UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the quarterly period ended December
31, 2009
or
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from ________ to __________
Commission
File No. 000-30841
UNITED
ENERGY CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
22
-
3342379
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
600
Meadowlands Parkway #20, Secaucus, N.J. 07094
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(800)
327-3456
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
þ
Yes
o
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
£
No
þ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
¨
|
|
Accelerated
filer
¨
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
¨
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller
reporting company
þ
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes
¨
No
þ
As of
February 16, 2010, 31,504,449 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share,
were outstanding.
INDEX
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
balance sheets December 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and
March
31, 2009
|
|
3-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
statements of operations for the three months and nine months ended
December 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
statement of stockholders' equity for the nine months ended December 31,
2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
statements of cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2009
(Unaudited) and 2008 (Unaudited)
|
|
7-8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to consolidated financial statements
|
|
9-15
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
|
15-18
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
21
|
Item
1.
Financial
Statements
|
|
UNITED
ENERGY CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
380,309
|
|
|
$
|
56,372
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $25,711 and $7,032,
respectively
|
|
|
108,965
|
|
|
|
140,531
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
95,010
|
|
|
|
155,427
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
31,617
|
|
|
|
79,237
|
|
Loan
receivable, net of reserve of $25,000
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
640,901
|
|
|
|
456,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
depreciation
and amortization of $484,902 and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$462,091
respectively
|
|
|
86,269
|
|
|
|
108,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill,
net
|
|
|
15,499
|
|
|
|
15,499
|
|
Patents,
net of accumulated amortization of $270,681 and $242,000,
respectively
|
|
|
322,679
|
|
|
|
347,661
|
|
Loans
receivable
|
|
|
19,942
|
|
|
|
3,843
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
|
|
1,385
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
1,086,675
|
|
|
$
|
933,049
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
UNITED
ENERGY CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
184,109
|
|
|
$
|
189,609
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
200,613
|
|
|
|
107,622
|
|
Convertible
term note
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
Due
to related parties
|
|
|
453,781
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
868,503
|
|
|
|
482,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock: 100,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A Convertible Preferred Stock: $8,000 stated value, 3 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2009
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
Common
stock: $0.01 par value 100,000,000 shares authorized; 31,328,587 and
31,030,115 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and March
31, 2009
|
|
|
313,286
|
|
|
|
310,301
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
23,204,751
|
|
|
|
22,196,257
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(23,323,865
|
)
|
|
|
(22,079,740
|
)
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
218,172
|
|
|
|
450,818
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
1,086,675
|
|
|
$
|
933,049
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements
UNITED
ENERGY CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES,
net
|
|
$
|
437,075
|
|
|
$
|
343,530
|
|
|
$
|
1,444,281
|
|
|
$
|
941,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
|
|
|
153,228
|
|
|
|
126,948
|
|
|
|
538,787
|
|
|
|
401,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
283,847
|
|
|
|
216,582
|
|
|
|
905,494
|
|
|
|
539,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
762,183
|
|
|
|
353,063
|
|
|
|
1,903,821
|
|
|
|
1,114,921
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
58,665
|
|
|
|
77,050
|
|
|
|
174,304
|
|
|
|
231,157
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
11,971
|
|
|
|
12,470
|
|
|
|
36,483
|
|
|
|
37,372
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
832,819
|
|
|
|
442,583
|
|
|
|
2,114,608
|
|
|
|
1,383,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(548,972
|
)
|
|
|
(226,001
|
)
|
|
|
(1,209,114
|
)
|
|
|
(843,508
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE), net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(14,528
|
)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
(33,951
|
)
|
|
|
(1,346
|
)
|
Total
other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(14,522
|
)
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(33,931
|
)
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
(563,494
|
)
|
|
|
(226,454
|
)
|
|
|
(1,243,045
|
)
|
|
|
(843,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED
DIVIDENDS
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(563,854
|
)
|
|
$
|
(226,814
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,244,125
|
)
|
|
$
|
(844,992
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC
AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE:
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC
AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING:
|
|
|
31,328,587
|
|
|
|
31,030,115
|
|
|
|
31,279,746
|
|
|
|
31,030,115
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
UNITED
ENERGY CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE,
April 1, 2009
|
|
|
31,030,115
|
|
|
$
|
310,301
|
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
$
|
22,196,257
|
|
|
$
|
(22,079,740
|
)
|
|
$
|
450,818
|
|
Compensation
expense associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
Compensation
expense associated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
975,411
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
975,411
|
|
Conversion
of convertible note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into
common stock
|
|
|
298,472
|
|
|
|
2,985
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
32,015
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
Dividends
accrued on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preferred
shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,243,045
|
)
|
|
|
(1,243,045
|
)
|
BALANCE,
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
31,328,587
|
|
|
$
|
313,286
|
|
|
$
|
24,000
|
|
|
$
|
23,204,751
|
|
|
$
|
(23,323,865
|
)
|
|
$
|
218,172
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
UNITED
ENERGY CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1,243,045
|
)
|
|
$
|
(843,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
51,492
|
|
|
|
48,589
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
18,680
|
|
|
|
(16,686
|
)
|
Compensation
expense associated with warrants
|
|
|
975,411
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Compensation
expense associated with options
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
17,346
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
12,887
|
|
|
|
117,207
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
60,417
|
|
|
|
(8,675
|
)
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
47,620
|
|
|
|
103,988
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
117,490
|
|
|
|
(24,679
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
42,020
|
|
|
|
(606,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
loans
|
|
|
(16,100
|
)
|
|
|
3,580
|
|
Payments
for acquisition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(985
|
)
|
|
|
(83,453
|
)
|
Payments
for patents
|
|
|
(3,699
|
)
|
|
|
(9,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
used in investing activities
|
|
|
(20,784
|
)
|
|
|
(89,517
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from related party payable
|
|
|
303,781
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Preferred
stock dividend
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
302,701
|
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
323,937
|
|
|
|
(697,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
56,372
|
|
|
|
858,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$
|
380,309
|
|
|
$
|
161,156
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
UNITED
ENERGY CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
1,160
|
|
|
$
|
1,345
|
|
Income
taxes
|
|
$
|
2,080
|
|
|
$
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
payable issued in conversion of accounts payable
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Conversion
of note payable into common stock
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
UNITED
ENERGY CORP.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER
31, 2009 (Unaudited)
1. BASIS
OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of presentation
Interim
Financial Statements
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of United Energy Corp.
(“we”, “United Energy” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, the unaudited interim financial statements furnished herein
include all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company's
financial position at December 31, 2009 (unaudited) and the results of its
operations for the three and nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(unaudited) and cash flows for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(unaudited). All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Interim
financial statements are prepared on a basis consistent with the Company's
annual financial statements. Results of operations for the three and nine months
ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the operating
results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2010.
The
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 has been derived from the
audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the
information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States for complete financial statements.
For
further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended March 31, 2009.
Going
Concern
– The accompanying
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which
contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company
has year-end losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit of
$23,323,865 as of December 31, 2009.
During the nine months ended December
31, 2009 the Company experienced a net loss from operations of $1,209,114 and
cash flow from operations of $42,020. These matters raise substantial
doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustment that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty
.
Our
continued existence is dependent upon several factors, including raising
additional funds through loans, additional sales of its equity securities,
increased sales volumes and the ability to achieve profitability from the sales
of our product lines. In order to increase our cash flow, we are
continuing our efforts to stimulate sales and cut back expenses not directly
supporting our sales and marketing efforts.
There can
be no assurance that we will be successful in stimulating sales or reducing
expenses to levels sufficient to generate cash flow sufficient to fund our
anticipated liquidity requirements. There also can be no assurance that
available financing will be available, or if available, that such financing will
be on terms acceptable to us.
2 NET
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic net
loss per share is computed based upon the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the periods and is computed by dividing net loss by
the adjusted weighted average number of shares during the
periods.
3
|
ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS UPDATES
|
In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU
2009-05 which includes amendments to Subtopic 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures—Overall”. The update provides clarification that in
circumstances, in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical
liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value
using one or more of the techniques provided for in this update. The amendments
in this ASU clarify that a reporting entity is not required to include a
separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a
restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability and also
clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the
identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the
identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no
adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value
measurements. The guidance provided in this ASU is effective for the first
reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after
issuance. The adoption of this standard did not have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
In
September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-06, Income Taxes (Topic 740),
”Implementation Guidance on Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and
Disclosure Amendments for Nonpublic Entities”, which provides implementation
guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, as well as eliminates
certain disclosure requirements for nonpublic entities. For entities
that are currently applying the standards for accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes, this update shall be effective for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. For those entities that have deferred the
application of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes in accordance with
paragraph 740-10-65-1(e), this update shall be effective upon adoption of those
standards. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have an impact on
the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations since
this accounting standard update provides only implementation and disclosure
amendments.
In
September 2009, the FASB has published ASU No. 2009-12, “Fair Value Measurements
and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net
Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent)”. This ASU amends Subtopic 820-10,
“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall”, to permit a reporting
entity to measure the fair value of certain investments on the basis of the net
asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent). This ASU also
requires new disclosures, by major category of investments including the
attributes of investments within the scope of this amendment to the
Codification. The guidance in this Update is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after December 15, 2009. Early application is permitted.
The adoption of this
standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial position and results of operations.
In
January 2010, the FASB has published ASU 2010-01 “Equity (Topic 505)- Accounting
for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash—a consensus
of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force,” as codified in ASC 505,. ASU
No. 2010-01 clarifies the treatment of certain distributions to
shareholders that have both stock and cash components. The stock portion of such
distributions is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per
share prospectively and is not a stock dividend. The amendments in this Update
are effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15,
2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. Early adoption
is permitted. The adoption of this standard did not have an impact on
the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
Not yet
adopted
In
December 2009, the FASB has published ASU 2010-16 ““Transfers and Servicing
(Topic 860): Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets.” ASU No. 2009-16
is a revision to ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing,” and amends the guidance on
accounting for transfers of financial assets, including securitization
transactions, where entities have continued exposure to risks related to
transferred financial assets. ASU No. 2009-16 also expands the disclosure
requirements for such transactions. This ASU will become effective for us on
April 1, 2010. The adoption of this standard is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
In
January 2010, the FASB has published ASU 2010-06 “Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (Topic 820): - Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.
ASU No. 2010-06 clarifies improve disclosure requirement related to fair
value measurements and disclosures – Overall Subtopic (Subtopic 820-10) of the
FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The new disclosures and clarifications
of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosure about purchase,
sales, issuances, and settlement in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair
value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal
years. The amendments in this Update are effective for interim and annual
periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a
retrospective basis. The adoption of this standard is not expected to
have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
Other
ASUs not effective until after January, 2010, are not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results
of operations.
On
November 6, 2009, the Company issued a convertible term note in the amount of
$30,000, which accrues interest at 7% per year. Principal and interest is
payable on the maturity date of April 30, 2010. The holder of this term note has
the option to convert all or a portion of the note (including principal and
interest) into shares of common stock at any time at a conversion price of $0.21
per share. The conversion price is subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock
dividends and similar events.
On
January 28, 2009, the Company issued a convertible term note in the amount of
$35,000, which accrues interest at 7% per year. Principal and interest is
payable on the maturity date of June 30, 2009. The holder of this term note has
the option to convert all or a portion of the note (including principal and
interest) into shares of common stock at any time at a conversion price of $0.12
per share. The conversion price is subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock
dividends and similar events. The holder of this term note agreed to convert the
note and on June 2, 2009, the term note was converted. In consideration for the
conversion, the Company issued to the holder of the note, warrants to acquire
140,000 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.12, which warrants are
exercisable for a period of five years.
The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in accordance with accounting principals generally accepted
in the United States of America requires the Company to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities.
On an on-going basis, the Company
evaluates its estimates, including those related to option and warrant values,
bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, contingencies and litigation. The
Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
6.
|
FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
|
FASB ASC
820-10 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, is effective for financial
assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and
for non-financial assets and liabilities in fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. The Company adopted FASB ASC 820-10 for financial assets and
liabilities with no material impact to the consolidated financial statements.
The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the application of
FASB ASC 820-10 on the non-financial assets and liabilities found on its
consolidated financial statements. FASB ASC 820-10 applies to all
assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported on a fair value
basis. FASB ASC 820-10 requires new disclosure that establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosure about fair value
measurements. This statement enables the reader of the financial statements to
assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy
for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine
fair values. The statement requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair
value be classified and disclosed in one of the following three
categories:
Level 1:
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2:
Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by
market data.
Level 3:
Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
Certain amounts in the December 31,
2008 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
December 31, 2009 presentation.
8.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and equipment are stated at
cost. Depreciation has been calculated over the estimated useful
lives of the assets ranging from 3 to 15 years. Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases, which are
shorter than the useful life. The cost of maintenance and repairs is
expensed as incurred. Depreciation and amortization expense for the
period ended December 31, 2009 and the year ended March 31, 2009 were $22,811
and $26,714, respectively.
Property
and equipment consists of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
|
$
|
83,355
|
|
|
$
|
83,355
|
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
|
|
419,612
|
|
|
|
418,626
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
42,001
|
|
|
|
42,001
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
26,203
|
|
|
|
26,203
|
|
|
|
|
571,171
|
|
|
|
570,185
|
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(484,902
|
)
|
|
|
(462,091
|
)
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
86,269
|
|
|
$
|
108,094
|
|
Inventory consists of the
following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Blended
chemicals
|
|
$
|
35,953
|
|
|
$
|
92,944
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
|
59,057
|
|
|
|
62,483
|
|
Total
inventory
|
|
$
|
95,010
|
|
|
$
|
155,427
|
|
10.
|
RELATED-PARTY
TRANSACTIONS
|
In March
2009, Ronald Wilen, a director, the President and the Chief Executive Officer,
Martin Rappaport, a director, and Sherleigh Associates Profit Sharing Plan
(“Sherleigh”), a trust of which Jack Silver, a director, is the trustee,
provided the Company with short term loans in the amount of $50,000 each, and
each received warrants to purchase up to 200,000 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $.125 per share which warrants are exercisable for a period of
five (5) years.
Subsequently,
in May 2009, the loan by Sherleigh was repaid, and Messrs Wilen and Rappaport
loaned the Company an additional $50,000 each, and Hilltop Holding Company, L.P.
(“Hilltop”), a limited partnership of which Mr. Silver is the managing partner,
loaned the Company $101,017. In addition, the Company amended Messrs
Wilen’s and Rappaport’s March 2009 notes into secured convertible notes (the
“Amended March Loan Notes”) and issued to Messrs Wilen and Rappaport and Hilltop
secured convertible notes (the “May Loan Notes”) for their May 2009 loans to the
Company. The amended notes extended the maturity date of the Amended
March Loan Notes to July 13, 2009. In consideration for agreeing to
extend the maturity date and for making the May 2009 loans, Messrs Wilen,
Rappaport and Hilltop each received warrants to purchase up to 400,000 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $.12 per share, which warrants are
exercisable for a period of five (5) years.
Thereafter,
in July 2009, Messrs Wilen and Rappaport and Hilltop agreed to extend the
maturity date of the Amended March Loan Notes and the May Loan Notes from July
13, 2009 to August 13, 2009 and as consideration for such extension received
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 611,825 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $.12 per share, which warrants are exercisable for a period of
five (5) years.
Thereafter,
in July/August 2009, Messrs Wilen and Rappaport and Hilltop each loaned the
Company an additional $50,000. In October 2009, the Company issued to
Messrs Wilen and Rappaport and Hilltop secured convertible notes (the “August
Loan Notes”) for their July/August 2009 loans to the Company. In
connection with the July/August 2009 loans, Messrs Wilen and Rappaport and
Hilltop agreed to extend the maturity date of the Amended March Loan Notes and
the May Loan Notes to January 29, 2010. In consideration for agreeing
to extend the maturity date and for making the July/August 2009 loans, Messrs
Wilen, Rappaport and Hilltop each received warrants to purchase up to 400,000
shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.09 per share, which warrants
are exercisable for a period of five (5) years. In addition, the
conversion price of the Amended March Loan Notes and the May Loan Notes was
lowered from $.12 per share to $.09 per share.
Pursuant
to an agreement dated January 29, 2010, Messrs Wilen and Rappaport and Hilltop
agreed to extend the maturity date of the Amended March Loan Notes, the May Loan
Notes and the August Loan Notes to January 31, 2011. In consideration
for agreeing to extend the maturity date, Messrs Wilen, Rappaport and Hilltop
received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,414,705 shares of common stock
at an exercise price of $.222 per share, which warrants are exercisable for a
period of five (5) years. As a result of the foregoing, each of
the Amended March Loan Notes, the May Loan Notes and the August Loan Notes are
convertible into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $.09 per
share, bear interest at 12% per annum, are due January 31, 2011 and are secured
by substantially all the assets of the Company.
The
issuance of the August Loan Notes and the warrants in October 2009 and the
reduction of the conversion price of the Amended March Loan Notes and the May
Loan Notes triggered the anti-dilution provisions of the Company’s outstanding
Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants, Series C Warrants and Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock. As a result, in October 2009, the Company entered
into an Anti-Dilution Waiver Agreement with the holders of Series A Warrants,
Series B Warrants, Series C Warrants and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,
including Sherleigh, whereby the exercise price of the Series A Warrants, the
Series B Warrants and the Series C Warrants were reduced from $0.12 to $0.09 per
share; however, such holders agreed to waive any increase in the number of
shares underlying the Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants and Series C Warrants
as a result of such reduction in the exercise price. In addition,
Sherleigh, as the sole holder of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock,
agreed to waive the anti-dilution provisions of the Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock.
11.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS PLAN
|
Stock
Option Plans
In August 2001, the Company’s
stockholders approved the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”), which
provides for the grant of stock options to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of
common stock to any employee, non-employee director, or consultant at the
Board’s discretion. Under the 2001 Plan, these options may be
exercised for a period up to ten years from the date of
grant. Options issued to employees are exercisable upon vesting,
which can range between the dates of the grant to up to 5
years
.
An
amendment and restatement of the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan increasing the
number of shares for a total of 4,000,000 was approved by the Board of Directors
on May 29, 2002 and was approved by the shareholders at the annual
meeting.
Under the 2001 Plan, options are
granted to non-employee directors upon election at the annual meeting of
stockholders at a purchase price equal to the fair market value on the date of
grant. In addition, the non-employee director stock options shall be
exercisable in full twelve months after the date of grant unless determined
otherwise by the Board of Directors.
Fair
Value of Stock Options
For disclosure purposes under FASB
guidance now codified as ASC Topic 505, the fair value of each option grant is
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model
with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
life (in
years)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
4.54
|
%
|
|
|
4.54
|
%
|
Volatility
|
|
|
175.3
|
|
|
|
143.7
|
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Utilizing
these assumptions, the weighted average fair value of options granted with an
exercise price equal to their fair market value at the date of the grant is
$1.05 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009.
Summary
Stock Option Activity
The following table summarizes stock
option information with respect to all stock options for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009:
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
Options
outstanding April 1, 2009
|
|
|
3,287,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
6.16
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
outstanding December 31, 2009
|
|
|
3,287,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
and expected to vest–end of quarter
|
|
|
3,287,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Exercisable–end
of quarter
|
|
|
3,175,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
4.83
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Pursuant to the terms of an
employment agreement with Ronald Wilen, Chief Executive Officer, President,
Secretary and Director of the Company dated April 17, 2007, for each of the next
five (5) years of the term of the agreement (commencing with April 17, 2008),
Mr. Wilen will receive an option to purchase fifty thousand (50,000) shares of
common stock of the Company. The exercise price with respect to any option
granted pursuant to the employment agreement shall be the fair market value of
the common stock underlying such option on the date such option was
granted.
Options
outstanding at December 31, 2009 have an exercise price ranging between $0.09 to
$2.05.
The aggregate intrinsic
value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value (the difference
between the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2009 and the exercise
price, multiplied by the number of in–the–money options) that would have been
received by the option holders had vested option holders exercised their options
on December 31, 2009. This amount changes based upon changes in the fair market
value of the Company’s stock. As of December 31, 2009, $3,201 of the total
unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options is expected to be
recognized over a period of two years and three months.
12.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Litigation
Sales Commission
Claim
In July 2002, an action was commenced
against us in the Court of Common Pleas of South Carolina, Pickens County,
brought by Quantum International Technology, LLC and Richard J.
Barrett. Plaintiffs allege that they were retained as a sales
representative of ours and in that capacity made sales of our products to the
United States government and to commercial entities. Plaintiffs
further allege that we failed to pay to plaintiffs agreed commissions at the
rate of 20% of gross sales of our products made by plaintiffs. The
complaint seeks an accounting, compensatory damages in the amount of all unpaid
commissions plus interest thereon, and punitive damages in an amount triple the
compensatory damages, plus legal fees and costs. Plaintiffs maintain
that they are entitled to receive an aggregate of approximately $350,000 in
compensatory and punitive damages, interest and costs. In June 2003,
the action was transferred from the court in Pickens County to a Master in
Equity sitting in Greenville, South Carolina and was removed from the trial
docket. The action, if tried, will be tried without a
jury. No trial date has been scheduled. We believe,
based on the advice of counsel, we have meritorious defenses to the claims
asserted in the action and intend to vigorously defend the case. The outcome of
this matter cannot be determined at this time.
Pursuant
to an agreement dated January 29, 2010, Messrs Wilen and Rappaport and Hilltop
agreed to extend the maturity date of the Amended March Loan Notes, the May Loan
Notes and the August Loan Notes to January 31, 2011. In consideration
for agreeing to extend the maturity date, Messrs Wilen, Rappaport and Hilltop
received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,414,705 shares of common stock
at an exercise price of $.222 per share, which warrants are exercisable for a
period of five (5) years. As a result of the foregoing, each of
the Amended March Loan Notes, the May Loan Notes and the August Loan Notes are
convertible into common stock of the Company at a conversion price of $.09 per
share, bear interest at 12% per annum, are due January 31, 2011 and are secured
by substantially all the assets of the Company.
Item
2
|
Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT RELATING TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this report constitute “forwarding-looking statements” within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section
21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1995 (collectively, the “Reform
Act”). Certain, but not necessarily all, of such forward-looking
statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
“believes”, “expects”, “may”, “will”, “should”, or “anticipates” or the negative
thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions
of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. All statements
other than statements of historical fact, included in this report regarding our
financial position, business strategy and plans or objectives for future
operations are forward-looking statements.
Such
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors, including but not limited to, the risk factors discussed
identified herein and those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in the
Company’s 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, which may cause our
actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any
future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements and other factors referenced in this
report. We do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation
to publicly release the results of any revisions which may be made to any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated
events. This item should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and other items contained elsewhere in the report. Unless the context otherwise
requires, “we”, “our”, “us”, the “Company” and similar phrases refer to United
Energy Corp.
Overview
We
develop and distribute environmentally friendly specialty chemical products with
applications in several industries and markets. Our current line of
products includes our K-Line of Chemical Products for the oil industry and
related products.
Through
our wholly owned subsidiary, Green Globe Industries, Inc., we provide the U.S.
military with a variety of solvents, paint strippers and cleaners under our
trade name “Qualchem.” Green Globe is a qualified supplier for the U.S. military
and has sales contracts currently in place with no minimum purchase
requirements, which are renewable at the option of the U.S.
Military.
A key
component of our business strategy is to pursue collaborative joint working and
marketing arrangements with established international oil and oil service
companies. We intend to enter into these relationships to more
rapidly and economically introduce our K-Line of Chemical Products to the
worldwide marketplace for refinery, tank and pipeline cleaning
services.
We
provide our K-Line of Chemical Products and our Green Globe Products to our
customers and generated revenues of $1,444,281 for the nine-month period ended
December 31, 2009 and $941,524 for the nine-month period ended December 31,
2008.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Three
Months Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended December 30,
2008
Revenues
. Revenues
for the three months ended December 31, 2009 were $437,075, a $93,545, or 27%
increase from revenues of $343,530 in the comparable three months of 2008. The
increase in revenues was due to higher levels our K-Line of Chemical Products
and military sales during the three months ended December 31,
2009. Revenues from our K-Line of Chemical Products increased by
$61,117 to $387,586 or 19% compared to $326,469 in the comparable three months
ended December 31, 2008, and revenues from our Green Globe/Qualchem military
sales increased by $32,428 to $49,489 or 190% compared to $17,061 in the
comparable three months ended December 31, 2008.
Cost of Goods Sold
. Cost of
goods sold increased $26,280, or 21% to $153,228 or 35% of revenues, for the
three months ended December 31, 2009 from $126,948 or 37% of revenues, for the
three months ended December 31, 2008. The increase in cost of goods
sold and the decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue was due
to the higher sales level in the period compared to the comparable period in
2008. Cost of goods sold from our K-Line of Chemical Products increased by
$15,956 to $131,112 or 14% compared to $115,156 in the comparable three months
ended December 31, 2008, and cost of goods sold by our Green Globe/Qualchem
military sales increased by $10,324 to $22,116 or 88% compared to $11,792 in the
comparable three months ended December 31, 2008.
Gross
Profit
. Gross profit for the three months ended December 31,
2009, increased by $67,265, or 31% to $283,847 or 65% of sales compared with
$216,582 or 63% of sales in the prior period. The increase in gross profit and
gross profit percentage reflects the higher levels of sales.
Operating
Costs and Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses
. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $409,120
to $762,183 or 174% of sales for the three months ended December 31, 2009
compared with $353,063 or 103% of sales for the three months ended December 31,
2008. The increase in general and administrative expenses is
primarily related to an increase in financing costs associated with the issuance
of warrants, offset by a decrease in professional fees, salaries, employee
benefits and travel and entertainment.
Research and Development.
Research and development expenses decreased $18,385 to $58,665 or 13% of sales
for the three months ended December 31, 2009 compared with $77,050 or 22% of
sales for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in research and
development expenses was primarily related to a decrease in salaries, partially
offset by a slight increase in lab supplies.
Depreciation and
Amortization
. Depreciation and amortization remained
relatively constant for the three months ended December 31, 2009 as compared
with December 31, 2008.
Interest
Income
. Interest income remained relatively constant for the
three months ended December 31, 2009 as compared with December 31,
2008.
Interest
Expense
. The Company had interest expense of $14,528 for the
three months ended December 31, 2009 compared with $472 in the corresponding
period in 2008. The increase was due to the indebtedness outstanding on the
loans by directors and other affiliates.
Net Loss
. The
three months ended December 31, 2009 resulted in a net loss of $563,494 or $0.02
per share as compared to a net loss of $226,454 or $0.01 per share for the three
months ended December 31, 2008. The average number of shares of common stock
used in calculating earnings per share increased 298,472 shares to 31,328,587 as
a result of 298,472 shares issued in connection with the conversion of the
convertible note.
Nine
Months Ended December 31, 2009 Compared to the Nine Months Ended December 31,
2008
Revenues
. Revenues
for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2009 were $1,444,281, a $502,757 or
53% increase from revenues of $941,524 in the comparable nine-month period ended
December 31, 2008. The increase in revenues was due to higher levels
our K-Line of Chemical Products and military sales during the nine months ended
December 31, 2009. Revenues from our K-Line of Chemical Products
increased by $359,828 to $1,255,144 or 40% compared to $895,316 in the
comparable nine months ended December 31, 2008, and revenues from our Green
Globe/Qualchem military sales increased by $142,929 to $189,137 or 309% compared
to $46,208 in the comparable nine months ended December 31, 2008.
Cost of Goods Sold
. Cost of
goods sold increased $137,205, or 34% to $538,787 or 37% of revenues, for the
nine-month period ended December 31, 2009 from $401,582 or 43% of revenues, for
the nine-month period ended December 31, 2008. The increase in cost
of goods sold and the decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue
was due to the higher sales level in the period compared to the comparable
period in 2008. Cost of goods sold from our K-Line of Chemical Products
increased by $86,691 to $456,315 or 23% compared to $369,624 in the comparable
nine months ended December 31, 2008, and cost of goods sold from our Green
Globe/Qualchem military sales increased by $50,514 to $82,472 or 158% compared
to $31,958 in the comparable nine months ended December 31, 2008.
Gross
Profit
. Gross profit for the nine months ended December 31,
2009, increased by $365,552, or 68% to $905,494 or 63% of revenues compared with
$539,942 or 57% of revenues in the prior period. The increase in gross profit
and gross profit percentage reflects the higher levels of sales of Specialty
Chemicals.
Operating
Costs and Expenses
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses
. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $788,900
to $1,903,821 or 132% of revenues for the nine months ended December 31, 2009
compared with $1,114,921 or 118% of revenues for the nine months ended December
31, 2008. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was
primarily related to an increase in financing costs associated with the issuance
of warrants and in marketing and insurance expenses, partially offset by a
decrease in professional fees, salaries, employee benefits and travel and
entertainment.
Research and Development.
Research and development expenses decreased $56,853 to $174,304 or 12% of sales
for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 compared with $231,157 or 25% of
sales for the nine months ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in research and
development expenses was related to a decrease in lab supplies and
salaries.
Depreciation and
Amortization
. Depreciation and amortization remained relatively constant
for the nine months ended December 31, 2009 as compared with December 31,
2008.
Interest
Income
. The Company had interest income of $20 for the nine
months ended December 31, 2009 compared with $942 in the corresponding period in
2008. The decrease was due to the use of cash received in connection with the
private placement in March 2006.
Interest Expense
. The Company
had interest expense of $33,951 for the nine months ended December 31, 2009
compared with $1,346 in the corresponding period in 2008. The increase was due
to the indebtedness outstanding on the loans by directors and their
affiliates.
Net Loss
. The nine
months ended December 31, 2009 resulted in a net loss of $1,243,045 or $0.04 per
share as compared to a net loss of $843,912 or $0.03 per share for the nine
months ended December 31, 2008. The average number of shares of common stock
used in calculating earnings per share increased 249,631 shares to 31,279,746 as
a result of 298,472 shares issued in connection with the conversion of the
convertible note.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
December 31, 2009, the Company had $380,309 in cash and cash equivalents, as
compared to $56,372 at March 31, 2009.
The
$323,937 increase in cash and cash equivalents was due to net cash provided by
operations of $42,020, net cash used in investing activities of $20,784 and net
cash provided by financing activities of $302,701. Cash used in investing
activities consisted of fixed asset purchases of $985, patent purchases of
$3,699 and employee loans of $16,100. Cash provided by financing
activities consisted of related party loans of $303,781, offset by preferred
stock dividends of $1,080.
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America which contemplate continuation of the
Company as a going concern. However, the Company has year-end losses from
operations and has an accumulated deficit of $23,323,865 as of December 31,
2009.
During
the nine months ended December 31, 2009, the Company experienced a net loss from
operations of $1,209,114 and a cash flow from operations of
$42,020. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty
.
Our
continued existence is dependent upon several factors, including raising
additional funds through loans, additional sales of its equity securities,
increased sales volumes and the ability to achieve profitability from the sales
of our product lines. In order to increase our cash flow, we are
continuing our efforts to stimulate sales and cut back expenses not directly
supporting our sales and marketing efforts.
There can
be no assurance that we will be successful in stimulating sales or reducing
expenses to levels sufficient to generate cash flow sufficient to fund our
anticipated liquidity requirements. There also can be no assurance that
available financing will be available, or if available, that such financing will
be on terms acceptable to us.
Concentration
of Risk
Sales to our top four customers,
accounted for approximately 78% of revenue, or $943,591, for the nine-month
period ending December 31, 2009 and sales to our top two customers, accounted
for approximately 48% of our revenue, or $456,150, for the nine-month period
ending December 31, 2008.
Sales to our top customer, for the
nine-month period ending December 31, 2009 were $372,421.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
do not currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to our
stockholders.
Item
3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market
Risks.
|
Not
applicable
Item
4.
|
Controls and
Procedures.
|
Evaluation
of the Company's Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and our Principal Accounting Officer
(Interim Chief Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of our “disclosure
controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of December 31,
2009. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the
Principal Accounting Officer (Interim Chief Financial Officer) concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective, in all material respects,
with respect to the recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting, within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and
forms, of information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file
or submit under the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating our “disclosure
controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), management recognized that any
controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable assurances of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours
are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures.
Changes
in Control Over Financial Reporting
|
Management
has not identified any change in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the third quarter ended December 31, 2009 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II
OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1.
Legal
Proceedings
None.
Item
1A.
Risk
Factors
Not applicable.
Item
2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
In
November 2009, the Company issued a convertible term note in the amount of
$30,000, which accrues interest at 7% per annum. Principal and
interest is payable on the maturity date of April 30, 2010. the
holder of the note has the option to convert all or portion of the note into
shares of common stock at a conversion price of $0.21 per share. The
Company did not receive any proceeds from the note and instead was issued as
payment of monies owed by the Company to the holder. The note was
issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933.
Item
3.
Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
None
Item
4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of
Security Holders
None
Item
5.
Other
Information
None
Item
6.
Exhibits
|
10.1
|
Agreement,
dated January 29, 2010 by and between the Company and Messrs Wilen and
Rappaport and Hilltop
|
|
31.1
|
Chief
Executive Officer’s Certificate, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) of
the Exchange Act.
|
|
31.2
|
Chief
Financial Officer’s Certificate, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a) of
the Exchange Act
|
|
32.1
|
Chief
Executive Officer’s Certificate, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
1350).
|
|
32.2
|
Chief
Financial Officer’s Certificate, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.
1350).
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Dated: February
16, 2010
|
|
UNITED
ENERGY CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Ronald Wilen
|
|
|
Ronald
Wilen,
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
(as
principal executive officer)
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ James McKeever
|
|
|
James
McKeever,
|
|
|
Interim
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(as
principal financial and accounting
officer)
|
United Energy (PK) (USOTC:UNRG)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Jan 2025 à Fév 2025
United Energy (PK) (USOTC:UNRG)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Fév 2024 à Fév 2025