Item 2.Properties.
We maintain our headquarters, research laboratories, and
manufacturing facilities in leased space located in Englewood,
Colorado, for monthly minimum lease payments of approximately
$30,000. The lease expires in September 2024.
Effective March 1, 2023, the Company entered into a sublease
agreement with the consent of the Landlord pursuant to which the
Company will sublease the Premises for a term commencing on March
1, 2023 and continuing until the expiration of the Lease on
September 30, 2024. However, the address of the Company’s principal
executive offices continues to be 373 Inverness Parkway, Suite 200,
Englewood, Colorado 80112.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
From time to
time, the Company may be a party to litigation arising in the
ordinary course of business. In addition, as of December 31, 2022, Ampio was involved in
the following material pending legal proceedings:
Kain v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
et al., 22-cv-2105
On August 17, 2022, a putative Ampio shareholder filed a securities
fraud class action against the Company, its current CEO Michael A.
Martino and two former executives, Michael Macaluso and Holli
Cherevka, in the United States District Court for the District of
Colorado, captioned Kain v. Ampio
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., 22-cv-2105. The Complaint
alleges that Ampio and the individual defendants made various false
and misleading statements regarding the efficacy, clinical trials
and FDA communications relating to Ampio’s lead product, Ampion,
and its treatment of severe osteoarthritis of the knee in violation
of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
The Complaint also asserts control person liability against the
individual defendants under Section 20 of the Exchange Act.
The Complaint relies largely on
Ampio’s announcement on May 16, 2022, that it had formed a special
Board committee to investigate the statistical analysis of Ampio’s
AP-013 clinical trial and the unauthorized provision of Ampion to
various individuals who were not participating in clinical trials,
and Ampio’s further announcement on August 3, 2022, that the
investigation had revealed that various employees were aware that
the AP-013 trial did not demonstrate efficacy for Ampion’s primary
endpoints and did not fully and timely report the results of the
trial and the timing of unblinding data from the trial. Based on
the Company’s reports, the Complaint asserts that various
statements made by the Company during the Class Period were false
and misleading because they: (i) inflated Ampio’s ability to
successfully obtain FDA approval for Ampion; (ii) inflated the
results of the AP-013 clinical trial and failed to disclose the
timing of unblinding the data from the study; and (iii) overstated
the Company’s business, operations and prospects.
The Complaint seeks an
unspecified amount of compensatory damages as well as attorneys’
fees and costs. On October 17, 2022, six putative shareholders
filed motions seeking to be named lead plaintiff. On November 7,
2022, two of the movants filed oppositions to each other’s motions;
the remaining movants either withdrew their motions or filed
non-oppositions to another putative shareholder’s motion. The Court
has not yet ruled on the competing motions for appointment of lead
plaintiff. In the interim, the Court approved the parties’ joint
motion to stay proceedings, and all deadlines are deferred until
after a decision on the lead plaintiff motion(s).
Ampio intends to defend itself vigorously against this action.
Maresca v. Martino, et al.,
22-cv-2646-KLM
On October 7, 2022, putative Ampio shareholder Robert Maresca filed
a Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint in the United States
District Court for the District of Colorado, captioned Maresca v. Martino, et al., 22-cv-2646-KLM. The derivative complaint,
brought on behalf of the Company, asserts claims against a number
of current and former executives and directors of the Company,
namely Michael A. Martino, Michael Macaluso, Holli Cherevka, David
Bar-Or, David Stevens, J. Kevin Buchi, Philip H. Coelho and Richard
B. Giles.
Based largely on the same allegations as the Kain securities fraud class action
complaint (including Ampio’s reports in May and August, 2022,
regarding its internal investigation and findings), the Complaint
asserts that the individual defendants caused the Company to make
false or misleading statements in its SEC filings by “hyp[ing
Ampio’s] ability to successfully file a BLA for Ampion;”
“exaggerate[ing] results of the AP-013 study;” “misstat[ing] the
true timing of