0001630113
false
FY
10
0
0001630113
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
2021-09-30
0001630113
2022-07-13
0001630113
2022-03-31
0001630113
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:PreferredStockMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SharesToBeIssuedMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:PreferredStockMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SharesToBeIssuedMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:PreferredStockMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SharesToBeIssuedMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:PreferredStockMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SharesToBeIssuedMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
2020-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:PreferredStockMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SharesToBeIssuedMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:EconomicInjuryDisasterLoanMember
2021-04-01
2021-06-30
0001630113
2021-04-01
2021-09-30
0001630113
2021-04-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
BTCY:DeviceSalesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:DeviceSalesMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TechnologyFeesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TechnologyFeesMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ServiceRelatedAndOtherRevenueMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ServiceRelatedAndOtherRevenueMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:OfficeEquipmentMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:LeaseholdImprovementMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PromissoryNoteMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
BTCY:PromissoryNoteMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
BTCY:PromissoryNoteMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PromissoryNoteMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:NoteHolderOneMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:NoteHolderOneMember
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:NoteHolderOneMember
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PromissoryNoteMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ShortTermLoanMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ShortTermLoanMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesANotesMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesANotesMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesANotesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesANotesSecondMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesANotesSecondMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesANotesMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PlacementAgentMember
BTCY:SeriesANotesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PlacementAgentMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesANotesMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
2021-01-08
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesBNotesMember
BTCY:AccreditorInvestorsMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConversionNoticeMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesBNotesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesBNotesMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesBNotesMember
BTCY:WarrantOneMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesBNotesMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesBNotesMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesBNotesMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:FourNoteholdersMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
2021-04-01
2021-06-30
0001630113
2021-06-30
0001630113
2021-07-01
2021-09-30
0001630113
2021-10-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
2021-12-31
0001630113
2022-01-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
2021-12-21
0001630113
2021-12-21
2021-12-21
0001630113
BTCY:CaptionedProgramMember
BTCY:USSmallBusinessAdministrationMember
2020-04-01
2020-04-30
0001630113
BTCY:CaptionedProgramMember
BTCY:USSmallBusinessAdministrationMember
2020-04-30
0001630113
BTCY:CaptionedProgramMember
BTCY:USSmallBusinessAdministrationMember
2021-05-31
0001630113
BTCY:PaycheckProtectionProgramMember
2020-05-01
2020-05-31
0001630113
BTCY:PaycheckProtectionProgramMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PaycheckProtectionProgramMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PaycheckProtectionProgramMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2020-01-09
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2019-12-19
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2020-01-08
2020-01-09
0001630113
BTCY:PromissoryNotesMember
2019-10-01
2019-10-31
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2020-05-22
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2020-05-22
2020-05-22
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2021-07-01
2021-09-30
0001630113
us-gaap:PreferredStockMember
2021-10-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
us-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember
2021-10-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-12-31
0001630113
us-gaap:PreferredStockMember
2021-12-31
0001630113
us-gaap:CommonStockMember
2021-10-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2021-04-01
2021-06-30
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2021-06-30
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2021-07-01
2021-09-30
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2021-09-30
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2021-10-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2021-12-31
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2022-01-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:ConvertibleDebtMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:MeasurementInputExpectedDividendRateMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputRiskFreeInterestRateMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputRiskFreeInterestRateMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputPriceVolatilityMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputPriceVolatilityMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputExpectedTermMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputExpectedTermMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
BTCY:ConversionAndRedemptionFeaturesMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputRiskFreeInterestRateMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
BTCY:ConversionAndRedemptionFeaturesMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputRiskFreeInterestRateMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
BTCY:ConversionAndRedemptionFeaturesMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputPriceVolatilityMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
BTCY:ConversionAndRedemptionFeaturesMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputPriceVolatilityMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
BTCY:ConversionAndRedemptionFeaturesMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputExpectedTermMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
BTCY:ConversionAndRedemptionFeaturesMember
us-gaap:MeasurementInputExpectedTermMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
BTCY:ConversionAndRedemptionFeaturesMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
BTCY:ConversionAndRedemptionFeaturesMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ShareholdersMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ShareholdersMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
srt:ChiefExecutiveOfficerMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementAxisMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementAxisMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ShareholdersMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementAxisMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ExchangecoMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:OptionsMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:WarrantMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:AdvisorWarrantMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ElevenPercentageSecuredConvertiblePromissoryNotesMember
BTCY:ExchangeAgreementMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConvertiblePromissoryNotesMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConvertiblePromissoryNotesMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:InvestorsMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConvertiblePromissoryNotesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConvertiblePromissoryNotesMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:CashlessWarrantMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:UplistingPublicStockOfferingMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:SeriesAPreferredStockMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:InvestorsMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:AdvisorAndConsultantTwoMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
srt:ChiefFinancialOfficerMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2020-12-31
0001630113
BTCY:AdvisorAndConsultantTwoMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
srt:MinimumMember
2020-12-31
2020-12-31
0001630113
BTCY:AdvisorAndConsultantTwoMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
srt:MaximumMember
2020-12-31
2020-12-31
0001630113
srt:ChiefFinancialOfficerMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
srt:ChiefFinancialOfficerMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:WarrantMember
BTCY:BrokersMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:WarrantMember
BTCY:ConvertibleNoteholdersMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:AdvisorAndConsultantTwoMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:ExecutiveOfficerMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:LendersMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:WarrantMember
BTCY:LendersMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:UnderwriterMember
us-gaap:WarrantMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:WarrantMember
BTCY:UnderwriterMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoThousandAndSixteenEquityIncentivePlanMember
BTCY:EmployeeMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoThousandAndSixteenEquityIncentivePlanMember
srt:MinimumMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoThousandAndSixteenEquityIncentivePlanMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoThousandAndSixteenEquityIncentivePlanMember
BTCY:BoardOfDirectorMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoThousandAndSixteenEquityIncentivePlanMember
srt:MaximumMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoThousandAndSixteenEquityIncentivePlanMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoThousandAndSixteenEquityIncentivePlanMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoThousandAndSixteenEquityIncentivePlanMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
2019-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
2019-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNotesMember
2019-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PrivatePlacementWarrantsMember
2019-03-31
0001630113
2019-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNotesMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PrivatePlacementWarrantsMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNotesMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PrivatePlacementWarrantsMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNotesMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PrivatePlacementWarrantsMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNotesMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PrivatePlacementWarrantsMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNotesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PrivatePlacementWarrantsMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNotesMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:PrivatePlacementWarrantsMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
srt:MinimumMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
srt:MaximumMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
srt:MinimumMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
srt:MaximumMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNoteMember
srt:MinimumMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNoteMember
srt:MaximumMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BrokerWarrantsMember
2021-04-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
BTCY:WarrantsIssuedOnConversionOfConvertibleNotesMember
2021-04-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
BTCY:ConsultantWarrantsMember
2021-04-01
2021-12-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2017-04-01
2018-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2017-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2018-04-01
2019-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2018-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2021-07-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:StockOptionMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
2020-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
srt:MinimumMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
srt:MaximumMember
2019-04-01
2020-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:NewLeaseAgreementMember
2021-12-02
0001630113
us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember
2020-04-01
2021-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:LessThanOneYearMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:BeyondOneYearMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember
2021-04-01
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:OfficeEquipmentMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember
2021-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:OfficeEquipmentMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember
2022-03-31
0001630113
BTCY:TwoAdvisorMember
us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember
2022-04-01
2022-07-14
0001630113
BTCY:SeriesBConvertiblePreferredStockMember
us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember
2022-04-01
2022-07-14
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
iso4217:USD
xbrli:shares
xbrli:pure
PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS
Summary
Biotricity
Inc. (the “Company”, “Biotricity”, “we”, “us”, “our”) is a leading-edge medical
technology company focused on biometric data monitoring solutions. Our aim is to deliver innovative, remote monitoring solutions to the
medical, healthcare, and consumer markets, with a focus on diagnostic and post-diagnostic solutions for lifestyle and chronic illnesses.
We approach the diagnostic side of remote patient monitoring by applying innovation within existing business models where reimbursement
is established. We believe this approach reduces the risk associated with traditional medical device development and accelerates the
path to revenue. In post-diagnostic markets, we intend to apply medical grade biometrics to enable consumers to self-manage, thereby
driving patient compliance and reducing healthcare costs. Our first focus is on the diagnostic mobile cardiac telemetry
market, otherwise known as MCT.
We developed and
received FDA clearance on our Bioflux® MCT technology, comprised of a monitoring device and software components, which we made available
to the market under limited release on April 6, 2018, in order to assess, establish and develop sales processes and market dynamics.
The fiscal year ended March 30, 2020 marked the Company’s first year of expanded commercialization efforts, focused on sales growth
and expansion. We have expanded our sales efforts to 27 states, with intention to expand further and compete in the broader US
market using an insourcing business model. Our technology has a large potential total addressable market, which can include hospitals,
clinics and physicians’ offices, as well as other IDTFs. We believe our solution’s insourcing model, which empowers physicians
with state-of-the-art technology and charges technology service fees for its use, has the benefit of a reduced operating overhead for
the Company, and enables a more efficient market penetration and distribution strategy. This, when combined with the value of the Company’s
solution in the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias, enhancement of patient outcomes, improved patient compliance, and the corresponding
reduction of healthcare costs, is driving growth.
Our principal executive
office is located at 203 Redwood Shores Pkwy Suite 600, Redwood City, California, and our telephone number is (800) 590-4155..
Our website address is www.biotricity.com. The information on our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
History
Our
company was incorporated on August 29, 2012 in the State of Nevada.
iMedical
was incorporated on July 3, 2014 under the Canada Business Corporations Act. On February 2, 2016, we completed the acquisition of iMedical
and moved the operations of iMedical into Biotricity Inc. through a reverse take-over (the “Acquisition Transaction”).
Description
of Business
Company
Overview
Biotricity
Inc. (“Company”, “Biotricity”, “we”, “us” or “our”)
Biotricity
Inc. (the “Company”, “Biotricity”, “we”, “us”, “our”) is a medical technology
company focused on biometric data monitoring solutions. Our aim is to deliver innovative, remote monitoring solutions to the medical,
healthcare, and consumer markets, with a focus on diagnostic and post-diagnostic solutions for lifestyle and chronic illnesses. We approach
the diagnostic side of remote patient monitoring by applying innovation within existing business models where reimbursement is established.
We believe this approach reduces the risk associated with traditional medical device development and accelerates the path to revenue.
In post-diagnostic markets, we intend to apply medical grade biometrics to enable consumers to self-manage, thereby driving patient compliance
and reducing healthcare costs. We intend to first focus on a segment of the diagnostic mobile cardiac telemetry market, otherwise known
as MCT, while providing our chosen markets with the capability to also perform other cardiac studies.
We developed our
FDA-approved Bioflux® MCT technology, comprised of a monitoring device and software components, which we made available to the
market under limited release on April 6, 2018, in order to assess, establish and develop sales processes and market dynamics. The
fiscal year ended March 31, 2020 marked the Company’s first year of expanded commercialization efforts, focused on sales
growth and expansion. We have since expanded our sales efforts to over 300 centers (estimated as market penetration of more than
1,500 cardiologists) across 27 states, with intention to penetrate further and compete in the broader US market using an insourcing
business model, before expending into international markets. Our technology has a large potential total addressable market, which
can include hospitals, clinics and physicians’ offices, as well as other Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities
(“IDTFs)”. We believe our solution’s insourcing model, which empowers physicians with state-of-the-art technology
and charges technology service fees for its use, has the benefit of a reduced operating overhead for the Company, and enables a more
efficient market penetration and distribution strategy. This, when combined with the value the Company’s solution in the
diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias, enhancement of patient outcomes, improved patient compliance, and the corresponding reduction of
healthcare costs, is driving growth and increasing revenues.
We
are a technology company focused on earning utilization-based recurring technology fee revenue. The Company’s ability to grow this
type of revenue is predicated on the size and quality of its sales force and their ability to penetrate the market and place devices
with clinically focused, repeat users of its cardiac study technology. The Company plans to grow its sales force in order to address
new markets and achieve sales penetration in the markets currently served.
The
fiscal year ended March 31, 2021 marked the trailing 24-month period of full market release of the Bioflux MCT device for commercialization,
originally launched in limited market release in April 2018, after receiving its second and final required FDA clearance. To commence
commercialization, we ordered device inventory from our FDA-approved manufacturer and hired a small, captive sales force, with deep experience
in cardiac technology sales; we expanded on our limited market release, which identified potential anchor clients who could be early
adopters of our technology. By increasing our sales force and geographic footprint, we had launched sales in 27 U.S. states by March
31, 2022.
On January 24, 2022
the Company announced that it has received the 510(k) FDA clearance of its Biotres patch solution, which is a novel product in the field
of Holter monitoring. This three-lead technology can provide connected Holter monitoring that is designed to produce more accurate recordings
than is typical of competing 1 channel holter solutions. One of the key features, connectivity, enables faster data availability, reducing
data access time from 2 weeks to 3 days. The Company officially launched sales of this product in April 2022.
During 2021, the Company
also announced that it received a 510(k) clearance from the FDA for its Bioflux Software II System, engineered to improve workflows.
ECG monitoring requires significant human oversight to review and interpret incoming patient data to discern actionable events for clinical
intervention, highlighting the necessity of driving operational efficiency. This improvement reduces operational costs and allows the
company to continue to focus on excellent customer service to physicians and their at-risk patients. Additionally, these advances mean
we can focus our resources on high-level operations and sales to help drive greater revenue.
The
Company has also developed or is developing several other ancillary technologies, which will require application for further FDA clearances,
which the Company anticipates applying for within the next to twelve months. Among these are:
|
● |
advanced
ECG analysis software that can analyze and synthesize patient ECG monitoring data with the purpose of distilling it down to the important
information that requires clinical intervention, while reducing the amount of human intervention necessary in the process; |
|
|
|
|
● |
the
Bioflux® 2.0, which is the next generation of our award winning Bioflux® |
During fiscal 2022,
the Company also commercially launched its Bioheart technology, which is a consumer technology whose development was forged out of prior
the development of the clinical technologies that are already part of the Company’s technology ecosystem.. This technology and
other consumer technologies and applications such as the Biokit and Biocare have been developed to allow the Company to transform and
use its strong cardiac footprint to expand into remote chronic care management market that will be part of the Biotricity ecoysytem.
In August 2021, the Company’s common stock
was listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. In June 2022, the Company announced that it was joining the Russell Microcap® Index.
The
COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of telemedicine and remote patient monitoring technologies. During the twelve
months ended March 31, 2022, the Company has continued to develop its telemedicine platform, with capabilities of real-time
streaming of medical devices. Telemedicine offers patients the ability to communicate directly with their health care providers
without the need of leaving their home. The introduction of a telemedicine solution is intended to align with the Company’s
Bioflux product and facilitate remote visits and remote prescriptions for cardiac diagnostics, but it is also intended to serve as a
means of establishing referral and other synergies across the network of doctors and patients that use the technologies we are
building within the Biotricity ecosystem. The intention is to continue to provide improved care to patients that may otherwise elect
not to go to medical facilities and continue to provide economic benefits and costs savings to healthcare service providers and
payers that reimburse.
Market
Overview
Chronic
diseases are the number one burden on the healthcare system, driving up costs year over year. Lifestyle related illnesses such as obesity
and hypertension are the top contributing factors of chronic conditions including diabetes and heart disease. Government and healthcare
organizations are focused on driving costs down by shifting to evidence-based healthcare where individuals, especially those suffering
from chronic illnesses, engage in self-management. This has led to growth in the connected health market, which is projected to reach
$150 billion by 2024 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30%1. Remote patient monitoring (RPM), one of the key areas
of focus for self-management and evidence-based practice, is projected to reach $31.3 billion by 20232. Currently, more than
seven million patients benefit from remote monitoring and the use of connected medical devices3, and nearly 1,800 hospitals4
in the US are using mobile applications to improve risk management and care quality.
The
number one cost to the healthcare system is cardiovascular disease, estimated to be responsible for 1 in every 6 healthcare dollars spent
in the US5. Since cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death worldwide, early detection, diagnosis, and management
of chronic cardiac conditions are necessary to relieve the increasing burden on the healthcare infrastructure. Diagnostic tests such
as ECGs are used to detect, diagnose and track certain types of cardiovascular conditions. We believe that the rise of lifestyle related
illnesses associated with heart disease has created a need to develop cost-effective diagnostic mechanisms to fill a hole in the current
ECG market.
The
global ECG market is growing at a CAGR of 5.6%6. The factors driving this market include an aging population, an increase
in chronic diseases related to lifestyle choices, improved technology in diagnostic ECG devices, and high growth rates of ECG device
sales. As of 2015, the United States accounted for approximately 27% of the global ECG market7 and is comprised of three major
segments: resting (non-stress) ECG systems, stress ECG systems, and holter monitoring systems.
In
the US, MCT tests are primarily conducted through outsourced Independent Diagnostic Testing Facilities (IDTFs) that are reimbursed at
an estimated average rate of approximately $850 per diagnostic test, based on pricing information provided by the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services, a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, and weighted towards the largest markets of New
York, California, Texas and Florida. Reimbursement rates can be lower in smaller markets, although the national average is $801. Further,
we believe private insurers provide for similar or better reimbursement rates.
We
launched a limited market release of our MCT diagnostic device and software solution in April 2018. In April 2019, we officially launched
our solution and expanded our sales efforts to 6 key states, with intention to expand further and compete in the broader US market using
an insourcing business model. This business model is applicable to a large portion of the total available market, which can include hospitals,
physicians’ offices and other IDTFs. We believe our solution’s insourcing model, which empowers physicians with state of
the art technology and charges technology service fees for its use, has the benefit of a reduced operating overhead for the Company,
and enables a more efficient market penetration and distribution strategy.
Our
initial device offering intends to revolutionize the MCT market by providing a convenient, cost-effective, integrated MCT solution, inclusive
of both software and hardware for physician providers and their patients. Biotricity, however, has a broader strategic vision to offer
an ecosystem of technologies that engage the patient-user and their medical practitioner(s) in sustained monitoring, diagnosis, communication
and pro-active treatment of patient chronic care conditions. Our core solution is designed as a platform to encompass multiple segments
of the remote monitoring market, and the future growth of that market.
Market
Opportunity
ECGs
are a key diagnostic test utilized in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, the number one cause of death worldwide. The global ECG
market is growing at a CAGR of 5.6%, and, assuming the U.S. continues to hold approximately 27% of the global market (based on 2017 statistics),
approximately $1.8 billion would be attributed to the US ECG market1,2. In the US in 2016, statistics show that there were
121.5 million adults3 living with cardiovascular disease, whereas 28.2 million adults4 had been diagnosed with
the disease. The increasing market size is attributed to an aging population and an influx in chronic diseases related to lifestyle choices.
The
US ECG market is divided into three major product segments:
|
1. |
Event
monitoring systems; |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Stress
ECG systems; and |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Resting
(non-stress) ECG systems. |
Event
monitoring systems are projected to grow the fastest due to a shift from in-hospital/clinic monitoring to outpatient monitoring. This
shift is expected to help reduce health care costs by limiting the number of overnight hospital stays for patient monitoring. We believe
that physicians prefer event monitoring systems over resting and stress ECG systems because they provide better insight to the patient’s
condition for diagnostic purposes.
The
event monitoring market is divided into the Holter/Extended Holter, Event Loop and Mobile Cardiac Telemetry (MCT) product segments, of
which Holter, and its variant Extended Holter, and Event Loop are the current market leaders. Among event monitoring systems, we believe
that the preferred choice of physicians and cardiologists is MCT, because of its ability to continuously monitor patients in real-time,
thereby reducing a patient’s risk and a physician’s liability. MCT devices have built-in arrhythmia detectors and real-time
communication, which allow physicians to prescribe the device for a longer period of time; thereby enabling prolonged data collection
and delivering a more complete picture for diagnosis.
Typical
Holter/Extended Holter and Event Loop solutions lack the ability to alert the patient in the event of an emergency. Holter is used
a short term solution, up to 3 days, whereas Event Loop is used for up to 30 days. Extended Holter, the long term variant of Event Loop
can be used for up 21 days. It is the most recent of the cardiac monitoring options and was created for longer term holter recordings.
Since Event Loop is also long term, reimbursement for Extended Holter and Event Loop are converging. Reimbursement for these are much
lower compared to MCT due to the nature of the solution, recording vs monitoring. With Holter and Event Loop monitoring, ECG data is
not uploaded or transmitted in real-time. Comparatively, if the patient were monitored through an MCT device with real-time ECG data
transfer and cellular network access, then in the event of cardiac distress, the monitoring center would immediately send communication
to the patient’s physician.
In
order to properly administer the MCT test, a healthcare provider must have access to three essential components:
|
1. |
The
MCT device; |
|
|
|
|
2. |
An
ECG reporting software that is capable of reading the data recorded from the device; and |
|
|
|
|
3. |
A
monitoring center that collects the ECG data and responds to the patient in case of an alarm detection. |
Since
MCT requires an FDA-cleared device (meaning for our purposes that it can be used to review medical ECG data from ECG devices), FDA-cleared
ECG reporting software, and remote monitoring capabilities, regulatory and development hurdles have resulted in relatively few
companies being able to successfully develop an all-encompassing solution. We believe that there are currently only 5 MCT solutions
within the market. Some of these solutions are sold to the market through solutions providers that have not developed and do not manufacture
their own device.
Of
the MCT systems currently available in the market, most are owned by IDTFs who employ an outsourcing business model, focused on providing
clinical services for which they can earn reimbursement; this means that they would typically not sell their devices to physicians, but
offer their clinical services. Some MCT providers choose to sell their solution by charging high prices for devices and upfront software
costs, as well as a per cardiac study monitoring fee. Among these are solutions that are not scalable; some lack monitoring software,
requiring a customer to acquire third party software and incur integration expenses. These would require an investment by the physician,
to incur upfront costs that would take time to recoup before profits are realized. The only other model available in the market is based
on a monthly fee for technology and devices, irrespective of usage, forcing the physician to pay whether the technology is used or not.
The
limited number of competitors makes this an attractive market for new entrants. However, entry into the market requires a hardware device
coupled with complex algorithms, ECG software and access to a monitoring center. Two of the five MCT players have done so by building
their own monitoring infrastructure, developing their own ECG software and utilizing TZ Medical’s MCT device. However, this is
capital intensive and we believe cost prohibitive for most hospitals and clinics. These barriers are in our opinion among the key reasons
as to why Holter and Event Loop have maintained a significant portion of the US event monitoring market despite the increase in patient
safety and improved outcomes with MCT.
The
Bioflux MCT solution and business model attempts to address these complications with its complete, turn-key solution, which consists
of all three essential components: an easy-to-wear GSM-enabled cardiac monitoring device, ECG reporting software, and facilitation of
physician-based monitoring that may utilize outsourced data screening. Bioflux employs an insourced business model, whereby our Bioflux
device is sold to physicians; they own the device, and then use our back-office technology to monitor their patient and supervise
the cardiac study as they perform and read their patient’s ECG; we earn technology service fees as physicians use our back office
software solution. Our revenue model relies on increased market penetration through the sale of devices and the use of our back office
software to service the needs of the physician. The physician, in turn, earns reimbursement as the practitioner who supervises and provides
the cardiac study, obtains diagnostic data and makes treatment decisions.
Our
Bioflux MCT solution is comprised of a separate monitoring device and an ECG reporting software component. Our Bioflux solution
provides:
|
● |
a
revenue model for physicians that fits within the established insurance billing practices, with recurring reimbursements to doctors,
hospitals and IDTFs, since the device can be washed and used multiple times on multiple patients requiring an MCT study; |
|
|
|
|
● |
built-in
cellular connectivity, enabling immediate alert to user in the event of an emergency; |
|
|
|
|
● |
technology
that is future-ready, in that its form and function enables opportunities to develop and use technologies adjacent to the MCT market. |
Following
Bioflux, the Company developed several breakthrough technologies in 2021, including:
|
● |
Biotres, a unique ECG Holter solution that addresses the limitations
of existing solutions in the Holter market, with built-in connectivity, ability to recharge, and 3 channels (instead of 1). |
|
● |
Bioheart, a unique
personal cardiac monitoring solution for consumers that addresses the limitations of existing solutions, designed with built-in connectivity,
ability to recharge, and 3 channels. |
Market
Strategy
The
Bioflux MCT device is expected to be deployed into physicians’ offices, clinics, hospitals, and IDTFs. For the prescribing physician,
the MCT diagnostic read is a reimbursable service from payers such as Medicare and insurance companies. In the United States, billing
codes for an MCT diagnostic read are currently available under the American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminal, with a current
average reimbursement rate of $850 per read (a read is between 1 and 30 days long).
We
believe that Bioflux’s revenue model, which is a platform or technology as a service model (PAAS or TAAS),
is a significant and disruptive departure from the pricing and reimbursement strategies of the existing competitors in the MCT market,
which apply an outsourced model to MCT diagnostics, where the entire procedure and reimbursement is outsourced; the MCT solutions provider
takes over the clinical responsibilities and earns the reimbursement and pays the physician a small administrative stipend. Bioflux’s
revenue and insourced business model entail differentiators that are expected to create barriers to entry for other competitors seeking
to emulate our strategy.
On
October 18, 2016, we announced that we have received a 510(k) clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the software component
of our Bioflux solution. On completion of required testing and submission of results, on December 18, 2017 we announced that we received
our second 510(k) clearance for our Bioflux device, thereby achieving the final FDA requirement needed for Biotricity to bring Bioflux
to the U.S. market. On April 6, 2018, we began a limited market release with a roll-out of our first devices to cardiologists, physicians,
research scientists and other opinion leaders related to the Company. Our first year was focused on ensuring reimbursement was in place
and our workflow aligned with customer needs. In 2019, we moved into an official launch to strategically target our addressable market
of approximately 2,213 physician offices (approximately 1% of all physician offices in the U.S.), 58 hospitals (approximately 1% of all
hospitals in the U.S.), and 30 IDTFs (an estimated 1% of all IDTFs in the U.S.). To do this, we invested in the hiring of top caliber
sales professionals with a proven track record in cardiac technology and device sales, and strong business relationships with providers
of cardiac medical services.
Product
and Technology
Bioflux
is an advanced, integrated ECG device and software solution for the MCT market. The Bioflux device is comprised of a wet electrode and
worn on a belt clip around the waist. The Bioflux ECG reporting software will allow doctors and labs to view a patient’s ECG data
for monitoring and diagnostic purposes. Both the device and software are in accordance with MCT billing code standards, compliant with
arrhythmia devices and alarms as defined by the FDA, and require 510(k) clearance, which has been obtained.
The
Bioflux device has been developed, among other things, with the following features:
|
● |
GSM
mobile chip for global cellular network compatibility; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Touch-screen
LCD viewer; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Extended
battery pack for an additional 48 hours of battery life. |
The
Bioflux platform has a built-in cellular chipset and a real-time embedded operating system which allows for our technology to be utilized
as an Internet of Things (IoT) platform. This technology can be leveraged into other applications and industries by utilizing the platform
and OS side of Bioflux.
Future
Markets
In
the next few years, we intend to expand use of our technology platform with medical-grade solutions for the monitoring of blood pressure,
diabetes, sleep apnea, chronic pain, as well as fetal monitoring, and other adjacent healthcare and lifestyle markets.
Preventative
Care. It is widely reported that chronic illnesses related to lifestyle diseases are on the rise, resulting in increased healthcare
costs. This has caused a major shift in the US healthcare market, emphasizing a need for evidence-based healthcare system focused on
overall health outcomes. Patient compliance is a critical component in driving improved health outcomes, where the patient adheres to
and implements their physician’s recommendation. Unfortunately, poor patient compliance is one of the most pressing issues in the
healthcare market. One of the key contributing factors to this is the lack of a feedback mechanism to measure improvement and knowledge.
Studies show that poor patient compliance costs the US healthcare system $100 to $289 billion annually1, representing 3% to
10% of total US healthcare costs2. Studies have proven that regular monitoring of chronic care conditions improves patient
outcomes in the form of lower morbidity rates and reduce the financial burden on the healthcare system by empowering preventative care.
The Company has developed a technology that will support medical practitioners as they gather data and regularly monitor and treat patients
with two or more of the top ten chronic care conditions that plague individuals. We expect that Bioheart, our planned third product,
will be focused on filling this need by developing a clinically relevant, preventative care and disease management solution for the consumer.
A key underlying component of Bioheart is expected to be the ability to measure patient improvements—with clinical accuracy—which
will drive feedback and eventual patient compliance. This approach is implemented in our development process by focusing on a disease/chronic
illness profile, as opposed to a customer profile. We are focused on cardiovascular disease for our first preventative care solution
since Bioflux is aimed at the same health segment. This will enable us to leverage the knowledge and expertise gained with Bioflux and
apply it to Bioheart.
Adjacent
Chronic Healthcare Markets and Prenatal Care. In the next few years, we intend to expand our reach with medical-grade solutions
for diabetes, sleep apnea, fetal monitoring, and other adjacent healthcare and lifestyle markets.
Bionatal is a proposed product
for monitoring fetus’ health by remote cardiac telemetry. In the US, there were approximately 24,073 fetal deaths at 20 or more
weeks gestation in 20123. The rise of older mothers and mothers with chronic conditions have driven high-risk pregnancies to
a new high; high-risk complications now occur in 6 to 8 percent of all pregnancies4.
Holter
and Event Monitoring. The Holter and Event Loop monitors are significantly simplified versions of an MCT device without a cellular
connectivity solution. Holter and Event Loop monitors require data to be downloaded manually, for test periods of 24 hours to 30 days.
The Bioflux MCT device software has been adjusted to be able to be used as a Holter/Extended Holter or an Event loop monitor, which has
already opened up the Holter and Event Loop monitor markets, by combining with Bioflux’s global cellular chipset to become a 4
in 1 device that is applicable to the global event monitoring market.
The key leading technologies in
the Holter market are patch devices that take the form of a large band-aid and can be mailed back or returned to the physician for data
retrieval. They lack connectivity, have only one channel of data, and cannot be charged but are convenient for low-risk patients. Responding
to our customer needs, the Company has developed a new technology that is applicable to this space which will continue to adhere to the
Company’s revenue model of deriving income from technology fees. This product is known as the Biotres and it addresses the shortcomings
of existing solutions by adding connectivity, the ability to charge, and improved data through 3 channels, while maintaining patient convenience.
The Biotres received FDA clearance in January 2022. The Company has commercialized and commenced selling of this product to its clinical
customer base in April 2022.
The Company has also developed the Bioheart device,
which is designed to be a personal Holter for consumers. This and other new technology that the Company is developing is applicable to
the market segments that the Company intends to serve and will continue to adhere to the Company’s revenue model of deriving income
from technology fees.
Competition
The
medical technology equipment industry is characterized by strong competition and rapid technological change. There are a number of companies
developing technologies that are competitive to our existing and proposed products, many of them, when compared to our Company, having
significantly longer operational history and greater financial and other resources.
Within
the US event monitoring systems market, we are aware of six main competitors in the MCT product segment. These competitors have increased
market presence and distribution primarily by working through existing IDTFs. The existing competitors have maintained a competitive
advantage within the market by controlling the distribution of all available MCT devices and software solutions. Our primary competitors
in the MCT market are:
●
Biotelemetry (formerly CardioNet), recently acquired by Philips for $2.8B. We believe that BioTelemetry, Inc. (NASDAQ:BEAT), has
the largest network of IDTFs within the MCT market. BioTelemetry is considered a complete solution provider as it produces and distributes
its own MCT device, software solution, and MCT monitoring centers. The company acquired its MCT device through the acquisition of a MCT
manufacturer, Braemar. Upon acquisition of Braemar, BioTelemetry offered limited support to other clients utilizing Braemar’s technology.
This resulted in BioTelemetry increasing the use of its device and software solution, enabling wide market penetration. We believe that
BioTelemetry business model is focused on providing the MCT diagnostic service, as opposed to selling MCT solutions to other IDTFs or
service providers, which enables a perpetual per-read fee as opposed to one time device or software sales. Equity research analysts categorize
BioTelemetry as a clinical health provider, because of its business model, rather than as a medical device company. As such, we believe
that BioTelemetry market cap is limited by the low multiples associated with that type of business, and, as a clinical health provider,
BioTelemetry has significant overhead and fixed costs associated with monitoring centers and health professionals.
●
Preventice (formerly eCardio.), recently acquired by Boston Scientific for $1.2B. Preventice is a private company, based in Houston,
Texas. Preventice’s device is manufactured by a third party medical device company, TZ Medical. Preventice has integrated TZ Medical’s
device with its software solution to create a complete MCT solution. Similar to Biotelemetry, we believe eCardio follows the same business
model of offering the MCT service and acting as a clinical health provider.
●
ScottCare. ScottCare is a private company in the US and a subsidiary of Scott Fetzer Company, a division of Berkshire Hathaway.
ScottCare provides equipment for cardiovascular clinics and diagnostic technicians. ScottCare has built its own MCT device and software
solution, and white-labeled TZ Medical’s device. Unlike the others, ScottCare offers its solution in an insourced model, where
the physician has the opportunity to bill. This model requires the physician to purchase a minimum number of devices at an approximate
average cost of $2,000 and their software at a cost of $25,000 to $40,000. After this initial upfront cost, ScottCare charges an additional
per test fee for monitoring. We believe the above model creates a long return on investment for the physician. In our opinion, this has
resulted in little market penetration for ScottCare as compared to the others.
●
Infobionic. Infobionic is a private company located in Waltham, Massachusetts. It follows a leasing model where it leases it’s
technology at a fixed monthly rate, whether technology is used or not. They have a complete solution, comprised of a device and software.
We believe that they have a good model that will enable them to be competitive in the market. In our opinion, there is room for both
Biotricity and Infobionic within the marketplace, though we believe that our solution is superior in two ways. Firstly, our device has
a screen which allows better patient feedback and improved patient hookup at the clinic. Secondly, our business model is based on usage.
The physician is charged a technology fee when the technology is used. If it is not used, there is no charge. This makes it attractive
compared to Infobionic’s model where the physician is charged even if the technology is not used.
In
addition, we note that:
●
Medtronic. Medtronic is a major medical device conglomerate. It has an MCT solution by the name of SEEQ that was added to their
portfolio through the acquisition of Corventis. We have seen no significant activity or usage with SEEQ in our market analysis. We also
note that SEEQ is a patch based MCT solution that only collects data on 1 lead. As such, it has strong competition from 3 lead systems
which are the standard for MCT. In early 2018, Medtronic withdrew SEEQ from the marketplace. We do not view Medtronic as a primary competitor,
but, given the size and reach of Medtronic, they are an organization that we must continuously watch and be aware of.
●
TZ Medical. TZ Medical is a medical device company that focuses on manufacturing a variety of medical devices. We do not consider
TZ Medical to be a direct competitor as they produce an MCT device that is available for purchase, and sold to competitors such as to
Scottcare and Preventice, described above. However, we do not believe that TZ Medical has a software solution, requiring any new entrant
to either acquire or build out a software solution and then integrate that with the TZ Medical device. This creates a requirement for
a large upfront capital investment. As a result, we believe this approach only works for organizations looking to become MCT solution
providers with the same business model as the others.
We
believe that our Bioflux MCT solution will successfully compete because:
|
● |
it
is designed as a platform to encompass all segments of the event monitoring market; |
|
|
|
|
● |
of
the insourcing business model which we believe is applicable to a significantly larger portion of the total available market and
enable more efficient strategic penetration and distribution; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
for
the other reasons described earlier under “–Market Opportunity.” |
Other
Competition
As
we commercialize our other products, such as Biotres, Bioheart, and Biocare, we will have additional competitors. We have listed some
of the key names for each space and will expand this as we fully commercialize:
Biotres:
|
● |
iRhythm
Technologies: iRhythm is the leader in holter patch technology with the largest footprint. They are primarily hospital focused and
operate as an IDTF, much like our MCT competitors. Their core product is the Zio patch, which is a 1 channel holter with no connectivity
and is not rechargeable |
|
|
|
|
● |
BardyDx
(Recently Acquired by Hilrom): BardyDx is the second largest player in the holter space. They operate as an IDTF as well.
Their core product is a 1 channel patch with no connectivity with a removable chip for data uploads. |
|
|
|
|
● |
VitalConnect:
is a small player in the holter space. They have a disposable patch monitor that can be used for a limited time, making it unusable
for long term studies. They operate as an IDTF. |
Bioheart:
|
● |
Alivecor
is a direct to consumer cardiac monitoring company. They are the biggest brand in consumer cardiac care and have a simple to use
handheld cardiac device. They operate as a service provider, providing cardiac insights direct to individuals. |
Biocare:
|
● |
Optimize
Health: Optimize health is a chronic care and RPM platform for a variety of chronic conditions. Thought it is platform with no focus
on cardiac specifically, it provides a complete platform for clinics and hospitals to utilize and build out a chronic disease management
program. |
|
|
|
|
● |
HelloHeart:
Hello Heart is a disease management program focused on hypertension. It is one of the few disease management programs that is focused
on a heart related chronic disease |
In
the digital health space, we have noticed that we have competitors for different products but not a single competitor that has the entire
product portfolio that we have. This adds a layer of differentiation and competitive advantage as customer can deal with one vendor as
opposed to multiple vendors that they have to integrate.
Intellectual
Property
We
primarily rely on trade secret protection for our proprietary information. No assurance can be given that we can meaningfully protect
our trade secrets. Others may independently develop substantially equivalent confidential and proprietary information or otherwise gain
access to, or disclose, our trade secrets.
Because
of customer needs that exceeded the capabilities of the third party software we were initially intending to use, we independently developed
our own ECG reporting software.
We
have and generally plan to continue to enter into non-disclosure, confidentiality and intellectual property assignment agreements with
all new employees as a condition of employment. In addition, we intend to also generally enter into confidentiality and non-disclosure
agreements with consultants, manufacturers’ representatives, distributors, suppliers and others to attempt to limit access to,
use and disclosure of our proprietary information. There can be no assurance, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful
protection or adequate remedies for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information.
We
also may from time to time rely on other intellectual property developed or acquired, including patents, technical innovations, laws
of unfair competition and various other licensing agreements to provide our future growth and to build our competitive position. We have
filed an industrial design patent in Canada, and we may decide to file for additional patents as we continue to expand our intellectual
property portfolio. However, we can give no assurance that competitors will not infringe on our patent or other rights or otherwise create
similar or non-infringing competing products that are technically patentable in their own right. We fully intend to vigorously defend
our intellectual property and patents.
Currently,
we have a number of registered trademarks; we may obtain additional registrations in the future.
Research
and Development
Our
research and development programs are generally pursued by engineers and scientists employed by us in California and Toronto on a full-time
basis or hired as per diem consultants or through partnerships with industry leaders in manufacturing and design and researchers and
academia. We are also working with subcontractors in developing specific components of our technologies. In all cases, we ensure that
all areas of IP are owned and controlled by the Company.
The
primary objective of our research and development program is to advance the development of our existing and proposed products, to enhance
the commercial value of such products.
We
incurred research and development costs of $2.8 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 and $2.1 million for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2021.
Government
Regulation
General
Our medical device products are
subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and various other federal and state agencies, as well as by foreign governmental
agencies. These agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising, marketing
and distribution, and market surveillance of our medical device products.
In
addition to those indicated below, the only other regulations we encounter are regulations that are common to all businesses, such as
employment legislation, implied warranty laws, and environmental, health and safety standards, to the extent applicable. We will also
encounter in the future industry-specific government regulations that would govern our products, if and when developed for commercial
use. It may become the case that other regulatory approvals will be required for the design and manufacture of our products and proposed
products.
U.S.
Regulation
The
FDA governs the following activities that Biotricity performs, will perform, upon the clearance or approval of its product candidates,
or that are performed on its behalf, to ensure that medical products distributed domestically or exported internationally are safe and
effective for their intended uses:
|
● |
product
design, and development; |
|
|
|
|
● |
product
safety, testing, labeling and storage; |
|
|
|
|
● |
record
keeping procedures; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
product
marketing. |
There
are numerous FDA regulatory requirements governing the approval or clearance and subsequent commercial marketing of Biotricity’s
products. These include:
|
● |
the
timely submission of product listing and establishment registration information, along with associated establishment user fees; |
|
|
|
|
● |
continued
compliance with the Quality System Regulation, or QSR, which require specification developers and manufacturers, including third-party
manufacturers, to follow stringent design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all
aspects of the manufacturing process; |
|
● |
labeling
regulations and FDA prohibitions against the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or off-label use or indication; |
|
|
|
|
● |
clearance
or approval of product modifications that could significantly affect the safety or effectiveness of the device or that would constitute
a major change in intended use; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Medical
Device Reporting regulations (MDR), which require that manufacturers keep detailed records of investigations or complaints against
their devices and to report to the FDA if their device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned
in a way that would likely cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if it were to recur; |
|
|
|
|
● |
adequate
use of the Corrective and Preventive Actions process to identify and correct or prevent significant systemic failures of products
or processes or in trends which suggest same; |
|
|
|
|
● |
post-approval
restrictions or conditions, including post-approval study commitments; |
|
|
|
|
● |
post-market
surveillance regulations, which apply when necessary to protect the public health or to provide additional safety and effectiveness
data for the device; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
notices
of correction or removal and recall regulations. |
Depending
on the classification of the device, before Biotricity can commercially distribute medical devices in the United States, it had to obtain,
either prior 510(k) clearance, 510(k) de-novo clearance or premarket approval (PMA), from the FDA unless a respective exemption applied.
The FDA classifies medical devices into one of three classes based on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the
extent of regulatory controls needed to ensure the device’s safety and effectiveness:
|
● |
Class
I devices, which are low risk and subject to only general controls (e.g., registration and listing, medical device labeling compliance,
MDRs, Quality System Regulations, and prohibitions against adulteration and misbranding) and, in some cases, to the 510(k) premarket
clearance requirements; |
|
● |
Class
II devices, which are moderate risk and generally require 510(k) or 510(k) de-novo premarket clearance before they may be commercially
marketed in the United States as well as general controls and potentially special controls like performance standards or specific
labeling requirements; and |
|
● |
Class
III devices, which are devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable
devices, or devices deemed not substantially equivalent to a predicate device. Class III devices generally require the submission
and approval of a PMA supported by clinical trial data. |
The
custom software and hardware of our products are classified as Class II. Class II devices are those for which general controls alone
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness and there is sufficient information to establish special
controls. Special controls can include performance standards, post-market surveillance, patient histories and FDA guidance documents.
Premarket review and clearance by the FDA for these devices is generally accomplished through the 510(k) or 510(k) de-novo premarket
notification process. As part of the 510(k) or 510(k) de-novo notification process, the FDA may have required the following:
|
● |
Development
of comprehensive product description and indications for use. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Completion
of extensive preclinical tests and preclinical animal studies, performed in accordance with the FDA’s Good Laboratory Practice
(GLP) regulations. |
|
|
|
|
● |
Comprehensive
review of predicate devices and development of data supporting the new product’s substantial equivalence to one or more predicate
devices. |
|
|
|
|
● |
If
appropriate and required, certain types of clinical trials (IDE submission and approval may be required for conducting a clinical
trial in the US). |
If required, clinical trials involve
use of the medical device on human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with current Good Clinical
Practices (GCPs), including the requirement that all research subjects provide informed consent for their participation in the clinical
study. A written protocol with predefined end points, an appropriate sample size and pre-determined patient inclusion and exclusion criteria,
is required before initiating and conducting a clinical trial. All clinical investigations of devices to determine safety and effectiveness
must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, regulations that among other things, govern
investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion of the investigational device, and specify recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring
responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators. If the device presents a “significant risk,” as defined by the
FDA, the agency requires the device sponsor to submit an IDE application, which must become effective prior to commencing human clinical
trials. The IDE will automatically become effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA denies the application or notifies
the company that the investigation is on hold and may not begin. If the FDA determines that there are deficiencies or other concerns with
an IDE that requires modification, the FDA may permit a clinical trial to proceed under a conditional approval. In addition, the study
must be approved by, and conducted under the oversight of, an Institutional Review Board (IRB) for each clinical site. If the device presents
a non-significant risk to the patient, a sponsor may begin the clinical trial after obtaining approval for the trial by one or more IRBs
without separate approval from the FDA, but it must still follow abbreviated IDE requirements, such as monitoring the investigation, ensuring
that the investigators obtain informed consent, and labeling and record-keeping requirements.
Given
successful completion of all required testing, a detailed 510(k) premarket notification or 510(k) de-novo was submitted to the FDA requesting
clearance to market the product. The notification included all relevant data from pertinent preclinical and clinical trials, together
with detailed information relating to the product’s manufacturing controls and proposed labeling, and other relevant documentation.
A
510(k) clearance letter from the FDA then authorized commercial marketing of the device for one or more specific indications of use.
After
510(k) clearance, Biotricity is required to comply with a number of post-clearance requirements, including, but not limited to, Medical
Device Reporting and complaint handling, and, if applicable, reporting of corrective actions. Also, quality control and manufacturing
procedures must continue to conform to QSRs. The FDA periodically inspects manufacturing facilities to assess compliance with QSRs, which
impose extensive procedural, substantive, and record keeping requirements on medical device manufacturers. In addition, changes to the
manufacturing process are strictly regulated, and, depending on the change, validation activities may need to be performed. Accordingly,
manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain compliance with
QSRs and other types of regulatory controls.
After
a device receives 510(k) clearance from FDA, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would
constitute a major change in its intended use or technological characteristics, requires a new 510(k) clearance or could require a PMA.
The FDA requires each manufacturer to make the determination of whether a modification requires a new 510(k) notification or PMA in the
first instance, but the FDA can review any such decision. If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s decision not to seek a new
510(k) clearance or PMA for a particular change, the FDA may retroactively require the manufacturer to seek 510(k) clearance or PMA.
The FDA can also require the manufacturer to cease U.S. marketing and/or recall the modified device until additional 510(k) clearance
or PMA approval is obtained.
The
FDA and the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, will also regulate the advertising claims of Biotricity’s products to ensure that
the claims it makes are consistent with its regulatory clearances, that there is scientific data to substantiate the claims and that
product advertising is neither false nor misleading.
We
received 510(k) clearance for both the software and hardware components of our Bioflux product. To obtain 510(k) clearance, a company
must submit a notification to the FDA demonstrating that its proposed device is substantially equivalent to a predicate device (i.e.,
a device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, a device that has been reclassified from Class III to Class I or Class
II, or a 510(k)-cleared device). The FDA’s 510(k) clearance process generally takes from three to 12 months from the date the application
is submitted but also can take significantly longer. If the FDA determines that the device or its intended use is not substantially equivalent
to a predicate device, the device is automatically placed into Class III, requiring the submission of a PMA. Once the information is
submitted, there is no guarantee that the FDA will grant a company 510(k) clearance for its pipeline products, and failure to obtain
the necessary clearances for its products would adversely affect its ability to grow its business. Delays in receipt or failure to receive
the necessary clearances, or the failure to comply with existing or future regulatory requirements, could reduce its business prospects.
Devices
that cannot be cleared through the 510(k) process due to lack of a predicate device but would be considered low or moderate risk may
be eligible for the 510(k) de-novo process. In 1997, the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act, or FDAMA added the de novo classification
pathway now codified in section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. This law established an alternate pathway to classify new devices into
Class I or II that had automatically been placed in Class III after receiving a Not Substantially Equivalent, or NSE, determination in
response to a 510(k) submission. Through this regulatory process, a sponsor who receives an NSE determination may, within 30 days of
receipt, request FDA to make a risk-based classification of the device through what is called a “de novo request.” In 2012,
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act was amended by section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA),
in order to provide a second option for de novo classification. Under this second pathway, a sponsor who determines that there is no
legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence can submit a de novo request to FDA without first
submitting a 510(k).
In
the event that a company receives a Not Substantially Equivalent determination for its candidates in response to a 510(k) submission,
the device may still be eligible for the 510(k) de-novo classification process.
Devices
that cannot be cleared through the 510(k) or 510(k) de-novo classification process require the submission of a PMA. The PMA process is
much more time consuming and demanding than the 510(k) notification process. A PMA must be supported by extensive data, including but
not limited to data obtained from preclinical and/or clinical studies and data relating to manufacturing and labeling, to demonstrate
to the FDA’s satisfaction the safety and effectiveness of the device. After a PMA application is submitted, the FDA’s in-depth
review of the information generally takes between one and three years and may take significantly longer. If the FDA does not grant 510(k)
clearance to its future products, there is no guarantee that Biotricity will submit a PMA or that if it does, that the FDA would grant
a PMA approval of Biotricity’s future products, either of which would adversely affect Biotricity’s business.
We
also need to establish a suitable and effective quality management system, which establishes controlled processes for our product design,
manufacturing, and distribution. We plan to do this in compliance with the internationally recognized standard ISO 13485:2013 Medical
Devices – Quality Management Systems – Requirements for Regulatory Purposes. Following the introduction of a product, the
FDA and foreign agencies engage in periodic reviews of our quality systems, as well as product performance and advertising and promotional
materials. These regulatory controls, as well as any changes in FDA policies, can affect the time and cost associated with the development,
introduction and continued availability of new products. Where possible, we anticipate these factors in our product development processes.
These agencies possess the authority to take various administrative and legal actions against us, such as product recalls, product seizures
and other civil and criminal sanctions.
Foreign
Regulation
In
addition to regulations in the United States, we will be subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and commercial
sales and distribution of our products in foreign countries. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain approval
of a product by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the
product in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required
for FDA approval. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly
from country to country.
The
policies of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be enacted which could prevent
or delay regulatory approval of our products and could also increase the cost of regulatory compliance. We cannot predict the likelihood,
nature or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the
United States or abroad.
Manufacturing
and Suppliers
Until recently, we have focused
primarily on research and development of the first generation version of the Bioflux. We have now completed the development of Biotres
and of Bioheart and their proposed marketing and distribution, but are not yet at a stage to commence volume production of either. We
currently assemble our devices at our Redwood City, California facility. In order to maintain compliance with FDA and other regulatory
requirements, our manufacturing facilities must be periodically re-evaluated and qualified under a quality system to ensure they meet
production and quality standards. Suppliers of components and products used to manufacture our devices must also comply with FDA regulatory
requirements, which often require significant resources and subject us and our suppliers to potential regulatory inspections and stoppages.
We
have a scalable manufacturing strategy and goals and use Providence Enterprises (herein “Providence”), which
is an FDA qualified manufacturer for contract manufacturing. We do not have a contract with Providence or any obligation to use them
(nor do they have any obligations with respect to us other than with respect to any specific orders we may make) and we enter into purchase
orders for each manufacturing request we have with Providence, as we would with other vendors. Despite our working relationship with
Providence, we intend to continue to identify and develop other efficient, automated, low-cost manufacturing capabilities and options
to meet the quality, price, engineering, design and production standards or production volumes required to successfully mass market our
products, especially at the low-cost levels we require to facilitate our business plan.
We
currently rely on a number of principal suppliers for the components that make up our products and proposed products; these include Digikey
Corporation and Mouser Electronics for electronics and connectors, Telit/Stollmann for Bluetooth modules, Yongan Innovations for batteries,
Dongguan Bole RP&M Cp. Ltd. for plastics, Unimed Medical and Conmed for ECG cables and electrodes, and Medico Systems for touch-panel
LCD displays. We believe that the raw materials used or expected to be used in our planned products can be acquired from multiple sources
and are readily available on the market.
Employees
We
currently have 44 full-time employees and approximately 20 consultants who are based in our offices located in Silicon Valley, California
and Toronto, Canada. These employees oversee day-to-day operations of the Company and, together with the consultants, support management,
engineering, manufacturing, and administration. We have no unionized employees.
We
plan to hire more than 20 additional full-time employees within the next 12 months, as needed to support continued growth in our business.
Their principal responsibilities will be the support of our sales, marketing, research and development, and clinical development activities.
We
consider relations with our employees to be satisfactory.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
Risks
Related to Our Business
Natural
disasters and other events beyond our control could materially adversely affect us.
Natural disasters or other catastrophic
events may cause damage or disruption to our operations, international commerce and the global economy, and thus could have a strong negative
effect on us. Our business operations are subject to interruption by natural disasters, fire, power shortages, pandemics and other events
beyond our control. Such events could make it difficult or impossible for us to deliver our services to our customers and could decrease
demand for our services. The World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. The extent of the impact of COVID-19
on our operational and financial performance will depend on certain developments, including the duration and any further spread of the
outbreak, the impact on our customers and employees, all of which are uncertain and cannot be predicted. The future extent to which COVID-19
may impact our financial condition or results of operations is uncertain.
The
COVID-19 pandemic may negatively affect our operations. The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in social distancing, travel bans and quarantine,
which has limited access to our facilities, customers, management, support staff and professional advisors and can, in future, impact
our manufacturing supply chain. These factors, in turn, may not only impact our operations, financial condition and demand for our products
but our overall ability to react in a timely manner, in order to mitigate the impact of this event.
We
have a limited operating history upon which investors can rely to evaluate our future prospects.
We
have a limited operating history upon which an evaluation of its business plan or performance and prospects can be made. The business
and prospects of the Company must be considered in the light of the potential problems, delays, uncertainties and complications encountered
in connection with a newly established business and new industry. The risks include, but are not limited to, the possibility that we
will not be able to develop functional and scalable products and services, or that although functional and scalable, our products and
services will not be economical to market; that our competitors hold proprietary rights that preclude us from marketing such products;
that our competitors market a superior or equivalent product; that we are not able to upgrade and enhance our technologies and products
to accommodate new features and expanded service offerings; or the failure to receive necessary regulatory clearances for our products.
To successfully introduce and market our products at a profit, we must establish brand name recognition and competitive advantages for
our products. There are no assurances that we can successfully address these challenges. If unsuccessful with one or more of these issues,
we and our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.
The
current and future expense levels in our forecasts are based largely on estimates of planned operations and future revenues rather than
experience. It is difficult to accurately forecast future revenues because our business is new and our market has not been fully developed.
If our forecasts prove incorrect, the business, operating results and financial condition of the Company may be materially and adversely
affected. Moreover, we may be unable to adjust our spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unanticipated reduction in revenues.
As a result, any significant reduction in revenues may immediately and adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating
results.
We
have not had a long history of producing revenues and we cannot predict when we will achieve sustained profitability.
We
have not been profitable, and cannot definitely predict when we will achieve profitability, if ever. We have experienced net losses historically.
We do not anticipate generating significant revenues until we successfully continue to develop, commercialize and sell our existing and
proposed products, of which we can give no assurance. We are unable to determine when we will generate significant revenues from the
sale of new products. Our inability to become profitable may force us to curtail or temporarily discontinue our research and development
programs and our day-to-day operations. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that profitability, if achieved, can be sustained on an
ongoing basis. As of March 31, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $93,037,142.
We
may never complete the commercialization and future development of new generations of the Bioflux or any of our other proposed products.
We
have no assurance of success as to the completion of the commercial piloting of the Bioflux or the completion and development of any
new generations of that product or other proposed or contemplated product, for any of our target markets. We continue to seek to improve
our technologies before we are able to develop them and produce commercially viable products. Failure to improve on any of our technologies
could delay or prevent their successful development for any of our target markets.
Developing
any technology into a marketable product is a risky, time consuming and expensive process. You should anticipate that we will encounter
setbacks, discrepancies requiring time consuming and costly redesigns and changes, and that there is the possibility of outright failure.
We
may not meet our product development and commercialization milestones.
We
have established milestones, based upon our expectations regarding our technologies at that time, which we use to assess our progress
toward developing our products. These milestones relate to technology and design improvements as well as dates for achieving development
goals. If our products exhibit technical defects or are unable to meet cost or performance goals, our commercialization schedule could
be delayed and potential purchasers of our initial commercial products may decline to purchase such products or may opt to pursue alternative
products.
We
may also experience shortages of monitors, sensors or bases due to manufacturing difficulties. Multiple suppliers provide the components
used in our devices. Our manufacturing operations could be disrupted by fire, earthquake or other natural disaster, a labor-related disruption,
failure in supply or other logistical channels, electrical outages or other reasons. If there were a disruption to manufacturing facilities,
we would be unable to manufacture devices until we have restored and re-qualified our manufacturing capability or developed alternative
manufacturing facilities.
Generally,
we have met our milestone schedules when making technological advances in our product. We can give no assurance that our commercialization
schedule will continue to be met as we further develop the Bioflux or any of our other proposed products.
We have entered into
a Credit Agreement pursuant to which we have granted the lender a security interest in all of our assets including our intellectual property
and if we default on our obligations in the Credit Agreement the lender could foreclose on our assets.
On
December 21, 2021, we entered into a Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with SWK Funding LLC (“Lender’), wherein
the Company has borrowed $12,000,000, with a maturity date of December 21, 2026. The principal will accrue interest at the LIBOR Rate
plus 10.5% (subject to adjustment as set forth in the Credit Agreement). Interest payments are due on each February, May, August and November
commencing February 15, 2022. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Company will be required to make interest only payments for the first
24 months (which may be extended to 36 months under prescribed circumstances), after which payments will include principal amortization
that accommodates a 40% balloon principal payment at maturity. Prepayment of amounts owing under the Credit Agreement are allowed under
prescribed circumstances. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement the Company paid an Origination Fee in the amount of $120,000. Upon Termination
of the Credit Agreement, the Company shall pay an Exit Fee of $600,000.
The
Company and Lender also entered into a Guarantee and Collateral Agreement wherein the Company agreed to secure the Credit Agreement with
all of the Company’s assets. The Company and Lender also entered into an Intellectual Property Security Agreement dated December
21, 2021 wherein the Credit Agreement is also secured by the Company’s right title and interest in the Company’s Intellectual
Property.
If
we default on our obligations to the lender, the lender could foreclose on their security interests and liquidate some or all of these
assets, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations and could require us to curtail or cease operations.
Our
business is dependent upon physicians utilizing our solution when prescribing cardiac monitoring; if we fail to continue to be successful
in convincing physicians in utilizing our solution, our revenue could fail to grow and could decrease.
The
success of our cardiac monitoring business is dependent upon physicians utilizing our solution when prescribing cardiac monitoring to
their patients. The utilization of our solution by physicians for use in the prescription of cardiac monitoring is directly influenced
by a number of factors, including:
|
● |
the
ability of the physicians with whom we work to obtain sufficient reimbursement and be paid in a timely manner for the professional
services they provide in connection with the use of our monitoring solutions; |
|
|
|
|
● |
continuing
to establish ourselves as a cardiac technology company; |
|
|
|
|
● |
our
ability to educate physicians regarding the benefits of MCT over alternative diagnostic monitoring solutions; |
|
|
|
|
● |
our
demonstrating that our proposed products are reliable and supported by us in the field; |
|
|
|
|
● |
supplying
and servicing sufficient quantities of products directly or through marketing alliances; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
pricing
our devices and technology service fees in a medical device industry that is becoming increasingly price sensitive. |
If
we are unable to drive physician utilization, revenue from the provision of our arrhythmia monitoring solutions could fail to grow or
even potentially decrease.
We
are subject to extensive governmental regulations relating to the manufacturing, labeling and marketing of our products.
Our
medical technology products and operations are subject to regulation by the FDA, Health Canada and other foreign and local governmental
authorities. These agencies enforce laws and regulations that govern the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling, advertising,
marketing and distribution, and market surveillance of our medical products.
Under
the United States Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, medical devices are classified into one of three classes — Class I, Class
II or Class III — depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to ensure
safety and effectiveness. Our Bioflux device is a Class II medical device and we believe our planned products will also be Class II medical
devices. Class II devices are subject to additional controls, including full applicability of the Quality System Regulations, and requirements
for 510(k) pre-market notification.
From
time to time, the FDA may disagree with the classification of a new Class II medical device and require the manufacturer of that device
to apply for approval as a Class III medical device. In the event that the FDA determines that our Class II medical products should be
classified as Class III medical devices, we could be precluded from marketing the devices for clinical use within the United States for
a period of time, the length of which depends on the specific change in the classification. Reclassification of our Class II medical
products as Class III medical devices could significantly increase our regulatory costs, including the timing and expense associated
with required clinical trials and other costs.
In
addition to regulations in the United States, we will be subject to a variety of foreign regulations governing clinical trials and commercial
sales and distribution of our products in foreign countries. Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain approval
of a product by the comparable regulatory authorities of foreign countries before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the
product in those countries. The approval process varies from country to country, and the time may be longer or shorter than that required
for FDA approval. The requirements governing the conduct of clinical trials, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary greatly
from country to country.
The
policies of the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may change and additional government regulations may be enacted which could prevent
or delay regulatory approval of our products and could also increase the cost of regulatory compliance. We cannot predict the likelihood,
nature or extent of adverse governmental regulation that might arise from future legislative or administrative action, either in the
United States or abroad.
The
FDA and non-U.S. regulatory authorities require that our products be manufactured according to rigorous standards. These regulatory requirements
may significantly increase our production costs and may even prevent us from making our products in amounts sufficient to meet market
demand. If we change our approved manufacturing process, the FDA may need to review the process before it may be used. Failure to comply
with applicable regulatory requirements discussed could subject us to enforcement actions, including warning letters, fines, injunctions
and civil penalties, recall or seizure of our products, operating restrictions, partial suspension or total shutdown of our production,
and criminal prosecution.
Federal,
state and non-U.S. regulations regarding the manufacture and sale of medical devices are subject to future changes. The complexity, timeframes
and costs associated with obtaining marketing clearances are unknown. Although we cannot predict the impact, if any, these changes might
have on our business, the impact could be material.
Following
the introduction of a product, these agencies will also periodically review our design and manufacturing processes and product performance.
The process of complying with the applicable good manufacturing practices, adverse event reporting, clinical trial and other requirements
can be costly and time consuming, and could delay or prevent the production, manufacturing or sale of our products. In addition, if we
fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it could result in fines, delays or suspensions of regulatory clearances, closure
of manufacturing sites, seizures or recalls of products and damage to our reputation. Recent changes in enforcement practice by the FDA
and other agencies have resulted in increased enforcement activity, which increases the compliance risk for the Company and other companies
in our industry. In addition, governmental agencies may impose new requirements regarding registration, labeling or prohibited materials
that may require us to modify or re-register products already on the market or otherwise impact our ability to market our products in
those countries. Once clearance or approval has been obtained for a product, there is an obligation to ensure that all applicable FDA,
Health Canada and other regulatory requirements continue to be met.
Additionally,
injuries caused by the malfunction or misuse of cardiac monitoring devices, even where such malfunction or misuse occurs with respect
to one of our competitor’s products, could cause regulatory agencies to implement more conservative regulations on the medical
cardiac monitoring industry, which could significantly increase our operating costs.
If
our customers are not able to both obtain and maintain adequate levels of third-party reimbursement for services using our products,
it would have a material adverse effect on our business.
Healthcare
providers and related facilities are generally reimbursed for their services through payment systems managed by various governmental
agencies worldwide, private insurance companies, and managed care organizations. The manner and level of reimbursement in any given case
may depend on the site of care, the procedure(s) performed, the final patient diagnosis, the device(s) utilized, available budget, the
efficacy, safety, performance and cost-effectiveness of our planned products and services, or a combination of these or other factors,
and coverage and payment levels are determined at each payer’s discretion. The coverage policies and reimbursement levels of these
third-party payers may impact the decisions of healthcare providers and facilities regarding which medical products they purchase and
the prices they are willing to pay for those products. Thus, changes in reimbursement levels or methods may either positively or negatively
impact sales of our products.
We
have no direct control over payer decision-making with respect to coverage and payment levels for our medical device products. Additionally,
we expect many payers to continue to explore cost-containment strategies (e.g., comparative and cost-effectiveness analyses, so-called
“pay-for-performance” programs implemented by various public and private payers, and expansion of payment bundling schemes
such as Accountable Care Organizations, and other such methods that shift medical cost risk to providers) that may potentially impact
coverage and/or payment levels for our current products or products we develop.
The
ability of physicians and other providers to successfully utilize our cardiac monitoring solution and successfully allow payors to reimburse
for the physicians’ technical and professional fees is critical to our business because physicians and their patients will select
arrhythmia monitoring solutions other than ours in the event that payors refuse to adequately reimburse our technical fees and physicians’
professional fees.
Our
customers may experience difficulty in obtaining reimbursement for our services from commercial payors that consider our technology to
be experimental and investigational, which would adversely affect our revenue and operating results.
Many
commercial payors refuse to enter into contracts to reimburse the fees associated with medical devices or services that such payors determine
to be “experimental and investigational.” Commercial payors typically label medical devices or services as “experimental
and investigational” until such devices or services have demonstrated product superiority evidenced by a randomized clinical trial.
Clinical
trials have been performed on other mobile cardiac telemetry devices, proving higher diagnostic yield than traditional event loop monitoring.
Certain remaining commercial payors, however, have stated that they do not believe the data from the clinical trials justifies the removal
of the experimental designation for mobile cardiac telemetry solutions. As a result, certain commercial payors may refuse to reimburse
the technical and professional fees associated with cardiac monitoring solutions such as the one expected to be offered by Biotricity.
If
commercial payors decide not reimburse physicians or providers for their services during the utilization of our cardiac monitoring solutions,
our revenue could fail to grow and could decrease.
Reimbursement
by Medicare is highly regulated and subject to change; our failure to comply with applicable regulations, could decrease our expected
revenue and may subject us to penalties or have an adverse impact on our business.
The
Medicare program is administered by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), which imposes extensive and detailed
requirements on medical services providers, including, but not limited to, rules that govern how we structure our relationships with
physicians, and how and where we provide our arrhythmia monitoring solutions. Our failure to comply with applicable Medicare rules could
result in discontinuing the ability for physicians to receive reimbursement as they will likely utilize our cardiac monitoring solution
under the Medicare payment program, civil monetary penalties, and/or criminal penalties, any of which could have a material adverse effect
on our business and revenues.
Consolidation
of commercial payors could result in payors eliminating coverage of mobile cardiac monitoring solutions or reducing reimbursement rates.
When
payors combine their operations, the combined company may elect to reimburse physicians for cardiac monitoring services at the lowest
rate paid by any of the participants in the consolidation. If one of the payors participating in the consolidation does not reimburse
for these services at all, the combined company may elect not to reimburse at any rate. Reimbursement rates tend to be lower for larger
payors. As a result, as payors consolidate, our expected average reimbursement rate may decline.
Product
defects could adversely affect the results of our operations.
The
design, manufacture and marketing of our products involve certain inherent risks. Manufacturing or design defects, unanticipated use
of our products, or inadequate disclosure of risks relating to the use of our products can lead to injury or other adverse events. These
events could lead to recalls or safety alerts relating to our products (either voluntary or required by the FDA, Health Canada or similar
governmental authorities in other countries), and could result, in certain cases, in the removal of a product from the market. A recall
could result in significant costs, as well as negative publicity and damage to our reputation that could reduce demand for our products.
Personal injuries relating to the use of our products could also result in product liability claims being brought against us. In some
circumstances, such adverse events could also cause delays in new product approvals.
Interruptions
or delays in telecommunications systems or in the data services provided to us by cellular communication providers or the loss of our
wireless or data services could impair the delivery of our cardiac monitoring services.
The
success of Biotricity’s cardiac monitoring services will be dependent upon our ability to store, retrieve, process and manage data
and to maintain and upgrade our data processing and communication capabilities. The monitoring solution relies on a third-party wireless
carrier to transmit data over its data network. All data sent by our monitors via this wireless data network or via landline is expected
to be routed directly to data centers and subsequently routed to the third-party ECG monitoring centers. We are therefore dependent upon
third party wireless carrier to provide data transmission and data hosting services to us. If we lose wireless carrier services, we would
be forced to seek alternative providers of data transmission and data hosting services, which might not be available on commercially
reasonable terms or at all.
As
we expand our commercial activities, an increased burden is expected to be placed upon our data processing systems and the equipment
upon which they rely. Interruptions of our data networks, or the data networks of our wireless carrier, for any extended length of time,
loss of stored data or other computer problems could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Frequent or
persistent interruptions in our arrhythmia monitoring services could cause permanent harm to our reputation and could cause current or
potential users or prescribing physicians to believe that our systems are unreliable, leading them to switch to our competitors. Such
interruptions could result in liability, claims and litigation against us for damages or injuries resulting from the disruption in service.
Our
systems are also expected to be vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunication failures,
terrorist attacks, computer viruses, break-ins, sabotage, and acts of vandalism. Despite any precautions that we may take, the occurrence
of a natural disaster or other unanticipated problems could result in lengthy interruptions in these services. We do not carry business
interruption insurance to protect against losses that may result from interruptions in service as a result of system failures. Moreover,
the communications and information technology industries are subject to rapid and significant changes, and our ability to operate and
compete is dependent on our ability to update and enhance the communication technologies used in our systems and services.
We
could be exposed to significant liability claims if we are unable to obtain insurance at acceptable costs and adequate levels or otherwise
protect ourselves against potential product liability claims.
The
testing, manufacture, marketing and sale of medical devices entail the inherent risk of liability claims or product recalls. Product
liability insurance is expensive and, if available, may not be available on acceptable terms at all periods of time. A successful product
liability claim or product recall could inhibit or prevent the successful commercialization of our products, cause a significant financial
burden on the Company, or both, which in either case could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We
require additional capital to support our present business plan and our anticipated business growth, and such capital may not be available
on acceptable terms, or at all, which would adversely affect our ability to operate.
We
will require additional funds to further develop our business plan. Based on our current operating plans, we plan to use $15 million
in capital to fund our planned operations and sales efforts necessary to propel the commercialization of Bioflux into broader markets.
We may choose to raise additional capital beyond this in order to expedite and propel growth more rapidly. We can give no assurance that
we will be successful in raising any additional funds. Additionally, if we are unable to generate sufficient planned revenues from our
sales and operating activities, we may need to raise additional funds, doing so through debt and equity offerings, in order to meet our
expected future liquidity and capital requirements, including capital required for the development completion and introduction of our
other planned products and technologies. Any such financing that we undertake will likely be dilutive to current stockholders.
We
intend to continue to make investments to support our business growth, including patent or other intellectual property asset creation.
In addition, we may also need additional funds to respond to business opportunities and challenges, including our ongoing operating expenses,
protecting our intellectual property, satisfying debt payment obligations, developing new lines of business and enhancing our operating
infrastructure. While we may need to seek additional funding for such purposes, we may not be able to obtain financing on acceptable
terms, or at all. In addition, the terms of our financings may be dilutive to, or otherwise adversely affect, holders of our common stock.
We may also seek to raise additional funds through arrangements with collaborators or other third parties. We may not be able to negotiate
any such arrangements on acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain additional funding on a timely basis, we may be required
to curtail or terminate some or all of our business plans.
We
cannot predict our future capital needs and we may not be able to secure additional financing.
We
will need to raise additional funds in the future to fund our working capital needs and to fund further expansion of our business. We
may require additional equity or debt financings, collaborative arrangements with corporate partners or funds from other sources for
these purposes. No assurance can be given that necessary funds will be available for us to finance our development on acceptable terms,
if at all. Furthermore, such additional financings may involve substantial dilution of our stockholders or may require that we relinquish
rights to certain of our technologies or products. In addition, we may experience operational difficulties and delays due to working
capital restrictions. If adequate funds are not available from operations or additional sources of financing, we may have to delay or
scale back our growth plans.
The
results of our research and development efforts are uncertain and there can be no assurance of the continued commercial success of our
products.
We
believe that we will need to incur additional research and development expenditures to continue development of our existing proposed
products as well as research and development expenditures to develop new products and services. The products and services we are developing
and may develop in the future may not be technologically successful. In addition, the length of our product and service development cycle
may be greater than we originally expected, and we may experience delays in product development. If our resulting products and services
are not technologically successful, they may not achieve market acceptance or compete effectively with our competitors’ products
and services.
If
we fail to retain certain of our key personnel and attract and retain additional qualified personnel, we might not be able to pursue
our growth strategy.
Our
future success will depend upon the continued service of Waqaas Al-Siddiq, our President and Chief Executive Officer. We entered into
an employment with Mr. Al-Siddiq on April 10, 2020 pursuant to which he will continue to serve as Chief Executive officer for 12 months
from the execution date unless his employment is terminated sooner or the employment agreement is automatically renewed pursuant to its
terms. Although we believe that our relationship with him is positive, there can be no assurance that his services will continue to be
available to us in the future. We do not carry any key man life insurance policies on any of our executive officers.
Executive
and legislative actions, or legal proceedings that seek to amend or impede the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, as well as
future efforts to repeal, replace or further modify the Affordable Care Act may adversely affect our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Since
its adoption into law in 2010, the Affordable Care Act has been challenged before the U.S. Supreme Court, and Congress in order to delay,
defund, or repeal implementation of or amend significant provisions of the Affordable Care Act. In addition, there continues to be ongoing
litigation over the interpretation and implementation of certain provisions of the law. The net effect of the Affordable Care Act, as
currently in effect, on our business is subject to a number of variables, including the law’s complexity, lack of complete implementing
regulations and interpretive guidance, and the sporadic implementation of the numerous programs designed to improve access to and the
quality of healthcare services. Additional variables of the Affordable Care Act impacting our business will be how states, providers,
insurance companies, employers, and other market participants respond to any future challenges to the Affordable Care Act.
We
cannot predict whether the Affordable Care Act will be modified, or whether it will be repealed or replaced, in whole or in part, and,
if so, what the replacement plan or modifications would be, when the replacement plan or modifications would become effective, or whether
any of the existing provisions of the Affordable Care Act would remain in place
We
will not be profitable unless we can demonstrate that our products can be manufactured at low prices.
To
date, we have focused primarily on research and development of the first-generation version of the Bioflux, as well as other technologies
we plan to introduce in our eco-system, and their proposed marketing and distribution. Consequently, we have little experience in manufacturing
these products on a commercial basis. We may manufacture our products through third-party manufacturers. We can offer no assurance that
either we or our manufacturing partners will develop efficient, automated, low-cost manufacturing capabilities and processes to meet
the quality, price, engineering, design and production standards or production volumes required to successfully mass market our products,
especially at the low-cost levels we require to absorb the cost of near free distribution of our products pursuant to our proposed business
plan. Even if we or our manufacturing partners are successful in developing such manufacturing capability and processes, we do not know
whether we or they will be timely in meeting our product commercialization schedule or the production and delivery requirements of potential
customers. A failure to develop such manufacturing processes and capabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business and
financial results.
Our
profitability in part is dependent on material and other manufacturing costs. We are unable to offer any assurance that either we or
a manufacturing partner will be able to reduce costs to a level which will allow production of a competitive product or that any product
produced using lower cost materials and manufacturing processes will not suffer from a reduction in performance, reliability and longevity.
If
we or our suppliers fail to achieve or maintain regulatory approval of manufacturing facilities, our growth could be limited, and our
business could be harmed.
We
currently assemble our devices in our California facility. To maintain compliance with FDA and other regulatory requirements, our manufacturing
facilities must be periodically re-evaluated and qualified under a quality system to ensure they meet production and quality standards.
Suppliers of components and products used to manufacture our devices must also comply with FDA regulatory requirements, which often require
significant resources and subject us and our suppliers to potential regulatory inspections and stoppages. If we or our suppliers do not
maintain regulatory approval for our manufacturing operations, our business could be adversely affected.
Our
dependence on a limited number of suppliers may prevent us from delivering our devices on a timely basis.
We
currently rely on a limited number of suppliers of components for our devices. If these suppliers became unable to provide components
in the volumes needed or at an acceptable price, we would have to identify and qualify acceptable replacements from alternative sources
of supply. The process of qualifying suppliers is lengthy. Delays or interruptions in the supply of our requirements could limit or stop
our ability to provide sufficient quantities of devices on a timely basis or meet demand for our services, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our
operations in international markets involve inherent risks that we may not be able to control.
Our
business plan includes the marketing and sale of our proposed products in international markets. Accordingly, our results could be materially
and adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors relating to international business operations, including:
|
● |
Macroeconomic
conditions adversely affecting geographies where we intend to do business; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Foreign
currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Political
or social unrest or economic instability in a specific country or region; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Higher
costs of doing business in foreign countries; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Infringement
claims on foreign patents, copyrights or trademark rights; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Difficulties
in staffing and managing operations across disparate geographic areas; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Difficulties
associated with enforcing agreements and intellectual property rights through foreign legal systems; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Trade
protection measures and other regulatory requirements, which affect our ability to import or export our products from or to various
countries; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Adverse
tax consequences; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Unexpected
changes in legal and regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Military
conflict, terrorist activities, natural disasters and medical epidemics; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
Our
ability to recruit and retain channel partners in foreign jurisdictions. |
Risks
Related to Our Industry
The
industry in which we operate is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change. If our competitors are better able to develop
and market products that are safer, more effective, less costly, easier to use, or are otherwise more attractive, we may be unable to
compete effectively with other companies.
The
medical technology industry is characterized by intense competition and rapid technological change, and we will face competition on the
basis of product features, clinical outcomes, price, services and other factors. Competitors may include large medical device and other
companies, some of which have significantly greater financial and marketing resources than we do, and firms that are more specialized
than we are with respect to particular markets. Our competition may respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, undertake more
extensive marketing campaigns, have greater financial, marketing and other resources than ours or may be more successful in attracting
potential customers, employees and strategic partners.
Our
competitive position will depend on multiple, complex factors, including our ability to achieve regulatory clearance and market acceptance
for our products, develop new products, implement production and marketing plans, secure regulatory approvals for products under development
and protect our intellectual property. In some instances, competitors may also offer, or may attempt to develop, alternative systems
that may be delivered without a medical device or a medical device superior to ours. The development of new or improved products, processes
or technologies by other companies may render our products or proposed products obsolete or less competitive. The entry into the market
of manufacturers located in low-cost manufacturing locations may also create pricing pressure, particularly in developing markets. Our
future success depends, among other things, upon our ability to compete effectively against current technology, as well as to respond
effectively to technological advances or changing regulatory requirements, and upon our ability to successfully implement our marketing
strategies and execute our research and development plan. Our research and development efforts are aimed, in part, at solving increasingly
complex problems, as well as creating new technologies, and we do not expect that all of our projects will be successful. If our research
and development efforts are unsuccessful, our future results of operations could be materially harmed.
We
face competition from other medical device companies that focus on similar markets.
We
face competition from other companies that have longer operating histories and may have greater name recognition and substantially greater
financial, technical and marketing resources than us. Many of these companies also have FDA or other applicable governmental approval
to market and sell their products, and more extensive customer bases, broader customer relationships and broader industry alliances than
us, including relationships with many of our potential customers. Increased competition from any of these sources could result in our
failure to achieve and maintain an adequate level of customers and market share to support the cost of our operations.
Unsuccessful
clinical or other trials or procedures relating to products under development could have a material adverse effect on our
prospects.
The
regulatory approval process for new products and new indications for existing products requires extensive clinical trials and procedures,
including early clinical experiences and regulatory studies. Unfavorable or inconsistent clinical data from current or future clinical
trials or procedures conducted by us, our competitors, or third parties, or perceptions regarding this clinical data, could adversely
affect our ability to obtain necessary approvals and the market’s view of our future prospects. Such clinical trials and procedures
are inherently uncertain and there can be no assurance that these trials or procedures will be completed in a timely or cost-effective
manner or result in a commercially viable product. Failure to successfully complete these trials or procedures in a timely and cost-effective
manner could have a material adverse effect on our prospects. Clinical trials or procedures may experience significant setbacks even
after earlier trials have shown promising results. Further, preliminary results from clinical trials or procedures may be contradicted
by subsequent clinical analysis. In addition, results from our clinical trials or procedures may not be supported by actual long-term
studies or clinical experience. If preliminary clinical results are later contradicted, or if initial results cannot be supported by
actual long-term studies or clinical experience, our business could be adversely affected. Clinical trials or procedures may be suspended
or terminated by us, the FDA or other regulatory authorities at any time if it is believed that the trial participants face unacceptable
health risks.
Intellectual
property litigation and infringement claims could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from selling certain of our products.
The
medical device industry in which we operate is characterized by extensive intellectual property litigation and, from time to time, we
might be the subject of claims by third parties of potential infringement or misappropriation. Regardless of outcome, such claims are
expensive to defend and divert the time and effort of our management and operating personnel from other business issues. A successful
claim or claims of patent or other intellectual property infringement against us could result in our payment of significant monetary
damages and/or royalty payments, or it could negatively impact our ability to sell current or future products in the affected category
and could have a material adverse effect on business, cash flows, financial condition or results of operations.
If
we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.
We
plan on relying on trade secrets, including unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information, to maintain our competitive
position. We will seek to protect these trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with parties
who have access to them, such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific collaborators, contract manufacturers, consultants,
advisors and other third parties. We will seek to protect our confidential proprietary information, in part, by entering into confidentiality
and invention or intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees and consultants. Moreover, to the extent we enter into
such agreements, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets,
and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or misappropriated
a trade secret is difficult, expensive and time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some courts inside and outside
the United States are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or
independently developed by a competitor, we would have no right to prevent them, or those to whom they communicate it, from using that
technology or information to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor,
our competitive position would be harmed. In general, any loss of trade secret protection or other unpatented proprietary rights could
harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
If
we are unable to protect our proprietary rights, or if we infringe on the proprietary rights of others, our competitiveness and business
prospects may be materially damaged.
We
have filed for one industrial design patent in Canada and in the U.S. We may continue to seek patent protection for our designs and may
seek patent protection for our proprietary technology if warranted. Seeking patent protection is a lengthy and costly process, and there
can be no assurance that patents will be issued from any pending applications, or that any claims allowed from existing or pending patents
will be sufficiently broad or strong to protect our designs or our proprietary technology. There is also no guarantee that any patents
we hold will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that the patent rights granted will provide competitive advantages to
us. Our competitors have developed and may continue to develop and obtain patents for technologies that are similar or superior to our
technologies. In addition, the laws of foreign jurisdictions in which we develop, manufacture or sell our products may not protect our
intellectual property rights to the same extent, as do the laws of Canada or the United States.
Adverse
outcomes in current or future legal disputes regarding patent and other intellectual property rights could result in the loss of our
intellectual property rights, subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, require us to seek licenses from third parties
on terms that may not be reasonable or favorable to us, prevent us from manufacturing, importing or selling our products, or compel us
to redesign our products to avoid infringing third parties’ intellectual property. As a result, we may be required to incur substantial
costs to prosecute, enforce or defend our intellectual property rights if they are challenged. Any of these circumstances could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and resources or results of operations.
Dependence
on our proprietary rights and failing to protect such rights or to be successful in litigation related to such rights may result in our
payment of significant monetary damages or impact offerings in our product portfolios.
Our
long-term success largely depends on our ability to market technologically competitive products. If we fail to obtain or maintain adequate
intellectual property protection, we may not be able to prevent third parties from using our proprietary technologies or may lose access
to technologies critical to our products. Also, our currently pending industrial design patent or any future patents applications may
not result in issued patents, and issued patents are subject to claims concerning priority, scope and other issues.
Furthermore,
to the extent we do not file applications for patents domestically or internationally, we may not be able to prevent third parties from
using our proprietary technologies or may lose access to technologies critical to our products in other countries.
Enforcement
of federal and state laws regarding privacy and security of patient information may adversely affect our business, financial condition
or operations.
The
use and disclosure of certain health care information by health care providers and their business associates have come under increasing
public scrutiny. Recent federal standards under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, establish
rules concerning how individually identifiable health information may be used, disclosed and protected. Historically, state law has governed
confidentiality issues, and HIPAA preserves these laws to the extent they are more protective of a patient’s privacy or provide
the patient with more access to his or her health information. As a result of the implementation of the HIPAA regulations, many states
are considering revisions to their existing laws and regulations that may or may not be more stringent or burdensome than the federal
HIPAA provisions. We must operate our business in a manner that complies with all applicable laws, both federal and state, and that does
not jeopardize the ability of our customers to comply with all applicable laws. We believe that our operations are consistent with these
legal standards. Nevertheless, these laws and regulations present risks for health care providers and their business associates that
provide services to patients in multiple states. Because these laws and regulations are recent, and few have been interpreted by government
regulators or courts, our interpretations of these laws and regulations may be incorrect. If a challenge to our activities is successful,
it could have an adverse effect on our operations, may require us to forego relationships with customers in certain states and may restrict
the territory available to us to expand our business. In addition, even if our interpretations of HIPAA and other federal and state laws
and regulations are correct, we could be held liable for unauthorized uses or disclosures of patient information as a result of inadequate
systems and controls to protect this information or as a result of the theft of information by unauthorized computer programmers who
penetrate our network security. Enforcement of these laws against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We
may become subject, directly or indirectly, to federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws and regulations and if we are unable
to fully comply with such laws, the Company could face substantial penalties.
Although
not affected at this time, our operations may in the future become directly or indirectly affected by various broad state and federal
health care fraud and abuse laws, including the Federal Healthcare Programs’ Anti-Kickback Statute and the Stark law, which among
other things, prohibits a physician from referring Medicare and Medicaid patients to an entity with which the physician has a financial
relationship, subject to certain exceptions. If our future operations are found to be in violation of these laws, we or our officers
may be subject to civil or criminal penalties, including large monetary penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment and exclusion from Medicare
and Medicaid program participation. If enforcement action were to occur, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
We
may be subject to federal and state false claims laws which impose substantial penalties.
Many
of the physicians and patients whom we expect to use our services will file claims for reimbursement with government programs such as
Medicare and Medicaid. As a result, we may be subject to the federal False Claims Act if we knowingly “cause” the filing
of false claims. Violations may result in substantial civil penalties, including treble damages. The federal False Claims Act also contains
“whistleblower” or “qui tam” provisions that allow private individuals to bring actions on behalf of the government
alleging that the defendant has defrauded the government. In recent years, the number of suits brought in the medical industry by private
individuals has increased dramatically. Various states have enacted laws modeled after the federal False Claims Act, including “qui
tam” provisions, and some of these laws apply to claims filed with commercial insurers. We are unable to predict whether we could
be subject to actions under the federal False Claims Act, or the impact of such actions. However, the costs of defending claims under
the False Claims Act, as well as sanctions imposed under the False Claims Act, could adversely affect our results of operations.
Changes
in the health care industry or tort reform could reduce the number of arrhythmia monitoring solutions ordered by physicians, which could
result in a decline in the demand for our planned solutions, pricing pressure and decreased revenue.
Changes
in the health care industry directed at controlling health care costs or perceived over-utilization of arrhythmia monitoring solutions
could reduce the volume of solutions ordered by physicians. If more health care cost controls are broadly instituted throughout the health
care industry, the volume of cardiac monitoring solutions could decrease, resulting in pricing pressure and declining demand for our
planned services, which could harm our operating results. In addition, it has been suggested that some physicians order arrhythmia monitoring
solutions, even when the services may have limited clinical utility, primarily to establish a record for defense in the event of a claim
of medical malpractice against the physician. Legal changes increasing the difficulty of initiating medical malpractice cases, known
as tort reform, could reduce the amount of our services prescribed as physicians respond to reduced risks of litigation, which could
harm our operating results.
Risks
Related to Our Securities and Other Risks
If we fail to comply
with the continuing listing standards of the Nasdaq, our common stock could be delisted from the exchange.
If
we were unable to meet the continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”), our common stock could be
delisted from the Nasdaq. Any such delisting of our common stock could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency
of the trading market for, our common stock, not only in terms of the number of shares that can be bought and sold at a given price, but
also through delays in the timing of transactions and less coverage of us by securities analysts, if any. Also, if in the future we were
to determine that we need to seek additional equity capital, being delisted from Nasdaq could have an adverse effect on our ability to
raise capital in the public or private equity markets.
There is a limited existing market
for our common stock and we do not know if a more liquid market for our common stock will develop to provide you with adequate liquidity.
Until August 25, 2021,
our common stock was quoted on the OTCQB. As of August 26,, 2021, our common stock began trading on the Nasdq Capital Market. We cannot
assure you that a more active trading market for our common stock will develop or if it does develop, that it will be maintained. You
may not be able to sell your securities quickly or at the market price if trading in our securities is not active. In the absence of an
active public trading market:
|
● |
you may not be able to resell your securities at or above the public offering price; |
|
● |
the market price of our common stock may experience more price volatility; and |
|
● |
there may be less efficiency in carrying out your purchase and sale orders. |
The
market price of our common stock may be volatile.
The
market price for our common stock may be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors including the following:
|
● |
Our
ability to successfully bring any of our proposed or planned products to market; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Actual
or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly or annual operating results; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Changes
in financial or operational estimates or projections; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Conditions
in markets generally; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Changes
in the economic performance or market valuations of companies similar to ours; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Announcements
by us or our competitors of new products, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
|
|
|
|
● |
Our
intellectual property position; and |
|
|
|
|
● |
General
economic or political conditions in the United States or elsewhere. |
In
addition, the securities market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are not related to the
operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market price of
shares of our common stock.
There
may be a significant number of shares of common stock eligible for sale, which could depress the market price of such stock.
We
have 50,301,806 outstanding shares as of July 13, 2022, of which 28,460,275 are unrestricted shares of
common stock, such that a large number of shares of our common stock could be made available for sale in the public market, which could
harm the market price of the stock.
Our
largest stockholder will substantially influence our Company for the foreseeable future, including the outcome of matters requiring shareholder
approval and such control may prevent you and other stockholders from influencing significant corporate decisions and may result in conflicts
of interest that could cause the Company’s stock price to decline.
Mr.
Al-Siddiq, our chief executive officer and a member of our board of directors, beneficially owns approximately 15.25% of our outstanding
shares of common stock and common stock underlying the Exchangeable Shares. As a result, coupled with his board seat, he will have the
ability to influence the election of our directors and the outcome of corporate actions requiring shareholder approval, such as: (i)
a merger or a sale of our Company, (ii) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and (iii) amendments to our articles of incorporation
and bylaws. This concentration of voting power and control could have a significant effect in delaying, deferring or preventing an action
that might otherwise be beneficial to our other shareholders and be disadvantageous to our shareholders with interests different from
those entities and individuals. Mr. Al-Siddiq also has significant control over our business, policies and affairs as an executive officer
or director of our Company. He may also exert influence in delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company, even if such change
in control would benefit the other stockholders of the Company. In addition, the significant concentration of stock ownership may adversely
affect the market value of the Company’s common stock due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or
arise.
Material
weaknesses may exist when the Company reports on the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting for purposes of its
reporting requirements.
We
are required to provide management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in our Annual Reports
on Form 10-K, as required by Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley. Material weaknesses may exist when the Company reports on the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting for purposes of its reporting requirements under the Exchange Act or Section 404 of
Sarbanes-Oxley following the completion of the Acquisition Transaction. The existence of one or more material weaknesses would preclude
a conclusion that the Company maintains effective internal control over financial reporting. Such a conclusion would be required to be
disclosed in the Company’s future Annual Reports on Form 10-K and could harm the Company’s reputation and cause the market
price of its common stock to drop.
Our
issuance of additional common stock or preferred stock may cause our common stock price to decline, which may negatively impact your
investment.
Issuances
of a substantial number of additional shares of our common or preferred stock, or the perception that such issuances could occur, may
cause prevailing market prices for our common stock to decline. In addition, our board of directors is authorized to issue additional
series of shares of preferred stock without any action on the part of our stockholders. Our board of directors also has the power, without
stockholder approval, to set the terms of any such series of shares of preferred stock that may be issued, including voting rights, conversion
rights, dividend rights, preferences over our common stock with respect to dividends or if we liquidate, dissolve or wind up our business
and other terms. If we issue cumulative preferred stock in the future that has preference over our common stock with respect to the payment
of dividends or upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up, or if we issue preferred stock with voting rights that dilute the voting
power of our common stock, the market price of our common stock could decrease.
Anti-takeover
provisions in the Company’s charter and bylaws may prevent or frustrate attempts by stockholders to change the board of directors
or current management and could make a third-party acquisition of the Company difficult.
The
Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition
or other change in control that stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive
a premium for their shares. For example, our Certificate of Incorporation permits the Board of Directors without stockholder approval
to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock (20,000 of these shares have been designated as Series A Preferred, of which 7,200
are outstanding, and one special voting preferred share is designated and outstanding) and to fix the designation, power, preferences,
and rights of the shares and preferred stock. Furthermore, the Board of Directors has the ability to increase the size of the Board and
fill newly created vacancies without stockholder approval. These provisions could limit the price that investors might be willing to
pay in the future for shares of the Company’s common stock.
Our
common stock could become subject to the SEC’s penny stock rules and accordingly, broker-dealers may experience difficulty in completing
customer transactions and trading activity in our securities may be adversely affected.
The
SEC has adopted regulations, which generally define “penny stock” to be an equity security that has a market price of less
than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. The market price of our common stock is less than $5.00 per share and therefore
would be a “penny stock” according to SEC rules, unless we are listed on a national securities exchange. Under these rules,
broker-dealers who recommend such securities to persons other than institutional accredited investors must:
●
Make a special written suitability determination for the purchaser;
●
Receive the purchaser’s prior written agreement to the transaction;
●
Provide the purchaser with risk disclosure documents which identify certain risks associated with investing in “penny stocks”
and which describe the market for these “penny stocks” as well as a purchaser’s legal remedies; and
●
Obtain a signed and dated acknowledgment from the purchaser demonstrating that the purchaser has actually received the required risk
disclosure document before a transaction in a “penny stock” can be completed.
If our common stock became subject
to these rules, broker-dealers may find it difficult to effectuate customer transactions and trading activity in our securities may be
adversely affected. As a result, the market price of our securities may be depressed, and you may find it more difficult to sell your
securities.
We
have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future, and any return on investment may be limited to
the value of our stock.
We
have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable
future and any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock. We plan to retain any future earning to finance
growth.
Risks
Related to Intellectual Property
We
have no utility patent protection, and have only limited design patent protection and rely on unregistered copyright and trade secret
protection, if we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection for our products, our competitors could develop and commercialize
products and technology similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our existing products and any products
we may develop, and our technology may be adversely affected.
Any
failure to obtain or maintain sufficient intellectual property protection with respect to our current and planned products could have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We
rely on trade secret protection to protect proprietary know-how that may not be patentable or that we elect not to patent, processes
for which patents may be difficult to obtain or enforce, and any other elements of our products and services that involve proprietary
know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. However, trade secrets can also be difficult to protect. If the steps
taken to maintain our trade secrets are deemed inadequate, we may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating
any trade secrets. Misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets could significantly affect our competitive position
and may have a material adverse effect on our business. Furthermore, trade secret protection does not prevent competitors from independently
developing similar technology. To the extent we also rely on copyright protection, it, too, does not prevent competitors from independently
developing similar technology.
Even
if we were to obtain additional patent protection, such patents may not issue in a form that will provide us with any meaningful protection,
prevent competitors or other third parties from competing with us, or otherwise provide us with any competitive advantage. Any patents
that we own may be challenged, narrowed, circumvented, or invalidated by third parties. Consequently, we do not know whether our products
will be protectable or remain protected by valid and enforceable patents. Our competitors or other third parties may be able to circumvent
our intellectual property by developing similar or alternative technologies or products in a non-infringing manner which could materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
The
Company has made and will continue to make decisions regarding what patents and trademarks and other intellectual property to pursue
and maintain in is business judgment balanced against the cost of obtaining and maintaining that IP.
We
may not be able to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights throughout the world.
Third
parties may attempt to commercialize competitive products or services in foreign countries where we do not have any patents or patent
applications where legal recourse may be limited. This may have a significant commercial impact on our foreign business operations.
We
may become involved in intellectual property litigation either due to claims by others that we are infringing their intellectual property
rights or due to our own assertions that others are infringing upon our intellectual property rights.
We have not done any investigation of and thus cannot provide assurance that our products or methods do not infringe the patents or other
intellectual property rights of third parties.
If
our business is successful, the possibility may increase that others will assert infringement claims against us.
Infringement
and other intellectual property claims and proceedings brought against us, whether successful or not, could result in substantial costs
and harm to our reputation. Such claims and proceedings can also distract and divert management and key personnel from other tasks important
to the success of the business. We cannot be certain that we will successfully defend against allegations of infringement of patents
and intellectual property rights of others. In the event that we become subject to a patent infringement or other intellectual property
lawsuit and if the other party’s patents or other intellectual property were upheld as valid and enforceable and we were found
to infringe the other party’s patents or violate the terms of a license to which we are a party, we could be required to do one
or more of the following:
|
● |
cease
selling or using any of our products that incorporate the asserted intellectual property, which would adversely affect our revenue; |
|
● |
pay
substantial damages for past use of the asserted intellectual property; |
|
● |
obtain
a license from the holder of the asserted intellectual property, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all,
and which could reduce profitability; and |
|
● |
redesign
or rename, in the case of trademark claims, our products to avoid violating or infringing the intellectual property rights of third
parties, which may not be possible and could be costly and time-consuming if it is possible to do so. |
Third-party
claims of intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other violation against may also prevent or delay the sale and marketing
of our products.
We
may also be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or advisors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of
their current or former employers or claims asserting ownership of what we regard as our own intellectual property.
If
we fail in defending any such claims, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs to us and be a distraction to
management.
If
our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our markets of interest
and our business may be adversely affected. None identified.
Our
trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be violating or infringing
on other marks. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names, which we need to build name recognition
among potential partners or customers in our markets of interest. At times, competitors or other third parties may adopt trade names
or trademarks similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to build brand identity and possibly leading to market confusion. In addition,
there could be potential trade name or trademark infringement or dilution claims brought by owners of other trademarks. Over the long
term, if we are unable to establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, then we may not be able to compete effectively
and our business may be adversely affected. Our efforts to enforce or protect our proprietary rights related to trademarks, trade secrets,
domain names, copyrights or other intellectual property may be ineffective and could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources
and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not
applicable.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
Our principal executive office
is located in leased premises of approximately 8,300 square feet at 203 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 600, Redwood City, California. We
believe that these facilities are adequate for our needs, including providing the space and infrastructure to accommodate our development
work based on our current operating plan. We do not own any real estate.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From
time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However,
litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may
harm business.
We
are not currently a party in any material legal proceeding or governmental regulatory proceeding nor are we currently aware of any
pending or potential legal proceeding or governmental regulatory proceeding proposed to be initiated against us that would have a
material adverse effect on us or our business.
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not
applicable.
PART
II
ITEM
5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
Market
for our Common Stock
Our common stock is traded on
NASDAQ under the symbol “BTCY” since August 26, 2021. Prior to that, our common stock was quoted on the OTCQB
marketplace under the symbol “BTCY”. On March 31, 2022 the closing price of our common stock as reported on
NASDAQ was $2.27 per share.
Shareholders
of Record
As
of July 13, 2022, an aggregate of 50,301,806 shares of the Company’s common stock were issued and outstanding and
owned by approximately 199 named shareholders of record. As of July 13, 2022, 1,466,718 Exchangeable Shares were also issued and
outstanding and held by approximately 11 holders of record. The numbers of record holders do not include beneficial owners holding
shares through nominee names.
As
of July 13, 2022 there is also one share of the Special Voting Preferred Stock issued and outstanding, held by the Trustee, and
8,045 Series A preferred shares issued and outstanding and owned by 6 shareholders .
Dividends
Our
Series A preferred shares earning dividends at the rate of 12% per annum. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common
shares in the foreseeable future and we intend to retain all of our earnings, if any, to finance our growth and operations and to fund
the expansion of our business. Payment of any dividends will be made in the discretion of our Board of Directors, after our taking into
account various factors, including our financial condition, operating results, current and anticipated cash needs and plans for expansion.
No dividends may be declared or paid on our common shares, unless a dividend, payable in the same consideration or manner, is simultaneously
declared or paid, as the case may be, on our shares of preferred stock, if any.
Issuance
of Securities
During the year ended March
31, 2022, the Company issued 4,696,083 common shares (net of 19,263 that were part of to be issued shares from prior year commitment),
for conversion of convertible notes. The fair value of the shares issued was $15,678,454. In addition, the Company issued 1,104,725 common
shares in connection with warrant exercises, and 451,688 common shares for services provided (net of 250,000 that were part of to be
issued shares from prior year commitment). In addition, the Company issued 69,252 common shares for cash proceeds of $250,000, which
were initially received as a promissory note, and paid through the issuance common shares within the same quarter. The Company also issued
5,382,331 common shares in connection with the equity financing that was concurrent with its listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, for
total net cash proceeds of $14,545,805.
During the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company also issued an aggregate
of 1,423,260 shares of its common stock to investors as part of the one-for-one exchange of previously issued exchangeable shares into
the Company’s Common Stock, which is a non-cash transaction.
During the year ended March 31, 2022, an additional
100 Series A preferred shares were issued for cash proceeds of $100,000. The Company issued 288,756 common shares as a result of preferred
share conversions.
The securities referenced above
were offered and sold pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
We
adopted an equity incentive plan effective as of February 2, 2016 to attract and retain employees, directors and consultants. The equity
incentive plan is administered by our Board of Directors which may determine, among other things, the (a) terms and conditions of any
option or stock purchase right granted, including the exercise price and the vesting schedule, (b) persons who are to receive options
and stock purchase rights and (c) the number of shares to be subject to each option and stock purchase right. The equity incentive plan
may also be administered by a special committee, as determined by the Board of Directors.
The
maximum aggregate number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the equity incentive plan is 7,448,529, which,
except as provided in the plan shall automatically increase on January 1 of each year for no more than 10 years, so the number of shares
that may be issued is an amount no greater than 15% of our outstanding shares of common stock and Exchangeable Shares as of such January
1. The equity incentive plan provides for the grant of, among other awards, (i) “incentive” options (qualified under section
422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) to our employees and (ii) non-statutory options and restricted stock to our employees,
directors or consultants.
Shown
below is information as of March 31, 2022 with respect to the common stock of the Company that may be issued under its equity compensation
plans.
Plan Category | |
(a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | |
(b) Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | |
(c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) | |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1) | |
| 7,409,715 | | |
$ | 2.347 | | |
| 38,814 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (2) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Directors, Officers and Employees Stock Option Plan (3) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Warrants granted to Directors and Officers (4) | |
| 1,066,400 | | |
$ | 1.187 | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total | |
| 8,476,115 | | |
| | | |
| 38,814 | |
|
(1) |
Represents
the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan and includes options to purchase an aggregate of 2,499,998 shares of our common stock
granted to Mr. Al-Siddiq pursuant to his employment agreement at an exercise price of $2.20, as well as a further grant to Mr. Al-Siddiq
of 1,300,000 options in January 2018 and 1,400,000 options in April 2020 which vest quarterly over four years and have an exercise
price of $1.06 per share. |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
At
the time of the Acquisition Transaction on February 2, 2016, each (a) outstanding option granted or issued pursuant to iMedical’s
existing equity compensation plan was exchanged for approximately 1.197 economically equivalent replacement options with a corresponding
adjustment to the exercise price and (b) outstanding warrant granted or issued pursuant to iMedical’s equity compensation plans
was adjusted so the holder receives approximately 1.197 shares of common stock with a corresponding adjustment to the exercise price.
Does not include options granted to Mr. Al-Siddiq discussed in (1) above. |
|
|
|
|
(3) |
On
March 30, 2015, iMedical approved Directors, Officers and Employees Stock Option Plan, under which it authorized and issued 3,000,000
options. This plan was established to enable the Company to attract and retain the services of highly qualified and experience directors,
officers, employees and consultants and to give such person an interest in the success of the Company. As of March 31, 2018, there
were 137,500 outstanding options at an exercise price of $.0001 under this plan. These options represented the right to purchase
164,590 shares of the Company’s common stock using the ratio of 1.1969:1. All of these options were exercised during the year
ended March 31, 2019. No other grants will be made under this plan. |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
This
category relates to individuals who, at the time of grant, were not part of the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan. |
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
applicable to a smaller reporting company.
ITEM
7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”)
covers information pertaining to the Company up to March 31, 2021 and should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and
related notes of the Company as of and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2021 and 2020 contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. Except as otherwise noted, the financial information contained in this MD&A and in the financial statements has been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars
unless otherwise noted.
Forward
Looking Statements
Certain
information contained in this MD&A and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements.”
Statements which are not historical reflect our current expectations and projections about our future results, performance, liquidity,
financial condition and results of operations, prospects and opportunities and are based upon information currently available to us and
our management and their interpretation of what is believed to be significant factors affecting our existing and proposed business, including
many assumptions regarding future events. Actual results, performance, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, prospects
and opportunities could differ materially and perhaps substantially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements
as a result of various risks, uncertainties and other factors, including those risks described in detail in the section entitled “Risk
Factors” as well as elsewhere herein.
Forward-looking
statements, which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies, and expectations, are generally identifiable by use
of the words “may,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “could,” “scheduled,”
“expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend,” “seek,”
or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology.
In
light of these risks and uncertainties, and especially given the nature of our existing and proposed business, there can be no assurance
that the forward-looking statements contained in this section and elsewhere in herein will in fact occur. Potential investors should
not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, there is no
undertaking to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed
circumstances or any other reason.
Company
Overview
We
are a healthcare technology company committed to the development of software and hardware solutions to help the management of chronic
health issues. Our first product is a turnkey, wearable medical cardiac solution that provides physicians the ability to monitor patients
remotely. We are also developing other remote patient monitoring solutions for physicians and public consumers. To achieve this, we are
dedicated to continuing our research and development programs, honing our medical-device expertise, increasing our deep knowledge of
biometrics, developing both software and hardware components and nurturing a cohesive medical network.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US
GAAP”) and are expressed in United States Dollars. Significant accounting policies are summarized below:
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”)
on April 1, 2018. In accordance with ASC 606, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an
amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services by applying
the core principles – 1) identify the contract with a customer, 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, 3) determine
the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract, and 5) recognize revenue as performance
obligations are satisfied.
The
Bioflux mobile cardiac telemetry device, a wearable device, is worn by patients for a monitoring period up to 30 days. The cardiac data
that the device monitors and collects is curated and analyzed by the Company’s proprietary algorithms and then securely communicated
to a remote monitoring facility for electronic reporting and conveyance to the patient’s prescribing physician or other certified
cardiac medical professional. Revenues earned with respect to this device are comprised of device sales revenues and technology fee revenues
(technology as a service). The device, together with its licensed software, is available for sale to the medical center or physician,
who is responsible for the delivery of clinical diagnosis and therapy. The remote monitoring, data collection and reporting services
performed by the technology culminate in a patient study that is generally billable when it is complete and is issued to the physician.
In order to recognize revenue, management considers whether or not the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of a commercial
arrangement exists, and delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. For sales of devices, which are invoiced directly, additional
revenue recognition criteria include that the price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured; for device sales
contracts with terms of more than one year, the Company recognizes any significant financing component as revenue over the contractual
period using the effective interest method, and the associated interest income is reflected accordingly on the statement of operations
and included in other income; for revenue that is earned based on customer usage of the proprietary software to render a patient’s
cardiac study, the Company recognizes revenue when the study ends based on a fixed billing rate. Costs associated with providing the
services are recorded as the service is provided regardless of whether or when revenue is recognized.
The
Company may also earn service-related revenue from contracts with other counterparties with which it consults. This contract work is
separate and distinct from services provided to clinical customers, but may be with a reseller or other counterparties that are working
to establish their operations in foreign jurisdictions or ancillary products or market segments in which the Company has expertise and
may eventually conduct business.
The
Company recognized the following forms of revenue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
$ | | |
$ | |
Device sales | |
| 995,876 | | |
| 635,901 | |
Technology fees | |
| 5,904,393 | | |
| 2,748,866 | |
Service-related and other revenue | |
| 750,000 | | |
| - | |
| |
| 7,650,269 | | |
| 3,384,767 | |
Inventory
Inventory
is stated at the lower of cost and market value, cost being determined on a weighted average cost basis. Market value of our inventory,
which is all purchased finished goods, is determined based on its estimated net realizable value, which is generally the selling price
less normally predictable costs of disposal and transportation. The Company records write-downs of inventory that is obsolete or in excess
of anticipated demand or market value based on consideration of product lifecycle stage, technology trends, product development plans
and assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Actual demand may differ from forecasted demand, and such differences may
have a material effect on recorded inventory values. Inventory write-downs are charged to cost of revenue and establish a new cost basis
for the inventory.
Significant
accounting estimates and assumptions
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions to be made in applying the accounting
policies that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
The estimates and related assumptions are based on previous experiences and other factors considered reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making the assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources.
The
estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period
in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the
revision affects both current and future periods.
Significant
accounts that require estimates as the basis for determining the stated amounts include share-based compensation, impairment analysis
and fair value of warrants, structured notes, convertible debt and conversion liabilities.
● | Fair
value of stock options |
The
Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of equity instruments at the date
at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for share-based payments requires determining the most appropriate valuation model for
a grant of such instruments, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. The estimate also requires determining the
most appropriate inputs to the Black-Scholes option pricing model, including the expected life of the instrument, risk-free rate, volatility,
and dividend yield.
● | Fair
value of warrants |
| |
| In
determining the fair value of the warrant issued for services and issue pursuant to financing
transactions, the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following
assumptions: volatility rate, risk-free rate, and the remaining expected life of the warrants
that are classified under equity. |
● | Fair
value of derivative liabilities |
In
determining the fair values of the derivative liabilities from the conversion and redemption features, the Company used valuation models
with the following assumptions: dividend yields, volatility, risk-free rate and the remaining expected life. Changes in those assumptions
and inputs could in turn impact the fair value of the derivative liabilities and can have a material impact on the reported loss and
comprehensive loss for the applicable reporting period.
Determining
the appropriate functional currencies for entities in the Company requires analysis of various factors, including the currencies and
country-specific factors that mainly influence labour, materials, and other operating expenses.
● |
Useful
life of property and equipment |
The
Company employs significant estimates to determine the estimated useful lives of property and equipment, considering industry trends
such as technological advancements, past experience, expected use and review of asset useful lives. The Company makes estimates when
determining depreciation methods, depreciation rates and asset useful lives, which requires considering industry trends and company-specific
factors. The Company reviews depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values annually or when circumstances change and adjusts
its depreciation methods and assumptions prospectively.
Provisions
are recognized when the Company has a present obligation, legal or constructive, as a result of a previous event, if it is probable that
the Company will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the obligation. The amount recognized is
the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, taking into account
the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligations. Provisions are reviewed at the end of each reporting period and adjusted to
reflect the current best estimate of the expected future cash flows.
Contingencies
can be either possible assets or possible liabilities arising from past events, which, by their nature, will be resolved only when one
or more uncertain future events occur or fail to occur. The assessment of the existence and potential impact of contingencies inherently
involves the exercise of significant judgment and the use of estimates regarding the outcome of future events.
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost and market value. Market value of our inventory, which is all purchased finished goods, is determined
based on its estimated net realizable value, which is generally the selling price less normally predictable costs of disposal and transportation.
The Company estimates net realizable value as the amount at which inventories are expected to be sold, taking into consideration fluctuations
in retail prices less estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are written down to net realizable value when the cost
of inventories is estimated to be unrecoverable due to obsolescence, damage, or declining selling prices.
The
calculation of current and deferred income taxes requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions and to exercise judgment regarding
the carrying values of assets and liabilities which are subject to accounting estimates inherent in those balances, the interpretation
of income tax legislation across various jurisdictions, expectations about future operating results, the timing of reversal of temporary
differences and possible audits of income tax filings by the tax authorities. In addition, when the Company incurs losses for income
tax purposes, it assesses the probability of taxable income being available in the future based on its budgeted forecasts. These forecasts
are adjusted to take into account certain non-taxable income and expenses and specific rules on the use of unused credits and tax losses.
When
the forecasts indicate that sufficient future taxable income will be available to deduct the temporary differences, a deferred tax asset
is recognized for all deductible temporary differences. Changes or differences in underlying estimates or assumptions may result in changes
to the current or deferred income tax balances on the consolidated statements of financial position, a charge or credit to income tax
expense included as part of net income (loss) and may result in cash payments or receipts. Judgment includes consideration of the Company’s
future cash requirements in its tax jurisdictions. All income, capital and commodity tax filings are subject to audits and reassessments.
Changes in interpretations or judgments may result in a change in the Company’s income, capital, or commodity tax provisions in
the future. The amount of such a change cannot be reasonably estimated.
● | Incremental
borrowing rate for lease |
The
determination of the Company’s lease obligation and right-of-use asset depends on certain assumptions, which include the selection
of the discount rate. The discount rate is set by reference to the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Significant assumptions
are required to be made when determining which borrowing rates to apply in this determination. Changes in the assumptions used may have
a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
The
Company has adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
Topic 260-10 which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share
includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in
the earnings of an entity. Diluted earnings per share exclude all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. There
were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as at March 31, 2022 and 2021.
Cash
Cash
includes cash on hand and balances with banks.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
functional currency of the Company’s Canadian-based subsidiary is the Canadian dollar and the US-based parent is the U.S. dollar.
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange
rates prevailing at the dates of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated using
the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using the historical rate
on the date of the transaction. All exchange gains or losses arising from translation of these foreign currency transactions are included
in net income (loss) for the year. In translating the financial statements of the Company’s Canadian subsidiaries from their functional
currency into the Company’s reporting currency of United States dollars, balance sheet accounts are translated using the closing
exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date and income and expense accounts are translated using an average exchange rate prevailing
during the reporting period. Adjustments resulting from the translation, if any, are included in cumulative other comprehensive income
(loss) in stockholders’ equity. The Company has not, to the date of these consolidated financial statements, entered into derivative
instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable consists of amounts due to the Company from medical facilities, which receive reimbursement from institutions and third-party
government and commercial payors and their related patients, as a result of the Company’s normal business activities. Accounts
receivable is reported on the balance sheets net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company establishes an allowance
for doubtful accounts for estimated uncollectible receivables based on historical experience, assessment of specific risk, review of
outstanding invoices, and various assumptions and estimates that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and recognizes
the provision as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. Uncollectible accounts are written off against the allowance
after appropriate collection efforts have been exhausted and when it is deemed that a balance is uncollectible.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
ASC
820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands required disclosure about fair value measurements
of assets and liabilities. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer
a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize
the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels
of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
●
Level 1 – Valuation based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
●
Level 2 – Valuation based on quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets.
●
Level 3 – Valuation based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring management’s
best estimate of what market participants would use as fair value.
In
instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy,
the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to
the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Fair
value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The respective
carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these
instruments or interest rates that are comparable to market rates. These financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, deposits
and other receivables, convertible promissory notes, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The Company’s cash and derivative
liabilities, which are carried at fair values, are classified as a Level 1 and Level 3, respectively. The Company’s bank accounts
are maintained with financial institutions of reputable credit, therefore, bear minimal credit risk.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of
the assets. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and improvements and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation
of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets with estimated lives as follow:
|
Office
equipment |
5
years |
|
Leasehold
improvement |
5
years |
Impairment
for Long-Lived Assets
The
Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for
the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets, including right-of-use
assets, used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner,
except that fair values are reduced for the cost of disposal. Based on its review at March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company believes there
was no impairment of its long-lived assets.
Leases
On
April 1, 2019, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, “Leases” (“ASC 842”) to replace
existing lease accounting guidance. This pronouncement is intended to provide enhanced transparency and comparability by requiring lessees
to record right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases. Expenses associated with leases
will continue to be recognized in a manner like previous accounting guidance. The Company adopted ASC 842 utilizing the transition practical
expedient added by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), which eliminates the requirement that entities apply
the new lease standard to the comparative periods presented in the year of adoption.
The
Company is the lessee in a lease contract when the Company obtains the right to use the asset. Operating leases are included in the line
items right-of-use asset, lease obligation, current, and lease obligation, long-term in the consolidated balance sheet. Right-of-use
(“ROU”) asset represents the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease obligations represent
the Company’s obligations to make lease payments arising from the lease, both of which are recognized based on the present value
of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. Leases with a lease term of 12 months or less at inception
are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheet and are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term in our consolidated
statement of income. The Company determines the lease term by agreement with lessor. As our lease does not provide an implicit interest
rate, the Company uses the Company’s incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining
the present value of future payments.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740. The Company provides for Federal and Provincial income taxes payable, as
well as for those deferred because of the timing differences between reporting income and expenses for financial statement purposes versus
tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recoverable or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the
period of the change. A valuation allowance is established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is
more likely than not to be realized.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs, which relate primarily to product and software development, are charged to operations as incurred. Under certain
research and development arrangements with third parties, the Company may be required to make payments that are contingent on the achievement
of specific developmental, regulatory and/or commercial milestones. Before a product receives regulatory approval, milestone payments
made to third parties are expensed when the milestone is achieved. Milestone payments made to third parties after regulatory approval
is received are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the approved product.
Stock
Based Compensation
The
Company accounts for share-based payments in accordance with the provision of ASC 718, which requires that all share-based payments issued
to acquire goods or services, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the statement of operations based on their
fair values, net of estimated forfeitures. ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary,
in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Compensation expense related to share-based awards is recognized
over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period.
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services, as prescribed by ASC 718-10, at either the
fair value of the services rendered or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable,
using the guidelines in ASC 505-50. The Company issues compensatory shares for services including, but not limited to, executive, management,
accounting, operations, corporate communication, financial and administrative consulting services.
Convertible
Notes Payable and Derivative Instruments
The
Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-11 to account for the down round features of warrants issued with private placements effective
as of April 1, 2017. In doing so, warrants with a down round feature previously treated as derivative liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet and measured at fair value are henceforth treated as equity, with no adjustment for changes in fair value at each reporting
period. Previously, the Company accounted for conversion options embedded in convertible notes in accordance with ASC 815. ASC 815 generally
requires companies to bifurcate conversion options embedded in convertible notes from their host instruments and to account for them
as free-standing derivative financial instruments. ASC 815 provides for an exception to this rule when convertible notes, as host instruments,
are deemed to be conventional, as defined by ASC 815-40. The Company accounts for convertible notes deemed conventional and conversion
options embedded in non-conventional convertible notes which qualify as equity under ASC 815, in accordance with the provisions of ASC
470-20, which provides guidance on accounting for convertible securities with beneficial conversion features. Accordingly, the Company
records, as a discount to convertible notes, the intrinsic value of such conversion options based upon the differences between the fair
value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the
note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt.
Preferred
Shares Extinguishments
The
Company accounted for preferred stock redemptions and conversions in accordance to ASU-260-10-S99. For preferred stock redemptions and
conversion, the difference between the fair value of consideration transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and the carrying
amount of the preferred stock is accounted as deemed dividend distribution and subtracted from net income.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments.” This pronouncement, along with subsequent ASUs issued to clarify provisions of ASU 2016-13, changes the impairment
model for most financial assets and will require the use of an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized
cost. Under this model, entities will be required to estimate the lifetime expected credit loss on such instruments and record an allowance
to offset the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, resulting in a net presentation of the amount expected to be collected on
the financial asset. In developing the estimate for lifetime expected credit loss, entities must incorporate historical experience, current
conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. On November 19, 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10, Financial Instruments—Credit
Losses (Topic 326), finalized various effective date delays for private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and certain smaller
reporting companies applying the credit losses (CECL), the revised effective date is January 2023.
In
July 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-07, Codification Updates to SEC Sections. This ASU amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the
issuance of SEC Final Rule Releases No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, and Nos. 33-10231 and 33-10442, Investment Company
Reporting Modernization. One of the changes in the ASU requires a presentation of changes in stockholders’ equity in the form of
a reconciliation, either as a separate financial statement or in the notes to the financial statements, for the current and comparative
year-to-date interim periods. The Company presented changes in stockholders’ equity as separate financial statements for the current
and comparative year-to-date interim periods beginning on April 1, 2019. The additional elements of the ASU did not have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which simplifies
the accounting for income taxes, eliminates certain exceptions within ASC 740, Income Taxes, and clarifies certain aspects of the current
guidance to promote consistency among reporting entities. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021.
Most amendments within the standard are required to be applied on a prospective basis, while certain amendments must be applied on a
retrospective or modified retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impacts of the provisions of ASU 2019-12 on its
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
In
March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2030-20 Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments, An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification: a)in ASU No. 2016-01, b) in Subtopic 820-10, c) for depository and lending institutions clarification in disclosure requirements,
d) in Subtopic 470-50, e) in Subtopic 820-10, f) Interaction of Topic 842 and Topic 326, g) Interaction of the guidance in Topic 326
and Subtopic 860-20.The amendments in this Update represent changes to clarify or improve the Codification. The amendments make the Codification
easier to understand and easier to apply by eliminating inconsistencies and providing clarifications. For public business entities updates
under the following paragraphs: a), b), d) and e) are effective upon issuance of this final update. The effective date for c) is for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect that
the new guidance will significantly impact its consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2021, The FASB issued ASU 2021-04 to codify the final consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on how an issuer
should account for modifications made to equity-classified written call options (hereafter referred to as a warrant to purchase the issuer’s
common stock). The guidance in the ASU requires the issuer to treat a modification of an equity-classified warrant that does not cause
the warrant to become liability-classified as an exchange of the original warrant for a new warrant. This guidance applies whether the
modification is structured as an amendment to the terms and conditions of the warrant or as termination of the original warrant and issuance
of a new warrant. The Company does not expect that the new guidance will significantly impact its consolidated financial statements.
Results
of Operations
The
fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 marked the trailing 24-month period of full market release of the Bioflux MCT device for commercialization,
originally launched in limited market release in April 2018, after receiving its second and final required FDA clearance. To commence
commercialization, we ordered device inventory from our FDA-regulated manufacturer and hired a small, captive sales force, with deep
experience in cardiac technology sales; we expanded on our limited market release, which identified potential anchor clients who could
be early adopters of our technology. By increasing our sales force and geographic footprint, we have since launched sales in 27
U.S. states by March 31, 2022. The Company earned combined device sales and technology fee income totaling $7.65 million
during the year ended March 31, 2022, a 126% increase over $3.4 million earned in the preceding fiscal year. During the
year ended March 31, 2022, Biotricity incurred a net loss of $30.2 million (loss per share of 66.5 cents), such that from
its inception in 2009 to this date, the Company has generated an accumulated deficit of $93.0 million. We devoted, and expect
to continue to devote, significant resources in the areas of sales and marketing and research and development costs. We also expect to
incur additional operating losses, as we build the infrastructure required to support higher sales volume.
For
the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2022 Compared to the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2021
Operating
Expenses
Total
operating expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 were $22.6 million compared to $14.6 million for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2021, as further described below.
General
and administrative expenses
Our
general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 increased to $19.8 million compared to $12.6 million
during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The increase of $7.2 million was primarily due to the cost of expanding our sales
force, product marketing and promotion incurred for our go-to-market efforts, as well as investor relation spending.
Research
and development expenses
During
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 we recorded research and development expenses of $2.7 million compared to $2.1 million incurred
in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. The research and development activity related to existing and new products. In addition, the
activity related to engineering of future product enhancements continuously increased during the year ended March 31, 2022.
Accretion
and amortization expenses
During
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, we incurred accretion expense of $9.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively.
The increase in accretion and amortization expenses corresponded to an increase in convertible note borrowing.
Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities
During
the year ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021, the Company recognized $684 thousand in expenses, and $408 thousand in gains related
to the change in fair value of derivative liabilities.
EBITDA
and Adjusted EBITDA
Earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses (EBITDA) and Adjusted EBITDA, which are presented below, are non-generally
accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP) measures that we believe are useful to management, investors and other users of our
financial information in evaluating operating profitability . EBITDA is calculated by adding back interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
expenses to net income.
Adjusted
EBITDA is calculated by excluding from EBITDA the effect of the following non-operational items: equity in earnings and losses of unconsolidated
businesses and other income and expense, net, as well as the effect of special items that related to one-time, non-recurring expenditures
. We believe that this measure is useful to management, investors and other users of our financial information in evaluating the effectiveness
of our operations and underlying business trends in a manner that is consistent with management’s evaluation of business performance.
Further, the exclusion of non-operational items and special items enables comparability to prior period performance and trend analysis.
See notes in the table below for additional information regarding special items.
It
is management’s intent to provide non-GAAP financial information to enhance the understanding of Biotricity’s GAAP financial
information, and it should be considered by the reader in addition to, but not instead of, the financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP. We believe that providing these non-GAAP measures in addition to the GAAP measures allows management, investors and other
users of our financial information to more fully and accurately assess business performance. The non-GAAP financial information presented
may be determined or calculated differently by other companies and may not be directly comparable to that of other companies.
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| |
12 months
ended March 31,
2022 | | |
3 months
ended
March 31,
2022 | | |
12 months
ended March 31,
2021 | | |
3 months
ended
March 31,
2021 | |
| |
$ | | |
$ | | |
$ | |
|
$ | |
Net loss attributable to common stockholders | |
| (30,219,454 | ) | |
| (5,981,731 | ) | |
| (16,453,324 | ) | |
| (5,784,356 | ) |
Add: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Provision for income taxes | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Interest expense | |
| 1,289,112 | | |
| 380,288 | | |
| 692,547 | | |
| 281,429 | |
Depreciation expense | |
| 2,308 | | |
| 1,488 | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
EBITDA | |
| (28,928,034 | ) | |
| (5,599,955 | ) | |
| (15,760,777 | ) | |
| (5,502,927 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Add (Less) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Accretion expense related to convertible note conversion (1) | |
| 4,485,143 | | |
| - | | |
| 333,934 | | |
| 333,934 | |
Other (income) expense related to convertible note conversion (2) | |
| 1,155,642 | | |
| - | | |
| 103,735 | | |
| 103,735 | |
Fair value change on derivative liabilities (3) | |
| 683,559 | | |
| 7,387 | | |
| (408,872 | ) | |
| 374,321 | |
Uplisting transaction expense (4) | |
| 946,763 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Adjusted EBITDA | |
| (21,656,927 | ) | |
| (5,592,568 | ) | |
| (15,731,980 | ) | |
| (4,690,937 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding | |
| 45,449,720 | | |
| 50,650,735 | | |
| 37,522,978 | | |
| 38,490,249 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Adjusted Loss per Share, Basic and Diluted | |
| (0.477 | ) | |
| (0.110 | ) | |
| (0.419 | ) | |
| (0.122 | ) |
(1)
This relates to one-time recognition of accretion expenses relate to the remaining debt discount balances on notes that were converted.
(2)
This relates to one-time recognition of expenses reflecting the difference between the book value of the convertible note and relevant
unamortized discounts, and the fair value of shares that the notes were converted into.
(3)
Fair value changes on derivative liabilities corresponds to changes in the underlying stock value and thus does not reflect our day to
day operations
(4)
These are one-time legal, professional and regulatory fees related to uplisting to Nasdaq during Q2 2022
Net
Loss
As
a result of the foregoing, the net loss attributable to common stockholders for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 was $30.2
million compared to a net loss of $16.5 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021.
Translation
Adjustment
Translation
adjustment for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 was a loss of $134 thousand compared to a gain of $223 thousand
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. This translation adjustment represents gains and losses that result from the translation of
currency in the financial statements from our functional currency of Canadian dollars to the reporting currency in U.S. dollars over
the course of the reporting period.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
Company is in commercialization mode, while continuing to pursue the development of its next generation MCT product as well as new products
that are being developed.
We
generally require cash to:
|
● |
purchase
devices that will be placed in the field for pilot projects and to produce revenue, |
|
|
|
|
●
|
launch
sales initiatives, |
|
|
|
|
●
|
fund
our operations and working capital requirements, |
|
|
|
|
●
|
develop
and execute our product development and market introduction plans, |
|
|
|
|
●
|
fund
research and development efforts, and |
|
|
|
|
●
|
pay
any expense obligations as they come due. |
The Company is in the early stages of commercializing
its first products and is concurrently in development mode, operating a research and development program in order to develop, obtain
regulatory approval for, and commercialize other proposed products. As a result of its early-revenue-stage operations, the Company has
incurred recurring losses from operations, and as at March 31, 2022, has an accumulated deficit of $93,037,142 and working capital of
$10,455,997. Management anticipates the Company will continue on its revenue growth trajectory and improve its liquidity through continued
business development and after additional equity or debt capitalization of the Company. On August 30, 2021, the Company completed an
underwritten public offering of its common stock that concurrently facilitated its listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Prior to listing
on the Nasdaq Capital Market, The Company had also filed a shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-255544) with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2021, which was declared effective on May 4, 2021. This facilitates better transactional preparedness
when the Company seeks to issue equity or debt to potential investors, since it continues to allow the Company to offer its shares to
investors only by means of a prospectus, including a prospectus supplement, which forms part of an effective registration statement.
As such, the Company has developed and continues to pursue sources of funding that management believes will be sufficient to support
the Company’s operating plan and alleviate any substantial doubt as to its ability to meet its obligations at least for a period
of one year from the date of these consolidated financial statements. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2021, the Company raised
$499,900 through government EIDL loan. In addition, during the fiscal quarter ended Sept 30, 2021, the Company raised total net proceeds
of $14,545,805 through the underwritten public offering that was concurrent with its listing onto the Nasdaq Capital Markets. Furthermore,
during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2021, the Company raised an additional net proceeds of $11,756,563 through a term loan transaction
(Note 6) and made repayment of the previously issued promissory notes (Note 5 (a)) and short-term loan (Note 5 (a)). In connection with
this loan, the Company and Lender also entered into a Guarantee and Collateral Agreement wherein the Company agreed to secure the Credit
Agreement with all of the Company’s assets. The Company and Lender also entered into an Intellectual Property Security Agreement
dated December 21, 2021 wherein the Credit Agreement is also secured by the Company’s right title and interest in the Company’s
Intellectual Property.
As we proceed with the commercialization
of the Bioflux product development, we expect to continue to devote significant resources on capital expenditures, as well as research
and development costs and operations, marketing and sales expenditures.
Based on the above facts and
assumptions, we believe our existing cash and cash equivalents can meet our base operating financial needs and, together with anticipated
near-term debt and equity financings, will be sufficient to meet our growth capital needs for the next twelve months from the filing
date of this report. However, we will need to seek additional debt or equity capital to respond to business opportunities and challenges,
including our ongoing operating expenses, protecting our intellectual property, developing or acquiring new lines of business and enhancing
our operating infrastructure. The terms of our future financings may be dilutive to, or otherwise adversely affect, holders of our common
stock. We may also seek additional funds through arrangements with collaborators or other third parties. There can be no assurance we
will be able to raise this additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional funding on a timely
basis, we may be required to modify our operating plan and otherwise curtail or slow the pace of development and commercialization of
our proposed product lines.
Net
Cash Used in Operating Activities
During
the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, we used cash in operating activities of $15.2 million compared to $11.1 million
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. For each of the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and March 31, 2021,
the cash in operating activities was primarily due to selling expenses as well as research, product development, business development,
marketing and general operations.
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $25.2 million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 compared to $12.2
million for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022, the cash provided by financing
activities was primarily due to the issuance of shares from up listing of $14.5 million (net proceeds) and proceeds of $11.7
million from term loans, net of other financing and repayment activities.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net
cash used in investing activities was $30 thousand in the fiscal year ended March 31, 2022 (2011: Nil).
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We
have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
ITEM
7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable to a smaller reporting company.
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Our
financial statements and corresponding notes thereto called for by this item may be found beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
ITEM
9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None
ITEM
9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s
Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time communicated to the Company’s management,
including its Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure
based closely on the definition of “disclosure controls and procedures” in Rule 13a-15(e). The Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of reaching the Company’s desired disclosure control
objectives. In designing periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and evaluating
the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated,
can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its
judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. The Company’s certifying officers have
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in reaching that level of assurance.
At
the end of the period being reported upon, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer
and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the material information
required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our principal executive and financial officer, recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities
and Exchange Commission rules and forms relating to the Company, based on the assessment and control of disclosure decisions currently
performed by a small team. The Company plans to expand its management team and build a fulsome internal control framework required by
a more complex entity.
Management’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management
of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Section
13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, the Company’s principal financial officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records
that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management
and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
As
of March 31, 2022, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
based on the framework established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO)
of the Treadway Commission. Based on the criteria established by COSO management concluded that the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting was effective as of March 31, 2022.
This
Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal
control over financial reporting as smaller reporting companies are not required to include such report and EGC’s are exempt from
this requirement entirely until they are no longer an EGC. Management’s report is not subject to attestation by the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls
Management
has confidence in its internal controls and procedures. The Company’s management believes that a control system, no matter how
well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance and cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the internal
control system are met, and no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of
fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. Further, the design of an internal control system must reflect the fact that there
are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitation
in all internal control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issuers and instances of fraud,
if any, within the Company have been detected.
Changes
in Internal Controls
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal year ended March 31,
2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Internal
control systems, no matter how well designed and operated, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even a system which is determined to
be effective cannot provide absolute assurance that all control issues have been detected or prevented. Our systems of internal controls
are designed to provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING
FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2022 AND 2021
1.
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Biotricity
Inc. (formerly MetaSolutions, Inc.) (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 29,
2012. iMedical Innovations Inc. (“iMedical”) was incorporated on July 3, 2014 under the laws of the Province of Ontario,
Canada and became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Biotricity through reverse take-over, which took place on February 2, 2016.
Both
the Company and iMedical are engaged in research and development activities within the remote monitoring segment of preventative care.
They are focused on a realizable healthcare business model that has an existing market and commercialization pathway. As such, its efforts
to date have been devoted in building technology that enables access to this market through the development of a tangible product.
2.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION, MEASUREMENT AND CONSOLIDATION
The
consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in United States dollars (“USD”).
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated.
Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year’s presentation.
Liquidity
and Basis of Presentation
The
Company is an emerging growth entity that is in the early stages of commercializing its first product and is concurrently in development
mode, operating a research and development program in order to develop, obtain regulatory approval for, and commercialize other proposed
products. The Company has incurred recurring losses from operations, and as at March 31, 2022, has an accumulated deficit of $93,037,142
and a working capital surplus of $10,455,997.
Management anticipates the Company will continue
on its revenue growth trajectory and improve its liquidity through continued business development and after additional equity or debt
capitalization of the Company. On August 30, 2021, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of its common stock that concurrently
facilitated its listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. Prior to listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the Company had also filed a shelf
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-255544) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 27, 2021, which was declared
effective on May 4, 2021. This facilitates better transactional preparedness when the Company seeks to issue equity or debt to potential
investors, since it continues to allow the Company to offer its shares to investors only by means of a prospectus, including a prospectus
supplement, which forms part of an effective registration statement. As such, the Company has developed and continues to pursue sources
of funding that management believes will be sufficient to support the Company’s operating plan and alleviate any substantial doubt
as to its ability to meet its obligations at least for a period of one year from the date of these consolidated financial statements.
During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2021, the Company raised $499,900
through government EIDL loan. In addition, during
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2021, the Company raised total net proceeds of $14,545,805
through the underwritten public offering that
was concurrent with its listing onto the Nasdaq Capital Markets. Furthermore, during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2021, the
Company raised an additional net proceeds of $11,756,563
through a term loan transaction (Note 6) and
made repayment of the previously issued promissory notes (Note 5 (a)) and short-term loan (Note 5 (a)).
As
we proceed with the commercialization of the Bioflux product development, we expect to continue to devote significant resources on capital
expenditures, as well as research and development costs and operations, marketing and sales expenditures.
Based
on the above facts and assumptions, we believe our existing cash, along with anticipated near-term equity financings,
will be sufficient to meet our needs for the next twelve months from the filing date of this report. However, we will need to seek additional
debt or equity capital to respond to business opportunities and challenges, including our ongoing operating expenses, protecting our
intellectual property, developing or acquiring new lines of business and enhancing our operating infrastructure. The terms of our future
financings may be dilutive to, or otherwise adversely affect, holders of our common stock. We may also seek additional funds through
arrangements with collaborators or other third parties. There can be no assurance we will be able to raise this additional capital on
acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to obtain additional funding on a timely basis, we may be required to modify our operating
plan and otherwise curtail or slow the pace of development and commercialization of our proposed product lines.
In
December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) emerged in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. While initially the outbreak was
largely concentrated in China and caused significant disruptions to its economy, it has now spread to several other countries and infections
have been reported globally.
On
March 17, 2020, as a result of COVID-19 infections having been reported throughout both Canada and the United States, certain national,
provincial, state and local governmental issued proclamations and/or directives aimed at minimizing the spread of COVID-19. Accordingly,
on March 17, 2020, the Company closed all corporate clinics for all in-clinic non-essential services to protect the health and safety
of its employees, partners and patients. On March 20, 2020, the Company announced the precautionary measures taken as well as announcing
the business impact related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
The
ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations remains unknown and will depend on future developments, which
are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted with confidence, including the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, new information which
may emerge concerning the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, and any additional preventative and protective actions that governments,
or the Company, may direct, which may result in an extended period of continued business disruption, reduced patient traffic and reduced
operations. The full long-term financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but is anticipated to have a material adverse
impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The
measures taken to date may impact the Company’s fiscal year 2022 business and potentially beyond. Management expects that all of
its business segments, across all of its geographies, may be impacted to some degree, but the significance of the full impact of the
COVID-19 outbreak on the Company’s business and the duration for which it may have an impact cannot be determined at this time.
3.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”)
on April 1, 2018. In accordance with ASC 606, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an
amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services by applying
the core principles – 1) identify the contract with a customer, 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, 3) determine
the transaction price, 4) allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract, and 5) recognize revenue as performance
obligations are satisfied.
The
Bioflux mobile cardiac telemetry device, a wearable device, is worn by patients for a monitoring period up to 30 days. The cardiac data
that the device monitors and collects is curated and analyzed by the Company’s proprietary algorithms and then securely communicated
to a remote monitoring facility for electronic reporting and conveyance to the patient’s prescribing physician or other certified
cardiac medical professional. Revenues earned with respect to this device are comprised of device sales revenues and technology fee revenues
(technology as a service). The device, together with its licensed software, is available for sale to the medical center or physician,
who is responsible for the delivery of clinical diagnosis and therapy. The remote monitoring, data collection and reporting services
performed by the technology culminate in a patient study that is generally billable when it is complete and is issued to the physician.
In order to recognize revenue, management considers whether or not the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of a commercial
arrangement exists, and delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. For sales of devices, which are invoiced directly, additional
revenue recognition criteria include that the price is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured; for device sales
contracts with terms of more than one year, the Company recognizes any significant financing component as revenue over the contractual
period using the effective interest method, and the associated interest income is reflected accordingly on the statement of operations
and included in other income; for revenue that is earned based on customer usage of the proprietary software to render a patient’s
cardiac study, the Company recognizes revenue when the study ends based on a fixed billing rate. Costs associated with providing the
services are recorded as the service is provided regardless of whether or when revenue is recognized.
The
Company may also earn service-related revenue from contracts with other counterparties with which it consults. This contract work is
separate and distinct from services provided to clinical customers, but may be with a reseller or other counterparties that are working
to establish their operations in foreign jurisdictions or ancillary products or market segments in which the Company has expertise and
may eventually conduct business.
The
Company recognized the following forms of revenue for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021:
SCHEDULE
OF REVENUE RECOGNITION
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | |
| |
$ | | |
$ | |
Device sales | |
| 995,876 | | |
| 635,901 | |
Technology fees | |
| 5,904,393 | | |
| 2,748,866 | |
Service-related and other revenue | |
| 750,000 | | |
| - | |
Revenue | |
| 7,650,269 | | |
| 3,384,767 | |
Inventory
Inventory
is stated at the lower of cost and market value, cost being determined on a weighted average cost basis. Market value of our inventory,
which is all purchased finished goods, is determined based on its estimated net realizable value, which is generally the selling price
less normally predictable costs of disposal and transportation. The Company records write-downs of inventory that is obsolete or in excess
of anticipated demand or market value based on consideration of product lifecycle stage, technology trends, product development plans
and assumptions about future demand and market conditions. Actual demand may differ from forecasted demand, and such differences may
have a material effect on recorded inventory values. Inventory write-downs are charged to cost of revenue and establish a new cost basis
for the inventory.
Significant
accounting estimates and assumptions
The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions to be made in applying the accounting
policies that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
The estimates and related assumptions are based on previous experiences and other factors considered reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making the assumptions about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources.
The
estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period
in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the
revision affects both current and future periods.
Significant
accounts that require estimates as the basis for determining the stated amounts include share-based compensation, impairment analysis
and fair value of warrants, structured notes, convertible debt and conversion liabilities.
| ● | Fair
value of stock options |
The
Company measures the cost of equity-settled transactions with employees by reference to the fair value of equity instruments at the date
at which they are granted. Estimating fair value for share-based payments requires determining the most appropriate valuation model for
a grant of such instruments, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. The estimate also requires determining the
most appropriate inputs to the Black-Scholes option pricing model, including the expected life of the instrument, risk-free rate, volatility,
and dividend yield.
In
determining the fair value of the warrant issued for services and issue pursuant to financing transactions, the Company used the Black-Scholes
option pricing model with the following assumptions: volatility rate, risk-free rate, and the remaining expected life of the warrants
that are classified under equity.
| ● | Fair
value of derivative liabilities |
In
determining the fair values of the derivative liabilities from the conversion and redemption features, the Company used valuation models
with the following assumptions: dividend yields, volatility, risk-free rate and the remaining expected life. Changes in those assumptions
and inputs could in turn impact the fair value of the derivative liabilities and can have a material impact on the reported loss and
comprehensive loss for the applicable reporting period.
Determining
the appropriate functional currencies for entities in the Company requires analysis of various factors, including the currencies and
country-specific factors that mainly influence labour, materials, and other operating expenses.
| ● | Useful life of property and equipment |
The
Company employs significant estimates to determine the estimated useful lives of property and equipment, considering industry trends
such as technological advancements, past experience, expected use and review of asset useful lives. The Company makes estimates when
determining depreciation methods, depreciation rates and asset useful lives, which requires considering industry trends and company-specific
factors. The Company reviews depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values annually or when circumstances change and adjusts
its depreciation methods and assumptions prospectively
Provisions
are recognized when the Company has a present obligation, legal or constructive, as a result of a previous event, if it is probable that
the Company will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the obligation. The amount recognized is
the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, taking into account
the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligations. Provisions are reviewed at the end of each reporting period and adjusted to
reflect the current best estimate of the expected future cash flows.
Contingencies
can be either possible assets or possible liabilities arising from past events, which, by their nature, will be resolved only when one
or more uncertain future events occur or fail to occur. The assessment of the existence and potential impact of contingencies inherently
involves the exercise of significant judgment and the use of estimates regarding the outcome of future events.
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost and market value. Market value of our inventory, which is all purchased finished goods, is determined
based on its estimated net realizable value, which is generally the selling price less normally predictable costs of disposal and transportation.
The Company estimates net realizable value as the amount at which inventories are expected to be sold, taking into consideration fluctuations
in retail prices less estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are written down to net realizable value when the cost
of inventories is estimated to be unrecoverable due to obsolescence, damage, or declining selling prices.
The
calculation of current and deferred income taxes requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions and to exercise judgment regarding
the carrying values of assets and liabilities which are subject to accounting estimates inherent in those balances, the interpretation
of income tax legislation across various jurisdictions, expectations about future operating results, the timing of reversal of temporary
differences and possible audits of income tax filings by the tax authorities. In addition, when the Company incurs losses for income
tax purposes, it assesses the probability of taxable income being available in the future based on its budgeted forecasts. These forecasts
are adjusted to take into account certain non-taxable income and expenses and specific rules on the use of unused credits and tax losses.
When
the forecasts indicate that sufficient future taxable income will be available to deduct the temporary differences, a deferred tax asset
is recognized for all deductible temporary differences. Changes or differences in underlying estimates or assumptions may result in changes
to the current or deferred income tax balances on the consolidated statements of financial position, a charge or credit to income tax
expense included as part of net income (loss) and may result in cash payments or receipts. Judgment includes consideration of the Company’s
future cash requirements in its tax jurisdictions. All income, capital and commodity tax filings are subject to audits and reassessments.
Changes in interpretations or judgments may result in a change in the Company’s income, capital, or commodity tax provisions in
the future. The amount of such a change cannot be reasonably estimated.
| ● | Incremental
borrowing rate for lease |
The
determination of the Company’s lease obligation and right-of-use asset depends on certain assumptions, which include the selection
of the discount rate. The discount rate is set by reference to the Company’s incremental borrowing rate. Significant assumptions
are required to be made when determining which borrowing rates to apply in this determination. Changes in the assumptions used may have
a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
The
Company has adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
Topic 260-10 which provides for calculation of “basic” and “diluted” earnings per share. Basic earnings per share
includes no dilution and is computed by dividing net income or loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution of securities that could share in
the earnings of an entity. Diluted earnings per share exclude all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. There
were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding as at March 31, 2022 and 2021.
Cash
Cash
includes cash on hand and balances with banks.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
functional currency of the Company’s Canadian-based subsidiary is the Canadian dollar and the US-based parent is the U.S.
dollar. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency at the
exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are
translated using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated using
the historical rate on the date of the transaction. All exchange gains or losses arising from translation of these foreign currency
transactions are included in net income (loss) for the year. In translating the financial statements of the Company’s Canadian
subsidiaries from their functional currency into the Company’s reporting currency of United States dollars, balance sheet
accounts are translated using the closing exchange rate in effect at the balance sheet date and income and expense accounts are
translated using an average exchange rate prevailing during the reporting period. Adjustments resulting from the translation, if
any, are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. The Company has not, to the date
of these consolidated financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency
fluctuations.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable consists of amounts due to the Company from medical facilities, which receive reimbursement from institutions and third-party
government and commercial payors and their related patients, as a result of the Company’s normal business activities. Accounts
receivable is reported on the balance sheets net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company establishes an allowance
for doubtful accounts for estimated uncollectible receivables based on historical experience, assessment of specific risk, review of
outstanding invoices, and various assumptions and estimates that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and recognizes
the provision as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. Uncollectible accounts are written off against the allowance
after appropriate collection efforts have been exhausted and when it is deemed that a balance is uncollectible.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
ASC
820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands required disclosure about fair value measurements
of assets and liabilities. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer
a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize
the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels
of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
●
Level 1 – Valuation based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
●
Level 2 – Valuation based on quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets.
●
Level 3 – Valuation based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, therefore requiring management’s
best estimate of what market participants would use as fair value.
In
instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy,
the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is
significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to
the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.
Fair
value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management. The
respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term
nature of these instruments or interest rates that are comparable to market rates. These financial instruments include cash,
accounts receivable, deposits and other receivables, convertible promissory notes and short term loans, federally-guaranteed
loans, term loans and accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The Company’s cash and derivative liabilities, which are
carried at fair values, are classified as a Level 1 and Level 3, respectively. The Company’s bank accounts are maintained with
financial institutions of reputable credit, therefore, bear minimal credit risk.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment
are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets. Maintenance
and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and improvements and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation of property and equipment
is provided using the straight-line method for substantially all assets with estimated lives as follow:
SCHEDULE
OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT ESTIMATED USEFUL LIVES
|
Office
equipment |
5
years |
|
Leasehold
improvement |
5
years |
Impairment for Long-Lived
Assets
The
Company applies the provisions of ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for
the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. ASC 360 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets, including right-of-use
assets, used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner,
except that fair values are reduced for the cost of disposal. Based on its review at March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company believes there
was no impairment of its long-lived assets.
Leases
The
Company is the lessee in a lease contract when the Company obtains the right to use the asset. Operating leases are included in the line
items right-of-use asset, lease obligation, current, and lease obligation, long-term in the consolidated balance sheet.
Right-of-use
(“ROU”) asset represents the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease obligations represent
the Company’s obligations to make lease payments arising from the lease, both of which are recognized based on the present value
of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. Leases with a lease term of 12 months or less at inception
are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheet and are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term in the consolidated
statement of operations. The Company determines the lease term by agreement with lessor. As the Company’s lease does not provide
implicit interest rate, the Company uses the Company’s incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement
date in determining the present value of future payments. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740. The Company provides for Federal, State and Provincial income taxes payable,
as well as for those deferred because of the timing differences between reporting income and expenses for financial statement purposes
versus tax purposes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recoverable or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates is recognized as income or expense in the
period of the change. A valuation allowance is established, when necessary, to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is
more likely than not to be realized.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs, which relate primarily to product and software development, are charged to operations as incurred. Under certain
research and development arrangements with third parties, the Company may be required to make payments that are contingent on the achievement
of specific developmental, regulatory and/or commercial milestones. Before a product receives regulatory approval, milestone payments
made to third parties are expensed when the milestone is achieved. Milestone payments made to third parties after regulatory approval
is received are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the approved product.
Stock
Based Compensation
The
Company accounts for share-based payments in accordance with the provision of ASC 718, which requires that all share-based payments issued
to acquire goods or services, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the statement of operations based on their
fair values, net of estimated forfeitures. ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary,
in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Compensation expense related to share-based awards is recognized
over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period.
The
Company accounts for stock based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services, as prescribed by ASC 718-10, at either the
fair value of the services rendered or the instruments issued in exchange for such services, whichever is more readily determinable,
using the guidelines in ASC 505-50. The Company issues compensatory shares for services including, but not limited to, executive, management,
accounting, operations, corporate communication, financial and administrative consulting services.
Convertible
Notes Payable and Derivative Instruments
The
Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-11 to account for the down round features of warrants issued with private placements effective
as of April 1, 2017. In doing so, warrants with a down round feature previously treated as derivative liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet and measured at fair value are henceforth treated as equity, with no adjustment for changes in fair value at each reporting
period. Previously, the Company accounted for conversion options embedded in convertible notes in accordance with ASC 815. ASC 815 generally
requires companies to bifurcate conversion options embedded in convertible notes from their host instruments and to account for them
as free-standing derivative financial instruments. ASC 815 provides for an exception to this rule when convertible notes, as host instruments,
are deemed to be conventional, as defined by ASC 815-40. The Company accounts for convertible notes deemed conventional and conversion
options embedded in non-conventional convertible notes which qualify as equity under ASC 815, in accordance with the provisions of ASC
470-20, which provides guidance on accounting for convertible securities with beneficial conversion features. Accordingly, the Company
records, as a discount to convertible notes, the intrinsic value of such conversion options based upon the differences between the fair
value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the note transaction and the effective conversion price embedded in the
note. Debt discounts under these arrangements are amortized over the term of the related debt.
Preferred Shares Extinguishments
The Company accounted for preferred stock redemptions
and conversions in accordance to ASU-260-10-S99. For preferred stock redemptions and conversion, the difference between the fair value
of consideration transferred to the holders of the preferred stock and the carrying amount of the preferred stock is accounted as deemed
dividend distribution and subtracted from net income.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) - Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments.” This pronouncement, along with subsequent ASUs issued to clarify provisions of ASU 2016-13, changes the impairment
model for most financial assets and will require the use of an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized
cost. Under this model, entities will be required to estimate the lifetime expected credit loss on such instruments and record an allowance
to offset the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, resulting in a net presentation of the amount expected to be collected on
the financial asset. In developing the estimate for lifetime expected credit loss, entities must incorporate historical experience, current
conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. On November 19, 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10, Financial Instruments—Credit
Losses (Topic 326), finalized various effective date delays for private companies, not-for-profit organizations, and certain smaller
reporting companies applying the credit losses (CECL), the revised effective date is January 2023.
In
July 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-07, Codification Updates to SEC Sections. This ASU amends various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the
issuance of SEC Final Rule Releases No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, and Nos. 33-10231 and 33-10442, Investment Company
Reporting Modernization. One of the changes in the ASU requires a presentation of changes in stockholders’ equity in the form of
a reconciliation, either as a separate financial statement or in the notes to the financial statements, for the current and comparative
year-to-date interim periods. The Company presented changes in stockholders’ equity as separate financial statements for the current
and comparative year-to-date interim periods beginning on April 1, 2019. The additional elements of the ASU did not have a material impact
on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which simplifies
the accounting for income taxes, eliminates certain exceptions within ASC 740, Income Taxes, and clarifies certain aspects of the current
guidance to promote consistency among reporting entities. ASU 2019-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021.
Most amendments within the standard are required to be applied on a prospective basis, while certain amendments must be applied on a
retrospective or modified retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impacts of the provisions of ASU 2019-12 on its
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
In
March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2030-20 Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments, An Amendment of the FASB Accounting Standards
Codification: a)in ASU No. 2016-01, b) in Subtopic 820-10, c) for depository and lending institutions clarification in disclosure requirements,
d) in Subtopic 470-50, e) in Subtopic 820-10, f) Interaction of Topic 842 and Topic 326, g) Interaction of the guidance in Topic 326
and Subtopic 860-20.The amendments in this Update represent changes to clarify or improve the Codification. The amendments make the Codification
easier to understand and easier to apply by eliminating inconsistencies and providing clarifications. For public business entities updates
under the following paragraphs: a), b), d) and e) are effective upon issuance of this final update. The effective date for c) is for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect that
the new guidance will significantly impact its consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2021, The FASB issued ASU 2021-04 to codify the final consensus reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on how an issuer
should account for modifications made to equity-classified written call options (hereafter referred to as a warrant to purchase the issuer’s
common stock). The guidance in the ASU requires the issuer to treat a modification of an equity-classified warrant that does not cause
the warrant to become liability-classified as an exchange of the original warrant for a new warrant. This guidance applies whether the
modification is structured as an amendment to the terms and conditions of the warrant or as termination of the original warrant and issuance
of a new warrant. The Company does not expect that the new guidance will significantly impact its consolidated financial statements.
The
Company continue to evaluate the impact of the new accounting pronouncement, including enhanced disclosure requirements, on our business
processes, controls and systems.
4.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
SCHEDULE OF ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES
| |
| | | |
| | |
| |
As at March 31,
2022 | | |
As at March 31,
2021 | |
| |
$ | | |
$ | |
Trade and other payables | |
| 1,159,477 | | |
| 1,041,385 | |
Accrued liabilities | |
| 1,436,270 | | |
| 1,478,739 | |
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities | |
| 2,595,747 | | |
| 2,520,124 | |
Trade
and other payables and accrued liabilities as at March 31, 2022 and 2021 included $2,851 and $182,995, respectively, due to a shareholder,
who is a director and executive of the Company.
5.
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES AND SHORT TERM LOANS
|
a) |
The
Company has issued various promissory notes and obtained several short term loans. The promissory notes and short-term loans are
generally for a 1-year term at interest rates of between 10% and 12%, with allowance for the Company to repay early, and the possibility
to convert into equity on the basis of mutual consent. Warrants to purchase the Company’s shares of common stock were granted
pursuant to the issuance of certain promissory notes. Management has evaluated the terms of these notes issued in accordance with
the guidance provided by ASC 470 and ASC 815 and concluded that there is no derivative or beneficial conversion feature attached
to these notes. |
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company raised additional $500,000 in promissory notes that was subject to the same term of the notes
previously issued. During the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company made repayment of the notes and short term loan in the amount of
$908,082, and one noteholder further paid the Company $67,941 to exercise warrants to purchase 97,500 shares of the Company’s common
stock. (Note 9)
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, one noteholder converted a $100,000 note and $15,000 accrued interest into 115 Series A preferred shares
(Note 8).
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company made repayment of all promissory notes and short-term loans outstanding.
As
at March 31, 2022, the Company had a balance in promissory note of Nil (2021 - $ 600,577).
As
at March 31, 2022, the Company had a balance in short term loan of Nil (2021 – $1,059,643)
General
and administrative expenses included interest expense on the above notes of $267,959
and
$151,797 for
the year ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
|
(b) |
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company issued $11,275,500 (face value) in two series of convertible promissory notes (the “Series
A Notes”) sold under subscription agreements to accredited investors. The Series A Notes mature one year from the final closing
date of the offering and accrue interest at 12% per annum. |
For
first series of Series A Notes, commencing six months following the Issuance Date, and at any time thereafter (provided the Holder has
not received notice of the Company’s intent to prepay the note), at the sole election of the Holder, any amount of the outstanding
principal and accrued interest of this note (the “Outstanding Balance”) may be converted into that number of shares of Common
Stock equal to: (i) the Outstanding Balance divided by (ii) 75% of the volume weighted average price of the Common Stock for the 5 trading
days prior to the Conversion Date (the conversion price).
For
the first series of Series A Notes, the notes will automatically convert into common stock (in each case, subject to the trading volume
of the Company’s common stock being a minimum of $500,000 for each trading day in the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding
the conversion date), upon the earlier to occur of (i) the Company’s common stock being listed on a national securities exchange,
in which event the conversion price will be equal to 75% of the volume weighted average price of the common stock for the 20 trading
days prior to the conversion date, or (ii) upon the closing of the Company’s next equity round of financing for gross proceeds
of greater than $5,000,000, in which event the conversion price will be equal to 75% of the price per share of the common stock (or of
the conversion price in the event of the sale of securities convertible into common stock) sold in such financing. The Company may, at
its discretion redeem the notes for 115% of their face value plus accrued interest.
For
second series of Series A Notes, the notes will be convertible into shares of common stock, at the option of the holder, commencing six
months from issuance, at a conversion price equal to the lower of $4.00 per share or 75% of the volume weighted average price of the
common stock for the five trading days prior to the conversion date.
For
the second series of Series A Notes, the notes will automatically convert into common stock (in each case, subject to the trading volume
of the Company’s common stock being a minimum of $500,000 for each trading day in the 20 consecutive trading days immediately preceding
the conversion date), upon the earlier to occur of (i) the Company’s common stock being listed on a national securities exchange,
in which event the conversion price will be equal to the lower of $4.00 per share or 75% of the volume weighted average price of the
common stock for the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date, or (ii) upon the closing of the Company’s next equity round
of financing for gross proceeds of greater than $5,000,000, in which event the conversion price will be equal to the lower of $4.00 per
share or 75% of the price per share of the common stock (or of the conversion price in the event of the sale of securities convertible
into common stock) sold in such financing. The Company may, at its discretion redeem the notes for 115% of their face value plus accrued
interest.
The
Company was obligated to issue warrants that accompany the convertible notes and provide 50% warrant coverage. The warrants have a 3-year
term from date of issuance and an exercise price that is 120% of the 20-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s common
shares at the time final closing.
The
Company was obligated to pay the placement agent of the first series of Series A Notes a 12% cash fee for $8,925,550 (face value) of
the notes and 2.5% cash fee and other sundry expenses for the remaining $2,350,000 (face value) of the notes.
Net
proceeds to the Company from Series A Notes issuance up to March 31, 2021 amounted to $10,135,690 after payment of the relevant financing
related fees.
The
Company was also obligated to issue warrants to the placement agent that have a 10-year term and cover 12% of funds raised for $8,925,550
(face value) of the notes (first series) and 2.5% of funds raised for the remaining $2,350,000 (face value) of notes (second series),
with an exercise price that is 120% of the 20-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s common shares at the time final
closing.
Prior
to final closing, the warrants’ exercise price is variable and will not be struck until that date.
Prior
to January 8, 2021 (final closing date), the Company determined that the conversion and redemption features, investor warrants and placement
agent warrants contained in those Series A Notes represented a single compound derivative liability that meets the requirements for liability
classification under ASC 815. The Company accounted for these obligations by determining the fair value of the related derivative liabilities
associated with the embedded conversion and redemption features, as well as investor warrants and placement agent warrants. The initial
fair value of the derivative liabilities generated as a result of issuing the Series A Notes that were issued until March 31, 2021 was
$6,932,194.
Subsequently,
the exercise price of all warrants was concluded and locked to $1.06 as of January 8, 2021. Since the exercise price was no longer a
variable, the Company concluded that the noteholder and placement agent warrants should no longer be accounted for as a derivative liability
in accordance with ASC 815 guidelines related to equity indexation and classification. The derivative liabilities related to those warrants
were therefore marked to market as of January 8, 2021 and then transferred to equity (collectively, “End of warrants derivative
treatment”).
For
the Series A Notes, The Company recognized debt issuance costs in the amount of $2,301,854 and treated these as a deduction from the
convertible note liabilities directly, as a contra-liability, and amortized the debt issuance cost over the term of the notes. The Company
recognized initial debt discount in the amount of $8,088,003 and accreted the interest over the remaining lives of those notes.
The
Company recorded interest accruals of $108,756
and $432,824,
respectively, as at March 31, 2022 and 2021, for Series A Notes. In connection with the foregoing, the Company relied upon the exemption
from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions not involving a public offering.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, $9,836,500 (face value) of Series A Notes with unpaid interests (2021: $739,000 face value) were converted
into 4,488,567 (2021: 751,487) common shares.
In
addition, during the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company also issued $1,312,500 (face value) of convertible promissory notes (“Series
B Notes”) to various accredited investors.
Commencing
six months following the issuance date, and at any time thereafter, subject to the Company’s Conversion Buyout clause, at the sole
election of the holder, any amount of the outstanding principal and accrued interest of the note (the “outstanding balance”)
may be converted into that number of shares of Common Stock equal to: (i) the outstanding balance divided by (ii) the Conversion Price.
Partial conversions of the note shall have the effect of lowering the outstanding principal amount of the note. The holder may exercise
such conversion right by providing written notice to the Company of such exercise in a form reasonably acceptable to the Company (a “conversion
notice”). Conversion price means (subject in all cases to proportionate adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, and similar
transactions), seventy-five percent (75%) multiplied by the average of the three (3) lowest closing prices during the previous ten (10)
trading days prior to the receipt of the conversion notice.
The
Series B Notes will automatically convert into common stock upon a merger, consolidation, exchange of shares, recapitalization, reorganization,
as a result of which the Company’s common stock shall be changed into another class or classes of stock of the Company or another
entity, or in the case of the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company other than a complete liquidation of the
Company. Within the first 180 days after the issuance date, the Company may, at its discretion redeem the notes for 115% of their face
value plus accrued interest. The Company is obligated to issue warrants that accompany the convertible notes and provide 50% warrant
coverage. The warrants have a 3-year term from date of issuance and an exercise price that is $1.06 per share for 100,000 warrant shares
and $1.5 per share for 212,500 warrant shares.
Net
proceeds to the Company from convertible note issuances to March 31, 2021 amounted to $1,240,000 after the original issuance discount
as well as payment of the financing related fees. The Company determined that the conversion and redemption features contained in the
Series B Notes represented a single compound derivative liability that meets the requirements for liability classification under ASC
815. The Company accounted for these obligations by determining the fair value of the related derivative liability associated with the
embedded conversion and redemption features. The initial fair value of the derivative liabilities generated as a result of issuing the
Series B Notes was $497,042.
SCHEDULE OF CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES AND SHORT TERM LOANS
| |
Total | |
| |
$ | |
Balance at March 31, 2021 | |
| 2,617,798 | |
| |
| | |
Three months ended June 30, 2021 | |
| | |
Accretion of debt discount | |
| 1,833,967 | |
Amortization of debt issuance cost | |
| 501,200 | |
Total accretion and amortization expenses | |
| 2,335,167 | |
| |
| | |
Conversion to common shares (Note 9) | |
| (1,157,500 | ) |
| |
| | |
Balance at June 30, 2021 | |
| 3,795,465 | |
| |
| | |
Three months ended September 30, 2021 | |
| | |
| |
| | |
Accretion of debt discount | |
| 4,627,415 | |
Amortization of debt issuance cost | |
| 537,304 | |
Total accretion and amortization expenses | |
| 5,164,719 | |
| |
| | |
Conversion to common shares (Note 9) | |
| (8,679,000 | ) |
| |
| | |
Balance at September 30, 2021 | |
| 281,184 | |
| |
| | |
Three months ended December 31, 2021 | |
| | |
Accretion of debt discount | |
| 782,726 | |
Amortization of debt issuance cost | |
| 546,604 | |
Total accretion and amortization expenses | |
| 1,329,330 | |
| |
| | |
Conversion to common shares (Note 9) | |
| (472,500 | ) |
| |
| | |
Balance at December 31, 2021 | |
| 1,138,014 | |
| |
| | |
Three months ended March 31, 2022 | |
| | |
Accretion of debt discount | |
| 353,588 | |
Amortization of debt issuance cost | |
| 48,398 | |
Total accretion and amortization expenses | |
| 401,986 | |
| |
| | |
Conversion to common shares | |
| - | |
Balance at March 31, 2022 | |
| 1,540,000 | |
The
Company recognized debt issuance costs in the amount of $10,000 and treated these as a deduction from the convertible note liabilities
directly, as a contra-liability, and amortized the debt issuance cost over the term of the Series B Notes. The Company recognized initial
debt discount in the amount of $1,312,500 and accreted the interest over the remaining lives of those notes.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, $472,500 (face value) of Series B Notes were converted into 207,516 common shares.
In
total, at March 31, 2022, the Company had issued $1.54 million in convertible notes that remained outstanding to 4 noteholders beyond
their contractual maturity date. These continued to accrue interest, and no repayment demands were received from noteholders, notwithstanding
the fact that these noteholders have continued to convert portions of these notes subsequently, and it is management’s expectation
that all of these notes will eventually convert. During the period then ended, the Company also recorded $64,079 (2021: $8,360)
interest accruals for the Series B Notes. In connection with the foregoing, the Company relied upon the exemption from registration provided
by Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for transactions not involving a public offering.
General
and administrative expenses include interest expense on the above notes of $546,878 (2021 – $488,186)
6.
TERM LOAN
On
December 21, 2021, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with SWK Funding LLC (“Lender’),
wherein the Company has borrowed $12,000,000, with a maturity date of December 21, 2026. The principal will accrue interest at the LIBOR
Rate plus 10.5% (subject to adjustment as set forth in the Credit Agreement). Interest payments are due on each February, May, August
and November commencing February 15, 2022. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Company will be required to make interest only payments
for the first 24 months (which may be extended to 36 months under prescribed circumstances), after which payments will include principal
amortization that accommodates a 40% balloon principal payment at maturity. Prepayment of amounts owing under the Credit Agreement are
allowed under prescribed circumstances. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement the Company is subject to an Origination Fee in the amount of
$120,000. Upon Termination of the Credit Agreement, the Company shall pay an Exit Fee of $600,000.
The
Company and Lender also entered into a Guarantee and Collateral Agreement (“Collateral Agreement”) wherein the Company agreed
to secure the Credit Agreement with all of the Company’s assets. The Company and Lender also entered into an Intellectual Property
Security Agreement dated December 21, 2021 (the “IP Security Agreement”) wherein the Credit Agreement is also secured by
the Company’s right title and interest in the Company’s Intellectual Property.
In
connection with the Credit Agreement, the Company issued 57,536 warrants to the lender, which was fair-valued at $198,713 (Note 9). The
warrants are accounted as a deduction from liability as well as a credit into additional paid-in capital, and amortized using the effective
interest method.
As
part of the loan transaction, the Company paid legal and professional costs directly in connection to the debt financing in the amount
of $50,000 in cash.
Total
costs directly in connection to the debt financing in the amount of $193,437 (professional fee $48,484; lender’s origination fee,
due diligence fee, and other expenses in the amount of $144,953) was deduced from the gross proceeds in the amount of $12,000,000.
The
Company also repaid $1,574,068 of existing short-term loan and promissory notes and relevant accrued interests using the proceeds from
the loan.
Total
costs directly in connection to the loan and fair value of warrants was in the amount of $1,042,149 . Such costs were accounted as debt
discount, and amortized using the effective interest method.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the amortization of debt discount expense was in the amount of $54,822 and included in the accretion and
amortization expenses.
Total
interest expense on the term loan for the year ended March 31, 2022 was $379,500.
7.
FEDERALLY GUARANTEED LOANS
Economic
Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”)
In
April 2020, the Company received $370,900 from the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) under the captioned program. The loan has
a term of 30 years and an interest rate of 3.75%, without the requirement for payment in its first 12 months. The Company may prepay
the loan without penalty at will.
In
May 2021, the Company received an additional $499,900 from the SBA under the same terms.
Payment
Protection Program (“PPP”) Loan
In
May 2020, the Company received loan proceeds of $1,200,000
(the “PPP Loan”) under the Paycheck Protection Program established by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security
Act (the “CARES Act”) administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”). The Company met the
criteria for the loan forgiveness and applied for the loan forgiveness in March 2021. For the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company
recognized the loan forgiveness as a reduction to payroll expense in the amount of $1,156,453
and a reduction to the rent expense of $43,547.
The loan forgiveness was granted by the SBA in May 2021. As at March 31, 2022, the balance of outstanding PPP loan is NIL
(March 31, 2021: NIL).
8.
DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
On
December 19, 2019 and January 9, 2020, the Company issued 7,830 Series A preferred shares; 6,000 of these were issued for cash proceeds
of $6,000,000 and 1,830 of these were issued on conversion of $1,830,000 of promissory notes that had previously been issued for cash
proceeds in October 2019.
On
May 22, 2020, another 215 Series A preferred shares were issued as a result of a combined transaction that included the conversion of
$100,000 in promissory notes (Note 5(a)) and $15,000 (Note 5(a)) in accrued interest for 115 preferred shares, as well as a purchase
of 100 preferred shares for cash proceeds of $100,000.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2021, an additional 100 Series A preferred shares were issued for cash proceeds of $100,000 (Note
9 c).
During
the three months ended December 31, 2021, the Company redeemed $230,000 preferred
shares through cash. The total amount of the preferred shares redeemed and derivative liabilities derecognized was $225,919.
The difference of redemption value of $230,000 and the carrying value of preferred shares on the day of redemption was $4,081 was
recognized as a deemed dividend distribution.
In addition, during the three months ended December
31, 2021, the Company converted $715,000 preferred shares into 288,756 common shares (Note 9(c)). The difference between the total amount
of the preferred shares converted, derivative liabilities derecognized and unpaid interests at the time of conversion ($1,076,513), and
the fair value of the common shares converted ($1,226,406) was $149,893 and was recognized as deemed dividend distribution.
Total deemed dividend expense as a result of above
deemed dividend distribution was $153,974.
The
Company analyzed the compound features of variable conversion and redemption embedded in the preferred shares instrument, for potential
derivative accounting treatment on the basis of ASC 820 (Fair Value in Financial Instruments), ASC 815 (Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities), Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00–19 and EITF 07–05, and determined that
the embedded derivatives should be bundled and valued as a single, compound embedded derivative, bifurcated from the underlying equity
instrument, treated as a derivative liability, and measured at fair value.
SCHEDULE
OF DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
| |
Total $ | |
Derivative liabilities as at March 31, 2021 | |
| 410,042 | |
Change in fair value of derivatives during the period | |
| (203,525 | ) |
Derivative liabilities as at June 30, 2021 | |
| 206,517 | |
Derivative fair value at issuance during three months ended September 30, 2021 | |
| 17,084 | |
Change in fair value of derivatives during the period | |
| (101,773 | ) |
Derivative liabilities as at September 30, 2021 | |
| 121,828 | |
Reduction due to preferred shares redeemed / converted | |
| (472,835 | ) |
Change in fair value of derivatives during the period | |
| 644,774 | |
Derivative liabilities as at December 31, 2021 | |
| 293,767 | |
Change in fair value of derivatives during the period | |
| 58,635 | |
Derivative liabilities as at March 31, 2022 | |
| 352,402 | |
The
lattice methodology was used to value the derivative components, using the following assumptions:
SCHEDULE
OF DERIVATIVE COMPONENTS VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS
| |
Assumptions | |
Dividend yield | |
| 12 | % |
Risk-free rate for term | |
| 1.63%
– 1.71 | % |
Volatility | |
| 101.7%
– to 110.5 | % |
Remaining terms (Years) | |
| 3.17
to
4.00 | |
Stock price ($ per share) | |
$ | 2.27
and
$3.98 | |
In
addition, the Company recorded derivative liabilities related to the conversion and redemption features of the convertible notes, as
well as warrants that were issued in connection with the convertible notes, during the year ended March 31, 2022 (Note 5(b)). As the
warrant exercise price became final and locked, the derivative liabilities related to those warrants were marked to market and transferred
to equity (Note 5(b)). Any noteholder and placement agent warrants that were issued after the finalization of exercise price was accounted
for as equity.
SCHEDULE
OF DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES
| |
Total | |
| |
$ | |
Balance at March 31, 2021 | |
| 3,633,856 | |
| |
| | |
For the three months ended June 30, 2021 | |
| | |
Conversion to common shares (Note 5(b)) | |
| (403,108 | ) |
| |
| | |
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | |
| 502,508 | |
| |
| | |
Balance at June 30, 2021 | |
| 3,733,256 | |
| |
| | |
For the three months ended September 30, 2021 | |
| | |
Conversion to common shares (Note 5(b)) | |
| (2,744,711 | ) |
| |
| | |
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | |
| (295,801 | ) |
| |
| | |
Balance at September 30, 2021 | |
| 692,744 | |
| |
| | |
For the three months ended December 31, 2021 | |
| | |
Conversion to common shares (Note 5(b)) | |
| (250,738 | ) |
| |
| | |
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | |
| 129,999 | |
| |
| | |
Balance at December 31, 2021 | |
| 572,005 | |
| |
| | |
For the three months ended March 31, 2022 | |
| | |
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities | |
| (51,258 | ) |
| |
| | |
Balance at March 31, 2022 | |
| 520,747 | |
The
monte-carlo methodology was used to value the convertible note and warrant derivative components, using the following assumptions for
the three months ended March 31, 2022:
SCHEDULE
OF DERIVATIVE COMPONENTS VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS
| |
Conversion and redemption
features |
Risk-free rate for term (%) | |
0.40
– 1.37 |
Volatility (%) | |
66.1
– 80.3 |
Remaining terms (Years) | |
0.12
– 0.29 |
Stock price ($ per share) | |
2.27
– 3.98 |
9.
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY
|
a) |
Authorized
and Issued Stock |
As
at March 31, 2022, the Company is authorized to issue 125,000,000 (March 31, 2021 – 125,000,000) shares of common stock ($0.001
par value), and 10,000,000 (March 31, 2021 – 10,000,000) shares of preferred stock ($0.001 par value), 20,000 of which (March 31,
2021 – 20,000) are designated shares of Series A preferred stock ($0.001 par value)
At
March 31, 2022, common shares and shares directly exchangeable into equivalent common shares that were issued and outstanding totaled
51,277,040 (2021 – 39,014,942) shares; these were comprised of 49,810,322 (2021 – 36,124,964) shares of common stock and
1,466,718 (2021 – 2,889,978) exchangeable shares. At March 31, 2022, there were 7,200 Series A shares of Preferred Stock that were
issued and outstanding (2021 – 8,045). There is also one share of the Special Voting Preferred Stock issued and outstanding held
by one holder of record, which is the Trustee in accordance with the terms of the Trust Agreement.
With the closing
of the Acquisition Transaction on February 2, 2016:
● |
Biotricity’s
sole existing director resigned and a new director who is the sole director of the Company was appointed to fill the vacancy; |
|
|
● |
Biotricity’s
sole Chief Executive Officer and sole officer, who beneficially owned 6,500,000 shares of outstanding common stock, resigned from
all positions and transferred all of his shares back for cancellation; |
|
|
● |
The
existing management of the Company were appointed as executive officers; and |
|
|
● |
The
existing shareholders of the Company entered into a transaction whereby their existing common shares of the Company were exchanged
for either (a) a new class of shares that are exchangeable for shares of Biotricity’s common stock, or (b) shares of Biotricity’s
common stock, which (assuming exchange of all such exchangeable shares) would equal in the aggregate a number of shares of Biotricity’s
common stock that constitute 90% of Biotricity’s issued and outstanding shares. |
In
addition, effective on the closing date of the acquisition transaction:
● |
Biotricity
issued approximately 1.197 shares of its common stock in exchange for each common share of the Company held by the Company shareholders
who in general terms, are not residents of Canada (for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada). Accordingly, the Company issued
13,376,947 shares; |
|
|
● |
Shareholders
of the Company who in general terms, are Canadian residents (for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada)) received approximately
1.197 Exchangeable Shares in the capital of Exchangeco in exchange for each common share of the Company held. Accordingly, the Company
issued 9,123,031 Exchangeable Shares; |
|
|
● |
Each
outstanding option to purchase common shares in the Company (whether vested or unvested) was exchanged, without any further action
or consideration on the part of the holder of such option, for approximately 1.197 economically equivalent replacement options with
an inverse adjustment to the exercise price of the replacement option to reflect the exchange ratio of approximately 1.197:1; |
|
|
● |
Each
outstanding warrant to purchase common shares in the Company was adjusted, in accordance with the terms thereof, such that it entitles
the holder to receive approximately 1.197 shares of the common stock of Biotricity for each Warrant, with an inverse adjustment to
the exercise price of the Warrants to reflect the exchange ratio of approximately 1.197:1 |
|
|
● |
Each
outstanding advisor warrant to purchase common shares in the Company was adjusted, in accordance with the terms thereof, such that
it entitles the holder to receive approximately 1.197 shares of the common stock of Biotricity for each Advisor Warrant, with an
inverse adjustment to the exercise price of the Advisor Warrants to reflect the exchange ratio of approximately 1.197:1; and |
|
|
● |
The
outstanding 11% secured convertible promissory notes of the Company were adjusted, in accordance with the adjustment provisions thereof,
as and from closing, so as to permit the holders to convert (and in some circumstances permit the Company to force the conversion
of) the convertible promissory notes into shares of the common stock of Biotricity at a 25% discount to purchase price per share
in Biotricity’s next offering. |
Issuance
of common stock, exchangeable shares and cancellation of shares in connection with the reverse takeover transaction as explained above
represents recapitalization of capital retroactively adjusting the accounting acquirer’s legal capital to reflect the legal capital
of the accounting acquiree.
Share
issuances during the year ended March 31, 2021
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company recorded preferred stock dividends for the Series A preferred stock in amount of $962,148
and made a payment in the amount of $602,969.
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company issued 733,085 common shares were issued in connection with conversion of convertible notes
(Note 5(b)) with another 18,402 that would be issued subsequent to year end. The total amounts of debts settled is in amount of $1,011,286
that composed of face value of convertible promissory notes in amount of $739,000 (Note 5(b)), carrying amount of conversion and redemption
feature derived from notes in amount of $225,284 and unpaid interest in amount of $47,002. The fair value of the shares issued
and to be issued was determined based on the market price upon conversion and was in the amount of $1,076,561 and $38,460 respectively.
The difference between amounts of debts settled and fair value of common shares issued was in the amount of $103,375 and was recorded
as loss on conversion of convertible promissory notes in statement of operations.
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company issued 1,900,042 common shares for services provided and for exercise of warrants.
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company also issued an aggregate of 898,084 shares of its common stock to investors as part of the
one-for-one exchange of previously issued exchangeable shares into the Company’s Common Stock, which is a non-cash transaction.
Share
issuances during the year ended March 31, 2022
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company issued 4,696,083
common shares (not including 19,263
shares that were part of to be issued shares
from prior year conversions) were issued in connection with conversion of convertible notes (Note 5(b)). The total amounts of debts settled
is in amount of $14,522,812
that composed of face value of convertible
promissory notes in amount of $10,309,000
(Note 5(b)), carrying amount of conversion and
redemption feature derived from notes in amount of $3,398,557
(Note 8) and unpaid interest in amount of $815,255.
The fair value of the shares issued was determined based on the market price upon conversion and was in the amount of $15,678,454.
The difference between amounts of debts settled and fair value of common shares issued was in the amount of $1,155,642
and was recorded as loss on conversion of convertible
promissory notes in statement of operations.
During the year ended March
31, 2022, the Company issued 658,355
common shares in connection with warrant exercises for cash, and 446,370 common shares in connection with cashless warrant exercises
(Note 9(e)). In addition, the Company issued 451,688
common shares for services
provided (not including 250,000
that were part of to
be issued shares from prior year commitment). The fair value of common shares issued for services provided was $1,414,449. The fair value
of common shares was determined based on the fair value on the date of approval of common share issuance.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company issued 69,252 common shares for cash proceeds of $250,000, which were initially received as
a promissory note, and paid through the issuance common shares within the same quarter.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company issued 5,382,331 common shares in connection with the equity financing that was concurrent
with its listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market, for total net cash proceeds of $14,545,805.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, an additional
Series A preferred shares were issued for cash proceeds of $100,000.
The Company issued 288,756
common shares as a result of preferred share conversions (Note 8).
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company also issued an aggregate of 1,423,260 shares of its common stock to investors as part of the
one-for-one exchange of previously issued exchangeable shares into the Company’s Common Stock, which is a non-cash transaction.
As
of March 31, 2022, the Company had recognized its commitment to issue a total of 123,817 common stocks.
|
e) |
Warrant
exercises and issuances |
Warrant
exercises and issuances during the year ended March 31, 2021
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, 97,500 warrants were exercised pursuant to receipt of exercise proceeds of $67,941.
(Note 5(a))
During
the year ended March 31, 2021, the Company issued 449,583 warrants as compensation for advisor and consultant services which were fair
valued. The vested portion in current year and from previous year at $275,801 and expensed in general and administrative expenses, with
a corresponding credit to additional paid in capital. As of December 31, 2020, the Company extended the expiry dates of 788,806 warrants
previously issued to an executive of the Company, in order to extend their term from 3 to 10 years in accord with the same term extension
made to the options of all other Company employees in fiscal 2020. As part of this revision in terms, 288,806 of these same warrants,
previously issued and expensed, were repriced to reflect current market conditions; the resulting increase in the fair value of these
warrants of $464,971 was expensed to general and administrative expenses. In addition, the Company issued 1,065,857 warrants to brokers,
and 5,631,132 warrants to convertible note holders, in connection with the convertible note issuance (Note 5(b)). The warrants’
fair value has been estimated using a monte carlo model, which were initially recorded as derivative liabilities, then recorded
as equity upon the end of derivative treatment of such warrants.
Warrant
exercises and issuances during the year ended March 31, 2022
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, 658,355
warrants were exercised (2021 – 97,500)
pursuant to receipt of exercise proceeds of $872,292. 446,370 warrants were exercised pursuant to cashless warrant exercise. In addition, $103,950 warrant exercise
proceeds receivable was recorded as part of deposit and other receivables as of March 31, 2022.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company issued 212,594
warrants, including 25,000
as compensation for advisor and consultant services, and 187,594
as compensation
to an executive of the Company who was not part of the the Company stock options plan. The warrant expenses were fair valued at
$541,443,
and recognized as general and administrative
expenses, with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company issued 57,536
share purchase warrants to lenders in connection with the term loan (Note 6). The fair value of these warrants, in the amount of $198,713,
was recorded as part of the discount of the loan, with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in capital. The warrants were not considered as derivative instruments. The fair value
of these warrants was determined by using the Black Scholes model, based on the following key inputs and assumptions: expiry date December
21, 2028, exercise price $6.26, rate of return 1.40%, and volatility 121.71%.
During the year ended
March 31, 2022, the Company issued 373,404 share purchase warrants to underwriter. The warrants were not considered as a derivative instrument
and was accounted as additional paid-in capital along with the uplisting transaction. The warrants were fair valued at $900,371.
The fair value of these warrants was determined by using
Black Scholes model, based on the following key inputs and assumptions: expiry date August 26, 2026, exercise price $3.75, rate of returns
0.77%, and volatility 111.9%.
Warrant
issuances, exercises and expirations or cancellations during the years ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, were as follows, resulting in warrants
outstanding at the end of those respective periods:
SCHEDULE
OF WARRANTS OUTSTANDING
| |
Broker Warrants | | |
Consultant and Noteholder Warrants | | |
Warrants Issued on Convertible Notes | | |
Private
Placement Warrants | | |
Total | |
As at March 31, 2019 | |
| 321,314 | | |
| 1,177,157 | | |
| 2,734,530 | | |
| 1,163,722 | | |
| 5,396,723 | |
Less: Expired/cancelled | |
| - | | |
| (148,750 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (148,750 | ) |
Add: Issued | |
| - | | |
| 1,021,430 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 1,021,430 | |
As at March 31, 2020 | |
| 321,314 | | |
| 2,049,837 | | |
| 2,734,530 | | |
| 1,163,722 | | |
| 6,269,403 | |
Less: Expired/cancelled | |
| (128,676 | ) | |
| (271,365 | ) | |
| (911,510 | ) | |
| (1,163,722 | ) | |
| (2,475,273 | ) |
Less: Exercised | |
| - | | |
| (97,500 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (97,500 | ) |
Add: Issued | |
| 1,065,857 | | |
| 449,583 | | |
| 5,631,132 | | |
| - | | |
| 7,146,572 | |
As at March 31, 2021 | |
| 1,258,495 | | |
| 2,130,555 | | |
| 7,454,152 | | |
| - | | |
| 10,843,202 | |
Less: Expired/cancelled | |
| (150,841 | ) | |
| (298,333 | ) | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| (449,174 | ) |
Less: Exercised | |
| (662,389 | ) | |
| (242,500 | ) | |
| (555,029 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (1,459,918 | ) |
Add: Issued | |
| 430,940 | | |
| 212,594 | | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| 643,534 | |
As at March 31, 2022 | |
| 876,205 | | |
| 1,802,316 | | |
| 6,899,123 | | |
| - | | |
| 9,577,644 | |
Exercise Price | |
$ | 1.06
to $3.00 | | |
$ | 0.48 to
$3.50 | | |
$ | 1.06
to $2.00 | | |
| | | |
| | |
Expiration Date | |
| July
2022 to January 2031 | | |
| July
2022 to March 2032 | | |
| May
2022 to February 2024 | | |
| | | |
| | |
|
g) |
Stock-based
compensation |
2016
Equity Incentive Plan
On
February 2, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).
The purpose of the Plan is to advance the interests of the Company and its stockholders by providing an incentive to attract, retain
and reward persons performing services for the Company and by motivating such persons to contribute to the growth and profitability of
the Company. The Plan seeks to achieve this purpose by providing for awards in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted
stock purchase rights, restricted stock bonuses, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other stock-based
awards.
The
Plan shall continue in effect until its termination by the board of directors or committee formed by the board; provided, however, that
all awards shall be granted, if at all, on or before the day immediately preceding the tenth (10th) anniversary of the effective date.
The maximum number of shares of stock that may be issued under the Plan shall be equal to 3,750,000 shares; provided that the maximum
number of shares of stock that may be issued under the Plan pursuant to awards shall automatically and without any further Company or
shareholder approval, increase on January 1 of each year for not more than 10 years from the effective date, so the number of shares
that may be issued is an amount no greater than 20% of the Company’s outstanding shares of stock and shares of stock underlying
any outstanding exchangeable shares as of such January 1; provided further that no such increase shall be effective if it would violate
any applicable law or stock exchange rule or regulation, or result in adverse tax consequences to the Company or any participant that
would not otherwise result but for the increase.
Based
on the 2016 Option Plan, the Company is authorized to issue employee options with a 10-year term. On March 31, 2020, the Company’s
Board of Directors approved the amendment of certain prior options grants, issued to current employees, previously issued with a 3-year
term, such that the respective options issued under these agreements would have their term extended to 10 years. The Company revalued
these options using a lattice model with an expected life of 10 years, risk free rates of 0.46% to 0.75%, stock price of $0.974 and expected
volatility of 132.2%, in order to recognize the additional expense associated with the longer term and recognized a one-time charge of
$1,600,515 in share-based compensation, with a corresponding adjustment to adjusted paid in capital.
During
the year ended March 31, 2022, the Company granted 596,458
stock options (2021: 2,610,647 options) with
a weighted average remaining contractual life of 5.75 years (2021: 8.7
years). The Company recorded stock-based compensation
of $913,613
(2021: $790,535) in connection with ESOP
2016 Plan under general and administrative expenses with corresponding credit to additional paid in capital.
The
following table summarizes the stock option activities of the Company to March 31, 2022:
SCHEDULE
OF STOCK OPTION ACTIVITIES
| |
Number of options | | |
Weighted average exercise price ($) | |
Granted | |
| 4,147,498 | | |
| 3.2306 | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Outstanding as of March 31, 2018 | |
| 4,147,498 | | |
| 3.2306 | |
Granted | |
| 270,521 | | |
| 1.8096 | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Outstanding as of March 31, 2019 | |
| 4,418,019 | | |
| 3.1436 | |
Granted | |
| 88,100 | | |
| 0.7763 | |
Expired | |
| (112,509 | ) | |
| 2.723 | |
Outstanding as of March 31, 2020 | |
| 4,393,610 | | |
| 3.1069 | |
Granted | |
| 2,610,647 | | |
| 1.0072 | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Outstanding as of March 31, 2021 | |
| 7,004,256 | | |
| 2.3268 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Granted | |
| 596,458 | | |
| 1.5272 | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Expired | |
| (56,433 | ) | |
| 1.5937 | |
Forfeited | |
| (134,567 | ) | |
| 1.5124 | |
Outstanding as of March 31, 2022 | |
| 7,409,714 | | |
| 2.3466 | |
The
fair value of each option granted is estimated at the time of grant using multi-nominal lattice model using the following assumptions,
for each of the respective years ended March 31:
SCHEDULE
OF FAIR VALUE OF OPTION GRANTED USING VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS
| |
2022 | | |
2021 | | |
2020 | |
Exercise price ($) | |
| 2.40-3.98 | | |
| 1.40-2.00 | | |
| 1.40-2.00 | |
Risk free interest rate (%) | |
| 0.34 – 2.32 | | |
| 0.18 – 1.72 | | |
| 0.52 - 2.81 | |
Expected term (Years) | |
| 2.0 – 10.0 | | |
| 2.0-10.0 | | |
| 2.0-3.0 | |
Expected volatility (%) | |
| 106.6
– 129.9 | | |
| 106.8 - 127.8 | | |
| 97.8-141.1 | |
Expected dividend yield (%) | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | |
Fair value of option ($) | |
| 1.19
– 3.52 | | |
| 0.72 | | |
| 0.76 | |
Expected forfeiture (attrition) rate (%) | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | | |
| 0.00 | |
The
intrinsic value of all the options as at March 31, 2022 were zero.
10.
INCOME TAXES
Income
taxes
The
provision for income taxes differs from that computed at combined corporate tax rate of approximately 26% as follows:
Income
tax recovery
SCHEDULE
OF EFFECTIVE INCOME TAX RATE RECONCILIATION
| |
Year
ended
March
31,
2022 | | |
Year
ended
March
31,
2021 | |
| |
$ | | |
$ | |
Net
loss | |
| (29,130,477 | ) | |
| (15,491,176 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Expected
income tax recovery | |
| (7,573,924 | ) | |
| (4,027,706 | ) |
Non-deductible
expenses | |
| 3,645,962 | | |
| 1,313,530 | |
Other
temporary differences | |
| (24,972 | ) | |
| (38,579 | ) |
Change
in valuation allowance | |
| 3,952,934 | | |
| 2,752,755 | |
Income
tax recovery | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Deferred
tax assets
SCHEDULE
OF DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
| |
As at March
31, 2022 | | |
As at March 31, 2021 | |
| |
$ | | |
$ | |
Non-capital loss carry forwards | |
| 11,214,790 | | |
| 7,311,800 | |
Other temporary differences | |
| 16,283 | | |
| 41,256 | |
Valuation allowance | |
| (11,231,073 | ) | |
| (7,353,056 | ) |
Deferred tax assets | |
| - | | |
| - | |
As
of March 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company decided that a valuation allowance relating to the above deferred tax assets of the Company was
necessary, largely based on the negative evidence represented by losses incurred and a determination that it is not more likely than
not to realize these assets, such that, a corresponding valuation allowance, for each respective period, was recorded to offset deferred
tax assets.
As
of March 31, 2022, and 2021 the Company has approximately $43,133,807
and $28,122,308,
respectively, of non-capital losses available to offset future taxable income. These
losses will expire between 2035 to 2039.
As
of March 31, 2022, and 2021 the Company is not subject to any uncertain tax positions.
11.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
There
are no claims against the Company that were assessed as significant, which were outstanding as at March 31, 2022 and, consequently, no
provision for such has been recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
12.
OPERATING LEASE RIGHT-OF-USE ASSETS AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The
Company has one operating lease primarily for office and administration.
As of December 1, 2021, the Company entered into
a new lease agreement. The Company paid $85,000 deposit that would be returned at the end of the lease.
When
measuring the lease obligations, the Company discounted lease payments using its incremental borrowing rate. The weighted-average-rate
applied is 11.4%.
SCHEDULE
OF OPERATING LEASES OBLIGATIONS
| |
$ | |
Operating lease right-of-use asset - initial recognition | |
| 1,308,731 | |
Amortization | |
| (66,031 | ) |
Balance at March 31, 2022 | |
| 1,242,700 | |
| |
| | |
Operating lease obligation - initial recognition | |
| 1,308,730 | |
Repayment and interest accretion | |
| 21,608 | |
Balance at March 31, 2022 | |
| 1,330,338 | |
| |
| | |
Current portion of operating lease obligation | |
| 210,320 | |
Noncurrent portion of operating lease obligation | |
| 1,120,018 | |
The
operating lease expense was $293,888
for the year ended March 31, 2022
(2021: $213,826)
and included in the general and administrative expenses.
The
following table represents the contractual undiscounted cash flows for lease obligations as at March 31, 2022.
SCHEDULE
OF CONTRACTUAL UNDISCOUNTED CASH FLOWS FOR LEASE OBLIGATION
| |
$ | |
Less than one year | |
| 348,565 | |
Beyond one year | |
| 1,368,654 | |
Total undiscounted lease obligations | |
| 1,717,219 | |
13. PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
During
the year-ended March 31, 2022, the Company purchased leasehold improvements of $12,928 (useful life: 5 years) as well as furniture &
fixtures of $16,839 (useful life: 5 years). The Company recognized depreciation expense for these assets in the amount of $2,308 during
the year ended March 31, 2022.
SCHEDULE
OF PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Cost | |
Office equipment | | |
Leasehold improvement | | |
Total | |
| |
| $ | | |
| $ | | |
| $ | |
Balance at March 31, 2021 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Additions | |
| 16,839 | | |
| 12,928 | | |
| 29,767 | |
Balance at March 31, 2022 | |
| 16,839 | | |
| 12,928 | | |
| 29,767 | |
Accumulated depreciation | |
Office equipment | | |
Leasehold improvement | | |
Total | |
| |
| $ | | |
| $ | | |
| $ | |
Balance at March 31, 2021 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Depreciation for the year | |
| 1,308 | | |
| 1,000 | | |
| 2,308 | |
Balance at March 31, 2022 | |
| 1,308 | | |
| 1,000 | | |
| 2,308 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net book value | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Balance at March 31, 2021 | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Balance at March 31, 2022 | |
| 15,531 | | |
| 11,928 | | |
| 27,459 | |
14.
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
The
Company’s management has evaluated subsequent events up to July 14, 2022, the date the consolidated financial statements
were issued, pursuant to the requirements of ASC 855 and has determined the following material subsequent events:
During
the period from April 1 to July 14, 2022, the Company issued 41,020 shares of common stock as equity-based compensation to two advisor
and 390,464 shares of common stock in connection with the conversion of Series B convertible note principal of $302,000. In addition,
the company issued 60,000 out of the total to be issued shares obligation it had as of March 31, 2022.