Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(2)
Registration
No. 333-272447
Pricing Supplement dated March 3, 2025 |  |
(To
Equity Index Underlying Supplement dated September 5, 2023, ETF Underlying Supplement dated September 5, 2023, Prospectus Supplement
dated September 5, 2023, and Prospectus dated September 5, 2023)
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Senior Global Medium-Term Notes
$1,419,000 Contingent Coupon Autocallable
Barrier Notes Linked to the Worst Performing of the S&P 500® Index, the Russell 2000® Index and the
SPDR® Dow Jones® Industrial Average ETF Trust due March 6, 2030
· | The Contingent Coupon Autocallable Barrier Notes (the “notes”)
will provide monthly Contingent Coupon Payments of $7.60 per $1,000 principal amount (or 0.76% of the principal amount, equivalent to
9.12% per annum) until the earlier of maturity or automatic call if, and only if, the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying
on the applicable monthly Coupon Determination Date is greater than or equal to its Coupon Barrier Value (70% of its Initial Value). |
· | If the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying on any semi-annual
Call Observation Date beginning on September 3, 2025 is greater than or equal to its Call Value (100% of its Initial Value), we will automatically
call the notes and pay you on the applicable Call Payment Date the principal amount plus the applicable Contingent Coupon Payment. No
further amounts will be owed to you. |
· | If the notes have not been previously called, the Payment at Maturity
will depend on the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying on the Final Valuation Date (the “Final Value”) and will
be calculated as follows: |
| a. | If the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is greater than
or equal to its Principal Barrier Value (70% of its Initial Value):(i) the principal amount plus (ii) the final Contingent Coupon Payment. |
| b. | If the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its
Principal Barrier Value: (i) the principal amount plus (ii) the product of the principal amount multiplied by the Percentage Change of
the Worst Performing Underlying. In this case, you will lose some or all of the principal amount at maturity. Even with any Contingent
Coupon Payments, the return on the notes could be negative. |
· | The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange. |
· | The notes will be issued in minimum denomination of $1,000 and integral
multiples of $1,000 in excess thereof. |
The notes are unsecured obligations of the Bank and any
payments on the notes are subject to the credit risk of the Bank. The notes will not constitute deposits insured by the Canada Deposit
Insurance Corporation, the U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or any other government agency or instrumentality of Canada, the
United States or any other jurisdiction. The notes are not bail-inable debt securities (as defined on page 6 of the prospectus).
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)
nor any state or provincial securities commission has approved or disapproved of these notes or determined if this pricing supplement
or the accompanying underlying supplements, prospectus supplement or prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary
is a criminal offense.
Investing in the notes involves risks not associated with
an investment in ordinary debt securities. See “Additional Risk Factors” beginning on page PS-8 of this pricing supplement,
and “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-1 of the accompanying underlying supplements, page S-1 of the prospectus supplement
and page 1 of the prospectus.
|
Price to Public (Initial Issue Price)(1) |
Underwriting Discount(1)(2) |
Proceeds to Issuer |
Per Note |
$1,000.00 |
$6.00 |
$994.00 |
Total |
$1,419,000.00 |
$8,514.00 |
$1,410,486.00 |
| (1) | Because certain dealers who purchase the notes for sale to certain fee-based advisory accounts may forgo
some or all of their commissions or selling concessions, the price to public for investors purchasing the notes in these accounts will
be $994.00 per note. |
| (2) | CIBC World Markets Corp. (“CIBCWM”), acting as agent for the Bank, will receive a commission
of $6.00 (0.60%) per $1,000 principal amount of the notes. CIBCWM may use a portion or all of its commission to allow selling concessions
to other dealers in connection with the distribution of the notes. The other dealers may forgo, in their sole discretion, some or all
of their selling concessions. See “Supplemental Plan of Distribution (Conflicts of Interest)” on page PS-18 of this pricing
supplement. |
The initial estimated value of the notes on the Trade Date
as determined by the Bank is $963.30 per $1,000 principal amount of the notes, which is less than the price to public. See “The
Bank’s Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
We will deliver the notes in book-entry form through the
facilities of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) on March 6, 2025 against payment in immediately available funds.
CIBC Capital Markets
ADDITIONAL
TERMS OF THE NOTES
You
should read this pricing supplement together with the prospectus dated September 5, 2023 (the “prospectus”),
the prospectus supplement dated September 5, 2023 (the “prospectus supplement”), the Equity Index Underlying Supplement dated
September 5, 2023 (the “index underlying supplement”) and the ETF Underlying Supplement dated September 5, 2023 (the “ETF
underlying supplement,” and together with the index underlying supplement, the “underlying supplements”). Information
in this pricing supplement supersedes information in the underlying supplements, the prospectus supplement and the prospectus to the extent
it is different from that information. Certain terms used but not defined herein will have the meanings set forth in the underlying supplements,
the prospectus supplement or the prospectus.
You should rely only on the information contained in or
incorporated by reference in this pricing supplement and the accompanying underlying supplements, the prospectus supplement and the prospectus.
This pricing supplement may be used only for the purpose for which it has been prepared. No one is authorized to give information other
than that contained in this pricing supplement and the accompanying underlying supplements, the prospectus supplement and the prospectus,
and in the documents referred to in those documents and which are made available to the public. We, CIBCWM and our other affiliates have
not authorized any other person to provide you with different or additional information. If anyone provides you with different or additional
information, you should not rely on it.
We and CIBCWM are not making an offer to sell the notes
in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should not assume that the information contained in or incorporated
by reference in this pricing supplement or the accompanying underlying supplements, the prospectus supplement or the prospectus is accurate
as of any date other than the date of the applicable document. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects
may have changed since that date. Neither this pricing supplement nor the accompanying underlying supplements, the prospectus supplement
or the prospectus constitutes an offer, or an invitation on behalf of us or CIBCWM, to subscribe for and purchase any of the notes and
may not be used for or in connection with an offer or solicitation by anyone in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or solicitation
is not authorized or to any person to whom it is unlawful to make such an offer or solicitation.
References
to “CIBC,” “the Issuer,” “the Bank,” “we,” “us” and “our” in this
pricing supplement are references to Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and not to any of our subsidiaries, unless we state otherwise
or the context otherwise requires. References to “Index” or “Fund” in the underlying supplements will be
references to “Underlying.”
You may access the underlying supplements, the prospectus
supplement and the prospectus on the SEC website www.sec.gov as follows (or if such address has changed, by reviewing our filing for the
relevant date on the SEC website):
| · | Index underlying supplement dated September 5, 2023: |
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045520/000110465923098170/tm2322483d89_424b5.htm
| · | ETF underlying supplement dated September 5, 2023: |
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045520/000110465923098171/tm2322483d88_424b5.htm
| · | Prospectus supplement dated September 5, 2023: |
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045520/000110465923098166/tm2322483d94_424b5.htm
| · | Prospectus dated September 5, 2023: |
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1045520/000110465923098163/tm2325339d10_424b3.htm
SUMMARY
The information in this “Summary” section is qualified
by the more detailed information set forth in the underlying supplements, the prospectus supplement and the prospectus. See “Additional
Terms of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
Issuer: |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce |
Reference Asset: |
The worst performing of the S&P 500® Index (Bloomberg ticker: SPX) (the “SPX”), the Russell 2000® Index (Bloomberg ticker: RTY) (the “RTY”), and the SPDR® Dow Jones® Industrial Average ETF Trust (Bloomberg ticker: DIA) (the “DIA”) (each, an “Underlying” and together, the “Underlyings”) |
Principal Amount: |
$1,000 per note |
Aggregate Principal Amount: |
$1,419,000 |
Term: |
Five years, unless previously called |
Strike Date: |
February 28, 2025 |
Trade Date: |
March 3, 2025 |
Original Issue Date: |
March 6, 2025 |
Final Valuation Date: |
March 1, 2030, subject to postponement as described under “Certain Terms of the Notes—Valuation Dates—For Notes Where the Reference Asset Consists of Multiple Indices” in the index underlying supplement and “Certain Terms of the Notes—Valuation Dates—For Notes Where the Reference Asset Consists of Multiple Funds” in the ETF underlying supplement. |
Maturity Date: |
March 6, 2030. The Maturity Date is subject to the Call Feature and may be postponed as described under “Certain Terms of the Notes—Interest Payment Dates, Coupon Payment Dates, Call Payment Dates and Maturity Date” in the underlying supplements. |
Contingent Coupon Payment: |
On each Coupon Payment Date, you will receive a Contingent Coupon Payment of $7.60 per $1,000 principal amount (or 0.76% of the principal amount, equivalent to 9.12% per annum) if, and only if, the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying on the related Coupon Determination Date is greater than or equal to its Coupon Barrier Value. If the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying on any Coupon Determination Date is less than its Coupon Barrier Value, you will not receive any Contingent Coupon Payment on the related Coupon Payment Date. If the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its Coupon Barrier Value on all monthly Coupon Determination Dates, you will not receive any Contingent Coupon Payments over the term of the notes. |
Coupon Barrier Value: |
4,168.15 with respect to the SPX, 1,514.148 with respect to the RTY, and $306.86 with respect to the DIA, each of which is 70% of its Initial Value (rounded to two decimal places for the SPX and three decimal places for the RTY). |
Coupon Determination Dates and Coupon Payment Dates: |
Monthly. Each Coupon Determination Date and the corresponding Coupon Payment Date are as set forth below: |
|
|
Coupon
Determination
Dates* |
Coupon
Payment
Dates** |
|
Coupon
Determination
Dates* |
Coupon
Payment
Dates** |
|
1 |
April
3, 2025 |
April
8, 2025 |
31
|
October
4, 2027 |
October
7, 2027 |
|
2 |
May
5, 2025 |
May
8, 2025 |
32
|
November
3, 2027 |
November
8, 2027 |
|
3 |
June
3, 2025 |
June
6, 2025 |
33
|
December
3, 2027 |
December
8, 2027 |
|
4 |
July
3, 2025 |
July
9, 2025 |
34
|
January
3, 2028 |
January
6, 2028 |
|
5 |
August
4, 2025 |
August
7, 2025 |
35
|
February
3, 2028 |
February
8, 2028 |
|
6 |
September
3, 2025*** |
September
8, 2025**** |
36
|
March
3, 2028*** |
March
8, 2028**** |
|
7 |
October
3, 2025 |
October
8, 2025 |
37
|
April
3, 2028 |
April
6, 2028 |
|
8 |
November
3, 2025 |
November
6, 2025 |
38
|
May
3, 2028 |
May
8, 2028 |
|
9 |
December
3, 2025 |
December
8, 2025 |
39
|
June
5, 2028 |
June
8, 2028 |
|
10 |
January
5, 2026 |
January
8, 2026 |
40
|
July
3, 2028 |
July
7, 2028 |
|
11 |
February
3, 2026 |
February
6, 2026 |
41
|
August
3, 2028 |
August
8, 2028 |
|
12 |
March
3, 2026*** |
March
6, 2026**** |
42
|
September
5, 2028*** |
September
8, 2028**** |
|
13 |
April
6, 2026 |
April
9, 2026 |
43
|
October
3, 2028 |
October
6, 2028 |
|
14 |
May
4, 2026 |
May
7, 2026 |
44
|
November
3, 2028 |
November
8, 2028 |
|
15 |
June
3, 2026 |
June
8, 2026 |
45
|
December
4, 2028 |
December
7, 2028 |
|
16 |
July
6, 2026 |
July
9, 2026 |
46
|
January
3, 2029 |
January
8, 2029 |
|
17 |
August
3, 2026 |
August
6, 2026 |
47
|
February
5, 2029 |
February
8, 2029 |
|
18 |
September
3, 2026*** |
September
9, 2026**** |
48
|
March
5, 2029*** |
March
8, 2029**** |
|
19 |
October
5, 2026 |
October
8, 2026 |
49
|
April
3, 2029 |
April
6, 2029 |
|
20 |
November
3, 2026 |
November
6, 2026 |
50
|
May
3, 2029 |
May
8, 2029 |
|
21 |
December
3, 2026 |
December
8, 2026 |
51
|
June
4, 2029 |
June
7, 2029 |
|
22 |
January
4, 2027 |
January
7, 2027 |
52
|
July
3, 2029 |
July
9, 2029 |
|
23 |
February
3, 2027 |
February
8, 2027 |
53
|
August
3, 2029 |
August
8, 2029 |
|
24 |
March
3, 2027*** |
March
8, 2027**** |
54
|
September
4, 2029*** |
September
7, 2029**** |
|
25 |
April
5, 2027 |
April
8, 2027 |
55
|
October
3, 2029 |
October
9, 2029 |
|
26 |
May
3, 2027 |
May
6, 2027 |
56
|
November
5, 2029 |
November
8, 2029 |
|
27 |
June
3, 2027 |
June
8, 2027 |
57
|
December
3, 2029 |
December
6, 2029 |
|
28 |
July
6, 2027 |
July
9, 2027 |
58
|
January
3, 2030 |
January
8, 2030 |
|
29 |
August
3, 2027 |
August
6, 2027 |
59
|
February
4, 2030 |
February
7, 2030 |
|
30 |
September
3, 2027*** |
September
9, 2027**** |
60
|
March
1, 2030
(the
Final Valuation Date) |
March
6, 2030
(the
Maturity Date) |
|
*Each Coupon Determination Date is subject to postponement as described under
“Certain Terms of the Notes—Valuation Dates—For Notes Where the Reference Asset Consists of Multiple Indices”
in the index underlying supplement and “Certain Terms of the Notes—Valuation Dates—For Notes Where the Reference
Asset Consists of Multiple Funds” in the ETF underlying supplement. |
|
**Each Coupon Payment Date
is subject to postponement as described under “Certain Terms of the Notes—Interest
Payment Dates, Coupon Payment Dates, Call Payment Dates and Maturity Date” in the underlying
supplements.
|
|
***These are also Call
Observation Dates.
|
|
****These are also Call Payment Dates. |
Call Feature: |
If
the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying on any semi-annual
Call Observation Date is greater than or equal to its Call Value, we will automatically call all
the notes, and pay you on the applicable Call Payment Date your principal amount plus the applicable Contingent Coupon Payment otherwise
due for that Call Observation Date.
If the notes are automatically called, they will cease to be outstanding
on the related Call Payment Date, and no further payments will be made on the notes. You will not receive any notice from us if the notes
are automatically called. |
Call Value: |
For each Underlying, 100% of its Initial Value. |
Call Observation Dates: |
Semi-annual, as indicated in the table above. |
Call Payment Dates: |
Each Coupon Payment Date corresponding to a Call Observation Date. |
Payment at Maturity: |
If the notes have not been previously called, the Payment at Maturity
will be based on the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying and will be calculated as follows:
·
If the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is greater than or equal to its Principal Barrier Value:
Principal Amount + Final Contingent
Coupon Payment
·
If the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its Principal Barrier Value:
Principal Amount + (Principal
Amount × Percentage Change of the Worst Performing Underlying)
In this case, you will lose some or all
of the principal amount at maturity. Even with any Contingent Coupon Payments, the return on the notes could be negative.
|
Percentage Change: |
The “Percentage Change” with respect to each Underlying,
expressed as a percentage, is calculated as follows:
Final Value – Initial Value
Initial Value
|
Principal Barrier Value: |
4,168.15 with respect to the SPX, 1,514.148 with respect to the RTY, and $306.86 with respect to the DIA, each of which is 70% of its Initial Value (rounded to two decimal places for the SPX and three decimal places for the RTY). |
Worst Performing Underlying: |
On any Coupon Determination Date, including the Final Valuation Date, the “Worst Performing Underlying” is the Underlying that has the lowest Closing Value on that date as a percentage of its Initial Value. |
Initial Value: |
5,954.50 with respect to the SPX, 2,163.069 with respect to the RTY, and $438.37 with respect to the DIA, each of which was its Closing Value on the Strike Date. The Initial Value of the DIA will be subject to adjustment by the calculation agent as described under “Certain Terms of the Notes—Anti-Dilution Adjustments” in the accompanying ETF underlying supplement. |
Final Value: |
For each Underlying, its Closing Value on the Final Valuation Date. |
Closing Value: |
The Closing Level or the Closing Price, as applicable, of an Underlying. |
Calculation Agent: |
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. |
CUSIP/ISIN: |
13607XWF0 / US13607XWF04 |
Fees and Expenses: |
The price at which you purchase the notes includes costs that the Bank or its affiliates expect to incur and profits that the Bank or its affiliates expect to realize in connection with hedging activities related to the notes. |
HYPOTHETICAL
PAYMENT AT MATURITY
The following table and examples are provided for illustrative
purposes only and are hypothetical. They do not purport to be representative of every possible scenario concerning increases or decreases
in the Final Value of any Underlying relative to its Initial Value. We cannot predict the Closing Value of any Underlying on any Coupon
Determination Date, including the Final Valuation Date. The assumptions we have made in connection with the illustrations set forth below
may not reflect actual events. You should not take this illustration or these examples as an indication or assurance of the expected performance
of the Underlyings or return on the notes. The numbers appearing in the table below and following examples have been rounded for ease
of analysis.
The table below illustrates the Payment at Maturity on a
$1,000 investment in the notes for a hypothetical range of Percentage Changes of the Worst Performing Underlying from -100% to +100%.
The following results are based solely on the assumptions outlined below. The “Hypothetical Return on the Notes” as used below
is the number, expressed as a percentage, that results from comparing the Payment at Maturity per $1,000 principal amount to $1,000. The
potential returns described below assume that the notes have not been automatically called prior to maturity and are held to maturity,
and are calculated excluding any Contingent Coupon Payments paid prior to maturity. The following table and examples are based on the
following terms:
Principal Amount: |
$1,000 |
|
|
Contingent Coupon Payment: |
$7.60 (or 0.76% of the principal amount, equivalent
to 9.12% per annum) |
|
|
Hypothetical Initial Value of the Worst Performing
Underlying: |
100 |
|
|
Hypothetical Principal Barrier Value of the Worst Performing
Underlying: |
70 (70% of its Initial Value) |
Hypothetical Final
Value of the
Worst Performing
Underlying |
Hypothetical
Percentage Change
of the Worst
Performing
Underlying |
Hypothetical Payment at
Maturity |
Hypothetical Return on
the Notes (Excluding
Any Contingent
Coupon Payments
Paid Prior to
Maturity) |
200.00 |
100.00% |
$1,007.60(1) |
0.76% |
175.00 |
75.00% |
$1,007.60 |
0.76% |
150.00 |
50.00% |
$1,007.60 |
0.76% |
125.00 |
25.00% |
$1,007.60 |
0.76% |
100.00(2) |
0.00% |
$1,007.60 |
0.76% |
90.00 |
-10.00% |
$1,007.60 |
0.76% |
80.00 |
-20.00% |
$1,007.60 |
0.76% |
70.00(3) |
-30.00% |
$1,007.60 |
0.76% |
69.00 |
-31.00% |
$690.00 |
-31.00% |
50.00 |
-50.00% |
$500.00 |
-50.00% |
25.00 |
-75.00% |
$250.00 |
-75.00% |
0.00 |
-100.00% |
$0.00 |
-100.00% |
(1) | The Payment at Maturity will not exceed the principal amount plus the final Contingent Coupon Payment. |
(2) | The hypothetical Initial Value of 100 used in these examples has been chosen for illustrative
purposes only. The actual Initial Value of each Underlying is set forth on page PS-4 of this pricing supplement. |
(3) | This is the hypothetical Principal Barrier Value of the Worst Performing Underlying. |
The following examples indicate how the Payment at Maturity
would be calculated with respect to a hypothetical $1,000 investment in the notes assuming that the notes have not been automatically
called prior to maturity and are held to maturity.
Example 1: The Percentage Change of the Worst Performing
Underlying Is 50.00%.
Because the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying
is greater than or equal to its Principal Barrier Value, the Payment at Maturity would be $1,007.60 per $1,000 principal amount, calculated
as follows:
$1,000 + Final Contingent Coupon
Payment
= $1,000 + ($1,000 × 0.76%)
= $1,007.60
Example 1 shows that the Payment at Maturity will be fixed
at the principal amount plus the final Contingent Coupon Payment when the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is at or above
its Principal Barrier Value, regardless of the extent to which the value of the Worst Performing Underlying increases.
Example 2: The Percentage Change of the Worst Performing
Underlying Is -20.00%.
Because the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying
is greater than or equal to its Principal Barrier Value, the Payment at Maturity would be $1,007.60 per $1,000 principal amount, calculated
as follows:
$1,000 + Final Contingent Coupon Payment
= $1,000 + ($1,000 × 0.76%)
= $1,007.60
Example 2 shows that the Payment at Maturity will equal
the principal amount plus the final Contingent Coupon Payment when the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is at or above its
Principal Barrier Value, although the value of the Worst Performing Underlying has decreased moderately.
Example 3: The Percentage Change of the Worst Performing
Underlying Is -75.00%.
Because the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying
is less than its Principal Barrier Value, the Payment at Maturity would be $250.00 per $1,000 principal amount, calculated as follows:
$1,000 + ($1,000 × Percentage Change of the
Worst Performing Underlying)
= $1,000 + ($1,000 × -75.00%)
= $250.00
Example 3 shows that you are exposed on a 1-to-1 basis to
any decrease in the value of the Worst Performing Underlying from its Initial Value if its Final Value is less than its Principal Barrier
Value. You may lose up to 100% of your principal amount at maturity. Even with any Contingent Coupon Payments, the return on the notes
could be negative.
These examples illustrate that you will not participate
in any appreciation of any Underlying, but will be fully exposed to a decrease in the Worst Performing Underlying if the notes are not
called and the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its Principal Barrier Value, even if the Final Values of the
other Underlyings have appreciated or have not declined below their respective Principal Barrier Values.
INVESTOR
CONSIDERATIONS
The notes are not appropriate for all investors. The notes
may be an appropriate investment for you if:
| · | You believe that the Closing Value of each Underlying will be at or above
its Coupon Barrier Value on most or all of the Coupon Determination Dates, and the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying will
be at or above its Principal Barrier Value. |
| · | You seek an investment with monthly Contingent Coupon Payments of $7.60
per $1,000 principal amount (or 0.76% of the principal amount, equivalent to 9.12% per annum) until the earlier of maturity or automatic
call, if, and only if, the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying on the applicable Coupon Determination Date is greater than
or equal to its Coupon Barrier Value. |
| · | You are willing to lose a substantial portion or all of the principal amount
of the notes if the notes are not called and the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its Principal Barrier Value. |
| · | You are willing to accept the risk that you may not receive any Contingent
Coupon Payments on most or all of the Coupon Payment Dates and may lose up to 100% of the principal amount of the notes at maturity. |
| · | You are willing to invest in the notes based on the fact that your maximum
potential return is the sum of any Contingent Coupon Payments payable on the notes. |
| · | You are willing to forgo participation in any appreciation of any Underlying. |
| · | You understand that the return on the notes will depend solely on the performance
of the Worst Performing Underlying on each Coupon Determination Date and consequently, the notes are riskier than alternative investments
linked to only one of the Underlyings or linked to a basket composed of the Underlyings. |
| · | You understand that the notes may be automatically called prior to maturity
and that the term of the notes may be as short as approximately six months, or you are otherwise willing to hold the notes to maturity. |
| · | You do not seek certainty of current income over the term of the notes. |
| · | You are willing to forgo dividends or other distributions paid on the DIA
and the securities included in or held by the Underlyings. |
| · | You do not seek an investment for which there will be an active secondary
market. |
| · | You are willing to assume the credit risk of the Bank for any payments
under the notes. |
The notes may not be an appropriate investment for you if:
| · | You believe that the Closing Value of at least one Underlying will be below
its Coupon Barrier Value on most or all of the Coupon Determination Dates, and the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying will
be below its Principal Barrier Value. |
| · | You believe that the Contingent Coupon Payments, if any, will not provide
you with your desired return. |
| · | You are unwilling to lose a substantial portion or all of the principal
amount of the notes if the notes are not called and the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its Principal Barrier
Value. |
| · | You are unwilling to accept the risk that you may not receive any Contingent
Coupon Payments on most or all of the Coupon Payment Dates and may lose up to 100% of the principal amount of the notes at maturity. |
| · | You seek full payment of the principal amount of the notes at maturity. |
| · | You seek an uncapped return on your investment. |
| · | You seek exposure to the upside performance of any or each Underlying. |
| · | You seek exposure to a basket composed of the Underlyings or a similar
investment in which the overall return is based on a blend of the performances of the Underlyings, rather than solely on the Worst Performing
Underlying. |
| · | You are unable or unwilling to hold the notes that may be automatically
called prior to maturity, or you are otherwise unable or unwilling to hold the notes to maturity. |
| · | You seek certainty of current income over the term of the notes. |
| · | You want to receive dividends or other distributions paid on the DIA or
the securities included in or held by the Underlyings. |
| · | You seek an investment for which there will be an active secondary market. |
| · | You are not willing to assume the credit risk of the Bank for all payments
under the notes. |
The investor suitability considerations identified above
are not exhaustive. Whether or not the notes are a suitable investment for you will depend on your individual circumstances and you should
reach an investment decision only after you and your investment, legal, tax, accounting and other advisors have carefully considered the
suitability of an investment in the notes in light of your particular circumstances. You should also review ‘‘Additional Risk
Factors’’ below for risks related to the notes.
ADDITIONAL
RISK FACTORS
An investment in the notes involves significant risks. In
addition to the following risks included in this pricing supplement, we urge you to read “Risk Factors” beginning on page
S-1 of the accompanying underlying supplements, page S-1 of the prospectus supplement and page 1 of the prospectus.
You should understand the risks of investing in the notes
and should reach an investment decision only after careful consideration, with your advisers, of the suitability of the notes in light
of your particular financial circumstances and the information set forth in this pricing supplement and the accompanying underlying supplements,
the prospectus supplement and the prospectus.
Structure Risks
If the notes are not called, you may lose all or
a substantial portion of the principal amount of your notes.
The notes do not guarantee any return of principal. The
repayment of any principal on the notes at maturity depends on the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying. The Bank will only
repay you the full principal amount of your notes if the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is equal to or greater than its
Principal Barrier Value. If the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its Principal Barrier Value, you will lose
1% of the principal amount for each percentage point that the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its Initial
Value. You may lose a substantial portion or all of the principal amount. Even with any Contingent Coupon Payments, the return on the
notes could be negative.
The automatic Call Feature limits your potential
return.
If the notes are called, the payment on the notes on any
Call Payment Date is limited to the principal amount plus the applicable Contingent Coupon Payment. In addition, if the notes are called,
which may occur as early as the sixth Coupon Determination Date, the amount of coupon payable on the notes will be less than the full
amount of coupon that would have been payable if the notes had not been called prior to maturity. If the notes are automatically called,
you will lose the opportunity to continue to receive the Contingent Coupon Payments from the relevant Call Payment Date to the scheduled
Maturity Date, and the total return on the notes could be minimal. Because of the automatic Call Feature, the term of your investment
in the notes may be limited to a period that is shorter than the original term of the notes and may be as short as approximately six months.
There is no guarantee that you would be able to reinvest the proceeds from an investment in the notes at a comparable return for a similar
level of risk in the event the notes are automatically called prior to the Maturity Date.
The notes do not provide for fixed payments of interest
and you may receive no Contingent Coupon Payments on most or all of the Coupon Payment Dates.
On each Coupon Payment Date, you will receive a Contingent
Coupon Payment if, and only if, the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying on the related Coupon Determination Date is greater
than or equal to its Coupon Barrier Value. If the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying on any Coupon Determination Date is
less than its Coupon Barrier Value, you will not receive any Contingent Coupon Payment on the related Coupon Payment Date, and if the
Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying is less than its Coupon Barrier Value on each Coupon Determination Date over the term
of the notes, you will not receive any Contingent Coupon Payments over the entire term of the notes.
You will not participate in any appreciation of
any Underlying and your return on the notes will be limited to the Contingent Coupon Payments paid on the notes, if any.
The Payment at Maturity will not exceed the principal amount
plus the final Contingent Coupon Payment and any positive return you receive on the notes will be composed solely of the sum of any Contingent
Coupon Payments received prior to and at maturity. You will not participate in any appreciation of any Underlying. Therefore, if the appreciation
of any Underlying exceeds the sum of the Contingent Coupon Payments paid to you, if any, the notes will underperform an investment in
securities linked to that Underlying providing full participation in the appreciation. Accordingly, the return on the notes may be less
than the return would be if you made an investment in securities directly linked to the positive performance of the Underlyings.
The notes are subject to the full risks of the Worst
Performing Underlying and will be negatively affected if any Underlying performs poorly, even if the other Underlyings perform favorably.
You are subject to the full risks of the Worst Performing
Underlying. If the Worst Performing Underlying performs poorly, you will be negatively affected, even if the other Underlyings perform
favorably. The notes are not linked to a basket composed of the Underlyings, where the better performance of one Underlying could offset
the poor
performance of the others. Instead, you are subject to the full risks of the Worst Performing Underlying on each Coupon Determination
Date. As a result, the notes are riskier than an alternative investment linked to only one of the Underlyings or linked to a basket composed
of the Underlyings. You should not invest in the notes unless you understand and are willing to accept the full downside risks of the
Worst Performing Underlying.
Higher Contingent Coupon Payment or lower Principal
Barrier Value are generally associated with Underlyings with greater expected volatility and therefore can indicate a greater risk of
loss.
“Volatility” refers to the frequency and magnitude
of changes in the value of an Underlying. The greater the expected volatility with respect to an Underlying on the Trade Date, the higher
the expectation as of the Trade Date that the value of the Underlying could close below its Principal Barrier Value on the Final Valuation
Date, indicating a higher expected risk of loss on the notes. This greater expected risk will generally be reflected in a higher Contingent
Coupon Payment than the yield payable on our conventional debt securities with a similar maturity, or in more favorable terms (such as
a lower Coupon Barrier Value or a higher Contingent Coupon Payment) than for similar securities linked to the performance of the Underlyings
with a lower expected volatility as of the Trade Date. You should therefore understand that a relatively higher Contingent Coupon Payment
may indicate an increased risk of loss. Further, a relatively lower Principal Barrier Value may not necessarily indicate that the notes
have a greater likelihood of a repayment of principal at maturity. The volatility of an Underlying can change significantly over the term
of the notes. The value of an Underlying could fall sharply, which could result in a significant loss of principal. You should be willing
to accept the downside market risk of the Underlyings and the potential to lose some or all of your principal at maturity.
The payments on the notes are not linked to the
value of the Underlyings at any time other than the Coupon Determination Dates.
The payments on the notes will be based on the Closing Value
of each Underlying on the Coupon Determination Dates. Therefore, for example, if the Closing Value of an Underlying declined as of a Coupon
Determination Date below its Initial Value or Coupon Barrier Value, as applicable, the notes will not be called and the relevant Contingent
Coupon Payment will not be payable. Similarly, if the Final Value of the Worst Performing Underlying declined as of the Final Valuation
Date below its Principal Barrier Value, the Payment at Maturity may be significantly less than it would otherwise have been had the Payment
at Maturity been linked to the Closing Value of the Worst Performing Underlying prior to the Final Valuation Date. Although the actual
value of an Underlying at other times during the term of the notes may be higher than its Closing Value on a Coupon Determination Date,
the payments on the notes will not benefit from the Closing Value of such Underlying at any time other than the Coupon Determination Dates.
The notes are riskier than notes with a shorter term.
The notes are relatively long-dated. Therefore, many of
the risks of the notes are heightened as compared to notes with a shorter term, as you will be subject to those risks for a longer period
of time. In addition, the value of a longer-dated note is typically less than the value of an otherwise comparable note with a shorter
term.
Reference Asset Risks
The notes will be subject to risks associated with small-capitalization
companies.
The RTY tracks companies that are considered small-capitalization.
These companies often have greater stock price volatility, lower trading volume and less liquidity than large-capitalization companies
and therefore the level of the RTY may be more volatile than an investment in stocks issued by larger companies. Stock prices of
small-capitalization companies may also be more vulnerable than those of larger companies to adverse business and economic developments,
and the stocks of small-capitalization companies may be thinly traded, making it difficult for the RTY to track them. In addition, small-capitalization
companies are often less stable financially than large-capitalization companies and may depend on a small number of key personnel, making
them more vulnerable to loss of personnel. Small-capitalization companies are often subject to less analyst coverage and may be in early,
and less predictable, periods of their corporate existences. These companies tend to have smaller revenues, less diverse product lines,
smaller shares of their product or service markets, fewer financial resources and competitive strengths than large-capitalization companies,
and are more susceptible to adverse developments related to their products or services.
The performance of the DIA may not correlate with the
performance of its Underlying Index as well as the net asset value per share of the DIA, especially during periods of market volatility.
Although the DIA is designed to track the performance of
its Underlying Index, the performance of the DIA and that of its Underlying Index generally will vary due to, for example, transaction
costs, management fees, certain corporate actions, and timing variances. Moreover, it is also possible that the performance of the DIA
may not fully replicate or may, in certain circumstances, diverge significantly from the performance of its Underlying Index. This could
be due to, for example, the DIA not holding all or substantially all of the underlying assets included in the Underlying Index and/or
holding assets that are not included in the Underlying Index, the temporary unavailability of certain securities in the secondary market,
the performance of any derivative instruments held by the DIA, differences in trading hours between the DIA (or the underlying assets
held by the DIA) and the Underlying Index, or due to other circumstances. This variation in performance is called the “tracking
error,” and, at times, the tracking error may be significant.
In
addition, because the shares of the DIA are traded on a securities exchange and are subject to market supply and investor demand, the
market price of one share of the DIA may differ from its net asset value per share; shares of the DIA may trade at, above, or below
its net asset value per share.
During periods of market volatility, securities held by
the DIA may be unavailable in the secondary market, market participants may be unable to calculate accurately the net asset value per
share of the DIA and the liquidity of the DIA may be adversely affected. This kind of market volatility may also disrupt the ability of
market participants to create and redeem shares of the DIA. Further, market volatility may adversely affect, sometimes materially, the
prices at which market participants are willing to buy and sell shares of the DIA. As a result, under these circumstances, the market
value of shares of the DIA may vary substantially from the net asset value per share of the DIA.
For the foregoing reasons, the performance of the DIA may
not match the performance of its Underlying Index over the same period. Because of this variance, the return on the notes, to the extent
dependent on the performance of the DIA, may not be the same as an investment directly in the securities, commodities, or other assets
included in the Underlying Index or the same as a debt security with a return linked to the performance of the Underlying Index.
Conflicts of Interest
Certain business, trading and hedging activities
of us, the agent, and our other affiliates may create conflicts with your interests and could potentially adversely affect the value of
the notes.
We,
the agent, and our other affiliates may engage in trading and other business activities related to an
Underlying or any securities included in or held by an Underlying that are not for
your account or on your behalf. We, the agent, and our other affiliates also may issue or underwrite other financial instruments with
returns based upon an Underlying. These activities may present a conflict of interest between
your interest in the notes and the interests that we, the agent, and our other affiliates may have in our or their proprietary accounts,
in facilitating transactions, including block trades, for our or their other customers, and in accounts under our or their management.
These trading and other business activities, if they adversely affect the value of any Underlying
or secondary trading in your notes, could be adverse to your interests as a beneficial owner of the notes.
Moreover,
we, the agent and our other affiliates play a variety of roles in connection with the issuance of the notes, including hedging
our obligations under the notes and making the assumptions and inputs used to determine the pricing of the notes and the initial estimated
value of the notes when the terms of the notes are set. We expect to hedge our obligations under the notes through the agent, one of our
other affiliates, and/or another unaffiliated counterparty, which may include any dealer from which you purchase the notes. Any of these
hedging activities may adversely affect the value of an Underlying and therefore the market
value of the notes and the amount you will receive, if any, on the notes. In connection with such activities, the economic interests of
us, the agent, and our other affiliates may be adverse to your interests as an investor in the notes. Any of these activities may adversely
affect the value of the notes. In addition, because hedging our obligations entails risk and may be influenced by market forces beyond
our control, this hedging activity may result in a profit that is more or less than expected, or it may result in a loss. We, the agent,
one or more of our other affiliates or any unaffiliated counterparty will retain any profits realized in hedging our obligations under
the notes even if investors do not receive a favorable investment return under the terms of the notes or in any secondary market transaction.
Any profit in connection with such hedging activities will be in addition to any other compensation that we, the
agent, our other affiliates
or any unaffiliated counterparty receive for the sale of the notes, which creates an additional incentive to sell the notes to you. We,
the agent, our other affiliates or any unaffiliated counterparty will have no obligation to take, refrain from taking or cease taking
any action with respect to these transactions based on the potential effect on an investor in the notes.
There are potential conflicts of interest between
you and the calculation agent.
The calculation agent will determine, among other things,
the amount of payments on the notes. The calculation agent will exercise its judgment when performing its functions. For example, the
calculation agent will determine whether a Market Disruption Event affecting an Underlying has occurred, and make a good faith estimate
in its sole discretion of the Closing Value for an affected Underlying if the relevant Coupon Determination Date is postponed to the last
possible day, and make certain anti-dilution adjustments to the Initial Value of the DIA if certain corporate events occur. See “Certain
Terms of the Notes—Valuation Dates” in the underlying supplements and “—Anti-Dilution Adjustments” in the
ETF underlying supplement. This determination may, in turn, depend on the calculation agent’s judgment as to whether the event has
materially interfered with our ability or the ability of one of our affiliates to unwind our hedge positions. The calculation agent will
be required to carry out its duties in good faith and use its reasonable judgment. However, because we will be the calculation agent,
potential conflicts of interest could arise. None of us, CIBCWM or any of our other affiliates will have any obligation to consider your
interests as a holder of the notes in taking any action that might affect the value of your notes.
Tax Risks
The tax treatment of the notes is uncertain.
Significant aspects of the tax treatment of the notes are
uncertain. You should consult your tax advisor about your own tax situation. See “United States Federal Income Tax Considerations”
and “Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations” in this pricing supplement, “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences” in the underlying supplements and “Material Income Tax Consequences—Canadian Taxation” in the prospectus.
General Risks
Payments on the notes are subject to our credit
risk, and actual or perceived changes in our creditworthiness are expected to affect the value of the notes.
The notes are our senior unsecured debt obligations and
are not, either directly or indirectly, an obligation of any third party. As further described in the accompanying prospectus and prospectus
supplement, the notes will rank on par with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated debt obligations, except such obligations as
may be preferred by operation of law. Any payment to be made on the notes depends on our ability to satisfy our obligations as they come
due. As a result, the actual and perceived creditworthiness of us may affect the market value of the notes and, in the event we were to
default on our obligations, you may not receive the amounts owed to you under the terms of the notes. If we default on our obligations
under the notes, your investment would be at risk and you could lose some or all of your investment. See “Description of Senior
Debt Securities—Events of Default” in the accompanying prospectus.
The Bank’s initial estimated value of the notes is lower
than the initial issue price (price to public) of the notes.
The initial issue price of the notes exceeds the Bank’s initial
estimated value because costs associated with selling and structuring the notes, as well as hedging the notes, are included in the initial
issue price of the notes. See “The Bank’s Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
The Bank’s initial estimated value does not represent
future values of the notes and may differ from others’ estimates.
The Bank’s initial estimated value of the notes is only an estimate,
which was determined by reference to the Bank’s internal pricing models when the terms of the notes were set. This estimated value
was based on market conditions and other relevant factors existing at that time, the Bank’s internal funding rate on the Trade Date
and the Bank’s assumptions about market parameters, which can include volatility, dividend rates, interest rates and other factors.
Different pricing models and assumptions could provide valuations for the notes that are greater or less than the Bank’s initial
estimated value. In addition, market conditions and other relevant factors in the future may change, and any assumptions may prove to
be incorrect. On future dates, the market value of the notes could change significantly based on, among other things, changes in market
conditions, including the values of the Underlyings, the Bank’s creditworthiness, interest rate movements and other relevant factors,
which may impact the price at which the agent or any other party would be willing to buy the notes from you in any secondary market transactions.
The Bank’s initial estimated value does not represent a minimum price at which the agent or any other party would be willing to
buy the notes in any secondary market (if any exists) at any time. See “The Bank’s Estimated Value of the Notes” in
this pricing supplement.
The Bank’s initial estimated value of the notes was not
determined by reference to credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate debt.
The internal funding rate used in the determination of the
Bank’s initial estimated value of the notes generally represents a discount from the credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate
debt. The discount is based on, among other things, our view of the funding value of the notes as well as the higher issuance, operational
and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs for our conventional fixed-rate debt. If the Bank were
to have used the interest rate implied by our conventional fixed-rate debt, we would expect the economic terms of the notes to be more
favorable to you. Consequently, our use of an internal funding rate for market-linked notes had an adverse effect on the economic terms
of the notes and the initial estimated value of the notes on the Trade Date, and could have an adverse effect on any secondary market
prices of the notes. See “The Bank’s Estimated Value of the Notes” in this pricing supplement.
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange
and we do not expect a trading market for the notes to develop.
The notes will not be listed on any securities exchange.
Although CIBCWM and/or its affiliates may purchase the notes from holders, they are not obligated to do so and are not required to make
a market for the notes. There can be no assurance that a secondary market will develop for the notes. Because we do not expect that any
market makers will participate in a secondary market for the notes, the price at which you may be able to sell your notes is likely to
depend on the price, if any, at which CIBCWM and/or its affiliates are willing to buy your notes.
If a secondary market does exist, it may be limited. Accordingly,
there may be a limited number of buyers if you decide to sell your notes prior to maturity or automatic call. This may affect the price
you receive upon such sale. Consequently, you should be willing to hold the notes to maturity or automatic call.
INFORMATION
REGARDING THE UNDERLYINGS
The information below are brief descriptions of each Underlying.
We have derived the following information from publicly available documents. We have not independently verified the accuracy or completeness
of the following information. In addition, information about the Underlyings may be obtained from other sources including, but not limited
to, the websites of their sponsors. We are not incorporating by reference into this pricing supplement the websites or any materials they
include. None of us, CIBCWM or any of our other affiliates makes any representation that such publicly available information regarding
the Underlyings is accurate or complete.
The S&P 500® Index
The S&P 500® Index (Bloomberg ticker:
“SPX <Index>”) is calculated, maintained and published by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC. The SPX consists of stocks
of 500 companies selected to provide a performance benchmark for the U.S. equity markets. See “Index Descriptions—The S&P
U.S. Indices” beginning on page S-43 of the accompanying underlying supplement for additional information about the SPX.
The Russell 2000® Index
The Russell 2000® Index (Bloomberg ticker:
“RTY <Index>”) is calculated, maintained and published by FTSE Russell. The RTY is designed to track the performance
of the small capitalization segment of the U.S. equity market. The RTY is a subset of the Russell 3000® Index and represents
approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. The RTY includes approximately 2,000 of the smallest securities in
the U.S. equity market. See “Index Descriptions—The Russell Indices” beginning on page S-31 of the accompanying underlying
supplement for additional information about the RTY.
The SPDR® Dow Jones®
Industrial Average ETF Trust
The
DIA seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Dow Jones Industrial Average®
(the “Underlying Index”). The Underlying Index is composed of 30 "blue-chip" U.S. stocks. The DIA trades on the
NYSE Area, Inc. under the ticker symbol “DIA.”
Information
provided to or filed with the SEC by the DIA pursuant to the Securities Act and the Investment Company Act can be located by reference
to SEC file numbers 333-31247 and 811-09170, respectively, through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. See “Reference
Sponsors and Fund Descriptions—The SPDR® Dow Jones® Industrial Average ETF Trust” beginning
on page S-47 of the accompanying ETF underlying supplement for additional information about the DIA.
Historical Performance of the Underlyings
The
following graphs set forth daily Closing Values of the Underlyings for the period from January 1, 2020 to March 3, 2025. On March 3, 2025,
the Closing Level of the SPX was 5,849.72, the Closing Level of the RTY was 2,102.235 and the Closing Price of the DIA was $432.09.
We obtained the Closing Values below from Bloomberg L.P. (“Bloomberg”) without independent verification. The historical performance
of an Underlying should not be taken as an indication of its future performance, and no assurances can be given as to the value of any
Underlying at any time during the term of the notes, including the Coupon Determination Dates. We cannot give you assurance that the performance
of the Underlyings will result in the return of any of your investment.
Historical
Performance of SPX

Source: Bloomberg
Historical
Performance of the RTY

Source: Bloomberg
Historical
Performance of the DIA

Source: Bloomberg
UNITED
STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following discussion is a brief summary of the material
U.S. federal income tax considerations relating to an investment in the notes. The following summary is not complete and is both qualified
and supplemented by (although to the extent inconsistent supersedes) the discussion entitled “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences”
in the underlying supplements, which you should carefully review prior to investing in the notes. It applies only to those U.S. Holders
who are not excluded from the discussion of United States Taxation in the accompanying prospectus.
The U.S. federal income tax considerations of your investment
in the notes are uncertain. No statutory, judicial or administrative authority directly discusses how the notes should be treated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. In the opinion of our tax counsel, Mayer Brown LLP, it would generally be reasonable to treat the notes
as prepaid derivative contracts. Pursuant to the terms of the notes, you agree to treat the notes in this manner for all U.S. federal
income tax purposes. If this treatment is respected, you should generally recognize capital gain or loss upon the sale, exchange, redemption
or payment upon maturity in an amount equal to the difference between the amount you receive in such transaction and the amount that you
paid for your notes. Such gain or loss should generally be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if you have held your notes for more
than one year. Although the tax treatment of the Contingent Coupon Payments is unclear, we intend to treat any Contingent Coupon Payments,
including on the Maturity Date or upon an automatic call, as ordinary income includible in income by you at the time it accrues or is
received in accordance with your normal method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
The expected characterization of the notes is not binding
on the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) or the courts. It is possible that the IRS would seek to characterize the
notes in a manner that results in tax consequences to you that are different from those described above or in the accompanying underlying
supplements. For a more detailed discussion of certain alternative characterizations with respect to the notes and certain other considerations
with respect to an investment in the notes, you should consider the discussion set forth in “Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences”
of the underlying supplements. We are not responsible for any adverse consequences that you may experience as a result of any alternative
characterization of the notes for U.S. federal income tax or other tax purposes.
With respect to the discussion in the underlying supplement
regarding “dividend equivalent” payments, the IRS has issued a notice that provides that withholding on dividend equivalent
payments will not apply to specified ELIs that are not delta-one instruments and that are issued before January 1, 2027.
You should consult your tax advisor as to the tax consequences
of such characterization and any possible alternative characterizations of the notes for U.S. federal income tax purposes. You should
also consult your tax advisor concerning the U.S. federal income tax and other tax consequences of your investment in the notes in your
particular circumstances, including the application of state, local or other tax laws and the possible effects of changes in federal or
other tax laws.
CERTAIN
CANADIAN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
In the opinion of Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, our
Canadian tax counsel, the following summary describes the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations under the Income Tax Act
(Canada) and the regulations thereto (the “Canadian Tax Act”) generally applicable at the date hereof to a purchaser who acquires
beneficial ownership of a note pursuant to this pricing supplement and who for the purposes of the Canadian Tax Act and at all relevant
times: (a) is neither resident nor deemed to be resident in Canada; (b) deals at arm’s length with the Issuer and any transferee
resident (or deemed to be resident) in Canada to whom the purchaser disposes of the note; (c) does not use or hold and is not deemed to
use or hold the note in, or in the course of, carrying on a business in Canada; (d) is entitled to receive all payments (including any
interest and principal) made on the note; (e) is not a, and deals at arm’s length with any, “specified shareholder”
of the Issuer for purposes of the thin capitalization rules in the Canadian Tax Act; and (f) is not an entity in respect of which the
Issuer or any transferee resident (or deemed to be resident) in Canada to whom the purchaser disposes of, loans or otherwise transfers
the note is a “specified entity”, and is not a “specified entity” in respect of such a transferee, in each case,
for purposes of the Hybrid Mismatch Rules, as defined below (a “Non-Resident Holder”). Special rules which apply to non-resident
insurers carrying on business in Canada and elsewhere are not discussed in this summary.
This
summary assumes that no amount paid or payable to a holder described herein will be the deduction component of a “hybrid mismatch
arrangement” under which the payment arises within the meaning of the rules in the Canadian Tax Act with respect to “hybrid
mismatch arrangements” (the “Hybrid Mismatch Rules”). Investors should note that the Hybrid Mismatch Rules are
highly complex and there remains significant uncertainty as to their interpretation and application.
This summary is supplemental to and should be read together
with the description of material Canadian federal income tax considerations relevant to a Non-Resident Holder owning notes under “Material
Income Tax Consequences—Canadian Taxation” in the accompanying prospectus and a Non-Resident Holder should carefully read
that description as well.
This summary is of a general nature only and is not intended
to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any particular Non-Resident Holder. Non-Resident Holders are advised to
consult with their own tax advisors with respect to their particular circumstances.
Based on Canadian tax counsel’s understanding of the
Canada Revenue Agency’s administrative policies, and having regard to the terms of the notes, interest payable on the notes should
not be considered to be “participating debt interest” as defined in the Canadian Tax Act and accordingly, a Non-Resident Holder
should not be subject to Canadian non-resident withholding tax in respect of amounts paid or credited or deemed to have been paid or credited
by the Issuer on a note as, on account of or in lieu of payment of, or in satisfaction of, interest.
Non-Resident Holders should consult their own advisors regarding
the consequences to them of a disposition of notes to a person with whom they are not dealing at arm’s length for purposes of the
Canadian Tax Act.
SUPPLEMENTAL
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION (CONFLICTS OF INTEREST)
CIBCWM will purchase the notes from CIBC at the price to
public less the underwriting discount set forth on the cover page of this pricing supplement for distribution to other registered broker-dealers,
or will offer the notes directly to investors. CIBCWM or other registered broker-dealers will offer the notes at the price to public set
forth on the cover page of this pricing supplement. CIBCWM may receive a commission of $6.00 (0.60%) per $1,000 principal amount of the
notes and may use a portion or all of that commission to allow selling concessions to other dealers in connection with the distribution
of the notes. The other dealers may forgo, in their sole discretion, some or all of their selling concessions. The price to public for
notes purchased by certain fee-based advisory accounts will be 99.40% of the principal amount of the notes. Any sale of a note to a fee-based
advisory account at a price to public below 100.00% of the principal amount will reduce the agent’s commission specified on the
cover page of this pricing supplement with respect to such note. The price to public paid by any fee-based advisory account will be reduced
by the amount of any fees assessed by the dealers involved in the sale of the notes to such advisory account but not by more than 0.60%
of the principal amount of the notes.
CIBCWM is our affiliate, and is deemed to have a conflict
of interest under FINRA Rule 5121. In accordance with FINRA Rule 5121, CIBCWM may not make sales in this offering to any of its discretionary
accounts without the prior written approval of the customer.
We will deliver the notes against payment therefor in New
York, New York on a date that is more than one business day following the Trade Date. Under Rule 15c6-1 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, trades in the secondary market generally are required to settle in one business day, unless the parties to any such trade expressly
agree otherwise. Accordingly, purchasers who wish to trade the notes on any date prior to one business day before delivery will be required
to specify alternative settlement arrangements to prevent a failed settlement.
The Bank may use this pricing supplement in the initial
sale of the notes. In addition, CIBCWM or another of the Bank’s affiliates may use this pricing supplement in market-making transactions
in any notes after their initial sale. Unless CIBCWM or we inform you otherwise in the confirmation of sale, this pricing supplement is
being used by CIBCWM in a market-making transaction.
While
CIBCWM may make markets in the notes, it is under no obligation to do so and may discontinue any market-making activities at any time
without notice. The price that it makes available from time to time after the Original Issue Date at which it would be willing
to repurchase the notes will generally reflect its estimate of their value. That estimated value will be based upon a variety of factors,
including then prevailing market conditions, our creditworthiness and transaction costs. However, for a period of approximately three
months after the Trade Date, the price at which CIBCWM may repurchase the notes is expected to be higher than their estimated value at
that time. This is because, at the beginning of this period, that price will not include certain costs that were included in the initial
issue price, particularly our hedging costs and profits. As the period continues, these costs are expected to be gradually included in
the price that CIBCWM would be willing to pay, and the difference between that price and CIBCWM’s estimate of the value of the notes
will decrease over time until the end of this period. After this period, if CIBCWM continues to make a market in the notes, the prices
that it would pay for them are expected to reflect its estimated value, as well as customary bid-ask spreads for similar trades. In addition,
the value of the notes shown on your account statement may not be identical to the price at which CIBCWM would be willing to purchase
the notes at that time, and could be lower than CIBCWM’s price. See the section titled “Supplemental Plan of Distribution
(Conflicts of Interest)” in the accompanying prospectus supplement.
The price at which you purchase the notes includes costs
that the Bank or its affiliates expect to incur and profits that the Bank or its affiliates expect to realize in connection with hedging
activities related to the notes. These costs and profits will likely reduce the secondary market price, if any secondary market develops,
for the notes. As a result, you may experience an immediate and substantial decline in the market value of your notes on the Original
Issue Date.
THE
BANK’S ESTIMATED VALUE OF THE NOTES
The Bank’s initial estimated value of the notes set
forth on the cover of this pricing supplement is equal to the sum of the values of the following hypothetical components: (1) a fixed-income
debt component with the same maturity as the notes, valued using our internal funding rate for structured debt described below, and (2)
the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes. The Bank’s initial estimated value does not represent
a minimum price at which CIBCWM or any other person would be willing to buy your notes in any secondary market (if any exists) at any
time. The internal funding rate used in the determination of the Bank’s initial estimated value generally represents a discount
from the credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate debt. The discount is based on, among other things, our view of the funding value
of the notes as well as the higher issuance, operational and ongoing liability management costs of the notes in comparison to those costs
for our conventional fixed-rate debt. For additional information, see “Additional Risk Factors—The Bank’s initial estimated
value of the notes was not determined by reference to credit spreads for our conventional fixed-rate debt” in this pricing supplement.
The value of the derivative or derivatives underlying the economic terms of the notes is derived from the Bank’s or a third party
hedge provider’s internal pricing models. These models are dependent on inputs such as the traded market prices of comparable derivative
instruments and on various other inputs, some of which are market-observable, and which can include volatility, dividend rates, interest
rates and other factors, as well as assumptions about future market events and/or environments. Accordingly, the Bank’s initial
estimated value of the notes was determined when the terms of the notes were set based on market conditions and other relevant factors
and assumptions existing at that time. See “Additional Risk Factors—The Bank’s initial estimated value does not represent
future values of the notes and may differ from others’ estimates” in this pricing supplement.
The Bank’s initial estimated value of the notes is
lower than the initial issue price of the notes because costs associated with selling, structuring and hedging the notes are included
in the initial issue price of the notes. These costs include the selling commissions paid to CIBCWM and other affiliated or unaffiliated
dealers, the projected profits that our hedge counterparties, which may include our affiliates, expect to realize for assuming risks inherent
in hedging our obligations under the notes and the estimated cost of hedging our obligations under the notes. Because hedging our obligations
entails risk and may be influenced by market forces beyond our control, this hedging may result in a profit that is more or less than
expected, or it may result in a loss. We or one or more of our affiliates will retain any profits realized in hedging our obligations
under the notes. See “Additional Risk Factors—The Bank’s initial estimated value of the notes is lower than the initial
issue price (price to public) of the notes” in this pricing supplement.
VALIDITY
OF THE NOTES
In the opinion of Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, as Canadian
counsel to the Bank, the issue and sale of the notes has been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action of the Bank in conformity
with the indenture, and when the notes have been duly executed, authenticated and issued in accordance with the indenture, the notes will
be validly issued and, to the extent validity of the notes is a matter governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario or the federal
laws of Canada applicable therein, will be valid obligations of the Bank, subject to applicable bankruptcy, insolvency and other laws
of general application affecting creditors’ rights, equitable principles, and subject to limitations as to the currency in which
judgments in Canada may be rendered, as prescribed by the Currency Act (Canada). This opinion is given as of the date hereof and is limited
to the laws of the Province of Ontario and the federal laws of Canada applicable therein. In addition, this opinion is subject to customary
assumptions about the Trustee’s authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and the genuineness of signature, and to
such counsel’s reliance on the Bank and other sources as to certain factual matters, all as stated in the opinion letter of such
counsel dated June 6, 2023, which has been filed as Exhibit 5.2 to the Bank’s Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed with the
SEC on June 6, 2023.
In the opinion of Mayer Brown LLP, when the notes have been
duly completed in accordance with the indenture and issued and sold as contemplated by this pricing supplement and the accompanying underlying
supplement, prospectus supplement and prospectus, the notes will constitute valid and binding obligations of the Bank, entitled to the
benefits of the indenture, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer, reorganization, moratorium and similar laws of general
applicability relating to or affecting creditors’ rights and to general equity principles. This opinion is given as of the date
hereof and is limited to the laws of the State of New York. This opinion is subject to customary assumptions about the Trustee’s
authorization, execution and delivery of the indenture and such counsel’s reliance on the Bank and other sources as to certain factual
matters, all as stated in the legal opinion dated June 6, 2023, which has been filed as Exhibit 5.1 to the Bank’s Registration Statement
on Form F-3 filed with the SEC on June 6, 2023.
F-3
424B2
EX-FILING FEES
333-272447
0001045520
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE /CAN/
0001045520
2025-03-03
2025-03-03
iso4217:USD
xbrli:pure
xbrli:shares
Calculation of Filing Fee Tables
|
F-3
|
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE /CAN/
|
The maximum aggregate offering price of the securities to which the prospectus relates is $1,419,000. The prospectus is a final prospectus for the related offering.
|
|
v3.25.0.1
X |
- DefinitionA unique 10-digit SEC-issued value to identify entities that have filed disclosures with the SEC. It is commonly abbreviated as CIK.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityCentralIndexKey |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
dei:centralIndexKeyItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- DefinitionThe exact name of the entity filing the report as specified in its charter, which is required by forms filed with the SEC.
+ ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Exchange Act -Number 240 -Section 12 -Subsection b-2
+ Details
Name: |
dei_EntityRegistrantName |
Namespace Prefix: |
dei_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:normalizedStringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- References
+ Details
Name: |
ffd_FeeExhibitTp |
Namespace Prefix: |
ffd_ |
Data Type: |
ffd:feeExhibitTypeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- References
+ Details
Name: |
ffd_RegnFileNb |
Namespace Prefix: |
ffd_ |
Data Type: |
ffd:fileNumberItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- References
+ Details
Name: |
ffd_SubmissionLineItems |
Namespace Prefix: |
ffd_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:stringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- References
+ Details
Name: |
ffd_SubmissnTp |
Namespace Prefix: |
ffd_ |
Data Type: |
ffd:submissionTypeItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
v3.25.0.1
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230
+ Details
Name: |
ffd_FeesSummaryLineItems |
Namespace Prefix: |
ffd_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:stringItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230
+ Details
Name: |
ffd_FnlPrspctsFlg |
Namespace Prefix: |
ffd_ |
Data Type: |
xbrli:booleanItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230
+ Details
Name: |
ffd_NrrtvDsclsr |
Namespace Prefix: |
ffd_ |
Data Type: |
dtr-types:textBlockItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
X |
- ReferencesReference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Securities Act -Number 230
+ Details
Name: |
ffd_NrrtvMaxAggtOfferingPric |
Namespace Prefix: |
ffd_ |
Data Type: |
ffd:nonNegative100TMonetary2ItemType |
Balance Type: |
na |
Period Type: |
duration |
|
Canadian Imperial Bank o... (NYSE:CM)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Fév 2025 à Mar 2025
Canadian Imperial Bank o... (NYSE:CM)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mar 2024 à Mar 2025