PART
I
ITEM
1. Business
Overview
alpha-En
Corporation was incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware on March 7, 1997 under the name Avenue Entertainment Group,
Inc. On June 9, 2008, we changed the name of the Company to alpha-En Corporation, and effective July 22, 2008, our trading symbol
was changed to “ALPE.”
Since
2008, the focus of our business has been developing new technologies for manufacturing highly pure lithium metal, a raw material
for use in lightweight, high energy density batteries, in an environmentally friendly manner for commercial purposes. In 2013,
we invented a new process for the production of highly pure lithium metal and associated products at room temperature. We subsequently
broadened our focus to develop products and processes derived from our new core proprietary technology, including battery components
and compounds of lithium.
Lithium
is the lightest of all metals and has the highest electrochemical potential, making lithium the raw material of choice for batteries.
There is a substantial existing market for lithium metal in primary non-rechargeable batteries and an emerging market for rechargeable
lithium metal batteries, including next-generation batteries under development.
In
September 2014, we formed Clean Lithium Corporation under the laws of New York State as a majority owned subsidiary. We formed
Clean Lithium Corporation to further develop and commercialize our technology and we owned approximately 91.0% of its capital
stock as of December 31, 2017. Clean Lithium Corporation holds our core intellectual property, including several patent applications
and licenses discussed further in the “Our Technology” section below. In 2016 we dissolved two inactive subsidiaries,
Avenue Pictures, Inc. and Wombat Productions, Inc.
Our
Technology
Based
on results to date, including what we believe to be multiple analyses of the process from outside laboratories, we believe that
our proprietary technology offers a number of advantages over lithium production methods currently in use. We also believe based
on results to date that the resulting products have a number of advantages over other lithium products produced via the traditional
ingot method. Traditionally, industrial production of lithium metal involved the electrolysis of molten salts at temperatures
at and above 400° Celsius (752° Fahrenheit). Maintaining these salts at high heat levels adds meaningful production costs
to the process, including the production of chlorine gas as a byproduct.
Our
proprietary technology allows for processing lithium at room temperature of 30° Celsius and allows for the use of lithium
carbonate as a primary feed stock. We believe the advantages of our process and products include:
|
●
|
lower
process temperatures and high electrical efficiency, leading to lower manufacturing costs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reduced
environmental risks, containment costs and regulatory concerns resulting in the elimination of chlorine gas from the production
process;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
feedstock
flexibility through the use of various grades of lithium carbonate as the feed stock, and reduced non-core hazardous by-products
typically produced when processing halide salts of lithium;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
electrolytic
deposition of highly pure lithium on a myriad of different substrates in custom form factors with custom protective conductive
coatings;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
reduced
presence of trace metals or undesired substances in the final products.
|
We
intend to continue developing the intellectual property associated with our core technology; broaden our patent portfolio and
scale up our production of various products.
Starting
in 2012, we devoted our resources internally to developing a technology to manufacture lithium metal, from the lab bench to the
manufacturing floor. We are still in the development stages, but we believe this process and resulting products may be commercially
viable and we are taking preliminary steps toward scaling-up our manufacturing design while we continue to optimize development
efforts.
Through
our subsidiary, Clean Lithium Corporation, we have filed a number of patent applications based on our proprietary room temperature,
flexible and energy efficient process. This proprietary process uses lithium carbonate as a feedstock and does not produce chlorine
gas as a by-product. These patent applications held by Clean Lithium Corporation include:
|
●
|
U.S.
Patent Application No. 14/328,613, Filed July 10, 2014 - Producing Lithium
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
PCT
Application No. PCT/US2015/039768, Filed July 9, 2015 - Producing Lithium. The following national phase applications have
been filed from this PCT patent application:
|
|
○
|
Australian
Patent Application No. 2015287769, Filed January 6, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Canadian
Patent Application No. 2954639, Filed January 9, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Chinese
Patent Application No. 201580037710.4, Filed January 10, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
European
Patent Application No. 15819217.9, Filed January 23, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Japan
Patent Application No.2017-522453, Filed January 6, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Korean
Patent Application No. 10-2017-7003400, Filed February 7, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Hong
Kong Patent Application No. 17110292.5, Filed October 12, 2017
|
|
●
|
PCT
Application No. PCT/US2016/064328, Filed December 1, 2016 - Method for Producing a Lithium Film
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
PCT
Application No. PCT/US2016/033445, Filed May 20, 2016 - High Purity Lithium and Associated Products and Processes
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
U.S.
Patent Application No. 15/160,013, Filed May 20, 2016- High Purity Lithium and Associated Produces and Processes. The following
national phase applications have been filed from this PCT patent application:
|
|
○
|
Australian
Patent Application No. 2016270313, Filed November 24, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Canadian
Patent Application No. 2987740, Filed November 22, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Chinese
Patent Application No. 01680031890, Filed November 22, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
European
Patent Application No. 16803991.5, Filed October 24, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Japan
Patent Application No. 2018-513724, Filed November 23, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Korean
Patent Application No. 10-2017-7037256, Filed November 22, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
Indian
Patent Application No. 201717042986, Filed November 22, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
○
|
U.S.
Continuation-In-Part Application No. 15/821,275, Filed November 22, 2017
|
The
PCT patent application, Method for Producing a Lithium Film, includes certain intellectual property that has been jointly developed
in partnership with the City University of New York and has been exclusively licensed to alpha-En.
Clean
Lithium Corporation’s patent applications encompass a broad portfolio of products and processes derived from our core lithium
production technology, ranging from processes to produce compounds of lithium, battery components and battery technology using
our high purity lithium metal products.
We
have entered into research agreements with a number academic research institutions as part of our process for developing and validating
our core technology. The institutions include Argonne National Laboratory, the City University of New York, and Princeton University.
Argonne National Laboratory is contracted with us to conduct optimization of our process, development work relating to the scale-up
of our technology, characterization of our new materials and electrochemical (battery) testing of our highly pure lithium anodes
and coatings. The City University of New York assists us in producing samples and characterizing the resulting materials, and
in testing new process equipment and products developed by our in-house research and development team. Princeton University assists
us with research and development relating to the use of our lithium anode in solid state and rechargeable lithium metal batteries.
Prior
to 2012 we also pursued a strategy of in-licensing. On February 25, 2009, we were granted an exclusive, worldwide, transferable,
perpetual license to use certain proprietary technology for the processing of lithium for use in batteries and other fields. Commencing
in October 2010, working through a third party, we conducted a series of tests to determine if the process worked and, based on
the results, initially believed that the process produced lithium, however it did not prove to be commercially feasible and research
and development efforts involving this license were abandoned. In exchange for the license, we had certain financial, share issuance
and royalty obligations if certain sale thresholds were met. However, since such thresholds were not met and the technology was
not used, we negotiated an amendment and release related to this license, which became effective in January, 2017.
From
2013 to the present, our operations primarily included activities related to development of our technology and maintaining our
public company status. We have had no revenues in any of these years as our business was and continues to be in the development
stage.
Currently,
we are attempting to further develop the intellectual property associated with our core technology; broaden our patent portfolio;
scale up our production of various products; and begin generating revenue; however, our cash position may not be sufficient to
support our daily operations. While we believe in the viability of our strategy to further develop our technology and generate
revenue and in our ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering, there can be no assurance that we
will succeed. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to raise additional funds by way of a public
or private offering and to further develop our technology and generate sufficient revenue.
Competition
The
market for the lithium and related products is highly competitive. There are numerous competitors in the industry, most of which
have substantially more financial resources, greater manufacturing capacity, research and development capability, and marketing
resources than us.
Regulation
Lithium
metal is classified as a hazardous material, and some of the chemicals we use are also classified as hazardous materials. We are
required by law to comply with environmental regulations pertaining to the use, handling, and disposal of lithium metal as well
as the other chemicals. Lithium battery chemistries react adversely with water and water vapor, and under certain circumstances
can cause fires. As such, lithium based batteries are subject to government regulation in various jurisdictions. We ship out small
quantities lithium metal samples and we conform to the regulatory requirements associated with such transportation.
Employees
As
of December 31, 2017, we have eight full-time employees and no part-time employees. We also engage five consultants who work on
a part-time basis. None of these employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, and we believe our relationship with
our employees is good. We also occasionally engage consultants on an as-needed basis to supplement existing staff. We also rely
on outsourced research and development relationships with a number academic research institutions as part of our process for developing
and validating our core technology.
ITEM 1A.
Risk Factors
An
investment in our Company is highly speculative in nature and involves an extremely high degree of risk. You should carefully
consider the following material risks, together with the other information contained in this report, before you decide to buy
our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, results of operations and financial condition would
likely suffer. In these circumstances, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your
investment.
We
have a limited operating history and no revenue; we have accumulated deficits; we are only in an initial commercialization stage
with technology that is unproven on a large-scale commercial basis; and there is a going concern explanatory paragraph in our
independent registered public accounting firm’s report.
Our
company reduced daily operations in late 2005 and essentially ceased daily operations in May 2006. Through January 2009, we were
substantially inactive. In February 2009, we entered into a technology license agreement for a process to produce lithium metal.
We do not utilize this technology for any purpose because it did not produce the intended result. From 2012 to the present, we
have devoted our resources to develop a different lithium manufacturing technology from that initially undertaken in 2009. Because
we are still in the developmental stage, there is a limited operating history upon which an evaluation of our performance and
prospects can be made. We are subject to all of the business risks associated with a new enterprise, including, but not limited
to, risks of unforeseen capital requirements, failure of market acceptance, failure to establish business relationships and competitive
disadvantages as against larger and more established companies.
The
report of our independent registered public accounting firm with respect to our financial statements included in this report includes
a “going concern” explanatory paragraph. As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, we had an accumulated
deficit of approximately $20.3 million at December 31, 2017, a net loss of approximately $6.9 million and $3.8 million,
and approximately $2.0 million and $1.5 million net cash used in operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2017 and
2016, respectively. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
We
have generated no revenues from our lithium technology and will not generate any meaningful revenues until after we have successfully
commercialized our new proprietary technology to manufacture high purity lithium metal and associated products, of which no assurance
can be given. We have continued to incur significant losses and anticipate that we may continue to incur significant losses in
2018 and beyond. There can be no assurance as to whether or when we will generate meaningful revenues or achieve profitable operations.
Our
lithium production technology has never been utilized on a large-scale basis, and there can be no assurance that this technology
will perform successfully on a large-scale commercial basis or that it will be profitable for us. All of the tests conducted to
date by us with respect to our new process and technology have been conducted in the laboratory on small scale only, and there
can be no assurance that the same or similar results could be obtained on a large-scale commercial basis. Additionally, our ability
to operate our business successfully will depend on a variety of factors, many of which are outside our control, including competition,
cost and availability of strategic components, changes in governmental initiatives and requirements, changes in regulatory requirements,
and the costs associated with commencing pilot manufacturing.
We
have not been able, and may continue to be unable, to timely file periodic reports with the SEC.
In
prior years we were unable to timely file certain of our annual and quarterly reports. If we are not able to file future periodic
reports in the time specified by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, stockholders and potential investors
will not have current public information about us which will likely have a negative effect on our obtaining future capital. Failure
to make timely filings also impairs our ability to conduct certain kinds of public offerings on short form registration statements
that provide more efficient automatic forward incorporation of future SEC filings. Any future inability to timely file periodic
reports could materially and adversely affect our future business growth and financial condition.
We
have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to develop or maintain an effective
system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, current
and potential stockholders could lose confidence in our financial reporting, which could harm our business and the trading price
of our stock.
During
the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017, we and our independent registered
public accounting firm identified deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in the standards established
by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Management determined the control deficiencies constitute material weaknesses
in our internal control over financial reporting.
The
existence of a material weakness could result in errors in our financial statements, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations
and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, leading to a decline in the trading price of our
stock.
There
remains uncertainty of any market acceptance of our technology to manufacture lithium metal.
Many
prospective users of lithium metal have already committed substantial resources to other existing forms of battery technology.
Our growth and future financial performance will depend on our ability to demonstrate to prospective users the technical and economic
advantages of our technology to manufacture lithium metal over alternative technologies. There can be no assurance that we will
be successful in this effort. Furthermore, it is possible that competing technologies may be perceived to have, or may actually
have, certain advantages over our technology or lithium metal in general for certain industries or applications.
We
have a need for additional financing in the foreseeable future.
During
the past three years, financing for all of our activities has been provided in the form of direct equity investments, private
placements and advances from our officers and directors. Our future capital requirements could vary significantly and will depend
on certain factors, many of which are not within our control. These include the ongoing development and testing of our technology
to manufacture lithium metal, the nature and timing of prospective commercial projects and permits required and the availability
of financing. In the battery market, we may not be able to enter into favorable business collaborations and might thus be required
to seek project contracts for our own account. If such efforts were successful, we would be required to make significant expenditures
on personnel and capital equipment which would require significant financing. In addition, our lack of operational experience
and limited capital resources could make it difficult, if not highly unlikely, to successfully secure major projects. In such
event, our business development could be limited to smaller commercial projects with significantly lower potential for profit.
In
addition, the expansion of our business will require the commitment of significant capital resources toward the hiring of technical
and operational support personnel and the development of a manufacturing and testing facility. In the event we are presented with
one or more significant projects, individually or in conjunction with collaborative working partners, we may require additional
capital to take advantage of such opportunities. There can be no assurance that such financing will be available or, if available,
that it will be on favorable terms. If adequate financing is not available, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate
certain of our research and development programs, to relinquish rights to certain of our technologies, or to license third parties
to commercialize technologies that we would otherwise seek to develop ourselves. To the extent we raise additional capital by
issuing equity securities, stockholders will be diluted.
We
may not be able to obtain or enforce patent rights or other intellectual property rights that cover our product candidates and
technologies that are of sufficient breadth to prevent third parties from competing against us.
Our
success with respect to our product candidates and technologies will depend in part upon our ability to obtain and maintain patent
protection in both the United States and other countries, to preserve our trade secrets and to prevent third parties from infringing
upon our proprietary rights. Our ability to protect any of our product candidates from unauthorized or infringing use by third
parties depends in substantial part upon our ability to obtain and maintain valid and enforceable patents.
Our
patent portfolio currently is made up entirely of pending patent applications. Any patents that we do obtain may be narrow in
scope and thus easily circumvented by competitors. Further, in countries where we do not have granted patents, third parties may
be able to make, use or sell products identical to or substantially similar to, our product candidates. The patent application
process is expensive and time-consuming, and we may not be able to prepare, file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent
applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is possible that defects of form in the preparation or filing of our
patent applications may exist, or may arise in the future, such as with respect to proper priority claims, inventorship, claim
scope or patent term adjustments. If there are material defects in the form or preparation of our patent applications, such applications
may be invalid and unenforceable. Moreover, our competitors may independently develop equivalent knowledge, methods and know-how.
Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third parties, which may have an adverse impact on
our business, financial condition and operating results.
We
face competition and technical alternatives in the overall battery market.
We
anticipate that our primary market will be for lithium metal batteries. We have had limited experience in manufacturing and marketing
our technology and have not previously had any employees or personnel whose primary responsibilities consisted of these functions.
Other participants include several large domestic and international companies and numerous small companies, many of whom have
substantially greater financial and other resources and more manufacturing, marketing and sales experience than we do. In addition,
as lithium metal technology evolves, there exists the possibility that our technology may be rendered obsolete by one or more
competing technologies. Any one or more of our competitors, or one or more other enterprises not presently known to us, may develop
technologies which are superior to our technology. To the extent that our competitors are able to offer more cost-effective alternatives,
our ability to compete could be materially and adversely affected.
There
can be no assurance that we will enter into collaborative agreements or projects utilizing our technology in the future.
We
propose to pursue opportunities in the battery market through collaborative joint working arrangements with companies that have
a significant presence in well-established industries or markets, and that can introduce our technology to industry participants.
However, neither we nor any of our prospective collaborative joint working partners have secured any project contracts. There
can be no assurance that we will enter into any definitive joint project arrangements with our prospective working partners or
others, or that any such definitive arrangements will be on terms and conditions that will enable us to generate profits. Furthermore,
even if we are successful in obtaining one or more project awards, such projects may be curtailed or eliminated, or other problems
may arise, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We
depend on our senior executive officers and other personnel to run our business.
We
are dependent on the efforts of our senior executive officers, particularly Jerome I. Feldman, our Executive Chairman and until
March 1, 2017, our Chief Financial Officer, Sam Pitroda, our Chief Executive Officer since November 1, 2017, and Nathan J. Wasserman,
our Chief Financial Officer since March 1, 2017. We do not have key-man life insurance policies on the lives of Messrs. Feldman,
Pitroda and Wasserman to compensate us for the loss of such individuals. The loss of the services of any one or more of such persons
may have a material adverse effect on our company.
Our
future success will depend in large part upon our ability to attract and retain skilled scientific, management, operational and
marketing personnel. Other than Messrs. Feldman, Pitroda, and Wasserman we do not currently have any employees or personnel whose
responsibilities are focused primarily in these fields. We face competition for hiring such personnel from other companies, including
companies that have greater resources. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel.
We
rely on third-party research organizations and as a result we are unable to directly control the timing, conduct, expense and
quality of our research and development efforts.
We
have entered into research agreements with a number academic research institutions as part of our process for developing and validating
our core technology. In relying on those third parties, we are dependent upon them to timely and accurately perform their services,
and dependent on them to accurately analyze the viability of our method to produce Lithium metal. If these third-party organizations
do not accurately collect and assess data and communicate their findings to us accurately, we may discontinue development of viable
products or methods or continue allocating resources to the development of products and methods that are not efficacious. Either
outcome could result in significant financial harm to us.
Because
we have entered into a substantial financial commitment for leased office and laboratory space, funds may be diverted from other
important matters in the development of our business and could negatively impact our financial position.
On
March 22, 2016, we entered into a lease for office and laboratory space located in Yonkers, New York, consisting of approximately
8,000 square feet. The lease has a term of 87 months and the annual rent for the first year of the lease is approximately $208,000,
increasing by 1.5% in each subsequent year. In the event of a termination of the lease following a default by us, we
will be obligated to pay the sum of the rent payable for the remainder of the lease term. This represents a substantial financial
commitment for us. Money that could be spent elsewhere will be needed to fulfill the lease commitment, which may divert funds
away from other important matters in the development of our business and could negatively impact our financial position.
We
will need to comply with government regulations, which can be costly and time-consuming.
We
may be required to comply with a number of federal, state and local laws and regulations in the areas of safety, health and environmental
controls, including without limitation, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended, and the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA), which may require us to obtain permits or approvals to utilize, handle, and dispose of lithium
metal and/or other chemicals. Furthermore, particularly in the battery market, we may be required to conduct performance and operating
studies to assure government agencies that our technology does not pose environmental or product safety risks. Changes in environmental
or safety regulations, the discovery of conditions not currently known to us, or other developments could result in the imposition
of additional or different environmental compliance obligations or expenditure for capital improvements. We do not believe at
this time that financial obligations incurred in connection with environmental regulatory compliance will have a material adverse
effect on the company’s financial condition, competitive position or results of operations. Our belief is based on the company’s
understanding of the underlying facts giving rise to its environmental regulatory obligations.
We
are controlled by a small number of “insider” stockholders.
Our
directors and executive officers currently beneficially own approximately 54% of our outstanding common stock. Accordingly,
through their collective ownership of our outstanding common stock, if they act together, they will be able to control the voting
of our shares at all meetings of stockholders and, because the common stock does not have cumulative voting rights, will be able
to determine the outcome of the election of all of our directors and determine corporate and stockholder action on other matters.
We
have no plans to pay dividends.
We
have never paid any dividends on our common stock and have no plans to pay dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
The payment of dividends on our common stock is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to our certificate of
incorporation. We intend to retain any earnings for use in our operations and any expansion of our business. Payment of dividends
in the future will depend on our future earnings, future capital needs and our operating and financial condition, among other
factors.
It
is likely that our common stock price will be volatile.
The
stock market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that may be unrelated to the operating
performances of specific companies. Announcements of new technologies and changing policies and regulations of the federal government
and state governments and other external factors, as well as potential fluctuations in our financial results, may have a significant
impact on the price of our stock.
Our
charter contains some anti-takeover provisions that may inhibit a takeover.
The
provisions in our certificate of incorporation relating to a classified Board of Directors and delegation to the Board of Directors
of rights to determine the terms of preferred stock may have the effect not only of discouraging attempts by others to buy us,
but also of making it more difficult or impossible for existing stockholders to make management changes. A classified board, which
is made up of directors elected for staggered terms, while promoting stability in board membership and management, also moderates
the pace of any change in control of our Board of Directors by extending the time required to elect a majority, effectively requiring
action in at least two annual meetings. The ability of our Board of Directors to determine the terms of preferred stock, while
providing flexibility in connection with possible business purchases and other corporate purposes, could make it more difficult
for a third party to secure a majority of our outstanding common stock. Additionally, we are subject to the anti-takeover provisions
of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits us from engaging in a “business combination”
with an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person
became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. Section 203 could have the
effect of delaying or preventing a change of control.
ITEM
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
ITEM
2. Properties
On
March 22, 2016, we entered into a lease (the “Lease”) with Hudson View Building #3, LLC (“the “Landlord”),
for office and laboratory space located in Yonkers, New York (the “Leased Premise”). The Leased Premise consists of
approximately 8,000 square feet. The Lease has a term of 87 months from the lease commencement date, which is the date upon which
the Landlord has substantially completed certain interior leasehold improvements to the Leased Premise. The annual rent of the
first year of the lease is approximately $208,000, increasing by 1.5% on each anniversary of the lease commencement date. In the
event of a termination of the lease following a default by us, we will be obligated to pay the sum of the rent payable
for the remainder of the lease term. We moved into the office on May 30, 2017. We began paying the monthly rent
in 2017.
ITEM
3. Legal Proceedings
There
are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our property is the subject.
ITEM
4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
applicable.
PART
III
ITEM
10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The
following table shows the positions held by our Board of Directors and executive officers, and their ages, as of the date of this
Form 10-K:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Jerome
I. Feldman
|
|
89
|
|
Executive
Chairman of the Board and Treasurer
|
Sam
Pitroda
|
|
75
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
Nathan
J. Wasserman
|
|
70
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
George
McKeegan
|
|
70
|
|
Vice
President, Secretary, General Counsel and Director
|
Steven
M. Payne
|
|
64
|
|
Director
|
Jim
Kilman
|
|
56
|
|
Director
and Vice Chairman of the Board
|
The
background of each of our directors and executive officers are as follows:
Jerome
I. Feldman
has been our Executive Chairman of the Board since December 2008 (he previously was the Vice Chairman) and was
our Chief Executive Officer from March 2011 to October 2015, and has been a member of our Board of Directors and our Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer since September 2006. In October 2015, he resigned as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Feldman founded GP
Strategies Corp., which provides training, engineering and consulting services to the automotive, steel, energy and government
industries, in 1959 and served as its Chief Executive Officer from 1959 until April 2005, Chairman of the Board from 1999 until
April 2005, and President from 1959 until 2001. He has been Chairman of the Board of Five Star Products, Inc., a paint and hardware
distributor, from 1994 until June 2007, a director of GSE Systems, Inc., a leading global provider of real-time simulation and
training solution to the power, process, manufacturing and government sectors, from 1994 until August 2015, Chairman of the Board
of GSE Systems from 1997 until August 2015, and Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of National Patent Development
Corp. (“NPDC”), which was devoted to searching out new inventions and assisting major corporations in licensing their
technologies, from 2004 until June 2007. He was a director of Valera Pharmaceuticals, a specialty pharmaceutical company, from
January 2005 until April 2007. Mr. Feldman was also Chairman of the New England Colleges Fund and a Trustee of Northern Westchester
Hospital Foundation. He has a B.A. degree from Indiana University and an LLB degree from New York University. During his tenure
with the NPDC, they developed the soft contact lense, founded U.S. surgical and a number of other technical developments.
As
the Executive Chairman, Mr. Feldman leads the board and guides our company. Mr. Feldman brings extensive industry knowledge to
our company and a deep background in technology growth companies.
Sam
Pitroda
became our Chief Executive Officer on November 1, 2017. Mr. Pitroda is an information technology and telecommunications
inventor and entrepreneur. He was the founder and former Chief Executive Officer of C-Sam, Inc. a provider of mobile wallets and
other on-device software, which was founded in 1998 and purchased in 2014 by MasterCard. Earlier in his career Mr. Pitroda also
founded a number of other telecommunications companies in India and the U.S. Mr. Pitroda also served as advisor to Prime Minister
Indira Gandhi of India on Public Information Infrastructure and Innovation and as a Cabinet Minister under Rajiv Gandhi. Mr. Pitroda
has an MS and BS in Physics from Maharaja Sayajai Rao University in India and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Illinois
Institute of Technology.
Nathan
J. Wasserman
became our Chief Financial Officer on March 1, 2017. Mr. Wasserman is the owner and President of Columbia Enterprises,
Inc., a state-of-the-art digital reprographic firm located in Manhattan, New York. Prior to joining Columbia Enterprises, Mr.
Wasserman was an audit partner and certified public accountant (CPA) at Deloitte & Touche LLP, a multi-national professional
services firm where he worked for 16 years. Mr. Wasserman holds a BBA in accounting from Kent State University. Mr. Wasserman
has maintained his CPA status and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the New York
State Society of Certified Public Accountants (NYSSCPA).
George
McKeegan
has been our Vice President or Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, and a member of our Board
of Directors since May 2006. Since 1986, Mr. McKeegan has led McKeegan & Shearer, P.C., a law firm engaged in the general
practice of civil law and specializing in litigation and corporate counseling. Prior to that, he served as Vice President at Citibank,
N.A. and as an Assistant District Attorney with the New York County District Attorney’s Office. He received a B.A. degree
from Fordham College and a J.D. degree from the University of Michigan. Mr. McKeegan’s almost 30 years of working experience
in corporate controls and governance makes him well qualified to be a member of our board.
Steven
M. Payne
has been a member of our Board of Directors since May 2006 and was our President from May 2006 to December 2012.
Since 1976, Mr. Payne has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Quatro Foods Inc., a food service enterprise. He
is a director and past Board President of Carbondale Main Street, Inc., a local downtown redevelopment corporation, and a director
of the Southern Illinois Entrepreneurship and Business Development Center at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale, Illinois.
Mr. Payne is also President of 13 West LLC, a developer and operator of Mini Storage facilities. He attended Southern Illinois
University. Mr. Payne’s experience in running businesses and advising entrepreneurial ventures makes him well qualified
to be a member of our board.
Jim
Kilman
has been a member of our Board of Directors since November 2016 and Vice Chairman of the Board since 2017. Mr.
Kilman is Chief Executive Officer of Scarborough, NY-based KielStrand Capital, a family office merchant bank that makes and manages
investments, provides advisory services and engages in philanthropic activities. He retired in 2016 as Vice Chairman of Investment
Banking at Morgan Stanley, having spent a total of 32 years in senior investment banking roles, including at Goldman Sachs, ABN
AMRO and PaineWebber. Mr. Kilman also serves on the boards of directors of Recombinetics Inc. in Saint Paul, Minnesota,
and the Hudson Valley Shakespeare Festival in Cold Spring, NY, as a Senior Advisor at Burford Capital Ltd, listed in London,
UK, and as chair of the Finance and Investments Committee and as interim treasurer of the Jacob Burns Film Center in Pleasantville,
NY. Mr. Kilman previously served on the board of directors of Modular Space Corporation in Berwyn, Pennsylvania and Lebenthal
Holdings LLC in New York. Mr. Kilman holds an MA and a BA in Economics from Yale University.
Our
directors are divided into three classes. At each annual meeting of stockholders, directors are elected to succeed those directors
whose terms expire and are elected for a term of office to expire at the third succeeding annual meeting of stockholders after
their election. Under our bylaws, the number of directors constituting the entire Board of Directors shall be fixed, from time
to time, by the directors then in office, who may decrease or increase the number of directors by majority action without soliciting
stockholder approval. We do not currently pay compensation to directors for service in that capacity.
Committees
of the Board
We
have not established an audit committee, compensation committee or nominations and governance committee, and we are not required
to do so since our shares are not listed on a national securities exchange.
None
of our directors or executive officers or their respective associates or affiliates is indebted to us.
Family
Relationships
There
are no family relationships among our current directors and executive officers.
Legal
Proceedings
No
officer, director, persons nominated for such positions, promoter or significant employee has been involved in the last ten years
in any of the following:
|
●
|
Any
bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either
at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Any
conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other
minor offenses);
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Being
subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction,
permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities
or banking activities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Being
found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Commission or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Being
the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently
reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of (i) any Federal or state securities or commodities law
or regulation, (ii) any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited
to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent
cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order or (iii) any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud
in connection with any business entity; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Being
the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory
organization, any registered entity, or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary
authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
|
Code
of Ethics
In
December 2007, we adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct that applies to all of our executive officers, directors and employees,
which was updated in March 2015. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct codifies the business and ethical principles that govern
all aspects of our business. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available without charge to any stockholder who makes
a written request for a copy. Our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available on our website at http://alpha-encorp.com.
If we make any amendments to or grant any waivers from our Code of Ethics, we will post such information on our website.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Rules
adopted by the SEC under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, require our officers and directors, and persons who own more than
ten percent of the issued and outstanding shares of our equity securities, to file reports of their ownership, and changes in
ownership, of such securities with the SEC on Forms 3, 4 or 5, as appropriate. Such persons are required by the regulations of
the SEC to furnish us with copies of all forms they file pursuant to Section 16(a).
We
believe that all of the officers, directors, and owners of more than ten percent of the outstanding shares of our common stock
complied with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act for the years ended December 31, 2017, except with respect to certain option grants
and with respect to a stock grant made to a director and stockholder which was made in lieu of repayment of a loan to us.
ITEM 11.
Executive Compensation
Summary
Compensation Table
The
following table sets forth, for the most recent fiscal year and prior fiscal year, all cash compensation paid, distributed or
accrued, including salary and bonus amounts, for services rendered to us by our principal executive officer and two other executive
officers in such year who received or are entitled to receive remuneration in excess of $100,000 during the stated period and
any individuals for whom disclosure would have been made in this table but for the fact that the individual was not serving as
an executive officer as at December 31, 2017:
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Jerome I. Feldman
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,043,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,103,000
|
|
Executive Chairman and Treasurer
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Pitroda(1)
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan Wasserman(2)
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
611,000
|
|
|
$
|
661,000
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Fludder(3)
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
$
|
320,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George McKeegan
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
241,000
|
|
|
$
|
241,000
|
|
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
Mr.
Pitroda joined our company on November 1, 2017.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Wasserman joined our company on March 1, 2017.
|
|
(3)
|
Mr.
Fludder resigned on November 1, 2017.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The
following tables summarizes equity awards outstanding at December 31, 2017, for each of the executive officers named in the Summary
Compensation Table above:
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2017
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
|
|
Option Expiration
Date
|
|
|
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
(#)
|
|
|
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
|
|
Jerome I. Feldman
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
7/26/2022
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan J. Wasserman
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
1/27/2022
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Pitroda
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Fludder
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
10/19/2025
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George McKeegan
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
(1)
|
250,000
shares of the option have an exercise price of $0.10 and another 250,000 shares of the option have an exercise price of $1.95.
|
|
(2)
|
250,000
shares of the option will expire on 2/20/2018 and another 250,000 shares of the option will expire on 7/26/2022.
|
Employment
Agreements
As
of December 31, 2017, and through the date of this report, we have no employment agreements in place with any person other than
our Chief Financial Officer, Nathan J. Wasserman.
On
February 23, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Nathan Wasserman to become Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
effective as of March 1, 2017. Pursuant to a term sheet dated February 27, 2017, Mr. Wasserman agreed to serve as the Company’s
Chief Financial Officer for an initial term of three years. The Company granted Mr. Wasserman stock options to purchase a total
of 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, of which 150,000 vested immediately, 150,000 will vest
in his second year of service and 200,000 will vest in his third year of service. Mr. Wasserman receives a starting salary of
$5,000 per month.
Director
Compensation
Directors currently do not receive cash
compensation for serving on our Board of Directors, other than reimbursement of reasonable expenses for attendance at board meetings.
In July 2017 in recognition of their service on our Board of Directors, Mr. Feldman and Mr. Kilman each received options to purchase
1,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price $1.95 per share, the fair value as of the date of grant, vesting in
equal instalments over a four year period starting on July 27, 2017. Also in July 2017 in recognition of his service on our Board
of Directors, Mr. Payne received an option to purchase 500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price $1.95 per share,
the fair value as of the date of grant, vesting in equal instalments over a four year period starting on July 27, 2017.
ITEM
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The
table below sets forth information, as of March 28, 2018, with respect to the beneficial ownership (as defined in Rule 13d-3 of
the Exchange Act) of our common stock by each person who is known by the Company to beneficially own more than five percent of
the Company’s Common Stock, each of our directors and our named executive officers, and all of our directors and executive
officers as a group.
The
beneficial ownership of each person was calculated based on 32,645,756 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March
28, 2018 according to the record ownership listings as of that date and the verifications we solicited and received from each
director and executive officer. The SEC has defined “beneficial ownership” to mean more than ownership in the usual
sense. For example, a person has beneficial ownership of a share not only if he owns it in the usual sense, but also if he has
the power to vote, sell or otherwise dispose of the share. Beneficial ownership also includes the number of shares that a person
has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 28, 2018, pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants or the conversion of
notes, debentures or other indebtedness, but excludes stock appreciation rights. Two or more persons might count as beneficial
owners of the same share. Unless otherwise noted, the address of the following persons listed below is c/o alpha-En Corporation,
28 Wells Avenue, 2
nd
Floor, Yonkers, New York, 10701.
Unless
otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to
all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them.
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Shares of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
|
|
|
Percent of
Common Stock
Beneficially
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Stockholder:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael D. Feldman
|
|
Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
3,899,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jerome I. Feldman
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board and Treasurer
|
|
|
10,736,254
|
(1)
|
|
|
32.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sam Pitroda
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
536,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George McKeegan
|
|
Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Director
|
|
|
875,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nathan J. Wasserman
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
320,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven M. Payne
|
|
Director
|
|
|
5,284,887
|
(5)
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Kilman
|
|
Director
|
|
|
1,268,015
|
(6)
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)
|
|
|
|
|
19,020,156
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
%
|
(1)
|
Includes
currently exercisable stock options to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock, 118,015 shares of our common stock issuable
upon conversion of Series A Preferred stock, and currently exercisable warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
286,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred stock and currently exercisable warrants
to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
(3)
|
Includes
currently exercisable stock options to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Includes
currently exercisable stock options to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
currently exercisable stock options to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock, 118,015 shares of our common stock issuable
upon conversion of Series A Preferred stock, and currently exercisable warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Includes
currently exercisable stock options to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock, 118,015 shares of our common stock issuable
upon conversion of Series A Preferred stock, and currently exercisable warrants to purchase 600,000 shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Includes currently exercisable stock options
to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock.
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following tables provides information as of December 31, 2017, with respect to shares of common stock that may be issued upon
exercise of outstanding stock options.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information as of December 31, 2017
Plan category
|
|
Number of shares of
common stock to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted-average exercise
price of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
(b)
|
|
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
8,874,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
3,205,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
8,874,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
3,205,000
|
|
ITEM
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
From
time to time, our stockholders have advanced funds to us for working capital purposes. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest
bearing and due on demand. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we borrowed $150,000 from Steven M. Payne, $100,000 from Jerome
I. Feldman and $150,000 from Jim Kilman, and $12,000 from Steven Fludder and repaid $32,000 in advances and $150,000
was converted into 150 shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the outstanding amount of the advances
from related parties was $308,000 and $78,000, respectively.
On
February 8, 2018, we entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement with several accredited and institutional investors, pursuant
to which the Company agreed to issue and sell in a private placement 1,950 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, as well as 975,000
warrants to purchase common stock at a purchase price of $1,000 per share, for total gross proceeds of $1.95 million. The warrants
have a 5-year term and an exercise price of $2.00. Jerome Feldman, our Executive Chairman and Treasure, invested $100,000, Stephen
Payne, Director, invested $100,000, Sam Pitroda, our Chief Executive Officer invested $500,000,and Jim Kilman, Director, invested
$100,000 through an affiliate,
On
May 17, 2017, we entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement with several accredited and institutional investors and issued
1,820 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 910,000 warrants to purchase common stock, for total gross proceeds of $1.8 million
(including previous advances from related parties). The warrants have a 5-year term and an exercise price of $2.00. Jerome Feldman,
our Executive Chairman and Treasurer, invested $100,000, Stephen Payne, a Director, invested $100,000, and Jim Kilman,
a Director, invested $100,000 through an affiliate.
On
June 3, 2016, we entered into a private placement offering with Jim. Kilman and sold him 100,000 shares of common stock
and 250,000 warrants for $250,000. The warrants have a five year term and an exercise price of $3.79 per share. On November 1,
2016, we entered into an additional private placement offering with Mr. Kilman and sold him 100,000 shares of common stock
and 250,000 warrants for $100,000. The warrants have a 5 year term and an exercise price of $1.16 per share. In connection with
the second private placement, Mr. Kilman also received an additional 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to certain
anti-dilution protections provided to him in connection with the June 3, 2016 private placement. Subsequent to these private placements,
Mr. Kilman joined our Board of Directors on November 3, 2016.
We
have been provided office space by Mr. Feldman at no cost through September 2016. We determined that such cost is nominal and
did not recognize the rent expense in our financial statements.
Director
Independence
Our
Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Kilman would be considered an “independent director”. Although we do not
have any securities listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, we have used its independence criteria in making this determination in
accordance with applicable SEC rules. Our other three current directors are not “independent” as they are or recently
were executive officers of our company.
ITEM
14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
On
May 26, 2016, our Board of Directors approved the dismissal of Li and Company, as our independent registered public accounting
firm effective as of May 21, 2016. Concurrent with the dismissal of Li and Company, the Board of Directors ratified and approved
the appointment of EisnerAmper LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017.
Audit
Fees
Audit
fees are those fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the annual financial statements. A total of $114,000
and $125,000 in audit fees were billed by EisnerAmper LLP for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Audit-related
Fees
Audit-related
fees are fees billed for professional services other than the audit of our financial statements. For the years ended December
31, 2017 and 2016, no audit-related fees were billed by EisnerAmper LLP.
Tax
Fees
Tax
fees are those fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, including preparation of corporate federal and
state income tax returns, tax advice and tax planning. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, no tax fees were billed
by EisnerAmper LLP.
All
Other Fees
No
other fees were billed by our independent registered public accounting firm in 2017 and 2016.
Audit
Committee
We
have not established an audit committee. Our Board of Directors approved the services rendered and fees charged by our independent
registered public accounting firm. Our Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2017, with our management. In addition, our Board of Directors has discussed with EisnerAmper LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by the Public Accounting Oversight Board’s
(“PCAOB”) AS1301 (Communications with Audit Committee). Our Board of Directors also has received the written disclosures
and the letter as required by the Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees)
and our Board of Directors has discussed the independence of EisnerAmper LLP.
Based
on our Board of Directors’ review of the matters noted above and its discussions with our independent registered public
accounting firm and our management, our Board of Directors approved the audited financial statements included in this Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Policy
for Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
Our
Board of Directors’ policy is to pre-approve all audit services and all non-audit services that our independent registered
public accounting firm is permitted to perform for us under applicable federal securities regulations. As permitted by the applicable
regulations, our Board of Directors’ policy utilizes a combination of specific pre-approval on a case-by-case basis of individual
engagements of the independent registered public accounting firm.
All
engagements of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform any audit services and non-audit services since the
date that EisnerAmper LLP was hired have been pre-approved by our Board of Directors in accordance with the pre-approval policy.
The policy has not been waived in any instance. All engagements of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform
any audit services and non-audit services prior to the date the pre-approval policy was implemented were approved by our Board
of Directors in accordance its normal functions.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term deposit
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
$
|
1,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT) EQUITY AND TEMPORARY EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
1,103
|
|
|
$
|
964
|
|
Advances from related parties
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Preferred stock par value $0.01: 2,000,000 shares authorized; 1,935 shares issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2017; aggregate liquidation preference of $1,935
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B common stock no par value: 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Common stock par value $0.01: 57,000,000 shares authorized;
33,350,506 shares and 33,282,089 shares issued and 32,635,756 and 32,567,339 shares outstanding
at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
18,482
|
|
|
|
13,987
|
|
Treasury stock at cost: 714,750 shares as of December 31, 2017 and 2016
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(20,276
|
)
|
|
|
(13,749
|
)
|
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity attributed to alpha-En Corporation stockholders
|
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
|
|
502
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(704
|
)
|
|
|
(320
|
)
|
Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(2,233
|
)
|
|
|
182
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ (DEFICIT)
EQUITY AND TEMPORARY EQUITY
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
$
|
1,224
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
For the year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
4,367
|
|
|
$
|
1,666
|
|
Legal and professional fees
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
6,831
|
|
|
|
3,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of accounts payable
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total other loss
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(6,911
|
)
|
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
Less: net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
(6,527
|
)
|
|
|
(3,580
|
)
|
Less: Dividends accrued on preferred stock
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Less: Deemed dividend on Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Less: Deemed dividend - beneficial conversion feature on preferred stock
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Less: Deemed dividend - issuance of common shares under anti-dilution provisions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Less: Deemed dividend - inducement to exercise warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to alpha-En Corporation common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(8,098
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,074
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share attributable to alpha-En Corporation common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
33,312,970
|
|
|
|
33,347,318
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Noncontrolling
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
32,235,525
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
10,705
|
|
|
|
714,750
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(10,169
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
691
|
|
Non-employee options
exercised for cash
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Warrants exercised
for cash
|
|
|
221,875
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Stock based compensation
(shares and options)
|
|
|
650,000
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
Issuance of common
stock and warrants in private placements
|
|
|
1,394,689
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
1,391
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
Shares cancellation
|
|
|
(1,420,000
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Shares issued due
to anti-dilution
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
Deemed dividend -
inducement to exercise warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Issuance of subsidiary
common stock for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
Warrants granted as
inducement to exercise warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
Deemed dividend -
inducement to exercise warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(3,580
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
33,282,089
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
13,987
|
|
|
|
714,750
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,749
|
)
|
|
$
|
(320
|
)
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
Stock based compensation
(options)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,189
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,189
|
|
Warrant issued for
services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Common stock and warrants
issued for extinguishment of accounts payable
|
|
|
62,417
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Options exercised
for cash
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Issuance of warrants
to purchase common stock associated with preferred stock offering
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
Deemed dividend on
Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
Beneficial conversion
feature of Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
Deemed dividends related
to beneficial conversion feature of Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
Vested options exchanged
for cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Accrued Series A dividends
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6,527
|
)
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(6,911
|
)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
33,350,506
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
$
|
18,482
|
|
|
|
714,750
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,276
|
)
|
|
$
|
(704
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,233
|
)
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
|
|
For
the year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(6,911
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile
net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,189
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
Warrant issued for
services
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Loss on extinguishment
of accounts payable
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of subsidiary
common stock for services
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Changes in operating
assets and liabilities of business, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
Due from related
parties
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
Accounts payable
and accrued expenses
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(1,986
|
)
|
|
|
(1,473
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Release of restricted
cash and long term deposit
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
Purchase
of fixed assets
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
Net cash provided by
(used in) investing activities
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
(462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance
of preferred stock and warrants
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
Options exercised
for cash
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Vested options
exchanged for cash
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Warrants exercised
for cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
Advances from related
parties
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
Repayments of advances
from related parties
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Net cash provided by
financing activities
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
in cash
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
Cash at beginning
of period
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
730
|
|
Cash at end of
period
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non
cash financing and investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
conversion feature of Series A preferred stock
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Deemed dividends
related to beneficial conversion feature of Series A preferred stock
|
|
$
|
807
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Deemed dividend on
Series A preferred stock
|
|
$
|
649
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Deemed dividend related
to issuance of warrants as inducement to exercise existing warrants
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
378
|
|
Deemed dividend related
to issuance of common shares under anti-dilution provisions
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Purchase of property
and equipment included in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
Accrued Series A
dividends
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Conversion of advances
from related parties to preferred stock
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Common stock and
warrants issued for extinguishment of accounts payable
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Issuance of restricted
stock to employee
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Shares cancellation
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
1 - Organization and Operations
alpha-En
Corporation (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) was incorporated in Delaware on March 7, 1997
Since
2008, the focus of the Company’s business has been developing new technologies for manufacturing highly pure lithium
metal, a raw material for use in lightweight, high energy density batteries, in an environmentally friendly manner for commercial
purposes. In 2013, the Company invented a new process for the production of highly pure lithium metal and associated products
at room temperature. The Company subsequently broadened our focus to develop products and processes derived from the
Company’s new core proprietary technology, including battery components and compounds of lithium.
Formation
of Majority-Owned Subsidiary
In
September 2014, alpha-En Corporation formed Clean Lithium Corporation (“CLC”) under the laws of New York State as
a wholly owned subsidiary with a nominal share capital of $100,000.
Following
the sale of CLC’s shares, the ownership is as follows:
Stockholder
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
alpha-En
Corporation
|
|
|
9,095,000
|
|
|
|
90.95
|
%
|
Non-controlling
interests
|
|
|
905,000
|
|
|
|
9.05
|
%
|
Total:
|
|
|
10,000,000
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
On
March 29, 2017 the Board of Directors of the Company and a subset of the Company’s stockholders representing in excess of
75% of the Company’s currently issued and outstanding voting stock approved of the amendment and restatement of the Company’s
Certificate of Incorporation (the “Restated Certificate”) to make certain corporate governance updates and to increase
the authorized capital stock of the Company to 60,000,000 shares, of which 57,000,000 are shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01
per share, 1,000,000 are shares of Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share and 2,000,000 are shares of preferred stock,
par value $0.01 per share. The Company filed a definitive information statement on Schedule 14C with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 1, 2017 describing the changes in the Restated Certificate. The Restated Certificate was filed with the Secretary
of State for the State of Delaware and became effective on June 30, 2017. On February 8, 2018 the Company filed with the Secretary
of State of the State of Delaware an amended and restated certificate of incorporation increasing the authorized number of preferred
shares designated as series A preferred from 2,000 to 5,000.
Note
2 - Going Concern and Liquidity
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which
contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
As
reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of approximately $20.3 million
and negative working capital of $834,000 at December 31, 2017. For the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company
had a net loss of approximately $6.9 million and $3.8 million and net cash used in operating activities of approximately
$2.0 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. These factors raise substantial doubt
about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The
Company is attempting to further develop the intellectual property associated with its technology; broaden its patent portfolio;
scale up our production of various products; and begin generating revenue; however, the Company’s cash position is not sufficient
to support its daily operations for the foreseeable future. While the Company believes in the viability of its technology and
in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering, there can be no assurances to that effect. The
ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public
or private offering and its ability to further develop its technology and generate sufficient revenue.
The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded
asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue
as a going concern.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
3 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices
Basis
of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company’s subsidiaries. For consolidated entities
where the Company owns less than 100% of the subsidiary, the Company records net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
in its consolidated statements of operations equal to the percentage of the economic or ownership interest retained in such entities
by the respective non-controlling parties.
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated.
Use
of Estimates
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements include certain amounts that are based on management’s best estimates
and judgments. The Company’s significant estimates include, but are not limited to, useful lives assigned to long-lived
assets, fair value used in estimating the value of warrants, stock-based compensation, accrued expenses and provisions for income
taxes. Due to the uncertainty inherent in such estimates, actual results may differ from these estimates.
Fair
Value Measurement
The
Company follows accounting guidance on fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a recurring basis. Under the accounting guidance, fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be
received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants
would use in pricing an asset or a liability.
The
accounting guidance requires fair value measurements be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level
1
:
|
Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
|
|
|
Level
2:
|
Observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices for similar assets or liabilities that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
|
|
|
Level
3:
|
Unobservable
inputs which are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are determined
using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination
of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.
|
The
fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs
when measuring fair value. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular
input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires management to make judgments and consider factors specific to the
asset or liability.
The
carrying amounts of cash accounts payable and accrued expenses and advances from related parties approximate fair value as these
accounts are largely current and short term in nature.
Cash
As
of December 31, 2017 and 2016, substantially all of the Company’s cash was held by major financial institutions and the
balance at certain times may exceed the maximum amount insured by the Federal Deposits Insurance Corporation. However, the Company
has not experienced losses on these accounts and management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant risks on such
accounts.
Property
and Equipment
Lab
equipment, leasehold improvements and office equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful life of each asset, generally three years.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
The
Company reviews long-lived assets, including property and equipment, for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Factors that the Company considers in deciding when
to perform an impairment review include significant underperformance of the business in relation to expectations, significant
negative industry or economic trends, and significant changes or planned changes in the use of the assets. If an impairment review
is performed to evaluate a long-lived asset for recoverability, the Company compares forecasts of undiscounted cash flows expected
to result from the use and eventual disposition of the long-lived asset to its carrying value. An impairment loss would be recognized
when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of an asset are less than its carrying amount. The
impairment loss would be based on the excess of the carrying value of the impaired asset over its fair value. There were no indicators
of impairment for long-lived assets during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Fair
Value of Preferred Stock
The
fair value of Preferred stock was estimated based upon equivalent common shares that Preferred Stock could have been converted
into at the closing price on the purchase date.
Convertible
Financial Instruments
The
Company bifurcates conversion options from their host instruments and accounts for them as free standing derivative financial
instruments if certain criteria are met. The criteria include circumstances in which (a) the economic characteristics and risks
of the embedded derivative instrument are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host
contract, (b) the hybrid instrument that embodies both the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not re-measured
at fair value under otherwise applicable generally accepted accounting principles with changes in fair value reported in earnings
as they occur and (c) a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative instrument would be considered a derivative
instrument. An exception to this rule is when the host instrument is deemed to be conventional, as that term is described under
applicable GAAP.
When
the Company has determined that the embedded conversion options should not be bifurcated from their host instruments, discounts
are recorded for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in the instruments based upon the differences between the
fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the transaction and the effective conversion price embedded
in the instrument. Deemed dividends are also recorded for the intrinsic value of conversion options embedded in preferred shares
based upon the differences between the fair value of the underlying common stock at the commitment date of the transaction and
the effective conversion price embedded in the preferred shares.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred. Advance payments for goods and services that will be used in future research and
development activities are expensed when the activity has been performed or when the goods have been received rather than when
the payment is made. Upfront and milestone payments due to third parties that perform research and development services on the
Company’s behalf will be expensed as services are rendered or when the milestone is achieved.
Research
and development costs primarily consist of personnel related expenses, including salaries, benefits, travel, and other related
expenses, stock-based compensation, payments made to third parties for license and milestone costs related to in-licensed products
and technology, payments made to third party contract research organizations, consultants, the cost of acquiring and manufacturing
research trial materials, and costs associated with regulatory filings, laboratory costs and other supplies.
In
accordance with ASC 730-10-25-1,
Research and Development
, costs incurred in obtaining technology licenses are charged
to research and development expense if the technology licensed has not reached commercial feasibility and has no alternative future
use. Certain licenses purchased by the Company require substantial completion of research and development and regulatory and marketing
approval efforts in order to reach commercial feasibility and have no alternative future use.
Contingencies
The
Company records accruals for contingencies and legal proceedings expected to be incurred in connection with a loss contingency
when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
If
a loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, the nature of the contingent
liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company expenses stock-based compensation to employees over the requisite service period based on the estimated grant-date fair
value of the awards. For stock-based compensation awards to non-employees, the Company remeasures the fair
value of the non-employee awards at each reporting period prior to vesting and finally at the vesting date of the award. Changes
in the estimated fair value of these non-employee awards are recognized as compensation expense in the period of change.
The
Company estimates the fair value of stock options grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the assumptions used
in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent management’s best estimates and involve inherent uncertainties
and the application of management’s judgment.
Income
Taxes
The
Company records income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets
and liabilities and their respective income tax bases, and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The Company establishes
a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be recovered based on an evaluation
of objective verifiable evidence. For tax positions that are more likely than not of being sustained upon audit, the Company recognizes
the largest amount of the benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. For tax positions that are not more likely
than not of being sustained upon audit, the Company does not recognize any portion of the benefit.
Loss
Per Share
Basic
loss per share of common stock is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number
of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share excludes the potential impact of common stock options,
unvested shares of restricted stock and outstanding common stock purchase warrants because their effect would be anti-dilutive.
Securities
that could potentially dilute loss per share in the future that were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share
at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
|
|
As
of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Warrants
to purchase common stock
|
|
|
4,744,292
|
|
|
|
3,271,875
|
|
Options
to purchase common stock
|
|
|
8,874,000
|
|
|
|
4,530,000
|
|
Preferred
stock to exchange common stock
|
|
|
1,106,807
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14,725,099
|
|
|
|
7,801,875
|
|
Non-Controlling
Interests
Non-controlling
interests in consolidated entities represent the component of equity in consolidated entities held by third parties. Any change
in ownership of a subsidiary while the controlling financial interest is retained is accounted for as an equity transaction between
the controlling and non-controlling interests.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updates (the “ASU”)
2017-11,
Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic
815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for
Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
with a Scope Exception
, (ASU 2017-11). Part I of this update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial
instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features)
that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance
creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with
down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. Part II of this update
addresses the difficulty of navigating Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because of the existence of extensive
pending content in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This pending content is the result of the indefinite deferral of
accounting requirements about mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of certain nonpublic entities and certain mandatorily
redeemable noncontrolling interests. The amendments in Part II of this update do not have an accounting effect. This ASU is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing
the potential impact of adopting ASU 2017-11 on its financial statements and related disclosures.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In
May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting
, (ASU
2017-09). ASU 2017-09 provides clarity and reduces both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the
guidance in Topic 718, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 should
be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company will adopt this ASU on January 1, 2018 and the
adoption will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
(“ASU 2016-02”). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity
to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on its balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements.
Lessees and lessors are required to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user
of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The
Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2016-02 on the consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures.
In
March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based
Payment Accounting
(“ASU 2016-09”)
. Under ASU 2016-09, companies will no longer
record excess tax benefits and certain tax deficiencies in additional paid-in capital (“APIC”). Instead, they will
record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement and the APIC pools
will be eliminated. In addition, ASU 2016-09 eliminates the requirement that excess tax benefits be realized before companies
can recognize them. ASU 2016-09 also requires companies to present excess tax benefits as an operating activity on the statement
of cash flows rather than as a financing activity. Furthermore, ASU 2016-09 will increase the amount an employer can withhold
to cover income taxes on awards and still qualify for the exception to liability classification for shares used to satisfy the
employer’s statutory income tax withholding obligation. An employer with a statutory income tax withholding obligation will
now be allowed to withhold shares with a fair value up to the amount of taxes owed using the maximum statutory tax rate in the
employee’s applicable jurisdiction(s). ASU 2016-09 requires a company to classify the cash paid to a tax authority when
shares are withheld to satisfy its statutory income tax withholding obligation as a financing activity on the statement of cash
flows. Under current GAAP, it was not specified how these cash flows should be classified. In addition, companies will now have
to elect whether to account for forfeitures on share-based payments by (1) recognizing forfeitures of awards as they occur or
(2) estimating the number of awards expected to be forfeited and adjusting the estimate when it is likely to change, as is currently
required. These aspects of ASU 2016-09 are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption
permitted provided that all of the guidance is adopted in the same period. The Company adopted the standard as of January 1, 2017
and adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In
August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments,
which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how certain
cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new pronouncement on its consolidated statements
of cash flows.
Note
4 - Property and Equipment
The
components of property and equipment as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, at cost are (dollars in thousands):
|
|
Useful
Life (Years)
|
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
|
December
31, 2016
|
|
Lab
equipment
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
|
$
|
173
|
|
Office
furniture and equipment
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Leasehold
improvement
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
Gross
property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
553
|
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
501
|
|
|
$
|
541
|
|
The
Company’s depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $65,000 and $12,000, respectively.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
5 - Related Party Transactions
Advances
from Related Parties
From
time to time, stockholders of the Company advance funds to the Company for working capital purposes. Those advances are unsecured,
non-interest bearing and due on demand.
During
the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company borrowed $150,000 from Steven M. Payne, $100,000 from Jerome I. Feldman,
$150,000 from Jim Kilman and $12,000 from Steven M. Fludder and repaid $32,000 in advances and $150,000 was converted into 150
shares of preferred stock. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the outstanding amount of the advances from related parties was
$308,000 and $78,000, respectively.
Free
Office Space
During
2015 and through September 2016, the Company was provided office space by its Chairman of the Board at no cost. Management determined
that such cost was nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its consolidated financial statements.
Restricted
Stock Grant to Chief Executive Officer and Associated Withholding Payments
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, Steven M. Fludder, the former Chief Executive Officer, paid the Company a withholding tax obligation
of $198,000 related to the grant of restricted stock in 2015. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had a remaining liability of
approximately $57,000.
Appointment
of Chief Financial Officer
On
February 23, 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Nathan Wasserman to become Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
effective as of March 1, 2017. Pursuant to a term sheet dated February 27, 2017, Mr. Wasserman agreed to serve as the Company’s
Chief Financial Officer for an initial term of three years. The Company granted Mr. Wasserman stock options to purchase a total
of 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.10 per share, of which 150,000 vested immediately, 150,000 will vest
in his second year of service and 200,000 will vest in his third year of service. Mr. Wasserman receives a starting salary of
$5,000 per month.
Appointment
of Chief Executive Officer
On
November 1, 2017, the Company appointed Sam Pitroda to serve as Chief Executive Officer, succeeding Steve Fludder who submitted
his resignation as Chief Executive Officer to the Company on October 30, 2017, with such resignation to be effective as of November
1, 2017. Mr. Fludder’s resignation and Mr. Pitroda’s appointment were each effective as of November 1, 2017. Mr. Fludder
will continue to support the Company in a consulting capacity.
Issue
shares of subsidiary
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the company also issued 75,000 shares of its subsidiary, CLC, to a consultant, who is also a
stockholder for the service provided, and the shares were valued at $1.00 per share based upon the estimated fair value on the
date the shares were issued. A related expense of $75,000 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
6 - Temporary Equity
Series
A Preferred Stock
The
following table summarizes the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
Series
A Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Total temporary
equity as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
Conversion
of advances into preferred stock
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Beneficial
conversion feature of Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(807
|
)
|
Deemed
dividends related to beneficial conversion feature of Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
Accrued
Series A dividends
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Deemed
dividend on Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
649
|
|
Fair
Value of common stock warrant issued with Series A preferred stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
Total
temporary equity as of December 31, 2017
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
$
|
1,935
|
|
On
May 17, 2017, the Company entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement (“Stock Purchase Agreement”) with several
accredited and institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell in a private placement 1,820 shares
of its newly designated Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series A Preferred”), as well as 910,000
warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Common Stock”), at a purchase price
of $1,000 per share, for total gross proceeds of $1.82 million (including previous advances from related parties). The warrants
have a 5-year term and an exercise price of $2.00. Steven M. Payne, Jerome I. Feldman and Jim Kilman each converted $50,000 advances
into preferred stock.
The
Series A Preferred is entitled to accrue cumulative dividends at a rate equal to 10.0% simple interest per annum on the original
issue price of $1,000 per share (the “Original Issue Price”). Accrued dividends will be payable quarterly based on
a 365-day year and may be paid in cash or in additional shares of Series A Preferred. Each share of Series A Preferred is convertible
into 572 shares of Common Stock, subject to customary increases or decreases for stock splits, stock dividends recapitalizations
and the like, and may be converted to Common Stock at any time after issuance at the option of a holder. The Company will have
the right, at the Company’s option, to redeem all or a portion of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock at any time or
times after the one year anniversary of the Issuance Date of such Series A Preferred Stock, at a price per share (the “Redemption
Price”) equal to the sum of the following (without duplication): (a) the Original Issue Price, plus (b) any accrued but
unpaid Dividends. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, liquidation of the Company’s assets will
be made in the following order of priority: (a) first, payment or provision for payment of debts and other liabilities; (b) second,
payment to the holders of Series A Preferred an amount with respect to each share of Series A Preferred equal to the Original
Issue Price, plus any accrued but unpaid Dividends thereon; and (c) third, payment to the holders of Common Stock. Except as required
by applicable law or as set forth herein, the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock will vote together with the holders
of shares of Common Stock and not as a separate class. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock will have a number of votes equal
to the number of shares of Common Stock then issuable upon conversion of such share of Series A Preferred Stock.
The
Series A Preferred Stock is being classified as temporary equity because it has redemption features that are outside of the Company’s
control upon certain triggering events, such as a deemed liquidation event. A “Deemed Liquidation Event” is defined
in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as a merger that results in a change in control or the
sale of substantially all the assets of the Company. In the case of a Deemed Liquidation Event, the assets of the Company will
be paid in order of liquidation preference to the holders of preferred and common stock. Because certain holders of the Series
A Preferred Stock constitute a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors, a potential Deemed Liquidation Event is considered
to be outside the control of the Company along with the call provision that can be exercised in one year, resulting in classification
of the Series A Preferred Stock as temporary equity.
The
Company has determined that the warrants should be accounted as a component of stockholders’ equity. On the issuance date,
the Company estimated the fair value of the warrants at $1.1 million using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the following
primary assumptions: contractual term of 5.0 years, volatility rate of 79.8%, risk-free interest rate of 1.76% and expected dividend
rate of 0%. Based on the warrant’s relative fair value to the fair value of the Series A Preferred, approximately $649,000
of the $1.1 million of aggregate fair value was allocated to the warrants, creating a corresponding preferred stock discount in
the same amount.
Due
to the reduction of allocated proceeds to Series A Preferred, the effective conversion price was approximately $1.1 per share
creating a beneficial conversion feature of $807,000. Since the conversion option of the Series A Preferred was immediately exercisable,
the beneficial conversion feature was immediately accreted to preferred dividends, resulting in an increase in the carrying value
of the Series A Preferred.
As
of December 31, 2017, the dividends accrued and outstanding were $115,000.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note
7 - Stockholders’ Equity
Common
Stock
2016
Activity
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company entered into private placement offerings with fourteen investors and issued approximately
1.5 million shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase approximately 1.4 million shares of common stock for $1.4 million.
The warrants have a 5-year term and a weighted-average exercise price of $1.68. 100,000 shares issued in this offering are subject
to “price protection” for a period of one year. Specifically, in the event the Company issues to any person common
stock or their equivalent at a lower price per share than $2.50 (the “Lower Price”), the Company shall, simultaneously
with the issuance of such shares, issue that investor a number of additional common shares (the “Additional Shares”)
necessary to cause the 100,000 purchased plus the Additional Shares to have a combined average cost per share equal to the Lower
Price, provided that in no event shall the Additional Shares exceed 100,000 shares. The price protection feature was analyzed
by the Company and the Company determined that such feature was not required to be bifurcated from the common stock and recorded
as a derivative as the price protection feature is clearly and closely related to an equity host. In November 2016 the Lower Price
protection was triggered and the Company became obligated to issue an additional 100,000 shares of common stock under the arrangement.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company also issued 75,000 shares of its subsidiary, CLC, to a consultant, who is
also a stockholder for the service provided, and the shares were valued at $1.00 per share based upon the estimated fair value
on the date the shares were issued. A related expense of $75,000 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016.
During
the year ended December 31, 2016, 221,875 warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $0.97 were exercised for cash consideration
of $215,000. These warrant holders were also granted 221,875 additional warrants in August 2016 with a 5-year term and an exercise
price of $2.70 per share. The warrants were accounted for as an inducement and accordingly $378,000 which reflects the fair value
of the warrants was recorded as a deemed distribution. The fair value of the warrants was determined using a Black-Scholes model
with the following assumptions: risk free rate - 1.14%, volatility - 78.49%, expected term - 5 years, expected dividends - N/A.
Stock
Options
2016
Equity Plan
In
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, the Company adopted the 2016 Equity Plan, an omnibus equity incentive plan to be administered
by the Company’s Board of Directors to which the Company may issue its common shares in connection with grants of stock
options to employees and consultants of the Company.
The
grant date fair value of stock options granted to employees during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was approximately
$4.3 million and $305,000, respectively. The fair value of the Company’s common stock was based upon the publicly quoted
price on the date that the final approval of the awards was obtained. The Company does not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable
future so therefore the expected dividend yield is 0%. The expected term for stock options granted with service conditions represents
the average period the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and is based on the expected term calculated using the
approach prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin for “plain vanilla”
options. The expected term for stock options granted with performance and/or market conditions represents the estimated period
estimated by management by which the performance conditions will be met. The Company obtained the risk-free interest rate from
publicly available data published by the Federal Reserve. The Company uses a methodology in estimating its volatility percentage
from a computation that was based on a comparison of average volatility rates of similar companies to a computation based on the
standard deviation of the Company’s own underlying stock price’s daily logarithmic returns. The fair value of employee
options granted in 2017 and 2016 was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
For
the year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Exercise
price
|
|
$
|
1.85
|
|
|
$
|
1.03
|
|
Expected
stock price volatility
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
|
|
79
|
%
|
Risk-free
rate of interest
|
|
|
1.61
|
%
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
Term
(years)
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
A
summary of option activity under the Company’s employee stock option plan for year ended December 31, 2017 is presented
below:
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Total
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual
Life (in years)
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2016
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Employee
options granted
|
|
4,150,000
|
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
4,160,000
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
(50,000
|
)
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2017
|
|
5,669,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
7,793,000
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Options
vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2017
|
|
5,669,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
|
$
|
7,793,000
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Options vested
and exercisable as of December 31, 2017
|
|
2,444,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
4,065,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
In
July 2017, in recognition of the service on the Board of Directors, Mr. Feldman and Mr. Kilman each received options to purchase
1,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price $1.95 per share, the fair value as of the date of grant, vesting in equal
instalments over a four year period starting on July 27, 2017. Also in July 2017 in recognition of his service on the Board of
Directors, Mr. Payne received an option to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price $1.95 per share, the fair
value as of the date of grant, vesting in equal instalments over a four year period starting on July 27, 2017.
A
summary of option activity under the Company’s employee stock option plan for year ended December 31, 2016 is presented
below:
|
Number
of
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Total
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2015
|
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
757,000
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Employee
options granted
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
182,000
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2016
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Options
vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2016
|
|
1,575,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
1,264,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Options
vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2016
|
|
687,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
$
|
647,000
|
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
A
summary of the activity of options that the Company granted to non-employees for the year ended December 31, 2017 is presented
below:
|
Number
of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Total
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual
Life (in years)
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2016
|
|
2,955,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
3,053,000
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Non-employee
options granted
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2017
|
|
3,205,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
7,847,000
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Options
vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2017
|
|
3,205,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
7,847,000
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Options
vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2017
|
|
2,317,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
5,714,000
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
A
summary of the activity of options that the Company granted to non-employees for the year ended December 31, 2016 is presented
below:
|
Number
of
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Total
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2015 (as reported)
|
|
2,670,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
2,118,000
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Adjustment
to stock options
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
134,000
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2015 (as adjusted)
|
|
2,820,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
2,252,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Non-employee
options granted
|
|
235,000
|
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
46,000
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Non-employee
options exercised
|
|
(100,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
119,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2016
|
|
2,955,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
3,053,000
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Options
vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2016
|
|
2,955,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
3,053,000
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Options
vested and exercisable as of December 31, 2016
|
|
1,667,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
1,660,700
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Estimated
future stock-based compensation expense relating to unvested stock options is approximately $2.1 million as of December 31, 2017
and will be amortized over the remaining 2.8 years.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Warrants
A
summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2017 and changes during the year then ended
is presented below:
|
Number
of Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Total
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual
Life (in years)
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2016
|
|
3,271,875
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Issued
|
|
1,472,417
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
|
|
1,666,000
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2017
|
|
4,744,292
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
7,884,000
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Warrants
exercisable as of December 31, 2017
|
|
4,494,292
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
7,472,000
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
A
summary of the status of the Company’s outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2016 and changes during the year then ended
is presented below:
|
Number
of
Warrants
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Total
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
(in years)
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2015
|
|
1,850,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
1,249,000
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Issued
|
|
1,643,750
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Exercised
|
|
(221,875
|
)
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Outstanding
as of December 31, 2016
|
|
3,271,875
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Warrants
exercisable as of December 31, 2016
|
|
3,271,875
|
|
|
$
|
1.02
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
During
year ended December 31, 2017, the Company granted 500,000 warrants with an exercise price of $1.20 to a service provider. 250,000
warrants were vested immediately, the other 250,000 warrants will be vested upon performance of the service.
Stock-based
Compensation Expense
Stock-based
compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
For
the year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Employee
restricted stock awards
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
Employee
stock option awards
|
|
|
2,423
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Non-employee
option awards
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
Total
compensation expense
|
|
$
|
4,189
|
|
|
$
|
1,582
|
|
Note
8 - Contingencies and Commitments
On
March 22, 2016, the Company entered into a lease (the “Lease”) with Hudson View Building #3, LLC (“the “Landlord”),
for office and laboratory space located in Yonkers, New York (the “Leased Premise”). The Leased Premise consists of
approximately 8,000 square feet. The Lease has a term of 87 months from the lease commencement date, which is the date upon which
the Landlord has substantially completed certain interior leasehold improvements to the Leased Premise. The annual rent of the
first year of the lease is approximately $208,000, increasing by 1.5% on each anniversary of the lease commencement date. In the
event of a termination of the lease following a default by the Company, the Company will be obligated to pay the sum of the rent
payable for the remainder of the lease term. The Company moved into the office on May 30, 2017. The Company began paying monthly
rent on August 30, 2017.
In
connection with this lease, the Company obtained an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit (the “Letter of Credit”)
from Chase Bank for a sum not exceeding $150,000. The Company has deposited this amount with Chase Bank as collateral for the
Letter of Credit and recorded the amount as restricted cash and long-term deposit in the consolidated balance sheets. During the
year ended December 31, 2017, $100,000 restricted cash was released to the Company.
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
As
of December 31, 2017, contractual minimal lease payments are as follows (in thousands):
2018
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
2019
|
|
|
212
|
|
2020
|
|
|
215
|
|
2021
|
|
|
219
|
|
2022
|
|
|
222
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
377
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,454
|
|
On
February 25, 2009, the Company was granted an exclusive, worldwide, transferable, perpetual license to use certain proprietary
technology for the processing of lithium for use in batteries and other fields. Commencing in October 2010, working through a
third party, the Company conducted a series of tests to determine if the process worked and, based on the results, initially believed
that the process produced lithium, however it did not prove to be commercially feasible and research and development efforts involving
this license were abandoned. In exchange for the license, the Company had certain financial, share issuance and royalty obligations
if certain sale thresholds were met. However, since contractually agreed thresholds were not met and the technology was not used,
the Company negotiated an amendment and release which was finalized in January 2017. Pursuant to the amendment and release, the
third party retained two million of the three million total shares from the original license and forfeited the remaining one million
shares. The two million shares retained by the third party are subject to customary transfer restrictions for restricted shares.
The
Company maintained an executive office in Tarrytown, New York. This space was previously provided to the Company without charge
by our Executive Chairman, Jerome I. Feldman. Beginning in September 2016 the Company began incurring rent for this space of approximately
$5,000 per month, plus taxes and utilities to the current owner Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc. The lease commenced
on May 1, 2016 and terminates on April 30, 2018. The Company has the option to terminate the lease at any time upon two months’
notice. On May 31, 2017, the Company terminated the lease.
Note
9 - Extinguishment of Accounts Payable
During
year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 62,417 shares of common stock and 62,417 warrants to certain vendors in lieu
of $110,000 of outstanding accounts payable. The warrants have a 5-year term and a weighted-average exercise price of $1.76. The
fair value of common stock and warrant at the conversion date was approximately $110,000 and $82,000, respectively. The difference
of $82,000 was recorded as a loss on extinguishment of accounts payable.
Note
10 - Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision
The
Company had no income tax expense due to operating loss incurred for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
On
December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax
Act”), which makes broad changes to the U.S. tax code. Certain changes are applicable to the Company effective
January 1, 2018, including but not limited to, reducing the highest U.S. federal corporate statutory tax rate
from 35 percent to 21 percent, creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense, eliminating the corporate alternative
minimum tax (“AMT”) and modifying the rules related to uses and limitations of net operating loss carryforwards
generated in tax years ending after December 31, 2017. Deferred tax impacts from new legislation are accounted for
in the period of enactment. As a result of the reduced corporate tax rate to 21 percent, the Company has
recorded a decrease related to the gross deferred tax assets by $1.4 million exclusive of the corresponding change
in the valuation allowance, for the year ended December 31, 2017. Due to the Company’s position of having a valuation
allowance on the net deferred tax assets, there is no net adjustment to deferred tax expense or benefit due to the reduction
of the corporate tax rate.
The
tax effects of temporary differences and tax losses and credit carry forwards that give rise to significant portions of deferred
tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are comprised of the following (dollars in thousands):
ALPHA-EN
CORPORATION
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
As
of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-operating
loss carryforward
|
|
$
|
1,523
|
|
|
$
|
1,196
|
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
1,752
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
3,275
|
|
|
|
2,239
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
(3,275
|
)
|
|
|
(2,239
|
)
|
Deferred
Tax Asset, Net of Allowance
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
At
December 31, 2017, the Company had net operating loss carry forwards for federal and state tax purposes of approximately $5.5
million which expires beginning in 2037. The Company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine whether an ownership
change under Section 382 of the IRC has occurred. The effect of a Section 382 ownership change would be the imposition
of an annual limitation on the use of net operating loss carryforwards attributable to periods before the change. Any limitation
may result in expiration of all, or a portion of the NOL or potential research and development credit carryforwards before utilization.
In
assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income during the period in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled
reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and taxing strategies in making this assessment. In case
the deferred tax assets will not be realized in future periods, the Company has provided a valuation allowance for the full amount
of the deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017. The valuation allowance increased by approximately $1.0 million and $1.5
million for the years ended as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The
expected tax expense (benefit) based on the U.S. federal statutory rate is reconciled with actual tax expense (benefit) as follows:
|
|
For
the years ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Statutory
Federal Income Tax Rate
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(34.0
|
)%
|
State
Taxes, Net of Federal Tax Benefit
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)%
|
Federal
tax rate change
|
|
|
11.9
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Warrant
issued for services
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Loss
on extinguishment of accounts payable
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
-
|
%
|
Change
in Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
23.0
|
%
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes Provision (Benefit)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The
Company has not identified any uncertain tax positions requiring a reserve as of December 31, 2017.
The
Company is in the process of preparing the 2017 federal and state tax returns. Therefore, the Company’s 2017
net operating loss carryovers will not be available to offset future taxable income, if any, until the tax returns are filed.
Note
11 - Subsequent Events
On
February 8, 2018, the Company entered into a preferred stock purchase agreement (“Stock Purchase Agreement”) with
several accredited and institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell in a private placement
1,950 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, as well as 975,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock, at a purchase
price of $1,000 per share, for total gross proceeds of $1.95 million.
Alpha En (CE) (USOTC:ALPE)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Déc 2024 à Jan 2025
Alpha En (CE) (USOTC:ALPE)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Jan 2024 à Jan 2025