United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009
OR
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number: 0-51014
BV FINANCIAL, INC.
(Exact name of
registrant in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
14-1920944
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
|
7114 North Point Road, Baltimore, Maryland
|
|
21219
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 477-5000
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark if
the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such filed). Yes
¨
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by
check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer
|
|
¨
|
|
Accelerated Filer
|
|
¨
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated Filer
|
|
¨
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company
|
|
x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates at December 31, 2008 was $3.51 million, based upon the closing price of
$4.25 as quoted on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board for December 31, 2008. Solely for purposes of this calculation, the shares held by Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and the directors and executive officers of the issuer are deemed to be held by
affiliates.
As of September 17, 2009, the issuer had 2,407,631 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.
INDEX
i
This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal
securities laws that are based on assumptions and may describe future plans, strategies and expectations of BV Financial, Inc. (the “Company” or “BV Financial”), Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank
(“Bay-Vanguard Federal”). These forward-looking statements are generally identified by terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects” and
similar expressions.
Management’s ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently
uncertain. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on the operations of BV Financial and its subsidiaries include, but are not limited to, the following: interest rate trends; the general economic climate in the market area in which we
operate, as well as nationwide; our ability to control costs and expenses; competitive products and pricing; loan delinquency rates and changes in federal and state legislation and regulation. Additional factors that may affect our results are
discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Item 1A—Risk Factors.” These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. BV
Financial does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly release the result of any revisions, which may be made to any forward-looking statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
PART I
General
BV Financial is a federally-chartered savings and loan holding company established in January 2005 to be the holding company for Bay-Vanguard Federal, a
federally-chartered savings bank. BV Financial’s business activity is the ownership of the outstanding capital stock of Bay-Vanguard Federal. BV Financial does not own or lease any property but instead uses the premises, equipment and other
property of Bay-Vanguard Federal. In the future, BV Financial may acquire or organize other operating subsidiaries; however, there are no current plans, arrangements, agreements or understandings, written or oral, to do so.
Bay-Vanguard Federal is the product of an April 1, 1996 merger of Bay Federal Savings and Loan Association and Vanguard Federal Savings and Loan
Association. Bay Federal Savings and Loan Association was incorporated in 1873 as a Maryland-chartered savings and loan association operating under the name Light Street Savings and Building Association of Baltimore City, later converting to a
federal charter. Bay Federal Savings and Loan Association had three full-service banking offices at the time of the merger. Vanguard Federal Savings and Loan Association was incorporated in 1959 as a Maryland-chartered savings and loan association
operating under the name Vanguard Savings and Loan Association. Vanguard Savings and Loan Association converted to a federal charter in 1987. Vanguard Federal Savings and Loan Association had one full-service banking office at the time of the
merger.
We operate as a community-oriented financial institution offering traditional financial services to consumers and businesses in
our market area. We attract deposits from the general public and use those funds to originate one- to four-family real estate, mobile home, construction, multi-family, commercial real estate, and consumer loans, which we hold for investment.
Our website address is www.bayvanguard.com. Information on our website should not be considered a part of this annual report.
Market Area
We are headquartered in Baltimore
County, Maryland. In addition to our main office, we operate two branch offices in Baltimore City and two branch offices in Anne Arundel County, one of which we acquired in August 2007 from Greater Atlantic Bank. We consider Baltimore City,
Baltimore County and Anne Arundel County to be our primary market area. The economy of our market area reflects a diverse cross-section of employment
sectors. The economies of Baltimore City, Baltimore County and Anne Arundel County are primarily geared toward the service, trade, government, financial
services and manufacturing sectors. However, because of the Fort Meade Installation and the state government in Annapolis, Anne Arundel County has a stronger concentration of government employees. Additionally, Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties
reported a higher level of construction employment than Baltimore City, reflecting the level of growth in those counties. According to the United States Census Bureau, the population of Baltimore City, Baltimore County and Anne Arundel County in
2008 was estimated to be approximately 637,000, 786,000 and 513,000, respectively. The economy of our market area is strongest in suburban Anne Arundel County, which has experienced higher growth rates in population and households while maintaining
low unemployment rates. Baltimore City, on the other hand, has seen its population and households decrease, which is reflective of the urban shift to suburban markets for job opportunities. Baltimore City also has a higher concentration of blue
collar workers, lower per capita income levels and a higher level of unemployment than the state or national averages.
Competition
We face significant competition for the attraction of deposits and origination of loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has
historically come from the several financial institutions operating in our market area and, to a lesser extent, from other financial service companies such as brokerage firms, credit unions and insurance companies. We also face competition for
investors’ funds from money market funds, mutual funds and other corporate and government securities. At June 30, 2008, which is the most recent date for which data is available from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, we held
approximately 0.29% of the deposits in the Baltimore-Towson, Maryland Metropolitan Statistical Area, which was the 41
st
largest market share out of the 78 financial institutions with offices in this metropolitan statistical area. In addition, banks
owned by large bank holding companies such as Bank of America Corporation, Wachovia Corporation, M&T Bank Corporation, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., BB&T Corporation and Sun Trust Banks, Inc. also operate in our market area. These
institutions are much larger than us and, therefore, have significantly greater resources that allow them to offer a wider variety of products and services.
Our competition for loans comes primarily from financial institutions in our market area, and, to a lesser extent, from other financial service providers such as mortgage companies and mortgage brokers. Competition
for loans also comes from the increasing number of non-depository financial service companies entering the mortgage market such as insurance companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies.
We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of
consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered the barriers to market entry, allowed banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the Internet and made it possible for
non-depository institutions to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Changes in federal law permit affiliation among banks, securities firms and insurance companies, which promotes a competitive environment in
the financial services industry. Competition for deposits and the origination of loans could limit our future growth.
Lending Activities
General.
Our loan portfolio consists primarily of one- to four-family residential real estate loans. To a much lesser
extent, our loan portfolio includes mobile home loans, construction loans, multi-family, commercial real estate loans, and consumer loans. Bay-Vanguard Federal historically originated and currently originates loans only for investment purposes. At
June 30, 2009, Bay-Vanguard Federal had no loans that were held for sale.
One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate
Loans
.
Our primary lending activity is the origination of mortgage loans to enable borrowers to purchase or refinance existing homes in our market area. We only offer fixed- and adjustable- rate mortgage loans primarily with terms of
15, 20 or 30 years. We offer adjustable-rate mortgage loans with interest rates and payments that adjust annually or every three years. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans generally are adjusted to a rate equal to a percentage
above the one year U.S. Treasury index. The maximum amount by which the interest rate may be increased or decreased is generally 200
2
basis points per adjustment period and the lifetime interest rate cap is generally 600 basis points over the initial interest rate of the loan. The loan fees
charged, interest rates and other provisions of mortgage loans are determined by us on the basis of our own pricing criteria and competitive market conditions.
Borrower demand for adjustable-rate loans compared to fixed-rate loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates, and the difference between the interest
rates and loan fees offered for fixed-rate mortgage loans as compared to the interest rates and loan fees for adjustable-rate loans. The relative amount of fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that can be originated at any time is largely
determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment.
While one- to four-family residential real estate loans are normally
originated with up to 30-year terms, such loans typically remain outstanding for substantially shorter periods because borrowers often prepay their loans in full upon sale of the property pledged as security or upon refinancing the original loan.
Therefore, average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates payable on outstanding loans.
We generally make loans with loan-to-value ratios that do not exceed 80%; however, we may make loans with a loan-to-value ratio up to 97% when secured by
first liens on owner-occupied one- to four-family residences. Loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80% generally require private mortgage insurance or additional collateral. We require all properties securing mortgage loans to be appraised
by a board-approved independent licensed appraiser. We also require title insurance on all first mortgage loans. Borrowers must obtain hazard insurance and flood insurance for loans on property located in a flood zone before closing the loan.
We originate second mortgage loans on one- to four-family residential real estate properties under the same underwriting criteria utilized
for our originations of one- to four-family real estate loans. We make second mortgage loans with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80% of the appraised value of the property, less the outstanding balance of the first mortgage.
We also originate home equity loans and lines of credit. Home equity lines of credit have adjustable rates of interest that are indexed to the prime rate
as reported in
The Wall Street Journal
. Home equity loans are fixed-rate loans. We will generally offer home equity loans and lines of credit with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80% of the appraised value of the property, less the then
outstanding balance on the first mortgage. A home equity line of credit may be drawn down by the borrower for an initial period of ten years from the date of the loan agreement. After the initial draw period, the line of credit is reviewed and may,
at our sole discretion, be renewed for another ten-year period. If the line is not renewed, the amount outstanding must be repaid over the remaining fifteen-year term.
Mobile Home Loans.
We originate mobile home loans directly and purchase mobile home loans from Forward National and Mainland Financial, which specialize in mobile home lending. At June 30, 2009,
13.6% of our mobile home portfolio was originated by us directly and 70.4% and 16.0% was purchased from Forward National and Mainland Financial, respectively. Our mobile home loans, which are made primarily to borrowers in Maryland and Pennsylvania,
have terms of up to 25 years and fixed interest rates. We generally will finance up to a maximum of 90% of the value of the mobile home. We require that the borrower obtain hazard insurance. At June 30, 2009, we had 340 mobile home loans, the
average size of which was approximately $34,000.
In April 2000, we began purchasing mobile home loans from Forward National. Forward
National assembles credit applications from third parties and provides such applications for our underwriting review. We then have the opportunity to accept or reject the loan contemplated by each credit application. If we agree to purchase a loan,
we must notify Forward National of the minimum rate of interest we will accept on the loan. Forward National will then seek to originate the loan with the third party at an interest rate exceeding the interest rate agreed to by us. Once Forward
National provides us with the original executed loan, we then purchase the loan from Forward National. Forward National assigns to us its right, title and interest in the loan, its collateral and all payments under the loan.
3
While we service the mobile home loans we purchase from Forward National, subject to our direction,
Forward National handles all delinquencies and collections on the loans at its expense. Forward National is advanced funds equal to the amount by which the interest rate on a loan we ultimately purchase exceeds the interest rate we prescribed to
Forward National. Forward National is then required to place half of that amount in a deposit account with us. This amount is recorded as a deposit on our financial statements. Additionally, the entire amount we compensate Forward National is
recorded as prepaid dealer interest, which is included in the loan balance and amortized in the same manner as deferred loan origination fees. If a loan amortizes fully and the borrower pays as agreed, Forward National receives all of the funds
related to that loan in the deposit account. However, if the mobile home is repossessed or prepaid, the amount of interest on such loan that otherwise would have been paid by the borrower and that has been previously advanced to Forward National by
us is returned to us by Forward National. The deposit account is used to fund (1) any costs of collections incurred on the loans we purchased from Forward National and (2) losses related to repossessions of these mobile home units. Any
debits to this account are recorded as a deposit withdrawal on our financial statements. Forward National has no right to make withdrawals from the deposit account. Thus, we may accrue excess balances and apply them against any future charges we
incur related to Forward National collections and repossessions.
In February 2007, we began purchasing mobile home loans from Mainland
Financial under the same terms and conditions as our agreement with Forward National with the exception of how delinquencies are handled. Delinquencies and collections are handled by us at our expense with the assistance of Mainland Financial.
However, the deposit account is used to fund losses related to repossessions of these mobile home units.
The following table presents the
activity and dollar amounts available to fund losses related to repossessions in the Forward National and Mainland Financial deposit accounts during the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward
National
|
|
|
Mainland
Financial
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Deposit account balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
Losses on repossessions and fees and expenses on collections absorbed by Forward National or Mainland Financial
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Deposits due to new loans
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
Withdrawals due to early payoffs
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit account balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction Loans
.
We originate loans to individuals and, to a lesser
extent, builders to finance the construction of residential dwellings. We also make construction loans for commercial development projects, including condominiums, apartment buildings, mixed-use properties with residential units, as well as retail
space and owner-occupied properties used for business. Our construction loans generally provide for the payment of interest only during the construction phase, which is usually 12 months. At the end of the construction period, the loan generally
converts into a permanent loan. With regard to construction loans that do not convert into permanent financing, the borrower is required to provide evidence of permanent financing by a qualified third party upon completion of the construction. Loans
generally can be made with a loan-to-value ratio of up to 80% of the completed project. Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by a board-approved independent licensed appraiser. We also
require an inspection of the property before disbursement of the funds during the term of the construction.
At June 30, 2009, the
largest residential construction loan commitment was for $525,000, of which $475,000 was outstanding. This loan was performing according to its terms at June 30, 2009.
At June 30, 2009, the largest commercial construction loan commitment was for $1.8 million, $1.6 million of which was outstanding. This loan was
performing according to its terms at June 30, 2009.
4
Multi-Family and Commercial Real Estate Loans
.
We offer fixed rate and
adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate. Our multi-family and commercial real estate loans are generally secured by condominiums, apartment buildings and mixed-use properties with residential units, as well
as retail space.
We originate multi-family and commercial real estate loans for terms up to 25 years. Interest rates and payments on our
adjustable-rate loans adjust every three, five or seven years after an initial three-, five- or seven- year period to a rate typically equal to 3-3.5% above the three-, five- or seven-year constant maturity Treasury index. There are no adjustment
period or lifetime interest rate caps. Loan amounts generally do not exceed 75% of the appraised value. We require all properties securing multi-family and commercial real estate loans to be appraised by a board-approved independent licensed
appraiser. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans also are generally supported by personal guarantees. At June 30, 2009, the largest multi-family and commercial real estate loan was a $1.9 million loan. This loan is secured by a
waterfront restaurant building in Baltimore, Maryland and was performing according to its terms at June 30, 2009.
We also originate
loans secured by undeveloped and developed land. Land loans are offered with a five-year term based on an amortization term of 15 years. A balloon payment for the principal plus any accrued interest is due at the end of the five-year period.
Additionally, we offer fixed-rate fully-amortized land loans with terms of 15 years. Land loans generally can be made with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 75%. Loans secured by undeveloped land or improved lots generally involve greater risks than
residential mortgage lending because land loans are more difficult to evaluate. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, in the event of default and foreclosure, we may be confronted with a property the value which is insufficient to assure
full repayment.
Other Consumer Loans
.
Our consumer loans are primarily loans secured by passbook or certificate
accounts, automobile and boat loans and secured personal loans. The procedures for underwriting consumer loans include an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the
proposed loan. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral, if any, to the proposed loan amount.
Loan Underwriting Risks.
While we anticipate that adjustable-rate loans will better offset the adverse effects of an increase in interest
rates as compared to fixed-rate mortgages, the increased mortgage payments required of adjustable-rate loan borrowers in a rising interest rate environment could cause an increase in delinquencies and defaults. The marketability of the underlying
property also may be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment. In addition, although adjustable-rate mortgage loans help make our loan portfolio more responsive to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is
limited by the annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits.
Mobile home lending generally entails greater risk than traditional
residential mortgage lending. Loans secured by mobile homes involve more credit risk than mortgage loans because of the type and nature of the collateral, which depreciates over time, and because mobile home borrowers, on average, tend to have lower
incomes than our residential mortgage borrowers. In many cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted mobile home loan will not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance because of depreciation or improper repair
and maintenance of the underlying security. Our arrangement with Forward National and Mainland Financial substantially mitigates the risks normally associated with mobile home lending. However, if Forward National or Mainland Financial ceases doing
business or terminates their arrangement with us, we would likely need to hire additional staff to service our mobile home loan portfolio.
Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial
estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost (including interest) of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of
construction costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the building. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted, at or before the
maturity of the loan, with a building having a value that is insufficient to assure full repayment. If we are forced to foreclose on a building before or at completion due to a default, there can be no
5
assurance that we will be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs.
In addition, we make loans to home builders who, at the time of loan origination, have not yet secured an end buyer for the home under construction. These loans typically carry higher risks than those associated with traditional construction loans.
These increased risks arise because of the risk that there will be inadequate demand to ensure the sale of the property within an acceptable time. As a result, in addition to the risks associated with traditional construction loans, speculative
construction loans carry the added risk that the builder will have to pay the property taxes and other carrying costs of the property until an end buyer is found.
Loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential real estate loans. Of primary concern in multi-family
and commercial real estate lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential of the project. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend on the successful operation and management of the
properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy to a greater extent than residential real estate loans. To monitor cash flows on income properties, we require borrowers
and loan guarantors, if any, to provide annual financial statements on multi-family and commercial real estate loans. In reaching a decision on whether to make a multi-family or commercial real estate loan, we consider the net operating income of
the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability and the value of the underlying property. In addition, with respect to commercial real estate rental properties, we will also consider the term of the lease and the credit
quality of the tenants. We have generally required that the properties securing these real estate loans have debt service coverage ratios (the ratio of earnings before debt service to debt service) of at least 1.2x.
Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are secured by assets that
depreciate rapidly. In such cases, repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and the remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection
efforts against the borrower. In addition, consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are more likely to be adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.
Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.
Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales
.
Loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary sources of loan originations
include existing customers, our in-house loan originators, advertising, referrals from customers and personal contacts by our staff. We currently utilize local mortgage brokers to assist with loan originations. We generally retain all of the loans
that we originate for our portfolio; however, we will sell participation interests to local financial institutions, primarily on the portion of loans that exceed our legal lending limit. We sold $3.3 million and $890,000 of participation interests
in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively.
From time to time, we purchase participation interests, primarily commercial real estate
loans. At June 30, 2009 and 2008, we had approximately $6.2 million and $7.1 million of purchased participation loans, respectively. We perform our own underwriting analysis on each of our participation interests before purchasing such loans
and therefore believe there is no greater risk of default on these obligations. However, in a purchased participation loan, we do not service the loan and thus are subject to the policies and practices of the lead lender with regard to monitoring
delinquencies, pursuing collections and instituting foreclosure proceedings. We are permitted to review all of the documentation relating to any loan in which we participate, including any annual financial statements provided by a borrower.
Additionally, we receive periodic updates on the loan from the lead lender.
In addition to purchasing participation interests, we
purchased $283,000 and $660,000 of mobile home loans from Forward National in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. We purchased $530,000 and $869,000 of mobile home loans from Mainland Financial in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. We
performed the underwriting on these mobile home loans.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority
.
We follow written,
non-discriminatory, underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our board of directors and management. Loans up to $500,000 require the approval of two of five members of an employee loan committee, consisting of the
President
6
and Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman and Chief Financial Officer and three Senior Vice Presidents. Loans up to $750,000 require the approval of three of
the members of the employee loan committee. All extensions of credit that exceed $750,000 in the aggregate require the approval of either the Executive Committee of the board of directors or the full board of directors.
Loans to One Borrower
.
The maximum amount that we may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is
limited by regulation to generally 15% of our unimpaired capital and surplus. At June 30, 2009, our regulatory limit on loans to one borrower was $1.4 million. At that date, our largest lending relationship was a $1.9 million loan secured by a
waterfront restaurant building in Baltimore, Maryland originated in 2006. At the time of origination, this loan did not exceed our legal lending limit. That loan was performing according to its original terms at June 30, 2009.
Loan Commitments
.
We issue commitments for fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans conditioned upon the
occurrence of certain events. Commitments to originate mortgage loans are legally binding agreements to lend to our customers and generally expire in 60 days.
Investment Activities
We have legal authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury
obligations, securities of various federal agencies and municipal governments, deposits at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions. Within certain regulatory limits, we also may invest a
portion of our assets in mutual funds. We also are required to maintain an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock. While we have the authority under applicable law to invest in derivative securities, our investment policy does not
permit this investment. We had no investments in derivative securities at June 30, 2009.
At June 30, 2009, our investment
portfolio totaled $13.8 million and consisted primarily of U.S. Treasury obligations and federal agency securities, mortgage-backed securities issued primarily by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae, and a mutual fund that invests in
adjustable-rate mortgages.
Our investment objectives are to provide and maintain liquidity, to establish an acceptable level of interest
rate and credit risk, to provide an alternate source of low-risk investments when demand for loans is weak and to generate a favorable return. Our board of directors has the overall responsibility for the investment portfolio, including approval of
our investment policy. The board of directors is also responsible for the implementation of the investment policy and monitoring our investment performance. Individual investment transactions, portfolio composition and performance are reviewed and
ratified by our board of directors monthly.
Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds
General
.
Deposits and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Loan repayments
are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions.
Deposit Accounts
.
Substantially all of our depositors are residents of the State of Maryland. Deposits are attracted from within our market area through the offering of a broad selection of
deposit instruments, including checking accounts, NOW and money market accounts, passbook and savings accounts and certificates of deposit. Additionally, our customers may use any M&T Bank ATM without a surcharge. At June 30, 2009, core
deposits, which consist of savings, NOW and money market accounts, comprised 49.0% of our deposits. We do not utilize brokered funds. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on
deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, our liquidity needs, profitability to us, matching deposit and loan products and customer
preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing monthly. We use our money market account as a primary source of liquidity. Consequently, when we require additional liquidity we will offer the highest rates in our market
area. When we do not require liquidity, our money market account rates are competitive. With regard to other deposit products, our current strategy is to offer competitive rates, and even higher rates on checking accounts, but not to be the market
leader in every type and maturity.
7
Borrowings
.
We utilize advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta to
supplement our supply of lendable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The Federal Home Loan Bank functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock
in the Federal Home Loan Bank and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States), provided
certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under several different programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based
either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the Federal Home Loan Bank’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. At June 30, 2009, we had the ability to borrow an additional $40.0 million from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. Additionally, at June 30, 2009, the Bank had a $2.0 million unsecured demand line of credit facility with M&T Bank, which had no outstanding balance.
Personnel
As of June 30, 2009, we had 34
full-time employees and two part-time employees, none of whom is represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationship with our employees is good.
Subsidiaries
BV Financial’s only direct subsidiary is Bay-Vanguard Federal.
Bay-Vanguard Federal has one subsidiary, Housing Recovery Corporation. Housing Recovery Corporation holds real estate and other assets acquired through
foreclosure or repossession by Bay-Vanguard Federal.
Regulation and Supervision
General
As a federal mutual holding company,
Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. is required by federal law to report to, and otherwise comply with the rules and regulations of, the Office of Thrift Supervision. BV Financial, as a federally chartered corporation, is also subject to reporting to and
regulation by the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Bay-Vanguard Federal, as an insured federal savings association, is subject to extensive
regulation, examination and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision, as its primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as the deposit insurer. Bay-Vanguard Federal is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank
System and, with respect to deposit insurance, of the Deposit Insurance Fund managed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Bay-Vanguard Federal must file reports with the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation concerning its activities and financial condition in addition to obtaining regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions such as mergers with, or acquisitions of, other savings institutions. The Office of Thrift
Supervision and/or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation conduct periodic examinations to test Bay-Vanguard Federal’s safety and soundness and compliance with various regulatory requirements.
This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the
protection of the insurance fund and depositors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with
respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Any change in such regulatory requirements and policies, whether by the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C., BV Financial, Bay-Vanguard Federal and their operations.
8
Certain regulatory requirements applicable to Bay-Vanguard Federal and to Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. are
referred to below or elsewhere herein. The description of statutory provisions and regulations applicable to savings institutions and their holding companies set forth below and elsewhere in this document does not purport to be a complete
description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Bay-Vanguard Federal and Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual statutes and regulations.
Holding Company Regulation
General
.
Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. is a federal savings and loan holding company within the meaning of federal law. As such, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. is registered with the Office of Thrift Supervision and is subject to Office of Thrift Supervision regulations,
examinations, supervision and reporting requirements. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has enforcement authority over Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and its non-savings institution subsidiaries. Among other things, this authority permits the OTS
to restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the subsidiary savings institution.
Activities
Restrictions Applicable to Mutual Holding Companies
.
Pursuant to federal law and Office of Thrift Supervision regulations, a mutual holding company such as Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C., with appropriate OTS approvals, may engage in the
following activities: (1) investing in the stock of a savings association; (2) acquiring a mutual association through the merger of such association into a savings association subsidiary of such holding company or an interim savings
association subsidiary of such holding company; (3) merging with or acquiring another holding company, one of whose subsidiaries is a savings association; (4) investing in a corporation, the capital stock of which is available for purchase
by a savings association under federal law or under the law of any state where the subsidiary savings association or associations share their home offices; (5) furnishing or performing management services for a savings association subsidiary of
such company; (6) holding, managing or liquidating assets owned or acquired from a savings subsidiary of such company; (7) holding or managing properties used or occupied by a savings association subsidiary of such company properties used
or occupied by a savings association subsidiary of such company; (8) acting as trustee under deeds of trust; (9) any other activity (A) that the Federal Reserve Board, by regulation, has determined to be permissible for bank holding
companies under Section 4(c) of The Bank Holding Company Act, unless the Office of Thrift Supervision, by regulation, prohibits or limits any such activity for savings and loan holding companies; or (B) in which multiple savings and loan
holding companies were authorized (by regulation) to directly engage on March 5, 1987; and (10) purchasing, holding, or disposing of stock acquired in connection with a qualified stock issuance if the purchase of such stock by such savings
and loan holding company is approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision.
The Gramm-Leach Bliley Act of 1999 was designed to modernize the
regulation of the financial services industry by expanding the ability of bank holding companies to affiliate with other types of financial services companies such as insurance companies and investment banking companies. The legislation also
expanded the activities permitted for mutual savings and loan holding companies to also include any activity permitted a “financial holding company” under the legislation, including a broad array of insurance and securities activities.
Federal law prohibits a savings and loan holding company, including a federal mutual holding company, from, directly or indirectly or
through one or more subsidiaries, acquiring more than 5% of the voting stock of another savings institution, or holding company thereof, without prior written approval of the Office of Thrift Supervision from acquiring or retaining, with certain
exceptions, more than 5% of a non-subsidiary holding company or savings association. A savings and loan holding company is also prohibited from acquiring more than 5% of a company engaged in activities other than those authorized by federal law; or
acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that is not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. In evaluating applications by holding companies to acquire savings institutions, the Office of Thrift Supervision must
consider the financial and managerial resources and future prospects of the company and institution involved, the effect of the acquisition on the risk to the insurance funds, the convenience and needs of the community and competitive factors.
The Office of Thrift Supervision is prohibited from approving any acquisition that would result in a multiple savings and loan holding
company controlling savings institutions in more than one state, except: (1) the approval of interstate supervisory acquisitions by savings and loan holding companies; and (2) the acquisition of a
9
savings institution in another state if the laws of the state of the target savings institution specifically permit such acquisitions. The states vary in the
extent to which they permit interstate savings and loan holding company acquisitions.
If the savings institution subsidiary of a savings
and loan holding company fails to meet the qualified thrift lender test set forth in federal law, the holding company must register with the Federal Reserve Board as a bank holding company within one year of the savings institution’s failure to
so qualify.
Although savings and loan holding companies are not currently subject to regulatory capital requirements or specific
restrictions on the payment of dividends or other capital distributions, federal regulations do prescribe such restrictions on subsidiary savings institutions as described below. Bay-Vanguard Federal must notify the Office of Thrift Supervision 30
days before declaring any dividend and comply with the additional restrictions described below. In addition, the financial impact of a holding company on its subsidiary institution is a matter that is evaluated by the Office of Thrift Supervision
and the agency has authority to order cessation of activities or divestiture of subsidiaries deemed to pose a threat to the safety and soundness of the institution.
Stock Holding Company Subsidiary Regulation
.
The Office of Thrift Supervision has adopted regulations governing the two-tier mutual holding company form of organization and mid-tier stock holding
companies, such as BV Financial, that are controlled by mutual holding companies. Under these rules, the stock holding company subsidiary holds all the shares of the mutual holding company’s savings association subsidiary and issues the
majority of its own shares to the mutual holding company parent. In addition, the stock holding company subsidiary is permitted to engage in activities that are permitted for its mutual holding company parent subject to the same terms and
conditions. Finally, Office of Thrift Supervision regulations maintain that the stock holding company subsidiary must be federally chartered for supervisory reasons.
Waivers of Dividends.
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations require mutual holding companies to notify the agency if they propose to waive receipt of dividends from their stock subsidiary. The Office
of Thrift Supervision reviews dividend waiver notices on a case-by-case basis and, in general, does not object to a waiver if: (1) the waiver would not be detrimental to the safe and sound operation of the savings association; and (2) the
mutual holding company’s board of directors determines that their waiver is consistent with such directors’ fiduciary duties to the mutual holding company’s members. Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. anticipates waiving dividends, if any are paid.
Conversion of Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. to Stock Form.
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations permit Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. to
convert from the mutual form of organization to the capital stock form of organization. There can be no assurance when, if ever, a conversion transaction will occur. In a conversion transaction, a new holding company would be formed as the successor
to BV Financial, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C.’s corporate existence would end, and certain depositors of Bay-Vanguard Federal would receive the right to subscribe for additional shares of the new holding company. In a conversion transaction, each share
of common stock held by stockholders other than Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. would be automatically converted into a number of shares of common stock of the new holding company based on an exchange ratio determined at the time of conversion that ensures
that stockholders other than Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. own the same percentage of common stock in the new holding company as they owned in BV Financial immediately before conversion. The total number of shares held by stockholders other than
Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. after a conversion transaction would be increased by any purchases by such stockholders in the stock offering conducted as part of the conversion transaction.
Acquisition of Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C.
Under the Federal Change in Control Act, a notice must be submitted to the Office of Thrift Supervision
if any person (including a company), or group acting in concert, seeks to acquire direct or indirect “control” of a savings and loan holding company or savings institution. Under certain circumstances, a change of control may occur, and
prior notice is required, upon the acquisition of 10% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the company or institution, unless the Office of Thrift Supervision has found that the acquisition will not result in a change of control of
Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. Under the Change in Control Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision generally has 60 days from the filing of a complete notice to act, taking into consideration certain factors, including the financial and managerial resources of
the acquirer and the anti-trust effects of the acquisition. Any company that acquires control would then be subject to regulation as a savings and loan holding company.
10
Federal Savings Institution Regulation
Business Activities
.
The activities of federal savings associations are governed by federal law and regulations. These laws and
regulations delineate the nature and extent of the activities in which federal savings institutions may engage. In particular, certain lending authority for federal savings institutions, e.g., commercial, non-residential real property loans and
consumer loans, is limited to a specified percentage of the institution’s capital or assets.
Capital
Requirements
.
The Office of Thrift Supervision capital regulations require savings institutions to meet three minimum capital standards: a 1.5% tangible capital to total assets ratio; a 4% Tier 1 capital to total assets leverage ratio
(3% for institutions receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS examination rating system); and an 8% risk-based capital ratio. In addition, the prompt corrective action standards discussed below also establish, in effect, a minimum 2% tangible
capital standard, a 4% leverage ratio (3% for institutions receiving the highest rating on the CAMELS system) and, together with the risk-based capital standard itself, a 4% Tier 1 risk-based capital standard. The Office of Thrift Supervision
regulations also require that, in meeting the tangible, leverage and risk-based capital standards, institutions must generally deduct investments in and loans to subsidiaries engaged in activities as principal that are not permissible for a national
bank.
The risk-based capital standard for savings institutions requires the maintenance of Tier 1 (core) and total capital (which is
defined as core capital and supplementary capital) to risk-weighted assets of at least 4% and 8%, respectively. In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet activities, recourse obligations,
residual interests and direct credit substitutes, are multiplied by a risk-weight factor of 0% to 100%, assigned by the Office of Thrift Supervision capital regulation based on the risks believed inherent in the type of asset. Core (Tier 1) capital
is generally defined as common stockholders’ equity (including retained earnings), certain noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and related surplus, and minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries less intangibles
other than certain mortgage servicing rights and credit card relationships. The components of supplementary (Tier 2) capital currently include cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, mandatory convertible securities,
subordinated debt and intermediate preferred stock, the allowance for loan and lease losses, limited to a maximum of 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, and up to 45% of unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable
fair market values. Overall, the amount of supplementary capital included as part of total capital cannot exceed 100% of core capital.
The
Office of Thrift Supervision also has authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements in appropriate cases upon a determination that an institution’s capital level is or may become inadequate in light of the particular
circumstances. At June 30, 2009, Bay-Vanguard Federal met each of its capital requirements.
The following table presents Bay-Vanguard
Federal’s capital position at June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
Capital
|
|
Required
Capital
|
|
Excess
Amount
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
Percent
|
|
|
Required
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible
|
|
$
|
10,597
|
|
$
|
2,291
|
|
$
|
8,306
|
|
6.9
|
%
|
|
>
1.5
|
%
|
|
Tier 1/Leverage
|
|
|
10,597
|
|
|
6,097
|
|
|
4,500
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
>
4.0
|
|
|
Tier 1/Risk-based
|
|
|
10,597
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Total/Risk-based
|
|
|
11,454
|
|
|
7,401
|
|
|
4,053
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
>
8.0
|
|
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action.
The Office of Thrift Supervision is required to
take certain supervisory actions against undercapitalized institutions, the severity of which depends upon the institution’s degree of undercapitalization. Generally, a savings institution that has a ratio of total capital to risk weighted
assets of less than 8%, a ratio of Tier 1 (core) capital to risk-weighted assets of less than 4% or a ratio of core capital to total assets of less than 4% (3% or less for institutions with the highest examination rating) is considered to be
11
“undercapitalized.” A savings institution that has a total risk-based capital ratio less than 6%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of less than 3% or a
leverage ratio that is less than 3% is considered to be “significantly undercapitalized” and a savings institution that has a tangible capital to assets ratio equal to or less than 2% is deemed to be “critically
undercapitalized.” Subject to a narrow exception, the Office of Thrift Supervision is required to appoint a receiver or conservator within specified time frames for an institution that is “critically undercapitalized.” The regulation
also provides that a capital restoration plan must be filed with the Office of Thrift Supervision within 45 days of the date a savings institution is deemed to have received notice that it is “undercapitalized,” “significantly
undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” Compliance with the plan must be guaranteed by any parent holding company in an amount of up to the lesser of 5% of the savings association’s total assets when it was deemed to
be undercapitalized or the amount necessary to achieve compliance with applicable capital regulations. In addition, numerous mandatory supervisory actions become immediately applicable to an undercapitalized institution, including, but not limited
to, increased monitoring by regulators and restrictions on growth, capital distributions and expansion. The Office of Thrift Supervision could also take any one of a number of discretionary supervisory actions, including the issuance of a capital
directive and the replacement of senior executive officers and directors. Significantly undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional mandatory and discretionary restrictions.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts.
Deposits of Bay-Vanguard Federal are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels
and certain other factors, with less risky institutions paying lower assessments. An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned, with less risky institutions paying lower assessments. For 2008, assessments
ranged from five to forty-three basis points of an institution’s deposit assessment base. Due to losses incurred by the Deposit Insurance Fund in 2008 from failed institutions, and anticipated future losses, the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation, pursuant to a Restoration Plan to replenish the fund, adopted an across the board seven basis point increase in the assessment range for the first quarter of 2009. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted further refinements to
its risk-based assessment that were effective April 1, 2009 and effectively make the range seven to seventy-seven and one half basis points. On May 22, 2009, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation issued a final rule that will impose a
special five basis points assessment on each institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, which would be payable to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on September 30, 2009. If after June 30, 2009, the
reserve ratio of the Deposit Insurance Fund falls to a level that the Board of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“the Board”) believes would adversely affect public confidence or to a level close to or below zero, the Board may
impose an additional special assessment of up to five basis points on each institution’s assets minus Tier 1 capital for the third and fourth quarters of 2009 as deemed necessary. The cost of the special five basis points assessment to
Bay-Vanguard Federal based on assets minus Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009 was $75,200. No institution may pay a dividend if in default of the federal deposit insurance assessment.
Due to the recent difficult economic conditions, deposit insurance per account owner has been raised to $250,000 for all types of accounts until
December 31, 2013. Thereafter, regular deposit accounts will be insured up to a maximum of $100,000 and self-directed retirement accounts up to a maximum of $250,000.
In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation adopted an optional Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program by which, for a fee, noninterest bearing
transaction accounts would receive unlimited insurance coverage until December 31, 2009 and certain senior unsecured debt issued by institutions and their holding companies would be guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
through June 30, 2012 and in certain conditions through December 31, 2012. Bay-Vanguard Federal made the business decision to participate in the unlimited noninterest bearing transaction account coverage and Bay-Vanguard Federal, BV
Financial and Bay-Vanguard M.H.C. opted not to participate in the unsecured debt guarantee program.
Federal law also provides for the
possibility that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may pay dividends to insured institutions once the Deposit Insurance fund reserve ratio equals or exceeds 1.35% of estimated insured deposits.
12
In addition to the assessment for deposit insurance, institutions are required to make payments on bonds
issued in the late 1980s by the Financing Corporation to recapitalize a predecessor deposit insurance fund. That payment is established quarterly and during the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009 averaged 1.08 basis points of assessable deposits.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums
would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of Bay-Vanguard Federal. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation upon a finding that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound
practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Office of Thrift Supervision. The management
of Bay-Vanguard Federal does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.
Loans to One Borrower
.
Federal law provides that savings institutions are generally subject to the limits on loans to one borrower applicable to national banks. Subject to certain exceptions, a savings institution may
not make a loan or extend credit to a single or related group of borrowers in excess of 15% of its unimpaired capital and surplus. An additional amount may be lent, equal to 10% of unimpaired capital and surplus, if secured by specified
readily-marketable collateral.
QTL Test
.
Federal law requires savings institutions to meet a qualified thrift lender
test. Under the test, a savings association is required to either qualify as a “domestic building and loan association” under the Internal Revenue Code or maintain at least 65% of its “portfolio assets” (total assets less:
(1) specified liquid assets up to 20% of total assets; (2) intangibles, including goodwill; and (3) the value of property used to conduct business) in certain “qualified thrift investments” (primarily residential mortgages
and related investments, including certain mortgage-backed securities) in at least 9 months out of each 12 month period. Recent legislation has expanded the extent to which education loans, credit card loans and small business loans may be
considered “qualified thrift investments.”
A savings institution that fails the qualified thrift lender test is subject to
certain operating restrictions and may be required to convert to a bank charter. As of June 30, 2009, Bay-Vanguard Federal maintained 74.0% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments and, therefore, met the qualified thrift lender
test.
Limitation on Capital Distributions
.
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations impose limitations upon all
capital distributions by a savings institution, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and prior approval of the
Office of Thrift Supervision is required prior to any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under Office of Thrift Supervision regulations (i.e., generally, examination
and Community Reinvestment Act ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the institution would be
undercapitalized following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with the Office of Thrift Supervision. If an application is not required, the institution must still provide prior
notice to the Office of Thrift Supervision of the capital distribution if, like Bay-Vanguard Federal, it is a subsidiary of a holding company. In the event Bay-Vanguard Federal’s capital fell below its regulatory requirements or the Office of
Thrift Supervision notified it that it was in need of increased supervision, Bay-Vanguard Federal’s ability to make capital distributions could be restricted. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision could prohibit a proposed capital
distribution by any institution, which would otherwise be permitted by the regulation, if the Office of Thrift Supervision determines that such distribution would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice.
Standards for Safety and Soundness
.
The federal banking agencies have adopted Interagency Guidelines prescribing Standards for
Safety and Soundness in various areas such as internal controls and information systems, internal audit, loan documentation and credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth and quality, earnings and
13
compensation, fees and benefits. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address
problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. If the Office of Thrift Supervision determines that a savings association fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the Office of Thrift Supervision may
require the institution to submit an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.
Transactions with Related
Parties
.
Bay-Vanguard Federal’s authority to engage in transactions with “affiliates” (e.g., any entity that controls or is under common control with an institution, including Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and its non-savings
institution subsidiaries) is limited by federal law. The aggregate amount of covered transactions with any individual affiliate is limited to 10% of the capital and surplus of the savings institution. The aggregate amount of covered transactions
with all affiliates is limited to 20% of the savings institution’s capital and surplus. Certain transactions with affiliates are required to be secured by collateral in an amount and of a type specified by federal law. The purchase of low
quality assets from affiliates is generally prohibited. The transactions with affiliates must be on terms and under circumstances that are at least as favorable to the institution as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with
non-affiliated companies. In addition, savings institutions are prohibited from lending to any affiliate that is engaged in activities that are not permissible for bank holding companies and no savings institution may purchase the securities of any
affiliate other than a subsidiary.
Bay-Vanguard Federal may make loans to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal
banking laws. Under such laws, Bay-Vanguard Federal’s authority to extend credit to executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders (“insiders”), as well as entities such persons control, is limited. The law limits both the
individual and aggregate amount of loans Bay-Vanguard Federal may make to insiders based, in part, on Bay-Vanguard Federal’s capital position and requires certain board approval procedures to be followed. Such loans are required to be made on
terms substantially the same as those offered to unaffiliated individuals and not involve more than the normal risk of repayment. There is an exception for loans made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that is widely available to all
employees of the institution and does not give preference to insiders over other employees. Loans to executive officers are subject to additional restrictions as to type and amount.
Enforcement
.
The Office of Thrift Supervision has primary enforcement responsibility over savings institutions and has the authority
to bring actions against the institution and all institution-affiliated parties, including stockholders, and any attorneys, appraisers and accountants who knowingly or recklessly participate in wrongful action likely to have an adverse effect on an
insured institution. Formal enforcement action may range from the issuance of a capital directive or cease and desist order to removal of officers and/or directors to institution of receivership, conservatorship or termination of deposit insurance.
Civil penalties cover a wide range of violations and can amount to $25,000 per day, or even $1 million per day in especially egregious cases. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has the authority to recommend to the Director of the Office of
Thrift Supervision that enforcement action to be taken with respect to a particular savings institution. If action is not taken by the Director, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has authority to take such action under certain circumstances.
Federal law also establishes criminal penalties for certain violations.
Assessments
.
Savings institutions are
required to pay assessments to the Office of Thrift Supervision to fund the agency’s operations. The general assessments, paid on a semi-annual basis, are computed based upon the savings institution’s (including consolidated subsidiaries)
total asset size, condition and complexity of portfolio. The OTS assessments paid by Bay-Vanguard Federal for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 totaled $53,000.
14
Federal Home Loan Bank System
Bay-Vanguard Federal is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides a central credit facility primarily for member
institutions. Bay-Vanguard Federal, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that Federal Home Loan Bank. Bay-Vanguard Federal was in compliance with this requirement with an
investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock at June 30, 2009 of $631,000. This stock is carried at a cost of $100 per share. Due to concerns about the capital strength of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and the entire Federal Home Loan
Bank system, there has been industry discussion about impairment issues on Federal Home Loan Bank stock. If the Federal Home Loan Bank stock were deemed to be impaired, the write-down for the Bank could be significant. However, due to the nature of
the Federal Home Loan Bank system and the heavy dependence of community banks on the Federal Home Loan Bank, it is believed that any determination about the valuation of Federal Home Loan Bank stock needs to be accomplished at the national level so
that the entire community banking system is not disrupted.
The Federal Home Loan Banks are required to provide funds for the resolution of
insolvent thrifts in the late 1980s and to contribute funds for affordable housing programs. These requirements, or the general financial condition of the Federal Home Loan Bank, could reduce the amount of dividends that the Federal Home Loan Banks
pay to their members and could also result in the Federal Home Loan Banks imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to their members. If dividends were reduced, or interest on future Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased, Bay-Vanguard
Federal’s net interest income would likely also be reduced.
The Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta changed its dividend declaration
and payment schedule in the fourth quarter of 2008 so a dividend can be declared and paid to members after net income is calculated for the preceding quarter. No dividends were paid for the fourth quarter of 2008 and first quarter of 2009; however,
dividends were paid for the third quarter of 2008 and second quarter of 2009.
Federal Reserve System
The Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings institutions to maintain non-interest earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily
Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) and regular checking accounts). The regulations generally provide that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction accounts up to
and including $44.4 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $44.4 million. The first $10.3 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve Board) are exempted from the reserve requirements. The amounts
are adjusted annually. Bay-Vanguard Federal complies with the foregoing requirements.
Federal and State Taxation
Federal Income Taxation
General.
We
report our income on a fiscal year basis using the accrual method of accounting. The federal income tax laws apply to us in the same manner as to other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly our reserve for bad debts discussed
below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to us. Our federal income tax returns have been either audited or closed under the
statute of limitations through tax year 2004. For its 2009 year, BV Financial’s maximum federal income tax rate was 34.0%.
BV
Financial and Bay-Vanguard Federal have entered into a tax allocation agreement. Because BV Financial owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Bay-Vanguard Federal, BV Financial and Bay-Vanguard Federal are members of an affiliated
group within the meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, of which group BV Financial is the common parent corporation. As a result of this affiliation, Bay-Vanguard Federal will be included in the filing of a consolidated
federal income tax return with BV Financial and the parties have agreed to compensate each other for their individual share of the consolidated tax liability and/or any tax benefits provided by them in the filing of the consolidated federal income
tax return.
15
Bad Debt Reserves.
For fiscal years beginning before June 30, 1996, thrift
institutions that qualified under certain definitional tests and other conditions of the Internal Revenue Code were permitted to use certain favorable provisions to calculate their deductions from taxable income for annual additions to their bad
debt reserve. A reserve could be established for bad debts on qualifying real property loans, generally secured by interests in real property improved or to be improved, under the percentage of taxable income method or the experience method. The
reserve for nonqualifying loans was computed using the experience method. Federal legislation enacted in 1996 repealed the reserve method of accounting for bad debts and the percentage of taxable income method for tax years beginning after 1995 and
require savings institutions to recapture or take into income certain portions of their accumulated bad debt reserves. Approximately $1.2 million of our accumulated bad debt reserves would not be recaptured into taxable income unless Bay-Vanguard
Federal makes a “non-dividend distribution” to BV Financial as described below.
Distributions.
If Bay-Vanguard
Federal makes “non-dividend distributions” to BV Financial, the distributions will be considered to have been made from Bay-Vanguard Federal’s unrecaptured tax bad debt reserves, including the balance of its reserves as of
December 31, 1987, to the extent of the “non-dividend distributions,” and then from Bay-Vanguard Federal’s supplemental reserve for losses on loans, to the extent of those reserves, and an amount based on the amount distributed,
but not more than the amount of those reserves, will be included in Bay-Vanguard Federal’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess of Bay-Vanguard Federal’s current and accumulated earnings and profits,
as calculated for federal income tax purposes, distributions in redemption of stock and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. Dividends paid out of Bay-Vanguard Federal’s current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be so
included in Bay-Vanguard Federal’s taxable income.
The amount of additional taxable income triggered by a non-dividend is an amount
that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Therefore, if Bay-Vanguard Federal makes a non-dividend distribution to BV Financial, approximately one and one-half times the amount of the
distribution not in excess of the amount of the reserves would be includable in income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% federal corporate income tax rate. Bay-Vanguard Federal does not intend to pay dividends that would result in a
recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserves.
State Taxation
For fiscal 2009 BV Financial was subject to Maryland’s Corporation Business Tax at the rate of 8.25% on its taxable income, before net operating loss deductions and special deductions for federal income tax
purposes. The rate will remain the same for fiscal 2010. BV Financial and Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. are required to file Maryland income tax returns because they are doing business in Maryland. For this purpose, “taxable income” generally means
federal taxable income subject to certain adjustments (including addition of interest income on state and municipal obligations).
A continuation of recent turmoil in the financial
markets could have an adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Beginning in 2008, United States and global
markets have experienced severe disruption and volatility, and general economic conditions have declined significantly. Adverse developments in credit quality, asset values and revenue opportunities throughout the financial services industry, as
well as general uncertainty regarding the economic and regulatory environment, have had a marked negative impact on the industry. The United States and the governments of other countries have taken steps to try to stabilize the financial system,
including investing in financial institutions, and have also been working to design and implement programs to improve general economic conditions. There can be no assurances that these efforts will be successful in restoring industry, economic or
market
16
conditions and that they will not result in adverse unintended consequences. Factors that could continue to pressure financial services companies, including
BV Financial, are numerous and include: (1) worsening credit quality, leading among other things to increases in loan losses and reserves; (2) continued or worsening disruption and volatility in financial markets, leading among other
things to continuing reductions in asset values; (3) capital and liquidity concerns regarding financial institutions generally; (4) limitations resulting from or imposed in connection with governmental actions intended to stabilize or
provide additional regulation of the financial system; and/or (5) recessionary conditions that are deeper or last longer than currently anticipated.
Changes in interest rates may hurt our earnings.
Short-term market interest rates (which we use as a guide to price our
deposits) have until recently risen from historically low levels, while longer-term market interest rates (which we use as a guide to price our longer-term loans) have not. This “flattening” of the market yield curve has had a
negative impact on our net interest margin, which has reduced our profitability. Over the last year, however, the U.S. Federal Reserve decreased its target for the federal funds rate from 2.00% to 0.25%. Our net interest margin was 2.80% for the
year ended June 30, 2009 compared to 2.48% for the year ended June 30, 2008. Decreases in interest rates can result in increased prepayments of loans, as borrowers refinance to reduce their borrowing costs. Under these circumstances,
we are subject to reinvestment risk as we may have to redeploy such loan proceeds into lower-yielding assets, which might also negatively impact our income. Additionally, if short-term interest rates rise, and if rates on our deposits reprice
upwards faster than the rates on our long-term loans and investments, we would experience compression of our net interest margin, which would have a negative effect on our profitability. For further discussion of how changes in interest rates could
impact us, see
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Risk Management—Interest Rate Risk Management”
and
“—Net Portfolio Value Simulation Analysis.”
We may be more susceptible to increases in interest rates because of the relatively small amount of adjustable-rate loans currently in our
portfolio and our heavy reliance on core deposits, especially our money market accounts, which reprice frequently. At June 30, 2009, $27.4 million, or 22.9% of our total loan portfolio, consisted of adjustable-rate loans. We attempt to limit
our exposure to rises in interest rates through: offering adjustable-rate one-to-four family residential real estate loans; an investment in a mutual fund that invests in adjustable-rate mortgage loans; an increased focus on multi-family and
commercial real estate lending, which emphasizes the origination of shorter-term adjustable-rate loans; and efforts to originate shorter-term fixed-rate loans. Our inability to successfully originate adjustable-rate multi-family and commercial real
estate loans or shorter-term fixed-rate loans could result in further compression of our net interest margin in a rising interest rate environment, which could hurt our profits.
Future FDIC Assessments Will Hurt Our Earnings
In May 2009, the FDIC adopted a
final rule imposing a special assessment on all insured institutions due to recent bank and savings association failures. The emergency assessment amounts to 5 basis points of total assets minus Tier 1 Capital as of June 30, 2009, and will be
collected on September 30, 2009. The special assessment negatively impacted the Company’s earnings and the Company’s non-interest expenses increased approximately $75,200 for the year ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the year
ended June 30, 2008 as a result of this special assessment. In addition, the final rule allows the FDIC to impose additional emergency special assessments of up to 5 basis points per quarter for the third and fourth quarters of 2009 if
necessary to maintain public confidence in federal deposit insurance or as a result of deterioration in the deposit insurance fund reserve ratio due to institution failures. Any additional emergency special assessment imposed by the FDIC will
further hurt the Company’s earnings.
Our increased emphasis on multi-family and commercial lending may expose us to increased lending risks.
At June 30, 2009, $16.6 million, or 13.5%, of our loan portfolio consisted of multi-family and commercial real estate loans. We intend
to increase our emphasis on these types of higher-yielding loans to provide us with the opportunity to increase profits. However, these types of loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of
17
non-payment and loss than one- to four-family residential real estate loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the
property and the income stream of borrowers. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one- to four-family residential real estate loans. Also, many of our commercial borrowers
have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one- to
four-family residential real estate loan.
Our level of non-performing loans expose us to increased lending risks. Further, our allowance for loan
losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb losses in our loan portfolio.
At June 30, 2009, our non-performing loans totaled
$921,000, representing 0.8% of total loans. If these loans continue to not perform according to their terms and the collateral is insufficient to pay any remaining loan balance, we may experience loan losses, which could have a material effect on
our operating results. Like all financial institutions, we maintain an allowance for loan losses to provide for loans in our portfolio that may not be repaid in their entirety. We believe that our allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level
adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio as of the corresponding balance sheet date. However, our allowance for loan losses may not be sufficient to cover actual loan losses, and future provisions for loan losses could
materially adversely affect our operating results.
In evaluating the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses, we consider numerous
quantitative factors, including our historical charge-off experience, growth of our loan portfolio, changes in the composition of our loan portfolio and the volume of delinquent and classified loans. In addition, we use information about specific
borrower situations, including their financial position and estimated collateral values, to estimate the risk and amount of loss for those borrowers. Finally, we also consider many qualitative factors, including general and economic business
conditions, current general market collateral valuations, trends apparent in any of the factors we take into account and other matters, which are by nature more subjective and fluid. Our estimates of the risk of loss and amount of loss on any loan
are complicated by the significant uncertainties surrounding our borrowers’ abilities to successfully execute their business models through changing economic environments, competitive challenges and other factors. Because of the degree of
uncertainty and susceptibility of these factors to change, our actual losses may vary from our current estimates.
At June 30, 2009,
our allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans was 0.71%. Our regulators, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses
by recognizing additional provisions for loan losses charged to expense, or to decrease our allowance for loan losses by recognizing loan charge-offs, net of recoveries. Any such additional provisions for loan losses or charge-offs, as required by
these regulatory agencies, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
A downturn in the local economy
or a decline in real estate values could hurt our profits.
Nearly all of our real estate loans are secured by real estate in the
Baltimore metropolitan area. As a result of this concentration, a downturn in the local economy could cause significant increases in non-performing loans, which would hurt our profits. Additionally, a decrease in asset quality could require
additions to our allowance for loan losses through increased provisions for loan losses, which would hurt our profits. In recent years, there were significant increases in real estate values in our market area. As a result of rising home prices, our
loans have been well collateralized. However, these real estate values have begun to decline, which could cause some of our mortgage loans to become inadequately collateralized, which would expose us to a greater risk of loss. For a discussion of
our market area, see
“Business—Market Area.”
Strong competition within our market area could hurt our profits and slow
growth.
We face intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. This competition has made it more difficult for us to
make new loans and has occasionally forced us to offer higher deposit rates. Price
18
competition for loans and deposits might result in us earning less on our loans and paying more on our deposits, which reduces net interest income. As of
June 30, 2008, we held 0.29% of the deposits in the Baltimore-Towson, Maryland Metropolitan Statistical Area, which was the 41
st
largest market share of deposits out of the 78 financial institutions in the metropolitan statistical area. Some of the
institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have and may offer services that we do not provide. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and
technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area. For more information about our market area and the
competition we face, see
“Business—Market Area”
and
“Business—Competition.”
Proposed regulatory reform may
have a material impact on our operations.
On June 17, 2009, President Obama published a comprehensive regulatory reform plan
intended to modernize and protect the integrity of the United States financial system. The President’s plan contains several elements that would have a direct effect on Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C., BV Financial and Bay-Vanguard Federal. Under the
reform plan, the federal thrift charter and the Office of Thrift Supervision would be eliminated and all companies that control an insured depository institution must register as a bank holding company. Although the reform plan does not specify how
existing federal thrifts, such as Bay-Vanguard Federal, would be treated, we expect that if the federal thrift charter is eliminated Bay-Vanguard Federal could become a national bank or adopt a state charter. Registration as a bank holding company
would represent a significant change, as there currently exist significant differences between savings and loan holding company and bank holding company supervision and regulation. For example, the Federal Reserve imposes leverage and risk-based
capital requirements on bank holding companies whereas the Office of Thrift Supervision does not impose any capital requirements on savings and loan holding companies. Further, a change in the bank regulatory structure could result in a change in
the way that mutual holding companies are regulated. The reform plan also proposes the creation of a new federal agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, that would be dedicated to protecting consumers in the financial products and services
market. The creation of this agency could result in new regulatory requirements and raise the cost of regulatory compliance. In addition, legislation stemming from the reform plan could require changes in regulatory capital requirements, loan loss
provisioning practices, and compensation practices. If implemented, the foregoing regulatory reforms may have a material impact on our operations. However, because the legislation needed to implement the President’s reform plan has not been
introduced, and because the final legislation may differ significantly from the reform plan proposed by the President, we cannot determine the specific impact of regulatory reform at this time.
Our mutual holding company structure limits our ability to raise additional equity capital.
Our mutual holding company structure limits our ability to raise additional equity capital without undertaking a second-step conversion transaction
because we cannot issue stock in an amount that would cause Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. to own less than a majority of our outstanding shares. Currently, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. owns approximately 61% of our outstanding shares. In addition, any
stock issuance by us must be approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision and must be structured in a manner similar to a mutual to stock conversion, including the stock purchase priorities accorded to members of the mutual holding company, unless
otherwise approved by the Office of Thrift Supervision. These requirements limit our ability to control the timing and structure of a stock offering.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
Bay-Vanguard Federal is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by the Office of Thrift Supervision, its chartering authority, and by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as insurer of its deposits. Both
Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and BV Financial are subject to regulation and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision. Such regulation and supervision govern the activities in which an institution and its holding company may engage, and are intended
primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and for the depositors and borrowers of Bay-Vanguard Federal. The regulation and supervision by the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation are not intended to
protect the interests of investors in BV Financial common
19
stock. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our
operations, the classification of our assets, increases in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation premiums and determination of the level of our allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory
policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our operations.
Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C.’s majority control of
our common stock will enable it to exercise voting control over most matters put to a vote of shareholders, and will prevent shareholders from forcing a sale or a second-step conversion transaction you may find advantageous.
Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. owns a majority of BV Financial’s common stock and, through its board of directors, will be able to exercise voting control
over most matters put to a vote of shareholders. The same directors and officers who manage BV Financial and Bay-Vanguard Federal also manage Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. As a federally chartered mutual holding company, the board of directors of
Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. must ensure that the interests of depositors of Bay-Vanguard Federal are represented and considered in matters put to a vote of shareholders of BV Financial. Therefore, the votes cast by Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. may not be in your
personal best interests as a shareholder. For example, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. may exercise its voting control to defeat a shareholder nominee for election to the board of directors of BV Financial. In addition, shareholders will not be able to force a
merger or second-step conversion transaction without the consent of Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. Some shareholders may desire a sale or merger transaction, because shareholders typically receive a premium for their shares, or a second-step conversion
transaction, because fully converted institutions tend to trade at higher multiples than mutual holding companies.
The Office of Thrift Supervision
policy on remutualization transactions could prohibit the acquisition of BV Financial, which may adversely affect our stock price.
Current Office of Thrift Supervision regulations permit a mutual holding company to be acquired by a mutual institution in a remutualization transaction. However, the Office of Thrift Supervision has issued a policy statement indicating
that it views remutualization transactions as raising significant issues concerning disparate treatment of minority shareholders and mutual members of the target entity and raising issues concerning the effect on the mutual members of the acquiring
entity. Under certain circumstances, the Office of Thrift Supervision intends to give these issues special scrutiny and reject applications providing for the remutualization of a mutual holding company unless the applicant can clearly demonstrate
that the Office of Thrift Supervision’s concerns are not warranted in the particular case. Should the Office of Thrift Supervision prohibit or otherwise restrict these transactions in the future, our per share stock price may be adversely
affected. In addition, Office of Thrift Supervision regulations prohibit, for three years following completion of the offering, the acquisition of more than 10% of any class of equity security issued by us without the prior approval of the Office of
Thrift Supervision.
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
Not applicable.
20
We conduct our business through our
main office and branch offices. The following table sets forth certain information relating to these facilities as of June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Year
Opened
|
|
Owned/
Leased
|
|
Date of
Lease
Expiration
|
|
|
Net Book Value
as of
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Main Office:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7114 North Point Road
Baltimore, Maryland 21219
|
|
1959
|
|
Owned
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
928
|
|
Branches:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1230 Light Street
Baltimore, Maryland 21230
|
|
1980
|
|
Owned
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
1521 East Fort Avenue
Baltimore, Maryland 21219
|
|
1992
|
|
Owned
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
7657 Arundel Mills Boulevard
Hanover, Maryland 21076
|
|
2004
|
|
Owned
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,818
|
|
8070 Ritchie Highway
Pasadena, Maryland 21122
|
|
2007
|
|
Leased
|
|
2013
|
(1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
We have an option to renew this lease for one additional five-year period.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
Periodically, there have
been various claims and lawsuits against us, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to
our business. We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
None.
21
PART II
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
BV Financial’s common stock is traded on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board under the symbol “BVFL.OB.” As of September 17, 2009, the
Company had approximately 134 holders of record. The following table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the daily high and low sales price for and dividends declared on the common stock for fiscal 2009 and 2008. The prices do not necessarily
reflect inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not reflect actual transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Dividends
|
|
Fiscal 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.60
|
|
$
|
2.59
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
7.15
|
|
$
|
5.50
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
7.90
|
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
8.75
|
|
|
7.65
|
|
|
0.05
|
BV Financial is not subject to Office of Thrift Supervision regulatory restrictions on the
payment of dividends. However, BV Financial’s ability to pay dividends may depend, in part, upon its receipt of dividends from Bay-Vanguard Federal because BV Financial has no source of income other than earnings from the investment of the net
proceeds from the offering that it retained. Payment of cash dividends on capital stock by a savings institution is limited by OTS regulations. No insured depository institution may make a capital distribution if, after making the distribution, the
institution would be undercapitalized. See
“Regulation and Supervision—Federal Savings Institution Regulation—Limitation on Capital Distributions.”
As of June 30, 2009, BV Financial satisfied all prescribed capital requirements. Future dividend payments will depend on the Company’s
profitability, approval by its Board of Directors and prevailing OTS regulations.
22
The following table provides certain information with regard to shares repurchased by the Company in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
(1)
|
|
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
|
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
|
|
Maximum
Number of Shares
that May Yet be
Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
|
|
April 1, 2009 through April 30, 2009
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
47,830
|
|
May 1, 2009 through May 31, 2009
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
47,830
|
|
June 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
47,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On March 20, 2008, BV Financial announced the adoption of a stock repurchase program to acquire up to 97,830 shares, or 10%, of BV Financial’s outstanding shares of common
stock, excluding shares held by Bay-Vanguard M.H.C. The program will continue until it is completed or terminated by the Board of Directors.
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
Not applicable as BV
Financial is a smaller reporting company.
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
|
The objective of this section is to help potential investors understand our views on our results of operations and financial condition. You should read
this discussion in conjunction with the financial statements and notes to the financial statements included in this annual report on Form 10-K.
Overview
Income
.
Our primary source of income is net interest income. Net interest income is the
difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. To a much lesser extent, we also recognize income from service
charge income—mostly from service charges on deposit accounts and fees for late loan payments—and from the increase in surrender value of our bank-owned life insurance.
Allowance for Loan Losses
.
The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
Expenses.
The expenses we incur in operating our business consist of compensation and related expenses, occupancy expenses, data processing
expenses, telephone and postage expenses, advertising expenses, professional fees, equipment expenses and other miscellaneous expenses.
Compensation and related expenses consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes and expenses for health insurance, retirement plans and other employee benefits, including the
23
employee stock ownership plan. Expense for the employee stock ownership plan is based on the average market value of the shares committed to be released. An
equal number of shares will be released each year over the 15-year term of the loan. Expense for shares of restricted stock awards and stock options is based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Compensation and related
expenses is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
Occupancy expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of
land and building, consist primarily of lease payments, real estate taxes, depreciation charges, maintenance and costs of utilities. Depreciation of premises is computed using the straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets,
which range from 15 to 40 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or term of the lease.
Data processing expenses include fees paid for third-party data processing service.
Telephone and postage expenses include our
communication lines between branch offices, our Internet access and our mailing expenses, including certain deposit statements.
Advertising expenses include expenses for print advertisements, promotions and premium items.
Professional fees primarily include
fees paid to our independent registered public accountants, as well as our attorneys, predominantly in relation to problem assets and due to the costs of operating a public company.
Equipment expense includes expenses and depreciation charges related to office and banking equipment. Depreciation of equipment is computed using the
straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to ten years.
FDIC insurance premium expense
includes premiums paid for federal insurance on deposits.
Other expenses include amortization of intangible assets, charitable
contributions, regulatory assessments, office supplies and other miscellaneous operating expenses.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying
value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. We consider the allowance for loan losses, fair value measurement for financial assets, the determination of other than temporary impairment of investments, intangible asset
impairment and the deferred tax asset valuation allowance to be critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan
Losses
.
The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses,
which is charged to income. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing
of future cash flows on impaired loans; the value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. We recorded charge-offs of
$581,000 and $21,000 in relation to foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets in fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. Additionally, we had net charge-offs to average loans of 0.68% for fiscal 2009 compared to net charge offs to average loans of
0.02% for fiscal 2008.
Management reviews the level of the allowance on a quarterly basis, at a minimum, and establishes the provision for
loan losses based on an evaluation of the portfolio, past loss experience, economic conditions and business conditions affecting our primary market area, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan
portfolio, the duration of the current business cycle and other factors related to the collectibility of the loan portfolio. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future additions
to the allowance may be necessary if certain future events occur that cause actual results to differ from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. For example, a further downturn
24
in the local economy could cause increases in non-performing loans. Additionally, a further decline in real estate values could cause some of our loans to
become inadequately collateralized. In either case, this may require us to increase our provision for loan losses, which would negatively impact earnings. Further, the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral part of its examination process,
periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. Such agency may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on its judgments about information available to it at the time of its examination. An increase to the allowance required
to be made by the Office of Thrift Supervision would negatively impact our earnings. Additionally, a large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would negatively affect earnings. See
notes 1 and 3 to the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K.
At each of June 30, 2009 and 2008, over
89.2% of the loan portfolio consisted of real estate loans.
However, over 19.0% of the real estate loans consisted of multi-family and commercial real estate and construction loans, which carry a higher risk of default than one-to four-family
residential real estate loans. The level of the allowance for loan losses has changed due to a provision for loan losses of $729,000 for fiscal 2008, offset by $583,000 in charge-offs. The allowance for loan losses also reflects changes in the size
of loan portfolio, which decreased by 4.4% for fiscal 2009 and increased by 6.2% fiscal 2008, respectively.
Fair Value Measurement
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.
SFAS 157 establishes a three level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Management has presented certain financial instruments measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis by level within the hierarchy. Management obtains fair values from various broker pricing
sources on a monthly basis, at a minimum, and reviews the fair values for reasonableness. Although the Company believes that it uses the best information available to establish fair values for these certain financial instruments, future changes to
the fair value may be significant if certain future events occur that cause actual results to differ from the assumptions used in making determinations about fair value. For example, market data used as inputs to calculate pricing for a particular
financial instrument may change dramatically.
Other-than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities.
There are certain
securities in the Company’s portfolio in an unrealized loss position that management believes at this time are temporarily impaired. If the fair value of these securities does not recover in a reasonable period of time or management can no
longer demonstrate the ability and intent to hold them until recovery, a write-down through the consolidated statements of income would be necessary.
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the
length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the Company’s intent to not sell the security and hold the security until the
specified maturity or repricing date. In analyzing the issuer’s financial condition, management considers industry analysts’ reports, financial performance and projected target prices of investment analysts.
Intangible Asset Impairment.
The Company has goodwill and core deposit intangible assets arising from a branch purchase. The goodwill is
evaluated annually for impairment while the core deposit intangible is being amortized over seven years and also evaluated annually for impairment. Goodwill impairment was tested at May 31, 2009. A valuation analysis identified impairment, and
as a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.9 million, which eliminated all goodwill at the Company. The goodwill impairment charge did not affect the Company’s regulatory capital or cash flow.
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance.
We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes as prescribed in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. We
25
exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments require us to
make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets, which are inherently subjective, are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. Any reduction in
estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. Management determined during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 that a deferred tax asset valuation allowance was warranted for its
mutual fund security based on the Company’s ability to generate future capital gains if necessary to offset capital losses. In addition, management determined that no deferred tax asset valuation allowance was warranted for its goodwill
impairment write-down due to the expectation of taxable income going forward and the availability of tax planning strategies to generate future income to offset operating losses.
Operating Strategy
Our mission is to operate and grow a profitable community-oriented financial
institution. We plan to achieve this by executing our strategy of:
|
|
•
|
|
aggressively attracting core deposits;
|
|
|
•
|
|
continuing to emphasize the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans;
|
|
|
•
|
|
pursuing opportunities to increase multi-family and commercial real estate lending in our market area;
|
|
|
•
|
|
continuing to use conservative underwriting practices to maintain the high quality of our loan portfolio; and
|
|
|
•
|
|
providing exceptional service to attract and retain customers.
|
Aggressively attract core deposits
Core deposits (accounts other than certificates of deposit)
comprised 53.4% of our total deposits at June 30, 2009. We value core deposits because they represent longer-term customer relationships and a lower cost of funding compared to certificates of deposit. We aggressively seek core deposits through
competitive pricing and targeted advertising.
Continue to emphasize the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate
loans
Our primary lending activity is the origination of residential mortgage loans secured by homes in our market area. We intend to
continue emphasizing the origination of residential mortgage loans going forward. At June 30, 2009, 70.3% of our total loans were one- to four-family residential real estate loans. We believe that our emphasis on residential lending, which
carries a lower credit risk, contributes to our high asset quality.
Pursue opportunities to increase multi-family and commercial real
estate lending in our market area
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans provide us with the opportunity to earn more income
because they tend to have higher interest rates than residential mortgage loans. Additionally, we offer adjustable-rate multi-family and commercial real estate loans. Adjustable-rate loans, which reprice periodically, help to offset the adverse
effects of an increase in interest rates, which improves our interest rate risk management. Multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased $3.0 million for the year ended June 30, 2009 and comprised approximately 13.5% of total loans.
There are many multi-family and commercial properties located in our market area, and we will continue to pursue these opportunities, while continuing to originate any such loans in accordance with what we believe are our conservative underwriting
guidelines.
26
Continue to use conservative underwriting practices to maintain the high quality of our loan portfolio
We believe that high asset quality is a key to long-term financial success. We have sought to maintain a high level of asset quality
and moderate credit risk by using underwriting standards which we believe are conservative. While our non-performing loans (loans that are 90 or more days delinquent) at June 30, 2009 decreased to 0.8% of our total loan portfolio and 0.6% of
our total assets, the decrease was attributable to two residential construction loans totaling $2.2 million being removed from non-accrual status due to $1.8 million in payoffs and $426,000 in charge-offs. We intend to continue our efforts to
originate multi-family and commercial real estate loans and our philosophy of managing large loan exposures through our conservative approach to lending.
Provide exceptional service to attract and retain customers
As a community-oriented financial
institution, we emphasize providing exceptional customer service as a means to attract and retain customers. We deliver personalized service and respond with flexibility to customer needs. We believe that our community orientation is attractive to
our customers and distinguishes us from the large banks that operate in our market area. We have also provided Internet banking since 1997.
Balance
Sheet Analysis
Loans
.
Our primary lending activity is the origination of loans secured by real estate. We
originate real estate loans secured by one- to four-family residential real estate, and to a much lesser extent, secured by multi-family and commercial real estate. At June 30, 2009, real estate loans totaled $110.0 million, or 89.2% of total
loans, compared to $115.1 million, or 89.9%, of total loans at June 30, 2008.
The largest segment of our real estate loans is one- to
four-family residential real estate loans. At June 30, 2009, one- to four-family residential real estate loans totaled $86.6 million, which represented 78.7% of real estate loans and 70.3% of total loans compared to $90.5 million at
June 30, 2008, which represented 78.6% of real estate loans and 70.7% of total loans. One- to four-family residential real estate loans decreased $3.9 million, or 4.3%, for the year ended June 30, 2009 due to borrower payoffs from their
refinancing with a competitor offering a lower rate, loan roll-off and a reduced demand for these loans.
Multi-family and commercial real
estate loans totaled $16.6 million at June 30, 2009, which represented 15.1% of real estate loans and 13.5% of total loans, compared to $13.6 million at June 30, 2008, which represented 11.8% of real estate loans and 10.6% of total loans.
Multi-family and commercial real estate loans increased $3.0 million, or 22.4%, for the year ended June 30, 2009 due to the continued emphasis of this type of lending.
We purchase and originate loans secured by mobile homes. Mobile home loans totaled $11.5 million at June 30, 2009, which represented 9.3% of total
loans, compared to $11.8 million at June 30, 2008, which represented 9.2% of total loans. To mitigate our exposure to this type of lending, we have limited the amount of mobile home loans to 15% of our loan portfolio. Mobile home loans
decreased in fiscal 2009 due to roll-off exceeding additional purchases from Forward National and Mainland Financial. A further discussion of our mobile home loans is contained in
“Business—Lending Activities—Mobile Home
Loans.”
We also originate construction loans secured by residential, multi-family and commercial real estate and loans to
individuals to acquire land upon which they intend to build a residence. This portfolio totaled $6.8 million at June 30, 2009, which represented 5.5% of total loans, compared to $11.1 million at June 30, 2008, which represented 8.7% of
total loans. Construction loans decreased $4.3 million, or 38.9%, for the year ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to management reducing exposure in this area, the completion of the construction period for some loans and resulting conversion to
permanent loans, and the foreclosure of a $1.0 million construction loan resulting in a charge-off of $426,000.
We also originate a
variety of consumer loans, including loans secured by passbook or certificate accounts. Consumer loans totaled $888,000 and represented 0.7% of total loans at June 30, 2009, compared to $824,000, or 0.7% of total loans, at June 30, 2008.
27
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family (1)
|
|
$
|
86,589
|
|
|
70.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
90,494
|
|
|
70.66
|
%
|
|
Multi-family and commercial
|
|
|
16,614
|
|
|
13.48
|
|
|
|
13,572
|
|
|
10.60
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
6,797
|
|
|
5.51
|
|
|
|
11,125
|
|
|
8.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
89.23
|
|
|
|
115,191
|
|
|
89.94
|
|
|
Mobile home loans
|
|
|
11,471
|
|
|
9.31
|
|
|
|
11,810
|
|
|
9.22
|
|
|
Other consumer loans
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
0.72
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans
|
|
|
12,359
|
|
|
10.03
|
|
|
|
12,634
|
|
|
9.87
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans
|
|
|
123,268
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
128,069
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in process
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,533
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(855
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
119,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes second mortgage loans, home equity loans and home equity lines of credit.
|
The following table sets forth certain information at June 30, 2009 regarding the dollar amount of loans maturing during the periods indicated. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments, which
significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported as due in one year or less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to
Four-
Family
|
|
Multi-
Family
and
commercial
|
|
Construction
|
|
Mobile
Home
|
|
Other
Consumer
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Amounts due in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
$
|
1,693
|
|
$
|
344
|
|
$
|
5,460
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
$
|
8,261
|
|
More than one year to five years
|
|
|
9,825
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
14,138
|
|
More than five years
|
|
|
75,071
|
|
|
14,252
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11,209
|
|
|
337
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
100,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount due
|
|
$
|
86,589
|
|
$
|
16,614
|
|
$
|
6,797
|
|
$
|
11,471
|
|
$
|
888
|
|
$
|
909
|
|
$
|
123,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at June 30, 2009 that are due after
June 30, 2010 and have either fixed interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due After June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rates
|
|
Floating or
Adjustable-Rates
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
One- to four-family
|
|
$
|
73,919
|
|
$
|
10,977
|
|
$
|
84,896
|
|
Multi-family and commercial
|
|
|
6,552
|
|
|
9,718
|
|
|
16,270
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,337
|
|
Mobile home
|
|
|
11,465
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11,465
|
|
Other consumer loans
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
880
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
94,312
|
|
$
|
20,695
|
|
$
|
115,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows loan activity during the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total loans at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
124,843
|
|
|
$
|
116,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans originated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- to four-family
|
|
|
9,376
|
|
|
|
10,795
|
|
Multi-family and commercial
|
|
|
5,634
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
3,975
|
|
|
|
3,048
|
|
Mobile home
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans originated
|
|
|
19,538
|
|
|
|
17,635
|
|
Loans and participations purchased
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
5,250
|
|
Deduct:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal loan repayments
|
|
|
22,858
|
|
|
|
13,049
|
|
Loans and participations sold
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
Transfer to foreclosed real estate/repossessed assets
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loan activity
|
|
|
(5,608
|
)
|
|
|
8,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans at end of period
|
|
$
|
119,235
|
|
|
$
|
124,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities.
Our securities portfolio consists primarily of U.S. Treasury and
U.S. government agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and a mutual fund that invests in adjustable-rate loans. Securities decreased approximately $4.8 million, or 26.0%, in the year ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to $9.0 million of
U.S. government agency securities being called or maturing and $2.5 million principal collected on mortgage-backed securities offset by $7.0 million of U.S. government agency securities purchases. All of our mortgage-backed securities were issued by
Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
29
The following table sets forth the carrying amounts and fair values of our securities portfolio at the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Held-to-maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
4,052
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
7,485
|
|
|
7,610
|
|
|
7,788
|
|
|
7,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity securities
|
|
|
11,537
|
|
|
11,689
|
|
|
9,788
|
|
|
9,661
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government agencies
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
4,947
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,547
|
|
|
2,547
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
8,838
|
|
Trading securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading securities
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
$
|
13,759
|
|
$
|
13,944
|
|
$
|
18,686
|
|
$
|
18,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009, we had no investments that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of
our equity at June 30, 2009. Management analyzed its exposure to U.S. federal agencies securities and mortgage-backed securities held and found no other-than-temporary impairment at June 30, 2009.
30
The following table sets forth the maturities and weighted average yields of securities at June 30,
2009. Weighted average yields are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis as the investment portfolio does not include any tax-exempt obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or Less
|
|
|
More than
One Year to
Five Years
|
|
|
More than
Five Years to
Fifteen Years
|
|
|
More than
Fifteen Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of the U.S. Treasury and
U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,052
|
|
1.45
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,052
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
3.33
|
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
2,952
|
|
5.65
|
|
|
|
7,485
|
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity securities
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
5,668
|
|
2.81
|
|
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
$
|
2,952
|
|
5.65
|
|
|
$
|
11,537
|
|
3.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,179
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
6.50
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
$
|
1,020
|
|
5.15
|
|
|
$
|
1,179
|
|
5.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
5.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
5.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading securities
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
5.09
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
5.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
Deposits
.
Our primary source of funds is our deposit accounts, which are comprised
of demand deposits, savings accounts and time deposits. These deposits are provided primarily by individuals within our market area. We do not use brokered deposits as a source of funding. Deposits increased $584,000, or 0.4%, for the year ended
June 30, 2009 primarily due to a $3.1 million increase in time deposits and a $150,000 increase in savings accounts, offset by a $2.6 million decrease in NOW and money market accounts. The Bank aggressively marketed time deposits early in
fiscal year 2009 attracting new monies while also seeing movement from other deposit categories.
The following table sets forth the
balances of our deposit products at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Non-interest bearing accounts
|
|
$
|
6,041
|
|
$
|
6,040
|
|
NOW and money market accounts
|
|
|
50,896
|
|
|
53,520
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
16,604
|
|
|
16,454
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
64,075
|
|
|
61,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
137,616
|
|
$
|
137,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table indicates the amount of jumbo certificates of deposit by time remaining until
maturity as of June 30, 2009. Jumbo certificates of deposit require minimum deposits of $100,000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity Period
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
7,316
|
|
Over three through six months
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
Over six through twelve months
|
|
|
4,798
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
9,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
23,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth time deposits classified by rates at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
1.00 - 1.99%
|
|
$
|
4,511
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
2.00 - 2.99%
|
|
|
11,804
|
|
|
6,019
|
|
3.00 - 3.99%
|
|
|
14,634
|
|
|
8,579
|
|
4.00 - 4.99%
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
|
29,662
|
|
5.00 - 5.99%
|
|
|
14,759
|
|
|
16,395
|
|
6.00 - 6.99%
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
64,075
|
|
$
|
61,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time deposits at June 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount Due
|
|
Total
|
|
Percent of
Total
Certificate
Accounts
|
|
|
|
One Year
or Less
|
|
More Than
One Year
to Two
Years
|
|
More Than
Two Years
to Three
Years
|
|
More Than
Three Years
to Four
Years
|
|
More Than
Four
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
1.00 - 1.99%
|
|
$
|
3,733
|
|
$
|
778
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,511
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
2.00 - 2.99%
|
|
|
10,690
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
11,804
|
|
18.42
|
|
|
3.00 - 3.99%
|
|
|
11,562
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
14,634
|
|
22.84
|
|
|
4.00 - 4.99%
|
|
|
11,693
|
|
|
3,485
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
18,247
|
|
28.48
|
|
|
5.00 - 5.99%
|
|
|
970
|
|
|
11,893
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,332
|
|
|
14,759
|
|
23.03
|
|
|
6.00 - 6.99%
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
120
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
38,748
|
|
$
|
17,878
|
|
$
|
1,940
|
|
$
|
1,321
|
|
$
|
4,188
|
|
$
|
64,075
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the deposit activity for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
137,032
|
|
|
$
|
98,492
|
|
|
Decrease before branch acquisition and interest credited
|
|
|
(3,148
|
)
|
|
|
(17,655
|
)
|
|
Increase due to branch acquisition
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
51,521
|
|
|
Interest credited
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
4,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
38,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
137,616
|
|
|
$
|
137,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
.
We use advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank to supplement our
supply of lendable funds or to meet deposit withdrawal requirements. The following tables present certain information regarding our advances with the Federal Home Loan Bank during the periods and at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Maximum amount of advances outstanding at any month end
|
|
$
|
12,500
|
|
|
$
|
16,000
|
|
|
Average advances outstanding
|
|
|
9,062
|
|
|
|
9,605
|
|
|
Weighted average rate paid on advances
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Balance outstanding at end of year
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
Weighted average rate on advances at end of year
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
33
Results of Operations for the Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
Overview.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009/2008
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
|
723.3
|
%
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
(1.70
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)%
|
|
750.0
|
%
|
|
Return on average equity
|
|
|
(20.09
|
)%
|
|
|
(2.44
|
)%
|
|
723.4
|
%
|
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
8.45
|
%
|
|
|
8.15
|
%
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
(17.09
|
)%
|
|
|
(142.86
|
)%
|
|
(88.0
|
)%
|
Net loss increased $2.4 million, or 723.3%, for fiscal 2009 due primarily to a $3.9 million
goodwill impairment write-down, a $401,000 increase in the provision for loan losses and a $471,000 loss in securities trading, offset by a $1.7 million increase in benefit for income taxes.
Net Interest Income.
Net interest income increased $420,000, or 11.3%, to $4.1 million for fiscal 2009. The increase in net
interest income for fiscal 2009 was primarily attributable to a decrease in interest expense to lower interest rates. Our net interest margin increased from 2.48% for fiscal 2008 to 2.80% for fiscal 2009 and our interest rate spread increased from
2.13% for fiscal 2008 to 2.54% for fiscal 2009.
Total interest income decreased $355,000, or 4.0%, to $8.5 million for fiscal 2009,
resulting from lower average balances and interest rates earned. During fiscal 2009, average interest-earning assets decreased by $2.3 million, or 1.6%, to $147.1 million, while the average yield decreased 15 basis points to 5.77%. The composition
of interest-earning assets consists of loans, securities and interest-bearing deposits. Interest on loans increased $286,000, or 3.8%, to $7.8 million for fiscal 2009 due to an increase in the average balance, offset by a decrease in the average
yield from 6.26% to 6.21%. During fiscal 2009, other interest income decreased $677,000, or 97.1%, due to a decrease in the average balance on federal funds and a decrease in the average yield on overnight federal funds from 4.11% to 0.29%. Interest
on securities increased 5.9% due to an increase in the average balance, offset by a decrease in the average yield from 5.03% to 4.29%.
Total interest expense decreased $775,000 or 15.1%, to $4.4 million for fiscal 2009 primarily due to decreases in interest paid on deposits, offset by an increase in interest paid on borrowings. The average interest rate paid on deposits
decreased 75 basis points to 2.95%. The interest paid on Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased due to an increase in the average rate paid from 4.86% to 7.00%, offset by a decrease in average balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances from $9.6
million for fiscal 2008 to $9.1 million for fiscal 2009. The increase in the average rate paid was due to prepayment penalties in connection with the prepayment of higher-interest rate advances.
Average Balances and Yields.
The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the
total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the resulting average yields and costs. The yields and costs for
the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. For purposes of this table, average balances have been calculated using daily average
balances.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
and
Dividends
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Balance
|
|
Interest
and
Dividends
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (1)
|
|
$
|
125,825
|
|
$
|
7,819
|
|
|
6.21
|
%
|
|
$
|
120,324
|
|
$
|
7,533
|
|
|
6.26
|
%
|
|
Securities taxable
|
|
|
15,110
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
12,164
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
5.03
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
563
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
4.28
|
|
|
Federal Funds
|
|
|
5,589
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
16,411
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
4.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
147,087
|
|
|
8,488
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
149,436
|
|
|
8,843
|
|
|
5.92
|
|
|
Non-interest-earning assets
|
|
|
13,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
160,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
166,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passbook accounts
|
|
$
|
4,782
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,172
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
0.81
|
%
|
|
Statement savings
|
|
|
11,057
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
1.51
|
|
|
|
12,210
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
39,672
|
|
|
942
|
|
|
2.37
|
|
|
|
40,578
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
3.51
|
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
8,424
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
8,079
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
62,345
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
|
|
60,140
|
|
|
2,894
|
|
|
4.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
126,280
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
2.95
|
|
|
|
126,179
|
|
|
4,674
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
9,062
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
9,605
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
135,342
|
|
|
4,366
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
135,784
|
|
|
5,141
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
6,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
4,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
146,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
13,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
160,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
166,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
Net interest margin (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets as a percentage of interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount is net of deferred loan origination costs, undisbursed proceeds of loans in process, allowance for loan losses and includes non-accrual loans.
|
|
(2)
|
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the weighted average yield on interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
|
|
(3)
|
Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
|
35
Rate/Volume Analysis
.
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates
and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume
multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have been allocated proportionately based on the changes
due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Compared to 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
$
|
342
|
|
|
$
|
(56
|
)
|
|
$
|
286
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
Federal Funds
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Passbook accounts
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(445
|
)
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
(990
|
)
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(795
|
)
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses increased $401,000, from $328,000 for fiscal 2008 to $729,000 for fiscal 2009. This was a result of increased charge-offs
and classified loans.
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses, non-performing loans and classified loans is presented
under
“Risk Management—Analysis of Non-Performing and Classified Assets”
and
“Risk Management—Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses.”
Non-Interest Income
.
The following table shows the components of other income and the percentage changes from year to year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Service fees on deposits
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
Service fees on loans
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
Income from investment in life insurance
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Loss on securities trading
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Loss on sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
Termination of split-dollar life insurance policy
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
288
|
|
|
(67.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Total non-interest income decreased $194,000 from $288,000 to $94,000 or 67.4% primarily due to a
$471,000 loss on securities trading associated with a decline in the AMF Short Mortgage Mutual Fund offset by $240,000 in income from the termination of a split-dollar life insurance policy.
Non-Interest Expenses.
The following table shows the components of non-interest expenses and the percentage changes from year to year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Compensation and related expenses
|
|
$
|
2,225
|
|
|
$
|
2,250
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)%
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
Telephone and postage
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|
Impairment write-down of investment securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
(100.0
|
)
|
|
Net amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Repossessed assets expense
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
633.3
|
|
|
FDIC Insurance Premiums
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
1,136.8
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,182
|
|
|
$
|
4,246
|
|
|
92.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency ratio (1)
|
|
|
194.1
|
%
|
|
|
106.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Computed as non-interest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income and other income. If goodwill impairment for 2009 and impairment write-down of investment securities for
2008 were excluded, the efficiency ratio would be 100.6% and 99.6% for 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
Total non-interest
expenses increased $3.9 million from $4.3 million to $8.2 million or 92.7% primarily due to a $3.9 million goodwill impairment charge off recorded in connection with the acquisition of the Pasadena, Maryland branch office in August 2007. The
increased non-interest expense also reflected increased FDIC insurance premiums due to the one-time special assessment and an increase in the overall assessment rate. Other expenses decreased due to management controlling costs and reductions in
office supplies, check printing, bank charges and insurance expenses.
Income Taxes.
The benefit for income taxes increased
$1.7 million, or 678.7%, from a benefit of $254,000 for fiscal year 2008 to $2.0 million for fiscal year 2009 due primarily to the decrease in pre-tax income. The Company’s effective tax rate was (42.1)% for fiscal year 2009 compared to
(43.5%) for fiscal year 2008.
Risk Management
Overview
.
Managing risk is an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk and market risk. Credit risk is
the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Market risk arises from
fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Other risks that we encounter are operational risks, liquidity
risks and reputation risk. Operational risks include risks related to fraud, regulatory compliance, processing errors, technology and disaster recovery. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, lenders or
borrowers. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could cause a decline in our customer base or revenue.
37
Credit Risk Management
.
Our strategy for credit risk management focuses on having
well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing prompt attention to potential problem loans. Our strategy also emphasizes the origination of one- to four-family residential real estate loans, which typically have lower
default rates than other types of loans and are secured by collateral that generally tends to appreciate in value.
When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. We make initial contact with the borrower when the loan becomes 15 days past
due. If payment is not received by the 35
th
day of delinquency, a letter from our
President and Chief Executive Officer is sent. Typically, when the loan becomes 60 days past due, a letter is sent from our attorney notifying the borrower that we will commence foreclosure proceedings if the loan is not paid in full within 30 days.
Generally, loan workout arrangements are made with the borrower at this time; however, if an arrangement cannot be structured before the loan becomes 90 days past due, we will commence foreclosure proceedings against any real property that secures
the loan or attempt to repossess any personal property that secures a consumer loan. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full or refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the
loan generally is sold at foreclosure.
Management informs the board of directors monthly of the amount of loans delinquent more than 30
days.
Analysis of Non-Performing and Classified Assets.
We consider repossessed assets and loans that are 90 days or more
past due to be non-performing assets. When a loan becomes 90 days delinquent, the loan is placed on non-accrual status at which time the accrual of interest ceases and an allowance for any uncollectible accrued interest is established and charged
against operations. Typically, payments received on a non-accrual loan are applied to the outstanding principal and interest as determined at the time of collection of the loan.
Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is sold. When
property is acquired, it is recorded at fair value, net of estimated selling costs, at the date of foreclosure. Holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property result in charges against income.
Non-performing assets totaled $1.6 million, or 1.02% of total assets, at June 30, 2009, which was a decrease of $1.2 million, or 42.9%, from
June 30, 2008. The decrease in non-performing assets was due primarily to a $2.6 million decrease in non-accruing construction loans offset by a $651,000 increase in non-accruing one- to four-family loans and a $500,000 increase in foreclosed
real estate. The decrease in non-accruing construction loans was due to $2.2 million in pay-offs, $426,000 in charge-offs and a $405,000 loan becoming current.
In August 2008, the Bank refinanced one of the non-accruing construction loans present at June 30, 2008 by splitting the original loan amount between the two primary borrowers and making two loans. One
borrower’s new loan was secured by two properties that were only 85% complete. This borrower provided additional properties for collateral so that there would be enough equity to finish the remaining 15% of the project. This project has been
completed and the two properties are being rented providing cash flows for repayment of this loan. The other borrower’s new loan was secured by two completed properties that are being rented providing cash flows for repayment of this loan. This
borrower is adding personal cash to help make the loan payments. Both of the refinanced loans were granted at the current market rates available and the same risk and compliance standards as other such loans available. At June 30, 2009, these
loans were current and paying in accordance with the revised terms.
Non-accrual loans accounted for 41.2% of total non-performing assets
at June 30, 2009.
38
The following table provides information with respect to our non-performing assets at the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Non-accruing loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,623
|
|
|
One- to four-family
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructuring (1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other repossessed assets
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
1,582
|
|
|
$
|
2,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
|
Total non-performing loans to total assets
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
(1)
|
As defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 15.
|
Other than disclosed in the above table, there are no other loans at June 30, 2009 that management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present repayment terms.
Interest income that would have been recorded for the year ended June 30, 2009 had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms
amounted to $45,000. The amount of interest related to these loans included in interest income was $23,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009.
Federal regulations require us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis. In addition, the Office of Thrift Supervision has the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are
three classifications for problem assets: substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies
are not corrected. “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values
questionable and there is a high possibility of loss. An asset classified “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a
“special mention” category, described as assets that do not currently expose us to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving our close attention. When we
classify an asset as substandard or doubtful, we establish a specific allowance for loan losses. If we classify an asset as loss, we charge off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified as loss.
The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified assets at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Special mention assets
|
|
$
|
2,853
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Substandard assets
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
Doubtful assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Loss assets
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total classified assets
|
|
$
|
4,629
|
|
$
|
2,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Total classified assets increased $2.0 million from $2.6 million to $4.6 million, or 76.9%,
primarily due to negative changes in customer payment histories and deterioration of customers’ personal credit histories.
There were ten loans at June 30, 2009 with an aggregate balance of $1.8 million that are classified as substandard and are considered non-performing. There were four loans at June 30, 2008 with an aggregate balance of $2.6 million
that were classified as substandard and were considered non-performing.
Delinquencies.
The following table
provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
90 Days or More
|
|
60-89 Days
|
|
90 Days or More
|
|
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
Principal
Balance
of
Loans
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
Principal
Balance
of
Loans
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
Principal
Balance
of
Loans
|
|
Number
of
Loans
|
|
Principal
Balance
of
Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Construction
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
2
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
6
|
|
$
|
2,623
|
|
One- to four-family residential
|
|
5
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
4
|
|
|
588
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mobile home
|
|
3
|
|
|
71
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
4
|
|
|
163
|
|
2
|
|
|
62
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
1
|
|
|
24
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
8
|
|
$
|
1,418
|
|
5
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
6
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
8
|
|
$
|
2,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses
.
The allowance
for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish provisions against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additions to the allowance are necessary, a provision for
loan losses is charged to earnings.
Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses consists of three
key elements: (1) specific allowances for identified problem loans; (2) a general valuation allowance on certain identified problem loans; and (3) a general valuation allowance on the remainder of the loan portfolio. Although we
determine the amount of each element of the allowance separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available for the entire portfolio.
Specific Allowance Required for Identified Problem Loans.
We establish an allowance on certain identified problem loans based on such factors as: (1) the strength of the customer’s personal or business cash flows;
(2) the availability of other sources of repayment; (3) the amount due or past due; (4) the type and value of collateral; (5) the strength of our collateral position; (6) the estimated cost to sell the collateral; and
(7) the borrower’s effort to cure the delinquency.
General Valuation Allowance on Certain Identified Problem Loans.
We
also establish a general allowance for classified loans that do not have an individual allowance. We segregate these loans by loan category and assign allowances to each category based on inherent losses associated with each type of lending and
consideration that these loans, in the aggregate, represent an above-average credit risk and that more of these loans will prove to be uncollectible compared to loans in the general portfolio.
General Valuation Allowance on the Remainder of the Loan Portfolio.
We establish another general allowance for loans that are not classified to
recognize the inherent losses associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, has not been allocated to particular problem assets. This general valuation allowance is determined by segregating the loans by loan category
and assigning allowances based on our historical loss experience, delinquency trends and management’s evaluation of the collectibility of the loan portfolio. The allowance may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s
judgment, affect the collectibility of the portfolio as of the evaluation date. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary
market area, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in
40
particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are
re-evaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current real estate environment.
The Office of Thrift Supervision, as an integral
part of its examination process, periodically reviews our allowance for loan losses. The Office of Thrift Supervision may require us to make additional provisions for loan losses based on judgments different from ours.
At June 30, 2009, our allowance for loan losses represented 0.71% of total loans and 92.8% of non-performing loans. The allowance for loan losses
increased to $855,000 at June 30, 2009 from $709,000 at June 30, 2008, due to a provision for loan losses of $729,000 and charge-offs of $583,000. The higher allowance reflects higher general loss factors being established in all loan
categories except construction. A lower allowance for construction loans was required at June 30, 2009 due to $1.8 million in pay-offs of non-accruing construction loans and $426,000 in construction loan charge-offs during fiscal year 2009.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
|
|
% of
Loans in
Each Category
to Total Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
|
|
% of
Loans in
Each Category
to Total Loans
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
One- to four-family
|
|
$
|
283
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
70.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
25.1
|
%
|
|
70.7
|
%
|
|
Multi-family and commercial
|
|
|
290
|
|
33.9
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
112
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
Mobile home
|
|
|
152
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
13
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
5
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan
losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and our results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while
we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not request us to increase our allowance for
loan losses. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should
the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
41
Analysis of Loan Loss Experience.
The following table sets forth an analysis of the
allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated. Where specific loan loss allowances have been established, any difference between the loss allowance and the amount of loss realized has been charged or credited to current income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses, at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Non-residential
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mobile home
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses, end of period
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance to non-performing loans
|
|
|
92.83
|
%
|
|
|
26.40
|
%
|
|
Allowance to total loans outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Interest Rate Risk Management.
We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our
interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in an effort to minimize the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than mortgage loans
because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. To reduce the potential volatility of our
earnings, we have sought to improve the match between asset and liability maturities and rates, while maintaining an acceptable interest rate spread. Also, we attempt to manage our interest rate risk through: the origination of adjustable-rate one-
to four-family residential real estate loans; an investment in a mutual fund that invests in adjustable-rate mortgage loans; an increased focus on multi-family and commercial real estate lending, which emphasizes the origination of shorter-term
adjustable-rate loans; and efforts to originate fixed-rate mortgage loans with maturities of fifteen years or less. We currently do not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of off-balance sheet
derivative financial instruments.
Our board of directors serves as our Asset/Liability Committee to communicate, coordinate and control
all aspects involving asset/liability management. The committee monitors the volume and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources.
Net Portfolio Value Simulation Analysis.
We use an interest rate sensitivity analysis prepared by the Office of Thrift Supervision to
review our level of interest rate risk. This analysis measures interest rate risk by computing changes in net portfolio value of our cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items in the event of a range of assumed changes in market
interest rates. Net portfolio value represents the market value of portfolio equity and is equal to the market value of assets minus the market value of liabilities, with adjustments made for off-balance sheet items. This analysis assesses the risk
of loss in market risk sensitive instruments in the event of a sudden and sustained 100 to 300 basis point increase or 50 basis point decrease in market interest rates. We measure interest rate risk by modeling the changes in net portfolio value
over a variety of interest rate scenarios. The following table, which is based on information that we provide to the Office of Thrift Supervision, presents the change in our net portfolio value at June 30, 2009 that would occur in the event of
an immediate change in interest rates based on Office of Thrift Supervision assumptions, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counteract that change.
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Portfolio Value
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net Portfolio Value as % of
Portfolio
Value of Assets
|
|
|
Basis Point (“bp”) Change in Rates
|
|
$ Amount
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
NPV Ratio
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
300
|
|
$
|
10,687
|
|
$
|
(3,203
|
)
|
|
(23
|
)%
|
|
6.79
|
%
|
|
(171
|
)bp
|
|
200
|
|
|
12,466
|
|
|
(1,424
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
7.79
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
100
|
|
|
13,623
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
50
|
|
|
13,857
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
8.51
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Static
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8.50
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(50)
|
|
|
13,856
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
8.46
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(100)
|
|
|
13,739
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
8.37
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
The Office of Thrift Supervision uses certain assumptions in assessing the interest rate risk of
savings associations. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayment rates, deposit decay rates, and the market values of certain assets under differing interest rate scenarios, among others. As with any method of measuring interest
rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to
changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Further,
in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from certificates could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the table.
Liquidity Management
.
Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary
sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments and maturities and sales of investment securities. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage
prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
We regularly adjust our investments in
liquid assets based upon our assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and (4) the objectives of our asset/liability management program.
Excess liquid assets are invested generally in interest-earning deposits, federal funds sold and short- and intermediate-term U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits. The levels of these assets are dependent on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At
June 30, 2009, cash and cash equivalents totaled $11.2 million. Additionally, at June 30, 2009, the Company had interest-bearing deposits of $124,000. Securities classified as available-for-sale, which provide additional sources of
liquidity, totaled $1.2 million at June 30, 2009. In addition, at June 30, 2009, we had the ability to borrow an additional $40.0 million from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. On that date, we had no outstanding borrowings.
At June 30, 2009, we had $471,000 in loan commitments outstanding. In addition to commitments to originate loans, we had $2.2 million
in unused lines of credit and $1.0 million in undisbursed construction loans in process. Certificates of deposit due within one year of June 30, 2009 totaled $38.7 million, or 28.2% of total deposits. If these deposits do not remain with us, we
will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and lines of credit. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the
certificates of deposit due on or before June 30, 2010. We believe, however, based on past experience, that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us. We have the ability to attract and retain deposits by
adjusting the interest rates offered.
Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase of securities. Our
primary financing activities consist of activity in deposit accounts. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products offered by us and our local competitors and other factors. We generally manage
the pricing of our deposits to be competitive and to increase core deposits. Occasionally, we offer promotional rates to attract certain deposit products.
43
The following table presents our primary investing and financing activities during the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan originations
|
|
$
|
17,692
|
|
|
$
|
17,635
|
|
|
Loan and participation purchases
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
5,250
|
|
|
New securities (sales) purchases
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
17,360
|
|
|
Loan participation sales
|
|
|
(3,290
|
)
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deposits
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
(8,402
|
)
|
|
FHLB borrowings net
|
|
|
(7,500
|
)
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
Capital Management.
We have managed our capital to maintain strong protection for
depositors and creditors. We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the Office of Thrift Supervision, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and
a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At June 30, 2009, we exceeded all of our regulatory capital requirements. We are considered “well
capitalized” under regulatory guidelines. See
“Regulation and Supervision—Federal Savings Institution Regulation—Capital Requirements”
and note 12 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
We also will manage our capital for maximum shareholder benefit. We may use capital management tools such as cash dividends and share
repurchases.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
.
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial
transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are
used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. A presentation of our outstanding loan commitments and unused lines of credit at June 30, 2009 and their effect on our
liquidity is presented at note 3 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K and under
“—Risk Management—Liquidity Management.”
For the year ended June 30, 2009, we did not engage in any off-balance-sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
The
financial statements and related financial data presented in this annual report on Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in
terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs. Unlike most industrial
companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s performance than do general levels of
inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
44
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Part II, Item 7,
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Risk Management—Interest Rate
Risk Management”
and
“—Net Portfolio Value Simulation Analysis.”
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
Information required by this item is included herein beginning on page F-1.
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
ITEM 9A(T).
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
|
The Company’s
management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by
this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s
management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
|
|
(b)
|
Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
|
Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control
over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to
provide only management’s report in this annual report.
|
|
(c)
|
Changes to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
|
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.
|
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
45
PART III
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Directors
For information concerning the directors of the Company, the information contained under the section captioned
“Items to be Voted on by Stockholders—Item 1—Election of Directors”
in BV Financial’s Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“Proxy Statement”) is incorporated by reference.
Executive Officers
The Board of Directors
annually elects the executive officers of BV Financial, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and Bay-Vanguard Federal, who serve at the Board’s discretion. Our executive officers are:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
|
|
|
Edmund T. Leonard
|
|
Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of BV Financial, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and Bay-Vanguard Federal
|
|
|
|
|
Carolyn M. Mroz
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of BV Financial, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. and Bay-Vanguard Federal
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel J. Gallagher, Jr.
|
|
Senior Vice President of Bay-Vanguard Federal
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey S. Collier
|
|
Senior Vice President of Bay-Vanguard Federal
|
|
|
|
|
Michele J. Kelly
|
|
Senior Vice President of Bay-Vanguard Federal
|
Below is information regarding our executive officers who are not also directors. Unless otherwise
stated, the individual has held their current occupation for the last five years. The age indicated is as of June 30, 2009.
Michele J. Kelly
is a senior vice president of Bay-Vanguard Federal. Ms. Kelly was vice president of Vanguard Federal Savings and Loan Association before its merger with Bay Federal Savings and Loan Association in April 1996.
Age 62.
Jeffrey S. Collier
is senior vice president of Bay-Vanguard Federal. Mr. Collier joined Bay-Vanguard Federal in
February 2006. Mr. Collier was vice president of lending for seven years at Harford Bank before his employment by Bay-Vanguard Federal. Age 47.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Reference is made to the cover page of this report and to the
section captioned
“Other Information Relating to Directors and Executive Officers—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”
in the Proxy Statement for information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of
the Exchange Act.
Disclosure of Code of Ethics and Business Conduct
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics, which is available to stockholders, without charge, upon written request to Robert R. Kern, Jr., Corporate Secretary, BV Financial, Inc., 7114 North Point Road, Baltimore,
Maryland 21219.
46
Corporate Governance
For information regarding the audit committee and its composition and the audit committee financial expert, the section captioned
“Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Committees of the Board of
Directors—Audit Committee”
in the Company’s Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference.
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
The information
contained under the sections captioned
“Executive Compensation”
and
“Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Director Compensation”
in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
|
|
(a)
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
|
Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned
“Stock Ownership”
in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
(b)
|
Security Ownership of Management
|
Information required by
this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned
“Stock Ownership”
in the Proxy Statement.
Management of BV Financial knows of no
arrangements, including any pledge by any person of securities of BV Financial, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the registrant.
|
|
(d)
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
The following table
provides information as of June 30, 2009 for compensation plans under which equity securities may be issued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan category
|
|
Number of Securities
to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights
(a)
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans
(excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
111,456
|
|
$
|
8.94
|
|
18,149
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
111,456
|
|
$
|
8.94
|
|
18,149
|
47
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by
reference to the section captioned
“Other Information Relating to Directors and Executive Officers—Transactions with Related Persons”
in the Proxy Statement.
Corporate Governance
Information regarding director independence is incorporated herein by
reference to the section captioned
“Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Director Independence.”
|
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The
information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section captioned
“Audit-Related Matters—Audit and Other Fees”
and
“Audit-Related Matters—Pre-Approval of Services by the Independent
Auditor”
in the Proxy Statement.
48
PART IV
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Charter of BV Financial, Inc.
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of BV Financial, Inc.
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate of BV Financial, Inc.
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank and Edmund
T. Leonard
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between BV Financial, Inc. and Edmund T. Leonard
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank and Carolyn M. Mroz
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between BV Financial, Inc. and Carolyn M. Mroz
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank and Daniel J. Gallagher, Jr.
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Form of Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Form of ESOP Loan Commitment Letter and ESOP Loan Documents
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank Change in Control Severance Compensation Plan
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank Employees’ Savings and Profit-Sharing Plan
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Form of Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Amended and Restated Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Form of Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank Directors’ Supplemental Retirement Plan
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
10.13
|
|
BV Financial, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
Consent of Beard Miller Company LLP
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to Form SB-2, Registration Statement and amendments thereto, initially filed on September 17, 2004, Registration
No. 333-119083.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated herein by reference from the Exhibits to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed on May 13, 2009.
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated herein by reference from Appendix C of the Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, filed on October 4, 2005.
|
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant had duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BV Financial, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: September
24
, 2009
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Carolyn M. Mroz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carolyn M. Mroz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Carolyn M. Mroz
Carolyn M. Mroz
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(principal executive officer)
|
|
September 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edmund T. Leonard
Edmund T. Leonard
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Financial Officer
(principal accounting and financial officer)
|
|
September
24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael J. Birmingham III
Michael J. Birmingham III
|
|
Director
|
|
September
24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frank W. Dingle
Frank W. Dingle
|
|
Director
|
|
September
24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel J. Gallagher, Jr.
Daniel J. Gallagher, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
September
24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert R. Kern, Jr.
Robert R. Kern, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
September
24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brian K. McHale
Brian K. McHale
|
|
Director
|
|
September
24, 2009
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Anthony J. Narutowicz
Anthony J. Narutowicz
|
|
Director
|
|
September 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jerry S. Sopher
Jerry S. Sopher
|
|
Director
|
|
September 24, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Catherine M. Staszak
Catherine M. Staszak
|
|
Director
|
|
September 24, 2009
|
51
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The management of BV Financial, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control process has
been designed under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of BV Financial, Inc.’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of BV Financial, Inc.’s
internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009, utilizing the framework established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on this assessment, management has determined that BV Financial, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2009 is effective.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, transactions and dispositions of assets; and provide
reasonable assurances that: (1) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States; (2) receipts and expenditures are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of BV Financial, Inc.; and (3) unauthorized acquisitions, use, or disposition of BV Financial, Inc.’s assets that could have a material affect on BV Financial,
Inc.’s financial statements are prevented or timely detected.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations.
Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of BV Financial, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to
attestation by BV Financial, Inc.’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit BV Financial, Inc. to provide only management’s report in this annual
report.
F-1
R
EPORT
OF
I
NDEPENDENT
R
EGISTERED
P
UBLIC
A
CCOUNTING
F
IRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
BV Financial, Inc.
Baltimore, Maryland
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of BV Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and 2008,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2009. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial
statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our
audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the
consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of BV Financial, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Beard Miller Company LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
September 18, 2009
F-2
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
C
ONSOLIDATED
S
TATEMENTS
OF
F
INANCIAL
C
ONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands Except Per
Share Amounts)
|
|
|
A
SSETS
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
3,154
|
|
|
$
|
1,753
|
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
8,086
|
|
|
|
6,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
11,240
|
|
|
|
8,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing time deposits in other banks
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
Securities trading
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
8,838
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity, fair value 2009 $11,689; 2008 $9,661
|
|
|
11,537
|
|
|
|
9,788
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses 2009 $855; 2008 $709
|
|
|
119,235
|
|
|
|
124,843
|
|
|
Foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,083
|
|
|
|
3,117
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock, at cost
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
Investment in life insurance
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
|
2,372
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
154,553
|
|
|
$
|
164,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
L
IABILITIES
AND
S
TOCKHOLDERS
’ E
QUITY
|
|
|
L
IABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
6,041
|
|
|
$
|
6,040
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
131,575
|
|
|
|
130,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
137,616
|
|
|
|
137,032
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
Official checks
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
Advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
|
|
1,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
140,904
|
|
|
|
147,680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S
TOCKHOLDERS
’ E
QUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 9,000,000 shares authorized; 2,645,000 shares issued; 2,407,631 and 2,408,806 shares outstanding as of
June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
11,117
|
|
|
|
11,123
|
|
|
Unearned employee stock ownership plan shares
|
|
|
(687
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 237,369 shares and 236,194 shares as of June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively
|
|
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
|
(2,140
|
)
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
5,241
|
|
|
|
8,129
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
13,649
|
|
|
|
16,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
$
|
154,553
|
|
|
$
|
164,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
C
ONSOLIDATED
S
TATEMENTS
OF
O
PERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
I
NTEREST
I
NCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
$
|
7,819
|
|
|
$
|
7,533
|
|
|
Investment securities - taxable
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Income
|
|
|
8,488
|
|
|
|
8,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I
NTEREST
E
XPENSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
4,674
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
|
|
|
634
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Expense
|
|
|
4,366
|
|
|
|
5,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
4,122
|
|
|
|
3,702
|
|
|
P
ROVISION
FOR
L
OAN
L
OSSES
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses
|
|
|
3,393
|
|
|
|
3,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
ON
-I
NTEREST
I
NCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service fees on deposits
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
Service fees on loans
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
Income from investment in life insurance
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
Loss on securities trading
|
|
|
(471
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Loss on sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
Termination of split-dollar life insurance liability
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N
ON
-I
NTEREST
E
XPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and related expenses
|
|
|
2,225
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
Impairment write-down of investment securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
FDIC insurance premiums
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Interest Expenses
|
|
|
8,182
|
|
|
|
4,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before Income Tax Benefit
|
|
|
(4,695
|
)
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
B
ENEFIT
FOR
I
NCOME
T
AXES
|
|
|
(1,978
|
)
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
$
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Loss Per Share
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Loss Per Share
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends Declared Per Share
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
C
ONSOLIDATED
S
TATEMENTS
OF
S
TOCKHOLDERS
’ E
QUITY
Years Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
|
Unearned Employee
Stock Ownership Plan
Shares
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
B
ALANCE
- J
UNE
30, 2007
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
$
|
11,083
|
|
|
$
|
(825
|
)
|
|
$
|
(878
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,866
|
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adoption of EITF 06-4 split-dollar life insurance (see Note 1)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (net of tax of $11 and reclassification adjustment for securities losses recognized of $293)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense under stock-based compensation plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
Compensation expense under Employee Stock Ownership Plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock (175,981 shares)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
ALANCE
- J
UNE
30, 2008
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
11,123
|
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
(2,140
|
)
|
|
|
8,129
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
16,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (net of tax of $38)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense under stock-based compensation plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Compensation expense under Employee Stock Ownership Plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock (1,175 shares)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B
ALANCE
- J
UNE
30, 2009
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
$
|
11,117
|
|
|
$
|
(687
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,241
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
13,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
C
ONSOLIDATED
S
TATEMENTS
OF
C
ASH
F
LOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
C
ASH
F
LOWS
FROM
O
PERATING
A
CTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of discounts and premiums
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
Impairment write-down of investment securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
Loss on sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Net change in securities trading
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred loan fees/costs
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
Provision for depreciation
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(1,735
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
Termination of split-dollar life insurance liability
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(604
|
)
|
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
ASH
F
LOWS
FROM
I
NVESTING
A
CTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in interest bearing deposits in other banks
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
Purchases of securities available for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(6,138
|
)
|
|
Purchases of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
(11,222
|
)
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held to maturity
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Principal collected on mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in loans
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
(9,034
|
)
|
|
Purchase of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
Purchase of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
Net cash received in branch acquisition
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
46,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities
|
|
|
7,839
|
|
|
|
23,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
ASH
F
LOWS
FROM
F
INANCING
A
CTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in official checks
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
(12,313
|
)
|
|
Increase (decrease) in advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
Repayment of advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
(16,000
|
)
|
|
|
(13,500
|
)
|
|
Purchase of stock for treasury
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
|
|
(6,928
|
)
|
|
|
(20,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
2,958
|
|
|
|
2,925
|
|
|
C
ASH
AND
C
ASH
E
QUIVALENTS
- B
EGINNING
|
|
|
8,282
|
|
|
|
5,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C
ASH
AND
C
ASH
E
QUIVALENTS
- E
NDING
|
|
$
|
11,240
|
|
|
$
|
8,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S
UPPLEMENTARY
C
ASH
F
LOWS
I
NFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
4,366
|
|
|
$
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans transferred to foreclosed real estate and repossessed assets
|
|
$
|
619
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
Business
BV Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized as a federally chartered corporation at the direction of Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank (the “Bank” or “Bay-Vanguard Federal”) in
January 2005 to become the mid-tier stock holding company for Bay-Vanguard Federal upon the completion of its reorganization into the mutual holding company form of organization. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Bank converted to stock
form with all of its stock owned by the Company and organized Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. (the “M.H.C.”) as a federally chartered mutual holding company that owned 55% of the common stock of the Company. At June 30, 2009 and 2008 the M.H.C.
owned 60.9% and 61.1%, respectively of the common stock of the Company. As part of the reorganization, the Company sold 1,190,250 shares of its common stock at a price of $10.00 per share to members of the Bank in a subscription offering raising
approximately $11.0 million in net proceeds.
Bay-Vanguard Federal is headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland and is a community-oriented
financial institution offering traditional financial services to its local communities. The Bank is engaged primarily in the business of attracting deposits from the general public using such funds to originate one-to four-family real estate, mobile
home, construction, multi-family, commercial real estate and consumer loans.
The Bank’s savings accounts are insured up to the
applicable legal limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Deposit Insurance Fund. Bay-Vanguard Federal is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System.
The Bank has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Housing Recovery Corporation (“HRC”). HRC’s primary business is holding real estate and other assets acquired by the Bank through foreclosure or repossession.
Principles of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank and its wholly-owned subsidiary, HRC. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Estimates
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is
required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial condition and revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the assessment of other than temporary impairment of
investment securities, intangible asset impairment and the valuation of deferred tax assets.
Significant Group Concentrations of Credit Risk
Most of the Company’s activities are with customers located within the Baltimore Metropolitan Area. The Company does not have any
significant concentrations to any one industry or customer.
F-7
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Securities
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” which requires investments in securities
to be classified in one of three categories: held to maturity, trading or available for sale. Debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and are reported at amortized
cost (including amortization of premium or accretion of discount). The Company does not regularly engage in security trading; however, beginning on July 1, 2008, the Company elected to account for the AMF Ultra Short Mortgage mutual fund it
holds under SFAS 159 which meant the investment was reclassified as securities trading from available-for-sale and carried at fair value with future gains and losses reflected through earnings. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company
recorded a $471,000 loss on securities trading in the income statement. Net unrealized gains and losses for debt securities classified as available-for-sale are required to be recognized as increases or decreases in other comprehensive income or
loss, net of taxes, and excluded from the determination of net income. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are determined using the specific identification method and are included in earnings. Premiums and discounts are recognized in
interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities.
Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and
available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the Company does not intend to sell the security and will hold the security until the specified maturity or
repricing date.
Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank System to hold stock of its district Federal Home
Loan Bank (“FHLB”) according to a predetermined formula. This restricted stock is carried at cost. In December 2008, FHLB of Atlanta announced it would suspend the repurchase of excess capital stock from its members due to deterioration in
its financial condition. As a result, the Bank may hold more FHLB stock than would have been previously required. Management evaluates the restricted stock for impairment in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) 01-6,
Accounting by Certain
Entities (Including Entities With Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the Activities of Others
. Management’s determination of whether this investment is impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their
cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the
bank as compared to the capital stock amount for the bank and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the bank to make payments required by law or regulation and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory
changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the bank. Management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB restricted stock as of June 30, 2009.
The Bank held $631,000 of FHLB restricted stock at June 30, 2009. This stock is carried at a cost of $100 per share. During 2008, the FHLB announced
that it would suspend paying dividends and repurchasing excess capital stock from its members due to deterioration in its financial condition. Due to concerns about the capital strength of the Atlanta FHLB and the entire FHLB system, there has been
industry discussion about impairment issues on FHLB stock. However, due to the nature of the FHLB system and the heavy dependence of community banks on the FHLB, it is believed that any determination about the valuation of FHLB stock needs to be
accomplished at the national level so that the entire community banking system is not disrupted. If FHLB stock were deemed to be impaired, the write-down for the Bank could be significant.
F-8
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Premises and Equipment
Land is stated at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed based on the straight-line method over the useful lives of the respective assets. Expenditures
for improvements are capitalized while costs for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
Foreclosed
Assets
Foreclosed real estate is composed of property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed-in-lieu of
foreclosure and is included in other assets. Foreclosed assets initially are recorded at fair value, net of estimated selling costs, at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Foreclosed assets totaled $661,000 and $42,000 at
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. If the fair value is less than the related loan balance at the time of acquisition, a charge against the allowance for loan losses is recorded. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by
management and the assets are carried at the lower of cost or fair value minus estimated costs to sell. Revenues and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in foreclosed real estate expense.
Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are
recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of assets and liabilities based on enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. Deferred tax assets are
recognized only to the extent that it is more likely than not that such amounts will be realized based on consideration of available evidence.
Loans
Receivable
Loans receivable are stated at unpaid principal balances, less undisbursed portion of loans in process, deferred loan
origination fees and costs and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees and costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment to the yield (interest income) of the related
loans. The Company is amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of the loan using the interest method. For purchased loans, the related premium or discount is recognized over the contractual life of the purchased loan and is included as
part of interest income.
The accrual of interest is generally discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become
90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectibility of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed
or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income is reversed. Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to
management’s judgment as to the collectibility of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the
ultimate collectibility of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. Cash payments on impaired loans are recorded in the same manner as payments on non-accrual loans.
F-9
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is established through provisions for loan losses charged against income. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if
any, are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level to provide for losses that are probable and can
be reasonably estimated. Management’s periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the Bank’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent losses in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s
ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be
susceptible to significant change, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans.
The
allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as either doubtful, substandard or special mention. For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an allowance is established
when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted
for qualitative factors.
A loan is considered past due or delinquent when a contractual payment is not paid in the month that it is due. A
loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment
shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower,
including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for multi-family,
commercial real estate and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is
collateral dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank
does not separately identify individual consumer, mobile home, and residential real estate loans for impairment disclosures, unless they are subject to a restructuring agreement.
F-10
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Investment in Life Insurance
Investment in life insurance is reflected at the net cash surrender value to the Company.
Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Intangible assets,
consisting of core deposit intangibles, represent purchased assets that also lack physical substance but can be distinguished from goodwill because of contractual or other legal rights or because the asset is capable of being sold or exchanged on
its own or in combination with a related contract, asset or liability. Core deposit intangibles are amortized on an accelerated basis over a 7-year period and goodwill is evaluated on an annual basis to determine impairment, if any. Any impairment
of goodwill would be recorded against income in the period of impairment. Goodwill impairment was tested at May 31, 2009 at the Company or reporting unit level. A valuation analysis identified impairment, and as a result, the Company recorded
an impairment charge of $3.9 million, which eliminated all goodwill at the Company. The goodwill impairment charge did not affect the Company’s regulatory capital or cash flow.
Statement of Cash Flows
Cash and cash equivalents in the statements of cash flows include cash and
federal funds sold. Federal funds are generally purchased and sold for one-day periods.
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to
be surrendered when: (1) the assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and
(3) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has entered into commitments to
extend credit. Such financial instruments are recorded in the statement of financial condition when they are funded.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be
included in net income or loss. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, are reported as a separate component of the stockholders’ equity section of the statement
of financial condition, such items, along with net income or loss, are components of comprehensive income or loss.
F-11
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the appropriate period. Unearned shares under the Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) are not included in outstanding shares. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding as adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options and
unvested stock awards based on the “treasury stock” method. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had 21,265 and 29,733 shares of unvested restricted stock, respectively, and 111,456 and 111,456 shares of unexercised stock
options, respectively, none of which were dilutive. Information related to the calculation of earnings (loss) per share is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
In Thousands,
Except Per Share Data
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted weighted average shares
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
2,313
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
2,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share amount
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.17
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Based Compensation
The Company accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123(R). SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized as
compensation expense over the required service period in the statement of operations at fair value.
F-12
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
The Company accounts for the ESOP in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Statement of Position 93-6. The cost of shares issued to the ESOP but not yet allocated to
participants is presented in the consolidated statement of financial condition as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Compensation expense is recorded based on the market price of the shares as they are committed to be released for allocation
to participant accounts. The difference between the market price and the cost of shares committed to be released is recorded as an adjustment to paid-in capital. Dividends on unallocated ESOP shares are reflected as a reduction of debt.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income.
Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of June 30, 2009, for items that should
potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through September 18, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued. On September 17, 2009, the Company filed a Form
8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission announcing that it plans to deregister its common stock and suspend its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by filing a Form 15 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on September 25, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141 (R) “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141 (R)”). This Statement establishes principles and requirements
for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. The Statement also provides guidance for recognizing
and measuring the goodwill acquired in the business combination and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The guidance will
become effective as of the beginning of a company’s fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008. This new pronouncement will impact the Company’s accounting for business combinations completed beginning July 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”). This Statement establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. The
guidance will become effective as of the beginning of a company’s fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2008 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
F-13
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)
In September 2006, the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF Issue No. 06-4,
“Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements” (“EITF 06-4”). EITF 06-4 requires the recognition of a liability related to the postretirement
benefits covered by an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement. The consensus highlights that the employer (who is also the policyholder) has a liability for the benefit it is providing to its employee. As such, if the policyholder has
agreed to maintain the insurance policy in force for the employee’s benefit during his or her retirement, then the liability recognized during the employee’s active service period should be based on the future cost of insurance to be
incurred during the employee’s retirement. Alternatively, if the policyholder has agreed to provide the employee with a death benefit, then the liability for the future death benefit should be recognized by following the guidance in SFAS
No. 106 or Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 12, as appropriate. For transition, an entity can choose to apply the guidance using either of the following approaches: (a) a change in accounting principle through
retrospective application to all periods presented or (b) a change in accounting principle through a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance in retained earnings at the beginning of the year of adoption. The Company adopted this EITF
effective July 1, 2007 and recorded a cumulative effect adjustment of $(221,000). The Bank terminated its executive and director split-dollar life insurance retirement death benefit and recognized income of $240,000 in the quarter ended
September 30, 2008.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities-Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the
fair value option has been elected will be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company July 1, 2008. The Company has elected to account for the AMF Ultra Short Mortgage mutual fund it
holds at fair value and there was no impairment recognized with this adoption as the investment had been written down to fair value at June 30, 2008. Losses, both realized and unrealized, were $471,000 for the year ended June 30, 2009 and
are reflected in the Company’s net loss.
In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-11,
“Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards” (“EITF 06-11”). EITF 06-11 states that an entity should recognize a realized tax benefit associated with dividends on nonvested equity shares,
nonvested equity share units and outstanding equity share options charged to retained earnings as an increase in additional paid in capital. The amount recognized in additional paid in capital should be included in the pool of excess tax
benefits available to absorb potential future tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. EITF 06-11 should be applied prospectively to income tax benefits of dividends on equity-classified share-based payment awards that are declared in
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. Adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” This Statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of
financial statements. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.” The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
F-14
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful
Life of Intangible Assets.” This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS 141R, and other GAAP. This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is
prohibited. Adoption is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP
133-1 and FIN 45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161” (FSP
133-1 and FIN 45-4). FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 amends and enhances disclosure requirements for sellers of credit derivatives and financial guarantees. It also clarifies that the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 161 are effective for quarterly
periods beginning after November 15, 2008, and fiscal years that include those periods. FSP 133-1 and FIN 45-4 is effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after November 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard did
not have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.
In September 2008, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
Issue No. 08-5, “Issuer’s Accounting for Liabilities Measured at Fair Value With a Third-Party Credit Enhancement” (EITF 08-5). EITF 08-5 provides guidance for measuring liabilities issued with an attached third-party credit
enhancement (such as a guarantee). It clarifies that the issuer of a liability with a third-party credit enhancement should not include the effect of the credit enhancement in the fair value measurement of the liability. EITF 08-5 is effective for
the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position and results of operations.
In November 2008, the SEC released a proposed roadmap regarding the potential use by U.S. issuers of financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). IFRS is a
comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). Under the proposed roadmap, the Company may be required to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS as early as
2014. The SEC will make a determination in 2011 regarding the mandatory adoption of IFRS. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that this potential change would have on its financial statements, and it will continue to monitor the
development of the potential implementation of IFRS.
In November 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 08-6,
“Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations.” EITF 08-6 clarifies the accounting for certain transactions and impairment considerations involving equity method investments. EITF 08-6 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
F-15
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)
In November 2008, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 08-7, “Accounting for Defensive
Intangible Assets.” EITF 08-7 clarifies the accounting for certain separately identifiable intangible assets which an acquirer does not intend to actively use but intends to hold to prevent its competitors from obtaining access to them. EITF
08-7 requires an acquirer in a business combination to account for a defensive intangible asset as a separate unit of accounting which should be amortized to expense over the period the asset diminishes in value. EITF 08-7 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. This new pronouncement will impact the Company’s accounting for any defensive intangible assets acquired in a business combination completed beginning July 1,
2009.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets.” This FSP
amends SFAS 132(R), “Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits,” to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The
disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP shall be provided for fiscal years ended after December 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP FAS 157-4). FASB Statement 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer
the liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FSP FAS 157-4 provides additional guidance on determining when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. The FSP also includes guidance on identifying circumstances when a transaction may not be considered orderly.
FSP FAS 157-4 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, further
analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with Statement 157.
This FSP clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate
the weight of the evidence to determine whether the transaction is orderly. The FSP provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given
little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.
This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with
early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. An entity early adopting FSP FAS 157-4 must also early adopt FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.
The adoption of
this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
F-16
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
(FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt
securities, management must assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before assessing
whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated
recovery in fair value to avoid recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.
In instances when a determination is made that an other-then-temporary impairment exists but the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more
likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement. The
other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the
total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all
other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.
This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009,
with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. An entity early adopting FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 must also early adopt FSP FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or
Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
(FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1). FSP FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1 amends FASB Statement No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well
as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting
, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods.
This FSP is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15,
2009. An entity early adopting FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 must also early adopt FSP FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly
and FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.
The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
F-17
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
1 – S
UMMARY
OF
S
IGNIFICANT
A
CCOUNTING
P
OLICIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)
In May 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 165,
Subsequent Events,
which establishes
general standards of and accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This FASB was effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. The Company has complied with the requirements of FASB 165.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for
Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.
This statement prescribes the information that a reporting entity must provide in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer
on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Specifically, among other aspects, SFAS 166 amends Statement of Financial Standards No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
, or SFAS 140, by removing the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from SFAS 140 and removes the exception from applying
FIN 46(R) to variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities. It also modifies the financial-components approach used in SFAS 140. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009.
The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact the new pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R).
This statement amends FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003) — an interpretation of ARB
No. 51
, or FIN 46(R), to require an enterprise to determine whether it’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity
is the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could
potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. SFAS 167 also amends FIN 46(R) to require ongoing
reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on
our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162. SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, to establish the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States. SFAS 168 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.
F-18
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
2 – S
ECURITIES
Securities at June 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
$
|
2,547
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,547
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies securities
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
4,947
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,898
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
$
|
8,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning on July 1, 2008, the Company elected to account for the AMF Ultra Short Mortgage mutual fund it
holds under SFAS 159 which meant the investment was reclassified as securities trading from available for sale and carried at fair value with future gains and losses reflected through earnings. The AMF Ultra Short Mortgage mutual fund had balances
of $1,076,000 and $2,547,000 at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Proceeds from trading securities sold during the year ended June 30, 2009 were $1,000,000 resulting in gross losses of $17,000. Additionally, net losses of $454,000 for
adjustments to fair value on the Company’s AMF Ultra Short Mortgage mutual fund were recognized for the year ended June 30, 2009. Proceeds from marketable equity securities sold during the year ended June 30, 2008 were $250,000
resulting in gross losses of $19,000. Additionally, an impairment loss of $274,000 was recognized during the year ended June 30, 2008 on the Company’s AMF Ultra Short Mortgage mutual fund as it became evident that the impairment was not
temporary.
F-19
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
2 – S
ECURITIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies securities
|
|
$
|
4,052
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
7,485
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
7,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,537
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
$
|
11,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies securities
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,013
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
7,788
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
7,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,788
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
$
|
9,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of securities as of June 30, 2009, by contractual maturity, are shown
below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the securities may be called or prepaid with or without prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
Held to Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Maturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
$
|
1,006
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
7,485
|
|
|
7,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,146
|
|
$
|
1,179
|
|
$
|
11,537
|
|
$
|
11,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All mortgage-backed securities are Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or Ginnie Mae backed securities.
F-20
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
2 – S
ECURITIES
(C
ONTINUED
)
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more
frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of
the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value or until maturity.
In analyzing the issuer’s financial condition, management considers industry analysts’ reports, financial performance, and projected target prices of
investment analysts. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Company did not identify any other-than-temporarily impaired assets. During the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company identified the AMF Ultra Short Mortgage mutual fund it
holds as being an other-than-temporarily impaired asset and realized an impairment loss of $274,000 on these securities. SFAS No. 159 was effective for the Company July 1, 2008. The Company elected to account for the AMF Ultra Short
Mortgage mutual fund it holds at fair value and recognized a trading securities loss of $471,000 during the year ended June 30, 2009.
Below is a
schedule of securities with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009 and 2008. These unrealized losses are the result of changes in market conditions and interest rates from those existing at the time of purchase of the securities and, as to
mortgage-backed securities, actual and estimated prepayment speeds. These factors along with the fact the Company has both the intent and the ability to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in
fair value, substantiates, in management’s opinion, that these unrealized losses are considered temporary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Continuous Unrealized Losses for
More Than 12
Months
|
|
Continuous Unrealized Losses for
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS – no securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HTM – one security
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
12
|
|
AFS – no securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Continuous Unrealized Losses for
More Than 12
Months
|
|
Continuous Unrealized Losses for
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AFS – four securities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
4,946
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HTM – five securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,167
|
|
|
146
|
|
AFS – one security
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
12,094
|
|
$
|
213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
3 – L
OANS
R
ECEIVABLE
Loans receivable at June 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured by one-to-four family residences
|
|
$
|
86,589
|
|
|
$
|
90,494
|
|
|
Secured by other properties
|
|
|
16,614
|
|
|
|
13,572
|
|
|
Construction loans
|
|
|
6,797
|
|
|
|
11,125
|
|
|
Mobile home loans
|
|
|
11,471
|
|
|
|
11,810
|
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
Share loans
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
909
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,268
|
|
|
|
128,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans in process
|
|
|
(3,178
|
)
|
|
|
(2,533
|
)
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs, net
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(855
|
)
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable – net
|
|
$
|
119,235
|
|
|
$
|
124,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
3 – L
OANS
R
ECEIVABLE
(C
ONTINUED
)
Residential lending payment experience is generally dependent to some extent on economic and market conditions in the
Bank’s lending area. Multi-family, commercial real estate and construction loan repayments are generally dependent on the operations of the related properties or the financial condition of its borrower or guarantor. Accordingly, repayment of
such loans can be more susceptible to adverse conditions in the real estate market and the regional economy.
Substantially all of the Bank’s loans
receivable are mortgage loans secured by residential, multi-family and commercial real estate properties located in the State of Maryland. Loans are extended only after evaluation by management of customers’ creditworthiness and other relevant
factors on a case-by-case basis. The Bank generally does not lend more than 90% of the appraised value of a property and usually requires private mortgage insurance on residential mortgages with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80%. In some
instances, the Bank lent up to 90% of the appraised value of a property through a combination of first and second mortgages without requiring private mortgage insurance. The Bank originates and purchases mobile home loans to owner occupied borrowers
up to a maximum of 90% of the value of the mobile home. In addition, the Bank generally obtains personal guarantees of repayment from borrowers and/or others for construction, commercial and multi-family residential loans and disburses the proceeds
of construction and similar loans only as work progresses on the related projects.
The following is a summary of the allowance for loan losses for the
years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
|
$
|
402
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
Loans charged-off
|
|
|
(583
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
Recovery of loans charged-off
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
855
|
|
|
$
|
709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank had two impaired loans as defined by SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan,” totaling $642,000 and allowances for loan losses relating to these impaired loans of $32,000 at June 30, 2009. The Bank had three impaired loans as defined by SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan,” totaling $2,582,000 and allowances for loan losses relating to these impaired loans of $286,000 at June 30, 2008. The average balance in the impaired loans totaled $321,000 and $1,084,000 for the years ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The Bank did not recognize any interest income on impaired loans for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Non-accrual loans
totaled approximately $651,000 and $2.6 million at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Bank had $270,000 and $-0- of loan balances past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at June 30, 2009 or 2008, respectively.
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.
These financial instruments are limited to commitments to originate loans and unused lines of credit and involve to varying degrees elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position.
F-23
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
3 – L
OANS
R
ECEIVABLE
(C
ONTINUED
)
The Bank’s exposure to credit loss from non-performance by the other party to the above mentioned financial
instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
The Bank generally requires collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance-sheet credit risk.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Instruments Whose Contract
Amounts Represent Credit Risk
|
|
Contract Amount at
June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Loan commitments
|
|
$
|
471
|
|
$
|
2,849
|
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
2,313
|
Mortgage loan commitments of $210,000 not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at
June 30, 2009 are for a fixed rate mortgage with interest rate of 5.50%. There were consumer loan commitments of $261,000 at June 30, 2009 with interest rates ranging from 11.90% to 14.50%. Mortgage loan commitments of $1.97 million not
reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements at June 30, 2008 are for fixed rate mortgages with interest rates ranging from 5.25% to 7.50%. There were consumer loan commitments of $881,000 at June 30, 2008 with interest
rates ranging from 8.90% to 12.25%. Loan commitments expire 60 days from the date of the commitment.
N
OTE
4 –
P
REMISES
AND
E
QUIPMENT
Premises and equipment at June 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized by major
classification as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Useful Life
in Years
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
|
$
|
1,055
|
|
|
—
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
1,585
|
|
|
15 – 40
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
5 – 10
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
3 – 10
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
4,322
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
|
(1,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,083
|
|
|
$
|
3,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $149,000 and $166,000, respectively.
F-24
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
5 – I
NVESTMENT
IN
F
EDERAL
H
OME
L
OAN
B
ANK
OF
A
TLANTA
S
TOCK
The Bank is required to maintain an investment in the stock of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (the
“FHLB”) in an amount equal to at least 0.20% of the Bank’s total assets plus 4.50% of its outstanding advances from the FHLB. Purchases and sales of stock are made directly with the FHLB at par value.
N
OTE
6 – G
OODWILL
, O
THER
I
NTANGIBLE
A
SSETS
AND
B
RANCH
A
CQUISITION
On August 24, 2007, the Bank acquired a branch office in Pasadena, Maryland from Greater Atlantic Bank. The Bank paid a
premium on the net liabilities, primarily on deposits of $51.5 million assumed at closing. The premium was comprised of goodwill totaling $3.9 million and identifiable intangibles (core deposit intangible) totaling $502,000. The goodwill is
deductible for tax purposes.
The activity in goodwill and acquired intangible assets related to branch purchases is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Year Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Core
Deposit
Intangible
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
Core
Deposit
Intangible
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
3,940
|
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Acquired during the year
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,940
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
|
(3,940
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
3,940
|
|
$
|
390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, goodwill is not amortized but will be subjected to an annual assessment
for impairment. The acquired intangible assets, apart from goodwill, will be amortized over their remaining estimated lives and assessed annually for impairment. Goodwill impairment was tested at May 31, 2009 at the Company or reporting unit
level. A valuation analysis identified impairment, and as a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $3.9 million, which eliminated all goodwill at the Company. The goodwill impairment charge did not affect the Company’s regulatory
capital or cash flow.
At June 30, 2009, future estimated annual amortization expense is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending June 30:
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
2011
|
|
|
74
|
|
2012
|
|
|
56
|
|
2013
|
|
|
38
|
|
2014
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
7 – D
EPOSITS
Deposits are composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Non-interest bearing accounts
|
|
$
|
6,041
|
|
$
|
6,040
|
|
NOW and money market accounts
|
|
|
50,896
|
|
|
53,520
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
16,604
|
|
|
16,454
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
64,075
|
|
|
61,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
137,616
|
|
$
|
137,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on deposits for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
NOW and money market accounts
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
$
|
1,469
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
311
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
2,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,732
|
|
$
|
4,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Bank had outstanding $23.4 million and $18.9 million in certificates of
deposit in excess of $100,000, respectively. Deposits in excess of $100,000 may not be insured by the FDIC. At June 30, 2009, the Bank had four certificates of deposits in excess of $250,000 outstanding. At June 30, 2008, the Bank had no
certificates of deposit in excess of $250,000 outstanding. IRA deposits in excess of $250,000 may not be insured by the FDIC.
At June 30, 2009,
scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending June 30:
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
38,748
|
|
2011
|
|
|
17,878
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,940
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
2014
|
|
|
4,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
8 – B
ORROWINGS
At June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Bank has an agreement under a blanket floating lien with the FHLB providing the Bank a line of credit of $40.0 million. At
June 30, 2009, the Bank had no outstanding advances. During the year ended June 30, 2009, the Bank prepaid $6.5 million in advances and incurred $279,000 in prepayment penalties. At June 30, 2008, the Bank had outstanding advances of
$7.5 million at a weighted rate of 4.68% consisting of a $2.5 million principal reducing advance at a fixed rate of 4.64% scheduled to mature in August 2010 and a $5.0 million fixed rate advance at a fixed rate of 4.75% scheduled to mature in
September 2010. The Bank is required to maintain as collateral for its FHLB advances qualified mortgage loans in an amount equal to 125% of the outstanding advances. Additionally at June 30, 2009, the Bank had a $2.0 million unsecured demand
line of credit facility with M&T Bank which had no outstanding balance.
N
OTE
9 – P
ROFIT
S
HARING
AND
D
EFERRED
C
OMPENSATION
A
GREEMENTS
The Bank has a profit-sharing plan and a 401(k) plan
for all eligible employees. Contributions to the plans are discretionary by the Board of Directors. Expenses for the years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 were $-0- and $-0- for the profit-sharing plan and $32,000 and $28,000 for the
401(k) plan, respectively.
Effective as of January 1, 2008, and in the place of prior deferred compensation agreements, the Bank entered into new
supplemental executive retirement agreements with two of its executive officers. Under the agreements, each executive will receive a stated annual benefit in monthly installments for 15 years following his or her separation from service after
attaining a normal retirement age of 65. If the executive voluntarily separates from service prior to reaching his or her normal retirement age, the executive will receive an unreduced lump sum of the accrued liability balance (i.e., the amount
accrued to fund the future benefit expense under the agreement) within thirty days of the separation from service. If the executive separates from service involuntarily (i.e., if he or she is terminated other than for cause or terminates employment
for good reason), the executive will receive an unreduced lump sum of the accrued liability balance with thirty days of the separation from service. Upon a change in control or the executive’s disability (as each term is defined in the
agreements), the executive will receive a stated annual benefit in monthly installments for 15 years following the change in control and, in the case of a disability, commencing at the executive’s normal retirement age of 65. If the executive
dies while actively employed, the executive’s beneficiary will receive an unreduced lump sum of the accrued liability balance within thirty days of the executive’s death. If the executive dies after monthly payments have commenced under
the agreement, the executive’s beneficiary will receive the remaining installments in monthly payments in accordance with the schedule of payments due to the executive.
Effective as of January 1, 2008, and in the place of a prior supplemental retirement plan, each director of the Bank entered into a new supplemental director retirement agreement. Under the agreements, each
director will receive a stated annual benefit in monthly installments for 10 years following his or separation from service after attaining a normal retirement age of 70. If the director voluntarily separates from service prior to reaching his or
her normal retirement age, the director will receive an unreduced lump sum of the accrued liability balance (i.e., the amount accrued to fund the future benefit expense under the agreement) within thirty days of the separation from service. If the
director separates from service involuntarily (i.e., if he or she is terminated other than for cause), the director will receive an unreduced lump sum of the accrued liability balance with thirty days of the separation from service. Upon a change in
control, the director will receive a stated annual benefit in monthly installments for 10 years following the change in control. If the director dies while actively serving as a director, the director’s beneficiary will receive an unreduced
lump sum of the accrued liability balance within thirty days of the director’s death. If the director dies after monthly payments have commenced under the agreement, the director’s beneficiary will receive the remaining installments in
monthly payments in accordance with the schedule of payments due to the director.
F-27
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
9 – P
ROFIT
S
HARING
AND
D
EFERRED
C
OMPENSATION
A
GREEMENTS
(C
ONTINUED
)
In connection with the new supplemental retirement agreements, the executives and directors revoked their split
dollar life insurance agreements with the Bank.
The accrued liabilities for the aforementioned plans were $860,000 and $725,000 for the executive plans
and $188,000 and $180,000 for the directors’ plans at June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company recognized compensation expense related to these plans in the amount of $142,000 and $167,000 during the years ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. In addition the Company recognized a liability of $221,000 through beginning retained earnings related to the postretirement benefits covered by endorsement split-dollar life arrangements effective July 1, 2007 with the
adoption of EITF 06-4. The Company reversed this entry and recognized $240,000 as income from termination of split-dollar life insurance liability during the year ended June 30, 2009. The Company recognized compensation expense related to the
split-dollar benefit in the amount of $-0- and $30,000 for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company recognized the increase
in the cash surrender value of the insurance policies as income from investment in life insurance in the amount of $76,000 and $76,000 during the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
N
OTE
10 – C
OMMON
S
TOCK
AND
E
MPLOYEE
S
TOCK
O
WNERSHIP
P
LAN
In 2005, the Bank reorganized from a federally chartered mutual savings bank to a federally chartered stock savings bank.
Simultaneously, the Bank formed a new holding company, BV Financial, Inc. Also simultaneously, a mutual holding company was formed, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. In connection with the reorganization, the Company issued 2,645,000 shares of its common stock.
A majority of that stock (1,454,750 shares) was issued to Bay Vanguard, M.H.C. The remainder was sold and issued to depositors of the Bank and the ESOP.
At the same time as the reorganization and conversion, the Bank established the ESOP for its employees. On January 12, 2005, the ESOP acquired 103,684 shares of the Company’s common stock in the conversion with funds provided by a
loan from the Company. Accordingly, $1,036,000 of common stock acquired by the ESOP was shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. The ESOP loan is being repaid principally from the Bank’s contributions to the ESOP in 15 equal annual
installments through 2020 and bears interest at the rate of five and one quarter percent (5.25%). Shares are released to participants proportionately as the loan is repaid. The Bank will recognize compensation expense as shares are committed for
release from collateral at their current market price. Dividends on allocated shares are recorded as a reduction of retained earnings and dividends on unallocated shares are recorded as a reduction of debt. The Company recognized $28,000 and $50,000
of compensation expense for the years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The ESOP holds the common stock in a trust for allocation among participating employees. 6,912 shares were allocated and 6,912 were released to
participants during the year ended June 30, 2009. 3,169 shares were allocated and 6,912 were released to participants during the year ended June 30, 2008. The unearned ESOP shares totaled 69,124 at June 30, 2009. The fair value of the
unearned shares at June 30, 2009 was $249,000.
All employees of the Bank who attain the age of 21 and complete one year of service with the Bank will
be eligible to participate in the ESOP. Each participant’s vested interest under the ESOP is determined according to the following schedule: 1 year – 20%, 2 years – 40%, 3 years 60%, 4 years – 80%, 5 years – 100%. For
vesting purposes, a year of service means any plan year in which an employee completes at least 1,000 hours of service (whether before or after the ESOP’s January 12, 2005 effective date).
F-28
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
10 – C
OMMON
S
TOCK
AND
E
MPLOYEE
S
TOCK
O
WNERSHIP
P
LAN
(C
ONTINUED
)
Vesting accelerates to 100% upon; (1) termination of the Plan or upon the permanent and complete discontinuance
of contributions by the Bank, (2) termination of service on or after the participant’s normal or postponed retirement date, (3) a change in control, or (4) termination of service by reason of death or disability.
N
OTE
11 – E
QUITY
I
NCENTIVE
P
LAN
On November 8, 2005, stockholders approved the BV Financial, Inc. 2005 Equity Compensation Plan that enabled the Company to grant up to 181,447 stock options and restricted stock awards to employees and
directors. On November 14, 2005, the Company granted stock options covering 111,456 shares of common stock to certain employees and directors of the Company, of which 64,646 and 43,466 were exercisable at June 30, 2009 and June 30,
2008, respectively. The options were granted at the then fair market value of the stock of $8.94, vest over five years and expire ten years from the date of grant.
Stock options had no intrinsic value at June 30, 2009. The Company recognized $35,000 and $59,000 of expense relating to the granting of stock options during the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. There has been no
activity in the stock options to date.
On November 14, 2005, the Company granted 44,577 shares of restricted stock to certain employees and directors
of the Company. The Company purchased shares in the open market during 2006 to fund this plan. The awards vest over a five-year period and, therefore, the cost of such awards is accrued ratably over a five-year period as compensation expense. The
Company recognized $77,000 and $77,000 of expense relating to the grant of shares of restricted stock during the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Shares vesting were 8,468 and 8,468 for the years ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. Unvested shares were 12,797 at June 30, 2009.
As of June 30, 2009, there was $183,000 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. The remaining cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.4 years.
N
OTE
12 – R
EGULATORY
M
ATTERS
The Bank is subject to various
regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possible additional discretionary actions by the regulators that, if undertaken, could
have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about
components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain
minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) and risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to adjusted total assets (as defined). Management
believes, as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which it was subject.
F-29
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
12 – R
EGULATORY
M
ATTERS
(C
ONTINUED
)
As of June 30, 2009, the most recent notification from the Office of Thrift Supervision has categorized the Bank
as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There
have been no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.
The following table presents the
Bank’s capital position based on the financial statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
|
|
|
To be Well Capitalized
under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
$
|
10,597
|
|
6.94
|
%
|
|
$
³
2,291
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
10,597
|
|
11.45
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$5,550
|
|
³
6.0
|
%
|
|
Core (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
|
10,597
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
³
6,097
|
|
³
4.0
|
|
|
7,638
|
|
³
5.0
|
|
|
Total (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
11,454
|
|
12.38
|
|
|
³
7,401
|
|
³
8.0
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
³
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
$
|
8,869
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
$
³
2,397
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
8,869
|
|
9.62
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$5,532
|
|
³
6.0
|
%
|
|
Core (to adjusted total assets)
|
|
|
8,869
|
|
5.55
|
|
|
³
6,389
|
|
³
4.0
|
|
|
7,990
|
|
³
5.0
|
|
|
Total (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
9,578
|
|
10.39
|
|
|
³
7,373
|
|
³
8.0
|
|
|
9,218
|
|
³
10.0
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of total stockholders’ equity per the consolidated financial
statements to capital amounts reflected in the above table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
$
|
13,649
|
|
|
$
|
16,345
|
|
|
Adjustments to regulatory capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (gain)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Intangible assets (goodwill, core deposit intangible, software)
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(4,359
|
)
|
|
Equity of BV Financial, Inc.
|
|
|
(2,736
|
)
|
|
|
(3,154
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible, Tier 1 and Core Capital
|
|
|
10,599
|
|
|
|
8,869
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
$
|
11,454
|
|
|
$
|
9,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
12 – R
EGULATORY
M
ATTERS
(C
ONTINUED
)
The Bank was allowed a special bad debt deduction at various percentages of otherwise taxable income for various
years through December 1, 1987. If the amounts which qualified as deductions for federal income tax purposes prior to December 31, 1987 are later used for purposes other than to absorb loan losses, including distributions in liquidations,
they will be subject to federal and state income tax at the then current corporate rate. Retained earnings at June 30, 2009 and 2008 include $1,201,000, for which no provision for income tax has been provided. The unrecorded deferred income tax
liability on the above amount was approximately $464,000.
Office of Thrift Supervision regulations impose limitations upon all capital distributions by a
savings institution, including cash dividends, payments to repurchase its shares and payments to shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger. Under the regulations, an application to and prior approval of the Office of Thrift
Supervision is required prior to any capital distribution if the institution does not meet the criteria for “expedited treatment” of applications under Office of Thrift Supervision regulations (i.e., generally, examination and Community
Reinvestment Act ratings in the two top categories), the total capital distributions for the calendar year exceed net income for that year plus the amount of retained net income for the preceding two years, the institution would be undercapitalized
following the distribution or the distribution would otherwise be contrary to a statute, regulation or agreement with the Office of Thrift Supervision. Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank met the criteria for “expedited treatment” of
applications under Office of Thrift Supervision regulations.
The Board of Directors of Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. determines whether Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. will
waive or receive dividends declared by the Company each time the Company declares a dividend, which is expected to be on a quarterly basis. Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. may elect to receive dividends and utilize such funds to pay general corporate expenses.
The Office of Thrift Supervision (the “OTS”) has indicated that (i) Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. shall provide the OTS annually with written notice of its intent to waive its dividends prior to the proposed date of the dividend, and the OTS
shall have the authority to approve or deny any dividend waiver request; and (ii) if a waiver is granted, dividends waived by Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. will be excluded from the Company’s capital accounts for purposes of calculating dividend
payments to minority shareholders. Through June 30, 2009, Bay-Vanguard, M.H.C. waived the right to receive its portion of the cash dividends paid which totaled $800,000 on a cumulative basis.
The Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings institutions to maintain non-interest earnings reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily Negotiable
Order of Withdrawal (NOW) and regular checking accounts). The regulations generally provide that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including
$44.4 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $44.4 million. The first $10.3 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the Federal Reserve Board) are exempted from the reserve requirements. The amounts are adjusted
annually. Bay-Vanguard Federal Savings Bank had no reserve requirement at June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008.
F-31
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
13 – I
NCOME
T
AXES
The income tax benefit consists of the following for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Current benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(204
|
)
|
|
$
|
(44
|
)
|
|
State
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(1,354
|
)
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
State
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,735
|
)
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,978
|
)
|
|
$
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and
deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
$
|
413
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Unrealized losses on available for sale securities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Impairment loss on investment securities
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
2,603
|
|
|
|
914
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock dividends
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Accrual basis books to cash basis tax return
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets, Net of Valuation Allowance
|
|
$
|
2,372
|
|
|
$
|
695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
13 – I
NCOME
T
AXES
(C
ONTINUED
)
The amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to loss before income tax benefit is different
than the taxes provided for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of Pretax
Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
of Pretax
Income
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars In Thousands)
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
$
|
(1,596
|
)
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(198
|
)
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
State tax, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
(387
|
)
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
Non-deductible stock-based compensation
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
Income from investment in life insurance
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
Other
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,978
|
)
|
|
(42.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(254
|
)
|
|
(43.5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management determined during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 that a deferred tax asset valuation
allowance was warranted for its mutual fund security based on the Company’s ability to generate future capital gains if necessary to offset capital losses. In addition, management determined that no deferred tax asset valuation was warranted
for its goodwill impairment write-down due to the expectation of taxable income going forward and the availability of tax planning strategies to generate future income to offset operating losses.
F-33
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
14 – R
ELATED
P
ARTY
T
RANSACTIONS
The Bank has had, and may be expected to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with directors, officers, their
immediate families and affiliated companies (commonly referred to as related parties), on the same terms including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with others. The following table presents a
summary of the activity of loans receivable from related parties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
Advances
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, ending
|
|
$
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bank had leased one of its office buildings from a relative of an officer of the Bank. The Bank had executed a
new lease on August 4, 2004 with an initial term of five years, with two five year renewal options. Rent expense for the year ended June 30, 2008 was $22,000. The annual rent was payable in equal monthly installments. The Bank entered into
an agreement to purchase this office building and settlement occurred on June 24, 2008 with a purchase price of $750,000. The lease agreement terminated upon the purchase of the building. (The building is reflected in construction in progress
for the years ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008 as it is undergoing significant renovation).
Gallagher Evelius & Jones LLP, of
which one of the Bank’s directors is a partner, has performed legal services for Bay-Vanguard Federal. Bay-Vanguard Federal paid a total of $60,000 and $60,000 in legal fees to Gallagher Evelius & Jones LLP for fiscal 2009 and fiscal
2008, respectively.
F-34
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
15 – L
EASING
A
RRANGEMENTS
The Bank assumed a non-cancelable operating lease, whose current term expires in August 2013, with the Pasadena branch acquisition. The lease contains an option which
enables the Bank to renew the lease for an additional 5-year period. In addition to minimum rentals, the lease has escalation clauses based upon price indices and includes provisions for additional payments to cover real estate taxes and common area
maintenance.
At June 30, 2009, the total minimum rental commitment under this lease is outlined below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending June 30:
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
2011
|
|
|
67
|
|
2012
|
|
|
69
|
|
2013
|
|
|
71
|
|
2014
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $72,000 and $85,000, respectively, including the
related party expense disclosed in Note 14.
N
OTE
16 – C
OMMITMENTS
AND
C
ONTINGENCIES
Various legal claims arise from time to time in the normal course of business, which, in the opinion of management, will have no material effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
N
OTE
17 – D
ISCLOSURE
A
BOUT
F
AIR
V
ALUE
OF
F
INANCIAL
I
NSTRUMENTS
The estimated fair values of the
Bank’s financial instruments are summarized below. The fair values are estimates derived primarily from present value techniques and may not be indicative of the net realizable or liquidation values. Also, the calculation of estimated fair
values is based on market conditions at a specific point in time and may not reflect current or future fair values.
In September 2006, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” (SFAS 157) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. The new guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Effective July 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157. The primary effect of SFAS 157 on the Company was to expand the required disclosures pertaining to the methods used
to determine fair values.
F-35
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
17 – D
ISCLOSURE
A
BOUT
F
AIR
V
ALUE
OF
F
INANCIAL
I
NSTRUMENTS
(C
ONTINUED
)
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157,” that permits a one-year deferral in applying the measurement provisions of Statement No. 157 to non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities (non-financial items) that are not recognized or disclosed at fair value in
an entity’s financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). Therefore, if the change in fair value of a non-financial item is not required to be recognized or disclosed in the financial statements on an annual basis or more
frequently, the effective date of application of Statement 157 to that item is deferred until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company elected a one-year deferral and will begin
adoption as of July 1, 2009.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When The Market for That Asset is Not Active” (FSP 157-3), to clarify the application of the provisions of SFAS 157 in an inactive market and how an entity would determine fair value in an inactive market. FSP 157-3 became effective immediately
and applies to our June 30, 2009 financial statements. The application of the provisions of (FSP) 157-3 did not materially affect our results of operations or financial condition as of and for the year ended June 30, 2009.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115.” SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected will be
recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. SFAS No. 159 was effective for the Company July 1, 2008. The Company elected to account for the AMF Ultra Short Mortgage Fund mutual fund it holds at fair value and recognized a
trading loss of $471,000 during the year ended June 30, 2009. The Company made this election based on the availability of tax planning strategies to generate future capital gains if necessary to offset capital losses on the mutual fund. The
fund pays monthly cash dividends which the Company records as interest income.
SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair
value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).
An asset or liability’s level within the fair
value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
F-36
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
17 – D
ISCLOSURE
A
BOUT
F
AIR
V
ALUE
OF
F
INANCIAL
I
NSTRUMENTS
(C
ONTINUED
)
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy used at
June 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
(Level 1)
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
|
|
(Level 2)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
(Level 3)
Significant
Other
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Securities trading
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,076
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,255
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,255
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following valuation techniques were used to measure the fair value of assets in the table
above on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009.
Securities trading
– The fair value of securities trading was based on
available market pricing for the security. A mutual fund is the only holding we have in this category and we rely on information provided to us by a third party pricing source.
Securities available for sale
– The fair values of securities available for sale were based on available market pricing for the securities.
We rely on third party brokers to obtain and provide us with this market pricing from a definitive security pricing source.
Assets
measured at fair value on a non recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy used at June 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2009
|
|
(Level 1)
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
|
|
(Level 2)
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
|
|
(Level 3)
Significant
Other
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
610
|
|
Foreclosed real estate
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Repossessed assets
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,303
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following valuation techniques were used to measure the fair value of assets in the table
above on a non recurring basis as of June 30, 2009.
Impaired Loans
– Loans included in the above table are those that are
accounted for under SFAS 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan
, in which the Company has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value was determined based upon a discounted
cash flow from the expected proceeds of the underlying collateral. This asset is included as Level 3 fair value, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value consists of the loan balance
reduced by any specific impairment reserve.
F-37
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
17 – D
ISCLOSURE
A
BOUT
F
AIR
V
ALUE
OF
F
INANCIAL
I
NSTRUMENTS
(C
ONTINUED
)
Foreclosed real estate
– Fair value of foreclosed real estate was based on the price paid
by the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary Housing Recovery Corporation at auction for the property. This value was subsequently determined to be reasonable based upon an independent third party current industry standard appraisal based on the value
of similar properties adjusted for factors including condition and location of property.
Repossessed Assets
– Fair value of
repossessed assets was based on the Company’s appraisal of the property. This value was determined from a current industry standard appraisal guide based on the value of similar properties adjusted for factors including condition and location
of property.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Interest Bearing Deposits in Other Banks
The carrying amounts of cash and equivalents and interest bearing deposits in other banks approximate fair value.
Investment Securities
Fair values for securities, excluding Federal Home Loan Bank stock, are based on quoted market
prices. The carrying amount of Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Home Loan Bank.
Loans Receivable
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values
are based on carrying amounts. Fair values for fixed-rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for
non-performing loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.
Deposits
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and non-interest checking, passbook savings, and certain types of money market accounts)
are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates
currently being offered on such certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on these deposits.
Advances from Federal Home Loan
Bank
The fair value of borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, based on rates currently available to the Bank for
borrowings with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable
The carrying amounts of accrued interest receivable and payable approximate fair value.
F-38
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
17 – D
ISCLOSURE
A
BOUT
F
AIR
V
ALUE
OF
F
INANCIAL
I
NSTRUMENTS
(C
ONTINUED
)
Off-Balance Sheet Credit Related Instruments
Fair values for off-balance sheet, credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into
account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair values of these instruments were not significant at June 30, 2009 or 2008.
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments at June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
11,240
|
|
$
|
11,240
|
|
$
|
8,282
|
|
$
|
8,282
|
|
Interest bearing time deposits in other banks
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
580
|
|
Securities trading
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
1,076
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
8,838
|
|
|
8,838
|
|
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
11,537
|
|
|
11,689
|
|
|
9,788
|
|
|
9,661
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
119,235
|
|
|
128,499
|
|
|
124,843
|
|
|
127,001
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
654
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
137,616
|
|
|
138,507
|
|
|
137,032
|
|
|
137,561
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
7,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet commitments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
F-39
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
18 – C
ONDENSED
F
INANCIAL
I
NFORMATION
(P
ARENT
C
OMPANY
O
NLY
)
Information as to the financial position of BV Financial, Inc. and its results of
operations and cash flows as of and for the years ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
$
|
2,215
|
|
Employee stock ownership plan loan
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
810
|
|
Investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
10,911
|
|
|
13,191
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
13,649
|
|
$
|
16,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
13,649
|
|
|
16,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
13,649
|
|
$
|
16,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
BV F
INANCIAL
, I
NC
.
AND
S
UBSIDIARIES
N
OTES
TO
C
ONSOLIDATED
F
INANCIAL
S
TATEMENTS
N
OTE
18 – C
ONDENSED
F
INANCIAL
I
NFORMATION
(P
ARENT
C
OMPANY
O
NLY
) (C
ONTINUED
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax benefit
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before equity in net loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Equity in net loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
(2,698
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(2,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
(330
|
)
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net loss of subsidiary
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
Decrease in other liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributed to subsidiary
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
Principal collected on ESOP loan
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend paid, including dividends on unallocated ESOP shares
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
Treasury stock purchased
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,339
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
(1,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(270
|
)
|
|
|
(1,613
|
)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,945
|
|
|
$
|
2,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
BV Financial (PK) (USOTC:BVFL)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mai 2024 à Juin 2024
BV Financial (PK) (USOTC:BVFL)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Juin 2023 à Juin 2024
