UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
x
|
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended September
30, 2012.
or
|
o
|
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number
QKL STORES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified
in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
75-2180652
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
4 Nanreyuan Street
Dongfeng Road
Sartu District
Daqing, P.R. China 163311
(Address of Principal Executive
Offices including zip code)
011-86-459-4607987
(Registrant’s Telephone Number,
Including Area Code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every, Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company
Large Accelerated Filer
o
|
Accelerated Filer
o
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
x
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act).
Yes
o
No
x
The Registrant had 10,527,637 shares of common
stock outstanding on November 14, 2012.
QKL STORES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1 – Interim Financial Statements
|
|
|
2
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
3
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
3
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
4
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A – Risk Factors
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4 –Mine Safety Disclosures
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5 – Other Information
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6 – Exhibits
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
26
|
|
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
QKL STORES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
27,387,082
|
|
|
$
|
9,037,550
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
117,230
|
|
|
|
115,163
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
45,567,703
|
|
|
|
54,336,501
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
8,990,737
|
|
|
|
11,991,134
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
5,945,518
|
|
|
|
6,085,379
|
|
Advances to suppliers
|
|
|
8,124,527
|
|
|
|
10,160,552
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
2,979,111
|
|
|
|
2,972,570
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
99,112,161
|
|
|
|
94,699,102
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
41,973,123
|
|
|
|
43,042,136
|
|
Land use rights, net
|
|
|
725,192
|
|
|
|
748,410
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
26,567,797
|
|
|
|
26,346,942
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
468,894
|
|
|
|
520,559
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
168,847,167
|
|
|
$
|
165,357,149
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term loans
|
|
$
|
15,787,812
|
|
|
$
|
10,998,162
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
26,508,022
|
|
|
|
28,417,894
|
|
Cash card and coupon liabilities
|
|
|
16,273,617
|
|
|
|
16,024,437
|
|
Customer deposits received
|
|
|
791,673
|
|
|
|
931,604
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
14,005,318
|
|
|
|
14,328,656
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
176,242
|
|
|
|
227,016
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
73,542,684
|
|
|
|
70,927,769
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
73,542,684
|
|
|
|
70,927,769
|
|
Shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share, authorized 100,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 10,527,637 and 10,448,197
shares at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively*
|
|
|
10,527
|
|
|
|
10,448
|
|
Series A convertible preferred stock, par value $0.01, authorized 10,000,000 shares, issued and
outstanding 5,457,960 and 5,694,549 at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
|
|
|
54,580
|
|
|
|
56,945
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
91,828,974
|
|
|
|
91,610,531
|
|
Retained earnings – appropriated
|
|
|
7,282,560
|
|
|
|
7,282,560
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(16,025,611
|
)
|
|
|
(15,758,416
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
12,153,453
|
|
|
|
11,227,312
|
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
95,304,483
|
|
|
|
94,429,380
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
168,847,167
|
|
|
$
|
165,357,149
|
|
*The number of shares of common stock has been retroactively
restated to reflect the Reverse Stock Split effected on June 11, 2012.
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
QKL STORES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Income
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended September
30,
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
84,343,510
|
|
|
$
|
82,068,788
|
|
|
$
|
279,603,670
|
|
|
$
|
266,833,256
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
70,189,152
|
|
|
|
67,874,242
|
|
|
|
231,825,748
|
|
|
|
219,918,263
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
14,154,358
|
|
|
|
14,194,546
|
|
|
|
47,777,922
|
|
|
|
46,914,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
13,330,045
|
|
|
|
13,040,763
|
|
|
|
40,878,831
|
|
|
|
38,327,459
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,074,153
|
|
|
|
2,333,267
|
|
|
|
6,539,428
|
|
|
|
6,483,350
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
15,404,198
|
|
|
|
15,374,030
|
|
|
|
47,418,259
|
|
|
|
44,810,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(1,249,840
|
)
|
|
|
(1,179,484
|
)
|
|
|
359,663
|
|
|
|
2,104,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
111,903
|
|
|
|
175,745
|
|
|
|
216,674
|
|
|
|
629,130
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(295,564
|
)
|
|
|
(10,593
|
)
|
|
|
(691,212
|
)
|
|
|
(41,693
|
)
|
Total non-operating income (expense)
|
|
|
(183,661
|
)
|
|
|
165,152
|
|
|
|
(474,538
|
)
|
|
|
587,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,433,501
|
)
|
|
|
(1,014,332
|
)
|
|
|
(114,875
|
)
|
|
|
2,691,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(326,094
|
)
|
|
|
(164,822
|
)
|
|
|
152,320
|
|
|
|
986,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,107,407
|
)
|
|
$
|
(849,510
|
)
|
|
$
|
(267,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,704,752
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,107,407
|
)
|
|
$
|
(849,510
|
)
|
|
$
|
(267,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,704,752
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(25,012
|
)
|
|
|
1,023,116
|
|
|
|
926,141
|
|
|
|
3,385,552
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(1,132,419
|
)
|
|
$
|
173,606
|
|
|
$
|
658,946
|
|
|
$
|
5,090,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic*
|
|
|
10,527,637
|
|
|
|
10,362,508
|
|
|
|
10,514,746
|
|
|
|
10,071,728
|
|
Diluted*
|
|
|
10,527,637
|
|
|
|
10,362,508
|
|
|
|
10,514,746
|
|
|
|
12,346,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic*
|
|
$
|
(0.105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.082
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.025
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.138
|
|
Diluted*
|
|
$
|
(0.105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.082
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.025
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.138
|
|
* The earnings (losses) per share data and the weighted
average shares outstanding for all periods have been retroactively restated to reflect the 1-for-3 Reverse Stock Split effected
on June 11, 2012.
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
QKL STORES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(267,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,704,752
|
|
Depreciation – property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
4,926,896
|
|
|
|
5,815,703
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
21,672
|
|
|
|
22,519
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
637,786
|
|
|
|
648,474
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
7,866
|
|
|
|
(225,151
|
)
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
6,128
|
|
|
|
153,494
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(562,574
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
9,041,509
|
|
|
|
3,086,917
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
3,319,138
|
|
|
|
18,037,812
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
223,775
|
|
|
|
604,642
|
|
Advances to suppliers
|
|
|
2,087,430
|
|
|
|
(2,500,125
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,049,728
|
)
|
|
|
(3,476,958
|
)
|
Cash card and coupon liabilities
|
|
|
171,689
|
|
|
|
2,975,779
|
|
Customer deposits received
|
|
|
(144,596
|
)
|
|
|
(13,012
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
(490,608
|
)
|
|
|
2,996,074
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(51,928
|
)
|
|
|
(1,904,396
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
17,438,324
|
|
|
|
27,363,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(3,648,874
|
)
|
|
|
(20,686,955
|
)
|
Decrease of restricted cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
69,952
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,648,874
|
)
|
|
|
(20,617,003
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loan borrowing
|
|
|
7,902,077
|
|
|
|
3,074,081
|
|
Bank loan repayment
|
|
|
(3,157,562
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
4,744,515
|
|
|
|
3,074,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(184,433
|
)
|
|
|
701,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
|
18,349,532
|
|
|
|
10,522,055
|
|
Cash – beginning of period
|
|
|
9,037,550
|
|
|
|
17,460,034
|
|
Cash – end of period
|
|
$
|
27,387,082
|
|
|
$
|
27,982,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
691,212
|
|
|
$
|
41,693
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
548,175
|
|
|
$
|
3,024,287
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
QKL STORES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS
QKL Stores Inc. (“Store”) was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on December 2, 1986. The Store currently operates through a wholly owned
subsidiary in the British Virgin Islands: Speedy Brilliant Group Ltd. (“Speedy Brilliant (BVI)”), wholly owned
subsidiary of Speedy Brilliant (BVI) located in Mainland China: Speedy Brilliant (Daqing) Ltd. (“Speedy Brilliant
(Daqing)” or “WFOE”), operating company located in Mainland China: Daqing Qingkelong Chain Commerce
& Trade Co., Ltd. (“Qingkelong Chain”), which the Store controls, through contractual arrangements between
WFOE and Qingkelong Chain, as if Qingkelong Chain were a wholly owned subsidiary of Store, and wholly owned operating
subsidiary of Qingkelong Chain located in Mainland China: Daqing Qinglongxin Commerce & Trade Co., Ltd
(“Qinglongxin Commerce”).
The Store and its subsidiaries (hereinafter, collectively referred
to as the “Company”) are engaged in the operation of retail chain stores in the PRC.
The Company is a regional supermarket chain that currently
operates 31 supermarkets, 16 hypermarkets and 4 department stores in northeastern China and Inner Mongolia. The Company’s
supermarkets and hypermarkets sell a broad selection of merchandise including groceries, fresh food and non-food items. A supermarket
offers various daily necessities on a self-service basis and averages 2,500 square meters in sales area. A hypermarket is similar
to a supermarket but has a larger operating scale, and is typically over 4,500 square meters in sales area. The Company currently
has two distribution centers servicing its supermarkets.
The Company is the first supermarket chain in northeastern
China and Inner Mongolia that is a licensee of the Independent Grocers Alliance, or IGA, a United States-based global grocery
network. As a licensee of IGA, the Company is able to engage in group bargaining with suppliers and have access to more than 2,000
private IGA brands, including many that are exclusive IGA brands.
Principles of Consolidation and Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The condensed consolidated
financial statements include the financial statements of QKL Stores Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
accounts, transactions, and profits have been eliminated upon consolidation.
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements (“Interim Financial Statements”) of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial
information and are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
these Interim Financial Statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
These Interim Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 included in the Company’s Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, the Interim
Financial Statements included herein contain all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary to
present fairly the Company’s financial position, the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The
operating results and cash flows of the interim periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected
for any other interim period or the full year.
QKL STORES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially
differ from those estimates.
Segment Reporting
The Company operates in one industry segment, operating retail
chain stores. ASC 280, Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments.
Given the economic characteristics of the similar nature of the products sold, the type of customer and the method of distribution,
the Company operates as one reportable segment as defined by ASC 280, Segment Reporting.
Revenue Recognition
The Company earns revenue by selling merchandise primarily
through its retail stores. Revenue is recognized when merchandise is purchased by and delivered to the customer and is shown net
of estimated returns during the relevant period. The allowance for sales returns is estimated based upon historical experience.
Cash received from the sale of cash cards (aka “gift
cards”) is recorded as a liability, and revenue is recognized upon the redemption of the cash card or when it is determined
that the likelihood of redemption is remote (“cash card breakage”) and no liability to relevant jurisdictions exists.
The Company determines the cash card breakage rate based upon historical redemption patterns and recognizes cash card breakage
on a straight-line basis over the estimated cash card redemption period. The Company recognized approximately nil in
cash card breakage revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
The Company records sales tax collected from its customers
on a net basis, and therefore excludes it from revenue as defined in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition.
Included in revenue are sales of returned merchandise to vendors
specializing in the resale of defective or used products, which accounted for less than 0.5% of net sales in each of the periods
reported.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes the cost of merchandise, related cost
of packaging and shipping cost, and the distribution center costs.
Selling Expenses
Selling expenses include store-related expense, other than
store occupancy costs, as well as advertising, depreciation and amortization, utilities, labour costs, preliminary expenses and
certain expenses associated with operating the Company’s corporate headquarters.
Advertising Costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense,
net of reimbursement from suppliers, amounted to $102,801 and $160,627 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011,
and amounted to $49,293 and $57,650 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Advertising expense
is included in selling expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company receives co-operative
advertising allowances from vendors in order to subsidize qualifying advertising and similar promotional expenditures made relating
to vendors’ products. These advertising allowances are recognized as a reduction to selling expenses when the Company incurs
the advertising cost eligible for the credit. Co-operative advertising allowances recognized as a reduction to selling expenses
amounted to nil for the nine months and three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
Vendor Allowances
The Company receives allowances for co-operative advertising
and volume purchase rebates earned through programs with certain vendors. The Company records a receivable for these allowances
which are earned but not yet received when it is determined the amounts are probable and reasonably estimable, in accordance with
ASC 605. Amounts relating to the purchase of merchandise are treated as a reduction of inventory cost and reduce cost of goods
sold as the merchandise is sold. Amounts that represent a reimbursement of costs incurred, such as advertising, are recorded as
a reduction in selling and administrative expense. The Company performs detailed analyses to determine the appropriate amount
of vendor allowances to be applied as a reduction of merchandise cost and selling expenses.
Inventories
Inventories primarily consist of merchandise inventories and
are stated at lower of cost or market and net realizable value. Cost of inventories is calculated on the weighted average basis
which approximates cost.
Management regularly reviews inventories and records valuation
reserves for damaged and defective returns, inventories with slow-moving or obsolescence exposure and inventories with carrying
value that exceeds market value. Because of its product mix, the Company has not historically experienced significant occurrences
of obsolescence.
Inventory shrinkage is accrued as a percentage of revenues
based on historical inventory shrinkage trends. The Company performs physical inventory count of its stores once per quarter and
cycle counts inventories at its distribution centers once per quarter throughout the year. The reserve for inventory shrinkage
represents an estimate for inventory shrinkage for each store since the last physical inventory date through the reporting date.
These reserves are estimates, which could vary significantly,
either favorably or unfavorably, from actual results if future economic conditions, consumer demand and competitive environments
differ from expectations.
Income Taxes
The Company follows ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires the
recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included
in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in
future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period
end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates, applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect
taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to
be realized.
The Company adopted ASC 740-10-25 on January 1, 2007, which
provides criteria for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax position. The Company
must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be
sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized
in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood
of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The Company did not recognize any additional liabilities for uncertain tax positions
as a result of the implementation of ASC 740-10-25.
Fair Value Measurements
ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received
from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities required or permitted to be recorded at fair value,
the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which it would transact and it considers assumptions that market
participants would use when pricing the asset or liability.
ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an
entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. A financial
instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant
to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
·
|
Level
1 – Valuations
based on unadjusted
quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
or liabilities that
the Company holds.
An active market
for the asset or
liability is a market
in which transactions
for the asset or
liability occur with
sufficient frequency
and volume to provide
pricing information
on an ongoing
basis.
|
|
·
|
Level
2 – Valuation
based on quoted prices
in markets that are
not active for which
all significant inputs
are observable, either
directly or indirectly.
|
|
·
|
Level
3
–
Valuations
based
on
inputs
that
are
unobservable
and
significant
to
the
overall
fair
value
measurement.
|
The Company adopted ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,
on January 1, 2008 for all financial assets and liabilities and non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized
or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). ASC 820 defines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company
has also adopted ASC 820, on January 1, 2009 for non financial assets and non financial liabilities, as these items are not recognized
at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of ASC 820 for all financial assets and liabilities and non-financial assets
and non-financial liabilities did not have any impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, prepayments
and other receivables, short-term borrowings from banks, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other payables. The carrying
amounts of cash, accounts receivable, prepayments and other receivables, short-term loans, accounts payable and accrued expenses
approximate their fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments. See footnote 7 regarding the fair value of
the Company’s warrants, which are classified as Level 3 liabilities in the fair value hierarchy.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-01, “Receivables
(Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20”, which
temporarily delay the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables (Topic
310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, for public entities. The
delay is intended to allow the FASB time to complete its deliberations on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The effective
date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for public entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes
a troubled debt restructuring will then be coordinated. Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. The deferral in ASU 2011-01 is effective January 19, 2011 (date of issuance).
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “A Creditor’s
Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”, which clarifies when creditors should classify
loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after
June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the year. The guidance on measuring
the impairment of a receivable restructured in a troubled debt restructuring is effective on a prospective basis. A provision in
ASU 2011-02 also ends the FASB’s deferral of the additional disclosures about troubled debt restructurings as required by
ASU 2010-20. The adoption of ASU 2011-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or
results of operations.
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, Consideration of
Effective Control on Repurchase Agreements, which deals with the accounting for repurchase agreements and other agreements that
both entitle and obligate a transferor to repurchase or redeem financial assets before their maturity. ASU 2011-03 changes the
rules for determining when these transactions should be accounted for as financings, as opposed to sales. The guidance in ASU 2011-03
is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively
to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted.
The adoption of ASU 2011-03 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of
operation.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement
(Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial
Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). ASU 2011-04 clarifies some existing concepts, eliminates wording differences between
U.S. GAAP and IFRS, and in some limited cases, changes some principles to achieve convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04
results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between
U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable
(Level 3) inputs. ASU 2011-04 will be effective for the Company beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect
the adoption of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect on its operating results or financial position.
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which requires an entity to
present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either
in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income, or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-05 eliminates
the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. ASU 2011-05 will be effective
for the Company beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2011-05 to have a material effect
on its operating results or financial position. However, it will impact the presentation of comprehensive income.
In September 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2011-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. ASU 2011-08 is intended
to simplify how entities, both public and nonpublic, test goodwill for impairment. ASU 2011-08 permits an entity to first assess
qualitative factors to determine whether it is "more likely than not" that the fair value of a reporting unit is less
than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described
in Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than
50%. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before
September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued
or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for issuance.
In September 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) No. 2011-09, Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Multiemployer Plans (Subtopic 715-80): Disclosures about an Employer’s
Participation in a Multiemployer Plan. ASU 2011-09 is intended to address concerns from various users of financial statements on
the lack of transparency about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer pension plan. Users of financial statements
have requested additional disclosure to increase awareness of the commitments and risks involved with participating in multiemployer
pension plans. The amendments in this ASU will require additional disclosures about an employer’s participation in a multiemployer
pension plan. Previously, disclosures were limited primarily to the historical contributions made to the plans. ASU 2011-09 applies
to nongovernmental entities that participate in multiemployer plans. For public entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods
for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2011. For nonpublic entities, ASU 2011-09 is effective for annual periods for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permissible for both public and nonpublic entities. ASU 2011-09 should
be applied retrospectively for all prior periods presented.
In December 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2011-10, Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification.
ASU No. 2011-10 is intended to resolve the diversity in practice about whether the guidance in Subtopic 360-20, Property, Plant,
and Equipment—Real Estate Sales, applies to a parent that ceases to have a controlling financial interest (as described in
Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall) in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary’s
nonrecourse debt. This Update does not address whether the guidance in Subtopic 360-20 would apply to other circumstances when
a parent ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate. ASU 2011-10 should be
applied on a prospective basis to deconsolidation events occurring after the effective date; with prior periods not adjusted even
if the reporting entity has continuing involvement with previously derecognized in substance real estate entities. For public entities,
ASU 2011-10 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. For nonpublic
entities, ASU 2011-10 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2013, and interim and annual periods thereafter.
Early adoption is permitted.
In December 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. ASU No. 2011-11 is intended
to provide enhanced disclosures that will enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the effect or potential effect of
netting arrangements on an entity’s financial position. This includes the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff
associated with an entity’s recognized assets and recognized liabilities within the scope of this Update. The amendments
require enhanced disclosures by requiring improved information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are
either (1) offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting
arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with either Section 210-20-45 or Section
815-10-45. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and
interim periods within those annual periods. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively
for all comparative periods presented.
In December 2011, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications
of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05. ASU No. 2011-11 is intended
to supersede certain pending paragraphs in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation
of Comprehensive Income, to effectively defer only those changes in Update 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification
adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendments will be temporary to allow the Board time to redeliberate
the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for annual and interim financial
statements for public, private, and non-profit entities. All other requirements in ASU No. 2011-05 are not affected by ASU No.
2011-12, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate
but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within
those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities should begin applying these requirements for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2012, and interim and annual periods thereafter.
In July 2012, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2012-02, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment.
This ASU states that an entity has the option first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events
and circumstances indicates that it is more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired. If, after assessing
the totality of events and circumstances, an entity concludes that it is not more likely than not that the indefinite-lived intangible
asset is impaired, then the entity is not required to take further action. However, if an entity concludes otherwise, then it is
required to determine the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative impairment test by comparing
the fair value with the carrying amount in accordance with Codification Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other,
General Intangibles Other than Goodwill.
Under the guidance in this ASU, an entity also has the option
to bypass the qualitative assessment for any indefinite-lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to performing
the quantitative impairment test. An entity will be able to resume performing the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period.
The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim
impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual
and interim impairment tests performed as of a date before July 27, 2012, if a public entity’s financial statements for the
most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued or, for nonpublic entities, have not yet been made available for
issuance.
In August 2012, the FASB has released Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2012-03, Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 114, Technical Amendments Pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-9250, and Corrections Related to FASB Accounting Standards
Update 2010-22. This ASU amends various SEC paragraphs: (a) pursuant to the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 114; (b)
pursuant to the issuance of the SEC’s Final Rule, Technical Amendments to Commission Rules and Forms Related to the FASB’s
Accounting Standards Codification, Release Nos. 33-9250, 34-65052, and IC-29748 August 8, 2011; and (c) related to ASU No. 2010-22,
Accounting for Various Topics.
The Company has considered all new accounting
pronouncements and has concluded that there are no new pronouncements that may have a material impact on results of operations,
financial condition, or cash flows, based on current information.
NOTE 3 – OTHER RECEIVABLES
Other receivables consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
2012
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
1,471,540
|
|
|
$
|
666,207
|
|
Purchase deposits
|
|
|
2,053,560
|
|
|
|
1,324,056
|
|
Input value added tax receivables
|
|
|
2,878,906
|
|
|
|
7,331,965
|
|
Rebates receivables
|
|
|
2,395,821
|
|
|
|
2,363,854
|
|
Rent deposits
|
|
|
174,249
|
|
|
|
277,841
|
|
Others
|
|
|
16,661
|
|
|
|
27,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,990,737
|
|
|
$
|
11,991,134
|
|
NOTE 4 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Buildings
|
|
$
|
6,861,043
|
|
|
$
|
6,861,043
|
|
Shop equipment
|
|
|
20,958,991
|
|
|
|
19,815,360
|
|
Office equipment
|
|
|
4,122,940
|
|
|
|
4,028,789
|
|
Motor vehicles
|
|
|
1,642,125
|
|
|
|
1,642,125
|
|
Car park
|
|
|
20,237
|
|
|
|
20,237
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
28,066,316
|
|
|
|
27,515,996
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
3,156,642
|
|
|
|
2,087,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
64,828,294
|
|
|
|
61,970,918
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(22,855,171
|
)
|
|
|
(18,928,782
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
41,973,123
|
|
|
$
|
43,042,136
|
|
The
depreciation expenses for the nine months period ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were $4,926,896 and $
5,815,703 respectively.
NOTE 5 – ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER PAYABLES
Accrued expenses and other payables consisted of the following:
|
|
September 30,
2012
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31,
2011
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
7,285,139
|
|
|
$
|
8,184,785
|
|
VAT and other PRC tax payable
|
|
|
865,151
|
|
|
|
1,695,669
|
|
Shop equipment and leasehold improvements payables
|
|
|
3,004,433
|
|
|
|
2,535,486
|
|
Deposit from vendors and employees
|
|
|
2,850,595
|
|
|
|
1,912,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
$
|
14,005,318
|
|
|
$
|
14,328,656
|
|
NOTE 6 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company calculates earnings per share in accordance with
ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires a dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share
are computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the fiscal year. Potentially dilutive common shares
consist of convertible preferred stock (using the if-converted method) and exercisable warrants and stock options outstanding
(using the treasury method). Holder of Class A convertible preferred stock participate in dividends of the Company on the same
basis as holders of the Company’s common stock and is therefore included in the calculation of basic earnings per share
using the two class method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and
diluted net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Net (loss) income to QKL Stores, Inc. for computing basic net income per share
|
|
$
|
(1,107,407
|
)
|
|
$
|
(849,510
|
)
|
|
$
|
(267,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,704,752
|
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
312,914
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to ordinary shareholders for computing basic net (loss) income
per ordinary share
|
|
$
|
(1,107,407
|
)
|
|
$
|
(849,510
|
)
|
|
$
|
(267,195
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,391,838
|
|
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
10,527,637
|
|
|
|
10,362,508
|
|
|
|
10,514,746
|
|
|
|
10,071,728
|
|
Dilutive shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of series A convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
1,819,320
|
|
|
|
1,983,871
|
|
|
|
1,819,320
|
|
|
|
2,274,652
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock warrants and options
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Anti-dilutive effect of preferred stock
|
|
|
(1,819,320
|
)
|
|
|
(1,983,871
|
)
|
|
|
(1,819,320
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
10,527,637
|
|
|
|
10,362,508
|
|
|
|
10,514,746
|
|
|
|
12,346,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(0.105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.082
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.025
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.138
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
(0.105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.082
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.025
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.138
|
|
The 11,768,860 shares of stock warrants and 2,033,000 options
were not included in the computation of diluted net earnings per share as their effects would have been anti-dilutive since the
average share price for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were lower than the options and warrants exercise price.
NOTE 7 – STOCK WARRANTS
Series A and Series B Stock Warrants
As a result of a completed sale of 9,117,647 units for cash
proceeds of $15,500,000 on March 28, 2008, the Company issued Series A stock warrants to purchase 1,940,885 shares of the Company’s
common stock and Series B stock warrants to purchase 1,933,637 shares of the Company’s common stock which can be converted
on a one-for-one basis into shares of the Company’s common stock. The stock warrants have a five year life and the Series
A warrants are exercisable at an equivalent price of $10.20 per share and the Series B are exercisable at an equivalent price
of $12.75 per share. These stock warrants will expire on March 28, 2013 pursuant to the warrant agreements.
The Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to
determine the fair value of the Series A and B stock warrants on March 28, 2008 (assumptions used – expected life of 5 years,
volatility of 89%, risk free interest rate of 2.51%, and expected dividend yield of 0%).
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions
of FASB ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”) (previously EITF 07-5, “Determining
Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock”). As a result of adopting ASC
815, warrants to purchase 3,874,522 of the Company’s common stock previously treated as equity pursuant to the derivative
treatment exemption were no longer afforded equity treatment as there was a down-round protection (full-ratchet down round protection). As
a result, the warrants were not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock, and as such, all future changes in the fair
value of these warrants were recognized in earnings until such time as the warrants are exercised or expire. The Company
reclassified the fair value of these warrants from equity to liability, as if these warrants were treated as a derivative liability.
On January 1, 2009, the Company recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment of decreasing additional paid-in capital of $6,020,000
and beginning retained earnings of $2,792,017 and $8,812,017 to warrant liabilities to recognize the fair value of such warrants.
The fair value of the warrants was $44,304,034 on December 31, 2009. The Company recognized $35,492,017 loss from the change in
fair value of warrants for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The Company amended Series A and Series B stock warrant agreements
deleting the down-round protection (full-ratchet down round protection) provision on March 24, 2010. As a result of this amendment,
the Company is no longer required to treat Series A and Series B warrants as a liability and was reclassified to equity as of
March 24, 2010 (assumption used – expected life of 3 years, volatility of 57%, and risk free interest rate of 1.67%, and
expected dividend yield of 0%). Based on the revaluation, the Company recognized $7,801,649 of income related to this
transaction and reclassified $36,502,385 to equity for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Warrant C
On January 22, 2010, the Company issued a warrant (“Warrant
C”) to a non-related individual in exchange for consulting services relating to operational and managerial experience. Warrant
C can be converted into 66,666 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $15.00 per share. Warrants C
has a five year term and became exercisable 180 days from the date of issuance of Warrant C.
The Company recognized share-based compensation cost based
on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with ASC 505-50 “equity based payments to non-employees”. The
fair value of these stock warrants on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes method (assumption used –
expected life of 2.75 years, volatility of 54%, and risk free interest rate of 1.25%, and expected dividend yield of 0%). The
Company recognized $558,180 of compensation expense related to this transaction in the first quarter of 2010.
A summary of the Company’s stock warrant activities are
as follows:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
|
|
Balance – December 31, 2011
|
|
|
3,922,953
|
|
|
$
|
11.52
|
|
|
|
1.27
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance – September 30, 2012
|
|
|
3,922,953
|
|
|
$
|
11.52
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
NOTE 8 – SHARED BASED COMPENSATION
Under the 2009 Omnibus Securities and Incentive Plan, on September
14, 2009, the Company entered into stock option agreements with its three independent directors, granting each director options
to purchase 6,666 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $24.00 per share. The options
vest in approximately equal amounts on the three subsequent anniversary dates of the grant and expire on the fifth anniversary
of the date of agreement of or the date the option is fully exercised. On January 30, 2010, the Company entered into amendment
agreements with its three directors to correct the exercise price to $22.50, which was the fair market value on the date of the
grant. The correction of this error was considered immaterial.
Under the 2009 Omnibus Securities and Incentive Plan, on June
26, 2010, the Company granted the its Chief Operating Officer, Alan Stewart and 20 employees options to acquire 690,000 shares
of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $13.20 per share. The options vest in approximately equal amounts
on the four subsequent anniversary dates of the grant and expire on the eighth anniversary of the date of agreement of or the
date the option is fully exercised. On June 17, 2011, Mr. Alan Stewart resigned from his position as Chief Operating Officer of
QKL Stores Inc. On April 20, 2012, Mr. Zhiguo Jin resigned as the board of directors of the Company. These have no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Under the 2009 Omnibus Securities and Incentive Plan, on December
2, 2010, the Company granted its Chief Financial Officer, Tsz-Kit Chan options to acquire 33,333 shares of the Company's common
stock at an exercise price of $10.26 per share. The options vest in approximately equal amounts on the four subsequent
anniversary dates of the grant and expire on the eighth anniversary of the date of agreement of or the date the option is fully
exercised.
The Company accounts for its share-based compensation in accordance
with ASC 718 and recognizes compensation expense using the fair-value method on a straight-line basis over the requisite service
period for share option awards and non-vested share awards granted which vested during the period. The fair value for
these awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of grant with the following assumptions:
|
|
September 14,
2009
|
|
|
June 26,
2010
|
|
|
December 2,
2010
|
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
41.2
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
44.9
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.69
|
%
|
|
|
1.49
|
%
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility
of the Company’s common stock. The observation is made on a weekly basis. The observation period covered
is consistent with the expected life of the options. The expected life of stock options is based on the minimum vesting
period required. The risk-free rate is consistent with the expected terms of the stock options and is based on the
United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Stock-based compensation expenses recognized was $212,595 and
$637,786 for the three months and the nine months ended September 30, 2012. A summary of the Company’s stock options activities
under the 2009 Omnibus Securities and Incentive Plan are as follows:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual
Term(Years)
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding – December 31, 2011
|
|
|
677,666
|
|
|
$
|
13.32
|
|
|
|
2.52
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding– September 30, 2012
|
|
|
677,666
|
|
|
$
|
13.32
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Exercisable – September 30, 2012
|
|
|
138,200
|
|
|
$
|
13.05
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
As of September 30, 2012, there was $1,437,020 of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested share option awards granted. Such cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2-3 years.
NOTE 9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
Certain of our real properties and equipment are operated under
lease agreements. Rental expense under operating leases was as follows:
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September
30
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September
30
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Rent expense
|
|
$
|
2,599,389
|
|
|
$
|
2,541,478
|
|
|
$
|
7,988,871
|
|
|
$
|
6,676,825
|
|
Less: Sublease income
|
|
|
(570,921
|
)
|
|
|
(336,245
|
)
|
|
|
(1,711,733
|
)
|
|
|
(1,239,235
|
)
|
Total rent expense, net
|
|
$
|
2,028,468
|
|
|
$
|
2,205,233
|
|
|
$
|
6,277,138
|
|
|
$
|
5,437,590
|
|
Annual minimum payments under operating leases are as follows:
As of September 30,
|
|
Minimum Lease
Payment
|
|
|
Sublease
Income
|
|
|
Net Minimum
Lease Payment
|
|
2013
|
|
$
|
8,082,917
|
|
|
$
|
542,750
|
|
|
$
|
7,540,167
|
|
2014
|
|
|
8,034,453
|
|
|
|
23,354
|
|
|
|
8,011,099
|
|
2015
|
|
|
7,988,609
|
|
|
|
13,244
|
|
|
|
7,975,365
|
|
2016
|
|
|
7,871,981
|
|
|
|
8,037
|
|
|
|
7,863,944
|
|
2017
|
|
|
7,482,645
|
|
|
|
1,392
|
|
|
|
7,481,253
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
67,931,207
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
67,931,207
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
107,391,812
|
|
|
$
|
588,777
|
|
|
$
|
106,803,035
|
|
NOTE 10 – AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
On June 11, 2012, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment
to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended to date, with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
to effect a one-for-three reverse stock split (the “Reverse Stock Split”) of the issued and outstanding common stock
of the Company, so that every three (3) outstanding shares of common stock before the Reverse Stock Split represents one (1) share
of common stock after the Reverse Stock Split. The Reverse Stock Split became effective on and as of June 11, 2012. The Reverse
Stock Split was duly approved by the Board of Directors of the Company and the Company’s shareholders entitled to vote a
majority of the shares of common stock pursuant to Delaware General Corporation Law.
As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, the number of outstanding
shares of common stock of the Company was reduced to 10,527,637 shares. Fractional stockholdings were rounded up to the nearest
whole number. Each shareholder's percentage ownership interest in the Company and proportional voting power remains unchanged
after the Reverse Stock Split except for minor changes and adjustments resulting from rounding of fractional interests. The rights
and privileges of the holders of common stock are substantially unaffected by the Reverse Stock Split.
All common stock based data in our consolidated financial statements
and the accompanying notes has been retroactively restated to reflect this Reverse Stock Split.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis of the QKL Stores Inc.
and subsidiaries (“we”, “our”, “us”) financial condition and results of operations includes
information with respect to our plans and strategies for our business and should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes (“Interim Financial Statements”) included herein and
our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations contained in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
Overview
We are a regional supermarket chain that currently operates
31 supermarkets, 16 hypermarkets and 4 department stores in northeastern China and Inner Mongolia. The Company’s supermarkets
and hypermarkets sell a broad selection of merchandise including groceries, fresh food and non-food items. A supermarket offers
various daily necessities on a self-service basis and averages 2,500 square meters in sales area. A hypermarket is similar to
a supermarket but has a larger operating scale, and is typically over 4,500 square meters in sales area. We currently have two
distribution centers servicing our supermarkets.
We are the first supermarket chain in northeastern China and
Inner Mongolia that is a licensee of the Independent Grocers Alliance, or IGA, a United States-based global grocery network. As
a licensee of IGA, the Company is able to engage in group bargaining with suppliers and have access to more than 2,000 private
IGA brands, including many that are exclusive IGA brands.
Our expansion strategy emphasizes growth through geographic
expansion in northeastern China and Inner Mongolia, where we believe local populations can support profitable supermarket operations,
and where we believe competition from large foreign and national supermarket chains, which generally have resources far greater
than ours, is limited. Our strategies for profitable operations include buy-side initiatives to reduce supply costs;
focusing on merchandise with higher margins, such as foods we prepare ourselves and private label merchandise; and increasing
reliance on the benefits of membership in the international trade group IGA.
We completed the initial steps in the execution of our expansion
plan in March 2008, when we raised financing through the combination of our reverse merger and private placement and also raised
additional financing in our public offering in the fourth quarter of 2009. Under our expansion plan, we opened:
|
•
|
ten new stores in 2008 that have in the aggregate approximately
42,000 square meters of space
|
|
•
|
seven new stores in 2009 that have, in the aggregate, approximately 32,000 square
meters of space
|
|
•
|
nine new stores in 2010 that have in the aggregate approximately 74,189 square
meters of space
|
|
•
|
fourteen new stores in the 2011 that have in the aggregate approximately 101,000
square meters of space
|
|
•
|
one new store in the first nine months of 2012 that have in the aggregate approximately
5,700 square meters of space
|
In 2012, we plan to open 2 hypermarkets, supermarkets and department stores having, in the aggregate,
approximately 15,000 square meters of space. In the first quarter of 2012, we closed 1 store due to the expiration of the lease
contract. In the third quarter of 2012, we closed 1 store due to the expiration of the lease contract and 2 stores due to underperformance.
We are making improvements to our logistics and information systems to support our supermarkets. We expect to finance our expansion
plan from funds generated from operations and bank loans.
Our Operations in China
Our headquarters and all of our stores are located in the provinces
of northeastern China and Inner Mongolia. The economy of this area has grown rapidly over the last four to five years and we believe
that the national government is committed to enhancing economic growth in the region. In December 2003, a major economic-development
plan for northeastern China, the “Plan for Revitalizing Northeast China,” was announced by an office of the national
government’s State Council.
Based on our own research, we believe there are approximately
200 to 300 small and medium-sized cities in northeast China without modern supermarket chains. We believe the number of supermarket
customers and the demand for supermarkets in these cities are likely to grow significantly over the next several years as the
region continues to experience urbanization.
Our Strategy for Growth and Profitability
Our strategic plan includes the following principal components: expanding
by opening stores in new strategic locations, and improving profitability by decreasing the cost through resource purchase, setting
up distribution centers and increasing the percentage of our sales attributable to private label merchandise, membership sales
and buying card sales.
Expanded Operations
As of September 30, 2012, we operated 31 supermarkets, 16 hypermarkets,
4 department stores, and 2 distribution centers in Harbin and Shenyang. In 2012, we plan to open 2 hypermarkets, supermarkets
and department stores having, in the aggregate, approximately 15,000 square meters of space. We closed 2 stores due to the expiration
of the lease contract and 2 stores due to underperformance. We are also making improvements to our logistics and information systems
to support our supermarkets. We expect to finance our expansion plan from funds generated from operations and bank loans. Based
on our previous experience, we believe it takes nine to twelve months for a new store to achieve profitability.
Private Label Merchandise
Some of the merchandise we sell is made to our specifications
by manufacturers using the QKL brand name. We refer to such merchandise as “private label” merchandise. With
private label merchandise, we entrust the manufacturer to make the product and to select the name and design. Under
our agreements with the private label manufacturer, the private label manufacturers cannot sell the product to any other party.
Sales of private label merchandise accounted for approximately 6.0% and 5.6% of our total revenues for the nine months ended September
30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In June 2008, we established a specialized department for designing and purchasing private label
merchandise, in which 7 full-time employees currently work. Our goal is to increase private label sales to 20% of our
total revenues.
Principal Factors Affecting Our Results
The following factors have had, and we expect they will continue
to have, a significant effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Seasonality
– Our business is subject to
seasonality, with increased sales in the first quarter and fourth quarter, due to increases in shopping and consumer activity
as a result of the holidays such as New Year (January 1), Chinese Lunar New Year (January or February), the Dragon Festival (February
2), Women’s Day (March 8), the Back to School Day (March 1), National Day (October 1), Mid-Autumn Festival (September
or October) and Christmas (December 25).
Timing of New Store Openings
– Growth through
new store openings is a fundamental part of our strategy. Our new stores typically operate at a loss for approximately three months
due to start-up inventory and other costs, promotional discounts and other marketing costs and strategies associated with new
store openings, rental expenses and costs related to hiring and training new employees. Our operating results, and
in particular our gross margin, have and will continue to vary based in part on the pace of our new store openings.
Locations for New Store
– Good commercial
space that meets our standards, in locations that meet our needs, may be scarce in some of the cities we wish to enter. One option
for entering certain target markets within our intended timeframe may be to begin operations in a location that is not optimal
and wait for an opportunity to move to a better location. Alternatively, we may seek to enter into a target market through acquisitions.
As such, the timing and costs associated with entry into new markets can be difficult to predict. Identifying and pursuing
opportunities will be a resource-intensive challenge, and if we do not perform or if actual costs of entering new markets exceed
our expectations, our total revenues, cash flows, and liquidity could suffer.
Logistics of Geographic Expansion
–Opening
additional stores in cities further from our headquarters in Daqing will mean that the transportation of our supplies and personnel
among our stores will become more difficult and subject to disruption. To alleviate this, we have opened a new distribution center
in Shenyang in November 2011. We started using our regional purchasing systems in 2008. All fresh food is ordered by individual
stores based on their needs from local vendors designated by our headquarters or regional purchasing department and is delivered
directly by the local vendors to individual stores. A portion of our non-perishable food and non-food items are distributed from
our distribution center to our different stores, and the remaining portion is purchased by our regional purchasing department
or headquarters and delivered directly to individual stores. Long-distance transportation for both food and non-food items from
our distribution center to our stores can be challenging in the winter as the roads can be covered with snow. As we expand in
territories further from our existing or planned distribution facilities, the costs of delivering food and merchandise may become
less predictable and more volatile.
Human Resources
– In our experience, it
takes approximately three months to train new employees to operate a new store. Training and supervision is organized by experienced
teachers in our training school. The management team for a new store is hired first and is trained in our training school, where
they learn our culture and operations. Employees are hired afterwards, and are trained by both our teachers and the management
team. In addition, the management team and the employees are sent to existing stores to get practical training from the employees
and management team members in those stores. Eventually, local employees must learn to perform the training and supervisory roles
themselves. If we do not perform well in response to these challenges, our operating costs will rise and our margins will fall.
Shortages of Trained Staff in Our New Locations
– Opening stores in locations with little or no competition from other large supermarkets is a major part of our strategy.
However, there are disadvantages to this approach, which relate to human resources. Where competitors operate supermarkets nearby,
their trained staff is a potential source for our own human resources needs, especially if we offer a superior compensation package.
Cities that have no large supermarkets also have no sources of trained employees. Although we believe we have a good training
school, from time to time we have to send experienced management team members from our headquarters or other stores to new stores
to provide assistance. This increases our cost of operating and decreases our gross margin.
Critical Accounting Estimates
As discussed in Part II, Item 7, Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2011, we consider our estimates on revenue recognition, vendor allowances, and inventory valuation to be the most critical
in understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing our consolidated financial statements. There have been no significant
changes to these estimates in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
Recently Issued Accounting Guidance
See Note 2 to condensed consolidated financial statements included
in Item 1, Financial Information, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Results of Operations
Three months ended September 30, 2012 compared with three
months ended September 30, 2011.
The following table sets forth selected items from our condensed
consolidated statements of income by dollar and as a percentage of our net sales for the periods indicated:
|
|
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
September 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of
Net Sales
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of
Net Sales
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
84,343,510
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
82,068,788
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
70,189,152
|
|
|
|
83.2
|
|
|
|
67,874,242
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
14,154,358
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
14,194,546
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
13,330,045
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
13,040,763
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
2,074,153
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2,333,267
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(1,249,840
|
)
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
(1,179,484
|
)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
111,903
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
175,745
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(295,564
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(10,593
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,433,501
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
(1,014,332
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(326,094
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(164,822
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(1,107,407
|
)
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
(849,510
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
Net Sales
– Net sales increased by $2.2
million, or 2.8%, to $84.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 from $82.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2011. The change in net sales was primarily attributable to the following:
|
•
|
Same store sales represents sales from stores that were opened for at least one
year before the beginning of the comparison period, or by July 1, 2011. Same store (47 stores) sales generated approximately
$78.1 million sales in the third quarter of 2012, an increase of $2.7 million, or 3.6% compared with $75.4 million net sales
in the third quarter of 2011.
|
|
•
|
New store sales increased, reflecting the net opening of 4 new stores since July
1, 2011. The new stores generated approximately $4.1 million sales in the third quarter of 2012.
|
|
•
|
The number of stores including supermarkets/hypermarkets and department stores
at September 30, 2012 was 51 versus 53 at September 30, 2011.
|
Cost of Sales –
Our cost of sales for the
three months ended September 30, 2012 was approximately $70.2 million, representing an increase of $2.3 million, or 3.4%, from
approximately $67.9 million for the same period in 2011. The increase was due to the increase in volume of sales. Our cost of
sales primarily consists of the cost for our merchandise; it also includes costs related to packaging and shipping and the distribution
center costs.
Gross Profit
– Gross profit, or total revenue
minus cost of sales, decreased by $0.04 million, or 0.3%, to $14.15 million, or 16.8% of net sales, in the third quarter of 2012
from $14.19 million, or 17.3% of net sales, in the third quarter of 2011. The decrease in gross margin was primarily attributable
to the increase in competition in Daqing area.
We believe that our gross margin is likely to be between 16.8%
and 17.3% over the next few business quarters. New stores tend to be less profitable during their early months of operation. In
addition, China’s retail industry in general, and its supermarket industry in particular, are becoming more competitive
every year. In this competitive marketplace, it is likely that we will focus on providing our customers with low prices in order
to increase our market share and long-term sales volume.
Selling Expenses
– Selling expenses increased
by $0.3 million, or 2.2%, to $13.3 million, or 15.8% of net sales, in the third quarter of 2012 from $13.0 million, or 15.9% of
net sales, in the third quarter of 2011. The change in selling expense was mainly due to increase in labor costs resulting from
an increase in the number of store employees and pay increases.
General and Administrative Expense
–General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.2 million, or 11.1%, to $2.1 million, or 2.5% of net sales, in the
third quarter of 2012 from $2.3 million, or 2.8% of net sales, in the third quarter of 2011. The decrease was mainly due to
our control on our headquarter’s expenses.
Income Taxes
– The provision for income
taxes was $(0.3) million for third quarter of 2012 compared with $(0.2) million for third quarter of 2011.
Net Income
– For the three months
ended September 30, 2012, our net loss was $1.1 million, or $(0.105) per diluted share, compared to $0.8 million, or
($0.082) per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2011.
Nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared with nine
months ended September 30, 2011
The following table sets forth selected items from our condensed
consolidated statements of income by dollar and as a percentage of our net sales for the periods indicated:
|
|
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months
Ended
September
30,
2012
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months
Ended
September
30,
2011
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of
Net Sales
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of
Net Sales
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$
|
279,603,670
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
266,833,256
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
231,825,748
|
|
|
|
82.9
|
|
|
|
219,918,263
|
|
|
|
82.4
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47,777,922
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
46,914,993
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
40,878,831
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
38,327,459
|
|
|
|
14.4
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,539,428
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
6,483,350
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
359,663
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2,104,184
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
216,674
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
629,131
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(691,212
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(41,693
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(114,875
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2,691,621
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
152,320
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
986,869
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(267,195
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,704,752
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Net Sales
– Net sales increased by $12.8
million, or 4.8%, to $279.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 from $266.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2011. The change in net sales was primarily attributable to the following:
|
•
|
Same store sales represents sales from stores that were opened for at least one
year before the beginning of the comparison period, or by January 1, 2011. Same store (36 stores) sales generated approximately
$224.7 million sales in the first nine months of 2012, an increase of $8.7 million, or 4.1% compared with $216.0 million net
sales in the first nine months of 2011.
|
|
•
|
New store sales increased, reflecting the net opening of 15 new stores since
January 1, 2011. The new stores generated approximately $42.4 million sales in the first nine months of 2012.
|
|
•
|
The number of stores including supermarket/hypermarket and department stores
at September 30, 2012 was 51 versus 53 at September 30, 2011.
|
Cost of Sales –
Our cost of sales for the
nine months ended September 30, 2012 was approximately $231.8 million, representing an increase of $11.9 million, or 5.4%, from
approximately $219.9 million for the same period in 2011. The increase was due to the increase in volume of sales. Our cost of
sales primarily consists of the cost for our merchandise; it also includes costs related to packaging and shipping and the distribution
center costs.
Gross Profit
– Gross profit, or total
revenue minus cost of sales, increased by $0.9 million, or 1.8%, to $47.8 million, or 17.1% of net sales, in the first nine
months of 2012 from $46.9 million, or 17.6% of net sales, in the first nine months of 2011. The decrease in gross margin
was primarily attributable to the increase in competition in Daqing area.
Selling Expenses
– Selling
expenses increased by $2.6 million, or 6.7%, to $40.9 million, or 14.6% of net sales, in the first nine months of 2012 from
$38.3 million or 14.4% of net sales in the first nine months of 2011. The change in selling expense was mainly due to
an increase in labor costs resulting from an increase in the number of store employees and pay increases.
General and Administrative Expense
– General
and administrative expenses increased by $0.06 million, or 0.9%, to $6.54 million, or 2.3% of net sales, in the first nine months
of 2012 from $6.48 million, or 2.4% of net sales, in the first nine months of 2011. There was no material change in the expenses.
.
Income Taxes
– The provision for income
taxes was $0.2 million for first nine months of 2012, compared with $1.0 million for first nine months of 2011. The decrease was
primarily due to lower taxable income.
Net Income
– Net loss
for the first nine months of 2012 was $0.3 million, or $(0.025) per diluted share, from net income of $1.7 million, or $0.138
per diluted share, in the prior year period. This decrease was due to lower gross margin, higher selling expenses and higher
staff costs in the first nine months of 2012. The number of shares used in the computation of diluted EPS decreased by 14.6%
to 10.5 million shares from 12.3 million shares for the same period during 2011 because of the anti-dilutive effect
of preferred stock in 2012.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal liquidity requirements are for working capital
and capital expenditures. We fund our liquidity requirements primarily through cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings
from our revolving credit facility. We believe our cash on hand, future funds from operations and borrowings from our revolving
credit facility will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. There is no assurance, however,
that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow or that we will be able to maintain our ability to borrow under our revolving
credit facility.
At September 30, 2012, we had $27.4 million of cash compared
to $28.0 million at September 30, 2011. The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:
|
|
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
17,438,324
|
|
|
$
|
27,363,950
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(3,648,874
|
)
|
|
|
(20,617,003
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
4,744,515
|
|
|
|
3,074,081
|
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(184,433
|
)
|
|
|
701,027
|
|
Net increase in cash
|
|
$
|
18,349,532
|
|
|
$
|
10,522,055
|
|
Seasonality
The seasonality of our business historically provides greater
cash flow from operations during the holiday and winter selling season, with the fourth quarter net sales traditionally generating
the strongest profits of each year. Typically, we use operating cash flow and borrowings under our revolving credit facility to
fund inventory increases in anticipation of the holidays and our inventory levels are at their highest in the months leading up
to Chinese Spring Festival. As holiday sales significantly reduce inventory levels, this reduction, combined with net income,
historically provides us with strong cash flow from operations at the end of each year.
Operating Activities
–Net cash provided
by operating activities for the nine month ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $17.4 million and $27.4 million, respectively.
The decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the nine month ended September 30, 2012 compared to the same period
in 2011 primarily reflects net cash inflow caused by a decrease of inventories and other receivables. The decrease of inventories
was caused by reducing the inventory after the peak Chinese New Year season. The decrease of other receivables is largely attributable
to the recovery of money from vendors.
Investing Activities
– Net cash used in
investing activities for the first nine months of 2012 was $3.6 million and net cash used in investing activities for the first
nine months of 2011 was $20.6 million. Capital expenditures represented substantially all of the net cash used in investing activities
for each period. Capital expenditures were higher in the first nine months of 2011 due to substantially more new store openings.
Our capital spending is primarily for new store openings and store-related remodeling.
Financing Activities
– Net cash provided
by financing activities for the first nine months of 2012 and 2011 were $4.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively which were
generated from short-term bank loans.
Loan Facility –
On July 6, 2011, QKL
Chain entered into a working capital agreement with Longjiang Commercial Bank. Under this agreement, QKL Chain has a credit line
up to approximately $7.7 million (RMB50.0 million). The term of any loan under the agreement is one year after the date the loan
is issued, with the annual interest rate of 6.941%. The loan under this financing agreement is secured by buildings with appraisal
value of approximately $11.9 million (RMB 77.0 million).
On July 6, 2011, Qinglongxin Commerce also entered into a working
capital agreement with Longjiang Commercial Bank. Under this agreement, Qinglongxin Commerce has a credit line up to approximately
$7.7 million (RMB50.0 million). The term of any loan under the agreement is one year after the date the loan is issued, with the
annual interest rate of 6.941%. The loan under this financing agreement is guaranteed by QKL Chain.
Future Capital Requirements
– We had cash
on hand of $27.4 million as of September 30, 2012. We expect capital expenditures for the remainder of 2012 primarily to fund
the opening of new stores, store-related remodeling and relocation.
We believe we will be able to fund our cash requirements, for
at least the next 12 months from cash on hand, operating cash flows and borrowings from our revolving credit facility. However,
our ability to satisfy our cash requirements depends upon our future performance, which in turn is subject to general economic
conditions and regional risks, and to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, including factors beyond
our control. There is no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow or that we will be able to maintain our
ability to borrow under our credit facility.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations
to meet our obligations and commitments, we will be required to refinance or restructure our indebtedness or raise additional
debt or equity capital. Additionally, we may be required to sell material assets or operations, suspend or further reduce dividend
payments or delay or forego expansion opportunities. We might not be able to implement successful alternative strategies on satisfactory
terms, if at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
– Our material off-balance sheet arrangements are operating lease obligations. We excluded these items from the
balance sheet in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”).
Operating lease commitments consist principally of leases for our retail store facilities and distribution center. These leases
frequently include options which permit us to extend the terms beyond the initial fixed lease term. With respect to most of those
leases, we intend to renegotiate those leases as they expire.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into arrangements
with vendors to purchase merchandise in advance of expected delivery. Because most of these purchase orders do not contain any
termination payments or other penalties if cancelled, they are not included as outstanding contractual obligations.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk
Pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.305(e)),
the Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item as it is a “smaller reporting company,”
as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1).
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
–We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules13a15(e) and 15d15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based
on such evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of September 30, 2012, our disclosure controls and procedures are not
effective, at a reasonable assurance level, in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis,
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and are not effective
in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
In particular, we did not maintain effective controls over
the financial reporting process due to an insufficient complement of personnel with a level of accounting knowledge, experience
and training in the application of U.S. GAAP commensurate with the Company’s financial requirements. Also, there is an insufficient
quantity of dedicated resources and experienced personnel involved in the general controls over information technology on our
new ERP system implementation. The lack of sufficient and adequately trained personnel resulted in ineffective top level review,
which in turn may affect the timeliness of our periodic financial reporting.
The conclusion that our internal control over financial reporting
was not effective was based on material weaknesses we identified in relation to our financial closing process.
Remediation Measures for Material Weaknesses
–
We have begun to take steps to remediate the material weaknesses described above in “Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures” and plan to implement the new measures described below in our ongoing efforts to address the internal
control deficiencies described above. We plan to further develop policies and procedures governing the hiring and training of
personnel to better ensure sufficient personnel with the requisite knowledge, experience and training in the application of
U.S. GAAP commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. We plan to utilize qualified internal control
consultants and supervisors to ensure that our staff has adequate professional knowledge and to monitor the need for
additional or better qualified staff. In addition, we plan to utilize appropriate training programs on accounting principles
and procedures to better ensure the adequacy of our accounting and finance personnel. We plan to continue to develop our
corporate culture toward emphasizing the importance of internal controls and to ensure that all personnel involved in
maintaining proper internal controls recognize the importance of strictly adhering to
U.S. GAAP. We plan to continue to provide additional training to the Company’s internal audit staff on
appropriate controls and procedures necessary to document and evaluate our internal control procedures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
–
During the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2012, no changes occurred with respect to our internal control over
financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal controls over financial
reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
As a smaller reporting company, the Company is not required
to make disclosures under this Item 1A.
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
(a) Exhibits
31.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 - Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101 - The following financial statements from QKL Stores Inc.’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income; (iii) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (iv) the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in detail.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
|
QKL STORES INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: November 14, 2012
|
By:
|
/s/ Zhuangyi Wang
|
|
|
|
Zhuangyi Wang
|
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Tsz-Kit Chan
|
|
|
|
Tsz-Kit Chan
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
QKL Stores (CE) (USOTC:QKLS)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Oct 2024 à Nov 2024
QKL Stores (CE) (USOTC:QKLS)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Nov 2023 à Nov 2024