NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. GENERAL
ITC Holdings and its subsidiaries are engaged in the transmission of electricity in the United States. Through our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries, we own and operate high-voltage electric transmission systems in Michigan’s Lower Peninsula and portions of Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois, Missouri, Kansas and Oklahoma that transmit electricity from generating stations to local distribution facilities connected to our transmission systems. ITC Holdings is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ITC Investment Holdings.
Basis of Presentation
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 included in ITC Holdings’ annual report on Form 10-K for such period.
The accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared using GAAP and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of SEC Regulation S-X as they apply to interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These accounting principles require us to use estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from our estimates.
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements are unaudited but, in our opinion, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period. The interim financial results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim period or the fiscal year.
Recent Developments Regarding the COVID-19 Pandemic
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. Efforts to control the recent outbreak of COVID-19 have resulted in the closure of various businesses and facilities and disruptions to the global economy and supply chains. The COVID-19 pandemic has and will continue to impact our customers throughout our operating footprint. To date, COVID-19 has not had a material impact on us. However, the duration of COVID-19 and the extent of such impact on our operations is unknown at this time. We are continuing to monitor developments involving our workforce, customers and suppliers and cannot predict whether COVID-19 will have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. We continue to monitor the rapidly evolving situation and guidance from federal, state and local public health authorities. We are taking steps to mitigate the potential risks to us posed by COVID-19 and are following all government restrictions to reduce the transmission of COVID-19.
Monthly Network Peak Load
For our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries, monthly network peak loads are used for billing network revenues, which currently is the largest component of our operating revenues. One of the primary factors that impacts our collection of revenues is actual monthly network peak load. Although monthly network peak loads do not impact our recognition of operating revenues, actual network load affects the timing of collection of our cash flows from transmission service. Since the period of business disruption, actual monthly network peak load for our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries was down ranging from as much as 9% to 26% across each of the operating companies as compared to pre-COVID-19 forecasted load. This is primarily as a result of reductions in or suspension of operations for many businesses and facilities in our operating footprint due to COVID-19. Further, while we are unable to predict the duration of COVID-19 and associated impacts on other businesses, we expect monthly network peak load to be negatively impacted by COVID-19 at similar levels during this period of business interruption.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
Accounting for Cloud Computing Arrangements
In August 2018, the FASB issued authoritative guidance to address the accounting for implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing agreement that is a service contract. The new standard aligns the accounting for implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement as a service contract with existing guidance on capitalizing costs associated with developing or obtaining internal-use software. In addition, the new guidance requires entities to expense capitalized implementation costs of a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the agreement and to present the expense in the
same income statement line item as the hosting fees. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 with either prospective or retrospective adoption permitted. We adopted the standard prospectively on January 1, 2020. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
3. REVENUE
Our total revenues are comprised of revenues which arise from three classifications including transmission services, other services, and Formula Rate true-up. As other services revenue is immaterial, it is presented in combination with transmission services on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Transmission Services
Through our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries, we generate nearly all our revenue from providing electric transmission services over our transmission systems. As independent transmission companies, our transmission services are provided and revenues are received based on our tariffs, as approved by the FERC. The transmission revenue requirements at our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries are set annually using Formula Rates and remain in effect for a one-year period. By updating the inputs to the formula and resulting rates on an annual basis, the revenues at our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries reflect changing operating data and financial performance, including the amount of network load on their transmission systems (for our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries), operating expenses and additions to property, plant and equipment when placed in service, among other items.
We recognize revenue for transmission services over time as transmission services are provided to customers (generally using an output measure of progress based on transmission load delivered). Customers simultaneously receive and consume the benefits provided by the Regulated Operating Subsidiaries’ services. We recognize revenue in the amount to which we have the right to invoice because we have a right to consideration in an amount that corresponds directly with the value to the customer of performance completed to date. As billing agents, MISO and SPP independently bill our customers on a monthly basis and collects fees for the use of our transmission systems. No component of the transaction price is allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations.
Transmission service revenue includes an estimate for unbilled revenues from service that has been provided but not billed by the end of an accounting period. Unbilled revenues are dependent upon a number of factors that require management’s judgment including estimates of transmission network load (for the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries) and preliminary information provided by billing agents. Due to the seasonal fluctuations of actual load, the unbilled revenue amount generally increases during the spring and summer and decreases during the fall and winter. See Note 4 for information on changes in unbilled accounts receivable.
Other Services
Other services revenue consists of rental revenues, easement revenues, and amounts from providing ancillary services. A portion of other services revenue is treated as a revenue credit and reduces gross revenue requirement when calculating net revenue requirement under our Formula Rates. Total other services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 were $1 million and $3 million, respectively.
Formula Rate True-Up
The true-up mechanism under our Formula Rates is considered an alternative revenue program of a rate-regulated utility given it permits our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries to adjust future rates in response to past activities or completed events in order to collect our actual revenue requirements under our Formula Rates. In accordance with our accounting policy, only the current year origination of the true-up is reported as a Formula Rate true-up. See “Cost-Based Formula Rates with True-Up Mechanism” in Note 5 for more information on our Formula Rates.
4. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The following table presents the components of accounts receivable on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Trade accounts receivable
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable
|
95
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
Due from affiliates
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Other
|
13
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
5. REGULATORY MATTERS
Cost-Based Formula Rates with True-Up Mechanism
The transmission revenue requirements at our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries are set annually using Formula Rates and remain in effect for a one-year period. By updating the inputs to the formula and resulting rates on an annual basis, the revenues at our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries reflect changing operational data and financial performance, including the amount of network load on their transmission systems (for our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries), operating expenses and additions to property, plant and equipment when placed in service, among other items. The formula used to derive the rates does not require further action or FERC filings each year, although the formula inputs remain subject to legal challenge at the FERC. Our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries will continue to use the formula to calculate their respective annual revenue requirements unless the FERC determines the resulting rates to be unjust and unreasonable and another mechanism is determined by the FERC to be just and reasonable. See “Rate of Return on Equity Complaints” in Note 13 for detail on ROE matters for our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries and “Incentive Adders for Transmission Rates” discussed in Note 5 herein.
The cost-based Formula Rates at our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries include a true-up mechanism that compares the actual revenue requirements of our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries to their billed revenues for each year to determine any over- or under-collection of revenue requirements. Revenue is recognized for services provided during each reporting period based on actual revenue requirements calculated using the formula. Our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries accrue or defer revenues to the extent that the actual revenue requirement for the reporting period is higher or lower, respectively, than the amounts billed relating to that reporting period. The amount of accrued or deferred revenues is reflected in future revenue requirements and thus flows through to customer bills within two years under the provisions of our Formula Rates.
The net changes in regulatory assets and liabilities associated with our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries’ Formula Rate revenue accruals and deferrals, including accrued interest, were as follows during the three months ended March 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Total
|
|
Net regulatory assets as of December 31, 2019
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
Net refund of 2018 revenue deferrals and accruals, including accrued interest
|
10
|
|
|
Net revenue accrual for the three months ended March 31, 2020
|
33
|
|
|
Net regulatory assets as of March 31, 2020
|
$
|
46
|
|
Regulatory assets and liabilities associated with our Regulated Operating Subsidiaries’ Formula Rate revenue accruals and deferrals, including accrued interest, are recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Current regulatory assets
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
Non-current regulatory assets
|
66
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Current regulatory liabilities
|
(39
|
)
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
Non-current regulatory liabilities
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Net regulatory assets
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Incentive Adders for Transmission Rates
The FERC has authorized the use of ROE incentives, or adders, that can be applied to the rates of TOs when certain conditions are met. Our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries and ITC Great Plains utilize ROE adders related to independent transmission ownership and RTO participation.
MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries
On April 20, 2018, Consumers Energy, IP&L, Midwest Municipal Transmission Group, Missouri River Energy Services, Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency and WPPI Energy filed a complaint with the FERC under section 206 of the FPA, challenging the adders for independent transmission ownership that are included in transmission rates charged by the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries. The adders for independent transmission ownership allowed up to 50 basis points or 100 basis points to be added to the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries’ authorized ROE, subject to any ROE cap established by the FERC. On October 18, 2018, the FERC issued an order granting the complaint in part, setting revised adders for independent transmission ownership for each of the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries to 25 basis points, and requiring the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries to include the revised adders, effective April 20, 2018, in their Formula Rates. In addition, the order directed the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries to provide refunds, with interest, for the period from April 20, 2018 through October 18, 2018. The MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries began reflecting the 25 basis point adder for independent transmission ownership in transmission rates in November 2018. Refunds of $7 million were primarily made in the fourth quarter of 2018 and were completed in the first quarter of 2019. The MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries sought rehearing of the FERC’s October 18, 2018 order, and on July 18, 2019, the FERC denied the rehearing request. On September 11, 2019, the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries filed an appeal of the FERC’s order in the D.C. Circuit Court. On December 16, 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court established a briefing schedule for the appeal. An initial brief was filed on January 27, 2020 and a reply brief was filed on April 24, 2020. We do not expect the final resolution of this proceeding to have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the authorized incentive adders for the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries included a 25 basis point adder for independent ownership and a 50 basis point adder for RTO participation. See Note 13 for information regarding the MISO ROE Complaints and the associated impact to the base ROE of our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries.
ITC Great Plains
On June 11, 2019, KCC filed a complaint with the FERC under section 206 of the FPA, challenging the ROE adder for independent transmission ownership that is included in the transmission rate charged by ITC Great Plains. The complaint argues that because ITC Great Plains is similarly situated to our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries with respect to ownership by Fortis and GIC, the same rationale by which the FERC lowered the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries adders for independent transmission ownership, as discussed above, also applies to ITC Great Plains. The adder for independent transmission ownership allows up to 100 basis points to be added to the ITC Great Plains authorized ROE, subject to any ROE cap established by the FERC. ITC Great Plains filed an answer to the complaint on July 1, 2019 asking the FERC to deny the complaint since KCC showed no evidence that ITC Great Plains’ independence or the benefits it provides as an independent TO has been compromised or reduced as a result of the Fortis and GIC acquisition. As of March 31, 2020, we have recorded an estimated current regulatory liability of $2 million related to this complaint. We do not expect the resolution of this proceeding to have a material adverse impact on our consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the authorized ROE used by ITC Great Plains is 12.16% and is composed of a base ROE of 10.66% with a 100 basis point adder for independent transmission ownership and a 50 basis point adder for RTO participation.
Rate of Return on Equity Complaints
See “Rate of Return on Equity Complaints” in Note 13 for a discussion of the MISO ROE Complaints.
6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had goodwill balances recorded at ITCTransmission, METC and ITC Midwest of $173 million, $454 million and $323 million, respectively, which resulted from the ITCTransmission and METC acquisitions and ITC Midwest’s acquisition of the IP&L transmission assets, respectively.
Intangible Assets
We have recorded intangible assets as a result of the METC acquisition in 2006. The carrying value of these assets was $18 million and $19 million (net of accumulated amortization of $41 million and $40 million) as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
We have also recorded intangible assets for payments made by and obligations of ITC Great Plains to certain TOs to acquire rights, which are required under the SPP tariff to designate ITC Great Plains to build, own and operate projects within the SPP region, including regional cost sharing projects in Kansas. The carrying amount of these intangible assets was $14 million (net of accumulated amortization of $2 million) at both March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.
We recognized $1 million of amortization expense of our intangible assets during each of the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. For the balance of intangible assets recorded as of March 31, 2020, we expect the annual amortization of these assets to be $3 million per year for each of the next five years.
7. DEBT
ITC Holdings
Term Loan Credit Agreement
On June 12, 2019, ITC Holdings entered into an unsecured, unguaranteed $400 million term loan credit agreement with a maturity date of June 11, 2021, under which ITC Holdings initially borrowed $200 million. The proceeds were used for the early redemption of the $200 million 5.50% Senior Notes due January 15, 2020. In January 2020, ITC Holdings drew upon the remaining $200 million under the term loan credit agreement to repay outstanding commercial paper balances. The weighted-average interest rate on the borrowing outstanding under this agreement was 1.41% at March 31, 2020.
Commercial Paper Program
ITC Holdings has an ongoing commercial paper program for the issuance and sale of unsecured commercial paper in an aggregate amount not to exceed $400 million outstanding at any one time. Borrowings under ITC Holdings’ $400 million revolving credit facility may be used to repay the notes under the commercial paper program, if necessary. With recent developments around COVID-19 and the resulting market volatility, ITC Holdings’ ability to issue commercial paper has been limited or unavailable. As a result, ITC Holdings has borrowed on its revolving credit facility to fund repayment of commercial paper obligations. As of March 31, 2020, ITC Holdings had $32 million of commercial paper issued and outstanding under the program, with a weighted-average interest rate of 1.4% and weighted average remaining days to maturity of 1 day. The amount outstanding as of March 31, 2020 was classified as debt maturing within one year in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position and has subsequently been repaid using borrowings under ITC Holdings’ revolving credit facility.
METC
Term Loan Credit Agreement
On January 23, 2020, METC entered into an unsecured, unguaranteed term loan credit agreement, due January 23, 2021, under which METC borrowed the maximum of $75 million available under the agreement. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, primarily the repayment of borrowings under the METC revolving credit agreement. The weighted-average interest rate on the borrowing outstanding under this agreement was 1.37% at March 31, 2020.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
We have entered into interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk associated with planned future borrowings, including the anticipated refinancing of the $400 million term loan at ITC Holdings with a maturity date of June 11, 2021. At March 31, 2020, ITC Holdings had the following interest rate swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
(in millions, except percentages)
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
Weighted Average Fixed Rate
|
|
Original Term
|
|
Effective Date
|
|
July 2019 swap
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
1.816
|
%
|
|
5 years
|
|
November 2020
|
|
August 2019 swap
|
|
50
|
|
|
1.488
|
%
|
|
5 years
|
|
November 2020
|
|
October 2019 swaps
|
|
100
|
|
|
1.288
|
%
|
|
5 years
|
|
November 2020
|
|
January 2020 swaps
|
|
188
|
|
|
1.437
|
%
|
|
5 years
|
|
October 2020
|
|
February 2020 swap
|
|
62
|
|
|
1.141
|
%
|
|
5 years
|
|
October 2020
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 5-year term interest rate swaps call for ITC Holdings to receive interest quarterly at a variable rate equal to LIBOR and to pay interest semi-annually at various fixed rates effective for the 5-year period beginning November 15, 2020 for the July 2019, August 2019 and October 2019 swaps and October 1, 2020 for the January 2020 and February 2020 swaps. The agreements include a mandatory early termination provision and will be terminated no later than the effective date of the interest rate swaps of November 15, 2020 for the 2019 swaps and October 1, 2020 for the 2020 swaps. The interest rate swaps have been determined to be highly effective at offsetting changes in the forecasted interest cash flows associated with the debt issuance, resulting from changes in benchmark interest rates from the trade date of the interest rate swaps to the issuance date of the debt obligation.
The interest rate swaps qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment, whereby any gain or loss recognized from the trade date to the effective date is recorded net of tax in AOCI. This amount will be accumulated and amortized as a component of interest expense over the first five years of the forecasted debt. As of March 31, 2020, the fair value of the derivative instruments was a liability of $20 million. The interest rate swaps do not contain credit-risk-related contingent features. Refer to Note 9 for additional fair value information.
Revolving Credit Agreements
At March 31, 2020, ITC Holdings and certain of its Regulated Operating Subsidiaries had the following unsecured revolving credit facilities available:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
Total
Available
Capacity
|
|
Outstanding
Balance (a)
|
|
Unused
Capacity
|
|
Weighted Average
Interest Rate on
Outstanding Balance (b)
|
|
Commitment
Fee Rate (c)
|
|
ITC Holdings
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
(d)
|
1.9%
|
|
0.175
|
%
|
|
ITCTransmission
|
100
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
METC
|
100
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
ITC Midwest
|
225
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
ITC Great Plains
|
75
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
Total
|
$
|
900
|
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
548
|
|
|
|
|
|
____________________________
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Included within long-term debt in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position.
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Interest charged on borrowings depends on the variable rate structure we elected at the time of each borrowing.
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Calculation based on the average daily unused commitments, subject to adjustment based on the borrower’s credit rating.
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
ITC Holdings’ revolving credit agreement may be used for general corporate purposes, including to repay commercial paper issued pursuant to the commercial paper program described above, if necessary. While outstanding commercial paper does not reduce available capacity under ITC Holdings’ revolving credit agreement, the unused capacity under this agreement adjusted for the commercial paper outstanding was $258 million as of March 31, 2020.
|
Revolving Credit Agreement Amendments
On January 10, 2020, ITC Holdings, ITCTransmission, METC, ITC Midwest and ITC Great Plains amended and restated their respective revolving credit agreements each dated October 23, 2017. The amendments extend the maturity date of the
revolving credit agreements from October 2022 to October 2023. The determination of the applicable interest rates and commitment fee rates in the new agreements is consistent with the previous agreements as described above and remain subject to adjustment based on the borrower’s credit rating.
8. RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND ASSETS HELD IN TRUST
Pension Plan Benefits
We have a qualified defined benefit pension plan (“retirement plan”) for eligible employees, comprised of a traditional final average pay plan and a cash balance plan. The traditional final average pay plan is noncontributory, covers select employees, and provides retirement benefits based on years of benefit service, average final compensation and age at retirement. The cash balance plan is also noncontributory, covers substantially all employees and provides retirement benefits based on eligible compensation and interest credits. Our funding practice for the retirement plan is generally to fund the annual net pension cost, though we may contribute additional amounts as necessary to meet the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 or as we deem appropriate. We expect to contribute $4 million to the retirement plan in 2020.
We also have two supplemental nonqualified, noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans for selected management employees (the “supplemental benefit plans” and, collectively with the retirement plan, the “pension plans”). The supplemental benefit plans provide for benefits that supplement those provided by the retirement plan. We expect to contribute $3 million to the supplemental benefit plans in 2020.
Net periodic benefit cost for the pension plans, by component, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Net pension cost
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
The components of net pension cost other than the service cost component are included in Other (income) and expenses, net in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Other Postretirement Benefits
We provide certain postretirement health care, dental and life insurance benefits for eligible employees. We expect to contribute $10 million to the postretirement benefit plan in 2020.
Net postretirement benefit plan cost, by component, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Service cost
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
Net postretirement cost
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
The components of net postretirement cost other than the service cost component are included in Other (income) and expenses, net in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Defined Contribution Plan
We also sponsor a defined contribution retirement savings plan. Participation in this plan is available to substantially all employees. We match employee contributions up to certain predefined limits based upon eligible compensation and the employee’s contribution rate. The cost of this plan was $3 million and $2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
9. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The measurement of fair value is based on a three-tier hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. Changes in economic conditions or model-based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value level to another. In such instances, the transfer is reported at the beginning of the reporting period. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2019, there were no transfers between levels.
Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value subject to the three-tier hierarchy at March 31, 2020, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
|
|
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
(in millions)
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Financial assets measured on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Mutual funds — fixed income securities
|
47
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Mutual funds — equity securities
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Our assets measured at fair value subject to the three-tier hierarchy at December 31, 2019, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
|
|
Significant
Other Observable
Inputs
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
|
|
(in millions)
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Financial assets measured on a recurring basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds — fixed income securities
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Mutual funds — equity securities
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Interest rate swap derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we held certain assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The assets included in the table consist of investments recorded within cash and cash equivalents and other long-term assets, including investments held in a trust associated with our supplemental benefit plans described in Note 8. The mutual funds we own are publicly traded and are recorded at fair value based on observable trades for identical securities in an active market. Changes in the observed trading prices and liquidity of money market funds are monitored as additional support for determining fair value. Gains and losses for all mutual fund investments are recorded in earnings.
The assets and liabilities related to derivatives consist of interest rate swaps discussed in Note 7. The fair value of our interest rate swap derivatives is determined based on a DCF method using LIBOR swap rates, which are observable at commonly quoted intervals.
We also held non-financial assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These consist of goodwill and intangible assets. We did not record any impairment charges on long-lived assets and no other significant events occurred requiring non-financial assets and liabilities to be measured at fair value (subsequent to initial recognition) during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. Refer to Note 6 for additional information on our goodwill and intangible assets.
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
Fixed Rate Debt
Based on the borrowing rates obtained from third party lending institutions currently available for bank loans with similar terms and average maturities from active markets, the fair value of our consolidated long-term debt and debt maturing within one year, excluding revolving and term loan credit agreements and commercial paper, was $5,577 million and $5,672 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. These fair values represent Level 2 under the three-tier hierarchy described above. The total book value of our consolidated long-term debt and debt maturing within one year, net of discount and deferred financing fees and excluding revolving and term loan credit agreements and commercial paper, was $5,109 million and $5,108 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
Revolving and Term Loan Credit Agreements
At March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had a consolidated total of $827 million and $499 million, respectively, outstanding under our revolving and term loan credit agreements, which are variable rate loans. The fair value of these loans approximates book value based on the borrowing rates currently available for variable rate loans obtained from third party lending institutions. These fair values represent Level 2 under the three-tier hierarchy described above.
Other Financial Instruments
The carrying value of other financial instruments included in current assets and current liabilities, including cash and cash equivalents, special deposits and commercial paper, approximates their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
10. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
The following table provides the components of changes in AOCI:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Balance at the beginning of period
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on interest rate swaps relating to interest rate cash flow hedges (net of tax of $7 for the three months ended March 31, 2020)
|
(16
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
(16
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Balance at the end of period
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
The amount of net loss relating to interest rate cash flow hedges to be reclassified from AOCI to earnings for the 12-month period ending March 31, 2021 is expected to be approximately $4 million (net of tax of $1 million). The reclassification is reported in Interest expense, net in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income on a pre-tax basis.
11. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE PLAN
Long-Term Incentive Plans
In the first quarter of 2020, 288,239 PBUs and 223,082 SBUs were granted pursuant to our long-term incentive plans. Generally, each PBU and SBU granted is valued based on one share of Fortis common stock traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, converted to U.S. dollars and settled only in cash. However, SBUs granted to the executives may settle in cash, 100% Fortis common stock, or 50% cash and 50% Fortis common stock depending on executives’ settlement elections and whether certain share ownership requirements are met. The awards are classified as liability awards and vest on the date specified in a particular grant agreement, provided the service and performance criteria, as applicable, are satisfied. The PBUs and SBUs earn dividend equivalents which are also re-measured and settled consistent with the target award at the end of the vesting period. The granted awards and related dividend equivalents have no shareholder rights.
The aggregate fair value of all outstanding PBUs and SBUs as of March 31, 2020 was $47 million and $28 million, respectively. At March 31, 2020, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to the PBUs and SBUs was $24 million and $16 million, respectively.
Employee Share Purchase Plan
We have an ESPP plan which enables ITC employees to purchase shares of Fortis common stock. Our cost of the plan is based on the value of our contribution, as additional compensation to a participating employee, equal to 10% of an employee’s contribution up to a maximum annual contribution of 1% of an employee’s base pay and an amount equal to 10% of all dividends paid on the Fortis shares allocated to an employee’s ESPP account. The cost of ITC Holdings’ contribution for each of the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was less than $1 million.
12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Intercompany Receivables and Payables
ITC Holdings may incur charges from Fortis and other subsidiaries of Fortis that are not subsidiaries of ITC Holdings for general corporate expenses incurred. In addition, ITC Holdings may perform additional services for, or receive additional services from, Fortis and such subsidiaries. These transactions are in the normal course of business and payments for these services are settled through accounts receivable and accounts payable, as necessary. We had intercompany receivables from Fortis and such subsidiaries of less than $1 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, and no intercompany payables to Fortis and such subsidiaries at March 31, 2020 and less than $1 million at December 31, 2019.
Related party charges for corporate expenses from Fortis and such subsidiaries are recorded in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Such expense for each of the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 for ITC Holdings was $3 million. Related party billings for services to Fortis and other subsidiaries, recorded as an offset to general and administrative expenses for ITC Holdings, were $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and less than $1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019.
Dividends
During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, we paid dividends of $82 million and $72 million, respectively, to ITC Investment Holdings. We also paid dividends of $83 million to ITC Investment Holdings in April 2020.
Intercompany Tax Sharing Agreement
We are organized as a corporation for tax purposes and subject to a tax sharing agreement as a wholly-owned subsidiary of ITC Investment Holdings. Additionally, we record income taxes based on our separate company tax position and make or receive tax-related payments with ITC Investment Holdings. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, ITC Holdings established an intercompany payable of $2 million to ITC Investment Holdings for matters related to the State of Michigan income taxes. In April 2020, ITC Holdings paid $2 million to ITC Investment Holdings to settle the intercompany payable.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Environmental Matters
We are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, which impose limitations on the discharge of pollutants into the environment, establish standards for the management, treatment, storage, transportation and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes and hazardous materials, and impose obligations to investigate and remediate contamination in certain circumstances. Liabilities relating to investigation and remediation of contamination, as well as other liabilities concerning hazardous materials or contamination, such as claims for personal injury or property damage, may arise at many locations, including formerly owned or operated properties and sites where wastes have been treated or disposed of, as well as properties currently owned or operated by us. Such liabilities may arise even where the contamination does not result from noncompliance with applicable environmental laws. Under some environmental laws, such liabilities may also be joint and several, meaning that a party can be held responsible for more than its share of the liability involved, or even the entire share. Although environmental requirements generally have become more stringent and compliance with those requirements more expensive, we are not aware of any specific developments that would increase our costs for such compliance in a manner that would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Our assets and operations also involve the use of materials classified as hazardous, toxic or otherwise dangerous. Many of the properties that we own or operate have been used for many years and include older facilities and equipment that may be more likely than newer ones to contain or be made from such materials. Some of these properties include aboveground or underground storage tanks and associated piping. Some of them also include large electrical equipment filled with mineral oil, which may contain or previously have contained PCBs. Our facilities and equipment are often situated on or near property owned by others so that, if they are the source of contamination, others’ property may be affected. For example, aboveground and underground transmission lines sometimes traverse properties that we do not own and transmission assets that we own
or operate are sometimes commingled at our transmission stations with distribution assets owned or operated by our transmission customers.
Some properties in which we have an ownership interest or at which we operate are, or are suspected of being, affected by environmental contamination. We are not aware of any pending or threatened claims against us with respect to environmental contamination relating to these properties, or of any investigation or remediation of contamination at these properties, that entail costs likely to materially affect us. Some facilities and properties are located near environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands.
Litigation
We are involved in certain legal proceedings before various courts, governmental agencies and mediation panels concerning matters arising in the ordinary course of business. These proceedings include certain contract disputes, eminent domain and vegetation management activities, regulatory matters and pending judicial matters. We cannot predict the final disposition of such proceedings. We regularly review legal matters and record provisions for claims that are considered probable of loss.
Rate of Return on Equity Complaints
Two complaints were filed with the FERC by combinations of consumer advocates, consumer groups, municipal parties and other parties challenging the base ROE in MISO. The complaints were filed with the FERC under Section 206 of the FPA requesting that the FERC find the MISO regional base ROE rate (the “base ROE”) for all MISO TO’s, including our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries, to no longer be just and reasonable.
In addition to the MISO ROE Complaints, complaints were filed with the FERC regarding the regional base ROE rate for ISO New England TOs. In resolving these complaints, the FERC adopted a methodology for establishing base ROE rates based on a two-step DCF analysis. This methodology provided the precedent for the FERC ruling on the Initial Complaint and the ALJ initial decision on the Second Complaint for our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries. This precedent has been superseded by the November 2019 Order in the MISO ROE Complaints, as discussed below.
Initial Complaint
On November 12, 2013, the Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers, Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers, Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc., Minnesota Large Industrial Group and Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group (collectively, the “complainants”) filed the Initial Complaint with the FERC. The complainants sought a FERC order to reduce the base ROE used in the formula transmission rates for our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries to 9.15%, reducing the equity component of our capital structure and terminating the ROE adders approved for certain Regulated Operating Subsidiaries. The FERC set the base ROE for hearing and settlement procedures, while denying all other aspects of the Initial Complaint.
On September 28, 2016, the FERC issued the September 2016 Order that set the base ROE at 10.32%, with a maximum ROE of 11.35%, effective for the period from November 12, 2013 through February 11, 2015 based on the two-step DCF methodology adopted in the ISO New England matters. The ROE collected through the MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries’ rates during the period November 12, 2013 through September 27, 2016, a portion of which was later refunded to customers for the period of the Initial Complaint, consisted of a base ROE of 12.38% plus applicable incentive adders.
The September 2016 Order required our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries to provide refunds, including interest, which were completed in 2017. Additionally, the base ROE established by the September 2016 Order was to be used prospectively from the date of that order until a new approved base ROE was established by the FERC. On October 28, 2016, the MISO TOs, including our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries, filed a request with the FERC for rehearing of the September 2016 Order regarding the short-term growth projections in the two-step DCF analysis. Additional impacts to the base ROE for the period of the Initial Complaint and the related accrued refund liabilities resulted from the November 2019 Order issued by the FERC, as discussed below.
Second Complaint
On February 12, 2015, the Second Complaint was filed with the FERC by Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation, Mississippi Delta Energy Agency, Clarksdale Public Utilities Commission, Public Service Commission of Yazoo City and Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc., seeking a FERC order to reduce the base ROE used in the formula transmission rates of our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries to 8.67%, with an effective date of February 12, 2015.
On June 30, 2016, the presiding ALJ issued an initial decision that recommended a base ROE of 9.70% for the refund period from February 12, 2015 through May 11, 2016, with a maximum ROE of 10.68%, which also would be applicable going forward from the date of a final FERC order.
Related FERC Orders
In April 2017, the D.C. Circuit Court vacated the precedent-setting FERC orders in the ISO New England matters that established and applied the two-step DCF methodology for the determination of base ROE. The court remanded the orders to the FERC for further justification of its establishment of the new base ROE for the ISO New England TOs. On October 16, 2018, in the New England matters, the FERC issued an order on remand which proposed a new methodology for 1) determining when an existing ROE is no longer just and reasonable; and 2) setting a new just and reasonable ROE if an existing ROE has been found not to be just and reasonable. The FERC established a paper hearing on how the proposed new methodology should apply to the ISO New England TOs ROE complaint proceedings. The FERC issued a similar order, the November 2018 Order, in the MISO ROE Complaints, establishing a paper hearing on the application of the proposed new methodology to the proceedings pending before the FERC involving the MISO TOs’ ROE, including our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries.
The November 2018 Order included preliminary illustrative calculations for the ROE that could have been established for the Initial Complaint, using the FERC's proposed methodology with financial data from the proceedings related to that complaint. The FERC’s preliminary calculations were not binding and could change, as significant changes to the methodology by the FERC were possible as a result of the paper hearing process. The November 2018 Order and our response to the order through briefs and reply briefs did not provide a reasonable basis for a change to the reserve or ROEs utilized for any of the complaint refund periods nor all subsequent periods.
November 2019 Order
On November 21, 2019, the FERC issued an order in the MISO ROE Complaints. The FERC did not adopt the methodology proposed in the November 2018 Order, which had proposed using four financial models to establish the base ROE. Instead, the FERC determined that two financial models should be used to determine the base ROE. The FERC applied that methodology to the Initial Complaint period and determined that the base ROE for the Initial Complaint should be 9.88% and the top of the range of reasonableness for that period should be 12.24%. The FERC determined that this base ROE should apply during the first refund period of November 12, 2013 to February 11, 2015 and from the date of the September 2016 Order prospectively. In the November 2019 Order, the FERC also dismissed the Second Complaint. Therefore, based on the November 2019 Order, for the Second Complaint refund period from February 12, 2015 to May 11, 2016, no refund is due, and the base ROE for that period should be 12.38% plus applicable incentive adders. As a result, we have reversed the aggregate estimated current liability we had previously recorded for the Second Complaint, as noted below in “Financial Statement Impacts”. In addition, from May 12, 2016 to September 27, 2016, the base ROE should be 12.38% plus applicable incentive adders, because no complaint had been filed for that period and no refund is due during that period. The FERC ordered refunds to be made in accordance with the November 2019 Order within 30 days, but on December 18, 2019 the FERC granted a request from MISO for an extension until December 23, 2020 for settlement of the refunds. The MISO TOs, including our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries, and several other parties filed requests for rehearing of the November 2019 Order. The MISO TOs filed their request for rehearing primarily on the basis that the methodology applied by the FERC in the November 2019 Order will not allow the MISO TOs to earn a reasonable rate of return on their investment, as required by precedent. On January 21, 2020, the FERC issued an order granting rehearings for further consideration.
In January 2020, certain complainants in the MISO ROE dockets filed an appeal of the September 2016 Order and the November 2019 Order at the D.C. Circuit Court. In February 2020, the same complainants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and on April 21, 2020 the D.C. Circuit Court issued an order dismissing the appeal without prejudice.
Financial Statement Impacts
In the condensed consolidated statements of financial position as of March 31, 2020 and in the consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2019, we had recorded an aggregate current regulatory liability of $69 million and $70 million, respectively, to reflect amounts due to customers under the terms outlined in the November 2019 Order on the Initial Complaint and the period from the date of the September 2016 Order to December 31, 2019. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we refunded $2 million of the regulatory liability to customers. We had recorded an aggregate estimated current regulatory liability in the consolidated statements of financial position of $151 million as of December 31, 2018 for the Second Complaint, which was reversed in November 2019 following the November 2019 Order. Although the November 2019 Order dismissed the Second Complaint with no refunds required, it is possible upon rehearing that our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries will be required to provide refunds related to the Second Complaint and these refunds could be material. It is also possible, upon rehearing of the November 2019 Order, that the outcome may differ materially from the November 2019 Order.
Our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries currently record revenues at the base ROE of 9.88% established in the November 2019 Order plus applicable incentive adders. See Note 5 for a summary of incentive adders for transmission rates.
The recognition of the obligations associated with the MISO ROE Complaints resulted in the following impacts to the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income during each respective period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Interest expense increase
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
Estimated net income reduction
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
As of March 31, 2020, our MISO Regulated Operating Subsidiaries had a total of approximately $5 billion of equity in their collective capital structures for ratemaking purposes. Based on this level of aggregate equity, we estimate that each 10 basis point change in the authorized ROE would impact annual consolidated net income by approximately $5 million.
Development Projects
Development projects may result in payments to developers that are contingent on the projects reaching certain milestones indicating that the projects are financially viable. We believe it is reasonably possible that we will be required to make these contingent development payments up to a maximum amount of $120 million for the period from 2020 through 2023. In the event it becomes probable that we will make these payments, we would recognize the liability and the corresponding intangible asset or expense as appropriate.
14. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported on the condensed consolidated statements of financial position that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
Restricted cash included in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Restricted cash included in other non-current assets primarily represents cash on deposit to pay for vegetation management, land easements and land purchases for the purpose of transmission line construction.
Supplementary Cash Flows Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Supplementary cash flows information:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid (net of interest capitalized)
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
Income tax refunds received
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Supplementary non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment and other long-lived assets (a)
|
88
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
6
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
____________________________
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts consist of current and accrued liabilities for construction, labor, materials and other costs that have not been included in investing activities. These amounts have not been paid for as of March 31, 2020 or 2019, respectively, but will be or have been included as a cash outflow from investing activities for expenditures for property, plant and equipment when paid.
|
15. SEGMENT INFORMATION
We identify reportable segments based on the criteria set forth by the FASB regarding disclosures about segments of an enterprise, including the regulatory environment of our subsidiaries and the business activities performed to earn revenues and incur expenses. The following tables show our financial information by reportable segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES:
|
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Regulated Operating Subsidiaries
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
Intercompany eliminations
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
$
|
322
|
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES:
|
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Regulated Operating Subsidiaries
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
ITC Holdings and other
|
(33
|
)
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
Total Income Before Income Taxes
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
NET INCOME:
|
March 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Regulated Operating Subsidiaries
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
111
|
|
|
ITC Holdings and other
|
92
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
Intercompany eliminations
|
(116
|
)
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
Total Net Income
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS:
|
March 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in millions)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
Regulated Operating Subsidiaries
|
$
|
10,114
|
|
|
$
|
9,946
|
|
|
ITC Holdings and other
|
5,493
|
|
|
5,402
|
|
|
Reconciliations / Intercompany eliminations (a)
|
(5,383
|
)
|
|
(5,290
|
)
|
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
10,224
|
|
|
$
|
10,058
|
|
____________________________
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Reconciliation of total assets results primarily from differences in the netting of deferred tax assets and liabilities in our segments as compared to the classification in our condensed consolidated statements of financial position.
|
