end of
December 31, 2018, our wholly owned subsidiary, SPI Solar Inc., sold eight solar projects in the USA (9.653 MW) to third parties.
In December 2018, SPI
Energy Co., Ltd divested our solar projects in China.
In July 2019, the Company
entered into a framework agreement to acquire up to eight solar PV projects, totaling 21MW in the State of Oregon (the “Oregon
Portfolio”). On August 26, 2019, the Company completed the closing of Manchester and Waterford solar projects with a total
of approximately 5.4MW. On September 10, 2019, the Company completed the closing on the Belvedere project with approximately 3.56MW
of clean energy for the local community. On September 24, 2019, the Company completed the closing of the Dover and Clayfield solar
projects with a total of approximately 5.45MW. On April 22, 2020, the Company completed the acquisition of the Cork project with
a total of approximately 1.89MW. The Company has now closed 6 of the 8 projects within the Oregon Portfolio.
In October, 2019, the
Company completed the closing on the sale of Sun Roof II and Sun Roof V totaling 2.83MW to Theia Investments (Italy) S.r.l (“Theia”).
Theia paid approximately EUR 4.3 million to complete the transaction.
In March, 2020, the
Company completed the closing of the sale of its Sun Roof I assets, a 479 kWp rooftop solar project in Italy. Proceeds from the
sale were approximately EUR 1.1 million before transaction fees. After the sale of Sun Roof II, Sun Roof V and Sun Roof I, the
Company currently owns only 1 PV asset with a capacity of 0.993 MW in Italy.
We have funded our
acquisitions primarily from cash generated from our financing activities and from credit facilities. Going forward we expect to
fund our future acquisitions with cash generated from our operations, as well as equity and debt financing.
Results of Operations
The following table
sets forth a summary, for the periods indicated, of our consolidated results of operations from our continuing operations and each
item expressed as a percentage of our total net revenues. Our historical results presented below are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for any future period.
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands except percentage)
|
|
Net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
121,520
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
125,582
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
97,883
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Cost of goods sold:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
111,428
|
|
|
|
91.7
|
%
|
|
|
114,525
|
|
|
|
91.2
|
%
|
|
|
90,693
|
|
|
|
92.7
|
%
|
Total cost of goods sold
|
|
|
111,428
|
|
|
|
91.7
|
%
|
|
|
114,525
|
|
|
|
91.2
|
%
|
|
|
90,693
|
|
|
|
92.7
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
10,092
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
11,057
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
7,190
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
13,994
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
12,225
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
15,158
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
Sales, marketing and customer service
|
|
|
2,944
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
Provision (reverse) for doubtful accounts, notes and other receivables
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)%
|
|
|
4,115
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Impairment charges
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
4,690
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
19,371
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
|
|
14,009
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
26,361
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(9,279
|
)
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(2,952
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(19,171
|
)
|
|
|
(19.6
|
)%
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(8,087
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(6,665
|
)
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3,923
|
)
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)%
|
Interest income
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Gain on extinguishment of convertible bonds
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Loss on investment in affiliates
|
|
|
(2,214
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–%
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
Net foreign exchange gain (loss)
|
|
|
(5,141
|
)
|
|
|
(4.2
|
)%
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,261
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
Reversal (accrual) of tax penalty
|
|
|
(9,670
|
)
|
|
|
(8.0
|
)%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–%
|
|
|
|
6,890
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
Gain on troubled debt restructuring
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
|
|
1,887
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
%
|
Others
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
|
(17,098
|
)
|
|
|
(14.1
|
)%
|
|
|
(2,853
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
4,115
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(26,377
|
)
|
|
|
(21.7
|
)%
|
|
|
(5,805
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(15,056
|
)
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
Income taxes expense
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(26,514
|
)
|
|
|
(21.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(6,137
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)%
|
|
|
(15,148
|
)
|
|
|
(15.5
|
)%
|
Comparison of the year ended December
31, 2019 to the year ended December 31, 2018
Net sales —Net
sales were $125.6 million and $97.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively, representing a decrease
of $27.7 million or 22%. The decrease in net sales for the year ended December 31, 2019 over the comparative period was primarily
due to the decrease of sales of PV solar components by $12.6 million and sales of pre-development project by $18.6 million respectively,
which was partially offset by the increase of bitcoin and hay sales.
Cost of goods sold
—Cost of goods sold was $114.5 million (91.2% of net sales) and $90.7 million (92.7% of net sales) for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively, representing a decrease of $23.8 million or 21%. The decrease in cost of goods sold was
consistent with the decrease of sales.
Gross profit
—Our gross profit decreased from $11.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 to $7.2 million in the year ended December
31, 2019. Gross margins were 8.8% and 7.3% for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The decrease in gross
margin was primarily due to the reversal of sales of pre-development projects amounting to $ 2.8 million.
General and administrative
expenses —General and administrative expenses were $12.2 million (9.8% of net sales) and $15.2 million (15.5% of net
sales) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively, representing an increase of $2.9 million, or 24%. The
increase in our general and administrative expenses was mainly due to the increase of salary and welfare and professional service
fee, which was partially offset by share-based compensation gain.
Sales, marketing
and customer service expenses —Sales, marketing and customer service expenses were $2.3 million (1.8% of net sales) and
$2.4 million (2.4% of net sales) for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively, representing an increase of
$0.1 million, or 5%. Sales, marketing and customer service expenses kept stable during the two years.
Provision (reverse)
for doubtful accounts, notes and other receivables —In 2018, we reversed doubtful accounts provision of $0.5 million.
In 2019, we accrued doubtful accounts provision of $4.1 million.
Impairment charges
—No impairment charge was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2018 and we accrued $4.7 million impairment loss for
the year ended December 31, 2019. The increase was due to decrease in the market value of mining equipment and impairment in PV
stations
Interest expense
—Interest expense was $6.7 million (5.3% of net sales) and $3.9 million (4.0% of net sales) for the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2019, respectively, representing a decrease of $2.8 million, or 41%. The decrease in interest expense was due to the decrease
of convertible bond interest.
Interest income
—Interest income was $0.3 million (0.3% of net sales) and $0.2 million (0.2% of net sales) for the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2019, respectively.
Gain on trouble
debt restructuring—We recorded a gain of $1.9 million on troubled debt restructuring for the year ended December 31,
2018. We defaulted the first amendment agreement with Union Sky in 2018. On June 29, 2018, we entered into another amendment agreement
with the Union Sky and Magical Glaze Limited (“MGL”), a company affiliated with Union Sky, to further extend the payment
term. A gain is recognized for the difference between the future undiscounted cash flow of the second amended convertible bond
of $20.0 million and the carrying amount of the first amended convertible bond of $21.9 million as of June 29, 2018.
Other gains or expenses—We
generated other gain of $1.6 million and $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2018 and 2019.
Income tax expense
—We had a provision for income taxes of $0.3 million (0.2% of net sales) and $0.1 million (0.1% of net sales) for the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2019, respectively.
Net loss —For
the foregoing reasons, we incurred a net loss of $15.1 million (15.5% of net sales) for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing
an increase of loss compared to a net loss of $6.1 million (4.9% of net sales) from our continuing operations for the year ended
December 31, 2018.
A comparison for operating
results of the year ended December 31, 2018 to the year ended December 31, 2017 has been omitted from this annual report.
For the details about the comparison, please see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – A. Operating Results – Results of Operations.” Included in the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2018 filed with the SEC on April 30, 2019.
B.
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
Liquidity
A summary of the sources
and uses of cash and cash equivalents is as follows:
|
|
For the year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(14,373
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,851
|
|
|
$
|
(2,871
|
)
|
Net cash generated by operating activities, discontinued operations
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities, continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,934
|
)
|
|
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
|
(7,894
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities, discontinued operations
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Net cash generated from (used in) financing activities, continuing operations
|
|
|
8,284
|
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
9,520
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities, discontinued operations
|
|
|
(2,488
|
)
|
|
|
(2,145
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(477
|
)
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
(351
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(9,607
|
)
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
(1,596
|
)
|
As of December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019,
we had $2.3 million, $4.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash.
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating
activities from continuing operations was $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, the decrease in cash was primarily
as a result of (i) net loss of $15.1 million, (ii) change in tax penalty of $6.9 million, and (iii) change in advance
from customers of $8.4 million, and (iv) change in inventories of $2.0 million; the decrease was partially offset by (i) change
in accounts payable of $7.8 million,(ii) Provision for prepaid and other current assets of $4.1 million, (iii) change in notes
receivable of $4.8 million, (iv) change in project assets of $3.3 million, and (v) change in accounts receivable of $3.1 million.
Net cash provided by
operating activities from continuing operations was $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, the increase in cash
was primarily as a result of (i) change in project assets of $17.8 million, and (ii) change in inventories of $2.9 million,
(iii) change in accounts payable of $3.4 million, (iv) non cash share-based compensation of $2.7 million, and (v) change in accrued
liabilities and other liabilities of $4.0 million, (vi) depreciation of $1.2 million, (vii) amortization of debt discount of convertible
bonds of $1.9 million; the increase was partially offset by (i) net loss of $12.3 million,(ii) change in accounts receivable
of $13.9 million, (iii) change in advance from customers of $5.1 million, and (iv) gain on troubled debt restructuring of $1.9
million.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing
activities from continuing operations was $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily as a result of the
acquisition of PV station in Greece of $8.3 million and acquisitions of property, plant and equipment of $4.8 million, partially
offset by proceeds from sale of cryptocurrencies of $3.6 million and proceeds from disposal of affiliated entities of $4.5 million.
Net cash used in investing
activities from continuing operations was $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily as a result of decrease
of cash due to disposition of SPI China.
Financing Activities
Net cash generated
from financing activities from continuing operations was $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, the increase in cash
was primarily the result of proceeds from issuance of common stocks of $7.7 million and proceeds from issuance of convertible bond
of $1.3 million.
Net cash used in financing
activities from continuing operations was $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, the decrease in cash primarily consisted
of (i) repayment of line of credit and loans payable of $67.8 million; the decrease was partially offset by (i) proceeds from
line of credit and loans payable of $66.2 million.
Capital Resources and Material Known
Facts on Liquidity
We have suffered
recurring losses from operations. We have incurred a net loss of $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. As of
December 31, 2019, we had an accumulated deficit of $585.4 million and working capital deficit of $113.5 million. As of
December 31, 2019, $55.9 million of convertible bonds was due within one year. These raised substantial doubt about our
ability to continue as a going concern.
We have revised the
assumptions underlying our existing operating plans and recognized the fact that additional actions were needed to reposition our
operations to minimize our cash outflows. Therefore, we undertook a number of initiatives in order to conserve or generate cash
on an incremental basis in 2018 and 2019. These initiatives included:
|
·
|
Working capital management. The Group sold several PV projects in Japan and US, and is actively
negotiating with the buyers to mobilize cash collection. In addition, the Group has intention to sell all the PV projects in Italy
and US. The sales of these projects are expected to bring in significant amount of cash to the company to improve liquidity and
capital to reinvest into new solar projects. Except for the PV projects in US to be constructed, the Group has been closely monitoring
the Group’s capital spending level until its liquidity position has improved. These initiatives are aimed at preserving cash
and generating operating cash flows to enable the Group to repay its borrowings and accounts payable.
|
|
·
|
Cost saving measures. The Group has implemented certain measures with an aim to reduce its operating
expenses in 2020. Such measures include: 1) strictly controlling and reducing business, marketing and advertising expenses in United
States and Australia; 2) lowering the remuneration of the Group’s management team.
|
However, we
cannot assure you that this liquidity plan will be successful executed. See “Item 3. Key
Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—. Historically, we have incurred
net losses, experienced net cash outflows from operating activities and recorded working capital deficit. If we do not
effectively manage our cash and other liquid financial assets and execute our liquidity plan, we may not be able to continue
as a going concern.”
Capital Expenditures
We incurred capital
expenditures of $0.3 million, $0.1 million and $1.5 million in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Capital commitments amounted
to approximately $5.1 million as of December 31, 2019. These capital commitments will be used primarily for the construction of
our solar projects. We expect to finance construction of these projects using cash from our operations and private placements,
bank borrowings as well as other third-party financing options.
Research and development, patents
and licenses, etc.
We have discontinued
our manufacturing business and liquidated our research and development function.
Trend information
Other than as disclosed
elsewhere in this annual report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for 2019 that are
reasonably likely to have a material effect on our net revenues, income, profitability, liquidity or capital resources, or that
would cause reported consolidated financial information not necessarily to be indicative of future operating results or financial
conditions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not entered
into any financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered
into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our own shares and classified as shareholder’s equity, or that are not
reflected in our consolidated financial statements. We do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to
an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest
in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging
or research and development services with us.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual
Obligations
The following table
sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:
|
|
Payment due by period
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
less than 1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
more than 5 years
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Convertible bonds
|
|
$
|
55,907
|
|
|
$
|
55,907
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,857
|
|
|
|
2,857
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
|
6,039
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
4,899
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
Capital commitment
|
|
|
5,144
|
|
|
|
5,144
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Due to an affiliate
|
|
|
2,037
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
74,819
|
|
|
$
|
64,763
|
|
|
$
|
1,724
|
|
|
$
|
1,541
|
|
|
$
|
6,791
|
|
ITEM 6.
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A.
|
Directors and Senior Management
|
The following table
sets forth the names and ages of our current board of directors (the “Board”) and our named executive officers and
the principal offices and positions held by each person. Our executive officers are appointed by the Board. Our directors serve
until the earlier to occur of the appointment of his or her successor at the next meeting of shareholders, death, resignation or
removal by the Board. There are no family relationships among our directors and our named executive officers.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Xiaofeng Peng
|
45
|
Director, Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
Maurice Ngai
|
58
|
Director
|
HoongKhoeng Cheong
|
55
|
Director and Chief Operating Officer
|
Lu Qing
|
49
|
Director
|
Jing Zhang
|
65
|
Director
|
Set forth below is
a brief biography of each director, named executive officer and significant employee that contains information regarding the individual’s
service as a director, named executive officer or significant employee including business experience for the past five years. In
addition, information for directors includes directorships held during the past five years, information concerning certain legal
or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Board to
determine that the individual should serve as a director for us.
Mr. Xiaofeng Peng
has served as a director and the executive chairman of our Board since January 10, 2011 and as our chief executive officer
since March 25, 2016. Mr. Peng was appointed chairman of the Board pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement entered into between
us and LDK on January 5, 2011. Mr. Peng founded LDK in July 2005 and is its chairman of the board and chief executive officer.
Prior to founding LDK, Mr. Peng founded Suzhou Liouxin Co., Ltd., or Suzhou Liouxin, in March 1997 and was its chief executive
officer until February 2006. Suzhou Liouxin is a leading manufacturer of personal protective equipment in Asia. Mr. Peng graduated
from Jiangxi Foreign Trade School with a diploma in international business in 1993 and from Beijing University Guanghua School
of Management with an executive MBA degree in 2002.
Dr. Maurice
Wai-fung Ngai has served as our director since May 9, 2016. Dr. Ngai is a member of the Working Group on Professional
Services under the Economic Development Commission of HKSAR, a director of Hong Kong Coalition of Professional Services, the
President of the Hong Kong Institute of Chartered Secretaries (2015), a General Committee member of The Chamber of Hong Kong
Listed Companies, a member of Qualification and Examination Board of the Hong Kong Institute of Certified Public Accountants
and the Adjunct Professor of Law of Hong Kong Shue Yan University. Dr. Ngai obtained a Doctoral Degree in Finance at Shanghai
University of Finance and Economics, a Master’s Degree in Corporate Finance from Hong Kong Polytechnic University, a
Master’s Degree in Business Administration from Andrews University of Michigan and a Bachelor’s Degree in Laws at
University of Wolverhampton. He is in a selected talent pool of State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration of the
State Council (SASAC) and is serving as an independent non-executive director of several reputable listed companies.
Mr. HoongKhoeng
Cheong has served as our director since September 2017, as and our chief operating officer since May 2014. Mr. Cheong has more
than 20 years of engineering and operation experience in the solar and electronics industries. He served in various management
positions in LDK from 2011 to 2014 and he was appointed as the chairman of the Management Board and chief executive officer of
Sunways AG, a publicly-listed company in Germany. He previously served as our general manager from 2007 to 2011 and was responsible
for PV system design and development as well as the manufacturing of key components for PV modules and racking systems before joining
LDK. Prior to joining the solar industry in 2007, Mr. Cheong spent 16 years in the electronics industry responsible for engineering
development and manufacturing of liquid crystal display products and he served as the Vice President of Engineering of an affiliate
of Flextronics International Ltd. Mr. Cheong holds a Bachelor of Science degree in mechanical engineering from the University of
Louisiana and obtained his Master of Science in computer integrated manufacturing from Nanyang Technology University, Singapore
in 1997.
Ms. Lu Qing
has served as our director since May 2017. She currently serves as the chief operating officer of WisePublic Asset Management Limited,
where she manages daily operations, and acts as the special consultant to Peking Certified Public Accountants. Ms. Lu Qing has
qualified experience in the finance, accounting, tax and legal fields. She served the head of internal audit of China Regenerative
Medicine International Limited (8158 HK) from January 2013 to October 2015. Ms. Lu Qing also served as financial controller of
Mainland China at Sing Tao News Corporation Limited (1105 HK) from May 2005 to May 2008. From February 1992 to March 2002, Ms.
Lu Qing served as one of the major business partners and vice general manager at Peking Certified Public Accountants. Ms. Lu Qing
received bachelor’s degree in economics, major in accounting from Central University of Finance and Economics in June 1993,
and a master’s degree in law from Peking University in January 2001. Ms. Lu Qing is also a Certified Tax Agents, Certified
Public Valuer, and Certified Public Account in China.
Mr. Jing Zhang has
served as our director since March 30, 2020. Mr. Zhang has served as a director of Hong Kong Dongying Financial Group since 2012,
where he manages the group’s private equity operations. He has also been an independent director of New City Construction
Development Group Co., Ltd. and China International Capital Corporation since 2012. He served as a deputy general manager of China
Yituo Group Co., Ltd. and a director and chief financial officer of First Tractor Co., Ltd. from 1997 to 2007. Mr. Zhang Jing received
the Master degree in Management Engineering from Jiangsu University.
B.
|
Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2019, the aggregate cash compensation and benefits that we paid to our directors and executive officers
was approximately $3,129,680. No pension, retirement or similar benefits have been set aside or have accrued by us for our executive
officers of directors.
Stock Incentive Plans
2006 Equity Incentive Plan
On November 15, 2006,
SPI’s board of directors adopted the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, reserving nine percent (9%) of the outstanding shares of
SPI’s common stock for the plan, and this plan was approved by SPI’s shareholders on February 7, 2007. Upon completion
of the Redomicle Merger, our Company assumed SPI’s existing obligations under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and an equal
number of the Company’s ordinary shares, rather than the common stock of SPI, will be issued upon the exercise of the awards
under this plan.
The following are principal
terms under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan:
Administration.
The administrator is a committee consisting of two or more independent members of the Board appointed by the Board to administer
this plan, or if there is no such committee, the Board itself.
Awards. We may
grant incentive and non-qualified share options, restricted shares, unrestricted shares and share appreciation rights under this
plan.
Award Agreements.
Each award granted under this plan will be evidenced by a signed written award agreement between the Company and the award
recipient.
Exercise Price.
The exercise price of any option or share appreciation right will be determined by the administrator in accordance with this
plan.
Terms of Awards.
The term of options granted under this plan may not exceed ten years (or five years, in the case of an incentive share option
granted to an optionee who owns more than ten percent of the total combined voting power of all classes of share of the Company).
The term of a share appreciation right will be set forth in the award agreement as determined by the administrator.
Vesting Schedule.
The administrator may determine in its discretion whether any award will be subject to vesting and the terms and conditions
of any such vesting. The award agreement will contain any such vesting schedule.
Transfer Restrictions.
No options, restricted shares awards (prior to vesting, subject to the plan and the award agreement) or share appreciation
rights may be transferred other than by will or by the laws of descent or distribution, except that non-qualified options and share
appreciation rights may be transferred to an award recipient’s former spouse pursuant to a property settlement made part
of an agreement or court order incident to the divorce. During the lifetime of an award recipient, only the award recipient, his
guardian or legal representative may exercise an option (other than an incentive share option) pursuant to a domestic relations
order in accordance with the plan. During the lifetime of an award recipient, only the award recipient may exercise the restricted
share awards or share appreciation rights.
Termination of Employment
or Service. In the event that an award recipient terminates employment with us or ceases to provide services to us, an award
may be exercised following the termination of employment or services as provided in the plan and the award agreement.
Termination and
Amendment of the Plan. This plan was terminated automatically in 2016 pursuant to its terms. Our Board has the authority to
amend, suspend or terminate the plan, subject to shareholder approval with respect to certain amendments. No award will be granted
after termination of this plan but all awards granted prior to termination will remain in effect in accordance with their terms.
2015 Equity Incentive Plan
On May 8, 2015, our
board of directors adopted our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. Our shareholders approved this plan on the same date. This plan went
effective upon completion of the Redomicile Merger. The total number of Shares that may be issued under this plan is nine percent
(9%) of the number of outstanding and issued ordinary shares of the Company. Awards may, in the discretion of the administrator,
be made under this plan in assumption of, or in substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by the Company or its affiliates
or a company acquired by the Company or with which the Company combines. The number of shares underlying such substitute awards
shall be counted against the aggregate number of shares available for awards under the plan.
The following are principal
terms under our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan:
Administration.
This plan is administered by the compensation committee of our Board, and the compensation committee may delegate its duties
and powers in whole or in part to any subcommittee of it.
Awards. We may
grant non-qualified or incentive share options, share appreciation rights and other share-based awards such as restricted shares
under this plan.
Option / Exercise
Price. The purchase price per share of any option and the exercise price of any share appreciation right will be determined
by the administrator in accordance with the plan.
Terms of Awards.
The term of options granted under this plan may not exceed ten years from the date of grant. Vesting Conditions. The
administrator has full power and authority to accelerate or waive any vesting conditions.
Transfer Restrictions.
Unless otherwise determined by the administrator and subject to terms and conditions of the plan, an award may not be transferred
other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
Adjustments upon
Certain Events. In the event of any change in the outstanding shares by reason of certain corporate transactions, the administrator
will in its sole discretion make such substitution or adjustment (if any) as to the number or kind of securities issued or reserved
for issuance pursuant to the plan or outstanding awards, the maximum numbers of awards that may be granted during a calendar year
to any award recipient, the option or exercise price of any awards, or other affected terms of the awards. In the event of a change
of control, the administrator may (1) determine any outstanding awards to be automatically exercisable or otherwise vested or no
longer subject to lapse restrictions; or (2) cancel these awards in accordance with the plan, provide for issuance of substitute
awards that substantially preserve the otherwise applicable terms of these awards, or provide that relevant options shall be exercisable
within a period of at least 15 days prior to the change of control and shall terminate upon occurrence of the change of control.
Termination and
Amendment of Plan. Unless terminated earlier, this plan shall terminate automatically in 2025. Our Board may amend, alter or
discontinue this plan in accordance with terms and conditions of the plan. No award may be granted under the plan after termination
date, but awards granted prior to termination will remain in effect.
Option Awards
The following table
summarizes the outstanding options that we granted to our directors and executive officers and to other individuals as a group
under both of our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and our 2015 Equity Incentive Plan as of the date of this annual report. We have not
granted any outstanding options other than to the individuals named below.
Name
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Exercise Price ($)
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Expiration Date
|
Xiaofeng Peng
|
|
100,000
|
|
$3.63
|
|
September 2017
|
|
September 2027
|
Maurice Ngai
|
|
3,600*
|
|
$62
|
|
May 2016
|
|
May 2026
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
$62
|
|
May 2016
|
|
May 2026
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
$3.63
|
|
September 2017
|
|
September 2027
|
HoongKhoeng Cheong
|
|
46,000*
|
|
$3.63
|
|
September 2017
|
|
September 2027
|
Qing Lu
|
|
800*
|
|
$3.63
|
|
September 2017
|
|
September 2027
|
Jing Zhang
|
|
20,000*
|
|
$0.66
|
|
March 2020
|
|
March 2030
|
Directors and executive officers as a group
|
|
179,000*
|
|
From $0.66 to $62
|
|
From August 2013 to March 2020
|
|
From May 2026 to September 2030
|
Other individuals as a group
|
|
92,200**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
_____________________
|
*
|
Upon exercise of all share options, would beneficially own less than 5.0% of our then outstanding
share capital.
|
|
**
|
Upon exercise of all share options, each such individual would beneficially own less than 1.0%
of our then outstanding share capital.
|
Board of Directors
Our board of directors
currently consists of five directors, three of whom satisfy the “independence” requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the
Exchange Act and Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Rules. The law of our home country, which is the Cayman Islands, does not require a majority
of the board of directors of our Company to be composed of independent directors, nor does the Cayman Islands law require that
of a compensation committee or a nominating committee. We intend to follow our home country practice with regard to composition
of the board of directors. A director is not required to hold any shares in the Company by way of qualification. A director who
is in any way, whether directly or indirectly, interested in a contract or transaction or proposed contract or transaction with
our company must declare the nature of his interest at a meeting of the directors. Subject to the NASDAQ Rules and disqualification
by the chairman of the relevant board meeting, a director may vote in respect of any contract or transaction or proposed contract
or transaction notwithstanding that he or she may be interested therein and if he or she does so his or her vote shall be counted
and he or she may be counted in the quorum at the relevant board meeting at which such contract or transaction or proposed contract
or transaction is considered. Our board of directors may exercise all of the powers of our Company to borrow money, to mortgage
or charge our undertakings, property and uncalled capital, and to issue debentures or other securities whenever money is borrowed
or pledged as security for any debt, liability or obligation of our Company or of any third party.
Committees of the Board of Directors
We have an audit committee,
a compensation committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee under the board of directors. We have adopted a charter
for each of the three committees. Each committee’s members and functions are described below.
Audit Committee
Our audit committee
consists of Maurice Ngai, Qing Lu and Jing Zhang, and is chaired by Maurice Ngai. All of the members of our audit committee satisfy
the “independence” requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Rules. The audit committee
assists the Board’s oversight of (1) the quality and integrity of our financial statements and related disclosure, (2) our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, (4) the
performance of our internal audit function and independent auditors and (5) related-party transactions. The audit committee is
responsible for, among other things:
|
·
|
appointing the independent auditors and pre-approving any non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reviewing and approving all proposed related-party transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reviewing with the independent auditors any audit problems or difficulties and management’s response;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
discussing the audited financial statements with management and the independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reviewing major issues as to the adequacy of our internal controls and any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in
internal controls;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
meeting separately and periodically with management and the independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reviewing with the general counsel the adequacy of procedures to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory responsibilities;
and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reporting regularly to the entire board of directors.
|
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee
consists of Qing Lu, Maurice Ngai and Jing Zhang, and is chaired by Qing Lu. Maurice Ngai, Qing Lu and Jing Zhang satisfy the “independence”
requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Rules. The compensation committee has overall responsibility
for evaluating and recommending to the Board compensation of our directors and executive officers and our equity-based and incentive
compensation plans, policies and programs. The compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:
|
·
|
approving and overseeing the total compensation package for our executives;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reviewing and recommending to the Board the compensation of our directors;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our chief executive officer, evaluating
the performance of our chief executive officer in light of those goals and objectives, and setting the compensation level of our
chief executive officer based on this evaluation;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reviewing periodically and recommending to the Board and administering any long-term incentive compensation or equity plans, programs
or similar arrangements; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
reporting regularly to the entire board of directors.
|
Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
Our nominating and
corporate governance committee consists of Jing Zhang, Maurice Ngai, and Qing Lu, and is chaired by Jing Zhang. Jing Zhang, Maurice
Ngai and Qing Lu satisfy the “independence” requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and Rule 5605 of the
NASDAQ Rules. The nominating and corporate governance committee assists the board of directors in selecting individuals qualified
to become our directors and in determining the composition of the Board and its committees. The nominating and corporate governance
committee is responsible for, among other things:
|
·
|
identifying and recommending to the Board nominees for election to the Board or for appointment to fill any vacancy that is anticipated
or has arisen on the Board;
|
|
·
|
reviewing annually with the Board the current composition of the Board in light of the characteristics of independence, age, skills,
experience and availability of service to us of its members and of anticipated needs;
|
|
·
|
identifying and recommending to the Board the directors to serve as members
of the Board’s committees;
|
|
·
|
advising the Board periodically regarding significant developments in law and practice of corporate governance and making recommendations
to the Board on all matters of corporate governance;
|
|
·
|
monitoring compliance with our code of business conduct and ethics, including reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our
procedures to ensure proper compliance; and
|
|
·
|
reporting regularly to the entire board of directors.
|
Duties of Directors
Under Cayman Islands
law, our directors owe to us fiduciary duties, including a duty of loyalty, a duty to act honestly and a duty to act in what they
consider in good faith to be in our best interests. Our directors also have a duty to exercise the skill they actually possess
and such care and diligence that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in comparable circumstances. In fulfilling their duty
of care to us, our directors must ensure compliance with our memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from
time to time. Our Company has the right to seek damages if a duty owed by our directors is breached.
Terms of Directors and Executive Officers
The members of the
Board serve until their successors are duly elected and have qualified. Our officers are appointed by and serve at the discretion
of the board of directors. A director will cease to be a director if, among other things, the director (i) becomes bankrupt or
makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors; (ii) dies or is found by our company to be or becomes of unsound mind;
(iii) resigns his office by written notice to the Company; (iv) the board resolves that his office be vacated; or (v) is removed
from office pursuant to any other provision of our memorandum and articles of association.
Employment Agreements
We have entered into
employment agreements with each of our executive officers. These employment agreements became effective on the signing date and
will remain effective through 2020. We may terminate an executive officer’s employment for cause for certain acts of the
officer, including, but not limited to, conviction of a felony, any act involving moral turpitude, or a misdemeanor where imprisonment
is imposed; commission of any act of theft, fraud, dishonesty, or falsification of any employment or the Company’s records;
improper disclosure of the Company’s confidential or proprietary information; any action that has a detrimental effect on
the Company’s reputation or business; or failure to perform agreed duties. We may also terminate an executive officer’s
employment without cause. Each of us or the relevant executive officer may terminate the employment by giving advance written notice.
We may renew the employment agreements with our executive officers.
As of December 31,
2017, 2018 and 2019, we had 63, 49 and 57 employees, respectively. The employees are based in the U.S., the U.K., Italy, Greece,
Hong Kong, Australia, and Japan. The following table sets forth the number of our employees for each of our major functions as
of December 31, 2019:
Major functions
|
|
As of
December 31,
2019
|
|
Managerial functions
|
|
|
33
|
|
Operating functions
|
|
|
20
|
|
Others
|
|
|
4
|
|
Total
|
|
|
57
|
|
None of our employees
are represented by a labor union nor are we organized under a collective bargaining agreement. We have never experienced a work
stoppage and believe that our relations with our employees are good.
As required by regulations
in China, we participated in various employee social security plans that are organized by municipal and provincial governments,
including pension, unemployment insurance, childbirth insurance, work-related injury insurance, medical insurance and housing insurance.
We were also required under PRC law to make contributions to employee benefit plans at specified percentages of the salaries, bonuses
and certain allowances of our employees, up to a maximum amount specified by the local government from time to time. Since we divested
our Chinese operation in December 2018, we are no longer subject to these laws.
The following tables
set forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our shares as of the date of the report.
·
|
each of our directors and executive officers; and
|
·
|
each person known to us to own beneficially in excess of 5% of our ordinary shares.
|
Directors and Executive Officers
|
|
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
|
|
|
Percentage
Beneficially
Owned
|
|
Xiaofeng Peng, Chairman of the Board1
|
|
|
5,339,340
|
|
|
|
35.99%
|
|
Maurice Wai-fung Ngai, Director
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Qing Lu, Director
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jing Zhang, Director
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
HoongKhoeng Cheong, Director and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group2
|
|
|
6,071,140
|
|
|
|
42.20%
|
|
__________________
|
(1)
|
Consists of 2,000 ordinary shares and options to purchase 50,000
ordinary shares, Mr. Xiaofeng Peng, as the spouse of Ms. Shan Zhou, may be deemed to beneficially own the 875,000 ordinary shares
of the Company held by Ms. Shan Zhou. Furthermore, LDK New Energy Holding Limited, or LDK Energy, directly owns 3,412,340 ordinary
shares. As the spouse of Ms. Shan Zhou, who is the sole shareholder and a director of LDK Energy, Mr. Peng may be deemed to beneficially
own such 3,412,340 ordinary shares beneficially owned by LDK Energy. Lighting Charm Limited holds an option to purchase 1,000,000
ordinary shares. As the spouse of Ms. Shan Zhou, who is the sole shareholder and a director of Lighting Charm Limited, Mr. Peng
may be deemed to beneficially own such 1,000,000 ordinary shares beneficially owned by Lighting Charm Limited.
|
|
(2)
|
Consists of an aggregate of 4,973,840 ordinary shares and options to purchase an aggregate of 1,097,300
ordinary shares.
|
Principal
Shareholders
|
|
Ordinary
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
|
Percentage
Beneficially Owned
|
|
LDK Solar USA, Inc. (1)
|
|
|
1,317,463
|
|
|
|
8.88%
|
|
LDK Solar Europe Holding SA (2)
|
|
|
97,712
|
|
|
|
0.66%
|
|
Shan Zhou(3)
|
|
|
5,339,340
|
|
|
|
35.99%
|
|
UPC CO., LTD. (4)
|
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
|
|
9.10%
|
|
Qian Kun Prosperous Times Investment Limited (5)
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
5.40%
|
|
______________________
|
(1)
|
LDK Solar USA, Inc. LDK Solar USA, Inc. is wholly owned by LDK Solar CO., Ltd. The address of LDK
Solar USA, Inc. LDK Solar USA, Inc. is One Front Street, Suite 1600, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA.
|
|
(2)
|
LDK Solar Europe Holding S.A. is wholly owned by LDK Solar International Co., Ltd., which is in
turn wholly owned by LDK Solar CO., Ltd. The address of LDK Solar Europe Holding S.A. is 898, rue Pafebruch, L-8308, Capellen RCS,
Luxembourg.
|
|
(3)
|
Consists of 875,000 ordinary shares held by Ms. Shan Zhou and 3,412,340 ordinary shares
beneficially owned by LDK Energy. As the spouse of Mr. Peng, Ms. Shan Zhou may also be deemed to beneficially own 2,000
ordinary shares and 50,000 ordinary shares that Mr. Peng has the option to purchase. Lighting Charm Limited holds an option
to purchase 1,000,000 ordinary shares. As the sole shareholder and a director of Lighting Charm Limited, Ms. Shan Zhou may be
deemed to beneficially own such 1,000,000 ordinary shares beneficially owned by Lighting Charm Limited.
|
|
(4)
|
Mrs. Qiuyue Liu is the natural person who has sole voting and investment power over 1,350,000 ordinary
shares of the company shares held through UPC CO., LTD. The address of UPC CO., LTD. is at Floor 4, Willow house, cricket square,
PO Box 2804,Grand Cayman, KY1-1112, Cayman Islands.
|
|
(5)
|
Mr. Yunshi Wang is the natural person who has sole voting and investment power over 800,000 ordinary
of the company shares held through Qian Kun Prosperous Times Investment Limited. The address of Qian Kun Prosperous Times Investment
Limited is Sea Meadow House, Blackburne Highway, (P.O. Box 116), Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands.
|
As of the date of this
annual report, 14,837,469 ordinary shares are issued and outstanding. We cannot ascertain the exact number of beneficial shareholders
with addresses in the United States.
None of our shareholders
has different voting rights from other shareholders as of the date of this annual report. We are currently not aware of any arrangement
that may, at a subsequent date, result in a change of control of our Company.
ITEM 7.
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Please refer to “Item
6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership.”
B.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
Transactions with Our Directors, Executive
Officers and Shareholders
On January 17, 2019,
we entered into share purchase agreements with certain existing shareholders (including certain key management personnel of the
Company) and other investors (collectively, the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Purchasers agreed to purchase
an aggregate of 6,600,000 ordinary shares of the Company at a price of US$1.16 per Share, for a total consideration of approximately
$7.7 million.
Employment Agreements
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—C. Board Practices—Employment Agreements.”
Share Incentives
See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—B. Compensation of Directors and Executive Officers” for a description of
share options that we have granted to our directors, officers and other individuals as a group.
C.
|
Interests of Experts and Counsel
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A.
|
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
|
We have appended consolidated
financial statements filed as part of this annual report.
Legal and Administrative Proceedings
Some of our previous employees filed lawsuits in late 2015 and
early 2016 against us for breach of their prior employment contracts with us. As of the date of this annual report, we have reached
a settlement with Michael Turco, Taimur Jamil, Sharon Mauer, William Heck and Brain Lessig and the court has administratively closed
those matters. There is only one unclosed employee lawsuit with Kevin Adler, which we and Kevin Adler have reached a settlement
in February 2020. The lawsuit is pending final adjournment upon the payment of all settlement amount.
There is currently
an ongoing dispute in Greece between the Company and SPI China (HK) Limited on one hand (hereinafter collectively, “SPI”)
and SINSIN Europe Solar Asset Limited Partnership and SINSIN Solar Capital Limited Partnership on the other hand (hereinafter collectively,
“SINSIN”) with respect to a share sale and purchase agreement dated September 9, 2014 (“SPA”) entered into
by and between SINSIN,as vendors, and SPI, as purchasers, in relation to all of the shares in Sinsin Renewable Investment Limited,
a company registered in Malta (for purpose of this section, “SRIL”). The SPA is governed by Maltese law and any disputes
thereunder shall be referred to arbitration in Malta. SRIL is the direct and/or indirect owner of four (4) Greek companies under
the names “JASPER PV MACEDONIA ENERGIAKI SOCIETE ANONYME”, “ORION ENERGIAKI SOCIETE ANONYME PHOTOVOLTAICON ERGON”,
“ASTRAIOS ENERGIAKI SOCIETE ANONYME PHOTOVOLTAICON ERGON”, “PHOTOVOLTAICA PARKA VEROIA I SOCIETE ANONYME”
(hereinafter collectively, “4 SPVs”). The 4 SPVs collectively own a number of photovoltaic parks in Greece having a
total power output of 26.57 MW.
In particular, the
following judicial proceedings were initiated in Greece and are pending as of the date of this annual report:
A. SINSIN’s Injunction
Petition against the 4 SPVs dated January 26, 2018, with General Submission No 8118/2018, which was heard on the March 20, 2018,
before the Athens One-Member First Instance Court and on which Judgement No 4212/2018 was issued on June 25,2018.
This Interim Measures
Judgment ordered, inter alia, the following:
(A) It suspends the
force of the extraordinary General Meetings of the shareholders of the 4 SPVs dated December 19, 2017 on the appointment of their
members of Board of Directors, until the issuance of a final judgment on the lawsuit filed by SINSIN on March 14, 2018 for the
annulment of the extraordinary General Meetings of the shareholders of the 4 SPVs dated December 19, 2017.
(B) It appoints an
interim management of the 4 SPVs, consisting of two members elected by SINSIN (Dejun Ye and Fan Yang) and one member elected by
the 4 SPVs (Hoong Khoeng Cheong), with the following, exclusively defined, competences: (a) to represent judicially and extra-judicially
the 4 SPVs before any public authority and court, (b) to manage the bank accounts of the 4 SPVs, in order to, exclusively and solely,
proceed with the payment of existing and current obligations of the 4 SPVs towards third parties, arising from their regular management
(liabilities towards the State, employees, social security institutions, private creditors, banks), excluding the payment of any
price of the shares that were transferred from SINSIN to SPI pursuant to the above-mentioned share sale and purchase agreement
dated September 6, 2014, (c) to collect the proceeds of the 4 SPVs, especially from selling electric energy from the photovoltaic
parks of the 4 SPVs to the Operator of Electricity Market (“LAGIE”), which (proceeds) should be subsequently deposited
to the bank accounts of the 4 SPVs, with the exclusive purpose being the payment of the above under element b΄ obligations
of the 4 SPVs (i.e., not for the payment of the purchase price of the shares transferred by SINSIN to SPI pursuant to the above-mentioned
share sale and purchase agreement dated September 6, 2014.
(C) It allows the petitioners
to register with the Greek General Commercial Registry (“GEMI”) the appointed interim management of the 4 SPVs with
the above competences.
B. SINSIN’s and
Mr. Dejun Ye’s lawsuit against the 4 SPVs dated March 14, 2018, with General Submission No. 25276/2018 (the “Annulment
Lawsuit”). By virtue of the Annulment Lawsuit, the petitioners request the annulment of the December 19, 2017 General Assemblies’
Resolutions of the 4 SPVs, which appointed a Board of Directors elected by their shareholders SRIL, Veltimo Limited and Photovoltaica
Parka Veroia 1 Malta Limited, companies belonging to SPI.
SPI and their subsidiaries
opposed the above-mentioned petition. SPI and their subsidiaries SRIL, Veltimo Limited and Photovoltaica Parka Veroia 1 Malta Limited
filed an Additional Intervention in the above pending trial under General No. 40772/2018 in favor of the 4 SPVs requesting the
rejection of the Annulment Lawsuit.
By virtue of its Decision
No 2318/2019, the Athens Multimember Court of First Instance suspended the issuance of a definitive judgment on SINSIN’s
petition until the issuance of a final decision on the case pending before the Malta arbitration tribunal with respect to the SPA.
C. By virtue of a petition under General Submission No 7294/2018 dated
January 25, 2018 filed by SINSIN before the Athens Local Court against SRIL, Veltimo Limited and Photovoltaica Parka Veroia 1
Malta Limited, SINSIN lacking an enforcement title, requested the above Athens Local Court to allow them to proceed to an auction
of the pledged shares of the 4 SPVs, in order to satisfy their claim amounting to EUR 38.3 million, plus interest and expenses,
for the outstanding purchase price of the 4 SPVs shares under the above-mentioned share sale and purchase agreement dated September
6, 2014.
SRIL, Veltimo Limited
and Photovoltaica Parka Veroia 1 Malta Limited opposed the above-mentioned petition.
The above petition
was heard on October 23, 2018. The Athens Local Court issued Decision No. 350/2019, which suspended the issuance of a definitive
judgment on SINSIN’s petition until the issuance of a final decision on the case pending before the Malta arbitration tribunal
with respect to the SPA.
In June 2018, the Company,
as Claimant, filed arbitration proceedings in Malta against SINSIN as respondents for an alleged breach of a share sale and purchase
agreement dated September 6, 2014 entered into by and between the respondents as sellers and the claimant as purchaser in relation
to all of the shares in SRIL. The claimant is requesting the payment of damages from the respondents.
The respondents have
filed separate arbitration proceedings in Malta against the Company, requesting payment of the balance of the purchase price due
in terms of the share purchase agreement mentioned above (stated to be EUR38,054,000) together with interest. Company is
contesting these claims. Meanwhile, SINSIN has obtained the status of a precautionary garnishee order against the Company as security
for its claims and has had the same order served on SRIL with a view to freezing any payments that may be due by the target company
to its shareholders, the Company.
The production of evidence
in both arbitration cases has been completed and the parties have also produced very extensive written final submissions in relation
to the cases. They have also filed their respective rebuttals to the submissions.
Unless there are any
unforeseen circumstances or developments, we expect that the Tribunal is now in a position to move to deliberate the cases with
a view to issuing its final awards in both cases concurrently. While no specific date has been given or agreed for the delivery
of the awards, in July 2019 the Tribunal had indicated that it expected to be in a position to issue the awards by the end of second
quarter in 2020. It is possible that the Tribunal will require more time for this purpose.
The cases are vigorously
contested and both parties have produced substantive evidence and plausible submissions with regard to their interpretation of
the facts and the application of relevant laws to the circumstances. The likelihood of success for either party is very difficult
to assess at this time. We believe that there is a possibility that the Tribunal could accept both Parties’ claims (in part)
thereby giving an award which is of limited success to each party. We believe that at best there is a 50% chance of obtaining a
favourable award in favour of the Company.
In a best-case scenario,
should an award in favour of the Company be given, the Company would be awarded damages in the sum of Euro54 million together
with interest and costs of the Arbitration held in Malta. On the other end of the spectrum and in a worst-case scenario, an arbitral
award given in favour of SINSIN would lead to an award ordering the Company to pay Euro38 million in outstanding payments
plus an unquantified amount in additional damages, together with legal interest and costs. The damages will need to be liquidated
and quantified by the Tribunal.
It should also be noted
that if there is an Award with costs against the Company, fees and costs payable to the arbitral tribunal and to counsel is expected
to be material and could be as high as Euro 1 million in the aggregate.
In June 2018, ENS obtained
a default judgement invalidating the Governance Agreement. In March 2019, ENS made an assignment for benefit of creditors which
assignment is part of a Wisconsin Chapter 128 receivership initiated by creditor Analytics Plus, LLC Captioned Analytics Plus,
LLC v. Ensync, Inc., Waukesha County Circuit Court Case No. 19-CV-556 (the “ Chapter 128 Proceeding”). The Company
has instructed to vigorously pursue all legal remedies available to the Company.
Solar
Juice USA Inc. (“SolarJuice”), a subsidiary of the Company, submitted a complaint in the local court in the county
of Santa Clara in the State of California on or about June 11, 2020 against Shengrun Int’l Industry Group, Inc., a California
corporation (“Shengrun”) and Sophie Harrison, a resident of the State of California and the purported controlling person
of Shengrun. In March, 2019, SolarJuice and Shengrun entered into a real property purchase agreement pursuant to which
SolarJuice shall purchase from Shengrun a real property located in Santa Clara in the State of California. Subsequently,
SolarJuice made a down payment of $3,132,000 to Shengrun for the proposed transaction, and Sophie Harrison provided personal guarantee
that if Shengrun does not convey the property to SolarJuice or if SolarJuice withdraws from the transaction, she would be personally
liable for the return of the down payment to SolarJuice. As of the date hereof, the subject property has not been conveyed
to SolarJuice, neither has Shengrun or Ms. Harrison refunded the down payment to SolarJuice. Counsel for SolarJuice on this
matter reasonably expects that the court shall render a verdict against Shengrun and Ms. Harrison personally (as related to the
personal guarantee) and in favor of SolarJuice. However, the counsel does not have the information to assess whether Shengrun
or Ms. Harrison has the assets available for the governmental authorities or the Company to enforce such verdict.
The Company is
currently involved in a potential lawsuit against NAAC regarding our newly set up CBD and hemp business. The Company was
required to make a down payment of $324,125 to NAAC on or before July 31, 2019, and the Company timely made this payment.
Subsequently, however, NAAC failed to comply with or perform the Agreement. First, in August 2019, representatives of the
Company visited the farm where NAAC was growing the hemp. The conditions of the plants and growing operations appeared to be
deficient and not up to industry standards. Second, NAAC failed to provide the required Milestone Report and Financial
Reports. Finally, NAAC failed to deliver any of the hemp plants by November 30, 2019, or at all, and refused and failed to
return Company’s down payment and to make whole for the damages the Company has suffered. As such, NAAC was in default under
the Agreement. The Company sent two demand letters to NAAC on October 25, 2019 and November 25, 2019 respectively without any
response from NAAC. The Company has instructed to vigorously pursue all legal remedies available to the Company.
In May 2020, Solar
Juice Co. Ltd (“Solar Juice Co”),a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, in its capacity as shareholder of Solar
Juice Australia (an Australian company) together with Mr. Kun Fong Lee and Mr. Jinhan Zhou (who hold shares in Solar Juice Australia
as trustee for Solar Juice Co) ("SPI Shareholders") commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia as plaintiffs
against its other shareholders and some of its other directors and purported directors and against Solar Juice Australia ("Defendants")
in relation to a purported new rights issue undertaken by Solar Juice Australia, the purported removal by those other shareholders
of Mr. Kun Fong Lee and Mr. Jinhan Zhou as directors of Solar Juice Australia and the purported appointment of an additional director.
The SPI Shareholders allege that the purported new rights issue and the subsequent purported removal and appointment of directors
are invalid and ineffective and therefore should be set aside. If effective, the purported rights issue will result in the SPI
Shareholders' shareholding in Solar Juice Australia being reduced from 80% to 40%. The parties to the litigation have requested
that the case be expedited but it is current unknown when a final hearing will take place.
From time to time,
we are involved in various other legal and regulatory proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While we cannot predict
the occurrence or outcome of these proceedings with certainty, it does not believe that an adverse result in any pending legal
or regulatory proceeding, individually or in the aggregate, would be material to our consolidated financial condition or cash flows.
However, an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for a specific interim period
or year.
Dividend Policy and Dividend Distribution
We have never declared
or paid dividends, nor do we have any present plan to pay any cash dividends on our ordinary shares in the foreseeable future.
We currently intend to retain our available funds and any future earnings to operate and expand our business.
Subject to our memorandum
and articles of association and certain restrictions under the Cayman Islands law, our board of directors has complete discretion
on whether to pay dividends. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed
the amount recommended by our directors. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount
will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual
restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant.
Except as disclosed
elsewhere in this annual report, we have not experienced any significant changes since the date of our audited consolidated financial
statements included in this annual report.
ITEM 9.
THE OFFER AND LISTING
A.
|
Offering and Listing Details
|
Our ADSs, each representing
ten ordinary shares, have been listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market between January 19, 2016 and September 18, 2017. Our Ordinary
Shares have been listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market since September 18, 2017.
Not Applicable.
Our ADSs, each representing
ten ordinary shares, were listed on the NASDAQ Global Select market between January 19, 2016 and September 18, 2017 under the symbol
“SPI”. Our ordinary shares have been listed on the NASDAQ Global Select market since September 19, 2017 under the symbol
“SPI”.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
ITEM 10.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Not Applicable.
B.
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association
|
The registered office
of our Company is at the offices of Harneys Fiduciary (Cayman) Limited, PO Box 10240, 103 South Church Street, 4th floor,
Harbour Place, George Town, Cayman Islands. The objects for which the Company is established are unrestricted, and the Company
has full power and authority to carry out any object not prohibited by the laws of the Cayman Islands.
The following summarizes
material provisions of our currently effective amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, as well as the Companies
Law (2020 Revision) of the Cayman Islands, which is referred to as the Companies Law below, insofar as they relate to the material
terms of our ordinary shares.
General
All of our issued and
outstanding ordinary shares are fully paid and non-assessable. Our ordinary shares are issued in registered form, and are issued
when registered in our register of members. Our shareholders who are non-residents of the Cayman Islands may freely hold and transfer
their ordinary shares.
Dividends
The holders of our
ordinary shares are entitled to such dividends as may be declared by our board of directors, subject to the Companies Law and the
memorandum and articles of association of our Company, as amended and restated from time to time. In addition, our shareholders
may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividend may exceed the amount recommended by our directors. Under Cayman
Islands law, dividends may be declared and paid only out of funds legally available therefor, namely out of either profit or share
premium account, and provided further that a dividend may not be paid if this would result in us being unable to pay our debts
as they fall due in the ordinary course of business.
Register of Members
Under Cayman Islands
law, we must keep a register of members and there shall be entered therein:
(a) the
names and addresses of the members, a statement of the shares held by each member, and of the amount paid or agreed to be considered
as paid, on the shares of each member;
(b) the
date on which the name of any person was entered on the register as a member; and
(c) the
date on which any person ceased to be a member.
Under Cayman Islands
law, our register of members is prima facie evidence of the matters set out therein (namely, the register of members will
raise a presumption of fact on the matters referred to above unless rebutted) and a member registered in the register of members
shall be deemed as a matter of Cayman Islands law to have legal title to the shares as set against its name in the register of
members. If the name of any person is incorrectly entered in or omitted from our register of members, or if there is any default
or unnecessary delay in entering on the register the fact of any person having ceased to be a member of our Company, the person
or member aggrieved (or any member of our Group or our Company itself) may apply to the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands for an
order that the register be rectified, and the Court may either refuse such application or it may, if satisfied of the justice of
the case, make an order for the rectification of the register.
Voting Rights
Each holder of ordinary
shares is entitled to one vote on all matters upon which the ordinary shares are entitled to vote on a show of hands or, on a poll,
each holder is entitled to have one vote for each share registered in his name on the register of members. Voting at any meeting
of shareholders is by show of hands unless a poll is demanded. A poll may be demanded by the chairman of the meeting or by any
one or more shareholders holding at least one-tenth of the paid-up shares given a right to vote at the meeting or one-tenth of
the votes attaching to the issued and outstanding ordinary shares in us entitled to vote at general meetings, present in person
or by proxy.
A quorum required for
a general meeting of shareholders consists of one or more shareholders who hold in aggregate at least one-third of the votes attaching
to the issued and outstanding ordinary shares in us entitled to vote at general meetings, present in person or by proxy or, if
a corporation or other non-natural person, by its duly authorized representative. Although not required by the Companies Laws or
our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, we expect to hold shareholders’ meetings annually and such
meetings may be convened by our board of directors on its own initiative or upon a request to the directors by shareholders holding
in aggregate at least one-third of the votes attaching to the issued and outstanding shares that carry the right to vote at general
meetings. Advance notice of at least 14 days is required for the convening of our annual general meeting and other shareholders
meetings.
An ordinary resolution
to be passed by the shareholders requires the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the votes cast by those shareholders entitled
to vote who are present in person or by proxy in a general meeting, while a special resolution requires the affirmative vote of
no less than two-thirds of the votes cast by those shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy in a general
meeting.
Transfer of Ordinary Shares
Subject to the restrictions
of our articles of association, as applicable, any of our shareholders may transfer all or any of his or her ordinary shares by
an instrument of transfer in the usual or common form or any other form approved by our board of directors.
Our board of directors
may, in its absolute discretion, decline to register any transfer of any ordinary share which is not fully paid up or on which
we have a lien. Our directors may also decline to register any transfer of any ordinary share unless:
|
·
|
the instrument of transfer is lodged with us, accompanied by the certificate for the ordinary shares to which it relates and such
other evidence as our board of directors may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to make the transfer;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the instrument of transfer is in respect of only one class of ordinary shares;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the instrument of transfer is properly stamped, if required;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
in the case of a transfer to joint holders, the number of joint holders to whom the ordinary share is to be transferred does not
exceed four;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
the ordinary shares transferred are free of any lien in favor of us; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
a fee of such maximum sum as NASDAQ may determine to be payable, or such lesser sum as our board of directors may from time to
time require, is paid to us in respect thereof.
|
If our directors refuse
to register a transfer they shall, within two months after the date on which the instrument of transfer was lodged, send to each
of the transferor and the transferee notice of such refusal. The registration of transfers may, on 14 days’ notice being
given by advertisement in such one or more newspapers or by electronic means, be suspended and the register of members closed at
such times and for such periods as our board of directors may from time to time determine; provided, however, that the registration
of transfers shall not be suspended and the register of members shall not be closed for more than 30 days in any year.
Liquidation
On a winding up of
our Company, if the assets available for distribution among our shareholders shall be more than sufficient to repay the whole of
the share capital at the commencement of the winding up, the surplus will be distributed among our shareholders in proportion to
the par value of the shares held by them at the commencement of the winding up, subject to a deduction from those shares in respect
of which there are monies due, of all monies payable to us for unpaid calls or otherwise. If our assets available for distribution
are insufficient to repay all of the paid-up capital, the assets will be distributed so that the losses are borne by our shareholders
in proportion to the par value of the shares held by them.
Calls on Ordinary Shares and Forfeiture
of Ordinary Shares
Our board of directors
may from time to time make calls upon shareholders for any amounts unpaid on their ordinary shares in a notice served to such shareholders
at least 14 days prior to the specified time of payment. The ordinary shares that have been called upon and remain unpaid are subject
to forfeiture.
Redemption, Repurchase and Surrender
of Ordinary Shares
We may issue shares
on terms that are subject to redemption, at our option or at the option of the holders, on such terms and in such manner as may
be determined before the issue of such shares, by our board of directors or by a special resolution of our shareholders. We may
also repurchase any of our shares provided that the manner and terms of such purchase have been approved by our board of directors
or by ordinary resolution of our shareholders, or are otherwise authorized by our memorandum and articles of association. Under
the Companies Law, the redemption or repurchase of any share may be paid out of our profits or out of the proceeds of a fresh issue
of shares made for the purpose of such redemption or repurchase, or out of capital (including share premium account and capital
redemption reserve) if we can, immediately following such payment, pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of business.
In addition, under the Companies Law no such share may be redeemed or repurchased (a) unless it is fully paid up, (b) if such redemption
or repurchase would result in there being no shares outstanding, or (c) if the company has commenced liquidation. In addition,
we may accept the surrender of any fully paid share for no consideration.
Variations of Rights of Shares
All or any of the special
rights attached to any class of shares may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Law, be varied either with the written consent
of the holders of a majority of the issued shares of that class or with the sanction of an ordinary resolution passed at a general
meeting of the holders of the shares of that class.
Inspection of Books and Records
Holders of our ordinary
shares have no general right under Cayman Islands law to inspect or obtain copies of our list of shareholders or our corporate
records. However, we will provide our shareholders with annual audited financial statements.
Changes in Capital
We may from time to
time by ordinary resolution:
|
·
|
increase our share capital by such sum, to be divided into shares of such classes and amount, as the resolution shall prescribe;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
consolidate and divide all or any of our share capital into shares of a larger amount than our existing shares;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
convert all or any of our paid-up shares into stock and reconvert that stock into paid up shares of any denomination;
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
sub-divide our existing shares, or any of them into shares of a smaller amount that is fixed by the amended and restated memorandum
and articles of association; and
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
cancel any shares which, at the date of the passing of the resolution, have not been taken or agreed to be taken by any person
and diminish the amount of our share capital by the amount of the shares so cancelled.
|
Subject to Companies
Law and confirmation by the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands on an application by us for an order confirming such reduction, we
may by special resolution reduce our share capital and any capital redemption reserve in any manner authorized by law.
Issuance of Additional Preferred Shares
Our amended and restated
memorandum and articles of association authorizes our board of directors to issue additional ordinary shares from time to time
as our board of directors shall determine, to the extent of available authorized but unissued shares.
Our amended and restated
memorandum and articles of association authorizes our board of directors to establish from time to time one or more series of preferred
shares and to determine, with respect to any series of preferred shares, the terms and rights of that series, including:
|
·
|
the designation of the series;
|
|
·
|
the number of shares of the series;
|
|
·
|
the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights; and
|
|
·
|
the rights and terms of redemption and liquidation preferences.
|
Our board of directors
may issue preferred shares without action by our shareholders to the extent of available authorized but unissued shares. In addition,
the issuance of preferred shares may be used as an anti-takeover device without further action on the part of the shareholders.
Issuance of these shares may dilute the voting power of holders of ordinary shares.
C.
Material Contracts
In the past two years,
we have not entered into any material contracts other than in the ordinary course of business and other than those described in
“Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview,” “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions—B. Related Party Transactions,” or elsewhere in this annual report on Form 20-F.
D.
Exchange Controls
See “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our International Operations—We are subject to risks associated
with foreign currency exchange rates, fluctuations of which may negatively affect our revenue, cost of goods sold and gross margins
and could result in exchange losses,” “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Foreign
Currency Exchange” and “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Dividend
Distribution.”
E.
Taxation
The following summary
of the material Cayman Islands and United States federal income tax consequences of an investment in our ordinary shares is based
upon laws and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this annual report, all of which are subject to change,
possibly with retroactive effect. This summary does not deal with all possible tax consequences relating to an investment in our
ordinary shares, such as the tax consequences under United States state or local tax laws, or tax laws of jurisdictions other than
the Cayman Islands and the United States.
Cayman Islands Taxation
The Cayman Islands
currently does not levy taxes on individuals or corporations based upon profits, income, gains or appreciation, and there is no
taxation in the Cayman Islands in the nature of inheritance tax or estate duty. There are no other taxes likely to be material
to us levied by the government of the Cayman Islands except for stamp duty which may be applicable on instruments executed in,
or after execution brought within the jurisdiction of the Cayman Islands. The Cayman Islands is not a party to any double tax treaties
that are applicable to any payments made to or by our Company. There are no exchange control regulations or currency restrictions
in the Cayman Islands.
Economic Substance Law
Since 1 January
2019,the Cayman Islands adopted certain laws and regulations in response to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development(OECD)Forum on Harmful Tax Practices,which sets the global standard that requires companies to have substantial
activities in a jurisdiction (also known as "economic substance").To date, the Cayman Islands have passed or
adopted the International Tax Co-Operation (Economic Substance) Law, (as varied by the Regulations which are defined below
and includes any revision thereof or amendment thereto from time to time,the"ES Law"), the International Tax
Co-Operation (Economic Substance) (Prescribed Dates) Regulations, 2018, the International Tax Co-Operation
(EconomicSubstance) (Amendment of Schedule) Regulations, 2019 and the International Co-Operation (Economic Substance)
(Amendment of Schedule) (No. 2) Requlations. 2019 (collectively referred to as, the “Regulations”), and the related
guidance was published on 30 April 2019.
A relevant entity
conducting any relevant activity must satisfy the economic substance test the
“ES Test”) as set out in the ES Law. Failure to comply with requirements of the ES Law may result in substantial
fines and/or imprisonment.
Considering SPI Energy
is a tax resident outside in US, the Company has been determined that it is either not a Relevant Entity (i.e. an “investment
fund” or tax resident in another jurisdiction) or not conducting a Relevant Activity for the purposes of the ES Law.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation
Introduction
The following discussion
is a summary of U.S. federal income tax considerations of the purchase, ownership and disposition of the ordinary shares. This
discussion applies only to holders that hold the ordinary shares as capital assets. This discussion is based on the Code, Treasury
regulations promulgated thereunder, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all as in effect on the date hereof
and all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion does not address all of the tax considerations
that may be relevant to specific holders in light of their particular circumstances or to holders subject to special treatment
under U.S. federal income tax law, such as banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, controlled foreign corporations,
passive foreign investment companies, tax-exempt entities, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, partnerships
and the partners therein, dealers in securities or currencies, traders in securities electing to mark to market, U.S. expatriates,
persons who have acquired the ordinary shares as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion transaction or other integrated investment,
U.S. Holders (as defined below) that have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar or persons that own (or
are deemed to own) 5% or more of our stock. This discussion does not address the alternative minimum tax, the Medicare tax on net
investment income or any U.S. state or local or non-U.S. tax considerations or, other than to the limited extent set forth below,
any U.S. federal estate or gift tax considerations.
As used in this discussion,
the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of the ordinary shares that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
(i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation, or other entity classified as a corporation
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any state thereof, or
the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source or (iv)
a trust that (1) is subject to the supervision of a court within the United States and the control of one or more United States
persons or (2) has a valid election in effect under applicable United States Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States
person.
As used in this discussion,
the term “Non-U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of the ordinary shares that is not a partnership (or entity treated
as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) and not a U.S. Holder.
Treatment of the Company as a U.S.
Corporation for U.S. Federal Income Tax Purposes
Even though we are
organized as a Cayman Islands exempted company, due to the application of Section 7874(b) of the Code, we are treated as a U.S.
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and all purposes under the Code.
U.S. Holders
Distributions
We do not currently
anticipate paying distributions on our ordinary shares. In the event that distributions are paid, however, the gross amount of
such distributions generally will be included in a U.S. Holder’s gross income as dividend income on the date of receipt to
the extent that the distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal
income tax principles. To the extent the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits as
so computed, it will be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax
basis in such ordinary shares and, to the extent the amount of such distribution exceeds such adjusted tax basis, will be treated
as gain from the sale of such ordinary shares.
Subject to certain
conditions, including a minimum holding period requirement, dividends received by individuals and other non-corporate U.S. Holders,
generally will be subject to reduced rates of taxation, and dividends paid by us will be eligible for the “dividends received”
deduction generally allowed to corporate shareholders with respect to dividends received from U.S. corporations.
Sale or Other Disposition of
Ordinary Shares
A U.S. Holder generally
will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes upon a sale or other disposition of the ordinary shares in an
amount equal to the difference between the amount realized from such sale or disposition and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax
basis in such ordinary shares. Such gain or loss generally will be a capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or
loss (taxable at a reduced rate for individuals and other non-corporate U.S. Holders) if, on the date of sale or disposition, such
ordinary shares were held by such U.S. Holder for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
Non-U.S. Holders
Distributions
Distributions treated
as dividends (see “—U.S. Holders—Distributions” above) paid to a Non-U.S. Holder are treated as income
derived from sources within the United States and generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a rate of 30% of
the gross amount of such dividend, or at a lower rate provided by an applicable income tax treaty.
Even if a Non-U.S.
Holder is eligible for a lower treaty rate, U.S. federal withholding tax will be imposed at a 30% rate (rather than the lower treaty
rate) on dividend payments to a Non-U.S. Holder, unless (i) the Non-U.S. Holder has furnished a valid U.S. Internal Revenue Service
(the “IRS”) Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E or other documentary evidence establishing such holder’s entitlement to the
lower treaty rate with respect to such payments, and (ii) in the case of actual or constructive dividends paid to a foreign entity,
(a) if such entity is, or holds the ordinary shares through, a foreign financial institution, any such foreign financial institution
(x) has entered into an agreement with the U.S. government to collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities information about
its accountholders (including certain investors in such institution), (y) satisfies an exemption from the obligation to enter into
such an agreement, or (z) satisfies the terms of an applicable intergovernmental agreement, and (b) if required, such entity has
provided the withholding agent with a certification identifying its direct and indirect U.S. owners.
If a Non-U.S. Holder
is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax pursuant to an applicable income tax treaty, the Non-U.S. Holder may obtain
a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS.
Sale or Other Disposition
Any gain realized upon
the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares by a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax
unless (i) the Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of
the disposition, and certain other conditions are met, or (ii) in the case of the sale or disposition of ordinary shares on or
after January 1, 2019, the requirements described in item (ii) in the second paragraph under “—Distributions,”
above, are satisfied. Each Non-U.S. Holder is encouraged to consult with its own tax advisor regarding the possible implications
of these withholding requirements on its investment in ordinary shares and the potential for a refund or credit in the case of
any withholding tax.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding
Payments of dividends
or of proceeds on the disposition of ordinary shares to U.S. Holders may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding
unless the U.S. Holder (i) is a corporation or comes within certain other exempt categories and demonstrates this fact, or (ii)
provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding and otherwise complies
with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Non-U.S. Holders may be required to provide documentary evidence
establishing they are not subject to information reporting and backup withholding. Payments of dividends to Non-U.S. Holders and
the amount of U.S. federal withholding tax imposed on such dividends must generally be reported annually to the IRS. A similar
report will be sent to Non-U.S. Holders. Copies of these reports may be made available to tax authorities in a holder’s country
of residence.
Backup withholding
is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against
a holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided the required information is furnished to the IRS on a timely basis.
U.S. Federal Estate Tax
Ordinary shares owned
or treated as owned by an individual who is not a citizen or resident of the United States (as specifically defined for U.S. federal
estate tax purposes) at the time of death will be included in the individual’s gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes
and may be subject to U.S. federal estate tax unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise.
F.
|
Dividends and Paying Agents
|
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We are subject to the
periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act as applicable to foreign private issuers. Under the
Exchange Act, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC. Specifically, we are required to file annually
a Form 20-F no later than four months after the close of each fiscal year, which is December 31. Copies of reports and other information,
when so filed with the SEC, can be inspected and copied at our executive offices. The SEC also maintains a web site at www.sec.gov
that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding registrants that make electronic filings
with the SEC using its EDGAR system. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules of the Exchange Act prescribing
the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and our executive officers, directors and principal shareholders
are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition,
we are not required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly
as U.S. companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act.
In accordance with
Rule 5250(d) of the NASDAQ Rules, we will post this annual report on Form 20-F on our website at http://www.spigroups.com.
I.
|
Subsidiary Information
|
Not applicable.
ITEM 11.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Exchange Risk
We currently conduct
our business operations in the U.S., Japan, the U.K., Greece, Italy and Australia. The functional currency of our Company and our
subsidiaries located in the United States is the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of our subsidiaries located in Europe and
Australia are the Euro and AUD, respectively. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured into the functional
currency at the rates of exchange prevailing when the transactions occur. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies are re-measured into the functional currency at rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates. Exchange gains
and losses are included in our consolidated statements of operations.
Our reporting currency
is the U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, are translated into
the U.S. dollar using exchange rates in effect at each period end, and revenues and expenses are translated into the U.S. dollar
at average rates prevailing during the year. Gains and losses resulting from the translations of the financial statements of these
subsidiaries into the U.S. dollar are recognized as other comprehensive income in our consolidated statements of comprehensive
income.
Depending on movements in foreign exchange rates, the foreign currency translation
may have an adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. In 2017, 2018 and 2019, we recorded foreign exchange loss
of $5.1 million, gain of $1.1 million and gain of $1.3 million in our consolidated statements of operations, respectively.
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to interest
rate risk primarily relates to interest expenses incurred on our short-term and long-term borrowings, as well as interest income
generated from excess cash invested in demand deposits. Such interest-earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk.
We have not used any derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk exposure. We have not been exposed to, nor
do we anticipate being exposed to, material risks due to changes in interest rates. However, our future interest expense may increase
due to changes in market interest rates. If market interest rates for short-term demand deposits increase in the near future, such
increase may cause the amount of our interest income to rise. A hypothetical 10% increase in the average interest rate for our
bank borrowings would result in an increase of approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million in interest expense for the years ended
December 31, 2018 and 2019. We may use derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, to mitigate potential risks
of interest expense increases due to changes in market interest rates.
ITEM 12.
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not Applicable.
*The shares are presented on a retroactive basis to reflect
the Company’s Reverse Stock Splits (Note 20).
*The shares are presented on a retroactive basis to reflect
the Company’s Reserve Stock Splits (Note 20).
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in US$ thousands, except share
and per share data)
|
1.
|
Description of Business and Organization
|
SPI Energy Co., Ltd. (“SPI
Energy” or the “Company”), its subsidiaries and consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”)
(collectively the “Group”) is a provider of photovoltaic (“PV”) solutions for business, residential, government
and utility customers and investors. The Group develops solar PV projects which are either sold to third party operators or owned
and operated by the Group for selling of electricity to the grid in multiple countries in Asia, North America and Europe. In Australia,
the Group primarily sells solar PV components to retail customers and solar project developers.
Since 2018, the Company engages
in the sale of bitcoin mining equipment, provides hosting services and mines bitcoins. In 2019, the Company also sells hays from
United States to China.
The Company was incorporated
in the Cayman Islands on May 4, 2015 for the sole purpose of effectuating the redomicile of the Company’s predecessor, Solar
Power, Inc., a California corporation (“SPI California”). The redomicile was approved by the shareholders of SPI California
on May 11, 2015, pursuant to which one share of common stock of SPI California held by the shareholders was converted into one
SPI Energy’s ordinary share. On January 4, 2016, SPI California completed the redomicile, resulting in SPI Energy becoming
the publicly held parent company of SPI California. SPI Energy’s shares then began quotation on the Open Transparent Connected
Markets under the symbol “SRGYY” effective January 4, 2016. On January 19, 2016, SPI Energy’s shares were listed
on the Nasdaq Global Select Market and traded under the symbol “SPI”.
The major subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31,
2019 are summarized as below:
|
Major Subsidiaries
|
|
Abbreviation
|
|
Location
|
|
SPI Renewables Energy (Luxembourg) Private Limited Company S.a.r.l. (formerly known as CECEP Solar Energy (Luxembourg) Private Limited Company (S.a.r.l.)) and Italsolar S.r.l.
|
|
CECEP
|
|
Luxembourg, Italy
|
|
Solar Juice Pty Ltd.
|
|
Solar Juice
|
|
Australia
|
|
Solar Juice USA Inc.
|
|
Solar Juice US
|
|
United States
|
|
Solar Juice (HK) Limited
|
|
Solar Juice HK
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
SPI Solar Japan G.K.
|
|
SPI Japan
|
|
Japan
|
|
Solar Power Inc UK Service Limited
|
|
SPI UK
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
SPI Solar Inc.
|
|
SPI US
|
|
United States
|
|
Heliostixio S.A.
|
|
Heliostixio
|
|
Greece
|
|
Heliohrisi S.A.
|
|
Heliohrisi
|
|
Greece
|
|
Thermi Sun S.A.
|
|
Thermi Sun
|
|
Greece
|
|
Knight Holding Corporation
|
|
Knight
|
|
United States
|
On January 1, 2017, the Group
deconsolidated one of the major subsidiaries, Sinsin Renewable Investment Limited (“Sinsin”) due to loss of control
and recognized the investment in Sinsin on the carrying amount of $69,606 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. Both the Group and
the former shareholders, Sinsin Europe Solar Asset Limited Partnership and Sinsin Solar Capital Limited Partnership (collectively,
the “Sinsin Group”) failed to fulfill the obligation under the share sale and purchase agreement of Sinsin, which led
to that both parties filed petitions to each other. The petitions directly affected the Group’s ability to effectively control
Sinsin and make any direct management decisions or have any direct impact on Sinsin’s polices, operations or assets without
the agreement of Sinsin Group. As of the issuance of the financial statements, the lawsuit with Sinsin is still on the proceeding,
and it is uncertain how the court will rule (See Note 26(b) Contingencies).
On December 10, 2018, the Group
disposed SPI China (HK) Limited (“SPI China”), which holds all of the Group’s assets and liabilities related
to its business in China, including engineering, procurement and construction (“EPC”) business, PV projects, Internet
finance lease related business and E-commence in China, to Lighting Charm Limited (“Lighting Charm”), an affiliate
of Ms. Shan Zhou, the spouse of Xiaofeng Peng, the Group’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
(see Note 4 (1) Disposition of SPI China). The Group effected an internal restructuring following which SPI China would only hold
the Group’s subsidiaries in China, and all the other subsidiaries outside of China would be transferred to the Group (the
“restructuring”). As of December 10, 2018, the restructuring was completed and the disposal transaction was closed
(see Note 4 (1) Disposition of SPI China).
Variable Interest Entities
Current PRC laws and regulations impose certain restrictions or prohibitions on foreign ownership
of companies that engage in value-added telecommunication services, and certain other business. The Group conducted its business
in China through a series of contractual agreements before December 10, 2018. On December 10, 2018, the Group disposed SPI China,
its PRC subsidiaries and the variable interest entities.
The Group operated its on-line
fund raising and leasing business and its on-line solar products trading through Shanghai Meijv Network Technology Co., Ltd. (“Meijv”)
and Lv Neng Tao E-Commerce (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. (“Lv Neng Tao”) (collectively referred to as the “VIEs”)
respectively. Both Meijv and Lv Neng Tao were limited liability companies established in the PRC and held the requisite licenses
and permits necessary to conduct the on-line businesses, which were restricted from foreign investment in accordance with the relevant
PRC laws and regulations. Meijv was established by Shanghai Youying E-commerce Co., Ltd. (“Youying”) on June 12, 2015.
Lv Neng Tao was established on June 17, 2015 by Mr. Min Xiahou, the former deputy chairman of the Company’s board of directors,
Mr. Minghua Zhao, a former director of the Group and Mr. Tairan Guo, the Group’s former Chief Financial Officer. These individuals
acted as nominee equity holders of Lv Neng Tao on behalf of the Company. OnMarch 17, 2016, Meijv entered into a series of contractual
arrangements with Yanhua Network Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.Y (“Yanhua Network”) and Youying, including exclusive
call option agreement, proxy voting agreement, exclusive business cooperation agreement and equity interest pledge agreement (collectively,
the “Meijv VIE Agreements”). On January 1, 2016, Lv Neng Tao entered into a series of contractual arrangements with
Yanhua Network and its legal shareholders, including exclusive call option agreement, proxy voting agreement, exclusive business
cooperation agreement and equity interest pledge agreement (collectively, the “Lv Neng Tao VIE Agreements”, and together
with Meijv VIE Agreements, the “VIE Agreements”).
Pursuant to the VIE Agreements,
Youying and Lv Neng Tao’s legal shareholders had granted all of their legal rights in Meijv and LvNeng Tao, respectively,
including voting rights and deposition rights, to Yanhua Network. As a result, Youying and Lv Neng Tao’s legal shareholders
did not have the direct or indirect ability through voting rights or similar rights to make decision about the activities of Meijv
and Lv Neng Tao, respectively, that had a significant effect on the success of Meijv and Lv Neng Tao. The Company, through Yanhua
Network, had obtained a financial controlling interest of Meijv and Lv Neng Tao which enable it to have (1) the power to direct
the activities that most significantly affected the economic performance of Meijv and Lv Neng Tao, and (2) the right to receive
benefits or have the obligation to absorb losses and to receive the expected residual return of Meijv and Lv Neng Tao that could
potentially be significant to Meijv and Lv Neng Tao. Accordingly, the Company, through Yanhua Network, was considered the primary
beneficiary of Meijv and Lv Neng Tao. As such, the financial results of Meijv and Lv Neng Tao were included in the Company’s
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and December 10, 2018. Prior to the signing of Meijv VIE Agreements
on March 17, 2016 and Lv Neng Tao VIE Agreements on January 2016, Meijv and Lv Neng Tao had not carried out any business except
for the holding the business licenses and permits necessary to conduct the on-line businesses in the PRC. With the disposition
of SPI China, all VIEs were disposed as of December 10, 2018 (see Note 4 (1) Disposition of SPI China).
The Group has suffered recurring losses from operations. The Group
has incurred a net loss of $15,148 during the year ended December 31, 2019, and the cash flow used in operating activities was
$2,871. As of December 31, 2019, the Group had a working capital deficit of $113,528 and accumulated deficit of $585,384. Additionally,
the Group has defaulted the repayment of convertible bonds of $35,000 since 2016, and another convertible bond of $20,000 would
be fully due in 2020. As of December 31, 2019, $55,907 of convertible bonds is payable within one year.
These and other factors disclosed
in these financial statements raise substantial doubt as to the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management
believes that it has developed a liquidity plan, as summarized below, that, if executed successfully, will provide sufficient liquidity
to meet the Group’s obligations for a reasonable period of time.
Working Capital management
The Group plans to implement
certain measures with an aim to reduce its operating costs in 2020, which has considered the impact of Coronavirus 2019 as disclosed
in Note 30 to the consolidated financial statements. Such measures include: 1) strict controlling and reducing business, marketing
and advertising expenses in United States and Australia; 2) lowering the remuneration of the Group’s management team; 3)
implementing comprehensive budget control, and other measures.
Cost Saving Measures
The Group plans to implement certain measures with an aim to
reduce its operating costs in 2020, which has considered the impact of Coronavirus 2019 as disclosed in Note 30 to the consolidated
financial statements. Such measures include: 1) strict controlling and reducing business, marketing and advertising expenses in
United States and Australia; 2) lowering the remuneration of the Group’s management team, which has considered the impact
of Coronavirus 2019 as disclosed in Note 30 to the consolidated financial statements. 3) implementing comprehensive budget control,
etc.
While management believes that
the measures in the liquidity plan will be adequate to allow the Group to meet its liquidity and cash flow requirements within
one year after the date that the financial statements are issued, there is no assurance that the liquidity plan will be successfully
implemented. Failure to successfully implement the liquidity plan will have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business,
results of operations and financial position, and may materially adversely affect its ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets
or the amounts and classification of liabilities or any other adjustments that might be necessary should the Group be unable to
continue as a going concern.
|
3.
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
|
(a)
|
Basis of Presentation
|
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements of the Group are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction
of liabilities in the normal course of business. The realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course
of business are dependent on, among other things, the Group’s ability to operate profitably, to generate cash flows from
operations, and to pursue financing arrangements to support its working capital requirements.
|
(b)
|
Principles of Consolidation
|
The consolidated financial
statements include the financial statements of the Company, and its subsidiaries. All material inter-company transactions and
balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. For consolidated subsidiaries where the Company’s ownership in the subsidiary
is less than 100%, the equity interest not held by the Group is shown as noncontrolling interests. The Company accounts for investments
over which it has significant influence but not a controlling financial interest using the equity method of accounting. The Company
deconsolidates a subsidiary when the Company ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. When control is
lost, the parent-subsidiary relationship no longer exists and the parent derecognizes the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary.
The
preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Group to make estimates and assumptions that
affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Significant accounting estimates reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements
include the allowance made for doubtful accounts receivable and other receivable, inventory write-downs, the estimated useful
lives of long-lived assets, the impairment of goodwill, long-lived assets and project assets, fair value of derivative liability,
valuation allowance of deferred tax assets, accrued warranty expenses, the grant-date fair value of share-based compensation awards
and related forfeiture rates, the lease discount rate, and fair value of financial instruments and assumptions related to the
consolidation of entities in which the Company holds variable interests. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised
estimates. The current economic environment has increased the degree of uncertainty inherent in those estimates and assumptions.
|
(d)
|
Foreign Currency Translation and Foreign Currency Risk
|
The functional currency of the
Company and subsidiaries located in the United States is the United States dollar (“US$” or “$”). The functional
currency of the Company’s subsidiaries located in the PRC, Europe, United Kingdom, Japan and Australia are Renminbi (“RMB”),
EURO (“EUR”), British Pounds(“GBP”), Japanese Yen (“JPY”) and Australia Dollar (“AUD”),
respectively. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured into the functional currency at the rates of exchange
prevailing when the transactions occur. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are re-measured into
the functional currency at rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates. Exchange gains and losses are included in the
consolidated statements of operations.
The Group’s reporting
currency is the US$. Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, whose functional currency is not the US$, are translated into US$
using exchange rates in effect at each period end, and revenues and expenses are translated into US$ at average rates prevailing
during the year, and equity is translated at historical exchange rates, except for the change in retained earnings during the year
which is the result of the income or loss. Gains and losses resulting from the translations of the financial statements of these
subsidiaries into US$ are recognized as other comprehensive income or loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss.
|
(e)
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
The Group estimates fair value
of financial assets and liabilities as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability
(an exit price) on the measurement date in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair value measurement guidance
establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs into the valuation techniques used to measure fair value.
|
Ÿ
|
Level 1 — Valuation techniques in which all significant inputs are unadjusted quoted prices from active markets for assets or liabilities that are identical to the assets or liabilities being measured.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Level 2 — Valuation techniques in which significant inputs include quoted prices from active markets for assets or liabilities that are similar to the assets or liabilities being measured and/or quoted prices for assets or liabilities that are identical or similar to the assets or liabilities being measured from markets that are not active. Also, model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets are Level 2 valuation techniques.
|
|
Ÿ
|
Level 3 — Valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Unobservable inputs are valuation technique inputs that reflect the Group’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use to price an asset or liability.
|
The Group uses quoted market
prices to determine the fair value when available. If quoted market prices are not available, the Group measures fair value using
valuation techniques that use, when possible, current market-based or independently-sourced market parameters, such as interest
rates and currency rates.
(f) Business Combination
Business combinations are recorded
using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, the acquired assets and liabilities are recorded at their fair market
value at the date of acquisition. Any excess of acquisition cost over the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities, including
identifiable intangible assets, is recorded as goodwill. The Company charges acquisition related costs that are not part of the
purchase price consideration to general and administrative expenses as they are incurred. Those costs typically include transaction
and integration costs, such as legal, accounting, and other professional fees.
The Company adopted Accounting
Standard Update (“ASU”) 2017-01 “Business Combination (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”
on January 1, 2018 and applied the new definition of a business prospectively for acquisitions made subsequent to December 31,
2017. Upon the adoption of ASU 2017-01, a new screen test is introduced to evaluate whether a transaction should be accounted for
as an acquisition and/or disposal of a business versus assets. In order for a purchase to be considered an acquisition of a business,
and receive business combination accounting treatment, the set of transferred assets and activities must include, at a minimum,
an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. If substantially all
of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable
assets, then the set of transferred assets and activities is not a business. The adoption of this standard requires future purchases
to be evaluated under the new framework.
(g) Asset Acquisition
When the Company acquires other
entities, if the assets acquired and liabilities assumed do not constitute a business, the transaction is accounted for as an asset
acquisition. Assets are recognized based on the cost, which generally includes the transaction costs of the asset acquisition,
and no gain or loss is recognized unless the fair value of noncash assets given as consideration differs from the assets’
carrying amounts on the Company’s books. If the consideration given is not in the form of cash (that is, in the form of noncash
assets, liabilities incurred, or equity interest issued), measurement is based on either the cost to the acquiring entity or the
fair value of the assets (or net assets) acquired, whichever is more clearly evident and, thus, more reliably measureable. The
cost of a group of assets acquired in an asset acquisition is allocated to the individual assets acquired or liabilities assumed
based on their relative fair value and does not give rise to goodwill.
|
(h)
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
Cash and cash equivalents include
cash on hand, cash accounts, interest bearing savings accounts and all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three
months or less, and which are unrestricted as to withdrawal and use. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2019 and
2018.
Restricted cash represent bank
deposits with designated use, which cannot be withdraw without certain approval or notice. Restricted cash, which matures twelve
months after the balance sheet date, is classified as noncurrent assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018,
the Group had restricted bank deposits of $239 and $458, respectively. The balance as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 mainly represented
the restricted bank deposits in the bank account established for the sole purpose of paying the obligations and making other
payments related to the project assets development in Hawaii of SPI Solar Inc., a subsidiary of the Group.
|
(j)
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
The Group grants open credit
terms to credit-worthy customers. Accounts receivable are primarily related to the Group's sales of pre-development solar projects
and sales of PV components. For pre-development sales contracts, the payment is typically due in installments over the contract
term, which are both before and after the performance by the Company. Payment for sales of PV components and electricity revenue
with power purchase agreements (“PPAs”) are typically due in full within 30 to 90 days of shipping of the products
or the start of the contract term.
The Group maintains allowances
for doubtful accounts. The Group regularly monitors and assesses the risk of not collecting amounts owed by customers. This evaluation
is based upon a variety of factors, including an analysis of amounts current and past due along with relevant history and facts
particular to the customer. The Group does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure related to its customers. Contractually,
the Group may charge interest for extended payment terms and require collateral.
Notes receivable was a 12-year
interest-bearing promissory note issued by an EPC customer in 2015. The promissory note carries interests at 6% per annum and is
settled by pre-determined installments. Installment payments that fall due within 12 months and over 12 months after the balance
sheet date are classified as current assets and noncurrent assets respectively on the consolidated balance sheet. Notes receivable
was fully collected during the year ended December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2018, no allowance was made against the notes receivable.
Inventories are carried at the
lower of cost or net realizable value, determined by the weighted average cost method. Provisions are made for obsolete or slow-moving
inventories based on management estimates. Inventories are written down based on the difference between the cost of inventories
and the net realizable value based upon estimates about future demand from customers, specific customer requirements on certain
projects and other factors. Inventory provision charges establish a new cost basis for inventory that subsequently cannot be marked
up based on changes in underlying facts and circumstances.
The Group acquires or constructs
PV solar power systems (“solar system”) that are (i) held for development and sale or (ii) held for the Group’s
own use to generate income or return from the use of the solar systems. Solar systems are classified as either held for development
and sale within “project assets” or as held for use within “property, plant and equipment” based on the
Group’s intended use of solar systems. The Group determines the intended use of the solar systems upon acquisition or commencement
of project construction.
Classification of the solar
systems affects the accounting and presentation in the consolidated financial statements. Transactions related to the solar systems
held for development and sale within “project assets” are classified as operating activities in the consolidated statements
of cash flows and reported as sales and costs of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations upon the sale of the solar
systems and fulfillment of the relevant recognition criteria. Incidental electricity income generated from the solar systems held
for development and sale prior to the sale of the projects is recorded in other operating income in the consolidated statement
of operations. The solar systems held for use within “property, plant and equipment”, are used by the Group in its
operations to generate income or a return from the use of the assets. Income generated from the solar systems held for use are
included in net sales in the consolidated statement of operations. The costs to construct solar systems intended to be held for
own use are capitalized and reported within property, plant and equipment on the consolidated balance sheets and are presented
as cash outflows from investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The proceeds from disposal of solar systems
classified as held for own use are presented as cash inflows from investing activities within the consolidated statements of cash
flows. A net gain or loss upon the disposal of solar systems classified as held for own use is reported in other operating income
or expense in the consolidated statement of operation.
Solar systems costs consist
primarily of capitalizable costs for items such as permits and licenses, acquired land or land use rights, and work-in-process.
Work-in-process includes materials and modules, construction, installation and labor, capitalized interests and other capitalizable
costs incurred to construct the PV solar power systems.
The solar systems held for development
and sale, named as “project assets”, are reported as current assets on the consolidated balance sheets when upon completion
of the construction of the solar systems, the Group initiates a plan to actively market the project assets for immediate sale in
their present condition to potential third party buyers subject to terms that are usual and customary for sales of these types
assets and it is probable that the project assets will be sold within one year. Otherwise, the project assets are reported as noncurrent
assets. No depreciation expense is recognized while the project assets are under construction or classified as held for sale.
For solar systems held for development
and sale, named as “project assets”, the Group considers a project commercially viable if it is anticipated to be sold
for a profit once it is either fully developed or fully constructed. The Group also considers a partially developed or partially
constructed project commercially viable if the anticipated selling price is higher than the carrying value of the related project
assets plus the estimated cost to completion. The Group considers a number of factors, including changes in environmental, ecological,
permitting, market pricing or regulatory conditions that affect the project. Such changes may cause the cost of the project to
increase or the selling price of the project to decrease. The Group records an impairment loss of the project asset to the extent
the carrying value exceed its estimated recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is estimated based on the anticipated sales
proceeds reduced by estimated cost to complete such sales.
|
(n)
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
|
The Group accounts for its property,
plant and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes the prices paid to acquire or construct the assets, interest
capitalized during the construction period and any expenditure that substantially extends the useful life of an existing asset.
The Group expenses repair and maintenance costs when they are incurred. Depreciation is recorded on the straight-line method based
on the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
Plant and machinery
|
|
5 or 6.67 years
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
3 or 5 years
|
|
Computers
|
|
3 or 5 years
|
|
Automobile
|
|
3 or 5 years
|
|
Bitcoin mining equipment
|
|
3 years
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
The shorter of the estimated life or the lease term
|
|
PV solar system
|
|
17, 20, 25 or 27 years
|
|
(o)
|
Intangible Assets other than Goodwill
|
Intangible assets consist of
customer relationships and patents. Amortization is recorded on the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of
the assets.
|
(p)
|
Impairment of Long-lived Assets
|
The Group’s long-lived
assets include property, plant and equipment, project assets and other intangible assets with finite lives. The Group evaluates
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment, the Group first
compare undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by that asset or asset group to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount
of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, an impairment is recognized to the
extent that the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including
discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. Any impairment
write-downs would be treated as permanent reductions in the carrying amounts of the assets and a charge to operations would be
recognized.
(q) Bitcoins
Bitcoins are awarded to the
Company through its mining activities which are accounted for in connection with the Company’s revenue recognition policy.
Bitcoins held are accounted
for as intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. An intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is not amortized but
assessed for impairment annually, or more frequently, when events or changes in circumstances occur indicating that it is more
likely than not that the indefinite-lived asset is impaired. Impairment exists when the carrying amount exceeds its fair value,
which is measured using the quoted price of the bitcoins at the time its fair value is being measured. In testing for impairment,
the Company has the option to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that an impairment
exists. If it is determined that it is not more likely than not that an impairment exists, a quantitative impairment test is not
necessary. If the Company concludes otherwise, it is required to perform a quantitative impairment test. To the extent an impairment
loss is recognized, the loss establishes the new cost basis of the asset. Subsequent reversal of impairment losses is not permitted.
The balance of bitcoins was nil as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Bitcoins awarded to the Company
through its mining activities are included within operating activities on the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows.
The sales of bitcoins are included within investing activities in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows and any
realized gains or losses from such sales are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. The
Company accounts for its gains or losses in accordance with the first in first out (FIFO) method of accounting.
Goodwill represents the excess
of the purchase consideration over the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
of the acquired entity as a result of the Company’s acquisitions of interests in its subsidiaries. Goodwill is not amortized
but is tested for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it might
be impaired. The Company has an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the
two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. In the qualitative assessment, the Company considers primary factors such as industry
and market considerations, overall financial performance of the reporting unit, and other specific information related to the operations.
Based on the qualitative assessment, if it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than the
carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is performed.
In performing the two-step quantitative
impairment test, the first step compares the fair values of each reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If
the fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered to be impaired and the second step
will not be required. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step compares the implied fair
value of goodwill to the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined
in a manner similar to accounting for a business combination with the allocation of the assessed fair value determined in the first
step to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amounts assigned
to the assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. This allocation process is only performed for the purposes
of evaluating goodwill impairment and does not result in an entry to adjust the value of any assets or liabilities. Application
of a goodwill impairment test requires significant management judgment, including the identification of reporting units, assigning
assets, liabilities and goodwill to reporting units, and determining the fair value of each reporting unit.
The Group offers the industry
standard warranty up to 25 years for PV modules and industry standard warranty for five to ten years on inverter and balance of
system components. Due to the warranty period, the Group bears the risk of extensive warranty claims long after products have been
shipped and revenues have been recognized. The Group provides a limited warranty to the original purchasers of its solar modules,
inverters and cables for trading business for one to five years, in relation to defects in materials and workmanship. For the Group’s
cable, wire and mechanical assemblies business, historically the related warranty claims have not been material. For the Group’s
solar PV business, the greatest warranty exposure is in the form of product replacement.
During the quarter ended September
30, 2007 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2010, the Group installed own manufactured solar panels and accrued warranty
based on the Group’s own historical data. Since 2011, due to the absence of historical material warranty claims and identical
warranty terms, the Group has not recorded any additional warranty provision relating to solar energy systems sold. PV construction
contracts entered into during the recent years included provisions under which the Group agreed to provide warranties to the customers.
The warranty the Group offers to its customers is identical to the warranty offered to the Group by its suppliers, therefore, the
Group passes on all potential warranty exposure and claims, if any, with respect systems sold by the Group to its suppliers.
The Group accounts for income
taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective
tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates
expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes
the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of a deferred
tax asset will not be realized.
The Company recognizes in the
consolidated financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained upon
examination, based on the technical merits of the position. In evaluating whether a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold, management presumes that the position will be examined by the appropriate taxing authority that has full
knowledge of all relevant information. In addition, a tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is
measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the financial statements. The tax position is measured at the largest
amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement. The Group’s tax liability associated
with unrecognized tax benefits is adjusted periodically due to changing circumstances, such as the progress of the tax audits,
case law developments and new or emerging legislation. Such adjustments are recognized entirely in the period in which they are
identified. The Group records interest and penalties related to an uncertain tax position, if and when required, as part of income
tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations. No reserve for uncertainty tax position was recorded by the Group for
the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
On January 1, 2018, the Group
adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC
606” or “Topic 606”) and applied the modified retrospective method to all contracts that were not completed as
of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period
amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the Group’s historical accounting practices under
ASC Topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”.
The Group has determined that
the impact of the transition to the new standard is immaterial to the Group’s revenue recognition model. Accordingly, the
Group has not made any adjustment to opening retained earnings.
The Group’s accounting
practices under ASC Topic 606 are as followings:
The Company generates revenue
from sales of PV components, electricity revenue with Power Purchase Agreements (“PPAs”), sales of PV project assets,
bitcoin mining equipment sales and hosting service, sales of pre-development solar projects, revenue from bitcoin mining and sales
of hays for the years ended December 31 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Sale of PV components
Revenue on sale of PV components
is recognized at a point in time following the transfer of control of such products to the customer, which typically occurs upon
shipment or acceptance of the customer depending on the terms of the underlying contracts.
Electricity revenue with PPAs
The Group sells energy generated
by PV solar power systems under PPAs. For energy sold under PPAs, the Group recognizes revenue each period based on the volume
of energy delivered to the customer (i.e., the PPAs off-taker) and the price stated in the PPAs. The Group has determined that
none of the PPAs contains a lease since (i) the purchaser does not have the rights to operate the PV solar power systems, (ii)
the purchaser does not have the rights to control physical access to the PV solar power systems, and (iii) the price that the purchaser
pays is at a fixed price per unit of output.
Sale of PV project asset
The Group’s sales arrangements
for PV projects do not contain any forms of continuing involvement that may affect the revenue or profit recognition of the transactions,
nor any variable considerations for energy performance guarantees, minimum electricity end subscription commitments. The Group
therefore determined its single performance obligation to the customer is the sale of a completed solar project. The Group recognizes
revenue for sales of solar projects at a point in time after the solar project has been grid connected and the customer obtains
control of the solar project.
Bitcoin mining equipment sales and hosting service
Revenue on sale of bitcoin mining equipment is recognized at a point in time following the
transfer of control of such products to the customer, which typically occurs upon delivery of the products to the hosting site
or receipt place assigned by the customer, installation and setting up the products. Revenue for hosting service is recognized
over time as services are performed and based on the output method related to the time incurred during the service period.
Sales of pre-development solar projects
For sales of pre-development
solar projects in which the Group transfers 100% of the membership interest in solar projects to a customer, the Group recognizes
all of the revenue for the consideration received at a point in time when the membership interest was transferred to the customer,
which typically occurs when the Group delivered the membership interest assignment agreement to the customer.
The contract arrangements may
contain provisions that can either increase or decrease the transaction price. These variable amounts generally are resolved upon
achievement of certain performance or upon occurrence of certain price reduction conditions. Variable consideration is estimated
at each measurement date at its most likely amount to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative
revenue recognized will not occur and true-ups are applied prospectively as such estimates change.
Changes in estimates for sales
of pre-development solar projects occur for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to (i) EPC construction plan accelerations
or delays, (ii) product cost forecast changes, (iii) change orders, or (iv) occurrence of purchase price reduction conditions.
The cumulative effect of revisions to transaction prices are recorded in the period in which the revisions to estimates are identified
and the amounts can be reasonably estimated.
Revenue from bitcoin mining
The Company has entered into a digital asset mining
pool to provide computing power to the mining pool. Providing computing power in crypto asset transaction verification services
is an output of the Company’s ordinary activities. The provision of computing power is the only performance obligation in
the Company’s contracts with the mining pool. The transaction consideration the Company receives, if any, is noncash consideration,
which the Company measures at fair value on the date of receipt, which is not materially different than the fair value at contract
inception or the time the Company has earned the award from the mining pool. The consideration is all variable. Because
it is not probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue will not occur, the consideration is constrained until the
Company receives the consideration, at which time revenue is recognized. There is no significant financing component in these
transactions.
Fair value of the digital asset
award received is determined using the average U.S. dollar spot rate of the related digital currency at the time of receipt.
Sale of Alfalfa hays
In 2019, the Company sells alfalfa hays from United States to China.
Revenue on sale of alfalfa hays is recognized at a point in time following the transfer of control of such products to the customer,
which typically occurs upon the acceptance of the products made by the customer.
Disaggregation of revenues
The following table illustrates
the disaggregation of revenue by revenue stream from continuing operations for the years
ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017:
By revenue
stream
|
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2019
|
|
Continued operations
|
|
Sales
of PV components
|
|
|
Electricity
revenue with PPAs
|
|
|
Sales
of PV
project
asset
|
|
|
Bitcoin
mining equipment
sales and
hosting
service
|
|
|
Sales
of pre-
development
solar projects
|
|
|
Bitcoin
mining
|
|
|
Sales
of hays
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Australia
|
|
$
|
79,470
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
80,518
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
United States
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
(2,835
|
)
|
|
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
1,487
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
Greece
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
80,941
|
|
|
$
|
3,368
|
|
|
$
|
9,563
|
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
(2,835
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,630
|
|
|
$
|
1,487
|
|
|
$
|
1,162
|
|
|
$
|
97,883
|
|
By revenue
stream
|
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2018
|
|
Continued operations
|
|
Sales
of PV components
|
|
|
Electricity
revenue with PPAs
|
|
|
Sales
of PV
project
asset
|
|
|
Bitcoin
mining equipment sales and hosting service
|
|
|
Sales
of pre-
development solar projects
|
|
|
Bitcoin
mining
|
|
|
Sales
of hays
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Australia
|
|
$
|
90,067
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
1,314
|
|
|
$
|
91,381
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
10,809
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
United States
|
|
|
1,875
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
15,794
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
18,721
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
Greece
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
93,547
|
|
|
$
|
3,043
|
|
|
$
|
10,809
|
|
|
$
|
1,052
|
|
|
$
|
15,794
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
1,337
|
|
|
$
|
125,582
|
|
By revenue
stream
|
|
For
the year ended December 31, 2017
|
|
Continued operations
|
|
Sales
of PV components
|
|
|
Electricity
revenue with PPAs
|
|
|
Sales
of PV
project
asset
|
|
|
Bitcoin
mining equipment
sales and
hosting
service
|
|
|
Sales
of pre-
development
solar projects
|
|
|
Bitcoin
mining
|
|
|
Sales
of hays
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Australia
|
|
$
|
111,284
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
112,174
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
United States
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
6,042
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6,903
|
|
Greece
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
111,795
|
|
|
$
|
2,793
|
|
|
$
|
6,042
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
121,520
|
|
Contract balance
The following table provides
information about accounts receivables and contract liabilities from contracts with customers:
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, current and noncurrent
|
|
$
|
16,539
|
|
|
$
|
27,777
|
|
|
Advance from customers
|
|
$
|
17,632
|
|
|
$
|
25,984
|
|
Advance from customers, which
represent a contract liability, represent mostly unrecognized amount received for customers. Advance from customers is recognized
as (or when) the Group performs under the contract. During the year ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Group recognized
$8,159, $11,365 and $326 that was included in the balance of advance from customers at January 1, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Cost of revenues for PV components
is mainly from direct purchase price of PV components. Cost of revenues for PV project assets and pre-development solar projects
include all direct material, labor, subcontractor cost, land use right fee, and those indirect costs related to contract performance,
such as indirect labor, supplies and tools. Cost of revenues for bitcoin mining equipment and hosting service include direct purchase
of mining equipment, electricity fee and other indirect expense. Costs of electricity generation revenue include depreciation of
solar power project assets and costs associated with operation and maintenance of the project assets. Costs of bitcoin mining include
depreciation of bitcoin miners and hosting service fee. Cost of sales of hays is mainly the purchase price of raw materials.
|
(w)
|
Share-based Compensation
|
The Group’s share-based
payment transactions with employees, such as restricted shares and share options, are measured based on the grant-date fair value
of the equity instrument issued. The fair value of the award is recognized as compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures,
over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award, which is generally the vesting
period.
|
(x)
|
Derivative Instruments
|
The Company evaluates its convertible debt to determine if the contract or
embedded component of the contract qualifies as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 480, “Distinguish
by Liabilities from Equity”, and ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”. The result of this accounting treatment
is that the fair value of the embedded derivative, if required to be bifurcated, is marked-to-market at each balance sheet date
and recorded as a liability. The change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. Upon conversion
or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value
is reclassified to equity.
The Group’s policy is
to capitalize interest cost incurred on debt during the construction of major projects exceeding three months. A reconciliation
of total interest cost to “Interest Expense” as reported in the consolidated statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost capitalized
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
|
$
|
1,607
|
|
|
Interest cost charged to expense
|
|
|
3,923
|
|
|
|
6,665
|
|
|
|
8,087
|
|
|
Total interest cost
|
|
$
|
3,923
|
|
|
$
|
6,957
|
|
|
$
|
9,694
|
|
|
(z)
|
Gain on Troubled Debt Restructuring
|
The Group accounted the debt
amendment as a troubled debt restructuring when the transaction meets the two criteria: 1) The Group was experiencing financial
difficulties; 2) the lender was granting a concession when the effective borrowing rate on the restructured debt is less than the
effective borrowing on the original debt. The difference between future undiscounted cash flows and the net carrying value of the
original debt is recognized as gain on troubled debt restructuring, and the carrying value of the debt is adjusted to the future
undiscounted cash flow amount.
Operating segments are defined
as components of a company which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the operating decision
maker in deciding how to allocate resources and assessing performance. The Group’s chief operating decision maker is the
Chairman, Mr. Peng. Based on the financial information presented to and reviewed by the chief operating decision maker, the Group
has determined that it has a single operating and reporting segment for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Basic loss per share is computed
by dividing net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to ordinary shareholders as adjusted for the effect
of dilutive ordinary equivalent shares, if any, by the weighted average number of ordinary and dilutive ordinary equivalent shares
outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive shares are excluded from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive.
U.S. GAAP generally requires
that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income or loss. Although certain changes in assets and
liabilities are reported as separate components of the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet, such items, along with
net income, are components of comprehensive income or loss. The components of other comprehensive income or loss consist solely
of foreign currency translation adjustments.
|
(ad)
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
Liabilities for loss contingencies
arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability
has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably
possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the
range of possible loss if determinable and material, is disclosed. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are
expensed as incurred.
In February 2016, the FASB issued
ASU 2016-12, Leases (ASC Topic 842), which amends the leases requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases. Under the new lease accounting
standard, a lessee will be required to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for most leases on the balance sheet.
The new standard also modifies the classification criteria and accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases, and enhances
the disclosure requirements. Leases will continue to be classified as either finance or operating leases.
The Group adopted ASC Topic
842 using the modified retrospective transition method effective January 1, 2019. There was no cumulative effect of initially applying
ASC Topic 842 that required an adjustment to the opening retained earnings on the adoption date nor revision of the balances in
comparative periods. As a result of the adoption, the Group recognized a lease liability and right-of-use asset for each of the
existing lease arrangement. The adoption of the new lease standard does not have a material impact on the consolidated statements
of operations or the consolidated statements of cash flows.
The Group determines if an arrangement
is a lease at inception. The lease payments under the lease arrangements are fixed. Non-lease components include payments for building
management, utilities and property tax. It separates the non-lease components from the lease components to which they relate.
Lease assets and liabilities
are recognized at the present value of the future lease payments at the lease commencement date. The interest rate used to determine
the present value of the future lease payments is the Group’s incremental borrowing rate, because the interest rate implicit
in the leases is not readily determinable. The incremental borrowing rate is estimated to approximate the interest rate on a collateralized
basis with similar terms and payments, and in economic environments where the leased asset is located. The lease terms include
periods under options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Group will exercise that option.
The Group generally uses the base, non-cancelable, lease term when determining the lease assets and liabilities.
|
(af)
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
Recently Adopted Accounting
Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) issued Topic 606, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605. The Group adopted
Topic 606 as of January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were not completed
as of January 1, 2018. See Note 3(u) “Revenue Recognition” above for further details.
In February 2016, the FASB issued
ASU 2016-12, Leases (ASC Topic 842), which amends the leases requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases. The Group adopted ASC Topic
842 using the modified retrospective transition method effective January 1, 2019. There was no cumulative effect of initially applying
ASC Topic 842 that required an adjustment to the opening retained earnings on the adoption date nor revision of the balances in
comparative periods. See Note 3(ae) “Leases” above for further details.
In November 2016, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): “Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires
that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally
described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods,
beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance will result in the inclusion of
the restricted cash balances within the overall cash balance and removal of the changes in restricted cash activity, as a result,
the Company no longer presents transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in the statement of cash flows.
Furthermore, an additional reconciliation will be required to reconcile cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within
the consolidated balance sheets to sum to the total shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The Group has already disclosed
the restricted cash separately on its consolidated balance sheets. Beginning January 1, 2018, the Group has adopted and included
the restricted cash balances on the consolidated statement of cash flows and reconciliation of cash, cash equivalent, and restricted
cash within its consolidated statements of balance sheet and consolidated statement of cash flows. This guidance has been applied
retrospectively to the consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, which required the Company to
recast each prior reporting period presented.
In January 2017, the FASB issued
AUS No. 2017-01, “Business Combination (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”. The Group adopted it
on January 1, 2018 and applied the new definition of a business prospectively for acquisitions made subsequent to December 31,
2017. See Note 3 (f) “Business Acquisition” above for further details.
Accounting Pronouncements
Issued But Not Yet Adopted
In August 2018, the FASB issued
ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)-Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value
Measurement. ASU 2018-13 removes the amounts and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy
and the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements; modifies certain disclosure requirements in Topic 820; and require
additional disclosures such as the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 measurements
etc. ASU No. 2018-13 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. The Company does not expect
this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
On December 18, 2019, the FASB
issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income taxes (Topic 740), Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. This guidance amends ASC Topic 740
and addresses several aspects including 1) evaluation of step-up tax basis of goodwill when there is not a business combination,
2) policy election to not allocate consolidated taxes on a separate entity basis to entities not subject to income tax, 3) accounting
for tax law changes or rates during interim periods, 4) ownership changes from equity method investment to subsidiary or vice versa,
5) elimination of exception to intraperiod allocation when there is gain in discontinued operations and a loss from continuing
operations, 6) treatment of franchise taxes that are partially based on income. The guidance is effective for calendar year-end
public entities on January 1, 2021 and other entities on January 1, 2022. The Company is evaluating the impact of this guidance
on its consolidated financial statements.
The Group does not believe other
recently issued but not yet effective accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the consolidated
financial position, statements of operations and cash flows.
(1) Disposition of SPI China
On August 30, 2018, the Group
entered into a share purchase agreement (the “SPI China disposal agreement”) with Lighting Charm, an affiliate of Ms.
Shan Zhou, the spouse of Xiaofeng Peng, the Group’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. Ms. Shan
Zhou, as the beneficial owner of the Group, hold more than 10% equity interest of the Group on December 10, 2018. The agreement
has been approved by an independent committee of the Group’s Board of Directors. The SPI China disposal agreement provides
that the Group sold Lighting Charm the 100% equity interest of SPI China, which holds all of the Group’s assets and liabilities
related to its business in China (the “Acquired Business”). The Group effected an internal restructuring following
which SPI China would only hold the Group’s subsidiaries in China, and all the other subsidiaries outside of China would
be transferred to the Group. Pursuant to the terms of the SPI China disposal agreement, the consideration for the Acquired Business
to be paid by the Lighting Charm to the Group in cash was US$1.00. As of December 10, 2018, the restructuring was completed and
the disposition was closed. As a result of the disposition to a principal shareholder for US$1.00, the excess of SPI China’s
book value of liabilities over the book value of its assets was recorded as an addition to paid-in capital of $107,867.
Together with the transaction,
the Group granted Lighting Charm options to purchase up to 1,000,000 of the Group’s ordinary shares with par value of $0.0001,
with an exercise price of US$ 3.80 per share. The options vested immediately and can be exercised at any time on or prior to August
21, 2021. The options were valued using the Binomial option pricing model and the fair value of the options on the grant date was
$1,260, which adjusted to the fair value of disposal consideration and was charged into additional paid-in capital.
The Group had made payment on
behalf of SPI China for its operation purpose from December 10, 2018 to December 31, 2018, which was considered remote collectability
due to the financial position of SPI China, and the Company recorded the amount due from SPI China as a debt forgiveness loss from
related parties, with amount of $536 recorded as a reduction of paid-in capital.
The following are revenues and
loss from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
5,945
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
6,235
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
2,904
|
|
|
|
8,391
|
|
|
Sales, marketing and customer service
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
887
|
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts, notes and other receivable
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
7,485
|
|
|
Impairment charges on goodwill and intangible assets
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
Impairment charges on property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,755
|
|
|
Impairment charges on project assets
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
Impairment charges on finance lease receivable
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
23,967
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,986
|
|
|
|
51,953
|
|
|
Total other expense, net
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(4,790
|
)
|
|
|
(12,188
|
)
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
(64,431
|
)
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
(64,445
|
)
|
|
(2)
|
Disposition of Italy Subsidiaries
|
On September 23, 2019, the Company
entered into a sale and purchase agreement with a third party buyer, Theia Investments (Italy) S.r.l. (“Theia”), to
sell all the shares it held in SUN ROOF II S.r.l (“SR II”) and SUN ROOF V S.r.l. (“SR V”) for a consideration
of $2,802 and $2,014, respectively.
SR II and SR V are two limited
liabilities companies established under the Italian law in 2011, which own 3 PV plants for a total of 1.8MW peak capacity
and 1 PV plant of 0.9MW peak capacity, respectively. The sale of both SR II and SR V were completed on September 26, 2019. The
Company derecognized all the assets, liabilities and equity components of SR II and SR V and recognized a loss of $481 on disposal
of SR II and a gain of $96 on disposal of SR V which are included in other income (expense) – others in the consolidated
statements of operations.
On September 20, 2017, the Group
entered into a Framework Share Purchase Agreement with Thermi Taneo Venture Capital Fund (“Thermi”) to expand the Company’s
business in Europe and also to settle the Group’s EPC receivable from Thermi. Pursuant to the Framework Share Purchase Agreement,
the Group agreed to purchase 100% equity interest in Heliohrisi S.A. (“Heliohrisi”), Heliostixio S.A. (“Heliostixio”)
and Thermi Sun S.A. (“Thermi Sun”) from Thermi.
(1) Acquisition of Heliostixio
On December 13, 2017, the Group
entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (“Heliostixio Purchase Agreement”) with Thermi and purchased 100% equity interest
of Heliostixio at a cash price of $2,108 (EUR 1,757). Heliostixio is a Company located in Greece, with a solar photovoltaic project
of 1.082 MW peak capacity. Pursuant to Heliostixio Purchase Agreement, the closing date of the acquisition was December 13, 2017,
and the Group obtained related control of Heliostixio.
The acquisition has been accounted
for under ASC 805 Business Combinations. The goodwill arose from the acquisition was $626 and $651 as of December 31, 2019 and
2018, respectively. No impairment was provided during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
(2) Acquisition
of Heliohrisi S.A
On March 20, 2019, the Group
entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (“Heliohrisi Purchase Agreement”) with Thermi and purchased 100% equity interest
of Heliohrisi. Heliohrisi is a company located in Greece, with a solar photovoltaic project of 1.99 MW peak capacity. The solar
photovoltaic facility began commercial operation in July 2012. The output of the plant is contracted under a 27-year PPA which
began on the commercial operation date. The acquisition was in accordance with the Company's overall growth strategy.
The total consideration for
acquiring Heliohrisi was $4,013 which was paid in cash as of December 31, 2019 and there is no noncash or contingent consideration.
The acquisition is accounted as an asset acquisition according to ASU 2017-01 since substantially all the fair value of the gross
assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset. The excess of consideration over fair value of the assets acquired
of $777 was allocated to property, plant and equipment.
(3) Acquisition
of Thermi Sun S.A.
On November 1, 2019, the Group
entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (“Thermi Sun Purchase Agreement”) with Thermi and purchased 100% equity interest
of Thermi Sun. Thermi Sun is a company located in Greece, with two solar photovoltaic project of totally 4.4 MW peak capacity.
The solar photovoltaic facility began commercial operation in July 2012. The output of the plant is contracted under a 27-year
PPA which began on the commercial operation date. The acquisition was in accordance with the Company's overall growth strategy.
The total consideration
for acquiring Thermi Sun was $8,476 which was paid in cash as of December 31, 2019, and there is no noncash or contingent
consideration. The acquisition is accounted as an asset acquisition according to ASU 2017-01 since substantially all the fair
value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset. The excess of consideration over the fair
value of the assets acquired of $232 was allocated to property, plant and equipment.
|
6.
|
Accounts Receivable, net
|
The accounts receivable as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
17,001
|
|
|
$
|
28,410
|
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
(633
|
)
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
16,539
|
|
|
$
|
27,777
|
|
The movements of allowance for
doubtful accounts are as follows:
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Balance as at January 1
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
Addition
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
Written off
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(1,526
|
)
|
|
Reversal
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
Foreign currency translation difference
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
Balance as at December 31
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
$
|
633
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
On March 18, 2019, Solar Juice,
entered into debtor finance agreements with Scottish Pacific (BFS) Pty Ltd. (“Scottish Pacific”), whereby Scottish
Pacific provided Solar Juice invoice discounting facility (see Note 16 Short-term Borrowings and Long-term Borrowings). As of December
31, 2019 and 2018, all the outstanding Accounts receivable of Solar Juice was pledged to Scottish Pacific for a total gross amount
of $9,761 and $8,345, respectively.
Inventories as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted
of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
$
|
12,216
|
|
|
$
|
9,867
|
|
|
Goods in transit
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
Raw materials
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Total inventories, net
|
|
$
|
13,781
|
|
|
$
|
11,906
|
|
During the years ended December
31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, inventories were written down by $103, $nil and $366 from continuing operations, respectively, to reflect
the lower of cost or net realizable value.
Project assets as of December
31, 2019 and 2018 consist of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Project assets completed for sale
|
|
$
|
17,847
|
|
|
$
|
21,215
|
|
|
Project assets under development
|
|
|
16,490
|
|
|
|
19,807
|
|
|
Total project assets
|
|
|
34,337
|
|
|
|
41,022
|
|
|
Current, net of impairment loss
|
|
$
|
17,842
|
|
|
$
|
24,654
|
|
|
Noncurrent, net of impairment loss
|
|
$
|
16,495
|
|
|
$
|
16,368
|
|
During the years ended December
31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, impairment losses of $2,455, $nil and $687 were recorded for certain project assets held for development
and sale from continuing operations, respectively. The impairment provided for the year ended December 31, 2019 is mainly for the
project assets located in Japan.
During the years ended December
31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Group recognized total revenue from sales of PV project assets and sales of pre-development solar
projects of $6,728, $26,603 and $6,042 from continuing operations, respectively, and cost of $7,703, $23,418 and $6,229 from continuing
operations were recognized accordingly.
|
9.
|
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets, net
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets, net as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 consist of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Value-added tax recoverable, current
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
|
Deposit and prepayment for acquisitions, net of provision of $10,921 and $10,840, respectively (a)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Other deposit and prepayment, net of provision of $3,584 and $452, respectively (b)
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
|
|
1,216
|
|
|
Other receivable, net of provision of $1,968 and $914, respectively (c)
|
|
|
2,262
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
Total prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
$
|
5,170
|
|
|
$
|
4,382
|
|
|
(a)
|
Deposit and Prepayment for Acquisitions
|
Deposit and prepayment for acquisitions
as at December 31, 2019 primarily include: i) an amount of $8,625 (2018: $8,543) relating to the acquisition of RE Capital Projects.
The prepayment for acquisition of RE Capital Projects mainly included cash of $2,640 and the Group’s ordinary shares amounting
to $5,500. In April 2017, the acquisition was terminated and both parties agreed that the ordinary shares would be transferred
back to the Group and the cash portion would not be refunded. Thus, provision for doubtful recoveries of $8,569 (2018: $8,488)
was accrued, and the prepayment for acquisition was written down to the recovered amount of $56 and $55 as of December 31, 2019
and 2018; ii) prepayment of $2,288 (2018: $2,288) relating to acquisition of the Kashima PV station. The Group assessed the collectability
is remote and full provision for doubtful recoveries was accrued.
|
(b)
|
Other Deposit and Prepayment
|
Other deposit and prepayment
primarily include: i) prepayment of $3,132 to purchase land from Shengrun Intl Industry Group INC (“Shengrun”) to develop
solar projects in California as of December 31, 2019, of which full provision has been provided during the year ended December
31, 2019. The total contract price is $19,577 and the Group has the right to redeem the prepayment within six months after May
21, 2019. In November 2019, the Group decide to terminate the transaction and require Shengrun to return $3,132 before December
15, 2019. However, the Group failed to collect it till the issuance of the financial statements. The Group provided full provision
after assessing the possibility of collectivity; ii) prepayment made to vendors to purchase PV modules, rental deposits and other
prepaid expenses.
Other receivable as at December
31, 2019 mainly included: i) the business fund lent to a third party, Tacoo Corporation with no interest bearing of $1,320 (2018:
$2,107). The Company assessed the collectability of the receivable and concluded no provision accrued as of December 31, 2019 and
2018; ii) other receivable of $2,910 (2018: $1,435) for project payment on behalf of third parties, the Group assessed the collectability
and provision of $1,968 (2018: $914) was accrued.
|
10.
|
Intangible Assets, net
|
Intangible assets, net as of
December 31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in months)
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Charge
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patent
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
2,700
|
|
|
$
|
(2,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
Customer Relationship
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
(1,547
|
)
|
|
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,070
|
|
|
$
|
(4,247
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,528
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patent
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
2,700
|
|
|
$
|
(2,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
Customer Relationship
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
4,366
|
|
|
|
(1,270
|
)
|
|
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,066
|
|
|
$
|
(3,970
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,801
|
|
The customer relationship was
mainly contributed by the acquisition of Solar Juice in May 2015. As customer relationship with clients was the key driver of the
revenue for Solar Juice, which will bring further economic benefit to the Group’s business. Therefore, the customer relationship
was separately identified as an intangible asset on the acquisition date. The balance is amortized over the useful life of 10 years.
No impairment loss was provided for intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Amortization expense for other
intangible assets was $278, $300 and $302 from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
As of December 31, 2019, the
estimated future amortization expense related to other intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,528
|
|
|
11.
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, net
|
Property, plant and equipment, net as of December
31, 2019 and 2018 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Photovoltaic solar systems
|
|
$
|
32,288
|
|
|
$
|
24,375
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining equipment
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
Automobile
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
Computers
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
1,177
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,747
|
|
|
|
26,746
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(3,636
|
)
|
|
|
(5,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
34,111
|
|
|
|
21,241
|
|
|
Less: impairment
|
|
|
(2,328
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
31,783
|
|
|
$
|
21,150
|
|
The costs of PV solar system
include costs of acquiring permits, construction fees of PV solar system, costs of items installed in the PV solar system including
solar panels, and other costs incurred that are directly attributable to getting the PV solar system ready for its intended use
of grid connection with customer for supply of electricity. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment was $1,981, $1,204 and
$1,159 from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Impairment loss on property,
plant and equipment of $2,235, $nil and $53 from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
|
12.
|
Investment in Affiliates, net
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Investment in Sinsin
|
|
$
|
69,606
|
|
|
$
|
69,606
|
|
|
Investment in EnSync, Inc.
|
|
|
33,390
|
|
|
|
33,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,996
|
|
|
|
102,996
|
|
|
Less: impairment
|
|
|
(33,390
|
)
|
|
|
(33,390
|
)
|
|
Investment in affiliates, net
|
|
$
|
69,606
|
|
|
$
|
69,606
|
|
The impairment provision for
the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $nil, $nil and $2,214, respectively.
|
13.
|
Fair Value Measurement
|
As of December 31, 2019, the
derivative liability was measured at fair value on a recurring basis in periods subsequent to their initial recognition using Black-Scholes
model, which was classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018.
The Company identified derivative
instruments arising from embedded conversion features in the convertible promissory note issued to Iliad Research and Trading,
L.P. (“ILIAD”) see Note 17 Convertible Bonds). The estimated fair value of the derivative embedded in the convertible
note issued to ILIAD was $652 as of December 31, 2019, and $937 as of the issuance date, May 28, 2019, respectively.
The following summarizes the
Black-Scholes Model assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the derivative liability at the dates of issuance and the revaluation
dates:
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
Expected term
|
|
|
0.41-0.5
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.6%-2.38%
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
120%-160%
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liability as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 is $652 and $nil, respectively, with the change in fair value of $285 recorded in the
consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The following method and assumptions
were used to estimate the fair value on a non-recurring basis as at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Cash and cash equivalents, restricted
cash, accounts receivable and payable, short term borrowings, accrued liabilities, advance from customers and other current liabilities
— costs approximate fair value because of the short maturity period.
The fair value of convertible
bonds was classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and uses binomial model. The estimated fair value of convertible bond
with Union Sky was $12,879 as of February 12, 2017 (see Note 17 Convertible Bonds).
The fair value of options issued
to Lighting Charm Limited was classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, and uses binomial model. The estimated fair value
of options issued to Lighting Charm Limited was $1,260 as of August 21, 2018 (see Note 4(1) Disposition of SPI China).
There have been no transfers
between Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 categories during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018
are as follows:
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Tax penalty payable (a)
|
|
$
|
2,780
|
|
|
$
|
9,670
|
|
|
Other payable
|
|
|
5,024
|
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
|
Other tax payables
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
Accrued expense
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
Other accrual and payables
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
9,177
|
|
|
$
|
16,495
|
|
The tax penalty payable of $2,780
and $9,670 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, represented the accrued tax penalty and interest since the Company was
late for filing the United States Federal and State income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company
recorded a tax penalty of $9,670 as of December 31, 2018 based on best estimation as the Company didn’t receive any result
from the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) by then.
On May 27, 2019 and February
20, 2020, IRS issued a notice to the Company which assessed penalties for Federal income tax for the tax years ended December 31,
2017 and 2016 in the amount of $1,190 and $1,290 plus interest, respectively. Therefore, the Company reversed tax penalty payable
of $6,890 for the year ended December 31, 2019 based on IRS notices for Federal income tax and the management reassessment for
State income tax. The tax penalty payable for Federal and State income tax plus interest was $2,780 as of December 31, 2019.
|
15.
|
Advance from Customers
|
The Group requires its customers
to make deposits before sale of PV projects. Such payments are recorded as advances from customers in the Group’s consolidated
financial statements, until the sales completed.
|
16.
|
Short-term Borrowings and Long-term Borrowings
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Debtor finance
|
|
$
|
2,226
|
|
|
$
|
2,691
|
|
|
Short-term bank borrowings
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
Other short-term borrowings
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
Total short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
2,857
|
|
|
|
3,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term bank borrowings
|
|
|
6,256
|
|
|
|
6,017
|
|
|
Other long-term borrowings
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
Total long-term borrowings
|
|
|
6,256
|
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
Less: current portion of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
Total long-term borrowings, excluding current portion
|
|
|
6,039
|
|
|
|
6,674
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
$
|
8,896
|
|
|
$
|
9,840
|
|
As of December 31, 2019, the
maturities of the long-term borrowings are as follows:
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
4,899
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,256
|
|
The Group’s subsidiary,
Solar Juice, entered into debtor finance agreements with Scottish Pacific on March 18, 2018, whereby Scottish Pacific provided
Solar Juice invoice discounting facility with a limit of $5,637, at service fee charge of 0.13% based on the invoices processed,
and discount fee charge of margin percentage plus 1.1% (margin percentage is around 6.76% during 2019 and 2018) based on the average
daily debtor finance balance. The accounts receivable collection of Solar Juice was automatically transferred to Scottish Pacific
for the debtor finance repayment at the ending of each work day. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the debtor finance balance was
$2,226 and $2,691, respectively.
As of December 31, 2019, long
term bank borrowings primarily represent a 10-year long term loan borrowed from Santander Bank amounting to $6,256 (2018: $6,017)
with a maturity date of February 16, 2027, of which $4,692 is at interest rate of 3.96% per annum and $1,564 is at interest rate
of 2.83% per annum.
The interest expense of bank
loans from continuing operations was $544, $525 and $567 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. The average interest
rate on short term borrowings from continuing operations was 7.97%, 7.39% and 5.65% per annum for the years ended December 31,
2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Brilliant King Group Limited (1)
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
Poseidon Sports Limited (1)
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Magical Glaze Limited (1)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
6,600
|
|
|
Vision Edge Limited (1)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. (2)
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Convertible bonds, current
|
|
|
55,907
|
|
|
|
41,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magical Glaze Limited (1)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
13,400
|
|
|
Convertible bonds, noncurrent
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
13,400
|
|
|
Total convertible bonds
|
|
$
|
55,907
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
|
(1)
|
2014 and 2015 Convertible Promissory Note and Amendments
|
In December 2014, the Company
entered into three convertible promissory note purchase agreements with Brilliant King Group Limited (“Brilliant King”),
Poseidon Sports Limited (“Poseidon”) and Union Sky Holding Group Limited (“Union Sky”), respectively whereby
the Company agreed to sell and issue to these three investors convertible promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of
$35,000 which could be converted into 175,000 Ordinary Shares at a fixed conversion price of $200 unless adjusted for anti-dilution.
The convertible notes bore no interest, and might be partially or wholly converted into shares of the Company’s ordinary
shares at any time prior to maturity at the option of the investor. The convertible promissory notes were due and payable on June
11, 2016.
On June 15, 2015, the Company
agreed to issue to Vision Edge Limited (“Vision Edge”) convertible promissory note in an aggregate amount of $20,000
which could be converted into 74,074 Ordinary Shares at a fixed conversion price of $270 unless adjusted for anti-dilution pursuant
to the agreement entered between the Company and Vision Edge. The convertible notes bore no interest, and might be wholly converted
into shares of the Company’s ordinary shares at any time prior to maturity at the option of the investor. The commitment
date of the convertible promissory note is on June 29, 2015. The convertible promissory note was due and payable on June 29, 2016.
The Group defaulted the payment
for all outstanding convertible bonds of $55,000 in June 2016.
First Amendment Agreement
with Union Sky
On February 12, 2017, the Group
entered into an Amendment Agreement (“First Amendment Agreement”) with Union Sky, one of the convertible bond holders
to extend the maturity date of the debt, pursuant to which the repayment of $6,600, $6,700 and $6,700 of the principal amount of
the convertible bond was extended to April 30, 2017, January 30, 2018 and January 30, 2019, respectively. The holder has the option
to convert the outstanding amounts under the convertible bond into equity interest in the Company at a conversion price per ordinary
share that equals the weighted average daily closing price of the Company’s American depositary shares from January 30, 2017
to February 10, 2017.
According to the First Amendment,
the convertible bond held by Union Sky was substantially amended by adding the substantive conversion option and the present value
of the cash flows under the terms of the amended debt instrument was more than 10 percent different from the present value of the
remaining cash flows under the terms of the original instrument. According to ASC Topic 470, if it is determined that the original
and new debt instruments are substantially different, and the new debt instrument shall be initially recorded at fair value, and
that amount shall be used to determine the debt extinguishment gain or loss to be recognized and the effective rate of the new
instrument. Therefore, the amended convertible bond held by Union Sky was initially recorded at fair value, amounting to $12,879
as of February 12, 2017. As comparing to the carrying value of original of $20,000, a gain from extinguishment of debt of $7,121
was recognized in 2017. The discount of $7,121 of the amended convertible bond is amortized as interest expense using the effective
interest rate method through the period of the First Amendment Agreement.
As the Group did not make the
first repayment by the end of April 2017, all outstanding debts of $20,000 under the Agreement became due immediately bearing an
annual interest rate of 18%.
Second Amendment Agreement
with Union Sky
On June 29, 2018, the Company
entered into another amendment agreement (the “Second Amendment Agreement”) with the Union Sky and Magical Glaze Limited
(“MGL”), a company and Union Sky was under common control, pursuant to which agreement the Union Sky has transferred
all the rights and obligations under the Original agreement and First Amendment Agreement to MGL, and the maturity date of the
note was further extended. According to the Second Amendment Agreement, the repayment of $6,600, $6,700 and $6,700 of the principal
amount of the convertible bond and interest thereon is due by December 2019, June 2020 and December 2020, respectively. MGL and
the Company also agreed that MGL had the option to convert the outstanding amounts under the convertible bond into equity interest
of the Company as the same provision stated in the First Amendment Agreement started on June 29, 2018, which the conversion price
per ordinary share equals the weighted average daily closing price of the Company’s ordinary shares in the NASDAQ stock market
10 working days prior to the date of signing the second amendment agreement.
Given that the Company was experiencing
financial difficulties and the note holder, MGL granted a concession by extending the note maturity dates, resulting in the effective
interest rate for the second amendment lower than effective interest rate for the first amendment, the Company accounted for the
second amendment as a troubled debt restructuring. According to ASC Topic 470, if future undiscounted cash flows are less than
the net carrying value of the original debt, a gain is recognized for the difference and the carrying value of the debt is adjusted
to the future undiscounted cash flow amount. The future undiscounted cash flow of the second amended convertible bond was $20,000,
which is less than the carrying amount of the first amended convertible bond of $21,887 as of June 29, 2018. Therefore, the Company
recognized a gain on troubled debt restructuring of $1,887 and the second amended convertible bond held by MGL was recorded at
the undiscounted future cash flow, amounting to $20,000. No interest expense or amortization of debt discount is recorded going
forward.
|
(2)
|
Convertible Promissory Note and Amendment with ILIAD
|
On May 28, 2019, the Company
entered into a Secured Convertible Promissory Note with ILIAD (the “ILIAD Note”), with an initial principal amount
of $1,335. The Company received $1,250 in cash from the ILIAD, and the remainder $19 was retained for legal fees for the issuance
of the ILIAD Note and the original issue discount of $62. The ILIAD Note had a 12-month term and carried interest at 10% per annum.
The Company’s obligations under the ILIAD Note may be prepaid at any time, provided that in such circumstance the Company
would pay 115% of any amounts outstanding under the note and being prepaid. The note could be convertible into shares of the Company’s
common stock at a conversion price of $10 per share (“Conversion Price”) at any time after the issuance date.
ILIAD could redeem any portion
of the note, at any time after six months from the issue date, subject to a maximum monthly redemption amount of $200, with the
Company having the option to pay such redemptions in cash, the Company’s common stock at the Redemption Conversion Price,
or by a combination thereof. The Redemption Conversion Price should be the lesser of $10 or 80% of the lowest closing trade price
during the ten trading days immediately preceding the applicable measurement date.
The Company determines that
the conversion feature within the ILIAD Note meets the requirements to be treated as a derivative and the Company estimates a fair
value of the derivative liability using the Black-Scholes Model upon the date of issuance. As the fair value of the derivative
liability is less than the face value of the convertible debt, the fair value of the derivative liability is recorded as a liability
with an offsetting amount recorded as a debt discount, which offsets the carrying amount of the debt. The derivative liability
is revalued at the end of each reporting period and any change in fair value is recorded as a change in fair value of derivative
liability in the consolidated statements of operations.
On December 10, 2019, the
Company made an amended to the ILIAD Note to defer the first redemption until January 1, 2020. The Company evaluated the
Amendment in accordance with ASC 470, Debt (“ASC 470”) and determined the Amendment is not considered a troubled
debt restructuring or an extinguishment of the existing debt.
The Company recorded a total
of $1,018 debt discount upon the issuance of ILIAD Note, including the $937 fair value of the embedded derivative liability, $19
of direct transaction costs incurred, and $62 original issue discount. The debt discount is amortized to interest expense over
the term of the loan. Amortization of the debt discount was $594 for the year ended December 31, 2019 and was included in interest
expense in the accompanying Statements of Operations.
As at December 31, 2019, except
the convertible bonds held by MGL and ILIAD, the conversion option of the convertible bonds had expired. As of December 31, 2019
and 2018, the carrying amounts of convertible bonds are $55,907 and $55,000, net of unamortized debt discount of $424 and $nil,
respectively. As of the date of issuance of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, except for the ILIAD Note, the
remaining principal amount of the convertible bonds of $55,000 remained unpaid, which are all due within the next 12 months.
|
18.
|
Consideration Payable
|
Consideration payable of $54,000
and $53,824 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 mainly represented: i) unpaid purchase consideration of Sinsin of $42,723 and $43,595
as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively; ii) Accrued interest for the unpaid purchase consideration of Sinsin of $11,277
and $8,712 with an interest rate of 6% for the unpaid purchase price, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively; iii) unpaid
purchase consideration of Heliostixio of $nil and $1,517 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively (see Note 5(1) Acquisition
of Heliostixio).
|
19.
|
Amount Due to an Affiliate
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Amount due to an affiliate, current
|
|
$
|
9,128
|
|
|
$
|
8,819
|
|
|
Amount due to an affiliate, noncurrent
|
|
|
1,728
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Total amount due to an Affiliate
|
|
$
|
10,856
|
|
|
$
|
8,819
|
|
Amount due to an affiliate includes:
i) payment made by Sinsin on the behalf of the Group of $8,819 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, which is classified as amount
due to an affiliate, current; ii) a borrowing of $729 (EUR 650) form Sinsin on February 20, 2019 with an interest rate of 5% per
annum which will mature on December 31, 2024, of which $146 will be paid in 2020 and classified as amount due to an affiliate,
current; ii) a borrowing of $1,308 (EUR 1,165) from Sinsin on October 14, 2019 with an interest rate of 4.5% per annum which will
mature on December 31, 2027, of which $163 will be paid in 2020 and classified as amount due to and affiliate, current.
On December 6, 2017, the Group
enacted a one-for-ten reverse stock split as approved by the Group’s extraordinary general meeting. On November 12, 2018,
the Group enacted a one-for-ten reverse stock split as approved by the Group’s extraordinary general meeting. All share and
per share amounts in the consolidated financial statements have been retroactively restated to reflect the reverse stock split.
The authorized shares of ordinary shares were 500,000,000 shares of a par value of $0.0001.
During the year ended December
31, 2019 and 2018, the Group issued 107,000 and 663,460 restricted ordinary shares to core management members and other management,
respectively (see Note 22 Share-based Compensation).
On January 17, 2019, the Company
announced the entry into share purchase agreements with certain existing shareholders (including certain key management personnel
of the Company) and other investors, to purchase an aggregate of 6,600,000 ordinary shares of the Company at a price of US$1.16
per share, for a total consideration of $7,656. The transaction was closed as of April 12, 2019.
The issued ordinary share of
the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 14,621,125 shares and 7,914,125 shares, respectively.
|
21.
|
Noncontrolling Interests
|
On July 25, 2019, the Company
purchased the 20% equity interest of SR II and 30% equity interest of SR V, subsidiaries of the Company in Italy, from Green Equity
S.à r.l. (“Green Equity”), the minority shareholder of SR II and SR V. The purchase price was $75, and the carrying
amount of the noncontrolling interest of SR II and SR V was $1,213 as of the purchase date. Green Equity also waived the amount
due from SR II and SR V of $1,140.
During the year ended December
31, 2019, as a result of purchasing all noncontrolling interest of SR II and SR V, the Company derecognized the noncontrolling
interest of $1,213, and the difference between the purchase price together with the debt forgiveness mount, and the carrying amount
of noncontrolling interest was recorded in additional paid-in capital, which was $2,278.
|
22.
|
Share-based Compensation
|
The Company measures employee
share-based compensation expense for all share-based compensation awards based on the grant-date fair value and recognizes the
cost in the financial statements over the employee requisite service period.
During the years ended December
31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the total share-based compensation expense was $821, $2,756 and $798, respectively. Among them, $821,
$2,726 and $1,174 were attributable to continuing operations, respectively. The following table summarizes the consolidated share-based
compensation expense from continuing operations, by type of awards:
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
1,799
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
Restricted stock grants
|
|
|
516
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
The following table summarizes
the consolidated share-based compensation by line items from continuing operations:
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
768
|
|
|
$
|
2,579
|
|
|
$
|
1,131
|
|
|
Sales, marketing and customer service
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
821
|
|
|
$
|
2,726
|
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
As share-based compensation
expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced
for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are required to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent
periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.
Determining Fair Value
Valuation and Amortization
Method —The Company estimates the fair value of service-based and performance-based stock options granted using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing formula. The fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards,
which is generally the vesting period. In the case of performance-based stock options, amortization does not begin until it is
determined that meeting the performance criteria is probable. Service-based and performance-based options typically have a ten-year
life from date of grant and vesting periods of four years.
Expected Term —The
Company’s expected term represents the period that the Company’s share-based awards are expected to be outstanding.
For awards granted subject only to service vesting requirements, the Group utilizes the simplified method for estimating the expected
term of the share-based award, instead of historical exercise data. For its performance-based awards, the Group has determined
the expected term life to be 6.25 years based on contractual life and the seniority of the recipient.
Expected Volatility —The
Company uses historical volatility of the price of its ordinary shares to calculate the volatility for its granted options.
Expected Dividend —The
Company has never paid dividends on its ordinary shares and currently does not intend to do so, and accordingly, the dividend yield
percentage is zero for all periods.
Risk-Free Interest Rate —
The Company bases the risk-free interest rate used in the Black-Scholes valuation model upon the implied yield curve currently
available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.
Assumptions used in the determination
of the fair value of share-based payment awards using the Black-Scholes model for stock option grants were as follows:
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
Expected term
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.55%-2.51%
|
|
|
|
2.54%-3.03%
|
|
|
|
1.81%-2.30%
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
575%-605%
|
|
|
|
624%-756%
|
|
|
|
284%-763%
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan
On May 8, 2015, the Company
adopted the 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) which permits the Company to grant stock options to directors,
officers or employees of the Company or others to purchase shares of Ordinary Stock of the Company through awards of incentive
and nonqualified stock options (“Option”), Restricted Stock or Unrestricted Stock and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”)
which was approved by the shareholders. The total number of shares which may be issued under the 2015 Plan is 9% of the number
of outstanding and issued ordinary shares of the Company. The Option Price per Share shall be determined by the compensation committee
of the Board (“Compensation Committee”), unless expressly approved by the Compensation Committee, shall not be less
than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the date an Option is granted.
During the year ended
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Board of Directors approved the grants of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) to core
management members and other management, pursuant to the terms of the 2015 Plan. The total number of RSUs granted is 107,000
and 663,460 shares, respectively. The vesting schedules are 100% vested at the grant date for all the grants. All these
shares were issued to the management during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Group used the market price of its
shares at grant date as the fair value of the RSUs in calculating the share based compensation expense.
The following table summarizes
the Group’s stock option activities:
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price Per Share
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000)
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
550,760
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
7.40
|
|
|
$
|
60,032
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
325,300
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(374,800
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
501,260
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
7.03
|
|
|
$
|
769
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
287,000
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(528,060
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
260,200
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
8.59
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
255,200
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
139,450
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
6.47
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
Expected to vest as of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
124,355
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
6.45
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
The following table presents
the exercise price and remaining life information about options exercisable at December 31, 2019:
|
Range of exercise price
|
|
Shares Exercisable
|
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic ($000)
|
|
|
$118 - $172
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
$
|
172.00
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$40 - $117
|
|
|
42,300
|
|
|
|
6.38
|
|
|
$
|
63.61
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$2 - $39
|
|
|
93,650
|
|
|
|
7.33
|
|
|
$
|
5.60
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$1-$2
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
9.69
|
|
|
$
|
1.96
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
Following is a summary of our restricted stock awards
as follows:
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
|
|
|
Restricted stock units at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
217,059
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(1,250
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
Restricted stock units at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
215,809
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
663,460
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
Restricted stock units at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
879,019
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
107,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
Restricted stock units at December 31, 2019
|
|
|
986,019
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
Changes in the Group’s non-vested stock awards
are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Time-based Options
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value Per Share
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
430,358
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
|
4,750
|
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
325,300
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(100,663
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(2,187
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(275,075
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(1,250
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
379,920
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
287,000
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
663,460
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(87,285
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(663,273
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(396,335
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(250
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2018
|
|
|
183,300
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
107,000
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(70,050
|
)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(108,250
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(62,500
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Non-vested as of December 31, 2019
|
|
|
115,750
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
The weighted average grant date
fair value of option per share are $3.48, $12.54, and $3.88 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017. As of December
31, 2019, the unrecognized compensation costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.72
years.
The total fair value of shares
vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $690, $1,382 and $2,955, respectively. There were no changes
to the contractual life of any fully vested options during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Loss before provision for income taxes is attributable
to the following geographic locations for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(4,926
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,757
|
)
|
|
Foreign Countries
|
|
|
(10,130
|
)
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
(1,620
|
)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(15,056
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,805
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,377
|
)
|
The provision for income taxes consists of the following
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Current tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal tax
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
State tax
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Foreign countries
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
Total current tax
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
Deferred tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal tax
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
State tax
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Foreign countries
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
Total deferred tax
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
The reconciliation between
the actual income tax expense and income tax computed by applying the statutory U.S. Federal income tax rate for the year ended
December 31 is as follows:
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes at U.S. Federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(3,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,219
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,232
|
)
|
|
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
Foreign taxes at different rate
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
(936
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
Tax law changes
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
22,813
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
6,463
|
|
|
|
45,870
|
|
|
|
(17,752
|
)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
5,086
|
|
|
Disposition of subsidiaries
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(45,193
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Impairments and intangible amortization
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(3,761
|
)
|
|
Share Based Compensation
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
Gain on debt modification
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(1,475
|
)
|
|
(Reversal) accrual of tax penalty
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
332
|
|
|
$
|
137
|
|
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(“TCJA” or the “Act”) (which is commonly referred to as “U.S. tax reform”). Among other provisions,
the Act reduces the top U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on
earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, changes the rules related to uses and limitations
of net operating loss carry forwards created in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, and creates new taxes on certain
foreign sourced earnings. The Company has reflected the changes resulting from the Act in the financial statements for the period
of enactment, the year ended December 31, 2017. The change in corporate rate resulted in a $22,813 decrease in the Company's gross
deferred tax assets, with an offsetting decrease in valuation allowance of the same amount. The Company is not subject to a one-time
repatriation tax as no aggregate foreign accumulated earnings and profits existed in the foreign subsidiaries as of December 31,
2019 and 2018. The Company has accounted for additional tax liability in 2018 arising from Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income
of $892 which accounted for as a period cost. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, the Company determined that
the measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities, as noted above, was accurate and no other adjustments relating to the
Act were necessary.
Deferred income taxes reflect
the net tax effects of loss carry forwards and temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Group’s deferred
tax assets and liabilities for federal, state and foreign income taxes are as follows at December 31 are presented below:
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry forwards
|
|
$
|
77,101
|
|
|
$
|
66,775
|
|
Temporary differences due to accrued warranty costs
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
459
|
|
Impairment of property, plant and equipment, and project assets
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
Credits
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Allowance for bad debts
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
Fair value adjustment arising from subsidiaries acquisition
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
4,949
|
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
Unrealized loss on derivatives
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
Unrealized investment loss
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
|
|
4,314
|
|
Other temporary differences
|
|
|
3,646
|
|
|
|
7,318
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(99,976
|
)
|
|
|
(93,513
|
)
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value adjustment arising from subsidiaries acquisition
|
|
|
(3,227
|
)
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
–
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(3,506
|
)
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(3,448
|
)
|
|
$
|
(375
|
)
|
As of December 31, 2019, the
Group had a net operating loss carry forward for federal income tax purposes of approximately $319,439, which will start to expire
in the year 2027. The Group had a total state net operating loss carry forward of approximately $154,237, which will start to expire
in the year 2027. The Group has foreign net operating loss carry forward of $7,801, some of which begin to expire in 2020. The
Group had a federal AMT credit of $16, which does not expire.
Utilization of the federal and
state net operating losses is subject to certain annual limitations due to the “change in ownership” provisions of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and similar state provisions. However, the annual limitation may be anticipated to result in
the expiration of net operating losses and credits before utilization.
The Group recognizes deferred
tax assets if it is more likely than not that those deferred tax assets will be realized. Management reviews deferred tax assets
periodically for recoverability and makes estimates and judgments regarding the expected geographic sources of taxable income in
assessing the need for a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to their estimated realizable value. Realization of
the Group’s deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which are uncertain.
Because of the Group’s lack of earnings history, the net deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance
in the U.S. The valuation allowance increased by $6,463 and $45,870 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and decreased
by $17,752 for the year ended December 31, 2017, respectively.
The Group had no unrecognized
tax benefits as of December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Group currently files income tax returns in the U.S., as well as California,
Hawaii, New Jersey, and certain other foreign jurisdictions. The Group is currently not the subject of any income tax examinations.
The Group’s tax returns generally remain open for tax years after 2011.
The Group has analyzed the
impact of adopting ASC 606 on the Group's financial statements and disclosures. There is no material impact on the financial statements
of adopting ASC 606. Therefore, there is no material tax impact either.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief
and Economy Security (CARES) Act (“the CARES Act, H.R. 748”) was signed into law on 27 March 2020. The CARES Act temporarily
eliminates the 80% taxable income limitation (as enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017) for NOL deductions for 2018-2020
tax years and reinstated NOL carrybacks for the 2018-2020 tax years. Moreover, the CARES Act also temporarily increases the business
interest deduction limitations from 30% to 50% of adjusted taxable income for the 2019 and 2020 taxable year. Lastly, the Tax Act
technical correction classifies qualified improvement property as 15-year recovery period, allowing the bonus depreciation deduction
to be claimed for such property retroactively as if it was included in the Tax Act at the time of enactment. The company does not
anticipate a material impact on its financial statements as of December 31, 2019 due to the recent enactment.
As a result of the net loss
for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, there is no dilutive impact to the net loss per share calculation for the
period.
The following table presents
the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share:
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for net loss from continuing operations per share-basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(15,258
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,168
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,682
|
)
|
|
Numerator for net loss from discontinued operations per share-basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
(6,114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64,398
|
)
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average ordinary shares
|
|
|
12,733,062
|
|
|
|
7,262,023
|
|
|
|
6,826,633
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average ordinary shares
|
|
|
12,733,062
|
|
|
|
7,262,023
|
|
|
|
6,826,633
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share-continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1.2)
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share-discontinued operations
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
For the years ended December
31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the following securities were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as inclusion
would have been anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Share options and non-vested restricted stock
|
|
|
255,200
|
|
|
|
261,450
|
|
|
|
502,573
|
|
|
Convertible bonds (see Note 17)
|
|
|
598,580
|
|
|
|
465,430
|
|
|
|
1,633,851
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
853,780
|
|
|
|
726,880
|
|
|
|
2,136,424
|
|
The Group has operating leases for its
PV stations and office facilities. The Group's leases have remaining terms of less than one year to approximately twenty years.
Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet; the Company recognizes lease expense for
these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The components of lease expenses were as
below:
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2019
|
|
Short term lease expenses
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
Operating lease expenses excluding short term lease expenses
|
|
$
|
510
|
|
Maturities of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019
were as follows:
|
Maturity of Lease Liabilities
|
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
546
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,402
|
|
|
Total lease payments
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
Less: interest
|
|
|
(909
|
)
|
|
Present value of lease payments
|
|
$
|
1,926
|
|
|
Operating lease liabilities, current
|
|
$
|
426
|
|
|
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
Supplemental information related to operating
leases was as follows:
|
|
|
For the year ended
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
New operating lease assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,419
|
|
Weighted average remaining lease term
|
|
|
11.8 Years
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
6.16%
|
|
26.
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
Product Warranties —The
Group offers the industry standard warranty up to 25 years for its PV panels and industry standard five to ten years on inverter
and balance of system components. Due to the warranty period, the Group bear the risk of warranty claims long after the Group has
shipped product and recognized revenue. In the Group’s cable, wire and mechanical assemblies business, the Group’s
historically warranty claims have not been material. In the Group’s solar PV business, the greatest warranty exposure is
in the form of product replacement.
During the quarter ended September
30, 2007 and continuing through the fourth quarter of 2010, the Group installed own manufactured solar panels. Since 2011, due
to the absence of historical material warranty claims and identical warranty terms, the Group has not recorded any additional warranty
provision relating to solar energy systems sold. The accrued warranty reserve is $1,538 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
PV construction contracts entered
into during the recent years included provisions under which the Group agreed to provide warranties to the customers. The warranty
the Group offers to its customers is identical to the warranty offered to the Group by its suppliers, therefore, the Group passes
on all potential warranty exposure and claims, if any, with respect systems sold by the Group to its suppliers. Therefore, the
Group has not recorded warranty reserve related to solar energy systems as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Capital commitments —As
of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Group had capital commitments of approximately $5,144 and $6,617, respectively, from continuing
operations. These capital commitments were solely related to contracts signed with vendors for procurement of services or PV related
products used for the construction of solar PV systems being developed by the Group.
The capital commitments as at
balance sheet dates disclosed above do not include those incomplete acquisitions for investment and business as at balance sheet
dates as the agreements could either be terminated unconditionally without any penalty or cancelable when the closing conditions
as specified in the agreements could not be met.
On January 26, 2018, Sinsin Group
filed a complaint against the Group requesting the payment of outstanding purchase price and related interest of $43,595 (EUR 38,054).
On June 25, 2018, an interim measures judgment was made which appointed an interim management of Sinsin, consisting of two members
elected by Sinsin Group and one member elected by the Group. The interim management would manage the bank accounts of Sinsin and
collect the proceeds of electric energy revenue. As of the issuance of the financial statements, this case is still on the proceeding,
and it is uncertain how the court will rule.
From time to time, the Group is
involved in various other legal and regulatory proceedings arising in the normal course of business. While the Group cannot predict
the occurrence or outcome of these proceedings with certainty, it does not believe that an adverse result in any pending legal
or regulatory proceeding, individually or in the aggregate, would be material to the Group’s consolidated financial condition
or cash flows; however, an unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s results of operations.
A substantial percentage of
the Group’s net revenue comes from sales made to a small number of customers to whom sales are typically made on an open
account basis. There was no customer of which the revenue accounted for 10% or more of total net revenue for the years ended December
31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Details of customers accounting
for 10% or more of total accounts receivable and notes receivable as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively are:
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Customer
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
Valta Solar LLC
|
|
$
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
$
|
8,366
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
Thermi Venture SA.
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–%
|
|
|
|
6,763
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
AES Distribution Energy, LLC
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–%
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
11%
|
|
|
KDC Solar Designed LLC
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
–%
|
|
|
|
4,823
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
32%
|
|
|
$
|
23,477
|
|
|
|
71%
|
|
Operating segments are defined
as components of a company which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the client operating
decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Group’s chief operating decision
maker is the Chairman, Mr. Peng. Based on the financial information presented to and reviewed by the chief operating decision
maker, the Group has determined that it has a single operating and reporting segment: solar energy products and services. The
types of products and services in this single segment primarily include: (i) Sales of PV components, (ii) Sales of pre-development
solar project, (iii) Sales of PV project assets, (iv) Electricity revenue under PPAs, (v) Bitcoin mining related business, (vi)
Sales of hays and others.
Net sales by major product and
services are as follows:
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
Sales of PV components
|
|
$
|
80,941
|
|
|
$
|
93,547
|
|
|
$
|
111,795
|
|
|
Sales of pre-development solar project
|
|
|
(2,835
|
)
|
|
|
15,794
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Sales of PV project assets
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
|
|
10,809
|
|
|
|
6,042
|
|
|
Electricity revenue with PPAs
|
|
|
3,368
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
2,793
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining related business
|
|
|
4,197
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Sales of hays and others
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,883
|
|
|
$
|
125,582
|
|
|
$
|
121,520
|
|
Net sales by geographic location are as follows:
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31,
|
|
|
Location (a)
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
$
|
979
|
|
|
$
|
932
|
|
|
$
|
6,903
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
80,518
|
|
|
|
91,381
|
|
|
|
112,174
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
18,721
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Greece
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
9,563
|
|
|
|
12,437
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,883
|
|
|
$
|
125,582
|
|
|
$
|
121,520
|
|
|
(a)
|
Sales are attributed to countries based on location of customers.
|
Geographic information, which is based upon physical
location, for long-lived assets was as follows:
|
Location
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
Greece
|
|
$
|
18,121
|
|
|
$
|
2,637
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
16,556
|
|
|
|
16,368
|
|
|
Italy
|
|
|
2,950
|
|
|
|
9,038
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
UK
|
|
|
9,657
|
|
|
|
9,642
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,428
|
|
|
$
|
39,970
|
|
|
29.
|
Related Party Transactions
|
The amount due from
related parties of $154 and $39 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 represented the advance payment to management for the
Group’s business operation.
The amount due to related parties
of $nil and $79 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 mainly represented the short term borrowing made from related parties.
In 2018, the Group disposed
SPI China to Lighting Charm, an affiliate of Ms. Shan Zhou, the spouse of Xiaofeng Peng, the Group’s Chairman of the Board
of Directors and Chief Executive Officer. As of the December 10, 2018, the disposition was closed (see Note 4(1) Disposition of
SPI China).
During year ended December 31,
2019, SPI China paid operation expenses of $653 on behalf of the Company, and the payable to SPI China was waived by SPI China.
|
(1)
|
Dispute on shareholding of Solar Juice
|
In May 2020, Solar Juice issued
100 shares in an amount of AU$20,000 per share to Andrew Burgess, Rami Fedda and Allied Energy, the minority shareholders of Solar
Juice. After the issuance of the shares, the Group’s shareholding in Solar Juice decreased from 80% to 40%. The issuance
and change of shares have been submitted, recorded and maintained by the Australia Securities and Investment Commission (“ASIC”).
With the change in shareholding, the board directors of Solar Juice appointed by the Group decreased from four directors to two
directors in May 2020, with five other directors.
There’s dispute between
the Group and the minority shareholders on the issuance of shares of Solar Juice. The Group filed an affidavit to the Federal Court
of Australia on May 29, 2020 to invalidate the aforesaid share issuance and appointment and removal of directors, and expect a
hearing on July 3, 2020. The dispute is on the proceeding and the Group could not estimate the outcome as of the date of issuance
of the consolidated financial statements.
The spread of COVID-19
around the world in the first quarter of 2020 has caused significant volatility in the markets of U.S., Europe and rest of the
world. There is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19, as well as
its impact on the economy of U.S. and international markets and, as such, the extent of the business disruption and the related
financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
On March 16, 2020, the Company
closed the sale of Sun Roof I assets, a 479 kWp rooftop solar project located in Aprilia, Italy, that has been in operation since
2012. The sale price was approximately $1.2 million (EUR 1.1 million) before transaction fees.
The Company has evaluated subsequent
events through the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements, there were no other subsequent events occurred that
would require recognition or disclosure in the consolidated financial statements.