Rx Investor Value Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“RIVC”),
was established by its two shareholders and officers, Jeffrey T. Holtmeier and Rob Smyjunas, to invest additional growth capital
into HealthWarehouse.com (“HEWA”). RIVC is the holder of 1,100 shares of HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. (OTC:
HEWA). Mr. Holtmeier is the owner of record of 19,900 shares of HEWA and Mr. Smyjunas is the owner of record of 225,300 shares
in addition to their holdings owned through RIVC. RIVC is a member of a group that reports beneficial ownership on a Schedule
13D filed with the SEC of 19,062,600 shares, approximately 40% of HEWA’s outstanding common shares, assuming
the exercise of warrants which have not been exercised. RIVC is nominating four highly qualified director candidates for election
to HEWA’s board at its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on September 2, 2016. We are sending you the attached proxy
statement and the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card to solicit your proxy to elect our director candidates.
RIVC believes that HEWA needs new and more active leadership
at the board level to improve the company’s financial performance, growth profile, balance sheet and ultimately the company’s
lagging stock performance. The current directors have had a number of years to make the necessary changes to improve the company’s
performance.
Our four director candidates are Jeffrey T. Holtmeier, Mark
Scott, Brian A. Ross and Dr. Stephen J. Weiss. They are experienced operators and directors and bring a wealth of experience and
a track-record of performance in healthcare, digital commerce and corporate finance. Their individual backgrounds are more fully
described in the attached proxy statement.
IF YOU HAVE ALREADY PROVIDED THE COMPANY WITH AN EXECUTED
WHITE PROXY CARD, YOU MAY REVOKE IT BY EXECUTING A LATER-DATED BLUE PROXY CARD AND SENDING IT TO US IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID
ENVELOPE (OR, IF YOU HOLD YOUR SHARES THROUGH A BANK, BROKER OR OTHER NOMINEE, BY SENDING A LATER DATED BLUE VOTING INSTRUCTION
CARD TO THAT ENTITY). YOU MAY ALSO REVOKE A BLUE PROXY CARD BY SUBMITTING A LATER DATED PROXY CARD TO THE COMPANY.
IF YOU WISH TO VOTE BY INTERNET, PLEASE ACCESS
www.okapivote.com/hewa
.
SEE THE BACK COVER PAGE OF THIS PROXY STATEMENT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION ON HOW TO VOTE YOUR HEWA SHARES.
Important Notice Regarding the Internet
Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting
This Proxy
Statement and our BLUE proxy card are available at
http://www.okapivote.com/healthwarehouse
Questions and Answers Relating to
this Proxy Solicitation
What are you asking HEWA’s shareholders
to do?
We are asking for your support for the election to HEWA’s
board of directors of our four director candidates, Jeffrey T. Holtmeier, Mark Scott, Brian A. Ross and Dr. Stephen J. Weiss. (One
additional director may be elected by the holders of the company’s Series B preferred stock.
Our reasons are simple. We believe that a change in leadership
is long overdue:
The company has underperformed for five consecutive years.
|
·
|
The stock price has dropped from a closing high of $7.74 on June 5,
2012 to its current August 11, 2016 close of $0.47. This is a 94% decline.
|
|
·
|
The company is positioned to grow exponentially by disrupting the
distribution of generic prescriptions; instead, revenue has declined by over 30% over the past five years.
|
|
·
|
During these five years, the company has not had the financial resources
to operate beyond a twelve month horizon. This financial stress inhibits focusing on operations and growth.
|
|
·
|
The company has defaulted under its senior credit facility for the
non-payment of it vendors. A legal advisor has sued the company for almost $1 million for past due fees.
|
|
·
|
Despite the company’s
performance, the board has recently increased the CEO’s salary and guaranteed a bonus.
|
|
·
|
The board has increased its director pay from $1,000 to $3,000 of
monthly cash compensation in spite of the company’s dismal performance and the company having only $2,199 of cash on hand,
as stated in the 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016.
|
Our plan is to:
|
·
|
Infuse
capital into the company to settle vendor claims and to finance future growth. We propose
to infuse capital by causing the company to pursue any combination of the following:
term bank financing, private and/or public offerings of the company’s equity securities,
debt securities or securities convertible into equity securities to accredited investors.
RIVC has no commitments with respect to any such capital infusion or financing at
this time and offerings of equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities
will likely have dilutive effects on company shareholders.
|
|
·
|
Implement a growth strategy which understands consumer buying preferences,
educates consumers about the company’s value proposition and which fulfills all generic prescriptions of the consumer.
|
|
·
|
Hold management accountable for performance metrics which create shareholder
value and only paying bonuses for results that meet or exceed these metrics.
|
|
·
|
Align director compensation with growth and shareholder creation.
|
Our director candidates have the experience and skill to execute
this plan:
|
·
|
Mr. Holtmeier is a serial entrepreneur who has rapidly grown digital
marketing, telecommunications and technologies companies. He is an experienced director of both public and private companies.
|
|
·
|
Mr. Scott is a licensed pharmacist, and a successful entrepreneur
in both the mail order/on-line pharmacy industry and the call center industry. He owns 4,480,861 shares of common stock of the
company, including warrants to purchase l,333,334 shares of common stock.
|
|
·
|
Mr. Ross is experienced as both a public company CFO, COO and director.
|
|
·
|
Dr. Weiss has founded and grown an on-line pharmacy. He is also an
accomplished real estate investor. He owns 670,000 of common stock of the company with the right to purchase an additional 350,000
shares.
|
Who are RIVC’s director candidates?
Jeffrey T. Holtmeier, Mark Scott, Brian A. Ross and Dr. Stephen
J. Weiss are highly qualified individuals with significant business experience. The principal occupation and business experience
of each of these candidates is described in this proxy statement in the section titled “Our Director Candidates.” We
believe that each of our director candidates will be considered independent under the listing standards of the OTC. None of our
director candidates is affiliated with HEWA or any of its subsidiaries. If elected to HEWA’s board of directors, our director
candidates will owe fiduciary duties to all of HEWA’s shareholders.
Who can provide a proxy?
If you are a record holder of HEWA shares as of the close of
business on the record date for the annual meeting, which is July 29, 2016, you have the right to vote in person or by proxy on
the election of directors and any other matters that may properly come before the annual meeting. If you are a record holder of
HEWA shares at the close of business on the record date, you will retain your right to vote or provide a proxy even if you sell
your HEWA shares after the record date.
How do I provide a proxy?
We urge you to either complete, sign, date and return in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card to elect our director candidates or vote by internet in the
manner described below. You do not need to mail in your proxy card if you vote by internet. You will not be able to vote for our
director candidates by returning a proxy card that is provided by HEWA. If you hold HEWA shares through a bank, broker or other
nominee, you must provide voting instructions to that entity. If you have not received a
BLUE
voting instruction card from
your bank, broker or other nominee, you should immediately contact the person responsible for your account to obtain a
BLUE
voting instruction card.
If you have already provided HEWA with an executed proxy, you
may revoke that proxy by executing a later dated
BLUE
proxy card and sending it to us in the enclosed postage-paid envelope
(or, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, by returning a later dated
BLUE
voting instruction
card to that entity). We urge you not to sign or return any proxy card provided by HEWA. You do not need to (and should not) vote
“withhold” on HEWA’s proxy card to vote for our director candidates. You should not vote on any other matter
by returning HEWA’s proxy card. See the back cover page of this proxy statement for further information on how to vote your
HEWA shares.
Can I vote by telephone or Internet?
If you hold your shares in registered form, information should
be included with this proxy statement providing you instructions on how to vote by telephone or the internet.
If you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee,
information may be included with this proxy statement from that entity providing you instructions on how to vote by telephone or
the internet. Many banks and brokerage firms participate in a program that allows eligible shareholders to vote by telephone or
the internet. If your bank or brokerage firm participates in the telephone or internet voting program, then the bank or brokerage
firm will provide you with instructions for voting by telephone or the internet on the voting form that it provides to you. Telephone
and internet voting procedures, if available through your bank or brokerage firm, are designed to authenticate your identity and
allow you to give your voting instructions and confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded.
If you have any questions or require any assistance with providing
your proxy or any other matters, please contact Okapi Partners LLC, our proxy advisor, at (877) 259-6290.
What is the deadline for providing a
proxy?
We urge you to submit your proxy to us as soon as possible.
For your proxy to be voted at the annual meeting, we must receive it on or prior to the date of the annual meeting. The annual
meeting is scheduled to occur on September 2, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. (EDT) at the offices of HealthWarehouse.com, Inc., 7107 Industrial
Road, Florence, Kentucky 41042.
Who is making this proxy solicitation?
This proxy solicitation is being made by RX Investor
Value Corporation. We believe RIVC, together with other investors who are reporting as a group as described in RIVC’s
Schedule 13D filing made with the SEC on August 2, 2016, represents the largest single beneficial ownership group of
shareholders consisting of approximately 40% of the outstanding shares as of August 2, 2016, assuming the exercise
of warrants which have not yet been exercised, and represents approximately 30% of the outstanding HEWA
shares entitled to vote (aggregating to 48,203,192 votes) as reported by the company in its definitive proxy materials
filed as of August 3, 2016. RIVC owns 1,100 shares of common stock of HEWA as record owner and RIVC’s officers Jeffrey
T. Holtmeier and Rob Smyjunas own 19,900 and 225,300 shares respectively. Mr. Holtmeier is one of our director
candidates.
Why is RIVC making this proxy solicitation?
RIVC believes that HEWA needs new and more active leadership
at the board level to improve the company’s financial performance, operating strategy, growth profile and ultimately the
company’s lagging performance. The company’s stock price has languished as a penny stock now for four years. Revenue
has declined 32% from $10.4 million in 2011 to $7.0 million as reported in the Annual Report for the fiscal year ended 2015. Since
December 31, 2011 the company has not been able to secure adequate financing such that it can assure employees, vendors, customers
and investors that it can continue operating as a going concern. We have significant concerns about this performance, but believe
that there is tremendous opportunity for improvement at the company through new leadership. We believe this leadership must be
in the form of a new, engaged directors, who will hold management accountable to a higher standard of performance.
How many proxies must be received for
RIVC’s director candidates to be elected?
Under HEWA’s by-laws, common shareholders are
entitled to one vote for each share held by them on each matter coming before the annual meeting. Each Series B preferred share
is entitled to 11.66 votes. HEWA directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at a meeting of shareholders at which
a quorum is present, and cumulative voting is not permitted. The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of
HEWA’s outstanding shares will constitute a quorum. HEWA is proposing that four directors be elected at the annual meeting
for the available four board seats. Therefore, at the annual meeting, assuming a quorum is present, the four director nominees
receiving the highest number of votes, whether cast in person or by proxy, will be elected to the HEWA board. Because the four
director candidates receiving the highest number of votes will be elected to HEWA’s board, every vote is important. We urge
you to complete, sign, date and return in the enclosed postage-paid envelope the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card to elect our
director candidates.
Can I revoke a proxy that I already provided
to the company?
We urge you not to sign or return any
white proxy card or revocation card that may be sent to you by the company and to return only the
BLUE
proxy card. If you
have already provided the company with an executed white proxy card or revocation card, you may revoke that document by executing
a later-dated
BLUE
proxy card and sending it to us in the enclosed postage-paid envelope (or, if you hold your shares through
a bank, broker or other nominee, by returning a later dated
BLUE
voting instruction card to that entity voting instructions
included with our
BLUE
proxy card). If you wish to revoke a proxy provided to the company, please send a copy of the revocation
to Okapi Partners at the fax number included on the back cover page of this proxy statement so that we will be aware of all revocations
and can attempt to ensure they are honored. If you wish to revoke a
BLUE
proxy card provided to us you may send a later
dated proxy card to the company.
How do I vote on the other matters being
presented by HEWA for vote at the annual meeting?
You can vote on all matters to be presented at the annual meeting
on RIVC’s
BLUE
proxy card. We urge you not to return any proxy card provided by HEWA so as not to revoke our
BLUE
proxy card. Only the latest dated proxy card will be counted at the annual meeting.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or
represented by proxy at the meeting or entitled to vote is required to approve HEWA’s executive compensation (say-on-pay)
proposal. Due to the company’s declining financial performance, RIVC will vote its HEWA shares, and recommends that you vote
your HEWA shares, “AGAINST” the company’s say-on-pay proposal. If you indicate your vote with respect to this
proposal on our
BLUE
proxy card, we will vote your shares as instructed. If you do not specify a choice with respect to
this proposal on our
BLUE
proxy card, we will vote your shares “AGAINST” this proposal.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or
represented by proxy at the meeting or entitled to vote is required to ratify the appointment of Marcum LLP as HEWA’s independent
auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. RIVC will vote its shares “AGAINST” the company’s auditor
ratification proposal due to what it believes are excessively high audit fees, which are disclosed in HEWA’s annual proxy
statements. If you indicate your vote with respect to this
proposal on our
BLUE
proxy card, we will vote your shares as instructed. If you do not specify a choice with respect to
this proposal on our
BLUE
proxy card, we will vote your shares “AGAINST” with respect to this proposal.
Abstentions and proxies marked “withhold” for the
election of directors, will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business,
but will not be counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast with respect to a proposal. If your HEWA shares are
held in the name of a brokerage firm and the brokerage firm has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the
shares with respect to a proposal that is not a routine matter, the brokerage firm cannot vote the shares on that proposal. This
is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Under the rules and interpretations of the New York Stock Exchange, there are
no “routine” proposals in a contested proxy solicitation. Because RIVC has initiated a contested proxy solicitation,
there will be no “routine” matters at the annual meeting for any broker accounts that are provided with proxy materials
by RIVC.
We urge you
NOT
to return any proxy card provided
by HEWA. To support RIVC, you should return our
BLUE
proxy card and discard any proxy card you receive from HEWA. You do
not need to (and should not) vote “withhold” on HEWA’s proxy card to vote for our director candidates. You should
not attempt to vote for any of our director candidates, or on any other matter, by returning HEWA’s proxy card. If you have
already provided HEWA with an executed proxy, you may revoke it by executing a later dated
BLUE
proxy card and sending
it to us in the enclosed postage-paid envelope (or, if you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, by sending
a later dated
BLUE
voting instruction card to that entity). A shareholder may also revoke a BLUE proxy card provided
to us by submitting a later dated proxy card to HEWA.
Who should I call if I have any questions?
If you have any questions, require any assistance in voting
your HEWA shares, need any additional copies of our proxy materials, or have any other questions, please call Okapi Partners, our
proxy advisor, at (877) 259-6290.
Background to the Solicitation
The company has been operating in a sub-standard manner for
many years. The current board has had ample to time to reverse this course but has taken insufficient action. Due to its substandard
financial performance and related inability to raise sufficient capital, the company’s Form 10-K has disclosed that it may
not be able to operate as a going concern for the past five years.
Excerpt from Footnote #2: Form 10-K dated Dec 31, 2011
“As of December 31, 2011, the Company had negligible cash
and a working capital deficiency of $2,404,464. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company generated revenues
of $10,363,293, however and incurred a net loss of $5,712,199. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company
generated $2,285,905 in net cash from financing activities, however, the Company used net cash in operating and investing
activities of $2,799,580, and $883,868, respectively. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern.”
Excerpt from Footnote #2: Form 10-K dated Dec 31, 2012
“As of December 31, 2012, the Company had a working capital
deficiency of $8,395,171 and an accumulated deficit of $20,828,674. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company
incurred a net loss of $5,574,775 and used cash in operating activities of $947,911. These conditions raise substantial doubt about
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
Excerpt from Footnote #2: Form 10-K dated Dec 31, 2013
“As of December 31, 2013, the Company had a working capital
deficiency of $4,533,555 and an accumulated deficit of $28,130,668. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company
incurred net losses of $5,489,892 and $5,574,775, respectively and used cash in operating activities of $1,024,781 and $947,911,
respectively. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
Excerpt from Footnote #2: Form 10-K dated Dec 31, 2014
“As of December 31, 2014, the Company had a working capital
deficiency of $4,237,165 and an accumulated deficit of $30,212,865. During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company
incurred net losses of $1,783,279 and $5,489,892, respectively and used cash in operating activities of $875,769 and $1,024,781,
respectively. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
Excerpt from Footnote #2: Form 10-K dated Dec 31, 2015
“As of December 31, 2015, the Company had a working capital
deficiency of $4,377,000 and an accumulated deficit of $31,159,401. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company
incurred net losses of $626,682 and $1,783,279, respectively and used cash in operating activities of $548,281 and $875,769, respectively.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
Indicative of the company’s inability to manage its financial
affairs and loss of vendor confidence, the company disclosed in its Form 8-K dated May 24, 2016 that Taft Stettinius & Hollister,
LLP has filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas for Hamilton County, Ohio for payment of $936,777 for past due legal services.
Contributing to the company’s poor financial condition
is its declining revenue. Over the past five years, revenue has declined from a high of $11,081,429 in 2012 to $7,018,137 in 2015.
Over this same time period the U.S. Department of Commerce reports that ecommerce continues to grow at approximately 15% per year.
Also, as the company has disclosed in its Form 8-K dated May
31, 2016, $212 billion of prescription brands have gone generic from 2009 to 2015. As the only Verified Internet Pharmacy Practice
Site (VIPPS) licensed in all 50 states, we believe the environment has been very conducive for HEWA to grow and take market share.
Instead the company has shrunk by over 30%.
Source:
HEWA Form 10-K filings
A consequence of declining financial performance and an inability
to address its working capital deficiencies has been a severe decline share price to where it currently trades well below $1.00
per share. As the chart for HEWA below illustrates, the share price once closed at a high of $7.74 in 2012 but since 2013 it has
traded below $2.00. As of August 5, 2016, the last business day before it announced that it would engage a financial advisor to
explore strategic alternatives, HEWA’s share price closed at $0.38. As of August 11, 2016, HEWA’s share price closed
at $0.47.
Source: http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/hewa/historical
Why We Are Soliciting Proxies
Reasons for the Solicitation
We are soliciting your proxy to elect our four director candidates
to the HEWA board of directors in an effort to solidify the company’s balance sheet so that the company can operate without
concern that it will not be able to finance its operations and thus enable the company to implement a plan of accelerating revenue
growth and improving financial performance. This in turn will lead to increased returns for all shareholders. We believe that five
years is more than a sufficient amount of time to reverse the company’s performance and begin to capitalize on its unique
market position.
We believe that the only way for the company to capitalize on
its unique market position is through new leadership. We believe this leadership must be in the form of a new and more active board
of directors who hold management accountable. We believe the HEWA board should be more actively involved in establishing and implementing
new policies and practices in these areas. We believe these changes will result in improved company performance and improved returns
for shareholders.
The following is a summary of the reasons why we believe that
change is necessary to achieve better results at HEWA.
1. We believe that HEWA’s stock
has greatly underperformed.
As we noted above, a stock price which has decreased from $7.74
to less than $2.00 and has remained below $2.00 for over three years, is unacceptable performance.
New leadership through a new board, an effective operating strategy
and fresh capital to fund both growth and the company’s working capital deficiency are required in order for sustained stock
price appreciation.
2. We believe that HEWA’s financial
performance has been subpar, and it has not capitalized on the explosive growth of new generic drugs and its unique position as
the only licensed VIPPS in all 50 states.
Revenue has declined 32% from $10.4 million in 2011 to $7.0
million in 2015. Revenues have increased from the period low, $6.1 million in 2014, to $7.0 million in 2015 on the fortuitous recognition
in a
Consumer Reports
publication. Although beneficial, this is not a sustainable growth strategy.
The company needs a sustainable and effective growth strategy
that educates potential new customers of the company’s value proposition, and capital to fund it. The company should be both
accelerating the growth of new customers as well as increasing their average spend.
3. HEWA has a serious working capital
deficiency and one of its legal advisors is suing for payment. The company does not have sufficient liquidity to assure continued
operations.
As of December 31, 2015, the company had a working capital deficiency
of $4,377,000 and does not have the finances to address this. Taft Stettinius & Hollister, LLP has filed suit in the Court
of Common Pleas for Hamilton County, Ohio for payment of $936,777 for past due legal services. This financial condition distracts
the company from improving operations and likely has contributed to the poor operating performance by creating doubt amongst customers,
vendors and creditors about HEWA’s viability. It is also paying high rates of interest and distributing equity because it
cannot secure appropriate financing.
The company needs new permanent capital with which it can eliminate
its working capital deficiency and with which it can fund revenue growth.
4. The current senior lender has
accumulated a significant number of HEWA securities.
As noted in the company’s most recent Form 10-K filing
with the SEC, Tim Reilly / Melrose Capital Advisors has been the senior lender since 2013 and has accumulated 1,875,000 warrants
of common stock over this time, an egregious amount that has diluted the shareholders.
Below is a breakdown of the warrants received by the senior
lender Melrose Capital Advisors controlled by Tim Reilly:
On March 18, 2013 the board granted Melrose warrants to purchase
750,000 shares at a purchase price of $0.35 per share. The lender later exercised the warrants on April 1, 2013 in a “cashless”
transaction, and received 573,826 shares of Common Stock.
On September 30, 2013 the board granted the lender warrants
to purchase 150,000 shares at a purchase price of $0.35 per share.
On November 11, 2015 the board reset the lender’s purchase
price to $0.12 per share.
On March 28, 2014 the board granted the lender warrants to purchase
150,000 shares at a purchase price of $0.35 per share.
On November 11, 2015 the board reset the lender’s purchase price
to $0.12 per share.
On April 29, 2014 the board granted the lender warrants to purchase
75,000 shares at a purchase price of $0.35 per share.
On November 11, 2015 the board reset the lender’s purchase price
to $0.12 per share.
On March 1, 2015 the board granted the lender warrants to purchase
500,000 shares at a purchase price of $0.10 per share.
On November 11, 2015 the board granted the lender warrants to
purchase 250,000 shares at a purchase price of $0.12 per share.
On July 28, 2016, the board of directors approved and issued
2,253,528 shares of common stock to Dellave Holdings, LLC, of which Tim Reilly is the Managing Member, in exchange for the extinguishment
of approximately $700,000 of accounts payable held by Dellave Holdings.
Note
: This action took place one day before the record
date for shareholders to be included in the upcoming September 2, 2016 meeting.
The past record and continued actions by the board of directors
could not be more clear to us: Provide favorable terms and arrangements to Tim Reilly.
Not only has the board of directors relentlessly issued shares
to the senior lender, they also granted the lender a “Control of Accounts” mechanism. This action was approved by the
board on October 22, 2015 and allows the lender to dictate the company’s bank to “comply with all instructions it receives
from Lender directing disposition of funds in the Accounts without further consent of Borrower.” This act can be triggered
if the company is in default.
5. The board has increased CEO compensation.
Despite HEWA’s poor performance and falling short of it
potential, the same CEO has led the company. In addition to not holding the CEO responsible for result, the board has permitted
the CEO to commute to the Company’s headquarters.
The company disclosed that it had increased the CEO’s
salary and is providing an annual target bonus of up to 100% of base salary under the annual bonus program for senior management
of the company, which bonus is payable 50% in cash and 50% in stock options, provided that for calendar years 2016 and 2017, Mr.
Dhadphale will earn a minimum bonus of 30% of base salary. The company’s proxy statement (page 16) reports that, “[e]ffective
May 14, 2014, Mr. Dhadphale began to receive an annual salary of $150,000, which equated to $100,000 for the last eight months
of 2014.” HEWA’s proxy materials describe the CEO’s salary and bonus in greater detail. His new contract
also provides for severance benefits of one year’s salary if the CEO leaves the company involuntarily.
We believe the board has acted irresponsibly in both increasing
the compensation and guarantying a performance bonus in light of the company’s tenuous financial condition and lack luster
performance.
6. We believe that HEWA’s corporate
governance and shareholder relations have been poor.
At times, the company has gone nearly an entire quarter without
informing shareholders of whether the company was pursuing other debt financing, as it sat in default month after month to the
shareholder’s dismay and concern. This is not proper management of a public company.
7. We believe that HEWA will benefit
from new and more active leadership at the board level.
We believe the concerns we have regarding HEWA’s financial
performance, squandered achievement of its potential, and poor governance and shareholder relations can be solved by electing a
new and more active board of directors that follows effective board practices. We believe it will take a board with solid credentials
that is actively involved in developing programs and practices for the board and the company and committed to the company in geographic
proximity, unlike the current CEO and board. When we say that our board nominees will actively lead HEWA in a new direction, we
mean that our nominees will meet more regularly than the current HEWA board, will be actively involved in creating a robust growth
strategy and cleaning up its balance sheet.
We also will hold senior management accountable for operating
performance. We will not guarantee bonuses and will require that management devote their full attention to the attending of the
company’s affairs. Given the company’s dismal performance, we find it completely unacceptable that the board has permitted
the CEO to be disconnected from day-to-day operations and live in Nevada. We will require senior management to reside and work
full-time in the greater Cincinnati area.
Concerning the chronic customer service issues the company faces,
HEWA's website currently states on its homepage that:
"Processing time for OTC products remains 1-3 business
days. Currently we're experiencing a surge in prescription medication order volume and are temporarily adding 2-4 extra
days to normal prescription processing times. As always, we will try to ship your order as quickly as possible."
This
routine message can no longer be an excuse for failing and detached management.
This issue can and will be fixed with qualified proper management
and capital allocation.
Our Plans for the Company
If we are successful in obtaining control of the HEWA board,
it would be our intent to take the following actions:
|
•
|
Elect a new chairman of the board and implement changes to improve the company’s board practices, corporate governance and shareholder relations;
|
|
•
|
Infuse new capital
into the company to strengthen its balance sheet and remove doubt about the company’s ability to operate as a going
concern. We propose to raise capital by causing the company to pursue any combination of the following: term bank financing,
public and/or private offerings of equity securities, debt securities or securities convertible into equity securities to
accredited investors. RIVC has no commitments with respect to any such capital infusion or financing at this time and offerings
of equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities will likely have dilutive effects on company shareholders;
|
|
•
|
Infuse additional capital to finance new customer and revenue growth;
|
|
•
|
Conduct an exhaustive review of the company’s SG&A and other expenses and implement cost-cutting measures where appropriate;
|
|
•
|
Undertake performance reviews for each senior executive of the company and review their performance against appropriate benchmarks; and
|
|
•
|
Attract new marketing and operations talent to the company.
|
Our Commitment to HEWA and its Shareholders
With your support, we are committed to replacing four of the
current members of the HEWA board with four experienced, capable and energetic director candidates. Our slate of highly qualified
directors has a track record of success in all areas that require attention. We are determined to effect positive change at HEWA,
and we expect to be held accountable to the shareholders to whom we will ultimately report. Our director candidates will be active
and responsible stewards of the trust placed in them by you and will be committed to obtaining positive results for all shareholders.
Every vote is critical, so please vote the
BLUE
proxy card and indicate to the current board that you believe the company
can do better.
Our Director Candidates
HEWA reports that its board of directors is currently comprised
of five directors. The shareholders nominate and vote for four shareholders. The owners of the Series B Convertible Preferred nominate
and elect one additional director. Under applicable law, each of our candidates, if elected, would hold office until HEWA’s next annual meeting
of shareholders and until such person’s successor has been elected or until such person’s death, resignation, retirement
or removal.
Under HEWA’s by-laws, shareholders are entitled to one
vote for each share held by them on each matter coming before the annual meeting. HEWA directors are elected by a plurality of
the votes cast at a meeting of shareholders at which a quorum is present, and cumulative voting is not permitted. The presence
in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of HEWA’s outstanding shares will constitute a quorum. HEWA is proposing
that four directors be elected at the annual meeting. Therefore, at the annual meeting, assuming a quorum is present, the four
director nominees receiving the highest number of votes, whether cast in person or by proxy, will be elected to the HEWA board.
If all of RIVC’s candidates are elected to the HEWA board,
this will result in these candidates controlling the board. RIVC, its affiliates and director candidates will vote their shares
in favor of our four director candidates. RIVC is not soliciting proxies to vote shares in favor of any of HEWA’s candidates.
To support RIVC, you should return only our
BLUE
proxy card and not vote HEWA’s proxy card or for any of their nominees.
Each of our director candidates has consented in writing to
be nominated as a director of HEWA, to being named as a director nominee in this proxy statement and to serve on HEWA’s board
of directors if elected or appointed to the board. At the annual meeting, we will nominate each of these director candidates for
election to HEWA’s board of directors.
Our Candidates
The following sets forth information about each of RIVC’s
director candidates. Included below is the name, age, present principal occupation, and other biographical and experience information
for each of our director candidates. We believe that each of our director candidates will be considered independent under applicable
listing standards.
Nominees
Jeffrey T. Holtmeier,
58 years old, is an entrepreneur
in technology and communications, with numerous companies founded, built and successfully sold or transitioned. Mr. Holtmeier is
currently the Chief Executive Officer and Founder of GENext, LLC, where Mr. Holtmeier has worked since February 2001. A holding
company, GENext controls assets including companies in China, the USA and Pakistan, and is unaffiliated with HEWA. He is a principal
and Chairman of Cinnova, a Pakistan-based digital media and software development company focused on leading edge web and mobile
applications. He has deep boardroom experience as a result of service on the Boards of Directors of a number of U.S. and Chinese
companies, both public and private is also currently a board member and a member of the audit and special committee at iSign Solutions
(ISGN), where he has served in various roles since August 2011.
Business address: 201 East Fifth Street Cincinnati, OH USA 45202.
Director qualifications: Mr. Holtmeier has experience on other
public company boards of directors, as an entrepreneur, and in mergers and acquisitions.
Other directorships: iSign Solutions, Inc. (OTC:ISGN)
Shareholding and dates acquired: 3,305 shares on August 13,
2015; 5 shares on August 18, 2015; 300 shares on August 21, 2015; and 16,390 shares on August 27, 2015, all through GENext LLC.
Holtmeier conveyed 100 shares to RIVC on April 26, 2016.
Brian Ross,
58 years old, is the Principal of Mid-Market
Growth Partners. Mr. Ross started the company in 2014 to provide consulting services and rigorous analytical tools to assist clients
in achieving their strategic objectives and to improve their financial results. In 2013, Mr. Ross founded AssuredMedPay, a healthcare
start-up focused upon streamlining the payment process for individual responsible claims of corporate sponsored medical plans.
Previously, Mr. Ross served as President (2010-2011) and President and CEO (2011-2012) of KnowledgeWorks, an educational non-profit
that provides innovative teaching pedagogies. Prior to joining KnowledgeWorks, Mr. Ross served both as the COO and CFO as part
of his 13-year tenure at Cincinnati Bell.
Business address: 4410 Carver Woods Drive, Suite 103, Blue Ash,
OH 45242
Director qualifications: Mr. Ross has experience as a financial
executive and director of public companies. He is also designated an “audit committee financial expert” as defined
by Regulation S-K Item 407.
Other directorships: Alaska Communications (NASDAQ: ALSK); Otelco,
Inc. (Nasdaq: OTEL), Journal Media Group, Inc. (NYSE: JMG), and until the sale in April 2016 of the company to Gannet Journal Media
Group, Inc. (NYSE: JMG).
Shareholding and dates acquired: none
Mark Scott
, 45 years old, is a licensed pharmacist, and
a successful entrepreneur in the both the mail order/on-line pharmacy and call center industries. Mark earned his Bsc (Pharm) from
the University of Manitoba in 1998. In 2002, Mark was a co-founder and President of Glenway Pharmacy, a mail order pharmacy
in Winnipeg, Canada. Mark also co-founded “Goodway Management and Call Center” a company that specialized in mail order
pharmaceutical sales to consumers. Mark also launched a near shore call center on the island of Barbados that also specialized
in mail order pharmacy retailing. In 2012, Mark co-founded KpiConnect, a call center company that has no relation to the pharmacy
industry.
Business address: 104 Falcon Ridge Drive, Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada R3Y1X6.
Director qualifications: Mr. Scott is a Pharmacist who also
has extensive experience in the business-to-consumer mail-order and online retailing of pharmaceuticals. His expertise in the call
center business is also a valuable asset to the customer service component required to acquire and maintain customers of HEWA.
Shareholding and dates acquired: Mr. Scott through Cormag Holdings,
Ltd. beneficially owns 4,480,861 shares of common stock of the company, including warrants to purchase l,333,334 shares of common
stock. Cormag Holdings is a Canadian corporation and Mr. Scott is the President, sole stockholder and director of Cormag and has
sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares owned by Cormag. Mr. Scott is a Canadian citizen. Mr. Scott acquired
2,666,668 shares and 1,333,334 warrants on August 21 2014.
Dr. Stephen J. Weiss
, 62 years old, graduated from the
University of Manitoba School of Dentistry in 1977. He established a dental practice upon graduation at the age of twenty-three
that grew to 30 employees and in the top 1% of dental practices in the city of Winnipeg, Manitoba. In December of 1978, he began
a tandem career in real estate investment and development in Scottsdale, Arizona and in 1998, with both businesses flourishing,
he and his family elected to pursue the real estate business on a full time basis, establishing full time residence in Scottsdale,
Arizona. Dr. Weiss’s real estate investments and developments are primarily focused in the Arizona market and secondarily
in the Las Vegas, Nevada and Lafayette, Colorado markets. Dr. Weiss became a US citizen in July of 2003.
Dr. Weiss was also one of the founders of Prescription Drugs
Canada, LLP, an online pharmacy based in Scottsdale, Arizona and Winnipeg, Manitoba to supply prescription drugs sourced in Canada
at affordable prices for American residents, that was ultimately sold. Dr. Weiss’s real estate ventures include land acquisition,
land syndications, residential land assembly, entitlement and sales to tract and custom homebuilders, shopping center development,
office/warehouse development for condominium unit sales and rental.
Business address: 10405 E. McDowell Mountain Ranch Road, Suite
250, Scottsdale, AZ 85255
Director qualifications: Mr. Weiss has experience in healthcare
and pharmaceutical industries, and has expertise in capital allocation and financial analysis.
Other directorships: none
Shareholding and dates acquired: 670,000 of common stock with
right to purchase an additional 350,000 shares, acquired August 15, 2014.
We recommend and urge you to vote FOR the election of our
director candidates by completing, signing, dating and returning in the enclosed postage-paid envelope the enclosed BLUE proxy
card. If you hold HEWA shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, you must provide voting instructions to that entity. If
you have not received a BLUE voting instruction card from your bank, broker or other nominee, you should immediately contact the
person responsible for your account to obtain a BLUE voting instruction card.
The information concerning the Company
contained in this proxy statement has been taken from, or is based upon, publicly available information.
Forward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement contains statements that are not historical
facts but are “forward-looking” in nature. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties
and other factors that may cause actual results or conditions to be materially different from any future results or conditions
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, such forward-looking statements may be identified by terminology
such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “expects,” “intends”
or “believes” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. Shareholders should not place undue reliance
on any such forward-looking statements.
Beneficial Ownership Reporting
RIVC and its director nominees acknowledge
the obligations under all federal securities laws and regulations, including, without limitation, Section 16 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to beneficial ownership reporting and take very seriously their obligations thereunder.
To the extent required by Section 16, RIVC and its director nominees are in the process of applying for EDGAR access codes and
preparing and filing beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3 in connection with their ownership of HEWA shares and their membership
in the Schedule 13D reporting group as initially identified in RIVC’s Schedule 13D filing made with the SEC on August 2,
2016. In addition to the initial filings on Form 3 pursuant to Section 16, if the nominees are elected as directors at the 2016
annual meeting, the nominees expect to file additional reports under Section 16 (including Forms 3, Forms 4 and Forms 5, as applicable)
as required.
Important: How to Provide a Proxy
to Us
Your vote is important. We are soliciting your proxy to vote
upon such pother business that may properly come before the annual meeting. We urge you to complete, sign, date and return in
the enclosed postage-paid envelope the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card to elect our director candidates and vote on the other
maters subject to the vote of stockholders at the annual meeting, including the ratification of auditors and the say-on-pay proposal.
You may also vote by telephone or internet.
If you wish to vote by internet, please access
www.okapivote.com/hewa.
Additional
telephone and internet voting instructions are included with the
BLUE
proxy card. We are not aware of any other matters
that are to come before the annual meeting. You will not be able to vote for our director candidates by returning a proxy card
that is provided by HEWA. No matter how many HEWA shares you own, please provide a proxy to vote in favor of our director candidates
by taking five steps:
|
•
|
Check the boxes indicating a vote FOR our four director candidates on the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card;
|
|
•
|
Check the box indicating your vote AGAINST HEWA’s say-on-pay proposal on the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card;
|
|
•
|
Check the box indicating your vote AGAINST HEWA’s auditor ratification proposal on the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card;
|
|
•
|
SIGN and DATE the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card; and
|
|
•
|
MAIL the enclosed
BLUE
proxy card to us in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
|
We are also soliciting your proxy to vote upon such pother business
that may properly come before the annual meeting.
If any of your HEWA shares are held in the name of a bank, broker
or other nominee, only that entity can vote your HEWA shares and only upon receipt of your specific instructions. Accordingly,
if you received a
BLUE
voting instruction card from your bank, broker or other nominee, you should immediately complete,
sign, date and return the
BLUE
voting instruction card to that entity. If you have not received a
BLUE
voting instruction
card from your bank, broker or other nominee, you should immediately contact the person responsible for your account to obtain
a
BLUE
voting instruction card. We urge you to confirm to us in writing any voting instructions provided to a bank, broker
or other nominee, by calling or sending a faxed copy of the executed voting instruction card to Okapi Partners, our proxy advisor,
at the toll-free telephone number or fax number provided below, so that we will be aware of all instructions given and can attempt
to ensure that such instructions are followed.
We urge you not to sign any proxy card or revocation card
that may be sent to you by HEWA. To support RIVC, you should return our BLUE proxy card and discard any proxy card you receive
from HEWA. You do not need to (and should not) vote “withhold” on HEWA’s proxy card to vote for our director
candidates. You should not vote for any of the director candidates nominated by HEWA, or on any other matter, by returning HEWA’s
proxy card.
If you have already provided HEWA with an executed proxy,
you may revoke it by executing a later dated BLUE proxy card and sending it to us in the enclosed postage-paid envelope (or, if
you hold your shares through a bank, broker or other nominee, by sending a later dated BLUE voting instruction card to that entity).
You may also revoke a BLUE proxy card provided to us by submitting a later dated proxy card to HEWA.
Your proxy will authorize the proxy holders named on the proxy,
with full powers of substitution and re-substitution, to raise and second motions to nominate candidates for election to HEWA’s
board of directors, and to vote all HEWA shares that you hold as of the record date, at the annual meeting and at any adjournments
or postponements of such meeting and at any meeting called in lieu of such meeting, in each case subject to applicable law.
Your proxy will be voted as directed by you thereon and in
the discretion of the proxy holders with respect to any other matters that may properly come before the annual meeting, including
any matters incidental to the conduct of the meeting. If no choice is specified by you with respect to the election of our director
candidates, the proxy holders will vote your shares for each of our director candidates, against HEWA’s say-on-pay proposal,
against the auditor ratification proposal, and vote in the discretion of the proxy holders on any other matters coming before
the meeting, including any matters incidental to the conduct of the meeting. The scope of any and all discretionary authority
is expressly qualified by applicable law, including Rule 14a-4(c)(3). The proxy holders may not use discretionary authority to
vote on all matters that may properly come before the meeting to the extent the person was aware of the proposal a reasonable
time before the solicitation. The proxy holders will not vote any of the proxies for any of the director candidates nominated
by HEWA’s board.
In the event that (i) any of our director candidates is unable
to serve or for good reason is unwilling to serve as a member of HEWA’s board of directors and/or (ii) HEWA or any other
person takes or announces any action that has, or if consummated would have, the effect of disqualifying any or all of our director
candidates, the proxy holders will have the right to nominate, and to vote your shares for the election of, such other nominees
as RIVC may designate, subject to applicable law and the requirements of HEWA’s governing documents. If HEWA or any other
person makes or announces any changes to HEWA’s certificate of incorporation or by-laws or takes or announces any other action
that has, or if consummated would have, the effect of decreasing the size of its board of directors, the proxy holders will have
the right to nominate, and vote your shares for the election of, the nominees that are selected in the sole discretion of the proxy
holders, other than for any nominee for whom the authority to vote has been withheld on your proxy, subject to applicable law.
Should the proxy holders identify or nominate substitute nominees before HEWA’s annual meeting, RIVC will supplement this
proxy statement.
Any proxy may be revoked prior to the proxy being voted at
the annual meeting. You may revoke a proxy by properly executing and delivering a later dated proxy or by delivering a written
revocation of proxy. If you wish to revoke a proxy provided to HEWA, please send a copy to Okapi Partners.
You may also
revoke a BLUE proxy card provided to us by submitting a later dated proxy card to HEWA.
If you have any questions, require any assistance in voting
your HEWA shares, need any additional copies of our proxy materials, or have any other questions, please call Okapi Partners LLC,
our proxy advisor, at the toll-free telephone number included below.
1212 Avenue
of the Americas, 24
th
Floor
New York, NY
10036
(212) 297-0720
Call Toll-Free:
(877) 259-6290
Email:
info@okapipartners.com
FORM
OF BLUE PROXYCARD FOR COMMON STOCK
|
HEALTHWAREHOUSE.COM,
INC.
2016 ANNUAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 2, 2016
THIS PROXY
IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF rx iNVESTOR vALUE cORPORATION, Jeffrey T. Holtmeier, Mark Scott, michael peppel, Brian A. Ross, and
Dr. Stephen J. Weiss
THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF HEALTHWAREHOUSE.COM, INC.
IS NOT SOLICITING
THIS PROXY
The undersigned
appoints each of Jeffrey T. Holtmeier, Mark Scott, Brian A. Ross, and Dr. Stephen J. Weiss (acting alone or together), as
attorney, agent and proxy with full power of substitution and resubstitution to represent the undersigned at the 2016 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders of HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. (the “Company”), on September 2, 2016 at 5:00 P.M (local
time, including any adjournments or postponements or continuations thereof and any meeting called in lieu thereof, the
“Annual Meeting”), and to vote all shares of common stock of the Company which the undersigned would be entitled
to vote if personally present .
The undersigned hereby
revokes any other proxy or proxies heretofore given to vote or act with respect to the shares of common stock of the Company held by the undersigned, and hereby ratifies and confirms all action the herein named attorneys and proxies, their
substitutes, or any of them may lawfully take by virtue hereof. If properly executed, this Proxy will be voted as directed on
the reverse and in the discretion of the herein named attorneys and proxies or their substitutes with respect to any other matters
as may properly come before the Annual Meeting that are unknown to RX Investor Value Corporation, Jeffrey T. Holtmeier, Mark Scott,
Brian A. Ross, and Dr. Stephen J. Weiss (collectively, “RIVC”) a reasonable time before this solicitation.
IF NO DIRECTION
IS INDICATED WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSALS ON THE REVERSE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” PROPOSAL 1 AND “AGAINST”
PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.
IMPORTANT:
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY
UNLESS YOU HAVE VOTED BY TELEPHONE OR
BY INTERNET!
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE
PLEASE VOTE TODAY!
SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR THREE EASY WAYS TO VOTE.
YOUR VOTE,
WHETHER BY INTERNET, TELEPHONE OR MAIL, MUST BE RECEIVED NO LATER THAN 11:59 PM, EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME, ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2016,
TO BE INCLUDED IN THE VOTING RESULTS.
RIVC STRONGLY
RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE NOMINEES LISTED BELOW IN PROPOSAL 1. RIVC RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST PROPOSALS
2 and 3.
1. RIVC’s proposal
to elect Jeffrey T. Holtmeier, Mark Scott, Brian A. Ross, and Dr. Stephen J. Weiss to serve as directors of the Company until
the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.
Note: If you do not
wish for your shares of common stock to be voted “FOR” a particular nominee, mark the “FOR
ALL EXCEPT” box and write the name of the Nominee you do not support on the line below. Your shares will be voted for
the remaining nominee.
|
|
FOR ALL
NOMINEES
|
|
WITHHOLD
ALL
|
|
FOR ALL
EXCEPT
|
Jeffrey T. Holtmeier
|
|
¨
|
|
¨
|
|
¨
|
Mark Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian A. Ross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Stephen J. Weiss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIVC does not expect
that our Nominees will be unable to stand for election, but, in the event that any Nominee is unable to serve or for good cause
will not serve, the shares of common stock represented by this proxy card will be voted for substitute nominee(s),
to the extent this is not prohibited under the Company’s Bylaws and applicable law. In addition, RIVC has reserved the right
to nominate substitute person(s) if the Company makes or announces any changes to its Bylaws or takes or announces any other action
that has, or if consummated would have, the effect of disqualifying any Nominee, to the extent this is not prohibited under the
Bylaws and applicable law. In any such case, shares of common stock represented by this proxy card will be
voted for such substitute nominee(s).
RIVC intends to use
this proxy to vote “FOR” Jeffrey T. Holtmeier, Mark Scott, Brian A. Ross, and Dr. Stephen J. Weiss. The names, background
and qualification of the candidates who have been nominated by the Company, and other information about them, can be found in
the Company’s proxy statement.
2. Company’s
proposal to ratify the appointment of Marcum LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December
31, 2016.
¨
FOR
|
|
¨
AGAINST
|
|
¨
ABSTAIN
|
3. Company’s
proposal to cast a non-binding advisory vote to approve executive compensation.
¨
FOR
|
|
¨
AGAINST
|
|
¨
ABSTAIN
|
In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized
to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
DATED:
|
|
|
|
|
(Signature)
|
|
|
(Signature,
if held jointly)
|
|
|
(Title)
|
WHEN
SHARES ARE HELD JOINTLY, JOINT OWNERS SHOULD EACH SIGN. EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, TRUSTEES, ETC., SHOULD INDICATE THE CAPACITY
IN WHICH SIGNING. PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS NAME APPEARS ON THIS PROXY
.
If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by a
duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by an authorized
person.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please take a moment now to vote your shares
of HealthWarehouse.com, Inc. stock for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
PLEASE REVIEW THE PROXY STATEMENT AND
VOTE TODAY IN ONE OF THREE WAYS:
VOTE BY TELEPHONE –
Please call toll-free in the
U.S. or Canada at 877-510-5560, on a touch-tone telephone. If outside the U.S. or Canada, call 877-510-5560. Please follow the
simple instructions. You will be required to provide the unique control number printed below.
OR
VOTE BY INTERNET –
Please access
www.okapivote.com/hewa
,
and follow the simple instructions. Please note you must type an “s” after http. You will be required to provide the
unique control number printed below.
You may vote by telephone or Internet
24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you had marked, signed and returned a proxy card.
OR
VOTE BY MAIL –
If you do not wish to transmit your
voting instructions by telephone or over the Internet, please sign, date and return the proxy card in the envelope provided, or
mail to: Rx Investor Value Corporation, c/o Okapi Partners LLC, 1212 Avenue of the Americas, 24th Floor, New York, New York 10036.