UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

________________

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.     )

________________

Filed by the Registrant

 

S

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

 

£

Check the appropriate box:

£

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

£

 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

S

 

Definitive Proxy Statement

£

 

Definitive Additional Materials

£

 

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

CUBIC CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

S

 

No fee required.

£

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

   

(1)

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

       

    

   

(2)

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

       

    

   

(3)

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

       

    

   

(4)

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

       

    

   

(5)

 

Total fee paid:

       

    

£

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

£

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

   

(1)

 

Amount Previously Paid:

       

    

   

(2)

 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

       

    

   

(3)

 

Filing Party:

       

    

   

(4)

 

Date Filed:

       

    

 

 

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICE
9233 Balboa Avenue
San Diego, California 92123

Cubic is a technology-driven, market-leading provider of innovative, mission-critical solutions that reduce congestion and increase operational readiness and effectiveness through superior situational understanding. Cubic serves transportation, defense C4ISR, and training customers globally. We offer integrated payment and information systems, expeditionary communications, cloud-based computing and intelligence delivery, as well as state-of-the-art training and readiness solutions.

Purpose

Our teams innovate to make a positive difference in people’s lives.

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Fellow Shareholders,

Against a backdrop of economic uncertainty and business disruption arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, our 6,000 talented, resilient employees have done an amazing job delivering mission critical solutions to our customers while safeguarding the well-being of our teams. 2020 was an extraordinary year that challenged us and strengthened us. I am proud of our team’s progress, which is driving innovation within the organization and continues to position Cubic Corporation (“Cubic”) as a technology-driven, market-leading company.

 

COVID-19 Response

Throughout the pandemic, the health and safety of our team members, customers, partners and communities has been our top priority. At the same time, we’ve taken the necessary actions to ensure business continuity and help mitigate the financial impacts related to COVID-19. While our financial performance was impacted by the pandemic, we believe that the long-term fundamentals of our business remain strong and that Cubic is well-positioned to drive growth by solving our customers’ hardest challenges. Particularly in our Transportation segment, where we are deploying contactless payment technologies and improving mobility through the use of real-time data, our solutions are helping to build customer trust in a safe public transportation environment and make transportation networks and services more efficient and resilient in the long term.

Commitment to Diversity & Inclusion and Advancing our ESG Strategy

Cubic is committed to a globally inclusive workplace where everyone is respected, empowered and supported. We continue to deliver on our human resources strategic plan, including our Diversity and Inclusion strategy, which drives innovation across the organization with clear priorities related to recruiting diverse talent, expanding unconscious bias education, engaging an inclusive workforce, strengthening community outreach and supporting supplier diversity. Cubic is focused on improving employee health, productivity and overall engagement and our engagement score of 82% during the third quarter of 2020 — a company record — is a reflection of our progress and our unwavering focus on employee safety and well-being throughout the pandemic. Additionally, we are honored to be to be named as one of San Diego Union-Tribune’s Top Workplaces in 2020, which is a competitive, employee-nominated program.

In alignment with our purpose and long-term strategy, during fiscal year 2020, we expanded our environmental, social and governance (ESG) priorities around five pillars — environment, social capital, human capital, business model and innovation, and governance — and identified ESG issues within each pillar that we believe are most likely to affect our business. In partnership with stakeholders and with oversight from our Board of Directors (the “Board”), we continue to refine our materiality assessment and enhance our disclosures surrounding these topics. We issued our inaugural ESG report in January 2021, aligning with widely recognized reporting frameworks and reflecting our support for the Ten Principles of the United Nations Global Compact. We look forward to sharing our progress and we are committed to further improving our performance and communications related to these areas.

Looking Ahead

In 2020, we launched the next chapter in our transformation — NextCUBIC. The COVID-19 pandemic led us to reassess the risks and opportunities across the organization, reimagine the way we work, and take action to further improve Cubic. NextCUBIC, which is underpinned by a robust outside-in assessment, launches a full-scale program to drive a step change in value creation and deliver sustainable, financial improvement through both functional and cultural transformation. We believe that our NextCUBIC strategy sets the stage for further growth, greater differentiation, expanded addressable markets, and improved profitability. We believe NextCUBIC will deliver exceptional value to our customers and superior returns to our shareholders.

I would like to thank my fellow Board members for their time, leadership, insight, support, and engagement. In closing, this has been a challenging year for the global economy, our country and our company. I could not be more proud of the efforts of my fellow Cubic employees, who persevered through it all and delivered strong results. On behalf of the Board, thank you for your continued support of Cubic Corporation.

As part of our precautions regarding COVID-19, the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held virtually via a live webcast, at 8:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on Tuesday, April 13, 2021, at www.cesonlineservices.com/cub21_vm. To participate in the Annual Meeting, you must pre-register at www.cesonlineservices.com/cub21_vm by 8:00 a.m, Pacific Time, on Monday, April 12, 2021.

The expected items of business for the meeting are described in detail in the attached Notice of 2021 Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement.

April 2, 2021

 

Sincerely,

   

 

   

Bradley H. Feldmann
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

NOTICE OF 2021 ANNUAL MEETING

   

When

April 13, 2021
8:00 a.m. Pacific Time

Where

Virtual webcast at www.cesonlineservices.com/cub21_vm

There is no physical location for the Annual Meeting

Items
of
Business

 

Election of nine directors to hold office for a one-year term or until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified:

Proposal
1

•   Prithviraj Banerjee

•   Bruce G. Blakley

•   Maureen Breakiron-Evans

•   Denise L. Devine

•   Bradley H. Feldmann

•   Carolyn A. Flowers

•   Janice M. Hamby

•   David F. Melcher

•   Steven J. Norris

Proposal
2

Approval, on an advisory, non-binding basis, of the Company’s named executive officer compensation

Proposal
3

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2021

 

Transaction of any other business that may properly come before the meeting

Attending the
Annual Meeting

All shareholders are invited to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. Attendance at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof will be limited to shareholders of the Company as of the close of business on the record date and guests of the Company. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person at a physical location. In order to attend the virtual meeting, you will need to pre-register by 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time on April 12, 2021. To pre-register for the meeting, please follow these instructions:

Registered Shareholders

Shareholders of record as of the record date may register to participate in the Annual Meeting remotely by visiting the website www.cesonlineservices.com/cub21_vm. Please have your proxy card, or notice, containing your control number available and follow the instructions to complete your registration request. After registering, shareholders will receive a confirmation email with a link and instructions for accessing the virtual Annual Meeting. Requests to register to participate in the Annual Meeting remotely must be received no later than 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time on April 12, 2021.

Beneficial Shareholders

Shareholders whose shares are held through a broker, bank or other nominee as of the record date may register to participate in the Annual Meeting remotely by visiting the website www.cesonlineservices.com/cub21_vm.

Please have your Voting Instruction Form, notice, or other communication containing your control number available and follow the instructions to complete your registration request. After registering, shareholders will receive a confirmation email with a link and instructions for accessing the virtual Annual Meeting. Requests to register to participate in the Annual Meeting remotely must be received no later than 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time on April 12, 2021.

 

If you attend the Annual Meeting and vote via the Annual Meeting website, your vote will revoke any proxy that you have previously submitted. If your shares are held in “street name” through a bank, broker, trust or other nominee, please instruct your bank, broker, trust or other nominee on how to vote your shares using the voting instructions furnished by your bank, broker, trust or other nominees as soon as possible.

Who Can Vote at the Annual Meeting

Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 2, 2021 will be entitled to vote. The transfer books will not be closed. Please vote as soon as possible, even if you plan to attend the meeting, to ensure that your shares will be represented. You do not need to attend the meeting to vote if you vote your shares before the meeting. If you are a record holder, you may vote your shares by mail, telephone or the Internet. If your shares are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, you must follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee to vote your shares and you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares at the meeting.

How to Vote

Shareholders of record may vote (i) by filling out and signing the proxy card that was included with this Proxy Statement and returning it in the envelope provided, (ii) by calling the toll-free number found on the proxy card, or (iii) online at the internet voting website provided on the proxy card. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you will receive instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares. If you received printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you may also vote by filling out the voting instruction form and returning it in the envelope provided. The availability of online or phone voting may depend on the voting process of the organization that holds your shares. Beneficial owners who want to attend and also vote in person at the Annual Meeting will need to obtain a legal proxy, in PDF or Image (gif, jpg, or png) file format, from the organization that holds their shares giving them the right to vote their shares in person at the Annual Meeting and by presenting it with their online ballot during the meeting.

Date of Mailing

On or about April 2, 2021

Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Our proxy statement and 2020 annual report are available online at www.proxyvoting.com/CUB.

You are cordially invited to attend the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Cubic Corporation (the “Company”), which will be held on April 13, 2021 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time (including any adjournments or postponements thereof, the “Annual Meeting”). Due to the continuing impact of the novel coronavirus (or COVID-19) pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders and employees, the Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting conducted via webcast. We believe that a virtual meeting provides greater access to our diverse base of shareholders and, therefore, have chosen this over an in-person meeting. For more information, please review this proxy statement and the enclosed 2020 annual report. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual annual meeting, you are urged to submit your proxy or voting instructions as promptly as possible by mobile device, Internet, telephone or mail to ensure your representation and the presence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting.

 

If you attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote electronically during the Annual Meeting, you may withdraw your proxy or voting instructions and vote your shares personally. Your proxy is revocable in accordance with the procedures set forth in the proxy statement.

If you have any questions about voting in connection with the Annual Meeting, please contact our proxy solicitor:

509 Madison Avenue
Suite 1206
New York, NY 10022

Banks and Brokers Call: (203) 561-6945
Stockholders Call Toll Free: (800) 662-5200
E-mail: CUB@investor.morrowsodali.com

San Diego, California

April 2, 2021

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

   

Hilary L. Hageman
Corporate Secretary

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

   

i

PROXY SUMMARY

   

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy carefully before voting.

2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Proposals and Voting Recommendations

Proposal

Board Recommendation

Page

1

Election of nine directors to hold office for a one-year term or until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified (“Proposal 1”)

P

FOR
each Board
nominee

12

2

Approval, on an advisory, non-binding basis, of the Company’s named executive officer compensation (“Proposal 2”)

P

FOR

39

3

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2021 (“Proposal 3”)

P

FOR

90

1

COVID-19 Response

The table below summarizes the key areas of focus and actions taken by the Company in response to challenges in fiscal year 2020 relating to the business disruption and risks surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our Focus

What We Did

Launched NextCUBIC Strategy - underpinned by a robust outside-in assessment - to drive a step change in value creation and deliver sustainable financial improvement through both functional and cultural transformation in the way we work.

Employees and Community

•   Effective actions to keep employees safe and to monitor employee well-being; no reported cases of employee-to-employee contraction

    Increased frequency of cleaning/sanitation; social distancing and additional protocols for “site essential” employees, including mandatory face coverings

    Implemented contact tracing and comprehensive protocols at all global sites for confirmed and suspected COVID-19 cases

•   Transitioned approximately 75% of the global workforce to telework

•   Implemented paid time-off policy to allow flexibility for employees who could not perform work due to restrictions as a result of COVID-19; implemented paid sick time globally for anyone affected by COVID-19

•   Digital workforce enablement and focus on cyber security to enable effective telework

•   Repurposed manufacturing capabilities to provide face coverings to all employees

•   Employee care and actions taken following events of social injustice in the U.S. amid an already challenging environment with the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., implemented new, mandatory Inclusion training course, globally); continued focus on progressing Diversity and Inclusion as a strategic priority

•   Frequent, effective communications from CEO and COVID-19 taskforce

•   Continued focus on engagement (won San Diego Union-Tribune's Top Workplaces; achieved a company-record engagement score)

•   Preparedness of workforce for post-COVID-19 recovery and rebound

•   Continued ESG initiatives, including helping our communities and charitable contributions; enhanced level of ESG disclosures on the Company’s website

•   Speed and fairness of changes (e.g., executive vs. employee pay cuts)

Customers and
Business Continuity

•   Ensured supply chain and manufacturing continuity

•   Maintained on-time delivery during pandemic; major projects remained on track

•   Repurposed manufacturing capabilities to provide face coverings to customers

•   Proactive discussions with customers surrounding risk management and preparedness

•   Launched three mobile apps for transit customers (i.e., D.C., Los Angeles, and Chicago), giving travelers a convenient, safe way to pay for their journeys

•   Conversations with transit customer senior executives to serve their immediate needs to enhance safety and provide insights to support rebound

•   Continued to advance key pursuits in support of the national defense strategy (e.g., won high capacity backbone prototype for the U.S. Air Force)

2

Our Focus

What We Did

Launched NextCUBIC Strategy - underpinned by a robust outside-in assessment - to drive a step change in value creation and deliver sustainable financial improvement through both functional and cultural transformation in the way we work.

Financial Discipline

•   Reduced Board and CEO cash compensation 15%; CFO 7.5% (May to fiscal 2020 year-end)

•   Suspended employee salary merit increases through fiscal year 2021 and 401(k) retirement contributions (May to fiscal 2020 year-end)

•   Debt restructuring enhanced flexibility; new term loan and upsized revolver (i.e., 30% additional capacity), attractive rates and improved covenants

•   Focused on reducing net leverage

•   Instituted an indirect/overhead position hiring freeze and control measures

•   Reduced/deferred select expenses

Shareholders

•   Took prudent action to withdraw guidance considering macro uncertainty; provided color on business environment, key assumptions and expectations

•   Frequent engagement with the investment community, including robust business updates

•   Strong focus on safety, customer commitments, business continuity, along with cost savings program and debt restructuring, supported the achievement of good financial results despite COVID-19 challenges

•   Maintained the payment of dividends to our shareholders

•   Continued key investments to support innovation and future growth

•   Driving growth, operational excellence and culture to deliver long-term, sustainable shareholder value through recently launched NextCUBIC strategy

3

Director Nominees

8 of 9

4 of 9

2 of 9

1 of 9

1 to 13

67

nominees are independent

nominees are women

nominees are ethnically or racially diverse

nominees is a non-U.S.
citizen

years tenure range

years average age

Name

Age

Director
Since

Independent

Principal Occupation

Committee
Memberships

Other Current
Public Company
Boards

Other Current
Directorships

Bradley H. Feldmann (Chairman)

59

2014

No

President and CEO of Cubic

•   Classified Business
Oversight (Financial Expert)

 

•   Aerospace Industries Association

•   National Defense Industrial Association

•   UrbanLife

Prithviraj Banerjee

60

2018

Yes

Chief Technology Officer, ANSYS Corporation

•   Executive
Compensation

•   Technology Strategy (Chair)

 

•   Turntide Technologies (formerly Software Motor Company)

Bruce G. Blakley

75

2008

Yes

Lecturer, University of California, San Diego

•   Audit and Compliance (Chair)

•   Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility

 

•   None

Maureen Breakiron- Evans

66

2017

Yes

Former CFO, Towers Perrin

•   Audit and Compliance (Financial Expert)

•   Technology Strategy

•   Ally Financial, Inc.

•   Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.

•   Stetson University

•   Drexel University Gupta Institute of Corporate Governance Advisory Board

Denise L. Devine

65

2019

Yes

Founder and CEO of FNB Holdings, LLC and Co-Founder, CAO and CFO of RTM Vital Signs, LLC

•   Audit and Compliance (Financial Expert)

•   Technology Strategy

•   AgroFresh Solutions, Inc.

•   Fulton Financial Corporation

•   Select Quote

•   AUS, Inc.

•   Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania

Carolyn A. Flowers

71

2019

Yes

Managing Principal, InfraStrategies LLC

•   Executive
Compensation

•   Technology Strategy

 

•   American Public Transportation Association

•   Eno Foundation

•   MV Transportation

4

Name

Age

Director
Since

Independent

Principal Occupation

Committee
Memberships

Other Current
Public Company
Boards

Other Current
Directorships

Janice M. Hamby

62

2015

Yes

Retired Rear Admiral, U.S. Navy; former Chancellor, College of Information and Cyberspace, National Defense University and President, and Co-Owner of Fair Winds Farm LLC; Doctor of Management

•   Classified Business
Oversight (Chair)

•   Nominating,
Governance, Ethics and
Corporate
Responsibility

•   Executive
Compensation

 

•   American Armed Forces
Mutual Aid

David F. Melcher

(Lead Independent Director)

66

2018

Yes

Former President and CEO of Exelis Inc., Former President and CEO of the Aerospace Industries Association, and retired Lieutenant General, U.S. Army

•   Classified Business
Oversight (Financial Expert)

•   Executive
Compensation (Chair)

•   Nominating,
Governance, Ethics and Corporate
Responsibility

•   Becton Dickinson & Company

•   Uniformed Services Automobile Association

•   GM Defense, LLC

Steven J. Norris

75

2014

Yes

Partner, Norris McDonough LLP; Chair, Soho Estates; President, ITS UK; and former Member of Parliament

•   Audit and Compliance

•   Nominating,
Governance, Ethics and
Corporate
Responsibility (Chair)

•   Driver Group (Chair)

•   Optare PLC

•   Soho Estates Limited

5

Director Skills and Qualifications

The table below summarizes some of the key experience and skills of our director nominees. This summary is not intended to be an exhaustive list of each of our director nominee’s skills or contributions to the Board.

6

Corporate Governance Highlights

Director Independence and Diversity

• All director nominees are independent, except the CEO

• Four fully independent Board committees

• Robust succession planning process

• Skills and experiences aligned with strategic direction

• Four of nine director nominees are women; two of nine director nominees are racially or ethnically diverse

• Guidelines limiting director age and tenure

 

Director Engagement and Access

• Directors attended 100% of all required Board and committee meetings in fiscal year 2020

• Board policy limits director service on other public company boards

• Significant Board interaction with senior leaders and access to other employees

• Regular visits to operations

Board Structure and Self Evaluation

• Annual assessment and determination of Board leadership structure

• Strong Lead Independent Director with clear roles and responsibilities

• Annual Board and committee self-evaluations

• Both CEO and Lead Independent Director performance are assessed on a regular basis (scheduled at least annually)

 

Shareholder Empowerment and Alignment

• Annual election of all directors, with majority voting in uncontested elections

• Majority voting for certain business combinations and amendments to bylaws and certificate of incorporation

• Robust ongoing shareholder outreach program, including topics relating to governance, executive compensation and corporate responsibility

• Stock ownership guidelines for CEO and directors (5X base salary or annual retainer)

• Majority of compensation for NEOs is variable and tied to achievement with emphasis on long-term performance

Risk Oversight

• The Board is responsible for oversight of risk management and allocates oversight of specific risks to the appropriate Board committee

• Robust Enterprise Risk Management program

• Active Board oversight of strategy development

• All Board members take the company’s mandatory annual Code of Business Conduct training

• Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee regularly receives briefings on human capital initiatives as well as the corporate compliance program

• Claw-back and anti-hedging policies

 

Commitment to Corporate Responsibility

• Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee has oversight responsibility for the Company’s ESG strategy around five key pillars

• 2020 signatory acceptance to the United Nations Global Compact

• Member of Social Responsibility Alliance and the Responsible Mineral Initiative

• Published inaugural ESG report in 2021 aligned with widely recognized reporting framework

• Launched new unconscious bias training and diversity and inclusion resources

7

Named Executive Officer Compensation Snapshot

Fiscal Year 2020 Compensation Summary For Named Executive Officers

Name and Principal Position

Salary
($)

Bonus
($)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)

Stock
Awards
($)

Change in
Pension
Value
($)

All Other
Compensation
($)

Total ($)

Bradley H. Feldmann

964,105

453,025

243,029

4,234,038

9,350

41,484

5,945,030

Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer

             

Anshooman Aga

512,372

165,487

88,776

1,129,091

25,981

1,921,707

Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

             

Michael Knowles

434,821

30,253

185,837

752,762

13,124

1,416,797

Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission and Performance Solutions

             

Grace G. Lee

398,224

97,071

52,074

658,654

27,394

1,233,417

Senior Vice President of Cubic and Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer

             

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

232,698

264,345

160,930

800,000

1,092

1,459,065

Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Transportation Systems

             

Michael R. Twyman(1)

515,091

752,762

1,208,479

2,476,332

Former Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions

             

(1)      Effective August 27, 2020, Mr. Twyman departed the Company after serving as Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions since May 25, 2016 as a result of the combination of the Company’s two defense businesses.

The table above is an excerpt from the Summary Compensation Table. For a complete discussion of our executive compensation program and the full Summary Compensation Table, please see the “Executive Compensation and Other Information” section of this proxy statement.

Fiscal Year 2020 Total Target Compensation Mix

8

Corporate Responsibility Highlights

Corporate responsibility is at the foundation of what we do every day — our teams innovate to make a positive difference in people’s lives. Guided by our Code of Conduct, we continue to focus on our key priority of Living One Cubic and efficiently building technology-driven, marketing-leading businesses to drive sustainable value, while holding ourselves to the highest standards of ethical conduct.

Environment

Reduce our environmental impact by reducing our global CO2 emissions.

Focus on energy and power management solutions at select sites for energy conservation and efficiency.

Maintain a dedicated team to optimize our full compliance with environmental laws and regulations (HSE Global Team).

Social Capital

Focus on community engagement and charitable donations in STEM education, military veteran support organizations, and health and safety approved organizations.

Support disaster recovery efforts in partnership with Help.NGO’s Global Disaster Immediate Response Team (DIRT) and other response agencies.

Human Capital

Focus on building an inclusive, diverse and high performing workforce that reflects the global communities in which we do business and that fuels innovation and engagement.

Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee regularly receives briefings on human capital initiatives, including the establishment of diversity goals in our strategic plan and briefings on employee demographics.

Support and equip our dynamic workforce with all of the essential conditions to meet their career goals through a range of learning and development tools, networking resources and global opportunities.

Ensure that our strong culture of ethics and compliance permeates everything we do.

Sustainability of our business with competitive talent and marketplace skills to ensure continued success.

Business Model & Innovation

Focus on supply chain sustainability, transparency, and compliance aligned with our Third-Party Code of Conduct.

Hold our vendors to high ethical and compliance standards.

Maintain membership in the Social Responsibility Alliance and the Responsible Mineral Initiative.

Continue to innovate products and services, helping our customers achieve a broad range of social and environmental policy goals and create enduring value for our shareholders.

Ethics & Compliance

Maintain a diverse and independent Board to promote sound corporate governance practices.

Conduct Code of Ethics and Business Conduct Policy (Code of Conduct) training.

Provide employees and other stakeholders with the ability to report a violation through our anonymous, confidential, third-party hotline.

 

DISCLAIMER STATEMENT

THE USE BY CUBIC OF ANY MSCI ESG RESEARCH LLC OR ITS AFFILIATES (“MSCI”) DATA, AND THE USE OF MSCI LOGOS, TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS OR INDEX NAMES HEREIN, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SPONSORSHIP, ENDORSEMENT, RECOMMENDATION, OR PROMOTION OF CUBIC BY MSCI. MSCI SERVICES AND DATA ARE THE PROPERTY OF MSCI OR ITS INFORMATION PROVIDERS AND ARE PROVIDED ‘AS-IS’ AND WITHOUT WARRANTY. MSCI NAMES AND LOGOS ARE TRADEMARKS OR SERVICE MARKS OF MSCI.

9

This year we launched Cubic’s global ESG strategic priorities to advance our long-standing commitment to corporate responsibility. Our Board and its committees play an important role in overseeing our ESG strategy, which consists of five core pillars — environment, social capital, human capital, business and innovation, and governance.

PROXY STATEMENT

   

We encourage your personal attendance at our virtual shareholders meeting. Proxies in the form enclosed and as shown at www.proxyvoting.com/CUB are being solicited by The Board of Directors (the “Board”) for the 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (including any adjournments or postponements thereof, the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be held as a virtual meeting conducted via webcast on April 13, 2021. Execution of a proxy will not in any way affect a shareholder’s right to attend the Annual Meeting and vote electronically during the Annual Meeting, and any shareholder giving a proxy has the right to revoke it at any time before it is exercised by filing with the Corporate Secretary of Cubic Corporation (“Cubic” or the “Company”) a written revocation or duly executed proxy bearing a later date or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting electronically during the Annual Meeting.

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON APRIL
13, 2021

This proxy statement and our 2020 annual report are available electronically and free of charge at
www.proxyvoting.com/CUB.

Outstanding Shares and Voting Rights

A quorum of shareholders is required in order to transact business at the Annual Meeting. A quorum exists if a majority of the common shares issued and outstanding and entitled to vote are present at the virtual meeting or represented by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. 31,748,390 shares of our common stock (the “Common Stock”) were outstanding at the record date of March 2, 2021. Each holder of common shares is entitled to one vote for each share held on the record date. Votes will be counted by an Inspector of Elections. Abstentions will be counted towards the vote total for Proposals 2 and 3, and will have the same effect as “AGAINST” votes. Broker non-votes have no effect on and are not counted towards the vote total for any proposal. Advisory votes are not binding, but the Board will consider the outcome of such votes when making future decisions.

If you are a beneficial holder and do not provide specific voting instructions to your broker, we expect that the organization that holds your shares will not be authorized to vote your shares, which would result in “broker non-votes,” on proposals other than Proposal 3 ratifying the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent public accountant for our fiscal year ending September 30, 2021 (“fiscal year 2021”). However, whether brokers have discretion to vote on matters is ultimately determined by the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) (which regulates certain banks, brokers and other nominees), and the NYSE may make a determination that is different from what we expect, which could result in your shares being voted in a manner you would not choose yourself. Accordingly, we strongly encourage you to submit your

proxy and exercise your right to vote as a shareholder to ensure that your shares are voted as you want them. For Proposal 1, nominees for director are to be elected by an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in favor of such nominee’s election. Any incumbent nominee for director who does not receive an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in favor of such nominee must promptly tender his or her resignation after the Annual Meeting. Proposals 2 and 3 require an affirmative vote of a majority of shares having voting power, present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy.

Proposal

Vote
Required

Broker
Discretionary
Voting
Expected
to be Allowed

1: Election of Directors

Majority of votes cast

No

2: Advisory Vote on Named Executive Officer Compensation

Majority of shares having voting power, present or represented by proxy

No

3: Ratification of appointment of Ernst & Young LLP for Fiscal Year 2021

Majority of shares having voting power, present or represented by proxy

No

There are no rights of appraisal or similar rights of dissenters with respect to any matter to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting.

10

Merger Agreement

On March 30, 2021, the Company entered into an amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 7, 2021 (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Atlas CC Acquisition Corp. (“Parent”), an affiliate of The Veritas Capital Fund VII, L.P., and Atlas Merger Sub Inc. (“Sub”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Sub is expected to merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Company’s shareholders are expected to receive, for each share of Common Stock, $75.00 per share in cash. The Board has unanimously approved the Merger Agreement and has also recommended that the Company’s shareholders adopt the Merger Agreement and proposals related thereto.

No action will be taken by the Company’s shareholders at the Annual Meeting with respect to, and no proxy is being solicited by this proxy statement in connection with, the Merger Agreement or any matters related

thereto. The Company and its directors and executive officers are soliciting votes in connection with the Merger Agreement pursuant to a separate definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), which was filed and mailed to the Company’s shareholders on or about March 26, 2021. The Company intends to provide to its shareholders supplemental disclosure to such definitive proxy statement with respect to the Merger Agreement and will file such materials with the SEC. Shareholders are urged to read the definitive proxy statement as supplemented and such other relevant materials for more information, including with respect to the terms of the Merger Agreement. The Merger is subject to the satisfaction (or mutual waiver by each of Parent and the Company where permitted under applicable law) of customary closing conditions, including the approval of the Company’s shareholders. Until the Merger closes, we remain a separate and independent company. As a result, the Company is holding the Annual Meeting to act on the matters outlined above.

Virtual Annual Meeting

Due to the continuing impact of the novel coronavirus (or COVID-19) pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders and employees, the Annual Meeting will be a completely virtual meeting conducted via webcast. We have determined that this is the best method to ensure that our diverse base of shareholders can participate in the Annual Meeting, especially given the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. All shareholders as of the close of business on the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the virtual Annual Meeting as well as vote and submit questions during the webcast of the meeting by visiting www.cesonlineservices.com/cub21_vm.

To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need to provide the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or voting instruction form that accompanied your proxy materials.

If you wish to participate in the Annual Meeting, please log on to the link provided above at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the Annual Meeting to provide time to register, download the required software, if necessary, and test your internet connectivity. If you access the Annual Meeting but do not enter your control number, you will be able to listen to the proceedings, but you will not be able to vote or otherwise participate.

We will ensure that at our virtual meeting, all attendees are afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. These procedures include the ability for shareholders to ask questions during the course of the meeting, post appropriate questions received during the meeting for review by other participants, review our corresponding answers to such questions on our “Investor Relations” section of our website at www.cubic.com/investor-relations as soon as possible after the Annual Meeting and access technical support staff during the meeting in the event of difficulties arising from the use of the virtual meeting platform.

We evaluate annually the method of holding our Annual Meeting, taking into consideration the above factors as well as business and market conditions and the proposed agenda items. We are mindful that in- person meetings are also challenging during the pandemic. In 2021, we believe that holding the Annual Meeting virtually over the internet is the right approach for the Company, as it enables more of our diverse base of shareholders to participate in our Annual Meeting.

We believe that a virtual meeting provides greater access to those who may want to attend our Annual Meeting and, therefore, have chosen this over an in-person meeting.

11

PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

   

The Company is asking its shareholders to vote to elect nine directors to serve on the Board until the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the “2022 Annual Meeting”) or until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified.

Our Board has nine members who are standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting. The Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Board have recommended the election of the nine directors listed below. Eight of the director nominees are independent (the “Independent Directors”) and one is an executive employee of the Company. Proxy holders will, unless authorization to do so is withheld, vote the proxies received by them for the election of the listed directors in accordance with this proxy authorization. The proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. Although it is not contemplated that any nominee will be unable to serve as a director, in such event, the proxies will be voted by the proxy holders for such other persons as may be designated by the Board.

Director Skills and Qualifications

The table below summarizes some of the key experience and skills of our director nominees. This summary is not intended to be an exhaustive list of each of our director nominee’s skills or contributions to the Board.

12

Director Diversity

The nominees to our Board represent a diverse mix of backgrounds, qualifications, skills and experiences that we believe contribute to a well-rounded Board that is positioned to effectively oversee our strategy. We have a balance of new and tenured directors, reflecting our

commitment to proactive Board refreshment. The average age of our directors is 67 years. The average tenure of our directors is 5 years. 89% of our directors are independent. 56% of our directors are diverse.

13

Biographies for Director Nominees

The Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee and the Board believe that the director nominees are qualified to serve the best interests of our shareholders and should be elected because they possess the following experience, qualifications, attributes and skills.

 

 

Chairperson

 

 

 

Financial Expert

 

 

 

Chairman of the Board

 

 

 

Lead Independent Director

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

 

BRADLEY H. FELDMANN

PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Age 59

Director since 2014

    Chairman since 2018
 

Committees

•   Classified Business Oversight  

Background

Mr. Feldmann is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and President of Cubic. He was appointed to the Board in May 2014 and was elected as Chairman of the Board in February 2018. He has served as CEO of Cubic since July 2014, and as President since January 2013. He also served as Chief Operating Officer of Cubic from January 2013 to July 2014. Prior to that, he was President of the companies comprising the Cubic Defense Systems segment, a role he assumed in 2008. He previously worked at Cubic Defense Systems from 1989 to 1999.

Prior to rejoining Cubic in 2008, Mr. Feldmann held senior leadership positions at OMNIPLEX World Services Corporation, a security services provider, and ManTech International (Nasdaq: MANT), a defense contracting firm. He is a Board Leadership Fellow of the National Association of Corporate Directors, a member of the Aerospace Industries Association Board of Governors and a member of the board of directors of the National Defense Industrial Association (“NDIA”), serving on NDIA’s Executive Committee and as Chair of the Finance Committee. He also serves on the board of directors of UrbanLife, a non-profit organization, as Chair of the Finance Committee.

Qualifications

•   Extensive defense, intelligence and transportation industry expertise

•   Long history and successful track record with Cubic; spearheaded the Company’s strategic growth and NextCUBIC plans, including customer-centric innovations, strong improvements to financial performance, IT infrastructure, operations and talent development

•   Executive management experience at global companies

14

 

PRITHVIRAJ BANERJEE

CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER,
ANSYS CORPORATION

Age 60

Director since 2018

P    Independent
 

Committees

•   Executive Compensation

•   Technology Strategy  

Background

Dr. Banerjee has served as Chief Technology Officer of ANSYS, Inc., a global engineering software developer, since October 2018, and prior to that, served as a senior client partner for Korn Ferry, a management consulting firm, from June 2017 to October 2018 where he was responsible for the Internet of Things and digital transformation advisory services within the organization’s global industrial practice. Prior to his role at Korn Ferry, Dr. Banerjee was the Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer for Schneider Electric SE, a multinational energy company, from September 2015 to June 2017, and served in several senior leadership roles including Managing Director of Global Technology R&D at Accenture PLC from 2013 to 2015; Chief Technology Officer and Executive Vice President of ABB Ltd., a multinational automation company, from 2012 to 2013; and Senior Vice President of Research and Director of HP Labs at Hewlett-Packard, a multinational technology company.

Dr. Banerjee founded AccelChip, a developer of products and services for electronic design automation in 2000 and BINACHIP, where he was also Chairman and Chief Scientist in 2006. He has also served as Dean of the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois at Chicago, Walter P. Murphy Professor and Chairman of Electrical and Computer Engineering (“ECE”) at Northwestern University and Professor of ECE at the University of Illinois. From 2013 to 2019, Dr. Banerjee served on the board of directors of Cray Inc., a company that specialized in supercomputers and solutions for storage and analytics. He also serves on the board of directors of Turntide Technologies.

Qualifications

•   Leadership experience in engineering, disruptive technology and research and development

•   Global experience in both public and private sectors with a track record of driving innovation and technology differentiation

 

BRUCE G. BLAKLEY

RETIRED MANAGING PARTNER, COOPERS & LYBRAND, AND FACULTY MEMBER AT UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

Age 75

Director since 2008

P    Independent
 

Committees

•   Audit and Compliance    

•   Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility

Background

Mr. Blakley was an audit partner and, from 1996 to 1998, was Managing Partner in the San Diego office of the national accounting firm Coopers & Lybrand (PricewaterhouseCoopers since 1998). He was employed there in auditing private and public companies and consulting with their boards of directors and executives for 32 years until his retirement in 2005. He maintains his CPA license, teaches at the University of California, San Diego, and serves as a director of a privately held manufacturing company. He previously served as a director and chair of the Audit Committee of Excel Trust, Inc. from April 2010 to August 2015 and as board chair of The San Diego Foundation, a non-profit organization with over $575 million in assets, including as chair of its finance, audit, and executive Committees, and as a director of The San Diego Foundation for 14 years.

Qualifications

•   Public, private and non-profit business experience as well as experience in academia

•   Extensive financial expertise, including financial reporting, accounting and controls

•   Enhanced corporate governance experience

15

 

MAUREEN BREAKIRON-EVANS

FORMER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, TOWERS PERRIN

Age 66

Director since 2017

P    Independent

 

Committees

•   Audit and Compliance  

•   Technology Strategy

Other Public Company Boards

•   Ally Financial, Inc.

•   Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.

Background

Ms. Breakiron-Evans served as the Chief Financial Officer of Towers Perrin, a global professional services company from 2007 until her retirement in 2008. Prior to that she was Vice President and General Auditor of CIGNA Corporation, a health services organization, from 2005 to 2006, and was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Inovant, LLC, VISA’s captive technology development and transaction processing company, from 2001 to 2004. She served 16 years in public accounting, ultimately as a partner at Arthur Andersen LLP through 1994

Ms. Breakiron-Evans currently serves on the board of directors Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., a multinational IT service provider (Nasdaq: CTSH), where she serves on the Audit Committee and on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Ally Financial, Inc., a financial services company (NYSE: ALLY), where she serves on the Audit Committee and Digital Transformation Committee. She recently served on the board of directors of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc., a payment processing and technology provider, where she served as Chair of the Audit Committee until its sale in April 2016. Ms. Breakiron-Evans served on the board of the Federal Home Loan Bank-Pittsburgh from 2011 through 2014. She received an NACD Cyber Security Certificate in 2017 and is a Board Leadership Fellow of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

Qualifications

•   Experience as an Audit Partner with a strong command of the financial reporting and tax issues facing public companies

•   Former chief financial officer with extensive leadership, technology, financial and risk management experience

16

 

DENISE L. DEVINE

FOUNDER AND CEO OF FNB HOLDINGS, LLC AND CO-FOUNDER AND CFO OF RTM VITAL SIGNS, LLC

Age 65

Director since 2019

P    Independent

 

Committees

•   Audit and Compliance  

•   Technology Strategy

Other Public Company Boards

•   AgroFresh Solutions, Inc.

•   Fulton Financial Corporation

Background

Ms. Devine was the founder and since 2014 has served as the CEO of FNB Holdings, LLC, a company dedicated to initiatives in the health and wellness space. Since 2014, Ms. Devine has been the co-founder, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of RTM Vital Signs, LLC, a medical device company. Ms. Devine was also the founder and previously served for more than ten years as the CEO of Nutripharm, Inc., a health and nutrition company. Ms. Devine previously served as Chief Financial Officer for Energy Solutions International, a technology company serving the energy industry, and in financial management positions for Campbell Soup Company, a processed food and snack company.

Ms. Devine has served as Chair of the Pennsylvania State Board of Accountancy and on the Board of the American Institute of CPAs. Ms. Devine has served as a director of Fulton Financial Corporation, a financial services company (Nasdaq: FULT), since 2012 as a director of AgroFresh Solutions, Inc., a global leader in produce freshness solutions (Nasdaq: AGFS), since 2018 and as a director of Select Quote, a technology-enabled, direct-to-consumer insurance distribution platform (NYSE: SQLT), since 2020. Ms. Devine was a member of the Board of Trustees of Villanova University from 2005 to 2015, where she was the Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee. She has also served as a member of the Board of Trustees of Lourdes Health System from 2010 to 2019 and on the board of directors of AUS, Inc., a privately-owned company, since 2016 and was appointed to the board of directors of Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern Pennsylvania in 2016. Ms. Devine is a certified public accountant.

Qualifications

•   Global leadership experience spanning from entrepreneurial start-ups to Fortune 100 corporations

•   Extensive financial and capital markets experience

•   Deep experience developing and commercializing technology platforms

•   Co-inventor on more than twenty U.S. and international patents

17

 

CAROLYN A. FLOWERS

MANAGING PRINCIPAL, INFRASTRATEGIES LLC, FORMER AMERICAS TRANSIT PRACTICE LEADER — AECOM

Age 71

Director since 2019

P    Independent
 

Committees

•   Executive Compensation

•   Technology Strategy

Background

Ms. Flowers has served as a Partner and Managing Principal of InfraStrategies LLC, a global advisory and management consulting firm since February 2019. Ms. Flowers is an experienced transportation executive who was formerly the Senior Vice President of Americas Transit Market Sector at AECOM, a multinational engineering firm, where she was responsible for client and industry relations and business development in the U.S. and Canada from March 2017 to February 2019. Prior to joining AECOM, she served as the acting administrator of the Federal Transit Administration under President Obama from January 2015 through January 2017.

Ms. Flowers was the CEO and Director of Public Transit for the Charlotte Area Transit System from January 2010 to January 2015 and spent 19 years at Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, where she completed her tenure as its Chief Operating Officer. Ms. Flowers currently serves on the American Public Transportation Association’s (“APTA”) board of directors. She previously served as Co-Chair of the Reauthorization Task Force and Publication Advisory, Leadership, Legislative and Awards committees. She currently serves on the Finance Committee of APTA.

Qualifications

•   Recognized thought leader in the transportation and infrastructure space

•   Unique understanding in the areas of policy, public-private partnerships and creative collaboration among stakeholders and the business community

•   Extensive leadership experience in public transportation

 

JANICE M. HAMBY

RETIRED REAR ADMIRAL, U.S. NAVY

Age 62

Director since 2015

P    Independent
 

Committees

•   Classified Business Oversight  

•   Executive Compensation

•   Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility

Background

Admiral Hamby retired as a U.S. Navy Rear Admiral in 2012 and is an information technology expert with more than 30 years of experience in the cyber security arena, most recently as a Deputy Chief Information Officer for the U.S. Department of Defense from 2011 to 2012. Prior to that, she served as Vice Director, Command, Control, Computers and Communications for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. She subsequently served as the Chancellor at the College of Information and Cyberspace, National Defense University in Washington, D.C., from October 2014 until her retirement in July 2018. Admiral Hamby served twice as Commanding Officer of critical telecommunications and technology services organizations, as well as on the staffs of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Commander of Multi-National Force in Iraq. She holds a Doctor of Management degree and consults and speaks on cyber security and leadership. She co-owns and operates Fair Winds Farm, LLC with her husband.

Qualifications

•   Strong background in directing and implementing information technology systems in complex organizations as well as deep experience in cyber security

•   Extensive defense industry and military leadership experience

•   Experience in strategy development, human capital management and development, and international negotiations

•   Expert in area of impacts of toxic environments on workforce resilience

18

 

DAVID F. MELCHER

FORMER PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR OF EXELIS, INC.,
FORMER PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION, AND RETIRED LIEUTENANT GENERAL, U.S. ARMY

Age 66

Director since 2018

  Lead Independent Director since 2019

P    Independent
 

Committees

•   Classified Business Oversight  

•   Executive Compensation  

•   Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility

Other Public Company Boards

•   Becton Dickinson & Company

Background

General Melcher served as the President and CEO of the Aerospace Industries Association from June 2015 until his retirement at the end of December 2017. From 2011 to 2015, he was President, CEO, and a member of the board of directors of Exelis Inc., a diversified, global aerospace defense, information and technology services company. Exelis Inc. was spun off from ITT Corporation (“ITT”), a global manufacturing company, in 2011 and acquired by Harris Corporation in 2015. From 2008 to 2011, he was the President of ITT’s Defense and Information Solutions business. He retired from the Army as a Lieutenant General in 2008 after a successful 32-year career and served in the Pentagon as the Army’s Military Deputy for Budget and Deputy Chief of Staff for Programs (G8).

General Melcher served on the board of directors of CR Bard Corporation (“CR Board”), a medical technology company, from 2014 to December 2017 and was a member of the Audit, Finance and Compensation and Personnel Committees. Becton, Dickinson and Company (“BD”), a multinational medical technology company (NYSE: BDX), acquired CR Bard in December 2017 and General Melcher was appointed to serve on BD’s board of directors as of that date, as well as the Audit and Compensation and Management Development Committees. As of August 2019, he was elected to the board of directors of the Uniformed Services Automobile Association and serves on the Audit and Compensation and Workforce committees. General Melcher was also selected in September 2019 as a member of the Board of Managers for General Motors Defense, LLC.

Qualifications

•   Extensive aerospace and defense industry leadership expertise, including as a former public company CEO

•   Experience with military programs and budgeting

•   Background in strategy, business development, finance and engineering

•   Extensive corporate governance experience with a decade worth of service on four corporate boards

19

 

STEVEN J. NORRIS

CHAIR, SOHO ESTATES;
PRESIDENT, ITS UK; AND
FORMER MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Age 75

Director since 2014

P    Independent
 

Committees

•   Audit and Compliance

•   Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility  

Other Public Company Boards

•   Driver Group Plc  

Background

Mr. Norris is a recognized authority on transport and infrastructure issues. Before joining the Cubic Board in 2014, he served as a member of the Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc. strategic advisory board from 2012 to 2014. He is the chair of Soho Estates, one of the largest real estate operations in the United Kingdom, and was appointed Chairman of Driver Group Plc (LON: DRV), an engineering services company, in March 2015 and as a Director of Optare PLC, a manufacturing company, in August 2014. He also serves as the President of ITS UK, the sister organization of ITS US, which represents transport technology business in their respective countries.

Mr. Norris became a Member of Parliament in 1983 and remained in government service until 1997. While serving as Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Transport and Minister for Transport in former Prime Minister Sir John Major’s government, Norris was responsible for the Jubilee Line Extension, the largest extension of the London Underground network to date. He is also a former member of the Board of Transport for London, which operates the London public transit system.

Qualifications

•   Recognized authority on transportation and infrastructure issues

•   Deep experience in government affairs

•   Global leadership experience drawing from many years in government service in the UK

•   Former and current experience as Chairman of AIM and LSE public companies in UK

 

Voting Recommendation

P The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR
each of the nine nominees listed above.

   

20

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

Board Leadership Structure

The Board regularly evaluates the appropriate leadership structure of the Company and currently believes that the Company and its shareholders are best served by not having a formal policy on whether the same individual may serve as both CEO and Chairman. This flexibility allows the Board to elect the most appropriate director as Chairman, while maintaining the ability to separate the Chairman and CEO roles if necessary. While the Board is confident that the combined Chairman and CEO structure, balanced by a strong Lead Independent Director position, is best suited to the current needs of the business, the Board remains committed to evaluating Cubic’s leadership structure on an ongoing basis as part of its annual self-assessment.

Chairman

Currently, the Company’s Chairman and CEO roles are held by Mr. Feldmann. The Board believes that this structure serves the Company and its shareholders well based primarily on Mr. Feldmann’s background, skills and

experience, as detailed in his biography above, including his history with Cubic and successful track record spearheading the Company’s strategic growth plan, including strong improvements to financial performance, IT infrastructure, operations and talent development.

The Chairman has the authority to call meetings of the Board and presides at such meetings. He has primary responsibility for shaping Board agendas (in consultation with the Lead Independent Director) and will communicate with all directors on key issues and concerns outside of Board meetings.

Lead Independent Director

General David Melcher has served as the Lead Independent Director since July 2019 and has deep expertise in the defense industry, including his leadership experience as a public company president and chief executive officer. The table below describes the key duties and responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director.

Key Responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director

•  Review with the Chairman and approve all Board meeting agendas

•  Call and chair all meetings of the Independent Directors

•  Preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present

•  Facilitate full and candid Board discussions and discussions among independent directors outside of Board meetings, including oversight of the CEO

•  Be authorized to attend all committee meetings, as appropriate

•  Serve as the liaison between the Independent Directors and the Chairman

•  Be available for consultation and communication with significant shareholders

•  Collaborate with the Executive Compensation Committee on the CEO’s annual performance evaluation

•  Collaborate with the Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee on the performance and structure of the Board and its committees, including the performance of individual directors

•  Guide the CEO succession planning process in conjunction with the Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee

21

Meetings

The Board met 17 times during our fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 (“fiscal year 2020”).

During fiscal year 2020, each director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings held during such director’s term of service by the Board and each committee of the Board on which such director served.

Non-employee directors regularly meet without management present at the conclusion of each regular Board meeting and the Audit and Compliance Committee meetings and at other times as necessary.

During fiscal year 2020, the Lead Independent Director, General Melcher, chaired these sessions for the Board, and Mr. Blakley chaired these sessions for the Audit and Compliance Committee.

The Board encourages its members to attend the Annual Meeting. The 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2020 Annual Meeting”) was attended by all then-current directors.

Director Independence

The Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee determined, and the Board agreed, that all directors nominated, except Mr. Feldmann, met the independence standards of the NYSE and the categorical independence standards adopted by the Board as defined in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines. There are no family relationships among any of the director nominees or any of the Company’s executive officers.

Shareholder Engagement

We actively engage with our shareholders on a year-round basis to discuss Cubic’s strategy, financial performance and key business developments. We participate in numerous investor conferences, hold our own shareholder engagement events and meet one-on-one with current and prospective shareholders in a variety of forums.

After our annual shareholder meeting, the Board reviews the voting results and any shareholder feedback. We implement a governance-focused outreach plan designed to solicit our shareholders’ input on matters such as corporate governance, executive compensation, sustainability and social responsibility. We extend meeting invitations to our largest shareholders in late summer and early fall.

Our engagement team includes our Chairman and CEO, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Vice President of Investor Relations, Senior Director of Responsible Business, and may include our Lead Independent Director and other Board members and executives as appropriate. The Board carefully reviews the shareholder feedback

from these discussions and implements changes, if appropriate. The engagement team may also conduct outreach ahead of the annual shareholder meeting to discuss matters to be voted on at our upcoming Annual Meeting.

In fiscal year 2020, we extended invitations to shareholders representing approximately 60% of our common shares outstanding, including both U.S. and international shareholders. Our discussions focused on topics including COVID-19, Board composition, culture, diversity initiatives and the Company’s ESG strategy. Shareholders also shared perspectives on various ESG reporting frameworks. From these discussions, it is clear that topics relating to environmental and social matters, are becoming increasingly important to our shareholders as part of their assessment of the Company’s risks and opportunities. As part of our annual engagement, we expect to continue to reach out to our largest shareholders holding in the aggregate at least 50% of our total outstanding common shares each year.

22

As a result, in part, of our discussions with shareholders and, in part, our focus on continuous improvement and better alignment with shareholder interests, we have

implemented key changes to our executive compensation program and corporate governance in recent years, including:

Executive Compensation and Stock Ownership Guidelines

•   Effective Fiscal Year 2019:    Modifications to long-term incentive plan to include a relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) multiplier (relative to Russell 2000) measured over the three-year performance period

 

•   Effective Fiscal Year 2020:    Modifications to our annual incentive plan to include a cash flow metric

 

•   Effective Fiscal Year 2020:    Increased stock ownership requirements for executive officers and directors under applicable guidelines

 

•   Effective Fiscal Year 2020:    Modifications to our long-term incentive plan to reduce the maximum payout on performance awards from 250% to 200% of target and limit the relative TSR modifier to 1.0 if absolute TSR is negative for the performance period

 

•   Effective Fiscal Year 2020:    Added Digital strategy to the annual incentive plan (10% weighting)

 

•   Effective Fiscal Year 2020:    Modification to the Long Term Incentive Plan for the growth and adjusted EBITDA to a three-year cumulative number, from an annual reset formula

 

Shareholder Rights and Board Accountability

•   Fiscal Year 2019:    Implementation of a majority voting standard for director elections

 

•   Fiscal Year 2019:    Elimination of supermajority voting requirements for certain business combinations, bylaw amendments and certificate of incorporation amendments

 

ESG Disclosures

•   Fiscal Year 2021:    Increased disclosures on corporate responsibility, Board diversity and employee demographics added to the Cubic’s website and this proxy; published inaugural corporate responsibility report

 

Annual Evaluation of Board Effectiveness

Each year, our Board conducts a comprehensive self-evaluation to assess its own effectiveness, review our governance practices and identify areas for enhancement. Our Board’s annual self-evaluation also is a key component of its director nomination process and succession planning.

The Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee reviews and determines the overall process, scope, and content of our Board’s annual self-evaluation process. As provided in its charter, each of our Board’s standing committees also conducts a separate self-evaluation process annually which is led by the committee chair. The Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee has

continued to enhance the form and scope of the Board’s self-evaluation process based on director feedback, best practices, experience and regulatory expectations.

The Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee reviews best practices annually relating to Board and committee self-evaluation processes and makes changes to the form and scope of its evaluation so that the process continues to provide the Board an effective mechanism to evaluate the Board’s performance and effectiveness and make changes the Board determines are necessary and appropriate. The Board engaged a third party to facilitate its annual self-evaluation during fiscal year 2020.

23

Recent Enhancements to Board Effectiveness Based on Self-Evaluations

We continue to make changes and enhancements based on feedback from the Board and committee self-evaluations, including the following:

•   Prioritizing Board and committee meeting agendas in order to allow sufficient time for discussion of our business, strategy, regulatory matters, and key issues and risks;

•   Ongoing improvement in the quality of management reports to the Board and committees, including risk reports, in order to streamline meeting materials and highlight the most important information; and

•   Improving new director orientation and training to enhance and maximize their contributions, including continuing external and internal director education opportunities, as well as training on compliance topics.

Topics Covered in the Scope of Board Self-Evaluation in Fiscal Year 2020

Board Composition, Structure and Meetings

Board composition, including size and mix of skills, knowledge, experience, perspectives, tenure, background and diversity

Committee structure and functioning, including the number of committees and their roles and responsibilities

Effectiveness of meeting structure, including the frequency and quality of Board meetings and executive sessions of independent directors

Board agenda planning and agenda content, organization and time allocation

Culture, Dynamics

Appropriate listings of Board goals, responsibilities and duties

Individual directors’ knowledge, skills and perspectives as needed in effective boardroom discussions

Trust exists among directors individually and as a group, and with management

Discussions are open and candid, constructive, appropriately challenging and productive

Meetings

Frequency and length of meetings are appropriate, enabling the Board to effectively carry out its responsibilities

Agendas are carefully planned yet sufficiently flexible to accommodate emergencies and unexpected developments

Timely feedback provided to CEO following executive sessions

Information

Board receives accurate, relevant information from a variety of sources, including management, analyst and media reports, and outside experts

Information is clear and well organized and is at the appropriate level and form with key matters highlighted to facilitate effective communication

24

Areas of Oversight Responsibilities

Strategy

Risk management

Crisis management

Culture

Ethics and compliance program

Measuring and monitoring performance

Mergers and acquisitions

Succession planning

Financial reporting

Relationships with Shareholders and Other Stakeholders

An effective program is in place to communicate with major shareholders

Shareholder perspectives are regularly communicated to the Board and incorporated into Board deliberations

Attention to institutional investor and proxy advisor focus on such matters as corporate purpose, board diversity, governance, social responsibility, sustainability and environmental matters, cyber risk/security, human capital management strategies, the link between CEO pay programs and strategy and performance, and related disclosures

Current Board Committee Members

Name

Audit and
Compliance

Executive
Compensation

Nominating,
Governance,
Ethics and
Corporate
Responsibility

Classified
Business
Oversight

Technology
Strategy

Bradley H. Feldmann    

     

 

Prithviraj Banerjee

 

   

Bruce G. Blakley

 

 

   

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

 

     

Denise L. Devine

 

     

Carolyn A. Flowers

 

   

Janice M. Hamby

 

 

David F. Melcher    

 

 

Steven J. Norris

 

   

Meetings in Fiscal Year 2020

5

7

4

2

4

25

Communications with Directors

Any interested person may communicate at any time with the whole Board, the Independent Directors or any individual director with the correspondence addressed to “Board of Directors” or “Independent Directors” or to a named director, by writing to:

Cubic Corporation
c/o Corporate Secretary
9233 Balboa Avenue
San Diego, CA 92123

or by e-mail to:

CorporateSecretary@Cubic.com

The Corporate Secretary will promptly relay all communications to the appropriate directors, other than communications that are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board or its committees. Those unrelated matters include, without limitation, business solicitations, advertisements and surveys; requests for donations and sponsorships; job referral materials such as resumes; product-related communications; unsolicited ideas and business proposals; and material that is determined to be illegal or otherwise inappropriate. The Corporate Secretary will coordinate responses, if appropriate.

Board Committees

Audit and Compliance Committee

•  Bruce G. Blakley    

•  Denise L. Devine  

•  Maureen Breakiron-Evans  

•  Steven J. Norris

All members are independent and financially literate.

Responsibilities

•  Oversee the Company’s financial reporting process.

•  Responsible for the appointment, retention and termination of independent auditors and their compensation.

•  Resolve disputes between management and auditors.

•  Pre-approve all audit and non-audit services according to a written plan and budget submitted by the auditors.

•  Meet quarterly (at a minimum) with the auditors and review their periodic reports.

•  Discuss with auditors the scope and plan for the audit and include management in its review of accounting and financial controls, assessment of business risks and legal and ethical compliance programs.

Qualifications

Each member of the Audit and Compliance Committee is independent as defined under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, Section 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and is financially literate. Mr. Blakley, Ms. Breakiron-Evans and Ms. Devine are our Audit and Compliance Committee Financial Experts with extensive accounting experience.

Mr. Blakley, Ms. Breakiron-Evans and Ms. Devine have all served on the audit committee of another publicly-held company. Mr. Blakley previously served as chair of an audit committee for Excel Trust, Inc., a publicly held real estate investment trust, until August 2015. The trust is unrelated to Cubic and its subsidiaries and does not present any conflicts of interest for Cubic or the industry in which it operates.

26

Ms. Breakiron-Evans currently serves on the Audit Committee of the Board of Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., and on the Audit Committee of the Board of Ally Financial, Inc. She recently served as Chair of the Audit Committee of the Board of Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. until its sale in April 2016. The companies are unrelated to Cubic and its subsidiaries and do not present any conflicts of interest for Cubic or the industry in which it operates.

Ms. Devine currently serves on the Audit Committee for AgroFresh Solutions, Inc. and Fulton Financial Corporation. She previously served as Chair of the Audit Committee of Villanova University. The companies and organizations are unrelated to Cubic and its subsidiaries and do not present any conflicts of interest for Cubic or the industry in which it operates.

Report of the Audit and Compliance Committee

The Committee selected Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accountants (“Accountants”) of the Company for fiscal year 2020. The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the Accountants the audited financial statements of the Company for fiscal year 2020. The Committee met with the Accountants on numerous occasions and discussed the matters required to be discussed under generally accepted auditing standards and the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and the SEC, has received from the Accountants the written disclosures and the letter regarding independence required by the PCAOB, and has discussed with the Accountants their independence.

Based on its review of the audited financial statements for fiscal year 2020 and its discussions with management and the Accountants, the Committee recommended to our Board that the Company’s fiscal year 2020 audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020.

AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE

Bruce G. Blakley, Chair
Maureen Breakiron-Evans
Denise L. Devine
Steven J. Norris

Executive Compensation Committee

•  David F. Melcher       

•  Janice M. Hamby

•  Carolyn A. Flowers

•  Prithviraj Banerjee

All members are independent.

Responsibilities

•  Establish and oversee the Company’s executive compensation programs.

•  Approve employment and severance arrangements and other material commitments concerning the Company’s executive officers.

•  Annually review and approve goals and objectives relevant to compensation for executive officers, evaluate each executive’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and either as a committee or together with the other Independent Directors of the Board, determine and approve the executives’ compensation.

Qualifications

Each of the members of the Executive Compensation Committee is independent as defined under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Under the Executive Compensation Committee’s charter, the Committee may delegate any of its responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Executive Compensation Committee, unless prohibited by law, regulation or NYSE listing standard.

27

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Participation

During fiscal year 2020, none of the members serving on the Executive Compensation Committee served either as a director or as a member of the compensation committee of any other entity whose executive officers served either as a director or as a member of the Executive Compensation Committee of the Company. Therefore,

there were no “interlocks” with other companies within the meaning of the proxy rules of the SEC. No member of the Executive Compensation Committee is a former or current officer or employee of Cubic or any of its subsidiaries. See also the section “Executive Compensation and Other Information” later herein.

Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee

•  Steven J. Norris  

•  Janice M. Hamby

•  Bruce G. Blakley  

•  David F. Melcher     

All members are independent.

Responsibilities

•  Track important legal and regulatory changes and new concepts in public company governance.

•  Oversee annual Board, Board member and committee evaluations.

•  Make recommendations regarding Board composition, Board committee structure and Board refreshment.

•  Oversee the Board’s annual self-evaluations and peer member evaluations with third party evaluations conducted every three years.

•  Review succession planning process for executive management, other members of senior management and Board succession.

•  Review and recommend to management and the Board objective policies and procedures that best serve Cubic’s and its shareholders’ interests in maintaining a business environment with high standards of ethics, integrity and compliance in the area of corporate responsibility, including topics such as conflict minerals, human trafficking, global data privacy, human testing, employee relations, health and safety, political participation and environmental stewardship.

Qualifications and Policy

Each of the members of the Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee is independent as defined under Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual and in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

The Committee’s policy is to consider Board candidate recommendations of shareholders that are received by the Corporate Secretary at least 120 days prior to the one-year anniversary of the mailing of notice of the previous annual meeting of shareholders. In considering additions to the Board or filling vacancies, the Committee assesses current needs of the Company and considers candidates’ expertise, experience and background. The Committee does not have a formal diversity policy that is applied when evaluating candidates but takes diversity, including geographic, gender, age, ethnic and racial diversity, into account among other factors it considers. In such circumstances, the Committee seeks recommendations from the Board, senior management personnel and relevant professional organizations regarding potential candidates.

The Committee will also review any shareholder recommendations on file. The Committee evaluates candidates submitted by shareholders using the same criteria as candidates identified by the Board, senior management personnel and other sources. The Committee screens and personally interviews appropriate candidates. Selected candidates may meet with additional Board members, certain members of management and the Chair of the Board. The Committee evaluates responses and recommends to the full Board the name of any candidate it feels should become a nominee for election or appointment.

28

The Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee also reviews and recommends to management and the Board objective policies and procedures that best serve Cubic’s and its shareholders’ interests in maintaining a business environment of high standards of ethics, integrity and compliance. The Committee also focuses on corporate responsibility matters, including topics such as conflict minerals, human trafficking, global data privacy, human testing, employee relations, health and safety, political participation and environmental stewardship.

Board Service Guidelines

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines generally limit individual Board service by tenure and/or age as described in the table below. These metrics are not absolute but are guidelines for maximums. When either of the individual maximums are reached, there must be compelling reasons for a director’s continued participation on the Board. When both maximums are reached, there will be a strong presumption for transition off the Board.

•   Succession planning process for near-term and 5-year needs of Cubic

•   Annual individual director evaluations

•   Regular Board refreshment to ensure balanced terms, ages and diversity

•   Endeavor to limit individual Board tenure to 12 years and/or age 75 maximum

•   Service on no more than 3 other public company boards

Classified Business Oversight Committee

•  Admiral Janice M. Hamby  

•  David F. Melcher     

•  Bradley H. Feldmann     

 

Responsibilities

•  Provide oversight of the Company’s business activities that for purposes of national security have been designated as classified by the United States government.

The Committee meets on an as-needed basis.

Technology Strategy Committee

•  Prithviraj Banerjee  

•  Denise L. Devine  

•  Maureen Breakiron-Evans  

•  Carolyn A. Flowers

All members are independent.

Responsibilities

•  Provide oversight of Cubic’s technology directions and cyber resilience consistent with Cubic’s strategy.

•  Provide advice on our digital strategy and reviews our research and development (“R&D”) investments to ensure they support the competitiveness of our products and services.

•  Review the technical competencies within Cubic and advises on the R&D organization and structure to support the R&D investment.

29

Risk Oversight

The Board reviews and approves the procedures adopted and conclusions reached by our Executive Management Committee (“EMC”) and discusses with the General Counsel, who is responsible for the Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) process, and the CEO, the major enterprise risk exposures and the steps that have been taken to appropriately manage and mitigate such exposures. The General Counsel also functions as the Chief Risk Officer of the Company.

The Company’s ERM Committee (the “ERMC”), comprised of members of senior management, works with the CEO, committees of the Board and the full Board to establish overall enterprise risk strategies and oversight of policies, systems, processes and training related to enterprise risk. The ERMC reports quarterly to the Audit Committee and annually to the full Board on its activities and findings, highlighting the key enterprise risks we face and management’s actions for managing those risks.

The ERMC engages in risk management procedures for all of our business segments. The Company conducts an annual survey of certain employees and all Board members in order to obtain data used to identify its top enterprise risks. In addition, senior officers meet periodically with the ERMC to identify, assess and rank the perceived severity of enterprise risks unique to their businesses. Appropriate mitigation plans are implemented and tracked by the ERMC.

The EMC reviews and assesses perceived risks to the enterprise as a whole and to its businesses. It works with relevant managers and oversees mitigation and remediation plans. Periodic reports are brought to the attention of the Board or applicable committee of the Board by the General Counsel.

The Board’s focus and concern is to identify, and ensure the Company has a plan to respond to, those few issues which could seriously impact our short- or long-term ability to continue normal operations.

In conjunction with its enterprise risk management review, the Board also addresses our legal compliance efforts in certain complex areas, such as export control, antitrust and antibribery/anticorruption.

As part of its oversight function, the Board and its committees monitor enterprise risk as part of their regular deliberations throughout the year. When granting authority to management, approving strategies, making decisions and receiving management reports, the Board considers, among other things, the enterprise risks facing the Company. The Board also oversees enterprise risk in particular areas through its committee structure.

The Board

Responsible for oversight of risk management and allocates oversight of specific risks to the appropriate Board committee.

   

Audit Committee

Evaluates the Company’s guidelines and policies regarding risk assessment and risk management, including risks related to internal control over financial reporting, the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the procedures to monitor and control those exposures.

Executive Compensation Committee

Assesses risks potentially arising from the Company’s human resources and compensation policies and practices.

Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility

Oversees risks associated with unethical conduct and political, social, environmental and reputational risks.

Classified Business Oversight Committee

Oversees risk review activities applicable to the Company’s classified business activities and receives reports from management on particular classified projects involving significant performance, financial or reputational risks.

Technology Strategy Committee

Oversees risks associated with the Company’s technology initiatives and capabilities in support of business growth as well as cyber security

Enterprise Risk Management Committee

The ERMC is comprised of members of senior management. The ERMC establishes the Company’s overall enterprise risk strategies and oversees policies, systems, processes and training related to the Company’s enterprise risk across business segments.

30

Compliance Steering Committee

Cubic has an internal Compliance Steering Committee (“CSC”), comprised of senior leaders with a wide variety of subject-matter expertise and authority, led by the head of the Ethics, Compliance, and Risk team with reporting to the Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee. The CSC’s mission is to promote a culture of ethical integrity and legal accountability across the global organization and to mitigate risks associated with compliance. The program that the CSC supports includes, among other things: an employee Code of Business Conduct; a Code of Conduct for Third Parties; a third party due diligence and management system; an anonymous and global complaint reporting mechanism for both employees and third parties (Cubic Helpline); global

mechanisms for employees to report conflicts of interest (and any environmental, health or safety concerns); a complaint investigation and reporting process; regular communications to and training of Cubic employees on matters of ethics and compliance; global surveys regarding the Company’s ethical culture; and regular reporting to senior management and the Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee regarding the effectiveness of program components. We require all employees to receive annual training related to our Code of Business Conduct and related policies in order to confirm that employees are familiar with those standards of conduct and to mitigate the risks associated with employees’ failure to meet those standards.

Corporate Governance Materials

Board Committee Charters

Audit and
Compliance
Committee Charter

Classified Business
Oversight
Committee Charter

Executive
Compensation
Committee Charter

Nominating, Governance,
Ethics and Corporate
Responsibility
Committee Charter

Technology
Strategy Committee
Charter

Key Governance Documents

Code of Ethical
Conduct

 

Code of Business
Conduct

 

Code of Business Conduct
for Third Parties

 

Corporate Governance
Guidelines

 

Cubic, UK Tax
Strategy – 2020

Each of our Board committee charters and key corporate governance documents are available at www.cubic.com/investor-relations/governance. Cubic’s UK Tax Strategy — 2020 is available at www.cubic.com/united-kingdom-disclosures. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, or considered part of, this proxy statement.

Hedging Policy

Pursuant to Cubic’s insider trading policy, all directors and executive officers, as well as other employees who are designated as subject to the policy (“Designated Employees”), are prohibited from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities which: (1) have been granted to the director, executive officer or Designated Employee by the Company as part of their compensation, or (2) are held directly or indirectly by the director, executive officer or Designated Employee. Designated Employees are selected by the Company as those employees that may have or be exposed to insider trading information by nature of their position.

31

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

   

In alignment with the Company’s purpose and long-term strategic focus, during fiscal year 2020, we refined and expanded our ESG priorities around five key areas, including environment, social capital, human capital, business model and innovation, and governance. These pillars are described in more detail below and we look forward to sharing our progress and enhancing our communications on matters most relevant for the Company and our stakeholders.

Over the next five years, we have set goals across our ESG framework to:

•   Lower our carbon footprint;

•   Engage in the communities where we live and work while continuing to support recovery efforts in communities affected by catastrophic events around the world;

•   Continue the initiatives started in 2019 around Diversity and Inclusion, Employee Engagement, and Health and Safety;

•   Further advance our supply chain sustainability efforts; and

•   Maintain impeccable ethics and compliance, while delivering sustainable value to our customers and shareholders.

We have established foundational baselines in connection with our materiality assessment to help us better understand, measure and disclose key exposures in areas most impactful to Cubic, our competitive positioning and our impact on society. In partnership with key stakeholders, we will continue to identify the most important issues for the Company. This will guide our efforts to provide useful disclosures, which will serve as measurement of progress in key strategies.

In fiscal year 2020, we formally launched our ESG website with content and disclosures that can be viewed at www.cubic.com/ESG. We also issued our inaugural annual ESG report in fiscal year 2021 with materiality-based disclosures that are aligned with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) framework and reflecting our support of the United National Global Compact’s Ten Principles and key Sustainable Development Goals.

We believe in doing business ethically, hiring exceptional people and enabling them to succeed, being respectful of our environment and supporting the communities where we live and work. We will continue to manage our business to achieve our strategic and financial objectives without compromising our corporate responsibility goals. In fact, our commitment to corporate responsibility plays a critical role in our business strategy and focus on driving superior value through innovation. Our approach has enabled us to better understand how ESG-related risks and opportunities, can impact our performance, our people and our communities.

32

Environment

Environmental compliance is part of our operational risk management process. We meet all local customer and regulatory requirements in the areas where we operate field sites, assembly or manufacturing. Furthermore, we recognize that environmental stewardship is an

     

important part of supporting the communities in which we operate. We have made substantial efforts over the past few years to reduce our environmental footprint at our manufacturing locations by eliminating processes that generated emissions or wastewater. For example:

•      We published a 20% CO2 intensity target to be achieved by 2025 and, in 2020, reduced our CO2 intensity by 17% against our 20% target.

•      We retired seven environmental permits with the air pollution control district and the industrial waste water district thus eliminating environmental impacts from these sources.

•      In our primary manufacturing sites, Tullahoma, Huntsville, San Diego and Mexico, we operate zero emission facilities (air and water).

Social Capital

       

At Cubic, we believe that everyone deserves to be treated with respect and dignity, and we are committed to the fair treatment of all people. The world’s call for social justice has created an opportunity for us to come together in a critical moment and build on our existing diversity and inclusion efforts. This year we held a company-wide virtual event to listen to one another and support our colleagues who are hurting from racial injustice. Our Maana Employee Resource Group sponsored multiple sessions with all of Cubic, facilitating powerful and vulnerable dialogue to discuss recent events, share personal experiences, and discuss potential actions to address inequalities. These discussions highlighted the importance of education and awareness. We committed to meaningful change by launching Cubic’s Global Inclusion for a Diverse Workforce Course, an unconscious bias training program for all our employees worldwide intended to make us better at recognizing and mitigating our biases and blind spots. Additionally, we rolled out a Diversity and Inclusion

     

toolkit and made a monetary donation to NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Additionally, we are advancing a number of initiatives including:

•   the establishment of diversity goals in our strategic plan;

•   inclusive Leadership and Microinequities training;

•   published demographics data reviewed by our Board to include diversity data on our talent funnels; and

•   established regional diversity and inclusion committees in Asia Pacific and Europe, Middle East and Africa.

These are small steps and there is more to be done, but we are committed to listening, learning and improving.

 

33

Community Engagement

       

Our corporate giving supports causes that make a positive difference in the lives of our customers and our associates. In fiscal year 2020, we provided support to employees, customers and our communities by

     

repurposing our manufacturing capabilities as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic and through our support and participation in disaster relief efforts. For example, we:

•   Repurposed manufacturing and supply chain resources to produce general purpose face coverings; and provided face coverings to all Cubic employees and the Red Cross in Tijuana, Mexico.

•   Through Cubic’s Charitable Committees, supported many local organizations in our communities to improve STEM education, military veteran, and health and safety organizations.

•   Supported efforts in the Australian bushfires and the Lebanon explosion; and partnered with Help.NGO Global Dirt to provide satellite communications support for recovery efforts in North America.

Human Capital Management

We believe that our talented, global workforce is our greatest strategic asset. Cubic is committed to shaping and enabling an inclusive, high performing culture, underpinned by a dedication to ethics and a Winning the Customer Obsession. We are focused on attracting and developing the best talent, creating memorable employee experiences, and maximizing the potential contribution of every individual. In support of our human capital management strategy and its significance in driving

     

long-term, sustainable value, we have improved our efforts related to the assessment of risk and opportunity associated with key human capital issues, including diversity, culture, employee well-being and development. Additionally, we are focused on improving our data and ability to assess key human capital metrics designed to provide actionable insights to help drive progress against our priorities.

Our Purpose and Values

 

34

Demographics Summary
(as of September 30, 2020)

Health & Safety Performance

0.70

 

0.29

 

0.36

Total Recordable Incident Rate*

 

Lost Time Incident Rate*

 

Medical Injury Incident Rate*

*   Number of incidents x 200,000 / YTD Exposure Hours (as of September 30, 2020)

Our People Strategy

Diversity & Inclusion

Cubic is committed to a globally inclusive workplace where everyone is respected, empowered and supported. To deliver on this commitment, the Cubic Diversity & Inclusion Committee was established under the leadership of Cubic’s SVP Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer. Cubic’s Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee regularly receives briefings on human capital initiatives, including Diversity and Inclusion, and the full Board receives a briefing at least annually.

The Diversity & Inclusion Committee’s recent progress included establishing a strategic plan focused on learning from industry best practices, enhancing diverse recruiting outreach and driving engagement. Ten Employee Resource Groups (ERGs) were launched to promote a culture of inclusion, working together effectively to help employees maximize their own potential and support our business objectives.

35

Employee Engagement

Cubic is focused on improving employee health, productivity and overall engagement. Cubic understands employee engagement increases when the daily experience of our employees includes “engageable moments.” To help create a positive employee experience, Cubic uses a variety of employee recognition, employee development, and total reward programs. Cubic will continue to build on that momentum, providing employees with the essentials to learn and grow, build a career, be empowered, and be inspired by our purpose of making a positive difference in people’s lives.

•   Employee recognition programs, including CEO Award and social platforms that encourage peer-to-peer recognition.

•   Employee development programs including mentoring, tuition reimbursement, leadership training, professional development and individual development plans.

•   Total reward program includes an award-winning wellness program, Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan.

•   Most recent employee engagement score from the third quarter of fiscal year 2020 improved three percentage points to 82%, a company record.

     

36

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

   

The following table represents the director compensation program in effect during fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2021. During fiscal year 2019, the Company made several adjustments to its non-executive director compensation program to simplify the design of such program and further align the Company’s non-executive director compensation with market best practices. Specifically, the Company eliminated Board committee member retainers and adjusted select leadership premiums. In addition, the Company enhanced its director stock ownership guidelines (by increasing the required number of shares of the Company’s common stock to be held by each director from an amount equal to two times each director’s base cash retainer to an amount equal to five times such base cash retainer) and aligned the vesting of equity awards granted to each director with the director’s corresponding annual term of service on the Board (as compared to the prior two-year vesting period for equity awards). As a result, we believe that the design and amount of each non-executive director’s compensation for fiscal year 2020 more closely align with the Company’s peer market. For fiscal year 2021, the Company made slight increases to certain committee leadership premiums to align with market practices.

Annualized Retainer

FY
2020
($)

FY
2021
($)

Board Service:

   

Director Base Annual Retainer

90,000

90,000

Lead Independent Director Base Additional Annual Retainer

30,000

30,000

     

Committee Chair Service:

   

Audit and Compliance Committee

20,000

20,000

Classified Business Oversight Committee

5,000

5,000

Executive Compensation Committee

15,000

15,000

Nominating, Governance, Ethics and Corporate Responsibility Committee

10,000

12,500

Technology Strategy Committee

7,500

10,000

Non-employee directors also participate in the Company’s equity plan. In November 2019, each non-employee director received an award of 2,268 restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The non-employee directors’ awards granted during fiscal year 2020 vested in full on October 1, 2020.

The RSUs awarded to our non-employee directors in November 2020 will vest on the next occurring October 1 following the grant date and will be eligible for accelerated vesting upon a director’s retirement from the Board, a director’s death or a change in control of the Company, as further described in the applicable RSU award agreements. Retirement for this purpose is generally defined as retirement from the Board after six years of service. Employee directors receive no additional compensation for their service as directors. All non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel expenses. Directors are also allowed to defer some or all of their cash compensation. Two directors elected to defer all of their respective cash compensation received during fiscal year 2020.

Our directors are also subject to stock ownership guidelines to further align the interests of directors with the Company’s shareholders, as described further below under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” as well as a policy against engaging in hedging transactions with respect to shares of the Company’s common stock, as described further above under “Hedging Policy.”

37

Director Compensation Fiscal Year 2020

The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation paid to our non-employee directors pursuant to the Company’s compensation policies for fiscal year 2020. As part of the cost reduction and cash preservation measures enacted by the Company in response to COVID-19, cash paid to non-employee directors for their retainer fees during the second half of fiscal year 2020 were reduced by 15%.

Name

Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
(1)
($)

Stock
Awards
(2)
($)

Change in Pension Value and
Nonqualified Deferred
Compensation Earnings
(3)
($)

Total
($)

Prithviraj Banerjee

85,188

135,000

220,188

Bruce G. Blakley

97,125

135,000

232,125

Maureen Breakiron-Evans

81,250

135,000

216,250

Denise L. Devine

75,750

135,000

210,750

Carolyn A. Flowers

75,750

135,000

210,750

Janice M. Hamby

86,000

135,000

221,000

David F. Melcher

119,875

135,000

254,875

Steven J. Norris

89,250

135,000

224,250

John H. Warner, Jr.(4)

33,450

135,000

168,450

(1)      Mr. Feldmann, who served as an executive director during fiscal year 2020, received no additional compensation for his service as a director during that time and is not included in this table. Amounts shown in this column reflect the 15% reduction in cash compensation for the Board in response to COVID-19 described above.

(2)      This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2020. These amounts generally reflect the amount that the Company expects to expense in its financial statements over the award’s vesting schedule, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the directors. For additional information on the valuation assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts, refer to Note 1 to the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, as filed with the SEC on November 18, 2020. The aggregate number of RSUs outstanding as of September 30, 2020 held by each non-employee director was as follows: Mr. Banerjee (3,320); Mr. Blakley (3,320); Ms. Breakiron-Evans (3,320); Ms. Devine (2,268); Ms. Flowers (2,268); Admiral Hamby (3,320); General Melcher (3,320); Mr. Norris (3,320) and Dr. Warner (3,320).

(3)      In fiscal year 2020, two of the non-employee directors elected to participate in the Cubic Corporation Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan. Earnings are not reported in the non-employee director compensation table because the earnings are not above market or preferential.

(4)      Dr. Warner retired from the Board and did not stand for reelection at the 2020 Annual Meeting held in February 2020. Dr. Warner’s outstanding equity awards vested upon his retirement.

38


PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

   

In accordance with Section 14A of the Exchange Act, the Board is seeking your approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement, including the information set forth under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and other related tables and disclosure. Accordingly, the Board recommends that you vote “FOR” the following resolution:

“Resolved, that the compensation of Cubic’s named executive officers, as described in its proxy statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including the information set forth under ‘Compensation Discussion and Analysis’ and other related tables and disclosure, is hereby approved.”

This proposal, commonly known as “say-on-pay,” provides you the opportunity to express your views on the Company’s executive compensation practices. Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Board. However, the Executive Compensation Committee will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when making future executive compensation decisions on behalf of the Company.

At the 2020 Annual Meeting, shareholders approved our named executive officer compensation policies by a strong majority, with approximately 92% of shareholder votes cast in favor of our 2020 say-on-pay resolution (including abstentions and excluding broker non-votes). We expect to bring a similar proposal to you at each annual meeting of shareholders.

2020

91% approval

 

2019

93% approval

As described more fully in the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section herein, the Board believes that the Company’s executive compensation policies are balanced, appropriately focused on pay for performance principles, aligned with the long-term interests of our shareholders, and enable the Company to attract and retain experienced senior executives.

 

Voting Recommendation

PThe Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR this Proposal 2.

   

39

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

   

Executive Compensation and Other Information – Table of Contents

    

40

Named Executive Officers

   

The following individuals are our named executive officers for fiscal year 2020 as listed in the Summary Compensation Table below (the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”).

Bradley H. Feldmann

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Anshooman Aga

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Michael Knowles

Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission and Performance Solutions

Grace G. Lee

Senior Vice President of Cubic and Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Transportation Systems

Michael R. Twyman(1)

Former Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions

(1)      Effective August 27, 2020, Mr. Twyman departed the Company after serving as Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions since May 25, 2016 as a result of the combination of the two defense businesses.

41

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

   

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the Company’s compensation philosophy and the objectives of the Company’s compensation program for its executive officers, including the NEOs, and how the Executive Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis also describes the compensation determination process for fiscal year 2020 and how each element of compensation was determined.

SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

A Focus on Resiliency and Agility in a Year of Unprecedented Global Crisis

COVID-19, officially declared a global pandemic in March 2020, has presented challenges and impacts on each of our businesses and our financial performance for the fiscal year. At the onset of the pandemic, Cubic’s customers (primarily U.S. and foreign state, regional and local governmental agencies) dramatically shifted their focus to safety, crisis management and budget conservation. Our customers in the public transportation sector have faced unprecedented challenges in 2020 as they continue to deliver an essential service to provide safe mobility options for travelers, but with greatly reduce operating revenues from all funding sources, especially public transit ridership, which plummeted by 90% in some cities.

While Cubic has not experienced any cancelations of existing projects and our pipeline remains robust, our financial results in fiscal year 2020 were impacted by delays in new awards and, to a lesser extent, lower ridership, and we expect this dynamic to continue until the funding situation and operating environment improves for our customers. In our Defense business, we have also experienced delays in new orders as well as a slowdown of training exercises. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted Sales by up to $73 million and Adjusted EBITDA by up to $28 million during fiscal year 2020. While the estimated impacts of COVID-19 may not have been overly material to Cubic’s operations, relative to the ambitious manner in which Cubic established its incentive plan goals for fiscal year 2020, we believe these reductions had a significant negative impact on award calculations.

Against a backdrop of economic challenges and uncertainty, we continued to advance our strategic priorities and delivered good financial performance, which is summarized in the Financial Performance discussion below.

Resilience to the Pandemic

Beginning in March 2020, Cubic took decisive action to respond to the unprecedented disruption and related risks surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and to protect the interests of the Company, our employees, our customers, our shareholders and our other stakeholders. To guide the Company’s efforts throughout the pandemic, the Cubic leadership team focused on three main priorities — Care for our People, Care for our Employees and Focus on Essentials. We believe that our strong culture and talented, experienced teams have enabled us to effectively address these priorities and our results and progress this year demonstrate that. We imposed mandatory stay-at-home remote work except for essential work, including our service associates who continued to serve our customers, and our production associates, who continued to work to meet customer commitments. Our 6,000 talented employees have done an excellent job delivering mission critical solutions to our customers during these increasingly complex times while safeguarding the well-being of our teams. As a result of the Company’s proactive measures, our operations did not miss any production days and did not have any significant disruption to our business. Importantly, the Company has no reported cases of employee-to-employee contraction of COVID-19.

42

The table below summarizes the key areas of focus and actions taken by the Company in response to the challenges in fiscal year 2020 relating to the business disruption and risks surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our Focus

What We Did

Launched NextCUBIC Strategy - underpinned by a robust outside-in assessment - to drive a step change in value creation and deliver sustainable financial improvement through both functional and cultural transformation in the way we work.

Employees and Community

•   Effective actions to keep employees safe and to monitor employee well-being; no reported cases of employee-to-employee contraction

    Increased frequency of cleaning/sanitation; social distancing and additional protocols for “site essential” employees, including mandatory face coverings

    Implemented contact tracing and comprehensive protocols at all global sites for confirmed and suspected COVID-19 cases

•   Transitioned approximately 75% of the global workforce to telework

•   Implemented paid time-off policy to allow flexibility for employees who could not perform work due to restrictions as a result of COVID-19; implemented paid sick time globally for anyone affected by COVID-19

•   Digital workforce enablement and focus on cyber security to enable effective telework

•   Repurposed manufacturing capabilities to provide face coverings to all employees

•   Employee care and actions taken following events of social injustice in the U.S. amid an already challenging environment with the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., implemented new, mandatory Inclusion training course, globally); continued focus on progressing Diversity and Inclusion as a strategic priority

•   Frequent, effective communications from CEO and COVID-19 taskforce

•   Continued focus on engagement (won San Diego Union-Tribune's Top Workplaces; achieved a company-record engagement score)

•   Preparedness of workforce for post-COVID-19 recovery and rebound

•   Continued ESG initiatives, including helping our communities and charitable contributions; enhanced level of ESG disclosures on the Company’s website

•   Speed and fairness of changes (e.g., executive vs. employee pay cuts)

Customers and
Business Continuity

•   Ensured supply chain and manufacturing continuity

•   Maintained on-time delivery during pandemic; major projects remained on track

•   Repurposed manufacturing capabilities to provide face coverings to customers

•   Proactive discussions with customers surrounding risk management and preparedness

•   Launched three mobile apps for transit customers (i.e., D.C., Los Angeles, and Chicago), giving travelers a convenient, safe way to pay for their journeys

•   Conversations with transit customer senior executives to serve their immediate needs to enhance safety and provide insights to support rebound

•   Continued to advance key pursuits in support of the national defense strategy (e.g., won high capacity backbone prototype for the U.S. Air Force)

43

Our Focus

What We Did

Launched NextCUBIC Strategy - underpinned by a robust outside-in assessment - to drive a step change in value creation and deliver sustainable financial improvement through both functional and cultural transformation in the way we work.

Financial Discipline

•   Reduced Board and CEO cash compensation 15%; CFO 7.5% (May to fiscal 2020 year-end)

•   Suspended employee salary merit increases through fiscal year 2021 and 401(k) retirement contributions (May to fiscal 2020 year-end)

•   Debt restructuring enhanced flexibility; new term loan and upsized revolver (i.e., 30% additional capacity), attractive rates and improved covenants

•   Focused on reducing net leverage

•   Instituted an indirect/overhead position hiring freeze and control measures

•   Reduced/deferred select expenses

Shareholders

•   Took prudent action to withdraw guidance considering macro uncertainty; provided color on business environment, key assumptions and expectations

•   Frequent engagement with the investment community, including robust business updates

•   Strong focus on safety, customer commitments, business continuity, along with cost savings program and debt restructuring, supported the achievement of good financial results despite COVID-19 challenges

•   Maintained the payment of dividends to our shareholders

•   Continued key investments to support innovation and future growth

•   Driving growth, operational excellence and culture to deliver long-term, sustainable shareholder value through recently launched NextCUBIC strategy

Actions taken by the Executive Compensation Committee

The Committee’s decision process takes into consideration the unforeseen effect of COVID-19 and the resulting impact to our performance-based compensation, and the impact to Cubic’s stakeholders, including our employees and shareholders. From the period of March 2020 at the onset of the pandemic through the end of the fiscal year, the Committee had seven meetings to discuss the available alternatives. The Committee also exercised its discretion under our plans to determine the best way to compensate management in a fair manner while ensuring the long-term sustainability of our business. The Executive Compensation Committee ensured that the actions taken to address our long-term performance incentive programs align with the long-term interests of our shareholders and the interests of management.

Annual Incentive Plan

The Executive Compensation Committee considered a number of factors, including the unprecedented global crisis due to the pandemic and its impact on Cubic’s financial performance, and management’s actions in managing the company throughout the pandemic, in its effort to meet and exceed customer commitments and care for employees and stakeholders.

•   As a result of the uncertainty and the unforeseen impact of the pandemic, the Company withdrew its guidance. The Committee did not reset its performance targets as the impact of the pandemic was uncertain and unpredictable, and decided that it would instead exercise its discretionary authority under the plan.

•  In recognition of the need to focus management on key priorities to navigate the impact of the pandemic, the Committee identified four main areas of focus. The Committee identified the resiliency factors described above to address ongoing business operations as well as the long-term sustainability of Cubic. The Committee indicated that any application of discretion at the end of the year would be guided by the Company’s resilience in these areas.

44

•  The Committee reviewed management’s execution against these priorities and noted its strong performance against objectives, and noted the achievements compared to the prior year.

•   The Committee also reviewed management’s care for its employees, noting Cubic had a record employee engagement result as well as being named as a Top Workplace.

•   Based on these contributions, the Committee established a funding cap, well below target, of 60% of target on average for the NEOs (and 70% of target for any individual NEO), compared to the 20.6% otherwise achieved for the Corporate NEOs under the annual incentive plan formula. Details of this formula-based achievement is on page 58.

Market-based Base Salary Adjustments

•   The Executive Compensation Committee approved adjustments to the NEOs’ base salaries for fiscal year 2020 in November of 2019 prior to the pandemic. This was completed based on its review of comparable company data and an evaluation of the NEOs’ individual performance.

•   Mr. Feldmann’s base salary was increased by 3.7% over fiscal year 2019.

•   Current NEOs’ base salary increases averaged 6.4% over fiscal year 2019. This average excludes the increase for Mr. Knowles which represents a market adjustment in connection with increased responsibilities as president of Cubic Global Defense, as well as Jeff Lowinger who was hired on April 27, 2020.

•   Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, all base salaries have been frozen for fiscal year 2021 except for changes in responsibilities resulting in a promotion.

•   From May 2020 to the end of the fiscal year, Mr. Feldmann elected to take a reduction in pay of 15% of his base salary. From May 2020 to the end of the fiscal year, Mr. Aga elected to take a reduction in pay of 7.5% of his base salary. From May 2020 to the end of the fiscal year, the Board elected to take a reduction in pay of 15% of their annual retainer.

Key Performance Objectives During Fiscal Year 2020 for the Annual Incentive Plan

Our executive compensation program is designed to drive the achievement of our strategic objectives and financial goals, while aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. The Executive Compensation Committee reviews our executive compensation program on an annual basis to ensure consistency with our philosophy. Compensation awarded to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2020 reflected the strategic achievements and financial results and supports the overall compensation philosophy.

The Executive Compensation Committee primarily used three financial metrics for fiscal year 2020 to determine the annual incentive payable to the Company’s Named Executive Officers.

For fiscal year 2020, Sales, Adjusted EBITDA and cash flow were the financial metrics used by the Executive Compensation Committee to evaluate our financial performance under the Company’s fiscal year 2020 annual incentive program. Our consolidated performance for fiscal year 2020 for these metrics, relative to fiscal year 2019 consolidated performance, is reflected in the table below.

Financial Measure

Fiscal Year 2019
(in millions)

Fiscal Year 2020
(in millions)

Increase (decrease)

Sales

$            1,496.5

$            1,476.2

(1.35%)

Adjusted EBITDA

$               146.6

$               158.3

+7.98%

Operating Cash Flows
(excluding the VIE)

$                 18.3

$               104.2

+469%

45

2020 Performance Highlights

We delivered strong year-over-year financial performance and other significant achievements during fiscal year 2020, including:

  

•    Responded to the challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic by transitioning our team members to a remote work configuration while keeping the Company on track to meet customer commitments through robust business continuity and safety measures.

•   Sales in fiscal year 2020 were comparable to the prior year at $1,476 million; Adjusted EBITDA increased 8% to $158 million, a company record; Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 90 basis points to 10.7%; strong cash flow of $104.2 million.

•   Generated a Book to Bill ratio of 1.14 (>1.0 in all segments); backlog at year-end was strong at $3.7 billion.

•   Continued to deliver on our major fare collection projects, on schedule, including our roll out of the One Metro New York (OMNY) system, successfully reaching our goal to bring OMNY to all subway stations and buses by the end of 2020.

•   Launched three new mobile apps for our transit customers in Washington D.C., Los Angeles and Chicago.

•   Advanced our strategic priorities, including key awards such as:

    Five-year extension to upgrade Chicago’s Ventra fare collection system

    High Capacity Backbone prototype for U.S. Air Force

    Advanced Battle Management System multiple award, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”) for U.S. Air Force

    Next-generation Troposcatter system for U.S. Marine Corps

    Surface Training Immersive Gaming and Simulations for U.S. Navy (single award, IDIQ)

•   Completed a debt restructuring, which provided additional capacity, more favorable terms and less restrictive covenants.

•   Implemented cost-reduction measures to offset certain unfavorable financial impacts related to the pandemic, including a. temporary reduction of pay for the CEO, CFO and Board.

•   Strong emphasis on our people. Employee engagement reached a record of 82%.

•   Cared for our people in response to the events of racial injustice in the United States. Enabled an environment for employees globally to share and learn in our “Safe Room” discussions.

•   Recipient of the 2020 Top Workplaces award from the San Diego Union Tribune.

•   Launched NextCUBIC strategy - underpinned by a comprehensive outside-in assessment — which focuses on growth, operational excellence and culture.

    Began implementation phase including the first key action: combining the Company’s defense business segments to drive superior customer value and enhance operational effectiveness.

    

46

In fiscal year 2020, Sales were $1,476 million, compared to $1,496 million in fiscal year 2019. We estimate that the negative impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic totalled up to $73 million, primarily reflecting delayed orders and lower transit ridership. Adjusted EBITDA increased 8% to $158.3 million and Adjusted EBITDA margin increased 90 basis points to 10.7%, as strong performance in Transportation, coupled with the contribution of the high-margin Pixia acquisition and company-wide cost management initiatives, more than offset investments in Mission Solutions and the impacts related to COVID-19.

Net loss from continuing operations was $3.7 million, or $0.12 per share, compared to net income from continuing operations attributable to Cubic of $51.1 million in fiscal year 2019, or $1.67 per share, primarily reflecting lower operating income, a $16.1 million loss on extinguishment of debt and higher interest expense, which was partially offset by an income tax benefit of $6.4 million, compared to an income tax expense of $11.0 million in fiscal year 2019. Additionally, prior year results included a $32.5 million gain on sale of fixed assets. Adjusted net income increased to $103.8 million, or $3.32 per share, compared to Adjusted net income of $95.6 million in fiscal year 2019, or $3.13 per share. The table below reconciles Adjusted EPS to GAAP EPS. Please see pages 47 through 48 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on November 18, 2020, for a reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA.

47

GAAP Net Income to Adjusted Net Income
and GAAP EPS to Adjusted EPS Reconciliation
(in millions, except share and per share amounts)

 

Year Ended September 30,

2018

 

2019

 

2020

GAAP EPS

 

$

0.29

 

 

$

1.67

 

 

$

(0.12

)

GAAP Net income from continuing operations attributable to Cubic

 

$

8.1

 

 

$

51.1

 

 

$

(3.7

)

Noncontrolling interest in the income (loss) of the VIE

 

 

(0.3

)

 

 

(9.8

)

 

 

6.6

 

Amortization of purchased intangibles

 

 

27.1

 

 

 

42.1

 

 

 

59.3

 

Gain on sale of fixed assets

 

 

 

 

 

(32.5

)

 

 

(0.2

)

Restructuring costs

 

 

5.0

 

 

 

15.4

 

 

 

16.6

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16.1

 

Acquisition related expenses, excluding amortization

 

 

4.5

 

 

 

13.4

 

 

 

13.0

 

Strategic and IT system resource planning expenses

 

 

24.1

 

 

 

8.3

 

 

 

3.9

 

Other non-operating expense, net

 

 

0.7

 

 

 

20.0

 

 

 

28.8

 

Noncontrolling interest in Adjusted Net Income of VIE

 

 

 

 

 

(9.7

)

 

 

(24.6

)

Tax impact related to acquisitions(1)

 

 

(1.2

)

 

 

(6.6

)

 

 

(12.4

)

Impact of US Tax Reform

 

 

(7.0

)

 

 

 

 

 

0.7

 

Tax impact related to non-GAAP adjustments(2)

 

 

(1.0

)

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

(0.3

)

Adjusted Net Income

 

$

60.0

 

 

$

95.6

 

 

$

103.8

 

Adjusted EPS

 

$

2.19

 

 

$

3.13

 

 

$

3.32

 

 

 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding (in thousands)

 

 

27,351

 

 

 

30,606

 

 

 

31,299

 

(1)      Represents the tax accounting impact of significant discrete items recorded at the time of acquisition.

(2)      The tax effect of the non-GAAP adjustments is generally based on the statutory tax rate of the jurisdiction of the event.

48

2020 Compensation Elements

Three primary elements make up our executive compensation program: base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives. The chart below summarizes these compensation elements for fiscal year 2020, which are described in more detail in the discussion that follows.

WHAT?

Cash

Cash

Equity

Equity

WHEN?

Annual

Annual

Time-based

Three equal
annual installments

3-year
Performance Period

WHY?

Provide a competitive level of base cash compensation to attract and retain talented leaders

Motivate and reward the achievement of short-term, company-wide, business segment and individual objectives, weighted towards key financial targets

Drive the achievement of specific long-term financial performance goals and stock price growth

HOW?

 

CEO and CFO and CHRDO:

Measures and % weighting

10% Sales

60% Adjusted EBITDA
20% Operating Cash Flow

10% Digital Strategy

 

I.      Annual Sales growth (50% weight)

    Cumulative over three years

II.     Annual Adjusted EBITDA growth (50% weight)

    Cumulative over three years

   

Other NEOs:

Measures and % weighting

20% Segment Adjusted EBITDA
10% Segment Operating Cash Flow 60% Company Adjusted EBITDA 10% Digital Strategy

 

III.    TSR multiplier

    Total award multiplied by 75% to 125% depending on TSR relative to Russell 2000 for performance period

   

Payout % of Target:

Company and Segment metrics 0-200%

Individual multiplier 0-120%

Maximum payout 250% of target

 

PRSU Vesting:

0-200%

(1)      For a description of the performance metrics used in our annual incentive plan, and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP performance measures to their GAAP counterparts, please see “Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Comepensation Decisions – Annual Incentive Plan” below.

49

Fiscal Year Target Total Compensation Mix

The charts below show that the significant majority of target total direct compensation for our NEOs is variable or “at-risk,” and tied to achievement of performance objectives or stock price performance.

2020 Key Executive Compensation Outcomes

•   Market-based Base Salary Adjustments.    The Executive Compensation Committee approved adjustments to the NEOs’ base salaries for fiscal year 2020 based on its review of comparable company data and an evaluation of the NEOs’ individual performance. Mr. Feldmann’s base salary was increased by 3.7% over fiscal year 2019, while the other current NEOs’ base salary increases averaged 6.4% over fiscal year 2019. This average excludes the increase for Mr. Knowles which represents a market adjustment in connection with increased responsibilities as president of Cubic Global Defense, as well as Jeff Lowinger who was hired on April 27, 2020.

•   Annual Incentive Plan.    The Executive Compensation Committee has full discretion as to the form and amount of the annual incentive payments to our NEOs. In the current environment with the global pandemic affecting more than half of the fiscal year, fiscal year 2020 has been a challenging year. Cubic delivers essential, mission critical solutions and our leadership team demonstrated unwavering commitment to serving our customers during unprecedented times. They took significant action to navigate the ongoing pandemic, including measures to safeguard our employees, which is our top priority, ensure business continuity, and mitigate the impacts and risks associated with COVID-19. In recognition of the challenges the corporation has faced and the resiliency NEOs exhibited despite these challenges, the Compensation Committee decided to apply positive discretion to the fiscal year 2020 annual incentive payout. For the NEOs, discretion was applied to the annual incentive payouts to provide incremental payments ranging from 9.8% to 38.4% of the NEOs’ target amounts. The Executive Compensation Committee also approved individual performance multipliers for the NEOs ranging from 1.00 to 1.10.

•   Vesting of Fiscal Year 2018-2020 PRSUs. For the fiscal year 2018 performance restricted stock unit grant (PRSU), the performance of the three-year cumulative results achieved a vesting of 160% following the performance period from 2018 to 2020. Sales attained 200% of target, Adjusted EBITDA attained 200% of target, and return on equity (“ROE”) fell below threshold levels for the three-year performance period. These results combined to produce an earned PRSU award equal to 160% of target. Below is a table representing the three-year performance period.

Fiscal Year 2018 PRSUs

 

Financial Measure

Weighting

Achievement 2018 to 2020
(in millions)

Target 2018 to 2020
(in millions)

Attainment

   

3-Year Cumulative

3-Year Cumulative

 

Sales

40%

$3,959

$3,655

200%

Adjusted EBITDA

40%

$397

$334

200%

Return on Equity (%)

20%

2.4%

8%

0%

Total Vesting

     

160%

50

Response to the 2020 Say-On-Pay Vote and Key Changes to Compensation Program

As described in Proposal 2, Cubic seeks an annual non-binding advisory say-on-pay vote from its shareholders to approve the compensation of its Named Executive Officers as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and other related tables and disclosure.

In February 2020, we held our most recent say-on-pay vote, with approximately 92% of shareholder votes cast in favor of our 2020 say-on-pay resolution (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes). While this represented overwhelming support of our executive compensation program, our Executive Compensation Committee takes into consideration the outcome of our say-on-pay votes as they review executive compensation decisions.

Based in part on feedback from discussions with shareholders following our two most recent say-on-pay votes and, in part, on its reevaluation of our compensation program and advice from its independent compensation consultant to better align our program with shareholder interests, the Executive Compensation Committee implemented certain changes to our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2021, as described below.

Key Changes to Executive Compensation Program For Fiscal Year 2020

As disclosed in our 2019 proxy statement, our executive compensation program for fiscal year 2020 contains a few key changes to the annual incentive awards and RSUs and PRSUs.

•   Annual Incentive Plan.    For fiscal year 2020, the Executive Compensation Committee replaced the invested capital and asset turnover metrics with cash flow to reflect feedback from shareholders and our financial priorities for fiscal year 2020.

•   PRSUs.    Fiscal year 2020 PRSU awards incorporate the following key changes:

    Completing our transition to a performance-based and shareholder return focused long-term incentive plan, the fiscal year 2020 PRSUs return to the measurement of Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth against three-year cumulative performance goals. In addition, Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth will be calculated in a manner to exclude the effect of acquisitions or divestitures, unless otherwise directed by the Executive Compensation Committee, and will be calculated in a manner to exclude the effect of foreign exchange rates.

    The TSR modifier, relative to the Russell 2000 (up or down by 25%), is unchanged from the 2019 awards, but the modifier is capped at 1.0 if Cubic’s absolute TSR is negative over the three-year performance period.

    The total shares that may be earned at the end of the three-year performance period is capped at 200% of the target number of PRSUs.

    Replaced single-trigger vesting upon a change in control with a double-trigger provision.

•   RSUs.    Fiscal year 2020 RSU awards will vest ratably over three years, consistent with competitive norms.

Key Changes to Executive Compensation Program for Fiscal Year 2021

In response to the business environment and the COVID-19 pandemic, which continues to impact our customers and our businesses, some changes were made to our Short-Term and Long-Term incentive programs for fiscal year 2021 relative to our Annual Incentive Plan and PRSU program, which comprise 50% of our long-term equity incentive program.

•   Annual Incentive Plan

○   Corporate Plan Components.    For fiscal year 2021, the Executive Compensation Committee replaced the goal for Digital Strategy to NextCUBIC, with a weighting of 30% due to its strategic importance. NextCUBIC is the transformational strategic plan for Cubic Corporation. The other components are: Sales with a 10% weighting, Adjusted EBITDA with a 40% weighting, and cash flow with a 20% weighting.

51

○   Segment Plan Components.    For fiscal year 2021, the segment plan has NextCUBIC replacing Digital Strategy, also weighted at 30%. The other components are: Segment adjusted EBITDA with a 20% weighting, Segment cash flow with a 20% weighting, and consolidated adjusted EBITDA with a 30% weighting.

    Threshold.    The vesting threshold for Adjusted EBITDA has been changed from 93% to 82%.

•   PRSUs (2021-2023)

    The vesting of the 2021-2023 PRSUs will be determined based on the compound annual growth rates of Sales and Adjusted EBITDA achieved over the three-year performance period. The annual rates used in the compound annual growth rates for the vesting threshold, target, and maximum amounts for the 2021-2023 PRSUs have been modified as follows:

■   Threshold.    The vesting threshold for Sales has been reduced from 2.5% to 2.0% annual growth and the threshold for Adjusted EBITDA has been reduced from 2.75% to 2.25% annual growth.

■   Target.    The target for Sales has been reduced from 6% to 5% annual growth and the target for Adjusted EBITDA has been reduced from 6.5% to 5.5% annual growth.

■   Maximum.    The maximum for Sales of 8.5% annual growth and Adjusted EBITDA of 9.25% growth has not changed.

Review of Executive Compensation Best Practices

Below is a summary of best practices we have implemented and practices we avoid.

Our Executive Compensation Best Practices

ü

Stock ownership guidelines apply to both executive officers and directors

ü

Independent compensation consultant

ü

Claw-back policy for incentive compensation

ü

No tax gross-ups

ü

“Double trigger” change-in-control agreements

ü

No employment contracts

ü

Modest perquisites

ü

No hedging by executive officers and directors

ü

Long-term equity incentive award program aligns executive incentives with shareholder interests

ü

No repricing of stock options without shareholder approval

ü

Executive compensation program that received strong shareholder response (92% of votes cast in favor) in 2020 and (96% of votes cast in favor) in 2019 say-on-pay vote

   

SECTION 2: KEY OBJECTIVES AND SETTING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Guiding Principles and Objectives

We align the interests of management with those of shareholders and other stakeholders through our executive compensation programs to ensure Cubic’s future as a technology-driven, market-leading global company that makes the world better through innovation, technology solutions, and world-class products. Our policies intend to support the development of a strong executive team provided with appropriate incentives that support the business strategy, build and retain the team and address different risks associated with compensation. We strive to provide a total compensation package that fairly and equitably rewards our leadership team as a team and as individuals, from each of whom we expect superior performance. Our total direct compensation program is designed so that majority of pay is variable or “at risk,” with emphasis on performance over the long term.

52

Our executive compensation and benefits programs are guided by the following principles:

Pay for Performance

•   Our incentive programs are tied to multiple growth goals that we believe are leading indicators of shareholder value to be achieved in manners consistent with our values.

•   We measure performance as a team and by each individual executive’s contribution to outcomes.

Retention of a Strong Leadership Team

•   Compensation opportunities are intended to be competitive against our peers and broader industry competitors for talent. By allowing pay to exceed median when performance warrants, we expect to be able to attract and retain the kind of leadership that is demanded by the complexity of opportunities and challenges in our business.

Aligned with Shareholder Interests

•   We balance fixed and variable compensation opportunities to manage risk while emphasizing performance.

•   All of our long-term incentives are earned in the form of equity that vests over time on the basis of performance and/or continued contribution.

•   Stock ownership guidelines and our compensation recovery policy encourage long-term results for shareholders.

Use of Comparable Company Compensation Data

•   Our pay opportunities and our compensation programs are reviewed against a peer group and comparable company data and best practices, as further described below, and are modified when we can better attract, retain, and motivate as a result.

•   We strive to establish overall target compensation at the median for seasoned performers, but our actual compensation can vary between the lower and the upper quartiles based on delivered performance, with such variances determined at the discretion of our Executive Compensation Committee.

Pay Positioning

•   Our Executive Compensation Committee reviews competitive peer and survey compensation at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles in order to understand how the marketplace pays for roles similar to our NEOs. Without targeting a specific percentile for target total direct compensation, the Executive Compensation Committee expects that actual executive compensation will vary between the lower and the upper quartiles based on experience and delivered performance.

○   In setting fiscal year 2020 executive compensation, after a review of the comparable company data, the Executive Compensation Committee noted that Mr. Feldmann’s total direct target compensation was below the median of chief executives at comparable companies in the peer group and survey data. After evaluating his performance and experience, the Executive Compensation Committee approved increases to Mr. Feldmann’s base salary and long-term incentive award target value that brought his total direct target compensation to a level above the 50th percentile of the comparable company data.

53

○   Additionally, the Executive Compensation Committee noted that the total direct target compensation of the other NEOs fell below the 50th percentile of executives in comparable positions and approved recommendations presented by Mr. Feldmann for base salary increases and adjustments to their target long-term incentive award values to bring, on average, total direct compensation approximating the 50th percentile of the comparable company data.

    While the Executive Compensation Committee used this comparable company data as a guide in determining which compensation components to increase and by how much, the final determinations were not made by reference to specific targeted levels for any of the individual compensation components.

Oversight

•   Our compensation programs and their outcomes are approved by an independent Executive Compensation Committee.

•   By overseeing the establishment and evolution of policies and programs, the Executive Compensation Committee motivates decision-making and behaviors that deliver value to shareholders and stakeholders within a mandate to build Company sustainability, culture and productivity.

Setting Executive Compensation

Our annual compensation evaluation process includes a review of salary, annual incentives and long-term incentive practices of organizations of similar size, in comparable industries, and specific individuals with relevant responsibilities and experience. In addition to reviewing comparable company data from our identified peer group and third-party compensation consultant surveys, the Executive Compensation Committee also relies on the judgment of its members in making compensation decisions consistent with the guiding principles and objectives of our compensation program described above. After carefully reviewing our performance, as well as evaluating a NEO’s annual performance compared to established goals, leadership qualities, operational performance, business responsibilities, career with our Company, current compensation arrangements and long-term potential to enhance shareholder value, an informed decision is reached. The roles of management, the Executive Compensation Committee and the committee’s independent compensation consultant in setting executive compensation are further described below:

Executive Compensation Committee

•   Oversees our executive compensation program for executive officers

•  Authorized to retain the services of an independent compensation consultant in connection with the oversight of our executive compensation program

•  Determines and approves ongoing compensation arrangements for our executive officers and recommends to the Board the compensation for Independent Directors

•  Evaluates and approves compensation elements annually

Management

•  CEO provides the Executive Compensation Committee with recommendations regarding salary, annual incentives and equity compensation for the executive officers (other than himself)

•  Human resources department assists in the formulation of compensation recommendations to the Executive Compensation Committee, and other executive officers may provide relevant input as needed for persons other than themselves

•  CEO and our human resources department support their recommendations regarding executive compensation with competitive market data

Independent Compensation Consultant

•  Reports to the Executive Compensation Committee

•  Advises on our compensation levels and compensation program

54

In late fiscal year 2019, in preparation for fiscal year 2020 compensation planning, the Executive Compensation Committee independently engaged Pay Governance LLC to provide senior executive compensation and non-employee director compensation advice.

After review and consultation with Pay Governance, the Executive Compensation Committee determined Pay Governance to be independent and that no conflict of interest resulted from retaining Pay Governance during fiscal year 2020. In reaching these conclusions, the Executive Compensation Committee considered the factors set forth in Exchange Act Rule 10C-1 and NYSE listing standards.

Comparable Company Compensation Data and Peer Group Used for Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions

The Executive Compensation Committee’s annual compensation evaluation process includes a review of the salary, annual incentive and long-term incentive practices of organizations of similar size, in comparable industries, and concerning individuals with relevant responsibilities and experience. The Executive Compensation Committee also reviews recommendations of our CEO and our human resources department that are supported by this competitive market data.

For fiscal year 2020 compensation setting purposes, industry survey data was provided by three independent consulting firms (Radford, Mercer and Willis Towers Watson). These surveys were subscribed to by our human resources department (data is not customized to our Company) and included surveys with both a regional and national focus. These surveys included data from approximately 4,000 companies and included executive and non-executive salaries, annual incentives and long-term incentive compensation data.

Providers of this data do not vary their reports from a standard format, the identities of the individual companies are not included in the surveys, and the Committee did not receive individual compensation information for the companies included in the surveys. Our objective was to obtain data from a broad spectrum of technology and defense companies and also, from public companies with similar revenue levels.

As part of its compensation review, Pay Governance also prepared an independent assessment of competitive compensation levels and incentive practices for the Company’s CEO for fiscal year 2020. The review was based on the survey data provided by our human resources department, as described above, as well as proxy disclosures by a select group of relevant peer companies.

Eighteen peer companies were approved by the Executive Compensation Committee in November 2020 with review and input from Pay Governance and senior management based on industry sector, similarity of business activities, size and performance. The objective was to have a group of companies sufficient in size and relevance to provide meaningful assessments of compensation levels and practices. The peer group used for the fiscal year 2020 compensation setting process included the following defense and technology companies.

AAR Corp

FLIR Systems, Inc.

Teledyne Technologies, Inc.

Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc.

HEICO Corporation

Teradata Corporation

Barnes Group, Inc.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

Tyler Technologies, Inc.

CAE, Inc.

Mercury Systems, Inc.

Verra Mobility Corporation

Comtech Telecommunications Corp

NCR Corporation

Viasat, Inc.

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

OSI Systems, Inc.

Woodward, Inc.

55

Our current peer group consists of 18 companies, a robust sample of organizations relevant to Cubic’s core business lines (Performance and Mission Solutions, and Transportation Systems).

The peer group is designed to be used for ongoing executive and director pay benchmarking and pay-performance evaluations.

Modifications to the peer group in 2019 and 2020 refined the group’s fit within industry, size, and labor market perspectives from which to draw such comparisons

The peer group changes from fiscal year 2019 included removing Crane co., Esterline Technologies Corporation, Maxar Technologies Inc., and VeriFone Systems, Inc., due to acquisitions; and adding Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Barnes Group Inc., CAE Inc., NCR Corporation, Verra Mobility Corporation, and Woodward, Inc. based on industry, size and business model.

56

SECTION 3: FISCAL YEAR 2020 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION DECISIONS

Named Executive Officer Leadership Changes

In fiscal year 2020, the Company made the following leadership changes impacting our NEOs:

Jeffrey Lowinger — Appointed Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Transportation Systems on April 27, 2020.

Michael Twyman — Departed on August 27, 2020, after serving as Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions since May 25, 2016 due to the combination of the two defense businesses.

Michael Knowles — Named Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission and Performance Solutions on August 29, 2020 after the combination of the two defense businesses.

The table below summarizes the fiscal year 2020 compensation decisions for our NEOs. Details about the 2020 compensation decisions are more fully discussed below in Section 3.

Pay Element

CEO (Mr. Feldmann)

Other NEOs

Additional Comments

Base Salary

•  Base salary was increased to $975,000 (up 3.7%)

•  Merit increases averaged 6.4% for Aga and Lee; Knowles received a market adjustment and Lowinger was newly hired in fiscal year 2020

•  Adjustment to base salaries based on comparable company data and evaluation of individual performance by Executive Compensation Committee

Annual Incentive

•  Target: 110% of base salary

•  Target: A range between 60% and 80% of base salary

•  Mr. Feldman’s target increased to 110% of base salary to align with comparable companies, all other targets were unchanged from prior year.

 

•  Paid at 59% of target (20.6% of target based on results and 38.4% of target for discretionary award)

•  Paid at range of 59% — 70% of individual targets (based on results and discretionary awards)

•  Actual payout is based on achievements of financial and strategic targets

Long-Term Incentive — PRSUs Annual Grant

•  Represented 50% of 2020 annual LTI awards (at “target”)

•  Represented 50% of 2020 annual LTI awards for other NEOs (at target) in position at the time of the annual LTI awards in November 2019

•  Vests based on annual Company Sales growth and annual Adjusted EBITDA growth and relative TSR for performance period as described below under “Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards”

Long-Term Incentive — RSUs Annual Grant

•  Represented 50% of 2020 annual LTI awards

•  Represented 50% of 2020 annual LTI awards for other NEOs in position at the time of the annual LTI awards in November 2019

•  Vests over 3 years

57

BASE SALARY

Base salaries for our executives are established based on individual factors such as the scope of their responsibilities, background, track record, training and experience, as well as competitive comparable company data and an evaluation of their performance.

In November 2019, the Executive Compensation Committee, upon establishing the total target compensation for the NEOs (other than Mr. Lowinger) for 2020 consistent with our overall compensation philosophy, established the following 2020 base salaries for the NEOs:

Named Executive Officers

2020 Base Salary

Year- over- Year

Mr. Feldmann

$975,000

+3.7%

Mr. Aga

$513,040

+6.0%

Mr. Knowles

$420,000

+20.0%

Ms. Lee

$401,250

+7.0%

Mr. Lowinger

$550,000

N/A

Mr. Twyman

$551,785

+7.0%

The adjustments to the NEOs’ base salaries for fiscal year 2020 were made at the beginning of fiscal year 2020 based on the Executive Compensation Committee’s review of comparable company data, as described above, and their assessment of each individual’s performance. This excludes Mr. Lowinger who was hired on April 27, 2020.

The fiscal year 2020 base salaries for each of the NEOs are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the Executive Compensation Tables section below.

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN

Our annual incentive awards emphasize pay-for-performance by providing our executives with the opportunity to receive performance awards based on annual corporate and business segment objectives and individual performance.

At the beginning of the fiscal year, the Executive Compensation Committee sets each listed NEO’s annual incentive target amount as part of the annual performance review and compensation adjustment cycle.

Individual target percentages for the last two years were:

2019 Target
Annual
Incentive Award

2020 Target
Annual
Incentive Award

Mr. Feldmann

100%

110%

Mr. Aga

80%

80%

Other NEOs

60% – 70%

60% – 70%

Mr. Feldman’s 2020 target incentive award was increased by the Executive Compensation Committee following their review of peer competitive practices and an assessment of the importance of the Chief Executive Officer role. Individual target annual incentive awards for the NEOs were determined by multiplying their 2020 fiscal year base salary by their individual target award percentage.

58

Target Performance Levels and Metrics

NEO annual incentives are determined through a three-step performance measurement process:

1.

Established target performance measures, company-wide and, as applicable, for each business segment as described below

 
     

2.

Relative achievement of performance measures: Weighted Metrics (0% – 200% payout)

 
     

3.

Individual NEO performance — Individual Multiplier Applied to Attained Results (0% – 120% payout)

 

The various performance objectives under the annual incentive plan are weighted depending on the Executive Compensation Committee’s belief regarding the suitability of emphasis of each factor for that year’s performance.

The following table describes each of the corporate and segment performance metrics (90% weighting to specific financial metrics) and the relative weighting percentage for each metric.

Metrics

Rationale

Weighting
CEO, CFO &
CHRDO

Weighting
other NEOs

Total Cubic Sales

Aligns with our objective to deliver top-line growth

10%

Total Cubic Adjusted EBITDA

Key measure of profitability and operating performance; target is set to drive improved profitability

60%

60%

Total Cubic Operating Cash Flow (excluding VIE)

Drives reduced leverage and capital efficiency

20%

Segment Cash Flows

Aligns with company-wide objectives and the individual’s specific area of responsibility

10%

Segment Adjusted EBITDA

Aligns with company-wide objectives and the individual’s specific area of responsibility

20%

Digital Strategy

Aligns with our strategic objective to enhance long-term value for our customers and shareholders

10%

10%

Target levels for the various performance objectives are set to require challenging but attainable goals depending on current market conditions and our business prospects. The following table describes the minimum and maximum achievement levels attributable to the 2020 performance measures.

59

 

Min

Max

Adjusted EBITDA

% of Target

93%

110%

 

% of Award

0%

200%

Each 1% achievement above target, payout amount increases by 10%

     

Sales

% of Target

93%

110%

 

% of Award

0%

200%

Each 1% achievement above target, payout amount increases by 10%

     

Cash Flows

% of Target

80%

120%

 

% of Award

0%

200%

Each 1% achievement above target, payout amount increases by 5%

     

Digital Strategy

% of Target

80%

100%

 

% of Award

0%

100%

Digital Strategy is a subjective measure and is capped at 100% achievement

     

The table below sets forth the performance objectives and weighting for each of the NEOs, our actual performance relative to those objectives during fiscal year 2020 and the formulaic weighted percentage achievement for the annual incentive awards. The overall formulaic weighted percentage achievement relative to all the corporate and segment performance measures for fiscal year 2020, prior to the application of the Executive Compensation Committee’s discretion as described below:

Performance measures
(in thousands)

 

2020
Weighting
%

 

2020
Target

 

2020
Actual

 

% of
Target
Achieved

 

% of
Payout
Earned

Cubic Corporation: Performance measures for Mr. Feldmann, Mr. Aga and Ms. Lee

 

Sales

 

10%

 

$1,629,752

 

$1,476,235

 

90.58%

 

0.00%

 

Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

60%

 

$182,317

 

$158,294

 

86.82%

 

0.00%

 

Cash Flows(2)

 

20%

 

$128,471

 

$104,206

 

81.11%

 

10.56%

 

Digital Strategy

 

10%

         

100.00%

 

10.00

%

               

Total

 

20.56

%

Cubic Transportation Systems: Performance measures Mr. Lowinger

 

Segment Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

20%

 

$128,949

 

$133,972

 

103.90%

 

27.97%

 

Segment Cash Flows(2)

 

10%

 

$100,890

 

$50,081

 

49.64%

 

0.00%

 

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

60%

 

$182,317

 

$158,294

 

86.82%

 

0.00%

 

Digital Strategy

 

10%

         

100.00%

 

10.00

%

               

Total

 

37.97

%

Cubic Mission Solutions: Performance measures for Mr. Twyman

 

Segment Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

20%

 

$62,000

 

$28,169

 

45.43%

 

0.00%

 

Segment Cash Flows(3)

 

10%

 

$42,900

 

$25,250

 

58.86%

 

0.00%

 

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

60%

 

$182,317

 

$158,294

 

86.82%

 

0.00%

 

Digital Strategy

 

10%

         

100.00%

 

10.00

%

               

Total

 

10.00

%

60

Performance measures
(in thousands)

 

2020
Weighting
%

 

2020
Target

 

2020
Actual

 

% of
Target
Achieved

 

% of
Payout
Earned

Cubic Global Defense: Performance measures for Mr. Knowles

 

Segment Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

20%

 

$

31,369

 

$

32,945

 

105.02%

 

30.05%

 

Segment Cash Flows(3)

 

10%

 

$

39,681

 

$

104,939

 

264.46%

 

20.00%

 

Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA(1)

 

60%

 

$

182,317

 

$

158,294

 

86.82%

 

0.00%

 

Digital Strategy

 

10%

 

 

   

 

   

100.00%

 

10.00

%

       

 

   

 

   

Total

 

60.05

%

(1)      Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), and Segment Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Segment Adjusted EBITDA”) are non-GAAP performance measures that exclude income taxes, non-operating income and expenses, depreciation, amortization, ERP/supply chain initiative expenses, acquisition related expenses, restructuring costs, intangible asset impairment charges, fixed asset and other long-lived asset impairment charges, and goodwill impairment charges.

The following is a reconciliation of Consolidated and Segment Adjusted EBITDA:

 

Year Ended September 30, 2020
(in millions)

 

Cubic
Consolidated

 

Segments

Cubic Transportation
Systems (CTS)

 

Cubic Mission
Solutions (CMS)

 

Cubic Global
Defense (CGD)

Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Cubic

 

$

(3.7

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noncontrolling interest in loss of VIE

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for income taxes

 

 

(6.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

20.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

16.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other non-operating expense, net

 

 

28.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

$

61.6

 

 

$

121.0

 

 

$

(26.7

)

 

$

22.9

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

88.5

 

 

 

29.5

 

 

 

47.8

 

 

 

7.2

 

Noncontrolling interest in EBITDA of VIE

 

 

(25.1

)

 

 

(25.1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition related expenses, excluding amortization

 

 

13.0

 

 

 

6.6

 

 

 

4.8

 

 

 

 

Strategic and IT system resource planning expenses

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on sale of fixed assets

 

 

(0.2

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(0.2

)

Restructuring costs

 

 

16.6

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

 

2.3

 

 

 

3.0

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

158.3

 

 

$

134.0

 

 

$

28.2

 

 

$

32.9

 

(2)      For purposes of the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan, Consolidated and CTS cash flows are defined as operating cash flows excluding operating cash flow associated with the OpCo Variable Interest Entity (VIE) in which Cubic has a 10% equity stake. The following is a reconciliation of our fiscal year 2020 Consolidated and CTS Cash Flows as defined by the Executive Compensation Committee for purposes of the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan:

 

(in thousands)

 

Consolidated

 

CTS

Net cash used in operating activities from continuing operations

 

$

(8,291

)

 

$

(62,416

)

Operating cash flows associated with OpCo VIE

 

 

112,497

 

 

 

112,497

 

Net cash provided by operating activities, excluding the impact of the OpCo VIE

 

$

104,206

 

 

$

50,081

 

(3)      For purposes of the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan, CMS and CGD cash flows are defined as operating income (loss) plus depreciation and amortization, plus share-based compensation expense, less the gain on the sale of fixed assets, less the increase in accounts receivable and inventories, plus the decrease in accounts receivable and inventories. The following is a calculation of our fiscal year 2020 CMS and CGD Cash Flows as defined by the Executive Compensation Committee for purposes of the 2020 Annual Incentive Plan.

61

 

(in thousands)

 

CMS

 

CGD

Operating income (loss)

 

$

(26,750)

 

 

$

22,945

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

47,797

 

 

 

7,196

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

4,314

 

 

 

3,184

 

Gain on sale of fixed assets

 

 

 

 

 

(170

)

   

 

25,361

 

 

 

33,155

 

Working Capital Changes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

 

2,470

 

 

 

74,178

 

Inventories

 

 

(2,581

)

 

 

(2,394

)

   

$

25,250

 

 

$

104,939

 

Payments of Fiscal Year 2020 Approved Annual Incentives and Application of Resilience-based Discretion

After applying the formulaic payout percentages described above, and deciding individual performance multipliers for each NEO, the Executive Compensation Committee approved 2020 annual incentive payments. Individual modifiers are scored based on business results, performance against objectives, operational excellence, talent development and employee engagement. Based on the determination of the participant’s individual performance, a multiplier is applied to the participant’s incentive amount as determined based on achievement relative to the corporate and/or business unit performance goals. The multiplier for individual performance is within the range of 0% to 120%.

Cubic delivered strong financial results in fiscal year 2020, despite the global pandemic. The leadership team swiftly adapted to the new way of working, providing employees the ability to work remotely and remain productive. The policies enacted were instrumental in ensuring that the Company could continue delivering essential services and meet its customer commitments and offset certain financial impacts related to delays in new awards, lower transit ridership, a slowdown of training exercises in defense and other headwinds. Cost containment measures were quickly put into place including pay reductions for the CEO, CFO and the Board, hiring freeze, reduction in force, temporary suspension of retirement benefits, including 401(k) match and discretionary contributions, re-negotiations of supply chain arrangements and the reduction or deferral of other expenses.

As detailed in the Executive Summary on page 42, the Executive Compensation Committee decided to use positive discretion as detailed below in determining the annual payout for fiscal year 2020 to recognize the exceptional work of the leadership team and employees to successfully address our key priorities relating to the Company’s COVID-19 response plan and to ensure the long-term sustainability of Cubic. The resilience based discretionary factor set forth in the table below for each NEO was determined by subtracting the formula based achievement percentage from the funding cap applicable to the NEO (60% of target on average for the NEOs). This positive discretion was also applied to other employees who are participants in the annual incentive plan. We estimate that the COVID-19 pandemic negatively impacted Sales by up to $73 million and Adjusted EBITDA by up to $28 million during fiscal year 2020. While the estimated impacts of COVID-19 may not have been overly material to Cubic’s operations, relative to the ambitious manner in which Cubic established its incentive plan goals for fiscal year 2020, we believe these reductions had a significant negative impact on award calculations.

NEO

Base
Salary

x

Individual
Target

Percentage

=

Target
Award

x

Formula
Based
Achievement

+

Resilience
Based
Discretion

x

Individual
Performance
Multiplier

=

Annual
Incentive
Cash Award Earned(1)

Mr. Feldmann

$975,000

 

110%

 

$1,072,500

 

20.6%

 

38.4%

 

1.1

 

$696,053

Mr. Aga

$513,040

 

80%

 

$410,432

 

20.6%

 

38.4%

 

1.05

 

$254,263

Mr. Knowles

$420,000

 

70%

 

$294,000

 

60.2%

 

9.8%

 

1.05

 

$216,090

Ms. Lee

$401,250

 

60%

 

$240,750

 

20.6%

 

38.4%

 

1.05

 

$149,145

Mr. Lowinger

$550,000

 

70%

 

$385,000

 

38.0%

 

27.0%

 

1.1

 

$275,275

(1)      The portion tied to formula-based achievement is reflected in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column and the portion tied to resilience-based discretion is reflected in the Bonus column of the Summary Compensation Table.

62

LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARDS

We award both RSUs and PRSUs pursuant to our long-term equity incentive award program. All of the awards are made under our 2015 Incentive Award Plan. Each RSU represents a contingent right to receive one share of our common stock. Vested shares will be delivered to the recipient following each vesting date. Dividend equivalent rights accrue with respect to the RSUs when and as dividends are paid on our common stock and vest proportionately with the RSUs to which they relate.

The use of PRSUs as a component of the overall equity awards granted is based upon the Executive Compensation Committee’s consideration of competitive market data, the desirability of utilizing a balanced system to mitigate risk, the desire to encourage superior performance while building ownership, and the desirability of this type of equity award as a component of a pay-for-performance program.

Fiscal Year 2020 Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards

In November 2019, the Executive Compensation Committee awarded the RSUs and PRSUs to the NEOs listed below, other than Mr. Lowinger. Mr. Lowinger was granted the time-based RSUs listed below upon the date of his employment with Cubic on April 27, 2020.

Time-Based
Vesting RSUs
(#)

Target Number of
PRSUs
(#)

Mr. Feldmann

37,784

37,784

Mr. Aga

10,076

10,076

Mr. Knowles

6,718

6,718

Ms. Lee

5,878

5,878

Mr. Lowinger(1)

22,683

Mr. Twyman(2)

6,718

6,718

(1)      On April 27, 2020, Mr. Lowinger was hired as Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Transportation Systems.

(2)      Effective August 27, 2020, Mr. Twyman departed the Company after serving as Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions since May 25, 2016, as a result of the combination of the two defense businesses.

The RSUs vest in three equal installments on each of October 1, 2020, 2021 and 2022, subject to the recipient’s continued service with the Company through each such vesting date, except as otherwise provided in the applicable RSU agreement.

The PRSUs granted to our NEOs are intended to reward the achievement of the following objectives over a three-year period:

Metric

Rationale

Weighting

Cumulative Sales growth over performance period

•  Key to our long-term success and reflects our focus on performance metrics that drive growth and shareholder value

50%

Cumulative Adjusted EBITDA growth over performance period

•  Drives performance towards achieving profitable growth and our strategic objectives related to building a technology-driven, market-leading company; target is set to exceed Sales growth to drive improved profitability

50%

Relative TSR multiplier

•  To further link the long-term interests of management and shareholders

 

The three-year performance period for the PRSUs granted on November 29, 2019 commenced on October 1, 2019 and will end on September 30, 2022. These performance-based RSUs are referred to as the “2020-2022 PRSUs”.

The 2020-2022 PRSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period based 50% on Cubic’s Sales growth and 50% on Cubic’s Adjusted EBITDA growth for the performance period, subject to the recipient’s continued service through the end of the three-year performance period, except as otherwise provided in the applicable PRSU agreement.

63

If the Company’s Sales growth achievement and/or Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement for the performance period equals or exceeds one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then an achievement percentage for the performance period will be determined (50%, 100% and 200%, respectively). Performance below the threshold level for a performance measure will result in a 0% achievement percentage for the applicable fiscal year for that measure.

Following the completion of the three-year performance period, the Executive Compensation Committee will determine the achievement percentage relative to Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for the performance period and determine the final average achievement percentage for the performance period for each factor.

Cubic’s Sales growth for purposes of the 2020-2022 PRSUs generally means the aggregate of the Company’s Sales during the performance period, divided by a baseline Sales level determined by the Executive Compensation Committee. Cubic’s Adjusted EBITDA growth for purposes of the 2020-2022 PRSUs generally means the aggregate of the Company’s Adjusted EBITDA during the performance period, divided by a baseline Adjusted EBITDA level determined by the Executive Compensation Committee. For purposes of the 2020-2022 PRSUs, Sales and Adjusted EBITDA will be calculated in a manner to exclude the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates and will also be calculated in a manner to exclude the effect of acquisitions or divestitures, unless otherwise specifically determined by the Executive Compensation Committee. In September 2020, the Executive Compensation Committee modified the Sales and Adjusted EBITDA growth targets to include the fiscal year 2020 acquisitions of Pixia and Delerrok in the baseline amounts, and the actual Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement will include the Sales and Adjusted EBITDA of Pixia and Delerrok over the performance period. Since the acquisitions of Pixia and Delerrok were completed soon after the inception of the three-year performance of the 2020-2022 PRSUs, the Executive Compensation Committee determined that the inclusion of these acquired entities in the performance targets would better represent the Company’s total performance over the performance period and would better hold management accountable for the overall results of the Company, including these acquired businesses, in order to drive shareholder value.

For these 2020-2022 PRSUs, Cubic’s relative TSR as compared to the Russell 2000 Index over the performance period will result in a multiplier for the number of PRSUs that will vest, after the final Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement percentages have been determined for the performance period. If Cubic’s relative TSR performance exceeds the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier will result in up to an additional 25% of the PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. If Cubic’s TSR performance is below the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier could result in a reduction of up to 25% of these PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. The relative TSR performance multiplier is described in the table below:

Relative TSR Performance

TSR Multiplier

Cubic TSR is 2500 basis points or more above the Russell 2000 Index TSR

125%    

Cubic TSR is 1000 basis points above the Russell 2000 Index TSR

110%    

Cubic TSR is 1000 basis points below the Russell 2000 Index TSR

90%    

Cubic TSR is 2500 basis points or more below the Russell 2000 Index TSR

75%    

If Cubic’s absolute TSR is negative for the performance period, in no event will the relative TSR multiplier exceed 100%, regardless of performance relative to the Russell 2000 Index. In addition, in no event will the number of 2020-2022 PRSUs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period exceed 200% of the target PRSUs. The percentage for determining the number of PRSUs that will vest if performance is between specified achievement levels will be determined by linear interpolation.

64

PRSUs for Performance Period Ended September 30, 2020

The PRSUs granted on November 12, 2017 (referred to as the “2018-2020 PRSUs”) were intended to reward the achievement of the following objectives over a three-year performance period, which commenced on October 1, 2017 and ended on September 30, 2020. These RSUs were eligible to vest based on:

•   Sales growth (40% weighting)

•   Adjusted EBITDA growth, (40% weighting)

•   ROE (20% weighting)

If the Company’s achievement of these objectives for the performance period equaled or exceeded one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then a certain percentage of the RSUs were eligible to vest (25%, 100% and 200%, respectively).

The percentage for determining the number of RSUs that would vest if performance was between the specified achievement levels was determined by linear interpolation between the applicable achievement amounts for each measure. Performance below the threshold level for a performance measure would result in no vesting with respect to that measure.

As described in the table below, based on the level of such Sales growth, Adjusted EBITDA growth, and ROE, for the three-year performance period, the Executive Compensation Committee determined that 160% of the 2018-2020 PRSUs would vest.

The Company’s performance as compared with the targets, which resulted in a 160% vesting with respect to the 2018-2020 PRSUs, is as follows:

Performance measures

 

2018-2020

PRSU

Weighting %

 

2018-2020

PRSU

Threshold

 

2018-2020

PRSU

Target

 

2018-2020

PRSU

Maximum

 

2018-2020

Actual

Achievement

 

% of Vesting

Achieved

 

Weighted

Vesting

Earned

Cubic Corporation

                           

Sales Growth Factor(1)

 

40%

 

1.05

 

1.10

 

1.15

 

1.19

 

200.0%

 

80.0%

Adjusted EBITDA Growth Factor(2)

 

40%

 

1.06

 

1.11

 

1.17

 

1.38

 

200.0%

 

80.0%

Return on Equity(3)

 

20%

 

5.5%

 

8.0%

 

10.5%

 

2.4%

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

                       

Total

 

160.0%

(1)      The Sales growth factor for the 2018-2020 PRSUs was calculated as the cumulative Sales achieved in fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020 divided by the baseline cumulative Sales amount of $3,323,000,000. The Sales for 2018, 2019 and 2020 are based upon the amounts included in the Company’s respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, September 30, 2019, and September 30, 2020, as filed with the SEC, less $109,199,000 and $107,722,000 for the impact of ASC 606 on fiscal years 2019 and 2020 Sales, respectively. The impact of ASC 606 on fiscal year 2020 Sales was determined by multiplying fiscal year 2020 Sales as reported in financial statements in the 2020 Form 10-K by the ratio of fiscal year 2019 Sales excluding the impact of ASC 606 as disclosed in footnote 2 of the financial statements in the 2019 Form 10-K, divided by the fiscal year 2019 Sales as reported in the financial statements in the 2019 Form 10-K. The impact of ASC 606 on fiscal year 2019 Sales was the amount disclosed in footnote 2 in the financial statements in the 2019 Form 10-K. The cumulative Sales achieved in fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020, excluding the impact of ASC 606, totaled $3,958,687,000. As such, the achieved Sales growth factor was 1.19.

(2)      Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP performance measure used by management. In the context of the vesting criteria for the 2018-2020 PRSUs, Adjusted EBITDA is defined as GAAP net income from continuing operations attributable to Cubic before interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, other non-operating expense, acquisition-related expenses, strategic and information technology (“IT”) system resource planning expenses, restructuring costs, and gains or losses on the disposal of fixed assets. The Adjusted EBITDA for 2018, 2019 and 2020 is calculated based upon the amounts from continuing operations included in the Company’s respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018, September 30, 2019, and September 30, 2020, as filed with the SEC, less the impact of ASC 606. The impact of ASC 606 on fiscal year 2020 Adjusted EBITDA was determined by multiplying fiscal year 2020 Adjusted EBITDA as reported in the fiscal year 2020 earnings release filed on Form 8-K by the ratio of (i) the fiscal year 2019 Adjusted EBITDA calculated

65

using net income (loss) from continuing operations excluding the impact of ASC 606 as disclosed in footnote 2 of the financial statements in the 2019 Form 10-K divided by (ii) the fiscal year 2019 Adjusted EBITDA calculated with net income (loss) from continuing operations as reported in the financial statements included in the 2019 Form 10-K which includes the impact of the adoption of ASC 606. The impact of ASC 606 on fiscal year 2019 Adjusted EBITDA was the amount disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in the 2019 Form 10-K. The Adjusted EBITDA growth factor for the 2018-2020 PRSUs is calculated as the cumulative Adjusted EBITDA achieved in fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020 divided by the baseline cumulative Adjusted EBITDA amount of $287,000,000. The adjusted EBITDA achieved in fiscal years 2018, 2019 and 2020, excluding the impact of ASC 606, totaled $397,064,000. As such the achieved Adjusted EBITDA growth factor was 1.38. The following is a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income as defined by the Executive Compensation Committee for purposes of the vesting of the 2018-2020 PRSUs:

 

(in thousands)

 



Year Ended September 30,

 

Three
Years Ended
September 30,
2020

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Cubic

 

$

12,310

 

 

$

49,694

 

 

$

(3,221

)

 

$

58,783

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

(4,243

)

 

 

1,423

 

 

 

(436

)

 

 

(3,256

)

Noncontrolling interest in the income (loss) of the VIE

 

 

(274

)

 

 

(9,811

)

 

 

6,592

 

 

 

(3,493

)

Add:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense, net

 

 

8,809

 

 

 

13,934

 

 

 

20,163

 

 

 

42,906

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,090

 

 

 

16,090

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

 

7,093

 

 

 

11,040

 

 

 

(6,380

)

 

 

11,753

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

46,600

 

 

 

64,742

 

 

 

88,482

 

 

 

199,824

 

Noncontrolling interest in EBITDA of VIE

 

 

 

 

 

(8,940

)

 

 

(25,122

)

 

 

(34,062

)

Acquisition related expenses, excluding amortization

 

 

4,420

 

 

 

13,437

 

 

 

13,026

 

 

 

30,883

 

Strategic and IT system resources planning expense

 

 

24,141

 

 

 

8,242

 

 

 

3,904

 

 

 

36,287

 

Gain on sale of fixed assets

 

 

 

 

 

(32,510

)

 

 

(170

)

 

 

(32,680

)

Restructuring costs

 

 

5,018

 

 

 

15,386

 

 

 

16,599

 

 

 

37,003

 

Other non-operating expense, net

 

 

687

 

 

 

19,957

 

 

 

28,767

 

 

 

49,411

 

Adjusted EBITDA

 

$

104,561

 

 

$

146,594

 

 

$

158,294

 

 

$

409,449

 

Impact of ASC 606

 

 

 

 

 

(5,955

)

 

 

(6,430

)

 

 

(12,385

)

Adjusted EBITDA, excluding the impact of ASC 606

 

$

104,561

 

 

$

140,639

 

 

$

151,864

 

 

$

397,064

 

(3)      The ROE measure is calculated as (i) the sum of: (A) the percentage determined by dividing (a) the Company’s net income attributable to Cubic for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018, by (b) the Company’s beginning equity as of October 1, 2017; plus (B) the percentage determined by dividing (a) the Company’s net income attributable to Cubic for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, excluding the impact of ASC 606 by (b) the Company’s beginning equity as of October 1, 2018, excluding the impact of ASC 606; plus (C) the percentage determined by dividing (a) the Company’s net loss attributable to Cubic for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020 by (b) the Company’s beginning equity as of October 1, 2019, excluding the impact of ASC 606; (ii) divided by three.

66

PRSUs for Performance Period Ending September 30, 2021

The three-year performance period for the PRSUs granted on November 21, 2018 commenced on October 1, 2018 and will end on September 30, 2021. These performance-based RSUs are referred to as the “2019-2021 PRSUs.”

The 2019-2021 PRSUs vest at the end of a three-year performance period based 50% on Cubic’s annual Sales growth and 50% on Cubic’s annual Adjusted EBITDA growth for each of the three fiscal years within the performance period, subject to the recipient’s continued service through the end of the three-year performance period, except as otherwise provided in the applicable PRSU agreement.

If the Company’s annual Sales growth achievement and/or annual Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement for each fiscal year during the performance period equals or exceeds one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then an annual achievement percentage for such fiscal year will be determined (50%, 100% and 200%, respectively), as reflected in the tables below:

Annual Sales Growth

Annual Sales
Growth
Achievement
Percentage

Less than 2.5%

0%    

2.5%

50%    

5.0%

100%    

7.5% or Greater

200%    

Annual Adjusted
EBITDA Growth

Annual Adjusted
EBITDA Growth
Achievement
Percentage

Less than 2.75%

0%    

2.75%

50%    

5.5%

100%    

8.25% or Greater

200%    

Performance below the threshold level for a performance measure will result in a 0% achievement percentage for the applicable fiscal year for that measure.

Following the completion of the three-year performance period, the Executive Compensation Committee will determine the annual achievement percentage relative to Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for each of the three fiscal years in the performance period and determine the final average achievement percentage for the performance period for each factor.

Cubic’s annual Sales growth for each fiscal year during the performance period will be determined by dividing Cubic’s Sales during the applicable fiscal year, divided by Cubic’s Sales for the preceding fiscal year, expressed as a percentage. Cubic’s annual Adjusted EBITDA growth for each fiscal year during the performance period will be determined by dividing Cubic’s Adjusted EBITDA during the applicable fiscal year, divided by Cubic’s Adjusted EBITDA for the preceding fiscal year, expressed as a percentage.

For these 2019-2021 PRSUs, Cubic’s relative TSR as compared to the Russell 2000 Index over the performance period will result in a multiplier for the number of PRSUs that will vest, after the final annual Sales and Adjusted EBITDA achievement percentages have been determined for the performance period.

67

If Cubic’s relative TSR performance exceeds the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier will result in up to an additional 25% of the PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. If Cubic’s TSR performance is below the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier could result in a reduction of up to 25% of these PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. The relative TSR performance multiplier is described in the table below:

Relative TSR Performance

TSR Multiplier

Cubic TSR is 2500 basis points or more above the Russell 2000 Index TSR

125%   

Cubic TSR is 1000 basis points above the Russell 2000 Index TSR

110%   

Cubic TSR is 1000 basis points below the Russell 2000 Index TSR

90%   

Cubic TSR is 2500 basis points or more below the Russell 2000 Index TSR

75%   

In no event will the number of 2019-2021 PRSUs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period exceed 250% of the target PRSUs.

The percentage for determining the number of PRSUs that will vest if performance is between specified achievement levels will be determined by linear interpolation.

As described in the table below, based on the level of Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for fiscal years 2019 and 2020, the achievement levels for fiscal years 2019 and 2020 relative to these objectives that will be used in determining the final average achievement percentage at the end of the three-year performance period are set forth below:

Performance Measures

2019-2021
PRSU
Weighting Percentage

2019
Growth
Achieved

Annual
Achievement
Percentage
for 2019

2020
Growth Achieved

Annual
Achievement
Percentage
for 2020

Cubic Corporation

         

Sales Growth Factor(1)

50%

15.3%

200%

(1.4%)

0.0%

Adjusted EBITDA Growth Factor(2)

50%

34.5%

200%

8.0%

190.2%

(1)      The annual Sales growth for fiscal year 2019 is calculated based upon the amounts included in the financial statements in the Company’s respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2019, as filed with the SEC, less $109,199,000 of ASC 606 on the fiscal year 2019 Sales. The annual growth for fiscal year 2020 is calculated based upon the amounts included in the financial statements in the Company’s respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2020, as filed with the SEC. The achieved Sales growth percentages for fiscal years 2019 and 2020 were 15.3% and (1.4%), respectively.

(2)      Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP performance measure used by management. In the context of the vesting criteria for the 2019-2021 PRSUs, Adjusted EBITDA is defined as GAAP net income from continuing operations attributable to Cubic before interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, other non-operating expense, acquisition-related expenses, strategic and information technology (“IT”) system resource planning expenses, restructuring costs, and gains or losses on the disposal of fixed assets. The annual Adjusted EBITDA growth for fiscal year 2019 is calculated based upon the amounts included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis in the Company’s respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2019, as filed with the SEC, less the impact of ASC 606. The annual Adjusted EBITDA growth for fiscal year 2020 is calculated based upon the amounts included in Management’s discussion and analysis in the Company’s respective Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2020, as filed with the SEC. Refer to footnote 2, of the 2018-2020 PRSUs table above, for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income as defined by the Executive Compensation Committee. The achieved Adjusted EBITDA growth for fiscal years 2019 and 2020 was 34.5% and 8.0%, respectively.

Accelerated Vesting of RSUs

RSUs are generally forfeited unless an executive is continuously employed through the applicable vesting dates. There are, however, certain exceptions to this treatment.

RSUs Granted Prior to Fiscal Year 2020.    For purposes of RSUs granted prior to fiscal year 2020, the RSUs granted by us vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination of employment or service as a result of his or her death or disability. In addition, the RSUs vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 12 months following a change in control.

68

RSUs Granted Beginning in Fiscal Year 2020.    Commencing with the RSUs granted in fiscal year 2020, the accelerated vesting provisions applicable to the RSUs were revised. The RSUs granted commencing in fiscal year 2020 vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination of employment or service as a result of his or her death or disability. In addition, the RSUs granted to our executive officers vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason in either case within 3 months prior to or 18 months following a change in control or during the required 12-month retirement notice period. Finally, the RSUs granted to our executive officers will vest upon retirement.

For purposes of the equity awards granted commencing in fiscal year 2020, retirement means an executive’s resignation following the attainment of age 60 and 10 years of service, and the satisfaction of a 12-month notice period.

Accelerated Vesting of PRSUs

PRSUs are generally forfeited unless an executive is continuously employed through the last day of the performance period. The underlying principle is that the executive needs to have been an active employee during the entire performance period in order to have contributed to the results on which the earned awards are based. There are, however, certain exceptions to this treatment.

PRSUs Granted Prior to Fiscal Year 2019.    With respect to PRSUs granted prior to fiscal year 2019, upon a change in control of the Company, a number of PRSUs equal to the target RSUs will vest immediately prior to the date of such change in control. In the event of a recipient’s termination of employment or service as a result of his or her disability, termination without cause or resignation for good reason, the recipient will remain eligible to vest in the PRSUs based on actual performance for the three-year performance period, with the resulting PRSUs prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of such termination.

In the event of a recipient’s death, the recipient will vest in the target PRSUs, which target PRSUs shall be prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of death.

PRSUs Granted in Fiscal Year 2019.    For purposes of the PRSUs granted in fiscal year 2019, upon a change in control of the Company, a number of PRSUs equal to the target PRSUs, or, if greater, the application of the relative TSR multiplier to the target PRSUs calculated for the performance period through the date of the change in control, will vest on the date of the change in control.

In the event of a recipient’s termination of employment or service as a result of his or her disability, termination without cause or resignation for good reason, the recipient will remain eligible to vest in the PRSUs based on actual performance for the performance period, with the resulting PRSUs prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of such termination.

In the event of a recipient’s death prior to a change in control, the recipient will vest in the target PRSUs.

PRSUs Granted Beginning in Fiscal Year 2020.    Commencing with the PRSUs granted in fiscal year 2020, the accelerated vesting provisions applicable to the PRSUs were further revised.

Upon a change in control of the Company, the number of PRSUs a participant will remain eligible to vest in following the change in control will be equal to the target PRSUs, or, if greater, the application of the relative TSR multiplier to the target PRSUs calculated for the performance period through the date of the change in control (the “vesting eligible PRSUs”). The vesting eligible PRSUs will then vest on the last day of the three-year performance period, subject to an employee’s continued employment through such date.

If, following a change in control, a recipient’s employment or service is terminated as a result of his or her death, disability or retirement, the vesting eligible PRSUs will vest upon such termination. In addition, if an executive’s employment or service is terminated as a result of his or her termination without cause or resignation for good reason within 3 months prior or 18 months following a change in control, or during his or her required 12-month notice period, all of the vesting eligible PRSUs will vest upon such termination.

In the event a recipient’s employment or service is terminated as a result of his or her termination without cause or resignation for good reason or disability prior to a change in control, the recipient will remain eligible to vest in the PRSUs based on actual performance for the performance period (or in the vesting eligible shares if a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period), with the resulting PRSUs prorated for the portion of the performance period

69

that elapsed prior to the date of such termination (unless such termination without cause or resignation for good reason occurs within 3 months prior to a change in control or such termination or disability occurs during the required retirement notice period, in which case no proration will apply).

In the event of a recipient’s retirement prior to a change in control, the recipient will remain eligible to vest in the PRSUs based on actual performance for the performance period (or in the vesting eligible shares if a change in control occurs prior to the end of the performance period).

In the event of a recipient’s death prior to a change in control, the recipient will vest in the target PRSUs.

SECTION 4: OTHER COMPENSATION MATTERS AND BENEFIT PROGRAMS

Stock Ownership Requirements

In keeping with corporate governance best practices, management and directors align their stock ownership interests with those of our shareholders. Beginning in fiscal year 2020, enhancements to stock ownership guidelines were established for our senior management and non-employee directors. These new guidelines are expected to be achieved within five years of implementation date. All company shares held by the director or officer, his or her related trusts and immediate family, unvested RSUs but not PRSUs shall be included in the calculations.

All NEOs and directors who have been executive officers or directors of the Company for at least five years are in compliance with the ownership guidelines. All NEOs and directors who joined the Company or became executive officers within the last five years are progressing toward compliance with the ownership guidelines by the required compliance date.

(multiples of base salary or base retainer)

2019    

2020   

CEO

3x   

5x   

Directors

2x   

5x   

CFO

1x   

3x   

Other NEOs

1x   

2x   

VPs

0.5x   

0.5x   

COMPENSATION RECOVERY POLICY

Management and our Board believe our compensation policies are not reasonably likely to result in a material adverse financial or other effect. Also, we believe our compensation policies and practices have not and will not impact our risk management objectives and do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

However, our Board is committed to following good corporate governance practices and believes it is prudent to maintain a compensation recovery, or “claw-back,” policy. This claw-back policy is in addition to any policies or recovery rights that are provided under applicable laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act.

Pursuant to the terms of the “claw-back” policy, our Board has the right to require reimbursement or forfeiture of incentive compensation from an executive officer in the event the officer’s wrongdoing is later determined by the Board to have resulted in (1) a restatement of the Company’s financial results due to its material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under U.S. securities law; or (2) a material negative revision of a financial or operating measure on the basis of which incentive compensation was awarded (a “Recoverable Event”).

70

Under our claw-back policy, if the Board determines that a Recoverable Event was caused by an executive officer’s fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct, it may require reimbursement from the executive officer for vested incentive compensation and/or the forfeiture of unvested or unpaid incentive compensation. The amount of incentive compensation that may be recovered or subject to forfeiture is any incentive compensation awarded, vested or paid to the executive officer that the executive officer would not have been awarded, vested or paid if the Company’s financial results had been reported properly. The right to cause a forfeiture or recovery of incentive compensation applies to incentive compensation awarded, vested and/or paid during the twelve months prior to the date on which we are required to prepare an accounting restatement and would be determined on an after-tax basis for any incentive compensation to be recovered from the executive officer.

ANTI-HEDGING POLICY APPLICABLE TO NEOS

Pursuant to Cubic’s insider trading policy, all NEOs are prohibited from purchasing financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities which: (1) have been granted to the NEO by the Company as part of their compensation, or (2) are held directly or indirectly by the NEO. Our hedging policy is described further above under “Hedging Policy.”

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

Certain of the directors and NEOs participate in the Cubic Corporation Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”). For more information, please see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table below.

Benefit Programs

RETIREMENT BENEFITS

All of our regular employees, including our NEOs, who meet certain defined requirements, may participate in our 401(k) plan. 401(k) matching payments and discretionary contribution are equally available to all eligible employees. The discretionary contribution percentage is based on a scale ranging from 2.5% to 9% of eligible compensation and is tied to the Company’s ROE for the fiscal year.

As part of our cost containment measures as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, management recommended to suspend the 401(k) match from May through September 2020 and the discretionary contribution for fiscal year 2020. Therefore, there is no discretionary contribution this year. The 401(k) match and discretionary contribution have been reinstated for fiscal year 2021.

Mr. Feldmann is also a participant in the Cubic Corporation Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”), which plan was frozen as of December 31, 2006.

OTHER BENEFITS

We provide certain perquisites and personal benefits to our senior executives. NEOs receive the following benefits: annual physical examinations, term life insurance, a financial planning and wellness benefit of up to $15,000 per year. The CEO is also provided with an automobile allowance.

During fiscal year 2019, we also provided each NEO a limited amount of administrative support for personal travel arrangements and other personal business at the Company’s expense.

Our Executive Compensation Committee periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits to the NEOs to ensure they fit within the Company’s overall compensation philosophy.

71

SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL BENEFITS

The Board has approved severance and change in control arrangements in which our NEOs participate to provide for certain severance benefits in the event that a NEO’s employment is involuntarily or terminated under certain circumstances unrelated to a change in control or involuntarily terminated without cause or constructively terminated, in connection with a change in control. The Company recognizes the challenges executives often face securing new employment following termination.

To mitigate these challenges and to secure the focus of our management team on the Company’s affairs, all NEOs are entitled to receive severance payments under the Company’s severance policy upon a termination by the Company under certain circumstances, such as a reduction in force, job elimination or reorganization. The Company believes that reasonable severance benefits for its executive officers are important because it may be difficult for its executive officers to find comparable employment within a short period of time following certain qualifying terminations.

In lieu of normal severance, we provide enhanced benefits in the event of an involuntary termination or a constructive termination within a specified period before or after a change in control as a means of reinforcing and encouraging the continued attention and dedication of our executives to their duties of employment without personal distraction or conflict of interest in circumstances that could arise from the occurrence of a change in control.

Our Transition Protection Plan (the “Protection Plan”), under which the foregoing change in control severance benefits are provided, also assists in the retention and attraction of senior individuals by reducing their concern for financial security in the event of a job loss in connection with a change of control. The terms of these severance arrangements are described below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

In fiscal year 2020, the following changes were made to the Protection Plan:

•     Limited the time period of change in control coverage to a defined period of 3 months before and 18 months after

•     Implemented a change where the benefits for change in control include a double trigger to include a qualifying event and involuntary termination or constructive termination

•     In the event of a change in control and a resulting involuntary termination or constructive termination, only change in control benefits shall apply and removal of the overlap in benefits

•     Change in control benefits include 24 months of base pay, two years annual incentive plan payout at target, and current year incentive plan at target on a pro-rata basis

In fiscal year 2021, the Committee approved a further amendment to the Protection Plan to align one aspect of the constructive termination definition to the comparable definition in the Company’s shareholder-approved 2015 Incentive Award Plan that better aligns with current market practices.

The Company believes that the interests of shareholders will be best served if the interests of its executive officers are aligned with them, and providing these changes in control benefits should eliminate, or at least reduce, the reluctance of the Company’s executives to pursue potential change in control transactions that may be in the best interests of shareholders.

As part of a negotiated agreement, on August 27, 2020, Mr. Twyman, President of Cubic Mission Solutions departed from Cubic as a result of the combination of the two defense segments. In exchange for a customary release of claims, Mr. Twyman received a severance payment equal to six months of base pay, the right to receive an annual incentive plan payment for fiscal year 2020 similar to other employees on the annual incentive plan, 12 months of COBRA coverage and accelerated or continued vesting in certain restricted stock units. In addition, Mr. Twyman’s PRSUs were eligible for continued vesting pursuant to the terms of the award agreements.

72

Deductibility of Executive Compensation

As part of its role, the Executive Compensation Committee reviews and considers the deductibility of our executive compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) generally limits the tax deduction for compensation in excess of one million dollars paid to certain executive officers. This Committee does not necessarily limit executive compensation to the amount deductible under that provision.

In its review and establishment of compensation programs and awards for our NEOs, the Committee considers the anticipated deductibility or non-deductibility of the compensation as only one factor in assessing whether a particular compensatory arrangement is appropriate, particularly in light of the goals of maintaining a competitive executive compensation system generally (i.e., paying for performance and maximizing shareholder return).

The Executive Compensation Committee reserves the right to use their judgment to authorize compensation payments that do not qualify for the compensation deduction, if, in light of all applicable circumstances, they believe that such payments are appropriate and in the Company’s best interests and that of our shareholders.

Executive Compensation Committee Report

The Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Cubic Corporation has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on such review and discussions, recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 and in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

David F. Melcher, Chair
Prithviraj Banerjee
Carolyn A. Flowers
Janice M. Hamby

73

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

   

Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows the compensation for the three fiscal years ended September 30, 2020, 2019 and 2018 earned by our CEO, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and our next three most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executives as of September 30, 2020 and one additional former executive officer who was no longer serving as of September 30, 2020.

Name and Principal Position

 

Fiscal Year

 

Salary
($)

 

Bonus(1)
($)

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(2) ($)

 

Stock Awards(3) ($)

 

Change in Pension Value(4)
($)

 

All Other Compensation(5) ($)

 

Total
($)

Bradley H. Feldmann

 

2020

 

964,105

 

453,025

 

243,029

 

4,234,038

 

9,350

 

41,484

 

5,945,030

Chairman, President and

 

2019

 

933,090

 

 

774,120

 

4,101,667

 

19,435

 

53,652

 

5,881,964

Chief Executive Officer

 

2018

 

870,776

 

 

959,372

 

2,750,000

 

 

42,583

 

4,622,731

Anshooman Aga

 

2020

 

512,372

 

165,487

 

88,776

 

1,129,091

 

 

25,981

 

1,921,707

Executive Vice President

 

2019

 

478,938

 

 

334,815

 

1,025,450

 

 

34,901

 

1,874,104

and Chief Financial Officer

 

2018

 

435,388

 

 

383,749

 

500,000

 

 

276,470

 

1,595,607

Michael Knowles

 

2020

 

434,821

 

30,253

 

185,837

 

752,762

 

 

13,124

 

1,416,797

Senior Vice President, Cubic Corporation and President, Cubic Mission and Performance Solutions

 

2019

 

329,809

 

 

287,672

 

512,725

 

 

22,358

 

1,152,564

Grace G. Lee

 

2020

 

398,224

 

97,071

 

52,074

 

658,654

 

 

27,394

 

1,233,417

Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources and Diversity Officer

                               

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

 

2020

 

232,698

 

264,345

 

160,930

 

800,000

 

 

1,092

 

1,459,065

Senior Vice President, Cubic Corporation and President, Cubic Transportation Systems

                               

Michael R. Twyman(6)

 

2020

 

515,091

 

 

 

752,762

 

 

1,208,479

 

2,476,332

Former Senior Vice

 

2019

 

511,288

 

 

522,780

 

717,802

 

 

41,236

 

1,793,106

President, Cubic Corporation and President, Cubic Mission Solutions

 

2018

 

473,901

 

100,000

 

328,512

 

500,000

 

 

31,357

 

1,433,770

(1)      For 2020, represents discretionary bonuses paid in excess of amounts paid under our annual incentive plan in recognition of the challenges the Company faced in fiscal year 2020 and the resiliency NEOs exhibited despite these challenges, as described above under “Compensation Discussions and Analysis — Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions”. For Mr. Lowinger, the amount also includes a $150,000 sign-on bonus.

(2)      Represents amounts paid under our annual incentive plan. With respect to fiscal year 2019, the Executive Compensation Committee determined to pay each of the NEOs their fiscal year 2019 annual incentive in the form of RSUs and PRSUs (or, in the case of Ms. Lee, in RSUs only). Due to the settlement in equity, in order to comply with tax laws and to recognize the transition from cash to equity settlement of the 2019 annual incentives, the final annual incentive awards included a 120% multiplier, resulting in the final annual incentive awards to the NEOs reflected in the table below. This final value was then converted into RSUs and PSUs based on the closing price per share of our common stock on November 29, 2019, the date of grant as shown in the table below. These RSUs and PRSUs have the same terms as the other stock awards granted to the NEOs for fiscal year 2020, as described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions”.

74

The amounts in this column for fiscal year 2019 represent the aggregate grant date fair value, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of these stock awards granted in satisfaction of the fiscal year 2019 annual incentives for the NEOs (based on “target” performance for the PRSUs), as reflected in the table below. The grant date fair value amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the NEOs. For the RSUs, the grant date fair value is equal to the share price on November 29, 2019, the date of the grant. For the PRSUs, Cubic’s TSR as compared to the Russell 2000 Index over the performance period may impact the number of shares that will vest and therefore impacts the grant date fair value of the PRSUs. The grant date fair value of each PRSU was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation method. Under this method, the prices of the Russell 2000 Index and our common stock were simulated through the end of the performance period. The correlation matrix between our common stock and the Russell 2000 Index as well as our stock and the Russell 2000 Index’s return volatilities were developed based upon an analysis of historical data. The primary assumptions used for the valuation of the PRSUs with performance and market-based vesting that were granted on November 29, 2019 included a risk-free interest rate of 1.60%, expected volatility of 41.3%, performance period beginning on November 29, 2019 and concluding on September 30, 2022. The valuation method resulted in each PRSU being valued at $52.51 on November 29, 2019, the date of the grant, which is lower than the closing price per share on the date of grant. As a result, the grant date fair value reported in this column for the PRSUs is lower than the final annual incentive award value that was converted into PRSUs.

Name

Final Annual Incentive Award Value
($)

/

Closing Price on Grant Date
($)

=

Final Annual Incentive Award Granted in Stock Awards (Total RSUs and PRSUs) (#)

RSUs Granted (#)

x

Closing Price on Grant Date
($)

=

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs
($)

PRSUs Granted (at “Target”) (#)

x

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit of PRSUs
($)

=

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of PRSUs (at
“Target”)
(a)
($)

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs and PRSUs (at “Target”)
($)

Bradley H. Feldmann

$822,753

 

59.55

 

13,816

6,908

 

59.55

 

411,376

6,908

 

52.51

 

362,743

774,120

Anshooman Aga

$355,849

 

59.55

 

5,976

2,988

 

59.55

 

177,925

2,988

 

52.51

 

156,890

334,815

Michael R. Twyman

$555,623

 

59.55

 

9,330

4,665

 

59.55

 

277,812

4,665

 

52.51

 

244,969

522,780

Michael Knowles

$305,744

 

59.55

 

5,134

2,567

 

59.55

 

152,872

2,567

 

52.51

 

134,800

287,672

(a)      The grant date fair value of the PRSUs assuming maximum achievement of the applicable Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth performance objectives (200% of target) is as follows: Mr. Feldmann, $725,487; Mr. Aga, $313,781; Mr. Twyman, $489,938; and Mr. Knowles, $269,599.

In September 2020, the Executive Compensation Committee modified the Sales and Adjusted EBITDA growth targets to include the fiscal year 2020 acquisitions of Pixia and Delerrok, in the same manner as the modification of the PRSU awards described in (3) below. As a result, the grant date fair value of these PRSUs was revalued as of the date of the approved modification on September 17, 2020. The valuation method resulted in each PRSU being valued at $41.13 on September 17, 2020, the date of the approved modification.

(3)      This column represents the aggregate grant date fair value, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of stock awards granted in the respective fiscal years based on “target” performance for the PRSUs. The grant date fair value amounts do not correspond to the actual value that will be realized by the NEOs. For additional information on the valuation assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts, refer to note 14 of the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, as filed with the SEC.

For fiscal year 2020, each NEO received 50% of their long-term equity incentive awards in the form of RSUs and 50% in the form of PRSUs (at “target” level), as reflected in the table below, except for Mr. Lowinger. Mr. Lowinger received 22,683 RSUs upon joining Cubic on April 27, 2020. For the RSUs granted to each NEO excluding Mr. Lowinger, the grant date fair value is equal to the share price on November 29, 2019, the date of the grant. For the RSUs granted to Mr. Lowinger, the grant date fair value is equal to the share price on April 27, 2020, the date of the grant. For the PRSUs, Cubic’s TSR as compared to the Russell 2000 Index over the performance period may impact the number of PRSUs that will vest and therefore impact the grant date fair value of the PRSUs. The grant date fair value of each PRSU was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation method. Under this method, the prices of the Russell 2000 Index and our common stock were simulated through the end of the performance period. The correlation matrix between our common stock and the index as well as our stock and the Russell 2000 Index’s return volatilities were developed based upon an analysis of historical data. The primary assumptions used for the valuation of the PRSUs with performance and market-based vesting that were granted on November 29, 2019 included a risk-free interest rate of 1.60%, expected volatility of 41.3%, performance period beginning on November 29, 2019 and concluding on September 30, 2022. The valuation method resulted in each PRSU being valued at $52.51 on November 29, 2019, the date of the grant, which is lower than the closing price per share on the date of grant.

75

Name

RSUs Granted (#)

x

Closing Price on Grant Date
($)

=

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs
($)

PRSUs Granted (at “Target”)
(#)

x

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit of PRSUs
($)

=

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of PRSUs (at “Target”)(a)
($)

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs and PRSUs (at “Target”)
($)

Bradley H. Feldmann

37,784

 

59.55

 

2,250,000

37,784

 

52.51

 

1,984,038

4,234,038

Anshooman Aga

10,076

 

59.55

 

600,000

10,076

 

52.51

 

529,091

1,129,091

Michael Knowles

6,718

 

59.55

 

400,000

6,718

 

52.51

 

352,762

752,762

Grace G. Lee

5,878

 

59.55

 

350,000

5,878

 

52.51

 

308,654

658,654

Michael R. Twyman

6,718

 

59.55

 

400,000

6,718

 

52.51

 

352,762

752,762

(a)      The grant date fair value of the PRSUs assuming maximum achievement of the applicable Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth performance objectives (200% of “target”) is as follows: Mr. Feldmann, $3,968,076; Mr. Aga, $1,058,182; Mr. Knowles, $705,524; Ms. Lee, $617,308; and. Mr. Twyman, $705,524.

In September 2020, the Executive Compensation Committee modified the Sales and Adjusted EBITDA growth targets to include the fiscal year 2020 acquisitions of Pixia and Delerrok. As a result, the grant date fair value of these PRSUs was revalued as of the date of the approved modification on September 17, 2020. The valuation method resulted in each PRSU being valued at $41.13 on September 17, 2020, the date of the approved modification, resulting in no incremental modification date fair value.

(4)     Amounts represent solely the change in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under the pension plan that was frozen at December 31, 2006 and does not represent a change in the benefit to be paid to the executive. The change in pension value is the estimated year-over-year change in the present value, including: (a) change in discount rate assumption; (b) passage of time; and (c) changes in demographics. Where amounts are negative, they are shown as zero in the table. The amounts were computed using the same assumptions the Company used for financial statement reporting purposes. See “Pension Benefits” herein. Additionally, the amounts shown as earnings during fiscal year 2020 in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table, later herein, are not included in the Summary Compensation Table above because they are not above market or preferential.

(5)      See following table for detail.

All Other Compensation – Detail

 

Name

 

Fiscal Year

 

Life Insurance Premiums(1)
($)

 

Profit Sharing and 401(k) Match(2)
($)

 

Car Allowance
($)

 

Personal Travel
($)

 

Financial Planning(3)
($)

 

Severance Agreement(4)
($)

 

Other(5)
($)

 

Total
($)

   

Bradley H. Feldmann

 

2020

 

2,580

 

17,632

 

7,200

 

 

14,072

 

 

 

41,484

       

2019

 

2,580

 

28,872

 

7,200

 

 

15,000

 

 

 

53,652

       

2018

 

2,550

 

28,247

 

7,200

 

 

2,348

 

 

2,238

 

42,583

                                         
   

Anshooman Aga

 

2020

 

831

 

12,138

 

 

 

10,879

 

 

2,133

 

25,981

       

2019

 

600

 

26,729

 

 

 

5,876

 

 

1,696

 

34,901

       

2018

 

600

 

26,166

 

 

 

 

 

249,704

 

276,470

                                         
   

Michael Knowles

 

2020

 

1,380

 

8,198

 

 

 

1,104

 

 

2,442

 

13,124

       

2019

 

1,035

 

20,823

 

 

 

 

 

500

 

22,358

                                         
   

Grace G. Lee

 

2020

 

1,380

 

9,756

 

 

 

16,258

 

 

 

27,394

                                         
   

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

 

2020

 

1,092

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,092

                                         
   

Michael R. Twyman

 

2020

 

3,490

 

11,621

 

 

 

4,306

 

1,189,062

 

 

1,208,479

       

2019

 

2,580

 

24,019

         

14,637

 

     

41,236

       

2018

 

2,550

 

28,807

 

 

 

 

 

 

31,357

(1)      Represents the value of executive life insurance premiums paid by the Company.

(2)      Includes Company portion of 401(k) contributions provided to all eligible employees.

(3)      Represents the amount of personal financial planning and wellness services paid by the Company under a benefit available to selected executives, including all NEOs.

76

(4)      Represents the amount of severance for Mr. Twyman. Refer to the “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” table below for details of the severance amount.

(5)      Miscellaneous items provided at the Company’s expense. The fiscal year 2020 amounts represent the cost of annual physical examinations, as does the fiscal year 2019 amount for Mr. Aga and the fiscal year 2018 amount for Mr. Feldmann. For Mr. Knowles, the fiscal year 2019 amount represents an invention disclosure filing. In fiscal year 2018, Mr. Aga’s amount includes a phone allowance of $242, $245,394 related to relocation and house purchase expenses as part of his initial employment offer, and fees related to an annual physical examination.

(6)      Effective August 27, 2020, Mr. Twyman departed the Company after serving as Senior Vice President of Cubic and President of Cubic Mission Solutions since May 25, 2016 as a result of the combination of the two defense businesses.

CEO Pay Ratio

PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information regarding the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of Mr. Feldmann, our CEO. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner that is intended to be consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

For fiscal year 2020, our last completed fiscal year:

•   the median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than our CEO) was $72,209; and

•   the annual total compensation of our CEO, as reported in the Summary Compensation Table included elsewhere in this proxy statement, was $5,945,030.

Based on this information, for fiscal year 2020, the ratio of the median of the total compensation of all employees of the Company to the annual total compensation of Mr. Feldmann, our CEO, was 82 to 1.

Determining the Median Employee

SEC rules allow us to identify our median employee once every three years unless there has been a change to our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would result in a significant change in our pay ratio disclosure. We determined that there were no significant changes to our global employee population, our employee compensation plans or the compensation of our fiscal year 2018 median employee that would make it inappropriate to use our fiscal year 2018 median employee again for this fiscal year 2020 disclosure. To identify the median employee in fiscal year 2018, we determined our median employee by measuring total annual cash compensation, which was consistently applied to all of our employees included in the calculation. Compensation was annualized for employees who did not work the entire 12-month period. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying our fiscal year 2018 median employee. We did convert all total cash compensation figures to USD using the applicable exchange rate on November 27, 2018. Our measurement date was September 30, 2018 for purposes of determining our employee population for the analysis.

Compensation Measure and Annual Total Compensation of “Median Employee”

With respect to the total annual compensation of the “median employee,” we calculated the elements of such employee’s compensation for fiscal year 2020 in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, resulting in annual total compensation of $72,209.

With respect to the annual total compensation of our CEO, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our fiscal year 2020 Summary Compensation Table included in this proxy statement.

77

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Fiscal Year 2020

The following table reflects the incentive plan awards to the NEOs during fiscal year 2020.

Name

Grant Date

Executive Compensation Committee Approval
Date


Estimated
Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)

 

Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards(2)(5)

All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock or
Units(3)(5)

Grant Date
Fair Value of Stock
Awards
(4)(5)
($)

Target
($)

Maximum
($)

 

Threshold
Shares

Target
Shares

Maximum
Shares

Bradley H. Feldmann

   

$1,072,500

$2,037,750

           
 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

           

44,692

$2,661,371

 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

     

22,346

44,692

89,384

 

$2,346,777

Anshooman Aga

   

$410,432

$779,821

           
 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

           

13,064

$777,935

 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

     

6,532

13,064

26,128

 

$685,991

Michael Knowles

   

$294,000

$558,600

           
 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

           

9,285

$552,865

 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

     

4,643

9,285

18,570

 

$487,555

Grace G. Lee

   

$240,750

$457,425

           
 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

           

9,516

$566,643

 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

     

2,939

5,878

11,756

 

$308,654

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

   

$385,500

$732,450

           
 

4/27/2020

4/27/2020

           

22,683

$800,000

Michael R. Twyman

   

$386,250

$733,875

           
 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

           

11,383

$677,801

 

11/29/2019

11/29/2019

     

5,692

11,383

22,766

 

$597,721

(1)      Non-equity incentive plan awards consist of annual bonus awards payable under the Company’s fiscal year 2020 annual bonus program. For more information about the Company’s annual bonus program, please see “ Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions” above.

(2)      These 2020-2022 PRSUs are intended to reward the achievement of cumulative Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth over a three-year performance period. The three-year performance period for these PRSUs commenced on October 1, 2019 and will end on September 30, 2022. Specifically, recipients of the PRSUs will be eligible to vest in the PRSUs at the end of the three-year performance period based on the achievement of specified Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for the performance period relative to the performance objectives established by the Executive Compensation Committee, subject to the recipient’s continued service with the Company through the last day of the performance period, except as otherwise provided in the applicable PRSU agreement. In September 2020, the Executive Compensation Committee modified the Sales and Adjusted EBITDA growth targets to include the fiscal year 2020 acquisitions of Pixia and Delerrok. As a result, the grant date fair value of these PRSUs was revalued as of the date of the approved modification on September 17, 2020, resulting in no incremental modification date fair value.

The PRSUs vest based 50% on cumulative Sales growth and 50% on cumulative Adjusted EBITDA growth during such performance period. If the Company’s cumulative Sales growth and/or cumulative Adjusted EBITDA growth for the performance period equals or exceeds one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then a certain percentage of the PRSUs will vest (50%, 100% and 200%, respectively). Following the completion of the three-year performance period, the Executive Compensation Committee will determine the achievement percentage relative to Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for the performance period and determine the final average achievement percentage for the performance period for each factor. The “threshold” and “target” number of PRSUs in the table above do not give effect to any possible relative TSR multiplier. The “maximum” number of PRSUs in the table assumes the highest level of performance with respect to the Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA objectives and the maximum relative TSR multiplier. For these 2020-2022 PRSUs, Cubic’s relative TSR as compared to the Russell 2000 Index over the performance period will result in a multiplier for the number of PRSUs that will vest, after the final annual Sales and annual Adjusted EBITDA achievement percentages have been determined for the three fiscal years in the performance period. If our relative TSR performance exceeds the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier will result in up to an additional 25% of the PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. If the relative TSR performance is below the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier could result in a reduction of up to 25% of these PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. In no event will the number of 2020-2022 PRSUs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period exceed 200% of the target PRSUs.

The percentage for determining the number of PRSUs that will vest if performance is between the specified achievement levels will be determined by linear interpolation between the applicable achievement amounts for each measure.

For more information about the accelerated vesting of these PRSUs, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions” above.

(3)      These RSUs will vest in three equal installments on each of October 1, 2020, 2021 and 2022, subject to the NEO’s continued service with the Company through each such date. Dividend equivalent rights accrue with respect to the RSUs when and as dividends are paid on the Company’s common stock and vest proportionately with the RSUs to which they relate. For more information about the accelerated vesting of these RSUs, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions” above.

78

(4)      The Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards amounts were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For additional information on the valuation assumptions refer to footnote 3 of the Summary Compensation Table.

(5)      In fiscal year 2019, the Executive Compensation Committee determined to pay each of the NEOs their fiscal year 2019 annual incentive awards in the form of fiscal year 2020 RSUs and PRSUs, except for Ms. Lee who received only fiscal year 2020 RSUs. These RSUs and PRSUs have the same terms as the other stock awards granted to the NEOs in fiscal year 2020, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions”. The following RSUs and PRSUs are included in the table above and are related to the 2019 annual incentive awards satisfied in the form of fiscal year 2020 RSUs and PRSUs:

Name

RSUs Granted (#)

x

Share Price at Equity Award Date
($)

=

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of RSUs
($)

PRSUs Granted
(#)

x

Share Price at Equity Award Date
($)

x

ASC 718 Grant Date Fair Value of PRSUs
($)

Bradley H. Feldmann

6,908

 

59.55

 

411,371

6,908

 

52.51

 

362,739

Anshooman Aga

2,988

 

59.55

 

177,935

2,988

 

52.51

 

156,900

Michael Knowles

2,567

 

59.55

 

152,865

2,567

 

52.51

 

134,793

Grace G. Lee

3,638

 

59.55

 

216,643

 

 

Michael R. Twyman

4,665

 

59.55

 

277,801

4,665

 

52.51

 

244,959

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The table below provides information on the current holdings of stock awards by the NEOs as of September 30, 2020.

Name

 

Grant Date

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(1)
(#)

 

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2)
($)

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (3)
(#)

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares,
Units
or Other Rights That Have Not Vested
($)(2)

Bradley H. Feldmann

 

11/29/2019

 

44,692

 

$2,599,734

       
   

11/29/2019

         

44,692

 

$2,599,734

   

11/21/2018

 

23,386

 

$1,360,364

       
   

11/21/2018

         

62,364

 

$3,627,714

   

11/27/2017

 

11,197

 

$651,329

       
   

11/14/2016

 

5,972

 

$347,391

       

Anshooman Aga

 

11/29/2019

 

13,064

 

$759,933

       
   

11/29/2019

         

13,064

 

$759,933

   

11/21/2018

 

5,847

 

$340,120

       
   

11/21/2018

         

15,592

 

$906,987

   

11/27/2017

 

2,036

 

$118,434

       
   

7/27/2017

 

541

 

$31,470

       

Michael Knowles

 

11/29/2019

 

9,285

 

$540,108

       
   

11/29/2019

         

9,285

 

$540,108

   

11/21/2018

 

2,923

 

$170,031

       
   

11/21/2018

         

7,796

 

$453,493

   

11/27/2017

 

448

 

$26,060

       
   

11/14/2016

 

270

 

$15,706

       

Grace G. Lee

 

11/29/2019

 

9,516

 

$553,546

       
   

11/29/2019

         

5,878

 

$341,923

   

11/21/2018

 

12,278

 

$714,211

       
   

11/21/2018

         

7,796

 

$453,493

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

 

4/27/2020

 

22,683

 

$1,319,470

       

(1)      These RSUs will vest, subject to the NEO’s continued service, as follows: for the RSUs granted on April 27, 2020, November 29, 2019, and November 21, 2018, the remaining unvested RSUs will vest in three equal installments on each of October 1, 2020, 2021 and 2022; for the RSUs granted on November 27, 2017, the remaining unvested RSUs will vest in two equal installments on each of October 1, 2020 and 2021; for the RSUs granted on November 14, 2016 and July 27, 2017, the remaining unvested RSUs vested on October 1, 2020. Dividend equivalent rights accrue with respect to the RSUs when and as dividends are paid on the Company’s common stock and vest proportionately with the RSUs to which they relate. For more information about the accelerated vesting of these RSUs, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions” above.

79

(2)      The market value of stock awards was determined by multiplying the number of unvested RSUs or PRSUs by the closing price of our common stock of $58.17 on September 30, 2020, the last trading day of our fiscal year 2020, as reported on the NYSE.

(3)      These PRSUs are intended to reward Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for the three fiscal years within the three-year performance period. The three-year performance period for the 2019-2021 PRSUs commenced on October 1, 2018 and will end on September 30, 2021. The three-year performance period for the 2020-2022 PRSUs commenced on October 1, 2019 and will end on September 30, 2022. Recipients of the PRSUs will be eligible to vest in the PRSUs at the end of the respective three-year performance period based on Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth for the performance period relative to the performance objectives established by the Executive Compensation Committee, subject to the recipient’s continued service with the Company through the last day of the performance period, except as otherwise provided in the applicable PRSU agreement.

The 2019-2021 PRSUs vest based 50% on annual Sales growth and 50% on annual Adjusted EBITDA growth during such performance period. If the Company’s annual Sales growth achievement and/or annual Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement for each fiscal year during the performance period equals or exceeds one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then an annual achievement percentage for such fiscal year will be determined (50%, 100% and 200%, respectively). The 2020-2022 PRSUs vest based 50% on cumulative Sales growth and 50% on cumulative Adjusted EBITDA growth during such performance period. If the Company’s cumulative Sales growth achievement and/or cumulative Adjusted EBITDA growth achievement for the performance period equals or exceeds one of three different achievement levels (threshold, target and maximum), then a certain percentage of PRSUs will vest (50%, 100% and 200%, respectively). Performance below the threshold level for a performance measure will result in a 0% achievement percentage for that measure. Following the completion of the respective performance periods, the Executive Compensation Committee will determine the achievement percentage relative to Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth and determine the final average achievement percentage for the performance period for each factor.

For these PRSUs, Cubic’s relative TSR as compared to the Russell 2000 Index over the performance period will result in a multiplier for the number of PRSUs that will vest, after the final Sales and Adjusted EBITDA achievement percentages have been determined for the three year performance period. If our relative TSR performance exceeds the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier will result in up to an additional 25% of the PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. If the relative TSR performance is below the performance of the Russell 2000 Index based on a scale established by the Executive Compensation Committee, the multiplier could result in a reduction of up to 25% of these PRSUs vesting at the end of the performance period. In no event will the number of PRSUs that vest at the end of the three-year performance period exceed 250% of the target PRSUs for the 2019-2021 PRSUs, or 200% of the target PRSUs for the 2020-2022 PRSUs.

The percentage for determining the number of PRSUs that will vest if performance is between the specified achievement levels will be determined by linear interpolation between the applicable achievement amounts for each measure.

For the 2019-2021 PRSUs, the number of shares listed equals the number of shares that may be issued to the NEOs pursuant to these PRSUs at maximum performance, as the current estimate is that the 2019-2021 PRSU’s will vest between target and maximum levels with respect to Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth. The number of PRSUs in the table above does not give effect to any possible relative TSR multiplier, and so is reflected at 200% of “target” levels. For the 2020-2022 PRSUs, the number of shares listed equals the number of shares that may be issued to the NEOs pursuant to these PRSUs at target performance, as the current estimate is that the 2020-2022 PRSU’s will vest between threshold and target levels with respect to Sales growth and Adjusted EBITDA growth. The number of PRSUs in the table above does not give effect to any possible relative TSR multiplier, and so is reflected at 100% of “target” levels.

For more information about the accelerated vesting of these PRSUs, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions” above.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table provides information concerning total RSU and PRSU vesting for each of the NEOs during fiscal year 2020.

Stock Awards

 

Name

Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
(1)

Value Realized on
Vesting
($)
(2)

 

Bradley H. Feldmann

59,979

3,715,477

 

Anshooman Aga

10,026

616,136

 

Michael Knowles

3,123

197,508

 

Grace G. Lee

3,314

223,861

 

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

 

Michael R. Twyman(3)

24,689

1,484,044

 

(1)      The performance period for the 2018-2020 PRSUs ended on September 30, 2020, with 160% of the target PRSUs vesting based on performance relative to those performance objectives during the performance period. The value of the actual number of shares issued pursuant to the 2018-2020 PRSUs following certification by the Executive Compensation Committee for each of the NEOs is included in the table above: Mr. Feldmann, 35,832 shares; Mr. Aga, 6,516 shares; Mr. Knowles, 1,434 shares; and Mr. Twyman, 6,516 shares. Ms. Lee did not hold 2018-202 PRSUs and the only shares reflected in the table above for Ms. Lee are time-based RSUs that vested during fiscal year 2020.

(2)      The value realized on vesting equals the closing price per share of our common stock on the date of vesting as reported by the NYSE multiplied by the number of shares subject to the RSUs that vested on such date.

(3)       Mr. Twyman vested as to 13,068 RSUs in connection with his separation from the Company on August 27, 2020 which are included in the table above.

80

Pension Benefits Fiscal Year 2020

The following table sets forth the present value of accumulated benefits under pension plans for the NEOs.

Name

Number of Years Credited Service
(#)

Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit Under Life
Annuity Election
(2)
($)

Payment During
Last Fiscal Year
($)

Bradley H. Feldmann(1)

22

120,077

       

(1)      The Pension Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2006; no additional benefits accrue after that date. The purpose of the Pension Plan was to provide a modest monthly retirement benefit, to supplement social security payments, for eligible full-time U.S. employees who have completed one year of service with the Company. The Company has not granted extra years of credited service to any employee. The full benefit is available, upon retirement, to any eligible employee who (a) has attained age 65, or (b) is between age 55 and 64 and whose combined age and number of years of service equals 85. A reduced benefit is available at or after age 55 through age 64 if the employee has at least five years of service. The annual benefit is determined by adding total salary and bonus (not exceeding the ERISA cap in any year) during the time of participation and multiplying the sum by 3/4 of 1%. Benefits are paid monthly. The monthly amount will vary based upon the form of benefit selected (e.g., a life annuity or a joint and 50% survivor annuity).

(2)      The present value of the accumulated benefit is determined by the projected unit credit method in a manner consistent with that used, and based on the same assumptions used, for financial reporting purposes set forth in Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 filed with the SEC, except retirement age has been assumed to be the normal retirement age under the Pension Plan. Under the Pension Plan, the interest rate used for computing present value was 2.89% and includes the following material assumptions: (i) retirement at the plan’s stated normal retirement date, or the earliest age at which benefits are unreduced, if earlier, and (ii) mortality taken from 2012 mortality table with Approach 2 for the Contingent Survivor table (i.e. assume the beneficiary mortality is the same as a healthy retiree mortality while the retiree is alive and assume Contingent Survivor mortality after the retiree’s death), with 2019 projection scale applied from 2012 forward and adjusted to reflect a long term improvement rate of 1% through age 85, grading to 0% at age 95. Pension Plan contributions are distributed among various funds held with financial institutions.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Fiscal Year 2020

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the participation in the Deferred Compensation Plan by our NEOs for fiscal year 2020.(1)

Name

Executive
Contributions in
FY 2020
(2)
($)

Aggregate Plan
Earnings in FY
2020
(3)
($)

Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)

Aggregate Plan
Balance at End of
FY 2020
(4)
($)

Bradley H. Feldmann

7,393

336,301

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

28,559

423

28,982

(1)      The amounts shown have been deferred (and not presently taxed) and other than plan earnings have also been reported herein as compensation. The Deferred Compensation Plan permits selected highly-compensated employees to defer (from time to time) up to 90% of their base salary and up to 100% of their bonus annually and non-employee directors to defer up to 100% of their retainer fees. We make contributions to a rabbi trust to provide a source of funds for satisfying a portion of these deferred compensation amounts and to provide the participants investment options similar to mutual funds yielding market returns based on the investment options selected by the participant. The Company makes no contribution to the Deferred Compensation Plan itself. Payment elections and withdrawals are permitted within guidelines established by the Internal Revenue Service. After retirement the participant may receive a lump sum payment or an annual distribution over 2 to 20 years. Annual revision of the selected payment method is regulated by Internal Revenue Service guidelines.

(2)      The amounts shown reflect salary deferrals of $28,559 for Mr. Lowinger. These amounts are also included in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2020.

(3)      These amounts are not reported as compensation in the Summary Compensation Table because the earnings are not above market or preferential.

(4)      Year-end balances consist of participant contributions and earnings on contributed amounts. All contributions have been included in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal year 2020 and prior years or would have been so included had the current reporting requirements been applicable to the executive. No amounts have previously been reported in the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Feldmann as he did not make any contributions to the plan for fiscal years 2018, 2019 or 2020.

81

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

GENERAL SEVERANCE POLICY

The Company has a severance policy (the “Severance Policy”) applicable to its full time U.S.-based employees, including the NEOs. In the event of a Company-originated termination without cause, the eligible individual who has completed three years of employment with the Company is offered the opportunity to receive, in exchange for signing a general release, a lump sum payment of one week of base pay at their current rate for each 12 months of employment, paid in installments over the severance period, and payment of medical and dental coverage under COBRA for up to 12 months (with the number of months of COBRA coverage dependent on the number of years of service). Outplacement consultation may be provided at the Company’s discretion. Employees in the position of Vice President or above will receive a minimum of 12 weeks’ severance pay and 3 months of COBRA coverage. Non-executive employees with less than three years of employment will receive two weeks’ severance pay.

In individual circumstances, an NEO may be offered alternative arrangements to be negotiated. These severance benefits are not offset by the Company’s normal retirement benefits. Other than the COBRA payments, the cash severance payments under the Severance Policy would be paid to a NEO in addition to any payments under the Protection Plan, as described below, in the event his or her termination of employment by the Company without cause were to occur under the circumstances described under the Protection Plan.

TRANSITION PROTECTION PLAN

The Company’s Protection Plan is intended to be made available upon specific approval of an individual for participation in the Protection Plan by the Executive Compensation Committee. It is intended to benefit selected principal officers and other selected key personnel. The Executive Compensation Committee has approved participation in the Protection Plan by each of the NEOs.

If there is any change of control of the Company (as defined below), and within 3 months before or 18 months after such change in control, a participant’s employment involuntarily terminates without cause (as defined below), or the participant resigns for good reason (as defined below), then the Company would be obligated to:

(1)    pay such person an amount equal to 24 months of the NEO’s current salary, two times the NEO’s annual incentive plan at target and a pro-rated portion of the NEO’s annual incentive

plan at target for the year of termination, which amount shall be paid in equal installments over 24 months, and

(2)    continue for 18 months the participant’s participation in the medical and dental plans of the Company in which such participant participated at the time of termination.

Miscellaneous additional benefits, including outplacement service of up to $6,000, may also be provided. In unusual cases, moving of household goods may also be reimbursed by the Company under the Protection Plan.

A “change in control” occurs when a “person” acquires sufficient shares of our voting stock to elect a majority of our directors, assuming 90% of outstanding shares vote; a merger resulting in a substantial change in the directors; and certain other events.

An “involuntary termination without cause” occurs when there is any involuntary termination of employment without (1) a willful and continued failure of the employee to perform substantially his or her duties, or (2) his or her gross negligence or breach of fiduciary duty involving personal profit (etc.) or (3) his or her conviction or plea of no contest or guilty to state or federal felony criminal laws.

A resignation “for good reason” occurs when the authority, duties, function or responsibilities of the employee are materially reduced, his or her base salary is reduced, his or her bonus participation opportunity is reduced by more than 50%, his or her job location is substantially changed, or the Company materially breaches the Protection Plan.

Following termination, to receive monthly payments the executive must execute a general release and must not breach the Company’s proprietary information policy and must not interfere with the employees, customers or suppliers of the Company.

LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE AWARDS

The long-term equity incentive awards granted to the NEOs may vest under certain circumstances in the event of a change in control of the Company and/or certain terminations of employment. For more information about the accelerated vesting provisions applicable to these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Section 3: Fiscal Year 2020 Executive Compensation Decisions” above.

82

DEFERRED COMPENSATION AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Certain of the NEOs are participants in the Pension Plans. For more information about payments payable to the NEOs under the pension plans upon a termination of employment, please see the Pension Benefits table above. Certain of the NEOs are participants in the Deferred Compensation Plan. For more information about amounts payable to the NEOs under the Deferred Compensation

 

Plan upon a termination of employment, please see the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Fiscal Year 2020 table above.

Retirement benefits also include the continued vesting of long-term incentive awards. In order to receive retirement benefits, NEOs must be at least 60 years of age, and have served a minimum of 10 years of continuous service. They must also provide a one-year notice of retirement.

 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control Table

The following table summarizes potential change in control and termination payments to each NEO. The five right-hand columns describe the payments that would apply in five different potential scenarios — a termination without cause apart from a change in control; a termination of employment as a result of the NEO’s resignation for good reason or termination of employment by us other than for cause, in each case within 3 months prior to or 18 months following a change in control (or 12 months following a change in control the case of certain equity awards); a change in control without a termination of employment; the NEO’s death; or the NEO’s termination of employment as a result of his or her disability. The table assumes that the termination or change in control occurred on September 30, 2020. None of the NEOs qualified for the enhanced retirement vesting provisions of certain of our equity awards as of September 30, 2020,

 

so the retirement scenario is not included in the table. For purposes of estimating the value of accelerated equity awards to be received in the event of a termination of employment or change in control, we have assumed a price per share of our common stock of $58.17, which represents the closing market price of our common stock as reported on the NYSE on September 30, 2020.

As part of a negotiated agreement, on August 27, 2020, Michael Twyman, President of Cubic Mission Solutions departed from Cubic as a result of the combination of the two defense segments. Mr. Twyman received six months of base pay as his severance payment, a payment under his annual incentive plan based on actual results for the year, 12 months of COBRA coverage, and vesting of his long-term incentive plan pursuant to the rules of the plan.

Name

 

Benefit

 

Termination w/o Cause Apart from a Change in Control
($)

 

After Change in Control Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason
($)

 

Change in Control(6)
($)

 

Death(7)
($)

 

Disability(8) ($)

         

 

   

 

           

Bradley H. Feldmann

 

Cash Severance

 

412,500

(1)

 

4,507,500

(2)

           
   

Healthcare and Other Insurance(3)

 

29,421

 

 

44,132

 

           
   

Outplacement

 

 

 

6,000

 

           
   

Stock Awards – Accelerated Vesting

 

4,137,589

(4)

 

7,558,552

(5)

 

3,116,574

 

10,675,126

 

9,118,981

   

Total Benefit Amount

 

4,579,510

 

 

12,116,183

 

 

3,116,574

 

10,675,126

 

9,118,981

         

 

   

 

           

Anshooman Aga

 

Cash Severance

 

118,394

(1)

 

1,965,338

(2)

           
   

Healthcare and Other Insurance(3)

 

25,305

 

 

37,958

 

           
   

Outplacement

 

 

 

6,000

 

           
   

Stock Awards – Accelerated Vesting

 

930,524

(4)

 

2,009,890

(5)

 

690,362

 

2,700,251

 

2,184,586

   

Total Benefit Amount

 

1,074,223

 

 

4,019,185

 

 

690,362

 

2,700,251

 

2,184,586

83

Name

 

Benefit

 

Termination w/o Cause Apart from a Change in Control
($)

 

After Change in Control Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason
($)

 

Change in Control(6)
($)

 

Death(7)
($)

 

Disability(8) ($)

         

 

   

 

           

Michael Knowles

 

Cash Severance

 

96,923

(1)

 

1,524,923

(2)

           
   

Healthcare and Other Insurance(3)

 

25,374

 

 

38,061

 

           
   

Outplacement

 

 

 

6,000

 

           
   

Stock Awards – Accelerated Vesting

 

413,690

(4)

 

1,142,691

(5)

 

278,867

 

1,421,558

 

1,017,176

   

Total Benefit Amount

 

535,987

 

 

2,711,675

 

 

278,867

 

1,421,558

 

1,017,176

         

 

   

 

           

Grace G. Lee

 

Cash Severance

 

92,596

(1)

 

1,376,596

(2)

           
   

Healthcare and Other Insurance(3)

 

25,374

 

 

38,061

 

           
   

Outplacement

 

 

 

6,000

 

           
   

Stock Awards – Accelerated Vesting

 

265,139

(4)

 

1,609,680

(5)

 

226,747

 

1,836,427

 

1,532,896

   

Total Benefit Amount

 

383,109

 

 

3,030,337

 

 

226,747

 

1,836,427

 

1,532,896

         

 

   

 

           

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

 

Cash Severance

 

126,923

(1)

 

1,997,923

(2)

           
   

Healthcare and Other Insurance(3)

 

9,610

 

 

14,415

 

           
   

Outplacement

 

 

 

6,000

 

           
   

Stock Awards – Accelerated Vesting

 

(4)

 

1,319,470

(5)

 

 

1,319,470

 

1,319,470

   

Total Benefit Amount

 

136,533

 

 

3,337,808

 

 

 

1,319,470

 

1,319,470

         

 

   

 

           

Michael R. Twyman

 

Cash Severance

 

397,562

 

 

 

           
   

Healthcare and Other Insurance

 

31,334

 

 

 

           
   

Outplacement

 

 

 

 

           
   

Stock Awards – Accelerated Vesting

 

760,166

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Total Benefit Amount

 

1,189,062

(9)

 

 

 

 

 

(1)      In the event of a NEO’s termination by the Company without cause, a NEO will be entitled to a number of weeks of base pay determined in accordance with the terms of our Severance Policy, payable in a lump sum. As of September 30, 2020, the NEOs would have been entitled to receive the following number of weeks of base pay under the terms of our Severance Policy: Mr. Feldmann, 22 weeks; Mr. Aga, 12 weeks; Mr. Knowles, 12 weeks; Mr. Lowinger, 12 weeks; and Ms. Lee, 12 weeks.

(2)      In the event of a NEO’s termination by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason, in each case within 3 months before or 18 months after a change in control, a NEO will be entitled to receive a monthly amount for 24 months computed as the current base salary and target bonus, plus a pro-rated payout of target bonus for the year of termination, for such NEO in accordance with the terms of our Protection Plan, payable in 24 equal monthly installments. As of September 30, 2020, the aggregate cash severance payable under the Protection Plan for each of our NEOs was as follows: Mr. Feldmann, $3,189,646; Mr. Aga, $1,769,604; Mr. Knowles, $963,304; Mr. Lowinger, $203,190; and Ms. Lee, $417,410. The foregoing severance benefits would be paid to a NEO in addition to any amounts payable under the Company’s Severance Policy, as described above, in the event his or her employment was terminated without cause. The amounts in this column assume that a NEO was terminated without cause on September 30, 2020, and that a change in control occurred on such date. Accordingly, the amounts payable to each NEO under both the Severance Policy and the Protection Plan are included in this column under the heading “Cash Severance.”

(3)      In the event of a NEO’s termination by the Company without cause, an NEO will be entitled to medical and dental coverage at the Company’s expense for up to 12 months in accordance with the terms of our Severance Policy. The amounts in this column represent 12 months of continued medical and dental coverage for the NEOs. In the event of an NEO’s termination by the Company without cause or by the NEO for good reason, in each case within 3 months before or 18 months after a change in control, an NEO will be entitled to continue for 18 months his or her participation in those welfare plans of the Company in which such NEO participated at the time of termination. The amounts in the “After Change in Control Termination w/o Cause or for Good Reason“ column represent 18 months of continued medical and dental insurance. In unusual cases, moving of household goods may also be reimbursed by the Company under the Protection Plan. Such amounts cannot be determined at this time.

84

(4)      In the event of an NEO’s involuntary termination without cause or resignation for good reason, the NEO will vest in his or her PRSUs on actual performance for the three-year performance period, with the resulting PRSUs prorated portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of such termination. With respect to the PRSUs that were scheduled to vest based on the three-year performance period that ended on September 30, 2020, the table reflects the value of the of PRSUs at 160% of target, the value at which such PRSUs vested on October 1, 2020, since such performance level was known as of September 30, 2020 and no proration has been applied since the assumed date of termination is the last day of the performance period. With respect to the PRSUs for which the three-year performance period had not expired on September 30, 2020, the table reflects the value of the “target” number of PRSUs subject to such awards, prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of such termination (and, with respect to the 2019-2021 and 2020-2022 PRSUs, the value does not give effect to any possible relative TSR multiplier, and so is reflected at 100% of “target” levels).

(5)      In the event of an NEO’s involuntary termination without cause or resignation for good reason, in each case within 12 months following a change in control, the NEO will vest in all of his or her outstanding RSUs granted prior to fiscal year 2020. For RSUs granted beginning in fiscal year 2020, the RSUs granted to our executive officers vest immediately upon a recipient’s termination without cause or resignation for good reason in either case within 3 months prior to or 18 months following a change in control. For PRSUs granted beginning in fiscal year 2020, upon the occurrence of a change in control, such outstanding PRSUs will convert to RSUs at the “target” number of shares subject to their outstanding PRSUs, or if greater, the relative TSR multiplier for the performance period through the date of the change in control. The table reflects the value of the “target” number of PRSUs subject to such awards and, does not give effect to any possible greater amount based on relative TSR multiplier, and so is reflected at 100% of “target” levels.

(6)     For PRSUs granted prior to fiscal year 2020, upon the occurrence of a change in control, the NEOs will vest in the “target” number of shares subject to their outstanding PRSUs (or, with respect to the 2019-2021 if greater, the relative TSR multiplier for the performance period through the date of the change in control). The table reflects the value of the “target” number of PRSUs subject to such awards and, with respect to the 2019-2021 PRSUs, does not give effect to any possible relative TSR multiplier, and so is reflected at 100% of “target” levels.

(7)      Upon the occurrence of an NEO’s death, the NEO will vest in (a) all of his or her outstanding RSUs, plus (b) the “target” number of shares subject to his or her outstanding PRSUs.

(8)      Upon the occurrence of an NEO’s termination of employment as a result of his or her disability, the NEO will vest in (a) all of his or her outstanding RSUs, plus (b) the NEO will remain eligible to vest in his or her PRSUs on actual performance for the three-year performance period, with the resulting PRSUs prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of such termination. With respect to the PRSUs that were scheduled to vest based on the three-year performance period that ended on September 30, 2020, the table reflects the value of the of PRSUs at 160% of target, the value at which such PRSUs vested on October 1, 2020, since such performance level was known as of September 30, 2020 and no proration has been applied since the assumed date of termination is the last day of the performance period. With respect to the PRSUs for which the three-year performance period had not expired on September 30, 2020 the table reflects the value of the “target” number of PRSUs subject to such awards, prorated for the portion of the performance period that elapsed prior to the date of such termination. With respect to the 2019-2021 and 2020-2022 PRSUs, the value does not give effect to any possible relative TSR multiplier, and so is reflected at 100% of “target” levels.

(9)      As part of a negotiated agreement, on August 27, 2020, Mr. Twyman departed from Cubic as a result of the combination of the two defense segments. In exchange for a customary release of claims, Mr. Twyman received a cash severance payment equal to six months of base pay and cash payment equal to an annual incentive plan payment for fiscal year 2020 based on actual results, 12 months of COBRA coverage and accelerated or continued vesting in certain restricted stock units.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides certain information with respect to the Company’s equity compensation plans in effect as of the end of fiscal year 2020.

Plan Category

Number of
Securities to
be Issued upon
Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(a)

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and
Rights
(b)

Number of
Securities
Remaining
Available
for Issuance
under Equity
Compensation
Plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
(c)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

926,163

1,979,889(1)

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

n/a

n/a

n/a

Total

926,163

1,979,889(1)

(1)      Includes 444,750 shares of our common stock remaining available for issuance under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) as of the end of fiscal year 2020, all of which were eligible to be issued with respect to the then-current purchase period that ended on December 31, 2020, pursuant to the terms of our ESPP.

85

OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK

   

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 18, 2021 for:

•   each person, or group of affiliated persons, known to us to own beneficially 5% or more of our outstanding common stock;

•   each of our directors and nominees;

•   each of our named executive officers; and

•   all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Under these rules, beneficial ownership of a class of capital stock includes any shares of such class as to which a person, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or investment power and also any shares as to which a person has the right to acquire

such voting or investment power within 60 days through the exercise of any options, warrants or other rights. Shares subject to options, warrants or other rights are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Except as indicated below and under applicable community property laws, we believe that the beneficial owners identified in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown below.

For the purpose of calculating the percentage of shares beneficially owned by any shareholder, this table lists applicable percentage ownership based on 31,752,933 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 18, 2021.

Unless otherwise indicated below, the address for each named director and executive officer is c/o Cubic Corporation, 9233 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, California 92123.

Name of Beneficial Owner

 

Shares Beneficially Owned

Percent Owned

Principal Shareholders

     

BlackRock, Inc.(1)

 

5,086,039

16.0%

The Vanguard Group.(2)

 

3,216,195

10.1%

State Street Corporation(3)

 

1,814,133

5.7%

Directors and Named Executive Officers

     

Bradley H. Feldmann(4)

 

107,094.0568

*

Michael R. Twyman(5)

 

37,781

*

Jeffrey B. Lowinger

 

10,250

*

Maureen Breakiron-Evans(6)

 

14,340

*

Anshooman Aga(7)

 

18,659.8318

*

David F. Melcher

 

10,369.8767

*

Bruce G. Blakley(8)

 

12,251.2300

*

Steven J. Norris

 

8,801

*

Grace G. Lee

 

15,395

*

Janice M. Hamby

 

8,158

*

Michael Knowles

 

6,194

*

Prithviraj Banerjee

 

4,373

*

Denise L. Devine

 

2,838

*

Carolyn A. Flowers

 

3,213

*

All directors and executive officers as a group (16 persons)

 

280,027.3544

*

*         Less than 1%

(1)      As of December 31, 2020, based on information set forth on Form 13F filed with the SEC on February 5, 2021. The address of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(2)      As of December 31, 2020, based on information set forth on Form 13F filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021. The address of The Vanguard Group, Inc. is 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, PA 19355.

86

(3)      As of December 31, 2020, based on information set forth on Form 13F filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021. The address of State Street Corporation is One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111.

(4)      Includes 33 shares held in the Feldmann Family Trust dated 04/20/12. Mr. Feldmann shares voting and investment powers over such shares as one of the two co-trustees of such trust and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Also includes 5,114.973 shares held in Mr. Feldmann’s IRA, and 1,547.0838 shares held indirectly through Mr. Feldmann’s 401(k).

(5)      Based solely on information set forth in Mr. Twyman’s Form 4 filed with the SEC on March 13, 2020.

(6)      Includes 7,615 shares held in the James L. Evans & Maureen Breakiron-Evans Trust. Ms. Breakiron-Evans has voting and investment power over such shares as the trustee of such trust and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of her pecuniary interest therein.

(7)      Includes 251.8318 shares held indirectly through Mr. Aga’s 401(k).

(8)      Includes 12,250 shares held in the Blakley Living Trust dated 2/9/16. Mr. Blakley has voting and investment power over such shares as the trustee of such trust and disclaims beneficial ownership of such shares except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein. Also includes 1.23 shares held indirectly through Mr. Blakley’s IRA account.

87

CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS
AND RELATIONSHIPS

   

Related Persons

The written Charter of our Executive Compensation Committee requires it to review and approve the compensation of any persons related to any director or executive officer. As a practical matter the Executive Compensation Committee will also review any non-compensation transactions between the Company and its directors, senior officers and their relatives.

Consistent with SEC regulations and NYSE listing standards, a related person transaction is any transaction in which the Company was, is, or will be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which a related person had, has, or will have a direct or indirect material interest. A related person includes any director or executive officer of the Company, any nominee for director, any person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, an immediate family member of any person described above, and any firm, corporation, or other entity controlled by any person described above.

Each director and executive officer completes an annual questionnaire to identify related interests and persons.

There have been no transactions since the beginning of fiscal year 2020 which were determined by the Executive Compensation Committee to be with related persons required to be disclosed pursuant to SEC regulations.

88

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS

   

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, and the rules of the SEC require our directors and executive officers as well as persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock to file reports of their ownership and changes in ownership of common stock with the SEC. For our directors and executive officers, our personnel generally prepare and file these reports on the basis of information obtained from each director and officer and

pursuant to a power of attorney. Based solely on a review of such reports furnished to the Company during fiscal year 2020, and written representations received from our directors and officers, no director, officer or beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common stock failed to file on a timely basis during fiscal year 2020 the reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, except the following:

•  Due to an administrative oversight on the part of the Company, a Form 3 for each of Hilary Hageman and Laurent Eskenazi was filed late during fiscal year 2020;

•   Due to an administrative oversight on the part of the Company, a Form 4 for Laurent Eskenazi was filed late during fiscal year 2020;

•   Due to an administrative oversight on the part of the Company, an amended Form 4 for each of Mark Harrison, Grace Lee and Rhys Williams was filed during fiscal year 2020 with respect to unintentionally omitted RSU grants from each original Form 4; and

•   Due to an administrative oversight on the part of the Company, an amended Form 4 for each of Anshooman Aga, Matthew Cole, James Edwards, Bradley Feldmann, Janice Hamby, Mark Harrison, Michael Knowles, Steven Norris, Michael Twyman and Rhys Williams was filed during fiscal year 2020 with respect to unintentionally omitted shares withheld to satisfy tax obligations from each original Form 4.

89


PROPOSAL 3 RATIFICATION OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

   

Ernst & Young LLP has audited the Company’s books and records since 1959. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Audit and Compliance Committee selects the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm each year and has approved the continuation of Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal year 2021. In certain years the selection includes a formal competitive proposal process. This competitive proposal process was most recently completed for the selection of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020. During this competitive proposal process, the Committee invited one international public accounting firm to participate in this process in addition to the incumbent, Ernst & Young LLP. As a result of an extensive review

process, the Committee approved the continuation of Ernst & Young LLP for fiscal year 2020. The Board is seeking your confirmation of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accountants for fiscal year 2021. Our organizational documents do not require that our shareholders confirm the selection of our independent auditors. We are doing so because we believe it is a matter of good corporate practice.

If our shareholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit and Compliance Committee will investigate the reasons for rejection and reconsider whether or not to retain Ernst & Young LLP, but still may retain them. Even if the selection is confirmed, the Audit and Compliance Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us by Ernst & Young LLP, our independent auditor, for fiscal year 2020 and 2019:

Services Rendered

Fiscal Years Ended September 30,

2020

2019

Audit fees(1)

$2,662,000

$3,648,000

Audit-related fees(2)

$72,000

$138,000

Tax fees(3)

$350,000

$115,000

All other fees(4)

$7,000

$7,000

Total fees

$3,091,000

$3,908,000

(1)      For professional services rendered for the audits of our fiscal year 2020 and 2019 annual financial statements, the reviews of our financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, statutory audits of foreign subsidiaries, consultation on accounting matters during fiscal years 2020 and 2019. The audit fees for fiscal year 2020 are estimated. The final amount of the fees for those services may vary from the estimate provided.

(2)      These fees included due diligence procedures

(3)      These fees were primarily related to consulting in response to U.S. tax reform and foreign compliance and consulting.

(4)      These fees were for online services provided by Ernst & Young LLP.

 

Voting Recommendation

P The Board unanimously recommends that you vote FOR this Proposal 3.

   

90

Other Matters

The Audit and Compliance Committee has adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP. The policy generally requires pre-approval of specified services in the defined categories of audit services, audit-related services, and tax services, up to specified amounts. Pre-approval may also be given as part of the Committee’s approval of the scope of the engagement of the independent auditor or on an individual explicit case-by-case basis before the independent auditor is engaged to provide each service. The pre-approval of services may be delegated to one or more of the Committee’s members, but the decision must be reported to the full Committee at its next scheduled meeting. During fiscal years 2020 and 2019 the Committee did not waive any requirement for pre-approval of any services by Ernst & Young LLP. The Committee approved all auditor services and fees as required by laws in effect at the time the services were commenced.

91


DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION
OF SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS

   

Proposals of shareholders intended to be included in the Company’s proxy statement and form of proxy relating to the 2022 Annual Meeting must be received by the Corporate Secretary, Cubic Corporation, 9233 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, California 92123, no later than December 3, 2021, unless the date of the 2022 Annual Meeting is changed by more than 30 days from the anniversary of the Company’s 2021 annual meeting, in which case the deadline for such proposals will be a reasonable time before the Company begins to print and send its proxy materials. These proposals must comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC for such proposals in order to be included in the proxy statement.

The Company’s bylaws set forth certain procedures which shareholders must follow in order to nominate a director or present any other business at an annual shareholders’ meeting. Generally, a shareholder must

give timely notice to the Corporate Secretary of the Company. To be timely, such notice must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than one hundred 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting (i.e., not earlier than December 14, 2021 and not later than January 13, 2022 for the 2022 annual meeting of shareholders), provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice must be received not earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the 90th day prior to such annual meeting, or, if later, the 10th day following the day on which public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting was first made. The bylaws specify the requirements as to form and substance of such shareholder notice. Details of such provisions of the bylaws may be obtained by any shareholder from the Corporate Secretary of the Company.

92


ANNUAL REPORT

   

The Company’s Annual Report for fiscal year 2020 will be sent to shareholders of record on or about April 2, 2021. The Annual Report does not constitute, and should not be considered, a part of this proxy solicitation material.

Any person who was a beneficial owner of the Company’s common stock on the record date may request a copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2020, and it will be furnished

without charge upon receipt of a written request identifying the person so requesting a report as a shareholder of the Company at such date. Requests should be directed to:

 

 

Cubic Corporation
9
233 Balboa Avenue
San Diego, California 92123
Attention: Corporate Secretary


SHAREHOLDERS SHARING
THE SAME ADDRESS

   

The rules promulgated by the SEC permit companies, brokers, banks or other intermediaries to deliver a single copy of a proxy statement, Annual Report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, to households at which two or more shareholders reside, unless one or more of the shareholders has provided instructions to the contrary. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and postage costs as well as natural resources. Shareholders sharing an address who have been previously notified by their broker, bank or other intermediary and have consented to householding will receive only one copy of the Company’s proxy statement, Annual Report and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable. If you would like to opt out of this practice for future mailings and receive separate proxy statements, Annual Reports and Notices of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for each shareholder sharing the same address, please contact your broker, bank or other intermediary. You may also obtain a separate proxy statement, Annual Report or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials without charge by sending a written request to Cubic Corporation, 9233 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, California 92123, Attention: Corporate Secretary or by calling 858-277-6780. The Company will promptly send additional copies of the proxy statement, Annual Report and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, as applicable, upon receipt of such request. Shareholders sharing an address that are receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement, Annual Report and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials can request delivery of a single copy of each of the proxy statement Annual Report and Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials by contacting their broker, bank or other intermediary or sending a written request to Cubic Corporation at the address above.

93


OTHER MATTERS

   

The expense of preparing, printing and mailing the proxy materials and all other expenses of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Company. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mails, the directors, officers and regular employees of the Company, who will receive no compensation in addition to their regular salary, if any, may solicit proxies by email, by telephone or in person. The Company has also retained Morrow Sodali LLC to assist in the solicitation and distribution of proxies at an estimated cost of $20,000 plus reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. The Company will also reimburse brokerage firms, banks, trustees, nominees and other persons for their expenses in forwarding proxy material to the beneficial owners of shares held by them of record.

Management knows of no business which will be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than that stated in the Notice of Annual Meeting. However, if any such matter shall properly come before the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed proxy form will vote the same in accordance with their best judgment.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Hilary L. Hageman
Corporate Secretary

April 2, 2021

94

 

Cubic Corporation
9233 Balboa Avenue
San Diego, California 92123                www.cubic.com

 

CUBIC CORPORATION This proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors Annual Meeting of Shareholders April 13, 2021 at 8:00 a.m. Pacific Time The undersigned hereby appoints Bradley H. Feldmann and Anshooman Aga, and each of them, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact, with full power to act without the other and with full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this card, all the shares of common stock of Cubic Corporation of which the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held virtually, via live webcast, on April 13, 2021 (including any adjournment or postponement thereof, the “Annual Meeting”). This proxy, when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned shareholder. On proposals for which you do not specify a choice, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors; therefore if no direction is made, this proxy will be voted FOR all of Cubic Corporation’s director nominees in Proposal 1 and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. IF VOTING BY MAIL, PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY, USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. The undersigned acknowledges receipt with this proxy of a copy of the Notice of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and the Proxy Statement of Cubic Corporation. By executing this Proxy, the undersigned hereby revokes all prior proxies that the undersigned has given with respect to the Annual Meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Continued and to be signed on reverse side SEE REVERSE SIDETO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH HERE, SIGN AND DATE PROXY CARD, AND RETURN IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvoting.com/CUB The Annual Meeting will be held in virtual format only at www.cesonlineservices.com/cub21_vm

 

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends you vote “FOR” the following: Proposal 1: Election of nine directors to hold office or a one-year term or until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified Nominees 01. Prithviraj Banerjee, 02. Bruce G. Blakley, 03. Maureen Breakiron-Evans, 04. Denise L. Devine, 05. Bradley H. Feldmann, 06. Carolyn A. Flowers, 07. Janice M. Hamby, 08. David F. Melcher, 09. Steven J. Norris FOR ALL WITHHOLD ALLFOR ALL EXCEPT INSTRUCTIONS: To vote against an individual nominee, mark the “FOR ALL EXCEPT” box and write the name(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below: The Board of Directors unanimously recommends you vote “FOR” proposals 2 and 3: Please mark vote as indicated in this example Proposal 2: Approval, on an advisory, non-binding basis, of the Company’s named executive office compensation Proposal 3: Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2021 NOTE: The proxies are authorized to vote, in their discretion, upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, to the extent permitted by Rule 14a-4(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Date (Signature) (Signature if held jointly) Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. TO VOTE BY MAIL, PLEASE DETACH HERE, SIGN AND DATE PROXY CARD, AND RETURN IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED TO AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY BY INTERNET OR TELEPHONE QUICK EASY IMMEDIATE Your internet or telephone proxy authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY BY INTERNET: THE WEB ADDRESS IS ww.proxyvoting.com/CUB. You will be asked to enter a CONTROL NUMBER which is located in the lower right hand corner of this form. AUTHORIZE YOUR PROXY BY PHONE: You will be asked to enter a CONTROL NUMBER which is located in the lower right hand corner of this form. OPTION A: You are encouraged to review each proposal and select a voting choice before you submit your proxy. Please press 0 in order to vote on each proposal separately. OPTION B: If you prefer not to select a voting choice with respect to each proposal you may press 1 to submit a proxy. If you select this option, your shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations made by the Board of Directors. Internet and Telephone voting is available through 11:59 P.M.Eastern Time on April 12, 2021. CONTROL NUMBER for Internet/Telephone Proxy Authorization

 

Cubic (NYSE:CUB)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Avr 2024 à Mai 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse Cubic
Cubic (NYSE:CUB)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mai 2023 à Mai 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse Cubic