AAGH America Great Health (CE)

Item 4.01.  Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

In April, 2019, America Great Health (the “Company”) was notified of the resignation of its independent registered public accounting firm, MJF & Associates, APC (“MJF”), effective that date. The Company’s Board of Directors accepted the resignation of MJF upon receipt of the notification and has commenced a search for a new independent public accounting firm.

No report of MJF on the financial statements of the Company’s fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 contained an adverse opinion or a disclaimer of opinion or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles, except that the audit report on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 contained an uncertainty about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

MJF at the time of resignation had not been engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, or released a report or opinion regarding the Company’s financial statements, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. During the time of their engagement and up through their resignation on, there were no disagreements with MJF on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope and procedures which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of MJF, would have caused MJF to make reference to the matter in their report. There were no reportable events (as that term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K) during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, except as noted in the following paragraph.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, there were the following “reportable events” (as such term is defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K). As disclosed in Part II, Item 9A of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the Company’s management determined that the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were not effective as of the end of such period due to the existence of material weaknesses related to the following:

1.  We identified material weaknesses in our ICFR primarily attributable to (i) lack of segregation of incompatible duties; and (ii) insufficient Board of Directors representation. These weaknesses are due to our inadequate staffing during the period covered by this report and our lack of working capital to hire additional staff. Management has retained an outside, independent financial consultant to record and review all financial data, as well as prepare our financial reports, in order to mitigate this weakness. Although management will periodically re-evaluate this situation, at this point it considers that the risk associated with such lack of segregation of duties and the potential benefits of adding employees to segregate such duties are not cost justified. We intend to hire additional accounting personnel to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow.

These material weaknesses have not been remediated as of the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K..

The Company has provided a copy of the foregoing disclosures to MJF and requested that MJF furnish it with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating whether MJF agrees with the above statements. A copy of MJF’s letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated May 8, 2020, is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to this Form 8-K.

On April 30, 2020, the Company engaged TAAD LLC (“TAAD”) as our independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2020.

During each of the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and through the date of this report, (a) the Company has not engaged TAAD as either the principal accountant to audit the Company’s financial statements, or as an independent accountant to audit a significant subsidiary of the Company and on whom the principal accountant is expected to express reliance in its report; and (b) the Company or someone on its behalf did not consult TAAD with respect to (i) either: the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, or (ii) any other matter that was either the subject of a disagreement or a reportable event as set forth in Items 304(a)(1)(iv) and (v) of Regulation S-K.