As previously disclosed, on November 6, 2024, Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., a Maryland corporation (the Company), Retail
Opportunity Investments Partnership, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the Partnership), Montana Purchaser LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Buyer 1), Mountain Purchaser LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (Buyer 2), Big Sky Purchaser LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Buyer 3 and, together with Buyer 1 and Buyer 2, collectively, Parent), Montana Merger Sub Inc., a
Maryland corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (Merger Sub I), and Montana Merger Sub II LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merger Sub I (Merger Sub II and,
together with Merger Sub I and Parent, the Parent Parties), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) pursuant to which, among other things, (i) Merger Sub II will merge with and
into the Partnership, with the Partnership being the surviving limited partnership and a subsidiary of the Company (the Partnership Merger), and (ii) immediately following the consummation of the Partnership Merger, Merger
Sub I will merge with and into the Company, with the Company surviving such merger as the surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (the Company Merger and together with the Partnership Merger, the
Mergers). Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions in the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Company Merger (the Company Merger Effective Time), each share of common stock, $0.0001 par
value per share, of the Company (Company Common Stock) that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Company Merger Effective Time will be automatically cancelled and extinguished and automatically converted into the
right to receive an amount in cash equal to $17.50 per share (the Common Stock Merger Consideration). Notwithstanding the foregoing, each share of Company Common Stock held immediately prior to the Company Merger Effective Time by
the Company, the Partnership, and each of their respective subsidiaries, or by Parent, Merger Sub I or Merger Sub II, if any, will automatically be cancelled and retired without any conversion thereof and will cease to exist, and no payment will be
made in respect thereof nor will any right inure or be made with respect thereto in connection with or as a consequence of the Company Merger.
In
connection with the Mergers, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) a definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-33749) (the
Proxy Statement). The Proxy Statement was first mailed to the Companys stockholders on or about January 7, 2024.
SUPPLEMENT TO PROXY STATEMENT
As of
January 30, 2025, the Company has received 14 demand letters from law firms claiming to represent purported stockholders of the Company, which challenge the adequacy of certain disclosures made in the Proxy Statement (the Demand
Letters). The Company cannot predict whether any such demands will result in litigation or whether additional demands may materialize. If additional similar demands are received, absent new or materially different allegations, the Company
does not intend to disclose them.
Furthermore, purported stockholders of the Company have filed to date three complaints relating to the Mergers
consisting of (i) a complaint, dated January 21, 2025, filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, captioned Robert Garfield v. Richard Baker, et al., (ii) a complaint, dated January 22, 2025, filed in the
Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, captioned John Burke v. Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., et al., and (iii) a complaint, dated January 23, 2025, filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York,
County of New York, captioned James Jones v. Retail Opportunity Investments Corp., et al. ((i) through (iii) being collectively referred to as the Complaints). The plaintiffs allege, among other things, that in
approving the Mergers, our directors breached their fiduciary duties under Maryland law, and that the Proxy Statement omitted material information concerning the Mergers rendering the Proxy Statement materially incomplete and misleading in violation
of applicable laws. The Complaints seek, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the Mergers, rescission of the Mergers if consummated or damages, and an award of plaintiffs expenses and attorneys fees. The
Company believes that the Complaints lack merit and intends to vigorously defend against these actions.
The Company denies that it has violated any laws
or breached any duties to the Companys stockholders, denies all allegations in the Demand Letters and believes that no supplemental disclosure to the Proxy Statement was or is required under any applicable law, rule or regulation. However,
solely to eliminate the burden and expense of actual and potential litigation, to moot certain of the claims made in the Demand Letters and the Complaints, to avoid nuisance and the potential delay or disruption to the Mergers, and to provide
additional information to the