PGSC Progressive Green Solutions Inc (CE)

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Organization and Operations

Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.

Progressive Green Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on August 26, 2011, under the laws of the State of Nevada as MarketingMobileText, Inc. which subsequently changed its corporate name to Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.

On March 7, 2014, the Company acquired all of the membership interests of Green Remanufacturing Solutions LLC (“GRS LLC”) in exchange for 23,000,000 newly issued post-split shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Exchange”). In connection with the Exchange, the Company adopted the business plan of GRS LLC, and amended its Articles of Incorporation to change its name to Progressive Green Solutions, Inc., effectuate a forward-split on a ten for one basis and increase its authorized capital stock to 300,000,000 shares of common stock and 10,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock.

As a result of the controlling financial interest of the former members of GRS LLC, for financial statement reporting purposes, the merger between the Company and GRS LLC has been treated as a reverse acquisition with GRS LLC deemed the accounting acquirer and the Company deemed the accounting acquiree under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with section 805-10-55 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The reverse acquisition is deemed a capital transaction and the net assets of GRS LLC (the accounting acquirer) are carried forward to the Company (the legal acquirer and the reporting entity) at their carrying value before the acquisition.  The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of the Company and the assets and liabilities of GRS LLC which are recorded at their historical cost.  The equity of the Company is the historical equity of GRS LLC retroactively restated to reflect the number of shares issued by the Company in the transaction.

Green Remanufacturing Solutions, Inc.

Green Remanufacturing Solutions, Inc. (“GRS Inc.”) was incorporated on June 27, 2011, under the laws of the State of New York. GRS Inc. specialized in reverse logistics, repair and recovery, engineering/quality assurance, warehousing and fulfillment, secondary market sales and e-commerce for retailers and manufacturers of major appliances, small appliances, floor care products, air-conditioning/filtration products, power tools and outdoor power equipment products.

Green Remanufacturing Solutions LLC

Green Remanufacturing Solutions LLC (“GRS LLC”) was formed on May 31, 2012, under the laws of the State of Delaware. The sole purpose of GRS LLC was to carry-on GRS Inc.’s business in the form of a limited liability company. The assets and liabilities of GRS Inc. were carried forward to GRS LLC at their historical costs on the date of conversion. On September 5, 2013 a Certificate of Merger was filed with the State of New York Department of State, Division of Corporations, merging GRS Inc. and GRS LLC.

Applianceplace.com, LLC

Applianceplace.com, LLC was formed on November 29, 2012 under the laws of the State of New York and is 100% owned by the Company.

Speyside Holdings LLC

Speyside Holdings LLC was formed on March 25, 2015 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Speyside Holdings LLC is engaged in the fine and coarse aggregates business in Highland Mills, New York.

On September 12, 2016, the operating agreement of Speyside Holdings LLC was amended and restated. As a result of the amended and restated operating agreement, the Company directly owns 60 Class A Units in Speyside Holdings LLC. On October 12, 2016, the operating agreement of Speyside Holdings LLC was again amended and restated and as result, the Company directly owns 51 Class A Units in Speyside Holdings LLC.

CEM III LLC

CEM III LLC (“CEM”) was formed on July 13, 2015 under the laws of the State of New York. CEM’s purpose is to take title and manage a parcel of real property in Highland Mills, New York.

On September 12, 2016, the operating agreement CEM III LLC was amended and restated. As a result of the amended and restated operating agreement, the Company indirectly owns 36 Class A Units in CEM III LLC. On October 12, 2016, the operating agreement of and CEM III LLC was again amended and restated and as a result the Company indirectly owns 26 Class A Units in CEM III LLC.

Speyside Holdings II LLC

On September 21, 2016, Speyside Holdings LLC formed a wholly owned subsidiary named Speyside Holdings II LLC. Speyside Holdings II LLC is a New York limited liability company whose purpose is to take title and to manage a parcel of real property in Highland Mills, New York.

Note 2 – Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with respect to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC on March 23, 2016.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.

On September 12, 2016, the operating agreements of Speyside Holdings LLC and CEM III LLC were amended and restated. As a result of the amended and restated operating agreement, the Company directly owns 60 Class A Units in Speyside Holdings LLC and indirectly own 36 Class A Units in CEM III LLC as of September 30, 2016.

On October 12, 2016, the operating agreements of Speyside Holdings LLC and CEM III LLC were amended and restated. As a result of the amended and restated operating agreements, the Company directly owns 51 Class A Units in Speyside Holdings LLC and indirectly own 26 Class A Units in CEM III LLC.

The Company’s consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows as of December 19, 2016:

The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities as of and for the reporting periods then ended.

All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepayments and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, advances from third party and deferred rent approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company’s equipment loans approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at December 31, 2015.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Fair Value of Non-Financial Assets or Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

The Company’s non-financial assets include inventories. The Company identifies potentially excess and slow-moving inventories by evaluating turn rates, inventory levels and other factors. Excess quantities are identified through evaluation of inventory aging, review of inventory turns and historical sales experiences. The Company provides lower of cost or market reserves for such identified excess and slow-moving inventories. The Company establishes a reserve for inventory shrinkage, if any, based on the historical results of physical inventory cycle counts.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-47 trade receivables that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future shall be reported in the balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs and the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows FASB ASC paragraphs 310-10-35-7 through 310-10-35-10 to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10- 35-9 Losses from uncollectible receivables shall be accrued when both of the following conditions are met: (a) Information available before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired at the date of the financial statements, and (b) The amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Those conditions may be considered in relation to individual receivables or in relation to groups of similar types of receivables. If the conditions are met, accrual shall be made even though the particular receivables that are uncollectible may not be identifiable. The Company reviews individually each trade receivable for collectability and performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.

Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-41 Credit losses for trade receivables (uncollectible trade receivables), which may be for all or part of a particular trade receivable, shall be deducted from the allowance. The related trade receivable balance shall be charged off in the period in which the trade receivables are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously charged off shall be recorded when received. The Company charges off its trade account receivables against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

The Company has a provision for doubtful accounts of $161,177 as of September 30, 2016, which is based upon an analysis of the Company’s prior collection experience, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends.

Inventory

The Company values inventories, consisting of raw materials, consumables, packaging material, finished goods, and purchased merchandise for resale, at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the first-in and first-out (“FIFO”) method for raw materials and packaging materials and the weighted average cost method for finished goods. Cost of finished goods comprises direct labor, direct materials, direct production cost and an allocated portion of production overhead. The Company reduces inventories for the diminution of value, resulting from product obsolescence, damage or other issues affecting marketability, equal to the difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value. Factors utilized in the determination of estimated market value include (i) current sales data and historical return rates; (ii) estimates of future demand; (iii) competitive pricing pressures; (iv) new product introductions; (v) product expiration dates; and (vi) component and packaging obsolescence. The Company had no Inventory at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:

(*) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.

(^) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the Management Agreement or its termination date, whichever is shorter.

Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-35-29 through 35-36 Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall include only the future cash flows (cash inflows less associated cash outflows) that are directly associated with and that are expected to arise as a direct result of the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall incorporate the entity’s own assumptions about its use of the asset (asset group) and shall consider all available evidence. The assumptions used in developing those estimates shall be reasonable in relation to the assumptions used in developing other information used by the entity for comparable periods, such as internal budgets and projections, accruals related to incentive compensation plans, or information communicated to others. However, if alternative courses of action to recover the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) are under consideration or if a range is estimated for the amount of possible future cash flows associated with the likely course of action, the likelihood of those possible outcomes shall be considered. A probability-weighted approach may be useful in considering the likelihood of those possible outcomes. Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of a long-lived asset (asset group) shall be made for the remaining useful life of the asset (asset group) to the entity. For long-lived assets (asset groups) that have uncertainties both in timing and amount, an expected present value technique will often be the appropriate technique with which to estimate fair value.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.

Leases

Lease agreements are evaluated to determine whether they are capital leases or operating leases in accordance with paragraph 840-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 840-10-25-1”). Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-1 A lessee and a lessor shall consider whether a lease meets any of the following four criteria as part of classifying the lease at its inception under the guidance in the Lessees Subsection of this Section (for the lessee) and the Lessors Subsection of this Section (for the lessor): a. Transfer of ownership. The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessee by the end of the lease term. This criterion is met in situations in which the lease agreement provides for the transfer of title at or shortly after the end of the lease term in exchange for the payment of a nominal fee, for example, the minimum required by statutory regulation to transfer title. b. Bargain purchase option. The lease contains a bargain purchase option. c. Lease term. The lease term is equal to 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property. d. Minimum lease payments. The present value at the beginning of the lease term of the minimum lease payments, excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, including any profit thereon, equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor.

In accordance with paragraphs 840-10-25-29 and 840-10-25-30, if at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease; and if none of the four criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1 are met, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as an operating lease. Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-31 a lessee shall compute the present value of the minimum lease payments using the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate unless both of the following conditions are met, in which circumstance the lessee shall use the implicit rate: a. It is practicable for the lessee to learn the implicit rate computed by the lessor. b. The implicit rate computed by the lessor is less than the lessee’s incremental borrowing rate. Capital lease assets are depreciated on a straight line method, over the capital lease assets estimated useful lives consistent with the Company’s normal depreciation policy for tangible fixed assets. Interest charges are expensed over the period of the lease in relation to the carrying value of the capital lease obligation.

Operating leases primarily relate to the Company’s leases of office spaces. When the terms of an operating lease include tenant improvement allowances, periods of free rent, rent concessions, and/or rent escalation amounts, the Company establishes a deferred rent liability for the difference between the scheduled rent payment and the straight-line rent expense recognized, which is amortized over the underlying lease term on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include (a.) affiliates of the Company (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act); (b.) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; (c.) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; (d.) principal owners of the Company and members of their immediate families ; (e.) management of the Company and members of their immediate families ;; (f.) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and (g.) other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 850-10-50-1 and 50-5 financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. The disclosures shall include: (a.) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; (b.) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; (c.) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and (d.) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement. Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

On December 8, 2016, the Company was served with a Summons with Notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau.  The action, entitled Tynes v. Progressive Green Solutions, Inc., names the Company, Eugene Fernandez, its President and Chairman, and several other unrelated parties.  The Summons with Notice alleges, unspecific to which defendant, breach of agreements, breach of fiduciary duty, gross negligence and general and securities fraud. The Summons and Notice, also unspecific as to which defendant, seeks relief in an indeterminate amount not less than $500,000. The Company’s time to appear in the action has not yet passed and it intends to vigorously defend against the Action.

Non-controlling Interest

The Company follows paragraph 810-10-65-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report the non-controlling interest in the consolidated balance sheets within the equity section, separately from the Company’s stockholders’ equity. Non-controlling interest represents the non-controlling interest holder’s proportionate share of the equity of the Company’s majority-owned subsidiary. Non-controlling interest is adjusted for the non-controlling interest holder’s proportionate share of the earnings or losses and other comprehensive income (loss), if any, and the non-controlling interest continues to be attributed its share of losses even if that attribution results in a deficit non-controlling interest balance.

Revenue Recognition

The Company applies paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer; (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

The Company derives its revenues from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the completion of the reconditioning process and/or the shipment of goods and merchandise. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement is demonstrated via sales invoice or contract; product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the transport company and title transfers upon shipment; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the signed purchase order or contract and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive. When the Company recognizes revenue, no provisions are made for returns because, historically, there have been very few sales returns and adjustments that have impacted the ultimate collection of revenues.

Net sales of products represent the invoiced value of goods, net of sales taxes. The Company is not subject to charge sales tax as the Company sells to wholesale distributors and is thereby exempt from charging sales tax. Sales or Output sales tax is borne by customers in addition to the invoiced value of sales and Purchase or Input sales tax is borne by the Company in addition to the invoiced value of purchases to the extent not exempt due to the purpose of the acquisition.

Shipping and Handling Costs

The Company accounts for shipping and handling fees in accordance with paragraph 605-45-45-19 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. While amounts charged to customers for shipping products are included in revenues, the related costs are classified in cost of goods sold as incurred.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under the guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC paragraphs 505-50-25-6 and 505-50-25-7, a grantor shall recognize the goods acquired or services received in a share-based payment transaction when it obtains the goods or as services are received. A grantor may need to recognize an asset before it actually receives goods or services if it first exchanges share-based payment for an enforceable right to receive those goods or services. Nevertheless, the goods or services themselves are not recognized before they are received. If fully vested, nonforfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, nonforfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services.

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 505-50-30-2 and 505-50-30-11 share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The issuer shall measure the fair value of the equity instruments in these transactions using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of the following dates, referred to as the measurement date: (a) The date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached (a performance commitment); or (b) The date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Taxes Provision

Prior to March 7, 2014, GRS LLC was treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, i.e. members of an LLC are taxed separately on their distributive share of the LLC’s earnings (loss) whether or not that income is actually distributed.

Effective March 7, 2014, the Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from net income (loss). The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-40 through 45-42 convertible securities shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the if converted method. The convertible preferred stock or convertible debt shall be assumed to have been converted at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later). In applying the if-converted method, conversion shall not be assumed for purposes of computing diluted EPS if the effect would be anti-dilutive.

There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the interim period ended September 30, 2016.

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (the “Indirect Method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments

Segment Information

The Company follows Topic 280 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for segment reporting. Pursuant to Paragraph 280-10-50-1 an operating segment is a component of a public entity that has all of the following characteristics: (a). It engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses (including revenues and expenses relating to transactions with other components of the same public entity). (b). Its operating results are regularly reviewed by the public entity’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess its performance. (c). Its discrete financial information is available. In accordance with Paragraph 280-10-50-5 the term chief operating decision maker identifies a function, not necessarily a manager with a specific title. That function is to allocate resources to and assess the performance of the segments of a public entity. Often the chief operating decision maker of a public entity is its chief executive officer or chief operating officer, but it may be a group consisting of, for example, the public entity’s president, executive vice presidents, and others. Pursuant to Paragraph 280-10-50-10 a public entity shall report separately information about each operating segment that meets both of the following criteria: (a). Has been identified in accordance with paragraphs 280-10-50-1 and 280-10-50-3 through 50-9 or results from aggregating two or more of those segments in accordance with the following paragraph; and (b). Exceeds the quantitative thresholds in paragraph 280-10-50-12. In accordance with Paragraph 280-10-50-12 a public entity shall report separately information about an operating segment that meets any of the following quantitative thresholds: (a). Its reported revenue, including both sales to external customers and intersegment sales or transfers, is 10 percent or more of the combined revenue, internal and external, of all operating segments. (b). The absolute amount of its reported profit or loss is 10 percent or more of the greater, in absolute amount, of either: 1. The combined reported profit of all operating segments that did not report a loss, or 2. The combined reported loss of all operating segments that did report a loss. (c). Its assets are 10 percent or more of the combined assets of all operating segments. Pursuant to Paragraphs 280-10-50-22 and 280-10-50-29, a public entity shall report a measure of profit or loss and total assets for each reportable segment and provide an explanation of the measurements of segment profit or loss and segment assets for each reportable segment. At a minimum, a public entity shall disclose all of the following: (a). The basis of accounting for any transactions between reportable segments. (b). The nature of any differences between the measurements of the reportable segments’ profits or losses and the public entity’s consolidated income (loss) before income tax provision, extraordinary items, and discontinued operations (if not apparent from the reconciliations described in paragraphs 280-10-50-30 through 50-31). (c). The nature of any differences between the measurements of the reportable segments’ assets and the public entity’s consolidated assets (if not apparent from the reconciliations described in paragraphs 280-10-50-30 through 50-31). (d). The nature of any changes from prior periods in the measurement methods used to determine reported segment profit or loss and the effect, if any, of those changes on the measure of segment profit or loss. (e). The nature and effect of any asymmetrical allocations to reportable segments.

Subsequent Events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-01, which amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Changes to the current guidance primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. In addition, the ASU clarifies guidance related to the valuation allowance assessment when recognizing deferred tax assets resulting from unrealized losses on available-for-sale debt securities. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and upon adoption, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is not permitted except for the provision to record fair value changes for financial liabilities under the fair value option resulting from instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02, which amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP on accounting for operating leases, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for operating leases with lease terms of more than 12 months on the balance sheet. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and upon adoption, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) “ASU 2016 – 09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” which is intended to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments. The ASU simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including; the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification on the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and upon adoption, an entity should apply the amendments by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet at the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In April 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) “ASU 2016 – 10 Revenue from Contract with Customers: identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”. The amendments in this Update clarify the two following aspects (a) contracts with customers to transfer goods and services in exchange for consideration and (b) determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The amendments in this Update are intended to reduce the degree of judgement necessary to comply with Topic 606. This guidance has no effective date as yet. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ASU No. 2016-15, “Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance regarding the classification of certain items within the statements of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In October 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-16 - Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. ASU 2016-16 will require the tax effects of intercompany transactions, other than sales of inventory, to be recognized currently, eliminating an exception under current GAAP in which the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers are deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use. The guidance will be effective for the first interim period of our 2019 fiscal year, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statement numbers to conform to the current presentation of the financial statements. These reclassifications had no impact on the reported results.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The Company elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”) .

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the unaudited condensed financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $6,793,042 at September 30, 2016, a net loss of $2,499,858 and net cash of $2,139,575 used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is continuing operations and hopes to generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The unaudited condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense were $210,919 and $119,280 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015.

Amortization of intangible asset related to the management agreement amounted to $25,000 and $14,445 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Note 5 – Related Party Transactions

Related parties

Related parties with whom the Company had transactions are:

Screening Plant Purchase Agreement

On June 19, 2015, Speyside Holdings LLC purchased a screening plant from FLS 3, Inc. FLS 3, Inc. is an entity solely owned by Eugene Fernandez, a major shareholder, President and acting CFO of the Company. The screening plant was sold by FLS 3, Inc. to Speyside Holdings LLC for $160,000. FLS 3, Inc. delivered the screening plant and a bill of sale to Speyside Holdings LLC and Speyside Holdings LLC tendered $41,000 and a promissory note for $119,000 to FLS 3, Inc. The promissory note bears an interest rate of 5% per annum and is due on demand.

Debt Conversion Agreements

On July 8, 2016, the Company entered into a Debt Conversion Agreement effective June 30, 2016 (the “DC Agreement I”) whereby the Company and Stonehenge Holdings, LLC (“Stonehenge”) agreed to convert $125,000 of previously advanced debt plus accrued interest (the “SH Advances I”) into 1,426,089 shares of the Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.’s common stock. The conversion price of the SH Advances I was $0.09 per share, which represents the market price of the Company’s stock on June 30, 2016. Anthony Williams, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, holds voting and dispositive control over Stonehenge. Mr. Williams abstained from the vote on this matter.

On September 26, 2016, Progressive Green Solutions, Inc. entered into a Debt Conversion Agreement effective September 26, 2016 (the “DC Agreement II”) whereby the Company and DGS Group LLC (“DGS”) agreed to convert $600,000.00 of previously advanced principal debt (the “DGS Advances I”) into 12,000,000 shares of the Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.’s common stock. The conversion price of the DGS Advances I was $0.05 per share, which represents the market price of the common stock on September 26, 2016. Eugene Fernandez, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, holds voting and dispositive control over DGS. Mr. Fernandez abstained from the vote on this matter. Also on September 26, 2016, the Progressive Green Solutions, Inc. entered into a Debt Conversion Agreement effective September 26, 2016 (the “DC Agreement III”) whereby the Company and Stonehenge agreed to convert $94,399.00 of previously advanced principal debt (the “SH Advances II”) into 1,887,980 shares of Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.’s common stock. The conversion price of the SH Advances II was $0.05 per share, which represents the market price of the common stock on September 26, 2016. Anthony Williams, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, holds voting and dispositive control over Stonehenge. Mr. Williams abstained from the vote on this matter.

Speyside Holdings LLC, Speyside Holdings II LLC, and CEM III LLC

On September 12, 2016, the Company, Speyside Holdings LLC, and CEM III LLC determined that it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company, Speyside Holdings LLC, and CEM III LLC to increase the limited liability company interests of Eugene Fernandez, Stonehenge Holdings LLC, and Canyon Bound LLC in Speyside Holdings LLC and CEM III LLC to remunerate Eugene Fernandez, Stonehenge Holdings LLC, and Canyon Bound LLC for their providing of loans to the Company, Speyside Holdings LLC, and CEM III LLC, for personally guaranteeing loans for Speyside Holdings LLC and CEM III LLC, for their service, to incentivize continued future performance, to encourage retention of their services, and to align their interests with those of the Speyside Holdings LLC, and CEM III LLC. As a result of the aforementioned, on September 12, 2016, the Company directly owns 60 Class A Units in Speyside Holdings LLC and indirectly own 36 Class A Units in CEM III LLC

On October 12, 2016, the operating agreements of Speyside Holdings LLC and CEM III LLC were amended and restated to account for the proportion dilution of the addition of a new member. As a result of the amended and restated operating agreements, the Company directly owns 51 Class A Units in Speyside Holdings LLC and indirectly own 26 Class A Units in CEM III LLC. Additionally, per the BCM Loan I agreement, Bradden Capital Management LLC through its assign, BCM Speyside, LLC, elected to acquire 15 Class B Units in Speyside Holdings LLC. As part of BCM Speyside, LLC becoming a Class B Unit member in Speyside Holdings LLC, BCM Speyside, LLC and Speyside Holdings II LLC became tenants in common on a parcel of real property in Highland Mills, New York. As part of the aforementioned, Speyside Holdings LLC and BCM Speyside, LLC respectively have a call / put provision whereby a respective party can call / put BCM Speyside, LLC’s tenant in common interest in the parcel of real property that BCM Speyside, LLC is tenants in common with Speyside Holdings II LLC in Highland Mills, New York in exchange for BCM Speyside, LLC contributing its tenancy in common interest into Speyside Holdings II LLC and Speyside Holdings LLC thereby converting BCM Speyside, LLC’s 15 Class B Units in Speyside Holdings LLC to 15 Class A Units in Speyside Holdings LLC along with the a corresponding adjustment to BCM Speyside, LLC’s capital account in Speyside Holdings LLC.

Advances from Stockholders

From time to time, the stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

Notes Payable - due to related parties

Notes payable - Stockholders consisted of the following:

Notes Payable third parties - long term

On August 16, 2016 Speyside Holdings LLC closed on a $1,000,000 loan from Bradden Capital Management LLC (the “BCM Loan I”) to be used in connection with the acquisition of equipment for Speyside Holdings LLC as well as for operations. The BCM Loan I has an effective date August 12, 2016. The BCM Loan I is interest only a bears an initial rate of 5% per annum and has an initial maturity date of December 31, 2017. As an inducement for Bradden Capital Management LLC to extend the BCM Loan I to Speyside Holdings LLC, Bradden Capital Management LLC was given the option to acquire a 15% membership interest in Speyside Holdings LLC for $2,000,000. In the event that Bradden Capital Management LLC does not acquire a 15% membership interest in Speyside Holdings LLC prior to December 31, 2016 or upon written notice from Bradden Capital Management LLC to Speyside Holdings LLC advising of the same, the interest rate of the BCM Loan I will automatically increase from 5% per annum to 8% per annum. In addition, Speyside Holdings LLC has the option to extend the maturity date of the BCM Loan I to December 31, 2018. During the aforementioned extension period, the BCM Loan I will bear an interest rate of 9% per annum. The BCM Loan I is secured by the personal guarantees of Anthony Williams, Eugene Fernandez, Michael Cox as well as their direct and indirect membership interests in Speyside Holdings LLC and their direct and indirect ownership of Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.’s common stock.

Note 6 – Equipment Loan / Leaser

On November 25, 2015 Speyside Holdings LLC purchased an excavator for $108,300. $15,600 was paid in cash and financing of $92,700 was acquired. The loan has forty-eight payments of $2,089 per month, commencing December 2015 and expiring in November 2019 with an annual interest rate of 3.9%. The members of the Board of Directors of Progressive Green Solutions, Inc. (Eugene Fernandez, Anthony Williams, and Michael Cox) personally guaranteed this loan.

On September 1, 2016, Speyside Holdings LLC leased processing equipment for $654,882 of which $200,000 was paid in cash and $454,882 was financed. The lease has sixty payments of $9,310.69 a month (with the exception of the first month which included stub interest and which the payment was $10,260.69), commencing on October 1, 2016 and expiring on September 1, 2021. At the conclusion of the lease, title is to transfer to Speyside Holdings LLC. The members of the Board of Directors of Progressive Green Solutions, Inc. (Eugene Fernandez, Anthony Williams, and Michael Cox) personally guaranteed this equipment lease.

Equipment loan consisted of the following:

Note 7 – Equity

On July 8, 2016, the Company entered into a Debt Conversion Agreement effective June 30, 2016 (the “DC Agreement I”) whereby the Company and Stonehenge Holdings, LLC (“Stonehenge”) agreed to convert $125,000 of previously advanced debt plus accrued interest (the “SH Advances I”) into 1,388,889 shares of the Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.’s common stock. The conversion price of the SH Advances I was $0.09 per share, which represents the market price of the Company on June 30, 2016. Anthony Williams, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, holds voting and dispositive control over Stonehenge. Mr. Williams abstained from the vote on this matter.

On September 26, 2016, Progressive Green Solutions, Inc. entered into a Debt Conversion Agreement effective September 26, 2016 (the “DC Agreement II”) whereby the Company and DGS Group LLC (“DGS”) agreed to convert $600,000.00 of previously advanced principal debt (the “DGS Advances I”) into 12,000,000 shares of the Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.’s common stock. The conversion price of the DGS Advances I was $0.05 per share, which represents the market price of the common stock on September 26, 2016. Eugene Fernandez, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, holds voting and dispositive control over DGS. Mr. Fernandez abstained from the vote on this matter. Also on September 26, 2016, the Progressive Green Solutions, Inc. entered into a Debt Conversion Agreement effective September 26, 2016 (the “DC Agreement III”) whereby the Company and Stonehenge agreed to convert $94,399.00 of previously advanced principal debt (the “SH Advances II”) into 1,887,980 shares of Progressive Green Solutions, Inc.’s common stock. The conversion price of the SH Advances II was $0.05 per share, which represents the market price of the common stock on September 26, 2016. Anthony Williams, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, holds voting and dispositive control over Stonehenge. Mr. Williams abstained from the vote on this matter.

Note 8 – Concentrations

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, Customer “A”, accounted for 21% of total sales; no other customer individually accounted for more than 10% of total sales. This large customer did not account for any sales made in 2015. Customer “A” represented a total of 7% of accounts receivable during the nine months quarter ending 2016. No other customer account exceeded 10% of total accounts receivable.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 Customer “A” accounted for 10% of total sales and represented a total of 7% of accounts receivable.

Note 9 – Segment Reporting

Reportable segments are components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available and that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s reportable segments are based on products and services, geography, legal structure, management structure, or any other manner in which management disaggregates a company. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as the accounting policies of the Company as a whole.

The Company operates in the following business segments:

The Company measures the segment profit or loss and segment assets for each reportable segment as follows: