0001173420 false --11-30 2022 FY 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 33.33 5 5 5 2 2 4 5
00011734202021-12-012022-11-30 thunderdome:item iso4217:USD
00011734202019-12-012020-11-30 00011734202020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2020-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:ManagementAndAdministrativeServicesProvidedMemberng:DonlinGoldMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:ManagementAndAdministrativeServicesProvidedMemberng:DonlinGoldMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:ManagementAndAdministrativeServicesProvidedMemberng:DonlinGoldMember2021-12-012022-11-30
00011734202020-11-30 00011734202021-11-30 00011734202022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CapitalLossCarryforwardMember2021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CapitalLossCarryforwardMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:IndefiniteMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:IndefiniteMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2042Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2042Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2041Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2041Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2040Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2040Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2039Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2039Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2038Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2038Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2037Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2037Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2036Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2036Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2035Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2035Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2034Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2034Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2033Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2033Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2032Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2032Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2031Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2031Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2030Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2030Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2029Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2029Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2028Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2028Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2027Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2027Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2026Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2026Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2025Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2025Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:DomesticCountryMemberus-gaap:CanadaRevenueAgencyMemberng:ExpiringIn2024Member2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:ForeignCountryMemberus-gaap:InternalRevenueServiceIRSMemberng:ExpiringIn2024Member2022-11-30
xbrli:pure xbrli:shares
0001173420ng:DeferredShareUnitsMembersrt:DirectorMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:DeferredShareUnitsMembersrt:DirectorMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:DeferredShareUnitsMembersrt:DirectorMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:DeferredShareUnitsMembersrt:DirectorMember2021-12-012022-11-30
iso4217:USDxbrli:shares
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMembersrt:DirectorMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMember2021-12-012022-11-30 utr:Y
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMember2022-11-302022-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMember2021-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMembersrt:MinimumMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2020-12-012022-11-30
0001173420ng:DeferredShareUnitsMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:DeferredShareUnitsMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:DeferredShareUnitsMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:BarrickMemberus-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMemberus-gaap:PrimeRateMember2021-12-012022-11-30
00011734202019-11-30 0001173420ng:TotalLiabilitiesMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420ng:SaltLakeCityOfficeMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:BarrickMemberus-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:OtherNoncurrentAssetsMember2021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:OtherNoncurrentAssetsMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2021-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2020-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2021-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420ng:DonlinGoldMember2019-11-30
0001173420ng:BarrickMemberng:DonlinGoldMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:BarrickMemberng:DonlinGoldMember2022-11-30 iso4217:CAD
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfGaloreCreekProjectFeasibilityMember2021-11-03
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfMinasSanRoqueProjectPrefeasibilityMember2021-11-03
0001173420ng:MinasSanRoqueMember2021-11-032021-11-03
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponApprovalOfGaloreCreekProjectConstructionPlanMember2018-07-27
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfGaloreCreekProjectFeasibilityMemberus-gaap:MeasurementInputDiscountRateMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfGaloreCreekProjectFeasibilityMemberus-gaap:MeasurementInputExpectedTermMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfGaloreCreekProjectFeasibilityMember2022-11-30
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfGaloreCreekProjectPrefeasibilityMember2021-07-272021-07-27
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfGaloreCreekProjectFeasibilityMember2018-07-27
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfGaloreCreekProjectPrefeasibilityMember2018-07-27
0001173420ng:GaloreCreekMember2018-07-272018-07-27
0001173420ng:NoteReceivableUponCompletionOfGaloreCreekProjectPrefeasibilityMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CommonStockMember2022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-12-012022-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-12-012021-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420ng:PerformanceShareUnitsMemberus-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-12-012020-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-11-30
0001173420us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-11-30 00011734202023-01-16
00011734202022-05-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
☒
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended November 30, 2022
OR
☐
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number: 001-31913
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
British Columbia
|
N/A
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
201 South Main Street, Suite 400
Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
|
84111
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
(801) 639-0511
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
Title of each class
|
Trading Symbol(s)
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Shares
|
NG
|
NYSE American
Toronto Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large accelerated filer ☒
|
Accelerated filer ☐
|
Non-accelerated filer ☐
|
Smaller reporting company ☐
|
Emerging growth company ☐
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on
and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the
registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit
report. ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act,
indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an
error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are
restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based
compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b).
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐
No ☒
Based on the last sale price on the NYSE American of the
registrant’s common shares on May 31, 2022 (the last business day
of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter)
of $5.59 per share, the aggregate market value of the voting common
shares held by non-affiliates was approximately $1,371,290,000.
As of January 17, 2023, the registrant had 333,965,718 common
shares, no par value, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
Regulation 14A not later than April 1, 2023, in connection with the
registrant’s fiscal year 2022 annual meeting of shareholders, are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the words
“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company”
and “NOVAGOLD” refer to NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC., a
British Columbia corporation, and its subsidiaries as of November
30, 2022.
CURRENCY
References in this report to $ refer to United States currency and
C$ to Canadian currency.
See the “Glossary of Technical Terms” for more information
regarding some of the terms used in this report.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking
statements or information within the meaning of Canadian securities
laws and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995 concerning anticipated results and developments in our
operations in future periods, planned exploration activities, the
adequacy of our financial resources and other events or conditions
that may occur in the future. These forward-looking statements may
include statements regarding perceived merit of properties,
exploration results and budgets, mineral reserves and resource
estimates, work programs, anticipated timing of updated reports
and/or studies, capital expenditures, operating costs, cash flow
estimates, production estimates and similar statements relating to
the economic viability of a project, timelines, strategic plans,
including our plans and expectations relating to the Donlin Gold
project, permitting and the timing thereof, market prices for
precious metals, or other statements that are not statements of
fact. These statements relate to analyses and other information
that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts
not yet determinable and assumptions of management. Statements
concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to
constitute “forward-looking statements” to the extent that they
involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if
the property is developed.
Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to
predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives,
assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always,
identified by words or phrases such as “expects”, “is expected”,
“anticipates”, “believes”, “plans”, “projects”, “estimates”,
“assumes”, “intends”, “strategy”, “goals”, “objectives”,
“potential”, “possible” or variations thereof or stating that
certain actions, events, conditions or results “may”, “could”,
“would”, “should”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be
achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and similar
expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be
forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on a number of material
assumptions, including those listed below, which could prove to be
significantly incorrect:
|
●
|
our ability to achieve production at the Donlin Gold project;
|
|
●
|
estimated capital costs, operating costs, production and economic
returns;
|
|
●
|
estimated metal pricing, metallurgy, mineability, marketability and
operating and capital costs, together with other assumptions
underlying our resource and reserve estimates;
|
|
●
|
our expected ability to develop adequate infrastructure and that
the cost of doing so will be reasonable;
|
|
●
|
assumptions that all necessary permits and governmental approvals
will be obtained and retained, and the timing of such
approvals;
|
|
●
|
assumptions made in the interpretation of drill results, the
geology, grade and continuity of our mineral deposits;
|
|
●
|
our expectations regarding demand for equipment, skilled labor and
services needed for the Donlin Gold project
|
|
●
|
our activities will not be adversely disrupted or impeded by
development, operating or regulatory risks; and
|
|
●
|
our expectations regarding the timing and outcome of the appeals to
the Donlin Gold 401 Certification (as defined below), the appeals
to the State ROW (as defined below) agreement and lease; and the
application for water rights.
|
Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause
actual events or results to differ from those reflected in the
forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:
|
●
|
uncertainty of whether there will ever be production at the Donlin
Gold project;
|
|
●
|
our history of losses and expectation of future losses;
|
|
●
|
risks related to our ability to finance the development of the
Donlin Gold project through external financing, strategic
alliances, the sale of property interests or otherwise;
|
|
●
|
uncertainty of estimates of capital costs, operating costs,
production and economic returns;
|
|
●
|
commodity price fluctuations;
|
|
●
|
risks related to market events and general economic conditions;
|
|
●
|
risks related to the coronavirus global health pandemic (COVID-19)
or other endemics/pandemics;
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
|
●
|
risks related to the third parties on which we depend for Donlin
Gold project activities;
|
|
●
|
dependence on cooperation of co-owner in exploration and
development of the Donlin Gold project;
|
|
●
|
risks related to opposition to our operations at our mineral
exploration and development properties from non-governmental
organizations or civil society;
|
|
●
|
the risk that permits and governmental approvals necessary to
develop and operate the Donlin Gold project will not be available
on a timely basis, subject to reasonable conditions, or at all;
|
|
●
|
risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill
results, the geology, grade and continuity of our mineral
deposits;
|
|
●
|
uncertainties relating to the assumptions underlying our resource
and reserve estimates, such as metal pricing, metallurgy,
mineability, marketability and operating and capital costs;
|
|
●
|
risks related to the inability to develop or access the
infrastructure required to construct and operate the Donlin Gold
project;
|
|
●
|
uncertainty related to title to the Donlin Gold project;
|
|
●
|
mining and development risks, including risks related to
infrastructure, accidents, equipment breakdowns, labor disputes or
other unanticipated difficulties with, or interruptions in,
development, construction or production;
|
|
●
|
competition in the mining industry;
|
|
●
|
risks related to governmental regulation and permits, including
environmental regulation;
|
|
●
|
risks related to our largest shareholder;
|
|
●
|
risks related to conflicts of interests of some of the directors
and officers of the Company;
|
|
●
|
risks related to the need for reclamation activities on our
properties and uncertainty of cost estimates related thereto;
|
|
●
|
credit, liquidity, interest rate and currency risks;
|
|
●
|
risks related to increases in demand for equipment, skilled labor
and services needed for exploration and development of the Donlin
Gold project, and related cost increases;
|
|
●
|
our need to attract and retain qualified management and technical
personnel;
|
|
●
|
uncertainty as to the outcome of potential litigation;
|
|
●
|
risks related to information technology systems;
|
|
●
|
risks related to the Company’s status as a “passive foreign
investment company” in the United States; and
|
|
●
|
risks related to the effects of global climate change on the Donlin
Gold project.
|
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect any of
our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are
statements about the future and are inherently uncertain, and our
actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ
materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements
due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors,
including, without limitation, those referred to in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors” and
elsewhere.
Our forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K are based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions
of management as of the date of this report. We do not assume any
obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances or
management’s beliefs, expectations or opinions should change,
except as required by law. For the reasons set forth above,
investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements.
Technical Information
Paul Chilson, P.E., a Qualified Person and an employee of the
Company reviewed and approved the scientific and technical
information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
GLOSSARY OF TECHNICAL TERMS
The following technical terms defined in this section are used
throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
alluvial
|
|
A placer formed by the action of running water, as in a stream
channel or alluvial fan; also said of the valuable mineral (e.g.
gold or diamond) associated with an alluvial placer.
|
arsenopyrite
|
|
An arsenic iron sulfide mineral (FeAsS).
|
assay
|
|
A metallurgical analysis used to determine the quantity (or grade)
of various metals in a sample.
|
concentrate
|
|
A clean product recovered in flotation, which has been upgraded
sufficiently for downstream processing or sale.
|
cut-off grade
|
|
When determining economically viable mineral reserves, the lowest
grade of mineralized material that can be mined and processed at a
profit.
|
cyanidation
|
|
A metallurgical technique, using a dilute cyanide solution, for
extracting gold from ore by dissolving the gold into solution.
|
dike
|
|
A tabular igneous intrusion that cuts across the bedding of the
host rock.
|
doré
|
|
A semi-pure alloy of gold and silver.
|
electrowinning
|
|
The deposition of gold from solution to cathodes by passing
electric current from anodes through gold-bearing solution.
|
flotation
|
|
A process used for the concentration of minerals, especially within
base metal systems.
|
geotechnical
|
|
Said of tasks or analysis that provide representative data of the
geological rock quality in a known volume.
|
grade
|
|
Quantity of metal or mineral per unit weight of host rock.
|
greywacke
|
|
A variety of sandstone generally characterized by its hardness,
dark color, and poorly sorted angular grains of quartz, feldspar,
and small rock fragments set in a compact, clay-fine matrix.
|
host rock
|
|
A body of rock serving as a host for other rocks or for mineral
deposits.
|
hydrothermal
|
|
Pertaining to hot aqueous solutions of magmatic origin which may
transport metals and minerals in solution.
|
intrusive
|
|
Said of igneous rock formed by the consolidation of magma intruded
into other rocks.
|
mafic
|
|
Igneous rocks composed mostly of dark, iron- and magnesium-rich
minerals.
|
massive
|
|
Said of a mineral deposit, especially of sulfides, characterized by
a great concentration of mineralization in one place, as opposed to
a disseminated or vein-like deposit.
|
mineral
|
|
A naturally formed chemical element or compound having a definite
chemical composition and, usually, a characteristic crystal
form.
|
mineral deposit
|
|
A mineralized body which has been physically delineated by
sufficient drilling, trenching, and/or underground work, and found
to contain a sufficient average grade of metal or metals to warrant
further exploration and/or development expenditures.
|
mineralization
|
|
A natural occurrence in rocks or soil of one or more yielding
minerals or metals.
|
net present value (NPV)
|
|
The sum of the value on a given date of a series of future cash
payments and receipts, discounted to reflect the time value of
money and other factors such as investment risk.
|
ore
|
|
Rock containing metallic or non-metallic materials that can be
mined and processed at a profit.
|
placer
|
|
An alluvial deposit of sand and gravel, which may contain valuable
metals.
|
porphyry
|
|
An igneous rock of any composition that contains conspicuous
phenocrysts (large crystals or mineral grains) in a fine-grained
groundmass.
|
pyrite
|
|
An iron sulfide mineral (FeS2), the most common
naturally occurring sulfide mineral.
|
pyrrhotite
|
|
An unusual, generally weakly magnetic, iron sulfide mineral with
varying iron content (Fe1-xS (x=0 to 0.2)).
|
reverse circulation (RC)
|
|
A type of drilling using dual-walled drill pipe in which the
material drilled, water and mud are circulated up the center pipe
while air is blown down the outside pipe.
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
realgar
|
|
An arsenic sulfide mineral (As4S4).
|
reclamation
|
|
Restoration of mined land to original contour, use, or condition
where possible.
|
rhyodacite
|
|
A volcanic, high-silica rock composed of mostly quartz and
feldspar.
|
sedimentary
|
|
Said of rock formed at the Earth’s surface from solid particles,
whether mineral or organic, which have been moved from their
position of origin and re-deposited, or chemically
precipitated.
|
shale
|
|
A fine-grained detrital (transported by wind, water, or ice)
sedimentary rock, formed by the consolidation of clay, silt, or
mud.
|
sill
|
|
An intrusive sheet of igneous rock of roughly uniform thickness
that has been forced between the bedding planes of existing
rock.
|
stibnite
|
|
An antimony sulfide mineral (Sb2S3).
|
strike
|
|
The direction, or bearing from true north, of a vein or rock
formation measured on a horizontal surface.
|
sulfide
|
|
A compound of sulfur and some other metallic element.
|
syngenetic
|
|
Relating to or denoting a mineral deposit or formation produced at
the same time as the host rock.
|
tailings
|
|
Uneconomic material produced by a mineral processing plant which is
disposed of in a manner meeting government regulation and which may
involve a permanent impoundment facility or which may involve the
discharge of material to the environment in a manner regulated by
the government authority.
|
vein
|
|
A thin, sheet-like crosscutting body of hydrothermal
mineralization, principally quartz.
|
waste rock
|
|
Barren or submarginal rock that has been mined but is not of
sufficient value to warrant treatment and is therefore removed
ahead of the milling processes.
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
PART
I
Overview
We operate in the gold mining industry, primarily focused on
advancing the Donlin Gold project in Alaska. The Donlin Gold
project is held by Donlin Gold LLC (“Donlin Gold”), a limited
liability company owned equally by wholly-owned subsidiaries of
NOVAGOLD and Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”).
We do not produce gold or any other minerals, and do not currently
generate operating earnings. Funding to explore our mineral
properties and to operate the Company was acquired primarily
through previous equity financings consisting of public offerings
of our common shares and warrants and through debt financing
consisting of convertible notes, and the sale of assets. We expect
to continue to raise capital through additional equity and/or debt
financings, through the exercise of stock options, and
otherwise.
We were incorporated by memorandum of association on
December 5, 1984, under the Companies Act (Nova Scotia) as
1562756 Nova Scotia Limited. On January 14, 1985, we changed
our name to NovaCan Mining Resources (l985) Limited and on
March 20, 1987, we changed our name to NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
On May 29, 2013, our shareholders approved the continuance of
the corporation into British Columbia. Subsequently, we filed the
necessary documents in Nova Scotia and British Columbia, and we
continued under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia)
effective as of June 10, 2013. The current addresses,
telephone and facsimile numbers of our offices are:
Executive office
|
Corporate office
|
201 South Main Street, Suite 400
|
400 Burrard Street, Suite 1860
|
Salt Lake City, UT, USA 84111
|
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 3A6
|
Telephone (801) 639-0511
|
Toll free (866) 669-6227
|
Facsimile (801) 649-0509
|
Facsimile (604) 669-6272
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Corporate Structure
As of November 30, 2022, we had the following material, direct and
indirect, wholly-owned subsidiaries: NOVAGOLD Resources Alaska,
Inc., NOVAGOLD US Holdings Inc., NOVAGOLD USA, Inc., AGC Resources
Inc, NOVAGOLD (Bermuda) Alaska Limited and NOVAGOLD Resources
(Bermuda) Limited.
The following chart depicts the corporate structure of the Company
together with the jurisdiction of incorporation of each of our
material subsidiaries and related holding companies. All ownership
is 100% unless otherwise indicated.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Human Capital Resources
On November 30, 2022, we had 13 full-time employees, of which four
are located in Canada and nine are located in the United States. We
also use consultants with specific skills to assist with various
aspects of project evaluation, engineering, and corporate
governance.
Company Values
Our company culture is the cornerstone of all our human capital
programs. Empowering every employee to be their best, affording
every employee the opportunity to make a difference, and giving
every employee a chance to be heard are core Company values. Our
values extend to the communities in which we work. We have adopted
a Human Rights Policy focused on our commitment to having a
positive influence in the communities where we operate which
includes ensuring that we respect human rights.
Diversity
As of the end of fiscal year 2022, 46% of our total workforce were
women. Selection of individuals for executive and other positions
with the Company is guided by the Company’s policy which “prohibits
discrimination in any aspect of employment based on race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, disability or age.” Our Board and
management acknowledge the importance of all aspects of diversity
including gender, ethnic origin, business skills and experience,
because it is right to do so and because it is good for our
business. When considering candidates for executive positions, the
Board’s evaluation considers the broadest possible assessment of
each candidate’s skills and background with the overriding
objective of ensuring that we have the appropriate balance of
skills, experience, and capacity that the Company needs to be
successful. In the context of this overriding objective, we have
determined not to set targets for the percentage of women, or other
aspects of diversity, in executive officer positions.
NOVAGOLD is committed to fostering, cultivating, and preserving a
culture of diversity, equity and inclusion. Our employees are one
of the most valuable assets we have. The collective sum of the
individual differences, life experiences, knowledge, inventiveness,
innovation, self-expression, unique capabilities, and talent that
our employees invest in their work represents a significant part of
our culture, reputation, and NOVAGOLD’s achievements.
NOVAGOLD is dedicated to creating an inclusive work environment for
everyone. We embrace and celebrate the unique experiences,
perspectives, and cultural backgrounds that each employee brings to
our workplace. NOVAGOLD strives to foster an environment where our
employees feel respected, valued, and empowered, and our team
members are at the forefront in helping us promote and sustain an
inclusive workplace.
NOVAGOLD’s diversity initiatives are applicable—but not limited—to
our practices and policies on recruitment and selection;
compensation and benefits; professional development and training;
promotions; and the ongoing development of a work environment built
on the premise of gender and diversity equity. To that end, we seek
out qualified diverse candidates to encourage them to apply for
open positions, either from within or outside of the company. We
also seek out opportunities to develop a pipeline of qualified
diverse candidates in a particular profession when we are unable to
find them ourselves. For example, in 2021 the Company established
and funded the NOVAGOLD Mining and Geological Engineering
Scholarship at the University of Alaska to help support and
encourage undergraduate students seeking bachelor’s degrees in
Mining or Geological Engineering, with a focus on supporting
underrepresented students.
We encourage:
|
●
|
Respectful communication and cooperation among all employees.
|
|
●
|
Teamwork and employee participation, fostering the representation
of all employee perspectives.
|
|
●
|
Work/life balance through flexible work schedules to accommodate
employees’ varying needs.
|
|
●
|
Learning about and, where appropriate, aiding the communities near
NOVAGOLD’s projects to promote a greater understanding and respect
for diversity in those communities.
|
Safety and Health
NOVAGOLD’s primary objective is to ensure the health and safety of
its employees, partners, and contractors, and is reflected in its
Health and Safety Policy. The Company has implemented COVID-19
policies at its offices in Salt Lake City and Vancouver designed to
ensure the safety and well-being of all employees and the people
associated with them. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, to
reduce risk, our employees have been encouraged to be fully
vaccinated against COVID-19, have been asked to work remotely,
adhere to good hygiene practices, and engage in physical
distancing. Our focus on safety is also reflected at Donlin Gold
where a wide-ranging set of policies were implemented at the Donlin
Gold project site and Anchorage office to mitigate the spread of
COVID-19. Also see section Item 7, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, below.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Recent Developments
Donlin Gold project
In 2022, Donlin Gold completed a 141-hole drilling program totaling
42,331 meters. As part of a key focus area for the drill program,
the tight-spaced grid drilling in structural domains in the Lewis
(further infilled to 10m x 10m), West ACMA and Divide areas
confirmed recent geological modelling at wider drill-spacing in the
immediate area surrounding the grids. It also identified additional
short-scale controls that will be incorporated in an update to
improve the geological domains used for global resource estimation
which will be utilized for strategic mine planning work. In
addition, the 14 geotechnical drill holes provided results for
advancing efforts to completing the issuance of the Alaska Dam
Safety Certifications. With the receipt of the final assay results
for the 2022 drill program, an update of the resource model, and
completion of trade-off studies, the owners expect to take the next
steps in moving the Donlin Gold project up the value chain and
leading toward an updated feasibility study decision.
Donlin Gold continued to work in partnership with Calista
Corporation (“Calista”) and The Kuskokwim Corporation (TKC) in
stakeholder and government engagement in the Yukon-Kuskokwim (Y-K)
region, Alaska and Washington, D.C. Environmental and social
investment in fiscal year 2022 focused on the Y-K region spanned
from supporting important health and safety initiatives in remote
communities, to cultural preservation efforts and educational
programming in collaboration with school districts and other
organizations.
For further information, see section Item 7, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, below.
Reclamation
We will generally be required to mitigate long-term environmental
impacts by stabilizing, contouring, re-sloping and re-vegetating
various portions of a site after mining and mineral processing
operations are completed. These reclamation efforts will be
conducted in accordance with detailed plans, which are approved by
the appropriate regulatory agencies. In addition, financial
assurance acceptable to the regulatory authority with jurisdiction
over reclamation must be provided in an amount that the authority
determines to be sufficient to allow the authority to implement the
approved reclamation plan in the event that the project owners fail
to complete the work as provided in the plan.
Government and Environmental Regulations
Our exploration and development activities are subject to various
national, state, and local laws and regulations in the United
States, which govern prospecting, development, mining, production,
exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste
disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous
substances, disclosure requirements and other matters. We have
obtained or have pending applications for those licenses, permits
or other authorizations currently required to conduct our
exploration and development programs. We believe that we are in
compliance in all material respects with applicable mining, health,
safety and environmental statutes and regulations in the United
States. There are no current orders or directions relating to us
with respect to the foregoing laws and regulations. For a more
detailed discussion of the various government laws and regulations
applicable to our operations and potential negative effects of
these laws and regulations, see section Item 1A, Risk
Factors, below.
Competition
We compete with other mineral resource exploration and development
companies for financing, technical expertise, and the acquisition
of mineral properties. Many of the companies with whom we compete
have greater financial and technical resources. Accordingly, these
competitors may be able to spend greater amounts on the
acquisition, exploration, and development of mineral properties.
This competition could adversely impact our ability to finance
further exploration and to obtain the financing necessary for us to
develop the Donlin Gold project.
Availability of Raw Materials and Skilled Employees
Most aspects of our business require specialized skills and
knowledge. Such skills and knowledge include the areas of geology,
drilling, resource estimating, metallurgy, mine planning,
logistical planning, preparation of pre-feasibility and feasibility
studies, permitting, engineering, construction and operation of a
mine, financing, legal, accounting, investor relations, and
community relations. Historically, we have found that we can locate
and retain appropriate employees and consultants and we believe we
will continue to be able to do so.
The raw materials we require to carry on our business are readily
available through normal supply or business contracting channels in
the United States and Canada. Historically, we have been able to
secure the appropriate equipment and supplies required to conduct
our contemplated programs. As a result, we do not believe that we
will experience any shortages of required equipment or supplies in
the foreseeable future.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Seasonality
Our business can be seasonal as our mineral exploration and
development activities take place in southwestern Alaska. Due to
the northern climate, work on the Donlin Gold project can be
limited due to excessive snow cover and cold temperatures. In
general, surface work often is limited to late spring through early
fall, although work in some locations is more readily and
efficiently completed during the winter months when the ground is
frozen.
Gold Price History
The price of gold is volatile and is affected by numerous factors,
all of which are beyond our control, such as the sale or purchase
of gold by various central banks and financial institutions,
inflation, recession, fluctuation in the relative values of the
U.S. dollar and foreign currencies, changes in global and regional
gold demand, in addition to international and national political
and economic conditions.
The following table presents the annual high, low and average daily
afternoon London Bullion Market Association (“LBMA”) Gold Price
over the past five calendar years on the London Bullion Market
($/ounce):
Year
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
Average
|
|
2018
|
|
$1,355
|
|
$1,178
|
|
$1,269
|
|
2019
|
|
$1,546
|
|
$1,271
|
|
$1,392
|
|
2020
|
|
$2,067
|
|
$1,474
|
|
$1,770
|
|
2021
|
|
$1,943
|
|
$1,684
|
|
$1,799
|
|
2022
|
|
$2,039
|
|
$1,628
|
|
$1,800
|
|
2023 (through January 17)
|
|
$1,917 |
|
$1,834 |
|
$1,876 |
|
On January 17, 2023, the afternoon LBMA gold price was
$1,914 per
ounce.
Data Source: www.kitco.com
Available Information
We maintain a website at www.novagold.com and make available,
through the Investors section of the website, our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form
8-K, Section 16 filings and all amendments to those reports, as
soon as reasonably practicable after such material is
electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”). These reports are also available at the SEC website at
www.sec.gov. Certain other information, including but not limited
to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of
key committees of its Board of Directors and its Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics are also available on the website. Our website
and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not
intended to be, and are not incorporated into this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors in
addition to the other information included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Each of these risk factors could adversely
affect our business, operating results and financial condition, as
well as adversely affect the value of an investment in our common
shares. The risks described below are not the only ones facing the
Company. Additional risks that we are not presently aware of, or
that we currently believe are immaterial, may also adversely affect
our business, operating results and financial condition. We cannot
assure you that we will successfully address these risks and
caution that other unknown risks may exist or may arise that may
affect our business.
An investment in our securities is speculative and involves a high
degree of risk due to the nature of our business and the present
stage of exploration and development of our mineral properties. The
following risk factors, as well as risks not currently known to us,
could materially adversely affect our future business, operations
and financial condition and could cause them to differ materially
from the estimates described in the forward-looking statements
relating to us.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have no history of commercially producing precious metals
from our mineral exploration properties and there can be no
assurance that we will successfully establish mining operations or
profitably produce precious metals.
The Donlin Gold project is not in production or currently under
construction, and we have no ongoing mining operations or revenue
from mining operations. Mineral exploration and development has a
high degree of risk and few properties that are explored are
ultimately developed into producing mines. The future development
of the Donlin Gold project will require obtaining permits and
financing and the construction and operation of mines, processing
plants and related infrastructure. As a result, we are subject to
all of the risks associated with establishing new mining operations
and business enterprises, including:
|
●
|
the need to obtain necessary environmental and other governmental
approvals and permits, and the timing and conditions of those
approvals and permits;
|
|
●
|
the availability and cost of funds to finance construction and
development activities;
|
|
●
|
the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of the construction
of mining and processing facilities as well as related
infrastructure;
|
|
●
|
potential opposition from non-governmental organizations,
environmental groups or local groups which may delay or prevent
development activities;
|
|
●
|
potential increases in construction and operating costs due to
changes in the cost of labor, fuel, power, materials and supplies,
services, and foreign exchange rates;
|
|
●
|
the availability and cost of skilled labor and mining equipment;
and
|
|
●
|
the availability and cost of appropriate smelting and/or refining
arrangements.
|
The costs, timing and complexities of mine construction and
development are increased by the remote location of our mineral
properties, with additional challenges related thereto, including
access, water and power supply, and other support infrastructure.
Cost estimates may increase significantly as more detailed
engineering work and studies are completed on a project. New mining
operations commonly experience unexpected costs, problems and
delays during development, construction, and mine start-up. In
addition, delays in the commencement of mineral production often
occur. Accordingly, there are no assurances that our activities
will result in profitable mining operations, or that we will
successfully establish mining operations, or profitably produce
precious metals at the Donlin Gold project.
In addition, there is no assurance that our mineral exploration
activities will result in any discoveries of new ore bodies. If
further mineralization is discovered there is also no assurance
that the mineralized material would be economical for commercial
production. Discovery of mineral deposits is dependent upon a
number of factors and significantly influenced by the technical
skill of the exploration personnel involved. The commercial
viability of a mineral deposit is also dependent upon a number of
factors which are beyond our control, including the attributes of
the deposit, commodity prices, government policies and regulation,
and environmental protection requirements.
We have a history of net losses and expect losses to continue
for the foreseeable future.
The Donlin Gold project has not advanced to the commercial
production stage and we have no history of earnings or cash flow
from operations. We expect to continue to incur net losses unless
and until such time the Donlin Gold project commences commercial
production and generates sufficient revenues to fund continuing
operations. The development of our mineral properties to achieve
production will require the commitment of substantial financial
resources. The amount and timing of expenditures will depend on a
number of factors, including the progress of ongoing exploration
and development, the results of consultants’ analyses and
recommendations, the rate at which operating losses are incurred,
the process of obtaining required government permits and approvals,
the availability and cost of financing, the participation of our
partners, and the execution of any sale or joint venture agreements
with strategic partners. These factors, and others, are beyond our
control. There is no assurance that we will be profitable in the
future.
We have a limited property portfolio.
At present, our only material mineral property is the interest that
we hold in the Donlin Gold project. Unless we acquire or develop
additional mineral properties, we will be solely dependent upon
this property. If no additional mineral properties are acquired by
us, any adverse development affecting our operations and further
development at the Donlin Gold project may have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to continue the exploration, permitting,
development, and construction of the Donlin Gold project, and to
continue as a going concern, will depend in part on our ability to
obtain suitable financing.
We have limited financial resources. We will need external
financing to develop and construct the Donlin Gold project.
According to the S-K 1300 Report, the total initial capital cost
estimate for the Donlin Gold project is approximately $7,402
million which includes the costs related to the natural gas
pipeline (100% basis). These cost estimates may change materially
as our studies are updated. Our failure to obtain sufficient
financing could result in the delay or indefinite postponement of
exploration, development, construction, or production at the Donlin
Gold project. The cost and terms of such financing may
significantly reduce the expected benefits from development of the
Donlin Gold project and/or render such development uneconomic.
There can be no assurance that additional capital or other types of
financing will be available when needed or that, if available, the
terms of such financing will be favorable. Our failure to obtain
financing could have a material adverse effect on our growth
strategy and results of operations and financial condition.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
We intend to fund our business plan from working capital, the
proceeds of financings, and the proceeds received from the sale of
our interest in the Galore Creek project. In the future, our
ability to continue our exploration, permitting, development, and
construction activities, if any, will depend in part on our ability
to obtain suitable financing. If we raise additional funding by
issuing additional equity securities or other securities that are
convertible into equity securities, such financings may
substantially dilute the interest of existing or future
shareholders. Sales or issuances of a substantial number of
securities, or the perception that such sales could occur, may
adversely affect the prevailing market price for our common shares.
With any additional sale or issuance of equity securities,
investors will suffer dilution of their voting power and may
experience dilution in earnings per share.
There can be no assurance that we will commence production at the
Donlin Gold project or generate sufficient revenues to meet our
obligations as they become due or obtain necessary financing on
acceptable terms, if at all. Our failure to meet our ongoing
obligations on a timely basis could result in the loss or
substantial dilution of our interests (as existing or as proposed
to be acquired) in the Donlin Gold project. In addition, should we
incur significant losses in future periods, we may be unable to
continue as a going concern, and realization of assets and
settlement of liabilities in other than the normal course of
business may be at amounts materially different than our
estimates.
Actual capital costs, operating costs, production and
economic returns may differ significantly from those we have
anticipated and there are no assurances that any future development
activities will result in profitable mining operations.
The capital costs to take the Donlin Gold project into production
may be significantly higher than anticipated. As a result of the
content updates included in the 2021 Technical Report (as defined
below) and S-K 1300 Report (as defined below), the total initial
capital cost estimate for the Donlin Gold project is $7,402
million. Likewise, the total sustaining capital estimate is $1,723
million.
We do not have an operating history upon which we can base
estimates of future operating costs. Decisions about the
development of the Donlin Gold project will ultimately be based
upon feasibility studies. Feasibility studies derive estimates of
cash operating costs based upon, among other things:
|
●
|
anticipated tonnage, grades and metallurgical characteristics of
the ore to be mined and processed;
|
|
●
|
anticipated recovery rates of gold and other precious metals from
the ore;
|
|
●
|
cash operating costs of comparable facilities and equipment;
and
|
|
●
|
anticipated climatic conditions.
|
Capital costs, operating costs, production and economic returns,
and other estimates contained in studies or estimates prepared by
or for us may differ significantly from those anticipated by our
current or future studies and estimates, and there can be no
assurance that the initial capital costs incurred to construct, and
the sustaining capital and operating costs incurred in operating
the Donlin Gold project will not be higher than currently
anticipated.
Changes in the market price of gold, which in the past has
fluctuated widely, affect our financial condition.
Our profitability and long-term viability will depend, in large
part, upon the market price of gold that may be produced from our
Donlin Gold project. The market price of gold is volatile and is
impacted by numerous factors beyond our control, including:
|
●
|
global or regional consumption patterns;
|
|
●
|
expectations with respect to the rate of inflation;
|
|
●
|
the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and certain other
currencies;
|
|
●
|
global or regional political or economic conditions, including
interest rates and currency values;
|
|
●
|
supply and demand for jewelry and industrial products containing
gold; and
|
|
●
|
sales or purchases by central banks and other holders, speculators,
and producers of gold in response to any of the above factors.
|
We cannot predict the effect of these factors on the price of gold.
A decrease in the market price of gold could affect our ability to
finance the development of the Donlin Gold project, which would
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations. There can be no assurance that the market
price of gold will remain at current levels or that such prices
will improve. An increase in worldwide supply, and consequent
downward pressure on prices, may result over the longer term from
increased production from the development of new or expansion of
existing mines. There is no assurance that if commercial quantities
of gold are discovered, that a profitable market may exist or
continue to exist for a production decision to be made or for the
ultimate sale of gold.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
General economic conditions may adversely affect our growth,
future profitability and ability to finance.
Some key impacts which can contribute to financial market turmoil
potentially impacting the mining industry include contraction in
credit markets resulting in a widening of credit risk, imposition
of trade tariffs among various countries, devaluations, high
volatility in global equity, commodity, foreign exchange and
precious metal markets and a lack of market liquidity. The prices
of gold and gold mining company equities have experienced
significant volatility over the past few years.
A decrease in gold prices or tightening of credit in the financial
markets or other economic conditions, including but not limited to,
consumer spending, employment rates, business conditions,
inflation, fuel and energy costs, consumer debt levels, lack of
available credit, the state of the financial markets, interest
rates and tax rates, may adversely affect our ability to finance
development and construction of the Donlin Gold project.
Specifically:
|
●
|
global economic conditions could make other investment sectors more
attractive, thereby affecting the cost and availability of
financing to us and our ability to achieve our business plan;
|
|
●
|
the imposition of protectionist or retaliatory trade tariffs by
countries may impact our ability to import materials needed to
construct our projects or conduct our operations, or to export our
products, at prices that are economically feasible for our
operations, or at all;
|
|
●
|
the volatility of metal prices would impact the economic viability
of the Donlin Gold project and any future revenues, profits, losses
and cash flow;
|
|
●
|
negative economic pressures could adversely impact demand for
future production from the Donlin Gold project;
|
|
●
|
construction related costs could increase and adversely affect the
economics of the Donlin Gold project;
|
|
●
|
volatile energy, commodity and consumables prices and currency
exchange rates would impact our future production costs; and
|
|
●
|
the devaluation and volatility of global stock markets would impact
the valuation of our equity and other securities.
|
The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic may affect our
operations.
The Company faces risks related to health epidemics/pandemics, and
other outbreaks of communicable diseases, which could significantly
disrupt its operations and may materially and adversely affect its
business and financial conditions.
The Company’s business could be adversely impacted by the effects
of COVID-19 or other epidemics/pandemics. The extent to which they
impact the Company’s business, including its operations and the
market for its securities, will depend on future developments,
which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time,
and include their duration, severity and scope and the actions
taken to contain or treat them. In particular, the continued
circulation or spread of COVID-19 could materially and negatively
impact the Company’s business including without limitation,
employee health, workforce productivity, insurance premiums,
ability to travel, the availability of industry experts and
personnel, restrictions or delays to future Donlin Gold drill and
work programs and/or the timing to process drill and other
metallurgical testing, and other factors that will depend on future
developments beyond the Company’s control, which may have a
material and adverse effect on its business, financial condition
and results of operations.
There can be no assurance that the Company's personnel will not be
impacted by these epidemic/pandemic diseases and ultimately see its
workforce productivity reduced and incur increased medical costs or
insurance premiums due to these health risks.
We are dependent on a third party that participates in
exploration and development of our Donlin Gold project.
Our success with respect to the Donlin Gold project depends on the
efforts and expertise of a third party with whom we have an
agreement; we hold a 50% interest and the remaining 50% interest is
held by a third party that is not under our control or direction.
We are dependent on that third party for the progress and
development of the Donlin Gold project. The third party may also
have different priorities which could impact the timing and cost of
development of the Donlin Gold project. The third party may also be
in default of its agreement with us, without our knowledge, which
may put the mineral property and related assets at risk. The
existence or occurrence of one or more of the following
circumstances and events could have a material adverse impact on
our ability to achieve our business plan, profitability, or the
viability of our interests held with the third party, which could
have a material adverse impact on our business, future cash flows,
earnings, results of operations and financial condition: (i)
disagreement with the third party on how to develop and operate the
Donlin Gold project efficiently; (ii) inability to exert influence
over certain strategic decisions made in respect of the
jointly-held Donlin Gold project; (iii) inability of the third
party to meet its obligations to the joint business or other
parties; and (iv) litigation with the third party regarding joint
business matters.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Opposition to our operations from local stakeholders or
non-governmental organizations could have a material adverse effect
on us.
There is ongoing public concern relating to the effect of mining
production on its surroundings, communities, and environment. Local
communities and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), some of
which oppose resource development, are often vocal critics of the
mining industry. While we seek to operate in a socially responsible
manner, opposition to extractive industries or our operations
specifically or adverse publicity generated by local communities or
NGOs related to extractive industries, or our operations
specifically, could have an adverse effect on our reputation and
financial condition or our relationships with the communities in
which we operate. As a result of such opposition or adverse
publicity, we may be unable to obtain permits necessary for our
operations or to continue our operations as planned or at all. See
“Recent Developments” above.
We require various permits to conduct our current and
anticipated future operations, and delays or a failure to obtain
such permits, or a failure to comply with the terms of any such
permits that we have obtained, could have a material adverse impact
on us.
Our current and anticipated future operations, including further
exploration and development activities and commencement of
production on the Donlin Gold project, require permits from various
United States federal, state, and local governmental authorities.
There can be no assurance that all permits that we require for the
construction of mining facilities and to conduct mining operations
will be obtainable on reasonable terms, or at all. Delays or a
failure to obtain such permits, or a failure to comply with the
terms of any such permits that we have obtained, could have a
material adverse impact on us.
The duration and success of efforts to obtain and renew permits are
contingent upon many variables not within our control. Shortage of
qualified and experienced personnel in the various levels of
government could result in delays or inefficiencies. Backlog within
the permitting agencies could affect the permitting timeline of the
various projects. Other factors that could affect the permitting
timeline include (i) the number of other large-scale projects
currently in a more advanced stage of development which could slow
down the review process and (ii) significant public response
regarding a specific project. As well, it can be difficult to
assess what specific permitting requirements will ultimately apply
to the Donlin Gold project.
The quantities for our mineral resources and mineral reserves
are estimates based on interpretation and assumptions and may yield
less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently
estimated.
Unless otherwise indicated, mineralization quantities presented in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with
securities regulatory authorities, press releases and other public
statements that may be made from time to time are based upon
estimates made by our personnel and independent professionals. In
addition, these estimates are imprecise and depend upon geologic
interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and
sampling analysis, which may prove to be unreliable. There can be
no assurance that:
|
●
|
these estimates will be accurate;
|
|
●
|
mineral reserve, mineral resource or other mineralization figures
will be accurate; or
|
|
●
|
this mineralization could be mined, processed, or sold
profitably.
|
Because we have not commenced commercial production at the Donlin
Gold project, mineralization estimates may require adjustments,
including potential downward revisions based upon further
exploration or development work, actual production experience, or
changes in the price of gold. In addition, the grade of ore
ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by
drilling results. There can be no assurance that the percentage of
minerals recovered in small-scale tests will be duplicated in
large-scale tests under on-site conditions or at production
scale.
Mineral resource estimates for mineral properties that have not
commenced production are based, in many instances, on limited and
widely spaced drill hole information, which is not necessarily
indicative of the conditions between and around drill holes.
Accordingly, such mineral resource estimates may require revision
as more drilling information becomes available or as actual
production experience is gained. No assurance can be given that any
part or all of our mineral resources constitute or will be
converted into reserves.
The estimating of mineral reserves and mineral resources is a
subjective process that relies on the judgment and experience of
the persons preparing the estimates. The process relies on the
quantity and quality of available data and is based on knowledge,
mining experience, analysis of drilling results and industry
practices. Valid estimates made at a given time may significantly
change when new information becomes available. By their nature,
mineral resource and reserve estimates are imprecise and depend, to
a certain extent, upon analysis of drilling results and statistical
inferences that may ultimately prove to be inaccurate. There can be
no assurances that actual results will meet the estimates contained
in studies.
Estimated mineral reserves or mineral resources may have to be
recalculated based on changes in metal prices, further exploration
or development activity, or actual production experience. In
addition, if production costs increase, recovery rates decrease, if
applicable laws and regulations are adversely changed, there is no
assurance that the anticipated level of recovery will be realized
or that mineral reserves or mineral resources as currently reported
can be mined or processed profitably. This could materially and
adversely affect estimates of the volume or grade of
mineralization, estimated recovery rates or other important factors
that influence mineral reserve or mineral resource estimates. The
extent to which mineral resources may ultimately be reclassified as
mineral reserves is dependent upon the demonstration of their
profitable recovery. Any material changes in mineral resource
estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic
viability of placing a mineral property into production and a
mineral property’s return on capital. We cannot provide assurance
that mineralization identified at the Donlin Gold project can or
will be mined or processed profitably.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
The mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates contained in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been determined and
valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and operating
costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in market
prices for gold may render portions of our mineralization
uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineralization. Any
material reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of our
ability to extract this mineralization, could have a material
adverse effect on our ability to implement our business strategy,
the results of operations or our financial condition.
We have established the presence of proven and probable mineral
reserves at the Donlin Gold project in accordance with the
disclosure definition and standards contained in S-K 1300 and in NI
43-101. There can be no assurance that any mineral resource
estimates for our mineral projects will ultimately be reclassified
as mineral reserves. The failure to establish proven and probable
mineral reserves could restrict our ability to successfully
implement our strategies for long-term growth and could impact
future cash flows, earnings, results of operation and financial
condition.
Lack of infrastructure could delay or prevent us from
developing advanced projects.
Completion of the development of the Donlin Gold project is subject
to various requirements, including the availability and timing of
acceptable arrangements for power, water, transportation, access,
and facilities. The lack of availability on acceptable terms or the
delay in the availability of any one or more of these items could
prevent or delay development of the project. There can be no
assurance that adequate infrastructure, including access and power
supply, will be built, that it will be built in a timely manner or
that the cost of such infrastructure will be reasonable or that it
will be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the project. If
adequate infrastructure is not available in a timely manner, there
can be no assurance that:
|
●
|
the development of the Donlin Gold project will be commenced or
completed on a timely basis, if at all;
|
|
●
|
the resulting operations will achieve the anticipated production
volume; or
|
|
●
|
the construction costs and ongoing operating costs associated with
the development of the Donlin Gold project will not be higher than
anticipated.
|
Access to the Donlin Gold project is limited and there is no
infrastructure that serves the project area. An approximately
507-kilometer natural gas pipeline is needed to supply fuel to the
proposed on-site generating plant to provide power for the Donlin
Gold project. The proposed pipeline would traverse generally
undeveloped areas in Alaska that are difficult to access.
Transportation of most of the supplies needed to construct and
operate the Donlin Gold project would be accomplished by barging
materials on the Kuskokwim River during the annual shipping season
which typically occurs from late April to mid-October. Two ports
would be needed on the Kuskokwim River, the first located in
Bethel, Alaska, where ocean barges would transition materials to
river barges; and the second located approximately 320 kilometers
upriver from Bethel. A 48-kilometer access road from the upriver
port to the project site is needed to deliver the materials.
Additionally, a 1,500-meter airstrip would be built to provide
year-round access to the project. Terrain, geologic conditions,
ground conditions, steep slopes, river levels, ice breakup,
weather, climate change impacts and other natural conditions that
are beyond our control along the pipeline and transportation routes
present design, permitting, construction, and operational
challenges for the project. Cost and schedule estimates may
increase significantly as more detailed engineering work,
geotechnical and geological studies are completed.
Title and other rights to our mineral properties are subject
to agreements with other parties.
The subsurface mineral and surface rights at the Donlin Gold
project are owned by Calista and TKC, respectively, two Native
corporations. Donlin Gold operates on these lands pursuant to a
Mining Lease with Calista (“Calista Lease”) and a Surface Use
Agreement (“SUA”) with TKC. The ability of Donlin Gold to continue
to explore and develop the Donlin Gold project depends upon its
continued compliance with the terms and conditions of the Calista
Lease and SUA. Furthermore, our ability to continue to explore and
develop other mineral properties may be subject to agreements with
other third parties, including agreements with Native corporations,
for instance.
Our largest shareholder has significant influence on us and
may also affect the market price and liquidity of our
securities.
Electrum Strategic Resources L.P. (“Electrum”) and its affiliate
GRAT Holdings LLC hold in the aggregate 25.3% of our issued and
outstanding common shares as of January 17, 2023. Accordingly,
Electrum and its affiliates will have significant influence in
determining the outcome of any corporate transaction or other
matter submitted to the shareholders for approval, including
mergers, consolidations, and the sale of all or substantially all
of our assets and other significant corporate actions. Unless full
participation of all shareholders takes place in such shareholder
meetings, Electrum and its affiliates may be able to approve such
matters itself. The concentration of ownership of the common shares
by Electrum and its affiliates may: (i) delay or deter a change of
control of the Company; (ii) deprive shareholders of an opportunity
to receive a premium for their common shares as part of a sale of
the Company; and (iii) affect the market price and liquidity of the
common shares. In conjunction with the January 22, 2009
financing, we provided Electrum with the right to designate an
observer at all meetings of the board of directors (the “Board”)
and any committee thereof so long as Electrum and its affiliates
hold not less than 15% of our common shares. Electrum designated
Igor Levental, President of The Electrum Group LLC, the company
that manages Electrum’s investments, as its observer at our Board
meetings. In July 2010, Mr. Levental was appointed to our Board.
Mr. Levental passed away in June 2022 while serving on the
Company’s Board. In November 2011, Dr. Thomas S. Kaplan, was
appointed Chairman of our Board. Dr. Kaplan is also the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer of The Electrum Group LLC. As long as
Electrum and its affiliates maintain its shareholdings in the
Company, Electrum will have significant influence in determining
the members of the Board. Without the consent of Electrum, we could
be prevented from entering into transactions that are otherwise
beneficial to us. The interests of Electrum and its affiliates may
differ from or be adverse to the interests of our other
shareholders. The effect of these rights and Electrum’s influence
may impact the price that investors are willing to pay for our
shares. If Electrum or its affiliates sell a substantial number of
our common shares in the public market, the market price of the
common shares could fall. The perception among the public that
these sales will occur could also contribute to a decline in the
market price of our common shares.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Some of the directors and officers have conflicts of interest
as a result of their involvement with other natural resource
companies.
Certain of our directors and officers also serve as directors, or
have significant shareholdings in, other companies involved in
natural resource exploration and development or mining-related
activities. To the extent that such other companies may participate
in ventures in which we may participate in or in ventures which we
may seek to participate in, the directors and officers may have a
conflict of interest. In all cases where the directors or officers
have an interest in other companies, such other companies may also
compete with us for the acquisition of mineral property
investments. Any decision made by any of these directors and
officers involving the Company will be made in accordance with
their duties and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with
a view to the best interests of the Company. In addition, each of
the directors is required to declare and refrain from voting on any
matter in which these directors may have a conflict of interest in
accordance with the procedures set forth in the Business
Corporations Act (British Columbia) and other applicable laws. In
appropriate cases, the Company will establish a special committee
of independent directors to review a matter in which several
directors, or management, may have a conflict. Nonetheless, as a
result of these conflicts of interest, the Company may not have an
opportunity to participate in certain transactions, which may have
a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, profitability,
financial condition, results of operation, and prospects.
We have ongoing reclamation on some of our mineral properties
and may be required to fund additional work that could have a
material adverse effect on our financial position.
Land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral
exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations)
in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance.
Reclamation may include requirements to:
|
●
|
treat ground and surface water to applicable water standards;
|
|
●
|
control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents;
|
|
●
|
reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance landforms and vegetation;
and
|
|
●
|
provide adequate financial assurance to ensure required reclamation
of land affected by our activities.
|
Exploration and other activities at the Donlin Gold project site
have created disturbance that must be reclaimed. Financial
resources spent on reclamation might otherwise be spent on further
exploration and development programs. In addition, regulatory
changes could increase our obligations to perform reclamation and
mine closure activities. There can be no assurance that we will not
be required to fund additional reclamation work at the site that
could have a material adverse effect on our financial position.
We are exposed to credit, liquidity, and interest rate
risk.
Credit risk is the risk of an unexpected loss if a customer or
third party to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual
obligations. Our cash equivalents and term deposit investments are
held through large Canadian chartered banks with high
investment-grade ratings. These investments mature at various dates
over the current operating period. A portion of the proceeds from
the sale of our Galore Creek assets include notes receivable from a
subsidiary of Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”), a publicly traded
company with investment-grade credit ratings. The notes receivable
included a $75 million note receivable of which payment was
received on July 27, 2021 and includes a $25 million note
receivable upon the earlier of the completion of a Galore Creek
project feasibility study or July 27, 2023. An additional $75
million will be receivable if, and when a Galore Creek project
construction plan is approved by the owner(s). No value was
assigned to the final $75 million contingent note receivable due to
the uncertainty with regards to the approval of a Galore Creek
project construction plan. The carrying amount of financial assets
recorded in the financial statements, net of any allowances for
losses, represents our maximum exposure to credit risk.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not be able to meet our
financial obligations as they come due. We manage liquidity risk
through the management of our capital structure and financial
leverage. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are due within
one year from the balance sheet date.
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash
flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes
in market interest rates. The risk that we will realize a loss as a
result of a decline in the fair value of the term deposit
investments is limited because these investments have an original
term of less than one year and are generally held to maturity. The
promissory note owed to Barrick is variable with the U.S. prime
rate. Based on the amount owing on the promissory note as of
November 30, 2022, and assuming all other variables remain
constant, a 1% change in the U.S. prime rate would result in an
increase/decrease of $1.24 million in the interest accrued on the
promissory note per annum. For more detail with respect to the
promissory note, see section Item 2, Donlin Gold Project,
Alaska, below.
Risks Related to Our Industry
Mining is inherently risky and subject to conditions or
events some of which are beyond our control, and which could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Mining involves various types of risks, including:
|
●
|
metallurgical and other processing problems;
|
|
●
|
unusual or unexpected geologic formations and conditions;
|
|
●
|
structural cave-ins or slides;
|
|
●
|
landslides and avalanches;
|
|
●
|
mechanical equipment and facility performance problems;
|
|
●
|
availability of materials and equipment;
|
|
●
|
periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather
conditions.
|
These risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral
properties, production facilities or other properties; personal
injury or death, including to employees; environmental damage;
delays in construction or mining operations; increased production
costs; asset write downs; monetary losses; and possible legal
liability. We may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these
risks at economically feasible premiums or at all. Insurance
against certain environmental risks, including potential liability
for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste
products occurring from mineral production, is not generally
available to us or to other companies within the mining industry.
We may suffer a material adverse impact on our business if we incur
losses related to any significant events that are not covered by
our insurance policies.
Exploration, construction, and production activities may be limited
or delayed by inclement weather and shortened exploration,
construction and operating seasons. For example, Donlin Gold
proposes to transport the bulk of the supplies required to operate
the Donlin Gold project to the site from ports in the United States
and Canada. This would require the supplies to be transported by
barge on the Kuskokwim River which is free of ice and open for
barge traffic for a limited period each year. Delays in the ice
breakup or early freeze-up, low flow levels and water depths, or
other conditions affecting the Kuskokwim River could delay or
prevent Donlin Gold from transporting supplies to the site. Any
such interference with the delivery of needed supplies to the
Donlin Gold project could adversely affect the construction or
operation of the project and/or the costs associated with these
activities which, in turn, would adversely affect our business.
We are subject to significant governmental
regulation.
Our operations, exploration and development activities in the
United States, are subject to extensive federal, state and local
laws and regulations governing various matters, including:
|
●
|
environmental protection;
|
|
●
|
management and use of toxic substances and explosives;
|
|
●
|
management of tailings and other wastes generated by our
operations;
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
|
●
|
management of natural resources;
|
|
●
|
exploration and development of mines, production and post-closure
reclamation;
|
|
●
|
taxation and mining royalties;
|
|
●
|
regulations concerning business dealings with indigenous
groups;
|
|
●
|
availability and use of water resources;
|
|
●
|
labor standards and occupational health and safety, including mine
safety; and
|
|
●
|
preservation of historic and cultural resources.
|
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result
in civil or criminal fines or penalties or enforcement actions,
including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities
enjoining, curtailing or closing operations or requiring corrective
measures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions,
any of which could result in us incurring significant expenditures.
We may also be required to compensate private parties suffering
loss or damage by reason of a breach of such laws, regulations or
permitting requirements. It is also possible that future laws and
regulations, or a more stringent enforcement of current laws and
regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional
expense, capital expenditures, restrictions on or suspensions of
our operations and delays in the exploration and development of our
mineral properties.
Our activities are subject to environmental laws and
regulations that may increase our costs of doing business and
restrict our operations.
Our exploration, potential development and production activities in
the United States are subject to regulation by governmental
agencies under various environmental laws. To the extent that we
conduct exploration activities or undertake new mining activities
in other foreign countries, we will also be subject to
environmental laws and regulations in those jurisdictions. These
laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water,
management of waste, management of hazardous substances, use of
water, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered
species, and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations.
Environmental legislation and regulations continue to evolve, and
the trend has been toward stricter standards and enforcement,
increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent
environmental assessments of proposed projects and increasing
responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and
employees. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may
require significant capital outlays on our behalf and may cause
material changes or delays in our intended activities. There can be
no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations will
not adversely affect our business, and it is possible that future
changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant
adverse impact on some portion of our business, causing us to
re-evaluate those activities at that time.
Environmental hazards may exist on our mineral properties that are
unknown to us at the present time, and that have been caused by
previous owners or operators or that may have occurred naturally.
We may be liable for remediating such damage.
Failure to comply with applicable environmental laws, regulations
and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions
thereunder, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial
authorities, causing operations to cease or to be curtailed, and
may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures,
installation of additional equipment or remedial actions.
Our insurance will not cover all of the potential risks
associated with mining operations.
Our business is subject to a number of risks and hazards generally
including adverse environmental conditions, industrial accidents,
labor disputes, unusual or unexpected geological conditions, ground
or slope failures, cave-ins, changes in the regulatory environment
and natural phenomena, such as inclement weather conditions,
floods, hurricanes and earthquakes. Such occurrences could result
in damage to mineral properties or production facilities, personal
injury or death, environmental damage to our properties or the
property of others, delays in construction or mining, monetary
losses, and possible legal liability.
Although we maintain insurance to protect against certain risks in
such amounts as we consider reasonable, our insurance will not
cover all the potential risks associated with a mining company’s
operations. We may also be unable to maintain insurance to cover
these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance coverage
may not continue to be available or may not be adequate to cover
any resulting liability. Moreover, insurance against risks such as
loss of title to mineral property, environmental pollution, or
other hazards, as a result of exploration and production is not
generally available to us or to other companies in the mining
industry on acceptable terms. We might also become subject to
liability for pollution or other hazards which may not be insured
against or which we may elect not to insure against because of
premium costs or other reasons. Losses from these events may cause
us to incur significant costs that could have a material adverse
effect on our financial performance and results of operations.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Title and other rights to our mineral properties cannot be
guaranteed and may be subject to prior unregistered agreements,
transfers or claims and other defects.
We cannot guarantee that title to our mineral properties will not
be challenged. We may not have, or may not be able to obtain, all
necessary surface rights to develop a mineral property. Title
insurance is generally not available for mineral properties and our
ability to ensure that we have obtained secure claim to individual
mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely
constrained. Our mineral properties may be subject to prior
unregistered agreements, transfers or claims, and title may be
affected by, among other things, undetected defects. We have not
conducted surveys of all the mineral properties in which we hold
direct or indirect interests. A successful challenge to the precise
area and location of these mineral properties could result in us
being unable to operate on our mineral properties as permitted or
being unable to enforce our rights with respect to our mineral
properties. This could result in us not being compensated for our
prior investment relating to the mineral property.
Rising metal prices encourage mining exploration,
development, and construction activity, which in the past has
increased demand for and cost of contract mining services and
equipment.
Increases in metal prices tend to encourage increases in mining
exploration, development, and construction activities. During past
expansions, demand for and the cost of contract exploration,
development and construction services and equipment have increased
as well. Increased demand for and cost of services and equipment
could cause project costs to increase materially, resulting in
delays if services or equipment cannot be obtained in a timely
manner due to inadequate availability, and increased potential for
scheduling difficulties and cost increases due to the need to
coordinate the availability of services or equipment, any of which
could materially increase project exploration, development, or
construction costs, result in project delays, or both. There can be
no assurance that increased costs may not adversely affect our
development of our mineral properties in the future.
We may experience difficulty attracting and retaining
qualified management and technical personnel to meet our business
objectives, and the failure to manage our business effectively
could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
We are dependent on the services of key executives including our
President and Chief Executive Officer and other highly skilled and
experienced executives and personnel focused on managing our
interests and the advancement of the Donlin Gold project, in
addition to the identification of new opportunities for growth and
funding. Due to our relatively small size, the loss of these
persons or our inability to attract and retain additional highly
skilled employees required for the development of our activities
may have a material adverse effect on our business or future
operations.
We may be subject to legal proceedings.
Due to the nature of our business, we may be subject to a variety
of regulatory investigations, claims, lawsuits, and other
proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. The results of
these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty due to
the uncertainty inherent in litigation, including the effects of
discovery of new evidence or advancement of new legal theories, the
difficulty of predicting decisions of judges and juries and the
possibility that decisions may be reversed on appeal. There can be
no assurances that these matters will not have a material adverse
effect on our business.
General Risk Factors
The Company is dependent upon information technology systems,
which are subject to disruption, damage, failure, and risks
associated with implementation and integration.
The Company’s information technology systems used in its operations
are subject to disruption, damage, or failure from a variety of
sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security
breaches, cyberattacks, natural disasters and defects in design.
Cybersecurity incidents are evolving and include, but are not
limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized
access to data or machines and equipment, and other electronic
security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems,
unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected
information, the corruption of data or the disabling, misuse or
malfunction of machines and equipment. Various measures have been
implemented to manage the Company’s risks related to information
technology systems and network disruptions. However, given the
unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of information or
operational technology disruptions, the Company could potentially
be subject to the compromising of confidential or otherwise
protected information, destruction or corruption of data, security
breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems and
networks or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on cash flows, financial
condition or results of operations.
The Company could also be adversely affected by system or network
disruptions if new or upgraded information technology systems are
defective, not installed properly or not properly integrated into
operations. Various measures have been implemented to manage the
risks related to the system implementation and modification, but
system modification failures could have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s business, financial position, and results of
operations.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
We believe we were a passive foreign investment company
(PFIC) in 2022 which could have negative tax consequences for U.S.
investors.
U.S. holders of our common shares should be aware that we believe
that for U.S. federal income tax purposes we were classified as a
PFIC for our fiscal year ended November 30, 2022, and that we may
continue to be classified as a PFIC in future years. The
determination of whether the Company is a PFIC is a factual
determination dependent on a number of factors and cannot be made
until the close of the applicable tax year. Accordingly, no
assurances can be given regarding the Company’s PFIC status for the
current year or any future year. If the Company is a PFIC at any
time during a U.S. holder’s holding period, then certain
potentially adverse tax consequences could apply to such U.S.
holder’s acquisition, ownership, and disposition of common shares.
For more information, please see the discussion in Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities “Certain
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders”
below.
Global climate change is an international concern and could
impact our ability to conduct future operations.
Global climate change is an international issue and receives an
enormous amount of publicity. We would expect that the imposition
of international treaties or U.S. or Canadian federal, state,
provincial, or local laws or regulations pertaining to mandatory
reductions in energy consumption or emissions of greenhouse gasses
could affect the feasibility of mining projects and increase
operating costs.
The Donlin Gold project is not directly threatened by current
predictions of sea level rise as it is located inland at elevations
150 meters to 640 meters above sea level. However, changes in sea
levels could affect ocean and river transportation and shipping
facilities, which would be used to transport supplies, equipment
and personnel to the Donlin Gold project and products from the
project to world markets. The Donlin Gold project proposes to
deliver the vast majority of construction and operations equipment,
supplies, consumables, and other required materials to the project
site via the Kuskokwim River when it is ice-free. Historically, the
Kuskokwim River has been ice-free from late April until mid-October
and models based on historic weather and river flow records predict
that there would be sufficient flow in the river to allow the
transportation of the required materials to the project site
annually. If climate changes alter the ice-free season or flow
patterns of the Kuskokwim River, the current supply logistics plan
for the project may need to be modified.
Climate changes also could affect the availability of water
required to sustain operations at the Donlin Gold project. Also,
management of water is an essential component of the project’s
operating plans. Climate change could require modifications to the
project’s water management plan, which may require additional
capital investments or increase operating costs, if precipitation
increases or decreases relative to historic records.
Extreme weather events (such as increased frequency or intensity of
storms, increased snowpack, prolonged drought, and associated fire
danger) have the potential to disrupt operations. Where appropriate
the Donlin Gold project has developed contingency plans for
managing extreme weather conditions; however, extended disruptions
to supply lines due to extreme weather could result in interruption
of activities at the project site, delay or increase the cost of
construction of the project, or otherwise adversely affect our
business.
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
None.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
The Company has adopted the mining disclosure standards of
Subpart 229.1300 of Regulation S-K – Disclosure by
Registrants Engaged in Mining Operations (“S-K 1300”). The
Company is subject to and required to disclose mineral resources
and mineral reserves in accordance with S-K 1300. While the S-K
1300 rules are similar to National Instrument 43-101 Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) rules in Canada, they
are not identical and therefore two reports have been produced for
the Donlin Gold project. The information in Item 2,
Properties, below is common to both reports and contains
pertinent information required under S-K 1300.
Donlin Gold Technical Report (NI 43-101)
The Company retained Wood Canada Limited (“Wood”), an unaffiliated
third party, to update content in its previously filed “Donlin
Creek Gold Project, Alaska, USA, NI 43-101 Technical Report on the
Second Updated Feasibility Study,” effective November 18, 2011,
and amended January 20, 2012 (“2011 Mining Study”). Wood’s
Qualified Persons (“QPs”) completed an exercise to verify which
content in the 2011 Mining Study remains current, and what was
required to update the report content with the latest information.
Updated content includes operating costs, capital costs, tax rates,
long term gold price, and the economic analysis. Additionally, work
done on the property since 2011 with respect to exploration,
drilling, permitting, and minor mine design changes as a result of
recent permitting activities are summarized in the updated content.
A data verification exercise was completed by each Wood QP
co-authoring the report. This included a September 2020 site visit
by two of the report QPs; review of the geologic data, geologic
model, and resource model; review of metallurgical test work;
review of designs for mining, processing, and infrastructure,
including minor design updates; update of capital and operating
cost estimates utilizing a combination of cost indices and vendor
quotations; and an updated economic analysis. Canadian NI 43-101
Definitions and CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and
Mineral Reserves (“CIM Definition Standards”), adopted by CIM
Council on May 10, 2014 apply for this exercise.
The Wood review determined that the report updating exercise
resulted in no material change to the Mineral Resources or Mineral
Reserves. On August 31, 2021, the Company voluntarily filed an
updated NI 43-101 technical report for the Donlin Gold project in
Alaska, USA, and titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report on the
Donlin Gold Project, Alaska, USA,” with an effective date of
June 1, 2021 (“2021 Technical Report”) reflecting the results of
the above exercise. The 2021 Technical Report was prepared by Wood.
The 2021 Technical Report is available on the Company’s website and
on EDGAR at www.sec.gov and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Donlin Gold Technical Report Summary (S-K 1300)
The Company is a registrant with the SEC and is reporting its
exploration results, Mineral Resources, and Mineral Reserves using
the mining disclosure standards of S-K 1300. The Company requested
that Wood prepare a Technical Report Summary of the Donlin Gold
project, Alaska, USA using the standards of S-K 1300 and it is
titled “S-K 1300 Technical Report Summary on the Donlin Gold
Project, Alaska, USA” (“S-K 1300 Report”), current as of
November 30, 2021, with a report date of November 30, 2021. Wood
prepared the S-K 1300 Report from the 2011 Mining Study of the
Donlin deposits that was completed to at least pre-feasibility
level, as defined by S-K 1300, at the time of the study. Material
aspects of the 2011 Mining Study were updated by Wood in 2020 and
made current. As part of the update process, Wood’s subject matter
experts completed an exercise to verify and update the content of
the 2011 Mining Study with the latest information under the
supervision of Wood’s independent QP co-authors of the S-K 1300
Report. Updated content includes operating costs, capital costs,
taxes, forecast long term gold price and the economic analysis.
Additionally, work done since 2011 on the property with respect to
exploration, drilling, permitting and minor project design changes
as a result of recent permitting activities are summarized in the
S-K 1300 Report. A data verification exercise was completed by each
Wood QP co-authoring the S-K 1300 Report. Wood QPs verified that
the updated content of the 2011 Mining Study met at least
pre-feasibility level of study as defined in S-K 1300, and it
supports the disclosure of exploration results, Mineral Resources,
and Mineral Reserves using S-K 1300 standards.
Results of the Donlin Gold Technical Report (NI 43-101) and
Donlin Gold Technical Report Summary (S-K 1300)
Wood reviewed the geologic and resource models that supported the
2011 Mining Study, including comparing them to data from recent
drilling programs, and determined that they continue to be adequate
and suitable to be used for a Mineral Resource estimation. Using
updated cost inputs from the first calendar quarter of 2020, a gold
price of $1,500 per ounce, and the geologic and resource models
utilized in support of the 2011 Mining Study, the contents within
an updated optimized pit shell did not show a material change to
the Mineral Resources stated in the 2011 Mining Study. Therefore,
the Mineral Resources were considered current as of November 30,
2021 and are unchanged. They continue to have an effective date of
July 11, 2011.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Similarly, using updated cost inputs, a gold price of $1,200 per
ounce, and the geologic and resource models utilized in support of
the 2011 Mining Study with appropriate modifying factors applied
for Mineral Reserve estimation, the previous Mineral Reserve
ultimate pit was contained within an updated optimized pit shell.
Therefore, the Mineral Reserves remained current as of November 30,
2021 and are unchanged. Because the Mineral Reserves are supported
by an updated economic analysis they have an effective date of
April 27, 2021.
Outside of verifying the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve
estimates, the primary efforts in the 2021 Technical Report and the
S-K 1300 Report were financial and permitting updates. This
includes updates to estimated capital costs, operating costs,
reclamation and closure costs, royalties, taxes, and economic
analysis, as well as current status of the permits. Updated capital
costs are based on first calendar quarter 2020 pricing (cost
indices and current commodity pricing and equipment quotes) applied
to the engineering designs and material take-offs from the 2011
Mining Study, except for minor changes made during permitting in
the operations water treatment plant and the natural gas pipeline.
As a result of the content updates, the total initial capital cost
estimate is $7,402 million, which is an increase of 10.8% or $723
million compared to the 2011 Mining Study total initial capital
cost estimate. Likewise, the total sustaining capital estimate is
$1,723 million, which is an increase of 14.6% or $219 million
compared to the 2011 Mining Study total sustaining capital
estimate. The 2011 Mining Study operating costs were updated to
first calendar quarter 2020 by updating key cost drivers like
energy, labor, consumables, and freight. No material changes to
project designs, schedules, or productivities were made;
consequently, the manning schedules and consumables remain
unchanged. The updated estimated Life of Mine (LOM) operating costs
total $19,289 million, which is $5.90/t mined, $38.21/t processed,
or $635/oz gold sold.
The economic evaluation of the Donlin Gold project in both the 2021
Technical Report and the S-K 1300 Report was updated using the
following inputs:
|
●
|
A production plan based on the 2011 Mining Study of 53,500 t/d open
pit gold mine with ore processing by means of flotation, pressure
oxidation, and cyanidation. The pit designs and Mineral Reserves
were based on the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource estimates
that were verified as remaining current. Annual LOM gold production
averages 1.13 million ounces per year over a production life of 27
years, including 1.46 million ounces per year for the first five
full years of production.
|
|
●
|
Current land and royalty agreements
|
|
●
|
Initial and sustaining capital costs, and operating costs updated
to first calendar quarter 2020
|
|
●
|
Tax payments in accordance with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”)
enacted in December 2017 and effective January 1, 2018
|
|
●
|
$292 million LOM contributions for reclamation, closure, and
financial assurance
|
|
●
|
Financing has been assumed on a 100%, all equity, stand-alone
basis
|
|
●
|
Escalation/inflation has been excluded
|
|
●
|
No salvage is assumed at the end of operations
|
Based on the economic evaluation, the Donlin Gold project generates
positive before and after-tax economic results. Total after-tax
cash flow is $13,145 million, after-tax NPV at a 5% discount rate
is $3,040 million, and the after-tax internal rate of return is
9.2%. After-tax payback is achieved 7.3 years following the start
of production.
The following descriptions summarize selected information about the
Company’s 50% interest in the Donlin Gold project located in
Alaska, USA. Except for subsequent events or as otherwise noted,
the disclosure in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of a
scientific or technical nature for the Donlin Gold project is based
on both the 2021 Technical Report and S-K 1300 Report, as of
November 30, 2021. The S-K 1300 Report meets at least a
pre-feasibility level. The 2021 Technical Report and the S-K 1300
Report do not incorporate the latest Donlin Gold optimization work
on the geologic modeling concepts or other optimization work since
these assessments are still underway.
The 2021 Technical Report was filed on EDGAR and SEDAR on August
31, 2021. The S-K 1300 Report is filed on EDGAR and SEDAR on
January 26, 2022. The 2021 Technical Report and S-K 1300 Report
were prepared by Wood.
The 2021 Technical Report and S-K 1300 Report have been filed with
securities regulatory authorities in each province of Canada and
with the SEC. Portions of the following information are based on
assumptions, qualifications and procedures that are not fully
described herein. Reference should be made to the full text of both
reports which are available for review on EDGAR at
www.sec.gov and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Paul Chilson, P.E., a Qualified Person and an employee of the
Company, has approved the mineral reserves and mineral resources
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as of November 30, 2022
and reviewed the reserves and resources in the S-K 1300 Report and
confirmed that the reserves and resources remain current as of
November 30, 2022.
Donlin Gold Project, Alaska, USA
The Donlin Gold project is a development-stage gold project held by
Donlin Gold LLC (“Donlin Gold”), a limited liability company that
is owned 50% by the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, NOVAGOLD
Resources Alaska Inc., and 50% by Barrick’s wholly-owned
subsidiary, Barrick Gold U.S. Inc. The Company’s book value of its
investment in the Donlin Gold project is $3.8 million as of
November 30, 2022.
The Company entered into the limited liability company agreement
with Barrick (“LLC Agreement”) dated December 1, 2007, which
provided for the creation of Donlin Gold, that is jointly owned by
the Company and Barrick on a 50/50 basis. Pursuant to the LLC
Agreement, the Company agreed to reimburse Barrick out of future
mine production cash flow for a portion of Barrick’s prior
expenditures on the Donlin Gold project. As of November 30, 2022,
the promissory note, including accrued interest, amounted to
approximately $123.7 million. Funding for the project is currently
shared by both parties on a 50/50 basis.
Except for events subsequent to the reports, or as otherwise stated
or implied, the scientific and technical information regarding the
Donlin Gold project in this Annual Report on Form 10-K is
based on both the 2021 Technical Report and the S-K 1300
Report.
Property Description and Location
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
The Donlin Gold deposits are situated approximately 62°North
latitude and 158°West longitude, which is 450 km west of
Anchorage and 250 km northeast of Bethel up the Kuskokwim
River. The closest village is the community of Crooked Creek,
approximately 20 km to the south, on the Kuskokwim River.
The resource areas are within T. 23 N., R. 49. W., Seward Meridian,
Kuskokwim and Mt. McKinley Recording Districts, Crooked Creek
Mining District, Iditarod A-5 USGS 1:63,360 topography map. The
mineralization is centered on approximately 540222.50 east and
6878534.36 north, using the NAD 83 datum.
The Donlin Gold property is located in the Kuskokwim region of
southwestern Alaska on private, Alaska Native-owned mineral and
surface land and Alaska state mining claims. The property is under
lease (the Calista Lease) for subsurface rights and some surface
rights from Calista and surface rights (the SUA) from TKC, two
Alaska Native corporations. Calista is one of 13 regional Alaska
Native corporations established as part of the Alaska Native Claims
Settlement Act of 1971 (ANCSA) and under ANCSA has title to the
subsurface estate and some surface rights in the region. TKC was
formed in 1977 when the ANCSA village corporations of Lower
Kalskag, Upper Kalskag, Aniak, Chuathbaluk, Napaimute, Crooked
Creek, Red Devil, Georgetown, Sleetmute and Stony River, which are
located along the middle region of the Kuskokwim River, merged.
Under ANCSA, TKC has title to extensive surface estate in the
region, including most of the project lands. The property hosts a
gold deposit currently estimated at 33.8 million ounces of proven
and probable mineral reserves averaging 2.09 grams per tonne. The
Company believes that significant exploration potential remains in
the Donlin Gold district, with prospects to increase mine life
and/or justify future production expansions. See Mineral
Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimate, below.
Other lands required for offsite infrastructure, such as the
Jungjuk port site, the road from the port site to the mine site,
and natural gas pipeline are categorized as Native, State of Alaska
conveyed, or Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands. Rights-of-way
are required from other Alaska Native corporations, the State of
Alaska and BLM for the road and pipeline alignments that cross
Native corporation, state, and federal lands.
Permits
Donlin Gold obtained the necessary permits and certifications that
allowed for the exploration, associated at least pre-feasibility
study level test work, environmental monitoring, and Environmental
Impact Study (EIS) baseline data collection efforts. The current
status of these permits is in line with the termination of the
baseline data collection effort, temporary closure of the camp in
May 2015, and the seasonal reopening of the site for the geological
drill program from July to November 2017, the geotechnical drill
program in 2019 for the issuance of the Dam Safety Certifications,
and the latest geological drill programs in 2020, 2021, and 2022.
The active permits include Alaska Department of Natural Resources
(ADNR) temporary use of water; ADNR Application for Permit to Mine
in Alaska (approval for the 2020, 2021 and 2022 drill programs),
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) individual 404 and
nationwide 26 permits; Alaska Department of Environmental
Conservation (ADEC) authorizations (landfill, septic system,
multisector stormwater general permit – sector G, owners requested
limit [air]); and Federal Aviation Administration approval (Landing
Area). Other permits were either put on hold, closed, or allowed to
expire.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
On August 7, 2012, we announced that Donlin Gold commenced
permitting of the project by submitting a draft Plan of Operations
and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA) draft permit application
to federal and state regulators. The Section 404 permit
application initiated the environmental review process under the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) which involves preparation
of an EIS. The Corps selected AECOM, formerly URS, an independent
contractor, to prepare the EIS. The Notice of Intent for the EIS
was published in the Federal Register on December 14, 2012,
and the NEPA public scoping process was completed on March 29,
2013. During the remainder of 2013 and through 2014 and 2015,
Donlin Gold worked to address the remaining data needs for the
draft EIS. Donlin Gold also continued to provide application
materials and maintained ongoing dialogue with the key permitting
agencies. The Corps addressed the cooperating agency comments on
the preliminary draft and filed the Notice of Availability for
public release of the draft EIS in the Federal Register in November
2015. After the filing of the draft EIS, the Corps issued a
schedule for public meetings on the Donlin Gold draft EIS in the
Y-K region and Anchorage, Alaska. The Corps conducted, and at the
end of May 2016 completed, a six-month public comment period for
the draft EIS, including 17 public comment meetings in communities
across the Y-K region and in Anchorage. The Corps received comments
from federal and state agencies, local and tribal governments,
Alaska Native organizations, businesses, special interest
groups/NGOs, and individuals.
On April 27, 2018, the Notice of Availability of the Donlin Gold
final EIS was published in the Federal Register. On August
13, 2018, the Corps and the BLM issued a joint Federal Record of
Decision (ROD) for the Donlin Gold project. Along with the ROD, the
Corps issued a combined permit under CWA Section 404 and Section 10
of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Additionally, the BLM issued the
Offer to Lease for the right-of-way (ROW) for those portions of the
natural gas pipeline that would cross federal lands. The Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration previously issued a
special permit for the natural gas pipeline on June 5, 2018.
Several major State of Alaska permits were also issued and advanced
during 2018 through 2022. After a public notice and comment period,
ADEC issued a Certificate of Reasonable Assurance under CWA Section
401 on August 10, 2018, indicating that the CWA 404 permit complies
with the State’s water quality standards. The Alaska Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (APDES) water discharge permit was
issued by ADEC on May 24, 2018 and became effective on July 1,
2018. Donlin Gold submitted its application to ADEC for the
regularly scheduled re-issuance of its APDES permit and in December
2022, Donlin Gold received a letter from ADEC indicating that the
application is complete and the permit will remain in effect until
ADEC completes the reissuances process. The State of Alaska
Department of Fish and Game (ADFG) issued Title 16 Fish Habitat
permits for the mine area and transportation corridor on August 30,
2018. Donlin Gold applied for a new air quality permit from ADEC,
which is expected to be in place when the current permit expires in
mid-2023. The Donlin Gold air quality permit renewal is required to
update that emissions controls reflect best technology and
re-confirm that air quality standards will be met. A draft permit
was issued for public comment in December 2022. The final approvals
of the Donlin Gold Reclamation Plan and the Waste Management Permit
were issued on January 18, 2019. ADNR issued the easement, land
leases, land use permits, and material site authorizations for the
proposed transportation facilities, and easement for the fiber
optic cable on State lands on January 2, 2020. On January 17, 2020,
ADNR’s State Pipeline Coordinator Services (SPCS) issued the final
State ROW authorization for the natural gas pipeline. On June 29,
2021, ADNR’s Division of Mining Land and Water issued 12 final
Water Rights for the mine site and transportation corridor. On
November 1, 2021, ADFG issued two Special Area Permits required for
pipeline facilities located within the Susitna Flats State Game
Refuge (“Refuge”). One permit authorizes the compressor station,
and the other permit authorizes the section of the pipeline ROW in
the Refuge. On November 1, 2022, ADNR finalized approval of the
proposed re-location plan for public easements in the mine site and
transportation facility areas.
The field work related to the issuance of the Alaska Dam Safety
certificates re-commenced during the third quarter of 2022 and is
planned to be completed in 2023.
On June 3, 2020, Earthjustice joined by Orutsararmiut Traditional
Native Council (ONC), Chevak, Kasigluk, Eek, Kwinhagak, Marshall,
Nightmute, Tununak, Kwethluk, Kotlik, SalmonState, and the Alaska
Community Action on Toxics filed a formal appeal with the ADEC
Commissioner of the state’s water quality certification under
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The appeal process consists of
an Administrative Hearing in front of an Administrative Law Judge
(ALJ) appointed by the ADEC Commissioner. The ALJ was subsequently
appointed. On April 12, 2021, the ALJ issued his opinion for the
Commissioner’s consideration recommending the 401 Certification be
vacated. The Commissioner issued his decision to uphold the 401
Certification on May 27, 2021. The decision was appealed on June
28, 2021 in Alaska Superior Court by Earthjustice, on behalf of
ONC. On September 27, 2021, Donlin Gold filed a motion requesting a
short term stay in the case to allow the State to fully consider
additional technical materials on mercury and temperature; the
State indicated to the Court that they do not oppose the motion. On
October 22, 2021, Donlin Gold submitted to ADEC expert technical
reports on mercury and temperature. On November 22, 2021, ADEC
filed an additional motion asking to remand the 401 certification
back to ADEC to determine how the additional information affects
the certification. Earthjustice did not oppose the motion although
had comments on the remand process. On December 29, 2021, the Court
granted the remand request, dismissed the case without prejudice,
and left in place existing certification. On May 13, 2022, the ADEC
Water Division Director reaffirmed the 401 certification. On June
13, 2022, Earthjustice appealed the elements of the decision
related to temperature to the Commissioner and requested an
adjudicatory hearing with an ALJ. On July 14, 2022, the
Commissioner granted the request for the hearing and a new ALJ was
assigned. On September 14, 2022, Earthjustice filed their initial
brief. Donlin Gold and ADEC filed response briefs on October 14,
2022. Earthjustice filed their final response brief on October 21,
2022. The Commissioner’s decision, which he will make in
collaboration with the new ALJ, is expected in early 2023. It is
then subject to further review in Alaska Superior Court.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
On September 20, 2021, Earthjustice, representing ONC, Cook
Inletkeeper, and three villages, filed an appeal of the State
pipeline ROW authorization in Alaska Superior Court. An appeal was
also filed by a second party, the owner of an outdoor guiding
business around the pipeline route, on September 20, 2021. On April
5, 2022, Earthjustice filed its opening brief, which related to the
scope of the cumulative effects analysis required by the Alaska
Constitutional, statutory, and regulatory provisions, and related
previous litigation. ADNR, Donlin Gold, and Calista filed response
briefs on June 15-16, 2022. Earthjustice filed responses on July
18, 2022, and then requested oral arguments. The second appellant
filed his initial brief on June 8, 2022. ANDR’s and Donlin Gold’s
response briefs were submitted on August 22, 2022, and the second
appellant filed their response brief on November 9, 2022. The
request for oral arguments was granted by the Court and were held
on January 11, 2023. Decisions are expected in 2023.
On May 25, 2022, Earthjustice, on behalf of ONC and five villages,
filed an appeal of the final water rights in Alaska Superior Court.
Earthjustice filed its initial brief on November 21, 2022. ADNR’s
and Donlin Gold’s response briefs are due by January 30, 2023. A
decision is expected in 2023 or the first half of 2024.
In September 2022, 13 tribes sent a letter to the Corps and the EPA
requesting that the Corps consider requiring a supplemental EIS on
the Donlin Gold project and revoking the Clean Water Act Section
404 permit in light of what the tribes consider "new information”
since the final EIS was issued in 2018. Also in September 2022, the
same tribes submitted a separate letter to EPA requesting that they
initiate a Clean Water Act Section 404(c) veto process for the
Donlin Gold project. Section 404(c) has recently been applied to
the Pebble Project in Alaska but is extremely rarely used by EPA.
In early January 2023, Donlin Gold and Calista both submitted
responses to the Corps on why the requests to prepare a
supplemental EIS or revoke the 404 permit should not be
granted. In mid-January 2023, Donlin Gold also provided a
response to EPA describing why the agency should not initiate a
404(c) process.
Thirteen of the 56 village councils in the Calista Region (Native
Village of Kasigluk, ONC, Native Village of Eek, Tuluksak Native
Community, Tununak Council, Native Village of Nunapitchuk,
Chuloonawick Tribal Council, Native Village of Kwigillingok, Native
Village of Kongiganak, Chefornak Traditional Council, Chevak Native
Village, Native Village of Napakiak and Quinhagak) have adopted
resolutions opposing development of the Donlin Gold project.
Mineral Tenure
The 2011 Restated Exploration and Lode Mining Lease (“Calista
Lease”) between Calista and Donlin Gold, includes subsurface
(mineral) rights leased from Calista. Calista also owns the
corresponding surface estate on a portion of these lands, the
rights to which are also included in the Calista Lease. The Calista
Lease provides Donlin Gold with rights to approximately 19,988
hectares of Calista-owned land. The Calista Lease was restated on
February 11, 2011, to reflect all assignments and amendments made
between its original execution on May 1, 1995 and February 11,
2011. The Calista Lease was amended once again effective June
6, 2014 (the “2014 Amendment”). The 2014 Amendment did not
affect the lands subject to the Calista Lease as restated on
February 11, 2011.
On June 9, 2014, the Company announced that Donlin Gold and TKC
reached an updated long-term Surface Use Agreement (SUA) for the
Donlin Gold project. The SUA with TKC grants non-exclusive surface
use rights to Donlin Gold for mining activities. TKC owns and
contributed to the SUA the corresponding surface estate over most
of Calista’s subsurface estate included in the Calista Lease as
well as some additional surface estate. The SUA with TKC provides
Donlin Gold with rights to approximately 16,923 hectares of
TKC-owned land.
Lyman Resources in Alaska, Inc. (Lyman Resources) has an existing
placer mining lease covering approximately four-square miles
(partially covering six sections) within the Calista Lease area.
The Lyman family also has title to approximately 14 acres of
surface estate within the Snow Gulch area. The Calista Lease grants
priority to extraction of the lode mineralization in the event of a
conflict of use between lode and placer mining operations, provided
that a two-year notice period is provided to Lyman Resources. Lyman
Resources, the Lyman family, and Donlin Gold executed a Surface
Lease and Assignment of Mining Lease effective May 9, 2012, leasing
the Lyman surface estate and assigning the Lyman placer lease
within the Calista Lease area to Donlin for Project mining use (the
“Lyman Lease”).
In addition to the leased land, Donlin Gold holds 493 State of
Alaska mining claims comprising approximately 29,008 hectares in
the Kuskokwim and Mt. McKinley Recording Districts. The mining
claims abut and largely surround northern and western boundaries of
the lands subject to the Calista Lease and TKC SUA. The mining
claims are located on lands that are owned by the State of Alaska
(409) and on State-selected lands from the BLM (84). All claims are
approximately either 16.2 hectares or 64.8 hectares in size.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
The terms for the Calista Lease and TKC SUA include various royalty
and other payment provisions and considerations such as shareholder
employment and contracting opportunities. The Lyman Lease provides
for rent and certain other payments.
Royalty Terms of the Calista Lease include:
|
●
|
Annual advance minimum royalty (variable) to 2030;
|
|
●
|
All advance minimum payments are recoverable as a credit against
the net smelter return royalty and net proceeds payment;
|
|
●
|
Net smelter return of 1.5% for the earlier of the first five years
following commencement of commercial production or until initial
capital payback;
|
|
●
|
Conversion to a 4.5% net smelter return after the earlier of five
years or initial capital payback; and
|
|
●
|
Net proceeds royalty of 8% of the net proceeds realized by Donlin
Gold LLC commencing with the first quarter in which net proceeds
are first realized.
|
Payment Terms of the TKC SUA include:
|
●
|
Annual advance minimum payment (variable per milestones);
|
|
●
|
All advance minimum payments are recoverable as a credit against
the milled tonnage fee and net proceeds payment;
|
|
●
|
Milled tonnage fee of $0.40 per tonne processed for the first 10
years of production;
|
|
●
|
Conversion of the milled tonnage fee to $0.50 per tonne processed
for all production after 10 years;
|
|
●
|
Net proceeds payment of 3% of the net proceeds realized by Donlin
Gold LLC commencing with the first quarter in which net proceeds
are first realized.
|
The term of the Calista Lease is to April 30, 2031 and extends
automatically year to year thereafter, so long as either mining or
processing operations are carried out on or with respect to the
property in good faith on a continuous basis in such year, or
Donlin Gold pays to Calista an advanced minimum royalty of $3.0
million (subject to adjustment for increases in the Consumer Price
Index) for such year. The TKC SUA remains in effect through April
30, 2031, and on a year-to-year basis thereafter, so long as the
Calista Mining Lease remains in effect. The Lyman Lease has an
initial term of 20 years but shall be extended while Donlin Gold
conducts operations on the property.
Additional estimated costs associated with various landowner and
lease agreements, not already covered in initial capital or G&A
operating costs, average approximate $8.6 million per year during
the six pre-production years and $2.5 million per year during the
27 operating years. Annual rent, labor expenditures and filings are
required to maintain Alaska State mining claims on State land.
Mining license tax payments may also apply.
Accessibility and Climate
The Kuskokwim River is a regional transportation route and is
serviced by commercial barge lines. A 25-kilometer winter road,
designated as an Alaska State Highway route and transportation
corridor, accesses the property from the barge landing at the
village of Crooked Creek. The Donlin Gold project currently has an
all-season, soft-sided camp. An adjacent 1,500-meter airstrip is
capable of handling aircraft as large as L-100 Hercules
(approximate cargo capacity of 19,050 kilograms), allowing
efficient shipment of personnel, some heavy equipment, and
supplies. The Donlin Gold project can be reached directly by
charter air facilities out of Anchorage and Aniak, 80 kilometers to
the west.
The project area is one of low topographic relief on the western
flank of the Kuskokwim Mountains. Elevations range from 150 meters
to 640 meters. Ridges are well rounded and easily accessible by
all-terrain vehicle. Hillsides are forested with black spruce,
tamarack, alder, birch and larch. Soft muskeg and discontinuous
permafrost are common in poorly drained areas at lower elevations.
The area has a relatively dry interior continental climate with
typically less than 500 millimeters total annual precipitation.
Summer temperatures are relatively warm and may exceed 30°C.
Minimum temperatures may fall to well below -42°C during the cold
winter months.
Exploration History
Approximately 1,678 exploration and development drill holes
totaling 367,886 meters, were completed from 1988 through 2007
in at least six separately managed campaigns. Another 108 core
holes totaling 33,425 meters were added in 2008 to explore
near-pit expansions and satellite deposits, and for
facility-related condemnation and geotechnical studies. In 2010, 6
core holes totaling 2,090 meters were drilled for additional
pit slope geotechnical drilling. In 2017, 16 core holes totaling
7,040 meters were drilled; in 2020, 85 core holes totaling
23,361 meters were drilled; in 2021, 79 core holes totaling 24,264
meters were drilled; and in 2022, 141 core holes totaling 42,331
meters were drilled.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Approximately 1,396 holes, totaling 339,733 meters, supported the
resource model used in the 2011 Mining Study. The remaining holes
were either drilled after the completion of the 2011 Mining Study
(2017, 2020, 2021, and 2022 drill programs) or were utilized for
other purposes, such as district exploration, carbonate resource,
facilities condemnation, hydrology, geotechnical, and
infrastructure engineering.
Year
|
|
Company
|
|
Work Performed
|
|
Results
|
1909 to 1956
|
|
Various prospectors and placer miners
|
|
Gold discovered in 1909. Placer mining by hand, underground, and
hydraulic methods.
|
|
Total placer gold production of approximately
30,000 ounces.
|
1970s to 2015
|
|
Robert Lyman and heirs
|
|
Resumed sluice mining in Donlin Gold area and placer mined Snow
Gulch.
|
|
First year of mining Snow Gulch produced best results, with
800 ounces of gold recovered. Donlin Gold has obtained an
agreement with the Lyman family to consolidate the land package
around the proposed mine.
|
1974, 1975
|
|
Resource Associates of Alaska (RAA)
|
|
Regional mineral potential evaluation for Calista. Soil grid and
three bulldozer trenches dug in Snow Gulch area.
|
|
Soil, rock, and vein samples have anomalous gold values. Trench
rock sample results range from 2 to 20 grams per
tonne gold.
|
1984 to 1987
|
|
Calista Corporation
|
|
Minor work. Geologists from various mining companies, including
Cominco and Kennecott, visit the property.
|
|
|
1986
|
|
Lyman Resources
|
|
Auger drilling for placer evaluation finds abundant gray, sulfide
rich clay near Quartz Gulch.
|
|
Assays of cuttings average over 7 grams per tonne gold. Initial
discovery of Far Side (“Carolyn”) prospect.
|
1987
|
|
Calista Corporation
|
|
Rock sampling of ridge tops and auger drill sampling of Far Side
prospect.
|
|
Anomalous gold values from auger holes: best result =
9.7 grams per tonne gold.
|
1988 to 1989
|
|
Western Gold Exploration and Mining Co.
|
|
Airborne geophysics, geological mapping, and soil sampling over
most of the project area. Total of 13,525 meters of D9 Cat
trenching at all prospects. Over 15,000 soil, rock chip, and auger
samples collected. Drilling included 3,106 feet of AX core
drilling, 404 meters in 239 auger holes, and 10,423 meters of RC
drilling (125 holes). First metallurgical tests and
petrographic work.
|
|
Initial work identified eight prospects with encouraging geology
(Snow, Dome, Quartz, Carolyn, Queen, Upper Lewis, Lower Lewis, and
Rochelieu). Drilling at most of these prospects led to
identification of the Lewis areas as having the best bulk-mineable
potential. Mineral resource estimate completed.
|
1993
|
|
Teck Exploration Ltd.
|
|
D-9 Cat trenching (1,400 meters) and two 500-meter soil lines
in Lewis area. Petrographic, fluid inclusion, and metallurgical
work.
|
|
Identified new mineralized areas, updated Mineral resource
estimate.
|
1995 to 2000
|
|
Placer Dome
|
|
87,383 meters of core, 11,909 meters of RC drilling and 8,493
meters of trenching. Environmental monitoring and assessment.
|
|
Drilled the American Creek magnetic anomaly (ACMA), discovered the
ACMA deposit. Numerous mineral resource estimation iterations.
|
2001 to 2002
|
|
NOVAGOLD
|
|
46,495 meters of core, 38,022 meters of RC drilling, 89.5
meters of geotechnical drilling, and 268 meters of water monitoring
holes.
|
|
Filed a preliminary assessment report on the project. Updated
resource estimate.
|
2003 to 2005
|
|
Donlin Gold Joint Venture
|
|
25,448 meters of core and 5,979 meters of RC drilling. Calcium
carbonate exploration drilling; IP lines for facility condemnation
studies.
|
|
Infill drilled throughout the resource area. Discovered a calcium
carbonate resource. Poor quality IP data.
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Year |
|
Company |
|
Work Performed |
|
Results |
2006
|
|
Donlin Gold Joint Venture
|
|
92,804 meters of core drilling to support mineral resource
classification conversion, slope stability, metallurgy, waste rock,
carbonate exploration, facilities and port road studies.
|
|
Geological model and mineral resource update.
|
2007
|
|
Donlin Gold Joint Venture
|
|
Core drilling totaled 75,257 meters and included resource
delineation, geotechnical and engineering, and carbonate
exploration. 13 RC holes for monitor wells and pit pump tests
totaled 1,043 meters.
|
|
Improved pit slope parameters, positive hydrogeological results.
Carbonate exploration was negative. Updated mineral resource
estimate. Completed feasibility study with positive results.
|
2008
|
|
Donlin Gold LLC
|
|
108 core holes totaling 33,425 meters for exploration and facility
related geotechnical and condemnation studies. Updated resource
models. Metallurgical test work: flotation variability and CN
leach. 54 test pits and 37 auger holes were also completed for
overburden characterization.
|
|
Resource expansion indicated for East ACMA. CN leach resource
potential indicated for the main resource area, Snow, and Dome
prospects. Facility sites successfully condemned. Updated resource
estimates utilizing applicable data through 2007.
|
2009
|
|
Donlin Gold LLC
|
|
19 geotechnical core holes totaling 950 meters in facility sites
and to address hydrology.
|
|
|
2010
|
|
Donlin Gold LLC
|
|
Six geotechnical core holes totaling 2,090 meters to evaluate slope
stability of expanded pit. Also drilled 90 auger holes totaling 585
meters and dug 59 test pits to further evaluate overburden
conditions and gravel supplies within tailings storage facility
(TSF) area.
|
|
Pit slope stability of new pit design remained acceptable.
Construction suitability of surficial materials in TSF is
evaluated.
|
2017
|
|
Donlin Gold LLC
|
|
16 core holes totaling 7,040 meters to test targeted mineralized
zones, collect structural data related to mineralization, and
collect geotechnical data.
|
|
Results not included in resource model used in the 2011 Mining
Study
|
2019
|
|
Donlin Gold LLC
|
|
30 geotechnical core holes totaling 1,060 meters were drilled as
part of a site investigation program in support of detailed dam
design.
|
|
Results not included in resource model used in the 2011 Mining
Study
|
2020
|
|
Donlin Gold LLC
|
|
85 core holes totaling 23,361 meters in both the ACMA and Lewis
deposits to validate recent geologic modeling concepts and test for
extensions of high-grade zones.
|
|
Results not included in resource model used in the 2011 Mining
Study
|
2021
|
|
Donlin Gold LLC
|
|
79 core holes totaling 24,264 meters in both the ACMA and Lewis
deposits to validate recent geologic modeling concepts and test for
extensions of high-grade zones.
|
|
Results not included in resource model used in the 2011 Mining
Study
|
2022
|
|
Donlin Gold LLC
|
|
141 core holes totaling 42,331 meters in both the ACMA and Lewis
deposits and in the Divide domain overlapping ACMA and Lewis.
|
|
Results not included in resource model used in the 2011 Mining
Study
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Geology
Regional Geology
The Kuskokwim region of southwestern Alaska is predominately
underlain by rocks of the Upper Cretaceous Kuskokwim Group that
filled a subsided northeast-trending strike-slip basin between a
series of amalgamated terranes. Intermediate composition
volcano-plutonic complexes intrude and overlie Kuskokwim Group
rocks throughout the region.
Local Geology
The Donlin Gold deposits lie between two regional,
northeast-trending, right lateral fault systems: the
Denali-Farewell fault system to the south and the Iditarod-Nixon
Fork fault system to the north. Undivided Kuskokwim Group
sedimentary rocks and granite porphyry complexes are the main rock
units.
Property Geology
Greywacke is dominant in the northern part of the area (“northern
resource area” comprising Lewis, Queen, Rochelieu, and Akivik),
while shale-rich units are common in the southern part of the area
(“southern resource area” comprising South Lewis and ACMA).
Gold deposits are associated with an extensive Late
Cretaceous–Early Tertiary gold–arsenic–antimony–mercury
hydrothermal system. Gold-bearing zones exhibit strong structural
and host rock control along north–northeast-trending fracture zones
and are best developed where those zones intersect relatively
competent host rocks. Mineralized material is most abundant in
intrusive dikes and sills, but sedimentary rocks are also
mineralized within strong fracture zones.
Geotechnical and Hydrology
A number of geotechnical and hydrological studies have been
completed in support of at least pre-feasibility and environmental
reports for Donlin Gold.
Rowland Engineering Consultants performed the geotechnical
assessments for the engineering to support design of the port site,
airstrip, plant site and interconnecting roads. BGC, Inc (BGC).
performed geotechnical analyses for the design of the pit, waste
rock facility (WRF), and tailings storage facility (TSF).
The site-wide hydrological and hydrologic models developed by BGC,
are based on extensive drill data and climatic information for the
area. BGC, CEMI, Hatch Ltd., and SRK, Inc. provided hydrologic
studies, design criteria and associated test work for the water
treatment plant requirements during construction, operations, and
closure. Lorax Environmental performed water quality modeling for
the post closure pit lake.
Exploration Potential
The mineral resource defined in the S-K 1300 Report is confined to
a portion of the property. We believe there is considerable
potential to increase the mineral resources at the Donlin Gold
project. Numerous other targets have been identified along the
8-kilometer mineralized gold trend and are defined by surface
sampling and various historical drill holes containing significant
gold values.
Exploration potential in the vicinity of the open pit design in the
S-K 1300 Report includes extensions along strike to the East ACMA,
Lewis, and Crooked Creek areas. Mineralization remains open at
depth under the current pit limits. Mineralization also remains
open to the north of the planned pit and has been tested by shallow
trenching and soil sampling, with limited drilling undertaken to
date.
Exploration potential at the Donlin Gold project also exists
outside the areas that have been the subject of the mine design in
the S-K 1300 Report. Gold mineralization is associated with an
overall north–northeasterly-trending high level dike/sill complex
that has been outlined in the regional aero-magnetics as a magnetic
low. The zone, approximately 8 kilometers long, and 4 kilometers
wide, consists of a northern, dike-dominated area, and a southern,
more sill-dominated area.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Mineralization
Southeast-dipping north-northeast-oriented fracture zones are the
primary control on gold-bearing vein distribution within the
north-northeast mineralized corridors. Composite vein zones or
mineralized corridors range up to 30 meters in width and extend for
hundreds of meters along strike. Intrusive rocks and to a lesser
extent competent massive greywacke are the most favored host rocks,
and act as a secondary control on the mineralization. Gold
distribution in the deposit closely mimics the intrusive rocks,
which contain about 74% of the mineral resource identified in the
S-K 1300 Report. Structural zones in competent sedimentary units
account for the remaining 26%.
Gold-bearing sulfides occur in both veins and disseminated zones in
mafic igneous bodies, rhyodacite dikes and sills, and sedimentary
rocks. Quartz-carbonate-sulfide (pyrite, stibnite, and
arsenopyrite) veins are the primary mineralized features, but gold
also occurs in thin, discontinuous sulfide fracture fillings.
Minor Elements and Deleterious Materials
The most abundant minor elements associated with gold-bearing
material are iron, arsenic, antimony, and sulfur. They are
contained primarily in the mineral suite associated with
hydrothermal deposition of gold, including pyrite, arsenopyrite,
realgar, native arsenic, and stibnite. Minor hydrothermal
pyrrhotite, marcasite and syngenetic or sedimentary pyrite, also
account for some of the iron and sulfur.
Three elements that have processing significance are mercury,
chlorine, and fluorine. Graphitic carbon and carbonate minerals
also would negatively affect the metallurgical process.
Metallurgy
Sufficient metallurgical test work was completed under the
direction of Barrick personnel to support the S-K 1300 Report. Gold
is mainly carried by arsenopyrite. Variation is observed in
processing behavior between intrusive rocks and sedimentary rocks,
but less so between the geographical sources.
Process testing generated development of the following conceptual
flowsheet:
|
●
|
conventional crushing and grinding;
|
|
●
|
concentration by flotation;
|
|
●
|
pressure oxidation of the concentrate in an autoclave;
|
|
●
|
carbon-in-leach (“CIL”) cyanidation of the oxidized
concentrate;
|
|
●
|
carbon strip and regeneration circuits;
|
|
●
|
gold electrowinning; and
|
|
●
|
refining and production of doré bars.
|
This processing concept incorporates proven commercial unit
operations.
Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates
The mineral reserves for the Donlin Gold project were classified
using criteria appropriate under the mining disclosure definitions
and standards of NI 43-101 and S-K 1300 with an effective date of
April 27, 2021 and are current as of November 30, 2022. The mineral
reserves are summarized in the table below.
Proven and Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate, Effective Date
April 27, 2021 and remain current as of November 30, 2022, based on
$1,200 per ounce gold price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contained Gold
(thousands of ounces)
|
|
Reserve Category
|
|
Tonnes
(thousands)
|
|
|
Gold Grade
(grams/tonne)
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
Attributable to
NOVAGOLD
50%
|
|
Proven
|
|
|
7,683 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Probable
|
|
|
497,128 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
33,276 |
|
|
|
16,638 |
|
Proven and probable |
|
|
504,811 |
|
|
|
2.09 |
|
|
|
33,849 |
|
|
|
16,925 |
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
Mineral reserves are reported within the pre-feasibility pit
designs, and supported by a mine schedule, featuring variable
throughput rates, stockpiling and cut-off optimization. The point
of reference for Mineral Reserves estimates is where the reserves
are delivered to the mill. The pit designs are contained within an
optimized pit shell based on the following economic and technical
parameters: Metal price for gold of $1,200 per ounce; reference
mining cost of $2.16 per tonne incremented $0.0033 per tonne per
meter with depth from the 220 meter elevation (equates to an
average mining cost of $2.64 per tonne), fixed processing cost of
$13.78/t processed; sustaining capital of $1.54/t processed;
general and administrative cost of $3.66/t processed; stockpile
rehandle costs of $0.24/t processed assuming that 45% of mill feed
is rehandled; variable metallurgical recoveries by rock type,
ranging from 86.7% in shale to 94.2% in intrusive rocks in the
Akivik domain; refining and freight charges of $1.21/oz Au; royalty
considerations of 4.5% NSR and $0.50/t processed; and variable pit
slope angles, ranging from 23° to 43°. See “Section 12:
Mineral Reserve Estimates” of the S-K 1300 Report.
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
|
(2)
|
Mineral reserves are reported using an optimized block value (BV)
based on the following equation: BV = Gold grade * Recovery
– royalties & refining costs – process operating
costs – G&A cost reported in $ per tonne processed.
Assuming an average gold recovery of 89.5% the marginal gold
cut-off grade would be approximately 0.57 grams per tonne, or the
gold grade that would equate to a $0.001 BV cut-off at these same
values.
|
|
(3)
|
The life of mine strip ratio is 5.48:1. The assumed life-of-mine
throughput rate is 53,500 tonnes per day.
|
|
(4)
|
Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between
tonnes, grade and contained metal content.
|
|
(5)
|
Mineral reserves are reported on a 100% ownership basis and a 50%
ownership basis. The 50% basis is attributable to NOVAGOLD through
their 50% ownership interest in the joint venture that owns the
mineral rights and manages the Donlin Gold project. Tonnage and
grade measurements are in metric units. Contained gold ounces are
reported as troy ounces.
|
Mineral reserves and resources have been estimated using a
life-of-mine long-term gold price assumption of $1,200 per ounce.
Mineral resources are based on a Whittle™ pit optimized for all
measured, indicated, and inferred blocks assuming a gold selling
price of $1,200 per ounce and are inclusive of reserves. Operating
and capital costs are estimated over the life-of-mine.
Mineral resources were classified using criteria appropriate under
the mining disclosure standards of S-K 1300 by application of the
NSR-based cut-off that incorporated mining and recovery parameters,
and constraint of the mineral resources to a pit shell based on
commodity prices. The mineral resources (exclusive of mineral
reserves) are summarized in the table below.
Mineral Resources Estimate (exclusive of reserves), Effective
Date July 11, 2011 and remain current as of November 30, 2022,
based on $1,200 per ounce gold price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contained Gold
(thousands of ounces)
|
|
Resource Category
|
|
Tonnes
(thousands)
|
|
|
Gold Grade
(grams/tonne)
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
Attributable to
NOVAGOLD
50%
|
|
Measured
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
2.23 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Indicated
|
|
|
69,402 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
|
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
2,718 |
|
Measured and indicated
|
|
|
70,271 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
5,497 |
|
|
|
2,749 |
|
Inferred
|
|
|
92,216 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
5,993 |
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves.
Mineral resources are reported on a 100% ownership basis and a 50%
ownership basis. The 50% basis is attributable to NOVAGOLD through
their 50% ownership interest in the joint venture that owns the
mineral rights and manages the Donlin Gold project property.
|
|
(2)
|
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
|
|
(3)
|
The cut-off date for the sample database used in the resource
estimate is November 1, 2009. However, more recent drilling data
was used to validate the resource model as remaining current.
|
|
(4)
|
Mineral resources are reported in-place (point of reference) and
contained within a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred
optimized pit shell using the following assumptions: gold price of
$1,200 per ounce; variable process cost based on 2.1874 * (sulfur
grade) + 10.65; administration cost of $2.29 per tonne processed;
refining, freight & marketing (selling costs) of $1.85 per
ounce recovered; stockpile re-handle costs of $0.20 per tonne
processed assuming that 45% of mill feed is re-handled; variable
royalty rate, based on royalty of 4.5% * (Gold price – selling
cost), and a variable metallurgical recovery depending on the host
rock type ranging from 86 to 94%. Assuming an average recovery of
89.5% and average sulfur grade of 1.07%, the marginal gold cut-off
grade is 0.47 g/t. These technical and economic parameters are
those that were used in the 2011 Mining Study to establish
reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction. Based on the
QP’s review of the estimate, there would be no material change to
the Mineral Resources if a gold price of $1,500/oz was used and
other economic parameters were updated to the 2020 parameters used
in the Mineral Reserve estimate. Therefore the 2011 Mineral
Resource statement is considered current and is presented
unchanged. See “Section 11: Mineral Resource
Estimates” of the S-K 1300 Report.
|
|
(5)
|
Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between
tonnes, grade and contained metal content.
|
|
(6)
|
Tonnage and grade measurements are in metric units. Contained gold
ounces are reported as troy ounces.
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Mineral Resources Estimate (inclusive of reserves)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contained Gold
(thousands of ounces)
|
|
Resource Category
|
|
Tonnes
(thousands)
|
|
|
Gold Grade
(grams/tonne)
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
Attributable to
NOVAGOLD
50%
|
|
Measured
|
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
Indicated
|
|
|
533,607 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
38,380 |
|
|
|
19,190 |
|
Measured and indicated
|
|
|
541,337 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
|
|
|
39,007 |
|
|
|
19,503 |
|
Inferred
|
|
|
92,216 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
5,993 |
|
|
|
2,997 |
|
Notes:
|
(1)
|
Mineral resources are reported inclusive of mineral reserves. This
information supplements the prior table showing Mineral Resource
Estimates exclusive of Mineral Resources as required by S-K 1300.
Mineral resources are reported on a 100% ownership basis and a 50%
ownership basis. The 50% basis is attributable to NOVAGOLD through
their 50% ownership interest in the joint venture that owns the
mineral rights and manages the Donlin Gold project property.
|
|
(2)
|
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
|
|
(3)
|
The cut-off date for the sample database used in the resource
estimate is November 1, 2009. However, more recent drilling data
was used to validate the resource model as remaining current.
|
|
(4)
|
Mineral resources are reported in-place (point of reference) and
contained within a conceptual measured, indicated and inferred
optimized pit shell using the following assumptions: gold price of
$1,200 per ounce; variable process cost based on 2.1874 * (sulfur
grade) + 10.65; administration cost of $2.29 per tonne processed;
refining, freight & marketing (selling costs) of $1.85 per
ounce recovered; stockpile re-handle costs of $0.20 per tonne
processed assuming that 45% of mill feed is re-handled; variable
royalty rate, based on royalty of 4.5% * (Gold price – selling
cost), and a variable metallurgical recovery depending on the host
rock type ranging from 86 to 94%. Assuming an average recovery of
89.5% and average sulfur grade of 1.07%, the marginal gold cut-off
grade is 0.47 g/t. These technical and economic parameters are
those that were used in the 2011 Mining Study to establish
reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction. Based on the
QP’s review of the estimate, there would be no material change to
the Mineral Resources if a gold price of $1,500/oz was used and
other economic parameters were updated to the 2020 parameters used
in the Mineral Reserve estimate. Therefore the 2011 Mineral
Resource statement is considered current and is presented
unchanged.
|
|
(5)
|
Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between
tonnes, grade and contained metal content.
|
|
(6)
|
Tonnage and grade measurements are in metric units. Contained gold
ounces are reported as troy ounces.
|
|
(7)
|
Due to modifying factors applied to the Mineral Resource model to
estimate Mineral Reserves, notably planned dilution and loss, the
sum of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources excluding Mineral
Reserves reported above will not equal Mineral Resources inclusive
of Mineral Reserves in this table. Proven and Probable Mineral
Reserves include planned dilution of 33,745 kt grading 0.31 g/t Au
and planned loss of 6,016 kt grading 1.33 g/t Au.
|
Financial model parameters
The estimated mine life is 27 years based on a nominal processing
rate of 53,500 tonnes per day. Annual gold production over the
projected mine life averages 1.13 million ounces per year,
including 1.46 million ounces per year for the first five full
years of production. The total initial capital cost estimate is
approximately $7,402 million. The project’s estimated after-tax net
present value at a 5% discount rate (“NPV 5%”) is $3,040 million
using the base case gold price of $1,500 per ounce. The internal
rate of return (IRR) at the same gold price is 9.2%.
Base Case Project Sensitivity to Gold Price
Gold price
($ per ounce)
|
|
|
After-tax
cash flow
($ million)
|
|
|
After-tax NPV 5%
($ million)
|
|
|
After-tax IRR
(%)
|
|
|
Payback
(years)
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
6,556 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
8,773 |
|
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
10,974 |
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
13,145 |
|
|
|
3,040 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
15,308 |
|
|
|
3,967 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
17,455 |
|
|
|
4,887 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
19,125 |
|
|
|
5,696 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Summary of Key Evaluation Metrics (Base Case at $1,500 per ounce
gold)
Total tonnes mined (million)
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
Ore tonnes treated (million)
|
|
|
505 |
|
Strip ratio (waste tonnes per ore tonne)
|
|
|
5.5 to 1 |
|
Gold ounces recovered (million)
|
|
|
30.4 |
|
Gold recovery (%)
|
|
|
89.8 |
% |
|
|
$ million
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
|
45,519 |
|
Total operating costs
|
|
|
(19,289 |
) |
Operating cash flow before tax
|
|
|
26,230 |
|
Income and mining taxes
|
|
|
(3,668 |
) |
Operating cash flow after tax
|
|
|
22,562 |
|
Initial capital
|
|
|
(7,402 |
) |
Sustaining capital
|
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
Closure costs - trust fund
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
Total costs
|
|
|
(30,248 |
) |
Net after-tax cash flow
|
|
|
13,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payback period (years)
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Operation life (years)
|
|
|
27 |
|
After-tax NPV 5% ($ million)
|
|
|
3,040 |
|
After-tax IRR
|
|
|
9.2 |
% |
Operating Cost Estimates
|
|
$ million
|
|
|
$ per tonne
processed
|
|
|
$ per tonne
mined
|
|
|
$ per gold
ounce sold
|
|
Mine operations
|
|
|
8,430 |
|
|
|
16.70 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Processing operations
|
|
|
6,916 |
|
|
|
13.70 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
Administration
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Land and royalty payments
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
19,289 |
|
|
|
38.21 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
Capital Cost Estimates
Initial capital costs are estimated at $7,402 million and
sustaining capital costs are estimated at $1,723 million over the
LOM.
Planned Mining Operations
The Donlin Gold project will be mined by a conventional
truck-and-shovel operation. Initial pioneering and pit development
will be undertaken to remove overburden, develop mine access roads
suitable for large mining equipment, and “face-up” the initial pit
for the large shovel and mining equipment.
Primary loading units for both bulk and selective mining in ore and
waste will be large electric-hydraulic shovels, with large
front-end loaders as secondary units. Large 360 tonne capacity haul
trucks will be used for transporting both ore and waste out of the
pit.
Blast hole drilling will be performed by medium-sized rotary and
down-the-hole hammer drills with various hole diameters depending
on bench height and desired mining selectivity. Reverse circulation
(RC) drilling is planned for detailed geologic definition and grade
control.
Support equipment will be used for road, bench, dump maintenance,
and miscellaneous projects.
Planned Processing Operations
The Donlin Gold project ore will be processed by crushing and
grinding, sulfide flotation concentration, concentrate treatment by
pressure oxidation (POX) in an autoclave, carbon-in-leach (CIL)
cyanide leaching of the oxidized concentrate, electrowinning, and
refining to produce doré bars on site.
Due to gold being associated with sulfide mineralization, primarily
arsenopyrite and pyrite, the ore is considered refractory and
requires POX pre-treatment to liberate the gold prior to CIL
leaching. Sulfide flotation concentration is required prior to POX
to concentrate the sulfide content to a level sufficient to fuel
the POX operation.
Concentrate is recovered from the primary rougher flotation
followed by regrinding of the tailings prior to secondary rougher
flotation. The secondary rougher concentrate is processed through a
cleaner scavenger circuit producing a concentrate which is combined
with the primary rougher concentrate for treatment by POX. The
final tailings from the secondary rougher flotation tailings is
thickened, and due to their neutralizing potential, is then
utilized to modify the pH of the POX discharge solution prior to
being transported to the TSF.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
The oxidized concentrate from the POX operation would then be
cyanide leached in a conventional CIL circuit to produce a pregnant
(gold-bearing) solution. Gold from the solution is adsorbed onto
activated carbon, which is later stripped (gold desorbed from
carbon) in an elution circuit. The pregnant solution after elution
is fed through electrowinning (EW) cells, where cathodes are plated
with gold-bearing materials, which are periodically removed, dried
in a retort, and melted in an induction furnace to produce doré
bars.
Tailings from the CIL circuit would be treated in a cyanide
detoxification process using SO2/air technology prior to being
recombined with the flotation tailings and transported to the
TSF.
Mercury naturally occurs in the Donlin Gold project ores and
mercury abatement controls will be installed in six areas of the
process facilities including POX, hot cure, EW, retort, refinery
furnace, and carbon regeneration kiln. In these control systems,
mercury will be collected for off-site shipment and management.
Chemicals will be added to tailings to limit the potential for
mercury releases from the TSF.
Proposed Production Plan and Schedule
Based on the S-K 1300 Report, the operating mine life is estimated
to be 27 years with the nominal processing rate of 53,500 tonnes
per day. Commercial gold production is expected after a period of
approximately 6 years for basic and detailed engineering, and
construction. In addition, the Donlin Gold board must approve a
construction program and budget before construction of the Donlin
Gold project can begin. The timing of the initiation of the
required engineering work, of the Donlin Gold board’s approval of a
construction program and budget, market conditions, and receipt of
all required governmental permits and approvals will determine
whether and when construction of the Donlin Gold project will
begin.
Preproduction covers the first 15 months of the mine plan, when
mining activities will focus on providing sufficient ore exposure
for plant start-up. Ore mined during preproduction will be
stockpiled and rehandled to the process during operations. Average
mine production increases progressively in the initial years until
the peak rate of 425,000 tonnes per day is reached in Year 6.
Proposed Waste Rock Facility (WRF)
Waste rock from open pit mining will be placed in an ex-pit WRF in
the American Creek Valley, east of the pit area, or in a backfill
dump in the ACMA pit. The ultimate footprint of the WRF covers an
area of approximately 9 square kilometers. Approximately 2,232
million tonnes of waste rock and overburden will be placed in the
WRF, and 423 million tonnes will be placed in the ACMA pit backfill
dump. Approximately 91 million tonnes of waste rock will be used
for construction purposes, and 17 million tonnes of overburden will
be stockpiled and used later for reclamation purposes.
The potential magnitude of flow in the American Creek drainage, as
well as discharge from springs in the valley floors, warrants the
construction of an engineered rock drain system below the waste
rock facility, including connecting secondary rock (finger) drains
in the smaller contributing drainages.
Waste rock will be characterized by its potential for acid
generation and assigned reactivity categories. Non-acid-generating
(NAG) rock will be placed directly in the WRF, along with less
reactive potentially acid-generating (PAG) rock, PAG5. Some of the
more reactive PAG rock, PAG6, will be encapsulated in cells in the
WRF to prevent water infiltration through them. The most reactive
PAG rock, PAG7, will be backfilled in the ACMA pit beneath the
ultimate pit lake water level.
Concurrent reclamation of the waste rock facility will be
undertaken during operations.
Proposed Tailings Storage Facility (TSF)
The TSF in the Anaconda Creek basin will be a fully lined
impoundment with a cross valley dam downstream (“main dam”) in the
valley. The tailings dam will be constructed of compacted rock fill
using the downstream method with a composite liner on the upstream
face. The tailings impoundment footprint will be lined with a
linear low-density polyethylene liner over a layer of broadly
graded silty sand and gravel acting as low permeability bedding
material and providing secondary containment. Material for
construction will be sourced from the plant site and fuel farm
during initial construction and from the open pit for the later
raises during operations.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Water Diversion Dams
Water dams are required during the construction period and initial
years of operation to protect the lined upstream face of the
tailings-starter dam from a significant flood event, to provide a
reliable source of fresh water during operation of the process
plant, and to minimize runoff into the TSF.
Current and Planned On-Site Infrastructure
Current site infrastructure comprises an all-season, soft-sided
camp with facilities consisting of kitchen, living quarters,
equipment shop, drill shack and other buildings required for
support of year-round exploration activities.
There is sufficient area within the project area to host an open
pit mining operation, including the proposed open pit, waste rock
facility, TSF and process facilities (primary and pebble crushers,
coarse ore conveyor and coarse ore stockpile, concentrator,
flotation, water treatment plants, POX, oxygen plant, boiler house,
utility corridors, leach, refinery, cyanide destruct, and access
walkways). Other planned site infrastructure is comprised of access
roads, airstrip, accommodation camp, fuel tank farm, and
dual-fueled power plant, truck shop, truck wash, workshops and
vehicle repair facilities, assay laboratory, administration
facilities and change rooms. Donlin Gold has secured the surface
rights for the areas that may host these facilities.
In nearby villages, Crooked Creek has approximately 105 residents
and Aniak has a population of approximately 500. The workforce for
the project would be sourced from the local area, from Alaskan
regional centers and from other sources as required.
The project is a greenfield site. The on-site infrastructure for
the project includes three main development sites in remote
locations: the mine and plant site area (including the power
plant), the permanent camp, and the airstrip. The plant site, power
plant and fuel tank farm will be on a ridge above the proposed TSF.
The layout of the plant site was designed to take maximum advantage
of the natural topography. The layout also provides for efficient
movement of equipment and material products around the site.
Planned Off-site Infrastructure
The off-site infrastructure for the project includes three main
development sites in remote locations: the Jungjuk Port site and
mine access road; the natural gas pipeline; and the Bethel Port
facilities. The Jungjuk Port site is situated upriver from Bethel
on the Kuskokwim River near the mouth of Jungjuk Creek. A
port-to-mine access road (Jungjuk Road), approximately 30 miles (48
kilometers) long, will traverse varied terrain from the Jungjuk
Port site to the mine site. A spur road, approximately 3 miles (4.8
kilometers) long, will serve the proposed project airstrip. The
primary purpose of the Jungjuk Road is to transport freight and
diesel from the Jungjuk Port site to the mine site, mostly by
conventional highway tractors, tankers, and trailers. The natural
gas pipeline is described under the Power heading below. The
proposed Bethel Port will be situated near the town of Bethel, a
community of approximately 6,080 residents, that is the main
existing port on the Kuskokwim River and is an administrative and
transportation hub for the 56 villages in the Y-K region. The
existing Port of Bethel is the northernmost medium-draft port in
the United States and is served by ocean-going barges. The proposed
port would serve as a trans-shipment point from ocean barges to
river barges to supply the project during the summer ice-free
period.
Power
Natural gas will be delivered to site by an approximately
507-kilometer, 356-millimeter (14 inch) diameter pipeline to supply
an on-site power generation facility. The S-K 1300 Report
contemplates that the electric power for the site will be generated
from a dual-fueled (natural gas and diesel), reciprocating engine
power plant with a steam turbine utilizing waste heat recovery from
the engines. The power plant consists of two equal halves, each
consisting of six reciprocating engines, and a separate steam
turbine. The total generation facility is nominally rated at 182 MW
initially and will increase to 215 MW after four years with the
addition of two more generators (one in each half) to allow for N+2
redundancy, thus allowing planned maintenance and predicted outages
without cutting back production.
Operating costs are based on importing liquefied natural gas (LNG)
by ship to Anchorage and total delivery cost to site which includes
regasification of the LNG and delivery from Anchorage to the Donlin
Gold project via the pipeline.
The pipeline would commence at the west end of the Beluga Gas
Field, approximately 48 kilometers northwest of Anchorage at a
tie-in near Beluga located in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough and
would run to the mine site. The pipeline would receive booster
compression supplied by one compressor station. No additional
compression along the pipeline route would be required. The
pipeline would have capacity to transport approximately 2 million
cubic meters per day of natural gas.
Water
Water requirements for the proposed project have been summarized in
a Water Resources Management Plan, which has been subject to review
by state and federal agencies. Water primarily will be sourced from
the two drainages (American and Anaconda Creeks) within the mine
footprint and pit dewatering. In some years, the water supply from
these sources may not be able to meet the makeup water requirements
for the plant. In these circumstances, additional water will be
obtained primarily from a proposed reservoir in Snow Gulch.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
The source of water supply for the construction camp and, later,
the plant site potable water systems is an array of eight deep
wells south of Omega Gulch, near Crooked Creek. Water supply will
be pumped to freshwater storage tanks and will be treated prior to
consumption.
Markets
The marketing plan is for the owners of Donlin Gold to take in-kind
their respective shares of the gold production, which they can then
sell for their own benefit. Under the LLC Agreement, the manager
shall give the members prompt notice in advance of the delivery
date upon which their respective shares of gold production will be
available.
Since there are a large number of available gold purchasers, the
members should not be dependent upon the sale of gold to any one
customer. Gold can be sold to various gold bullion dealers or
smelters on a competitive basis at spot prices.
It is expected that selling contracts for NOVAGOLD’s share of the
gold production will be typical of, and consistent with, standard
industry practice, and be similar to contracts for the supply of
doré elsewhere in the world.
Taxation
The S-K 1300 Report contemplates that the following taxes may be
levied on the project:
|
●
|
Federal income tax – 21%.
|
|
●
|
Alaska state income tax – 9.4% of net income.
|
|
●
|
Alaska state mining license tax – 7% of taxable mining income.
There is a tax holiday applied for the first 3.5 years from the
start of production.
|
Income tax becomes payable after deductions for capital
allowances.
Financial results
The total initial capital cost estimate for the Donlin Gold project
is approximately $7,402 million. The project’s estimated after-tax
NPV at a 5% discount rate is $3,040 million with an IRR after-tax
at 9.2% using the base case gold price of $1,500 per ounce. The
undiscounted break-even gold price is $930 per ounce and at a 5%
discount rate is $1,180 per ounce. In the S-K 1300 Report, the
overall economic viability of the project was evaluated by both
discounted and undiscounted cash flow analyses, based on the
engineering studies and cost estimates discussed in the S-K 1300
Report.
Assumptions in the model comprised:
|
●
|
Costs prior to project Year -6, the start of basic and detailed
engineering, are considered sunk. For discounted cash flow (or NPV)
purposes, the model commences in Year -6. Estimates were prepared
for all the individual elements of cash revenue and cash
expenditures for ongoing operations.
|
|
●
|
Estimated cash flows from revenue are based on a gold price of
$1,500 per ounce. The pit has been optimized at a gold price of
$1,200 per ounce.
|
|
●
|
Gold recovery is estimated to average 89.8% over the LOM based on
work and testing performed for at least pre-feasibility study
purposes.
|
|
●
|
Doré refining and shipping charges were estimated at $1.21 per
ounce based on escalating to 2020 the actual refining charges for
Barrick’s Goldstrike operations and a quotation for transportation
and insurance costs from the Donlin Gold project site to a
U.S.-based refinery utilized in 2011. In addition, 0.1% of gold
produced from the mine is deducted as a cost of refining.
|
|
●
|
The current hydrometallurgical process selection renders any
contained silver into a greater refractory state, which provides
less than 10% silver recovery through standard metal leaching. As a
consequence, silver is not included in the Mineral Resource and
Mineral Reserve estimates, and no silver credit has been applied to
the project.
|
|
●
|
To fund the $1,361 million reclamation and closure costs, the
Project provides $412 million at closure by contributing to a Trust
Fund commencing in Year -5 and continuing through the end of
operations with annual contributions of $7.8 million. In addition
to the Trust Fund, financial assurance in the form of letters of
credit and/or surety bonds is required to construct and operate the
mine. Per the Donlin Gold Project Reclamation Plan Approval from
ADNR, financial assurance in the amount of approximately $322
million must be submitted in a form and substance approved by ADNR.
The cost to maintain this financial assurance is assumed to be 0.4%
of the total assured amount, annually. This equates to
approximately $1.3 million per year, paid from the start of
construction through the end of operations.
|
|
●
|
No salvage is assumed at the end of operations.
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Current Activities
For information on current activities, see section Item 7,
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, below.
Change in Mineral Resources and Reserves from 2021 to
2022
There were no changes in reported mineral resources and reserves
reported for the years ended November 30, 2021 and 2022. Paul
Chilson, P.E., a Qualified Person and an employee of the Company,
has reviewed the mineral reserves and mineral resources and
material assumptions included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
and confirmed that they remain current as of November 30, 2022.
Mineral Resource and Reserve Internal Controls
Sample collection, preparation, analysis and security for all
Donlin Gold core drill programs are in line with industry-standard
methods for gold deposits.
|
●
|
Drill programs included insertion of blank, duplicate and SRM
samples
|
|
●
|
Quality Assurance/Quality Control program results do not indicate
any problems with the analytical programs
|
|
●
|
Data is subject to validation, which includes checks on surveys,
collar coordinates, lithology data, and assay data. The checks are
appropriate, and consistent with industry standards
|
|
●
|
Independent data audits have been conducted and indicate that the
sample collection and database entry procedures are acceptable
|
|
●
|
All core has been catalogued and stored in designated areas.
|
Mineral resources and mineral reserves are estimates that are
imprecise and depend upon geologic interpretation and statistical
inferences drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which may
prove to be unreliable. See Risk Factors – “The
quantities for our mineral resources and mineral reserves are
estimates based on interpretation and assumptions and may yield
less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently
estimated.”
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Item 3.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
Periodically, we are a party to or otherwise involved in legal
proceedings arising in the normal course of business. Management
does not believe that there is any pending or threatened proceeding
against the Company which, if determined adversely, would have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, liquidity or
results of operations. There are no material proceedings pursuant
to which any of our directors, officers or affiliates or any owner
of record or beneficial owner of more than 5% of our securities or
any associate of any such director, officer or securityholder is a
party adverse to us or has a material interest adverse to us.
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, issuers
that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator,
of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to
disclose specified information about mine health and safety in
their periodic reports. These reporting requirements are based on
the safety and health requirements applicable to mines under the
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”) which
is administered by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and
Health Administration (MSHA). During the fiscal year ended November
30, 2022, the Company and its subsidiaries were not subject to
regulation by MSHA under the Mine Act and thus no disclosure is
required under Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act. Donlin
Gold LLC is the operator of the Donlin Gold project. Donlin Gold
LLC is not a “subsidiary” of the Company for purposes of
Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act because the Company does
not control Donlin Gold LLC.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
PART
II
Item 5.
|
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
Market Information
Our common shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE
American) and on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) under the symbol
“NG.” On January 17, 2023, there were 586 holders of record of our
shares, which does not include shareholders for which shares are
held in nominee or street name. We believe that more than half of
our common shares are beneficially owned by investors in the United
States.
Dividends
We have never declared or paid dividends on our common shares and
our current business plan requires that, for the foreseeable
future, any future earnings be reinvested to finance growth and
development of our business. We will pay dividends on our common
shares only if and when declared by our Board. In determining
whether to declare dividends, the Board will consider our financial
condition, results of operations, working capital requirements,
future prospects, and other factors it considers relevant.
Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S.
Residents
The following summarizes certain Canadian federal income tax
consequences generally applicable under the Income Tax Act (Canada)
and the regulations enacted thereunder (collectively, the “Canadian
Tax Act”) and the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980)
(the “Convention”) to the holding and disposition of common
shares.
This comment is restricted to holders of common shares each of
whom, at all material times for the purposes of the Canadian Tax
Act and the Convention, (i) is resident solely in the United
States, (ii) is entitled to the benefits of the Convention, (iii)
holds all common shares as capital property, (iv) deals at arm’s
length with and is not affiliated with NOVAGOLD, (v) does not and
is not deemed to use or hold any common shares in a business
carried on in Canada, (vi) is not an insurer that carries on
business in Canada and elsewhere and (vii) is not a “specified
shareholder” (as defined in subsection 18(5) of the Canadian Tax
Act) of NOVAGOLD (each such holder, a “U.S. Resident Holder”).
Certain U.S.-resident entities that are fiscally transparent for
United States federal income tax purposes (including limited
liability companies) may not in all circumstances be entitled to
the benefits of the Convention. Members of or holders of an
interest in such an entity that holds common shares should consult
their own tax advisers regarding the extent, if any, that the
benefits of the Convention will extend to the entity in respect of
its common shares. This summary does not deal with special
situations such as the particular circumstances of traders or
dealers or holders who have entered into a “derivative forward
agreement” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act) in respect of the
common shares. Such holders should consult their own tax
advisors.
Generally, a U.S. Resident Holder’s common shares will be
considered to be capital property of a U.S. Resident Holder
provided that the U.S. Resident Holder does not use the common
shares in the course of carrying on a business of trading and
dealing in securities and has not acquired the common shares in one
or more transactions considered to be an adventure or concern in
the nature of trade (i.e. speculation).
This summary is based on the current provisions of the Canadian Tax
Act and the Convention in effect on the date hereof, all specific
proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act and Convention publicly
announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) on or
before the date hereof, and the current published administrative
and assessing policies of the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA). It is
assumed that all such amendments will be enacted as currently
proposed, and that there will be no other material change to any
applicable law or administrative or assessing practice, whether by
judicial, legislative, governmental, or administrative decision or
action, although no assurance can be given in these respects.
Except as otherwise expressly provided, this summary does not take
into account any provincial, territorial or foreign tax
considerations, which may differ materially from those set out
herein.
Currency conversion
For the purposes of the Canadian Tax Act, all amounts relating to
the acquisition, holding or disposition of common shares, including
dividends and proceeds of disposition must be determined in
Canadian dollars based on the daily exchange rate of the Bank of
Canada on the particular day, or such other rate of exchange as
acceptable to the CRA.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Dividends on common shares
Under the Canadian Tax Act, dividends on shares paid or credited to
a non-resident of Canada will be subject to Canadian withholding
tax at the rate of 25% of the gross amount of the dividends. Under
the Convention, a U.S. resident will generally be subject to
Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 15% of the gross amount of
such dividends unless the beneficial owner is a company which owns
at least 10% of the voting shares of NOVAGOLD at that time, in
which case the rate of Canadian withholding tax is generally
reduced to 5%.
Disposition of common shares
A U.S. Resident Holder will not be subject to tax under the
Canadian Tax Act in respect of any capital gain realized by such
U.S. Resident Holder on a disposition of common shares unless the
common shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” (as defined in
the Canadian Tax Act) of the U.S. Resident Holder at the time of
disposition and the U.S. Resident Holder is not entitled to relief
under the Convention.
Generally, a U.S. Resident Holder’s common shares will not
constitute “taxable Canadian property” of the U.S. Resident Holder
at a particular time at which the common shares are listed on a
“designated stock exchange” (which currently includes the TSX and
NYSE American) unless at any time during the 60‑month period
immediately preceding a disposition both of the following
conditions are true:
|
(i)
|
the U.S. Resident Holder, any one or more persons with whom the
U.S. Resident Holder does not deal at arm’s length, or partnership
in which the U.S. Resident Holder or persons with whom the U.S.
Resident Holder did not deal at arm’s length holds a membership
interest directly or indirectly through one or more partnerships,
alone or in any combination, owned 25% or more of the issued shares
of any class or series of the capital stock of NOVAGOLD; and
|
|
(ii)
|
more than 50% of the fair market value of the common shares was
derived directly or indirectly from, or from any combination of,
real or immovable property situated in Canada, “Canadian resource
properties” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act), “timber
resource properties” (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act), or
options in respect of, interests in or civil law rights in, such
properties whether or not it exists.
|
In certain circumstances, a common share may also be deemed to be
“taxable Canadian property” for purposes of the Canadian Tax
Act.
Even if the common shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” to
a U.S. Resident Holder, under the Convention, such a U.S. Resident
Holder will not be subject to tax under the Canadian Tax Act on any
capital gain realized by such holder on a disposition of such
common shares, provided the value of such common shares is not
derived principally from real property situated in Canada (within
the meaning of the Convention).
U.S. Resident Holders whose shares are taxable Canadian
property should consult their own tax advisors.
Certain United States Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S.
Holders
There may be material U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S.
holders in relation to an acquisition or disposition of common
shares or other securities of the Company. U.S. holders should
consult their own legal, accounting and tax advisors regarding such
tax consequences under United States, state, local or foreign tax
law regarding the acquisition or disposition of our common shares
or other securities, in particular the tax consequences if the
Company is or becomes a “passive foreign investment company”
(commonly known as a “PFIC”) within the meaning of
Section 1297 of the United States Internal Revenue Code.
Current and potential U.S. holders of our common shares should be
aware that we believe we were a PFIC for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2022, and based on current business plans and
financial expectations, may be a PFIC in the current tax year and
future tax years. No opinion of legal counsel or ruling from the
IRS concerning the status of the Company as a PFIC has been
obtained or is currently planned to be requested. PFIC
classification is fundamentally factual in nature, generally cannot
be determined until the close of the tax year in question and is
determined annually. Additionally, the analysis depends, in part,
on the application of complex U.S. federal income tax rules, which
are subject to differing interpretations. In any tax year in which
we are a PFIC, shareholders that are U.S. holders will be required
to file an annual report with the Internal Revenue Service
containing such information as Treasury Regulations or other tax
rules may require.
Any gain recognized on the sale of common shares of a PFIC, and any
excess distributions paid on the common shares of a PFIC must be
ratably allocated to each day in a U.S. holder’s holding period for
the common shares. The amount of any such gain or excess
distribution allocated to prior years of such U.S. holder’s holding
period for the common shares generally will be subject to U.S.
federal income tax at the highest tax applicable to ordinary income
in each such prior year, and the U.S. holder will be required to
pay interest on the resulting tax liability for each such prior
year, calculated as if such tax liability had been due in each such
prior year.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Alternatively, a U.S. holder that makes a timely “QEF election”
generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on such U.S.
holder’s pro rata share of our “net capital gain” and “ordinary
earnings” (calculated under U.S. federal income tax rules),
regardless of whether such amounts are actually distributed by us.
As a second alternative, a U.S. holder may make a “mark-to-market
election” if we are a PFIC and the common shares are marketable
stock under applicable Treasury Regulations. A U.S. holder that
makes a mark-to-market election generally will include in gross
income, for each taxable year in which we are a PFIC, an amount
equal to the excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of the
common shares as of the close of such taxable year over (b) such
U.S. holder’s tax basis in such common shares. U.S. holders are
advised to consult their own tax advisors regarding the PFIC rules,
including the elections that may be available.
For each tax year that the Company determines that it is a PFIC,
upon the written request of a U.S. holder, the Company will make
available to such U.S. holder all information and documentation
that a U.S. holder making a QEF election with respect to the
Company is required to obtain for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Such information may be included on the Company’s website.
In addition, U.S. holders will not be eligible for preferential tax
rates on dividends paid by the Company if the Company is a PFIC in
the tax year of such dividend distribution or in the preceding tax
year.
U.S. holders should consult their own legal, accounting and tax
advisors regarding the tax consequences of holding and disposing of
common shares and other securities of the Company.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
None.
Repurchase of Securities
None.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Item
7.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (US dollars in thousands,
except per share amounts)
|
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”)
provides information that management believes is relevant to an
assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial
condition and results of operations of NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.,
incorporated in British Columbia, Canada, and its subsidiaries
(collectively, “NOVAGOLD,” the “Company,” “our” and “we”). This
item should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial
Statements and the notes thereto included in this annual
report.
The following MD&A generally discusses our consolidated
financial condition and results of operations for 2022 and 2021 and
year-to-year comparisons between 2022 and 2021. Discussions of our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations for 2020
and year-to-year comparisons between 2021 and 2020 are included in
Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2021, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2022,
are incorporated by reference into this MD&A.
Overview
We operate in the gold mining industry, primarily focused on
advancing the Donlin Gold project in Alaska. The Donlin Gold
project is held by Donlin Gold LLC (“Donlin Gold”), a limited
liability company owned equally by wholly-owned subsidiaries of
NOVAGOLD and Barrick Gold Corporation (“Barrick”).
Our corporate goals include continuing to advance the Donlin Gold
project toward a construction decision; maintaining support for
Donlin Gold among the project’s stakeholders; promoting a strong
safety, sustainability, and environmental culture; maintaining a
favorable reputation of NOVAGOLD; and preserving a healthy balance
sheet. Our operations primarily relate to the delivery of project
milestones, including the achievement of various technical,
environmental, sustainable development, economic and legal
objectives, obtaining necessary permits, completion of
pre-feasibility and feasibility studies, preparation of engineering
designs and the financing to fund these objectives.
Donlin Gold
Stakeholder and government engagement
Donlin Gold is fortunate to have time-tested partnerships with
Calista and TKC, owners of the mineral and surface rights,
respectively. The project’s location on private lands specially
selected for mineral development potential pursuant to the 1971
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act is a key attribute that
distinguishes it from most other mining assets in Alaska. Donlin
Gold’s commitment to meaningful tribal engagement throughout
project development and permitting has been reinforced by decades
of reliable and dependable engagement with the community.
Donlin Gold continues to work with Calista and TKC in all aspects
of outreach and engagement throughout the Y-K region. Crooked
Creek, the closest community to the project site in the Y-K region
submitted a letter in support of Donlin Gold. Three additional
Shared Value Statements were also signed with villages in the Y-K
region in the last three months for a total of 11. These formalize
current engagement with key local communities, expand upon the
long-term relationships already established with them, and address
specific community needs including: water, sewer, and solid waste
projects; the ice road that connects remote villages in the Y-K
region; salmon and other aquatic life studies; and suicide and
public safety prevention programs. Various local hires from the
2022 drill program will continue to support Donlin Gold’s
engagement efforts through the Community Liaison program in five
Y-K villages.
For the 2022 season, Donlin Gold hired employees from 24 Y-K
communities. In an area with high unemployment and fewer job
choices than in urban environments, the work experience and skills
training that Donlin Gold provides is attractive and employees are
encouraged to bring their safety knowledge into their home village.
Local community involvement in the project is core to both
Barrick’s and NOVAGOLD’s philosophy, and approximately 83% of Donlin Gold direct
hires for this year’s work program were Alaska Natives.
Calista and Donlin Gold continued their proactive, bipartisan
outreach in Alaska and with the Administration and Congress in
Washington, D.C. to highlight the thoroughness of the project’s
environmental review and permitting processes, in addition to the
considerable benefits that the project would deliver to all Native
Alaskans. The 2022 United States elections were held on November 8,
2022. Alaska U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski and Governor Michael
Dunleavy were re-elected. Both, along with U.S Senator Dan
Sullivan, have been long-term supporters of the Donlin Gold
project. We also recognize the historic re-election of U.S.
Congresswomen Mary Peltola for a full term as an Alaska Native from
the Y-K region and look forward to our continued outreach to her
regarding Donlin Gold in the upcoming year.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Environment and social investments
Environmental stewardship, education, community wellness, and
cultural preservation constitute key focus investments for Donlin
Gold in the Y-K region. The project supports these initiatives
through fisheries studies and other environmental activities,
subsistence and cultural preservation efforts, and educational
grants. A wide range of activities and projects were carried out in
collaboration with Calista and TKC during the fiscal year 2022.
Some of these activities included the Backhaul Project, “In It for
the Long Haul”. This was the fifth annual backhaul project to
collect, remove, and safely dispose of household hazardous and
electronic waste from 30 remote villages throughout the Y-K region,
removing nearly 400,000 pounds of waste during the last five years
that would otherwise have ended up in landfills and waterways.
Donlin Gold supported various search and rescue teams in the
region, provided funding to the Healthy Alaska Natives Foundation
and Bethel Community Services Foundation, as well as sponsored and
participated in the Alaska Safe Riders initiative, which promotes
safety for year-round outdoor sports. Donlin Gold fostered
education, community wellness and cultural preservation through a
variety of interventions including several river studies,
supporting the local school district and educational organizations,
funding and participating in youth sporting activities, and backing
initiatives led by Traditional Councils and Native communities.
During the 2022 field season at the Donlin Gold project site, there
were no spills to water and no spills of greater than 10 gallons to
land. There were no spills that required reporting to government
agencies. Donlin Gold was not cited for any permit non-compliance
during 2022. Donlin Gold further continued updating its site
baseline data, including monitoring water quality and
fisheries.
Permitting
Permitting in Alaska has been a tremendous achievement to date and
a substantial undertaking over many years to ensure a diligent,
thorough, transparent, and inclusive process for all involved,
including stakeholders from the Y-K region. Donlin Gold, its
owners, and its partners Calista and TKC are intimately familiar
with the permitting and regulatory processes applicable to the
project and will continue to support the State in its defense of
the thorough and diligent permitting process. Together, they will
also continue working to secure the various remaining state-level
permits and certificates required for the project. Calista and
Donlin Gold continued their proactive, bipartisan outreach in
Alaska and with the Administration and Congress in Washington, D.C.
to highlight the thoroughness of the project’s environmental review
and permitting processes as well as the benefits the project would
deliver to all Native Alaskans. Alaska’s U.S. Senators and Governor
have consistently expressed their long-term support of the Donlin
Gold project.
The APDES water discharge permit was issued by ADEC on May 24, 2018
and became effective on July 1, 2018. Donlin Gold submitted its
application to ADEC for the regularly scheduled re-issuance of its
APDES permit and in December 2022, Donlin Gold received a letter
from ADEC indicating that the application is complete and the
permit will remain in effect until ADEC completes the reissuances
process. ADFG issued Title 16 Fish Habitat permits for the mine
area and transportation corridor on August 30, 2018. Donlin Gold
applied for a new air quality permit from ADEC, which is expected
to be in place when the current permit expires in mid-2023. The
Donlin Gold air quality permit renewal is required to update that
emissions controls reflect best technology and re-confirm that air
quality standards will be met, which modeling demonstrates they
will be. A draft permit was issued for public comment in December
2022. The final approvals of the Donlin Gold Reclamation Plan and
the Waste Management Permit were issued on January 18, 2019. ADNR
issued the easement, land leases, land use permits, and material
site authorizations for the proposed transportation facilities, and
easement for the fiber optic cable on State lands on January 2,
2020. On January 17, 2020, SPCS issued the final State ROW
authorization for the natural gas pipeline. On June 29, 2021,
ADNR’s Division of Mining Land and Water issued 12 final Water
Rights for the mine site and transportation corridor. On November
1, 2021, ADFG issued two Special Area Permits required for pipeline
facilities located within the Refuge. One permit authorizes the
compressor station, and the other permit authorizes the section of
the pipeline ROW in the Refuge. On November 1, 2022, ADNR finalized
approval of the proposed re-location plan for public easements in
the mine site and transportation facility areas.
The field work related to the issuance of the Alaska Dam Safety
certificates re-commenced during the third quarter of 2022 and is
planned to be completed in 2023.
In September 2022, 13 Tribes sent a letter to the Corps and the EPA
requesting that the Corps consider requiring a supplemental EIS on
the Donlin Gold project and revoking the Clean Water Act Section
404 permit in light of what the Tribes consider "new information”
since the final EIS was issued in 2018. Also in September 2022, the
same Tribes submitted a separate letter to EPA requesting that they
initiate a Clean Water Act Section 404(c) veto process for Donlin.
A Section 404(c) veto has recently been applied to the Pebble
Project in Alaska but is rarely used by EPA. Donlin Gold and
Calista are preparing responses to submit to the Corps and EPA
arguing that the Tribes’ requests should be denied.
On June 3, 2020, Earthjustice joined by ONC, Chevak, Kasigluk, Eek,
Kwinhagak, Marshall, Nightmute, Tununak, Kwethluk, Kotlik,
SalmonState, and the Alaska Community Action on Toxics filed a
formal appeal with the ADEC Commissioner of the State’s water
quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The
appeal process consists of an Administrative Hearing in front of an
ALJ appointed by the ADEC Commissioner. The ALJ was subsequently
appointed. On April 12, 2021, the ALJ issued his opinion for the
Commissioner’s consideration recommending the 401 Certification be
vacated. The Commissioner issued his decision to uphold the 401
Certification on May 27, 2021. The decision was appealed on June
28, 2021 in Alaska Superior Court by Earthjustice, on behalf of
ONC. On September 27, 2021, Donlin Gold filed a motion requesting a
short term stay in the case to allow the State to fully consider
additional technical materials on mercury and temperature; the
State indicated to the Court that they do not oppose the motion. On
October 22, 2021, Donlin Gold submitted to ADEC expert technical
reports on mercury and temperature. On November 22, 2021, ADEC
filed an additional motion asking to remand the 401 certification
back to ADEC to determine how the additional information affects
the certification. Earthjustice did not oppose the motion although
had comments on the remand process. On December 29, 2021, the Court
granted the remand request, dismissed the case without prejudice,
and left in place existing certification. On May 13, 2022, the ADEC
Water Division Director reaffirmed the 401 certification. On June
13, 2022, Earthjustice appealed the elements of the decision
related to temperature to the Commissioner and requested an
adjudicatory hearing with an ALJ. On July 14, 2022, the
Commissioner granted the request for the hearing and a new ALJ was
assigned. On September 14, 2022, Earthjustice filed their initial
brief. Donlin Gold and ADEC filed response briefs on October 14,
2022. Earthjustice filed their final response brief on October 21,
2022. The Commissioner’s decision, which he will make in
collaboration with the ALJ, is expected in early 2023. It is then
subject to further review in Alaska Superior Court.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
On September 20, 2021, Earthjustice, representing ONC, Cook
Inletkeeper, and three villages, filed an appeal of the State
pipeline ROW authorization in Alaska Superior Court. An appeal was
also filed by a second party, the owner of an outdoor guiding
business around the pipeline route, on September 20, 2021. On April
5, 2022, Earthjustice filed its opening brief, which related to the
scope of the cumulative effects analysis required by the Alaska
Constitutional, statutory, and regulatory provisions, and related
previous litigation. ADNR, Donlin Gold, and Calista filed response
briefs on June 15-16, 2022. Earthjustice filed responses on July
18, 2022, and then requested oral arguments. The second appellant
filed his initial brief on June 8, 2022. ANDR’s and Donlin Gold’s
response briefs were submitted on August 22, 2022, and the second
appellant filed their response brief on November 9, 2022. The
request for oral arguments was granted by the Court and they were
held on January 11, 2023. Decisions are expected in 2023.
On May 25, 2022, Earthjustice, on behalf of ONC and five villages,
filed an appeal of the final Water Rights in Alaska Superior Court.
Earthjustice filed its initial brief on November 21, 2022. ADNR’s
and Donlin Gold’s response briefs are due by January 30, 2023. A
decision is expected in 2023 or the first half of 2024.
In September 2022, 13 tribes sent a letter to the Corps and the EPA
requesting that the Corps consider requiring a supplemental EIS on
the Donlin Gold project and revoking the Clean Water Act Section
404 permit in light of what the tribes consider "new information”
since the final EIS was issued in 2018. Also in September 2022, the
same tribes submitted a separate letter to EPA requesting that they
initiate a Clean Water Act Section 404(c) veto process for the
Donlin Gold project. A Section 404(c) veto has recently been
applied to the Pebble Project in Alaska but is rarely used by EPA.
In early January 2023, Donlin Gold and Calista both submitted
responses to the Corps on why the requests to prepare a
supplemental EIS or revoke the 404 permit should not be granted. In
mid-January 2023, Donlin Gold also provided a response to EPA
describing why the agency should not initiate a 404(c) process.
Donlin Gold project
In 2022, Donlin Gold completed a 141-hole drilling program totaling
42,331 meters. As part of a key focus area for the drill program,
the tight-spaced grid drilling in structural domains in the Lewis
(further infilled to 10m x 10m), West ACMA and Divide areas
confirmed recent geological modelling at wider drill-spacing in the
immediate area surrounding the grids. It also identified additional
short-scale controls that will be incorporated in an update to
improve the geological domains used for global resource estimation
which will be utilized for strategic mine planning work. In
addition, the 14 geotechnical drill holes provided results for
advancing efforts in completing the issuance of the Alaska Dam
Safety Certifications.
With the receipt of the final assay results for the 2022 drill
program (that returned significant high-grade intercepts and
continued to demonstrate important grade continuity), an update of
the resource model, and completion of trade-off studies, the owners
expect to take the next steps in moving the Donlin Gold project up
the value chain and leading toward an updated feasibility study
decision.
Our share of funding for the Donlin Gold project in 2022 was
$28,435. In 2023, we expect our share of Donlin Gold funding to be
approximately $17,000 to update geologic modelling and
interpretation work for an updated resource model and includes
engineering activities for use in an updated project feasibility
study, the advancement of current permits, fieldwork for the Alaska
Dam Safety certificates, environmental studies, community
relations, and government affairs activities.
The Donlin Gold board must approve a construction program and
budget before the Donlin Gold project can be developed. The timing
of the required engineering work and the Donlin Gold board’s
approval of a construction program and budget, the receipt of all
required governmental permits and approvals, and the availability
of financing, commodity price fluctuations, risks related to market
events and general economic conditions among other factors, will
affect the timing of and whether to develop the Donlin Gold
project. Among other reasons, project delays could occur as a
result of public opposition, litigation challenging permit
decisions, requests for additional information or analysis,
limitations in agency staff resources during regulatory review and
permitting, or project changes made by Donlin Gold.
We record our interest in the Donlin Gold project as an equity
investment, which results in our 50% share of Donlin Gold’s
expenses being recorded in the income statement as an operating
loss. The investment amount recorded on the balance sheet primarily
represents unused funds advanced to Donlin Gold.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Consolidated Financial Results
The details of our Net loss are set forth below:
|
|
Years ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(53,343 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,536 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,807 |
) |
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
Net loss increased by $12,807 from 2021 to 2022, primarily
due to the expanded Donlin Gold drilling and work program, and
lower accretion income in 2022 resulting from the receipt of the
$75,000 note from Newmont in July 2021. Increasing interest rates
resulted in higher Barrick promissory note interest expense and was
offset by income earned on cash and term deposits and favorable
foreign exchange movements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity overview
At present, we believe we have sufficient working capital available
to cover anticipated funding of the Donlin Gold project and
corporate general and administrative costs through completion of an
updated Donlin Gold feasibility study. Substantial additional
capital will be required once a decision to commence engineering
and construction is reached by the Donlin Gold board for the Donlin
Gold project. Future financings to fund construction are
anticipated through debt, equity, project specific debt, and/or
other means. Our continued operations are dependent on our ability
to obtain additional financing or to generate future cash flows.
However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in
our efforts to raise additional capital on terms favorable to us,
or at all. For further information, see section Item 1A, Risk
Factors – Our ability to continue the exploration,
permitting, development, and construction of the Donlin Gold
project, and to continue as a going concern, will depend in part on
our ability to obtain suitable financing.
Our anticipated expenditures in fiscal year 2023 are approximately
$31,000, including $17,000 to fund the Donlin Gold project, $13,000
for corporate general and administrative costs, and $1,000 for
working capital and other items.
Our financial position includes the following as of November 30,
2022:
|
●
|
Cash and cash equivalents of $63,882.
|
|
●
|
Term deposits of $62,000 denominated in U.S. dollars and held at
Canadian chartered banks with high investment-grade ratings and
maturities of one year or less.
|
|
●
|
Note receivable for $25,000 due on the earlier of the completion of
a Galore Creek feasibility study or July 27, 2023, and a note for
$75,000 fully contingent upon approval of a Galore Creek project
construction plan by the owner(s).
|
|
●
|
Promissory note payable to Barrick of $123,685, including accrued
interest at U.S. prime plus 2%. The promissory note and accrued
interest are payable from 85% of the Company’s share of revenue
from future Donlin Gold project production or from any net proceeds
resulting from a reduction of the Company’s interest in Donlin
Gold.
|
Cash flows
Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows are summarized as
follows:
|
|
Years ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
(12,371 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,863 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,508 |
) |
Funding of Donlin Gold
|
|
|
(28,435 |
) |
|
|
(17,587 |
) |
|
|
(10,848 |
) |
Proceeds from note receivable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
Net proceeds from (purchases of) term deposits
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
(17,221 |
) |
|
|
33,221 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
Withholding tax on share-based compensation
|
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(1,391 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and other
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
(807 |
) |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
(27,242 |
) |
|
$ |
30,218 |
|
|
$ |
(57,460 |
) |
In 2022, the net decrease in Cash and cash equivalents of
$27,242 primarily resulted from Donlin Gold funding of $28,435,
corporate operating activities of $12,371 and withholding tax on
share-based compensation of $2,122, partially offset by cash
received from term deposits of $16,000.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Net spending on operating activities increased in 2022 from 2021
primarily due to the timing of corporate liability insurance
payments, partially offset by higher interest received on cash and
term deposits due to higher interest rates. Donlin Gold funding
increased due to the expanded drilling and work program. In 2021, a
$75,000 payment was received from Newmont related to the 2018 sale
of Galore Creek.
Outstanding share data
As of January 17, 2023, the Company had 333,965,718 common shares
issued and outstanding. Also, as of January 17, 2023, the Company
had: i) a total of 9,229,233 stock options outstanding; 7,968,101
of those stock options with a weighted-average exercise price of
$6.26 and the remaining 1,261,132 with a weighted-average exercise
price of C$8.02; and ii) 1,605,500 performance shares units (PSUs)
and 301,359 deferred share units (DSUs) outstanding. Upon exercise
of the foregoing convertible securities, the Company would be
required to issue a maximum of 11,938,842 common shares.
Related party transactions
As of November 30, 2022, the Company has accounts receivable from
Donlin Gold of $574 (November 30, 2021: $nil) included in Other
current assets for third party study costs contracted for by
the Company on behalf of Donlin Gold.
Fourth quarter results
During the fourth quarter of 2022 we incurred a net loss of $12,255
compared to a net loss of $10,269 in 2021. The increase in net loss
primarily resulted from the expanded activity at Donlin Gold and
increased interest on the promissory note, partially offset by
higher interest income and lower remediation expense for the former
New Gold House mineral property.
Critical Accounting Policies
We believe the following accounting policies are critical to our
financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the
judgements or assumptions involved and/or the magnitude of the
asset, liability, or expense being reported.
Contingent note receivable
A portion of the proceeds on the sale of the Company’s 50% interest
in the Galore Creek project to Newmont, included a contingent note
for $75,000 receivable upon the approval of a Galore Creek project
construction plan by the owner(s). The Company has assigned no
value to the contingent note receivable as management determined
that approval of Galore Creek project construction was not probable
as of the closing of the Galore Creek sale, and management’s
assessment did not change as of November 30, 2022. The contingent
note will be recognized only when, in management’s judgement,
payment is probable, and the amount recorded will not reverse in
future periods.
Investment in affiliates
Investments in unconsolidated ventures over which the Company has
the ability to exercise significant influence, but does not
control, are accounted for under the equity method and include the
Company’s investment in the Donlin Gold project. We identified
Donlin Gold as a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) as the entity is
dependent on funding from its owners. All funding, ownership,
voting rights and power to exercise control is shared equally on a
50/50 basis between the owners of the VIE. Therefore, the Company
has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
The Company’s maximum exposure to loss is its investment in Donlin
Gold. Donlin Gold is a non-publicly traded equity investee holding
exploration and development projects. The Company reviews and
evaluates its investment in affiliates for other than temporary
impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Events that
could indicate impairment of an investment in affiliates include a
significant decrease in long-term expected gold price, a
significant increase in expected operating or capital costs,
unfavorable exploration results or technical studies, a significant
decrease in reserves, a loss of significant mineral claims, or a
change in the development plan or strategy for the project. Asset
impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future
cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying
amount of the asset. If the underlying assets are not recoverable,
an impairment loss is measured and recorded based on the difference
between the carrying amount of the investee and its estimated fair
value which may be determined using a discounted cash flow
model.
Income taxes
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. Under the asset and liability
method, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a
change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that
includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if
it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred
tax asset will not be recognized.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Share-based compensation
We grant share-based compensation awards in exchange for employee
services, including a stock option plan and a PSU plan. The fair
value of awards granted under the plans are recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Loss over the related service
period. The fair values of stock options are estimated at the time
of each grant using a Black‐Scholes option pricing model, and the
fair values of PSUs are measured at each grant date using a Monte
Carlo valuation model. The fair value estimates may be impacted by
certain variables including, but not limited to, stock price
volatility, employee stock option exercise behaviors, additional
stock option grants, estimates of forfeitures, the Company's
performance, and the Company’s performance in relation to its
peers.
We grant members of our board of directors DSUs whereby each DSU
entitles the directors to receive one common share of the Company
when they retire from service with the Company. The fair value of
the DSUs is measured at the date of the grant in amounts ranging
from 50% to 100% of directors’ annual retainers at the election of
the directors. The fair value is recognized in the Consolidated
Statements of Loss over the related service period.
As of November 30, 2022, we had $2,303 of unrecognized
compensation cost related to 3,231,000 non-vested stock options
expected to be expensed and vest over a period of approximately two
years. Also, as of November 30, 2022, we had 1,257,200
non-vested PSU awards outstanding of which 438,900 were fully
expensed. On December 1, 2022, it was determined that those
expensed PSU awards matured and did not meet the performance
criteria; therefore, no common shares were issued. The remaining
818,300 non-vested PSU awards with $3,184 of unrecognized
compensation cost will be expensed over a period of approximately
two years.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
Our financial instruments are exposed to certain financial risks,
including credit and interest rate risks.
Credit risk
Concentration of credit risk exists with respect to our cash and
cash equivalents, term deposit investments, and notes receivable.
All term deposits are held through Canadian chartered banks with
high investment-grade ratings and have maturities of one year or
less.
A note receivable of $25 million is due from a subsidiary of
Newmont upon the earlier of the completion of a Galore Creek
project feasibility study or July 27, 2023. Newmont is a publicly
traded company with investment-grade credit ratings and has
guaranteed the notes receivable.
Interest rate risk
The interest rate on the promissory note owed to Barrick is
variable with the U.S. prime rate. Based on the amount owing on the
promissory note as of November 30, 2022, and assuming all other
variables remain constant, a 1% change in the U.S. prime rate would
result in an increase/decrease of approximately $1.24 million in
the interest accrued on the promissory note per annum. The
promissory note and accrued interest are payable from 85% of the
Company’s share of revenue from future mine production or from any
net proceeds resulting from a reduction of the Company’s interest
in Donlin Gold.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Item 8.
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of NOVAGOLD RESOURCES
INC.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control
over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC. and its subsidiaries (together, the
Company) as of November 30, 2022 and 2021, and the related
consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss, cash flows
and equity for each of the three years in the period ended November
30, 2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to as
the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the
Company's internal control over financial reporting as of November
30, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control –
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of November 30, 2022 and 2021, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended November 30, 2022 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all
material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of November 30, 2022, based on criteria established in
Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated
financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting appearing under Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express
opinions on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on
the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on
our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included
performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement
of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or
fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such
procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding
the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated
financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed
risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising
from the current period audit of the consolidated financial
statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to
the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures
that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii)
involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex
judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not
alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the
critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the
critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it
relates.
Recognition of the contingent note receivable
As described in Notes 2 and 4 to the consolidated financial
statements, on July 27, 2018, the Company sold its interest in the
Galore Creek project (the sale). As part of the consideration for
the sale, the Company received a $75 million note (the contingent
note receivable), which is contingent upon the approval of a Galore
Creek project construction plan by the owner(s). The Company has
not assigned a value to the contingent note receivable as
management determined that Galore Creek project construction
approval was not probable as of the closing of the Galore Creek
sale or in subsequent periods. Management’s assessment did not
change as of November 30, 2022. The contingent note will be
recognized when, in management’s judgment, it is probable that the
payment will occur, and that the amount recorded will not reverse
in future periods.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing
procedures relating to the recognition of the contingent note
receivable is a critical audit matter are the judgment by
management when determining if recognition was required, which in
turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in
performing procedures and evaluating management’s assessment of the
probability of whether a Galore Creek project construction plan
will be approved.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating
audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on
the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included
testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s
assessment of the basis for recognizing the contingent note
receivable. These procedures also included, among others,
evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assessment regarding
the probability of the owner(s) of the project approving the Galore
Creek project construction plan. This included considering both
publicly available information and the latest annual progress
report provided by the owner(s) of the project to the Company under
the terms of the sale agreement.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
January 25, 2023
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1984.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(US dollars in thousands)
|
|
As of November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
63,882 |
|
|
$ |
91,124 |
|
Term deposits
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
Notes receivable (Note 4)
|
|
|
24,421 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other assets (Note 6)
|
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Current assets
|
|
|
152,538 |
|
|
|
169,451 |
|
Notes receivable (Note 4)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
23,572 |
|
Investment in Donlin Gold (Note 5)
|
|
|
3,848 |
|
|
|
3,576 |
|
Other assets (Note 6)
|
|
|
2,803 |
|
|
|
2,253 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
159,189 |
|
|
$ |
198,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
769 |
|
|
$ |
682 |
|
Accrued payroll and related benefits
|
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
Other liabilities (Note 9)
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
1,064 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
4,599 |
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
Promissory note (Note 7)
|
|
|
123,685 |
|
|
|
115,723 |
|
Other liabilities (Note 9)
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
129,286 |
|
|
|
120,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7 and 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized – 1,000 million shares, no par value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding – 333.8 and 332.4 million shares,
respectively
|
|
|
1,983,962 |
|
|
|
1,978,520 |
|
Contributed surplus
|
|
|
82,866 |
|
|
|
82,216 |
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(2,012,508 |
) |
|
|
(1,959,165 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(24,417 |
) |
|
|
(23,289 |
) |
Total equity
|
|
|
29,903 |
|
|
|
78,282 |
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
159,189 |
|
|
$ |
198,852 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
Approved by the Board of Directors
/s/ Gregory A. Lang |
|
/s/ Anthony P. Walsh |
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(US dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
Years ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative (Note 12)
|
|
$ |
20,109 |
|
|
$ |
20,210 |
|
|
$ |
18,735 |
|
Equity loss - Donlin Gold (Note 5)
|
|
|
28,163 |
|
|
|
16,625 |
|
|
|
14,502 |
|
|
|
|
48,272 |
|
|
|
36,835 |
|
|
|
33,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(48,272 |
) |
|
|
(36,835 |
) |
|
|
(33,237 |
) |
Interest expense on promissory note (Note 7)
|
|
|
(7,962 |
) |
|
|
(5,922 |
) |
|
|
(6,014 |
) |
Accretion of notes receivable (Note 4)
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
3,337 |
|
Other income (expense), net (Note 14)
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
1,569 |
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(53,376 |
) |
|
|
(40,399 |
) |
|
|
(34,345 |
) |
Income tax recovery (expense) (Note 15)
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
781 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(53,343 |
) |
|
|
(40,536 |
) |
|
|
(33,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
(54,471 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,949 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (thousands)
|
|
|
333,236 |
|
|
|
331,546 |
|
|
|
329,269 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
(US dollars in thousands)
|
|
Years ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(53,343 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,536 |
) |
|
$ |
(33,564 |
) |
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss – Donlin Gold
|
|
|
28,163 |
|
|
|
16,625 |
|
|
|
14,502 |
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
8,214 |
|
|
|
8,235 |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
Interest expense on promissory note
|
|
|
7,962 |
|
|
|
5,922 |
|
|
|
6,014 |
|
Remediation expense
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Foreign exchange (gain) loss
|
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
Accretion of notes receivable
|
|
|
(849 |
) |
|
|
(2,556 |
) |
|
|
(3,337 |
) |
Change in fair value of marketable securities
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(431 |
) |
Gain on sale of mineral property
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Deferred income tax recovery
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(751 |
) |
Other operating adjustments
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Net change in operating assets and liabilities (Note 17)
|
|
|
(2,056 |
) |
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(12,371 |
) |
|
|
(9,863 |
) |
|
|
(10,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from term deposits
|
|
|
148,000 |
|
|
|
141,578 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
Purchases of term deposits
|
|
|
(132,000 |
) |
|
|
(158,799 |
) |
|
|
(61,000 |
) |
Proceeds from note receivable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Funding of Donlin Gold
|
|
|
(28,435 |
) |
|
|
(17,587 |
) |
|
|
(15,276 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of mineral property
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Other
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net cash provided from investing activities
|
|
|
(12,362 |
) |
|
|
40,392 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Withholding tax on share-based compensation
|
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(27,242 |
) |
|
|
30,218 |
|
|
|
(6,643 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
91,124 |
|
|
|
60,906 |
|
|
|
67,549 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
63,882 |
|
|
$ |
91,124 |
|
|
$ |
60,906 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
EQUITY
(US dollars and shares in thousands)
|
|
Common shares
|
|
|
Contributed
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
deficit
|
|
|
AOCL*
|
|
|
equity
|
|
November 30, 2019
|
|
|
327,630 |
|
|
$ |
1,965,573 |
|
|
$ |
82,254 |
|
|
$ |
(1,885,065 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,808 |
) |
|
$ |
137,954 |
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,057 |
|
Performance share units (PSUs) settled in shares
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
|
5,430 |
|
|
|
(5,430 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Withholding tax on PSUs
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(33,564 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(33,564 |
) |
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
932 |
|
November 30, 2020
|
|
|
330,412 |
|
|
$ |
1,972,029 |
|
|
$ |
81,203 |
|
|
$ |
(1,918,629 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,876 |
) |
|
$ |
110,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,235 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,235 |
|
PSUs settled in shares
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
(1,460 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
(5,031 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Withholding tax on PSUs
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(731 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(731 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(40,536 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(40,536 |
) |
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
November 30, 2021
|
|
|
332,416 |
|
|
$ |
1,978,520 |
|
|
$ |
82,216 |
|
|
$ |
(1,959,165 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,289 |
) |
|
$ |
78,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,214 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,214 |
|
PSUs settled in shares
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Deferred share units (DSUs) settled in shares
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
854 |
|
|
|
3,462 |
|
|
|
(3,462 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Withholding tax on PSUs
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(53,343 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(53,343 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
November 30, 2022
|
|
|
333,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,983,962 |
|
|
$ |
82,866 |
|
|
$ |
(2,012,508 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,417 |
) |
|
$ |
29,903 |
|
* Accumulated other comprehensive loss
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(US dollars in thousands, except per share)
NOTE 1 – THE COMPANY
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC. and its affiliates and subsidiaries
(collectively, “NOVAGOLD” or the “Company”) operate in the mining
industry, focused on the exploration for and development of gold
mineral properties. The Company has no realized revenues from its
planned principal business purpose. The Company’s principal asset
is a 50% interest in the Donlin Gold project in Alaska, USA. The
Donlin Gold project is owned and operated by Donlin Gold LLC
(“Donlin Gold”), a limited liability company that is owned equally
by wholly-owned subsidiaries of NOVAGOLD and Barrick Gold
Corporation (“Barrick”).
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
Presentation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries NOVAGOLD
U.S. Holdings Inc., NOVAGOLD Resources Alaska Inc., NOVAGOLD USA,
Inc., and AGC Resources Inc. All inter-company transactions and
balances are eliminated on consolidation.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are presented in United
States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP). The
preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements in
accordance with US GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the
reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. The
Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ
from the amounts recorded in these Consolidated Financial
Statements.
References in these Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to
$ refer to United States (US) dollars and C$ to Canadian dollars.
Dollar amounts are in thousands, except for per share amounts.
Foreign currency
The functional currency for NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC. is the Canadian
dollar and the functional currency for the Company’s U.S.
operations is the U.S. dollar. Therefore, gains and losses on U.S.
dollar denominated transactions and the effect of translating U.S.
dollar denominated balances of Canadian operations are recorded in
net loss. The effects of translating the Company’s Canadian
operations from the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar are recorded
in Other comprehensive income (loss).
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash balances and highly
liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less, that are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents
are held for the purpose of meeting short-term cash commitments
rather than for investment or other purposes.
Term deposits
The Company’s term deposits are classified as held to maturity and
recorded at cost. Term deposits are held at Chartered Canadian
banks with original maturities of 12 months or less. The term
deposits are not traded in an active market.
Contingent note receivable
A portion of the proceeds related to the sale of Galore Creek to
Newmont includes a $75,000 note receivable, contingent upon the
approval of a Galore Creek project construction plan by the
owner(s). The Company has not assigned a value to the contingent
note receivable as management determined that the approval of the
Galore Creek project construction was not probable as of the
closing of the Galore Creek sale or in subsequent periods. The
contingent note will be recognized when, in management’s judgement,
it is probable that the payment will occur, and that the amount
recorded will not reverse in future periods.
Investment in affiliates
Investments in unconsolidated ventures over which the Company has
the ability to exercise significant influence, but does not
control, are accounted for under the equity method and include the
Company’s investment in the Donlin Gold project. The Company
identified Donlin Gold as a Variable Interest Entity (VIE) as the
entity is dependent on funding from its owners. All funding,
ownership, voting rights, and power to exercise control is shared
equally on a 50/50 basis between the owners of the VIE. Therefore,
the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary
of the VIE. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss is its equity
investment in Donlin Gold.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(US dollars in thousands, except per share)
The equity method is a basis of accounting for investments whereby
the investment is initially recorded at cost and the carrying value
is adjusted thereafter to include the investor’s pro rata share of
post-acquisition earnings or losses of the investee, as computed by
the consolidation method. Cash funding increases the carrying value
of the investment. Profit distributions received or receivable from
an investee reduce the carrying value of the investment.
Donlin Gold is a non-publicly traded equity investee owning an
exploration and development project. Therefore, the Company
assesses whether there has been a potential triggering event for
other-than-temporary impairment by assessing the underlying assets
of the equity investee for recoverability and assessing whether
there has been a change in the development plan or strategy for the
project. If the underlying assets are not recoverable, the Company
will record an impairment charge equal to the difference between
the carrying amount of the investee and its fair value.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the liability method,
recognizing certain temporary differences between the financial
reporting basis of the Company’s liabilities and assets and the
related income tax basis for such liabilities and assets. This
method generates deferred income tax liabilities and assets for the
Company, as measured by the statutory tax rates in effect. The
Company derives its deferred income tax charge or benefit by
recording the change in deferred income tax liabilities and asset
balances for the year.
The Company’s deferred income tax assets include certain future tax
benefits. The Company records a valuation allowance against any
portion of those deferred income tax assets when it believes, based
on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred income tax asset will not
be realized.
Share-based payments
The Company records share-based compensation awards exchanged for
employee services at fair value on the date of the grant and
expenses the awards in the Consolidated Statements of Loss over the
requisite employee service period. The fair values of stock options
are determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair
values of PSUs are determined using a Monte Carlo valuation model.
The Company’s estimates may be impacted by certain variables
including, but not limited to, stock price volatility, employee
stock option exercise behaviors, additional stock option grants,
estimates of forfeitures, the Company’s performance, and the
Company’s performance in relation to its peers.
Net income (loss) per common share
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share are presented for Net
income (loss). Basic income (loss) per share is computed by
dividing Net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of
outstanding common shares for the period. Diluted income per share
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or
other contracts that may require the issuance of common shares in
the future were converted. Diluted income per share is computed by
increasing the weighted-average number of outstanding common shares
to include the additional common shares that would be outstanding
after conversion and adjusting net income for changes that would
result from the conversion. Only those securities or other
contracts that result in a reduction in earnings per share are
included in the calculation.
NOTE 3 – SEGMENTED INFORMATION
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the
internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker.
The chief operating decision-maker, who is responsible for
allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating
segments, has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer. The
Chief Executive Officer considers the business from a geographic
perspective considering the performance of our investment in the
Donlin Gold project in Alaska, USA (Note 5).
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(US dollars in thousands, except per share)
NOTE 4 – NOTES RECEIVABLE
Changes in the Company’s Notes receivable are summarized as
follows:
|
|
Years ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Balance – beginning of period
|
|
$ |
23,572 |
|
|
$ |
96,016 |
|
|
$ |
92,679 |
|
Accretion of notes receivable
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
3,337 |
|
Payment received
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(75,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Balance – end of period
|
|
$ |
24,421 |
|
|
$ |
23,572 |
|
|
$ |
96,016 |
|
Galore Creek
On July 27, 2018, the Company sold its interest in the Galore Creek
project to a subsidiary of Newmont Corporation (“Newmont”) for cash
proceeds of $100,000, a $75,000 note due upon the earlier of the
completion of a Galore Creek pre-feasibility study or July 27,
2021, a $25,000 note due upon the earlier of the completion of a
Galore Creek feasibility study or July 27, 2023, and a contingent
note for $75,000 due upon approval of a Galore Creek project
construction plan by the owner(s). The Company received $75,000
from Newmont on July 27, 2021.
As of November 30, 2022, the carrying value of the $25,000 note was
$24,421 including $3,473 of accumulated accretion. The carrying
value of the note is being accreted to $25,000 over five years at a discount rate of 3.6%
based on quoted market values for Newmont debt with a similar
term.
A contingent note for $75,000 is due upon approval of a Galore
Creek project construction plan by the owner(s). No value was
assigned to the final $75,000 contingent note. The Company
determined that Galore Creek project construction approval was not
probable as of the closing of the Galore Creek sale. The Company’s
assessment did not change as of November 30, 2022.
Minas San Roque
On November 3, 2021, the Company sold its 49% interest in the Minas
San Roque project in Argentina to Marifil S.A., a subsidiary of
International Iconic Gold Mines Ltd. (“Iconic”) for cash proceeds
of C$250 upon closing, a C$750 note receivable due on November 1,
2022, and a C$1,000 note receivable due on November 1, 2023. The
notes are guaranteed by Iconic. On closing, the Company determined
the fair value of the notes was nil. The Company’s assessment did
not change as of November 30, 2022. Subsequent to November 30,
2022, Iconic obtained sufficient funding and completed the C$750
note payment by the end of December 2022.
NOTE 5 – INVESTMENT IN DONLIN GOLD
The Donlin Gold project is owned and operated by Donlin Gold, a
limited liability company in which wholly-owned subsidiaries of
NOVAGOLD and Barrick each own a 50% interest. Donlin Gold has a
board of four
representatives, with two
representatives selected by Barrick and two representatives selected by the
Company. All significant decisions related to Donlin Gold require
the approval of at least a majority of the Donlin Gold board.
Changes in the Company’s Investment in Donlin Gold are
summarized as follows:
|
|
Years ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Balance – beginning of period
|
|
$ |
3,576 |
|
|
$ |
2,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
Share
of losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral property expenditures
|
|
|
(27,690 |
) |
|
|
(16,286 |
) |
|
|
(14,339 |
) |
Depreciation
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
Accretion
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
(28,163 |
) |
|
|
(16,625 |
) |
|
|
(14,502 |
) |
Funding
|
|
|
28,435 |
|
|
|
17,587 |
|
|
|
15,276 |
|
Balance – end of period
|
|
$ |
3,848 |
|
|
$ |
3,576 |
|
|
$ |
2,614 |
|
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(US dollars in thousands, except per share)
The following amounts represent the Company’s 50% share of the
assets and liabilities of Donlin Gold. Donlin Gold capitalized the
initial contribution of the Donlin Gold property as Non-current
assets: Mineral property with a carrying value of $64,000,
resulting in a higher carrying value of the mineral property than
that of the Company.
|
|
As of November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Current assets: Cash, prepaid expenses, and other receivables
|
|
$ |
4,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,815 |
|
Non-current assets: Right-of-use assets, property and equipment
|
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
Non-current assets: Mineral property
|
|
|
32,615 |
|
|
|
32,615 |
|
Current liabilities: Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and
lease obligations
|
|
|
(2,322 |
) |
|
|
(1,584 |
) |
Non-current liabilities: Reclamation and lease obligations
|
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(687 |
) |
Net assets
|
|
$ |
35,848 |
|
|
$ |
35,576 |
|
NOTE 6 – OTHER ASSETS
|
|
As of November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and interest receivable
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
Receivable from Donlin Gold
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,235 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
long-term assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities
|
|
$ |
1,845 |
|
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
Right-of-use assets
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,803 |
|
|
$ |
2,253 |
|
NOTE 7 – PROMISSORY NOTE
The Company has a promissory note payable to Barrick of $123,685,
comprised of $51,576 in principal, and $72,109 in accrued interest
at U.S. prime plus 2%. The promissory note resulted from the
agreement that led to the formation of Donlin Gold, where the
Company agreed to reimburse Barrick for a portion of their
expenditures incurred from April 1, 2006 to November 30, 2007. The
promissory note and accrued interest are payable from 85% of the
Company’s share of revenue from future mine production or from any
net proceeds resulting from a reduction of the Company’s interest
in Donlin Gold. The carrying value of the promissory note
approximates fair value.
Changes in the Company’s Promissory Note is
summarized as follows:
|
|
Years ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2020
|
|
Balance – beginning of period
|
|
$ |
115,723 |
|
|
$ |
109,801 |
|
|
$ |
103,787 |
|
Interest expense on promissory note
|
|
|
7,962 |
|
|
|
5,922 |
|
|
|
6,014 |
|
Balance – end of period
|
|
$ |
123,685 |
|
|
$ |
115,723 |
|
|
$ |
109,801 |
|
NOTE 8 – LEASES
The Company leases office space under non-cancelable operating
leases with original lease terms of five years. These leases require
monthly lease payments that may be subject to annual increases
throughout the lease term. Certain of these leases also include
renewal options at the election of the Company to renew or extend
the lease for an additional five years. These optional periods
have not been considered in the determination of ROU assets or
lease liabilities associated with these leases as management did
not consider it reasonably certain it would exercise the options.
In 2022, the Company extended the lease of its Salt Lake City
office for an additional 6.25 years. Certain of our leases include
payments that vary based on the Company’s level of usage and
operations. These variable payments are not included within ROU
assets and lease liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Additionally, short-term leases, which have an initial term of 12
months or less, are not recorded in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(US dollars in thousands, except per share)
Lease expenses are included in General and administrative
expense – Office expense on the Consolidated
Statements of Loss and include the following components:
|
|
Years ended November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Operating lease cost
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
Variable lease cost
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Short-term lease cost
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
361 |
|
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating
leases as of November 30, 2022, were as follows:
2023
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
2024
|
|
|
234 |
|
2025
|
|
|
157 |
|
2026
|
|
|
154 |
|
2027
|
|
|
159 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
220 |
|
Total future minimum lease payments
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
Less: imputed interest
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
944 |
|
Other information regarding leases for the year ended November 30,
2022 includes the following:
Cash paid for operating leases
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
Variable lease cost
|
|
|
126 |
|
Short-term lease cost
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
$ |
369 |
|
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
Weighted average remaining lease term (years) – operating
leases
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Weighted average discount rate – operating leases
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
NOTE 9 – OTHER LIABILITIES
|
|
As of November 30,
|
|
|
|
2022
|
|
|
2021
|
|
Other current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remediation liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,156 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
Lease obligations
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remediation liabilities
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
Lease obligations
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
$ |
1,002 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
NOTE 10 – SHARE CAPITAL
Common shares
The Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000,000 common shares
without par value, of which 333,753,116 were issued and outstanding
as of November 30, 2022, and 332,415,547 were issued and
outstanding as of November 30, 2021.
NOVAGOLD RESOURCES INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(US dollars in thousands, except per share)
Preferred shares
Pursuant to the Company’s Notice of Articles filed under the
Business Corporations Act (British Columbia), the Company is
authorized to issue 10,000,000 preferred shares without par value.
The authorized but unissued preferred shares may be issued in
designated series from time to time by one or more resolutions
adopted by the Directors. The Directors have the authority to
determine the preferences, limitations, and relative rights of each
series of preferred shares. As of November 30, 2022 and 2021,
no preferred shares were issued or outstanding.
NOTE 11 – FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING
Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified into
one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the
significance of the inputs used in making the measurement. The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that
are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted
assets or liabilities;
Level 2 — Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or
inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
Level 3 — Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs
that are both significant to the fair value measurement and
unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).
The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash
equivalents, term deposits, accounts receivable, receivable from
Donlin Gold, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and
promissory note. The fair value of the promissory note approximates
its carrying value based on accrued interest at U.S. prime plus 2%
and the terms for repayment from future mine production or from any
net proceeds resulting from a reduction of the Company’s interest
in Donlin Gold. The fair value of the Company’s other financial
instruments approximate their carrying value due to the short‐term
nature of their maturity. The Company’s financial instruments
initially measured at fair value and then held at amortized cost
include cash and cash equivalents, term deposits, accounts
receivable, receivable from Donlin Gold, note receivable, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, and promissory note. The Company’s
marketable equity securities are valued using quoted market prices
in active markets and as such are classified within Level 1 of the
fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the marketable equity
securities was $1,845 as of November 30, 2022 ($1,830 as of
November 30, 2021), calculated as the quoted market price of the
marketable equity security multiplied by the quantity of shares
held by the Company.
NOTE 12 – GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE