UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED
SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-09157
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Deidre E.
Walsh
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(Registrant’s Telephone Number)
November 30
Date of
Fiscal Year End
November 30, 2023
Date of Reporting Period
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust (CEV)
Annual Report
November 30, 2023
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Registration. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) has adopted regulations that subject registered investment companies and advisers to regulation by the CFTC if a fund invests more than a
prescribed level of its assets in certain CFTC-regulated instruments (including futures, certain options and swap agreements) or markets itself as providing investment exposure to such instruments. The investment adviser has claimed an exclusion
from the definition of “commodity pool operator” under the Commodity Exchange Act with respect to its management of the Fund. Accordingly, neither the Fund nor the adviser with respect to the operation of the Fund is subject to CFTC
regulation. Because of its management of other strategies, the Fund's adviser is registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator. The adviser is also registered as a commodity trading advisor.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or
other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Annual Report November 30, 2023
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Management’s Discussion of Fund Performance†
Economic and Market Conditions
For municipal bond investors, the 12-month period ended
November 30, 2023, was a roller-coaster ride. As the period opened on December 1, 2022, the municipal market was in the midst of a rally that would last through January 2023. Rally drivers included signals by the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) that
future rate hikes might be smaller, as well as growing investor demand amid lower supplies of new municipal bond issues.
In February, however, the municipal bond rally stalled as
robust economic reports -- including unexpectedly strong job creation in January -- led investors to fear the Fed might keep rates higher for longer than previously expected.
In March 2023, municipal bond returns turned positive again, as
the second- and third-largest bank failures in U.S. history triggered a “flight to quality” that drove municipal bonds to their strongest March performance since 2008 -- despite the Fed announcing its ninth consecutive rate hike that
month.
From April through October 2023, the municipal
bond market experienced another sell-off. Although positive technical factors -- most importantly, demand that exceeded municipal bond supply -- produced brief periods of positive performance, the Fed’s tenth and eleventh rate hikes in a
little over a year -- in May and July 2023 -- overwhelmed the positive technical factors and caused municipal yields to rise and bond prices to fall.
From August through October, above-average supply -- reversing
a previous favorable supply-demand imbalance -- plus a typical end-of-summer slowdown in coupon reinvestment, helped reduce demand for municipal bonds even more. And while the Fed left rates unchanged after its September 2023 meeting, investors
interpreted the Fed’s message to be that rates would stay higher for longer than investors expected just weeks earlier -- adding further fuel to the municipal bond sell-off.
In the final month of the period, the municipal bond market
made yet another U-turn. After several consecutive months of negative returns and rising rates, federal tax-free municipal yields approached their 2022 highs, and investors saw this as a compelling reason to buy municipal bonds.
Typical calendar year-end technical factors -- constrained
supply and increased demand -- were additional tailwinds for municipal bond prices, as was a general market perception -- fueled by falling inflation numbers and moderating employment gains -- that the Fed might finally be done raising rates. As a
result, the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index (the Index) rose 6.35% in November 2023, its best monthly performance since 1982.
For the period as a whole, the Index returned 4.28%. At the
short end of the municipal yield curve with maturities below 15 years, yields moved slightly lower during the period and bond prices rose. At the long end of the curve, yields moved modestly higher and bond prices declined. Overall, municipal bonds
outperformed U.S. Treasurys, as yields rose and bond prices fell across the entire Treasury yield curve.
Fund Performance
For the 12-month period ended November 30, 2023, Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust (the Fund) returned 3.80% at net asset value of its common shares (NAV), underperforming its benchmark, the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Index (the Index), which returned 4.28%.
The Fund’s overall strategy is to invest primarily in
California investment-grade municipal bonds in seeking to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax.
Detractors from Fund performance versus the Index during the
period included security selections and an overweight position in the education sector, security selections in BBB-rated bonds, and security selections in zero-coupon bonds.
In contrast, contributors to performance relative to the Index
included an overweight position in bonds with 17 years or more remaining to maturity, during a period when longer-maturity bonds generally outperformed shorter-maturity bonds. Additional contributors included an overweight position in the health
care sector, security selections in 4% coupon bonds, and the Fund’s use of leverage.
The Fund used leverage during the period in the form of
residual interest bond financing to enhance its tax-exempt income potential. In general, the use of leverage has the effect of achieving additional exposure to the municipal bond market, thereby magnifying the Fund’s exposure to its underlying
holdings in both up and down market environments.
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Returns are historical and are calculated net of management fees and other expenses by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested in accordance with the Fund’s
Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Furthermore, returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Performance at market price will differ from performance at NAV due to
variations in the Fund’s market price versus NAV, which may reflect factors such as fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, changes in Fund distributions, shifting market expectations for the Fund’s future returns and
distribution rates, and other considerations affecting the trading prices of closed-end funds. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance for
periods less than or equal to one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month-end,
please refer to eatonvance.com.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Performance
Portfolio Manager(s) Trevor G.
Smith and Carl A. Thompson, CFA
| %
Average Annual Total Returns1,2 |
Inception
Date |
One
Year |
Five
Years |
Ten
Years |
| Fund
at NAV |
01/29/1999
|
3.80%
|
1.83%
|
3.82%
|
| Fund
at Market Price |
—
|
3.08
|
2.25
|
3.56
|
|
| Bloomberg
Municipal Bond Index |
—
|
4.28%
|
2.03%
|
2.77%
|
| %
Premium/Discount to NAV3 |
|
| As
of period end |
(14.25)%
|
| Distributions
4 |
|
| Total
Distributions per share for the period |
$0.431
|
| Distribution
Rate at NAV |
3.54%
|
| Taxable-Equivalent
Distribution Rate at NAV |
7.72
|
| Distribution
Rate at Market Price |
4.13
|
| Taxable-Equivalent
Distribution Rate at Market Price |
9.00
|
| %
Total Leverage5 |
|
| Residual
Interest Bond (RIB) Financing |
28.39%
|
Growth of $10,000
This graph shows the change in value of a hypothetical
investment of $10,000 in the Fund for the period indicated. For comparison, the same investment is shown in the indicated index.
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Returns are historical and are calculated net of management fees and other expenses by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested in accordance with the Fund’s
Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Furthermore, returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Performance at market price will differ from performance at NAV due to
variations in the Fund’s market price versus NAV, which may reflect factors such as fluctuations in supply and demand for Fund shares, changes in Fund distributions, shifting market expectations for the Fund’s future returns and
distribution rates, and other considerations affecting the trading prices of closed-end funds. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance for
periods less than or equal to one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month-end,
please refer to eatonvance.com.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
| Credit
Quality (% of total investments)1,2 |
Footnotes:
|
1 |
For
purposes of the Fund’s rating restrictions, ratings are based on Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) or Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”), as applicable. If
securities are rated differently by the ratings agencies, the highest rating is applied. Ratings, which are subject to change, apply to the creditworthiness of the issuers of the underlying securities and not to the Fund or its shares. Credit
ratings measure the quality of a bond based on the issuer’s creditworthiness, with ratings ranging from AAA, being the highest, to D, being the lowest based on S&P’s measures. Ratings of BBB or higher by S&P or Fitch (Baa or
higher by Moody’s) are considered to be investment-grade quality. Credit ratings are based largely on the ratings agency’s analysis at the time of rating. The rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of
the issuer’s current financial condition and does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. Holdings designated as “Not Rated”
(if any) are not rated by the national ratings agencies stated above. |
|
2 |
The
chart includes the municipal bonds held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds, consistent with the Portfolio of Investments. |
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
The Fund's Investment
Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks‡
Investment Objectives. The
Fund’s investment objective is to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax and California state personal income taxes.
Principal Strategies. During
normal market conditions, substantially all of the Fund’s total assets (at least 80%) will be invested in debt obligations, the interest on which is exempt from federal income tax and California state personal income taxes. At least 65% of the
Fund’s total assets will normally be invested in municipal obligations (i) issued by the State of California or its political subdivisions, agencies, authorities and instrumentalities and (ii) rated at least investment grade at the time of
investment (which are those rated Baa or higher by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or BBB or higher by either S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) or Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”)), or, if unrated,
determined by Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”) to be of at least investment grade quality. From time to time, the Fund may hold a significant amount of municipal obligations not rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (“Rating Agency”). When the Fund invests in unrated municipal obligations, it may be more dependent on EVM’s research capabilities than when it invests in rated municipal obligations.
The Fund may invest up to 35% of its total assets in municipal
obligations rated below investment grade by each of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch (but no more than 30% of total assets may be rated lower than B by each of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) and unrated municipal obligations considered to be of
comparable quality by EVM. For purposes of rating restrictions, if an instrument is rated differently by the Rating Agencies, the higher rating is used. The Fund will not purchase securities that are in default at the time of purchase.
The Fund may purchase and sell derivative instruments, which
derive their value from another instrument, security or index, including financial futures contracts and related options based on various debt securities and securities indices, to seek to hedge against changes in interest rates, as a substitute for
the purchase of securities or for other risk management purposes. The Fund also may invest in residual interest bonds of a trust (the “trust”) that holds municipal securities. The trust will also issue floating-rate notes to third
parties that may be senior to the Fund’s residual interest.
Except for certain fundamental investment restrictions set
forth in the Fund’s registration statement and the 80% requirement set forth above, the investment objective and policies of the Fund may be changed by the Board without shareholder action. The Fund is “non-diversified,” which
means it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer than a “diversified” fund.
The Fund employs leverage to seek opportunities for additional
income. Leverage may amplify any increase or decrease in the value of investments held by the Fund. The Fund generally will not use leverage if the investment adviser anticipates that it would result in a lower return to shareholders for any
significant amount of time. There can be no assurance that the use of leverage will be successful.
Principal Risks
Market Discount Risk. As with
any security, the market value of the common shares may increase or decrease from the amount initially paid for the common shares. The Fund’s common shares have traded both at a premium and at a discount relative to NAV. The shares of
closed-end management investment companies frequently trade at a discount from their NAV. This is a risk separate and distinct from the risk that the Fund’s NAV may decrease.
Investment and Market Risk. An
investment in common shares is subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of the entire principal amount invested. An investment in common shares represents an indirect investment in the securities owned by the Fund, which will
generally trade in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets. The common shares at any point in time may be worth less than the original investment, even after taking into account any reinvestment of distributions.
The value of investments held by the Fund may increase or
decrease in response to social, economic, political, financial, public health crises or other disruptive events (whether real, expected or perceived) in the U.S. and global markets and include events such as war, natural disasters, epidemics and
pandemics, terrorism, conflicts and social unrest. These events may negatively impact broad segments of businesses and populations and may exacerbate pre-existing risks to the Fund. The frequency and magnitude of resulting changes in the value of
the Fund’s investments cannot be predicted. Certain securities and other investments held by the Fund may experience increased volatility, illiquidity, or other potentially adverse effects in reaction to changing market conditions. Monetary
and/or fiscal actions taken by U.S. or foreign governments to stimulate or stabilize the global economy may not be effective and could lead to high market volatility. No active trading market may exist for certain investments held by the Fund, which
may impair the ability of the Fund to sell or to realize the current valuation of such investments in the event of the need to liquidate such assets.
Municipal Obligations Risk. The
amount of public information available about municipal obligations is generally less than for corporate equities or bonds, meaning that the investment performance of municipal obligations may be more dependent on the analytical abilities of the
investment adviser than stock or corporate bond investments. The secondary market for municipal obligations also tends to be less well-developed and less liquid than many other securities markets, which may limit the Fund’s ability to sell its
municipal obligations at attractive prices. The differences between the price at which an obligation can be purchased and the price at which it can be sold may widen during periods of market distress. Less liquid obligations can become more
difficult to value and be subject to erratic price movements. The increased presence of non-traditional participants (such as proprietary trading desks of investment banks and hedge funds) or the absence of traditional participants (such as
individuals, insurance companies, banks and life insurance companies) in the municipal markets may lead to greater volatility in the markets because non-traditional participants may trade more frequently or in greater volume.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
The Fund's Investment
Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks‡ — continued
Interest Rate Risk. In general,
the value of debt instruments will fluctuate based on changes in interest rates. The value of these securities is likely to increase when interest rates fall and decline when interest rates rise. Duration measures the time-weighted expected cash
flows of a fixed income security, while maturity refers to the amount of time until a fixed income security matures. Generally, securities with longer durations or maturities are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than securities with
shorter durations or maturities, causing them to be more volatile. Conversely, fixed-income securities with shorter durations or maturities will be less volatile but may provide lower returns than fixed-income securities with longer durations or
maturities. Because the Fund is managed toward an income objective, it may hold more longer-duration or maturity obligations and thereby be more exposed to interest rate risk than municipal income funds that are managed with a greater emphasis on
total return. The impact of interest rate changes is significantly less for floating rate instruments that have relatively short periodic rate resets (e.g., ninety days or less). In a rising interest rate environment, the durations or maturities of
income securities that have the ability to be prepaid or called by the issuer may be extended. In a declining interest rate environment, the proceeds from prepaid or maturing instruments may have to be reinvested at a lower interest rate. Certain
instruments held by the Fund were historically based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), which was the average offered rate for various maturities of short-term loans between certain major international banks. LIBOR
historically was used throughout global banking and financial industries to determine interest rates for a variety of financial instruments (such as debt instruments and derivatives) and borrowing arrangements. Upon a determination by regulators to
phase out the use of LIBOR, market participants have been transitioning to the use of alternative reference rates over the past few years. As of June 30, 2023, the administrator of LIBOR ceased publishing LIBOR settings. The impact of the transition
away from LIBOR on certain debt securities, derivatives and other financial instruments that utilize LIBOR remains uncertain. The transition away from LIBOR and the use of replacement rates may adversely affect transactions that used LIBOR as a
reference rate, financial institutions, funds and other market participants that engaged in such transactions, and the financial markets generally.
Credit Risk. Investments in
municipal obligations and other debt obligations (referred to below as “debt instruments”) are subject to the risk of non-payment of scheduled principal and interest. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances may reduce the
capacity of the party obligated to make principal and interest payments on such instruments and may lead to defaults. Such non-payments and defaults may reduce the value of Fund shares and income distributions. The value of debt instruments also may
decline because of concerns about the issuer’s ability to make principal and interest payments. In addition, the credit ratings of debt instruments may be lowered if the financial condition of the party obligated to make payments with respect
to such instruments deteriorates. In order to enforce its rights in the event of a default, bankruptcy or similar situation, the Fund may be required to retain legal or similar counsel, which may increase the Fund’s operating expenses and
adversely affect net asset value. Municipal obligations may be insured as to principal and interest payments. If the claims-paying ability or other rating of the insurer is downgraded by a rating agency, the value of such obligations may be
negatively affected.
Lower Rated Investments Risk. Investments rated below investment grade and comparable unrated investments (sometimes referred to as “junk”) are speculative because of increased credit risk relative to other fixed income investments.
Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances typically have a greater effect on the ability of issuers of lower rated investments to make principal and interest payments than they do on issuers of higher rated investments. An economic
downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a lower rated investment may lose significant value before a default occurs. Lower rated investments typically are subject to greater price volatility and illiquidity than higher rated
investments.
Unrated Securities Risk. The Fund may invest in unrated obligations for which Eaton Vance will make a credit quality determination for purposes of the Fund’s credit quality policy. To the extent that the Fund invests in such unrated
obligations, the Fund’s credit quality will be more dependent on Eaton Vance’s credit analysis than if the Fund invested in only rated obligations. Some unrated securities may not have an active trading market or may be difficult to
value.
Leverage Risk. Certain Fund transactions may give rise to leverage. Leverage can result from a non-cash exposure to an underlying reference instrument. Leverage can also result from borrowings, issuance of preferred shares or
participation in residual interest bond transactions. Leverage can increase both the risk and return potential of the Fund. The use of leverage may cause the Fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it may not be advantageous to do so to satisfy
its obligations. Leverage may cause the Fund’s NAV to be more volatile than if it had not been leveraged, as certain types of leverage may exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the Fund’s portfolio securities. The loss on
leveraged investments may substantially exceed the initial investment.
Risk of Residual Interest
Bonds. The Fund may enter into residual interest bond transactions, which expose the Fund to leverage and greater risk than an investment in a fixed-rate municipal bond. The interest payments that the Fund receives
on the residual interest bonds acquired in such transactions vary inversely with short-term interest rates, normally decreasing when short-term rates increase. The value and market for residual interest bonds are volatile and such bonds may have
limited liquidity. As required by applicable accounting standards, the Fund records interest expense on its liability with respect to floating-rate notes and also records offsetting interest income in an amount equal to this expense.
Restricted Securities Risk.
Unless registered for sale to the public under applicable federal securities law, restricted securities can be sold only in private transactions to qualified purchasers pursuant to an exemption from registration. The sale price realized from a
private transaction could be less than the Fund’s purchase price for the restricted security. It may be difficult to identify a qualified purchaser for a restricted security held by the Fund and such security could be deemed illiquid. It may
also be more difficult to value such securities.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
The Fund's Investment
Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks‡ — continued
Derivatives Risk. The
Fund’s exposure to derivatives involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other investments. The use of derivatives can lead to losses because of adverse movements in
the price or value of the security, instrument, index, currency, commodity, economic indicator or event underlying a derivative (“reference instrument”), due to failure of a counterparty or due to tax or regulatory constraints.
Derivatives may create leverage in the Fund, which represents a non-cash exposure to the underlying reference instrument. Leverage can increase both the risk and return potential of the Fund. Derivatives risk may be more significant when derivatives
are used to enhance return or as a substitute for a cash investment position, rather than solely to hedge the risk of a position held by the Fund. Use of derivatives involves the exercise of specialized skill and judgment, and a transaction may be
unsuccessful in whole or in part because of market behavior or unexpected events. Changes in the value of a derivative (including one used for hedging) may not correlate perfectly with the underlying reference instrument. Derivative instruments
traded in over-the-counter markets may be difficult to value, may be illiquid, and may be subject to wide swings in valuation caused by changes in the value of the underlying reference instrument. If a derivative’s counterparty is unable to
honor its commitments, the value of Fund shares may decline and the Fund could experience delays in (or be unable to achieve) the return of collateral or other assets held by the counterparty. The loss on derivative transactions may substantially
exceed the initial investment. A derivative investment also involves the risks relating to the reference instrument underlying the investment.
Inflation Risk/Deflation Risk.
Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investment will be worth less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the real value of the common shares and distributions thereon can
decline. In addition, during periods of rising inflation, short-term interest rates and the Fund’s cost of leverage would likely increase, reducing returns to the common shareholders to the extent that such increased cost is not offset by
commensurately higher income. Deflation risk is the risk that prices throughout the economy decline over time − the opposite of inflation. Deflation may have an adverse affect on the creditworthiness of issuers and may make issuer defaults
more likely, which may result in a decline in the value of the Fund’s investments.
Liquidity Risk. The Fund is
exposed to liquidity risk when trading volume, lack of a market maker or trading partner, large position size, market conditions, or legal restrictions impair its ability to sell particular investments or to sell them at advantageous market prices.
Consequently, the Fund may have to accept a lower price to sell an investment or continue to hold it or keep the position open, sell other investments to raise cash or abandon an investment opportunity, any of which could have a negative effect on
the Fund’s performance. These effects may be exacerbated during times of financial or political stress.
Current Regulatory Environment Risk. From time to time proposals have been introduced before Congress for the purpose of restricting or eliminating the federal income tax exemption for interest on certain types of municipal obligations, and it can be
expected that similar proposals may be introduced in the future. Any proposed or actual changes in such rates or exempt status, therefore, can significantly affect the demand for and supply, liquidity and marketability of municipal obligations. This
could in turn affect the Fund’s net asset value and ability to acquire and dispose of municipal obligations at desirable yield and price levels. Legislation may be enacted that could negatively affect the assets of the Fund. Legislation or
regulation may change the way in which the Fund itself is regulated. The Adviser cannot predict the effects of any new governmental regulation that may be implemented, and there can be no assurance that any new governmental regulation will not
adversely affect the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective.
Sector and Geographic Risk.
Because the Fund may invest a significant portion of its assets in obligations issued in a particular state and/or U.S. territories and in certain types of municipal or other obligations and/or in certain sectors, the value of Fund shares may be
affected by events that adversely affect that state, U.S. territory, sector or type of obligation and may fluctuate more than that of a fund that invests more broadly. General obligation bonds issued by municipalities are adversely affected by
economic downturns and any resulting decline in tax revenues.
Issuer Non-Diversification
Risk. The Fund is “non-diversified,” which means it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer than a fund that is “diversified.” Non-diversified funds
may focus their investments in a small number of issuers, making them more susceptible to risks affecting such issuers than a more diversified fund might be, and the value of the Fund’s shares may be more volatile than the values of shares of
more diversified funds.
Recent Market Conditions. The outbreak of COVID-19 and efforts to contain its spread have resulted in closing borders, enhanced health screenings, changes to healthcare service preparation and delivery, quarantines, cancellations, disruptions to
supply chains and customer activity, as well as general concern and uncertainty. The impact of this coronavirus and the effects of other infectious illness outbreaks, epidemics or pandemics may be short term or may continue for an extended period of
time. Health crises caused by outbreaks of disease, such as the coronavirus outbreak, may exacerbate other pre-existing political, social and economic risks and disrupt normal market conditions and operations. For example, a global pandemic or other
widespread health crisis could cause substantial market volatility and exchange trading suspensions and closures. In addition, the increasing interconnectedness of markets around the world may result in many markets being affected by events or
conditions in a single country or region or events affecting a single or small number of issuers. The coronavirus outbreak and public and private sector responses thereto have led to large portions of the populations of many countries working from
home for indefinite periods of time, temporary or permanent layoffs, disruptions in supply chains, and lack of availability of certain goods. The impact of such responses could adversely affect the information technology and operational systems upon
which the Fund and the Fund’s service providers rely, and could otherwise disrupt the ability of the employees of the Fund’s service providers to perform critical tasks relating to the Fund. Any such impact could adversely affect the
Fund’s performance, or the performance of the securities in which the Fund invests and may lead to losses on your investment in the Fund.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
The Fund's Investment
Objectives, Principal Strategies and Principal Risks‡ — continued
Risks Associated with Active Management. The success of the Fund’s investment strategy depends on portfolio management’s successful application of analytical skills and investment judgment. Active management involves subjective decisions and there
is no guarantee that such decisions will produce the desired results or expected returns.
Tax Risk. Income from
tax-exempt municipal obligations could be declared taxable because of changes in tax laws, adverse interpretations by the relevant taxing authority or the non-compliant conduct of the issuer of an obligation.
Tax-Sensitive Investing Risk.
The Fund may hold a security in order to achieve more favorable tax treatment or to sell a security in order to create tax losses. The Fund’s utilization of various tax-management techniques may be curtailed
or eliminated by tax legislation, regulation or interpretations. The Fund may not be able to minimize taxable distributions to shareholders and a portion of the Fund’s distributions may be taxable.
Cybersecurity Risk. With the
increased use of technologies by Fund service providers to conduct business, such as the Internet, the Fund is susceptible to operational, information security and related risks. In general, cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or
unintentional events. Cybersecurity failures by or breaches of the Fund’s investment adviser or administrator and other service providers (including, but not limited to, the custodian or transfer agent), and the issuers of securities in which
the Fund invests, may disrupt and otherwise adversely affect their business operations. This may result in financial losses to the Fund, impede Fund trading, interfere with the Fund’s ability to calculate its net asset value, interfere with
Fund shareholders’ ability to transact business or cause violations of applicable privacy and other laws, regulatory fines, penalties, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensation costs, or additional compliance costs.
Anti-Takeover Provisions. The
Fund’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust (the “Declaration of Trust”) and Amended and Restated By-Laws include provisions that could have the effect of limiting the ability of other persons or entities to acquire control of the
Fund or to change the composition of its Board. For example, pursuant to the Fund’s Declaration of Trust, the Fund Board is divided into three classes of Trustees with each class serving for a three-year term and certain types of transactions
require the favorable vote of holders of at least 75% of the outstanding shares of the Fund.
General Fund Investing Risks.
The Fund is not a complete investment program and there is no guarantee that the Fund will achieve its investment objective. It is possible to lose money by investing in the Fund. An investment in the Fund is not a deposit in a bank and is not
insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other government agency.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Endnotes and
Additional Disclosures
| †
|
The views expressed in this
report are those of the portfolio manager(s) and are current only through the date stated at the top of this page. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and Eaton Vance and the Fund(s) disclaim any
responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions are based on many factors, may not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund.
This commentary may contain statements that are not historical facts, referred to as “forward-looking statements.” The Fund’s actual future results may differ significantly from those stated in any forward-looking statement,
depending on factors such as changes in securities or financial markets or general economic conditions, the volume of sales and purchases of Fund shares, the continuation of investment advisory, administrative and service contracts, and other risks
discussed from time to time in the Fund’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
| ‡ |
The information contained
herein is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell Fund shares. Common shares of the Fund are available for purchase and sale only at current market prices in secondary market
trading. |
| |
|
| 1 |
Bloomberg Municipal Bond
Index is an unmanaged index of municipal bonds traded in the U.S. Unless otherwise stated, index returns do not reflect the effect of any applicable sales charges, commissions, expenses, taxes or leverage, as applicable. It is not possible to invest
directly in an index. |
|
2 |
Performance
results reflect the effects of leverage. Included in the average annual total return at NAV for the ten year period is the impact of the 2016 tender and repurchase of a portion of the Fund’s Auction Preferred Shares (APS) at 95.5% of the
Fund’s APS per share liquidation preference. Had this transaction not occurred, the total return at NAV would be lower for the Fund. |
|
3 |
The shares
of the Fund often trade at a discount or premium to their net asset value. The discount or premium may vary over time and may be higher or lower than what is quoted in this report. For up-to-date premium/discount information, please refer to
https://funds.eatonvance.com/closed-end-fund-prices.php. |
|
4 |
The
Distribution Rate is based on the Fund’s last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) divided by the Fund’s NAV or market price at the end of the period. The Fund’s distributions may be comprised of amounts
characterized for federal income tax purposes as tax-exempt income, qualified and non-qualified ordinary dividends, capital gains and nondividend distributions, also known as return of capital. The Fund may distribute more than its net investment
income and net realized capital gains and, therefore, a distribution may include a return of capital. The Fund will determine the federal income tax character of distributions paid to a shareholder after the end of the calendar year. This is
reported on the IRS form 1099-DIV and provided to the shareholder shortly after each year-end. For information about the tax character of distributions made in prior calendar years, please refer to Performance-Tax Character of Distributions on the
Fund’s webpage available at eatonvance.com. The Fund’s distributions are determined by the investment adviser |
| |
based on its current
assessment of the Fund’s long-term return potential. Fund distributions may be affected by numerous factors including changes in Fund performance, the cost of financing for Funds that employ leverage, portfolio holdings, realized and projected
returns, and other factors. As portfolio and market conditions change, the rate of distributions paid by the Fund could change. Shareholders should not assume that the source of any distribution from the Fund is net income or profit, and the Fund's
distributions should not be used as a measure of performance or confused with “yield” or “income”. Taxable-equivalent performance is based on the highest combined federal and state income tax rates, where applicable. Lower
tax rates would result in lower tax-equivalent performance. Actual tax rates will vary depending on your income, exemptions and deductions. Rates do not include local taxes. |
|
5 |
Fund
employs RIB financing. The leverage created by RIB investments provides an opportunity for increased income but, at the same time, creates special risks (including the likelihood of greater price volatility). The cost of leverage rises and
falls with changes in short-term interest rates. See “Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held” in the notes to the financial statements for more information about RIB financing. RIB leverage represents the amount
of Floating Rate Notes outstanding at period end as a percentage of Fund net assets plus Floating Rate Notes. |
| |
Fund profile subject to
change due to active management. |
| |
Additional Information
|
| |
Yield curve is a graphical
representation of the yields offered by bonds of various maturities. The yield curve flattens when long-term interest rates fall and/or short-term interest rates increase, and the yield curve steepens when long-term interest rates increase and/or
short-term interest rates fall. |
| |
Important Notice to
Shareholders |
| |
On January 26, 2023, the
Fund’s Board of Trustees voted to exempt, on a going forward basis, all prior and, until further notice, new acquisitions of Fund shares that otherwise might be deemed “Control Share Acquisitions” under the Fund’s By-Laws
from the Control Share Provisions of the Fund’s By-Laws. |
| |
Effective
August 17, 2023, the portfolio managers of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust are Trevor G. Smith and Carl A. Thompson. |
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
| Security
|
Principal
Amount
(000's omitted) |
Value
|
| Other
— 1.3% |
| Morongo
Band of Mission Indians, 7.00%, 10/1/39(1) |
$
|
1,040
|
$
1,063,462 |
Total
Corporate Bonds
(identified cost $1,091,682) |
|
|
$ 1,063,462
|
| Tax-Exempt
Municipal Obligations — 126.3% |
| Security
|
Principal
Amount
(000's omitted) |
Value
|
| Education
— 13.1% |
| California
State University, 5.00%, 11/1/41(2) |
$
|
6,275
|
$
6,469,023 |
| University
of California, 5.00%, 5/15/46(2) |
|
4,075
|
4,192,523
|
| |
|
|
$ 10,661,546
|
| Electric
Utilities — 9.1% |
| Los
Angeles Department of Water and Power, CA, Power System Revenue, 5.00%, 7/1/42(2) |
$
|
4,000
|
$
4,177,720 |
| Sacramento
Municipal Utility District, CA, 5.00%, 8/15/50(2) |
|
3,000
|
3,212,070
|
| |
|
|
$ 7,389,790
|
| General
Obligations — 34.5% |
| ABC
Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2018), 4.00%, 8/1/47 |
$
|
1,000
|
$
1,004,330 |
| Alum
Rock Union Elementary School District, CA, (Election of 2016), 5.25%, 8/1/47 |
|
1,000
|
1,099,120
|
| Brentwood
Union School District, CA, (Election of 2016), 5.25%, 8/1/47 |
|
1,350
|
1,482,772
|
| Brisbane
School District, CA, (Election of 2020), 3.00%, 8/1/49 |
|
1,135
|
854,473
|
| California:
|
|
|
|
| 4.85%,
12/1/46 |
|
1,500
|
1,529,400
|
| 5.00%,
9/1/52(2) |
|
3,500
|
3,816,330
|
| 5.25%,
9/1/53(2) |
|
5,000
|
5,612,150
|
| La
Canada Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2017), 5.75%, 8/1/50 |
|
1,000
|
1,168,870
|
| Modesto
High School District, CA, (Election of 2022), 4.00%, 8/1/52 |
|
2,000
|
2,011,420
|
| Pasadena
Area Community College District, CA, 4.00%, 8/1/52 |
|
1,250
|
1,247,613
|
| San
Diego Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2022), Sustainablility Bonds, 5.00%, 7/1/48(2) |
|
3,500
|
3,858,260 |
| Security
|
Principal
Amount
(000's omitted) |
Value
|
| General
Obligations (continued) |
| San
Rafael City High School District, CA, (Election of 2022), 4.25%, 8/1/47 |
$
|
1,500
|
$
1,526,940 |
| South
Bay Union School District, CA, (Election of 2018), 4.00%, 8/1/47 |
|
1,000
|
973,090
|
| Westminster
School District, CA, (Election of 2016), 4.00%, 8/1/47 |
|
1,900
|
1,906,555
|
| |
|
|
$ 28,091,323
|
| Hospital
— 16.9% |
| California
Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Cedars-Sinai Health System), 4.00%, 8/15/48 |
$
|
2,685
|
$
2,634,629 |
| California
Health Facilities Financing Authority, (City of Hope): |
|
|
|
| 5.00%,
11/15/32 |
|
635
|
635,279
|
| 5.00%,
11/15/35 |
|
910
|
910,364
|
| California
Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Kaiser Permanente): |
|
|
|
| 4.00%,
11/1/44(2) |
|
6,000
|
5,914,020
|
| 4.00%,
11/1/44 |
|
1,500
|
1,478,490
|
| California
Health Facilities Financing Authority, (Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford), 4.00%, 5/15/51 |
|
1,250
|
1,151,263
|
| California
Public Finance Authority, (Henry Mayo Newhall Hospital), 5.00%, 10/15/47 |
|
1,000
|
1,003,310
|
| |
|
|
$ 13,727,355
|
| Housing
— 4.4% |
| California
Municipal Finance Authority, (Caritas), 4.00%, 8/15/56 |
$
|
325
|
$
265,366 |
| CMFA
Special Finance Agency, CA, (Solana at Grand), 4.00%, 8/1/56(1) |
|
475
|
385,857
|
| CSCDA
Community Improvement Authority, CA, (Pasadena Portfolio), Essential Housing Revenue, Social Bonds, 3.00%, 12/1/56(1) |
|
1,075
|
701,319
|
| Independent
Cities Finance Authority, CA, (Augusta Communities Mobile Home Park Pool), 5.25%, 5/15/56 |
|
1,500
|
1,566,675
|
| Independent
Cities Finance Authority, CA, (Castle Mobile Estates), 3.00%, 5/15/56 |
|
210
|
149,814
|
| Independent
Cities Finance Authority, CA, (Vista de Santa Barbara Mobilehome Park): |
|
|
|
| 3.00%,
9/15/46 |
|
325
|
244,309
|
| 3.00%,
9/15/56 |
|
390
|
267,836
|
| |
|
|
$ 3,581,176
|
10
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Portfolio of
Investments — continued
| Security
|
Principal
Amount
(000's omitted) |
Value
|
| Insured
- Escrowed/Prerefunded — 5.9% |
| Foothill/Eastern
Transportation Corridor Agency, CA, (AGC), (AGM), Escrowed to Maturity, 0.00%, 1/1/26 |
$
|
5,130
|
$
4,814,608 |
| |
|
|
$ 4,814,608
|
| Insured
- General Obligations — 12.2% |
| Antioch
Unified School District, CA, (BAM), 4.00%, 8/1/47 |
$
|
1,125
|
$
1,103,017 |
| Bakersfield
City School District, CA, (Election of 2016), (BAM), 3.00%, 11/1/51 |
|
500
|
367,415
|
| Coalinga-Huron
Recreation and Park District, CA, (Election of 2016), (BAM), 3.00%, 8/1/50 |
|
250
|
180,045
|
| Duarte
Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2020), (AGM), 4.25%, 8/1/48 |
|
1,000
|
1,023,010
|
| McFarland
Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2020), (BAM), 3.00%, 11/1/49 |
|
250
|
180,843
|
| Moreno
Valley Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2014), (AGM), 4.125%, 8/1/50 |
|
745
|
738,034
|
| Mountain
Empire Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2018), (BAM), 6.00%, 8/1/42 |
|
1,000
|
1,153,640
|
| Oxnard
School District, CA, (Election of 2022), (BAM), 4.125%, 8/1/50 |
|
500
|
500,835
|
| Pittsburg
Unified School District, CA, (Election of 2018), (AGM), 4.25%, 8/1/49 |
|
250
|
252,780
|
| Sweetwater
Union High School District, CA, (Election of 2000), (AGM), 0.00%, 8/1/25 |
|
4,720
|
4,451,857
|
| |
|
|
$ 9,951,476
|
| Insured
- Hospital — 0.1% |
| California
Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Enloe Medical Center), (AGM), 5.25%, 8/15/52 |
$
|
40
|
$
43,195 |
| |
|
|
$ 43,195
|
| Insured
- Transportation — 9.2% |
| Alameda
Corridor Transportation Authority, CA: |
|
|
|
| (AMBAC),
0.00%, 10/1/29 |
$
|
5,000
|
$
4,084,700 |
| (NPFG),
0.00%, 10/1/31 |
|
4,500
|
3,393,945
|
| |
|
|
$ 7,478,645
|
| Insured
- Water and Sewer — 0.9% |
| Mountain
House Financing Authority, CA, Utility Systems Revenue, Green Bonds, (BAM), 4.25%, 12/1/52 |
$
|
750
|
$
750,713 |
| |
|
|
$ 750,713
|
| Security
|
Principal
Amount
(000's omitted) |
Value
|
| Other
Revenue — 0.6% |
| California
Community Choice Financing Authority, Clean Energy Project Revenue, Green Bonds, 5.00% to 8/1/29 (Put Date), 12/1/53 |
$
|
500
|
$
520,435 |
| |
|
|
$ 520,435
|
| Senior
Living/Life Care — 1.2% |
| California
Municipal Finance Authority, (HumanGood - California Obligated Group), 4.00%, 10/1/49 |
$
|
750
|
$
660,307 |
| California
Public Finance Authority, (Enso Village): |
|
|
|
| Green
Bonds, 2.375%, 11/15/28(1) |
|
35
|
32,996
|
| Green
Bonds, 5.00%, 11/15/46(1) |
|
350
|
307,465
|
| |
|
|
$ 1,000,768
|
| Special
Tax Revenue — 3.0% |
| Aliso
Viejo Community Facilities District No. 2005-01, CA, Special Tax Revenue, (Glenwood at Aliso Viejo), 5.00%, 9/1/30 |
$
|
495
|
$
497,237 |
| Los
Angeles County Community Facilities District No. 3, CA, (Valencia/Newhall Area): |
|
|
|
| 5.00%,
9/1/24 |
|
240
|
240,341
|
| 5.00%,
9/1/25 |
|
335
|
335,492
|
| 5.00%,
9/1/26 |
|
240
|
240,334
|
| Puerto
Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., 5.00%, 7/1/58 |
|
1,140
|
1,108,160
|
| |
|
|
$ 2,421,564
|
| Transportation
— 15.2% |
| Bay
Area Toll Authority, CA, (San Francisco Bay Area), 4.125%, 4/1/54 |
$
|
1,000
|
$
997,670 |
| California
Municipal Finance Authority, (LINXS Automated People Mover), (AMT), 5.00%, 12/31/47 |
|
3,000
|
3,021,510
|
| Los
Angeles Department of Airports, CA, (AMT), 5.00%, 5/15/43(2) |
|
5,000
|
5,159,650
|
| San
Diego County Regional Airport Authority, CA, (San Diego International Airport), (AMT), 5.00%, 7/1/48 |
|
1,250
|
1,301,175
|
| San
Francisco City and County Airport Commission, CA, (San Francisco International Airport): |
|
|
|
| (AMT),
5.00%, 5/1/45 |
|
750
|
768,023
|
| (AMT),
5.75%, 5/1/48 |
|
1,000
|
1,112,060
|
| |
|
|
$ 12,360,088
|
Total
Tax-Exempt Municipal Obligations
(identified cost $101,932,745) |
|
|
$102,792,682
|
11
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Portfolio of
Investments — continued
| Taxable
Municipal Obligations — 9.1% |
| Security
|
Principal
Amount
(000's omitted) |
Value
|
| Education
— 3.7% |
| California
Educational Facilities Authority, (Loyola Marymount University), Green Bonds, 4.842%, 10/1/48 |
$
|
3,000
|
$
2,509,380 |
| California
Municipal Finance Authority, (Albert Einstein Academies), 3.75%, 8/1/31(1) |
|
605
|
509,640
|
| |
|
|
$ 3,019,020
|
| Hospital
— 5.4% |
| California
Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Loma Linda University Medical Center), 6.00%, 12/1/24 |
$
|
2,500
|
$
2,482,500 |
| California
Statewide Communities Development Authority, (Marin General Hospital), 4.821%, 8/1/45 |
|
2,500
|
1,928,525
|
| |
|
|
$ 4,411,025
|
Total
Taxable Municipal Obligations
(identified cost $8,580,541) |
|
|
$ 7,430,045
|
| Security
|
Notional
Amount
(000's omitted) |
Value
|
| Transportation
— 1.2% |
| HTA
TRRB 2005L-745190UR7 Assured Custodial Trust, 5.25%, 7/1/41 |
$
|
1,000
|
$
981,350 |
Total
Trust Units
(identified cost $994,570) |
|
|
$ 981,350
|
Total
Investments — 137.9%
(identified cost $112,599,538) |
|
|
$112,267,539
|
| Other
Assets, Less Liabilities — (37.9)% |
|
|
$
(30,846,708) |
| Net
Assets — 100.0% |
|
|
$ 81,420,831
|
| The
percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets. |
|
(1) |
Security
exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be sold in certain transactions in reliance on an exemption from registration (normally to qualified institutional buyers). At November 30,
2023, the aggregate value of these securities is $3,000,739 or 3.7% of the Trust's net assets. |
|
(2) |
Security
represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1G). |
| The
Trust invests primarily in debt securities issued by California municipalities. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry or municipality. At November
30, 2023, 20.5% of total investments are backed by bond insurance of various financial institutions and financial guaranty assurance agencies. The aggregate percentage insured by an individual financial institution or financial guaranty assurance
agency ranged from 3.0% to 10.1% of total investments. |
| Abbreviations:
|
| AGC
|
– Assured
Guaranty Corp. |
| AGM
|
– Assured
Guaranty Municipal Corp. |
| AMBAC
|
– AMBAC
Financial Group, Inc. |
| AMT
|
– Interest
earned from these securities may be considered a tax preference item for purposes of the Federal Alternative Minimum Tax. |
| BAM
|
– Build
America Mutual Assurance Co. |
| NPFG
|
– National
Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
12
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Statement of Assets
and Liabilities
| |
November 30,
2023 |
| Assets
|
|
| Investments,
at value (identified cost $112,599,538) |
$
112,267,539 |
| Cash
|
394,324
|
| Interest
receivable |
1,028,967
|
| Receivable
for investments sold |
393,472
|
| Trustees'
deferred compensation plan |
24,100
|
| Total
assets |
$114,108,402
|
| Liabilities
|
|
| Payable
for floating rate notes issued |
$
32,292,927 |
| Payable
to affiliates: |
|
| Investment
adviser fee |
36,108
|
| Administration
fee |
18,054
|
| Trustees'
fees |
1,317
|
| Trustees'
deferred compensation plan |
24,100
|
| Interest
expense and fees payable |
213,885
|
| Accrued
expenses |
101,180
|
| Total
liabilities |
$
32,687,571 |
| Net
Assets |
$
81,420,831 |
| Sources
of Net Assets |
|
| Common
shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized |
$
70,336 |
| Additional
paid-in capital |
87,535,456
|
| Accumulated
loss |
(6,184,961)
|
| Net
Assets |
$
81,420,831 |
| Common
Shares Issued and Outstanding |
7,033,575
|
| Net
Asset Value Per Common Share |
|
| Net
assets ÷ common shares issued and outstanding |
$
11.58 |
13
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
| |
Year
Ended |
| |
November
30, 2023 |
| Investment
Income |
|
| Interest
income |
$
5,034,623 |
| Total
investment income |
$
5,034,623 |
| Expenses
|
|
| Investment
adviser fee |
$
479,961 |
| Administration
fee |
239,981
|
| Trustees’
fees and expenses |
7,834
|
| Custodian
fee |
30,412
|
| Transfer
and dividend disbursing agent fees |
18,641
|
| Legal
and accounting services |
53,976
|
| Printing
and postage |
27,644
|
| Interest
expense and fees |
1,454,891
|
| Miscellaneous
|
27,295
|
| Total
expenses |
$
2,340,635 |
| Net
investment income |
$
2,693,988 |
| Realized
and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
| Net
realized gain (loss): |
|
| Investment
transactions |
$
(1,981,150) |
| Net
realized loss |
$(1,981,150)
|
| Change
in unrealized appreciation (depreciation): |
|
| Investments
|
$
1,784,566 |
| Net
change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
$
1,784,566 |
| Net
realized and unrealized loss |
$
(196,584) |
| Net
increase in net assets from operations |
$
2,497,404 |
14
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Statements of Changes
in Net Assets
| |
Year
Ended November 30, |
| |
2023
|
2022
|
| Increase
(Decrease) in Net Assets |
|
|
| From
operations: |
|
|
| Net
investment income |
$
2,693,988 |
$
3,363,752 |
| Net
realized loss |
(1,981,150)
|
(3,438,899)
|
| Net
change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
1,784,566
|
(17,581,441)
|
| Net
increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
$
2,497,404 |
$
(17,656,588) |
| Distributions
to common shareholders |
$
(2,752,723) |
$
(3,787,019) |
| Tax
return of capital to shareholders |
$
(276,638) |
$
— |
| Capital
share transactions: |
|
|
| Cost of shares repurchased (see Note 5)
|
$
— |
$
(1,069,604) |
| Net
decrease in net assets from capital share transactions |
$
— |
$
(1,069,604) |
| Net
decrease in net assets |
$
(531,957) |
$
(22,513,211) |
| Net
Assets |
|
|
| At
beginning of year |
$
81,952,788 |
$104,465,999
|
| At
end of year |
$81,420,831
|
$
81,952,788 |
15
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
| |
Year
Ended |
| |
November
30, 2023 |
| Cash
Flows From Operating Activities |
|
| Net
increase in net assets from operations |
$
2,497,404 |
| Adjustments
to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
| Investments
purchased |
(36,665,936)
|
| Investments
sold |
47,117,781
|
| Net
amortization/accretion of premium (discount) |
(183,978)
|
| Decrease
in interest receivable |
202,580
|
| Increase
in Trustees’ deferred compensation plan |
(24,100)
|
| Decrease
in payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee |
(4,337)
|
| Decrease
in payable to affiliate for administration fee |
(2,168)
|
| Decrease
in payable to affiliate for Trustees' fees |
(541)
|
| Decrease
in interest expense and fees payable |
(36,650)
|
| Increase
in payable to affiliate for Trustees' deferred compensation plan |
24,100
|
| Increase
in accrued expenses |
1,240
|
| Net
change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments |
(1,784,566)
|
| Net
realized loss from investments |
1,981,150
|
| Net
cash provided by operating activities |
$
13,121,979 |
| Cash
Flows From Financing Activities |
|
| Cash distributions paid to common shareholders
|
$
(3,029,361) |
| Proceeds
from secured borrowings |
10,800,000
|
| Repayment
of secured borrowings |
(22,340,000)
|
| Net
cash used in financing activities |
$(14,569,361)
|
| Net
decrease in cash |
$
(1,447,382) |
| Cash
at beginning of year |
$
1,841,706 |
| Cash
at end of year |
$
394,324 |
| Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
| Cash paid for interest and fees
|
$
1,491,541 |
16
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Selected data for a
common share outstanding during the periods stated
| |
Year
Ended November 30, |
| |
2023
|
2022
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
| Net
asset value — Beginning of year (Common shares) |
$
11.650 |
$
14.640 |
$
14.690 |
$
14.320 |
$
13.130 |
| Income
(Loss) From Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net
investment income(1) |
$
0.383 |
$
0.473 |
$
0.563 |
$
0.544 |
$
0.517 |
| Net
realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(0.022)
|
(2.949)
|
(0.048)
|
0.372
|
1.203
|
| Total
income (loss) from operations |
$
0.361 |
$
(2.476) |
$
0.515 |
$
0.916 |
$
1.720 |
| Less
Distributions to Common Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
| From
net investment income |
$
(0.392) |
$
(0.533) |
$
(0.564) |
$
(0.545) |
$
(0.530) |
| From
net realized gain |
—
|
—
|
(0.001)
|
(0.001)
|
—
|
| Tax
return of capital |
(0.039)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
| Total
distributions to common shareholders |
$
(0.431) |
$
(0.533) |
$
(0.565) |
$
(0.546) |
$
(0.530) |
| Anti-dilutive
effect of share repurchase program (see Note 5)(1) |
$
— |
$
0.019 |
$
— |
$
— |
$
— |
| Net
asset value — End of year (Common shares) |
$11.580
|
$11.650
|
$
14.640 |
$
14.690 |
$
14.320 |
| Market
value — End of year (Common shares) |
$
9.930 |
$10.060
|
$
13.790 |
$
13.480 |
$
13.120 |
| Total
Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) |
3.80%
|
(16.49)%
|
3.83%
|
6.89%
|
13.83%
|
| Total
Investment Return on Market Value(2) |
3.08%
|
(23.44)%
|
6.58%
|
7.05%
|
24.15%
|
| Ratios/Supplemental
Data |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net
assets applicable to common shares, end of year (000’s omitted) |
$
81,421 |
$
81,953 |
$104,466
|
$104,792
|
$102,186
|
| Ratios
(as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares): |
|
|
|
|
|
| Expenses
excluding interest and fees |
1.09%
|
1.19%
|
1.08%
|
1.09%
|
1.12%
|
| Interest
and fee expense(3) |
1.79%
|
0.95%
|
0.29%
|
0.68%
|
1.20%
|
| Total
expenses |
2.88%
|
2.14%
|
1.37%
|
1.77%
|
2.32%
|
| Net
investment income |
3.31%
|
3.76%
|
3.83%
|
3.79%
|
3.71%
|
| Portfolio
Turnover |
31%
|
30%
|
18%
|
23%
|
8%
|
|
(1) |
Computed
using average common shares outstanding. |
|
(2) |
Returns
are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Distributions are assumed to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Trust's dividend reinvestment plan.
|
|
(3) |
Interest
and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1G). |
17
See Notes to Financial Statements.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Notes to Financial
Statements
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (the Trust) is a
Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Trust's investment objective is to provide current income exempt from
regular federal income tax and California state personal income taxes.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies
of the Trust. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The Trust is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946.
A Investment
Valuation—The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or fair value of
investments.
Debt Obligations. Debt obligations are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to,
reported trades, executable bid and ask prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, interest rates, anticipated prepayments, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as
industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term debt obligations purchased with a
remaining maturity of sixty days or less for which a valuation from a third party pricing service is not readily available may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value.
Fair Valuation. In connection
with Rule 2a-5 of the 1940 Act, the Trustees have designated the Trust’s investment adviser as its valuation designee. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued by the
investment adviser, as valuation designee, at fair value using methods that most fairly reflect the security’s “fair value”, which is the amount that the Trust might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current
sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the
existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from
broker/dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial statements, and an
evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions and Related Income—Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized
gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal
Taxes—The Trust’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no
provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Trust intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in non-taxable municipal securities, which
are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by the Trust, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to
shareholders.
As of November 30, 2023, the Trust
had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. The Trust files a U.S. federal income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is subject to examination by the
Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years from the date of filing.
D Legal Fees— Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected
to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
E Use of
Estimates—The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
F Indemnifications—Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified
against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be
deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Trust shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall
assume, upon request by the shareholder, the defense on behalf of any Trust shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Trust property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been
a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum
exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Notes to Financial
Statements — continued
G Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with
Securities Held—The Trust may invest in residual interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating
rate securities, whereby the Trust may sell a variable or fixed rate bond for cash to a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), while at the same time, buying a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of
the SPV. The bond is deposited into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the SPV by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the bond purchased from the Trust (the Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate
notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held by the Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the Bond
held by the SPV transferred to the Trust, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Trust exercise such right, it would generally pay the SPV the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying
Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Trust accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in its
Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset
weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the SPV for redemption at par at each reset date. Accordingly, the fair value of the payable for floating rate notes issued approximates its carrying value. If measured at fair value,
the payable for floating rate notes would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 6) at November 30, 2023. Interest expense
related to the Trust's liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as
incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Trust, as noted above, or by the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying Bond, bankruptcy of or payment
failure by the issuer of the underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which
liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. At November 30, 2023, the amount of the Trust's Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the related collateral were $32,292,927 and $42,411,746, respectively. The range of
interest rates on the Floating Rate Notes outstanding at November 30, 2023 was 3.30% to 3.35%. For the year ended November 30, 2023, the Trust’s average settled Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate including fees were
$38,476,219 and 3.78%, respectively.
In certain
circumstances, the Trust may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with brokers by which the Trust agrees to reimburse the broker for the difference between the liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the
Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Trust had no shortfalls as of November 30, 2023.
The Trust may also purchase residual interest bonds in a
secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary market
transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.
The Trust's investment policies and restrictions expressly
permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for
fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile than that of
a fixed rate bond. The Trust's investment policies do not allow the Trust to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Effective August 19, 2022, the Trust began operating under Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, which, among other things,
governs the use of derivative investments and certain financing transactions by registered investment companies. Consistent with Rule 18f-4, the Trust may treat its investments in residual interest bonds and similar financing transactions as subject
to the asset coverage requirements of Section 18 of the 1940 Act, or as derivatives transactions subject to the Trust’s value-at-risk (VaR)-based limits on leverage risk. Effective October 11, 2023, the Trust has opted to treat such
investments as derivatives transactions. The Trust may change this approach at any time. Residual interest bonds held by the Trust are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
2 Distributions to Shareholders and Income Tax
Information
The Trust intends to make monthly
distributions of net investment income to common shareholders. In addition, at least annually, the Trust intends to distribute all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Distributions to shareholders are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. As required by U.S. GAAP, only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits are reported in the financial
statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary
income.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Notes to Financial
Statements — continued
The
tax character of distributions declared for the years ended November 30, 2023 and November 30, 2022 was as follows:
| |
Year
Ended November 30, |
| |
2023
|
2022
|
| Tax-exempt
income |
$2,356,395
|
$3,374,998
|
| Ordinary
income |
$
396,328 |
$
412,021 |
| Tax
return of capital |
$
276,638 |
$
— |
As of November 30, 2023, the components of distributable
earnings (accumulated loss) on a tax basis were as follows:
| Deferred
capital losses |
$
(5,753,628) |
| Net
unrealized depreciation |
(431,333)
|
| Accumulated
loss |
$(6,184,961)
|
At November 30, 2023, the Trust, for
federal income tax purposes, had deferred capital losses of $5,753,628 which would reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus
would reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Trust of any liability for federal income or excise tax. The deferred capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the
Trust’s next taxable year and retain the same short-term or long-term character as when originally deferred. Of the deferred capital losses at November 30, 2023, $1,518,490 are short-term and $4,235,138 are long-term.
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
investments of the Trust at November 30, 2023, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| Aggregate
cost |
$
80,405,945 |
| Gross
unrealized appreciation |
$
2,626,445 |
| Gross
unrealized depreciation |
(3,057,778)
|
| Net
unrealized depreciation |
$
(431,333) |
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions
with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by
Eaton Vance Management (EVM), an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Trust. The investment adviser fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.40% of the Trust’s
average weekly gross assets and is payable monthly. Gross assets are calculated by deducting accrued liabilities of the Trust except (i) the principal amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by the Trust and
the amount of floating-rate notes included as a liability in the Trust's Statement of Assets and Liabilities of up to $59,000,000, and (ii) the amount of any outstanding preferred shares issued by the Trust. The administration fee is earned by EVM
for administering the business affairs of the Trust and is computed at an annual rate of 0.20% of the Trust’s average weekly gross assets. For the year ended November 30, 2023, the investment adviser fee and administration fee were $479,961
and $239,981, respectively.
Trustees and officers of the
Trust who are members of EVM’s organization receive remuneration for their services to the Trust out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Trust who are not affiliated with EVM may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of
their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. Certain officers and Trustees of the Trust are officers of EVM.
4 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term
obligations, aggregated $36,665,936 and $47,511,253, respectively, for the year ended November 30, 2023.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Notes to Financial
Statements — continued
5 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Trust may issue common shares pursuant to its dividend
reinvestment plan. There were no common shares issued by the Trust for the years ended November 30, 2023 and November 30, 2022.
In November 2013, the Board of Trustees initially approved a
share repurchase program for the Trust. Pursuant to the reauthorization of the share repurchase program by the Board of Trustees in March 2019, the Trust is authorized to repurchase up to 10% of its common shares outstanding as of the last day of
the prior calendar year at market prices when shares are trading at a discount to net asset value (NAV). The share repurchase program does not obligate the Trust to purchase a specific amount of shares. There were no repurchases of common shares by
the Trust for the year ended November 30, 2023. During the year ended November 30, 2022, the Trust repurchased 100,000 of its common shares under the share repurchase program at a cost, including brokerage commissions, of $1,069,604 and an average
price per share of $10.70. The weighted average discount per share to NAV on these repurchases amounted to 10.96% for the year ended November 30, 2022.
At November 30, 2023, according to the filings made on Schedule
13D and 13G pursuant to Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, three affiliated entities together owned 12.6% of the Trust's common shares.
6 Fair Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value
measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| •
|
Level 1 – quoted prices
in active markets for identical investments |
| •
|
Level 2 – other
significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
| •
|
Level 3
– significant unobservable inputs (including a fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in
different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At November 30, 2023, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing
the Trust's investments, which are carried at fair value, were as follows:
| Asset
Description |
Level
1 |
Level
2 |
Level
3 |
Total
|
| Corporate
Bonds |
$
— |
$
1,063,462 |
$
— |
$
1,063,462 |
| Tax-Exempt
Municipal Obligations |
—
|
102,792,682
|
—
|
102,792,682
|
| Taxable
Municipal Obligations |
—
|
7,430,045
|
—
|
7,430,045
|
| Trust
Units |
—
|
981,350
|
—
|
981,350
|
| Total
Investments |
$ —
|
$112,267,539
|
$ —
|
$112,267,539
|
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the
Trustees and Shareholders of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements and Financial
Highlights
We have audited the accompanying statement of
assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (the “Trust”), including the portfolio of investments, as of November 30, 2023, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the
statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, and the related notes. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial
highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Trust as of November 30, 2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years
in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the
responsibility of the Trust’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Trust’s financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Trust in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
The Trust is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for
the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks
of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements and financial highlights. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2023, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; when replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing
procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
January 19, 2024
We have served as the auditor of one or
more Eaton Vance investment companies since 1959.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Federal Tax
Information (Unaudited)
The
Form 1099-DIV you receive in February 2024 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2023. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their
investment in the Trust. As required by the Internal Revenue Code and/or regulations, shareholders must be notified regarding exempt-interest dividends.
Exempt-Interest Dividends. For
the fiscal year ended November 30, 2023, the Trust designates 86.92% of distributions from net investment income as an exempt-interest dividend.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Dividend Reinvestment
Plan
The Trust offers a dividend reinvestment plan (Plan) pursuant
to which shareholders automatically have distributions reinvested in common shares (Shares) of the Trust unless they elect otherwise through their investment dealer. On the distribution payment date, if the NAV per Share is equal to or less than the
market price per Share plus estimated brokerage commissions, then new Shares will be issued. The number of Shares shall be determined by the greater of the NAV per Share or 95% of the market price. Otherwise, Shares generally will be purchased on
the open market by Equiniti Trust Company, LLC ("EQ"), the Plan agent (Agent). Distributions subject to income tax (if any) are taxable whether or not Shares are reinvested.
If your Shares are in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or
other nominee, you can ask the firm or nominee to participate in the Plan on your behalf. If the nominee does not offer the Plan, you will need to request that the Trust's transfer agent re-register your Shares in your name or you will not be able
to participate.
The Agent’s service fee for
handling distributions will be paid by the Trust. Plan participants will be charged their pro rata share of brokerage commissions on all open-market purchases.
Plan participants may withdraw from the Plan at any time by
writing to the Agent at the address noted on the following page. If you withdraw, you will receive Shares in your name for all Shares credited to your account under the Plan. If a participant elects by written notice to the Agent to sell part or all
of his or her Shares and remit the proceeds, the Agent is authorized to deduct a $5.00 fee plus brokerage commissions from the proceeds.
If you wish to participate in the Plan and your Shares are held
in your own name, you may complete the form on the following page and deliver it to the Agent. Any inquiries regarding the Plan can be directed to the Agent at 1-866-439-6787.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Application for
Participation in Dividend Reinvestment Plan
This form is for shareholders who hold
their common shares in their own names. If your common shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you should contact your nominee to see if it will participate in the Plan on your behalf. If you wish to participate in
the Plan, but your brokerage firm, bank, or nominee is unable to participate on your behalf, you should request that your common shares be re-registered in your own name which will enable your participation in the Plan.
The following authorization and appointment
is given with the understanding that I may terminate it at any time by terminating my participation in the Plan as provided in the terms and conditions of the Plan.
| |
| Please
print exact name on account |
|
| |
| Shareholder
signature |
Date
|
| |
| Shareholder
signature |
Date
|
| Please
sign exactly as your common shares are registered. All persons whose names appear on the share certificate must sign. |
YOU SHOULD NOT RETURN THIS FORM IF YOU WISH TO
RECEIVE YOUR DISTRIBUTIONS IN CASH. THIS IS NOT A PROXY.
This authorization form, when signed, should
be mailed to the following address:
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income
Trust
c/o Equiniti Trust Company, LLC ("EQ")
P.O. Box 10027
Newark, NJ 07101
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Board of
Trustees’ Contract Approval
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940
Act”), provides, in substance, that the investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year-to-year only if its continuation is approved on an annual basis by a vote of the fund’s
board of trustees, including a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“independent trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting held on June 8, 2023, the Boards of
Trustees/Directors (collectively, the “Board”) that oversee the registered investment companies advised by Eaton Vance Management or its affiliate, Boston Management and Research (the “Eaton Vance Funds”), including a
majority of the independent trustees (the “Independent Trustees”), voted to approve the continuation of existing investment advisory agreements and sub-advisory
agreements1 for each of the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. The Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of its Contract Review Committee, which is
a committee exclusively comprised of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished by the adviser and sub-adviser to each of the Eaton Vance Funds (including information
specifically requested by the Board) for a series of formal meetings held between April and June 2023, as well as certain additional information provided in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees as members of the Contract
Review Committee. Members of the Contract Review Committee also considered information received at prior meetings of the Board and its committees, to the extent such information was relevant to the Contract Review Committee’s annual evaluation
of the investment advisory agreements and sub-advisory agreements.
In connection with its evaluation of the investment advisory
agreements and sub-advisory agreements, the Board considered various information relating to the Eaton Vance Funds. This included information applicable to all or groups of Eaton Vance Funds, which is referenced immediately below, and information
applicable to the particular Eaton Vance Fund covered by this report (each “Eaton Vance Fund” is referred to below as a “fund”). (For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, references to “each
fund” in this section may include information that was considered at the portfolio-level.)
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
• A report from an independent
data provider comparing advisory and other fees paid by each fund to such fees paid by comparable funds, as identified by the independent data provider (“comparable funds”);
• A report from an independent
data provider comparing each fund’s total expense ratio (and its components) to those of comparable funds;
• A report from an independent
data provider comparing the investment performance of each fund (including, as relevant, total return data, income data, Sharpe ratios and information ratios) to the investment performance of comparable funds and, as applicable, benchmark indices,
over various time periods;
• In certain instances, data
regarding investment performance relative to customized groups of peer funds and blended indices identified by the adviser in consultation with the Portfolio Management Committee of the Board (a committee exclusively comprised of Independent
Trustees);
• Comparative
information concerning the fees charged and services provided by the adviser and sub-adviser to each fund in managing other accounts (which may include other mutual funds, collective investment funds and institutional accounts) using investment
strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such fund(s), if any;
• Profitability analyses with
respect to the adviser and sub-adviser to each of the funds;
Information about Portfolio Management and Trading
• Descriptions of the investment
management services provided to each fund, as well as each of the funds’ investment strategies and policies;
• The procedures and processes
used to determine the value of fund assets, including, when necessary, the determination of “fair value” and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes;
• Information about the policies
and practices of each fund’s adviser and sub-adviser with respect to trading, including their processes for seeking best execution of portfolio transactions;
• Information about the
allocation of brokerage transactions and the benefits, if any, received by the adviser and sub-adviser to each fund as a result of brokerage allocation, including, as applicable, information concerning the acquisition of research through client
commission arrangements and policies with respect to “soft dollars”;
• Data relating to the portfolio
turnover rate of each fund and related information regarding active management in the context of particular strategies;
Information about each Adviser and Sub-adviser
• Reports detailing the
financial results and condition of the adviser and sub-adviser to each fund;
1 Not all Eaton Vance Funds have entered into a sub-advisory agreement with a sub-adviser. Accordingly, references to
“sub-adviser” or “sub-advisory agreement” in this “Overview” section may not be applicable to the particular Eaton Vance Fund covered by this report.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Board of
Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued
• Information regarding the
individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and, for portfolio managers and certain other investment professionals, information relating to their responsibilities
with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts, as applicable;
• Information regarding the
adviser’s and its parent company’s (Morgan Stanley’s) efforts to retain and attract talented investment professionals, including in the context of a competitive marketplace for talent, as well as the ongoing unique environment
presented by hybrid, remote and other alternative work arrangements;
• Information regarding the
adviser’s compensation methodology for its investment professionals and the incentives and accountability it creates, along with investment professionals’ investments in the fund(s) they manage;
• The Code of Ethics of the
adviser and its affiliates and the sub-adviser of each fund, together with information relating to compliance with, and the administration of, such codes;
• Policies and procedures
relating to proxy voting, including regular reporting with respect to fund proxy voting activities;
• Information regarding the
handling of corporate actions and class actions, as well as information regarding litigation and other regulatory matters;
• Information concerning the
resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by the adviser and its affiliates and the sub-adviser of each fund, if any, including descriptions of their various compliance programs and their record of compliance;
• Information concerning the
business continuity and disaster recovery plans of the adviser and its affiliates and the sub-adviser of each fund, if any;
• A description of Eaton Vance
Management’s and Boston Management and Research’s oversight of sub-advisers, including with respect to regulatory and compliance issues, investment management and other matters;
Other Relevant Information
• Information regarding
ongoing initiatives to further integrate and harmonize, where applicable, the investment management and other departments of the adviser and its affiliates with the overall investment management infrastructure of Morgan Stanley, in light of Morgan
Stanley’s acquisition of Eaton Vance Corp. on March 1, 2021;
• Information concerning the
nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment advisory services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates;
• Information concerning
oversight of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians, fund accountants, and other third-party service providers by the adviser and/or administrator to each of the funds;
• Information concerning efforts
to implement policies and procedures with respect to various recently adopted regulations applicable to the funds, including Rule 12d1-4 (the Fund-of-Funds Rule), Rule 18f-4 (the Derivatives Rule) and Rule 2a-5 (the Fair Valuation Rule);
• For an Eaton Vance Fund
structured as an exchange-listed closed-end fund, information concerning the benefits of the closed-end fund structure, as well as, where relevant, the closed-end fund’s market prices (including as compared to the closed-end fund’s net
asset value (NAV)), trading volume data, continued use of auction preferred shares (where applicable), distribution rates and other relevant matters;
• The risks which the adviser
and/or its affiliates incur in connection with the management and operation of the funds, including, among others, litigation, regulatory, entrepreneurial, and other business risks (and the associated costs of such risks); and
• The terms of each investment
advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement.
During the
various meetings of the Board and its committees over the course of the year leading up to the June 8, 2023 meeting, the Board received information from portfolio managers and other investment professionals of the advisers and sub-advisers of the
funds regarding investment and performance matters, and considered various investment and trading strategies used in pursuing the funds’ investment objectives. The Board also received information regarding risk management techniques employed
in connection with the management of the funds. The Board and its committees evaluated issues pertaining to industry and regulatory developments, compliance procedures, fund governance and other issues with respect to the funds, and received and
participated in reports and presentations provided by Eaton Vance Management, Boston Management and Research and fund sub-advisers, with respect to such matters. In addition to the formal meetings of the Board and its committees, the Independent
Trustees held regular teleconferences to discuss, among other topics, matters relating to the continuation of investment advisory agreements and sub-advisory agreements.
The Contract Review Committee was advised throughout the
contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, independent legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee, with the advice of such counsel, exercised their own business judgment in determining the material
factors to be considered in evaluating each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory
agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with
respect to each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement. In evaluating each investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement, including the fee structures and other terms contained in such agreements, the members of the
Contract Review Committee were also informed by multiple years of analysis and discussion with the adviser and sub-adviser to each of the Eaton Vance Funds.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Board of
Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued
Results of the Contract Review Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other
information it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement between Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (the
“Fund”) and Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. Based on the recommendation of the
Contract Review Committee, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory
agreement for the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management
capabilities and investment processes in light of the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and
similar services to the Fund. In particular, the Board considered the abilities and experience of the Adviser’s investment professionals in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing
in municipal bonds. The Board considered the Adviser’s municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Fund. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio
management and other services, the compensation methods of the Adviser and other factors, including the reputation and resources of the Adviser to recruit and retain highly qualified research, advisory and supervisory investment professionals. In
addition, the Board considered the time and attention devoted to the Eaton Vance Funds, including the Fund, by senior management, as well as the infrastructure, operational capabilities and support staff in place to assist in the portfolio
management and operations of the Fund, including the provision of administrative services. The Board also considered the business-related and other risks to which the Adviser or its affiliates may be subject in managing the Fund. The Board
considered the deep experience of the Adviser and its affiliates with managing and operating funds organized as exchange-listed closed-end funds, such as the Fund. In this regard, the Board considered, among other things, the Adviser’s and its
affiliates’ experience with implementing leverage arrangements, monitoring and assessing trading price discounts and premiums and adhering to the requirements of securities exchanges.
The Board considered the compliance programs of the Adviser and
relevant affiliates thereof. The Board considered compliance and reporting matters regarding, among other things, personal trading by investment professionals, disclosure of portfolio holdings, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the
allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also considered the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from regulatory authorities, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered other
administrative services provided or overseen by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large fund
complex offering exposure to a variety of asset classes and investment disciplines.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the
Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to
that of comparable funds identified by an independent data provider (the peer group), as well as an appropriate benchmark index, and assessed the Fund’s performance on the basis of total return and current income return. The Board’s
review included comparative performance data with respect to the Fund for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2022. In this regard, the Board noted that the performance of the Fund was higher than the median performance
of the Fund’s peer group for the three-year period. The Board also noted that the performance of the Fund was lower than its benchmark index for the three-year period. The Board considered, among other things, the Adviser’s efforts to
generate competitive levels of tax-exempt current income over time through investments that focus on higher quality municipal bonds that often have longer maturities. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board considered contractual fee rates payable by the Fund
for advisory and administrative services (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the one-year period ended December 31,
2022, as compared to those of comparable funds, before and after giving effect to any undertaking to waive fees or reimburse expenses. The Board also considered certain factors identified by management in response to inquiries from the Contract
Review Committee regarding the Fund’s total expense ratio relative to comparable funds. Additionally, the Board took into account the financial resources committed by the Adviser in structuring the Fund at the time of its initial public
offering and the waiver of fees provided by the Adviser for the first five years of the Fund’s life. The Board also considered that, following discussions with the Contract Review Committee, the Adviser had implemented a series of permanent
reductions in management fees beginning in May 2010, which had been fully implemented as of December 31, 2022.
After considering the foregoing information, and in light of
the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services are reasonable.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Board of
Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued
Profitability and “Fall-Out” Benefits
The Board considered the level of profits realized by the
Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to marketing support or other
payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution or other services.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and
the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are deemed not to be excessive.
The Board also considered direct or indirect fall-out benefits
received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their respective relationships with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund
and other investment advisory clients.
Economies of
Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the
Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the
difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from economies of scale, if any, with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the
Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or
decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the Fund currently shares in the benefits from economies of scale, if any, when they are realized by the Adviser. The Board also considered the fact that the Fund is not continuously
offered and that the Fund’s assets are not expected to increase materially in the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Board did not find that the implementation of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule is warranted at this time.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Management and
Organization
Fund
Management. The Board of Trustees of the Fund (the “Board”) is responsible for the overall management and supervision of the affairs of the Fund. The Board members and officers of the Fund are listed
below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Each Trustee holds office until the annual meeting for the year in which his or her term expires and until his or her
successor is elected and qualified, subject to a prior death, resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal. Under the terms of the Fund’s current Trustee retirement policy, an Independent Trustee must retire and resign as a Trustee on
the earlier of: (i) the first day of July following his or her 74th birthday; or (ii), with limited exception, December 31st of the 20th year in which he or she has served as a Trustee. However, if such retirement and resignation would cause the
Fund to be out of compliance with Section 16 of the 1940 Act or any other regulations or guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission, then such retirement and resignation will not become effective until such time as action has been taken for
the Fund to be in compliance therewith. The “noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Fund, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Board
member and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “EV” refers to EV LLC, “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management,
“MSIM” refers to Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EV is the trustee of each of EVM and BMR. Each of EVM, BMR, EVD and EV are indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries
of Morgan Stanley. Each officer affiliated with EVM may hold a position with other EVM affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below. Each Trustee oversees 127 funds in the Eaton Vance fund complex (including both funds
and portfolios in a hub and spoke structure).
| Name
and Year of Birth |
Fund
Position(s) |
Length
of Service |
Principal
Occupation(s) and Other Directorships
During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience |
| Interested Trustee
|
Anchal
Pachnanda(1)
1980 |
Class
II
Trustee |
Until
2025.
3 years.
Since 2023. |
Co-Head of
Strategy of MSIM (since 2019). Formerly, Head of Strategy of MSIM (2017-2019). Ms. Pachnanda is an interested person because of her position with MSIM, which is an affiliate of the Fund.
Other
Directorships. None. |
| Noninterested Trustees
|
Alan
C. Bowser
1962 |
Class
III
Trustee |
Until
2026.
3 years.
Since 2023. |
Private investor.
Formerly, Chief Diversity Officer, Partner and a member of the Operating Committee, and formerly served as Senior Advisor on Diversity and Inclusion for the firm’s chief executive officer, Co-Head of the Americas Region, and Senior Client
Advisor of Bridgewater Associates, an asset management firm (2011- 2023).
Other Directorships. Independent Director of Stout Risius Ross (a middle market professional services advisory firm) (since 2021).
|
Mark
R. Fetting
1954 |
Class
II
Trustee |
Until
2025.
3 years.
Since 2016. |
Private investor.
Formerly held various positions at Legg Mason, Inc. (investment management firm) (2000-2012), including President, Chief Executive Officer, Director and Chairman (2008-2012), Senior Executive Vice President (2004-2008) and Executive Vice President
(2001-2004). Formerly, President of Legg Mason family of funds (2001-2008). Formerly, Division President and Senior Officer of Prudential Financial Group, Inc. and related companies (investment management firm) (1991-2000).
Other Directorships. None. |
Cynthia
E. Frost
1961 |
Class
I
Trustee |
Until
2024.
3 years.
Since 2014. |
Private investor.
Formerly, Chief Investment Officer of Brown University (university endowment) (2000-2012). Formerly, Portfolio Strategist for Duke Management Company (university endowment manager) (1995-2000). Formerly, Managing Director, Cambridge Associates
(investment consulting company) (1989-1995). Formerly, Consultant, Bain and Company (management consulting firm) (1987-1989). Formerly, Senior Equity Analyst, BA Investment Management Company (1983-1985).
Other
Directorships. None. |
George
J. Gorman
1952 |
Chairperson
of the Board
and Class I
Trustee |
Until
2024.
3 years.
Chairperson of the Board since 2021 and Trustee since 2014. |
Principal
at George J. Gorman LLC (consulting firm). Formerly, Senior Partner at Ernst & Young LLP (a registered public accounting firm) (1974-2009).
Other Directorships. None. |
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Management and
Organization — continued
| Name
and Year of Birth |
Fund
Position(s) |
Length
of Service |
Principal
Occupation(s) and Other Directorships
During Past Five Years and Other Relevant Experience |
| Noninterested Trustees
(continued) |
Valerie
A. Mosley
1960 |
Class
I
Trustee |
Until
2024.
3 years.
Since 2014. |
Chairwoman
and Chief Executive Officer of Valmo Ventures (a consulting and investment firm). Founder of Upward Wealth, Inc., dba BrightUp, a fintech platform. Formerly, Partner and Senior Vice President, Portfolio Manager and Investment Strategist at
Wellington Management Company, LLP (investment management firm) (1992-2012). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, PG Corbin Asset Management (1990-1992). Formerly worked in institutional corporate bond sales at Kidder Peabody (1986-1990).
Other Directorships. Director of DraftKings, Inc. (digital sports entertainment and gaming company) (since September 2020). Director of Envestnet, Inc. (provider of intelligent systems for wealth management and
financial wellness) (since 2018). Formerly, Director of Dynex Capital, Inc. (mortgage REIT) (2013-2020) and Director of Groupon, Inc. (e-commerce provider) (2020-2022). |
Keith
Quinton
1958 |
Class
III
Trustee |
Until
2026.
3 years.
Since 2018. |
Private investor,
researcher and lecturer. Formerly, Independent Investment Committee Member at New Hampshire Retirement System (2017-2021). Formerly, Portfolio Manager and Senior Quantitative Analyst at Fidelity Investments (investment management firm)
(2001-2014).
Other Directorships. Formerly, Director (2016-2021) and Chairman (2019-2021) of New Hampshire Municipal Bond Bank. |
Marcus
L. Smith
1966 |
Class
III
Trustee |
Until
2026.
3 years.
Since 2018. |
Private investor
and independent corporate director. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Canada (2012-2017), Chief Investment Officer, Asia (2010-2012), Director of Asian Research (2004-2010) and portfolio manager (2001-2017) at MFS Investment Management
(investment management firm).
Other Directorships. Director of First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (an industrial REIT) (since 2021). Director of MSCI Inc. (global provider of investment decision support
tools) (since 2017). Formerly, Director of DCT Industrial Trust Inc. (logistics real estate company) (2017-2018). |
Susan
J. Sutherland
1957 |
Class
I
Trustee |
Until
2024.
3 years.
Since 2015. |
Private investor.
Director of Ascot Group Limited and certain of its subsidiaries (insurance and reinsurance) (since 2017). Formerly, Director of Hagerty Holding Corp. (insurance) (2015-2018) and Montpelier Re Holdings Ltd. (insurance and reinsurance) (2013-2015).
Formerly, Associate, Counsel and Partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (law firm) (1982-2013).
Other Directorships. Formerly, Director of Kairos Acquisition Corp. (insurance/InsurTech
acquisition company) (2021-2023). |
Scott
E. Wennerholm
1959 |
Class
II
Trustee |
Until
2025.
3 years.
Since 2016. |
Private investor.
Formerly, Trustee at Wheelock College (postsecondary institution) (2012-2018). Formerly, Consultant at GF Parish Group (executive recruiting firm) (2016-2017). Formerly, Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President at BNY Mellon Asset
Management (investment management firm) (2005-2011). Formerly, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer at Natixis Global Asset Management (investment management firm) (1997-2004). Formerly, Vice President at Fidelity Investments
Institutional Services (investment management firm) (1994-1997).
Other Directorships. None. |
Nancy
A. Wiser
1967 |
Class
III
Trustee |
Until
2026.
3 years.
Since 2022. |
Formerly,
Executive Vice President and the Global Head of Operations at Wells Fargo Asset Management (2011-2021).
Other Directorships. None. |
| Name
and Year of Birth |
Fund
Position(s) |
Length
of Service |
Principal
Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years |
| Principal
Officers who are not Trustees |
Kenneth
A. Topping
1966 |
President
|
Since
2023 |
Vice
President and Chief Administrative Officer of EVM and BMR and Chief Operating Officer for Public Markets at MSIM. Also Vice President of Calvert Research and Management (“CRM”) since 2021. Formerly, Chief Operating Officer for Goldman
Sachs Asset Management ‘Classic’ (2009-2020). |
Deidre
E. Walsh
1971 |
Vice
President and
Chief
Legal Officer |
Since
2009 |
Vice
President of EVM and BMR. Also Vice President of CRM. |
James
F. Kirchner
1967 |
Treasurer
|
Since
2007 |
Vice
President of EVM and BMR. Also Vice President of CRM. |
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Management and
Organization — continued
| Name
and Year of Birth |
Fund
Position(s) |
Length
of Service |
Principal
Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years |
| Principal
Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
Nicholas
S. Di Lorenzo
1987 |
Secretary
|
Since
2022 |
Formerly,
associate (2012-2021) and counsel (2022) at Dechert LLP. |
Laura
T. Donovan
1976 |
Chief
Compliance
Officer |
Since
2024 |
Vice
President of EVM and BMR. |
(1) Ms. Pachnanda began serving as Trustee effective April 1, 2023.
| Privacy
Notice |
April 2021
|
| FACTS
|
WHAT
DOES EATON VANCE DO WITH YOUR
PERSONAL INFORMATION? |
| Why?
|
Financial
companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read
this notice carefully to understand what we do. |
| |
|
| What?
|
The
types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include:■ Social Security number and income
■ investment
experience and risk tolerance
■ checking account number and wire transfer instructions |
| |
|
| How?
|
All
financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons Eaton Vance
chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. |
Reasons
we can share your
personal information |
Does
Eaton Vance
share? |
Can
you limit
this sharing? |
| For
our everyday business purposes — such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus |
Yes
|
No
|
| For
our marketing purposes — to offer our products and services to you |
Yes
|
No
|
| For
joint marketing with other financial companies |
No
|
We
don’t share |
| For
our investment management affiliates’ everyday business purposes — information about your transactions, experiences, and creditworthiness |
Yes
|
Yes
|
| For
our affiliates’ everyday business purposes — information about your transactions and experiences |
Yes
|
No
|
| For
our affiliates’ everyday business purposes — information about your creditworthiness |
No
|
We
don’t share |
| For
our investment management affiliates to market to you |
Yes
|
Yes
|
| For
our affiliates to market to you |
No
|
We
don’t share |
| For
nonaffiliates to market to you |
No
|
We
don’t share |
To
limit our
sharing |
Call
toll-free 1-800-262-1122 or email: EVPrivacy@eatonvance.comPlease note:If you are a new customer,
we can begin sharing your information 30 days from the date we sent this notice. When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice. However, you can contact
us at any time to limit our sharing. |
| Questions?
|
Call
toll-free 1-800-262-1122 or email: EVPrivacy@eatonvance.com |
| Privacy
Notice — continued |
April 2021
|
| Who
we are |
| Who
is providing this notice? |
Eaton
Vance Management, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton Vance Management (International) Limited, Eaton Vance Advisers International Ltd., Eaton Vance Global Advisors Limited, Eaton Vance Management’s Real Estate
Investment Group, Boston Management and Research, Calvert Research and Management, Eaton Vance and Calvert Fund Families and our investment advisory affiliates (“Eaton Vance”) (see Investment Management Affiliates definition below)
|
| What
we do |
How
does Eaton Vance
protect my personal
information? |
To
protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings. We have policies governing the proper handling of
customer information by personnel and requiring third parties that provide support to adhere to appropriate security standards with respect to such information. |
How
does Eaton Vance
collect my personal
information? |
We
collect your personal information, for example, when you■ open an account or make deposits or withdrawals from your account
■ buy securities from us or make a wire transfer
■ give us your contact informationWe also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates, or other companies. |
| Why
can’t I limit all sharing? |
Federal
law gives you the right to limit only■ sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes — information about your creditworthiness
■ affiliates from using your information
to market to you
■ sharing for nonaffiliates to market to youState laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. See below for more on your rights under state law.
|
| Definitions
|
Investment
Management
Affiliates |
Eaton
Vance Investment Management Affiliates include registered investment advisers, registered broker- dealers, and registered and unregistered funds. Investment Management Affiliates does not include entities associated with Morgan Stanley Wealth
Management, such as Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. |
| Affiliates
|
Companies
related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.■ Our affiliates include companies with a Morgan Stanley name and financial
companies such as Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co. |
| Nonaffiliates
|
Companies
not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies.■ Eaton Vance does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to
you. |
| Joint
marketing |
A
formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you.■ Eaton Vance doesn’t jointly market.
|
| Other
important information |
| Vermont:
Except as permitted by law, we will not share personal information we collect about Vermont residents with Nonaffiliates unless you provide us with your written consent to share such
information.California: Except as permitted by law, we will not share personal information we collect about California residents with Nonaffiliates and we will limit sharing
such personal information with our Affiliates to comply with California privacy laws that apply to us. |
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Potential Conflicts of
Interest
As a
diversified global financial services firm, Morgan Stanley, the parent company of the investment adviser, engages in a broad spectrum of activities, including financial advisory services, investment management activities, lending, commercial
banking, sponsoring and managing private investment funds, engaging in broker-dealer transactions and principal securities, commodities and foreign exchange transactions, research publication and other activities. In the ordinary course of its
business, Morgan Stanley is a full-service investment banking and financial services firm and therefore engages in activities where Morgan Stanley’s interests or the interests of its clients may conflict with the interests of a Fund. Morgan
Stanley advises clients and sponsors, manages or advises other investment funds and investment programs, accounts and businesses (collectively, together with the Morgan Stanley funds, any new or successor funds, programs, accounts or businesses
(other than funds, programs, accounts or businesses sponsored, managed, or advised by former direct or indirect subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp. (“Eaton Vance Investment Accounts”)), the ‘‘MS Investment Accounts, and,
together with the Eaton Vance Investment Accounts, the “Affiliated Investment Accounts’’) with a wide variety of investment objectives that in some instances may overlap or conflict with the Fund’s investment objectives and
present conflicts of interest. In addition, Morgan Stanley or the investment adviser may also from time to time create new or successor Affiliated Investment Accounts that may compete with a Fund and present similar conflicts of interest. The
discussion below enumerates certain actual, apparent and potential conflicts of interest. There is no assurance that conflicts of interest will be resolved in favor of Fund shareholders and, in fact, they may not be. Conflicts of interest not
described below may also exist.
The discussions below
with respect to actual, apparent and potential conflicts of interest also may be applicable to or arise from the MS Investment Accounts whether or not specifically identified.
Material Non-public and Other Information. It is expected that confidential or material non-public information regarding an investment or potential investment opportunity may become available to the investment adviser. If such information becomes available, the
investment adviser may be precluded (including by applicable law or internal policies or procedures) from pursuing an investment or disposition opportunity with respect to such investment or investment opportunity. The investment adviser may also
from time to time be subject to contractual ‘‘stand-still’’ obligations and/or confidentiality obligations that may restrict its ability to trade in certain investments on a Fund’s behalf. In addition, the investment
adviser may be precluded from disclosing such information to an investment team, even in circumstances in which the information would be beneficial if disclosed. Therefore, the investment team may not be provided access to material non-public
information in the possession of Morgan Stanley that might be relevant to an investment decision to be made on behalf of a Fund, and the investment team may initiate a transaction or sell an investment that, if such information had been known to it,
may not have been undertaken. In addition, certain members of the investment team may be recused from certain investment-related discussions so that such members do not receive information that would limit their ability to perform functions of their
employment with the investment adviser or its affiliates unrelated to that of a Fund. Furthermore, access to certain parts of Morgan Stanley may be subject to third party confidentiality obligations and to information barriers established by Morgan
Stanley in order to manage potential conflicts of interest and regulatory restrictions, including without limitation joint transaction restrictions pursuant to the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). Accordingly, the
investment adviser’s ability to source investments from other business units within Morgan Stanley may be limited and there can be no assurance that the investment adviser will be able to source any investments from any one or more parts of
the Morgan Stanley network.
The investment adviser
may restrict its investment decisions and activities on behalf of the Funds in various circumstances, including because of applicable regulatory requirements or information held by the investment adviser or Morgan Stanley. The investment adviser
might not engage in transactions or other activities for, or enforce certain rights in favor of, a Fund due to Morgan Stanley’s activities outside the Funds. In instances where trading of an investment is restricted, the investment adviser may
not be able to purchase or sell such investment on behalf of a Fund, resulting in the Fund’s inability to participate in certain desirable transactions. This inability to buy or sell an investment could have an adverse effect on a Fund’s
portfolio due to, among other things, changes in an investment’s value during the period its trading is restricted. Also, in situations where the investment adviser is required to aggregate its positions with those of other Morgan Stanley
business units for position limit calculations, the investment adviser may have to refrain from making investments due to the positions held by other Morgan Stanley business units or their clients. There may be other situations where the investment
adviser refrains from making an investment due to additional disclosure obligations, regulatory requirements, policies, and reputational risk, or the investment adviser may limit purchases or sales of securities in respect of which Morgan Stanley is
engaged in an underwriting or other distribution capacity.
Morgan Stanley has established certain information barriers and
other policies to address the sharing of information between different businesses within Morgan Stanley. As a result of information barriers, the investment adviser generally will not have access, or will have limited access, to certain information
and personnel in other areas of Morgan Stanley relating to business transactions for clients (including transactions in investing, banking, prime brokerage and certain other areas), and generally will not manage the Funds with the benefit of the
information held by such other areas. Morgan Stanley, due to its access to and knowledge of funds, markets and securities based on its prime brokerage and other businesses, may make decisions based on information or take (or refrain from taking)
actions with respect to interests in investments of the kind held (directly or indirectly) by the Funds in a manner that may be adverse to the Funds, and will not have any obligation or other duty to share information with the investment adviser. In
limited circumstances, however, including for purposes of managing business and reputational risk, and subject to policies and procedures and any applicable regulations, Morgan Stanley personnel, including personnel of the investment adviser, on one
side of an information barrier may have access to information and personnel on the other side of the information barrier through “wall crossings.” The investment adviser faces conflicts of interest in determining whether to engage in
such wall crossings. Information obtained in connection with such wall crossings may limit or restrict the ability of the investment adviser to engage in or otherwise effect transactions on behalf of the Funds (including purchasing or selling
securities that the investment adviser may otherwise have purchased or sold for a Fund in the absence of a wall crossing). In managing conflicts of interest that arise because of the foregoing, the investment adviser generally will be subject to
fiduciary requirements. The investment adviser may also implement internal information barriers or ethical walls, and the conflicts described herein with respect to information barriers and otherwise with respect to Morgan Stanley and the investment
adviser will also apply internally within the investment adviser. As a result, a Fund may not be permitted to transact in (e.g., dispose of a security in whole or in part) during periods when it otherwise
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Potential Conflicts of
Interest — continued
would have been able
to do so, which could adversely affect a Fund. Other investors in the security that are not subject to such restrictions may be able to transact in the security during such periods. There may also be circumstances in which, as a result of
information held by certain portfolio management teams in the investment adviser, the investment adviser limits an activity or transaction for a Fund, including if the Fund is managed by a portfolio management team other than the team holding such
information.
Investments by Morgan Stanley and its
Affiliated Investment Accounts. In serving in multiple capacities to Affiliated Investment Accounts, Morgan Stanley, including the investment adviser and its investment teams, may have obligations to other clients
or investors in Affiliated Investment Accounts, the fulfillment of which may not be in the best interests of a Fund or its shareholders. A Fund’s investment objectives may overlap with the investment objectives of certain Affiliated Investment
Accounts. As a result, the members of an investment team may face conflicts in the allocation of investment opportunities among a Fund and other investment funds, programs, accounts and businesses advised by or affiliated with the investment
adviser. Certain Affiliated Investment Accounts may provide for higher management or incentive fees or greater expense reimbursements or overhead allocations, all of which may contribute to this conflict of interest and create an incentive for the
investment adviser to favor such other accounts.
Morgan Stanley currently invests and plans to continue to
invest on its own behalf and on behalf of its Affiliated Investment Accounts in a wide variety of investment opportunities globally. Morgan Stanley and its Affiliated Investment Accounts, to the extent consistent with applicable law and policies and
procedures, will be permitted to invest in investment opportunities without making such opportunities available to a Fund beforehand. Subject to the foregoing, Morgan Stanley may offer investments that fall into the investment objectives of an
Affiliated Investment Account to such account or make such investment on its own behalf, even though such investment also falls within a Fund’s investment objectives. A Fund may invest in opportunities that Morgan Stanley and/or one or more
Affiliated Investment Accounts has declined, and vice versa. All of the foregoing may reduce the number of investment opportunities available to a Fund and may create conflicts of interest in allocating investment opportunities. Investors should
note that the conflicts inherent in making such allocation decisions may not always be resolved to a Fund’s advantage. There can be no assurance that a Fund will have an opportunity to participate in certain opportunities that fall within
their investment objectives.
To seek to reduce potential
conflicts of interest and to attempt to allocate such investment opportunities in a fair and equitable manner, the investment adviser has implemented allocation policies and procedures. These policies and procedures are intended to give all clients
of the investment adviser, including the Funds, fair access to investment opportunities consistent with the requirements of organizational documents, investment strategies, applicable laws and regulations, and the fiduciary duties of the investment
adviser. Each client of the investment adviser that is subject to the allocation policies and procedures, including each Fund, is assigned an investment team and portfolio manager(s) by the investment adviser. The investment team and portfolio
managers review investment opportunities and will decide with respect to the allocation of each opportunity considering various factors and in accordance with the allocation policies and procedures. The allocation policies and procedures are subject
to change. Investors should note that the conflicts inherent in making such allocation decisions may not always be resolved to the advantage of a Fund.
It is possible that Morgan Stanley or an Affiliated Investment
Account, including another Eaton Vance fund, will invest in or advise a company that is or becomes a competitor of a company of which a Fund holds an investment. Such investment could create a conflict between the Fund, on the one hand, and Morgan
Stanley or the Affiliated Investment Account, on the other hand. In such a situation, Morgan Stanley may also have a conflict in the allocation of its own resources to the portfolio investment. Furthermore, certain Affiliated Investment Accounts
will be focused primarily on investing in other funds which may have strategies that overlap and/or directly conflict and compete with a Fund.
In addition, certain investment professionals who are involved
in a Fund’s activities remain responsible for the investment activities of other Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by the investment adviser and its affiliates, and they will devote time to the management of such investments and other
newly created Affiliated Investment Accounts (whether in the form of funds, separate accounts or other vehicles), as well as their own investments. In addition, in connection with the management of investments for other Affiliated Investment
Accounts, members of Morgan Stanley and its affiliates may serve on the boards of directors of or advise companies which may compete with a Fund’s portfolio investments. Moreover, these Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by Morgan Stanley
and its affiliates may pursue investment opportunities that may also be suitable for a Fund.
It should be noted that Morgan Stanley may, directly or
indirectly, make large investments in certain of its Affiliated Investment Accounts, and accordingly Morgan Stanley’s investment in a Fund may not be a determining factor in the outcome of any of the foregoing conflicts. Nothing herein
restricts or in any way limits the activities of Morgan Stanley, including its ability to buy or sell interests in, or provide financing to, equity and/or debt instruments, funds or portfolio companies, for its own accounts or for the accounts of
Affiliated Investment Accounts or other investment funds or clients in accordance with applicable law.
Different clients of the investment adviser, including a Fund,
may invest in different classes of securities of the same issuer, depending on the respective clients’ investment objectives and policies. As a result, the investment adviser and its affiliates, at times, will seek to satisfy fiduciary
obligations to certain clients owning one class of securities of a particular issuer by pursuing or enforcing rights on behalf of those clients with respect to such class of securities, and those activities may have an adverse effect on another
client which owns a different class of securities of such issuer. For example, if one client holds debt securities of an issuer and another client holds equity securities of the same issuer, if the issuer experiences financial or operational
challenges, the investment adviser and its affiliates may seek a liquidation of the issuer on behalf of the client that holds the debt securities, whereas the client holding the equity securities may benefit from a reorganization of the issuer.
Thus, in such situations, the actions taken by the investment adviser or its affiliates on behalf of one client can negatively impact securities held by another client. These conflicts also exist as between the investment adviser’s clients,
including the Funds, and the Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by Morgan Stanley.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Potential Conflicts of
Interest — continued
The
investment adviser and its affiliates may give advice and recommend securities to other clients which may differ from advice given to, or securities recommended or bought for, a Fund even though such other clients’ investment objectives may be
similar to those of the Fund.
The investment adviser and
its affiliates manage long and short portfolios. The simultaneous management of long and short portfolios creates conflicts of interest in portfolio management and trading in that opposite directional positions may be taken in client accounts,
including client accounts managed by the same investment team, and creates risks such as: (i) the risk that short sale activity could adversely affect the market value of long positions in one or more portfolios (and vice versa) and (ii) the risks
associated with the trading desk receiving opposing orders in the same security simultaneously. The investment adviser and its affiliates have adopted policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to mitigate these conflicts. In certain
circumstances, the investment adviser invests on behalf of itself in securities and other instruments that would be appropriate for, held by, or may fall within the investment guidelines of its clients, including a Fund. At times, the investment
adviser may give advice or take action for its own accounts that differs from, conflicts with, or is adverse to advice given or action taken for any client.
From time to time, conflicts also arise due to the fact that
certain securities or instruments may be held in some client accounts, including a Fund, but not in others, or that client accounts may have different levels of holdings in certain securities or instruments. In addition, due to differences in the
investment strategies or restrictions among client accounts, the investment adviser may take action with respect to one account that differs from the action taken with respect to another account. In some cases, a client account may compensate the
investment adviser based on the performance of the securities held by that account. The existence of such a performance based fee may create additional conflicts of interest for the investment adviser in the allocation of management time, resources
and investment opportunities. The investment adviser has adopted several policies and procedures designed to address these potential conflicts including a code of ethics and policies that govern the investment adviser’s trading practices,
including, among other things, the aggregation and allocation of trades among clients, brokerage allocations, cross trades and best execution.
In addition, at times an investment adviser investment team
will give advice or take action with respect to the investments of one or more clients that is not given or taken with respect to other clients with similar investment programs, objectives, and strategies. Accordingly, clients with similar
strategies will not always hold the same securities or instruments or achieve the same performance. The investment adviser’s investment teams also advise clients with conflicting programs, objectives or strategies. These conflicts also exist
as between the investment adviser’s clients, including the Funds, and the Affiliated Investment Accounts managed by Morgan Stanley.
The investment adviser maintains separate trading desks by
investment team and generally based on asset class, including two trading desks trading equity securities. These trading desks operate independently of one another. The two equity trading desks do not share information. The separate equity trading
desks may result in one desk competing against the other desk when implementing buy and sell transactions, possibly causing certain accounts to pay more or receive less for a security than other accounts. In addition, Morgan Stanley and its
affiliates maintain separate trading desks that operate independently of each other and do not share trading information with the investment adviser. These trading desks may compete against the investment adviser trading desks when implementing buy
and sell transactions, possibly causing certain Affiliated Investment Accounts to pay more or receive less for a security than other Affiliated Investment Accounts.
Investments by Separate Investment Departments. The entities and individuals that provide investment-related services for the Fund and certain other Eaton Vance Investment Accounts (the “Eaton Vance Investment Department”) may be different from the
entities and individuals that provide investment-related services to MS Investment Accounts (the “MS Investment Department and, together with the Eaton Vance Investment Department, the “Investment Departments”). Although Morgan
Stanley has implemented information barriers between the Investment Departments in accordance with internal policies and procedures, each Investment Department may engage in discussions and share information and resources with the other Investment
Department on certain investment-related matters. The sharing of information and resources between the Investment Departments is designed to further increase the knowledge and effectiveness of each Investment Department. Because each Investment
Department generally makes investment decisions and executes trades independently of the other, the quality and price of execution, and the performance of investments and accounts, can be expected to vary. In addition, each Investment Department may
use different trading systems and technology and may employ differing investment and trading strategies. As a result, a MS Investment Account could trade in advance of the Fund (and vice versa), might complete trades more quickly and efficiently
than the Fund, and/or achieve different execution than the Fund on the same or similar investments made contemporaneously, even when the Investment Departments shared research and viewpoints that led to that investment decision. Any sharing of
information or resources between the Investment Department servicing the Fund and the MS Investment Department may result, from time to time, in the Fund simultaneously or contemporaneously seeking to engage in the same or similar transactions as an
account serviced by the other Investment Department and for which there are limited buyers or sellers on specific securities, which could result in less favorable execution for the Fund than such account. The Eaton Vance Investment Department will
not knowingly or intentionally cause the Fund to engage in a cross trade with an account serviced by the MS Investment Department, however, subject to applicable law and internal policies and procedures, the Fund may conduct cross trades with other
accounts serviced by the Eaton Vance Investment Department. Although the Eaton Vance Investment Department may aggregate the Fund’s trades with trades of other accounts serviced by the Eaton Vance Investment Department, subject to applicable
law and internal policies and procedures, there will be no aggregation or coordination of trades with accounts serviced by the MS Investment Department, even when both Investment Departments are seeking to acquire or dispose of the same investments
contemporaneously.
Payments to Broker-Dealers and
Other Financial Intermediaries. The investment adviser and/or Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (“EVD”) may pay compensation, out of their own funds and not as an expense of the Funds, to certain financial
intermediaries (which may include affiliates of the investment adviser and EVD), including recordkeepers and administrators of various deferred compensation plans, in connection with the sale, distribution, marketing and retention of shares of the
Funds and/or shareholder servicing. For example, the investment adviser or EVD may pay additional compensation to a
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Potential Conflicts of
Interest — continued
financial
intermediary for, among other things, promoting the sale and distribution of Fund shares, providing access to various programs, mutual fund platforms or preferred or recommended mutual fund lists that may be offered by a financial intermediary,
granting EVD access to a financial intermediary’s financial advisors and consultants, providing assistance in the ongoing education and training of a financial intermediary’s financial personnel, furnishing marketing support, maintaining
share balances and/or for sub-accounting, recordkeeping, administrative, shareholder or transaction processing services. Such payments are in addition to any distribution fees, shareholder servicing fees and/or transfer agency fees that may be
payable by the Funds. The additional payments may be based on various factors, including level of sales (based on gross or net sales or some specified minimum sales or some other similar criteria related to sales of the Funds and/or some or all
other Eaton Vance funds), amount of assets invested by the financial intermediary’s customers (which could include current or aged assets of the Funds and/or some or all other Eaton Vance funds), a Fund’s advisory fee, some other agreed
upon amount or other measures as determined from time to time by the investment adviser and/or EVD. The amount of these payments may be different for different financial intermediaries.
The prospect of receiving, or the receipt of, additional
compensation, as described above, by financial intermediaries may provide such financial intermediaries and their financial advisors and other salespersons with an incentive to favor sales of shares of the Funds over other investment options with
respect to which these financial intermediaries do not receive additional compensation (or receive lower levels of additional compensation). These payment arrangements, however, will not change the price that an investor pays for shares of the Funds
or the amount that the Funds receive to invest on behalf of an investor. Investors may wish to take such payment arrangements into account when considering and evaluating any recommendations relating to Fund shares and should review carefully any
disclosures provided by financial intermediaries as to their compensation. In addition, in certain circumstances, the investment adviser may restrict, limit or reduce the amount of a Fund’s investment, or restrict the type of governance or
voting rights it acquires or exercises, where the Fund (potentially together with Morgan Stanley) exceeds a certain ownership interest, or possesses certain degrees of voting or control or has other interests.
Morgan Stanley Trading and Principal Investing Activities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, Morgan Stanley will generally conduct its sales and trading businesses, publish research and analysis, and render investment advice without regard for a Fund’s
holdings, although these activities could have an adverse impact on the value of one or more of the Fund’s investments, or could cause Morgan Stanley to have an interest in one or more portfolio investments that is different from, and
potentially adverse to that of a Fund. Furthermore, from time to time, the investment adviser or its affiliates may invest “seed” capital in a Fund, typically to enable the Fund to commence investment operations and/or achieve sufficient
scale. The investment adviser and its affiliates may hedge such seed capital exposure by investing in derivatives or other instruments expected to produce offsetting exposure. Such hedging transactions, if any, would occur outside of a
Fund.
Morgan Stanley’s sales and trading,
financing and principal investing businesses (whether or not specifically identified as such, and including Morgan Stanley’s trading and principal investing businesses) will not be required to offer any investment opportunities to a Fund.
These businesses may encompass, among other things, principal trading activities as well as principal investing.
Morgan Stanley’s sales and trading, financing and
principal investing businesses have acquired or invested in, and in the future may acquire or invest in, minority and/or majority control positions in equity or debt instruments of diverse public and/or private companies. Such activities may put
Morgan Stanley in a position to exercise contractual, voting or creditor rights, or management or other control with respect to securities or loans of portfolio investments or other issuers, and in these instances Morgan Stanley may, in its
discretion and subject to applicable law, act to protect its own interests or interests of clients, and not a Fund’s interests.
Subject to the limitations of applicable law, a Fund may
purchase from or sell assets to, or make investments in, companies in which Morgan Stanley has or may acquire an interest, including as an owner, creditor or counterparty.
Morgan Stanley’s Investment Banking and Other Commercial
Activities. Morgan Stanley advises clients on a variety of mergers, acquisitions, restructuring, bankruptcy and financing transactions. Morgan Stanley may act as an advisor to clients, including other investment
funds that may compete with a Fund and with respect to investments that a Fund may hold. Morgan Stanley may give advice and take action with respect to any of its clients or proprietary accounts that may differ from the advice given, or may involve
an action of a different timing or nature than the action taken, by a Fund. Morgan Stanley may give advice and provide recommendations to persons competing with a Fund and/or any of a Fund’s investments that are contrary to the Fund’s
best interests and/or the best interests of any of its investments.
Morgan Stanley could be engaged in financial advising, whether
on the buy-side or sell-side, or in financing or lending assignments that could result in Morgan Stanley’s determining in its discretion or being required to act exclusively on behalf of one or more third parties, which could limit a
Fund’s ability to transact with respect to one or more existing or potential investments. Morgan Stanley may have relationships with third-party funds, companies or investors who may have invested in or may look to invest in portfolio
companies, and there could be conflicts between a Fund’s best interests, on the one hand, and the interests of a Morgan Stanley client or counterparty, on the other hand.
To the extent that Morgan Stanley advises creditor or debtor
companies in the financial restructuring of companies either prior to or after filing for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar laws in other jurisdictions, the investment adviser’s flexibility in making
investments in such restructurings on a Fund’s behalf may be limited.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Potential Conflicts of
Interest — continued
Morgan
Stanley could provide investment banking services to competitors of portfolio companies, as well as to private equity and/or private credit funds; such activities may present Morgan Stanley with a conflict of interest vis-a-vis a Fund’s
investment and may also result in a conflict in respect of the allocation of investment banking resources to portfolio companies.
To the extent permitted by applicable law, Morgan Stanley may
provide a broad range of financial services to companies in which a Fund invests, including strategic and financial advisory services, interim acquisition financing and other lending and underwriting or placement of securities, and Morgan Stanley
generally will be paid fees (that may include warrants or other securities) for such services. Morgan Stanley will not share any of the foregoing interest, fees and other compensation received by it (including, for the avoidance of doubt, amounts
received by the investment adviser) with a Fund, and any advisory fees payable will not be reduced thereby.
Morgan Stanley may be engaged to act as a financial advisor to
a company in connection with the sale of such company, or subsidiaries or divisions thereof, may represent potential buyers of businesses through its mergers and acquisition activities and may provide lending and other related financing services in
connection with such transactions. Morgan Stanley’s compensation for such activities is usually based upon realized consideration and is usually contingent, in substantial part, upon the closing of the transaction. Under these circumstances, a
Fund may be precluded from participating in a transaction with or relating to the company being sold or participating in any financing activity related to merger or acquisition.
The involvement or presence of Morgan Stanley in the investment
banking and other commercial activities described above (or the financial markets more broadly) may restrict or otherwise limit investment opportunities that may otherwise be available to the Funds. For example, issuers may hire and compensate
Morgan Stanley to provide underwriting, financial advisory, placement agency, brokerage services or other services and, because of limitations imposed by applicable law and regulation, a Fund may be prohibited from buying or selling securities
issued by those issuers or participating in related transactions or otherwise limited in its ability to engage in such investments.
Morgan Stanley’s Marketing Activities. Morgan Stanley is engaged in the business of underwriting, syndicating, brokering, administering, servicing, arranging and advising on the distribution of a wide variety of securities and other investments in which a
Fund may invest. Subject to the restrictions of the 1940 Act, including Sections 10(f) and 17(e) thereof, a Fund may invest in transactions in which Morgan Stanley acts as underwriter, placement agent, syndicator, broker, administrative agent,
servicer, advisor, arranger or structuring agent and receives fees or other compensation from the sponsors of such products or securities. Any fees earned by Morgan Stanley in such capacity will not be shared with the investment adviser or the
Funds. Certain conflicts of interest, in addition to the receipt of fees or other compensation, would be inherent in these transactions. Moreover, the interests of one of Morgan Stanley’s clients with respect to an issuer of securities in
which a Fund has an investment may be adverse to the investment adviser’s or a Fund’s best interests. In conducting the foregoing activities, Morgan Stanley will be acting for its other clients and will have no obligation to act in the
investment adviser’s or a Fund’s best interests.
Client Relationships. Morgan
Stanley has existing and potential relationships with a significant number of corporations, institutions and individuals. In providing services to its clients, Morgan Stanley may face conflicts of interest with respect to activities recommended to
or performed for such clients, on the one hand, and a Fund, its shareholders or the entities in which the Fund invests, on the other hand. In addition, these client relationships may present conflicts of interest in determining whether to offer
certain investment opportunities to a Fund.
In
acting as principal or in providing advisory and other services to its other clients, Morgan Stanley may engage in or recommend activities with respect to a particular matter that conflict with or are different from activities engaged in or
recommended by the investment adviser on a Fund’s behalf.
Principal Investments. To the
extent permitted by applicable law, there may be situations in which a Fund’s interests may conflict with the interests of one or more general accounts of Morgan Stanley and its affiliates or accounts managed by Morgan Stanley or its
affiliates. This may occur because these accounts hold public and private debt and equity securities of many issuers which may be or become portfolio companies, or from whom portfolio companies may be acquired.
Transactions with Portfolio Companies of Affiliated Investment
Accounts. The companies in which a Fund may invest may be counterparties to or participants in agreements, transactions or other arrangements with portfolio companies or other entities of portfolio investments of
Affiliated Investment Accounts (for example, a company in which a Fund invests may retain a company in which an Affiliated Investment Account invests to provide services or may acquire an asset from such company or vice versa). Certain of these
agreements, transactions and arrangements involve fees, servicing payments, rebates and/or other benefits to Morgan Stanley or its affiliates. For example, portfolio entities may, including at the encouragement of Morgan Stanley, enter into
agreements regarding group procurement and/or vendor discounts. Morgan Stanley and its affiliates may also participate in these agreements and may realize better pricing or discounts as a result of the participation of portfolio entities. To the
extent permitted by applicable law, certain of these agreements may provide for commissions or similar payments and/or discounts or rebates to be paid to a portfolio entity of an Affiliated Investment Account, and such payments or discounts or
rebates may also be made directly to Morgan Stanley or its affiliates. Under these arrangements, a particular portfolio company or other entity may benefit to a greater degree than the other participants, and the funds, investment vehicles and
accounts (which may or may not include a Fund) that own an interest in such entity will receive a greater relative benefit from the arrangements than the Eaton Vance funds, investment vehicles or accounts that do not own an interest therein. Fees
and compensation received by portfolio companies of Affiliated Investment Accounts in relation to the foregoing will not be shared with a Fund or offset advisory fees payable.
Eaton Vance
California Municipal Income Trust
November 30, 2023
Potential Conflicts of
Interest — continued
Investments in Portfolio Investments of Other Funds. To the extent permitted by applicable law, when a Fund invests in certain companies or other entities, other funds affiliated with the investment adviser may have made or may be making an investment in such companies or
other entities. Other funds that have been or may be managed by the investment adviser may invest in the companies or other entities in which a Fund has made an investment. Under such circumstances, a Fund and such other funds may have conflicts of
interest (e.g., over the terms, exit strategies and related matters, including the exercise of remedies of their respective investments). If the interests held by a Fund are different from (or take priority over) those held by such other funds, the
investment adviser may be required to make a selection at the time of conflicts between the interests held by such other funds and the interests held by a Fund.
Allocation of Expenses.
Expenses may be incurred that are attributable to a Fund and one or more other Affiliated Investment Accounts (including in connection with issuers in which a Fund and such other Affiliated Investment Accounts have
overlapping investments). The allocation of such expenses among such entities raises potential conflicts of interest. The investment adviser and its affiliates intend to allocate such common expenses among a Fund and any such other Affiliated
Investment Accounts on a pro rata basis or in such other manner as the investment adviser deems to be fair and equitable or in such other manner as may be required by applicable law.
Temporary Investments. To more
efficiently invest short-term cash balances held by a Fund, the investment adviser may invest such balances on an overnight “sweep” basis in shares of one or more money market funds or other short-term vehicles. It is anticipated that
the investment adviser to these money market funds or other short-term vehicles may be the investment adviser (or an affiliate) to the extent permitted by applicable law, including Rule 12d1-1 under the 1940 Act.
Transactions with Affiliates.
The investment adviser and any investment sub-adviser might purchase securities from underwriters or placement agents in which a Morgan Stanley affiliate is a member of a syndicate or selling group, as a result of which an affiliate might benefit
from the purchase through receipt of a fee or otherwise. Neither the investment adviser nor any investment sub-adviser will purchase securities on behalf of a Fund from an affiliate that is acting as a manager of a syndicate or selling group.
Purchases by the investment adviser on behalf of a Fund from an affiliate acting as a placement agent must meet the requirements of applicable law. Furthermore, Morgan Stanley may face conflicts of interest when the Funds use service providers
affiliated with Morgan Stanley because Morgan Stanley receives greater overall fees when they are used.
General Process for Potential Conflicts. All of the transactions described above involve the potential for conflicts of interest between the investment adviser, related persons of the investment adviser and/or their clients. The Investment Advisers Act of
1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), the 1940 Act and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (“ERISA”), impose certain requirements designed to decrease the possibility of conflicts of interest
between an investment adviser and its clients. In some cases, transactions may be permitted subject to fulfillment of certain conditions. Certain other transactions may be prohibited. In addition, the investment adviser has instituted policies and
procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest from arising and, when they do arise, to ensure that it effects transactions for clients in a manner that is consistent with its fiduciary duty to its clients and in accordance with applicable
law. The investment adviser seeks to ensure that potential or actual conflicts of interest are appropriately resolved taking into consideration the overriding best interests of the client.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and
shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Equiniti Trust Company, LLC (“EQ”), the closed-end funds transfer agent, or your financial intermediary, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless
you instruct EQ, or your financial intermediary, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact EQ or your financial intermediary. Your
instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will typically be effective within 30 days of receipt by EQ or your financial intermediary.
Portfolio
Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) files a schedule of portfolio holdings on Part F to Form N-PORT with the
SEC. Certain information filed on Form N-PORT may be viewed on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Proxy
Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying
Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or
Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122 and by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Share Repurchase
Program. The Fund's Board of Trustees has approved a share repurchase program authorizing the Fund to repurchase up to 10% of its common shares
outstanding as of the last day of the prior calendar year in open-market transactions at a discount to net asset value. The repurchase program does not obligate the Fund to purchase a specific amount of shares. The Fund's repurchase activity,
including the number of shares purchased, average price and average discount to net asset value, is disclosed in the Fund's annual and semi-annual reports to shareholders.
Additional Notice to Shareholders. If applicable, a Fund may also redeem or purchase its outstanding preferred shares in order to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, borrowing or
rating agency requirements or for other purposes as it deems appropriate or necessary.
Closed-End Fund Information. Eaton Vance closed-end funds make fund performance data and certain information about portfolio characteristics available on the Eaton Vance website shortly
after the end of each month. Other information about the funds is available on the website. The funds’ net asset value per share is readily accessible on the Eaton Vance website. Portfolio holdings for the most recent month-end are also posted
to the website approximately 30 days following the end of the month. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com on the fund information pages under “Closed-End Funds & Term Trusts.”
This Page Intentionally Left
Blank
This Page Intentionally Left
Blank
This Page Intentionally Left
Blank
Investment Adviser and Administrator
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Congress Street, Suite 1
Boston, MA 02114-2016
Transfer Agent
Equiniti Trust Company, LLC (“EQ”)
P.O. Box 500
Newark, NJ 07101
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche
LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Fund Offices
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The
registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling
1-800-262-1122. The registrant has not amended the code of ethics as described in Form
N-CSR during the period covered by this report. The registrant has not granted any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the code of ethics as described in Form N-CSR during the period covered by this report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has designated George J. Gorman and Scott E. Wennerholm, each an independent trustee, as audit
committee financial experts. Mr. Gorman is a certified public accountant who is the Principal at George J. Gorman LLC (a consulting firm). Previously, Mr. Gorman served in various capacities at Ernst & Young LLP (a registered
public accounting firm), including as Senior Partner. Mr. Gorman also has experience serving as an independent
trustee and audit committee financial expert of other mutual fund complexes. Mr. Wennerholm is a private investor. Previously, Mr. Wennerholm served as a Trustee at Wheelock College
(postsecondary institution), as a Consultant at GF Parish Group (executive recruiting firm), Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President at BNY Mellon Asset Management (investment management firm), Chief Operating Officer and Chief
Financial Officer at Natixis Global Asset Management (investment management firm), and Vice President at Fidelity Investments Institutional Services (investment management firm).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a)-(d)
The following table presents the aggregate fees
billed to the registrant for the registrant’s fiscal years ended November 30, 2022 and November 30, 2023 by the registrant’s principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), for professional services
rendered for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T during such periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
|
11/30/22 |
|
|
11/30/23 |
|
| Audit Fees |
|
$ |
45,400 |
|
|
$ |
45,400 |
|
| Audit-Related Fees(1) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Tax Fees(2) |
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| All Other Fees(3) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total |
|
$ |
45,750 |
|
|
$ |
45,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (1) |
Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably
related to the performance of the audit of financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees. |
| (2) |
Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant
relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation and other related tax compliance/planning matters. |
| (3) |
All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the principal
accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services. |
(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and
procedures relating to the pre-approval of services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant (the “Pre-Approval Policies”). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee in the proper discharge of its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and
(ii) delineate specific procedures governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit and non-audit service fees.
Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the audit
committee.
The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit
services pre-approved therein must be reviewed and ratified by the registrant’s audit committee at least annually. The registrant’s audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment,
compensation, and oversight of the work of the registrant’s principal accountant.
(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were
approved by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to the “de minimis exception” set forth in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other
services) billed to the registrant by D&T for the registrant’s fiscal years ended November 30, 2022 and November 30, 2023; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for
audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by D&T for the same time periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fiscal Years Ended |
|
11/30/22 |
|
|
11/30/23 |
|
| Registrant |
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Eaton Vance(1) |
|
$ |
52,836 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| (1) |
Eaton Vance Management, a subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, acts as the registrant’s investment adviser and
administrator. |
(h) The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrant’s principal
accountant of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant
that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal
accountant’s independence.
(i) Not applicable.
(j)
Not applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. George J. Gorman, Keith Quinton, Scott E. Wennerholm (Chair), and Nancy A. Wiser are the members of the registrant’s audit committee.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule
of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7.
Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
The Board of
Trustees of the Trust has adopted a proxy voting policy and procedure (the “Fund Policy”), pursuant to which the Trustees have delegated proxy voting responsibility to the Fund’s investment adviser and adopted the investment
adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures (the “Policies”) which are described below. The Trustees will review the Fund’s proxy voting records from time to time and will annually consider approving the Policies for the
upcoming year. In the event that a conflict of interest arises between the Fund’s shareholders and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund, the investment adviser will generally refrain
from voting the proxies related to the companies giving rise to such conflict until it consults with the Board’s Special Committee except as contemplated under the Fund Policy. The Board’s Special Committee will instruct the investment
adviser on the appropriate course of action.
The Policies are designed to promote accountability of a company’s management to its shareholders and to
align the interests of management with those shareholders. An independent proxy voting service (“Agent”), currently Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., has been retained to assist in the voting of proxies through the provision of
vote analysis, implementation and recordkeeping and disclosure services. The investment adviser will generally vote proxies through the Agent. The Agent is required to vote all proxies and/or refer them back to the investment adviser pursuant to the
Policies. It is generally the policy of the investment adviser to vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Agent. The Agent shall refer to the investment adviser proxies relating to mergers and restructurings, and the disposition of assets,
termination, liquidation and mergers contained in mutual fund proxies. The investment adviser will normally vote against anti-takeover measures and other proposals designed to limit the ability of shareholders to act on possible transactions, except
in the case of closed-end management investment companies. The investment adviser generally supports management on social and environmental proposals. The investment adviser may abstain from voting from time
to time where it determines that the costs associated with voting a proxy outweighs the benefits derived from exercising the right to vote or the economic effect on shareholders interests or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or
insignificant.
In addition, the investment adviser will monitor situations that may result in a conflict of interest between the Fund’s shareholders
and the investment adviser, the administrator, or any of their affiliates or any affiliate of the Fund by maintaining a list of significant existing and prospective corporate clients. The investment adviser’s personnel responsible for reviewing
and voting proxies on behalf of the Fund will report any proxy received or expected to be received from a company included on that list to the personnel of the investment adviser identified in the Policies. If such personnel expects to instruct the
Agent to vote such proxies in a manner inconsistent with the guidelines of the Policies or the recommendation of the Agent, the personnel will consult with members of senior management of the investment adviser to determine if a material conflict of
interests exists. If it is determined that a material conflict does exist, the investment adviser will seek instruction on how to vote from the Special Committee.
Information on how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30 is available
(1) without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122, and (2) on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
website at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Eaton Vance Management (“EVM” or “Eaton Vance”) is the investment adviser of the Fund. Trevor G. Smith and Carl Thompson, CFA are
the portfolio managers of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust and are responsible for the overall and day-to-day management of the Fund’s investments.
Each portfolio manager is a Vice President of EVM and also manages other Eaton Vance portfolios.
The following table shows, as of the Fund’s most
recent fiscal year end, the number of accounts each portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets (in millions of dollars) in the accounts managed within each category. The table also shows the number of accounts
with respect to which the advisory fee is based on the performance of the account, if any, and the total assets (in millions of dollars) in those accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Number of All
Accounts |
|
|
Total Assets of
All Accounts |
|
|
Number of Accounts
Paying a
Performance Fee |
|
|
Total Assets of
Accounts Paying a
Performance Fee |
|
| Trevor G. Smith |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Registered Investment Companies |
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
3,545.7 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
159.6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Other Accounts |
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Carl Thompson, CFA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Registered Investment Companies |
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
817.5 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Other Pooled Investment Vehicles |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
| Other Accounts |
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
The following table shows the dollar range of Fund shares beneficially owned by each portfolio manager as of the Fund’s
most recent fiscal year end.
|
|
|
| Fund Name and Portfolio Manager |
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities
Beneficially Owned in the Fund |
| Trevor G. Smith |
|
None |
| Carl Thompson, CFA |
|
None |
Potential for Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in connection with a portfolio
manager’s management of the Fund’s investments on the one hand and the investments of other accounts for which a portfolio manager is responsible on the other. For example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating
management time, resources and investment opportunities among the Fund and other accounts he advises. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions between the Fund and the other accounts, the portfolio manager may
take action with respect to another account that differs from the action taken with respect to the Fund. In some cases, another account managed by a portfolio manager may compensate the investment adviser based on the performance of the securities
held by that account. The existence of such a performance based fee may create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities. Whenever conflicts of interest
arise, the portfolio manager will endeavor to exercise his discretion in a manner that he or she believes is equitable to all interested persons. EVM has adopted several policies and procedures designed to address these potential conflicts including
a code of ethics and policies that govern the investment adviser’s trading practices, including among other things the aggregation and allocation of trades among clients, brokerage allocations, cross trades and best execution.
Compensation Structure for EVM
The compensation
structure of Eaton Vance and its affiliates that are investment advisers (for purposes of this section “Eaton Vance”) is based on a total reward system of base salary and incentive compensation, which is paid either in the form of cash
bonus, or for employees meeting the specified deferred compensation eligibility threshold, partially as a cash bonus and partially as mandatory deferred compensation. Deferred compensation granted to Eaton Vance employees is generally granted as a
mix of deferred cash awards under the Investment Management Alignment Plan (IMAP) and equity-based awards in the form of stock units. The portion of incentive compensation granted in the form of a deferred compensation award and the terms of such
awards are determined annually by the Compensation, Management Development and Succession Committee of Morgan Stanley.
Base salary compensation.
Generally, portfolio managers receive base salary compensation based on the level of their position with the adviser.
Incentive compensation. In addition to base compensation, portfolio managers may receive discretionary year-end compensation. Incentive compensation may include:
| |
• |
|
A mandatory program that defers a portion of incentive compensation into restricted stock units or other awards
based on Morgan Stanley common stock or other plans that are subject to vesting and other conditions. |
| |
• |
|
IMAP is a cash-based deferred compensation plan designed to increase the alignment of participants’
interests with the interests of clients. For eligible employees, a portion of their deferred compensation is mandatorily deferred into IMAP on an annual basis. Awards granted under IMAP are notionally invested in referenced funds available pursuant
to the plan, which are funds advised by MSIM and its affiliates that are investment advisers. Portfolio managers are required to notionally invest a minimum of 40% of their account balance in the designated funds that they manage and are included in
the IMAP notional investment fund menu. |
| |
• |
|
Deferred compensation awards are typically subject to vesting over a multi-year period and are subject to
cancellation through the payment date for competition, cause (i.e., any act or omission that constitutes a breach of obligation to the Funds, including failure to comply with internal compliance, ethics or risk management standards, and failure or
refusal to perform duties satisfactorily, including supervisory and management duties), disclosure of proprietary information, and solicitation of employees or clients. Awards are also subject to clawback through the payment date if an
employee’s act or omission (including with respect to direct supervisory responsibilities) causes a restatement of the firm’s consolidated financial results, constitutes a violation of the firm’s global risk management principles,
policies and standards, or causes a loss of revenue associated with a position on which the employee was paid and the employee operated outside of internal control policies. |
Eaton Vance compensates employees based on principles of pay-for-performance,
market competitiveness and risk management. Eligibility for, and the amount of any, discretionary compensation is subject to a multi-dimensional process. Specifically, consideration is given to one or more of the following factors, which can vary by
portfolio management team and circumstances:
| |
• |
|
Revenue and profitability of the business and/or each fund/account managed by the portfolio manager
|
| |
• |
|
Revenue and profitability of the Firm |
| |
• |
|
Return on equity and risk factors of both the business units and Morgan Stanley |
| |
• |
|
Assets managed by the portfolio manager |
| |
• |
|
External market conditions |
| |
• |
|
New business development and business sustainability |
| |
• |
|
Contribution to client objectives |
| |
• |
|
Team, product and/or MSIM and its affiliates that are investment advisers (including Eaton Vance) performance
|
| |
• |
|
The pre-tax investment performance of the funds/accounts managed by the
portfolio manager (which may, in certain cases, be measured against the applicable benchmark(s) and/or peer group(s) over one, three and five-year periods) |
| |
• |
|
Individual contribution and performance |
Further, the firm’s Global Incentive Compensation Discretion Policy requires compensation managers to consider Further the only legitimate, business
related factors when exercising discretion in determining variable incentive compensation, including adherence to Morgan Stanley’s core values, conduct, disciplinary actions in the current performance year, risk management and risk outcomes.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management
Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers
No such purchases this period.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No material changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the
registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the
registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to
the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b)
There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End
Management Investment Companies
No activity to report for the registrant’s most recent fiscal year end.
Item 13. Exhibits
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
| Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust |
|
|
| By: |
|
/s/ Kenneth A. Topping |
|
|
Kenneth A. Topping |
|
|
President |
|
|
| Date: |
|
January 23, 2024 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has
been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
| By: |
|
/s/ James F. Kirchner |
|
|
James F. Kirchner |
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
| Date: |
|
January 23, 2024 |
|
|
| By: |
|
/s/ Kenneth A. Topping |
|
|
Kenneth A. Topping |
|
|
President |
|
|
| Date: |
|
January 23, 2024 |
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
FORM N-CSR
Exhibit 13(a)(2)(i)
CERTIFICATION
I, James F. Kirchner, certify that:
1. I have
reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Date: January 23, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James F. Kirchner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
James F. Kirchner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
FORM N-CSR
Exhibit 13(a)(2)(ii)
CERTIFICATION
I, Kenneth A. Topping, certify that:
1. I have
reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust;
2. Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under
the Investment Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Date: January 23, 2024 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kenneth A. Topping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth A. Topping |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President |
Form N-CSR Item 13(b) Exhibit
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned hereby certify in their capacity as Treasurer and President, respectively, of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
(the “Trust”), that:
| (a) |
The Annual Report of the Trust on Form N-CSR for the period ended
November 30, 2023 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
| (b) |
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
the results of operations of the Trust for such period. |
A signed original of this written statement required by section 906
has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust
|
| Date: January 23, 2024 |
|
| /s/ James F. Kirchner |
| James F. Kirchner |
| Treasurer |
|
| Date: January 23, 2024 |
|
| /s/ Kenneth A. Topping |
| Kenneth A. Topping |
| President |
Eaton Vance California M... (AMEX:CEV)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Mar 2024 à Avr 2024
Eaton Vance California M... (AMEX:CEV)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Avr 2023 à Avr 2024
