LSBI (MM)

LSB FINANCIAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

INDIANA		35-1934975
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
101 Main Street, Lafayette, Indiana		47901
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class:		Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.		Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.		Yes o No ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.		Yes   ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).		Yes   ý No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.		ý

 

 

---

 

Large Accelerated Filer o	Accelerated Filer o
Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller Reporting Company ý

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Document		Parts Into Which Incorporated
Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held April 16, 2014		Part III

PART I

 

Item 1.  Business

 

General

 

LSB Financial Corp. (“LSB Financial” or the “Company”) is an Indiana corporation which was organized in 1994 by Lafayette Savings Bank, FSB (“Lafayette Savings” or the “Bank”) for the purpose of becoming a thrift institution holding company. Lafayette Savings is a federally chartered stock savings bank headquartered in Lafayette, Indiana. Originally organized in 1869, Lafayette Savings converted to a federal savings bank in 1984. Lafayette Savings’ deposits are insured up to the applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). In February 1995, Lafayette Savings converted to the stock form of organization through the sale and issuance of 1,029,576 shares of its common stock to LSB Financial. LSB Financial’s principal asset is the outstanding stock of Lafayette Savings. LSB Financial presently has no separate operations and its business consists only of the business of Lafayette Savings. References in this Form 10-K to “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to LSB Financial and/or Lafayette Savings as the context requires.

 

We have been, and intend to continue to be, a community-oriented financial institution. Our principal business consists of attracting retail deposits from the general public and investing those funds primarily in permanent first mortgage loans secured by owner-occupied, one- to four-family residences, and to a lesser extent, non-owner-occupied one- to four-family residential, commercial real estate, multi-family, construction and development, consumer and commercial business loans. We currently serve Tippecanoe County, Indiana and its surrounding counties through our five retail banking offices. At December 31, 2013, we had total assets of $367.6 million, deposits of $314.6 million and stockholders’ equity of $40.7 million.

 

Our revenues are derived principally from interest on mortgage and other loans and interest on securities.

 

Our executive offices are located at 101 Main Street, Lafayette, Indiana 47901. Our telephone number at that address is (765) 742-1064.

 

 

Market Area

 

Tippecanoe County and the eight surrounding counties comprise Lafayette Savings’ primary market area. Lafayette is the county seat of Tippecanoe County and West Lafayette is the home of Purdue University. There are three things that set Greater Lafayette apart from other urban areas of the country - the presence of a world class university, Purdue University; a government sector due to the presence of the county seat; and the mix of heavy industry and high-tech innovative start-up companies tied to Purdue University. In addition, Greater Lafayette is a regional health care center serving nine counties and has a large campus of Ivy Tech Community College.

 

Tippecanoe County typically shows better growth and lower unemployment rates than Indiana or the national economy because of the diverse employment base. The Tippecanoe County unemployment rate peaked at 10.6% in July 2009 and ended 2013 at 5.4% compared to 6.9% for Indiana and 6.7% nationally. The local housing market has remained fairly stable for the last several years with no price bubble and no resulting price swings. As of the most recent third quarter results provided by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the five year percent change in house prices for the Lafayette Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”) was a 1.00% increase with the one-year change a 1.02% increase. For the third quarter of 2013, the most recent report available, housing prices in the MSA increased 0.67%. Existing home sales increased 13% in Tippecanoe County in 2013, with the average price of a home sold in 2013 1% higher than in 2012. New home starts as seen in building permits which decreased slightly from 496 in 2012 to 457 in 2013.

 

The area’s diversity did not make us immune to the ongoing effects of the recession; however, growth continues, although at a somewhat lower rate. Current signs of recovery, based on a report from Greater Lafayette Commerce, include increasing manufacturing employment, a continuing commitment to new facilities and renovations at Purdue University, and signs of renewed activity in residential development projects. Capital investments announced and/or made in 2013 are projected to total over $1 billion compared to $605 million in 2012 and $444 million in 2011. Purdue, the area’s largest employer, announced enrollment of almost 39,000 in the fall 2013 semester.

 

Subaru, the area’s largest industrial employer and producer of the Subaru Legacy, Outback and Tribeca, recently announced the addition of more production capacity for a new model to be built there. Despite Toyota’s decision to no longer build Camrys at this Subaru location, the Lafayette plant expects to use the space to produce another Subaru line and growth projections should stay on line for substantial hiring increases. Wabash National, the

 

 

5

---

 

area’s second largest industrial employer, continues to sustain its level of production. Alcoa’s new aluminum lithium plant is expected to begin production and hire 75 people in 2014. Nanshan America began operating its new aluminum extrusion plant in Lafayette in 2012 which will employ 200 people.

 

While the developments noted above lead us to believe many of the problems caused by the recession are behind us as increased hiring and new industry moving to town have continued, we expect the recovery to be long term. However, Purdue’s presence, and national recognitions such as the Lafayette MSA being named by Fortune the best Place for Small Business in Indiana and 8th best in the country in 2013, should contribute to the success of the region.

 

 

Lending Activities

 

General . Our principal lending activity is the origination of conventional mortgage loans for the purpose of purchasing, constructing, or refinancing owner-occupied one- to four-family residential real estate located in our primary market area. We also originate non-owner-occupied one- to four-family residential, multi-family and land development, commercial real estate, consumer and commercial business loans.

 

We originate both adjustable rate loans and fixed rate loans. We generally originate adjustable rate loans for retention in our portfolio in an effort to increase the percentage of loans with more frequent repricing than traditional long-term fixed rate loans. As a result of continued consumer demand for long-term fixed rate loans, we have continued to originate such loans. We underwrite these mortgages utilizing secondary market guidelines allowing them to be salable without recourse. The sale of these loans results in additional short-term income and improves our interest-rate risk position by reducing the average maturity of our interest-earning assets. We generally retain servicing rights on loans sold to Freddie Mac, but release the servicing rights on loans sold to other third parties. Furthermore, in order to limit our potential exposure to increasing interest rates caused by our traditional emphasis on originating single-family mortgage loans, we have diversified our portfolio by increasing our emphasis on the origination of short-term or adjustable rate multi-family and commercial real estate loans and commercial business and consumer loans.

 

Where a borrower’s aggregate indebtedness is less than $500,000 our loan officers and certain executive officers in combination with a senior loan officer have approval authority on individual loans up to $500,000 over certain minimum debt service coverage thresholds. Where a borrower’s aggregate indebtedness is less than $1.5 million our officers’ loan committee has approval authority on individual loans up to $500,000, also over certain minimum debt service coverage thresholds. The Board of Directors’ loan committee approves all individual loans over $500,000 and all loans where aggregate debt is over $1.5 million or where debt coverage is below certain minimum thresholds. Any member of the loan committee may request a loan be moved to the Board of Directors’ loan committee for approval. Any member of the Board of Directors’ loan committee may refer a loan to the full Board for approval.

 

At December 31, 2013, the maximum amount we could have loaned to any one borrower and the borrower’s related entities was $7.0 million. Our largest lending relationship to a single borrower or a group of related borrowers at December 31, 2013, totaled $5.8 million, consisting of four secured commercial loans, three loans on non-residential property, two secured commercial lines of credit, two loans on undeveloped land and a mortgage loan and home equity loan on a single family residence. The second largest lending relationship at December 31, 2013 to a single borrower or a group of related borrowers totaled $4.8 million, consisting of 27 loans on one- to four-family rental properties, eight loans on multi-family rental properties, and four loans on non-residential properties. The third largest lending relationship to a single borrower or a group of related borrowers totaled $4.8 million and consisted of one loan on a non-residential property, a secured commercial line of credit and a secured commercial loan. None of these loans was past due 30-89 days at December 31, 2013. At December 31, 2013, we had 23 other loans or lending relationships to a single borrower or group of related borrowers with a principal balance in excess of $2.0 million.

 

 

6

---

 

Loan Portfolio Composition . The following table sets forth information concerning the composition of our loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, in dollar amounts and in percentages of the total loan portfolio, before deductions for loans in process, deferred fees and discounts and allowances for losses.

		December 31,
		2013						2012						2011						2010						2009
		Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Real Estate Loans:
One- to four-family		$	98,719		37.31	%		$	100,579		34.59	%		$	111,987		35.59	%		$	125,121		37.46	%		$	123,502		37.46	%
Multi-family			49,866		18.85				62,823		21.60				60,612		19.26				53,458		16.00				52,790		16.01
Commercial			72,030		27.22				82,430		28.35				90,879		28.88				90,395		27.06				90,571		27.47
Land and land development			9,872		3.73				5,185		1.78				10,304		3.27				14,510		4.34				17,192		5.21
Construction			5,446		2.06				8,928		3.07				8,060		2.56				15,957		4.78				13,002		3.95
Total real estate loans			235,932		89.17				259,945		89.39				281,842		89.56				299,441		89.65				297,057		90.10
Other Loans:
Consumer loans:
Home equity			16,050		6.07				16,421		5.65				17,330		5.51				17,043		5.10				14,698		4.46
Home improvement			---		---				---		---				---		---				---		---				124		0.04
Automobile			848		0.32				920		0.32				858		0.27				871		0.26				930		0.28
Deposit account			183		0.07				106		0.04				176		0.06				211		0.06				196		0.06
Other			129		0.05				105		0.03				127		0.04				126		0.03				71		0.02
Total consumer loans			17,210		6.50				17,552		6.04				18,491		5.88				18,251		5.46				16,019		4.86
Commercial business  loans			11,461		4.33				13,290		4.57				14,366		4.56				16,332		4.89				16,638		5.04
Total other loans			28,671		10.84				30,842		10.61				32,857		10.44				34,583		10.35				32,657		9.90
Total loans			264,603		100.00	%			290,787		100.00	%			314,699		100.00	%			334,024		100.00	%			329,714		100.00	%
Less:
Loans in process			2,487						2,798						3,242						5,107						4,383
Deferred fees and discounts			408						469						496						499						431
Allowance for losses			6,348						5,900						5,331						5,343						3,737
Total loans receivable, net		$	255,360					$	281,620					$	305,630					$	323,075					$	321,163

 

7

---

 

The following table shows the composition of our loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, by fixed and adjustable rate at the dates indicated. The one- to four-family fixed rate loans include $52,000 and $197,000 of loans at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which carry a fixed rate of interest for the initial five or seven years and then convert to a one-year adjustable rate of interest for the remaining term of the loan.

 

		December 31,
		2013						2012						2011						2010							2009
		Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent			Amount			Percent				Amount			Percent
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Fixed Rate Loans:
Real estate:
One- to four-family		$	44,283		16.74	%		$	42,018		14.45	%		$	45,463		14.45	%		$	51,621			15.46	%		$	45,059		13.67	%
Multi-family			2,494		0.94				2,658		0.91				2,521		0.80				2,179			0.65				2,443		0.74
Commercial			10,313		3.90				12,421		4.27				15,995		5.08				14,825			4.44				21,611		6.55
Construction			2,066		0.78				3,505		1.21				3,272		1.04				4,625			1.38				2,660		0.81
Land and land development			2,366		0.89				7,098		2.44				6,639		2.11				5,108			1.53				4,698		1.42
Total real estate loans			61,522		23.25				67,700		23.28				73,890		23.48				78,358			23.46				76,471		23.19
Consumer			1,160		0.44				1,131		0.39				1,161		0.37				1,208			0.36				1,452		0.44
Commercial business			9,041		3.42				12,063		4.15				7,986		2.54				8,182			2.45				7,293		2.21
Total fixed rate loans			71,723		27.11				80,894		27.82				83,037		26.39				87,748			26.27				85,216		25.84
Adjustable Rate Loans:
Real estate:
One- to four-family			54,435		20.57				58,560		20.14				66,524		21.14				73,500			22.00				78,443		23.79
Multi-family			47,372		17.90				60,165		20.69				58,091		18.46				51,278			15.35				50,347		15.27
Commercial			61,717		23.32				70,010		24.07				74,884		23.80				75,570			22.63				68,960		20.91
Construction			7,806		2.95				1,680		0.58				7,032		2.23				9,886			2.96				14,532		4.41
Land and land development			3,080		1.16				1,830		0.63				1,421		0.45				10,849			3.25				8,304		2.52
Total real estate loans			174,410		65.91				192,245		66.11				207,952		66.08				221,083			66.19				220,586		66.90
Consumer			16,050		6.07				16,421		5.65				17,330		5.51				17,043			5.10				14,568		4.42
Commercial business			2,420		0.92				1,227		0.42				6,380		2.03				8,150			2.44				9,345		2.84
Total adjustable rate loans			192,880		72.89				209,893		72.18				231,662		73.61				246,276			73.73				244,499		74.16
Total loans			264,603		100.00	%			290,787		100.00	%			314,699		100.00	%			334,024			100.00	%			329,714		100.00	%
Less:
Loans in process			2,487						2,798						3,242						5,107							4,383
Deferred fees and discounts			408						469						496						499							431
Allowance for losses			6,348						5,900						5,331						5,343							3,737
Total loans receivable, net		$	255,360					$	281,620					$	305,630					$	323,075						$	321,163

 

The following schedule illustrates the maturities of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2013. Loans which have adjustable or renegotiable interest rates are shown as maturing in the period during which the contract is due. The schedule does not reflect the effects of possible prepayments or enforcement of due-on-sale clauses. 

 

		Real Estate
		Mortgage(1)								Construction, Land and Land Development								Consumer								Commercial Business								Total
Due During Years Ending December 31,		Amount				Weighted Average Rate				Amount				Weighted Average Rate				Amount				Weighted Average Rate				Amount				Weighted Average Rate				Amount				Weighted Average Rate
(Dollars in Thousands)
2014		$	6,338				4.49	%		$	1.248				5.19	%		$	2,625				4.36	%		$	2,049				5.10	%		$	12,260				4.64	%
2015 to 2018			12,297				5.20				2,883				4.44				14,464				4.34				7,611				5.16				37,256				4.80
2019 and following			201,979				4.42				11,187				3.50				121				5.40				1,802				4.70				215,088				4.37
Total		$	220,614				4.47	%		$	15,318				3.81	%		$	17,210				4.35	%		$	11,461				5.08	%		$	264,603				4.45	%

---

(1) Includes one- to four-family, multi-family and commercial real estate loans.

 

8

---

 

The total amount of loans due to mature after December 31, 2014 which have fixed interest rates is $64.9 million, and which have adjustable or renegotiable interest rates is $187.5 million.

 

 

One- to Four-Family Residential Real Estate Lending

 

Our lending program focuses on the origination of permanent loans secured by mortgages on owner-occupied one- to four-family residences. We also originate loans secured by non-owner-occupied one- to four-family residences. Substantially all of these loans are secured by properties located in our primary market area. We originate a variety of residential loans, including conventional 15- and 30-year fixed rate loans, fixed rate loans convertible to adjustable rate loans, adjustable rate loans and balloon loans.

 

Our one- to four-family residential adjustable rate loans are fully amortizing loans with contractual maturities of up to 30 years. The interest rates on the majority of the adjustable rate loans originated by us are subject to adjustment at one-, three- or five-year intervals. Our adjustable rate mortgage products generally carry interest rates which are reset to a stated margin over the weekly average of the one-, three- or five-year U.S. Treasury rates. Increases or decreases in the interest rate of our one-year adjustable rate loans are generally limited to 2% annually with a lifetime interest rate cap of 6% over the initial rate. Increases or decreases in the interest rate of three-year and five-year adjustable rate loans are limited to a 3% periodic adjustment cap with a 5% lifetime interest rate cap over the initial rate. Our one-year adjustable rate loans may be convertible into fixed rate loans after the first year and before the sixth year upon payment of a fee, do not contain prepayment penalties and do not produce negative amortization. Initial interest rates offered on our adjustable rate loans may be below the fully indexed rate. Borrowers are generally qualified at 2% over the initial interest rate for our one-year adjustable rate loans and at the initial interest rate for our three-year and five-year adjustable rate loans. We generally retain adjustable rate loans in our portfolio pursuant to our asset/liability management strategy. Five-year adjustable rate mortgage loans represented $18.9 million, three-year adjustable rate mortgage loans represented $31.4 million and one-year and two-year adjustable rate mortgage loans represented $4.1 million of our adjustable rate mortgage loans at December 31, 2013.

 

Overall, at December 31, 2013, 72.9% of our loans were adjustable rate loans. As part of our interest rate risk strategy we typically sell qualifying fixed rate residential mortgages on the secondary market and hold adjustable rate mortgages in our portfolio. Proceeds from the sale of these fixed rate loans can be used to fund other mortgages which can also be sold. Adjustable rate mortgage loans currently in our portfolio can be expected to reprice to higher rates when interest rates begin to rise, which could be expected to have a positive impact on our interest income. Most loans added to our portfolio in the last few years have interest rate floors.

 

We offer fixed rate mortgage loans to owner-occupants with maturities up to 30 years and which conform to Freddie Mac standards. We currently sell in the secondary market the majority of our long-term, conforming, fixed rate loans. Loans designated as held for sale are carried on the balance sheet at the lower of cost or market value. At December 31, 2013, we had $657,000 of loans held for sale. Interest rates charged on these fixed rate loans are priced on a daily basis in accordance with Freddie Mac pricing standards. These loans do not include prepayment penalties.

 

We also offer 30-year fixed rate mortgage loans, which, after five or seven years, convert to our standard one-year adjustable rate mortgage for the remainder of the term. Of these, $52,000 have more than three years to their adjustments and are included in fixed rate loans and $3.9 million have less than three years to their adjustment date and are included in adjustable rate loans.

 

We had $48.2 million in primarily non-owner-occupied one- to four-family residential loans at December 31, 2013. These loans are underwritten using the same criteria as owner-occupied one- to four-family residential loans, but are provided at higher rates than owner-occupied-loans. We offer fixed rate, adjustable rate and convertible rate loans, with terms of up to 30 years.

 

We originate residential mortgage loans with loan-to-value ratios of up to 95% for owner-occupied residential loans and up to 80% for non-owner-occupied residential loans. We typically require private mortgage insurance in an amount intended to reduce our exposure to 80% or less of the lesser of the purchase price or appraised value of the underlying collateral. We occasionally originate FHA loans in excess of 95% loan-to-value, all of which are sold, with the servicing rights released, to a third party.

 

 

9

---

 

In underwriting one- to four-family residential real estate loans, we evaluate both the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments and the value of the property securing the loan. Properties securing owner-occupied one- to four-family residential real estate loans that we make are appraised by independent fee appraisers. We require borrowers to obtain title insurance and fire insurance, extended coverage casualty insurance and flood insurance, if appropriate. Real estate loans that we originate contain a “due on sale” clause allowing us to declare the unpaid principal balance due and payable upon the sale of the security property.

 

 

Multi-Family and Commercial Real Estate Lending

 

We originate permanent loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate. Our permanent multi-family and commercial real estate loan portfolio includes loans secured by apartment buildings, office buildings, churches, warehouses, retail stores, restaurants, shopping centers, small business facilities and farm properties, most of which are located within our primary market area.

 

Permanent multi-family and commercial real estate loans are originated as three-year and five-year adjustable rate loans with up to a 25-year amortization. To a substantially lesser extent, such loans are originated as fixed rate or balloon loans or at a floating rate based on national prime rate, at terms up to 15 years. The adjustable rate loans are tied to an index based on the weekly average of the three-year or five-year U.S. Treasury rate, respectively, plus a stated margin over the index. Multi-family loans and commercial real estate loans have been written in amounts of up to 85% of the lesser of the appraised value of the property or the purchase price, and borrowers are generally personally liable for all or part of the indebtedness.

 

Appraisals on properties securing multi-family and commercial real estate loans originated in excess of $250,000 are performed by independent appraisers designated by us at the time the loan is made and reviewed by management. Appraisals or evaluations are typically performed on properties securing multi-family and commercial real estate loans originated between $50,000 and $250,000. In addition, our underwriting procedures generally require verification of the borrower’s credit history, income and financial statements, banking relationships and income projections for the property.

 

Multi-family and commercial real estate loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by one- to four-family residences. This greater risk is due to several factors, including the concentration of principal in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the effects of general economic conditions on income-producing properties and the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by multi-family and commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related real estate project. If the cash flow from the project is reduced (for example, if leases are not obtained or renewed, or a bankruptcy court modifies a lease term, or a major tenant is unable to fulfill its lease obligations), the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.

 

 

Construction, Land and Land Development Lending

 

We make construction loans to individuals for the construction of their residences as well as to builders and developers for the construction of one- to four-family residences, multi-family dwellings and commercial real estate projects. At December 31, 2013, substantially all of these loans were secured by property located within our primary market area.

 

Construction loans to individuals for their residences typically run six to eight months and are generally structured to be converted to permanent loans at the end of the construction phase. These construction loans are typically fixed rate loans, with interest rates higher than those we offer on permanent one- to four-family residential loans. During the construction phase, the borrower pays interest only. Residential construction loans are underwritten pursuant to the same guidelines used for originating permanent residential loans. At December 31, 2013, we had $1.7 million of construction loans to borrowers intending to live in the properties upon completion of construction.

 

Construction loans to builders of one- to four-family residences generally have terms of six to eight months and require the payment of interest only at a fixed rate for the loan term. We generally limit builders to one home construction loan at a time, but would consider requests for more than one if the homes are presold. At December 31, 2013, we had $304,000 of this type of construction loans to builders of one- to four-family residences.

 

We make construction loans to builders of multi-family dwellings and commercial projects with terms up to one year and require payment of interest only at a fixed rate for the construction phase of the loan. These loans may be structured to be converted to one of our permanent commercial loan products at the end of the construction phase or may be for the construction phase only. At December 31, 2013, we had $3.5 million of loans to builders of multi-family dwellings and commercial projects structured to run for the construction phase only.

 

 

10

---

 

We also make loans to builders for the purpose of developing one- to four-family lots and residential condominium projects. These loans typically have terms of two to three years with interest rates tied to national prime. The maximum loan-to-value ratio is 75%. The principal in these loans is typically paid down as lots or units are sold. These loans may be structured as closed-end revolving lines of credit with maturities of generally two years or less. At December 31, 2013, we had $2.5 million of development loans to builders. We also make land acquisition loans. At December 31, 2013, we had $7.4 million in loans secured by raw land.

 

Construction, land and development loans are obtained principally through continued business from developers and builders who have previously borrowed from us, as well as referrals from existing customers and realtors, and walk-in customers. The application process includes a submission to us of accurate plans, specifications and costs of the project to be constructed/developed which are used as a basis to determine the appraised value of the subject property. Loans are based on the lesser of current appraised value or the cost of construction, which is the land plus the building. At December 31, 2013, our largest construction and development loan was a raw land loan for $4.3 million.

 

Construction and land development loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by one- to four-family residences. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating land development and construction costs and the market for the project upon completion, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project, the related loan-to-value ratios and the likelihood of ultimate success of the project. Construction and land development loans to borrowers other than owner-occupants also involve many of the same risks discussed above regarding multi-family and commercial real estate loans and tend to be more sensitive to general economic conditions than many other types of loans. We had $121,000 non-performing land loans at December 31, 2013 and no non-performing construction and development loans.

 

 

Consumer Lending

 

We originate a variety of different types of consumer loans, including home equity loans, direct automobile loans, home improvement loans, deposit account loans and other secured and unsecured loans for household and personal purposes. Consumer loan terms vary according to the type and value of collateral, length of contract and creditworthiness of the borrower. The largest component of consumer lending is home equity loans, which totaled $16.0 million or 6.07% of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2013. We are currently offering a revolving line of credit home equity loan on which the total commitment amount, when combined with the balance of the first mortgage lien and other priority liens, may not exceed 90% of the appraised value of the property, with a ten-year term and minimum monthly payment requirement of interest only. At December 31, 2013, we had $14.6 million of unused credit available under our home equity line of credit program.

 

Our underwriting standards for consumer loans include a determination of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and the applicant’s ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration, our underwriting process also includes a comparison of the value of the security, if any, in relation to the proposed loan amount. Consumer loans may entail greater credit risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans which are unsecured or are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In such cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the outstanding loan balance as a result of the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

 

 

Commercial Business Lending

 

Our current commercial business lending activities encompass predominantly secured and unsecured lines of credit and loans secured by small business equipment and vehicles. At December 31, 2013, we had $283,000 of unsecured loans and lines of credit outstanding (with $2.2 million of unused credit available) and $11.2 million of loans and lines of credit (with $7.6 million of unused credit available) secured by inventory or accounts receivable, small business equipment and vehicles. We also had $144,000 of unused credit available on letters of credit.

 

 

11

---

 

Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment and other income and which are secured by real property the value of which tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial business loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself, which is likely to be dependent upon the general economic environment. Our commercial business loans are sometimes, but not always, secured by business assets. However, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.

 

We recognize the increased risks associated with commercial business lending. Our commercial business lending policy emphasizes credit file documentation and analysis of the borrower’s character, capacity to repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower’s capital and collateral as well as an evaluation of the industry conditions affecting the borrower. Analysis of the borrower’s past, present and future cash flows is also an important aspect of our credit analysis.

 

 

Loan Originations, Purchases and Sales

 

Real estate loans are originated by our staff of salaried loan officers and our residential mortgage loan originators who receive applications from existing customers, walk-in customers, referrals from realtors and other outreach programs. While we originate both adjustable rate and fixed rate loans, our ability to originate loans is dependent upon the relative customer demand for loans in our market. Demand is affected by the interest rate environment. Currently, the majority of conforming fixed rate residential mortgage loans with maturities of 15 years and over are originated for sale in the secondary market. Based on our interest-rate risk considerations, we occasionally will keep fixed rate residential mortgage loans in our portfolio to generate income and to be available for substitution in the event a loan committed for sale fails to close as expected. Residential loans originated for sale are sold either to Freddie Mac while we retain the servicing rights, or to BB&T or other secondary market mortgage purchasers with servicing released. These loans are originated to satisfy customer demand and to generate fee income and are sold to achieve the goals of our asset/liability management program.

 

When loans are sold to Freddie Mac or the Federal Home Loan Bank, we retain the responsibility for collecting and remitting loan payments, inspecting the properties, making certain that insurance and real estate tax payments are made on behalf of borrowers, and otherwise servicing the loans. We receive a servicing fee for performing these services. We serviced mortgage loans for others totaling $131.1 million at December 31, 2013.

 

In periods of rising interest rates, our ability to originate large dollar volumes of real estate loans may be substantially reduced or restricted, with a resultant decrease in related operating earnings. In addition, our ability to sell loans may substantially decrease as potential buyers reduce their purchasing activities.

 

We occasionally purchase a limited amount of participation interests in real estate loans from other financial institutions outside our primary market area. We review and underwrite all loans to be purchased to insure that they meet our underwriting standards.

 

 

12

---

 

The following table shows our loan and mortgage-backed security origination, purchase, sale and repayment activities for the periods indicated. One- to four-family fixed rate loans for 2013 include no loans originated which carry a fixed rate of interest for the initial five or seven years and then convert to a one-year adjustable rate of interest for the remaining term of the loan.

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2013				2012				2011
Originations by Type:		(Dollars in Thousands)
Adjustable rate:
Real estate
One- to four-family		$	2,849			$	1,929			$	2,694
Multi-family			881				3,512				12,923
Commercial			6,765				4,083				4,687
Construction, land and land development			2,411				6,151				1,225
Non-real estate
Consumer			4,653				4,407				4,876
Commercial business			1,049				175				1,883
Total adjustable rate			18,599				20,257				28,288
Fixed rate:
Real estate
One- to four-family			51,843				100,167				58,291
Multi-family			27				184				244
Commercial			1,339				3,743				3,084
Construction, land and land development			2,408				2,364				2,229
Non-real estate
Consumer			651				588				587
Commercial business			4,882				8,034				1,710
Total fixed rate			61,151				115,081				66,145
Total loans originated			79,750				135,338				94,433
Purchases:
Mortgage-backed securities			11,295				4,377				1,349
Total purchases			11,295				4,377				1,349
Sales and Repayments:
Real estate loans sold
One- to four-family			45,272				84,144				52,700
Total loans sold			45,272				84,144				52,700
Principal repayments			61,403				75,205				59,173
Total loans sold and repayments			106,674				159,348				111,873
Mortgage-backed securities:
Principal repayments			1,524				900				308
Increase in other items, net			-				-				-
Net decrease		$	(17,153	)		$	(20,533	)		$	(16,399	)

 

 

Asset Quality

 

Loan payments are generally due the first day of each month. When a borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan, we attempt to cause the delinquency to be cured by contacting the borrower. In the case of residential loans, a late notice is sent for accounts 15 or more days delinquent. For delinquencies not cured by the 15th day, borrowers will be assessed a late charge. Additional written and oral contacts may be made with the borrower between 20 and 30 days after the due date. If the full scheduled payment on the loan is not received prior to the first day of the succeeding month, the loan is considered 30 days past due and more formal collection procedures may be instituted. If the delinquency continues for a period of 60 days, we usually send a default letter to the borrower and, after 90 days, institute appropriate action up to and including foreclosing on the property. If foreclosed, the property is sold at public auction and we may purchase it. Delinquent consumer loans are handled in a similar manner. Our procedures for repossession and sale of consumer collateral are subject to various requirements under Indiana consumer protection laws.

 

 

13

---

 

Delinquent Loans . The following table sets forth information concerning delinquent loans at December 31, 2013, in dollar amounts and as a percentage of each category of our loan portfolio. The amounts represent the total remaining principal balances of the related loans, rather than the actual payment amounts which are overdue.

 

		Loans Delinquent For
		60-89 Days												90 Days and Over												Total Delinquent Loans
		Number				Amount				Percent of Loan Category				Number				Amount				Percent of Loan Category				Number				Amount				Percent of Loan Category
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Real Estate:
One- to four-family			3			$	183				0.19	%			17			$	1,152				1.18	%			20			$	1,335				1.36	%
Multi-family			1				65				0.13				---				---				0.00				1				65				0.13
Commercial			---				---				0.00				1				111				0.15				1				111				0.15
Construction, land and land development			---				---				0.00				1				121				0.82				1				121				0.82
Non-Real Estate:
Consumer			---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---
Commercial business			1				140				1.22				---				---				---				1				140				1.22
Total			5			$	388				0.15	%			19			$	1,384				0.52	%			24			$	1,772				0.67	%

 

 

14

---

 

Non-Performing Assets . The table below sets forth the amounts and categories of non-performing assets. Interest income on loans is accrued over the term of the loans based upon the principal outstanding except where serious doubt exists as to the collectability of a loan, in which case the accrual of interest is discontinued. The amounts shown do not reflect reserves set up against such assets. See “ - Allowance for Loan Losses” below.

 

		December 31,
		2013				2012				2011				2010				2009
		(Dollars in Thousands )
Non-accruing loans more than 90 days:
One- to four- family		$	1,152			$	2,231			$	2,632			$	3,760			$	7,137
Multi-family			1				---				801				2,289				22
Commercial real estate			110				487				1,974				5,011				4,218
Construction, land and land development			121				140				1,173				1,022				1,120
Consumer			---				---				36				134				3
Commercial business			---				49				148				251				104
Total			1,384				2,907				6,764				12,467				12,604
Accruing loans delinquent more than 90 days:
One- to-four-family			---				---				---				---				---
Multi-family			---				---				---				48				---
Commercial real estate			---				---				---				628				---
Total			---				---				---				676				---
Non-accruing loans less than 90 days:
One- to four-family			1,107				1,405				1,617				2,633				---
Multi-family			65				76				501				559				---
Commercial real estate			16				815				1,677				213				---
Construction, land and land development			---				1,238				924				1,468				---
Consumer			---				2				8				---				---
Commercial business			---				---				568				30				---
Total			1,188				3,536				5,295				4,903				---
Foreclosed assets:
One- to four-family			---				---				1,251				1,071				1,686
Multi-family			---				---				---				---				---
Commercial real estate			---				256				495				143				206
Construction, land and land development			18				---				---				---				---
Consumer			---				---				---				---				---
Total			18				256				1,746				1,214				1,892
Total non-performing assets:		$	2,590			$	6,699			$	13,805			$	19,260			$	14,496
Total as a percentage of total assets			0.70	%			1.84	%			3.79	%			5.18	%			3.91	%
Total assets		$	367,581			$	364,610			$	364,290			$	371,847			$	371,050

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013, gross interest income which would have been recorded had the non-accruing loans been current in accordance with their original terms was $172,000, none of which was included in interest income.

 

 

15

---

 

 

Other Loans of Concern. In addition to the non-performing assets set forth in the table above under the caption “Non-Performing Assets,” as of December 31, 2013, there was also an aggregate of $24.3 million in net book value of loans with respect to which past payment history or a decrease in the debt service coverage of the borrowers may cause management to have doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and which may result in the future inclusion of such items in the non-performing asset categories. Included in the other loans of concern are: (i) 83 loans secured by one- to four-family and multi-family rental properties with a total outstanding balance of $10.0 million, where management has concerns about the ability of the borrowers to keep the rental properties leased and concerns about the cash flow of the borrowers ($4.8 million of these loans were upgraded into this category because of positive performance trends); and (ii) 25 loans secured by non-residential properties to separate borrowers with an outstanding balance of $12.4 million, where management has concerns about the cash flow of the borrowers.

 

Classified Assets . Federal regulations provide for the classification of loans and other assets, such as debt and equity securities considered by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) to be of lesser quality, as “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss.” An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard,” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are required to be designated “special mention” by management.

 

When an insured institution classifies problem assets as either substandard or doubtful, it may establish general allowances for loan losses in an amount deemed prudent by management. General allowances represent loss allowances which have been established to recognize the inherent risk associated with lending activities, but which, unlike specific allowances, have not been allocated to particular problem assets. When an insured institution classifies problem assets as “loss,” it is required either to establish a specific allowance for losses equal to 100% of that portion of the asset so classified or, as is done here, to charge off such amount. An institution’s determination as to the classification of its assets and the amount of its valuation allowances is subject to review by the OCC and the FDIC, which may order the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances.

 

In connection with the filing of our periodic reports with the OCC and in accordance with our classification of assets policy, we regularly review the problem assets in our portfolio to determine whether any assets require classification in accordance with applicable regulations. At December 31, 2013, we had classified $15.2 million of our loans as substandard and none as doubtful or loss. At December 31, 2013, we had designated $3.8 million in loans as special mention.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses . We establish our provision for loan losses based on a systematic analysis of risk factors in the loan portfolio. The analysis includes consideration of concentrations of credit, past loss experience, current economic conditions, the amount and composition of the loan portfolio, estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, delinquencies, and other factors. We also consider the loss experience of similar portfolios in comparable lending markets as well as using the services of a consultant to assist in the evaluation of our growing commercial loan portfolio. On at least a quarterly basis, a formal analysis of the adequacy of the allowance is prepared and reviewed by management and the Board of Directors. This analysis serves as a point-in-time assessment of the level of the allowance and serves as a basis for provisions for loan losses.

 

Our analysis of the loan portfolio begins by assigning each new loan a risk rating at the time the loan is originated, corresponding to one of ten risk categories. If the loan is a commercial credit, the borrower will also be assigned a rating. Adjustments are made to these ratings on a quarterly basis, based on the performance of the individual loan. Loans no longer performing as agreed are assigned a lower risk rating, eventually resulting in their being regarded as classified loans. A collateral re-evaluation form is completed on all classified loans, identifying expected losses, generally based on an analysis of the collateral securing those loans. A portion of the loan loss reserve is allocated to the classified loans in the amount identified as at risk.

 

Portions of the allowance are also allocated to non-classified loan portfolios which have been segregated into categories of loans having similar characteristics and similar inherent risk. These categories include loans on: one- to four-family owner-occupied properties, one- to four-family non-owner-occupied properties, multi-family rental properties, non-residential properties, land and land development projects, construction projects, home equity loans and consumer loans, unsecured and secured commercial business loans. Factors considered in determining the percentage allocation for each category include: historical loss experience, underwriting standards, trends in property values, trends in delinquent and non-performing loans, trends in charge-offs and recoveries, trends in volume and terms of loans, experience and depth of the

 

 

16

---

 

lending department, concentrations of credit, and economic, industry and regulatory trends affecting our market. Although we believe we use the best information available to make such determinations, future adjustments to reserves may be necessary, and net income could be significantly affected, if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. These agencies may require the recognition of additions to the allowance based upon their judgments of information available at the time of their examination. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 – Provision for Loan Losses” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The following table sets forth an analysis of our allowance for loan losses.

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2013				2012				2011				2010				2009
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period		$	5,900			$	5,331			$	5,343			$	3,737			$	3,697
Charge-offs:
One- to four-family			400				144				1,692				696				1,573
Multi-family			---				259				730				---				97
Commercial real estate			40				795				1,721				211				336
Construction, land and land development			10				16				278				402				45
Consumer			35				11				79				5				91
Commercial business			32				485				940				68				1,043
Total charge-offs			517				1,710				5,440				1,382				3,185
Recoveries:
One- to four-family			126				22				36				153				---
Multi-family			1				1				---				---				---
Commercial real estate			21				28				---				37				---
Construction, land and land development			42				96				30				35				25
Consumer			---				2				1				3				2
Commercial business			125				30				---				---				1
Total recoveries			315				179				67				229				28
Net charge-offs			202				1,532				5,373				1,153				3,157
Additions charged to operations			650				2,100				5,361				2,759				3,197
Balance at end of period		$	6,348			$	5,900			$	5,331			$	5,343			$	3,737
Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding			0.69	%			0.53	%			1.71	%			0.35	%			0.98%	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing assets			245.13	%			88.06	%			38.62	%			27.67	%			25.78	%
Allowance for loan losses to net loans at end of period			2.43	%			2.06	%			1.73	%			1.64	%			1.16	%

 

17

---

 

The allocation of our allowance for losses on loans, including loans held for sale, at the dates indicated is summarized as follows:

 

		December 31,
		2013						2012						2011						2010						2009
		Amount of Loan Loss Allowance			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans			Amount of Loan Loss Allowance			Percent of Loans in Each Category to Total Loans
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Real Estate:
One- to four-family		$	1,798		37.31	%		$	1,611		34.59	%		$	1,766		35.59	%		$	1,015		37.46	%		$	1,705		37.46	%
Multi-family			1,023		18.85				1,055		21.60				646		19.26				1,138		16.00				321		16.01
Commercial real estate			2,436		27.22				2,177		28.35				1,788		28.88				2,061		27.06				801		27.47
Land and land development			146		3.73				154		1.78				264		3.27				480		4.35				283		5.21
Construction			38		2.06				---		3.07				64		2.56				---		4.78				102		3.94
Consumer			258		6.50				208		6.04				136		5.88				84		5.46				110		4.86
Commercial business			649		4.33				633		4.57				667		4.56				565		4.89				384		5.05
Unallocated			---		---				---		---				---		---				---		---				31		---
Total		$	6,348		100.00	%		$	5,900		100.00	%		$	5,331		100.00	%		$	5,343		100.00	%		$	3,737		100.00	%

 

Investment Activities

 

We must maintain minimum levels of securities that qualify as liquid assets under the OCC regulations. Liquidity may increase or decrease depending upon the availability of funds and comparative yields on investments in relation to the return on loans. Historically, we have maintained liquid assets at levels we believe adequate to meet the requirements of normal operations, including potential deposit outflows. Cash flow projections are regularly reviewed and updated to assure that adequate liquidity is maintained. At December 31, 2013 our liquidity ratio – liquid assets as a percentage of net withdrawable savings deposits and current borrowings – was 26.03%. Our level of liquidity is a result of management’s asset/liability strategy. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Federally chartered savings institutions have the authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including United States Treasury obligations, securities of various federal agencies, certain certificates of deposit of insured banks and savings institutions, certain bankers’ acceptances, repurchase agreements and federal funds. Subject to various restrictions, federally chartered savings institutions may also invest their assets in investment grade commercial paper and corporate debt securities and mutual funds whose assets conform to the investments that a federally chartered savings institution is otherwise authorized to make directly.

 

Generally, we invest funds among various categories of investments and maturities based upon our asset/liability management policies, concern for the highest investment quality, liquidity needs and performance objectives. It is our general policy to purchase securities which are U.S. Government securities, investment grade municipal and corporate bonds, commercial paper, federal agency obligations and interest-bearing deposits with the Federal Home Loan Bank.

 

 

18

---

 

The following table sets forth the composition of our securities portfolio at the dates indicated. As of December 31, 2013, our investment portfolio did not contain securities of any issuer with an aggregate book value in excess of 10% of our shareholders’ equity, excluding those issued by the U.S. Government and its agencies.

 

		December 31,
		2013								2012								2011
		Carrying Value				% of Total				Carrying Value				% of Total				Carrying Value				% of Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Debt securities:
Federal agency obligations		$	28,604				58.03	%		$	10,709				44.64	%		$	3,177				23.87	%
Corporate bonds			1,063				2.16				---				---				---				---
Municipal bonds			16,439				33.35				10,097				42.09				6,949				52.20
Subtotal			46,105				93.54	%			20,806				86.72	%			10,126				76.07	%
Other:
Federal Home Loan Bank stock			3,185				6.46				3,185				13.28				3,185				23.93
Total debt securities and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		$	49,590				100.00	%		$	23,991				100.00	%		$	13,311				100.00	%
Average remaining life of debt securities		4.19 years								4.82 years								4.07 years
Other interest-earning assets:
Interest-bearing deposits with Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve		$	19,935				100.00	%		$	5,778				100.00	%		$	3,156				100.00	%
Mortgage-backed securities:
Fannie Mae certificates		$	7,537				45.41	%		$	4,203				58.40	%		$	2,813				75.64	%
Freddie Mac certificates			9,062				54.59				2,995				41.60				906				24.36
Total mortgage-backed securities		$	16,599				100.00	%		$	7,198				100.00	%		$	3,719				100.00	%

 

 

The following table sets forth the composition and contractual maturities of our securities portfolio at December 31, 2013. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. At December 31, 2013, all of our securities were classified as available for sale and as such were reported at fair value. The weighted average yields on tax exempt obligations have been computed on a tax equivalent basis.

 

		December 31, 2013
		Less than 1 year				1 to 5 Years				5 to 10 Years				Over 10 Years				Total Investment Securities
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Federal agency obligations		$	---			$	21,006			$	7,598			$	---			$	28,604
Municipal bonds			1,393				10,674				4,371				---				16,439
Corporate bonds			---				1,063				---				---				1,063
Fannie Mae certificates			---				---				7,537				---				7,537
Freddie Mac certificates			---				---				9,062				---				9,062
Total investment securities		$	1,393			$	32,743			$	28,568			$	---			$	62,705
Weighted average yield			1.80	%			2.12	%			1.74	%			---	%			1.94	%

 

 

Sources of Funds

 

General . Our primary sources of funds are deposits, repayment and prepayment of loans, interest earned on or maturation of investment securities and short-term investments, borrowings and funds provided from operations.

 

 

19

---

 

Deposits. We offer a variety of deposit accounts. Our deposits consist of statement savings accounts, money market accounts, NOW accounts and certificate accounts. In addition, we periodically solicit broker originated certificates of deposit when issues are available that meet our interest rate and liquidity needs. Brokered deposits at December 31, 2013 totaled $13.7 million. We rely primarily on competitive pricing policies, on-line and off-line advertising, and customer service to attract and retain these deposits.

 

The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market and prevailing interest rates and competition. The variety of deposit accounts we offer has allowed us to be competitive in obtaining funds and to respond with flexibility to changes in consumer demand. We manage the pricing of our deposits in keeping with our asset/liability management, profitability and growth objectives. Based on our experience, we believe that our savings, interest- and non-interest-bearing checking accounts are relatively stable sources of deposits. However, our ability to attract and maintain certificates of deposit, and the rates paid on these deposits, has been and will continue to be significantly affected by market conditions.

 

The following table sets forth our savings flows during the periods indicated.

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2013				2012				2011
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Opening balance		$	308,637			$	308,433			$	311,458
Deposits			1,857,811				1,988,647				1,627,125
Withdrawals			(1,853,667	)			(1,990,916	)			(1,633,415	)
Interest credited			1,839				2,473				3,265
Ending balance		$	314,620			$	308,637			$	308,433
Net increase (decrease)		$	5,983			$	204			$	(3,025	)
Percent increase (decrease)			1.94	%			0.07	%			(0.97	%)

 

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of savings deposits in the various types of deposit programs offered by us at the dates indicated.

		At December 31,
		2013								2012								2011
		Amount				Percent of Total				Amount				Percent of Total				Amount				Percent of Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Transaction and Savings Deposits :
Non-interest-bearing		$	33,488				10.64	%		$	30,879				10.00	%		$	26,668				8.65	%
Savings accounts (0.05% - 0.10% at December 31, 2013)			30,866				9.81				28,966				9.39				26,331				8.53
NOW Accounts (0.00% - 0.15% at December 31, 2013)			57,221				18.19				42,386				13.73				37,620				12.20
Money Market Accounts (0.05% - 0.30% at December 31, 2013)			63,531				20.19				65,473				21.21				64,660				20.96
Total Non-Certificates			185,106				58.83				167,704				54.33				155,279				50.34
Certificates:
0.00 - 1.99%			94,948				30.18				94,506				30.62				85,785				27.81
2.00 - 3.99%			33,367				10.60				42,802				13.87				61,894				20.07
4.00 - 5.99%			1,199				0.38				3,620				1.17				5,469				1.77
6.00 - 7.99%			---				0.00				5				0.00				6				0.00
Total certificates			129,514				41.16				140,933				49.66				153,154				49.65
Accrued interest			23				0.01				25				0.01				31				0.01
Total deposits with interest		$	314,643				100.00	%		$	308,662				100.00	%		$	308,464				100.00	%

 

 

20

---

 

The following table shows rate and maturity information for our certificates of deposit as of December 31, 2013.

 

		0.00- 1.99%				2.00- 3.99%				4.00- 5.99%				6.00- 7.99%				Total				Percent of Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Certificate accounts maturing in quarter ending:
March 31, 2014		$	28,755			$	2,704			$	1,199			$	---			$	32,658				25.22	%
June 30, 2014			21,945				1,323				---				---				23,268				17.96
September 30, 2014			8,909				4,245				---				---				13,154				10.16
December 31, 2014			6,128				2,508				---				---				8,636				6.67
March 31, 2015			2,500				3,691				---				---				6,191				4.78
June 30, 2015			2,058				6,810				---				---				8,868				6.85
September 30, 2015			2,534				6,231				---				---				8,765				6.77
December 31, 2015			2,678				4,328				---				---				7,006				5.41
March 31, 2016			2,303				3				---				---				2,306				1.78
June 30, 2016			1,200				---				---				---				1,200				0.92
September 30, 2016			2,662				149				---				---				2,811				2.17
December 31, 2016			2,555				376				---				---				2,931				2.26
Thereafter			10,721				999				---				---				11,720				9.05
Total		$	94,948			$	33,367			$	1,199			$	---			$	129,514				100.00	%
Percent of total			73.31	%			25.76	%			0.93	%			---	%			100.00	%			100.00	%

 

 

The following table indicates the amount of our certificates of deposit by time remaining until maturity as of December 31, 2013.

 

		Maturity
		3 Months or Less				Over 3 to 6 Months				Over 6 to 12 Months				Over 12 months				Total
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000, excluding public funds		$	10,481			$	8,871			$	13,209			$	27,176			$	59,737
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more, excluding public funds			21,037				14,340				8,580				24,472				68,429
Public funds			1,141				57				---				150				1,348
Total certificates of deposit		$	32,658			$	23,268			$	21,790			$	51,798			$	129,514

 

Borrowings. Our other available sources of funds include borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Indianapolis and other borrowings. As a member of the FHLB of Indianapolis, we are required to own capital stock in the FHLB and are authorized to apply for borrowings from the FHLB. Each FHLB credit program has its own interest rate, which may be fixed or variable, and the programs have a range of maturities. The FHLB of Indianapolis may prescribe the acceptable uses for these funds, as well as limitations on the size of the borrowings and repayment provisions. All FHLB advances must be fully secured by sufficient collateral as determined by the FHLB. The Federal Housing Finance Board, an independent agency, controls the FHLB of Indianapolis.

 

The FHLB of Indianapolis is required to provide funds for the resolution of troubled savings associations and to contribute to affordable housing programs through direct loans or interest subsidies on advances targeted for community investment and low- and moderate-income housing projects. For the year ended December 31, 2013, dividends paid by the FHLB of Indianapolis to the Bank totaled approximately $111,000, for an annualized rate of 3.50%.

 

 

21

---

 

Generally, the loan terms from the FHLB of Indianapolis are better than the terms the Bank can receive from other sources making it cheaper to borrow money from the FHLB of Indianapolis. Continued and additional financial difficulties at the FHLB of Indianapolis could reduce or eliminate our additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB of Indianapolis which could force us to borrow money from other sources. Such other monies may not be available when we need them or, more likely, will be available at higher interest rates and on less advantageous terms, which will impact our net income and could impact our ability to grow.

 

We utilize FHLB borrowings as part of our asset/liability management strategy in order to extend the maturity of our liabilities in a cost-effective manner. We may be required to pay a commitment fee upon application and may be subject to a prepayment fee if we prepay the advance. See Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

The following table sets forth the maximum month-end balance and average balance of FHLB advances for the periods indicated.

 

		Year Ended December 31,
		2013				2012				2011
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Maximum Balance - Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		$	15,000			$	18,000			$	21,000
Average Balance - Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		$	10,833			$	17,000			$	19,250

 

The following table sets forth actual balances of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and the weighted average interest rate of those advances at the dates indicated.

 

		December 31,
		2013				2012				2011
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances		$	10,000			$	15,000			$	18,000
Weighted average interest rate of Federal Home Loan Bank Advances			2.35	%			2.18	%			2.18	%

 

 

Subsidiaries and Other Activities

 

Lafayette Savings owns a service corporation, L.S.B. Service Corporation. In April 1994, Lafayette Savings made an initial investment of $51,000 in L.S.B. Service Corporation when it became a 14.16% limited partner in a low-income housing project in Lafayette, Indiana. During 2013, L.S.B. Service Corporation transferred the limited partnership interest for one dollar and recorded a loss of $80,440 for the investment balance remaining on the books. L.S.B. Service Corporation is currently inactive, pending either renewed investment in an appropriate low-income housing project or other course of action determined by management. At December 31, 2013, our total investment in L.S.B. Service Corporation was $415,292.

 

 

Competition

 

We face strong competition, both in originating real estate and other loans and in attracting deposits. Competition in originating real estate loans comes primarily from other savings institutions, commercial banks, credit unions and mortgage bankers making loans secured by real estate located in Tippecanoe County, our primary market area. Other savings institutions, commercial banks, credit unions and finance companies provide vigorous competition in consumer lending.

 

We attract the majority of our deposits through our branch offices, primarily from the communities in which those branch offices are located; therefore, competition for those deposits is principally from other savings institutions, commercial banks and credit unions located in the same communities as well as mutual funds and other financial intermediaries. We compete for these deposits by offering a variety of deposit accounts at competitive rates, convenient business hours and branch locations and Internet banking with interbranch deposit and withdrawal privileges.

 

There are 22 other savings institutions, credit unions and banks in our primary market area. We estimate our share of the savings market in Tippecanoe County to be approximately 15% and our share of the mortgage loan market to be approximately 10%.

 

 

22

---

 

 

Regulation and Supervision

 

General . Lafayette Savings is a federally chartered savings bank, the deposits of which are federally insured and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government. Accordingly, we are subject to broad federal regulation and oversight by the OCC extending to all of our operations. This supervision and regulation are intended primarily for the protection of depositors and the federal deposit insurance fund. Lafayette Savings must pay a semi-annual assessment to the OCC based upon a marginal assessment rate that decreases as the asset size of the savings association increases.

 

Lafayette Savings is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and is subject to certain limited regulation by the Federal Reserve. As the thrift holding company of Lafayette Savings, LSB Financial is also subject to federal regulation and oversight by the Federal Reserve.

 

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) eliminated the regulatory authority of the OTS as of July 21, 2011. The Dodd-Frank Act transferred to the OCC all functions and all rulemaking authority of the OTS relating to federal savings associations. The Dodd-Frank Act also transferred to the Federal Reserve all functions of the OTS relating to savings and loan holding companies and their non-depository institution subsidiaries. Thus, LSB Financial has been supervised by the Federal Reserve from and after July 21, 2011. The Federal Reserve also regulates loans to insiders, transactions with affiliates, and tying arrangements.

 

For ease of reference throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, references to the OCC are intended to include a reference to the OTS, as its predecessor in thrift regulation and supervision, as the context and the time period requires.

 

Insurance of Deposits. Deposits in the Bank are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC up to a maximum amount, which is generally $250,000 per depositor, subject to aggregation rules. The Dodd-Frank Act extended unlimited insurance on non-interest bearing accounts through December 31, 2013. Under this program, traditional non-interest demand deposit (or checking) accounts that allow for an unlimited number of transfers and withdrawals at any time, whether held for a business, individual, or other type of depositor, are covered. Later, Congress added Lawyers’ Trust Accounts (IOLTA) to this unlimited insurance protection through December 31, 2012. Because this program expired on December 31, 2012, there is no longer unlimited insurance coverage for non-interest bearing transaction accounts. Deposits held in non-interest bearing transaction accounts are now aggregated with interest bearing deposits the owner may hold in the same ownership category, and the combined total is insured up to at least $250,000.

 

The Bank is subject to deposit insurance assessments by the FDIC pursuant to its regulations establishing a risk-related deposit insurance assessment system, based upon the institution’s capital levels and risk profile. Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk-weighted categories based on supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels, and certain other factors with less risky institutions paying lower assessments. An institution’s initial assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned. There are also adjustments to a bank’s initial assessment rates based on levels of long-term unsecured debt, secured liabilities in excess of 25% of domestic deposits and, for certain institutions, brokered deposit levels. Pursuant to FDIC rules adopted under the Dodd-Frank Act (described below), initial assessments ranged from 5 to 35 basis points of the institution’s total assets minus tangible equity. The Bank paid assessments at the rate of 14 basis points for each $100 of insured deposits during the year ended December 31, 2013. No institution may pay a dividend if it is in default of the federal deposit insurance assessment.

 

The Bank is also subject to assessment for the Financing Corporation (FICO) to service the interest on its bond obligations. The amount assessed on individual institutions, including the Bank, by FICO is in addition to the amount paid for deposit insurance according to the risk-related assessment rate schedule. These assessments will continue until the FICO bonds are repaid between 2017 and 2019. During 2013, the FICO assessment rate ranged between .62 and .64 basis points for each $100 of the same assessment bases applicable to the FDIC assessment. For the first quarter of 2014, the FICO assessment rate is .62 basis points. The Bank expensed deposit insurance assessments (including the FICO assessments) of $476,000 during the year ended December 31, 2013. Future increases in deposit insurance premiums or changes in risk classification would increase the Bank’s deposit related costs.

 

On December 30, 2009, banks were required to pay the fourth quarter FDIC assessment and to prepay estimated insurance assessments for the years 2010 through 2012. The prepayment did not affect the Bank’s earnings on that date. The Bank paid its quarterly assessment for the fourth quarter of 2009 and prepaid all quarterly assessments for 2010, 2011, and 2012 on December 30, 2009 in the amount of $2.3 million. As of December 31, 2013, no prepaid premiums were carried in the financial statements of the Company.

 

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the FDIC is authorized to set the reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund at no less than 1.35%, and must achieve the 1.35% designated reserve ratio by September 30, 2020. The FDIC must offset the effect of

 

 

23

---

 

the increase in the minimum designated reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35% on insured depository institutions of less than $10 billion, and may declare dividends to depository institutions when the reserve ratio at the end of a calendar quarter is at least 1.5%, although the FDIC has the authority to suspend or limit such permitted dividend declarations. In December 2010, the FDIC adopted a final rule setting the designated reserve ratio for the deposit insurance fund at 2% of estimated insured deposits.

 

On October 19, 2010, the FDIC proposed a comprehensive long-range plan for deposit insurance fund management with the goals of maintaining a positive fund balance, even during periods of large fund losses, and maintaining steady, predictable assessment rates throughout economic and credit cycles. The FDIC determined not to increase assessments in 2011 by 3 basis points, as previously proposed, but to keep the current rate schedule in effect. In addition, the FDIC proposed adopting a lower assessment rate schedule when the designated reserve ratio reaches 1.15% so that the average rate over time should be about 8.5 basis points. In lieu of dividends, the FDIC proposed adopting lower rate schedules when the reserve ratio reaches 2% and 2.5%, so that the average rates will decline about 25 percent and 50 percent, respectively.

 

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the assessment base for deposit insurance premiums was changed from adjusted domestic deposits to average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity, affecting assessments for the last two quarters of 2011, as well as future assessments. Tangible equity for this purpose means Tier 1 capital. Since this is a larger base than adjusted domestic deposits, assessment rates are expected to be lower for the Bank as a result of these changes, which were first reflected in invoices due September 30, 2011. The FDIC rule to implement the revised assessment requirements includes rate schedules scaled to the increase in the assessment base, including schedules that will go into effect when the reserve ratio reaches 1.15%, 2% and 2.5%. The FDIC staff has projected that the new rate schedules will be approximately revenue neutral.

 

The schedule reduces the initial base assessment rate in each of the four risk-based pricing categories.

 

·

For small Risk Category I banks, the rates range from 5-9 basis points.

 

·

The rates for small institutions in Risk Categories II, III and IV are 14, 23 and 35 basis points, respectively.

 

·

For large institutions and large, highly complex institutions, the rate schedule ranges from 5 to 35 basis points.

 

There are also adjustments made to the initial assessment rates based on long-term unsecured debt, depository institution debt, and brokered deposits.

 

The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. A significant increase in insurance premiums would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of the Bank. Management cannot predict what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.

 

The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository institution if the FDIC determines, after a hearing, that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe and unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, order or any condition imposed in writing by, or written agreement with, the FDIC. The FDIC may also suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for a permanent termination of insurance if the institution has no tangible capital.

 

Federal Regulation of Savings Associations. The OCC has extensive authority over the operations of savings institutions. As part of this authority, we are required to file periodic reports with the OCC and are subject to periodic examinations by the OCC and the FDIC. The OCC also has enforcement authority over federal savings associations, including, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease-and-desist or removal orders and to initiate injunctive actions.

 

Lafayette Savings’ general permissible lending limit for loans to one borrower is equal to the greater of $500,000 or 15% of unimpaired capital and surplus, except for loans fully secured by certain readily marketable collateral, in which case this limit is increased to 25% of unimpaired capital and surplus. At December 31, 2013, our lending limit under this restriction was $7.0 million.

 

Regulatory Capital Requirements

 

Lafayette Savings . The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”) requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, FDICIA establishes five capital tiers: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized. To be considered adequately

 

 

24

---

 

capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations, a savings association must maintain the following capital ratios: a leverage ratio (the ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets) of at least 4% (unless its supervisory condition allows a 3% ratio), a Tier 1 risk-based ratio (the ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets) of at least 4%, and a total risk-based capital ratio (the ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets) of at least 8%. Total capital consists of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital.

 

Tier 1 capital generally consists of common stockholders’ equity, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock and other tangible capital plus certain intangible assets, including a limited amount of purchased credit card receivables. Tier 2 capital consists generally of certain permanent and maturing capital instruments and allowances for loan and lease losses up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. When determining total capital, Tier 2 capital may not exceed Tier 1 capital. At December 31, 2013, we had no intangible assets which were included in Tier 1 capital, other than mortgage servicing rights of $109,000.

 

To determine the amount of risk-weighted assets, all assets, including certain off-balance sheet items, will be multiplied by a risk weight, ranging from 0% to 100%, based on the risk inherent in the type of asset. For example, the OCC has assigned a risk weight of 50% for prudently underwritten permanent one- to four-family first lien mortgage loans not more than 90 days delinquent and having a loan-to-value ratio of not more than 90% at origination unless insured to such ratio by an insurer approved by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

 

To be considered well capitalized, a savings association must have a leverage ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of at least 6% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10%. As of December 31, 2013, Lafayette Savings qualified as well capitalized, with a leverage ratio of 10.98%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 16.13% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 17.40%. The OCC may reclassify a savings association in a lower capital category or require it to hold additional capital based upon supervisory concerns on a case-by-case basis.

 

Under the prompt corrective action regulations, the OCC and the FDIC are authorized, and under certain circumstances required, to take certain actions against a savings association that is not at least adequately capitalized. Such an association must submit a capital restoration plan and, until the plan is approved by the OCC, may not increase its assets, acquire another institution, establish a branch or engage in any new activities, and generally may not make capital distributions. For a savings association controlled by a holding company, the capital restoration plan must include a guarantee by the holding company limited to the lesser of 5% of the association’s assets when it failed the “adequately capitalized” standard or the amount needed to satisfy the plan, and, in the event of the bankruptcy of the holding company, the guaranty would have priority over the claims of general creditors. Additional and more stringent restrictions may be applicable, depending on the financial condition of the association and other circumstances. If an association becomes critically undercapitalized, because it has a ratio of tangible equity to total assets of 2% or less, appointment of a receiver or conservator may be required.

 

As described below in this section, under “New Capital Rules,” Lafayette Savings will soon become subject to new capital requirements mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act to implement Basel III, changes that will be phased in from 2015 to 2019.

 

LSB Financial . Effective as of the transfer of regulatory responsibilities from the OTS to the OCC and the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve was authorized to establish capital requirements for savings and loan holding companies. These capital requirements must be counter-cyclical so that the required amount of capital increases in times of economic expansion and decreases in times of economic contraction, consistent with safety and soundness. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, LSB Financial is expected to act as a source of financial strength to the Bank and to commit resources to support the Bank in circumstances in which LSB Financial might not otherwise do so. This source of financial strength doctrine has long applied to bank holding companies but now applies to savings and loan holding companies as well. For this purpose, “source of financial strength” means LSB Financial’s ability to provide financial assistance to the Bank, in the form of capital, liquidity, or other support, in the event of the Bank’s financial distress or adversity.

 

Also under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve is to apply consolidated capital requirements to depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent than those currently applied to depository institutions that were not supervised by the Federal Reserve as of May 19, 2010. Under this provision, the components of Tier 1 capital of depository institution holding companies would be restricted to capital instruments that are currently considered Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions. Thus, for the first time, savings and loan holding companies will be subject to consolidated capital requirements.

 

As described below in this section under “New Capital Rules,” LSB Financial will soon become subject to the new capital requirements mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act to implement Basel III, changes that will be phased in from 2015 to 2019.

 

 

25

---

 

New Capital Rules . On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve approved final rules that substantially amend the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to the Company and the Bank. The FDIC and the OCC subsequently approved these rules. The final rules implement the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. “Basel III” refers to two consultative documents released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2009, the rules text released in December 2010, and loss absorbency rules issued in January 2011, which include significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity requirements.

 

The final rules include new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which will be phased in from 2015 to 2019, and will refine the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Company and the Bank under the final rules are: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions. The rules also establish a “capital conservation buffer” above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital. The capital conservation buffer requirement will be phased in over four years beginning on January 1, 2016, as follows: the maximum buffer will be 0.625% of risk-weighted assets for 2016, 1.25% for 2017, 1.875% for 2018, and 2.5% for 2019 and thereafter. This will result in the following minimum ratios beginning in 2019: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. Under the final rules, institutions are subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations would establish a maximum percentage of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.

 

Basel III provided discretion for regulators to impose an additional buffer, the “countercyclical buffer,” of up to 2.5% of common equity Tier 1 capital to take into account the macro-financial environment and periods of excessive credit growth. However, the final rules permit the countercyclical buffer to be applied only to “advanced approach banks” (i.e., banks with $250 billion or more in total assets or $10 billion or more in total foreign exposures), which currently excludes the Company and the Bank. The final rules also implement revisions and clarifications consistent with Basel III regarding the various components of Tier 1 capital, including common equity, unrealized gains and losses, as well as certain instruments that will no longer qualify as Tier 1 capital, some of which would be phased out over time.

 

The final rules also contain revisions to the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including the Bank, if their capital levels begin to show signs of weakness. These revisions take effect January 1, 2015. Under the prompt corrective action requirements, which are designed to complement the capital conservation buffer, insured depository institutions will be required to meet the following increased capital level requirements in order to qualify as “well capitalized”: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8% (increased from 6%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 10% (unchanged from current rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5% (increased from 4%).

 

The final rules set forth certain changes for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, which we will be required to utilize beginning January 1, 2015. The standardized approach final rule utilizes an increased number of credit risk exposure categories and risk weights, and also addresses: (i) an alternative standard of creditworthiness consistent with Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act; (ii) revisions to recognition of credit risk mitigation; (iii) rules for risk weighting of equity exposures and past due loans; (iv) revised capital treatment for derivatives and repo-style transactions; and (v) disclosure requirements for top-tier banking organizations with $50 billion or more in total assets that are not subject to the “advance approach rules” that apply to banks with greater than $250 billion in consolidated assets.

 

Based on our current capital composition and levels, we believe that we would be in compliance with the requirements as set forth in the final rules if they were presently in effect.

 

Limitations on Dividends and Other Capital Distributions . OCC regulations impose various restrictions on savings institutions with respect to their ability to make distributions of capital, which include dividends, stock redemptions or repurchases, cash-out mergers and other transactions charged to the capital account.

 

A savings association that is a subsidiary of a holding company, such as Lafayette Savings, may make a capital distribution with prior notice to the Federal Reserve (with a copy to the OCC), in an amount that does not exceed its net income for the calendar year-to-date plus retained net income for the previous two calendar years (less any dividends previously paid) if the savings association has a regulatory rating in the two top examination categories, is not of supervisory concern, and would remain well-capitalized following the proposed distribution. All other institutions or those seeking to exceed the noted amounts must obtain approval from the Federal Reserve for a capital distribution before making the distribution.

 

 

26

---

 

LSB Financial’s declaration of dividends is subject to Indiana law, which generally prohibits the payment of dividends to amounts that will not affect the ability of LSB Financial, after the dividend has been distributed, to pay its debts in the ordinary course of business. Moreover, such dividends may not exceed the difference between LSB Financial’s total assets and total liabilities plus preferential amounts payable to shareholders with rights superior to those of the holders of common stock.

 

In addition, the Federal Reserve may prohibit LSB Financial’s payment of dividends if it concludes such payment would raise safety and soundness concerns at either the Bank or LSB Financial. Also, the Federal Reserve required prior approval of the declaration of dividends under the terms of a now-terminated Memorandum of Understanding, and despite the termination, has directed the Company’s Board of Directors to adopt resolutions committing the Company to continue to seek prior approval of the Federal Reserve for dividend declarations, additional debt not in the ordinary course, and redemption of Company common stock.

 

Qualified Thrift Lender Test . All savings institutions are required to meet a qualified thrift lender test to avoid certain restrictions on their operations. This test requires a savings institution to have at least 65% of its portfolio assets in qualified thrift investments on a monthly average for nine out of every 12 months on a rolling basis. As an alternative, the savings institution may maintain 60% of its assets in those assets specified in Section 7701(a)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Under either test, these assets primarily consist of residential housing related loans and investments. At December 31, 2013, Lafayette Savings met the test.

 

Any savings institution that fails to meet the qualified thrift lender test must either convert to a national bank or restrict its branching rights, new activities and investments to those permissible for a national bank. In addition, under the Dodd-Frank Act, a savings association that fails the qualified thrift lender test will be prohibited from paying dividends, except for dividends that are permissible for national banks, are necessary to meet obligations of the company that controls the savings association, and are specifically approved by the OCC and the Federal Reserve. If the institution has not requalified or converted to a national bank within three years after the failure, it must sell all investments and stop all activities not permissible for a national bank. If any institution that fails the qualified thrift lender test is controlled by a holding company, then within one year after the failure, the holding company must register as a bank holding company and become subject to all restrictions on bank holding companies. Under the Dodd-Frank Act, the failure to satisfy the qualified thrift lender test may also result in regulatory enforcement action.

 

Transactions with Affiliates. Generally, transactions between a savings association or its subsidiaries and its affiliates are required to be on terms as favorable to the association as transactions with non-affiliates. In addition, certain of these transactions, such as loans to an affiliate, are restricted to a percentage of the association’s capital and are subject to collateralization requirements. Affiliates of Lafayette Savings include LSB Financial and any company which is under common control with Lafayette Savings. In addition, a savings association may not lend to any affiliate engaged in activities not permissible for a bank holding company or acquire the securities of an affiliate.

 

Community Reinvestment Act . Under the Community Reinvestment Act, every FDIC insured institution has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with safe and sound banking practices, to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the OCC, in connection with our examination, to assess our record of meeting the credit needs of our community and to take this record into account in its evaluation of certain applications, such as a merger or the establishment of a branch, by Lafayette Savings. An unsatisfactory rating may be used as the basis for the denial of an application by the OCC. We were last examined for Community Reinvestment Act compliance in 2013 and received a rating of “Outstanding.”

 

Holding Company Regulation . LSB Financial is a unitary savings and loan holding company subject to regulatory oversight by the Federal Reserve. LSB Financial is required to register and file reports with the Federal Reserve and is subject to regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve. In addition, the Federal Reserve has enforcement authority over us and our non-savings institution subsidiaries.

 

LSB Financial generally is not subject to activity restrictions. If LSB Financial acquired control of another savings institution as a separate subsidiary, it would become a multiple savings and loan holding company, and its activities and any of its subsidiaries (other than Lafayette Savings or any other savings institution) would generally become subject to additional restrictions. 

 

USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 . In 2001, President Bush signed the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “PATRIOT Act”). The PATRIOT Act, among other things, is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. law enforcement to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The PATRIOT Act contains sweeping anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws and requires financial institutions to implement additional policies and procedures with respect to, or additional measures designed to address, any or all the following matters, among others: money laundering, suspicious activities and currency transaction

 

 

27

---

 

reporting, and currency crimes. Many of the provisions in the PATRIOT Act were to have expired December 31, 2005, but the U.S. Congress made permanent all but two of the provisions that had been set to expire and provided that the remaining two provisions, which relate to surveillance and the production of business records under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, expire in 2015. These provisions have not materially affected our operations.

 

Federal Securities Law . The shares of Common Stock of LSB Financial have been registered with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act (the “Exchange Act”). LSB Financial is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules of the SEC thereunder. If LSB Financial has fewer than 300 shareholders, it may deregister its shares under the Exchange Act and cease to be subject to the foregoing requirements.

 

Shares of Common Stock held by persons who are affiliates of LSB Financial may not be resold without registration unless sold in accordance with the resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. If LSB Financial meets the current public information requirements under Rule 144, each affiliate of LSB Financial who complies with the other conditions of Rule 144 (including those that require the affiliate’s sale to be aggregated with those of certain other persons) would be able to sell in the public market, without registration, a number of shares not to exceed, in any three-month period, the greater of (i) 1% of the outstanding shares of LSB Financial or (ii) the average weekly volume of trading in such shares during the preceding four calendar weeks.

 

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, beginning in 2013, LSB Financial was required to provide its shareholders an opportunity to vote on the executive compensation payable to its named executive officers and on golden parachute payments made in connection with mergers or acquisitions. At the Annual Meeting held in April 2013, at the first such “say-on-pay” vote, the shareholders approved the compensation paid to the Company’s executive officers. This vote, and all others like it, will be non-binding and advisory. Also beginning in 2013, LSB Financial must permit shareholders to determine on an advisory basis at least once every six years whether such votes should be held every one, two, or three years. At the Annual Meeting, a majority of the shareholders followed the recommendation of the Board of Directors and voted in favor of holding future say-on-pay votes on an annual basis. The next vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes is to be held no later than the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 . On July 30, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) became law. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s stated goals include enhancing corporate responsibility, increasing penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies and protecting investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act generally applies to all companies that file or are required to file periodic reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act.

 

Among other things, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act creates the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as an independent body subject to SEC supervision with responsibility for setting auditing, quality control and ethical standards for auditors of public companies. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires public companies to make faster and more extensive financial disclosures, requires the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of public companies to provide signed certifications as to the accuracy and completeness of financial information filed with the SEC, and provides enhanced criminal and civil penalties for violations of the federal securities laws.

 

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also addresses functions and responsibilities of audit committees of public companies. The statute makes the audit committee directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the company’s outside auditor, and requires the auditor to report directly to the audit committee. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act authorizes each audit committee to engage independent counsel and other advisors, and requires a public company to provide the appropriate funding, as determined by its audit committee, to pay the company’s auditors and any advisors that its audit committee retains. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act also requires public companies to include an internal control report and assessment by management. As a small reporting company, LSB Financial is not subject to the additional obligation to have an auditor attestation to the effectiveness of its controls included in its annual report.

 

Although LSB Financial will continue to incur additional expense in complying with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the resulting regulations, management does not expect that such compliance will have a material impact on LSB Financial’s results of operations or financial condition.

 

Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending . Title XIV of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act, includes a series of amendments to the Truth In Lending Act with respect to mortgage loan origination standards affecting, among other things, originator compensation, minimum repayment standards and pre-payments. With respect to mortgage loan originator compensation, except in limited circumstances, an originator is prohibited from receiving compensation that varies based on the terms of the loan (other than the principal amount). The amendments to the Truth In Lending Act also prohibit a creditor from making a residential mortgage loan unless it determines, based on verified and

 

 

28

---

 

documented information of the consumer’s financial resources, that the consumer has a reasonable ability to repay the loan. The amendments also prohibit certain pre-payment penalties and require creditors offering a consumer a mortgage loan with pre-payment penalty to offer the consumer the option of a mortgage loan without such a penalty. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act expands the definition of a “high-cost mortgage” under the Truth In Lending Act, and imposes new requirements on high-cost mortgages and new disclosure, reporting and notice requirements for residential mortgage loans, as well as new requirements with respect to escrows and appraisal practices.

 

Financial System Reform-The Dodd-Frank Act and the CFPB. On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Act, which significantly changed the regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. Many of its provisions went into effect on July 21, 2011, the one-year anniversary. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions affecting large and small financial institutions alike, including several provisions that profoundly affect how community banks, thrifts, and small bank and thrift holding companies, such as LSB Financial, are regulated. Among other things, these provisions abolished the OTS and transferred its functions to the other federal banking agencies, relaxed rules regarding interstate branching, allowed financial institutions to pay interest on business checking accounts, changed the scope of federal deposit insurance coverage, imposed new capital requirements on bank and thrift holding companies, and imposed limits on debit card interchange fees charged by large banks (commonly known as the Durbin Amendment).

 

The Dodd-Frank Act created a new, independent federal agency called the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), which was granted broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement powers under various federal consumer financial protection laws, including the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth in Lending Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act, Fair Debt Collection Act, the Consumer Financial Privacy provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, and certain other statutes. In July 2011, many of the consumer financial protection functions formerly assigned to the federal banking and other designated agencies transferred to the CFBP. The CFBP has a large budget and staff, and has the authority to implement regulations under federal consumer protection laws and enforce those laws against financial institutions. The CFPB will have examination and primary enforcement authority with respect to depository institutions with $10 billion or more in assets. Smaller institutions will be subject to rules promulgated by the CFPB but will continue to be examined and supervised by the federal banking regulators for consumer compliance purposes. The CFPB will have authority to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practice in connection with the offering of consumer financial products. Additionally, this bureau is authorized to collect fines and provide consumer restitution in the event of violations, engage in consumer financial education, track consumer complaints, request data, and promote the availability of financial services to underserved consumers and communities. Moreover, the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the CFPB to establish certain minimum standards for the origination of residential mortgages including a determination of the borrower’s ability to repay. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act will allow borrowers to raise certain defenses to foreclosure if they receive any loan other than a “qualified mortgage” as defined by the CFPB.

 

The CFPB has indicated that mortgage lending is an area of supervisory focus and that it will concentrate its examination and rulemaking efforts on the variety of mortgage-related topics required under the Dodd-Frank Act, including minimum standards for the origination of residential mortgages. The CFPB has published several final regulations impacting the mortgage industry, including rules related to ability-to-repay, mortgage servicing, escrow accounts, and mortgage loan originator compensation. The ability-to-repay rule makes lenders liable if they fail to assess ability to repay under a prescribed test, but also creates a safe harbor for so called “qualified mortgages.” Failure to comply with the ability-to-repay rule may result in possible CFPB enforcement action and special statutory damages plus actual, class action, and attorneys’ fees damages, all of which a borrower may claim in defense of a foreclosure action at any time. LSB Financial’s management is currently assessing the impact of these requirements on its mortgage lending business.

 

The Dodd-Frank Act contains numerous other provisions affecting financial institutions of all types, many of which may have an impact on the operating environment of the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. Consequently, the Dodd-Frank Act is expected to increase our cost of doing business, it may limit or expand our permissible activities, and it may affect the competitive balance within our industry and market areas. The nature and extent of future legislative and regulatory changes affecting financial institutions, including as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and the CFPB, is unpredictable at this time. The Company’s management continues to actively monitor the implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder and assess its probable impact on the business, financial condition, and results of operations of the Company. However, the ultimate effect of the Dodd-Frank Act and the CFPB on the financial services industry in general, and the Company in particular, remains uncertain.

 

Other Future Legislation and Change in Regulations . Various other legislation, including proposals to expand or contract the powers of banking institutions and bank holding companies, is from time to time introduced. This legislation may change banking statutes and the operating environment of the Company and the Bank in substantial and unpredictable ways. If

 

 

29

---

 

enacted, such legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions and other financial institutions. The Company cannot accurately predict whether any of this potential legislation will ultimately be enacted, and, if enacted, the ultimate effect that it, or implementing regulations, would have upon the financial condition or results of operations of the Company or the Bank.

 

 

Federal and State Taxation

 

Federal Taxation . Savings institutions that meet certain definitional tests relating to the composition of assets and other conditions prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, are permitted to establish reserves for bad debts and to make annual additions which may, within specified formula limits, be taken as a deduction in computing taxable income for federal income tax purposes. The amount of the bad debt reserve deduction is computed under the experience method.

 

In addition to the regular income tax, corporations, including savings institutions, generally are subject to a minimum tax. An alternative minimum tax is imposed at a minimum tax rate of 20% on alternative minimum taxable income, which is the sum of a corporation’s regular taxable income (with certain adjustments) and tax preference items, less any available exemption. The alternative minimum tax is imposed to the extent it exceeds the corporation’s regular income tax and net operating losses can offset no more than 90% of alternative minimum taxable income. 

 

A portion of our allowance for loan losses which is presented on the balance sheets and included in retained earnings without tax effect, may not, without adverse tax consequences, be utilized for the payment of cash dividends or other distributions to a shareholder, including distributions on redemption, dissolution or liquidation, or for any other purpose except to absorb bad debt losses. As of December 31, 2013, the portion of our reserves subject to this treatment for tax purposes totaled approximately $1.9 million. We file consolidated federal income tax returns with our subsidiaries on a calendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting. We have not been audited by the IRS during the last five fiscal years.

 

Indiana Taxation . The State of Indiana imposes an 8.5% franchise tax on corporations transacting the business of a financial institution in Indiana. Included in the definition of corporations transacting the business of a financial institution in Indiana are holding companies of thrift institutions, as well as thrift institutions. Net income for franchise tax purposes will constitute federal taxable income before net operating loss deductions and special deductions, adjusted for certain items, including Indiana income taxes and bad debts. Legislation is being considered in Indiana which would lower the 8.5% franchise tax to 6.5% over a four-year period, but there can be no guarantee that such legislation will be adopted. Other applicable Indiana taxes include sales, use and property taxes.

 

 

Employees

 

At December 31, 2013, we had a total of 93 employees, including three part-time employees. Our employees are not represented by any collective bargaining group. Management considers its employee relations to be good.

 

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

 

Not Applicable.

 

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

Item 2.  Properties

 

We conduct our business at our main office and four other locations in Lafayette and West Lafayette, Indiana. We own our main office and three branch offices. The fourth branch office is leased with the term of the lease expiring in 2014. We have purchased property and are constructing a new branch which will replace the leased branch in mid-2014. The total net book value of our premises and equipment (including land, building and leasehold improvements and furniture, fixtures and equipment) at December 31, 2013 was approximately $6.0 million. We have also purchased an office building adjacent to the main office location as our growth rate has required space for additional personnel. The ground floor of this building has been renovated to provide an easily accessible location for our residential loan production area.

 

We maintain an on-line database of depositor and borrower customer information. The net book value of our data processing, computer equipment and software at December 31, 2013 was $513,000.

 

 

30

---

 

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

 

In 2010, LSB Financial entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (the “MOU”) with the OTS under which LSB Financial agreed to take a number of actions to address concerns identified by the OTS in connection with its 2010 examination of the Bank. As a result of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve assumed responsibility for the MOU. By letter dated February 26, 2014, the Federal Reserve notified the Company that the MOU was terminated. However, at that time, the Federal Reserve advised the Company that its Board of Directors will be required to adopt resolutions confirming the Company’s commitment to continue to obtain written approval from the Federal Reserve prior to declaring dividends, increasing debt or redeeming Company common stock. The Company’s Board of Directors intends to take action with respect to these resolutions at its Board meeting to be held on March 17, 2014.

 

We are, from time to time, involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. While the ultimate outcome of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel representing us in the proceedings, that the resolution of any prior and pending proceedings should not have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

 

 

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not Applicable.

 

 

Item 4.5  Executive Officers of the Registrant

 

The executive officers of LSB Financial are identified below. The executive officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors of LSB Financial.

 

Randolph F. Williams (age 65). Mr. Williams is President and Chief Executive Officer of LSB Financial and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lafayette Savings. Mr. Williams was appointed to the Board of Directors of LSB Financial in September 2001. He was appointed President of LSB Financial in September 2001 and Chief Executive Officer in January 2002. Mr. Williams served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Delaware Place Bank in Chicago, Illinois from 1996 until joining LSB Financial. Mr. Williams has over 25 years of banking-related experience.

 

Mary Jo David (age 64). Ms. David is Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of LSB Financial and Lafayette Savings. She has held these positions with the Company since its formation in 1994 and with Lafayette Savings since 1992 and was elected a Director of LSB Financial and Lafayette Savings in 1999.

 

Todd C. Van Sickel (age 54) . Mr. Van Sickel is Vice President-Director of Operations of Lafayette Savings. He has served in that position since joining the Company in 2003. Mr. Van Sickel served as Senior Vice President of First National Bank and Trust in Kokomo, Indiana from 1988 until joining Lafayette Savings.

PART II

 

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

(a)           We have not sold any equity securities during the period covered by this report that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933. As of February 21, 2014, there were approximately 852 holders of record of LSB Financial Common Stock and 1,566,104 shares of issued and outstanding common stock. LSB Financial’s stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “LSBI.”

 

 

31

---

 

The following table sets forth, for the periods shown, the high and low sale price of the common stock and cash dividends per share declared. All amounts have been adjusted to reflect stock dividends and stock splits declared by the Company to date. The last stock dividend was declared in 2006.

 

	Quarter Ended		High			Low			Cash Dividends Declared
	March 31, 2012		$19.05			$13.50			$0.00
	June 30, 2012		19.00			16.96			0.00
	September 30, 2012		18.75			17.80			0.00
	December 31, 2012		21.19			17.95			0.05
	March 31, 2013		23.38			19.70			0.05
	June 30, 2013		22.70			20.44			0.05
	September 30, 2013		28.49			22.66			0.07
	December 31, 2013		30.00			27.00			0.07

 

 

Dividend payment decisions are made with consideration of a variety of factors including earnings, financial condition, market considerations and regulatory restrictions. As a savings association that is a subsidiary of a holding company, the Bank may pay dividends with prior notice to the Federal Reserve, with a copy to the OCC, in an amount that does not exceed its net income for the calendar year-to-date plus retained net income for the previous two calendar years (less dividends previously paid). This is permitted provided the savings association has a regulatory rating in the two top examination categories, is not of supervisory concern, and would remain well-capitalized following the proposed distribution.

 

With respect to LSB Financial, since it has no independent operation or other subsidiaries to generate income, its ability to pay cash dividends to its shareholders directly depends upon the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to it. LSB Financial’s ability to declare dividends is also subject to Indiana law, which prohibits a corporation from paying dividends if, after giving effect to payment of the dividends, the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business or the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities plus preferential rights of holders of preferred stock, if any. Further, the Memorandum of Understanding imposed restrictions on LSB Financial’s ability to pay dividends, but the Federal Reserve notified the Company by letter dated February 26, 2014, that the Memorandum of Understanding was terminated. The Federal Reserve advised the Company at that time, however, that its Board of Directors should adopt resolutions confirming the Company’s commitment to continue to seek prior Federal Reserve approval before declaring dividends, among other things. Additional restrictions on dividend payments are described in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

In addition, the “Equity Compensation Plan Information” contained in Part III, Item 12 of this Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.

 

(b)           We have no information to furnish pursuant to Rule 463 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Item 701(f) of Regulation S-K.

 

(c)           The following table sets forth the number and price paid for repurchased shares.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Month of Purchase		Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan (2)		Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan (2)
October 1 – October 31, 2013		---		---		---		52,817
November 1 – November 30, 2013		---		---		---		52,817
December 1 – December 31, 2013		---		---		---		52,817
Total		---		---		---		52,817

---

(1)	There were no shares repurchased other than through a publicly announced plan or program.

(2)	We have in place a program, announced February 6, 2007, to repurchase up to 100,000 shares of our common stock.

 

 

32

---

 

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

 

The selected financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as the audited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

			December 31,
			2013				2012				2011				2010				2009
			(Dollars in Thousands)
	Selected Financial Condition Data :
	Total assets		$	367,581			$	364,610			$	364,290			$	371,847			$	371,050
	Loans receivable, including loans held for sale, net			255,360				281,620				305,630				323,075				321,163
	Securities available-for-sale			64,448				29,744				13,845				11,805				11,345
	Short-term investments			2,237				5,778				3,156				2,980				4,817
	Deposits			314,620				308,637				308,433				311,458				277,866
	Total borrowings			10,000				15,000				18,000				22,500				57,000
	Shareholders’ equity			40,727				38,955				36,174				35,577				33,884

 

 

			December 31,
			2013				2012				2011				2010				2009
			(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
	Selected Operations Data :
	Total interest income		$	13,771			$	15,720			$	17,594			$	18,895			$	19,659
	Total interest expense			2,363				3,225				4,189				6,115				9,335
	Net interest income			11,408				12,495				13,405				12,780				10,324
	Provision for loan losses			650				2,100				5,361				2,759				3,197
	Net interest income after provision for loan losses			10,758				10,395				8,044				10,021				7,127
	Deposit account service charges			1,204				1,338				1,397				1,522				1,525
	Gain on sale of mortgage loans			1,338				2,489				1,080				1,019				1,386
	Gain on sale of securities			---				---				54				---				---
	Loss on real estate owned			(53	)			(97	)			(700	)			(441	)			(183	)
	Other non-interest income			1,402				1,036				1,077				980				1,059
	Total non-interest income			3,891				4,766				2,908				3,080				3,787
	Total non-interest expense			10,655				10,970				10,259				9,932				10,503
	Income before taxes			3,994				4,191				693				3,169				411
	Income taxes (credits)			1,456				1,532				154				1,052				(49	)
	Net income		$	2,538			$	2,659			$	539			$	2,117			$	460
	Earnings per share		$	1.63			$	1.71			$	0.35			$	1.36			$	0.30
	Earnings per share, assuming dilution			1.62				1.70				0.35				1.36				0.30
	Dividends paid per share			0.24				0.05				0.00				0.25				0.50

 

33

---

 

		December 31,
		2013				2012				2011				2010				2009
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data :
Performance Ratios:
Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)			0.70	%			0.73	%			0.15	%			0.56	%			0.12	%
Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity)			6.37				7.07				1.48				6.09				1.34
Average interest rate spread during period			3.31				3.88				3.99				3.65				2.82
Net interest margin (1)			3.36				3.87				4.02				3.68				2.94
Operating expense to average total assets			2.95				3.01				2.82				2.62				2.81
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities			1.07	x			0.99	x			1.02	x			1.02	x			1.04	x
Quality Ratios:
Non-performing assets to total assets at end of period			0.70	%			1.84	%			3.79	%			5.18	%			3.91	%
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans			246.81				91.56				44.21				29.53				29.65
Allowance for loan losses to loans receivable			2.43				2.06				1.73				1.64				1.16
Capital Ratios:
Shareholders’ equity to total assets at end of period			11.08				10.68				9.93				9.56				9.13
Average shareholders’ equity to average total assets			11.05				10.32				9.99				9.18				9.17
Dividend payout ratio			14.74				2.93				0.00				18.38				168.48
Other Data:
Number of full-service offices			5				5				5				5				5

 

(1)   Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

 

34

---

 

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

 

Executive   Summary

 

LSB Financial Corp., an Indiana corporation (“LSB Financial” or the “Company”), is the holding company of Lafayette Savings Bank, FSB (“Lafayette Savings” or the “Bank”). LSB Financial has no separate operations and its business consists only of the business of Lafayette Savings. References in this Annual Report to “we,” “us” and “our” refer to LSB Financial and/or Lafayette Savings as the context requires.

 

Lafayette Savings is, and intends to continue to be, an independent, community-oriented financial institution. The Bank has been in business for 144 years and differs from many of our competitors by having a local board and local decision-making in all areas of business. In general, our business consists of attracting or acquiring deposits and lending that money out primarily as real estate loans to construct and purchase single-family residential properties, multi-family and commercial properties and to fund land development projects. We also make a limited number of commercial business and consumer loans.

 

We have an experienced and committed staff and enjoy a good reputation for serving the people of the community, for understanding their financial needs and for finding a way to meet those needs. We contribute time and money to improve the quality of life in our market area and many of our employees volunteer for local non-profit agencies. We believe this sets us apart from the other 22 banks and credit unions that compete with us. We also believe that operating independently under the same name for over 144 years is a benefit to us - especially as local offices of large banks often have less local authority as their companies strive to consolidate. Focusing time and resources on acquiring customers who may be feeling disenfranchised by their no-longer-local or very large bank has proved to be a successful strategy.

 

Tippecanoe County and the eight surrounding counties comprise Lafayette Savings’ primary market area. Lafayette is the county seat of Tippecanoe County and West Lafayette is the home of Purdue University. There are three things that set Greater Lafayette apart from other urban areas of the country - the presence of a world class university, Purdue University; a government sector due to the presence of the county seat; and the mix of heavy industry and high-tech innovative start-up companies tied to Purdue University. In addition, Greater Lafayette is a regional health care center serving nine counties and has a large campus of Ivy Tech Community College.

 

Tippecanoe County typically shows better growth and lower unemployment rates than Indiana or the national economy because of the diverse employment base. The Tippecanoe County unemployment rate peaked at 10.6% in July 2009 and ended 2013 at 5.4% compared to 6.9% for Indiana and 6.7% nationally. The local housing market has remained fairly stable for the last several years with no price bubble and no resulting price swings. As of the most recent third quarter results provided by the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the five year percent change in house prices for the Lafayette Metropolitan Statistical Area (“MSA”) was a 1.00% increase with the one-year change a 1.02% increase. For the third quarter of 2013, the most recent report available, housing prices in the MSA increased 0.67%. Existing home sales increased 13% in Tippecanoe County in 2013, while the average price of a home sold in 2013 was 1% higher than in 2012. New home starts decreased to 457 in 2013 from 496 in 2012.

 

The area’s diversity did not make us immune to the ongoing effects of the recession; however, growth continues, although not at the same rate as before the recession. Current signs of recovery, based on a report from Greater Lafayette Commerce, include increasing manufacturing employment, a continuing commitment to new facilities and renovations at Purdue University, and signs of renewed activity in residential development projects. Capital investments announced and/or made in 2013 are expected to total over $1 billion compared to $605 million in 2012 and $444 million in 2011. Purdue, the area’s largest employer, announced enrollment of almost 39,000 in the fall 2013 semester.

 

Subaru, the area’s largest industrial employer and producer of the Subaru Legacy, Outback and Tribeca, recently announced addition of more production capacity for a new model to be built there. They expect to hire 900 additional employees by 2016. Wabash National, the area’s second largest industrial employer, continues to secure contracts to maintain its production level. Nanshan America began operating its new aluminum extrusion plant in Lafayette in 2012 and expects to employ 200 people. Alcoa will be adding a 115,000 square foot aluminum lithium plant to begin production in 2014 and employ 75 people. While the developments noted above lead us to believe the most serious problems are behind us as increased hiring and new industry moving to town have continued, we expect the recovery to be long term.

 

 

35

---

 

We have seen progress in our problem loans as more borrowers who had fallen behind on their loan payments are qualifying for troubled debt restructures, or have resumed payments or, less often, we have acquired control of their properties. The majority of our delinquent loans are secured by real estate and we believe we have sufficient reserves to cover incurred losses. The challenge is to get delinquent borrowers back on a workable payment schedule or if that is not feasible, to get control of their properties through an overburdened court system. In 2013, we acquired one property through foreclosure. We sold two OREO properties in 2013.

 

The funds we use to make loans come primarily from deposits from customers in our market area, from brokered deposits and from Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances. In addition we maintain an investment portfolio of available-for-sale securities to provide liquidity as needed. Our preference is to rely on local deposits unless the cost is not competitive, but if the need is immediate we will acquire pre-payable FHLB advances which are immediately available for member banks within their borrowing tolerance and can then be replaced with local or brokered deposits as they become available. We will also consider purchasing fixed term FHLB advances or brokered deposits as needed. We generally prefer brokered deposits over FHLB advances when the cost of raising money locally is not competitive. The deposits are available with a range of terms, there is no collateral requirement and the money is predictable as it cannot be withdrawn early except in the case of the death of a depositor and there is no option to have the money rollover at maturity. In 2013, total deposits remained fairly flat, increasing by only $6.0 million, from $308.6 million to $314.6 million. This increase consisted of a $17.4 million increase in our core deposits offset by an $11.4 million decrease in our higher rate time accounts. The movement was primarily because of depositors’ preference for having immediate access to their accounts if needed. Our reliance on brokered funds as a percentage of total deposits decreased slightly in 2013 from 4.44% of deposits to 4.35% with the actual dollar amount unchanged at $13.7 million. While we always welcome local deposits, the cost and convenience of brokered funds make them a useful alternative. We will also continue to rely on FHLB advances to provide immediate liquidity and help manage interest rate risk.

 

Our primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on our loan and investment portfolio and the interest expense incurred on deposits and borrowings. Our net interest income depends on the balance of our loan and investment portfolios and the size of our net interest margin – the difference between the income generated from loans and the cost of funding. Our net interest income also depends on the shape of the yield curve. The Federal Reserve has held short-term rates at almost zero for the last four years while long-term rates have stayed in the 3.0% range. Because deposits are generally tied to shorter-term market rates and loans are generally tied to longer-term rates this would typically be viewed as a positive step and in fact our net interest margin increased to a record high of 4.12% before falling to 3.36% at year end. The decrease was generally due to the continued decline in loan rates while deposit rates have started to level out. Our expectation for 2014 is that deposit rates will remain at these low levels as the Federal Reserve continues to focus on strengthening the economy. Overall loan rates are expected to remain low.

 

Rate changes can typically be expected to have an impact on interest income. Because the Federal Reserve has stated it intends to keep rates low, we expect to see little change in the money supply or market rates in 2014. Low rates generally increase borrower preference for fixed rate products which we typically sell on the secondary market. Some existing adjustable rate loans can be expected to reprice to lower rates which could be expected to have a negative impact on our interest income, although many of our loans have already reached their interest rate floors. While we would expect to sell the majority of our fixed rate loans on the secondary market, we expect to book some higher quality loans to replace runoff in the portfolio. Although new loans put on the books in 2013 will be at comparatively low rates we expect they will provide a return above any other opportunities for investment.

 

Our primary expense is interest on deposits and FHLB advances which are used to fund loan growth. We offer customers in our market area time deposits for terms ranging from three months to 66 months, checking accounts and savings accounts. We also purchase brokered deposits and FHLB advances as needed to provide funding or improve our interest rate risk position. Generally when interest rates are low, depositors will choose shorter-term products and conversely when rates are high, depositors will choose longer-term products.

 

We consider expected changes in interest rates when structuring our interest-earning assets and our interest-bearing liabilities. When rates are expected to increase we try to book shorter-term assets that will reprice relatively quickly to higher rates over time, and book longer-term liabilities that will remain for a longer time at lower rates. Conversely, when rates are expected to fall, we would like our balance sheet to be structured such that loans will reprice more slowly to lower rates and deposits will reprice more quickly. We currently offer a three-year and a five-year certificate of deposit that allows depositors one opportunity to have their rate adjusted to the market rate at a

 

 

36

---

 

future date to encourage them to choose longer-term deposit products. However, since we are not able to predict market interest rate fluctuations, our asset/liability management strategy may not prevent interest rate changes from having an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

 

Our results of operations may also be affected by general and local competitive conditions, particularly those with respect to changes in market rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.

 

 

2013 Summary

 

Our strategy in 2013 was to focus on improving credit quality by enhancing credit analysis, working to manage non-performing loans and dispose of other real estate owned (OREO), control the cost of funds and other expenses, and focus on growth in other income. New lending was focused on selectively extending credit to stronger borrowers to improve credit quality and on increasing our secondary market lending, including VA and FHA lending to qualified borrowers. Our credit department is fully staffed with a department manager experienced in credit analysis and debt restructuring, an experienced credit analyst and two collectors.

 

Although the local economy fared somewhat better in 2013, the opportunity for loan production was generally lower than expected despite low market interest rates. Local unit residential real estate sales in 2013 increased from 2012, from 1,922 properties to 1,829 through September 2013, and building permits for single family homes were up slightly. Commercial real estate activity was more often due to existing properties changing hands or being refinanced rather than new projects being started. New commercial building activity was minimal. Our residential loan originators originated and sold $45.3 million of residential loans on the secondary market for a gain of $1.3 million. In 2013, we sold $347,000 of OREO properties, consisting of 2 properties.

 

In 2013 we allocated $650,000 to loan loss reserves. The allocation generally covered the charge off of $244,000 of loans where we no longer expected payment, and $273,000 to charge down the balance on loans to be restructured. We had recoveries of $315,000 in 2013 and added $162,000 of foreclosed properties to OREO. At December 31, 2013, our allowance for loan losses to total loans was 2.43%, compared to 2.06% at December 2012. Our non-performing loans decreased from $6.4 million at December 31, 2012 to $2.6 million at December 31, 2013, including $1.2 million of loans that were less than 90 days past due but must remain as non-performing loans until they show they can continue to perform, typically by paying as agreed for six months. At December 31, 2013, our allowance for loan losses compared to non-performing loans was 246.81% compared to 91.57% at December 31, 2012. Non-performing loans compared to total loans decreased from 2.29% at December 31, 2012 to 1.01% at December 31, 2013. Despite improvements in our loan quality, the slow economic recovery has had a noticeable effect on debt service coverage, which can be seen in the increase in Watch loans from $13.1 million at December 2012 to $22.4 million at December 2013 as we have added several new relationships, including loans on various rental properties. The rental situation is generally improving as more people are interested in renting than owning. However, the possibility of problems while these markets stabilize warrants monitoring. Our OREO properties at December 31, 2013 were $18,000 compared to $256,000 at December 31, 2012. In 2013, we wrote off losses of $53,000 on the sale of OREO properties generally due to the lack of interest in the properties at the time of sale compared to $97,000 in 2012. We believe our allowance for loan losses to be adequate to absorb estimated incurred losses inherent in our loan portfolio. While we continue to seek to lower our delinquencies, based on our analysis we believe we have sufficient reserves to cover incurred losses.

 

The continuing upward slope of the yield curve in 2013 had the expected effect of decreasing interest rate margins as the average deposit rates had already reached very low levels. While loans tied to prime remained at low rates and other repricing variable rate loans repriced to lower rates resulting in a 34 basis point decrease in the yield on loans, deposit rates in 2013 only decreased by 24 basis points. This was due to both the decrease in deposit rates and the fact that much of the movement of deposits from higher rate time accounts to lower rate demand and savings accounts had occurred earlier. However, our percentage of interest earning assets to interest bearing liabilities increased to 1.07% over the year as more cash was moved into interest earning assets, typically investments and interest earning deposit accounts.

 

Other non-interest income, excluding the gain on sale of loans and the loss on the sale of OREO, increased by $233,000 from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013. This was generally attributable to a $327,000 increase in Other Income due to a $147,000 increase in income from our wealth management department on the sale of non-bank investment products, a $142,000 increase in mortgage loan servicing fees due to the increase in the volume of loans serviced, a $40,000 increase in debit card fees due to increased volume, offset by a $134,000 decrease in

 

 

37

---

 

deposit account fees due primarily to changes in our fee structure as a result of changes mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act.

 

The results of our loan and deposit activity in 2013 are illustrated in the Selected Financial Condition Data on page 35 and include:

 

·

Residential mortgage loans (including loans held for sale) decreased by 1.9% from $100.6 million to $98.7 million.

 

·

All other real estate loans, net, including multi-family, land, land development, construction and commercial real estate loans decreased 13.9% from $159.4 million to $137.2 million net of undisbursed loans.

 

·

Commercial business lending decreased 13.8% from $13.3 million to $11.5 million.

 

·

At December 31, 2013, 72.9% of our gross loan portfolio had adjustable interest rates.

 

·

Total deposit accounts increased 1.9% from $308.6 million at December 31, 2012 to $314.6 million at December 31, 2013, with core deposits increasing 10.4% from $167.7 million to $185.1 million over the same period.

 

 

2014 Overview

 

We expect to see continued slow growth in our residential loan portfolio through 2014 with interest rates generally staying at or near historically low levels, at least through the first part of the year. While we expect to see good volume in residential mortgage loan refinance activity as long as loan rates stay at this level, especially with the opening of our new residential mortgage center on the newly renovated first floor of the LSB Building, we intend to originate most of these loans for sale on the secondary market when borrowers choose long-term fixed rate terms, while keeping some of our shorter-term fixed rate loans and adjustable rate loans in our portfolio. We expect to have the opportunity to consider some new commercial loans but will continue to evaluate them with an eye to credit quality. However, portfolio loan growth overall is expected to be modest. Money from repayment and prepayment of loans that is not immediately used for new lending opportunities will be used to purchase readily marketable investment securities to bring in a return on investment.

 

Because of the improvement in our loan quality, operating results will be less affected by the disposition of non-performing loans and of properties in foreclosure or held in other real estate owned. We expect to see the loss of interest income on non-performing assets and non-interest expenses incurred in obtaining, marketing and disposing of the properties in 2014 as we made significant progress in addressing these problems in 2013. Our allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans ended the year at 246.81% and the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 2.43%, both significantly improved. Despite improvements in our loan quality, the slow economic recovery has had a noticeable effect on debt service coverage which can be seen in the increase in Watch loans from $13.1 million at December 2012 to $22.4 million at December 2013 as we have added several new relationships, including loans on various rental properties. The rental situation is generally improving as more people are interested in renting than owning. However, the possibility of problems while these markets stabilize warrants monitoring. We continue to work proactively with troubled borrowers while their situation is still salvageable. We monitor these and all other loans in our portfolio carefully and perform specific impairment analyses on any loans over 90 days delinquent. Based on our analysis, we believe that our current loan loss reserve is sufficient to cover estimated incurred losses. In the event that loan growth is not as strong as expected, we will invest in securities that are readily marketable if needed.

 

 

38

---

 

We intend to continue to follow a strategy in 2014 that includes (1) maintaining a strong capital position, (2) managing our vulnerability to changes in interest rates by emphasizing adjustable rate and/or shorter-term loans, (3) optimizing our net interest margin by supplementing our traditional mortgage lending with prudent multi-family and commercial real estate, consumer and construction loans when feasible, (4) working to originate and sell residential mortgage loans in the secondary market for a fee, including FHA and VA loans, to access a market not previously available to us, and (5) funding our growth by using primarily local deposits but using brokered deposits and FHLB advances should loan growth warrant it.

 

 

Possible Implications of Current Events

 

Significant external factors impact our results of operations including the general economic environment, changes in the level of market interest rates, government policies, actions by regulatory authorities and competition. Our cost of funds is influenced by interest rates on competing investments and general market rates of interest. Lending activities are influenced by the demand for real estate loans and other types of loans, which are in turn affected by the interest rates at which such loans are made, general economic conditions affecting loan demand and the availability of funds for lending activities.

 

Management continues to assess the impact on the Company of the uncertain economic and regulatory environment affecting the country at large and the financial services industry in particular. The level of turmoil in the financial services industry does present unusual risks and challenges for the Company, as described below:

 

The Current Economic Environment Poses Challenges For Us and Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations . We continue to operate in a challenging and uncertain economic environment, including generally uncertain national conditions and local conditions in our markets. Overall economic growth continues to be slow and national and regional unemployment rates remain at elevated levels. The risks associated with our business remain acute in periods of slow economic growth and high unemployment. Moreover, many financial institutions continue to be affected by an uncertain real estate market. While we continue to take steps to decrease and limit our exposure to problem loans, and while our local economy has remained somewhat insulated from the most severe effects of the current economic environment, we nonetheless retain direct exposure to the residential and commercial real estate markets and we are affected by these events.

 

Our loan portfolio includes commercial real estate loans, residential mortgage loans, and construction and land development loans. Declines in real estate values, home sales volumes and financial stress on borrowers as a result of the uncertain economic environment, including job losses, could have an adverse effect on our borrowers or their customers, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the current level of low economic growth on a national scale, the occurrence of another national recession or a deterioration in local economic conditions in our markets could drive losses beyond that which is provided for in our allowance for loan losses and result in the following other consequences: increases in loan delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures may increase; demand for our products and services may decline; deposits may decrease, which would adversely impact our liquidity position; and collateral for our loans, especially real estate, may decline in value, in turn reducing customers’ borrowing power, and reducing the value of assets and collateral associated with our existing loans.

 

Impact of Recent and Future Legislation, Including New Capital Requirements . During the last five years, Congress and the Treasury Department have adopted legislation and taken actions to address the disruptions in the financial system and declines in the housing market, and the overall regulation of financial institutions and the financial system. See Part I, Item 1 – Regulation and Supervision for a description of recent legislation and regulatory actions, including the adoption of final rules that establish new risk-based capital and leverage ratios to which we will be subject as they are phased in from 2015 to 2019. There can be no assurance regarding the specific impact that such measures may have on us and no assurance whether or to what extent we will be able to benefit from such programs.

 

In addition to the legislation mentioned above, federal and state governments could pass additional legislation responsive to current credit conditions. As an example, the Bank could experience higher credit losses because of federal or state legislation or regulatory action that reduces the amount the Bank’s borrowers are otherwise contractually required to pay under existing loan contracts. Also, the Bank could experience higher credit losses because of federal or state legislation or regulatory action that limits its ability to foreclose on property or other collateral or makes foreclosure less economically feasible.

 

 

39

---

 

Difficult Market Conditions Have Adversely Affected Our Industry . We are particularly exposed to downturns in the U.S. housing market. Dramatic declines in the housing market over the past five years, with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures, unemployment and under-employment, have negatively impacted the credit performance of mortgage and construction loans and securities and resulted in significant write-downs of asset values by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities, major commercial and investment banks, and regional financial institutions. Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and institutional investors have continued to observe tight lending standards, including with respect to other financial institutions, although there have been signs that lending is increasing. These market conditions have led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, and increased market volatility. A worsening of these conditions would likely exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market conditions on the Company and others in the financial institutions industry. In particular, the Company may face the following risks in connection with these events:

 

•

We are experiencing, and expect to continue experiencing increased regulation of our industry, particularly as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act and the CFPB. Compliance with such regulation is expected to increase our costs and may limit our ability to pursue business opportunities.

 

•

Our ability to assess the creditworthiness of our customers may be impaired if the models and approaches we use to select, manage and underwrite our customers become less predictive of future behaviors.

 

•

The process we use to estimate losses inherent in our credit exposure requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments, including forecasts of economic conditions and how these economic predictions might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, which may no longer be capable of accurate estimation which may, in turn, impact the reliability of the process.

 

•

Our ability to borrow from other financial institutions on favorable terms or at all could be adversely affected by disruptions in the capital markets or other events, including actions by rating agencies and deteriorating investor expectations.

 

•

Competition in our industry could intensify as a result of the increasing consolidation of financial services companies in connection with current market conditions.

 

•

We may be required to pay higher deposit insurance premiums because market developments have significantly depleted the insurance fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured deposits.

 

Future Reduction in Liquidity in the Banking System. The Federal Reserve Bank has been injecting vast amounts of liquidity into the banking system to compensate for weaknesses in short-term borrowing markets and other capital markets. However, the Federal Reserve has recently announced that it will begin cutting back and reducing its bond-buying program during 2014. A reduction in the Federal Reserve’s activities or capacity could reduce liquidity in the markets, thereby increasing funding costs to the Company or reducing the availability of funds to the Company to finance its existing operations.

 

Changes in Insurance Premiums. The FDIC insures the Bank’s deposits up to a maximum amount, generally $250,000 per depositor. Current economic conditions have increased expectations for bank failures. The FDIC takes control of failed banks and ensures payment of deposits up to insured limits using the resources of the Deposit Insurance Fund. The FDIC charges us premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund. The FDIC has set the designated reserve ratio for the Deposit Insurance Fund at 2.0% of insured deposits. The Bank is also subject to assessment for the Financing Corporation (FICO) to service the interest on its bond obligations. The amount assessed is in addition to the amount paid for deposit insurance. These assessments will continue until the FICO bonds are repaid between 2017 and 2019. Future increases in deposit insurance premiums or changes in risk classification would increase the Bank’s deposit related costs.

 

Effective with the June 2011 reporting period, the FDIC, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, changed the assessment base for deposit insurance premiums from adjusted domestic deposits to average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity, and scaled the insurance premium rates to the increased assessment base. As a result of the change to an asset-based assessment, the Company experienced a decrease in premiums.

 

The FDIC has authority to increase insurance assessments. Increased assessment rates and special assessments have had a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and could continue to do so.

 

 

40

---

 

Concentrations of Real Estate Loans Could Subject the Company to Increased Risks in the Event of a Real Estate Recession or Natural Disaster. A significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by real estate. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. While property values in the Midwest show signs of stabilizing, a further weakening of the real estate market in our primary market area could result in an increase in the number of borrowers unable to refinance or who may default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our profitability and asset quality. If we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, our earnings and capital could be adversely affected. Significant natural disasters can also negatively affect the value of real estate that secures our loans or interrupt our business operations, also negatively impacting our operating results or financial condition.

 

Credit Risk Could Adversely Affect Our Operating Results or Financial Condition. One of the greatest risks facing lenders is credit risk – that is, the risk of losing principal and interest due to a borrower’s failure to perform according to the terms of a loan agreement. During the last few years, the banking industry has experienced increasing trends in problem assets and credit losses which have resulted from weakening national economic trends and a decline in housing values. While management attempts to provide an allowance for loan losses at a level adequate to cover probable incurred losses based on loan portfolio growth, past loss experience, general economic conditions, information about specific borrower situations, and other factors, future adjustments to reserves may become necessary, and net income could be significantly affected, if circumstances differ substantially from assumptions used with respect to such factors.

 

Interest Rate Risk Could Adversely Affect Our Operations. The Company’s earnings depend to a great extent upon the level of net interest income, which is the difference between interest income earned on loans and investments and the interest expense paid on deposits and other borrowings. Interest rate risk is the risk that the earnings and capital will be adversely affected by changes in interest rates. While the Company attempts to adjust its asset/liability mix in order to limit the magnitude of interest rate risk, interest rate risk management is not an exact science. Rather, it involves estimates as to how changes in the general level of interest rates will impact the yields earned on assets and the rates paid on liabilities. Moreover, rate changes can vary depending upon the level of rates and competitive factors. From time to time, maturities of assets and liabilities are not balanced, and a rapid increase or decrease in interest rates could have an adverse effect on net interest margins and results of operations of the Company. Volatility in interest rates can also result in disintermediation, which is the flow of funds away from financial institutions into direct investments, such as U.S. Government and corporate securities and other investment vehicles, including mutual funds, which, because of the absence of federal insurance premiums and reserve requirements, generally pay higher rates of return than financial institutions.

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Generally accepted accounting principles are complex and require management to apply significant judgments to various accounting, reporting and disclosure matters. Management of LSB Financial must use assumptions and estimates to apply these principles where actual measurement is not possible or practical. For a complete discussion of LSB Financial’s significant accounting policies, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2013, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain policies are considered critical because they are highly dependent upon subjective or complex judgments, assumptions and estimates. Changes in such estimates may have a significant impact on the financial statements. Management has reviewed the application of these policies with the Audit Committee of LSB Financial’s Board of Directors. These policies include the following:

 

Allowance for Loan Losses . The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in Lafayette Savings’ loan portfolios. In determining the appropriate amount of the allowance for loan losses, management makes numerous assumptions, estimates and assessments.

 

The strategy also emphasizes diversification on an industry and customer level, regular credit quality reviews and quarterly management reviews of large credit exposures and loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality.

 

Lafayette Savings’ allowance consists of three components: probable losses estimated from individual reviews of specific loans, probable losses estimated from historical loss rates, and probable losses resulting from economic or other deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the first two components of the allowance.

 

 

41

---

 

Larger commercial loans that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses and all loans that are rated substandard or lower are subject to individual review. Where appropriate, reserves are allocated to individual loans based on management’s estimate of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral and other sources of cash flow and, if the loan is considered to be collateral dependent, based on the fair value of the collateral. Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired as provided in FASB ASC 310-10 (formerly FAS 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan). Any allowances for impaired loans are determined by the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or fair value of the underlying collateral based on the discounted appraised value. Historical loss rates are applied to other commercial loans not subject to specific reserve allocations.

 

Homogenous smaller balance loans, such as consumer installment and residential mortgage loans are not individually risk graded. Reserves are established for each pool of loans based on the expected net charge-offs for one year. Loss rates are based on the average net charge-off history by loan category.

 

Historical loss rates for commercial and consumer loans may be adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. Factors which management considers in the analysis include the effects of the national and local economies, trends in the nature and volume of loans (delinquencies, charge-offs and non-accrual loans), changes in mix, asset quality trends, risk management and loan administration, changes in the internal lending policies and credit standards, collection practices and examination results from bank regulatory agencies and the Bank’s internal loan review.

 

Allowances on individual loans are reviewed quarterly and historical loss rates are reviewed annually and adjusted as necessary based on changing borrower and/or collateral conditions and actual collection and charge-off experience.

 

Lafayette Savings’ primary market area for lending is Tippecanoe County, Indiana and to a lesser extent the eight surrounding counties. When evaluating the adequacy of allowance, consideration is given to this regional geographic concentration and the closely associated effect of changing economic conditions on Lafayette Savings’ customers.

 

Mortgage Servicing Rights . Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) associated with loans originated and sold, where servicing is retained, are capitalized and included in other intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The value of the capitalized servicing rights represents the present value of the future servicing fees arising from the right to service loans in the portfolio. Critical accounting policies for MSRs relate to the initial valuation and subsequent impairment tests. The methodology used to determine the valuation of MSRs requires the development and use of a number of estimates, including anticipated principal amortization and prepayments of that principal balance. Events that may significantly affect the estimates used are changes in interest rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds and the payment performance of the underlying loans. The carrying value of the MSRs is periodically reviewed for impairment based on a determination of fair value. For purposes of measuring impairment, the servicing rights are compared to a valuation prepared based on a discounted cash flow methodology, utilizing current prepayment speeds and discount rates. Impairment, if any, is recognized through a valuation allowance and is recorded as amortization of intangible assets.

 

Accounting for Foreclosed Assets . Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net income or expense from foreclosed assets.

 

 

42

---

 

Financial Condition at December 31, 2013 compared to December 31, 2012

SELECTED FINANCIAL CONDITION DATA
(Dollars in Thousands)
		December 31,				December 31,				$				%
		2013				2012				Difference				Difference
Total assets		$	367,581			$	364,610			$	2,971				0.81	%
Loans receivable, including loans held for sale, net			255,360				281,620				(26,260	)			(9.32	)
1-4 family residential mortgage loans			98,719				100,579				(1,860	)			(1.85	)
Home equity lines of credit			16,050				16,421				(371	)			(2.26	)
Other real estate loans net undisbursed portion of loans			137,213				159,367				(22,154	)			(13.90	)
Commercial business loans			11,461				13,290				(1,829	)			(13.76	)
Consumer loans			1,160				1,131				29				2.56
Loans sold			45,272				84,144				(38,872	)			(46.20	)
Non-performing loans			1,384				2,907				(1,523	)			(52.39	)
Loans less than 90 days past due, not accruing			1,188				3,536				(2,348	)			(66.40	)
Other real estate owned			18				256				(238	)			(92.47	)
Non-performing assets			2,590				6,699				(4,109	)			(61.34	)
Available-for-sale securities			62,705				28,004				34,701				123.91
Short-term investments			2,237				5,778				(3,541	)			(61.28	)
Deposits			314,620				308,637				5,983				1.94
Core deposits			185,106				167,704				17,402				10.38
Time accounts			129,514				140,933				(11,419	)			(8.10	)
Brokered deposits			13,690				13,690				---				---
FHLB advances			10,000				15,000				(5,000	)			(33.33	)
Shareholders’ equity (net)			40,727				38,955				1,772				4.55

 

As shown in the table above, the net balance in our loan portfolio decreased by $26.3 million from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013. Loans decreased primarily due to a $22.2 million decrease in non-residential loans largely the result of continuing uncertainty in the market making people wary of initiating projects. The same uncertainty affected commercial business loans which decreased $1.8 million. With the increase in longer term loan rates, we have seen a reduction in the number of residential borrowers taking advantage of low market interest rates and refinancing to primarily fixed rate loans which we typically sell on the secondary market. We sold $45.3 million of residential loans in 2013 compared to $84.1 million in 2012. These loans are sold based on asset/liability considerations and to increase income from the gain on sale of loans. There was also a slight decrease in home equity loans due primarily to the low volume of new loan activity combined with the paydown or chargeoff of existing loans.

 

The $34.7 million increase in our available-for-sale securities was primarily due to a desire to get a return on investments in light of slow loan demand and to have investments available to use for liquidity purposes. The balance in short term investments will be moved to investment securities as opportunities arise. Due to low returns on these investments we try to keep the balances at the minimal amount needed to meet cash flow needs.

 

 

43

---

 

Deposit balances increased by about $6.0 million. Because we have minimal loan demand we are not aggressively working to generate deposits, however, we have worked to attract depositors to our core deposit accounts rather than into higher rate time deposits. Part of our success in this endeavor is because of a desire on the part of depositors not to lock up their funds for longer periods in uncertain times. In 2013, we reduced time deposits by $11.4 million and increased core deposits by $17.4 million. We are generally letting brokered funds roll off as they mature.

 

We utilize advances available through the FHLB as needed to provide additional funding for loan growth as well as for asset/liability management purposes. At December 31, 2013, we had $10.0 million in FHLB advances outstanding compared to $15.0 million at December 31, 2012. Based on the collateral we currently have listed under a blanket collateral arrangement with the FHLB, we could borrow up to $52.5 million in additional advances. We have other collateral available if needed. These advances are generally available on the same day as requested and allow us the flexibility of keeping our daily cash levels tighter than might otherwise be prudent.

 

Non-performing assets, which include non-accruing loans, accruing loans 90 days past due and foreclosed assets, decreased from $6.7 million at December 31, 2012 to $2.6 million at December 31, 2013. Non-performing loans at December 31, 2013 consisted of $2.3 million of loans on residential real estate and $248,000 on land or commercial real estate loans. Foreclosed assets consisted of an $18,000 commercial real estate property. At December 31, 2013, our allowance for loan losses equaled 2.43% of total loans compared to 2.06% at December 31, 2012. The allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2013 totaled 245.10% of non-performing assets compared to 88.07% at December 31, 2012, and 246.81% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2013 compared to 91.57% at December 31, 2012. Our non-performing assets equaled 1.84% of total assets at December 31, 2012 compared to 0.70% at December 31, 2013. The decrease in non-performing loans is due to $2.7 million of loans being upgraded as they are performing as agreed and expected to fulfill the terms of their loans, $1.9 million of properties sold in short sales where the Bank agreed to take a lesser amount for the loan, $205,000 taken into OREO, $160,000 of loans being charged down or charged off by the Bank, $142,000 from loans paid off or paid down by borrowers, offset by $537,000 of loans added to non-accrual during the year.

 

When a non-performing loan is added to our classified loan list, an impairment analysis is completed to determine expected losses upon final disposition of the property. An adjustment to loan loss reserves is made at that time for any anticipated losses. This analysis is reviewed and updated quarterly thereafter. It may take several months or up to two years to move a foreclosed property through the system to the point where we can obtain title to and dispose of it. We attempt to acquire properties through deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure if there are no other liens on the properties. In 2013, we acquired 2 properties through foreclosure. In 2012, we acquired 5 properties through deeds-in-lieu of foreclosure and 5 properties through foreclosure. Although we believe we use the best information available to determine the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary, and net income could be significantly affected if circumstances and/or economic conditions cause substantial changes in the estimates we use in making the determinations about the levels of the allowance for losses. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. These agencies may require the recognition of additions to the allowance based upon their judgments of information available at the time of their examination.

 

Shareholders’ equity increased $1.8 million, or 4.55%, during 2013 primarily as a result of net income of $2.5 million offset by the payment of $375,000 of dividends to shareholders. Shareholders’ equity to total assets was 11.08% at December 31, 2013 compared to 10.68% at December 31, 2012.

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Our results of operations depend primarily on the levels of net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on loans and securities and other interest-earning assets, and the interest expense on deposits and borrowed funds. Our results of operations are also dependent upon the level of our non-interest income, including fee income and service charges, gains or losses on the sale of loans and the level of our non-interest expenses, including general and administrative expenses. Net interest income is dependent upon the volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and upon the interest rate which is earned or paid on these items. Our results of operations are also affected by the level of the provision for loan losses. We, like other financial institutions, are subject to interest rate risk to the degree that our interest-bearing liabilities mature or reprice at different times, or on a different basis, than our interest-earning assets.

 

 

44

---

 

 

Average Balances, Interest Rates and Yields

 

The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest income earned on average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields on such assets, as well as the interest expense paid on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the rates paid on such liabilities. No tax equivalent adjustments were made. All average balances are monthly average balances. Non-accruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield .

		2013												2012
		Average Outstanding  Balance				Interest Earned/  Paid				Yield/  Rate				Average Outstanding  Balance				Interest Earned/  Paid				Yield/  Rate
										(Dollars in Thousands)
Assets
Interest-earning assets
Loans receivable (1)		$	265,667			$	12,914				4.86	%		$	291,590			$	15,162				5.20	%
Mortgage-backed securities			10,956				238				2.17				6,749				175				2.59
Other investments			59,798				508				0.85				21,244				283				1.33
FHLB stock			3,185				111				3.49				3,185				100				3.14
Total interest-earning assets			339,607				13,771				4.05				322,768				15,720				4.87
Non-interest earning assets			21,241												41,576
Total assets		$	360,847											$	364,344
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits		$	30,561				18				0.06			$	27,890				20				0.07
Demand and NOW deposits			141,575				293				0.21				131,101				420				0.32
Time deposits			135,734				1,794				1.32				148,445				2,399				1.62
Borrowings			10,833				258				2.38				17,000				386				2.27
Total interest-bearing liabilities			318,704				2,363				0.74				324,436				3,225				0.99
Other liabilities			2,280												2,309
Total liabilities			320,984												326,745
Shareholders’ equity			39,863												37,599
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	360,847											$	364,344
Net interest income						$	11,408											$	12,495
Net interest rate spread											3.31	%											3.88	%
Net earning assets		$	20,903											$	(1,668	)
Net yield on average interest-earning assets											3.36	%											3.87	%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities			1.07	x											0.99	x

_________________

(1)    Calculated net of deferred loan fees, loan discounts, loans in process and loss reserves.

 

45

---

 

 

Rate/Volume Analysis of Net Interest Income

 

The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the major categories of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The change in total interest income and total interest expense is allocated between those related to changes in the outstanding balances and those due to changes in interest rates. For each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, information is provided on changes attributable to (i) changes in volume ( i.e ., changes in volume multiplied by old rate) and (ii) changes in rate ( i.e. , changes in rate multiplied by old volume). For purposes of this table, changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the change due to volume and change due to rate.

 

		2013 vs. 2012
		Increase (Decrease) Due to								Total   Increase
		Volume				Rate				( Decrease)
		(Dollars in Thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable		$	(1,297	)		$	(951	)		$	(2,248	)
Mortgage-backed securities			95				(32	)			63
Other investments			358				(133	)			225
FHLB stock			---				11				11
Total interest-earning assets		$	(844	)		$	(1,105	)		$	(1,949	)
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings deposits		$	2			$	(4	)		$	(2	)
Demand deposits and NOW accounts			31				(158	)			(127	)
Time deposits			(193	)			(412	)			(605	)
Borrowings			(146	)			18				(128	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		$	(306	)		$	(556	)		$	(862	)
Net interest income										$	(1,087	)

 

Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

General. Net income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $2.5 million, a decrease of $121,000 or 4.6%, from net income of $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. The primary reason for the decrease was a $1.1 million decrease in non-interest income and an $875,000 decrease in net interest income partially offset by a $1.5 million decrease in the provision for loan losses, as well as a $316,000 decrease in non-interest expenses and a $76,000 decrease in taxes on income.

 

Our return on average assets was 0.70% for the year ended 2013, compared to 0.73% for the year ended 2012. Return on average equity was 6.37% for the year ended 2013, compared to 7.07% for 2012. We paid cash dividends on common stock during 2013 totaling $375,000, or $0.24 per share, representing a dividend payout ratio (dividends declared per share divided by diluted net income per share) of approximately 14.7% compared to $77,000, or $0.05 per share, in 2012 for a dividend payout ratio of approximately 2.9%.

 

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased $1.1 million from the same period in 2012. Our net interest margin (net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets) decreased from 3.87% at December 31, 2012 to 3.36% at December 31, 2013. The largest factor in the decrease in net interest income was the decrease in the average rate on interest-earning assets, particularly loans, with the average rate on interest-earning assets decreasing 82 basis points from 4.87% in 2012 to 4.05% in 2013. The balance of average interest-earning assets increased over the period from $322.8 million in 2012 to $339.6 million in 2013, although most of the increase was in lower rate investment securities and interest-earning deposits which increased $42.8 million offset by a $25.9 million decrease in average loan balances. The average rate on deposits and FHLB advances decreased from 0.99% in 2012 to 0.74% in 2013 caused primarily by reductions in short-term interest rates due to cuts by the Federal Reserve. Separating deposits from FHLB advances, the rate on

 

 

46

---

 

deposits decreased from 0.92% in 2012 to 0.68% in 2013. The rate on advances increased from 2.27% in 2012 to 2.38% in 2013 due to the maturity of a low rate advance late in 2012. Overall, the average rate on loans and investments decreased by 82 basis points while the average rate paid on advances and deposits decreased by only 25 basis points.

 

Interest income on loans decreased $2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to a decrease of $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily because of lower average loan volume but also due to lower interest rates. The average balance of loans held in our portfolio decreased by $25.9 million from $291.6 million in 2012 to $265.7 million in 2013.The average yield on loans decreased from 5.20% for the year ended December 31, 2012 to 4.86% for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

Interest income on investments increased $299,000 taking into account an increase of $11,000 in dividends on FHLB stock for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in interest on investments and FHLB stock was primarily due to a $42.7 million increase in the average balance of investments from $31.2 million in 2012 to $73.9 million in 2013 partially offset by a 63 basis point decrease in the average rates on investments from 1.79% in 2012 to 1.16% in 2013 due to the decrease in market rates.

 

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased $862,000 from the same period in 2012. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities consisting of deposit accounts and FHLB advances from 0.99% in 2012 to 0.74% in 2013. Average balances of deposits increased slightly from $307.4 million in 2012 to $307.9 million in 2013 while the average balances of FHLB advances decreased from $17.0 million in 2012 to $10.8 million in 2013.

 

Provision for Loan Losses . The evaluation of the level of loan loss reserves is an ongoing process that includes closely monitoring loan delinquencies. The following chart shows delinquent loans as well as a breakdown of non-performing assets.

 

			December 31,
			2013				2012				2011
			(Dollars in Thousands)
	Loans delinquent 30-59 days		$	483			$	1,176			$	2,263
	Loans delinquent 60-89 days			388				781				1,006
	Total delinquencies			871				1,957				3,269
	Accruing loans past due 90 days			---				---				---
	Non-accruing loans			2,542				6,443				12,059
	Total non-performing loans			2,572				6,443				12,059
	OREO			18				256				1,746
	Total non-performing assets		$	2,590			$	6,699			$	13,805

 

 

The accrual of interest income is discontinued when a loan becomes 90 days and three payments past due. Loans 90 days past due but not yet three payments past due will continue to accrue interest as long as it has been determined that the loan is well secured and the borrower has the capacity to repay.

 

Troubled debt restructurings and loans that begin to perform after a period of nonperformance are considered non-accruing loans until sufficient time has passed for them to establish a pattern of compliance with the terms of the restructure. There were $1.2 million of loans at December 31, 2013 considered non-accruing in the chart above that are troubled debt restructurings or loans that have begun to perform after a period of nonperformance compared to $3.5 million at December 31, 2012.

 

We establish our provision for loan losses based on a systematic analysis of risk factors in the loan portfolio. The analysis includes consideration of concentrations of credit, past loss experience, current economic conditions, the amount and composition of the loan portfolio, estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, delinquencies and other relevant factors. From time to time, we also use the services of a consultant to assist in the evaluation of our commercial real estate loan portfolio.   On at least a quarterly basis, a formal analysis of the adequacy of the allowance is prepared and reviewed by management and the Board of Directors. This analysis serves as a point-in-time assessment of the level of the allowance and serves as a basis for provision for loan losses.

 

 

47

---

 

More specifically, our analysis of the loan portfolio will begin at the time the loan is originated, at which time each loan is assigned a risk rating. If the loan is a commercial credit, the borrower will also be assigned a similar rating. Loans that continue to perform as agreed will be included in one of ten non-classified loan categories. Portions of the allowance are allocated to loan portfolios in the various risk grades, based upon a variety of factors, including historical loss experience, trends in the type and volume of the loan portfolios, trends in delinquent and non-performing loans, and economic trends affecting our market. Loans no longer performing as agreed are assigned a higher risk rating, eventually resulting in their being regarded as classified loans. A collateral reevaluation is completed on all classified loans. This process results in the allocation of specific amounts of the allowance to individual problem loans, generally based on an analysis of the collateral securing those loans. These components are added together and compared to the balance of our allowance at the evaluation date.

 

At December 31, 2013, our largest area of concern was loans on one- to four-family non-owner-occupied rental properties. Of lesser concern are loans on one- to four-family owner-occupied residences, loans on non-residential properties and land loans and non-residential commercial loans. Loans delinquent more than 30 days at December 31, 2013 included $1.7 million of loans on one- to four-family rental properties, $156,000 of land loans, a single non-residential commercial loan of $140,000, a single $111,000 loan on non-residential real estate, a single $84,000 loan on one- to four-family owner-occupied properties, and a single $65,000 loan on a multi-family property. There has been some improvement in the local economy and we are seeing enough improvement in our one- to four-family rental property market to warrant restructuring a number of those relationships. However, we are working to decrease our concentrations in that sector especially in non-campus housing.

 

We recorded a $650,000 provision for loan losses during 2013 as a result of our analyses of our current loan portfolios, compared to $2.1 million during 2012. The provisions were necessary to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level considered adequate to absorb losses inherent and incurred in the loan portfolio. During the year 2013, we charged $517,000 against loan loss reserves on 14 loans, either written off, written down to fair value or taken into other real estate owned, including a group of loans to a single borrower. We expect to obtain possession of more properties in 2014 that are currently in the process of foreclosure. The final disposition of these properties may be expected to result in a loss in some cases. The $6.3 million reserve for loan losses in 2013 was considered adequate to cover further charge-offs based on our evaluation and our loan mix.

 

Our loan portfolio does not contain option ARM products, interest only loans, or loans with initial teaser rates. While we occasionally make loans to borrowers with credit scores in the subprime range, these loans are only made if there are sufficient mitigating factors, not as part of a subprime mortgage plan. We occasionally make mortgages that exceed high loan-to-value regulatory guidelines for a particular property type. We currently have $10.6 million of mortgage loans that are not one- to four-family loans that qualify as high loan-to-value. We typically make these loans only to well-qualified borrowers and none of these loans are delinquent. We also have $5.4 million of one- to four-family loans which either alone or combined with a second mortgage exceed high loan-to-value guidelines. None of these loans is currently over 30 days past due. Our total high loan-to-value loans at December 31, 2013 were at 36% of capital, well under regulatory guidelines of 100% of capital. We have $16.4 million of home equity lines of credit of which none are delinquent more than 30 days.

 

At December 31, 2013, non-performing assets, consisting of non-performing loans, accruing loans 90 days or more delinquent, loans less than 90 days past due still on non-accrual, and other real estate owned, totaled $2.6 million compared to $6.7 million at December 31, 2012. In addition to our non-performing assets, we identified $3.8 million in other loans of concern where information about possible credit problems of the borrowers causes management to have doubts as to the ability of the borrowers to comply with present repayment terms and that may result in disclosure of such loans as non-performing assets in the future. The vast majority of these loans, as well as our non-performing assets, are well collateralized.

 

At December 31, 2013, we believe that our allowance for loan losses was adequate to absorb estimated losses inherent in our loan portfolio. Our allowance for losses equaled 2.43% of net loans receivable and 246.81% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2013, compared to 2.06% and 91.57% at December 31, 2012, respectively. Our non-performing assets equaled 0.70% of total assets at December 31, 2013 compared to 1.84% at December 31, 2012. We had only $18,000 of OREO properties at December 31, 2013. The increase in reserves is deemed prudent until the rental market stabilizes at a level that can provide landlords with rents adequate to cover their costs and the local economy returns to full strength.

 

 

48

---

 

Non-Interest Income . Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased by $875,000, or 18.36%, compared to the same period in 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a $1.2 million decrease in the gain on sale of loans due to a lower volume of loans sold, from $84.1 million in 2012 to $45.3 million in 2013, as well as a $134,000 decrease in deposit account fees due primarily to changes in our fee structure as a result of changes mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act. These decreases were partially offset by a $327,000 increase in other non-interest income, including, a $147,000 increase in income from our wealth management department on the sale of non-bank investment products, a $142,000 increase in mortgage loan servicing fees due to the increase in the volume of loans serviced, and a $40,000 increase in debit card fees due to increased use, as well as an improvement in the loss recognized on the sale of OREO properties from a $97,000 loss in 2012 to a $53,000 loss in 2013.

 

Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 decreased $315,000 over the same period in 2012. The decrease was primarily due to a $372,000 decrease in salaries and benefits from lower loan origination activity by commission-based loan originators and a decrease in the number of employees from 96 in 2012 to 93 in 2013. In addition, there was a $128,000 decrease in other expenses including a $131,000 decrease in expenses related to acquiring, maintaining and disposing of foreclosed and OREO properties because of the decrease in the number of these properties, offset by a $93,000 increase in legal fees due primarily to the cost of an extended lawsuit over construction loan disbursements and change orders. We also experienced a decrease in accounting fees because no additional regulatory reporting was required in 2013. These decreases in expenses were offset by a $118,000 increase in occupancy costs (primarily due to increased maintenance and janitorial costs of $81,000 from weather-related maintenance and to the acquisition of an additional property) and to a $21,000 increase in property taxes, a $60,000 increase in advertising costs tied to the introduction of additional mobile banking products and services and a $24,000 increase in ATM fees tied to increased use.

 

Income Tax Expense. Our income tax provision decreased by $76,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily due to decreased income.

 

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our primary sources of funds are deposits, repayment and prepayment of loans, interest earned on or maturation of investment securities and short-term investments, borrowings and funds provided from operations. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans, investments and mortgage-backed securities are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general market interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

 

We monitor our cash flow carefully and strive to minimize the level of cash held in low-rate overnight accounts or in cash on hand. We also carefully track the scheduled delivery of loans committed for sale to be added to our cash flow calculations.

 

Our primary investing activities are the origination of loans and the purchase of securities. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Bank originated loans totaling $79.8 million and purchased $11.3 million of mortgage-backed securities. These activities were funded primarily by principal repayments and prepayments on loans and maturities of mortgage-backed securities totaling $62.9 million.   The proceeds from the sale of loans totaled $45.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Bank also purchased $37.9 million of investment securities funded primarily through maturities of investment securities of $1.9 million, through cash and short term investments and loan repayments and prepayments. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Bank purchased $19.5 million of investment securities funded primarily through sales and maturities of investment securities of $5.3 million.

 

Because there was a decrease in the balance of loans in our portfolio in 2013, we were less aggressive in acquiring additional deposits, reducing deposit interest rates from an average of 0.92% in 2012 to 0.68% in 2013. Despite the lower rates, deposits increased $6.0 million in 2013. We also allowed $5.0 million of FHLB advances to roll off in 2013. As opportunities for loan growth improve, we intend to use FHLB advances as a source of funding for loans when advantageous interest-rate risk matches can be found.

 

Liquidity management is both a daily and long-term function for our senior management. We adjust our investment strategy, within the limits established by the investment policy, based upon assessments of expected loan demand, expected cash flows, FHLB advance opportunities, market yields and the objectives of our asset/liability management program. Base levels of liquidity have generally been invested in interest-earning overnight and time deposits with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and more recently at the Federal Reserve since it has started to pay interest on deposits in excess of reserve requirements and because of increasing wire transfer requests

 

 

49

---

 

due to a change in funding methods now required by title companies. Funds for which a demand is not foreseen in the near future are invested in investment and other securities for the purpose of yield enhancement and asset/liability management.

 

Our current internal policy for liquidity is 5.0% of total assets. Our liquidity ratio at December 31, 2013 was 22.16% as a percentage of total assets which we attribute to depositors aversion to market risk and their preference to the safety of insured deposits.

 

We anticipate that we will have sufficient funds available to meet current funding commitments. At December 31, 2013 we had outstanding commitments to originate loans and available lines of credit totaling $27.3 million and commitments to provide borrowers the funds needed to complete current construction projects in the amount of $2.5 million. Certificates of deposit that will mature in one year or less at December 31, 2013 totaled $77.7 million. Based on our experience, our certificates of deposit have been a relatively stable source of long-term funds as such certificates are generally renewed upon maturity since we have established long-term banking relationships with our customers. Therefore, we believe a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although that cannot be assured. An exception to this rule would be the brokered certificates of deposit. Of the certificates maturing in one year or less at December 31, 2013, $3.6 million were brokered deposits which will be leaving the Bank at maturity.

 

LSB Financial also has a need for, and sources of, liquidity. Liquidity is required to fund our operating expenses and fund stock repurchase programs, as well as for the payment of dividends to shareholders as needed. LSB Financial declared quarterly cash dividends during each quarter of 2013 and the first quarter of 2014 after receiving all required regulatory non-objections to the dividend declarations. At December 31, 2013, LSB Financial had $339,000 in liquid assets on hand.

 

Federal insured savings institutions are required to maintain a minimum level of regulatory capital. If the requirement is not met, regulatory authorities may take legal or administrative actions, including restrictions on growth or operations or, in extreme cases, seizure. As of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, Lafayette Savings was categorized as well capitalized. Our actual and required capital amounts and ratios at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are presented in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (“Regulatory Matters”) in this Annual Report on 10-K.

 

 

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

 

As of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we do not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, change in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors. The term “off-balance-sheet arrangement” generally means any transaction, agreement, or other contractual arrangement to which any entity unconsolidated with the Company is a party and under which the Company has (i) any obligation arising under a guarantee contract, derivative instrument or variable interest or (ii) a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to such entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets.

 

See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements regarding off-balance-sheet commitments.

 

 

Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices

 

The Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These principles require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation.

 

The Company’s primary assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on our performance than the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates, however, do not necessarily move in the same direction or with the same magnitude as the price of goods and services, since such prices are affected by inflation. In a period of rapidly rising interest rates, the liquidity and maturities structures of our assets and liabilities are critical to the maintenance of acceptable performance levels.

 

The principal effect of inflation, as distinct from levels of interest rates, on earnings is in the area of non-interest expense. Such expense items as employee compensation, employee benefits and occupancy and equipment costs may be subject to increases as a result of inflation. An additional effect of inflation is the possible increase in

 

 

50

---

 

the dollar value of the collateral securing loans that the Company has made. The Company is unable to determine the extent, if any, to which properties securing our loans have appreciated in dollar value due to inflation.

 

 

Quarterly Results of Operations

 

Q uarter Ending		Interest Income				Interest Expense				Net Interest Income				Provision For Loan Losses				Net Income				Basic Earnings Per Share				Diluted Earnings Per Share
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Share Data)
2013
March		$	3,642			$	647			$	2,995			$	400			$	653			$	0.42			$	0.42
June			3,462				596				2,866				225				664				0.43				0.42
September			3,389				575				2,814				25				703				0.45				0.45
December			3,278				545				2,733				---				518				0.33				0.33
		$	13,771			$	2,363			$	11,408			$	650			$	2,538			$	1.63			$	1.62
2012
March		$	4,194			$	910			$	3,284			$	600			$	595			$	0.38			$	0.38
June			3,950				851				3,099				500				509				0.33				0.33
September			3,901				769				3,132				500				879				0.57				0.56
December			3,675				695				2,980				500				676				0.43				0.43
		$	15,720			$	3,225			$	12,495			$	2,100			$	2,659			$	1.71			$	1.70

 

 

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

Not Applicable.

 

 

51

---

 

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

 

 

LSB Financial Corp.

 

December 31, 2013 and 2012

 

 

Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	53
Consolidated Financial Statements
Balance Sheets	54
Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income	55
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity	56
Statements of Cash Flows	57
Notes to Financial Statements	58

 

52

---

 

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee, Board of Directors and Stockholders

LSB Financial Corp.

Lafayette, Indiana

 

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LSB Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.  The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing auditing procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  Our audits also included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of LSB Financial Corp. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

 

 

 

/s/ BKD, LLP

 

Indianapolis, Indiana

March 14, 2014

 

 

 

53

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Assets

		2013				2012
Cash and due from banks		$	21,961			$	25,643
Short-term investments			2,237				5,778
Cash and cash equivalents			24,198				31,421
Interest bearing time deposits			1,743				1,740
Available-for-sale securities			62,705				28,004
Loans held for sale			657				1,363
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $6,348 and $5,900 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively			254,703				280,257
Premises and equipment, net			7,933				7,069
Federal Home Loan Bank stock			3,185				3,185
Bank-owned life insurance			6,745				6,595
Interest receivable and other assets			5,712				4,976
Total assets		$	367,581			$	364,610
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Liabilities
Deposits		$	314,620			$	308,637
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			10,000				15,000
Interest payable and other liabilities			2,234				2,018
Total liabilities			326,854				325,655
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized 7,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2013 – 1,564,838 shares, 2012 - 1,555,972 shares			15				15
Additional paid-in capital			11,348				11,121
Retained earnings			29,658				27,495
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			(294	)			324
Total stockholders’ equity			40,727				38,955
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	367,581			$	364,610

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

54

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

		2013				2012
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans		$	12,914			$	15,162
Securities
Taxable			600				352
Tax-exempt			210				162
Other			47				44
Total interest and dividend income			13,771				15,720
Interest Expense
Deposits			2,105				2,839
Borrowings			258				386
Total interest expense			2,363				3,225
Net Interest Income			11,408				12,495
Provision for Loan Losses			650				2,100
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses			10,758				10,395
Non-interest Income
Deposit account service charges and fees			1,204				1,338
Net gains on loan sales			1,337				2,489
Net loss on other real estate owned			(53	)			(97	)
Debit card fees			598				558
Brokerage fees			267				119
Other			538				359
Total non-interest income			3,891				4,766
Non-interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits			5,833				6,205
Net occupancy and equipment expense			1,326				1,208
Computer service			606				618
Advertising			437				377
FDIC Insurance			476				481
ATM			289				265
Professional fees			500				500
Other			1,188				1,316
Total non-interest expense			10,655				10,970
Income Before Income Tax			3,994				4,191
Provision for Income Taxes			1,456				1,532
Net Income		$	2,538			$	2,659
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of $(412) and $58 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively			(618	)			88
Total comprehensive income		$	1,920			$	2,747
Basic Earnings Per Share		$	1.63			$	1.71
Diluted Earnings Per Share		$	1.62			$	1.70

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

55

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

														Accumulated
						Additional								Other
		Common				Paid-in				Retained				Comprehensive
		Stock				Capital				Earnings				Income (Loss)				Total
Balance, January 1, 2012		$	15			$	11,010			$	24,913			$	236			$	36,174
Net income											2,659								2,659
Other comprehensive income															88				88
Stock options exercised (750 shares)							7												7
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised							2												2
Dividends on common stock, $0.05 per share											(77	)							(77	)
Share-based compensation expense							102												102
Balance, December 31, 2012			15				11,121				27,495				324				38,955
Net income											2,538								2,538
Other comprehensive loss															(618	)			(618	)
Stock options exercised (8,866 shares)							185												185
Tax benefit related to stock options exercised							3												3
Dividends on common stock, $0.24 per share											(375	)							(375	)
Share-based compensation expense							39												39
Balance, December 31, 2013		$	15			$	11,348			$	29,658			$	(294	)		$	40,727

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

56

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

		2013				2012
Operating Activities
Net income		$	2,538			$	2,659
Items not requiring (providing) cash
Depreciation			437				453
Provision for loan losses			650				2,100
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities			233				155
Deferred income taxes			(227	)			(242	)
Loss on other real estate owned			53				97
Gain on sale of loans			(1,337	)			(2,489	)
Loans originated for sale			(43,506	)			(80,317	)
Proceeds on loans sold			45,272				84,144
Share-based compensation expense			39				102
Changes in
Interest receivable and other assets			(208	)			1,377
Interest payable and other liabilities			216				335
Net cash provided by operating activities			4,160				8,374
Investing Activities
Net change in interest-bearing deposits			(3	)			(1,740	)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities			(37,881	)			(19,454	)
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale securities			1,917				5,282
Net change in loans			24,742				18,797
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned			347				2,694
Purchase of premises and equipment			(1,301	)			(1,376	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities			(12,179	)			4,203
Financing Activities
Net change in demand deposits, money market, NOW and savings accounts			17,402				12,425
Net change in certificates of deposit			(11,419	)			(12,221	)
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances			(5,000	)			(3,000	)
Proceeds from stock options exercised			184				7
Tax benefits related to stock options purchased			3				2
Dividends paid			(374	)			(77	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			796				(2,864	)
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents			(7,223	)			9,713
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year			31,421				21,708
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year		$	24,198			$	31,421
Supplemental Cash Flows Information
Interest paid		$	2,369			$	3,235
Income taxes paid			2,110				675
Supplemental Non-Cash Disclosures
Capitalization of mortgage servicing rights		$	277			$	419
Loans transferred to other real estate owned			162				1,424

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

57

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

 

Note 1:   Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Nature of Operations

 

LSB Financial Corp. (“Company”) is a thrift holding company whose principal activity is the ownership and management of its wholly owned subsidiary, Lafayette Savings Bank (“Bank”). The Bank is primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking and financial services to individual and corporate customers in Tippecanoe and surrounding counties in Indiana. The Bank is subject to competition from other financial institutions. The Bank is subject to the regulation of certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Bank, and the Bank’s subsidiary, L.S.B. Service Corporation (“LSBSC”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses and fair value of servicing rights and financial instruments. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is secured by single and multi-family residential mortgages.

 

Cash Equivalents

 

The Company considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

Securities

 

Available-for-sale securities, which include any security for which the Company has no immediate plan to sell but which may be sold in the future, are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded, net of related income tax effects, in other comprehensive income.

 

Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts are recorded as interest income from securities. Realized gains and losses are recorded as net security gains (losses). Gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on the specific-identification method.

 

Loans Held for Sale

 

Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to non-interest income. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded in non-interest income, and direct loan origination costs and fees are deferred at origination of the loan and are recognized in non-interest income upon sale of the loan.

 

Loans

 

Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoffs are reported at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for any charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, any deferred fees or costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Interest income is reported on the interest method and includes amortization of net deferred loan fees and costs over the loan term.

 

 

58

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

 

For loans amortized at cost, interest income is accrued based on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, as well as premiums and discounts, are deferred and amortized as a level yield adjustment over the respective term of the loan.

 

The accrual of interest on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on non-accrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.

 

All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on non-accrual or charged off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses charged to income. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of a loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

 

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

 

The allowance consists of allocated and general components. The allocated component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For those loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers nonclassified loans and is based on historical charge-off experience and expected loss given default derived from the Company’s internal risk rating process. Other adjustments may be made to the allowance for pools of loans after an assessment of internal or external influences on credit quality that are not fully reflected in the historical loss or risk rating data.

 

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

 

Large groups of smaller balance homogenous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment measurements.

 

Premises and Equipment

 

Depreciable assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is charged to expense using the straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 3 to 39 years.

 

 

59

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

 

Federal Home Loan Bank stock is a required investment for institutions that are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank system. The required investment in the common stock is based on a predetermined formula, carried at cost and evaluated for impairment.

 

Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale

 

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net income or expense from foreclosed assets.

 

Servicing Rights

 

Servicing rights on originated loans that have been sold are initially recorded at fair value. Capitalized servicing rights are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated servicing revenues. Impairment of mortgage servicing rights is assessed based on the fair value of those rights. Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows based on a current market interest rate. For purposes of measuring impairment, the rights are stratified based on the predominant risk characteristics of the underlying loans. The predominant characteristic currently used for stratification is type of loan. The amount of impairment recognized is the amount by which the capitalized mortgage servicing rights for a stratum exceed their fair value and is recorded through a valuation allowance.

 

Stock Options

 

The Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan, which is described more fully in Note 13.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (ASC 740, Income Taxes ). The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Company determines deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur. Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

 

Uncertain tax positions are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50%; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date and is subject to management’s judgment. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by authorities for years before 2010.

 

Earnings Per Share

 

Basic earnings per share represents income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share reflects additional potential common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential

 

 

60

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and are determined using the treasury stock method.

 

Operating Segments

 

While the chief decision-makers monitor the revenue streams of the various products and services, the identifiable segments are not material and operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Accordingly, all of the financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated in one reportable operating segment.

 

Note 2:   Restriction on Cash and Due From Banks

 

The Bank is required to maintain reserve funds in cash and/or on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve required at December 31, 2013 was $2.0 million.

 

At December 31, 2013, the Company’s interest-bearing cash accounts do not exceed federally insured limits. Additionally, approximately $17.9 million and $1.8 million of cash is held by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago and the FHLB of Indianapolis, respectively, which is not federally insured.

 

Note 3:   Securities

 

The amortized cost and approximate fair values, together with gross unrealized gains and losses, of securities are as follows:

 

			Amortized Cost				Gross Unrealized Gains				Gross Unrealized Losses				Approximate Fair Value
	Available-for-sale Securities:
	December 31, 2013
	U.S. Government sponsored agencies		$	28,982			$	39			$	(417	)		$	28,604
	Mortgage-backed securities-Government sponsored entities			16,704				122				(227	)			16,599
	Corporate bonds			1,050				13				---				1,063
	State and political subdivisions			16,465				172				(198	)			16,439
			$	63,201			$	346			$	(842	)		$	62,705
	Available-for-sale Securities:
	December 31, 2012
	U.S. Government sponsored agencies		$	10,639			$	83			$	(13	)		$	10,709
	Mortgage-backed securities-Government sponsored entities			6,989				209				---				7,198
	State and political subdivisions			9,840				271				(14	)			10,097
			$	27,468			$	563			$	(27	)		$	28,004

 

 

 

61

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

 

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

			Amortized Cost				Fair Value
	Within one year		$	2,145			$	2,148
	One to five years			35,808				35,615
	Five to ten years			8,544				8,343
	After ten years			---				---
				46,497				46,106
	Mortgage-backed securities			16,704				16,599
	Totals		$	63,201			$	62,705

 

 

The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral was $1.8 million at December 31, 2013, and $2.0 million at December 31, 2012. Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost. Total fair value of these investments at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $40.8 million and $5.6 million, which is approximately 65% and 20%, respectively, of the Company’s available-for-sale investment portfolio.

 

Based on evaluation of available evidence, including recent changes in market interest rates, credit rating information and information obtained from regulatory filings, management believes the declines in fair value for these securities are temporary.

 

Should the impairment of any of these securities become other than temporary, the cost basis of the investment will be reduced and the resulting loss recognized in net income in the period the other-than-temporary impairment is identified.

 

The following tables show our investments’ gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

			2013
			Less Than 12 Months							12 Months or More							Total
	Description of Securities		Fair Value			Unrealized Losses				Fair Value			Unrealized Losses				Fair Value			Unrealized Losses
	U.S. Government sponsored agencies		$	21,587		$	417			$	---		$	---			$	21,587		$	417
	Mortgage-backed securities-Government sponsored entities			9,781			226				7			1				9,788			227
	State and political subdivisions			9,401			198				---			---				9,401			198
	Total temporarily impaired securities		$	40,769		$	841			$	7		$	1			$	40,776		$	842

 

62

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

			2012
			Less Than 12 Months						12 Months or More						Total
	Description of Securities		Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses
	U.S. Government sponsored agencies		$	3,076		$	13		$	---		$	---		$	3,076		$	13
	State and political subdivisions			2,541			14			---			---			2,541			14
	Total temporarily impaired securities		$	5,617		$	27		$	---		$	---		$	5,617		$	27

 

U.S. Government Agencies

 

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in direct obligations of U.S. government agencies were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013.

 

Residential Mortgage-backed Securities

 

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investment in residential mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases. The Company expects to recover the amortized cost bases over the term of the securities. Because the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, and because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013.

 

State and Political Subdivisions

 

The unrealized losses on the Company’s investments in securities of state and political subdivisions were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost bases of the investments. Because the Company does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Company will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013.

 

 

Note 4:  Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in Lafayette Savings’ loan portfolios. In determining the appropriate amount of the allowance for loan losses, management makes numerous assumptions, estimates and assessments.

 

The strategy also emphasizes diversification on an industry and customer level, regular credit quality reviews and quarterly management reviews of large credit exposures and loans experiencing deterioration of credit quality.

 

Lafayette Savings’ allowance consists of three components: probable losses estimated from individual reviews of specific loans, probable losses estimated from historical loss rates, and probable losses resulting from economic or other deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the first two components of the allowance.

 

All loans that are rated substandard and impaired, or are troubled debt restructures, are subject to individual review. Where appropriate, reserves are allocated to individual loans based on management’s estimate of the borrower’s ability to repay the loan given the availability of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal

 

 

63

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

options available to the Bank. Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired as provided in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 310-10. Any allowances for impaired loans are determined by the fair value of the underlying collateral based on the discounted appraised value. Allowances for loans that are not collateral dependent are determined by the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate. Historical loss rates are applied to all loans not included in the ASC 310-10 calculation.

 

Historical loss rates for commercial and consumer loans may be adjusted for significant qualitative factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. Factors which management considers in the analysis include the effects of the national and local economies, trends in the nature and volume of loans (delinquencies, charge-offs and non-accrual loans), changes in mix, asset quality trends, risk management and loan administration, changes in the internal lending policies and credit standards, collection practices, examination results from bank regulatory agencies and Lafayette Savings’ internal loan review.

 

Allowances on individual loans and historical loss rates are reviewed quarterly and adjusted as necessary based on changing borrower and/or collateral conditions and actual collection and charge-off experience.

 

Lafayette Savings’ primary market area for lending is Tippecanoe County, Indiana and to a lesser extent the eight surrounding counties. When evaluating the adequacy of the allowance, consideration is given to this regional geographic concentration and the closely associated effect of changing economic conditions on Lafayette Savings’ customers.

 

Categories of loans at December 31 include:

 

			2013				2012
	Real Estate
	One-to-four family residential		$	98,061			$	99,216
	Multi-family residential			49,866				62,823
	Commercial real estate			72,030				82,430
	Construction and land development			15,318				14,113
	Commercial			11,461				13,290
	Consumer and other			1,160				1,131
	Home equity lines of credit			16,050				16,421
	Total loans			263,946				289,424
	Less
	Net deferred loan fees, premiums and discounts			(408	)			(469	)
	Undisbursed portion of loans			(2,487	)			(2,798	)
	Allowance for loan losses			(6,348	)			(5,900	)
	Net loans		$	254,703			$	280,257

 

 

The risk characteristics of each loan portfolio segment are as follows:

 

Commercial

 

Commercial loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.

 

 

64

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Commercial Real Estate

 

These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. The properties securing the Company’s commercial real estate portfolio are diverse in terms of type and geographic location. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. As a general rule, the Company avoids financing single purpose projects unless other underwriting factors are present to help mitigate risk. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner-occupied loans.

 

Construction

 

Construction loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based on estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Company until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.

 

Residential, Home Equity and Consumer

 

With respect to residential loans that are secured by one- to four-family residences that are usually owner occupied, the Company generally establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded. Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in one- to four-family residences, and consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit. Repayment of these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.

 

 

65

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Additional information on the allocation of loan loss reserves by loan category, which does not include loans held for sale, for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is provided below.

 

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
2013		Commercial				Owner Occupied 1-4				Non-owner Occupied 1-4				Multi- family				Commercial Real Estate				Construction				Land				Consumer and Home Equity				Total
Allowance for losses
Beginning balance		$	633			$	589			$	1,022			$	1,055			$	2,177			$	62			$	154			$	208			$	5,900
Provision charged to expense			(77	)			236				225				(33	)			278				(24	)			(40	)			85				650
Losses charged off			32				73				327				---				40				---				10				35				517
Recoveries			125				1				125				1				21				---				42				---				315
Ending balance		$	649			$	753			$	1,045			$	1,023			$	2,436			$	38			$	146			$	258			$	6,348
ALL individually evaluated		$	5			$	13			$	30			$	---			$	749			$	---			$	1			$	---			$	798
ALL collectively evaluated			644				740				1,015				1,023				1,687				38				145				258				5,550
Total ALL		$	649			$	753			$	1,045			$	1,023			$	2,436			$	38			$	146				258			$	6,348
Loans individually evaluated		$	1,250			$	921			$	2,820			$	522			$	6,703			$	---			$	779			$	90			$	13,085
Loans collectively evaluated			10,211				51,098				43,222				49,344				65,327				5,446				9,093			$	17,120				250,861
Total loans evaluated		$	11,461			$	52,019			$	46,042			$	49,866			$	72,030			$	5,446			$	9,872			$	17,210			$	263,946

 

Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loans for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
2012		Commercial				Owner Occupied 1-4				Non-owner Occupied 1-4				Multi- family				Commercial Real Estate				Construction				Land				Consumer and Home Equity				Total
Allowance for losses
Beginning balance		$	667			$	436			$	1,330			$	646			$	1,788			$	64			$	264			$	136			$	5,331
Provision charged to expense			421				213				(246	)			667				1,156				(2	)			(190	)			81				2,100
Losses charged off			485				61				83				259				795				---				16				11				1,710
Recoveries			30				1				21				1				28				---				96				2				179
Ending balance		$	633			$	589			$	1,022			$	1,055			$	2,177			$	62			$	154			$	208			$	5,900
ALL individually evaluated		$	---			$	14				27			$	24			$	253			$	---			$	---			$	---			$	318
ALL collectively evaluated			633				575				995				1,031				1,924				62				154				208				5,582
Total ALL		$	633			$	589			$	1,022			$	1,055			$	2,177			$	62			$	154			$	208			$	5,900
Loans individually evaluated		$	49			$	1,653			$	5,917			$	2,891			$	6,233			$	---			$	1,379			$	92			$	18,214
Loans collectively evaluated			13,241				46,892				44,754				59,932				76,197				8,928				3,806				17,460				271,210
Total loans evaluated		$	13,290			$	48,545			$	50,671			$	62,823			$	82,430			$	8,928			$	5,185			$	17,552			$	289,424

 

 

66

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Management’s general practice is to charge down collateral dependent loans individually evaluated for impairment to the fair value of the underlying collateral.

 

Consistent with regulatory guidance, charge-offs on all loan segments are taken when specific loans, or portions thereof, are considered uncollectible. The Company’s policy is to promptly charge these loans off in the period the uncollectible loss is reasonably determined.

 

For all loan portfolio segments except one- to four-family residential properties and consumer, the Company promptly charges-off loans, or portions thereof, when available information confirms that specific loans are uncollectible based on information that includes, but is not limited to, (1) the deteriorating financial condition of the borrower, (2) declining collateral values, and/or (3) legal action, including bankruptcy, that impairs the borrower’s ability to adequately meet its obligations. For impaired loans that are considered to be solely collateral dependent, a partial charge-off is recorded when a loss has been confirmed by an updated appraisal or other appropriate valuation of the collateral.

 

The Company charges-off one- to four-family residential and consumer loans, or portions thereof, when the Company reasonably determines the amount of the loss. The Company adheres to timeframes established by applicable regulatory guidance which provides for the charge-down of one- to four-family first and junior lien mortgages to the net realizable value less costs to sell when the loan is 120 days past due, charge-off of unsecured open-end loans when the loan is 120 days past due, and charge-down to the net realizable value when other secured loans are 120 days past due. Loans at these respective delinquency thresholds for which the Company can clearly document that the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection, such that collection will occur regardless of delinquency status, need not be charged off. Charge-offs may be taken sooner than the above-referenced timeframes if circumstances warrant.

 

The entire balance of a loan is considered delinquent if the minimum payment contractually required to be made is not received by the specified due date.

 

The historical loss experience is determined by portfolio segment and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Company over the prior four years. Management believes the four year historical loss experience methodology is appropriate in the current economic environment, as it captures loss rates that are comparable to the current period being analyzed.

 

We rate all loans by credit quality using the following designations:

 

GRADE 1 - Pass, superior credit quality

 

Loans of the highest quality. Financial strength of the borrower (exhibited by extremely low debt-to-income ratios/high debt-service coverage, low loan-to-value ratio, and clean credit history) is such that no loss is anticipated. Probability of serious or rapid deterioration is extremely small.

 

GRADE 2 - Pass, good credit quality

 

Loans of good quality. Overall above average credit, with strong capacity to repay (exhibited by higher debt-to-income ratios/lower debt-service coverage than Grade 1, but still better than average levels), sound credit history and employment. Loan-to-value is not as strong as Grade 1, but is greater than Grade 3. Minor loss exposure with the probability of serious financial deterioration unlikely.

 

GRADE 3 - Pass, low risk

 

Loans of satisfactory quality. Average quality due to average capacity to repay (exhibited by higher debt-to-income ratios/lower debt-service coverage than Grade 2 but better than levels requiring Loan Committee approval), employment, credit history, loan-to-value ratio, or paying habits. Deterioration possible if adverse factors occur.

 

GRADE 4 - Pass, acceptable risk

 

Loans of marginal, but acceptable quality due to below average capacity to repay (exhibited by high debt-to-income ratios/low debt-service coverage), high loan-to-value, or poor paying habits. Deterioration likely if adverse factors occur.

 

 

67

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

GRADE W-4 - Pass, watch list credit

 

These loans have the same characteristics as standard Grade 4 loans, with an added significant weakness such as the global debt-service coverage of the borrower being below 1.00. Such loans should have no delinquencies within the previous 12 months.

 

GRADE 5- Special Mention

 

Loans in this classification are in a state of change that could adversely affect paying ability, collateral value or which require monthly monitoring to protect the asset value.

 

GRADE 6- Substandard

 

A substandard asset with a defined weakness. Heavy debt condition, deterioration of collateral, poor paying habits, or conditions present that unless deficiencies are corrected will result in some loss. Loans 90 or more days past due should be automatically included in this grade.

 

GRADE 7- Doubtful

 

Poor quality. Loans in this group are characterized by less than adequate collateral and all of the characteristics of a loan classified as substandard. The possibility of a loss is extremely high, but factors may be underway to minimize the loss or maximize the recovery.

 

GRADE 8 - Loss

 

Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as an asset is not warranted.

 

Interest income on loans individually classified as impaired is recognized on a cash basis after all past due and current principal payments have been made.

 

Subsequent payments on non-accrual loans are recorded as a reduction of principal, and interest income is recorded only after principal recovery is reasonably assured. Non-accrual loans are returned to accrual status when, in the opinion of management, the financial position of the borrower indicates there is no longer any reasonable doubt as to the timely collection of interest or principal. The Company requires a period of satisfactory performance of not less than six months before returning a non-accrual loan to accrual status.

 

 

68

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

The following tables provide an analysis of loan quality using the above designations, based on property type at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

		Loan Quality Analysis as of December 31, 2013
Credit Rating		Commercial				Owner Occupied 1-4				Non-owner Occupied 1-4				Multi- Family				Commercial Real Estate				Construction				Land				Consumer and Home Equity				Total
1- Superior		$	20			$	3,703			$	427			$	---			$	98			$	---			$	139			$	1,854			$	6,241
2 – Good			1,528				24,965				3,307				1,755				10,784				2,393				1,752				11,419				57,903
3 - Pass Low risk			3,872				16,321				10,896				22,131				16,340				2,806				4,552				3,274				80,192
4 – Pass			3,035				5,088				22,579				19,006				23,604				247				2,239				589				76,387
4W - Watch			860				926				4,518				5,447				12,397				---				85				35				24,268
5 - Special mention			---				274				1,248				1,461				343				---				412				38				3,776
6 - Substandard			2,146				742				3,067				66				8,464				---				693				1				15,179
7 - Doubtful			---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---
8 – Loss			---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---
Total		$	11,461			$	52,019			$	46,042			$	49,866			$	72,030			$	5,446			$	9,872			$	17,210			$	263,946

 

		Loan Quality Analysis as of December 31, 2012
Credit Rating		Commercial				Owner Occupied 1-4				Non-owner Occupied 1-4				Multi- Family				Commercial Real Estate				Construction				Land				Consumer and Home Equity				Total
1- Superior		$	27			$	3,849			$	246			$	---			$	103			$	667			$	193			$	1,787			$	6,872
2 – Good			3,061				20,104				4,299				7,661				10,924				1,123				172				11,311				58,655
3 - Pass Low risk			7,982				16,459				12,625				31,281				31,853				5,383				286				3,374				109,243
4 – Pass			1,689				6,221				24,623				18,010				22,993				1,755				1,387				1,078				77,756
4W - Watch			186				746				2,894				2,954				5,014				---				1,769				---				13,563
5 - Special mention			296				---				2,535				2,139				4,658				---				---				---				9,628
6 - Substandard			49				1,166				3,449				778				6,885				---				1,378				2				13,707
7 - Doubtful			---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---
8 – Loss			---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---				---
Total		$	13,290			$	48,545			$	50,671			$	62,823			$	82,430			$	8,928			$	5,185			$	17,552			$	289,424

 

69

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Analyses of past due loans segregated by loan type as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 are provided below.

 

		Loan Portfolio Aging Analysis as of December 31, 2013
		30-59 Days				60-89 Days				Over 90 Days				Total Past Due				Current				Total Loans				Under 90 Days and Not Accruing				Total 90 Days and Accruing
Commercial		$	---			$	140			$	---			$	140			$	11,321			$	11,461			$	---			$	---
Owner occupied 1-4			84				---				---				84				51,935				52,019				553				---
Non-owner occupied 1-4			362				183				1,152				1,697				44,345				46,042				554				---
Multi-family			---				65				---				65				49,801				49,866				65				---
Commercial real estate			---				---				111				111				71,919				72,030				16				---
Construction			---				---				---				---				5,446				5,446				---				---
Land			35				---				121				156				9,716				9,872				---				---
Consumer and home equity			2				---				---				2				17,208				17,210				---				---
Total		$	483			$	388			$	1,384			$	2,255			$	261,691			$	263,946			$	1,188			$	---

 

 

		Loan Portfolio Aging Analysis as of December 31, 2012
		30-59 Days				60-89 Days				Over 90 Days				Total Past Due				Current				Total Loans				Under 90 Days and Not Accruing				Total 90 Days and Accruing
Commercial		$	---			$	---			$	49			$	49			$	13,241			$	13,290			$	---			$	---
Owner occupied 1-4			184				406				107				697				47,848				48,545				862				---
Non-owner occupied 1-4			291				216				2,124				2,631				48,040				50,671				543				---
Multi-family			700				78				---				778				62,045				62,823				76				---
Commercial real estate			---				---				487				487				81,943				82,430				815				---
Construction			---				---				---				---				8,928				8,928				---				---
Land			---				79				140				219				4,966				5,185				1,238				---
Consumer and home equity			1				2				---				3				17,549				17,552				2				---
Total		$	1,176			$	781			$	2,907			$	4,864			$	284,560			$	289,424			$	3,536			$	---

 

70

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Impaired loans are those for which we believe it is probable that we will not collect all principal and interest due in accordance with the original terms of the loan agreement. The following tables present impaired loans and interest recognized on them for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

		Impaired Loans as of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
		Recorded Balance				Unpaid Principal Balance				Specific Allowance				Average Impaired Loans				Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance
Commercial		$	---			$	---			$	---			$	---			$	---
Owner occupied 1-4			793				922				---				1,089				28
Non-owner occupied 1-4			2,543				3,264				---				4,340				241
Multi-family			522				541				---				1,346				101
Commercial real estate			2,452				2,646				---				3,478				310
Construction			---				---				---				---				---
Land			694				959				---				719				---
Consumer and home equity			90				91				---				100				5
Total loans without a specific valuation allowance			7,094				8,423				---				11,072				685
Loans with a specific valuation allowance
Commercial			1,250				1,250				5				313				12
Owner occupied 1-4			128				132				13				128				4
Non-owner occupied 1-4			277				277				30				283				2
Multi-family			---				---				---				---				---
Commercial real estate			4,251				3,769				749				2,952				347
Construction			---				---				---				---				---
Land			85				85				1				71				2
Consumer and home equity			---				---				---				---				---
Total loans with a specific valuation allowance			5,991				5,513				798				3,747				367
Total
Commercial			1,250				1,250				5				313				12
Owner occupied 1-4			921				1,054				13				1,217				32
Non-owner occupied 1-4			2,820				3,541				30				4,623				243
Multi-family			522				541				---				1,346				101
Commercial real estate			6,703				6,415				749				6,430				657
Construction			---				---				---				---				---
Land			779				1,044				1				790				2
Consumer and home equity			90				91				---				100				5
Total impaired loans		$	13,085			$	13,936			$	798			$	14,819			$	1,052

 

71

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Impaired Loans as of and for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
		Recorded Balance				Unpaid Principal Balance				Specific Allowance				Average Impaired Loans				Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance
Commercial		$	49			$	521			$	---			$	568			$	35
Owner occupied 1-4			1,421				1,535				---				1,434				65
Non-owner occupied 1-4			5,636				5,990				---				6,485				273
Multi-family			2,813				2,865				---				3,032				151
Commercial real estate			4,667				5,720				---				8,275				260
Construction			---				---				---				---				---
Land			1,379				1,615				---				1,566				25
Consumer and home equity			92				114				---				160				11
Total loans without a specific valuation allowance			16,057				18,360				---				21,520				820
Loans with a specific valuation allowance
Commercial			---				---				---				143				2
Owner occupied 1-4			232				240				14				160				8
Non-owner occupied 1-4			281				281				27				295				1
Multi-family			78				83				24				16				---
Commercial real estate			1,566				1,567				253				1,612				48
Construction			---				---				---				---				---
Land			---				---				---				---				---
Consumer and home equity			---				---				---				1				1
Total loans with a specific valuation allowance			2,157				2,171				318				2,227				60
Total
Commercial			49				521				---				711				37
Owner occupied 1-4			1,653				1,775				14				1,594				73
Non-owner occupied 1-4			5,917				6,271				27				6,780				274
Multi-family			2,891				2,948				24				3,048				151
Commercial real estate			6,233				7,287				253				9,887				308
Construction			---				---				---				---				---
Land			1,379				1,615				---				1,566				25
Consumer and home equity			92				114				---				161				12
Total impaired loans		$	18,214			$	20,531			$	318			$	23,747			$	880

All loans rated substandard that have had an impairment allocated to them and all troubled debt restructures are considered impaired. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due (both principal and interest) according to contractual terms of the loan agreement. Loans that are considered impaired are reviewed to determine if a specific allowance is required based on the borrower’s financial condition, resources and payment record, support from guarantors and the realizable value of any collateral. As a practical expedient, the Bank will typically use the collateral fair market value method to determine impairments unless circumstances preclude its use. In this method, any portion of the investment above the current fair market value of the collateral should be identified as an impairment. Fair market value is determined using a current appraisal or evaluation in compliance with federal appraisal regulations.

 

 

72

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

The following table gives a breakdown of non-accruing loans by loan class at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

			2013				2012
	Commercial		$	---			$	49
	Owner occupied 1-4			553				969
	Non-owner occupied 1-4			1,706				2,667
	Multi-family			66				76
	Commercial real estate			126				1,302
	Land			121				1,378
	Consumer and home equity			---				2
	Total		$	2,572			$	6,443

 

Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in the judgment of management, the probability of collection of interest is deemed to be insufficient to warrant further accrual. All interest accrued but not received for loans placed on non-accrual is reversed against interest income. Interest subsequently received on such loans is accounted for by using the cost-recovery basis for commercial loans and the cash-basis for retail loans until qualifying for return to accrual status.

 

Loans to related parties at December 31, 2013 totaled $2.6 million. Loans to related parties at December 31, 2012 of $3.1 million were reduced by paydowns of $625,000 and increased by new debt of $18,000.

 

The following tables present information regarding troubled debt restructurings by class for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

	Troubled Debt Restructurings for Year Ended December 31, 2013
			Number of Loans			Pre-Modification Recorded Balance				Post-Modification Recorded Balance			Type of Modification
	Commercial		1			$	1,250			$	1,250		Term
	Owner occupied 1-4		1				38				38		Below market rate
	Non-owner occupied 1-4		7				1,519				1,246		A/B loan, payment adjustment, term
	Multi-family		1				35				35		Rate
	Commercial Real Estate		2				1,274				1,256		Rate, term
	Construction		---				---				---
	Land		1				95				95		Rate, term
	Consumer and home equity		1				29				29		Term
	Total		14			$	4,240			$	3,949

 

 

73

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

	Troubled Debt Restructurings for Year Ended December 31, 2012
			Number of Loans			Pre-Modification Recorded Balance				Post-Modification Recorded Balance			Type of Modification
	Commercial		1			$	245			$	245		Term
	Owner occupied 1-4		3				239				239		Rate, high loan-to-value
	Non-owner occupied 1-4		---				---				---
	Multi-family		---				---				---
	Commercial Real Estate		2				1,889				1,430		A/B loan, payment adjustment
	Construction		---				---				---
	Land		---				---				---
	Consumer and home equity		---				---				---
	Total		6			$	2,373			$	1,914

 

No troubled debt restructurings modified in the past 12 months have subsequently defaulted. As of December 31, 2013, borrowers with loans designated as troubled debt restructures and totaling $6.8 million, met the criteria for placement back on accrual status. These criteria are a minimum of six months payment performance under existing or modified terms.

 

Note 5:   Premises and Equipment

 

Major classifications of premises and equipment, stated at cost, are as follows:

 

			2013				2012
	Land		$	1,681			$	1,681
	Buildings and improvements			8,552				7,569
	Equipment			3,811				3,493
				14,044				12,743
	Less accumulated depreciation			(6,111	)			(5,674	)
	Net premises and equipment		$	7,933			$	7,069

 

 

 

74

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

 

Note 6:   Loan Servicing

 

Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal balances of mortgage loans serviced for others were $131.1 million and $123.2 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

The following summarizes the activity pertaining to mortgage servicing rights measured using the amortization method. Comparable market values and a valuation model that calculates the present value of future cash flows were used to estimate fair value of the mortgage servicing rights. For purposes of measuring impairment, risk characteristics including product type, investor type and interest rates, were used to stratify the originated mortgage servicing rights.

 

			2013				2012
	Mortgage servicing rights
	Balance, beginning of year		$	983			$	962
	Additions			277				419
	Amortization of servicing rights			(173	)			(398	)
	Balance, end of year		$	1,087			$	983

 

			2013				2012
	Fair value, beginning of period		$	1,184			$	983
	Fair value, end of period			1,513				1,184

 

Note 7:   Deposits

 

Deposits at year-end are summarized as follows:

 

			2013								2012
			Amount				Percent				Amount				Percent
	Non-interest-bearing deposits		$	33,488				10.64	%		$	30,879				10.00	%
	NOW accounts			120,752				38.38				107,859				34.95
	Savings accounts			30,866				9.81				28,966				9.39
				185,106				58.83				167,704				54.34
	Certificates of deposit
	0.00% to 1.99%			94,948				30.18				94,506				30.62
	2.00% to 3.99%			33,367				10.61				42,802				13.87
	4.00% to 5.99%			1,199				0.38				3,620				1.17
	6.00% to 7.99%			---				---				5				---
				129,514				41.17				140,933				45.66
			$	314,620				100.00	%		$	308,637				100.00	%

 

 

75

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

At December 31, 2013, scheduled maturities of certificates of deposit are as follows:

 

	2014		$	77,716
	2015			30,829
	2016			9,249
	2017			5,805
	2018			5,915
			$	129,514

 

Time deposits of $100,000 or more, including brokered deposits, were $68.4 million and $69.2 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Deposits from related parties held by the Company at December 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled $1.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

 

Brokered deposits totaled approximately $13.7 million at both December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

 

Note 8:   Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

 

Federal Home Loan Bank advances totaled $10.0 million and $15.0 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At December 31, 2013, the advances range in interest rates from 1.84% to 3.13% and are secured by blanket mortgage loan collateral totaling $110 million.

 

Aggregate annual maturities of the advances at December 31, 2013, are:

 

	2014		$	---
	2015			3,000
	2016			7,000
	2017			---
			$	10,000

 

 

Note 9:   Income Taxes

 

The provision for income taxes includes these components:

 

			2013				2012
	Taxes currently payable		$	1,683			$	1,774
	Deferred income taxes			(227	)			(242	)
	Income tax expense		$	1,456			$	1,532

 

A reconciliation of income tax expense at the statutory rate to the Company’s actual income tax expense is shown below:

 

			2013				2012
	Computed at the statutory rate (34%)		$	1,358			$	1,425
	Increase (decrease) resulting from
	Tax exempt interest			(67	)			(51	)
	State income taxes			193				195
	Other			(28	)			(37	)
	Actual tax expense		$	1,456			$	1,532

 

 

76

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

The tax effects of temporary differences related to deferred taxes were:

 

			2013				2012
	Deferred tax assets
	Allowance for loan losses		$	2,632			$	2,382
	Non-accrual loan income			342				350
	Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities			196				---
	Other			359				344
				3,529				3,076
	Deferred tax liabilities
	Depreciation			287				265
	Mortgage servicing rights			459				416
	FHLB stock dividends			131				132
	Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities			---				212
	Other			320				357
				1,197				1,382
	Net deferred tax asset		$	2,332			$	1,694

 

Retained earnings at December 31, 2013 and 2012 include approximately $1.9 million for which no deferred federal income tax liability has been recognized. This amount represents an allocation of income to bad debt deductions for tax purposes only. Reduction of amounts so allocated for purposes other than tax bad debt losses or adjustments arising from carryback of net operating losses would create income for tax purposes only, which would be subject to the then-current corporate income tax rate. The deferred income tax liabilities on the preceding amounts that would have been recorded if they were expected to reverse into taxable income in the foreseeable future were approximately $737,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

 

Note 10:   Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

The components of accumulated other income, included in the consolidated statement of stockholder’s equity, are related to unrealized gains in the available-for-sale investment portfolio. Net unrealized gains (losses) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 were approximately ($496,000) and $536,000, with related deferred income tax expense (benefit) of approximately ($196,000) and $212,000, respectively.

 

 

Note 11:   Regulatory Matters

 

The Bank is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. As discussed in the Regulation section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Federal Reserve has released new rules that will increase the capital adequacy standards over the next few years and change the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.

 

The current quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below). Management believes, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 that the Bank meets all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

 

 

77

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

As of December 31, 2013, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category.

 

The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the table. The tables include capital amounts and ratios reported in the periodic Call Reports required by the OCC.

 

			Actual						For Capital Adequacy Purposes						To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
			Amount			Ratio			Amount			Ratio			Amount				Ratio
	As of December 31, 2013
	Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)		$	43,604		17.4	%		$	20,054		8.0	%		$	25,067			10.0	%
	Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)			40,431		16.1				10,027		4.0				15,040			6.0
	Tier I capital (to adjusted total assets)			40,431		11.0				11,048		3.0				18,413			5.0
	As of December 31, 2012
	Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)		$	41,400		16.0	%		$	20,694		8.0	%		$	25,868			10.0	%
	Tier I capital (to risk-weighted assets)			38,134		14.7				10,347		4.0				15,521			6.0
	Tier I capital (to adjusted total assets)			38,134		10.5				10,928		3.0				18,213			5.0

 

The Bank and the Company are subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that each may declare without prior regulatory approval. At December 31, 2013, regulatory action was required for all dividend declarations.

 

In 1995, when the Company converted from a mutual to a stock institution, a “liquidation account” was established at $8.1 million, which was net worth reported in the conversion prospectus. Eligible depositors who have maintained their accounts, less annual reduction to the extent they have reduced their deposits, would receive a distribution from this account if the Bank liquidated. Dividends may not reduce shareholders’ equity below the required liquidation account balance.

 

 

Note 12:   Employee Benefits

 

The Bank maintains an ESOP, which purchased 8% of the stock offered in the conversion of the Company from a mutual to a stock institution. All shares in the ESOP have been allocated to participants in prior years. Dividends paid on allocated shares are charged to retained earnings.

 

There was no ESOP expense recorded for 2013 and 2012.

 

			2013			2012
	ESOP shares allocated		78,334			95,680

 

The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees. Employees may contribute up to 100% of their compensation with the Company matching 100% of the employee’s

 

 

78

---

 

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

contribution on the first 4% of the employee’s compensation. Employer contributions charged to expense for 2013 and 2012 were $99,000 and $127,000, respectively.

 

 

Note 13:   Stock Option Plans

 

The Company’s original Incentive Stock Option Plan (the “1995 Plan”), which was shareholder approved, permitted the grant of stock options to its directors, officers and other key employees. The 1995 Plan authorized the grant of options for up to 238,050 shares of the Company’s common stock which generally vest at a rate of 20 percent a year and have a 10-year contractual life. At December 31, 2013, 10,610 shares from the 1995 Plan were outstanding. The Company’s 2007 Incentive Stock Option Plan (“2007 Plan”), which is shareholder approved, also permits the grant of stock options to its directors, officers and other key employees. The 2007 Plan authorized the grant of options for up to 81,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, which generally vest at a rate of 20 percent a year and have a 10-year contractual term. At December 31, 2013, 32,315 shares from the 2007 Plan were outstanding. The Company believes that such awards better align the interests of its directors and employees with those of its shareholders. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. Certain option awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined in the 1995 and 2007 Plans). The Company issues shares from its authorized shares to satisfy option exercises. There were no options granted under the 2007 Plan during 2013.

 

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock and other factors. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The discount rate for post-vesting restrictions is estimated based on the Company’s credit-adjusted risk-free rate of return.

 

No option awards were granted in 2013.

 

A summary of option activity under the 1995 and 2007 Plans as of December 31, 2013, and changes during the year then ended, is presented below:

 

			2013
			Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price			Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	Outstanding, beginning of year		64,183		$	18.58
	Granted		0
	Exercised		(8,866	)		20.83
	Forfeited		(12,392	)		18.68
	Outstanding, end of year		42,925		$	18.36		6.27 years		$	131
	Exercisable, end of year		18,722		$	20.12		2.48 years		$	70

 

 

79

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during 2012 was $672,000. There were no options granted during the year 2013. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 was $5,000 and $45,000, respectively.

 

Cash received from option exercise under all share-based payment arrangements for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 was $7,000 and $184,000, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercise of the share-based payment arrangements totaled $2,000 and $3,000, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013.

 

There were 12,392 options forfeited in 2013. There were 2,000 options forfeited or expired during the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

As of December 31, 2013, there was $63,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of four years.

 

 

Note 14:   Earnings Per Share

 

Earnings per share (EPS) were computed as follows:

 

			Year Ended December 31, 2013
			Income				Weighted- Average Shares				Per Share Amount
	Net income		$	2,538				1,558,729
	Basic earnings per share
	Income available to common stockholders										$	1.63
	Effect of dilutive securities
	Stock options							6,867
	Diluted earnings per share
	Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions		$	2,538				1,565,596			$	1.62

 

 

There were no options outstanding at December 31, 2013 that were considered anti-dilutive.

 

			Year Ended December 31, 2012
			Income				Weighted- Average Shares				Per Share Amount
	Net income		$	2,659				1,555,810
	Basic earnings per share
	Income available to common stockholders										$	1.71
	Effect of dilutive securities
	Stock options							5,685
	Diluted earnings per share
	Income available to common stockholders and assumed conversions		$	2,659				1,561,495			$	1.70

 

 

There were 25,866 options outstanding at December 31, 2012 that were considered anti-dilutive.

 

 

80

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Note 15:   Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

ASC Topic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements , defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1

Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

 

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities

 

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities

 

Recurring Measurements

 

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

							Fair Value Measurements Using
			Fair Value				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)				Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	December 31, 2013
	Available-for-sale securities
	U.S. government-sponsored agencies		$	28,604			$	---			$	28,604			$	---
	Mortgage-backed securities			16,599				---				16,599				---
	Corporate bonds			1,063				---				1,063				---
	State and political subdivision securities			16,439				---				16,439				---
	Totals		$	62,705			$	---			$	62,705			$	---
	December 31, 2012
	Available-for-sale securities
	U.S. government-sponsored agencies		$	10,709			$	---			$	10,709			$	---
	Mortgage-backed securities			7,198				---				7,198				---
	State and political subdivision securities			10,097				---				10,097				---
	Totals		$	28,004			$	---			$	28,004			$	---

 

 

81

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

 

Available-for-Sale Securities

 

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or independent asset pricing services and pricing models, the inputs of which are market-based or independently sourced market parameters, including, but not limited to, yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, prepayments, defaults, cumulative loss projections and cash flows. Such securities are classified in Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

 

Nonrecurring Measurements

 

The following table presents the fair value measurement of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

						Fair Value Measurements Using
			Fair Value			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)				Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Collateral-dependent impaired loans
	December 31, 2013		$	3,637		$	---		$	---			$	3,637
	December 31, 2012		$	527		$	---		$	---			$	527

 

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as the general classification of those assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

 

Collateral-Dependent Impaired Loans, Net of Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses

 

The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell. Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The Company considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value. Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary by the office of the Company’s Controller. Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Controller’s office. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management. The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral. These discounts and estimates are developed by the Controller’s office by comparison to historical results.

 

 

82

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

 

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

 

The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements at December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

			Value at 12/31/2013		Valuation Technique		Unobservable Inputs		Range (Weighted Average)
	Collateral-dependent impaired loans		$3,637		Market comparable properties		Marketability discount		10%-20%

 

 

			Value at 12/31/2012		Valuation Technique		Unobservable Inputs		Range (Weighted Average)
	Collateral-dependent impaired loans		$  527		Market comparable properties		Marketability discount		10%

 

83

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The following table presents estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments and the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

 

						Fair Value Measurements Using
			Carrying Amount			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)			Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	December 31, 2013:
	Financial assets
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	24,198		$	24,198		$	---		$	---
	Interest bearing time deposits			1,743			---			1,743			---
	Loans held for sale			657			---			657			---
	Loans, net of allowance for losses			254,703			---			---			265,715
	Federal Home Loan Bank stock			3,185			---			3,185			---
	Mortgage servicing rights			1,087			---			---			1,513
	Accrued interest receivable			1,114			---			1,114			---
	Financial liabilities
	Transaction and savings deposits			185,106			185,106			---			---
	Time Deposits			129,514			---			---			130,892
	Federal Home Loan Bank advances			10,000			---			10,289			---
	Accrued interest payable			34			---			34			---
	December 31, 2012:
	Financial assets
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	31,421		$	31,421		$	---		$	---
	Interest bearing time deposits			1,740			---			1,740			---
	Loans held for sale			1,363			---			1,363			---
	Loans, net of allowance for losses			280,257			---			---			299,010
	Federal Home Loan Bank stock			3,185			---			3,185			---
	Mortgage servicing rights			983			---			---			1,184
	Accrued interest receivable			1,133			---			1,133			---
	Financial liabilities
	Transaction and savings deposits			167,704			167,704			---			---
	Time Deposits			140,933			---			---			143,181
	Federal Home Loan Bank advances			15,000			---			15,515			---
	Accrued interest payable			40			---			40			---

 

 

84

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of all other financial instruments recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at amounts other than fair value.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Interest-Bearing Time Deposits

 

The carrying amount approximates fair value.

 

Loans Held For Sale

 

The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the insignificant time between origination and date of sale. The carrying amount is the amount funded and accrued interest.

 

Loans

 

Fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the market rates at which similar notes would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The market rates used are based on current rates the Bank would impose for similar loans and reflect a market participant assumption about risks associated with non-performance, illiquidity, and the structure and term of the loans along with local economic and market conditions.

 

Federal Home Loan Bank Stock

 

Fair value is estimated at book value due to restrictions that limit the sale or transfer of such securities.

 

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable

 

The carrying amount approximates fair value. The carrying amount is determined using the interest rate, balance and last payment date.

 

Deposits

 

Fair value of term deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates of similar deposits with similar maturities. The market rates used were obtained from a knowledgeable independent third party and reviewed by the Company. The rates were the average of current rates offered by local competitors of the Bank.

 

The estimated fair value of demand, NOW, savings and money market deposits is the book value since rates are regularly adjusted to market rates and amounts are payable on demand at the reporting date.

 

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

 

Fair value is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using rates of similar advances with similar maturities. These rates were obtained from current rates offered by FHLB.

 

Commitments to Originate Loans, Forward Sale Commitments, Letters of Credit and Lines of Credit

 

The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.

 

The fair value of commitments to sell securities is estimated based on current market prices for securities of similar terms and credit quality.

 

The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. The fair value of commitments was not material at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

 

85

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Note 16:   Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

 

Some financial instruments, such as loan commitments, credit lines, letters of credit and overdraft protection, are issued to meet customer financing needs. These are agreements to provide credit or to support the credit of others, as long as conditions established in the contract are met, and usually have expiration dates. Commitments may expire without being used. Off-balance-sheet risk to credit loss exists up to the face amount of these instruments, although material losses are not anticipated. The same credit policies are used to make such commitments as are used for loans, including obtaining collateral at exercise of the commitment.

 

At year-end, these financial instruments are summarized as follows:

 

			2013				2012
	Commitments to extend credit
	Fixed rate		$	5,592			$	9,062
	Variable rate			---				227
	Unused portions of lines of credit			23,956				26,968
	Letters of credit			144				49

 

 

The commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established under the contract. Generally, such commitments are for no more than 60 days. At December 31, 2013, the fixed rate loan commitments were at rates ranging from 3.38% to 4.88%. Unused portions of lines of credit include balances available on commercial and home equity loans and are variable rate.

 

Note 17:   Condensed Financial Information (Parent Company Only)

 

Presented below is condensed financial information as to financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company:

 

	Condense d Balance Sheets
			December 31
			2013				2012
	Assets
	Cash		$	339			$	223
	Securities available-for-sale			---				110
	Investment in the Bank			40,245				38,556
	Other assets			143				66
	Total assets		$	40,727			$	38,955
	Liabilities		$	---			$	---
	Stockholders’ Equity			40,727				38,955
	Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	40,727			$	38,955

 

86

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Condensed State ments of Income and Comprehensive Income
		Years Ending December 31
		2013				2012
Income
Dividends from the Bank		$	400			$	155
Other income			---				7
Total income			400				162
Expenses			(216	)			(211	)
Income (Loss) Before Income Tax and Equity in Undistributed Net Income (Loss) of Bank Subsidiary			184				(49	)
Income Tax Benefit			85				82
Income Before Equity in Undistributed Income of Bank Subsidiary			269				33
Equity in Undistributed Income of Bank Subsidiary			2,269				2,626
Net Income		$	2,538			$	2,659
Comprehensive Income		$	1,920			$	2,747

 

Conde nsed Statements of Cash Flows
		Years Ending December 31
		2013				2012
Operating Activities
Net income		$	2,538			$	2,659
Equity in undistributed income of the Bank			(2,269	)			(2,626	)
Change in other assets			(76	)			15
Net cash provided by operating activities			193				48
Investing Activity - proceeds from paydowns of securities			110				18
Financing Activity
Dividends paid			(374	)			(77	)
Stock options exercised			184				7
Tax benefit of stock options exercised			3				2
Net cash used in financing activities			(187	)			(68	)
Net Change in Cash			116				(2	)
Cash at Beginning of Year			223				225
Cash at End of Year		$	339			$	223

 

 

87

---

 

LSB Financial Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013 and 2012

(Table Dollar Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

 

Note 18:   Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-04, “Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure,” to reduce diversity by clarifying when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014.  Adoption of the ASU is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01, “Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects,” to permit entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met.  The ASU modifies the conditions that an entity must meet to be eligible to use a method other than the equity or cost methods to account for qualified affordable housing project investments. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014.  Adoption of the ASU is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists,” to require presentation in the financial statements of an unrecognized tax benefit or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except as follows. When an  NOL carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position, or when the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.  Adoption of the ASU is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

88

---

 

 

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

Not Applicable.

 

 

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures . An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934), as of December 31, 2013 (the “Evaluation Date”), was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of our senior management. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures in effect as of the Evaluation Date are effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and were designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in those reports is accumulated and communicated to our management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting . The management of LSB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our internal control over financial reporting process was designed, under supervision of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of our senior management, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

	·	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
	·	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and
	·	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of the inherent limitations in any internal control, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation. Further, the evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting was made as of a specific date, and projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

 

The Company’s management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, the Company’s management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992 version).

 

Based on our assessment, management has determined that, as of December 31, 2013, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

 

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting . There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) identified in connection with our evaluation of controls that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Item 9B.  Other Information

 

We have no information that was required to be reported on a Form 8-K in the fourth quarter covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, but was not reported on a Form 8-K during the fourth quarter.

 

 

89

---

 

PART III

 

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

Information concerning LSB Financial directors is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of the definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in April 2014 under the caption “Proposal 1 - Election of Directors.” Information concerning LSB Financial executive officers is included in Item 4.5 in Part I of this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

The information relating to corporate governance required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in April 2014 under the caption “Corporate Governance.”

 

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and our other equity securities by the end of the second business day following a change. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

 

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and 10% beneficial owners were complied with.

 

LSB Financial has a written code of ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers and employees. The code of ethics is available on our website at www.lsbank.com.

 

 

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

 

Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in April 2014 with the captions “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation of Directors.”

 

 

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

Information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated herein by reference to the section of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in April 2014 with the caption “Principal Holders of Common Stock.”

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information . The following table summarizes our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013.

 

Plan Category		Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options warrants and rights (a)		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options warrants and rights (b)		Number of Securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)		42,925 (2)		$18.36 (3)		36,025 (4)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		---		---		---
______________________

(1)	LSB Financial Corp.’s 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan terminated on August 22, 2005 so no further options may be granted under the 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

(2)	Includes 10,609 shares under LSB Financial Corp.’s 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and 32,315 shares under the LSB Financial Corp. 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

(3)	The total in Column (b) includes only the weighted-average price of stock options.

(4)	The total in Column (c) is the number of shares reserved for issuance under the LSB Financial Corp. 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan excluding the 32,315 shares included in Column (a).

 

90

---

 

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

Information concerning director independence and certain relationships and transactions is incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in April 2014 with the captions “Corporate Governance” and “Transactions with Related Persons.”

 

 

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

 

Information concerning principal accountant fees and services are incorporated herein by reference to the sections of our definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in April 2014 with the caption “Accountant’s Fees.”

PART IV

 

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)           The following documents are filed as part of this report:

 

	Financial Statements:
	Report of BKD, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and 2012
	Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
	Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules are omitted as the required information either is not applicable or is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes contained in Item 8.

 

(b)           The exhibits filed herewith or incorporated by reference herein are set forth on the Index to Exhibits.

 

A copy of this Annual Report on Form 10-K without exhibits for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the SEC, will be furnished without charge to shareholders of LSB Financial upon written request to the Secretary, LSB Financial Corp., 101 Main Street, P.O. Box 1628, Lafayette, Indiana 47902, or by calling (765) 742-1064. Copies of the exhibits filed with the Form 10-K may be obtained by shareholders at a charge of $0.25 per page.

 

 

91

---

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

		LSB FINANCIAL CORP.
Date:  March 14, 2014		By:	/s/ Randolph F. Williams
			Randolph F. Williams, President,
			Chief Executive Officer and Director
			(Duly Authorized Representative)

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

/s/ Mariellen M. Neudeck		/s/ Randolph F. Williams
Mariellen M. Neudeck, Chairman of the Board		Randolph F. Williams, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive and Operating Officer)
Date:  March 14, 2014		Date:  March 14, 2014
/s/ James A. Andrew		/s/ Kenneth P. Burns
James A. Andrew, Director		Kenneth P. Burns, Director
Date:  March 14, 2014		Date:  March 14, 2014
/s/ Philip W. Kemmer		/s/ Stephen E. Belter
Philip W. Kemmer, Director		Stephen E. Belter, Director
Date:  March 14, 2014		Date:  March 14, 2014
/s/ Jeffrey A. Poxon		/s/ Thomas B. Parent
Jeffrey A. Poxon, Director		Thomas B. Parent, Director
Date:  March 14, 2014		Date:  March 14, 2014
/s/ Mary Jo David		/s/ Charles W. Shook
Mary Jo David, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary-Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)		Charles W. Shook, Director
Date:  March 14, 2014		Date:  March 14, 2014
/s/ Sarah R. Byrn
Sarah R. Byrn, Director
Date:  March 14, 2014

 

92

---

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Regulation S-K Exhibit Number		Document
3.1		Articles of Incorporation, filed on September 21, 1994 as an exhibit to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-84266), are incorporated herein by reference.
3.2		Bylaws, as amended and restated, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2012, are incorporated herein by reference.
4		Registrant’s Specimen Stock Certificate, filed on September 21, 1994 as an exhibit to Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-84266), is incorporated herein by reference.
10.1*		Registrant’s 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/06728832).
10.2*		Form of 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/05704550).
10.3*		Form of 1995 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Incentive Stock Option Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/05704550).
10.4*		Deferred Compensation Agreement between Lafayette Savings Bank and Randolph F. Williams, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K for the event occurring on September 29, 2005, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/051114515).
10.5*		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 27, 2008 between LSB Financial Corp. and Randolph F. Williams filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 3, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/08658380).
10.6*		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated February 27, 2008 between LSB Financial Corp. and Mary Jo David filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s 8-K filed on March 3, 2008, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/08658380)
10.7*		LSB Financial Corp. 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/07785275).
10.8*		Form of 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Incentive Stock Option Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/07845678).
10.9*		Form of 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement, filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/07845678).

 

 

---

 

10.10*		Form of Agreement for Restricted Stock Granted under LSB Financial Corp. 2007 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/07845678).
14		Code of Ethics, filed as Exhibit 14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, is incorporated herein by reference (SEC File/Film No. 000-25070/04698801).
21		Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23		Consent of BKD, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1		Rule 13a - 14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer).
31.2		Rule 13a - 14(a) Certification (Chief Financial Officer).
32		Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101		The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2013, formatted in an XBRL Interactive Data File: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, with detailed tagging of Notes and financial statement schedules.
		*Indicates exhibits that describe or evidence management contracts and plans required to be filed as exhibits.

(MM) (NASDAQ:LSBI)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mai 2024 à Juin 2024

(MM) (NASDAQ:LSBI)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Juin 2023 à Juin 2024