6 June 2024
Worldwide
Healthcare Trust PLC
(the
“Company”)
Annual
Financial Report for the year ended 31 March
2024
The
statements below are extracted from the Company’s annual report for
the year ended 31 March 2024 (the
Annual Report).
The Annual
Report, will be posted to shareholders on 13
June 2024. Copies of the Annual Report will be available in
hard copy format from the Company Secretary, Frostrow Capital LLP,
25 Southampton Buildings, London
WC2A 1AL or from the Company’s website at
www.worldwidewh.com where up
to date information on the Company, including daily NAV, share
prices and fact sheets, can also be found.
The Annual
Report will be submitted to the Financial Conduct Authority and
will shortly be available in full, unedited text for inspection on
the National Storage Mechanism (NSM):
https://data.fca.org.uk/#/nsm/nationalstoragemechanism
The Annual
General Meeting will be held on Wednesday, 10 July 2024.
COMPANY
PERFORMANCE
HISTORIC
PERFORMANCE
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED 31 MARCH
|
2019
|
2020
|
2021
|
2022
|
2023
|
2024
|
Net
asset value per share (total return)*^
|
13.7%
|
6.5%
|
30.0%
|
(5.8)%
|
(0.1)%
|
12.0%
|
Benchmark
(total return)*
|
21.1%
|
5.7%
|
16.0%
|
20.4%
|
2.5%
|
10.9%
|
Net asset
value per share
|
272.3p
|
286.9p
|
370.3p
|
346.5p
|
343.5p
|
381.1p
|
Share
price
|
273.0p
|
292.0p
|
369.5p
|
327.5p
|
311.5p
|
335.0p
|
Premium/(discount)
of share price to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net asset
value per share
|
0.3%
|
1.8%
|
(0.2)%
|
(5.5)%
|
(9.3)%
|
(12.1)%
|
Dividends
per share
|
2.65p
|
2.5p
|
2.2p
|
2.7p
|
3.1p
|
2.8p
|
Leverage
|
4.9%
|
12.0%
|
7.6%
|
10.9%
|
10.5%
|
10.8%
|
Ongoing
charges^
|
0.9%
|
0.9%
|
0.9%
|
0.9%
|
0.8%
|
0.9%
|
Ongoing
charges (including performance
fees paid
or crystallised during the year)^
|
1.1%
|
0.9%
|
0.9%
|
1.4%
|
0.8%
|
0.9%
|
Comparative
periods have been restated for the sub-division of each share of
25p each into 10 new shares of 2.5p each, approved at the AGM held
on 18 July 2023 and effective on
27 July 2023.
* Source:
Morningstar
^ Alternative
Performance Measure (see Glossary).
* Source:
Morningstar
STATEMENT
FROM THE CHAIR
INVESTMENT
PERFORMANCE
I am
pleased to present your Company’s Annual Report and Financial
Statements for the year ended 31 March
2024.
Stock
market volatility continued in the year under review, with company
and healthcare industry fundamentals often taking a back seat to
macroeconomic forces and geopolitical events. The first half of the
year was dominated by investor uncertainty and concerns regarding
lingering inflation and continued high interest rates. The second
half of the year saw these concerns abate, which helped markets to
rise, in some cases, back to all-time highs.
Against
this backdrop, I am pleased to report that the Company performed
well, with a net asset value per share total return of +12.0%
(2023: -0.1%), outperforming the Company’s Benchmark, the MSCI
World Health Care Index measured on a net total return, sterling
adjusted basis, which returned +10.9% (2023: +2.5%).
The
Company’s share price total return during the year was +8.6% (2023:
-4.1%). The disparity between the performance of the Company’s net
asset value per share and its share price was reflected in the
widening of our share price discount to our net asset value per
share from 9.3% at 31 March 2023 to
12.1% at 31 March 2024.
Principal
contributors to our outperformance were Big Pharma, Medtech and
Emerging Biotech stocks. A key part of our Portfolio Manager’s
strategy is to be overweight the Emerging Biotech sector. This
reflects both the high levels of innovation and growth found in
these companies as well as their potential to be acquisition
targets by larger pharmaceutical companies seeking growth
opportunities.
While the
Company has underperformed the Benchmark on a five-year view
(+45.8% compared to +68.3%), our long-term performance continues to
be strong. From the Company’s inception in 1995 to 31 March 2024, the total return of our net asset
value per share has been +4,733%, equivalent to a compound annual
return of +14.4%. This compares to a cumulative blended Benchmark
return of +2,438% and a compound annual return of 11.9% over the
same period.
Further
information on the healthcare sector, the Company’s investments and
performance during the year can be found in the Portfolio Manager’s
Review.
CAPITAL
Since the
beginning of 2022, and for a variety of reasons, share price
discounts across the investment company sector in the UK have
widened. The average level of discount in the broader sector
currently stands at c.14.0%*. This compares to the Company’s share
price discount of 9.4% as at 5 June
2024.
It is the
Board’s policy to buy back our shares if the Company’s share price
discount to the net asset value per share exceeds 6% on an ongoing
basis. Shareholders should note, however, that it remains possible
for the discount to be greater than 6% for extended periods of
time, particularly when sentiment towards the Company, the sector
and to investment trusts generally remains poor. In such an
environment, buybacks may prove unable to prevent the discount from
widening. However, they enhance the net asset value per share for
remaining shareholders and go some way to dampening discount
volatility, which can adversely affect investors’ risk adjusted
returns.
Over the
year, the Company remained committed to its share buyback and
issuance policy, regularly repurchasing shares. This commitment was
demonstrated by the fact that a total of 80,265,298 shares were
repurchased for treasury at a cost of £253m and at an average
discount of 10.5%. In addition to increasing the Company’s net
asset value per share, during the period under review this activity
made the Company the most active acquirer of its own shares both in
its sector and across the investment trust sector as a
whole.
* Source:
Winterflood Investment Trusts
The shares
repurchased during the year under review equated to 12.8% of the
Company’s share capital at the beginning of the year. The total
number of shares shown to have been repurchased during the year has
been adjusted to reflect the share split of each of the Company’s
shares of 25p each into 10 shares of 2.5p each which took effect
from 27 July 2023.
On
31 March 2024, there were 545,942,332
shares in issue (excluding the 55,722,868 shares held in treasury).
From the beginning of the new financial year to 5 June 2024, a further 10,677,869 shares have
been bought back for treasury, at a cost of £36.5m and at an
average discount of 10.1%.
In a
change to the Company’s stated policy, I confirm that all shares
held in treasury at the date of the Company’s Annual General
Meeting to be held on 10 July 2024,
will not be cancelled and will continue to be held in treasury for
re-issue at a premium to the net asset value per share.
REVENUE
AND DIVIDEND
Shareholders
will be aware that it remains the Company’s investment policy to
pursue capital growth for shareholders and to pay dividends at
least to the extent required to maintain investment trust status.
Therefore, the level of dividends declared can go down as well as
up. An unchanged interim dividend of 0.7p per share for the year
ended 31 March 2024, was paid on
11 January 2024 to shareholders on
the register on 24 November
2023.
The
Company’s net revenue for the year as a whole decreased to £16.1m
from £19.7m. This was due largely to a decrease in exposure to
higher yielding stocks in the portfolio as well as a reduction in
the size of the portfolio due to shares bought back by the Company
during the year. As a result, the revenue return per share was 2.7p
(2023: 3.0p per share).
Accordingly,
the Board is proposing a slightly reduced final dividend for the
year of 2.1p per share (2023:2.4p per share). Together with the
interim dividend already paid, this makes a total dividend for the
year of 2.8p per share (2023: 3.1p per share).
The effect
of share buybacks means that the reported dividend per share, which
is based on the number of shares in issue at the end of the
financial year, is higher than the reported revenue return per
share, which is based on the average number of shares in issue over
the year.
Based on
the closing mid-market share price of 353.5p on 5 June 2024, the total dividend payment for the
year represents a current yield of 0.8%.
The final
dividend will be payable, subject to shareholder approval, on
24 July 2024, to shareholders on the
register of members on 14 June 2024.
The associated ex-dividend date will be 13
June 2024.
The
Company’s dividend policy will be proposed for approval at the
forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
BOARD
OF DIRECTORS
Humphrey van der Klugt will retire at the conclusion of the
Company’s Annual General Meeting on Wednesday, 10 July 2024.
Humphrey
has served on the Board since 2016 and was the Chair of the Audit
& Risk Committee from 2016 to 2023. Humphrey’s accounting,
general finance and portfolio management experience, including his
deep knowledge of the investment trust sector, have been invaluable
to the Board. His friendship and wise counsel will be greatly
missed. The Board is in the process of recruiting a new Director to
join the Board later in the year and we will keep shareholders
informed of developments.
ENVIRONMENTAL,
SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (“ESG”) MATTERS
ESG
matters continue to be an important priority for the Board. Our
objective is to have full, transparent disclosure on the topic. Our
Senior Independent Director, Bina
Rawal, works closely with our Portfolio Manager on this
matter.
Our
Portfolio Manager remains committed to taking a leading role in the
development of meaningful ESG engagement practices in the
healthcare sector. As part of this, they facilitate dialogue and an
exchange of leading practices among investors, companies and other
relevant experts on ESG, in particular, the large capitalisation
pharmaceutical sector. They also engage with a broad range of
companies on a regular basis where areas of improvement can be
identified. Further information on both ESG matters and climate
change can be found in the Portfolio Manager’s ESG
report.
CONTINUATION
VOTE
The Board
has committed to undertaking a continuation vote every five years,
with a resolution tabled at the Annual General Meeting falling in
the fifth year. Accordingly, such a resolution is included in the
notice of Annual General Meeting contained within this
report.
In the
light of the Company’s long-term track record of outperformance,
the positive outlook for the healthcare sector globally and the
Company’s unique ability to provide shareholders with access to a
broad range of healthcare investment opportunities worldwide, the
Board unanimously recommends that shareholders vote in favour of
the resolution allowing the Company to continue as an investment
trust for a further five years.
ANNUAL
GENERAL MEETING (“AGM”)
The
Company’s AGM will again be held at Saddlers’ Hall, 40 Gutter Lane,
London EC2V 6BR on Wednesday,
10 July 2024 at 1.00pm. As well as the formal proceedings, there
will be an opportunity to meet the Board and the Portfolio Manager
and to receive an update on the Company’s strategy. We look forward
to seeing as many of you as possible there.
For those
investors who are not able to attend the meeting in person, a video
recording of the Portfolio Manager’s presentation will be uploaded
to the website after the meeting. Shareholders can submit questions
in advance by sending them to wwh@frostrow.com.
I
encourage all shareholders to exercise their right to vote at the
AGM and to register your votes online in advance of the meeting.
Registering your vote in advance will not restrict you from
attending and voting at the meeting in person should you wish to do
so. The votes on the resolutions to be proposed at the AGM will
again be conducted on a poll. The results of the proxy votes will
be published following the conclusion of the AGM by way of a stock
exchange announcement and will also be able to be viewed on the
Company’s website at www.worldwidewh.com.
OUTLOOK
While
stock market volatility is to be expected, and in the coming year
may be influenced by elections in the US and UK, our Portfolio
Manager, OrbiMed, continues to remain positive on the outlook for
the healthcare sector and our Company’s strategy for maximizing
shareholder value over time. They believe that the overall future
of the healthcare industry remains strong due to increasing demand
globally, driven by a combination of the world’s aging population
and improving access to healthcare products and services worldwide.
At the same time, the rapid pace of innovation continues unabated,
leading to the availability of new products and
treatments.
OrbiMed
further believes that the challenging investment backdrop for
healthcare stocks that had existed since the easing of the COVID
pandemic appears to be changing and that the recent upturn in share
prices across the industry is more representative of its positive
fundamentals.
Lastly,
OrbiMed expects the currently high level of merger and acquisition
activity in the healthcare sector to continue, supported by
attractive valuations, healthy balance sheets and, within the
pharmaceutical sector, a need to address future patent
expirations.
Your Board
shares OrbiMed’s optimism. We believe the prospects for the global
healthcare sector are strong and that your Company is uniquely
placed to take advantage of opportunities in a wide variety of
companies around the world. Accordingly, we believe that long-term
investors in the Company will continue to be rewarded.
Doug McCutcheon
Chair
6 June 2024
INVESTMENT
OBJECTIVE AND POLICY
INVESTMENT
OBJECTIVE
The
Company invests in the global healthcare sector with the objective
of achieving a high level of capital growth.
In order
to achieve its investment objective, the Company invests worldwide
in a diversified portfolio of shares in pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies and related securities in the healthcare
sector. It uses gearing, and derivative transactions to enhance
returns and mitigate risk. Performance is measured against the MSCI
World Health Care Index on a net total return, sterling adjusted
basis (“Benchmark”).
INVESTMENT
STRATEGY
The
implementation of the Company’s Investment Objective has been
delegated to OrbiMed by Frostrow (as AIFM) under the Board’s and
Frostrow’s supervision and guidance.
Details of
OrbiMed’s investment strategy and approach are set out in the
Portfolio Manager’s Review.
While the
Board’s strategy is to allow flexibility in managing the
investments, in order to manage investment risk it has imposed
various investment, gearing and derivative guidelines and limits,
within which Frostrow and OrbiMed are required to manage the
investments, as set out below.
Any
material changes to the Investment Objective, Policy and Benchmark
or the investment, gearing and derivative guidelines and limits
require approval from shareholders.
INVESTMENT
POLICY
INVESTMENT LIMITS AND
GUIDELINES
· The
Company will not invest more than 15% of the portfolio in any one
individual stock at the time of acquisition;
· At
least 50% of the portfolio will normally be invested in larger
companies (i.e. with a market capitalisation of at least
U.S.$10bn);
· At
least 20% of the portfolio will normally be invested in smaller
companies (i.e. with a market capitalisation of less than
U.S.$10bn);
· Investment
in unquoted securities will not exceed 10% of the portfolio at the
time of acquisition;
· A
maximum of 5% of the portfolio, at the time of acquisition, may be
invested in each of debt instruments, convertibles and royalty
bonds issued by pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies;
· A
maximum of 30% of the portfolio, at the time of acquisition, may be
invested in companies in each of the following sectors:
–
healthcare
equipment and supplies;
– healthcare
providers and services;
· The
Company will not invest more than 10% of its gross assets in other
closed ended investment companies (including investment trusts)
listed on the London Stock Exchange, except where the investment
companies themselves have stated investment policies to invest no
more than 15% of their gross assets in other closed ended
investment companies (including investment trusts) listed on the
London Stock Exchange, where such investments shall be limited to
15% of the Company’s gross assets at the time of
acquisition.
DERIVATIVE STRATEGY AND
LIMITS
In line
with the Investment Objective, derivatives are employed, when
appropriate, in an effort to enhance returns and to improve the
risk-return profile of the Company’s portfolio. Only Equity Swaps
were employed within the portfolio during the year.
The Board
has set the following limits within which derivative exposures are
managed:
· Derivative
transactions (excluding equity swaps) can be used to mitigate risk
and/or enhance capital returns and will be restricted to a net
exposure of 5% of the portfolio; and
· Equity
Swaps may be used in order to meet the Company’s investment
objective of achieving a high level of capital growth, and
counterparty exposure through these is restricted to 12% of the
gross assets of the Company at the time of acquisition.
The
Company does not currently hedge against foreign currency
exposure.
GEARING LIMIT
The Board
has set a maximum gearing level, through borrowing, of 20% of the
net assets.
LEVERAGE LIMITS
Under the
AIFMD the Company is required to set maximum leverage limits.
Leverage under the AIFMD is defined as any method by which the
total exposure of an AIF is increased.
The
Company has two current sources of leverage: the overdraft
facility, which is subject to the gearing limit; and, derivatives,
which are subject to the separate derivative limits. The Board and
Frostrow have set a maximum leverage limit of 140% on both the
commitment and gross basis.
Further
details on the gearing and leverage calculations, and how total
exposure through derivatives is calculated, are included in the
Glossary. Further details on how derivatives are employed can be
found in note 16.
PORTFOLIO
INVESTMENTS
HELD AS AT 31 MARCH
2024
Investments
|
Sector
|
Country
|
Market
value
£’000
|
%
of
Investments
|
Eli
Lilly
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
United
States
|
192,261
|
9.2%
|
Boston
Scientific
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
United
States
|
139,752
|
6.7%
|
Novo
Nordisk
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
Denmark
|
130,534
|
6.2%
|
AstraZeneca
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
United
Kingdom
|
129,973
|
6.2%
|
Intuitive
Surgical
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
United
States
|
123,124
|
5.9%
|
Merck
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
United
States
|
117,578
|
5.6%
|
Biogen
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
92,990
|
4.4%
|
Tenet
Healthcare
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
United
States
|
80,031
|
3.8%
|
Daiichi
Sankyo
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
Japan
|
77,991
|
3.7%
|
Stryker
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
United
States
|
63,107
|
3.0%
|
Top
10 investments
|
|
|
1,147,341
|
54.7%
|
BioMarin
Pharmaceutical
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
56,867
|
2.7%
|
Elevance
Health
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
United
States
|
52,559
|
2.5%
|
Eisai
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
Japan
|
52,016
|
2.5%
|
Thermo
Fisher Scientific
|
Life
Sciences Tools & Services
|
United
States
|
51,937
|
2.5%
|
Evolent
Health
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
United
States
|
51,662
|
2.5%
|
GSK
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
United
Kingdom
|
50,940
|
2.4%
|
Natera
|
Life
Sciences Tools & Services
|
United
States
|
46,733
|
2.2%
|
Ionis
Pharmaceuticals
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
42,969
|
2.0%
|
Caris Life
Sciences*
|
Life
Sciences Tools & Services
|
United
States
|
40,531
|
1.9%
|
Sarepta
Therapeutics
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
38,152
|
1.8%
|
Top
20 investments
|
|
|
1,631,707
|
77.7%
|
ICON
|
Life
Sciences Tools & Services
|
Ireland
|
37,515
|
1.8%
|
Apellis
Pharmaceuticals
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
37,187
|
1.8%
|
Argenx
|
Biotechnology
|
Netherlands
|
32,035
|
1.5%
|
Neurocrine
Biosciences
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
29,086
|
1.4%
|
SI-BONE
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
United
States
|
29,033
|
1.4%
|
Vertex
Pharmaceuticals
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
28,781
|
1.4%
|
UnitedHealth
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
United
States
|
27,397
|
1.3%
|
Vaxcyte
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
26,716
|
1.3%
|
Cytokinetics
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
26,621
|
1.3%
|
Shanghai
INT Medical Instruments
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
China
|
20,244
|
1.0%
|
Top
30 investments
|
|
|
1,926,322
|
91.9%
|
Janux
Therapeutics
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
19,806
|
0.9%
|
Crossover
Health*
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
United
States
|
18,018
|
0.9%
|
EDDA
Healthcare & Technology*
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
China
|
15,129
|
0.7%
|
VISEN
Pharmaceuticals*
|
Biotechnology
|
China
|
13,714
|
0.7%
|
Beijing
Yuanxin Technology*
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
China
|
13,407
|
0.6%
|
Sino
Biopharmaceutical
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
Hong
Kong
|
12,723
|
0.6%
|
Dexcom
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
United
States
|
12,012
|
0.6%
|
Galderma
Group
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
Switzerland
|
11,652
|
0.6%
|
New
Horizon Health
|
Life
Sciences Tools & Services
|
China
|
11,186
|
0.5%
|
Innovent
Biologics
|
Biotechnology
|
China
|
11,053
|
0.5%
|
Top
40 investments
|
|
|
2,065,022
|
98.5%
|
Ruipeng
Pet Group*
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
China
|
10,844
|
0.5%
|
Jiangxi
RiMAG Group*
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
China
|
10,503
|
0.5%
|
MabPlex*
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
China
|
5,395
|
0.3%
|
API
Holdings*
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
India
|
5,072
|
0.2%
|
Shandong
Weigao Group Medical Polymer
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
China
|
2,961
|
0.1%
|
Shanghai
Bio-heart Biological Technology
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
China
|
2,381
|
0.1%
|
Passage
Bio
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
2,218
|
0.1%
|
Ikena
Oncology
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
1,815
|
0.1%
|
Dingdang
Health Technology
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
China
|
1,510
|
0.1%
|
Peloton
Therapeutics - Milestone*
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
514
|
0.0%
|
Total
equities
|
|
|
2,108,235
|
100.5%
|
Biotech
M&A Target Swap
|
Basket
Swaps
|
United
States
|
176,869
|
8.4%
|
Apollo
Hospitals
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
India
|
16,416
|
0.8%
|
GLP-1
Dislocation;/MedTech Recovery Swap
|
Basket
Swaps
|
China
|
4,797
|
0.2%
|
Less:
Gross exposure on financed swaps
|
|
|
(209,556)
|
(10.0)%
|
Total
Equity Swaps
|
|
|
(11,474)
|
(0.5)%
|
Total
investments including OTC Swaps
|
|
|
2,096,761
|
100.0%
|
* Unquoted
holding
SUMMARY
Investments
|
Market
value
£’000
|
%
of
Investments
|
Quoted
Equities
|
1,975,108
|
94.2%
|
Unquoted
equities
|
133,127
|
6.3%
|
Equity
Swaps
|
(11,474)
|
(0.5)%
|
Total
of all investments
|
2,096,761
|
100.0%
|
PORTFOLIO
MANAGER’S REVIEW
MARKETS
Global
equity markets continued their rollercoaster ways in the financial
year, with a volatile first half followed by a steep climb higher
in the second half. One constant throughout the year has been the
macroeconomic and political factors driving returns, trumping
industry specific fundamentals.
The first
half of the year was characterised mostly by investor fear and
uncertainty, with rising interest rates, geopolitical conflicts,
and persistent inflation providing the backdrop for the debate
around a recession. Broad market returns during this period were
flat to down, exacerbated by a precipitous market sell-off in
October where “higher for longer” was the rally cry for investors
to sell. Healthcare stocks eschewed their traditional defensive
characteristics and lagged the market by over 5% (source: MSCI)
during this period.
But the
second half of the year saw a dramatic reversal of market
performance as investors expressed enthusiasm over easing inflation
data and the U.S. Federal Reserve’s indication of a potential end
to its two-year interest rate hiking cycle. That momentum continued
unabated into the financial year end where the MSCI World Index and
the S&P 500 closed on all-time highs whilst the FTSE
All-Share
Index closed on a 52-week high. Healthcare stocks also rose, but
again trailed the broad market by 6%.
The net of
it was a difficult year for healthcare stocks. The MSCI World Index
bucked the early tumult of the year to post an impressive total
return of +22.4% (sterling). Whilst the MSCI World Healthcare Index
also rebounded during the year, the total return of +10.9%
(sterling) was the worst relative performance versus the broad
market in over 20 years.
Despite
the difficult backdrop for healthcare, the Company was able to
produce a strong double-digit return that exceeded the Benchmark by
over 1%, driven primarily by stock picking across Big Pharma,
Emerging Biotech, and Medtech.
ALLOCATION
We
actively manage the Company’s allocation across healthcare
sub-sectors with reference to the Benchmark. In the reported
financial year, we have continued our strategic overweight
positioning in Biotechnology stocks, in particular Emerging
Biotech. As innovation has become the real hallmark of the Company,
the real cradle of innovation has been in Emerging Biotech stocks,
companies that are typically without revenues but have been the
technology engine behind both the majority of the industry’s
pipeline and ultimately new product approvals. We ended the
financial year with total Biotechnology exposure of 29.0%, 20.7%
above the Benchmark, representing an increase year-over-year on
both an absolute and relative basis. Within Emerging Biotech, there
was a modest increase year-over-year (+1.7%) on an absolute basis
and a large increase relative to the Benchmark (+3.9%) as
valuations compressed in the period. Overall, the exposure is very
much consistent with our long-held positioning that has typically
ranged from high 20’s to low 30’s percentage on an absolute basis,
which we expect to continue.
Similarly,
we have continued our strategic underweight positioning in
Pharmaceutical stocks in the reported financial year. There are two
main rationales for this. First is a nod to the Benchmark where
Pharmaceuticals (global large capitalisation stocks, generics, and
specialty) comprise approximately 45% of the weighting, the largest
segment of MSCI World Healthcare Index. This fact creates the most
likely candidate for funding other segments of our investment.
Second, and more importantly, the underweight positioning is
primarily due to our fundamental outlook for the sector. Big Pharma
companies, in our view, are a collection of companies that are
easily divided into the classic “Have or Have Not” designation from
a variety of metrics including but certainly not limited to
valuation, growth profile, management credibility, pipelines, new
product launches, strength of balance sheet, capital allocation
priorities, and forward-looking catalysts. Our focus on the “Haves”
has enabled us to capture performance in the financial year both in
absolute terms and relative to the Benchmark, despite the
underweight positioning. Year-over-year, our exposure in Big Pharma
companies did increase by 3.3% (absolute) and 1.3% (relative) given
high conviction ideas in companies that are significant weightings
in the Benchmark including Eli
Lilly,
Novo
Nordisk,
and AstraZeneca.
In the
Life Sciences Tools & Services (“Tools”) sector, we increased
our exposure over the course of the year but remained underweight
versus the Benchmark, reflecting the difficult macro environment
for tools companies across many markets, including bioprocessing,
instruments, China, and general
biopharma weakness. We added one new significant position, Icon
Life Sciences, a contract research organisation where market trends
and opportunities have improved for the company. We await
opportunities to add exposure as the Tools sector returns to more
normal growth towards the end of calendar 2024.
ALLOCATION
BY SUB-SECTOR
(WWH
vs. MSCI World Healthcare Index)
|
As
of 31 March 2024
|
As
of 31 March 2023
|
Subsector
|
^WWH
% NAV
|
MSCI
HC
|
Over/Under
vs.BM
|
^WWH
% NAV
|
MSCI
HC
|
Over/Under
vs.BM
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
31.0
|
44.8
|
(13.8)
|
26.8
|
43.0
|
(16.2)
|
Big
Pharma
|
29.9
|
41.7
|
(11.8)
|
26.6
|
39.7
|
(13.1)
|
Spec
Pharma
|
1.1
|
2.9
|
(1.8)
|
0.2
|
3.2
|
(3.0)
|
Generics
|
–
|
0.2
|
(0.2)
|
–
|
0.1
|
(0.1)
|
Biotechnology
|
29.0
|
8.3
|
20.7
|
24.1
|
9.4
|
14.7
|
Big
Biotech
|
6.1
|
6.2
|
(0.1)
|
2.9
|
5.1
|
(2.2)
|
Emerging
Biotech
|
22.9
|
2.1
|
20.8
|
21.2
|
4.3
|
16.9
|
Life
Science Tools & Services
|
6.5
|
11.1
|
(4.6)
|
3.8
|
12.3
|
(8.5)
|
Health
Care Equipment & Supplies
|
17.8
|
16.9
|
0.9
|
19.3
|
16.2
|
3.1
|
Healthcare
Services & Supplies
|
10.2
|
15.1
|
(4.9)
|
15.4
|
14.9
|
0.5
|
Japan
|
6.3
|
3.8
|
2.5
|
6.3
|
4.2
|
2.1
|
Emerging
Market
|
3.7
|
–
|
3.7
|
8.0
|
–
|
8.0
|
Privates
|
6.4
|
–
|
6.4
|
6.8
|
–
|
6.8
|
Total
|
110.9
|
100.0
|
10.9
|
110.5
|
100.0
|
10.5
|
^ Figures
expressed as a % of total Net Asset Value. This includes all
derivatives as an economically equivalent position in the
underlying holding and allocated to the underlying holdings’
respective sectors and regions.
The
portfolio allocation in Health Care Equipment & Supplies
(“Medtech”) varied through the financial year given a variety of
shifting tailwinds and headwinds. Whilst this is unlike our
strategic positioning in Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals, it is a
typical trading pattern for us, historically, in Medtech. We
started the financial year overweight given high conviction, single
stock ideas and a sub-sector valuation that appeared reasonable
against a backdrop of improving procedural utilisation rates.
Exposure was reduced mid-year due to profit taking, ahead of a
seasonally slower second quarter, and the negative
fall-out
from GLP-1 data sets, such as the SELECT trial, which created
significant tumult in the sector during the year. Our exposure to
the group increased in November 2023
to take advantage of what we saw to be a rebound in the hardest hit
parts of the sub-sector. Into the year-end, the portfolio was back
to a slight overweight position, albeit slightly down
year-over-year (approximately 1.5% absolute and 2.2% relative).
Looking ahead, subsector fundamentals are highly bifurcated between
a select group of large capitalisation companies such as
Boston
Scientific,
Intuitive
Surgical,
and Stryker
which
are benefiting
from sizable new product cycles, while most of the other large cap
companies should remain at much lower growth rates and out of
favour with investors.
In
Healthcare Providers & Services (“Services”), we reduced our
managed care exposure meaningfully over the course of the year. Our
current underweight positioning reflects the significant challenges
that this sector has faced, especially for companies exposed to
Medicare Advantage – including an unprecedented spike in
utilisation and insufficient reimbursement updates from a more
negative government stance on the industry. We are watching
carefully for opportunities to increase our exposure again as
utilisation appears to be stabilising.
Historically,
our exposure to Japanese pharmaceuticals has been idea based. That
is, our long history in both due diligence and investing in
companies from Japan has shown
episodic opportunities of novel innovation and outsized returns
from concentrated investments there, regardless of the Benchmark.
As of the year-end, our overweight positioning here was stable, as
two investment opportunities have carried through the start and end
of the period, specifically Daiichi-Sankyo,
the worldwide leaders in antibody drug conjugate technology for the
treatment of multiple cancers, and Eisai,
the longtime pioneers in Alzheimer’s disease, now presiding over a
historic global launch of Leqembi (lecanemab).
Another
sector in which we have historically been overweight is Emerging
Markets, in particular China
healthcare. Fundamentally, there are a multitude of reasons for
this, including a sizable and growing market, patient demographics,
local consumer demand, and ultimately government support in
building healthcare infrastructure and reforms to improve access to
healthcare services for its citizens. More recently, we have also
discovered the incredible innovation that is also coming out of
China in the healthcare space,
drug discovery and development which is rivalling, and sometimes
surpassing, their Western counterparts. That said, we have also
acknowledged (and capitulated) to the plethora of headline risk
that has been coming out of China,
primarily the given geopolitical tensions between U.S. and
China. As a result, we have
lowered our exposure to Emerging Markets significantly over the
past four years, ending the year at 3.7% and down over 4.3%
year-over-year. Nevertheless, the secular tailwinds remain strong
and we expect to continue to look for and invest in meaningful
opportunities in China and
India.
PERFORMANCE
For the
year ended 31 March 2024, we are
pleased to report that the Company generated a net asset value
total return of +12.0% whilst the share price total return was
+8.6%. The net asset value performance surpassed the Benchmark
return of +10.9%. Drivers of both absolute and relative performance
were similar to the most recent years, namely the fluctuations
between fundamental industry drivers and macroeconomic factors
heavily influenced the returns during the year. With interest rates
being the most significant corollary to performance, the only
sustained returns were achieved in the second half of the financial
year when investors and the market began to expect – and price in –
interest rate cuts in 2024.
As
detailed below, key upside drivers for performance included stock
picking in Big Pharma, allocation and stock picking in
Biotechnology, and stock picking in Medtech. This was partially
offset by allocation in China,
stock picking in Japan, and
exposure to unquoteds.
SUBSECTOR
PERFORMANCE
On a
sub-sector level, the largest contributor to absolute performance
was from Big Pharma, contributing 7% (of the +12% net asset value
return). Obesity drugs and the landmark data from the newest GLP-1
medications was the true hallmark for healthcare stocks in 2023 and
was a key contributor to the Company’s absolute performance. Stock
picking here was key as relative contribution from Big Pharma was
also positive, despite the sizable underweight positioning versus
the Benchmark throughout the financial year (average portfolio
weight 28% compared to Benchmark weight 41%).
An
outsized contribution also came from Medtech at just over 4% of the
12.0% NAV return. The space was particularly volatile in 2023 as
small capitalisation stocks underperformed and obesity-laterals
disrupted the share prices of many stocks. Additionally, stock
picking here was particularly astute and combined with allocation
effect (average year-long overweight of approximately 1.6%),
investments in Medtech yielded nearly 2% of excess
return.
A
contribution of import was also generated within Biotechnology,
more specifically Emerging Biotech stocks which generated nearly 3%
of absolute return. Moreover, this return also represented nearly
3% of relative return, primarily due to stock picking. The majority
of this contribution came from OrbiMed’s custom and proprietary
mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) swap basket, first constructed
in April 2022, which consists of
handpicked biotechnology companies (by OrbiMed) that we believe are
likely M&A targets as an efficient way to gain exposure to a
plethora of single stocks. The strategy proved very successful,
with the basket returning over 65% (USD) since inception,
outperforming broad small and mid-capitalisation
stocks (+28% per the XBI) and large capitalisation (+17% per the
NBI) Biotechnology stocks, contributing over 2% or nearly £35
million alone. The total net contribution for Biotechnology was
partially offset by our investments in Big Biotech names, which
were negative.
Detractors
of note on a sub-sector level (China, Japan,
Unquoted) were modest. The equity markets in China remained difficult as investor concerns
over the economy were exacerbated by ongoing geopolitical tensions
with the U.S. and proposed legislation that could limit China’s
role in the U.S. biopharmaceutical industry. Overall, the Hang Seng
Healthcare Index dropped 35% in the financial year under
review.
Thus,
allocation effect primarily led to more than a 2% negative impact
from China-based
investments.
In
Japan, the TOPIX Pharm Index total
return was negative at -6% (sterling) despite the Nikkei-225 Index
advancing more than 25% (sterling) and reaching all-times highs in
March 2024. Thus, the allocation
effect, and stock picking, combined for more than a 1% impact to
performance in the financial year.
UNQUOTEDS
During the
financial year, the Company strategically refrained from making new
investments in unquoted companies, as we
continued to cautiously navigate the challenging public offering
market for small and mid-capitalisation healthcare firms. While the
capital market funding landscape has been improving, most of our
unquoted companies are well capitalised and are being selective
with regards to pursuing listings. We are optimistic about the
ability of some of our unquoted investments to achieve listings
within the next year as we anticipate the capital market funding
environment will continue to improve.
As of the
end of the financial year, unquoted investments made up 6.3% of the
Company’s portfolio, a slight decrease from 6.7% as at 31 March 2023. The existing unquoted portfolio
demonstrates a diverse and forward-looking approach.
Geographically, exposure is evenly distributed among Emerging
Markets and North American companies. On a sub-sector
basis, the exposure is concentrated in Services and Tools, with
small exposures to Biotechnology and Medtech.
We
participated in one additional investment (£3.3 million) in API
Holdings (better known as PharmEasy) which was also the only
material write-down in valuation. The company was compelled to
accept a capital infusion at a distressed valuation after a planned
initial public offering (“IPO”) was delayed due to adverse market
conditions, leading to a funding shortfall, including a potential
breach of a debt covenant.
During the
year under review, the unquoted investments made a loss of £14.7
million, from an opening market value of £145.2 million across 10
companies. The unquoted strategy as a whole had an implied return
of -9.9% which detracted -0.7%
from performance. API Holdings was the main detractor in the
unquoted strategy while other emerging markets names had minor
downward valuation revisions largely due to a historically
challenging public market environment in China and Hong
Kong. On the contrary, North American unquoted holdings had
a positive return during the financial year.
ABSOLUTE
CONTRIBUTION BY INVESTMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2024
Principal
contributors to and detractors from net asset value
performance
Top
five contributors
|
Sector
|
Country
|
Contribution
£’000
|
Contribution
per
share
p
|
Eli
Lilly
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
United
States
|
77,301
|
13.2
|
Novo
Nordisk
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
Denmark
|
59,568
|
10.2
|
Intuitive
Surgical
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
United
States
|
49,032
|
8.4
|
Boston
Scientific
|
Healthcare
Equipment & Supplies
|
United
States
|
36,022
|
6.2
|
Tenet
Healthcare
|
Healthcare
Providers & Services
|
United
States
|
32,586
|
5.6
|
Top
five detractors
|
Sector
|
Country
|
Contribution
£’000
|
Contribution
per
share
p
|
Bristol-Myers
Squibb*
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
United
States
|
(12,246)
|
(2.1)
|
uniQure*
|
Biotechnology
|
Netherlands
|
(15,647)
|
(2.7)
|
Eisai
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
Japan
|
(16,628)
|
(2.8)
|
Madrigal
Pharmaceuticals*
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
(16,642)
|
(2.8)
|
Biogen
|
Biotechnology
|
United
States
|
(21,702)
|
(3.7)
|
* Not
held at 31 March 2024
MAJOR
CONTRIBUTORS TO PERFORMANCE
The
pursuit of innovation is the longtime hallmark of the Company.
Nowhere has this been better exemplified than in the study and
development of the incretin class of medicines, better known as the
GLP-1 agonists or the now famous “obesity drugs” Wegovy
(semaglutide) and Zepbound (tirzepatide). The journey of these
medicines began in 1996 when the target was first isolated from the
venom of a Gila monster and is now culminating in unprecedented
benefit for patients with diabetes and obesity and a plethora of
other indications, including cardiovascular disease, heart failure,
chronic kidney disease, liver disease, just to name a
few.
Eli
Lilly can call
themselves one of the true pioneers in this class
of drugs and currently markets the undisputed “best-in-class”
agents in the space. The company’s most recent offering is Mounjaro
(tirzepatide), a dual GLP-1 and “GIP” agonist. Whilst approved for
diabetes in 2022, the company presented additional data in obesity
in 2023, showing weight loss eclipsing 20% and even approaching 25%
in some cases. This dual-agonist therapy has pushed weight loss to
new levels and the company benefited materially from the SELECT
trial, with investors (and the company) assuming that “more is
better”: the cardiovascular benefits shown by Wegovy should extend
to Mounjaro, if not more so, given the superior weight loss
profile. Sales of Mounjaro were annualising at almost $10 billion per annum at the end of 2023. The
year-end approval of Zepbound in obesity was the company’s first
and only approval so far in obesity and the launch has thus been
explosive to start 2024. The combination of data disclosures,
approvals, launches, and anticipation of next generation agents
throughout the fiscal year caused the share price to more than
double in the period. Eli Lilly was the top contributor to
performance for the Company at 3.8%.
The other
true pioneer of the GLP-1 class is the global sales leader in this
space, Novo
Nordisk. 2023
contained a landmark moment for the company with the announcement
and presentation of the SELECT trial, a global study that followed
nearly 18,000 patients over five years to measure the benefits of
taking Wegovy (semaglutide) on cardiovascular disease in obese
patients. The full results were presented at the American Heart
Association congress and simultaneously published in the New
England Journal of Medicine in November
2023. The data was stunning and unequivocally showed a 20%
drop in the risk of a patient suffering a “MACE” event (heart
attack, stroke, or cardiovascular related death) by taking a
once-weekly injection of Wegovy. This data surpassed all investor
expectations and moved this drug from a lifestyle intervention into
a chronic care medicine that can prolong a patient’s life. Sales
growth has been explosive and the company’s total GLP-1 franchise
was annualising close to U.S.$25
billion by the end of 2023, despite supply limitations,
given insatiable demand. With additional manufacturing coming
online in 2024, we expect this exciting growth to continue. With a
share price rise of nearly 60% (sterling) in the period, Novo
Nordisk was the second largest contributor to the Company’s
performance.
With a
seasoned management team, multi-decade head start and superior
robotic technology, we view Intuitive
Surgical as the
best positioned company in the fast-growing
and vastly under-penetrated surgical robotics space. The company
operates as a monopoly with its da Vinci suite of robotic systems,
and we see upcoming competitor system launches as market expansive
as opposed to driving material share gains against Intuitive. Over
the past year, building investor excitement over a potential new
system that should further insulate the company from competition,
as well as accelerating top and bottom-line growth, has driven
strong share performance. Intuitive’s procedure volumes benefited
from rebounding U.S. surgeries and deeper penetration into new
procedure categories and international markets. As procedures
improved, customers required further robotics capacity resulting in
strong system placements as well. The company’s latest system, the
da Vinci 5, was U.S. Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”)
approved in March 2024 and the
roll-out has already begun. While there are still several
unanswered questions about the pace of new system purchases going
forward, it is clear that consensus estimates have yet to fully
reflect the new system launch, and we see significant further share
price appreciation in the coming years.
Boston
Scientific is an
industry leading medical technology company
that develops, manufactures, and markets minimally invasive medical
devices in several high growth end markets including interventional
cardiology, cardiac rhythm management, peripheral interventions,
electrophysiology, neurovascular intervention, endoscopy, urology,
gynecology, and neuromodulation. Over the past year, the company
has successfully driven accelerating organic sales growth ahead of
company guidance and investor expectations on the back of several
new product launches, improving labour issues at U.S. hospitals and
stabilising inflation headwinds. Moreover, investor optimism for
improving future growth has increased in recent months on the back
of positive trial results and subsequent FDA approval for the
company’s next generation device for the treatment of atrial
fibrillation, known as the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System.
While the company has several other new products launching over the
next three years, investors are particularly focused on the pulsed
field ablation device as the multi-billion dollar atrial
fibrillation market could rapidly shift toward this new technology.
We believe the ongoing company algorithm of best-in-class organic
sales growth, differentiated margin expansion potential and ongoing
M&A should result in continued strong and durable EPS growth
for the foreseeable future.
The
Texas-based hospital
operator, Tenet
Healthcare, had an
excellent year, as the most outsized beneficiary of favourable
hospital market trends during the fiscal year. Hospitals spent most
of 2022 managing spikes in labour costs for temporary nurse
staffing, but were set up favourably for 2023 with continued strong
utilisation trends exiting COVID, receding labour costs, and
higher-than-average reimbursement trends in delayed recognition of
higher labour costs. This combination of strong volume, price, and
lower cost drove stellar results for hospitals throughout 2023,
including Tenet Healthcare. Share price gains were also realised by
the company due to the company’s (1) business mix toward
higher-value
ambulatory surgery centres, (2) impressive free cash flow, and (3)
reduced leverage. Finally, we would note the company executed three
significant hospital divestitures in early 2024 at valuations far
beyond their own, which unlocked further value to
shareholders.
MAJOR
DETRACTORS FROM PERFORMANCE
In 2023,
one of the most notable new drug approvals was Leqembi (lecanemab),
the first monoclonal antibody to show unequivocal disease modifying
effects in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease.
This landmark full approval was achieved by Eisai
and their
partner Biogen
in
July 2023 after receiving accelerated
approval in January 2023. However,
the launch has proven to be much more of a challenge than
originally expected. Many factors contributed to the guarded uptake
of Leqembi for prospective patients, including a cognitive test and
physical exam, biomarker-confirmed
diagnosis using cerebral spinal fluid (via lumbar puncture) or
positron emission tomography test, confirmation of ApoE status (for
safety considerations), and enrolment in a federal patient
registry.
Furthermore,
the dosing regimen for Leqembi requires a patient to receive a long
duration intra-venous infusion once every two weeks at an
appropriate infusion centre. Much of the infrastructure for this
was limited or even absent in the first year of the launch, curbing
access to “chair time” for patients to get this novel medication.
As a result, uptake has been modest through the second half of
2023, although it has inflected in early 2024. This situation has
weighed on the share prices of both Eisai and Biogen. Share price
declines were exacerbated when delays arose to the companies’
sub-cutaneous
formulation of Leqembi, a drug regimen that would circumvent the
need for infusion centres and perhaps require less frequent
administration and almost assuredly allow for greater uptake and
utilisation of Leqembi in afflicted patients.
Ultimately,
Eisai and Biogen failed to dose 10,000 patients in the U.S. – their
stated goal at launch – in the financial year ended 31 March 2024. Overall, the sub-optimal launch of
Leqembi resulted in Eisai and Biogen being the largest detractors
to performance in the period. However, key opinion leader feedback
on Leqembi remains supportive; the drug remains an important and
beneficial clinical intervention for patients with Alzheimer’s
disease. We believe sales can and will inflect going forward and
our ongoing investment in these companies remains a lucrative
opportunity.
Madrigal
Pharmaceuticals is a
clinical-stage biopharmaceutical
company based in Pennsylvania,
pursuing novel therapeutics for the treatment of NASH (nonalcoholic steatohepatitis), or the
emerging acronym of MASH (metabolic dysfunction-associated
steatohepatitis). MASH is a severe form of fatty liver disease, a
condition in which the liver builds up excessive fat deposits. Over
time, inflammation, fibrosis, and cirrhosis can occur, leading to
liver failure. With few options to treat this deadly condition and
a huge prevalence globally, the commercial opportunity is large.
Their primary pipeline asset, resmetirom, is a thyroid hormone
β-receptor agonist which is believed to play a role in liver
health. It has shown promising data in late stage, pivotal trials
for this disease. However, the emergence of data for the GLP-1
class of drugs (for the treatment of diabetes and obesity from Eli
Lilly and Novo Nordisk) have shown significant ability to reduce
liver fat accumulation, decrease inflammation, and prevent the
progression of fibrosis in patients with NASH. This finding dramatically hurt investor
sentiment for all NASH players,
including Madrigal. Share price declines were exacerbated by a
change in the CEO and a subsequent financing, which removed the
takeout premium in the stock. Ultimately, with the commercial
opportunity for resmetirom blunted, we exited the stock.
The Netherlands-based gene therapy player,
uniQure,
is a clinical-stage company that focuses on neurological disorders.
Gene therapy, whilst still somewhat nascent, represents an
incredible leap in innovation that has curative properties. The
company’s lead asset is a novel gene therapy, AMT-130, for
Huntington’s disease, an inherited disorder that causes cells in
parts of the brain to gradually degenerate and die, progressively
impacting a person’s functional abilities and results in movement,
cognitive, and psychiatric disorders. However, in June 2023 the company provided a mixed interim
update from its Phase I/II trial for AMT-130, which raised investor
concern over target engagement of the gene therapy. The stock fell
on the news and continued to sell-off. That said, we were
encouraged by the totality of the data, including the early
indication of function benefit across multiple measures.
Ultimately, however, we concluded that the data was not approvable
as is and an additional large, multi-year trial would be required
to satisfy FDA and other regulatory authorities. As a result, we
exited the stock.
The global
pharmaceutical company, Bristol-Myers
Squibb
is well
known for its leadership in oncology, with major
cancer franchises in both immuno-oncology and multiple myeloma.
However, both franchises are aged and have reached or are nearing
expiration of exclusivity. With a declining topline, the company’s
price-to-earnings multiple has compressed to below 10x, creating
the most heavily discounted stock in the large cap pharmaceutical
space. However, this “value play” turned into a “value trap” in
2023. The company has had one of the most productive pipelines in
the industry over the past three years, with new approvals in
immunology, haematology, oncology, and cardiovascular disease.
However, commercial execution of the many new product launches has
underwhelmed, and a top line renaissance has so far failed to
materialise. The share price has subsequently fallen further as has
the multiple. We exited the stock during the first half of the
financial year as our conviction level for a turnaround
deteriorated. The share price continued to move lower in the second
half of the year.
DERIVATIVE
STRATEGY
The
Company has the ability to utilise equity swaps and options as part
of its financial strategy. Equity swaps are a financial tool, a
derivative contract, that allow for synthetic exposure to a basket
of single stocks in an efficient manner and within a well-defined
theme. For example, having 15 to 50+ additional positions at
smaller weights in the portfolio (i.e., non-core) is suboptimal. An
equity swap basket facilitates management of the investment theme
and tracking of performance. The swaps contain multiple single
stock long positions and the basket swap counterparty is Goldman
Sachs, allowing for confidence in forward trading and rebalancing
strategies.
The
Company strategically invested in three customised tactical basket
swaps, targeting growth opportunities in undervalued small and
mid-capitalisation biotech, therapeutic and medical device
companies.
These
baskets were constructed to capitalise on three prevailing themes:
1) investment opportunities possessing considerable potential as
attractive acquisition targets for larger corporations (M&A
swap basket), 2) those exhibiting a favourable risk/reward profile
in light of upcoming clinical catalysts and 3) substantial
valuation dislocations in small and mid-capitalisation medical
device companies brought about by the GLP-1 weight loss
craze.
During the
period under review, the basket swaps gained £32.7 million, which
added 1.6% to performance. The gains were primarily due to the
returns generated by the propriety Biotech M&A Target
Swap.
Throughout
the year, the Company also used single stock equity swaps to access
Chinese and Indian investments, which would otherwise be
inaccessible through more traditional investment methods. During
the period under review, single stock equity swaps contributed £5.0
million to performance, and we remain confident in the long-term
prospects of emerging market securities, particularly those trading
locally in mainland China.
LEVERAGE
STRATEGY
Historically,
the typical leverage level employed by the Company has been in the
mid-to-high teens range. Considering the market volatility during
the past three plus financial years, we have, more recently, used
leverage in a more tactical fashion. In 2023, we have flexed
leverage modestly in response to the economic climate, including in
consideration of a putative recession earlier in the period and
interest rate fluctuations and speculation.
Most
recently, leverage has converged to the low-double digit range, a
reflection of our overall bullishness on the portfolio and a
hopeful turn in biotechnology stocks. Some factors that keep us
from extending leverage even further is the continued uncertainty
with the macro backdrop, further geopolitical risk, the looming
U.S. Presidential election, and relatively higher borrowing costs
at present.
SECTOR
DEVELOPMENTS
Innovation
is one of the major value drivers across the healthcare space. One
of the most objective measures of said innovation is novel product
approvals and 2023 was record setting with 67 approvals across a
wide range of therapeutic categories. More impressive has been the
nearly 400 new drugs approved over the past 7 years. This
marks one of the most productive
periods in the bio-pharmaceutical industry. With standards for new
product approvals ever increasing, this industry-wide
accomplishment stands as one of the most consequential achievements
in the modern era of medicine. Additionally, the recent return of
FDA inspectors to China and other
Asian venues for the first time in two of years is an encouraging
sign for the industry (source: Washington Analysis).
There were
many notable new drugs among the more than five dozen approvals in
2023. As mentioned previously in this report was the landmark
approval of Leqembi (lecanemab), the first monoclonal antibody to
show unequivocal disease modifying effects in the treatment of mild
to moderate Alzheimer’s disease, ushering in a new paradigm in
helping patients and families with this devastating disease.
GSK
presided
over the best (non-COVID)
vaccine launch in history after the approval of Arexvy, indicated
for seniors for active immunisation for the prevention of lower
respiratory tract disease in patients exposed to Respiratory
Syncytial Virus (RSV). Another medicine approved for RSV was
Beyfortus (nirsevimab), a monoclonal antibody designed to prevent
infections in newborns babies. Multiple novel gene therapies were
also approved, including Elevidys for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy
(a genetic problem in producing dystrophin, a protein that protects
muscle fibers from breaking down, a disease found in young boys
which results in the inability to crawl or walk and early death)
and Roctavian for Haemophilia A (a genetic disorder resulting from
a deficit of factor VIII, a vital blood-clotting
protein, that manifests as protracted and excessive bleeding either
spontaneously or secondary to trauma).
A
significant investment theme in 2023 – a theme we expect to
continue into 2024 – is the accelerated pace of mergers and
acquisitions in the therapeutics space, fuelled by a variety of
factors. First, the industry is facing another “patent cliff” with
approximately U.S.$250 billion in
branded sales at risk to generic alternatives commencing in 2025.
Second, the looming drug price headwinds in the U.S. in 2026 (from
the Inflation Reduction Act) is pressuring management teams to
bolster top lines via M&A. Third, historically low
biotechnology valuations have created bargains with many small and
mid-capitalisation
biotechnology companies being taken out at or below their all-time
high price. Finally, and most importantly, innovation in
biotechnology is at all-time highs where 65% of the industry
pipeline and 50% of approved drugs originated from small and
mid-capitalisation biotechnology companies.
This has
created a very positive environment for deal making as high
interest rates and a quiet initial public offering market created
some barriers to access for capital for these companies. The
financial year saw a total of 40-bio-pharmaceutical
takeovers valued at U.S.$115 billion.
The first 14 weeks of calendar 2024 saw14 deals, accelerating the
trend into the new year.
INNOVATION
The
largest sector development continues to be the incredible era of
innovation that the bio-pharmaceutical industry is presiding over.
The global phenomenon of obesity drugs that gripped the market in
2023 actually represents a class of drugs that is nearly 20 years
old, but the continued innovation by the pioneers – Eli Lilly and
Novo Nordisk – pushed the efficacy benefits beyond expectations.
And these companies are not stopping here despite the recent
launches of Wegovy and Zepound, rather, next-generation incretins
are already in late-stage
development. Over the next 6-12 months,
data for “CagriSema” (from Novo Nordisk) and “retatrutide” (from
Eli Lilly) will most likely improve the standard-of-care beyond
what we are seeing today, pushing the life cycle of GLP-1 drugs
(and the various combinations) well into the next decade and
beyond.
Capital
expenditure exceeding U.S.$10 billion
per company is being spent on expanded global manufacturing
capacity in attempt to satisfy the incredible demand for these
drugs. Additionally, both companies are in hot pursuit of oral
incretins as well, to further increase the size and reach of this
market.
Another
key tailwind for this class of drugs is also usage outside of
“diabesity” with impressive clinical data for cardiovascular
disease, heart failure, osteoarthritis, kidney disease, liver, and
sleep apnea already published. Over the coming year we should see
data in other indications as well, such as peripheral arterial
disease and even Alzheimer’s disease. An independent study out of
France even showed
proof-of-concept for a GLP-1 molecule benefiting patients with
Parkinson’s disease. Of course, there are many companies, both
small and large, trying to enter this market and we should see
plenty of rival data in 2024.
As 2023
came to a close, the latest generation GLP-1’s were annualising at
U.S.$40 billion per annum – despite
neither company having fully rolled out Wegovy and Zepbound
globally by year end. Previously, we speculated if this market
could reach U.S.$100 billion in
annual sales by 2030. No more. Now we are contemplating a market
size of potentially U.S.$200 billion
by the decade end.
A
therapeutic class that has been a hot bed of innovation over the
past decade has been oncology. The launch of the first
“immuno-oncology” agent ushered in a revolution in the treatment of
cancer never before seen and despite the bar constantly resetting
higher, the industry continues to deliver as “IO” agents eclipsed
U.S.$45 billion in sales in 2023.
This year, data for next generation IO agents (such as TIGIT, LAG3,
and newer CTLA-4) may prove critical in the continued growth of
this class. Also, novel bi-specific formulations could be game
changing.
Not to be
outdone, but the largest inflection of interest in the oncology
space over the past year has been in the antibody-drug-conjugate
(ADC) class of drugs. ADCs are a form of targeted medicines that
deliver chemotherapy agents directly to cancer cells, destroying
them whilst mostly sparing normal, healthy cells. The pursuit of
ADCs was behind the largest business development deals in 2023,
specifically the U.S.$43 billion
acquisition of Seagen (by Pfizer) and the U.S.$22 billion
development deal between Daiichi Sankyo and Merck.
Radiopharmaceuticals
– the using of localised radiation in the form of injectable
isotopes – was another area of oncology which saw outsized M&A
activity with Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, and Bristol-Myers Squibb all
buying their way in to compete with the industry leader,
Novartis.
With
record new drug approvals and clinical pipelines as full as they
have ever been, this impressive wave of innovation will be
bountiful in 2024 and for years to come. Whilst our focus here has
been on metabolic disease and oncology, by no means are new
achievements in innovation limited to these therapeutic classes.
2023 saw the approval of the very first disease modifying agent for
Alzheimer’s disease (Eisai’s Leqembi). 2023 saw the approval of the
very first vaccine for respiratory syncytial virus (GSK’s Arexvy).
2023 saw the first approval for a gene therapy treatment for
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (Sarepta Therapeutic’s Elevidys). Early
2024 saw the approval of the most sophisticated surgical robotic
suite ever produced (Intuitive Surgical’s da Vince 5). Early 2024
saw the approval of the most efficacious agent to treat pulmonary
arterial hypertension (Merck’s Winrevair). This list goes on and on
– across immunology, inflammation, women’s health, haematology,
endocrinology, respiratory, dermatology, gastrointestinal,
neurology, infectious disease, and vaccines. The next 12-18 months
will bring new and novel data sets across numerous disease states,
advancing the standard of care in medicine, and driving the value
of the sector higher.
Now in our
29th year, the performance from inception remains strong. As we
closed the financial year, the NAV was near all-time highs and our
bullishness into the new financial year remained steadfast.
Overall, the Company’s net asset value performance since inception
(from 28 April 1995), has posted a
4,733% return, or an average of 14.4% per annum through
31 March 2024. This compares to a
benchmark return of 2,438% and 11.9% over the same investment
horizon. This compares to the FTSE All-Share Index return of +636%
and +7.1%. As we enter our 30th year of managing the Company, the
multiple since inception of 48x represents both the strength of the
healthcare industry and the unyielding global demand for healthcare
related goods and services. It also shows what an active manager or
specialist investor can do in healthcare, especially in the face of
a highly idiosyncratic, global sector that possesses many barriers
to understanding the scientific, clinical, regulatory,
technological, and political environment that envelops all of
healthcare.
OUTLOOK
The state
of the healthcare industry remains strong, supported by significant
global demand and new product flow, underpinned by an era of
incredible innovation that has not been seen before. Moreover, the
challenging investment backdrop for healthcare stocks that has been
in place since the easing of the COVID pandemic appears to be in
the past as the recent inflection of share prices across the
industry is much more indicative of the positive fundamentals of
the space. The long-term growth potential of healthcare also
remains strong: global demographics, aging populations, and
constant, persistent demand. Innovation, however, continues to
advance in unparalleled fashion and is the primary driver of value
creation. Innovation is not just in the domain of biotechnology,
but across therapeutics, medical technology, patient services,
analytics, and platform technologies. Together, they are improving
patient care, advancing medical knowledge, and creating new
medicines, with many that now can offer a cure. The productivity in
the therapeutics space continues to be exceptional, with pipelines
the fullest they have ever been, and the number of new drug
approvals at all-time
highs. The inflection in M&A in the space is just one testimony
to this productivity, one that has already continued in
2024.
Overall,
we remain committed to our long-term investment strategy that has
underpinned our impressive track record since inception. There is
no change to our investment philosophy and we eschew change for its
own sake. We look forward to what the year ahead brings, across the
entirety of the healthcare spectrum, as the growth of this industry
continues to create a multitude of exciting investment
opportunities.
Sven H. Borho and Trevor M.
Polischuk
OrbiMed
Capital LLC
Portfolio
Manager
6 June 2024
ENVIRONMENTAL,
SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE AND CLIMATE CHANGE
ORBIMED’S
APPROACH TO ESG
The
Company’s Portfolio Manager, OrbiMed, is guided by its Responsible
Investing Policy in its approach to environmental, social, and
governance (“ESG”). They seek to invest in innovative healthcare
companies that are working towards addressing significant unmet
medical needs, across biopharmaceuticals, medical devices,
diagnostics, and healthcare services sectors, globally.
OrbiMed
believes that there is a high congruence between companies that
seek to act responsibly and those that succeed in building
long-term shareholder value. The Portfolio Manager seeks to
integrate ESG into the overall investment process, with the
objective of maximising investment returns. Investment decisions
are based on a variety of financial and non-financial company
factors, including ESG information. The Portfolio Manager has
appointed a full-time member of staff to the role of Director – ESG
to oversee the integration of ESG analysis.
As a
responsible investor, OrbiMed negatively screens potential
investments and business sectors that may objectively lead to
negative impacts on public health or well-being. They consider
healthcare sector-specific guidance from the Sustainability
Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) to determine material ESG
factors as part of their investment research. Social factors such
as affordability, pricing, access, and safety dominate the
financially material ESG issues for the pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, and medical devices sub-sectors, followed by
governance factors. For companies which do not have manufacturing
and are focused on drug discovery and development, environmental
factors such as greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions are seldom
material. Energy and waste management appear as material factors
for healthcare delivery, and drug retailer sub-sectors, where the
physical footprint of the companies is large. Healthcare and life
sciences sectors are highly regulated, globally. Environmental
regulation, along with quality-related regulation is
well-established across developed markets and emerging markets for
the sector. To that end, OrbiMed considers compliance with local
laws and regulations as one of the factors in its investment
evaluation. Depending on the investment, all or a subset of the ESG
factors that are financially material and relevant are considered
in OrbiMed’s research.
MONITORING
AND ENGAGEMENT
OrbiMed
utilises ESG scores for public equity holdings from third-party
service providers. To supplement the information from the
third-party service providers, OrbiMed also conducts proprietary
analysis on ESG performance. The scores from the third-party
service providers are integrated with OrbiMed’s analysis onto a
business intelligence platform via programming interface, for
regular monitoring.
The
Portfolio Manager also engages on a regular basis with its
portfolio companies through meetings with management, proxy voting,
and in some cases, through board representation.
OrbiMed’s
analysts regularly track ESG information on safety of clinical
trials, drug safety, product safety, ethical marketing, call-backs
and other materially relevant factors. As part of these efforts,
OrbiMed engages with companies directly or through brokers, and
facilitates dialogues and exchange of leading practices among
investors, companies, and other relevant experts on ESG in the
healthcare sector.
Between
1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024, a total of 626 proposals came to
vote within the Company’s portfolio. Of these, 607 were management
proposals and 19 were shareholder proposals.
Proposed
by
|
Total
number of proposals
|
Voted
for
|
Voted
against
|
Votes
abstained
|
Number
of
votes
against
management’s
proposed
response
|
Management
|
607
|
562
|
45
|
0
|
45
|
5Shareholder
|
19
|
2
|
17
|
0
|
2
|
There were
no management proposals referring to ESG that came to vote. Of the
19 shareholder proposals, there was one proposal regarding
diversity, equity and inclusion report and another proposal
regarding impact of extension of patents on access. ‘Access to
medicine’ is one of the material ESG topics listed in the
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board guidance for the
Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals sub-sector.
The
Portfolio Manager provides a quarterly update on ESG to the Board
of the Company.
CLIMATE
CHANGE
As per the
guidance from SASB, climate change in relation to the Company’s own
operations is not a material ESG consideration for biotechnology
and pharmaceutical, medical equipment and supplies, and managed
care sectors. However, Energy management is noted as a material ESG
concern for the healthcare delivery sector. To that end, OrbiMed
includes the scores on energy management for the relevant sectors
in its overall ESG monitoring.
REGULATORY
UPDATE ON ESG
During the
year, regulators around the world remained active on defining and
classifying ESG investing and curbing greenwashing. The UK
Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) released its final Policy
Statement on Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (“SDR”) and
investment labels on 28 November
2023. The UK SDR, which applies to all UK-domiciled
funds, introduces a set of sustainability-related product labels,
product and entity-level disclosures, and anti-greenwashing
rules for sustainable investing in the UK. The product- and
entity-level disclosure requirements outlined in the UK SDR build
on the recommendations of the Task Force for Climate-related
Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”). The anti-greenwashing rules apply
to firms and products from 31 May
2024, while the first annual report for funds with
sustainability labels are due 31 July
2025, and those for non-labelled funds are due 2 December 2025. Entity-level disclosures for
entities with greater than GBP 50
billion AUM are due 2 December
2025, and for those funds with greater than GBP 5 billion AUM are due 2 December 2026, and annually
thereafter.
While the
Portfolio Manager considers ESG issues to be important when
selecting investments, the Company does not have explicit
sustainability objectives in its investment policy and the Company
will not seek to apply a sustainability label under SDR.
Sven H. Borho and Trevor M.
Polischuk
OrbiMed
Capital LLC
Portfolio
Manager
6 June 2024
BUSINESS
REVIEW
The
Strategic Report contains a review of the Company’s business model
and strategy, an analysis of its performance during the financial
year and its future developments and details of the principal risks
and challenges it faces. Its purpose is to inform shareholders in
the Company and help them to assess how the Directors have
performed their duty to promote the success of the
Company.
The
Strategic Report contains certain forward-looking statements. These
statements are made by the Directors in good faith based on the
information available to them up to the date of this report. Such
statements should be treated with caution due to the inherent
uncertainties, including both economic and business risk factors,
underlying such forward-looking information.
BUSINESS
MODEL
Worldwide
Healthcare Trust PLC is an externally managed investment trust and
its shares are listed on the premium segment of the Official List
and traded on the main market of the London Stock
Exchange.
The
purpose of the Company is to achieve a high level of capital growth
for its shareholders by providing a vehicle for investors to gain,
through a single investment, exposure to the global healthcare
sector through a diversified portfolio of shares in pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies and related securities.
The
Company’s strategy is to create value for shareholders by
addressing its investment objective.
As an
externally managed investment trust, all of the Company’s
day-to-day managements and administrative functions are outsourced
to service providers. As a result, the Company has no executive
directors, employees or internal operations. The Company employs
Frostrow Capital LLP (“Frostrow”) as its Alternative Investment
Fund Manager (“AIFM”), OrbiMed Capital LLC (“OrbiMed”) as its
Portfolio Manager, J.P. Morgan Europe Limited as its Depositary and
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC as its Custodian and Prime Broker.
Further details about their appointments can be found in the
Business Review.
The
Company is an investment company within the meaning of Section 833
of the Companies Act 2006 and has been approved by HM Revenue &
Customs as an investment trust (for the purposes of Section 1158 of
the Corporation Tax Act 2010). As a result the Company is not
liable for taxation on capital gains. The Directors have no reason
to believe that approval will not continue to be retained. The
Company is not a close company for taxation purposes.
The Board
is responsible for all aspects of the Company’s affairs, including
the setting of parameters for and the monitoring of the investment
strategy a s well as the review of investment performance and
policy. It also has responsibility for all strategic issues, the
dividend policy, the share issuance and buy-back policy, gearing,
share price and discount/premium monitoring and corporate
governance matters.
CONTINUATION
OF THE COMPANY
A
resolution was passed at the Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) held in
2019 that the Company continues as an investment trust for a
further five year period. In accordance with the Company’s Articles
of Association, shareholders will have an opportunity to vote on
the continuation of the Company at this year’s AGM and every five
years thereafter.
THE
BOARD
The Board
of the Company comprises Doug
McCutcheon (Chair), Sven
Borho, Dr Bina Rawal,
Humphrey van der Klugt, Tim Livett and Jo
Parfrey. All of these Directors served throughout the year.
All are independent non-executive Directors with the exception of
Sven Borho who is not considered to
be independent by the Board.
All
Directors, with the exception of Humphrey
van der Klugt, are seeking re-election by shareholders at
this year’s Annual General Meeting.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
It is the
Company’s policy to pay out dividends to shareholders at least to
the extent required to maintain investment trust status for each
financial year. Such dividends will typically be paid twice a year
by means of an interim dividend and a final dividend.
KEY
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (“KPIs”)
The Board
assesses the Company’s performance in meeting its objectives
against KPI’s as follows. The KPI’s have not changed from the
previous year:
· Net
asset value (“NAV”) per share total return against the
Benchmark;*
· Discount/premium
of share price to NAV per share; and
· Ongoing
charges ratio.*
* Alternative
Performance Measure (See Glossary)
Information
on the Company’s performance is provided in the Statement from the
Chair and the Portfolio Manager’s Review and a record of these
measures is shown in the Strategic Report. Further information can
be found in the Glossary.
NAV per share total return against the
Benchmark
The
Directors regard the Company’s NAV per share total return as being
the overall measure of value delivered to shareholders over the
long term. This reflects both net asset value growth of the Company
and dividends paid to shareholders.
The Board
considers the most important comparator, against which to assess
the NAV per share total return performance, to be the MSCI World
Health Care Index measured on a net total return, sterling adjusted
basis (the ‘Benchmark’). As noted in the Strategic Report, OrbiMed
has flexibility in managing the investments and are not limited by
the makeup of the Benchmark. As a result, investment decisions are
made that differentiate the Company from the Benchmark and
therefore the Company’s performance may also be different from that
of the Benchmark.
A full
description of performance during the year under review is
contained in the Portfolio Manager’s Review.
Share price discount/premium to NAV per
share
The share
price discount/premium to the NAV per share is considered a key
indicator of performance as it impacts the share price total return
of shareholders and can provide an indication of how investors view
the Company’s performance and its Investment Objective.
Ongoing charges*
The Board
continues to be conscious of expenses and works hard to maintain a
balance between good quality service and costs.
As at
31 March 2024 the ongoing charges
figure was 0.9% (2023: 0.8%).
* Alternative
Performance Measure (See Glossary).
PRINCIPAL
SERVICE PROVIDERS
The
principal service providers to the Company are the AIFM, Frostrow,
the Portfolio Manager, OrbiMed, the Custodian and Prime Broker J.P.
Morgan Securities LLC, and the Depositary, J.P. Morgan Europe
Limited. Details of their key responsibilities follow and further
information on their contractual arrangements with the Company are
included in the Report of the Directors.
Alternative investment fund manager
(“AIFM”)
Frostrow
under the terms of its AIFM agreement with the Company
provides, inter
alia, the
following services:
· oversight
of the portfolio management function delegated to OrbiMed Capital
LLC;
· portfolio
administration and valuation;
· risk
management services;
· marketing
and shareholder services;
· share
price discount and premium management;
· administrative
and secretarial services;
· advice
and guidance in respect of corporate governance
requirements;
· maintenance
of the Company’s accounting records;
· maintenance
of the Company’s website;
· preparation
and dispatch of annual and half-year reports (as applicable) and
monthly fact sheets; and
· ensuring
compliance with applicable legal and regulatory
requirements.
During the
year, under the terms of the AIFM Agreement, Frostrow received a
fee as follows:
On market
capitalisation up to £150 million: 0.3%; in the range £150 million
to £500 million: 0.2%; in the range £500 million
to £1 billion: 0.15%; in the range £1 billion to £1.5 billion:
0.125%; over £1.5 billion: 0.075%. In addition, Frostrow receives a
fixed fee per annum of £57,500.
Portfolio manager
OrbiMed
under the terms of its portfolio management agreement with the AIFM
and the Company provides, inter
alia, the
following services:
· the
seeking out and evaluating of investment opportunities;
· recommending
the manner by which monies should be invested, disinvested,
retained or realised;
· advising
on how rights conferred by the investments should be
exercised;
· analysing
the performance of investments made; and
· advising
the Company in relation to trends, market movements and other
matters which may affect the investment objective and policy of the
Company.
OrbiMed
receives a base fee of 0.65% of NAV and a performance fee of 15% of
outperformance against the Benchmark as detailed
in the Report of the Directors.
Depositary, custodian and prime
broker
J.P.
Morgan Europe Limited acts as the Company’s Depositary and J.P.
Morgan Securities LLC as its Custodian and Prime Broker.
J.P.
Morgan Europe Limited, as Depositary, must take reasonable care to
ensure that the Company is managed in accordance with the Financial
Conduct Authority’s Investment Funds Sourcebook, the AIFMD and the
Company’s Articles of Association. The Depositary must in the
context of this role act honestly, fairly, professionally,
independently and in the interests of the Company and its
shareholders.
The
Depositary receives a variable fee based on the size of the Company
as set out in the Report of the Directors.
J.P.
Morgan Europe Limited has discharged certain of its liabilities as
Depositary to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. Further details of this
arrangement are set out in the Report of the Directors. J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC, as Custodian and Prime Broker, provides the
following services under its agreement with the Company:
· safekeeping
and custody of the Company’s investments and cash;
· processing
of transactions;
· provision
of an overdraft facility. Assets up to 140% of the value of the
outstanding overdraft can be taken as collateral; and
· foreign
exchange services.
AIFM
AND PORTFOLIO MANAGER EVALUATION AND
RE-APPOINTMENT
The
performance of the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager is reviewed
continuously by the Board and the Management Engagement &
Remuneration Committee (the “Committee”) with a formal evaluation
being undertaken each year. As part of this process, the Committee
monitors the services provided by the AIFM and the Portfolio
Manager and receives regular reports and views from them. The
Committee also receives comprehensive performance measurement
reports to enable it to determine whether or not the performance
objectives set by the Board have been met. The Committee reviewed
the appropriateness of the appointment of the AIFM and the
Portfolio Manager in March 2024 with
a positive recommendation being made to the Board.
The Board
believes the continuing appointment of the AIFM and the Portfolio
Manager is in the interests of shareholders as a whole. In coming
to this decision, it took into consideration, inter alia,
the following:
· the
quality of the service provided and the depth of experience of the
company management, company secretarial, administrative and
marketing team that the AIFM allocates to the management of the
Company; and
· the
quality of the service provided and the quality and depth of
experience allocated by the Portfolio Manager to the management of
the portfolio and the long-term performance of the portfolio in
absolute terms and by reference to the Benchmark.
RISK
MANAGEMENT
The Board
is responsible for the management of risks faced by the Company.
Through delegation to the Audit & Risk Committee, the Board has
established procedures to manage risk, to review the Company’s
internal control framework and establish the level and nature of
the principal risks the Company is prepared to accept in order to
achieve its long-term
strategic objective. At least twice a year the Audit & Risk
Committee carries out a robust assessment of the principal risks
and uncertainties with the assistance of Frostrow (the Company’s
AIFM) identifying the principal risks faced by the Company. These
principal risks and the ways they are managed or mitigated are
detailed on the following pages.
Principal
risks and uncertainties
|
Mitigation
|
Market
risks
|
|
By the
nature of its activities and Investment Objective, the Company’s
portfolio is exposed to fluctuations in market prices (from both
individual security prices and foreign exchange rates) and due to
exposure to the global healthcare sector, it is expected to have
higher volatility than the wider market. As such investors should
be aware that by investing in the Company they are exposing
themselves to market risks and those additional risks specific to
the sectors in which the Company invests, such as political
interference in drug pricing.
In
addition, OrbiMed’s approach is expected to lead to performance
that will deviate from that of comparators, including both market
indices and other investment companies investing in
healthcare.
The
Company also uses leverage (both through derivatives and gearing)
the effect of which is to amplify the gains or losses the Company
experiences.
|
To manage
these risks the Board and the AIFM have appointed OrbiMed to manage
the portfolio within the remit of the investment objective and
policy, and imposed various limits and guidelines. These limits
ensure that the portfolio is diversified, reducing the risks
associated with individual stocks, and that the maximum exposure
(through derivatives and an overdraft facility) is limited. The
compliance with those limits and guidelines is monitored daily by
Frostrow and OrbiMed and reported to the Board monthly.
In
addition, OrbiMed reports at each Board meeting on the performance
of the Company’s portfolio, which encompasses the rationale for
stock selection decisions, the make-up of the portfolio, potential
new holdings and, derivative activity and strategy (further details
on derivatives can be found in note 16).
The
Company does not currently hedge its currency exposure.
|
Geopolitical/regulatory
and macro economic risk
|
|
Macro
events may have an adverse impact on the Company’s performance by
causing exchange rate volatility, changes in tax or regulatory
environments, and/or a fall in market prices. Emerging markets,
which a portion of the portfolio is exposed to, can be subject to
greater political uncertainty and price volatility than developed
markets.
|
While such
events are outside the control of the Company the Board reviews
regularly, and discusses with the Portfolio Manager, the wider
economic and political environment, along with the portfolio
exposure and the execution of the investment policy against the
long-term objectives of the Company. The ongoing tensions in the
Asia Pacific Region and also the instability caused by the war in
the Ukraine have featured in these discussions. The Portfolio
Manager’s risk team perform systematic risk analysis, including
country and industry specific risk monitoring.
The Board
monitors regulatory developments but relies on the services of its
external advisers to ensure compliance with applicable law and
regulations.
The Board
has appointed a specialist investment trust AIFM and Company
Secretary who provides industry and regulatory updates at each
Board meeting.
|
Unquoted
investment risk
|
|
The
Company’s risk could be increased by its investment in unquoted
companies. These investments may be more difficult to buy, sell or
value, so changes in their valuations may be greater than for
listed assets. The valuation of unquoted investments requires
considerable judgement as explained in Note1(a) and as such
realisations may be materially lower than the value as estimated by
the Company. Particular events, outside the control of the Company,
may also have a significant impact on the valuation and
considerable uncertainty may exist around the potential future
outcomes for each investment.
|
To
mitigate this risk the Board and AIFM have set a limit of 10% of
the portfolio, calculated at the time of investment, that can be
held in unquoted investments and have established a robust and
consistent valuation policy and process as set out in Note 1(b),
which is in line with UK GAAP requirements and the International
Private Equity and Venture Capital (“IPEV”) Guidelines. The Board
also monitors the performance of these investments compared to the
additional risks involved.
|
Investment
management key person risk
|
|
There is a
risk that the individuals responsible for managing the Company’s
portfolio may leave their employment or may be prevented from
undertaking their duties.
|
The Board
manage this risk by:
· appointing
OrbiMed, who operate a team environment such that the loss of any
individual should not impact on service levels;
· receiving
reports from OrbiMed at each Board meeting, such report includes
any significant changes in the make-up of the team supporting the
Company;
· meeting
the wider team, outside the designated lead managers, at OrbiMed’s
offices and encouraging the participation of the wider OrbiMed team
in investor updates; and
· delegating
to the Management Engagement & Remuneration Committee
responsibility to perform an annual review of the service received
from OrbiMed, including, inter alia, the team supporting the lead
managers and succession planning.
|
Counterparty
risk
|
|
In
addition to market and foreign currency risks, discussed above, the
Company is exposed to risk arising from the use of counterparties.
If a counterparty were to fail, the Company could be adversely
affected through either delay in settlement or loss of
assets.
The most
significant counterparty the Company is exposed to is J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC which is responsible for the safekeeping of the
Company’s assets and provides the overdraft facility to the
Company. As part of the arrangements with J.P. Morgan Securities
LLC they may take assets, up to 140% of the value of the drawn
overdraft, as collateral and have first priority security interest
or lien over all of the Company’s assets. Such assets taken as
collateral may be used, loaned, sold, rehypothecated or transferred
by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. Although the Company maintains the
economic benefit from the ownership of those assets it does not
hold any of the rights associated with those assets. Any of the
Company’s assets taken as collateral are not covered by the custody
arrangements provided by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The Company
is, however, afforded protection in accordance with SEC rules and
U.S. legislation equal to the value of the assets that have been
rehypothecated.
|
This risk
is managed by the Board through:
· reviews
of the arrangements with, and services provided by, the Depositary
and the Custodian and Prime Broker to ensure that the security of
the Company’s assets is being maintained. Legal opinions are
sought, where appropriate, as part of this review. Also, the Board
regularly monitors the credit rating of the Company’s Custodian and
Prime Broker;
· monitoring
of the assets taken as collateral (further details can be found in
note 16);
· reviews
of OrbiMed’s approved list of counterparties, the Company’s use of
those counterparties and OrbiMed’s process for monitoring, and
adding to, the approved counterparty list;
· monitoring
of counterparties, including reviews of internal control reports
and credit ratings, as appropriate;
· by
primarily investing in markets that operate DVP (Delivery Versus
Payment) settlement. The process of DVP mitigates the risk of
losing the principal of a trade during the settlement process;
and
· J.P.
Morgan Securities LLC is subject to regular monitoring by J.P.
Morgan Europe Limited, the Company’s Depositary, and the Board
receives regular reports from J.P. Morgan Europe
Limited.
|
Service
provider risk
|
|
The
Company is reliant on the systems of its service providers and as
such disruption to, or a failure of, those systems (including, for
example, as a result of cyber-crime or a ‘black swan’ event) could
lead to a failure to comply with law and regulations leading to
reputational damage and/ or financial loss.
|
To manage
these risks the Board:
· receives
a monthly compliance report from Frostrow, which includes,
inter
alia, details
of compliance with applicable laws and regulations;
· reviews
internal control reports, key policies, including measures taken to
combat cyber security issues, and also the disaster recovery
procedures of its service providers;
· maintains
a risk matrix with details of risks the Company is exposed to, the
controls relied on to manage those risks and the frequency of the
controls operation;
· receives
updates on pending changes to the regulatory and legal environment
and progress towards the Company’s compliance with these;
and
· has
considered the increased risk of cyber-attacks and received reports
and assurance at meetings with its service providers where the
information security controls in place were reviewed.
|
ESG
related risks
|
|
Both the
Board and the Portfolio Manager recognise the importance of having
a coherent ESG policy. There is a risk that investing in companies
that disregard ESG factors will have a negative impact on
investment returns and also that the Company itself may become
unattractive to investors if ESG is not appropriately considered in
the Portfolio Manager’s decision making process.
|
The
Portfolio Manager provides ESG reports at each Board meeting,
highlighting examples where ESG issues influenced investment
decisions and/or led to engagement with an investee company. The
Portfolio Manager also produces a quarterly ESG update.
The Board
ensures that the Portfolio Manager’s ESG approach is in line with
standards elsewhere and the Board’s expectations. A summary of the
Portfolio Manager’s approach to Responsible Investing can be found
in the Strategic Report.
|
Shareholder
relations and share price performance risk
|
|
The
Company is also exposed to the risk, particularly if the investment
strategy and approach are unsuccessful, that the Company may
underperform resulting in the Company becoming unattractive to
investors and a widening of the share price discount to NAV per
share. Also, falls in stock markets and the risk of a global
recession, are likely to adversely affect the performance of the
Company’s shares.
|
In
managing this risk the Board:
· reviews
the Company’s Investment Objective in relation to market, and
economic, conditions and the operation of the Company’s
peers;
· discusses
at each Board meeting the Company’s future development and
strategy;
· reviews
the shareholder register at each Board meeting;
· actively
seeks to promote the Company to current and potential investors;
and
· has
implemented a discount/premium control mechanism.
The Board
undertakes a regular review of the Company’s share price compared
to the NAV per share. Further information can be found in the
Business Review. Company promotional activities have been delegated
to Frostrow, who report to the Board at each Board meeting on these
activities.
|
Emerging risks
The
Company has carried out a robust assessment of the Company’s
emerging and principal risks and the procedures in place to
identify emerging risks are described below. The International Risk
Governance Council definition of an ‘emerging’ risk is one that is
new, or is a familiar risk in a new or unfamiliar context or under
new context conditions (re-emerging).
Failure to identify emerging risks may cause reactive actions
rather than being proactive and, in worst case, could cause the
Company to become unviable or otherwise fail or force the Company
to change its structure, objective or strategy.
The Audit
& Risk Committee reviews a risk schedule at its half-yearly
meetings. Emerging risks are discussed in detail as part of this
process and also throughout the year to try to ensure that emerging
(as well as known) risks are identified and, so far as practicable,
mitigated.
During the
year the Audit & Risk Committee discussed how artificial
intelligence (AI) might impact the Company itself and also its
portfolio companies in the future. It was agreed that these
developments should be regarded as an opportunity as well as a
possible threat.
COMPANY
PROMOTION
The
Company has appointed Frostrow to provide marketing and investor
relations services, in the belief that a well-marketed
investment company is more likely to grow over time, have a more
diverse and stable shareholder register and will trade at a
superior rating to its peers.
Frostrow
actively promotes the Company in the following ways:
Engaging
regularly with institutional investors, discretionary wealth
managers and a range of execution-only
platforms:
Frostrow
regularly talks and meets with institutional investors,
discretionary wealth managers and execution-only platform providers
to discuss the Company’s strategy and to understand any issues and
concerns, covering both investment and corporate governance
matters;
Making
Company information more accessible: Frostrow
works to
raise the profile of the Company by targeting key groups within the
investment community, holding annual investment seminars,
overseeing PR output and managing the Company’s website and wider
digital offering, including Portfolio Manager videos and social
media;
Disseminating
key Company information: Frostrow
performs
the Investor Relations function on behalf of the Company and
manages the investor database. Frostrow produces all key corporate
documents, distributes monthly Fact Sheets, Annual Reports and
updates from OrbiMed on portfolio and market developments;
and
Monitoring
market activity, acting as a link between the Company, shareholders
and other stakeholders: Frostrow
maintains
regular contact with sector broker analysts and other research and
data providers, and conducts periodic investor perception surveys,
liaising with the Board to provide up-to-date and accurate
information on the latest shareholder and market
developments.
DISCOUNT/PREMIUM
CONTROL
The Board
undertakes a regular review of the level of discount/premium and
consideration is given to ways in which share price performance may
be enhanced, including the effectiveness of marketing, share
issuance and share buybacks, where appropriate.
It is the
Board’s policy to buy back the Company’s shares if the share price
discount to the net asset value per share exceeds 6% on an ongoing
basis. Shares repurchased are held as treasury shares. Treasury
shares can be sold back to the market at a later date at a premium
to the cum-income
net asset value per share (See Glossary). Shareholders should note,
however, that it remains very possible for the discount to be
greater than 6% for extended periods of time particularly when
sentiment towards the Company, the sector and to investment trusts
generally remains poor.
While
buybacks may prove unable to prevent the discount from widening,
they also enhance the net asset value per share for remaining
shareholders and go some way to dampening discount volatility which
can adversely affect investors’ risk adjusted returns.
At times
when there are unsatisfied buying orders for the Company’s shares
in the market, the Company has the ability to issue new shares or
to re-issue treasury shares at a small premium to the cum income
net asset value per share. This acts as an effective share price
premium management tool.
Details of
share issuance and share buybacks are set out in the Report of the
Directors.
SOCIAL,
HUMAN RIGHTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The
Directors, through the Company’s Portfolio Manager, encourage
companies in which investments are made to adhere to best practice
with regard to corporate governance. In light of the nature of the
Company’s business there are no relevant human rights issues and
the Company does not have a human rights policy.
The
Company recognises that social and environmental issues can have an
effect on some of its investee companies.
The
Company is an investment trust and so its own direct environmental
impact is minimal. As an externally- managed investment trust, the
Company does not have any employees or maintain any premises, nor
does it undertake any manufacturing or other physical operations
itself. All its operational functions are outsourced to third party
service providers. Therefore, the Company has no material, direct
impact on the environment or any particular community and the
Company itself has no environmental, human rights, social or
community policies. The Board of Directors consists of six
Directors, four of whom are resident in the UK, one in Canada and one in the U.S. The Board holds the
majority of its regular meetings in the UK, with usually one
meeting held each year in New
York, and has a policy that travel, as far as possible, is
minimal, thereby minimising the Company’s greenhouse gas emissions.
Further details concerning greenhouse gas emissions can be found
within the Report of the Directors. Video conferencing has proved
to be a very effective way of holding meetings, and this medium
continues to be used alongside in person meetings.
The
Portfolio Manager engages with the Company’s underlying investee
companies in relation to their corporate governance practices and
the development of their policies on social, community and
environmental matters.
INTEGRITY
AND BUSINESS ETHICS
The
Company is committed to carrying out business in an honest and fair
manner with a zero-tolerance approach to bribery, tax evasion and
corruption. As such, policies and procedures are in place to
prevent this. In carrying out its activities, the Company aims to
conduct itself responsibly, ethically and fairly, including in
relation to social and human rights issues.
The
Company believes that high standards of ESG make good business
sense and have the potential to protect and enhance investment
returns. The Portfolio Manager’s investment criteria provide that
ESG and ethical issues are taken into account and best practice is
encouraged by the Board. The Board’s expectations are that its
principal service providers have appropriate governance policies in
place.
TASKFORCE
FOR CLIMATE-RELATED FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
(“TCFD”)
The
Company notes the TCFD recommendations on climate-related financial
disclosures. The Company is an investment trust with no employees,
internal operations or property and, as such, it is exempt from the
Listing Rules requirement to report against the TCFD
framework.
GOING
CONCERN
The
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.
The Directors consider this is the appropriate basis as the Company
has adequate resources to continue in operational existence for the
foreseeable future, being taken as 12 months after approval of the
financial statements. The Company’s shareholders are asked every
five years to vote for the continuation of the Company, this will
next be put to shareholders at this year’s Annual General Meeting.
The content of the Company’s portfolio, trading activity, the
Company’s cash balances and revenue forecasts, and the trends and
factors likely to affect the Company’s performance are reviewed and
discussed at each Board meeting. The Board has considered a
detailed assessment of the Company’s ability to meet its
liabilities as they fall due, including stress and liquidity tests
which modelled the effects of substantial falls in markets and
significant reductions in market liquidity, on the Company’s net
asset value, its cash flows and its expenses. Further information
is provided in the Audit & Risk Committee Report.
Based on
the information available to the Directors at the date of this
report, including the results of these stress tests, the
conclusions drawn in the Viability Statement, the Company’s cash
balances, and the liquidity of the Company’s listed investments,
the Directors are satisfied that the Company has adequate financial
resources to continue in operation for at least the next 12 months
and that, accordingly, it is appropriate to continue to adopt the
going concern basis in preparing the financial
statements.
VIABILITY
STATEMENT
The
Directors have assessed the Company’s position and prospects,
including consideration of the Company’s principal risks, and have
formed a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to
continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due
over the next five financial years. The Board has chosen a
five-year horizon in view of both the long-term outlook adopted by
the Portfolio Manager when making investment decisions and also the
investment horizon adopted by investors.
To make
this assessment, the Audit & Risk Committee has considered the
Company’s financial position, its ability to liquidate the
portfolio and to meet its liabilities as they fall due. The
following points were noted:
· The
portfolio is comprised principally of investments traded on major
international stock exchanges. Based on recent market volumes 96.0%
of the current portfolio could be liquidated within 5 trading days.
There is no current expectation that the nature of the investments
held within the portfolio will be significantly different in
future.
· The
Board has considered the viability of the Company under various
scenarios, including periods of stock market and economic
volatility, and concluded that it would expect to be able to ensure
the financial stability of the Company due, in large part, to
having a diversified portfolio comprising principally of listed and
readily realisable assets. As illustrated in note 16 to the
financial statements, the Board has considered the following risks
with appropriate sensitivity analysis having been undertaken:
market risk (including foreign currency risk, interest rate risk
and other price risk), liquidity risk and credit risk.
With an
ongoing charges ratio of 0.9%, the expenses of the Company are
predictable and modest in comparison with the assets and there are
no known capital commitments which would alter that
position.
· The
Company has an overdraft facility which can be used to meet its
liabilities. Details of the Company’s current liabilities as at
31 March 2024 are set out in notes 10
and 12 to the financial statements.
· The
Company has no employees. Therefore, it does not have redundancy or
other employment related liabilities or
responsibilities.
The Audit
& Risk Committee, in addition to considering the potential
impact of the Company’s principal risks and various plausible
downside scenarios, has made the following assumptions in
considering the Company’s longer-term viability:
· There
will continue to be demand for investment trusts;
· The
Portfolio Manager will continue to adopt a long-term view when
making investments;
· The
Company invests principally in the securities of listed companies
traded on international stock exchanges to which investors will
wish to continue to have exposure;
· Shareholders
will vote for the continuation of the Company at this year’s Annual
General Meeting and at five-year intervals thereafter. Following a
programme of extensive engagement with the Company’s principal
shareholders, there is an expectation that the resolution will be
passed.
· Due
to the closed-ended nature of the Company, unlike open-ended funds,
it does not have to sell investments when shareholders wish to sell
their shares;
· The
Company will continue to be able to fund share buybacks when
required. The Company bought back 80,265,298 shares in the year
under review at a total cost of £252.7 million. It had
shareholders’ funds in excess of £2,081.2 million at the year-end;
and
· The
long-term performance of the Company will continue to be
satisfactory.
STAKEHOLDER
INTERESTS AND BOARD DECISION-MAKING (SECTION 172 OF THE COMPANIES
ACT 2006)
The
Directors are required to explain more fully how they have
discharged their duty under s172 of the Companies Act 2006 in
promoting the success of the Company for the benefit of the members
as a whole. This includes the likely consequences of the Directors’
decisions in the long term and how they have taken wider
stakeholders’ needs into account.
The
Directors aim to act fairly between the Company’s stakeholders. The
Board’s approach to shareholder relations is summarised in the
Corporate Governance Report. The Statement from the Chair provides
an explanation of actions taken by the Directors during the year to
achieve the Board’s long-term aim of ensuring that the Company’s
shares trade at a price close to the NAV per share.
As an
externally managed investment trust, the Company has no employees,
customers, operations or premises. Therefore, the Company’s key
stakeholders (other than its shareholders) are considered to be its
service providers. The need to foster business relationships with
the service providers and maintain a reputation for high standards
of business conduct are central to the Directors’ decision-making
as the Board of an externally managed investment trust. The
Directors believe that fostering constructive and collaborative
relationships with the Company’s service providers will assist in
their promotion of the success of the Company for the benefit of
all shareholders.
The Board
engages with representatives from its service providers throughout
the year. Representatives from OrbiMed and Frostrow are in
attendance at each Board meeting. As the Portfolio Manager and the
AIFM respectively, the services they provide are fundamental to the
long-term success and smooth running of the Company. The Statement
from the Chair and the Business Review, describe relevant decisions
taken during the year relating to OrbiMed and Frostrow. Further
details about the matters discussed in Board meetings and the
relationship between OrbiMed and the Board are set out in the
Corporate Governance Report.
Representatives
from other service providers are asked to attend Board meetings
when deemed appropriate.
Further
details are set out overleaf.
Stakeholder
group
|
The
benefits of engagement with the Company's
stakeholders
|
How
the board, the portfolio manager and the AIFM have engaged with the
Company’s stakeholders
|
Investors
|
Clear
communication of the Company’s strategy and the performance against
the Company’s objective can help the share price trade at a
narrower discount or a premium to its net asset value per share
which benefits shareholders.
New shares
can be issued to meet demand without net asset value per share
dilution to existing shareholders. Increasing the size of the
Company can benefit liquidity as well as spread costs.
Share
buybacks are undertaken at the discretion of the
Directors.
|
The
Portfolio Manager and Frostrow, on behalf of the Board, complete a
programme of investor relations throughout the year.
In advance
of this year’s continuation vote, the Chair of the Board, the
Portfolio Manager and Frostrow undertook a series of meetings with
the Company’s principal shareholders. The purpose of these meetings
was two fold: to give holders the opportunity to raise issues of a
corporate governance nature and to discuss any portfolio related
matters.
An
analysis of the Company’s shareholder register is provided to the
Directors at each Board meeting along with marketing reports from
Frostrow. The Board reviews and considers the marketing plans on a
regular basis. Reports from the Company’s broker are submitted to
the Board on investor sentiment and industry issues.
Key
mechanisms of engagement include:
· The
Annual General Meeting, where the Portfolio Manager provides an
update on the Company’s performance and strategy. This is followed
by a question and answer section.
· The
Company’s website which hosts reports, articles and insights, and
monthly fact sheets.
· One-on-one
and group investor meetings.
· Should
any significant votes be cast against a resolution proposed at the
Annual General Meeting the Board will engage with
shareholders.
· The
Board will explain in its announcement of the results of the Annual
General Meeting any actions it intends to take to consult
shareholders in order to understand the reasons behind significant
votes against.
· Following
any consultation, an update would be published no later than six
months after the Annual General Meeting and the Annual Report will
detail the impact shareholder feedback has had on any decisions the
Board has taken and any actions or resolutions proposed.
|
What
were the key areas of engagement?
|
What
actions were taken, including main decisions?
|
Key
areas of engagement with investors
· Ongoing
dialogue with shareholders concerning the strategy of the Company,
performance and the portfolio.
|
· The
Portfolio Manager and Frostrow meet regularly with shareholders and
potential investors to discuss the Company’s strategy, performance
and portfolio. The Chair of the Board also met with key
shareholders during the year to discuss corporate governance
matters and also the Company’s investment strategy.
Frostrow
and the Portfolio Manager engage with retail investors through a
number of different channels:
(i) The
Company’s website, which is maintained by Frostrow, contains
articles, webinars and quarterly updates;
(ii) A
distribution list of shareholders (retail and professional) which
is maintained by Frostrow and is used to communicate with investors
on a regular basis;
(iii) The
Portfolio Manager provides annual presentations online – (webcasts)
and offline (Annual General Meeting), which shareholders are able
to attend and participate in; and
(iv) Frostrow
ensures that the Company is available through a wide range of
leading execution only platforms.
|
Stakeholder
group
|
The
benefits of engagement with the Company's
stakeholders
|
How
the board, the portfolio manager and the AIFM have engaged with the
Company’s stakeholders
|
Portfolio
Manager
|
Engagement
with the Company’s Portfolio Manager is necessary to evaluate their
performance against the Company’s stated strategy and to understand
any risks or opportunities this may present. The Board ensures that
the Portfolio Manager’s environmental, social and governance
(“ESG”) approach is in line with standards elsewhere and the
Board’s expectations.
Engagement
also helps ensure that the Portfolio Manager’s fees are closely
monitored and remain competitive.
Gaining a
deeper understanding of the portfolio companies and their
strategies as well as incorporating consideration of ESG factors
into the investment process assists in understanding and mitigating
risks of an investment as well as identifying future potential
opportunities.
|
The Board
met regularly with the Company’s Portfolio Manager throughout the
year. The Board also receives monthly performance and compliance
reporting.
The
Portfolio Manager’s attendance at each Board meeting provides the
opportunity for the Portfolio Manager and Board to further
reinforce their mutual understanding of what is expected from both
parties.
The Board
encourages the Company’s Portfolio Manager to engage with companies
and in doing so expects ESG issues to be an important
consideration.
The Board
receives an update on Frostrow’s engagement activities by way of a
dedicated report at Board meetings and at other times during the
year as required.
|
Service
Providers
|
The
Company contracts with third parties for other services including:
custody, company secretarial, accounting & administration and
registrar. The Company ensures that the third parties to whom the
services have been outsourced complete their roles in line with
their service level agreements thereby supporting the Company in
its success and ensuring compliance with its
obligations.
|
The Board
and Frostrow, acting in its capacity as AIFM, engage regularly with
other service providers both in one-to-one meetings and via regular
written reporting. This regular interaction provides an environment
where topics, issues and business development needs can be dealt
with efficiently and collegiately.
The Board
together with Frostrow also carried out a review of the service
providers’ business continuity plans and additional cyber security
provisions.
The review
of the performance of the Portfolio Manager and Frostrow is a
continuous process carried out by the Board and the Management
Engagement & Remuneration Committee with a formal evaluation
being undertaken annually.
|
What
were the key areas of engagement?
|
What
actions were taken, including main decisions?
|
Key
areas of engagement with the Portfolio Manager on an ongoing basis
are portfolio composition, performance, outlook and business
updates.
|
• Regular
review of the performance and make-up of the investment
portfolio.
• The
integration of ESG factors into the Portfolio Manager’s investment
processes.
|
• The
Board engaged with the Portfolio Management team to discuss the
Company’s overall performance as well as developments in individual
portfolio companies and wider macroeconomic
developments.
• The
Portfolio Manager reports on ESG issues at each Board
meeting.
|
Key
areas of engagement with Service Providers
|
|
• The
Directors have frequent engagement with the Company’s other service
providers through the annual cycle of reporting. This engagement is
completed with the aim of maintaining an effective working
relationship and oversight of the services provided.
|
• No
specific action required as the reviews of the Company’s service
providers, have been positive and the Directors believe their
continued appointment is in the best interests of the
Company.
|
Key
areas of engagement with the broker
|
|
• The
Board is cognisant that the trading of the Company‘s shares at a
persistent and significant discount or premium to the prevailing
NAV per share is not in the interests of shareholders.
|
• Throughout
the year the Board closely monitored the Company’s discount/premium
to NAV per share and received regular updates from the broker.
80,265,298 shares
were bought back during the year, and a further 10,677,869 shares
were bought back since the year-end to 5 June 2024. No new shares
were issued during the year, nor following the year-end to
5 June
2024. (Please see the Statement from the Chair for further
information.)
|
PERFORMANCE
AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
A review
of the Company’s year, its performance and the outlook for the
Company can be found in the Chair’s Statement and in the Portfolio
Manager’s Review.
The
Company’s overall strategy remains unchanged.
LOOKING
TO THE FUTURE
The Board
concentrates its attention on the Company’s investment performance
and OrbiMed’s investment approach and on factors that may have an
effect on this approach. Marketing reports are given to the Board
at each board meeting by the AIFM which include how the Company
will be promoted and details of planned communications with
existing and potential shareholders. The Board is regularly updated
by the AIFM on wider investment trust industry issues and
discussions are held at each Board meeting concerning the Company’s
future development and strategy.
A review
of the Company’s year, its performance since the year-end and the
outlook for the Company can be found in the Chair’s Statement and
in the Portfolio Manager’s Review. It is expected that the
Company’s Strategy will remain unchanged in the coming
year.
ALTERNATIVE
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The
Financial Statements set out the required statutory reporting
measures of the Company’s financial performance. In addition, the
Board assesses the Company’s performance against a range of
criteria which are viewed as particularly relevant for investment
trusts, which are explained in greater detail in the Strategic
Report, under the heading ‘Key Performance Indicators’.
By order
of the Board
Frostrow
Capital LLP
Company
Secretary
6 June 2024
REPORT
OF THE DIRECTORS
The
Directors present their Annual Report on the affairs of the Company
together with the audited financial statements and the Independent
Auditors’ Report for the year ended 31 March
2024.
SIGNIFICANT
AGREEMENTS
Details of
the services provided under these agreements are included in the
Strategic Report.
Alternative
investment fund management agreement
Frostrow
is the designated AIFM for the Company on the terms and subject to
the conditions of the alternative investment fund management
agreement between the Company and Frostrow (the “AIFM
Agreement”).
The notice
period on the AIFM Agreement with Frostrow is 12 months,
termination can be initiated by either party.
Details of
the fee payable to Frostrow can be found in the Business
Review.
Portfolio
management agreement
Under the
AIFM Agreement Frostrow has delegated the portfolio management
function to OrbiMed, under a portfolio management agreement between
it, the Company and Frostrow (the “Portfolio Management
Agreement”).
OrbiMed
receives a periodic fee equal to 0.65% p.a. of the Company’s NAV
and a performance fee as set out in the Performance Fee section
below. Its agreement with the Company may be terminated by either
party giving notice of not less than 12 months.
Performance
fee
Dependent
on the level of long-term outperformance of the Company, OrbiMed is
entitled to a performance fee. The performance fee is calculated by
reference to the amount by which the Company’s NAV performance has
outperformed the Benchmark (see inside front cover for details of
the Benchmark).
The fee is
calculated quarterly by comparing the cumulative performance of the
Company’s NAV with the cumulative performance of the Benchmark
since the launch of the Company in 1995. The performance fee
amounts to 15.0% of any outperformance over the Benchmark.
Provision is made within the daily NAV per share calculation as
required and in accordance with generally accepted accounting
standards.
In order
to ensure that only sustained outperformance is rewarded, at each
quarterly calculation date any performance fee payable is based on
the lower of:
(i) The
cumulative outperformance of the portfolio over the Benchmark as at
the quarter end date; and
(ii) The
cumulative outperformance of the portfolio over the Benchmark as at
the corresponding quarter end date in the previous year
less any
cumulative outperformance on which a performance fee has already
been paid.
The effect
of this is that outperformance has to be maintained for a twelve
month period before it is paid.
As at
31 March 2024 no performance fees
were accrued or payable (31 March
2023: £nil).
Depositary
agreement
The
Company appointed J.P. Morgan Europe Limited (the “Depositary”) as
its Depositary in accordance with the AIFMD on the terms and
subject to the conditions of the Depositary agreement between the
Company, Frostrow and the Depositary (the “Depositary
Agreement”).
Under the
terms of the Depositary Agreement the Company has agreed to pay the
Depositary a fee calculated at 1.75bp on net assets up to £150
million, 1.50 bps on net assets between £150 million and £300
million, 1.00bps on net assets between £300 million and £500
million and 0.50bps on net assets above £500 million.
The
Depositary has delegated the custody and safekeeping of the
Company’s assets to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the “Custodian and
Prime Broker”) pursuant to a delegation agreement between the
Company, Frostrow, the Depositary and the Custodian and Prime
Broker (the “Delegation Agreement”).
The
Delegation Agreement transfers the Depositary’s liability for the
loss of the Company’s financial instruments held in custody by the
Custodian and Prime Broker to the Custodian and Prime Broker as
permitted by the AIFMD. The Company has consented to the transfer
and reuse of its assets by the Custodian and Prime Broker (known as
“rehypothecation”) in accordance with the terms of an institutional
account agreement between the Company, the Custodian and Prime
Broker and certain other J.P. Morgan entities (as defined
therein).
Prime
brokerage agreement
The
Company appointed J.P. Morgan Securities LLC on the terms and
subject to the conditions of the prime brokerage agreement between
the Company, Frostrow and the Depositary (the “Prime Brokerage
Agreement”). The Custodian and Prime Broker receives interest on
the drawn overdraft as detailed in note 12..
The
Custodian and Prime Broker is a registered
broker-dealer
and is regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission.
RESULTS
AND DIVIDENDS
The
results attributable to shareholders for the year and the transfer
to reserves are shown in the Income Statement and the Statement of
Changes in Equity Details of the Company’s dividend record can be
found in the Strategic Report.
Substantial
interests in share capital
The
Company was aware of the following substantial interests in the
voting rights of the Company:
|
30
April 2024
|
31
March 2024
|
Shareholder
|
Number
of
shares
|
%
of issued
share
capital
|
Number
of
shares
|
%
of issued
share
capital
|
Rathbone
Brothers plc
|
48,038,882
|
8.88
|
48,436,836
|
8.85
|
Investec
Wealth & Investment Limited
|
41,413,773
|
7.66
|
42,232,373
|
7.72
|
Interactive
Investor
|
37,594,401
|
6.95
|
37,766,720
|
6.90
|
Hargreaves
Lansdown plc
|
31,735,426
|
5.87
|
32,444,732
|
5.93
|
Charles
Stanley & Co Limited
|
27,085,383
|
5.01
|
27,284,055
|
4.99
|
Forsyth
Barr
|
20,859,186
|
3.86
|
21,376,017
|
3.91
|
Craigs
Investment Partners
|
19,540,173
|
3.61
|
19,672,830
|
3.60
|
Evelyn
Partners
|
19,239,555
|
3.56
|
19,450,805
|
3.56
|
Quilter
Cheviot Investment Management
|
18,204,177
|
3.37
|
18,651,596
|
3.41
|
RBC Brewin
Dolphin
|
18,758,151
|
3.47
|
18,495,921
|
3.38
|
As at
31 March 2024 the Company had
545,942,332 shares in issue (excluding 55,722,868 shares held in
treasury). As at 30 April 2024 there
were 540,098,103 shares in issue (excluding 61,567,097 shares held
in treasury).
CAPITAL
STRUCTURE
The
Company’s capital structure comprises solely ordinary
shares.
Share
split
The price
of the Company’s shares has increased substantially over the last
10 years. To assist monthly savers, those who reinvest their
dividends or are looking to invest smaller amounts the Directors
proposed a sub-division of each share of 25p each into 10 new
shares of 2.5p each during the year. This was approved by
shareholders at the AGM on 18 July
2023 and became effective on 27 July
2023. All comparative per share amounts within this Annual
Report have been restated to reflect this share split.
During the
year, and to 5 June 2024, no new
shares were issued. A total of 2,507,439 shares of 25p were
repurchased prior to the share split on 27
July 2023. Post 27 July 2023
55,190,908 shares of 5p were repurchased. The total cost of the
shares repurchased during the year was £252,759,000 and the average
discount to the NAV per share was 10.5%. Shares bought back are
held in treasury and were previously cancelled annually after the
Company’s AGM. In a change to the Company’s stated policy, all
shares held in treasury at the date of the Company’s AGM will now
not be cancelled and will continue to be held in treasury for
re-issue at a premium to the net asset value per share. Following
the year-end, to 5 June 2024, the
latest practicable date prior to the publication of this Annual
Report, a further 10,677,869 shares were repurchased at an average
discount of 10.1% to the cum income NAV per share. As at
5 June 2024 there were 535,264,463
shares in issue excluding 66,400,737 shares held in
treasury.
Voting
rights in the Company’s shares
Details of
the voting rights in the Company’s shares at the date of this
Annual Report are given in note 9 to the Notice of Annual General
Meeting. Each shareholder is entitled to one vote on a show of
hands and, on a poll, one vote for every share held.
DIRECTORS’
& OFFICERS’ LIABILITY INSURANCE COVER
Directors’
& officers’ liability insurance cover was maintained by the
Company during the year ended 31 March
2024 and to the date of this report. It is intended that
this policy will continue for the year ending 31 March 2025 and subsequent years.
DIRECTORS’
INDEMNITIES
During the
year under review and to the date of this report, indemnities were
in force between the Company and each of its Directors under which
the Company has agreed to indemnify each Director, to the extent
permitted by law, in respect of certain liabilities incurred as a
result of carrying out his or her role as a Director of the
Company. The Directors are also indemnified against the costs of
defending any criminal or civil proceedings or any claim by the
Company or a regulator as they are incurred provided that where the
defence is unsuccessful the Director must repay those defence costs
to the Company. The indemnities are qualifying third party
indemnity provisions for the purposes of the Companies Act
2006.
A copy of
each deed of indemnity is available for inspection at the Company’s
registered office during normal business hours and will be
available for inspection at the Annual General Meeting. Please
refer to the Statement from the Chair for details of this year’s
Annual General Meeting arrangements.
POLITICAL
AND CHARITABLE DONATIONS
The
Company has not in the past and does not intend in the future to
make political or charitable donations.
MODERN
SLAVERY ACT 2015
The
Company does not provide goods or services in the normal course of
business, and as a financial investment vehicle does not have
customers. The Directors do not therefore consider that the Company
is required to make a statement under the Modern Slavery Act 2015
in relation to slavery or human trafficking.
ANTI-BRIBERY
AND CORRUPTION POLICY
The Board
has adopted a zero tolerance approach to instances of bribery and
corruption. Accordingly, it expressly prohibits any Director or
associated persons when acting on behalf of the Company, from
accepting, soliciting, paying, offering or promising to pay or
authorise any payment, public or private in the UK or abroad to
secure any improper benefit for themselves or for the
Company.
The Board
ensures that its service providers apply the same standards in
their activities for the Company.
A copy of
the Company’s Anti Bribery and Corruption Policy can be found on
its website at www.worldwidewh.com. The policy is reviewed
regularly by the Audit & Risk Committee.
CRIMINAL
FINANCES ACT 2017
The
Company has a commitment to zero tolerance towards the criminal
facilitation of tax evasion.
A copy of
the Company’s Prevention of the Facilitation of Tax Evasion Policy
can be found on its website at www.worldwidewh.com. The policy is
reviewed regularly by the Audit & Risk Committee.
GLOBAL
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
The
Company has no greenhouse gas emissions to report from its
operations, nor does it have responsibility for any other emissions
producing sources under the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Reports
and Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013 or the Companies
(Directors’ Report) and Limited Liability Partnerships (Energy and
Carbon Report) Regulations 2018, including those within the
Company’s underlying investment portfolio. Consequently, the
Company consumed less than 40,000 kWh of energy during the year in
respect of which the Report of the Directors is prepared and
therefore is exempt from the disclosures required under the
Streamlined Energy and Carbon Reporting criteria.
COMMON
REPORTING STANDARD (“CRS”)
CRS is a
global standard for the automatic exchange of information
commissioned by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development and incorporated into UK law by the International Tax
Compliance Regulations 2015. CRS requires the Company to provide
certain additional details to HMRC in relation to certain
shareholders. The reporting obligation began in 2016 and is an
annual requirement. The Registrars, Link Group, have been engaged
to collate such information and file the reports with HMRC on
behalf of the Company.
ARTICLES
OF ASSOCIATION
Amendments
of the Company’s Articles of Association require a special
resolution to be passed by shareholders.
REQUIREMENTS
OF THE LISTING RULES
Listing
Rule 9.8.4 requires the Company to include certain information in a
single identifiable section of the Annual Report or a cross
reference table indicating where the information is set out. The
Directors confirm that there are no disclosures to be made under
Listing Rule 9.8.4.
UK
SANCTIONS
The Board
has made due diligence enquiries of the service providers that
process the Company’s shareholder data, to ensure the Company’s
compliance with the UK sanctions regime. The relevant service
providers have confirmed that they check the Company’s shareholder
data against the UK sanctions list on a daily basis. At the date of
this report, no sanctioned individuals had been identified on the
Company’s shareholder register. The Board notes that stockbrokers
and execution-only platforms also carry out their own due
diligence.
By order
of the Board
Frostrow
Capital LLP
Company
Secretary
6 June 2024
STATEMENT
OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
The
Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report and the
Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and
regulations. In preparing these financial statements, the Directors
are required to:
· select
suitable accounting policies and apply them
consistently;
· make
judgements and estimates that are reasonable and
prudent;
· follow
applicable UK accounting standards comprising FRS 102;
· prepare
the financial statements on a going concern basis unless it is
inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in
business; and
· prepare
a director’s report, a strategic report and a directors’
remuneration report which comply with the requirements of the
Companies Act 2006.
The
Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records
that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions
and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial
position of the Company and enable them to ensure that the
financial statements and the Directors’ Remuneration Report comply
with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for
safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking
reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and
other irregularities.
The
Directors are responsible for ensuring that the Report of the
Directors and other information included in the Annual Report is
prepared in accordance with company law in the United Kingdom. They are also responsible for
ensuring that the Annual Report includes information required by
the Listing Rules of the FCA.
The
Directors are also responsible for ensuring that the Annual Report
and the Financial Statements are made available on a website. The
Annual Report and the Financial Statements are published on the
Company’s website at www.worldwidewh.com and via Frostrow’s website
at www.frostrow.com. The maintenance and integrity of
these
websites, so far as it relates to the Company, is the
responsibility of Frostrow. The work carried out by the Auditors
does not involve consideration of the maintenance and integrity of
these websites and, accordingly, the Auditors accept no
responsibility for any changes that have occurred to the financial
statements since they were initially presented on these websites.
Visitors to the websites need to be aware that legislation in the
United Kingdom governing the
preparation and dissemination of the financial statements may
differ from legislation in their jurisdiction.
DISCLOSURE
OF INFORMATION TO THE AUDITORS
So far as
the Directors are aware, there is no relevant information of which
the Auditors are unaware. The Directors have taken all steps they
ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit
information and to establish that the Auditors are aware of such
information.
RESPONSIBILITY
STATEMENT OF THE DIRECTORS IN RESPECT OF THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL
REPORT
The
Directors confirm to the best of their knowledge that:
· the
Annual Report and the Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with applicable accounting standards, give a true and
fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and the
return for the year ended 31 March
2024;
· the
Chairman’s Statement, Strategic Report and the Report of the
Directors include a fair review of the information required by
4.1.8R to 4.1.11R of the FCA’s Disclosure Guidance and Transparency
Rules; and
· the
Annual Report and the Financial Statements, includes a fair review
of the development and performance of the Company and of its
financial position, together with a description of the principal
risks and uncertainties it faces. Also, that taken as a whole they
are fair, balanced and understandable and provide the information
necessary to assess the Company’s performance, business model and
strategy.
On behalf
of the Board
Doug McCutcheon
Chair
6 June 2024
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
THE
BOARD AND COMMITTEES
Responsibility
for effective governance lies with the Board. The governance
framework of the Company reflects the fact that as an investment
company it has no employees and outsources portfolio management to
OrbiMed and risk management, company management, company
secretarial, administrative and marketing services to
Frostrow.
THE
BOARD
Chair
– Doug
McCutcheon
Senior
Independent Director – Dr. Bina
Rawal
Five
additional non-executive Directors, all considered independent,
except for Sven Borho.
Key
responsibilities:
-
to provide
leadership and set strategy, values and standards within a
framework of prudent effective controls which enable risk to be
assessed and managed;
-
to ensure
that a robust corporate governance framework is implemented;
and
-
to
challenge constructively and scrutinise performance of all
outsourced activities.
|
Management
Engagement & Remuneration Committee
Chair
Jo
Parfrey
All
Independent Directors
Key
responsibilities:
-
to review
regularly the contracts, the performance and remuneration of the
Company’s principal service providers;
-
to set the
Directors’ Remuneration Policy; and
-
to review
the terms and conditions of the Directors’
appointments.
|
|
Audit
& Risk Committee
Chair
Tim
Livett*
All
Independent Directors (excluding the Chair, Doug
McCutcheon)
Key
responsibilities:
-
to review
the Company’s financial reports;
-
to oversee
the risk and control environment and financial reporting;
and
-
to have
primary responsibility for the relationship with the Company’s
external Auditors, to review their independence and performance,
and to determine their remuneration.
|
|
Nominations
Committee
Chair
Dr. Bina
Rawal
All
Independent Directors
Key
responsibilities:
-
to review
regularly the Board’s structure and composition; and
-
to make
recommendations for any changes or new appointments.
|
* The
Board believes that Tim Livett has
the necessary recent and relevant financial experience to Chair the
Company’s Audit & Risk Committee.
Copies of
the full terms of reference, which clearly define the
responsibilities of each Committee, can be obtained from the
Company Secretary and can be found at the Company’s website at
www.worldwidewh.com. Copies will also be available for inspection
on the day of the Annual General Meeting.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
The Board
is committed to maintaining and demonstrating high standards of
corporate governance. The Board has considered the principles and
recommendations of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance published
in February 2019 (‘AIC Code’). The
AIC Code addresses all the principles set out in the UK Corporate
Governance Code (the ‘UK Code’), as well as setting out additional
provisions on issues that are of specific relevance to the
Company.
The
Financial Reporting Council has confirmed that by following the AIC
Code boards of investment companies will meet their obligations in
relation to the UK Code and paragraph 9.8.6 of the UK Listing
Rules.
The Board
considers that reporting in accordance with the principles and
recommendations of the AIC Code (which has been endorsed by the
Financial Reporting Council) provides more relevant and
comprehensive information to shareholders. By reporting against the
AIC Code, the Company meets its obligations under the UK Code (and
associated disclosure requirements under paragraph 9.8.6 of the
Listing Rules) and as such does not need to report further on
issues contained in the UK Code which are irrelevant to the Company
as an externally managed investment company, including the
provisions relating to the role of the chief executive, executive
directors’ remuneration and the internal audit function.
The
Company has complied with the principles and recommendations of the
AIC Code.
The AIC
Code can be viewed at www.theaic.co.uk and the UK Code can be
viewed on the Financial Reporting Council website at
www.frc.org.uk. The Corporate Governance Report forms part of the
Report of the Directors.
BOARD
LEADERSHIP AND PURPOSE
Purpose and strategy
The
purpose and strategy of the Company are described in the Strategic
Report.
THE
BOARD
The Board
is responsible for the effective Stewardship of the Company’s
affairs. Strategy issues and all operational matters of a material
nature are considered at its meetings.
The Board
consists of six non-executive Directors, each of whom, with the
exception of Sven Borho, is
independent of OrbiMed and the Company’s other service providers.
No member of the Board is a Director of another investment company
managed by OrbiMed, nor has any Board member (with the exception of
Sven Borho) been an employee of
OrbiMed or any of the Company’s service providers. Further details
regarding the Directors can be found in the governance section of
the annual report.
The Board
carefully considers the various guidelines for determining the
independence of non-executive Directors, placing particular weight
on the view that independence is evidenced by an individual being
independent of mind, character and judgement. All Directors retire
at the AGM each year and, if appropriate, seek election or
re-election.
Each Director has signed a letter of appointment to formalise the
terms of their engagement as a non-executive
Director, copies of which are available on request at Frostrow’s
offices.
BOARD
CULTURE
The Board
aims to consider and discuss differences of opinion, unique vantage
points and to exploit fully areas of expertise. The Chair
encourages open debate to foster a supportive and co-operative
approach for all participants. Strategic decisions are discussed
openly and constructively. The Board aims to be open and
transparent with shareholders and other stakeholders and for the
Company to conduct itself responsibly, ethically and fairly in its
relationships with service providers.
The Board
has gained assurance on whistleblowing procedures at the Company’s
principal service providers to ensure employees at those companies
are supported in speaking up and raising concerns. No concerns
relating to the Company were raised during the year.
Shareholder relations
The
Company has appointed Frostrow to provide marketing and investor
relations services, in the belief that a well marketed investment
company is more likely to grow over time, have a more diverse,
stable list of shareholders and its shares will trade at close to
net asset value per share over the long run. Frostrow actively
promotes the Company as set out in the Strategic Report.
Shareholder communications
The Board,
the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager consider maintaining good
communications with shareholders and engaging with larger
shareholders through meetings and presentations a key priority.
Shareholders are kept informed by the publication of annual and
half-year reports which include financial statements. These reports
are supplemented by the daily release of the net asset value per
share to the London Stock Exchange and the publication of monthly
fact sheets. All this information, including interviews with the
Portfolio Manager, is available on the Company’s website at
www.worldwidewh.com.
The Board
monitors the share register of the Company; it also reviews
correspondence from shareholders at each meeting and maintains
regular contact with major shareholders. Shareholders who wish to
raise matters with a Director may do so by writing to them at the
registered office of the Company.
The Board
supports the principle that the Annual General Meeting be used to
communicate with private investors, in particular. Shareholders are
encouraged to attend the AGM, where they are given the opportunity
to question the Chair, the Board and representatives of the
Portfolio Manager. In addition, the Portfolio Manager makes a
presentation to shareholders covering the investment performance
and strategy of the Company at the AGM. Voting at the AGM is
conducted on a poll and details of the proxy votes received in
respect of each resolution will be made available on the Company’s
website.
Significant holdings and voting
rights
Details of
the shareholders with substantial interests in the Company’s
shares, the Directors’ authorities to issue and repurchase the
Company’s shares, and the voting rights of the shares are set out
in the Directors’ Report.
BOARD
MEETINGS
The Board
meets formally at least four times each year. A representative of
OrbiMed attends all meetings; representatives from Frostrow are
also in attendance at each Board meeting. The Independent Directors
also meet before each formal Board meeting without representatives
from Frostrow and OrbiMed being present. The Chair encourages open
debate to foster a supportive and co-operative
approach for all participants.
The Board
has agreed a schedule of matters specifically reserved for decision
by the Board. This includes establishing the investment objectives,
strategy and the Benchmark, the permitted types or categories of
investments, the markets in which transactions may be undertaken,
the amount or proportion of the assets that may be invested in any
geography or category of investment or in any one investment, and
the Company’s share issuance and share buyback policies.
The Board,
at its regular meetings, undertakes reviews of key investment and
financial data, revenue projections and expenses, analyses of asset
allocation, transactions and performance comparisons, share price
and net asset value performance, marketing and shareholder
communication strategies, the risks associated with pursuing the
investment strategy, peer group information and industry
issues.
The Chair
is responsible for ensuring that the Board receives accurate,
timely and clear information. Representatives of OrbiMed and
Frostrow Capital LLP report regularly to the Board on issues
affecting the Company.
The Board
is responsible for strategy and has established an annual programme
of agenda items under which it reviews the objectives and strategy
for the Company at each meeting.
CONFLICTS
OF INTEREST
Company
Directors have a statutory obligation to avoid a situation in which
they (and connected persons) have, or can have, a direct or
indirect interest that conflicts, or may possibly conflict, with
the interests of the Company. The Board has in place procedures for
managing any actual or potential conflicts of interest. No
conflicts of interest arose during the year under
review.
BOARD
FOCUS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
With the
day to day management of the Company outsourced to service
providers the Board’s primary focus at each Board meeting is
reviewing the investment performance and associated matters, such
as, inter
alia, future
outlook and strategy, gearing, asset allocation, investor
relations, marketing, and industry issues.
In line
with its primary focus, the Board retains responsibility for all
the key elements of the Company’s strategy and business model,
including:
· the
Investment Objective, Policy and Benchmark, incorporating the
investment and derivative guidelines and limits, and changes to
these;
· the
maximum level of gearing and leverage the Company may
employ;
· a
review of performance against the Company’s KPIs;
· a
review of the performance and continuing appointment of service
providers; and
· the
maintenance of an effective system of oversight, risk management
and corporate governance.
The
Investment Objective, Policy, and Benchmark, including the related
limits and guidelines, are set out in the Strategic Report, along
with details of the gearing and leverage levels allowed.
Details of
the principal KPIs and further information on the principal service
providers, their performance and continuing appointment, along with
details of the principal risks, and how they are managed, are set
out in the Strategic Report.
The
Corporate Governance Report includes a statement of compliance with
corporate governance codes and best practice, and the Business
Review includes details of the internal control and risk management
framework within which the Board operates.
BOARD
COMPOSITION AND SUCCESSION
Succession planning
During the
year, the Nominations Committee considered the structure of the
Board, recognising the need for progressive refreshment. A plan for
recruiting a Director to succeed Humphrey
van der Klugt, following his retirement at the forthcoming
AGM, was also agreed. (Please see the Statement from the Chair for
further information).
The Board
has an approved succession planning policy to ensure that (i) there
is a formal, rigorous and transparent procedure for the appointment
of new Directors; and (ii) the Board is comprised of members who
collectively display the necessary balance of professional skills,
experience, length of service and industry/Company
knowledge.
Policy on the tenure of the Board Chair and other
Directors
All
Directors seek election or re-election every year. The Board
subscribes to the view that long-serving Directors should not
necessarily be prevented from forming part of an independent
majority. The Board considers that a Director’s tenure does not
necessarily reduce his or her ability to act independently and will
continue to assess each Director’s independence annually through a
formal performance evaluation.
The tenure
of each Director is not ordinarily expected to exceed nine years.
However, the Board has agreed that the tenure of the Board Chair
may be extended in order to facilitate the Board’s overall orderly
succession. The Board believes that this more flexible approach to
the tenure of the Chair is appropriate in the context of the
regulatory rules that apply to investment companies, which ensure
that the Board Chair remains independent after appointment, while
being consistent with the need for regular refreshment and
diversity.
The Board
asked Doug McCutcheon to take on the
role of Board Chair from July 2022
for a period of three to five years. This was in order to oversee
the renewal of the Board, including the retirement and replacement
of all but one of the then Directors as well as changing the
composition and leadership of all of the Board’s
Committees.
Since
then, good progress has been made toward the end goal of having a
Board structure that will facilitate Director renewal on a more
regular basis than has occurred historically. And the process
continues – as stated in the Statement from the Chair, Humphrey van der Klugt will be retiring as a
Director at this year’s Annual General Meeting and the Board
expects to recruit a new Director to join the Board later this
year. In the light of this progress, the Board now expects Doug
McCutcheon’s term as Board Chair to not exceed four
years.
Portfolio Manager Representative on the
Board
The
Company was founded in 1995 by our Portfolio Manager, OrbiMed.
Since that time, the Company has performed strongly, producing a
compound net asset value per share annual return of +14.4%, well
above our Benchmark and making us the third best performing trust
in the UK across all sectors over the period (Source: Winterflood
Investment Trusts).
Since our
inception, a representative of OrbiMed has served as a Director of
the Company. While less common in the investment trust sector today
than when the Company was founded, the Board believes that the
Company’s long-term performance and its shareholders have and will
continue to benefit from this arrangement. The Board has also taken
steps to avoid any potential conflicts of interest – the current
OrbiMed representative, Sven Borho,
does not sit on any of the Board’s Committees and he does not
receive a salary for serving as a Director.
Appointments to the Board
The
Nominations Committee considers annually the skills possessed by
the Board and identifies any skill shortages to be filled by new
Directors.
The rules
governing the appointment and replacement of Directors are set out
in the Company’s articles of association and the aforementioned
succession planning policy. Where the Board appoints a new Director
during the year, that Director will stand for election by
shareholders at the next AGM. Subject to there being no conflict of
interest, all Directors are entitled to vote on candidates for the
appointment of new Directors and on the recommendation for
shareholders’ approval for the Directors seeking re-election at the
AGM. When considering new appointments, the Board endeavours to
ensure that it has the capabilities required to be effective and
oversee the Company’s strategic priorities.
This will
include an appropriate range, balance and diversity of skills,
experience and knowledge. The Company is committed to ensuring that
any vacancies arising are filled by the most qualified
candidates.
Diversity policy
The Board
supports the principle of Boardroom diversity, of which gender and
ethnicity are two important aspects. The Company’s policy is that
the Board and its committees should be comprised of directors with
a diverse range of skills, knowledge and experience and that
appointments should be made on merit against objective criteria,
including diversity in its broadest sense.
The
objective of the policy is to have a broad range of approaches,
backgrounds, skills, knowledge and experience represented on the
Board. To this end, achieving a diversity of perspectives and
backgrounds on the Board will be a key consideration in any
director search process. The Board encourages any recruitment
agencies it engages to find a diverse range of candidates that meet
the criteria agreed for each appointment and, from the shortlist,
aims to ensure that a diverse range of candidates is brought
forward for interview.
The Board
will continue to give due regard to the new diversity targets in
the Listing Rules set out below. The Board will not discriminate
unfairly on the grounds of gender, ethnicity, age, sexual
orientation, disability or socio-economic background when
considering the appointment of a new Director. Candidates’
educational and professional backgrounds, their cognitive and
personal strengths, are considered against the specification
prepared for each appointment.
The Board
has noted the FCA’s new Listing Rules which require companies to
report against the following diversity targets:
a) At
least 40% of individuals on the board are women;
b) At
least one of the senior board positions is held by a woman;
and
c) At
least one individual on the board is from a minority ethnic
background.
As an
externally managed investment company, the Company does not have
the positions of CEO or CFO and therefore, as permitted by the
Listing Rules, it has not reported formally against the second
target as it is not applicable. As shown in the tables below, the
Company has met the third target but has not yet met the first
target. The Board notes that the statistics will change when
Humphrey van der Klugt retires from
the Board at the conclusion of the forthcoming AGM and will have
due regard to these targets in future Director recruitment
processes.
In
accordance with the Listing Rules, the Board has provided the
following information in relation to its diversity as at the year
end.
|
|
|
Number
of
|
|
Number
of
|
|
senior
|
|
Board
|
Percentage
of
|
positions
on
|
|
Members
|
the
Board
|
the
Board*
|
Men
|
4
|
67%
|
2
|
Women
|
2
|
33%
|
1
|
Not
specified/prefer not to say
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
Number
of
|
|
Number
of
|
|
senior
|
|
Board
|
Percentage
of
|
positions
on
|
|
Members
|
the
Board
|
the
Board*
|
White
British or other White (including minority-white groups)
|
5
|
83%
|
2
|
Mixed/Multiple
Ethnic Groups
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Asian/Asian
British
|
1
|
17%
|
1
|
Black/African/Caribbean/Black
British
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Other
ethnic group, including Arab
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Not
specified/ prefer not to say
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
* The
format of the above tables is prescribed in the Listing Rules which
define ‘senior positions on the Board’ as ‘CEO, CFO, SID and
Chair’. However, as an externally managed investment trust, the
Company has no executive management functions, including the roles
of CEO and CFO, and the Company has therefore excluded columns
relating to executive management. In the absence of the
aforementioned roles, the Board considers the Chair of the Audit
& Risk Committee to be a senior position and therefore the
Company has defined the ‘senior positions on the Board’ as Chair,
Senior Independent Director and Chair of the Audit & Risk
Committee.
The
information above was obtained by asking the Directors to indicate
on an anonymous form, how they should be categorised for the
purposes of the Listing Rules disclosures.
MEETING
ATTENDANCE
The number
of meetings held during the year of the Board and its Committees,
and each Director’s attendance level, is shown below:
Type
and number of meetings held in 2023/24
|
Board
(5)
|
Audit
& Risk
Committee
(3)
|
Nominations
Committee
(2)
|
Management
Engagement
&
Remuneration
Committee
(1)
|
Sarah
Bates*
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
Sven
Borho^
|
5
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Tim
Livett
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Humphrey
van der Klugt
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Doug
McCutcheon~
|
5
|
–
|
2
|
1
|
Jo
Parfrey
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
Dr Bina
Rawal
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
* Retired
from the Board on 18 July
2023.
^ Sven
Borho does not sit on any of the Company’s
Committees.
~ Not
a member of the Audit & Risk Committee.
All of the
serving Directors attended the Annual General Meeting held on
18 July 2023.
BOARD
EVALUATION
During the
year, an externally facilitated review of the Board its committees
and individual Directors (including each Director’s independence)
was carried out by Stephenson Executive Search Ltd. The evaluation
took the form of a series of one-to-one meetings with the
Directors. Areas covered in the evaluation included Board and Board
Committee structure, succession planning, recruitment and the
Board’s compliance with AIC corporate governance guidelines, paying
particular attention to diversity and Board tenure.
The
evaluation concluded that the Board works in a collegiate,
efficient and effective manner, and there were no material
weaknesses or concerns identified. The Board is satisfied that the
structure, mix of skills and operation of the Board, its
committees, and individual Directors continue to be
effective.
The Board
pays close attention to the capacity of individual Directors to
carry out their work on behalf of the Company. In recommending
individual Directors to shareholders for re-election, it considered
their other Board positions and their time commitments and is
satisfied that each Director has the capacity to be fully engaged
with the Company’s business. The Board has considered the position
of all of the Directors as part of the evaluation process, and
believes that it would be in the Company’s best interests to
propose them for re-election
(with the exception of Humphrey van der
Klugt who will be retiring from the Board on the date of
this year’s AGM), for the following reasons:
Doug McCutcheon joined the Board in November 2012 and became Chair in July 2022. Doug was an investment banker at S.G.
Warburg and then UBS for 25 years, most recently as the head of
Healthcare Investment Banking for Europe, the Middle
East, Africa and
Asia-Pacific. It is noted that
Doug has been a Director of the Company for more than nine years.
The Board has agreed to this period of longer service to ensure an
orderly succession. The Senior Independent Director conducted a
preliminary evaluation of the Chair shortly after his appointment
with no issues being raised. The Board continues to believe that
Doug remains independent in thought and judgement.
Sven Borho joined the Board in June
2018. Sven is a founder and Managing Partner of OrbiMed and
heads their public Equity team and is the portfolio manager for
OrbiMed’s public equity and hedge funds.
Having a
senior OrbiMed representative on the Board dates back to the
Company’s inception in 1995. The Board believes that there is great
value in the current representative, Sven
Borho, being a Director of the Company as a result of his
considerable knowledge and experience. Sven does not receive a fee
for being a Director, neither is he a member of any of the
Company’s Committees.
Tim Livett joined the Board in September 2022. A qualified accountant, Tim is
Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee. Tim was
formerly the Chief Financial Officer at Caledonia Investments PLC.
Prior to this role he was Chief Financial Officer at Wellcome
Trust, the global charitable foundation focused on health research
and at Virgin Atlantic Limited. Tim is
a non-executive Director of British Standards Institution and of
Oxford University Endowment Management,
plus a Trustee of Babraham Institute; he chairs the respective
Audit and Risk Committees of these institutions. He has an
extensive and broad financial background.
Jo Parfrey joined the Board in September 2022. Jo is Chair of the Management
Engagement & Remuneration Committee. She is a non-executive
Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of Henderson
International Income Trust plc, and a non-executive Director of
Octopus AIM VCT. She is also a non-executive Director and Chair of
the Audit Committee of Start Codon Limited and IESO Digital Health
Limited and the non-executive Chair of Babraham Research Campus
Limited. A Chartered Accountant, Jo has extensive experience of
both global investment trusts and healthcare, including life
sciences.
Dr
Bina Rawal joined the Board on
November 2019. A physician with 25
years’ experience in life sciences research and development, she
has held senior executive roles in drug development and scientific
evaluation in four global pharmaceutical companies. She has also
worked in senior roles with two medical research funding
organisations.
The Chair
is pleased to report that following a formal performance
evaluation, the Directors’ performance continues to be effective
and they continue to demonstrate commitment to the role.
TRAINING
AND ADVICE
New
appointees to the Board are provided with a full induction
programme. The programme covers the Company’s investment strategy,
policies and practices. The Directors are also given key
information on the Company’s regulatory and statutory requirements
as they arise including information on the role of the Board,
matters reserved for its decision, the terms of reference of the
Board Committees, the Company’s corporate governance practices and
procedures and the latest financial information. It is the Chair’s
responsibility to ensure that the Directors have sufficient
knowledge to fulfil their role and Directors are encouraged to
participate in training courses where appropriate.
The
Directors have access to the advice and services of a Company
Secretary through its appointed representative which is responsible
to the Board for ensuring that Board procedures are followed and
that applicable rules and regulations are complied with. The
Company Secretary is also responsible for ensuring good information
flows between all parties.
There is
an agreed procedure for Directors, in the furtherance of their
duties, to take independent professional advice if necessary at the
Company’s expense.
RISK
MANAGEMENT AND INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Board
has overall responsibility for the Company’s risk management and
internal control systems and for reviewing their effectiveness. The
Company applies the guidance published by the Financial Reporting
Council on internal controls. Internal control systems are designed
to manage, rather than eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve
the business objective and can provide only reasonable and not
absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. These
controls aim to ensure that the assets of the Company are
safeguarded, that proper accounting records are maintained and that
the Company’s financial information is reliable. The Directors have
a robust process for identifying, evaluating and managing the
significant risks faced by the Company, which are recorded in a
risk matrix. The Audit & Risk Committee, on behalf of the
Board, considers each risk as well as reviewing the mitigating
controls in place. Each risk is rated for its “likelihood” and
“impact” and the resultant numerical rating determines its ranking
into ‘Principal/Key’, ‘Significant’ or ’Minor’. This process was in
operation during the year and continues in place up to the date of
this report. The process also involves the Audit & Risk
Committee receiving and examining regular reports from the
Company’s principal service providers. The Board then receives a
detailed report from the Audit & Risk Committee on its
findings. The Directors have not identified any significant
failures or weaknesses in respect of the Company’s internal control
systems.
BENEFICIAL
OWNERS OF SHARES – INFORMATION RIGHTS
Beneficial
owners of shares who have been nominated by the registered holder
of those shares to receive information rights under section 146 of
the Companies Act 2006 are required to direct all communications to
the registered holder of their shares rather than to the Company’s
registrar, Link Group, or to the Company directly.
The
Company has adopted a nominee share code which is set out
below.
The annual
and half-year financial reports, and a monthly fact sheet are
available to all shareholders. The Board, with the advice of
Frostrow, reviews the format of the annual and half-year financial
reports so as to ensure they are useful to all shareholders and
others taking an interest in the Company. In accordance with best
practice, the annual report, including the Notice of the Annual
General Meeting, is sent to shareholders at least 20 working days
before the meeting. Separate resolutions are proposed for
substantive issues.
ANNUAL
GENERAL MEETING
The
following information to be considered at the forthcoming annual
general meeting is important and requires your immediate
attention.
If
you are in any doubt about the action you should take, you should
seek advice from your stock broker, bank manager, solicitor,
accountant or other financial adviser authorised under the
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended). If you have
sold or transferred all of your ordinary shares in the Company, you
should pass this document, together with any other accompanying
documents, including the form of proxy, at once to the purchaser or
transferee, or to the stock broker, bank or other agent through
whom the sale or transfer was effected, for onward transmission to
the purchaser or transferee
The
Company’s Annual General Meeting will be held at Saddlers’ Hall, 40
Gutter Lane, London EC2V 6BR on
Wednesday, 10 July 2024 from
1.00 p.m. Please refer to the Chair’s
Statement for details of this year’s arrangements.
In
particular, resolutions relating to the following items will be
proposed at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting.
Resolution
11 Authority
to allot shares
Resolution
12 Authority
to disapply pre-emption rights
Resolution
13
Authority
to sell shares held in treasury on a non pre-emptive
basis
Resolution
14
Authority
to buy-back shares
Resolution
15
Authority
to hold General Meetings (other than the Annual General Meeting) on
at least 14 clear days’ notice
Resolution
16
The
continuance of the Company as an investment trust for a further
period of five years
Resolutions
11 and 16 will be proposed as Ordinary Resolutions and resolutions
12 to 15 will be proposed as Special Resolutions.
The full
text of the resolutions can be found in the Notice of Annual
General Meeting.
EXERCISE
OF VOTING POWERS
The Board
and the AIFM have delegated authority to OrbiMed to vote the shares
owned by the Company. The Board has instructed that OrbiMed submit
votes for such shares wherever possible. This accords with current
best practice whilst maintaining a primary focus on financial
returns. OrbiMed may refer to the Board on any matters of a
contentious nature. The Board has reviewed OrbiMed’s Voting
Guidelines and is satisfied with their approach.
The
Company does not retain voting rights on any shares that are held
as collateral in connection with the overdraft facility provided by
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.
NOMINEE
SHARE CODE
Where
shares are held in a nominee company name, the Company
undertakes:
· to
provide the nominee company with multiple copies of shareholder
communications, so long as an indication of quantities has been
provided in advance; and
· to
allow investors holding shares through a nominee company to attend
general meetings, provided the correct authority from the nominee
company is available.
Nominee
companies are encouraged to provide the necessary authority to
underlying shareholders to attend the Company’s general
meetings.
By order
of the Board
Frostrow
Capital LLP
Company
Secretary
6 June 2024
INCOME
STATEMENT
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2024
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Notes
|
Revenue
£’000
|
Capital
£’000
|
Total
£’000
|
Revenue
£’000
|
Capital
£’000
|
Total
£’000
|
Gains on
investments
|
9
|
–
|
213,794
|
213,794
|
–
|
10,388
|
10,388
|
Exchange
losses on currency
|
|
–
|
(5,492)
|
(5,492)
|
–
|
(18,302)
|
(18,302)
|
Income
from investments balances
|
2
|
21,398
|
–
|
21,398
|
23,945
|
–
|
23,945
|
AIFM,
portfolio management and performance fees
|
3
|
(813)
|
(15,454)
|
(16,267)
|
(877)
|
(16,657)
|
(17,534)
|
Other
expenses
|
4
|
(1,294)
|
–
|
(1,294)
|
(1,142)
|
(22)
|
(1,164)
|
Net
return/(loss) before finance charges and
taxation
|
|
19,291
|
192,848
|
212,139
|
21,926
|
(24,593)
|
(2,667)
|
Finance
costs
|
5
|
(406)
|
(7,718)
|
(8,124)
|
(193)
|
(3,658)
|
(3,851)
|
Net
return/(loss) before taxation
|
|
18,885
|
185,130
|
204,015
|
21,733
|
(28,251)
|
(6,518)
|
Taxation
|
6
|
(2,853)
|
–
|
(2,853)
|
(2,021)
|
(248)
|
(2,269)
|
Net
return/(loss) after taxation
|
|
16,032
|
185,130
|
201,162
|
19,712
|
(28,499)
|
(8,787)
|
Return/(loss)
per share*
|
7
|
2.7p
|
31.7p
|
34.4p
|
3.0p
|
(4.4)p
|
(1.4)p
|
* Comparative
period restated for the sub-division of each ordinary share into 10
new ordinary shares during the year.
The
“Total” column of this statement is the Income Statement of the
Company. The “Revenue” and “Capital” columns are supplementary to
this and are prepared under guidance published by The Association
of Investment Companies.
All
revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from
continuing operations.
The
Company has no recognised gains and losses other than those shown
above and therefore no separate Statement of Total Comprehensive
Income has been presented.
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
STATEMENT
OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2024
|
|
Capital
|
Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Share
|
redemption
|
premium
|
Capital
|
Revenue
|
shareholders’
|
|
capital
|
reserve
|
account
|
reserve
|
reserve
|
funds
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
At
31 March 2023
|
16,265
|
8,341
|
841,599
|
1,261,025
|
23,491
|
2,150,721
|
Net return
after taxation
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
185,130
|
16,032
|
201,162
|
Final
dividend paid in respect of year ended 31 March 2023
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(14,709)
|
(14,709)
|
Interim
dividend paid in respect of year ended 31 March 2024
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(3,998)
|
(3,998)
|
Shares
purchased for treasury
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(252,759)
|
–
|
(252,759)
|
Shares
cancelled from treasury
|
(1,223)
|
1,223
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
At
31 March 2024
|
15,042
|
9,564
|
841,599
|
1,193,396
|
20,816
|
2,080,417
|
FOR
THE YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH
2023
|
|
Capital
|
Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Share
|
redemption
|
premium
|
Capital
|
Revenue
|
shareholders’
|
|
capital
|
reserve
|
account
|
reserve
|
reserve
|
funds
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
At
1 April 2022
|
16,385
|
8,221
|
841,599
|
1,381,038
|
20,990
|
2,268,233
|
Net
(loss)/return after taxation
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(28,499)
|
19,712
|
(8,787)
|
Final
dividend paid in respect of year ended 31 March 2022
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(12,721)
|
(12,721)
|
Interim
dividend paid in respect of year ended 31 March 2023
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(4,490)
|
(4,490)
|
Shares
purchased for treasury
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
(91,514)
|
–
|
(91,514)
|
Shares
cancelled from treasury
|
(120)
|
120
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
At
31 March 2023
|
16,265
|
8,341
|
841,599
|
1,261,025
|
23,491
|
2,150,721
|
STATEMENT
OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT
31 MARCH 2024
|
Notes
|
2024
£’000
|
2023
£’000
|
Fixed
assets
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
9
|
2,108,235
|
2,186,417
|
Derivative
– OTC swaps
|
9 &
10
|
944
|
209
|
|
|
2,109,179
|
2,186,626
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
Debtors
|
11
|
10,232
|
4,376
|
Cash
|
|
73,797
|
58,925
|
|
|
84,029
|
63,301
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
Creditors:
amounts falling due within one year
|
12
|
(100,373)
|
(72,105)
|
Derivative
– OTC swaps
|
9 &
10
|
(12,418)
|
(27,101)
|
|
|
(112,791)
|
(99,206)
|
Net
current liabilities
|
|
(28,762)
|
(35,905)
|
Total
net assets
|
|
2,080,417
|
2,150,721
|
Capital
and reserves
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
|
13
|
15,042
|
16,265
|
Capital
redemption reserve
|
|
9,564
|
8,341
|
Share
premium account
|
|
841,599
|
841,599
|
Capital
reserve
|
17
|
1,193,396
|
1,261,025
|
Revenue
reserve
|
|
20,816
|
23,491
|
Total
shareholders' funds
|
|
2,080,417
|
2,150,721
|
Net
asset value per share*
|
14
|
381.1p
|
343.5p
|
* Comparative
period restated for the sub-division of each ordinary share into 10
new ordinary shares during the year.
The
financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and
authorised for issue on 6 June 2024
and were signed on its behalf by:
Doug McCutcheon
Chair
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of this
statement.
Worldwide
Healthcare Trust PLC – Company Registration Number 3023689
(Registered in England)
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE
YEAR ENDED 31 MARCH 2024
|
Notes
|
2024
£’000
|
2023
£’000
|
Net
cash inflow from operating activities
|
18
|
2,262
|
5,394
|
Purchases
of investments and derivatives
|
|
(975,783)
|
(1,189,133)
|
Sales of
investments and derivatives
|
|
1,260,461
|
1,404,617
|
Realised
loss on foreign exchange transactions
|
|
(5,535)
|
(18,240)
|
Net
cash inflow from investing activities
|
|
279,143
|
197,244
|
Shares
repurchased
|
13
|
(252,760)
|
(91,514)
|
Equity
dividends paid
|
|
(18,707)
|
(17,211)
|
Interest
paid
|
|
(8,124)
|
(3,851)
|
Net
cash outflow from financing activities
|
|
(279,591)
|
(112,576)
|
Increase
in net cash
|
|
1,814
|
90,062
|
Cash flows
from operating activities include interest received of £3,219,000
(2023: £2,302,000) and dividends received of £17,463,000 (2023:
£20,507,000).
RECONCILIATION
OF NET CASH FLOW MOVEMENT TO MOVEMENT IN NET
CASH/(DEBT)
|
2024
£’000
|
2023
£’000
|
Increase
in net cash/debt resulting from cashflows
|
1,814
|
90,062
|
Gains/(Losses)
on foreign currency cash and cash equivalents
|
44
|
(62)
|
Movement
in net cash/debt in the year
|
1,858
|
90,000
|
Net
cash/(debt) at 1 April
|
2,997
|
(87,003)
|
Net
cash at 31 March
|
4,855
|
2,997
|
Net cash
includes the bank overdraft of £68,942,000 (2023: £55,928,000) (see
note 12) and cash as per the balance sheet of £73,797,000 (2023:
£58,925,000).
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of this
statement.
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
principal accounting policies, all of which have been applied
consistently throughout the year in the preparation of these
financial statements, are set out below:
(A)
Basis of preparation
These
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006, FRS 102 ‘The Financial Reporting Standard
applicable in the UK and Ireland’ (‘UK GAAP’) and the guidelines
set out in the Statement of Recommended Practice (‘SORP’),
published in February 2021, for
Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts issued by the
Association of Investment Companies (‘AIC’), the historical cost
convention, as modified by the valuation of investments and
derivatives at fair value. The Board has considered a detailed
assessment of the Company’s ability to meet its liabilities as they
fall due, including stress and liquidity tests which modelled the
effects of substantial falls in markets and significant reductions
in market liquidity (including further stressing the current
economic conditions) on the Company’s financial position and cash
flows. The results of the tests showed that the Company would have
sufficient cash, or the ability to liquidate a sufficient
proportion of its listed holdings, to meet its liabilities as they
fall due. Based on the information available to the Directors at
the time of this report, including the results of the stress tests,
the Company’s cash balances, and the liquidity of the Company’s
listed investments, the Directors are satisfied that the Company
has adequate financial resources to continue in operation for at
least the next 12 months from the date of approval of these
financial statements and that, accordingly, it is appropriate to
adopt the going concern basis in preparing these financial
statements.
The
Company’s financial statements are presented in sterling, being the
functional and presentational currency of the Company. All values
are rounded to the nearest thousand pounds (£’000) except where
otherwise indicated.
In
addition, investments and derivatives held at fair value are
categorised into a fair value hierarchy based on the degree to
which the inputs to the fair value measurements are observable and
the significance of the inputs to the fair value measurement in its
entirety, which are described as follows:
· Level
1 – Quoted prices in active markets.
· Level
2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that
are observable (i.e. developed using market data), either directly
or indirectly.
· Level
3 – Inputs are unobservable (i.e. for which market data is
unavailable).
Presentation
of the Income Statement
In order
to reflect better the activities of an investment trust company and
in accordance with the SORP, supplementary information which
analyses the Income Statement between items of a revenue and
capital nature has been presented alongside the Income Statement.
The net revenue return is the measure the Directors believe
appropriate in assessing the Company’s compliance with certain
requirements set out in Sections 1158 and 1159 of the Corporation
Tax Act 2010.
Critical
Accounting Judgements and Key Sources of Estimation
Uncertainty
Critical
accounting judgements and key sources of estimation uncertainty
used in preparing the financial information are continually
evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors,
including expectations of future events that are believed to be
reasonable. The resulting estimates will, by definition, seldom
equal the related actual results.
In the
course of preparing the financial statements, the only key source
of estimation uncertainty in the process of applying the Company’s
accounting policies, is in relation to the valuation of the
unquoted (Level 3) investments. The nature of estimation means that
the actual outcomes could differ from those estimates, possibly
significantly. The estimates relate to the investments where there
is no appropriate market price i.e. the private investments. Whilst
the board considers the methodologies and assumptions adopted in
the valuation are supportable, reasonable and robust, because of
the inherent uncertainty of valuation, those estimated values may
differ significantly from the values that would have been used had
a ready market for the investment existed. As at 31 March 2024, there is no single key assumption
used in the valuation of the unquoted investments, or other key
source of estimation uncertainty, that, in the Directors’ opinion
has a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the
carrying values of assets and liabilities within the next financial
year.
Unquoted
investments are all valued in line with the accounting policy set
out below.
(B)
Investments
Investments
are measured under FRS 102 and are measured initially, and at
subsequent reporting dates, at fair value. Investments are
recognised and de-recognised at trade date where a purchase or sale
is under a contract whose terms require delivery within the time
frame established by the market concerned. Changes in fair value
and gains or losses on disposal are included in the Income
Statement as a capital item.
For quoted
securities fair value is either bid price or last traded price,
depending on the convention of the exchange on which the investment
is listed.
Fair value
is the price for which an asset could be exchanged between
knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction. In
estimating the fair value of unquoted investments, the AIFM and
Board apply valuation techniques which are appropriate in light of
the nature, facts and circumstances of the investment, and use
reasonable current market data and inputs combined with judgement
and assumptions and apply these consistently. The following
principles used in determining the valuation of unquoted
investments, are consistent with the International Private Equity
and Venture Capital Valuation (“IPEV”) Guidelines. The assumptions
and estimates made in determining the fair value of each unquoted
investment are considered at least each six months or sooner if
there is a triggering event. An example of where a valuation would
be considered out of the six-month cycle is the success or failure
of a drug under development to meet an anticipated outcome of its
trial, announcement of the company undergoing an initial public
offering, or other performance against tangible development
milestones.
The
primary valuation method applied in the valuation of the unquoted
investments is the probability-weighted expected return method
(“PWERM”), which considers on a probability weighted basis the
future outcomes for the investment. When using the PWERM method
significant judgements are made in estimating the various inputs
into the model and recognising the sensitivity of such estimates.
Examples of the factors where significant judgement is made
include, but are not limited to, the probability assigned to
potential future outcomes; discount rates; and, the likely exit
scenarios for the investor company, for example, IPO or trade
sale.
Where the
investment being valued was itself made recently, or there has been
a third party transaction in the investment, the price of the
transaction may provide a good indication of fair value. Using the
Price of Recent Investment technique is not a default and at each
reporting date the fair value of recent investments is estimated to
assess whether changes or events subsequent to the relevant
transaction would imply a material change in the investment’s fair
value.
When using
the price of a recent transaction in the valuations the Company
looks to ‘re-calibrate’ this price at each valuation point by
reviewing progress within the investment, comparing against the
initial investment thesis, assessing if there are any significant
events or milestones that would indicate the value of the
investment value has changed materially and considering whether an
alternative methodology would be more appropriate.
(C)
Derivative financial instruments
The
Company uses derivative financial instruments (namely put and call
options and equity swaps).
All
derivative instruments are valued initially, and at subsequent
reporting dates, at fair value in the Statement of Financial
Position.
The equity
swaps are accounted for as Fixed Assets or Current
Liabilities.
All gains
and losses on over-the-counter (OTC) equity swaps are accounted for
as gains or losses on investments. Where there has been a
re-positioning of the swap, gains and losses are accounted for on a
realised basis. All such gains and losses have been debited or
credited to the capital column of the Income Statement.
Cash
collateral held by counterparties is included within cash, except
where there is a right of offset against the
overdraft facility.
(D)
Investment income
Dividends
receivable are recognised on the ex-dividend date. Where no
ex-dividend date is quoted, dividends are recognised when the
Company’s right to receive payment is established. Foreign
dividends are grossed up at the appropriate rate of withholding
tax, with the withholding tax recognised in the taxation
charge.
Income
from fixed interest securities is recognised on a time
apportionment basis so as to reflect the effective interest rate.
Deposit interest is accounted for on an accruals basis.
(E)
Expenses
All
expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are
charged through the revenue column of the Income Statement except
as follows:
· expenses
which are incidental to the acquisition or disposal of an
investment are charged to the capital column of the Income
Statement; and
· expenses
are charged to the capital column of the Income Statement where a
connection with the maintenance or enhancement of the value of the
investments can be demonstrated. In this respect the portfolio
management and AIFM fees have been charged to the Income Statement
in line with the Board’s expected long-term split of returns, in
the form of capital gains and income, from the Company’s portfolio.
As a result, 5% of the portfolio management and AIFM fees are
charged to the revenue column of the Income Statement and 95% are
charged to the capital column of the Income Statement.
Any
performance fee is charged in full to the capital column of the
Income Statement.
(F)
Finance costs
Finance
costs are accounted for on an accruals basis. Finance costs are
charged to the Income Statement in line with the Board’s expected
long-term split of returns, in the form of capital gains and
income, from the Company’s portfolio. As a result 5% of the finance
costs are charged to the revenue column of the Income Statement and
95% are charged to the capital column of the Income Statement.
Finance charges are accounted for on an accruals basis in the
Income Statement using the effective interest rate method and are
added to the carrying amount of the instrument to the extent that
they are not settled in the period in which they arise.
(G)
Taxation
The tax
effect of different items of expenditure is allocated between
capital and revenue using the marginal basis.
Deferred
taxation is provided on all timing differences that have originated
but not been reversed by the Statement of Financial Position date
other than those differences regarded as permanent. This is subject
to deferred tax assets only being recognised when it is probable
that there will be suitable profits from which the reversal of
timing differences can be deducted. Any liability to deferred tax
is provided for at the rate of tax enacted or substantially
enacted.
(H)
Foreign currency
Transactions
recorded in overseas currencies during the year are translated into
sterling at the appropriate daily exchange rates. Assets and
liabilities denominated in overseas currencies at the Statement of
Financial Position date are translated into sterling at the
exchange rates ruling at that date.
Exchange gains/losses on foreign currency
balances
Any gains
or losses on the translation of foreign currency balances,
including the foreign currency overdraft, whether realised or
unrealised, are taken to the capital or the revenue column of the
Income Statement, depending on whether the gain or loss is of a
capital or revenue nature.
(I)
Capital redemption reserve
This
reserve arose when ordinary shares were redeemed by the Company and
subsequently cancelled. When ordinary shares are redeemed by the
Company and subsequently cancelled, an amount equal to the par
value of the ordinary share capital is transferred from the
ordinary share capital to the capital redemption
reserve.
(J)
Capital reserve
The
following are transferred to this reserve:
· gains
and losses on the disposal of investments;
· exchange
differences of a capital nature, including the effects of changes
in exchange rates on foreign currency borrowings;
· expenses,
together with the related taxation effect, in accordance with the
above policies; and
· changes
in the fair value of investments and derivatives.
This
reserve can be used to distribute realised capital profits by way
of dividend or share buybacks. Any gains in the fair value of
investments that are not readily convertible to cash are treated as
unrealised gains in the capital reserve. Distributions are only
payable out of the capital reserve if capital reserves are greater
than the proposed distribution and positive on the date of
distribution.
(K)
Revenue reserve
The
revenue reserve is distributable by way of dividend. Dividends are
only payable out of the revenue reserve if revenue reserves are
greater than the proposed dividend and positive on the date of
distribution.
(L)
Dividend payments
Dividends
paid by the Company on its shares are recognised in the financial
statements in the year in which they become payable and are shown
in the Statement of Changes in Equity.
(M)
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash
comprises cash at bank and cash equivalents are short-term, highly
liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of
cash and are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in
value.
Bank
overdrafts are considered as a component of cash and cash
equivalents as they are repayable on demand and form an integral
part of the Company’s cash management.
2.
INCOME FROM INVESTMENTS
|
2024
£’000
|
2023
£’000
|
Income
from investments
|
|
|
Overseas
dividends
|
14,699
|
18,431
|
Fixed
interest income
|
–
|
184
|
UK
dividends
|
3,480
|
3,212
|
|
18,179
|
21,827
|
Other
income
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
27
|
79
|
Deposit
interest
|
3,192
|
2,039
|
Total
income from investments
|
21,398
|
23,945
|
Total
income comprises:
|
|
|
Dividends
|
18,179
|
21,643
|
Interest
|
3,219
|
2,302
|
|
21,398
|
23,945
|
3.
AIFM, PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE FEES
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
AIFM
fee
|
141
|
2,689
|
2,830
|
151
|
2,862
|
3,013
|
Portfolio
management fee
|
672
|
12,765
|
13,437
|
726
|
13,795
|
14,521
|
|
813
|
15,454
|
16,267
|
877
|
16,657
|
17,534
|
Further
details on the above fees are set out in the Strategic Report and
in the Report of the Directors.
4.
OTHER EXPENSES
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Directors’
remuneration
|
211
|
212
|
Employer’s
NIC on Directors’ remuneration
|
17
|
18
|
Auditors’
remuneration for the audit of the Company’s financial
statements
|
56
|
54
|
Depositary
and custody fees
|
227
|
208
|
Listing
fees
|
101
|
85
|
Registrar
fees
|
58
|
45
|
Legal and
professional costs
|
267
|
181
|
Broker
fees
|
–
|
(15)
|
Other
costs
|
357
|
354
|
|
1,294
|
1,142
|
Professional
fees (Capital)^
|
–
|
22
|
|
1,294
|
1,164
|
Details of
the amounts paid to Directors are included in the Directors’
Remuneration Report.
^ Professional
fees in respect of acquisition of unquoted investments. These fees
do not form part of the ongoing charge ratio.
5.
FINANCE COSTS
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Finance
costs
|
406
|
7,718
|
8,124
|
193
|
3,658
|
3,851
|
6.
TAXATION
(A)
Analysis of charge in year
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Corporation
tax at 25% (2023: 19%)
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Overseas
taxation
|
2,853
|
–
|
2,853
|
2,021
|
248
|
2,269
|
|
2,853
|
–
|
2,853
|
2,021
|
248
|
2,269
|
(B)
Factors affecting the tax charge for the year
Approved
investment trusts are exempt from tax on capital gains made within
the Company.
The tax
charged for the year is lower (2023: higher) than the standard rate
of corporation tax of 25% (2023: 19%).
The
difference is explained below.
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
Revenue
|
Capital
|
Total
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Net
return/(loss) before taxation
|
18,885
|
185,130
|
204,015
|
21,733
|
(28,251)
|
(6,518)
|
Corporation
tax at 25% (2023: 19%)
|
4,721
|
46,283
|
51,004
|
4,129
|
(5,415)
|
(1,286)
|
Non-taxable
(gains)/losses on investments
|
–
|
(52,076)
|
(52,076)
|
–
|
1,551
|
1,551
|
Overseas
withholding taxation
|
2,853
|
–
|
2,853
|
2,021
|
–
|
2,021
|
Overseas
capital gains tax
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
248
|
248
|
Non
taxable dividends
|
(4,545)
|
–
|
(4,545)
|
(4,112)
|
–
|
(4,112)
|
Unutilised
management expenses
|
(176)
|
5,056
|
4,880
|
(17)
|
3,864
|
3,847
|
Corporate
interest restriction
|
–
|
737
|
737
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
Total
tax charge
|
2,853
|
–
|
2,853
|
2,021
|
248
|
2,269
|
(C)
Provision for deferred tax
No
provision for deferred taxation has been made in the current or
prior year. The Company has not provided for deferred tax on
capital profits and losses arising on the revaluation or disposal
of investments, as it is exempt from tax on these items because of
its status as an investment trust company.
The
Company has not recognised a deferred tax asset of £54,349,000 (25%
tax rate) (2023: £49,985,000 (25% tax rate)) as a result of excess
management expenses and overdraft expenses. It is not anticipated
that these excess expenses will be utilised in the foreseeable
future.
7.
RETURN/(LOSS) PER SHARE
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
The
return/(loss) per share is based on the following
figures:
|
|
|
Revenue
return
|
16,032
|
19,712
|
Capital
return/(loss)
|
185,130
|
(28,499)
|
|
201,162
|
(8,787)
|
Weighted
average number of ordinary shares in issue during the
year
|
585,308,530
|
644,744,220
|
Revenue
return per ordinary share
|
2.7p
|
3.0p
|
Capital
return/(loss) per ordinary share
|
31.7p
|
(4.4)p
|
|
34.4p
|
(1.4)p
|
2023
return per share figures restated for the sub-division of each
ordinary share into 10 new ordinary shares during the
year.
The
calculation of the total, revenue and capital (loss)/return per
ordinary share is carried out in accordance with IAS 33, “Earnings
per Share”, in accordance with the requirements of FRS
102.
8.
DIVIDENDS
Under UK
Company Law, final dividends are not recognised until they are
approved by shareholders and interim dividends are not recognised
until they are paid. They are also debited directly from reserves.
Amounts recognised as distributable in these financial statements
were as follows:
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Final
dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2022
|
–
|
12,721
|
Interim
dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2023
|
–
|
4,490
|
Final
dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2023
|
14,709
|
–
|
Interim
dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2024
|
3,998
|
–
|
|
18,707
|
17,211
|
In respect
of the year ended 31 March 2024, an
interim dividend of 0.7p per share was paid on 11 January 2024. A final dividend of 2.1p will be
payable, subject to shareholder approval, on 26 July 2024, the associated ex-dividend date
will be 13 June 2024. The total
dividends payable in respect of the year ended 31 March 2024 amount to 2.8p per share (2023:
31.0p per share, prior to 10 for 1 share split). The aggregate cost
of the final dividend, based on the number of shares in issue
(excluding shares held in treasury) at 5
June 2024, will be £11,241,000. In accordance with FRS 102
dividends will be reflected in the financial statements for the
year in which they become payable. Total dividends in respect of
the financial year, which is the basis on which the requirements of
s1158 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010 are considered, are set out
below.
|
2024
£’000
|
2023
£’000
|
Revenue
available for distribution by way of dividend for the
year
|
16,032
|
19,712
|
Interim
dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2024
|
(3,998)
|
–
|
Final
dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2024*
|
(11,241)
|
–
|
Interim
dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2023
|
–
|
(4,490)
|
Final
dividend in respect of the year ended 31 March 2023
|
–
|
(14,717)
|
Net
retained revenue
|
793
|
505
|
* based
on 535,264,463 shares in issue (excluding shares held in treasury)
as at 5 June 2024.
9.
INVESTMENTS AND DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
|
|
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Quoted
|
Unquoted
|
|
Instruments
-
|
Total
|
|
Investments
|
Investments
|
Total
|
Net
|
Investments
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Cost at 1
April 2023
|
1,829,033
|
121,703
|
1,950,736
|
–
|
1,950,736
|
Investment
holdings gains/(losses) at 1 April 2023
|
212,214
|
23,467
|
235,681
|
(26,892)
|
208,789
|
Valuation
at 1 April 2023
|
2,041,247
|
145,170
|
2,186,417
|
(26,892)
|
2,159,525
|
Movement
in the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
at cost
|
987,042
|
3,278
|
990,320
|
–
|
990,320
|
Sales -
proceeds
|
(1,244,565)
|
–
|
(1,244,565)
|
(22,313)
|
(1,266,878)
|
Net
movement in investment holding gains/(losses)
|
191,384
|
(15,321)
|
176,063
|
37,731
|
213,794
|
Valuation
at 31 March 2024
|
1,975,108
|
133,127
|
2,108,235
|
(11,474)
|
2,096,761
|
Cost at 31
March 2024
|
1,549,252
|
124,985
|
1,674,237
|
–
|
1,674,237
|
Investment
holding gains/(losses) at 31 March 2024
|
425,856
|
8,142
|
433,998
|
(11,474)
|
422,524
|
Valuation
at 31 March 2024
|
1,975,108
|
133,127
|
2,108,235
|
(11,474)
|
2,096,761
|
* See
Note 16.
The
Company received £1,266,878,000 (2023: £1,393,875,000) from
investments and derivatives sold in the year. The book cost of
these was £1,266,824,000 (2023: £1,307,159,000). These investments
and derivatives have been revalued over time and until they were
sold any unrealised gains/losses were included in the fair value of
the investments.
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Net
movement in investment holding gains in the year
|
176,063
|
33,331
|
Net
movement in derivative holding gains/(losses) in the
year
|
37,731
|
(22,835)
|
Effective
interest rate amortisation
|
–
|
(108)
|
Gains
on investments
|
213,794
|
10,388
|
Purchase
transaction costs were £992,000 (2023: £1,660,000). Sales
transaction costs were £1,299,000 (2023: £1,266,000). These
comprise mainly commission and stamp duty.
10.
DERIVATIVES
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Fair value
of OTC equity swaps (asset)
|
944
|
209
|
Fair value
of OTC equity swaps (liability)
|
(12,418)
|
(27,101)
|
|
(11,474)
|
(26,892)
|
See note 9
above for movements during the year.
11.
DEBTORS
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Amounts
due from brokers
|
6,508
|
88
|
Withholding
taxation recoverable
|
1,665
|
2,882
|
Prepayments
and accrued income
|
2,059
|
1,406
|
|
10,232
|
4,376
|
12.
CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Amounts
due to brokers
|
23,973
|
9,432
|
Overdraft
drawn*
|
68,942
|
55,928
|
Other
creditors and accruals
|
7,458
|
6,745
|
|
100,373
|
72,105
|
* The
Company’s borrowing requirements are met through the utilisation of
an overdraft facility provided by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The
overdraft is drawn down in U.S. dollars. Interest on the drawn
overdraft is charged at the United States Overnight Bank Funding
Rate plus 45 basis points.
J.P.
Morgan Securities LLC may take investments up to 140% of the value
of the overdrawn balance as collateral and has been granted a first
priority security interest or lien over the Company’s
assets.
13.
SHARE CAPITAL
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
Number
|
Number
|
As
at 1 April
|
62,620,763
|
65,457,246
|
Purchase
of shares into treasury pre-share split
|
(2,507,439)
|
(2,836,483)
|
Issue of
shares following 10 for 1 share split
|
541,019,916
|
–
|
Purchase
of shares into treasury post-share split
|
(55,190,908)
|
–
|
As at year
end:
|
|
|
In
circulation
|
545,942,332
|
62,620,763
|
In
Treasury
|
55,722,868
|
2,438,015
|
Listed
|
601,665,200
|
65,058,778
|
Nominal
Value of 2.5p (2023: 25p) ordinary shares (£000)
|
15,042
|
16,265
|
During the
year, the Company bought back ordinary shares at a cost of
£252,759,000 (Year ended 31 March
2023: £91,514,000).
Following
the AGM held in July 2023 4,892,258
shares were cancelled from treasury. At the AGM shareholders
approved a resolution for a ten for one share split such that each
shareholder would receive ten shares with a nominal value of
2.5 pence
each for every one share held. 541,498,680 additional shares
(541,019,916 to shareholders and 478,764 in relation to shares held
in treasury) were issued on 27 July
2023 following this approval.
14.
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
|
2024
|
2023
|
Net asset
value per share
|
381.1p
|
343.5p
|
The net
asset value per share is based on the assets attributable to equity
shareholders of £2,080,417,000 (2023: £2,150,721,000) and on the
number of shares in issue at the year-end (excluding those shares
held in treasury) of 545,942,332 (2023: 62,620,763) in issue.
Comparative NAV per share adjusted to reflect ten for one share
issue during the year).
15.
RELATED PARTIES AND TRANSACTIONS WITH THE AIFM
The
following are considered to be related parties:
· Frostrow
Capital LLP (the Company’s AIFM, a related party under the Listing
Rules only)
· OrbiMed
Capital LLC (the Company’s Portfolio Manager)
· The
Directors of the Company
Sven Borho is a Managing Partner at OrbiMed and has waived
his Director’s fee of £34,244 (2023: £33,573). Details of fees paid
to OrbiMed by the Company can be found in note 3. All material
related party transactions have been disclosed in notes 3 and
4.
Details of
the remuneration of all Directors can be found in the Remuneration
Report. Details of the Directors’ interests in the capital of the
Company can also be found in the Remuneration Report.
Three
current and two former partners at OrbiMed have a minority
financial interest totalling 19.4% in Frostrow, the Company’s AIFM.
Details of the fees paid to Frostrow by the Company can be found in
note 3.
16.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Risk
management policies and procedures
The
Company’s financial instruments comprise securities and other
investments, derivative instruments, cash balances, overdrafts and
debtors and creditors that arise directly from its
operations.
As an
investment trust, the Company invests in equities and other
investments for the long term so as to secure its investment
objective. In pursuing its investment objective, the Company is
exposed to a variety of risks that could result in a reduction in
the Company’s net assets.
The main
risks that the Company faces arising from its financial instruments
are:
(i) market
risk (including foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and other
price risk)
(ii) liquidity
risk
(iii) credit
risk
These
risks, with the exception of liquidity risk, and the Directors’
approach to the management of them have not changed from the
previous accounting year. The AIFM, in close co-operation with the
Board and the Portfolio Manager, co-ordinates
the Company’s risk management.
Use
of derivatives
Equity
swaps are used within the Company’s portfolio.
OTC
equity swaps
The
Company uses OTC equity swap positions to gain access to the Indian
and Chinese markets when it is more cost effective to gain access
via swaps or to gain exposure to thematic baskets of
stocks.
Offsetting
disclosure
Swap
trades and OTC derivatives are traded under ISDA† Master
Agreements. The Company currently has such agreements in place with
Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan.
These
agreements create a right of set-off that becomes enforceable only
following a specified event of default, or in other circumstances
not expected to arise in the normal course of business. As the
right of set-off is not unconditional, for financial reporting
purposes, the Company does not offset derivative assets and
derivative liabilities.
† International
Swap Dealers Association Inc.
(i)
Other price risk
In
pursuance of the Company’s Investment Objective the Company’s
portfolio, including its derivatives, is exposed to the risk of
fluctuations in market prices and foreign exchange
rates.
The Board
manage these risks through the use of limits and guidelines,
monthly compliance reports from Frostrow and reports from Frostrow
and OrbiMed presented at each Board meeting.
Other
price risk exposure
The
Company’s gross exposure to other price risk is represented by the
fair value of the investments and the underlying exposure through
the derivative investments held at the year-end as shown in the
table below.
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
|
|
Notional*
|
|
|
Notional*
|
|
Assets
|
Liabilities
|
exposure
|
Assets
|
Liabilities
|
exposure
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Investments
|
2,108,235
|
–
|
2,108,235
|
2,186,417
|
–
|
2,186,417
|
OTC equity
swaps
|
944
|
(12,418)
|
198,082
|
209
|
(27,101)
|
190,704
|
|
2,109,179
|
(12,418)
|
2,306,318
|
2,186,626
|
(27,101)
|
2,377,121
|
* The
notional exposure is calculated in accordance with the AIFMD
requirements for calculating exposure via derivatives. See
glossary.
Other
price risk sensitivity
If market
prices of all of the Company’s financial instruments including the
derivatives at the Statement of Financial Position date had been
25% higher or lower (2023: 25% higher or lower) while all other
variables remained constant: the revenue return would have
decreased/increased by £0.2 million (2023: £0.2 million); the
capital return would have increased/decreased by £572.5 million
(2023: £596.6 million); and, the return on equity would have
increased/decreased by £572.3 million (2023: £594.6 million). The
calculations are based on the portfolio as at the respective
Statement of Financial Position dates and are not representative of
the year as a whole.
(ii)
Foreign currency risk
A
significant proportion of the Company’s portfolio and derivative
positions are denominated in currencies other than sterling (the
Company’s functional currency, and the currency in which it reports
its results). As a result, movements in exchange rates can
significantly affect the sterling value of those items.
Foreign
currency exposure
The fair
values of the Company’s monetary assets and liabilities that are
denominated in foreign currencies are shown below.
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
2023
|
|
Current
|
Current
|
|
Current
|
Current
|
|
|
assets
|
liabilities
|
Investments
|
assets
|
liabilities
|
Investments
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
U.S.
dollar
|
140,646
|
(166,711)
|
1,579,696
|
115,823
|
(124,286)
|
1,488,321
|
Swiss
franc
|
11,102
|
–
|
11,652
|
2,466
|
–
|
84,999
|
Japanese
yen
|
1,041
|
–
|
130,007
|
793
|
–
|
135,398
|
Hong Kong
dollar
|
–
|
–
|
62,058
|
–
|
–
|
109,170
|
Other
|
993
|
–
|
132,435
|
194
|
–
|
201,798
|
|
153,782
|
(166,711)
|
1,915,848
|
119,276
|
(124,286)
|
2,019,686
|
Foreign
currency sensitivity
The
following table details the sensitivity of the Company’s net return
for the year and shareholders’ funds to a 10% increase
and decrease in sterling against the relevant currency (2023: 10%
increase and decrease).
These
percentages have been determined based on market volatility in
exchange rates over the previous 12 months. The sensitivity
analysis is based on the Company’s significant foreign currency
exposures at each Statement of Financial Position date.
|
|
|
|
2024
|
|
|
|
2023
|
|
USD
|
YEN
|
CHF
|
HKD
|
USD
|
YEN
|
CHF
|
HKD
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Sterling
depreciates
|
195,910
|
14,561
|
2,528
|
6,895
|
188,606
|
15,132
|
9,718
|
12,130
|
Sterling
appreciates
|
(160,290)
|
(11,913)
|
(2,069)
|
(5,642)
|
(154,314)
|
(12,381)
|
(7,951)
|
(9,925)
|
(iii)
Interest rate risk
Interest
rate changes may affect:
– the
interest payable on the Company’s variable rate
borrowings;
– the
level of income receivable from floating and fixed rate securities
and cash at bank and on deposit;
–
the fair
value of investments in fixed interest securities.
Interest
rate exposure
The
Company’s main exposure to interest rate risks is through its
overdraft facility with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, which is
repayable on demand, and its holding in fixed interest securities.
The exposure of financial assets and liabilities to fixed and
floating interest rates, is shown below.
The
interest rate exposure is shown in the table below.
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
Floating
|
Floating
|
|
rate
|
rate
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Cash
|
78,721
|
100,366
|
Overdraft
facility
|
(12,412)
|
(97,369)
|
Financed
swap positions
|
(209,556)
|
(217,596)
|
|
(143,247)
|
(214,599)
|
All
interest rate exposures are held in U.S. dollars.
Cash of
£78.7 million (2023: £100.4 million) was held as collateral against
the financed swap positions, of which £4.9 million
(2023: £41.4 million) was offset against the overdraft
position.
Interest
rate sensitivity
If
interest rates had been 1% higher or lower and all other variables
were held constant, the Company’s net return for the year ended
31 March 2024 and the net assets
would increase/decrease by £1.4 million (2023: increase/decrease by
£2.1 million).
(iv)
Liquidity risk
This is
the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting
obligations associated with financial liabilities.
Management
of the risk
Liquidity
risk is not considered significant as the majority of the Company’s
assets are investments in quoted securities that are readily
realisable within one week, in normal market conditions. There may
be circumstances where market liquidity is lower than normal.
Stress tests have been performed to understand how long the
portfolio would take to realise in such situations. The Board is
comfortable that in such a situation the Company would be able to
meet its liabilities as they fall due.
Liquidity
exposure and maturity
Contractual
maturities of the financial liability exposures as at 31 March 2024, based on the earliest date on
which payment can be required, are as follows:
|
|
2024
|
|
2023
|
|
3
to 12
|
3
months
|
3
to 12
|
3
months
|
|
months
|
or
less
|
months
|
or
less
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Overdraft
facility
|
–
|
12,412
|
–
|
97,369
|
Amounts
due to brokers and accruals
|
–
|
31,461
|
–
|
16,177
|
OTC equity
swaps
|
12,418
|
–
|
27,101
|
–
|
|
12,418
|
43,873
|
27,101
|
113,546
|
£4.9
million of cash held as collateral is offset against the overdraft
facility in the Statement of Financial Position, as set out in Note
16(iii) above.
(v)
Credit risk
Credit
risk is the risk of failure of a counterparty to discharge its
obligations resulting in the Company suffering a financial
loss.
The
carrying amounts of financial assets best represent the maximum
credit risk at the Statement of Financial Position date.
The
Company’s quoted securities are held on its behalf by J.P. Morgan
Securities LLC acting as the Company’s Custodian and Prime
Broker.
Certain of
the Company’s assets can be held by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC as
collateral against the overdraft provided by them to the Company.
As at 31 March 2024 such assets held
by J.P. Morgan Securities LLC are available for rehypothecation
(see Glossary). As at 31 March 2024,
assets with a total market value of £104.1 million (2023: £134.7
million) were available to J.P. Morgan Securities LLC to be used as
collateral against the overdraft facility which equates to 140% of
the overdrawn position (calculated on a settled basis).
CREDIT
RISK EXPOSURE
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Derivative
– OTC equity swaps
|
944
|
209
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
Other
receivables (amounts due from brokers, dividends and interest
receivable)
|
10,232
|
4,376
|
Cash
|
73,797
|
58,925
|
(vi)
Fair value of financial assets and financial
liabilities
Financial
assets and financial liabilities are either carried in the
Statement of Financial Position at their fair value (investments
and derivatives) or the Statement of Financial Position amount is a
reasonable approximation of fair value (due from brokers, dividends
and interest receivable, due to brokers, accrual, cash at bank, and
the overdraft).
(vii)
Hierarchy of investments
The
Company has classified its financial assets designated at fair
value through profit or loss and the fair value of derivative
financial instruments using a fair value hierarchy that reflects
the significance of the inputs used in making the fair value
measurements. The hierarchy has the following levels:
· Level
1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities;
· Level
2 – inputs other than quoted prices included with Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly (i.e. as
prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices); and
· Level
3 – inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on
observable market data (unobservable inputs).
As
of 31 March 2024
|
Level
1
£’000
|
Level
2
£’000
|
Level
3
£’000
|
Total
£’000
|
Investments
held at fair value through profit or loss
|
1,975,108
|
–
|
133,
127
|
2,108,235
|
Derivatives:
OTC swaps (assets)
|
–
|
944
|
–
|
944
|
Derivatives:
OTC swaps (liabilities)
|
–
|
(12,418)
|
–
|
(12,418)
|
Financial
instruments measured at fair value
|
1,975,108
|
(11,474)
|
133,127
|
2,096,761
|
As at
31 March 2024 & 2023, ten equity
investments and a deferred consideration investment have been
classified as level 3. All level 3 positions have been valued in
accordance with the accounting policy set out in Note
1(b).
During
2023 one unquoted investment was transferred to Level 1 following
their initial public offering.
As
of 31 March 2023
|
Level
1
£’000
|
Level
2
£’000
|
Level
3
£’000
|
Total
£’000
|
Investments
held at fair value through profit or loss
|
2,041,247
|
–
|
145,170
|
2,186,417
|
Derivatives:
OTC swaps (assets)
|
–
|
209
|
–
|
209
|
Derivatives:
OTC swaps (liabilities)
|
–
|
(27,101)
|
–
|
(27,101)
|
Financial
instruments measured at fair value
|
2,041,247
|
(26,892)
|
145,170
|
2,159,525
|
(viii)
Capital management policies and procedures
The
Company’s capital management objectives are to ensure that it will
be able to continue as a going concern and to maximise the income
and capital return to its equity shareholders through an
appropriate level of gearing or leverage.
The
Board’s policy on gearing and leverage is set out in the Strategic
Report.
As at
31 March 2024 the Company had a net
leverage percentage of 10.8% (2023: 10.5%).
The
capital structure of the Company consists of the equity share
capital, retained earnings and other reserves as shown in the
Statement of Financial Position.
The Board,
with the assistance of the AIFM and the Portfolio Manager, monitors
and reviews the broad structure of the Company’s capital on an
ongoing basis. This includes a review of:
–
the
planned level of gearing, which takes into account the Portfolio
Manager’s view of the market;
–
the need
to buy back equity shares, either for cancellation or to hold in
treasury, in light of any share price discount to net asset value
per share in accordance with the Company’s share buy-back
policy;
–
the need
for new issues of equity shares, including issues from treasury;
and
–
the extent
to which revenue in excess of that which is required to be
distributed should be retained.
The
Company’s objectives, policies and processes for managing capital
are unchanged from the preceding accounting year.
17.
CAPITAL RESERVE
|
Capital
Reserves
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Other
|
Gains*
|
Total
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
At 1 April
2023
|
888,953
|
372,072
|
1,261,025
|
Net
gains/(losses) on investments
|
60
|
213,734
|
213,794
|
Expenses
and taxation charged to capital
|
(23,172)
|
–
|
(23,172)
|
Exchange
loss on currency balances
|
(5,492)
|
–
|
(5,492)
|
Shares
repurchased for Treasury
|
(252,759)
|
–
|
(252,759)
|
At
31 March 2024
|
607,590
|
585,806
|
1,193,396
|
* Investment
holding gains relate to the revaluation of investments and
derivatives held at the reporting date. (See note 9 for further
details).
Under the
Company’s Articles of Association, sums within “capital reserves –
other” are also available for distribution.
18.
RECONCILIATION OF OPERATING RETURN/(LOSS) TO NET CASH INFLOW FROM
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
Gain/(loss)
before finance charges and taxation
|
212,139
|
(2,667)
|
Add:
capital (gain)/loss before finance charges and taxation
|
(192,848)
|
24,593
|
Revenue
return before finance charges and taxation
|
19,291
|
21,926
|
Expenses
charged to capital
|
(15,454)
|
(16,679)
|
(Increase)/decrease
in other debtors
|
(653)
|
150
|
Increase
in other creditors
|
714
|
2,669
|
Net
taxation suffered on investment income
|
(1,636)
|
(2,564)
|
Amortisation
|
–
|
(108)
|
Net
cash inflow from operating activities
|
2,262
|
5,394
|
GLOSSARY
OF TERMS AND ALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES
(“APMS”)
ALTERNATIVE
INVESTMENT FUND MANAGERS DIRECTIVE (“AIFMD”)
Agreed by
the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union and
transported into UK legislation, the
AIFMD
classifies certain investment vehicles, including investment
companies, as Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) and requires them
to appoint an Alternative Investment Fund Manager (AIFM) and a
depositary to manage and oversee the operations of the investment
vehicle. The Board of the Company retains responsibility for
strategy, operations and compliance and the Directors retain a
fiduciary duty to shareholders.
Alternative
performance measure (“APM”)
An APM is
a numerical measure of the Company’s current, historical or future
financial performance, financial position or cash flows, other than
a financial measure defined or specified in the applicable
financial framework. In selecting these Alternative Performance
Measures, the Directors considered the key objectives and
expectations of typical investors in an investment trust such as
the Company.
Discount
or premium
A
description of the difference between the share price and the net
asset value per share. The size of the discount or premium is
calculated by subtracting the share price from the net asset value
per share and is usually expressed as a percentage (%) of the net
asset value per share. If the share price is higher than the net
asset value per share the result is a premium. If the share price
is lower than the net asset value per share, the shares are trading
at a discount.
Equity
swaps
An equity
swap is an agreement where one party (counterparty) transfers the
total return of an underlying equity position to the other party
(swap holder) in exchange for a payment of the principal, and
interest for financed swaps, at a set date. Total return includes
dividend income and gains or losses from market movements. The
exposure of the holder is the market value of the underlying equity
position.
The
Company currently only uses financed equity swaps, where payment is
made on maturity. Financed swaps increase exposure by the value of
the underlying equity position, with no initial outlay and no
increase in the investment portfolio’s value – there is therefore
embedded leverage within a financed swap due to the deferral of
payment to maturity.
The
Company employs swaps for two purposes:
· To
gain access to individual stocks in the Indian, Chinese and other
emerging markets, where the Company is not locally registered to
trade or is able to gain in a more cost efficient manner than
holding the stocks directly; and,
· To
gain exposure to thematic baskets of stocks (a Basket Swap). Basket
Swaps are used to build exposure to themes, or ideas, that the
Portfolio Manager believes the Company will benefit from and where
holding a Basket Swap is more cost effective and operationally
efficient than holding the underlying stocks or individual
swaps.
Gearing
Gearing is
calculated as the overdraft drawn, less net current assets
(excluding dividends), divided by Net Assets, expressed as a
percentage. For years prior to 2013, the calculation was based on
borrowings as a percentage of Net Assets.
* Alternative
Performance Measure
International
swaps and derivatives association (“ISDA”)
ISDA has
created a standardised contract (the ISDA Master Agreement) which
sets out the basic trading terms between the counterparties to
derivative contracts.
Leverage
Leverage
is defined in the AIFMD as any method by which the AIFM increases
the exposure of an AIF. In addition to the gearing limit the
Company also has to comply with the AIFMD leverage requirements.
For these purposes the Board has set a maximum leverage limit of
140% for both methods. This limit is expressed as a % with 100%
representing no leverage or gearing in the Company. There are two
methods of calculating leverage as follows:
The Gross
Method is calculated as total exposure divided by Shareholders’
Funds. Total exposure is calculated as net assets, less cash and
cash equivalents, adding back cash borrowing plus derivatives
converted into the equivalent position in their underlying
assets.
The
Commitment Method is calculated as total exposure divided by
Shareholders Funds. In this instance total exposure is calculated
as net assets, less cash and cash equivalents, adding back cash
borrowing plus derivatives converted into the equivalent position
in their underlying assets, adjusted for netting and hedging
arrangements.
See the
definition of Equity Swaps for more details on how exposure through
these instruments is calculated.
|
2024
£’000
|
2023
£’000
|
|
Fair
Value
|
Exposure*
|
Fair
Value
|
Exposure*
|
Investments
|
2,108,235
|
2,108,235
|
2,186,417
|
2,186,417
|
OTC equity
swaps
|
(11,474)
|
198,082
|
(26,092)
|
190,704
|
|
2,096,761
|
2,306,317
|
2,159,525
|
2,377,121
|
Shareholders’
funds
|
|
2,081,180
|
|
2,150,721
|
Leverage
%
|
|
10.8%
|
|
10.5%
|
* Calculated
in accordance with AIFMD requirements using the Commitment
Method
MSCI
World Health Care Index (the Company’s
Benchmark)
The MSCI
World Health Care Index is designed to capture the large and mid
capitalisation segments across 23 developed markets countries: All
securities in the index are classified as healthcare as per the
Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). Developed Markets
countries include: Australia,
Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong
Kong, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan,
Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland the UK and the U.S. The net total
return of the Index is used which assumes the reinvestment of any
dividends paid by its constituents after the deduction of relevant
withholding taxes. The performance of the Index is calculated in
U.S.$ terms. Because the Company’s reporting currency is £ the
prevailing U.S.$/£ exchange rate is applied to obtain a £ based
return.
NAV
per share (pence)
The value
of the Company’s assets, principally investments made in other
companies and cash being held, minus any liabilities. The NAV is
also described as ‘shareholders’ funds’ per share. The NAV is often
expressed in pence per share after being divided by the number of
shares which have been issued. The NAV per share is unlikely to be
the same as the share price which is the price at which the
Company’s shares can be bought or sold by an investor. The share
price is determined by the relationship between the demand and
supply of the shares.
* Alternative
Performance Measure
Net
asset value (NAV) per share total return*
The
theoretical total return on shareholders’ funds per share,
reflecting the change in NAV assuming that dividends paid to
shareholders were reinvested at NAV at the time the shares were
quoted ex-dividend. A way of measuring investment management
performance of investment trusts which is not affected by movements
in discounts/premiums.
|
2024
|
2023
|
NAV
Total Return
|
p
|
p
|
Opening
NAV
|
343.5
|
346.5
|
Increase/(decrease)
in NAV
|
37.6
|
(3.1)
|
Closing
NAV
|
381.1
|
343.5
|
%
increase/(decrease) in NAV
|
10.9%
|
(0.9%)
|
Impact of
reinvested dividends
|
1.1%
|
0.8%
|
NAV
Total Return
|
12.0%
|
(0.1%)
|
Ongoing
Charges*
Ongoing
charges are calculated by taking the Company’s annualised ongoing
charges, excluding finance costs, taxation, performance fees and
exceptional items, and expressing them as a percentage of the
average daily net asset value of the Company over the
year.
|
2024
|
2023
|
|
£’000
|
£’000
|
AIFM &
Portfolio Management fees (Note 3)
|
16,267
|
17,534
|
Other
Expenses – Revenue (Note 4)
|
1,294
|
1,142
|
Total
Ongoing Charges
|
17,561
|
18,676
|
Performance
fees paid/crystallised
|
–
|
–
|
Total
|
17,561
|
18,676
|
Average
net assets
|
2,036,653
|
2,247,296
|
Ongoing
Charges
|
0.9%
|
0.8%
|
Ongoing
Charges (including performance fees paid or crystallised during the
year)
|
0.9%
|
0.8%
|
Rehypothecation
Rehypothecation
is the practice by banks and brokers of using, for their own
purposes, assets that have been posted as collateral by
clients.
Share
Price Total Return*
Return to
the investor on mid-market prices assuming that all dividends paid
were reinvested.
|
2024
|
2023
|
Share
Price Total Return
|
p
|
p
|
Opening
share price
|
311.5
|
327.5
|
Increase
in share price
|
23.5
|
16.0
|
Closing
share price
|
335.0
|
311.5
|
% increase
in share price
|
7.5%
|
(4.9%)
|
Impact of
reinvested dividends
|
1.1%
|
0.8%
|
Share
Price Total Return
|
8.6%
|
(4.1%)
|
* Alternative
Performance Measure
NOTICE
OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
Notice is
hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of Worldwide
Healthcare Trust PLC will be held at Saddlers' Hall, 40 Gutter
Lane, London EC2V 6BR on
Wednesday, 10 July 2024 from
1.00 p.m. for the following
purposes:
Ordinary
Resolutions
To
consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolutions which
will be proposed as ordinary resolutions:
1. That
the Report of the Directors and the audited Accounts for the year
ended 31 March 2024 together with the
Report of the Auditors thereon be received and adopted.
2. To
approve the payment of a final dividend of 2.1p per ordinary share
for the year ended 31 March
2024.
3. To
approve the Company’s dividend policy, as set out on page 31 of the
Annual Report for the year ended 31 March
2024.
4. To
re-elect Mr Doug McCutcheon as a
Director of the Company.
5. To
re-elect Mr Sven Borho as a Director
of the Company.
6. To
re-elect Dr Bina Rawal as a Director
of the Company.
7. To
re-elect Mr Tim Livett as a Director
of the Company.
8. To
re-elect Ms Jo Parfrey as a Director
of the Company.
9. To
re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s Auditors and
to authorise the Audit & Risk Committee to determine their
remuneration.
10. To
approve the Directors’ Remuneration Report for the year ended
31 March 2024.
Authority
to Allot Shares
11. THAT
in substitution for all existing authorities the Directors be and
are hereby generally and unconditionally authorised in accordance
with section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”) to exercise
all powers of the Company to allot relevant securities (within the
meaning of section 551 of the Act) up to a maximum aggregate
nominal amount equal to 10% of the issued share capital of the
Company at 5 June 2024 (or, if
changed, the number representing 10% of the issued share capital of
the Company at the date at which this resolution is passed),
provided that this authority shall expire at the conclusion of the
Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2025 or 15
months from the date of passing this resolution, whichever is the
earlier, unless previously revoked, varied or renewed, by the
Company in General Meeting and provided that the Company shall be
entitled to make, prior to the expiry of such authority, an offer
or agreement which would or might require relevant securities to be
allotted after such expiry and the Directors may allot relevant
securities pursuant to such offer or agreement as if the authority
conferred hereby had not expired.
Special
Resolutions
To
consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolutions which
will be proposed as special resolutions:
Disapplication
of Pre-Emption Rights
12. THAT
in substitution for all existing powers (and in addition to any
power conferred on them by resolution 13 set out in the notice
convening the Annual General Meeting at which this resolution is
proposed (“Notice of Annual General Meeting”)) the Directors be and
are hereby generally empowered pursuant to Section 570 of the
Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”) to allot equity securities (within
the meaning of Section 560 of the Act) for cash pursuant to the
authority conferred on them by resolution 11 set out in the Notice
of Annual General Meeting or otherwise as if Section 561(1) of the
Act did not apply to any such allotment:
(a) pursuant
to an offer of equity securities open for acceptance for a period
fixed by the Directors where the equity securities respectively
attributable to the interests of holders of shares in the capital
of the Company (“Shares”) are proportionate (as nearly as may be)
to the respective numbers of Shares held by them but subject to
such exclusions or other arrangements in connection with the issue
as the Directors may consider necessary, appropriate or expedient
to deal with equity securities representing fractional entitlements
or to deal with legal or practical problems arising in any overseas
territory, the requirements of any regulatory body or stock
exchange, or any other matter whatsoever;
(b) provided
that (otherwise than pursuant to sub-paragraph (a) above) this
power shall be limited to the allotment of equity securities up to
an aggregate nominal value equal to 10% of the issued share capital
of the Company at 5 June 2024 (or, if
changed, the number representing 10% of the issued share capital of
the Company at the date at which this resolution is passed) and
provided further that (i) the number of equity securities to which
this power applies shall be reduced from time to time by the number
of treasury shares which are sold pursuant to any power conferred
on the Directors by resolution 13 set out in the Notice of Annual
General Meeting and (ii) no allotment of equity securities shall be
made under this power which would result in Shares being issued at
a price which is less than the net asset value per Share as at the
latest practicable date before such allotment of equity securities
as determined by the Directors in their reasonable discretion;
and
such power
shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General Meeting
of the Company after the passing of this resolution or 15 months
from the date of passing this resolution, whichever is earlier,
unless previously revoked, varied or renewed by the Company in
General Meeting and provided that the Company shall be entitled to
make, prior to the expiry of such authority, an offer or agreement
which would or might otherwise require equity securities to be
allotted after such expiry and the Directors may allot equity
securities pursuant to such offer or agreement as if the power
conferred hereby had not expired.
13. THAT
in substitution for all existing powers (and in addition to any
power conferred on them by resolution 12 set out in the Notice of
Annual General Meeting) the Directors be and are hereby generally
empowered pursuant to Section 570
of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”) to sell relevant shares
(within the meaning of Section 560 of the Act) if, immediately
before the sale, such shares are held by the Company as treasury
shares (as defined in Section 724 of the Act (“treasury shares”)),
for cash as if Section 561(1) of the Act did not apply to any such
sale provided that:
(a) this
power shall be limited to the sale of relevant shares having an
aggregate nominal value equal to 10% of the issued share capital of
the Company at 5 June 2024 (or, if
changed, the number representing 10% of the issued share capital of
the Company at the date at which this resolution is passed) and
provided further that the number of relevant shares to which power
applies shall be reduced from time to time by the number of Shares
which are allotted for cash as if Section 561(1) of the Act did not
apply pursuant to the power conferred on the Directors by
resolution 15 set out in the Notice of Annual General
Meeting,
and such
power shall expire at the conclusion of the next Annual General
Meeting of the Company after the passing of this resolution or 15
months from the date of passing this resolution, whichever is
earlier, unless previously revoked, varied or renewed by the
Company in General Meeting and provided that the Company shall be
entitled to make, prior to the expiry of such authority, an offer
or agreement which would or might otherwise require treasury shares
to be sold after such expiry and the Directors may sell treasury
shares pursuant to such offer or agreement as if the power
conferred hereby had not expired.
Authority
to Repurchase Ordinary Shares
14. THAT
the Company be and is hereby generally and unconditionally
authorised in accordance with section 701 of the Companies Act 2006
(the “Act”) to make one or more market purchases (within the
meaning of section 693 of the Act) of ordinary shares in the
capital of the Company (“Shares”) (either for retention as treasury
shares for future reissue, resale, transfer or cancellation),
provided that:
(a) the
maximum aggregate number of Shares authorised to be purchased shall
be that number of shares which is equal to 14.99% of the issued
share capital of the Company as of the value of the date of the
passing of this resolution;
(b) the
minimum price (exclusive of expenses) which may be paid for a Share
is 2.5 pence;
(c) the
maximum price (exclusive of expenses) which may be paid for a Share
is an amount equal to the greater of (i) 105% of the average of the
middle market quotations for a Share as derived from the Daily
Official List of the London Stock Exchange for the five business
days immediately preceding the day on which that Share is purchased
and (ii) the higher of the price of the last independent trade and
the highest then current independent bid on the London Stock
Exchange as stipulated in the technical standards referred to in
Article 5(6) of the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014
(which forms part of UK law by virtue of the European Union
(Withdrawal) Act 2018);
(d) the
authority hereby conferred shall expire at the conclusion of the
Annual General Meeting of the Company to be held in 2025 or, if
earlier, on the expiry of 15 months from the date of the passing of
this resolution unless such authority is renewed prior to such
time; and
(e) the
Company may make a contract to purchase Shares under this authority
before the expiry of such authority which will or may be executed
wholly or partly after the expiration of such authority, and may
make a purchase of Shares in pursuance of any such
contract.
General
Meetings
15. THAT
the Directors be authorised to call general meetings (other than
the Annual General Meeting of the Company) on not less than 14
clear days’ notice, such authority to expire on the conclusion of
the next Annual General Meeting of the Company, or, if earlier, on
the expiry 15 months from the date of the passing of the
resolution.
Ordinary
Resolution
To
consider and, if thought fit, pass the following resolution which
will be proposed as an ordinary resolution:
Continuance
of the Company
16. To
approve the continuance of the Company as an investment trust for a
further period of five years.
By order
of the Board
|
Registered
Office:
|
|
One Wood
Street
|
|
London
EC2V 7WS
|
Frostrow
Capital LLP
|
|
Company
Secretary
|
|
|
|
6 June
2024
|
|
NOTES
1. Members
are entitled to appoint a proxy to exercise all or any of their
rights to attend and to speak and vote on their behalf at the
meeting. A shareholder may appoint more than one proxy in relation
to the meeting provided that each proxy is appointed to exercise
the rights attached to a different share or shares held by that
shareholder. A proxy need not be a shareholder of the
Company.
2. A
vote withheld is not a vote in law, which means that the vote will
not be counted in the calculation of votes for or against the
resolutions. If no voting indication is given, a proxy may vote or
abstain from voting at his/her discretion. A proxy may vote (or
abstain from voting) as he or she thinks fit in relation to any
other matter which is put before the meeting.
3. Hard
copy forms of proxy have not been included with this notice.
Members can vote by: logging onto www.signalshares.com and
following instructions; requesting a hard copy form of proxy
directly from the registrars, Link Group at
shareholderenquiries@linkgroup.co.uk or in the case of CREST
members, utilising the CREST electronic proxy appointment service
in accordance with the procedures set out below. To be valid any
proxy form or other instrument appointing a proxy must be completed
and signed and received by post or (during normal business hours
only) by hand at Link Group, PXS1, Central Square, 29 Wellington
Street, Leeds LS1 4DL no later than 1.00 p.m. on Monday, 8 July
2024. Alternatively, if you are an institutional shareholder you
may also be able to appoint a proxy electronically via the
proxymity platform (see note 14 below).
4. In
the case of a member which is a company, the instrument appointing
a proxy must be executed under its seal or signed on its behalf by
a duly authorised officer or attorney or other person authorised to
sign. Any power of attorney or other authority under which the
instrument is signed (or a certified copy of it) must be included
with the instrument.
5. The
return of a completed proxy form, other such instrument or any
CREST Proxy Instruction (as described below) will not prevent a
shareholder attending the meeting and voting in person if he/she
wishes to do so.
6. Any
person to whom this notice is sent who is a person nominated under
section 146 of the Companies Act 2006 to enjoy information rights
(a “Nominated Person”) may, under an agreement between him/her and
the shareholder by whom he/she was nominated, have a right to be
appointed (or have someone else appointed) as a proxy for the
meeting. If a Nominated Person has no such proxy appointment right
or does not wish to exercise it, he/she may, under any such
agreement, have a right to give instructions to the shareholder as
to the exercise of voting rights.
7. The
statement of the rights of shareholders in relation to the
appointment of proxies in paragraphs 1 and 3 above does not apply
to Nominated Persons. The rights described in these paragraphs can
only be exercised by shareholders of the Company.
8. Pursuant
to regulation 41 of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001,
only shareholders registered on the register of members of the
Company (the “Register of Members”) at the close of business on
Monday, 8 July 2024 (or, in the event of any adjournment, on the
date which is two days before the time of the adjourned meeting)
will be entitled to attend and vote or be represented at the
meeting in respect of shares registered in their name at that time.
Changes to the Register of Members after that time will be
disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend and
vote at the meeting.
9. As
at 5 June 2024 (being the last business day prior to the
publication of this notice) the Company’s issued share capital
consists of 601,665,200 ordinary shares, carrying one vote each.
The Company holds 66,400,737 shares in treasury. Therefore, the
total voting rights in the Company as at 5 June 2024 are
535,264,463.
10. CREST
members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies through the CREST
electronic proxy appointment service may do so by using the
procedures described in the CREST Manual. CREST Personal Members or
other CREST sponsored members, and those CREST members who have
appointed a service provider(s), should refer to their CREST
sponsor or voting service provider(s), who will be able to take the
appropriate action on their behalf.
11. In
order for a proxy appointment or instruction made using the CREST
service to be valid, the appropriate CREST message (a “CREST Proxy
Instruction”) must be properly authenticated in accordance with the
specifications of Euroclear UK & International (“CRESTCo”), and
must contain the information required for such instruction, as
described in the CREST Manual. The message, regardless of whether
it constitutes the appointment of a proxy or is an amendment to the
instruction given to a previously appointed proxy must, in order to
be valid, be transmitted so as to be received by the issuer’s agent
(ID RA10) no later than 48 hours before the time appointed for
holding the meeting. For this purpose, the time of receipt will be
taken to be the time (as determined by the timestamp applied to the
message by the CREST Application Host) from which the issuer’s
agent is able to retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST in the
manner prescribed by CREST. After this time any change of
instructions to proxies appointed through CREST should be
communicated to the appointee through other means.
12. CREST
members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors, or voting
service providers should note that CRESTCo does not make available
special procedures in CREST for any particular message. Normal
system timings and limitations will, therefore, apply in relation
to the input of CREST Proxy Instructions. It is the responsibility
of the CREST member concerned to take (or, if the CREST member is a
CREST personal member, or sponsored member, or has appointed a
voting service provider, to procure that his CREST sponsor or
voting service provider(s) take(s)) such action as shall be
necessary to ensure that a message is transmitted by means of the
CREST system by any particular time. In this connection, CREST
members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting
system providers are referred, in particular, to those sections of
the CREST Manual concerning practical limitations of the CREST
system and timings.
13. The
Company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy Instruction in the
circumstances set out in Regulation 35(5)(a) of the Uncertificated
Securities Regulations 2001.
14. If
you are an institutional investor you may also be able to appoint a
proxy electronically via the Proxymity platform, a process which
has been agreed by the Company and approved by the Registrar. For
further information regarding Proxymity, please go to
www.proxymity.io. Your proxy must be lodged by 1.00pm on 8 July
2024 in order to be considered valid or, in the event of any
adjournment, close of business on the date which is two working
days before the time of the adjourned meeting. Before you can
appoint a proxy via this process you will need to have agreed to
Proxymity’s associated terms and conditions. It is important that
you read these carefully as you will be bound by them and they will
govern the electronic appointment of your proxy. An electronic
proxy appointment via the Proxymity platform may be revoked
completely by sending an authenticated message via the platform
instructing the removal of your proxy vote.
15. In
the case of joint holders, where more than one of the joint holders
purports to appoint a proxy, only the appointment submitted by the
most senior holder will be accepted. Seniority is determined by the
order in which the names of the joint holders appear in the
Register of Members in respect of the joint holding (the first
named being the most senior).
16. Members
who wish to change their proxy instructions should submit a new
proxy appointment using the methods set out above. Note that the
cut-off time for receipt of proxy appointments (see above) also
applies in relation to amended instructions; any amended proxy
appointment received after the relevant cut-off time will be
disregarded.
17. Members
who have appointed a proxy using the hard-copy proxy form and who
wish to change the instructions using another hard-copy form,
should contact Link Group on 0371 664 0300 or +44 371 664 0300.
Calls are charged at the standard geographic rate and will vary by
provider. Calls outside the United Kingdom are charged at the
applicable international rate. Lines are open 09.00 to 17.30 Monday
to Friday excluding public holidays in England and
Wales.
18. If
a member submits more than one valid proxy appointment, the
appointment received last before the latest time for the receipt of
proxies will take precedence.
19. In
order to revoke a proxy instruction, members will need to inform
the Company. Members should send a signed hard copy notice clearly
stating their intention to revoke a proxy appointment to Link
Group, PXS1, 29 Wellington Street, Central Square, Leeds LS1 4DL.
In the case of a member which is a company, the revocation notice
must be executed under its common seal or signed on its behalf by
an officer of the company or an attorney for the company. Any power
of attorney or any other authority under which the revocation
notice is signed (or a duly certified copy of such power of
attorney) must be included with the revocation notice. If a member
attempts to revoke their proxy appointment but the revocation is
received after the time for receipt of proxy appointments (see
above) then, subject to paragraph 4, the proxy appointment will
remain valid.
EXPLANATORY
NOTES TO THE RESOLUTIONS
Resolution
1 – To receive and adopt the Annual Report and
Accounts
The Annual
Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2024 will be
presented to the Annual General Meeting (“AGM”). These accounts
accompany this Notice of Meeting.
Resolution
2 – To approve a Final Dividend
The
rationale for the payment of a final dividend is set out in the
Statement from the Chair and the Report of the
Directors.
Resolution
3 – Approval of the Company’s Dividend Policy
Resolution
3 seeks shareholder approval of the Company’s dividend
policy.
Resolutions
4 to 8 – Re-election of Directors
Resolutions
4 to 8 deal with the re-election of each Director.
The Board
has confirmed, following a performance review, that the Directors
standing for re-election and election continue to perform
effectively.
Resolution
9 – Re-appointment of Auditors and the determination of their
remuneration
Resolution
9 relates to the re-appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as
the Company’s independent Auditors to hold office until the next
AGM of the Company and also authorises the Audit & Risk
Committee to set their remuneration.
Resolution
10 – Directors’ Remuneration Report
The
Directors’ Remuneration Report is set out in full within the
governance section of the annual report.
Resolutions
11, 12 and 13 – Issue of Shares
Ordinary
Resolution 11 in the Notice of AGM will renew the authority to
allot the unissued share capital up to an aggregate nominal amount
equal to 10% of the aggregate nominal amount of the Company’s
issued share capital on 5 June 2024, being the nearest practicable
date prior to the signing of this Report (or if changed, the number
representing 10% of the issued share capital of the Company at the
date at which the resolution is passed). Such authority will expire
on the date of the next AGM or after a period of 15 months from the
date of the passing of the resolution, whichever is earlier. This
means that the authority will have to be renewed at the next
AGM.
When
shares are to be allotted for cash, Section 551 of the Companies
Act 2006 (the “Act”) provides that existing shareholders have
pre-emption rights and that the new shares must be offered first to
such shareholders in proportion to their existing holding of
shares. However, shareholders can, by special resolution, authorise
the Directors to allot shares otherwise than by a
pro
rata issue to
existing shareholders. Special Resolution 12 will, if passed, give
the Directors power to allot for cash equity securities up to an
aggregate nominal amount equal to 10% of the Company’s share
capital on 5 June
2024 (or if changed, the number representing 10% of the issued
share capital of the Company at the date at which the resolution is
passed), as if Section 551 of the Act does not apply. This is the
same nominal amount of share capital which the Directors are
seeking the authority to allot pursuant to Resolution 13. This
authority will also expire on the date of the next Annual General
Meeting or after a period of 15 months, whichever is earlier. This
authority will not be used in connection with a rights issue by the
Company.
Under the
Companies (Acquisition of Own Shares) (Treasury Shares) Regulations
2003 (as amended) (the “Treasury Share Regulations”) the Company is
permitted to buyback and hold shares in treasury and then sell them
at a later date for cash, rather than cancelling them. The Treasury
Share Regulations require such sale to be on a pre-emptive,
pro
rata, basis to
existing shareholders unless shareholders agree by special
resolution to disapply such pre-emption rights. Accordingly, in
addition to giving the Directors power to allot unissued share
capital on a non pre-emptive basis pursuant to Resolution 12,
Resolution 13, if passed, will give the Directors authority to sell
shares held in treasury on a non pre-emptive
basis. No dividends may be paid on any shares held in treasury and
no voting rights will attach to such shares. The benefit of the
ability to hold treasury shares is that such shares may be resold.
This should give the Company greater flexibility in managing its
share capital, and improve liquidity in its shares. It is the
intention of the Board that any re-sale of treasury shares would
only take place at a premium to the cum income net asset value per
share. It is also the intention of the Board that sales from
treasury would only take place when the Board believes that to do
so would assist in the provision of liquidity to the market. The
number of treasury shares which may be sold pursuant to this
authority is limited to an aggregate nominal amount equal to 10% of
the Company’s share capital on 5 June 2024 (or if changed, the
number representing 10% of the issued share capital of the Company
at the date at which the resolution is passed) (reduced by any
equity securities allotted for cash on a non-pro
rata basis
pursuant to Resolution 12, as described above).
This authority will also expire on the date of the next Annual
General Meeting or after a period of 15 months, whichever is
earlier.
The
Directors intend to use the authority given by Resolutions 11, 12
and 13 to allot shares and disapply pre-emption rights only in
circumstances where this will be clearly beneficial to shareholders
as a whole. The issue proceeds would be available for investment in
line with the Company’s investment policy. No issue of shares will
be made which would effectively alter the control of the Company
without the prior approval of shareholders in general
meeting.
New Shares
will only be issued at a premium to the Company’s cum income net
asset value per share at the time of issue.
Resolution
14 – Share Repurchases
The
Directors wish to renew the authority given by shareholders at the
previous AGM. The principal aim of a share buyback facility is to
enhance shareholder value by acquiring shares at a discount to net
asset value, as and when the Directors consider this to be
appropriate. The purchase of Shares, when they are trading at a
discount to net asset value per share should result in an increase
in the net asset value per share for the remaining shareholders.
This authority, if conferred,
will only be exercised if to do so would result in an increase in
the net asset value per share for the remaining shareholders and if
it is in the best interests of shareholders generally. Any purchase
of shares will be made within guidelines established from time to
time by the Board. It is proposed to seek shareholder authority to
renew this facility for another year at the AGM.
Under the
current Listing Rules, the maximum price that may be paid on the
exercise of this authority must not exceed the higher of (i) 105%
of the average of the middle market quotations for the shares over
the five business days immediately preceding the date of purchase
and (ii) the higher of the last independent trade and the highest
current independent bid on the trading venue where the purchase is
carried out. The minimum price which may be paid is 2.5p per Share.
Existing shares which are purchased under this authority will
either be cancelled or held as Treasury Shares.
Special
Resolution 14 in the Notice of AGM will renew the authority to
purchase in the market a maximum of 14.99% of the issued share
capital of the Company as at the date of the passing of the
resolution, 14.99% of the issued share capital of the Company as
changed by that resolution. Such authority will expire on the date
of the next AGM or after a period of 15 months from the date of
passing of the resolution, whichever is earlier. This means in
effect that the authority will have to be renewed at the next AGM
or earlier if the authority has been exhausted.
Resolution
15 – General Meetings
Special
Resolution 15 seeks shareholder approval for the Company to hold
General Meetings (other than the AGM) at 14 clear
days’ notice. The Board confirms that the shorter notice period
would only be used where it was merited by the purpose of the
meeting.
Resolution
16 – Continuance
of the Company as an investment
trust. Ordinary Resolution 16 seeks shareholder approval for the
Company to continue as an investment trust for a further period of
five years.
Recommendation
The Board
considers that the resolutions relating to the above items are in
the best interests of shareholders as a whole. Accordingly, the
Board unanimously recommends to the shareholders that they vote in
favour of the above resolutions to be proposed at the forthcoming
AGM as the Directors intend to do in respect of their own
beneficial holdings totalling 548,017 shares.
-ENDS-
Neither
the contents of the Company's website nor the contents of any
website accessible from hyperlinks on the Company's website (or any
other website) is incorporated into, or forms part of, this
announcement.
For
further information please contact
Mark
Pope
For and on
behalf of Frostrow Capital LLP
Company
Secretary
0203 008
4913