Item
1. Financial Statements.
Jammin
Java Corp.
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
|
April
30,
2016
|
|
January
31,
2016
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
193,002
|
|
|
$
|
231,021
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
1,436,015
|
|
|
|
1,415,559
|
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
6,382
|
|
|
|
30,171
|
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
3,840
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
1,639,239
|
|
|
|
1,684,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
148,307
|
|
|
|
187,838
|
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
578,663
|
|
|
|
593,325
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
23,567
|
|
|
|
23,567
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$
|
2,389,776
|
|
|
$
|
2,489,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$
|
3,635,442
|
|
|
$
|
3,611,257
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
936,457
|
|
|
|
497,431
|
|
Convertible
and other notes payable, net of discount, current
|
|
|
928,971
|
|
|
|
1,029,558
|
|
Conversion
feature - derivative liability
|
|
|
782,603
|
|
|
|
778,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
6,283,473
|
|
|
|
5,917,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
and other notes payable, net of discount and current portion
|
|
|
250,363
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
250,363
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
6,533,836
|
|
|
|
5,917,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
& Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
Deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 5,112,861,525 shares authorized; 130,134,439 and 126,455,312 shares issued and outstanding, as of
April 30, 2016 and January 31, 2016, respectively
|
|
|
130,134
|
|
|
|
126,455
|
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
26,459,125
|
|
|
|
25,691,579
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(30,733,319
|
)
|
|
|
(29,245,750
|
)
|
Total
Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|
|
(4,144,060
|
)
|
|
|
(3,427,716
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
|
|
$
|
2,389,776
|
|
|
$
|
2,489,481
|
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements
JAMMIN
JAVA CORP.
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended April 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales,
net
|
|
$
|
2,727,999
|
|
|
$
|
2,581,427
|
|
Cost
of sales
|
|
|
1,786,870
|
|
|
|
1,784,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
941,129
|
|
|
|
796,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
and benefits
|
|
|
970,703
|
|
|
|
972,806
|
|
Selling
and marketing
|
|
|
600,709
|
|
|
|
521,116
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
771,303
|
|
|
|
492,824
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
2,342,715
|
|
|
|
1,986,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
expense
|
|
|
(7,650
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Changes
in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
75,914
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
362,506
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(516,753
|
)
|
|
|
(7,105
|
)
|
Total
other expense
|
|
|
(85,983
|
)
|
|
|
(7,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Loss
|
|
$
|
(1,487,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,197,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted
|
|
|
127,748,811
|
|
|
|
124,879,545
|
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements
JAMMIN
JAVA CORP.
statements
OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended April 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$
|
(1,487,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,197,236
|
)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock issued for services
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
156,381
|
|
Shared-based
compensation
|
|
|
771,225
|
|
|
|
368,046
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
35,757
|
|
|
|
41,273
|
|
Amortization
of intangibles
|
|
|
14,662
|
|
|
|
16,325
|
|
Changes
in fair value of derivative liability
|
|
|
(75,914
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Gain
on sale of fixed asset
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
(20,456
|
)
|
|
|
(577,995
|
)
|
Inventory
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43,713
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
27,949
|
|
|
|
7,689
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
24,185
|
|
|
|
737,723
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
439,026
|
|
|
|
(210,502
|
)
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(267,361
|
)
|
|
|
(614,583
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
disposal of property and equipment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(55,523
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(55,523
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments
on short term debt
|
|
|
(214,071
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Borrowings
on long term debt
|
|
|
443,413
|
|
|
|
298,948
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
229,342
|
|
|
|
298,948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(38,019
|
)
|
|
|
(371,158
|
)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
231,021
|
|
|
|
443,189
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
193,002
|
|
|
$
|
72,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash
Transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addition
of capital leases
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
73,000
|
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APRIL
30, 2016
(Unaudited)
Note
1. Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Jammin Java Corp. (the “
Company
”) have been prepared
in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“
SEC
”) and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes
thereto contained in the Company’s latest Annual Report filed with the SEC on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results
of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or any other future period. Notes to the financial
statements that would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent
fiscal year as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K have been omitted. The accompanying balance sheet at
April 30, 2016 has been derived from the audited balance sheet at January 31, 2016 contained in such Form 10-K.
As
used in this Quarterly Report, the terms “
we,
” “
us,
” “
our,
” “
Jammin
Java
” and the “
Company
” mean Jammin Java Corp., unless otherwise indicated. All dollar amounts in
this Quarterly Report are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise stated.
Note
2. Going Concern and Liquidity
These
financial statements have been prepared by management assuming that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern and
contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These financial statements
do not include any adjustments to the recoverability of recorded asset amounts or the amounts or classifications of liabilities
that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The
Company incurred a net loss of $1,487,569 for the three months ended April 30, 2016, and has an accumulated deficit since inception
of $30,733,319. The Company has a history of losses and has only recently begun to generate revenue as part of its principal operations.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The operations of the
Company have primarily been funded by the sale of its common stock. The Company will, in the future, need to secure additional
funds through future equity sales or other fund raising activities. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be
available, or if available, will be on terms acceptable to the Company.
The
Company’s ability to meet its obligations in the ordinary course of business is dependent upon its ability to sell its products
directly to end-users and through distributors, establish profitable operations through increased sales and decreased expenses,
and obtain additional funds when needed. Management intends to increase sales by increasing the Company’s product offerings,
expanding its direct sales force and expanding its domestic and international distributor relationships.
There
can be no assurance that the Company will be able to increase sales, reduce expenses or obtain additional financing, if necessary,
at a level to meet its current obligations. As a result, the opinion the Company received from its independent registered public
accounting firm on its January 31, 2016 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph stating that there is a substantial
doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Note
3. Business Overview and Summary of Accounting Policies
Jammin
Java, doing business as Marley Coffee, is a United States (U.S.)-based company that provides sustainably grown, ethically farmed
and artisan roasted gourmet coffee through multiple U.S. and international distribution channels, using the Marley Coffee brand
name. U.S. and international grocery retail channels have become the Company’s largest revenue channels, followed by online
retail, office coffee services (referred to herein as OCS), food service outlets and licensing. The Company intends to continue
to develop these revenue channels and achieve a leadership position in the gourmet coffee space by capitalizing on the global
recognition of the Marley name through the licensing of the Marley Coffee trademarks.
Reclassifications.
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation for comparative purposes.
Use
of Estimates in Financial Statement Preparation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“
GAAP
”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as certain financial statement disclosures.
While management believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are appropriate,
actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents.
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less to be cash equivalents. As of April 30, 2016, the Company had $193,002 of cash and cash equivalents. Additionally, no interest
income was recognized for the three months ended April 30, 2016.
Revenue
Recognition.
Revenue is derived from the sale of coffee products and is recognized on a gross basis upon shipment to the customer.
All revenue is recognized when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (ii) the service or sale is completed; (iii)
the price is fixed or determinable; and (iv) the ability to collect is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized as the net amount
estimated to be received after deducting estimated amounts for discounts, trade allowances and product terms. We record promotional
and return allowances based on recent and historical trends. Promotional allowances, including customer incentive and trade promotion
activities, are recorded as a reduction to sales based on amounts estimated being due to customers, based primarily on historical
utilization and redemption rates. Discounts and promotional allowances deducted from sales for the three months ended April 30,
2016 and 2015 were $355,560 and $156,952, respectively.
The
Company utilizes third parties for the production and fulfillment of orders placed by customers. The Company, acting as principal,
takes title to the product and assumes the risks of ownership; namely, the risks of loss for collection, delivery and returns.
Accounts
Receivable due from Roasters.
We source coffee that we sell to our roaster, Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee Inc. (“Mother
Parkers”), a related party and shareholder of the Company, who in turn sells it to its own customers. This is especially
the case with Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee secured by us. Mother Parkers is also a shareholder of the Company. At April 30, 2016,
we are owed $463,906 by Mother Parkers. We also utilize the services of Mother Parkers, to roast coffee to our specifications
for sale to the Company’s customers. As a result, at April 30, 2016, we owe $2,232,088 to Mother Parkers for roasting services.
Financial
assets and liabilities are subject to offset and presented as net amounts in the statement of financial position when, and only
when, the Company currently has a legally enforceable right to offset amounts and intends either to settle on a net basis, or
to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. The Company does not have offset rights with respect to Mother Parkers
due to/due from amounts at April 30, 2016.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts.
The Company does not require collateral from its customers with respect to accounts receivable. The
Company determines any required allowance by considering a number of factors, including the terms for each customer, and the length
of time accounts receivable are outstanding. Management provides an allowance for accounts receivable whenever it is evident that
they become uncollectible. The Company has reserved an allowance of $78,760 and $71,168, respectively for doubtful accounts at
April 30, 2016 and January 31, 2016. Because our accounts receivable are concentrated in a relatively few number of customers,
a significant change in the liquidity or financial position of any one of these customers could have a material adverse effect
on the collectability of our accounts receivable and our future operating results.
Property
and Equipment.
Equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Maintenance and repairs, as
incurred, are charged to expense. Renewals and enhancements which extend the life or improve existing equipment are capitalized.
Upon disposition or retirement of equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed and any resulting gain
or loss is reflected in operations. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets, which are three years.
Depreciation
was $35,757 and $41,273, for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets.
Long-lived assets consist primarily of a license agreement that was recorded at the estimated cost
to acquire the asset. The license agreement is reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable (see Note 4). Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate
of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such cash
flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the assets, the assets are written down to their estimated
fair values. Management evaluated the carrying value of long-lived assets including the license and determined that no impairment
existed at April 30, 2016.
Stock-Based
Compensation
. Pursuant to the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“
FASB
”) Accounting Standards
Codification (“
ASC
”) 718-10, “
Compensation – Stock Compensation,
” which establishes
accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee service, management utilizes the Black-Scholes option pricing
model to estimate the fair value of employee stock option awards at the date of grant, which requires the input of highly subjective
assumptions, including expected volatility and expected life. Changes in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the
measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. These assumptions are subjective and generally require significant
analysis and judgment to develop. When estimating fair value, some of the assumptions will be based on, or determined from, external
data and other assumptions may be derived from our historical experience with stock-based payment arrangements. The appropriate
weight to place on historical experience is a matter of judgment, based on relevant facts and circumstances.
Common
stock issued for services to non-employees is recorded based on the value of the services or the value of the common stock, whichever
is more clearly determinable. Whenever the value of the services is not determinable, the measurement date occurs generally at
the date of issuance of the stock. In more limited cases, it occurs when a commitment for performance has been reached with the
counterparty and nonperformance is subject to significant disincentives. If the total value of stock issued exceeds the par value,
the value in excess of the par value is added to the additional paid-in-capital. We estimate volatility of our publicly-listed
common stock by considering historical stock volatility.
Income
Taxes.
The Company follows Financial Accounting Standards Board (“
FASB
”) Accounting Standards Codification
No 740,
Income Taxes
. The Company records deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the differences between the
financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities and on net operating loss carry forwards using enacted tax rates in
effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely
than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Loss
Per Common Share.
Basic loss per common share equals net loss divided by the weighted average of shares
outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted loss per share includes the impact on dilution from all contingently
issuable shares, including options, warrants and convertible securities. The common stock equivalents from contingent shares
are determined by the treasury stock method. The Company incurred a net loss for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and
2015, respectively. In addition, basic and diluted loss per share for such periods are the same because all potential common
equivalent shares totaling 21,580,195 shares have been excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share as their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
. Accounting standards that have been issued by the FASB or other standards setting bodies
that do not require adoption until a future date are being evaluated by the Company to determine whether adoption will have a
material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Financial
Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Update, or ASU 2016-02 “Leases (Topic 842)”
- In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which will require lessees to recognize almost all leases on their balance sheet as
a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to
be classified as either operating or finance. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied
in current lease accounting, but without explicit bright lines. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model, but updated
to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. This ASU is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 18, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the potential
impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
FASB
ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” or ASU 2014-09
- In May 2014, the FASB issued
ASU 2014-09, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements of Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic 605 “Revenue
Recognition.” This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with the option to adopt
as early as December 15, 2017. We are currently assessing the impact of adoption of this ASU on our consolidated results of operations,
cash flows and financial position.
Note
4
.
Trademark License Agreements and Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets include our License Agreement, and intangibles and goodwill arising from our BikeCaffe acquisition. The amortization periods are fifteen years and ten years for the license agreement and intangible assets,
respectively. Amortization expense consists of the following:
License
agreement, net consists of the following:
|
|
April
30,
2016
|
|
January
31, 2016
|
License
Agreement
|
|
$
|
730,000
|
|
|
$
|
730,000
|
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
|
|
(182,499
|
)
|
|
|
(170,332
|
)
|
License
Agreement, net
|
|
$
|
547,501
|
|
|
$
|
559,668
|
|
The amortization period is fifteen years. Amortization expense consists of the following:
|
|
For
the three months ending April 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
License
Agreement
|
|
$
|
(12,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,166
|
)
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
(2,495
|
)
|
|
|
(4,159
|
)
|
Total
License Agreement Amortization Expense
|
|
$
|
(14,662
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,325
|
)
|
As of January 31, 2016, the remaining useful life of the Company's license agreement was approximately 11.5 years. The following
table shows the estimated amortization expense for such assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter.
Years
Ending January 31,
|
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
36,501
|
|
2018
|
|
|
48,668
|
|
2019
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
2020
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
2021
|
|
|
48,688
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
316,328
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
547,501
|
|
Note
5. Outstanding debt
Convertible
and Other Notes Payable are as follows:
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
Available
|
|
Accrued
|
|
Debt
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
Commitment
|
|
April
30, 2016
|
|
Proceeds
|
|
Interest
|
|
Discount
|
|
Rate
|
|
Maturity
|
Colorado
Medical Finance Services, LLC *
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
99,949
|
|
|
$
|
400,051
|
|
|
$
|
23,599
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
September
26, 2016
|
|
JSJ
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
275,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,815
|
|
|
|
(111,049
|
)
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
December
6, 2016
|
|
Typenex **
|
|
|
1,005,000
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
16,401
|
|
|
|
(55,320
|
)
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
May
14, 2017
|
|
JMJ **
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
385,000
|
|
|
|
515,000
|
|
|
|
51,968
|
|
|
|
(252,686
|
)
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
September
16, 2017
|
|
Vis Vires
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
11,969
|
|
|
|
(137,537
|
)
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
December
9, 2016
|
|
Duck Duck Spruce
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,558
|
|
|
|
(279,240
|
)
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
December
15, 2016
|
|
Third
party loan
|
|
|
260,311
|
|
|
|
259,907
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
|
|
December
1, 2016
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,740,311
|
|
|
$
|
1,899,856
|
|
|
$
|
1,815,051
|
|
|
$
|
115,310
|
|
|
$
|
(835,832
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivative
liability
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
782,603
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,740,311
|
|
|
$
|
2,682,459
|
|
|
$
|
1,815,051
|
|
|
$
|
115,310
|
|
|
$
|
(835,832
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
*Line
of Credit.
**Long
term note.
Revolving
Line of Credit – Colorado Medical Finance Services, LLC
Effective
on February 16, 2015, The Company entered into an unsecured Revolving Line of Credit Agreement with Colorado Medical Finance
Services, LLC, dba Gold Gross Capital LLC. The line of credit allows the Company the right to borrow up to $500,000 from the
lender from time to time. Amounts borrowed under the line of credit accrue interest at the rate of 17.5% per annum and can be
repaid at any time without penalty. A total of 10% of the interest rate is payable in cash and the other 7.5% of the interest
rate is payable in cash, or as a reduction of accounts receivable related to coffee sales/services, at the option of the
lender, with our consent. We have paid or intend to pay all related interest in cash. The line of credit expires, and all
amounts are due under the line of credit on September 26, 2016. Upon the occurrence of an event of default the amounts owed
under the line of credit bear interest at the rate of 20% per annum. Proceeds from the line of credit can be solely used for
working capital purposes. The lender has no relationship with the Company or its affiliates. As of April 30, 2016 there was
$123,548 outstanding which included $99,949 in principal and $23,599 in interest due. The payments due on this line of credit
have been made on a monthly basis.
Convertible
Note Payable – JSJ
On
September 9, 2015, we entered into a 12% Convertible Note to JSJ Investments Inc. (“JSJ” and the “JSJ Convertible
Note”) in the amount of $275,000. On March 1, 2016, we amended the JSJ Convertible Note through a side letter agreement.
Amounts owed under the JSJ Convertible Note accrue interest at the rate of 12% per annum (18% upon an event of default). The JSJ
Convertible Note is due in December 2016. We have the right to repay the JSJ Convertible Note (a) from March 1, 2016 to through
September 9, 2016, provided we pay a redemption premium of 135% of the principal amount of such note together with accrued interest
thereon, and (b) from September 10, 2016 to the maturity date, provided we pay a redemption premium of 150% of the principal amount
of such note together with accrued interest thereon.
The
JSJ Convertible Note and all accrued interest is convertible at the option of the holder thereof into the
Company’s common stock at any time after September 9, 2016. The conversion price of the JSJ Convertible Note is the
greatest of a) 60% (a 40% discount) to the third lowest intra-day trading price of the Company’s common stock during
the 10 trading days prior to any conversion date of the note, or b) $0.00005. The variable conversion price was accounted for
as a derivative liability. Upon initial issuance, the Company recorded a discount of approximately $233,000 relating to the
derivative liability. The goal is for the Company to utilize this debt as growth capital to help accelerate projects that
generate revenue. We hope to repay the JSJ Convertible Note prior to any conversion. In the event that the JSJ Note is not
repaid in cash in its entirety, Company shareholders may suffer dilution if and to the extent that the balance of the JSJ
Note is converted into common stock. As of April, 30 2016, the balance of the note was $280,815 of which $275,000 was
principal and $5,815 was accrued interest. In connection with the side letter agreement, we paid $96,250 in consideration to
extend the due date of the JSJ Note (which represents the prepayment penalty which would have been due had we repaid the JSJ
Note when due). The side letter agreement was considered to be a debt extinguishment and the Company recorded a gain of
approximately $133,000 relating to such extinguishment.
Convertible
Promissory Notes Payable - with Typenex Co-Investment, LLC
On
September 14, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the
“Typenex SPA”) with Typenex Co-Investment, LLC (“Typenex”). Pursuant to the Typenex SPA, the Company
issued to Typenex convertible promissory notes in with a total the principal amount of $1,005,000 in the form of: (a) an
initial tranche of $255,000 in cash (the “Typenex Note”), and (b) three promissory notes of $250,000 each. The
Typenex Note has a term of 20 months and an interest rate of 10% per annum (22% upon an event of default). The gross proceeds
to the Company from the transactions contemplated by the Typenex SPA were $1,005,000, in the form of: (a) an initial tranche
of $250,000 in cash, and (b) three promissory notes of $250,000 each (collectively, the “Investor Notes”).
Typenex and the Company must mutually agree to fund one or more of the three additional Investor Notes. As of April 30, 2016,
none of the additional three tranches only $255,000 had been funded. The Typenex Note has a term of 20 months, matures in May
2017, and has and an interest rate of 10% per annum (22% upon an event of default). Each of the Investor Notes accrue
interest at the rate of 10% per annum until paid and are secured by a Membership Interest Pledge Agreement. Beginning in
March 2016, and on the same day of each month thereafter until the maturity date, the Company is required to pay to Typenex
monthly installments of principal equal to $75,000 (or such lesser principal amount as is then outstanding), plus the sum of
any accrued and unpaid interest. Alternatively, Typenex or the Company may elect to convert an installment amount into Common
Stock at the lower of (a) $0.30 per share, and (b) if the Company’s market capitalization falls below $3,000,000, the
Market Price conversion price shall be adjusted to the market price as of the applicable date applying a discount of 40%. The
Typenex Note also includes repricing features whereby if the Company sells or issues any common stock or other securities
exercisable for, or convertible into, Common Stock for a price per share that is less than the conversion price applicable
under the Typenex Note, then such lower price will apply to all subsequent conversions by Typenex. The repricing feature of
the conversion feature was considered to be derivative liabilities and accordingly, the Company recorded approximately
$55,320 discount to debt. The Company has the right to prepay the Typenex Note under certain circumstances, subject to
payment of a 35% prepayment penalty during the first six months the note is outstanding and 50% thereafter. In the event that
the Typenex Note is not repaid in cash in its entirety, Company shareholders may suffer dilution if and to the extent that
the balance of the Typenex Note is converted into common stock. As of April 30, 2016, the outstanding balance of the Typenex
Note was $121,401 of which $105,000 was principal and $16,401 was interest payable. With the principal payment during the
quarter ended April 30, 2016, a portion of the related derivative liability was also extinguished and the Company
recorded approximately $44,000 as a gain on extinguishment of debt. The remaining derivative liability associated with the
outstanding debt balance was approximately $61,382.
Convertible
Promissory Note with JMJ Financial
On
September 16, 2015, we entered into a Convertible Promissory Note with JMJ Financial (“JMJ”) in the principal amount
of up to $900,000 (the “JMJ Convertible Note”). Upon entering into this arrangement, the total face amount of the
JMJ Convertible Note was initially $385,000 and we received $350,000 in cash, as all amounts borrowed under the note include a
10% original issue discount. Moving forward, JMJ may loan us additional funds (up to $900,000 in aggregate) if mutually agreed
by both parties, provided that JMJ has the right in its sole discretion to approve any future request for additional funding.
Each advance under the JMJ Convertible Note is due two years from the date of such advance, with the amount initially funded under
the note due on September 16, 2017.
The
JMJ Convertible Note (including principal and accrued interest and where applicable other fees) is convertible into our common
stock, at any time, at the lesser of (a) $0.75 per share or (b) 65% (a 35% discount) of the two lowest closing prices of our common
stock in the 20 trading days prior to the date of any conversion, subject to certain adjustments described in the JMJ Convertible
Note. The variable conversion term was considered to be a derivative liability and the Company recorded approximately $253,000
of debt discount upon issuance. The derivative liability had a fair value of approximately $132,000 as of April 30, 2016.
A
one-time interest charge of 12% was applied to the principal amount of the note, which remains payable regardless of the repayment
(or conversion) date of the note.
The
goal is for the Company to utilize this debt as growth capital to help accelerate projects that generate revenue. We hope to
repay the JMJ Convertible Note prior to any conversion. In the event that the JMJ Note is not repaid in cash in its entirety,
Company shareholders may suffer dilution if and to the extent that the balance of the JMJ Note is converted into common
stock. At April 30, 2016, the amount owed JMJ Financial was $436,968 of which $385,000 was principal and $51,968 was interest
payable.
Convertible
Notes Payable –Vis Vires
On
September 24, 2015, we sold Vis Vires Group, Inc. (“Vis Vires”) a Convertible Promissory Note (with an issuance date
of September 9, 2015) in the principal amount of $254,000 (the “Vis Vires Convertible Note”). The Vis Vires Convertible
Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum (22% upon an event of default) and is due and payable on June 11, 2016. The principal
amount of the Vis Vires Convertible Note and all accrued interest is convertible at the option of the holder at the greater of
(a) 65% (a 35% discount) multiplied by the average of the lowest five closing bid prices of our common stock during the ten trading
days immediately prior to the date of any conversion and (b) $0.00009. The Vis Vires Convertible Note conversion price also includes
price protection features in the event we issue or are deemed to have issued common stock or convertible securities at a price
equal to less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Vis Vires Convertible Note is automatically reduced to such
lower price. The variable conversion term was considered to be a derivative liability and the Company recorded approximately $224,000
of debt discount upon issuance. There is a prepayment penalty on the note ranging from 108% to 133% of the then outstanding balance,
depending on when such prepayment is made. In March 2016, we paid $347,172 to satisfy the amount outstanding under the Vis Vires
Convertible Note in full. With the payment of the note, the related derivative liability was also extinguished and the Company
recorded approximately $133,000 as a gain on extinguishment of debt.
On
March 16, 2016, we sold Vis Vires an additional Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $225,000 (the “New
Vis Vires Convertible Note”). The New Vis Vires Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum (22% upon an
event of default) and is due and payable on December 15, 2016. The principal amount of the New Vis Vires Convertible Note and
all accrued interest is convertible at the option of the holder thereof into our common stock at any time after September 2016.
The conversion price of the New Vis Vires Convertible Note is equal to the greater of a) 65% (a 35% discount) multiplied by the
average of the lowest five closing bid prices of our common stock during the ten trading days immediately prior to the date of
any conversion, and (b) $0.00009. The New Vis Vires Convertible Note conversion price also includes price protection such that
in the event we issue or are deemed to have issued common stock or convertible securities at a price equal to less than the conversion
price of the New Vis Vires Convertible Note, the conversion price of the New Vis Vires Convertible Note is automatically reduced
to such lower price. The repricing feature of the conversion feature was considered to be derivative liabilities and accordingly,
the Company recorded approximately $130,000 discount to debt. The Company revalued the derivative liability at approximately $166,000
as of April 30, 2016. We may prepay in full the unpaid principal and interest on the New Vis Vires Convertible Note, upon notice,
any time after September 2016. Any prepayment is subject to payment of a prepayment amount ranging from 108% to 133% of the then
outstanding balance on the New Vis Vires Convertible Note, depending on when such prepayment is made. We hope to repay the New
Vis Vires Convertible Note prior to any conversion. In the event that the New Vis Vires Convertible Note is not repaid in cash
in its entirety, Company shareholders may suffer dilution if and to the extent that the balance of the New Vis Vires Convertible
Note is converted into common stock At April 30, 2016, the amount owed Vis Vires was $236,969 of which $225,000 was principal
and $11,969 was interest payable.
Convertible
Promissory Convertible Promissory Notes with Duck Duck Spruce
In
March 2016, we sold Duck Duck Spruce, LLC (“Duck Duck”) two 5% Convertible Promissory Notes with total principal face
amounts of $550,000 and received $500,000 in cash, with the difference representing an original issue discount (collectively,
the “Duck Duck Notes”). The Duck Duck Notes accrue interest at the rate of 5% per annum (the lesser of 10% per annum
and the highest rate allowed per law upon an event of default), and are due in December 2016.
The
Duck Duck Notes can be repaid prior to September 2016 with a prepayment penalty of between 105% and 130% of the principal amount
owed thereunder, plus interest. After September 2016, the notes cannot be repaid without the written consent of Duck Duck. The
amounts owed under the Duck Duck Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock in September 2016 at a 35% discount the
average of the two lowest closing prices of our common stock during the 10 consecutive trading days prior to the date of conversion,
subject to a floor of $0.05 per share. The variable conversion terms of the note were accounted for as derivative liabilities
and the Company recorded a discount to the note of approximately $279,000. We hope to repay the Duck Duck Notes prior to any conversion.
In the event that the Duck Duck Notes are not repaid in cash in their entirety, Company shareholders may suffer dilution if and
to the extent that the balance of the Duck Duck Notes is converted into common stock. At April 30, 2016 the balance of these loans
total $555,558 of which $550,000 is principal and $5,558 is interest payable.
The
second Duck Duck Note also (a) required us to issue 250,000 shares of restricted common stock to Duck Duck in consideration for
agreeing to the sale of such note; and (b) the conversion price also includes price protection such that in the event we issue
or are deemed to have issued common stock or convertible securities at a price equal to less than the conversion price, the conversion
price is automatically reduced to such lower price. The Company recorded a debt discount associated with this note totaling approximately
$279,000.
Third
Party Loan
In
October 2015, we borrowed $150,000 from a third-party lender. The October 2015 loan has a seven-month term, a total payback
amount of $202,500 and is payable by way of 147 daily payments of $1,378.
In
November 2015, we borrowed $65,000 from the same lender. The November 2015 loan has a term of six months, a total payable
amount of $89,700 and is payable by way of 126 daily payments of $712. In January 2016, we borrowed $220,000 from the same
lender (of which $91,887.70 was new lending and $128,112.30 was used to repay the balance on the October 2015 loan). The
January 2016 loan has a term of ten months, a total payback amount of $290,400 and is payable by way of 210 daily payments of
$1,383. There was $215,173 outstanding as of January 31, 2016. In February 2016, we borrowed $100,000 from the same lender
which has a six-month term, a total payback amount of $130,000 and is payable by way of 126 daily payments of $1,032. In
April 2016, we borrowed $115,000 from the same lender (of which $90,000 was new lending and the remainder was used to pay
back the balance on the November 2015 loan). The April 2016 loan has a term of eight months, a total payable amount of
$158,700 and is payable by way of 168 daily payments of $945. The loans are secured by a security interest in all of our
accounts, equipment, inventory and investment property. We have the right to repay the loans within the first 30 days after
the effective date of each loan at the rate of 85% of the applicable repayment amount and between 31 and 90 days after the
effective date of each loan at the rate of 90% of the applicable repayment amount. The interest rate on these loans range
from 30-38% per annum. As of April 30, 2016, $259,907 is payable under the outstanding loans.
Note
6. Related Party Transactions
Transactions
with Marley Coffee Ltd.
During
the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company made purchases of $0 and $161,645, respectively, from Marley Coffee
Ltd. (“
MC
”) a producer of Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee that the Company purchases in the normal course of
its business. The Company’s Chairman, Rohan Marley, is an owner of approximately 25% of the equity of MC.
The
Company also received $0 and $45,200 in rebates from MC during the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, on
the Jamaican green coffee purchased. We buy JBM coffee at the most favorable market rate in the market. For the majority of transactions,
we buy raw unroasted beans from MC and then resell them to customers around the world. From time to time, it is more economically
favorable for the Company to allow MC to sell to our customers directly and then receive a rebate.
License
with Fifty-Six Hope Rd
As
of April 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred license fees payable to Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited (“
56 Hope
Road
”) of $77,653 and $59,113, respectively. For the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, there were licensing
fees accrued and payable of $297,324 in our accounts payable balance and $118,700, respectively, to 56 Hope Road, for the license
to use the name “
Marley Coffee
”.
Other
Related Party Transactions
The
following describe transactions with entities which are licensees of Hope Road Merchandising, LLC a company in which Rohan Marley
is a beneficiary. During the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company made net purchases of $77, and $2,483, respectively,
from House of Marley. House of Marley produces headphones and speakers that the Company uses for promotions and trade shows. During
the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company made purchases of $0 and $521, respectively from Zion Rootswear. The
purchases from Zion Rootswear were for Bob Marley apparel and gifts that were used for marketing and promotions purposes.
The
Company has made sales to related parties for the three months ending April 30, 2016 of $3,198 to Lions of Marley, $420 to Delivery
Agent (for product that is sold on the Bob Marley Website) and for the three months ending April 30, 2015, the Company made no
sales to related parties. The companies above are licensees of Hope Road Merchandising, LLC, a company in which Rohan Marley is
a beneficiary.
During
the three months ended April 30, 2016, the Company paid Rohan Marley Enterprises $93,668 of which $93,428 was paid through stock
compensation for director’s fees and bonus and $240 was paid in cash for reimbursable expenses. During the three months
ended April 30, 2015, the Company paid Rohan Marley Enterprises $47,482 for directors consulting fees and expense reimbursements.
Rohan Marley Enterprises is the personal S-Corporation of Rohan Marley which he uses to record all of his business transactions
The
total owed to Mother Parkers at April 30, 2016 was $2,232,088 and at April 30, 2015 $2,480,206 was due to Mother Parkers for coffee
purchases. The total accounts receivable due from Mother Parkers as of April 30, 2016 and 2015 is $463,906 and $810,498, respectively.
During
the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid Sondra Toevs, $1,832 and $2,524, respectively and Ellie Toevs,
$1,922 and $858, respectively, for part-time employment. Sondra Toevs is the wife of the Company’s CEO, Brent Toevs, and
Ellie Toevs is the daughter of Mr. Toevs.
Note
7. Stockholders’ Equity
Share-based
Compensation:
On
August 5, 2011, the Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2011 Equity Compensation Plan (the “
2011 Plan
”).
The 2011 Plan authorizes the issuance of various forms of stock-based awards, including incentive or non-qualified options, restricted
stock awards, performance shares and other securities as described in greater detail in the 2011 Plan, to the Company’s
employees, officers, directors and consultants. A total of 20,000,000 shares are authorized for issuance under the 2011 Plan,
which has not been approved by the stockholders of the Company as of April 30, 2016. A total of 16,333,333 shares are available
for issuance under the 2011 Plan.
On
October 14, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, which was amended and restated
on September 19, 2013 (as amended and restated, the “
2012 Plan
”). The 2012 Plan authorizes the issuance of
various forms of stock-based awards, including incentive or non-qualified options, restricted stock awards, restricted units,
stock appreciation rights, performance shares and other securities as described in greater detail in the 2012 Plan, to the Company’s
employees, officers, directors and consultants. A total of 12,000,000 shares are authorized for issuance under the 2012 Plan,
which has been approved by the stockholders of the Company, and as of April 30, 2016, a total of 436,907 shares are available
for issuance under the 2012 Plan.
On
September 10, 2013, the Board of Directors approved the Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “
2013 Plan
”).
The 2013 Plan authorizes the issuance of various forms of stock-based awards, including incentive or non-qualified options, restricted
stock awards, restricted units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares and other securities as described in greater detail
in the 2013 Plan, to the Company’s employees, officers, directors and consultants. A total of 12,000,000 shares are authorized
for issuance under the 2013 Plan, which has been approved by the stockholders of the Company to date, and as of April 30, 2016,
a total of 1,717,652 shares are available for issuance under the 2013 Plan.
On
June 30, 2015, the Board of Directors approved and adopted the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, which was amended and
restated by the Board of Directors on March 10, 2016 (the Amended and Restated 2015 Equity Incentive Plan, the “
2015
Plan
”). The sole amendment to the 2015 Plan which was affected by the entry into the amended and restated plan was to
clarify and confirm that no awards under the 2015 Plan can be issued or granted to any person under the 2015 Plan in connection
with, or in consideration for, the offer or sale of securities in a capital-raising transaction, or where such services directly
or indirectly promote or maintain a market for the Company’s securities. The 2015 Plan authorizes the issuance of various
forms of stock-based awards, including incentive or non-qualified options, restricted stock awards, restricted units, stock appreciation
rights, performance shares and other securities as described in greater detail in the 2015 Plan, to the Company’s employees,
officers, directors and consultants. Subject to adjustment in connection with the payment of a stock dividend, a stock split or
subdivision or combination of the shares of common stock, or a reorganization or reclassification of the Company’s common
stock, the maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock which may be issued pursuant to awards under the 2015 Plan is 17,500,000
shares, and as of April 30, 2016, a total of 8,927,182 shares are available for issuance under the 2015 Plan.
The
Plans are administered by the Board of Directors in its discretion. The Board of Directors interprets the Plans and has broad
discretion to select the eligible persons to whom awards will be granted, as well as the type, size and terms and conditions of
each award, including the exercise price of stock options, the number of shares subject to awards, the expiration date of awards,
and the vesting schedule or other restrictions applicable to awards.
Activity
in stock options during the three month period ended April 30, 2016 and related balances outstanding as of that date are set forth
below:
|
|
Number
of
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Weighted
Average Reaming Contract Term (# of years)
|
Outstanding
at January 31, 2016
|
|
|
23,590,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
and canceled
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at April 30, 2016
|
|
|
23,590,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
Exercisable
at April 30, 2016
|
|
|
14,246,666
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
Note
8. Commitments and Contingencies
From
time to time, we may become party to litigation or other legal proceedings that we consider to be a part of the ordinary course
of our business.
On
September 30, 2014, Shane Whittle, individually, a former significant shareholder and officer and director of the Company (“
Whittle
”),
and derivatively on behalf of Marley Coffee LLC (“
MC LLC
”) filed a complaint against Rohan Marley, Cedella
Marley, the Company, Hope Road Merchandising, LLC (“
HRM
”), Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited (“
56
Hope Road
”), and Marley Coffee Estate Limited (“
Marley Coffee Estate
”) in the United States District
Court for the District of Colorado (Civil Action No. 2014-CV-2680).
The
complaint alleged that Whittle entered into a partnership with Rohan Marley, the son of the late reggae music legend Robert Nesta
Marley p/k/a Bob Marley, to sell premium coffee products branded after the name and likeness of Rohan Marley. The causes of action
set forth in the complaint included, among others, racketeering activity, trademark infringement, breach of fiduciary duty, civil
theft, and civil conspiracy (some of which causes of action were not directly alleged against the Company), which were alleged
to have directly caused Whittle and MCL substantial financial harm. Damages claimed by Whittle and MCL included economic damages
to be proven at trial, profits made by defendants, treble damages, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and pre and post judgment
interest.
Effective
on May 19, 2016, Whittle, MCL, Rohan Marley, Cedella Marley, the Company, HRM and 56 Hope Road entered into a Settlement Agreement
in connection with the proceeding described above (at the same time Whittle entered into a separate settlement agreement with
Marley Coffee Estate). Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, (a) Whittle agreed to resign as a manager of MCL, assign his approximate
29% membership interest in MCL to MCL for $1.00 of total consideration, and also consented to the redemption of certain other
outstanding membership interests in such entity; (b) Whittle agreed to cancel and terminate the options to purchase 2 million
shares of the Company’s common stock which he held as of the date of the parties’ entry into the Settlement Agreement
for $1.00 of total consideration; (c) Whittle agreed to release and waive any rights to any past due or future due payments owed
by the Company under the Settlement described above, including releasing the remaining amount of $10,000 which Whittle was due
pursuant to such Settlement; (d) Whittle provided a general release to each of the defendants (including the Company and Rohan
Marley) from all claims, liability and obligations which Whittle had against such defendants; and (e) each of the defendants (including
the Company and Rohan Marley) provided Whittle a general release from all claims, liability and obligations which such defendants
had against Whittle.
In
connection with the entry into the Settlement Agreement and the settlement of the lawsuit, the lawsuit described above and the
prior Colorado state court lawsuit were dismissed.
On
November 17, 2015, the SEC filed a complaint against us (Case 2:15-cv-08921) in the United States District Court Central District
of California Western Division. Also included as defendants in the complaint were Shane G. Whittle (our former Chief Executive
Officer and Director) and parties unrelated to us, Wayne S. P. Weaver, Michael K. Sun, Rene Berlinger, Stephen B. Wheatley, Kevin
P. Miller, Mohammed A. Al-Barwani, Alexander J. Hunter, and Thomas E. Hunter (collectively, the “
Defendants
”).
Pursuant to the complaint, the SEC alleged that Mr. Whittle orchestrated a “
pump and dump
” scheme with certain
other of the Defendants in connection with our common stock. The scheme allegedly involved utilizing our July 2009 reverse merger
transaction to secretly gain control of millions of our shares, spreading the stock to offshore entities, and dumping the shares
on the unsuspecting public after the stock price soared following fraudulent promotional campaigns undertaken by Mr. Whittle and
certain other of the Defendants in or around 2011. The complaint also alleges that to boost our stock price and provide cash to
the Company, Mr. Whittle and certain other of the Defendants orchestrated a sham financing arrangement designed to create the
false appearance of legitimate third-party interest and investment in the Company through a non-existent entity, Straight Path
Capital, pursuant to which we raised approximately $2.5 million through the sale of 6.25 million shares of common stock in 2011.
The SEC also alleges that Mr. Whittle and others caused us to make public announcements which caused our stock price to rise,
which helped facilitate the alleged frauds among other allegations spelled out more completely in the complaint. The SEC’s
complaint charges us, Mr. Whittle, Mr. Weaver, Mr. Sun, Mr. Berlinger, Mr. Wheatley, Mr. Miller, and Mr. Al-Barwani with conducting
an illegal offering in violation of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. The complaint further alleges that Mr. Whittle,
Mr. Weaver, Mr. Sun, Mr. Berlinger, and the Hunters violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, and Mr. Whittle,
Mr. Weaver, Mr. Sun, and Mr. Berlinger violated Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1 and 13d-2 thereunder. Mr. Whittle
is additionally charged with violating Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 16a-3, and the Hunters are charged with violations
of Sections 17(b) of the Securities Act, which prohibits fraudulent touting of stock. The SEC is seeking injunctions, disgorgement,
prejudgment interest, and penalties as well as penny stock bars against all of the individual Defendants and an officer-and-director
bar against Mr. Whittle.
On
or around May 31, 2016, the Company entered into a ‘Consent of Defendant Jammin Java Corp.’ (the “
Consent
”),
in connection with the SEC’s complaint (the “
Complaint
”). Pursuant to the Consent, without admitting
or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as specifically set forth in such Consent mainly relating to personal and
subject matter jurisdiction, which we admitted), we consented to the entry of a final judgment (the “
Final Judgment
”),
which, among other things: (a) permanently restrains and enjoins us from violating Section 5 of the Securities Act, and (b) orders
us to pay disgorgement in the amount of $605,330.73, plus prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $94,669.27, totaling an
aggregate of $700,000, of which (1) $200,000 is due within 14 days of the entry of the Final Judgment, which funds are currently
held in an attorney’s trust account for payment; and (2) $500,000 is due within 90 days of the entry of the Final Judgment.
The
Final Judgment was approved by the SEC on or around May 31, 2016 and is awaiting a file stamped copy of the Final Judgement
from the court, which is anticipated by the end of June 2016. The Company has accrued $700,000 for estimated settlement expense in the first quarter, which is offset by a $400,000 insurance settlement which was received in May
2016.
In
addition to the above, we may become involved in other material legal proceedings in the future.
Note
9. Concentrations
A
significant portion of our revenue is derived from our relationships with a limited number of vendors and distributors. The loss
of one or more of our significant vendors or distributors would have a material impact on our revenues and results of operations.
During the three-month periods ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, three customers accounted for 49.3% and 47% of net revenues, respectively.
During
the three month periods ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, two vendors accounted for 44% and 35% of purchases. The same two vendors
accounted for 75% and 86% of the accounts payable as of April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
For
the three month periods ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, total sales in Canada totaled $157,077 and $219,803, respectively.
For
the three month periods ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, sales in South Korea sales totaled $0 and $295,759, respectively.
For
the three month periods ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, sales in Chile totaled $213,420 and $184,240, respectively.
Note
10. Subsequent Event
On
May 12, 2016, we paid $75,000 to Typenex and on June 7, 2016 we paid off the remaining balance of $45,920 owed to
Typenex.
In
June 2016, we increased the net amount owed to a third party by $92,000. We currently
owe $418,500 to such third party as a result of these transactions.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Unless
the context requires otherwise, references to the “
Company,
” “
we,
” “
us,
”
“
our,
” “
Jammin Java
” and “
Jammin Java Corp.
” refer specifically to Jammin
Java Corp.
In
addition, unless the context otherwise requires and for the purposes of this report only:
●
|
|
“
Exchange
Act
” refers to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
“
SEC
”
or the “
Commission
” refers to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission; and
|
|
|
|
●
|
|
“
Securities
Act
” refers to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
|
You
should carefully consider the risk factors described below, if any, and those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended January 31, 2016, filed with the SEC on May 5, 2016 (the “
Annual Report
”), as well as the other
information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Annual Report and in our other reports filed with the SEC, prior
to making a decision to invest in our securities.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated by reference, include “
forward-looking statements
”
that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they prove incorrect or never materialize, could cause our
results to differ materially and adversely from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to any statements, predictions and expectations regarding our earnings, revenues, sales
and operations, operating expenses, anticipated cash needs, capital requirements and capital expenditures, needs for additional
financing, use of working capital, plans for future products, services and distribution channels, anticipated growth strategies,
planned capital raises, ability to attract distributors and customers, sources of net revenue, anticipated trends and challenges
in our business and the markets in which we operate, the impact of economic and industry conditions on our customers and our business,
customer demand, our competitive position, the outcome of any litigation against us, critical accounting policies and the impact
of recent accounting pronouncements. Additional forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements pertaining
to other financial items, plans, strategies or objectives of management for future operations, our financial condition or prospects,
and any other statement that is not historical fact. Forward-looking statements are often identified by the use of words such
as “
may,
” “
might,
” “
intend,
” “
should,
” “
could,
”
“
can,
” “
would,
” “
continue,
” “
expect,
” “
believe,
”
“
anticipate,
” “
estimate,
” “
predict,
” “
potential,
”
“
plan,
” “
seek
” and similar expressions and variations or the negativities of these terms
or other comparable terminology.
These
forward-looking statements are based on the expectations, estimates, projections, beliefs and assumptions of our management based
on information currently available to management, all of which is subject to change. Such forward-looking statements are subject
to risks, uncertainties and other factors that are difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from
those stated or implied by our forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include,
but are not limited to, those identified under “
Risk Factors
” in Item 1A of our Annual Report. We undertake
no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
such statements for any reason except as otherwise required by law.
In
this Form 10-Q, we may rely on and refer to information regarding the market for our products and our industry in general, which
information comes from market research reports, analyst reports and other publicly available information. Although we believe
that this information is reliable, we cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of this information, and we have not independently
verified any of it.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This
information should be read in conjunction with the interim unaudited financial statements and the notes thereto included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the unaudited financial statements and notes thereto and Part II, Item 7, Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended January 31, 2016.
Certain
capitalized terms used below and otherwise defined below, have the meanings given to such terms in the footnotes to our consolidated
financial statements included above under “
Part I - Financial Information
” - “
Item 1. Financial Statements
”.
Overview
We
provide premium roasted coffee and specialty coffee on a wholesale level to the service, hospitality, office coffee service and
big box store markets, as well as to a variety of other business channels. Specifically, we currently provide award winning sustainably
grown, ethically-farmed and artisan roasted gourmet coffee through multiple United States and international distribution channels.
We intend to develop a significant share of these markets and achieve a leadership position by capitalizing on the global recognition
of the “
Marley
” brand name. We hope to capitalize on the guidance and leadership of our Chairman, Rohan Marley,
and to increase our sales through the marketing of products using the likeness of, and reflecting the personality of, Mr. Marley.
Additionally, through a licensing agreement with the family of the late reggae performer, Robert Nesta Marley, professionally
known as Bob Marley (whose family members include Rohan Marley, our Chairman and the son of Bob Marley)(as described below), we
are provided the worldwide right to use the name “
Marley Coffee
” and reasonably similar variations thereof.
We
believe the key to our growth is a multichannel distribution and sales strategy. Since August 2011, we have been introducing a
wide variety of coffee products through multiple distribution channels using the Marley Coffee brand name. The main channels of
revenue for the Company are now and are expected to continue to be domestic retail in both grocery and away from home (for example,
consumption at the office and on the go), international distribution, and online retail.
In
order to market our products in these channels, we have developed a variety of coffee products in varying formats. The Company
offers an entire line of coffee in whole bean and ground form with varying sizes including 2.5 ounce (oz), 8oz, 12oz and 2 pound
(lbs) sizes. The Company also offers a “
single serve
” solution with its compostable Single-Serve Pods for Bunn®
and other pod-based home and office brewers. The Company recently launched its Marley Coffee recyclable RealCup; compatible cartridges,
for use in most models of Keurig®’s K-Cup brewing system.
License
Agreement with Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited
On
September 13, 2012, the Company entered into a fifteen (15) year license agreement (renewable for two additional fifteen (15)
year terms thereafter in the option of the Company) with an effective date of August 7, 2012 with Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Limited,
a Bahamas international business company (“
56 Hope Road
” and the “
56 Hope Road License Agreement
”).
Rohan Marley, our Chairman, owns an interest in and serves as a director of 56 Hope Road. Pursuant to the 56 Hope Road License
Agreement, 56 Hope Road granted the Company a worldwide, exclusive, non-transferable license to utilize the “
Marley Coffee
”
trademarks (the “
Trademarks
”) in connection with (i) the manufacturing, advertising, promotion, sale, offering
for sale and distribution of coffee in all its forms and derivations, regardless of portions, sizes or packaging (the “
Exclusive
Licensed Products
”) and (ii) coffee roasting services, coffee production services, and coffee sales, supply, distribution
and support services, provided that the Company may not open retail coffee houses utilizing the Trademarks. 56 Hope Road owns
and controls the intellectual property rights in and to the late reggae performer, Robert Nesta Marley, professionally known as
Bob Marley, including the Trademarks. In addition, 56 Hope Road granted the Company the right to use the Trademarks on advertising
and promotional materials that pertain solely to the sale of coffee cups, coffee mugs, coffee glasses, saucers, milk steamers,
machines for brewing coffee, espresso and/or cappuccino, grinders, water treatment products, tea products, chocolate products,
and ready-to-use (instant) coffee products (the “
Non-Exclusive Licensed Products
”, and together with the Exclusive
Licensed Products, the “
Licensed Products
”). Licensed Products may be sold by the Company pursuant to the 56
Hope Road License Agreement through all channels of distribution, provided that, subject to certain exceptions, the Company cannot
sell the Licensed Products by direct marketing methods (other than the Company’s website), including television, infomercials
or direct mail without the prior written consent of 56 Hope Road. Additionally, 56 Hope Road has the right to approve all Licensed
Products, all advertisements in connection therewith and all product designs and packaging. The agreement also provides that 56
Hope Road shall own all rights to any domain names (including marleycoffee.com), incorporating the Trademarks.
In
consideration for the foregoing licenses, the Company agreed to pay royalties to 56 Hope Road in an amount equal to 3% of the
net sales of all Licensed Products on a quarterly basis. In addition, such royalty payments are to be deferred during the first
20 months of the term of the 56 Hope Road License Agreement, and such deferred payments shall be paid on a quarterly-basis thereafter
until paid in full. For the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, $77,653 and $58,609, respectively, was payable for
such royalty fees. The total accounts payable to 56 Hope Road, a related party, as of April 30, 2016 is $297,324.
We
have been notified by 56 Hope Road of our alleged breach of certain of the terms of the License Agreement, including, but
not limited to, our failure to deliver quarterly statements in a timely manner, our failure to timely make licensing
payments, and our failure to deliver audited financial statements in a timely manner. Some of these breaches are due to cash
flow issues and corporate governance matters. We are working with 56 Hope Road in an effort to resolve the alleged breaches and we are optimistic that we will be able to resolve the issues and will be able to put
in place corporate governance procedures to alleviate certain of the issues raised moving forward.
Mother
Parkers License Agreement
On
May 20, 2014, we entered into an Amended and Restated License Agreement with Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee Inc. (“
Mother
Parkers
” and the “
MP Agreement
”), which amended and restated a prior license agreement entered into
between the parties in October 2011. A significant portion of the Company’s revenue comes from sales to and through Mother
Parkers. As described in greater detail in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 30, 2014, the Company
also entered into a Subscription Agreement with Mother Parkers in April 2014, pursuant to which Mother Parkers purchased 7,333,529
units from the Company for $2.5 million, each unit consisting of one share of the Company’s common stock; and one warrant
to purchase one share of common stock at $0.51135 per share for a term of three years.
Pursuant
to our relationship with Mother Parkers, Mother Parkers produces Marley Coffee RealCups for us. For direct sales of RealCups (e.g.,
in jurisdictions in which Mother Parkers does not have exclusive rights as described below) we purchase the RealCups from Mother
Parkers and handle all aspects of selling, merchandising and marketing products to retailers. Pursuant to the MP Agreement, the
Company granted Mother Parkers the exclusive right to manufacture, process, package, label, distribute and sell single serve hard
capsules (which excludes single serve soft pods) (the “
Product
”) on behalf of the Company in Canada, the United
States of America and Mexico. The rights granted under the MP Agreement are subject to certain terms and conditions of our license
agreement with 56 Hope Road. Pursuant to the MP Agreement, Mother Parkers is required to, among other things, supply all ingredients
and materials, labor, manufacturing equipment and other resources necessary to manufacture and package the Product, develop coffee
blends set forth in specifications provided by the Company from time to time, procure coffee beans in the open market (or from
the Company’s designee) at favorable prices, set prices for the Product in a manner that is competitive in the market place
and deliver Product logo/brand designs to the Company for approval prior to manufacturing any such Product. We are required to,
among other things, cross-promote the Product, use Product images and marketing materials provided by Mother Parkers to promote
the Product, and provide the services of Rohan Marley (our Chairman) at a minimum of five locations per year at the Company’s
sole cost and expense. There are no minimum volume or delivery requirements under the MP Agreement. Pursuant to the MP Agreement,
Mother Parkers agreed to pay us a fee of $0.06 per capsule for Talkin’ Blues products and $0.04 per capsule for all other
Product sold by Mother Parkers under the terms of the agreement, which payments are due in monthly installments. The MP Agreement
has a term of five years, provided that it automatically renews thereafter for additional one year periods if not terminated by
the parties, provided further that we are not able to terminate the agreement within the first 12 months of the term of the agreement
and if we terminate the agreement or take any action that lessens or diminishes Mother Parkers’ exclusive rights under the
agreement during months 12 through 36 of the agreement, we are required to pay Mother Parkers a fee of $600,000 and reimburse
Mother Parkers for any out of pocket costs incurred by Mother Parkers for inventory and other materials that are unsalable or
unusable after such termination. We also receive revenues through the sale by Mother Parkers of our roast coffee in Canada, whereby
we receive a portion of the gross revenues of such sales.
Sales
and Distribution Agreements and Understandings
The
Company has entered into informal sales arrangements, not documented by definitive agreements, with several coffee distributors,
beverage services and retailers around the world.
In
Canada, Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee Inc. is the Company’s distributor for the food service channel, which sells to restaurant
chains like Milestones, Original Joe’s and Elephant and Castle. Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee also brings the Company’s
products into retailers such as Loblaw’s, Sobey’s, ID Foods, COOP and Metro. Their success has led to about a 60%
ACV for the entire country.
In
the United States, for the commercial break room channel, the Company uses its national sales representatives, National Coffee
Service & Vending (NCS&V), to distribute to various retailers and distributors.
In
addition to distributions through NCS&V, the Company conducts sales directly to retailers as well as to distributors. In order
to get in front of retail and distributor accounts, we rely on the experience and relationships of our staff to acquire both groups.
Our marketing efforts are comprised of in store promotions, in store demos, external marketing programs, public relations, social
media, tradeshows and general advertising.
Within
the U.S. grocery and specialty retail channel, the Company utilizes two national brokerage companies to represent, market and
merchandise its products in the conventional grocery market. The Company works with Alliance Sales & Marketing, a private
food broker based in Charlotte, North Carolina, to increase its new market penetration nationally in the grocery and natural foods
retail sector. The Company also uses Harlow HRK to help manage its Kroger business.
Within
the U.S. grocery and specialty retail channel, the Company’s products are distributed through several distributors such
as UNFI, Kehe, C&S and DPI and we also distribute directly to certain retailers.
The
Company has strengthened its online presence by selling through a multitude of online retailers such as Amazon.com, Cooking.com,
coffeeicon.com, ecscoffee.com, officedepot.com and coffeewiz.com.
Products,
Plan of Operations and Business Growth
During
Fiscal 2015 and 2016, we established a national grocery distribution network, increased our brand awareness and strengthened our
international presence. Two of the Company’s SKUs have now made it into 1/3 of U.S. grocery stores. For Fiscal 2017, our
primary goal is to increase our velocity rate per store instead of increasing the number of our accounts.
We
prepared and organized the operations of the Company to scale to $40 million in revenue without materially increasing our staffing
needs from where they are currently.
The
Company is organized around our three pillars of growth, which are domestic grocery, international and ecommerce.
Domestic
Grocery
Domestic
grocery is the core focus of the Company with the strategy of continuing to expand into key markets and gaining new accounts and
building on the base of accounts we have already. Within the U.S. grocery and specialty retail channel, the Company’s products
are distributed through several distributors such as UNFI, Kehe, C&S and DPI and we also distribute directly to certain customers.
We sell to retailers such as Krogers, HEB, Wegmans, Safeway, Albertsons, Sprouts, Target, Jewel-Osco, Market Basket, Whole Foods,
South Eastern Grocers, Ahold, Hannafords, Shaw’s, Fairways, Ingles, Acme, Meijers, Lucky’s Markets and Farm Fresh.
During the past year we have expanded our distributor relationships nationally in the United States. We expect our ongoing discussions
with retailers will enable us to place our products in more chains throughout the year and we continue to seek to expand our product
placement with grocery retailers and distributors throughout the United States and internationally.
Over
the course of the last few years, we gained distribution in over 11,500 stores in the United States, which represents 35% of all
commodity volume (ACV) for all grocery. Throughout fiscal 2017, while we will still look to gain additional distribution, we are
not pursuing it at the same pace we did during the past 18 months. Our objective for our existing distribution is to add more
SKUs (Stock Keeping Units) to our current distribution, increase our turn rate (velocity), and build brand awareness to drive
further growth.
One
of our primary drivers is to enhance our brand and increase our turn rate on shelves. In order to accomplish that we will continue
to promote the Marley Coffee brand as well as our Recyclable RealCup™. In July of fiscal 2015, we launched a new version
of the Marley Coffee RealCup™ capsule that is compatible with the Keurig Green Mountain K2.0. The recyclable RealCup™
utilizes a recyclable capsule that is accepted by many curbside recycling programs. The technology and intellectual property is
owned by Mother Parkers, however we are one of the first and primary super premium product to launch in market amongst Mother
Parkers portfolio of brands especially at our scale.
Based
on our current distribution in the U.S. and an average of three SKUS of RealCups™ per store, if we can get an additional
customer to purchase one SKU per store, per week, within our existing distribution, we believe we can generate approximately ~$8
million in additional revenue per year. Our next objective is to get all nine Recyclable RealCup™ Marley Coffee SKUs within
our current distribution. SKUs or Stock Keeping Units are a store’s or catalog’s product and service identification
code, often portrayed as a machine-readable bar code that helps items be tracked for inventory.
We
believe that our recyclable RealCup™ capsule (Ecocup) has been one of the most innovative and sustainable single serve products
to hit the market and we’ve seen material growth results because of it. Keurig Green Mountain, the largest company in the
single serve space in North America has expressed their belief that there should be a recyclable solution for K-Cups, however
they have only set a 2020 target for their commitment to making 100% of their K-Cup packs recyclable, which we believe both validates
what we’re doing and gives us a 5 year first mover competitive advantage.
Based
on the positive feedback from retailers and customers as well as some preliminary sales information, EcoCup has had a very positive
impact on our operations. We’ve even been nominated by the Nexty Awards and Beverage Awards for our innovation and packaging.
Our preliminary data has shown that EcoCups by themselves have helped with incremental growth in accounts like Market Basket and
Kroger.
International
Our
international business is one of the key components of our revenues. For our international accounts, we rely on first in class
operators to take our brand to market and handle all of the distribution and marketing for the products. We provide brand support
to our international accounts. We currently have key distribution in several countries, which include Canada, the United Kingdom,
South Korea, Mexico and Chile. These countries primarily sell to the food service industry, which includes hotels, restaurants
and cafes. From their success in food service, they have expanded distribution into retail distribution. Mother Parkers takes
our products to market in Canada through both a licensing agreement and buy-sell relationship. Our U.K. distributor roasts and
packs Company approved coffee and resells it to customers throughout Europe.
The
International Coffee Organization recently reported that it expects global coffee demand to rise 25% by 2021. We believe that
we are in a strong position to capitalize on that growth and our goal is to continue finding top-tier operators like the ones
we have in place in Canada, South Korea, Chile, Mexico and the United Kingdom. Through a distribution arrangement we have in place
with C&V International (which has no relation to 56 Hope Road), we generate revenue through coffee sold to Marley Coffee branded
coffee shops in Korea (which we have no ownership or management in) and also general licensing fees through such coffee sales.
Through
a distribution arrangement we have in place with C&V International, we generate revenue through coffee sold to Marley Coffee
branded coffee shops in Korea (which we have no ownership in) and also general licensing fees through such coffee sales.
Canada
In
Canada, through Mother Parkers, the Company is distributed in grocery retail, OCS and food service.
Mother
Parkers distributes our products in over 2,000 stores, including some of the largest retail chains in Canada, which include Loblaw’s,
Sobey’s, ID Foods, COOP, London Drugs and Metro. Our goal is to establish distribution of RealCups in grocery stores for
the next two years and then to introduce our bagged coffee by 2017. We estimate that Mother Parkers will sell approximately 15
million RecyclableRealCup™ through grocery retail, OCS and food service within this fiscal year.
Mother
Parkers has also found success in bringing our coffee into its food service business. They have been able to establish our products
in several large restaurant chains and expect to expand the business over the next few years. For its food service business, Mother
Parkers currently buys 8 ounce, 2.5 ounce fractional packs and 2 pound bags directly from the Company. The projected volume for
this year is approximately 140,000 pounds of coffee with plans to get to 500,000 pounds by 2017.
For
fiscal 2016 total sales in Canada totaled $922,517 and total RealCup licensing was $572,612 and total sales for the year ended
January 31, 2015 was $1,546,422. For the years ended January 31, 2016 and 2015 the total sales and total licensing with Mother
Parker’s was equal to $1,495,128 and $1,546,422, respectively. For the three month periods ended April 30, 2016 and 2015,
total sales in Canada totaled $157,077 and $219,803, respectively. The total owed to Mother Parkers at April 30, 2016 is $2,232,088
and at April 30, 2015 $2,480,206 was due to Mother Parkers for coffee purchases. The total accounts receivable due from Mother
Parkers as of April 30, 2016 and 2015 is $463,906 and $810,498, respectively.
United
Kingdom/ Europe
Our
U.K. partners are still finding success in distribution at specialty and natural grocery stores throughout Europe.
South
Korea
We
have several initiatives that have launched or are launching this year. Being successful in South Korea has the potential to echo
throughout Asia and we believe our success in South Korea will be a springboard to getting meaningful distribution elsewhere in
Asia. Our South Korean partners currently buy green beans and roasted products from the Company.
For
fiscal 2016 sales in South Korea totaled $828,723 for green coffee and whole bean coffee and for fiscal 2015 sales in South Korea
totaled $227,751. For the three month periods ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, sales in South Korea sales totaled $0 and $295,759,
respectively.
Chile
Chile
is a great example of a distributor who has been a brand champion for us in the region. Through their guerilla marketing efforts
by sponsoring surf competitions and music festivals like Lollapalooza, they have gained distribution in food service as well as
retail grocery.
In
food service, our distributor has secured over 350 accounts in the region from boutiques to large restaurant chains. They recently
secured Castaño, one of the largest coffee chains in all of Chile with over 80 stores that can in total do ~132,000 lbs.
of coffee per year (which began in summer 2015). In December of 2014, they gained distribution in 44 Subway sandwich stores and
they have goals to be in 53 stores by the end of the year and to potentially expand into other countries.
Their
success in food service has helped them quickly expand into grocery retail. They recently placed our products into 100 Unimarc
and 50 Tottus supermarkets, two big retail chains in Chile. However, their biggest customer to date is Walmart, which they just
landed. Walmart will be bringing in 3 bags of 227 grams (8oz) coffees into stores in an early summer launch in the 30 biggest
stores, with the goal of getting to the other 120 stores in Chile within six months.
For
fiscal 2016 sales in Chile totaled $808,658 and for fiscal 2015 sales in Chile totaled $196,099. For the three month periods ended
April 30, 2016 and 2015, sales in Chile totaled $213,420 and $184,240, respectively.
Online
During
the fourth quarter of calendar 2014, we launched an innovative Coffee of the Month subscription service as well an online retail
platform at
https://shop.marleycoffee.com/
. We anticipate this to be a key revenue driver in the upcoming year. The
total online sales for the year ended January 31, 2016 were $49,900 compared to $-0- for the year ended January 31, 2015.
Our
online business and social media presence is also critical in driving consumers to retail grocery stores. We have a robust social
media presence with an aggregate of more than 2 million followers through Marley Coffee’s own accounts as well as our Chairman’s
account. We believe we have the ability to connect with everyone from Baby Boomers who grew up listening to Bob Marley’s
music to the Millennials who still connect with Bob Marley and the next generation of Marley music both offline and online. We
believe the Company is naturally positioned to talk to all of these consumers digitally through our social media and at the shelf
through our products and brand positioning.
Commitment
to Reduce Cash Compensation
Throughout
fiscal 2016, the Company issued shares of common stock as partial consideration for services rendered to its officers, directors
and employees in an effort to maximize its cash on hand and improve liquidity. During the remainder of fiscal 2017, the Company
plans to pay the salaries of its officers and employees in cash, provided that where possible, the Company intends to continue
to use common stock in lieu of cash consideration, and has continued to pay certain of its employees in stock instead of cash
during fiscal 2017. As the Company continues to grow it will need to raise additional cash in order to maintain its growth and
fund its operations. If the Company is unable to access additional capital moving forward, it will hurt our ability to maintain
growth and possibly jeopardize our ability to maintain our current operations. We may not be able to increase sales, reduce expenses
or obtain additional financing, if necessary, at a level to meet our current obligations to continue as a going concern.
The
Company is focused on growing revenue while working to lower cost of sales and operating expenses, with the ultimate goal of generating
net income.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
Comparison
of the Three Months Ended April 30, 2016 and 2015
Revenue
.
Revenue for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 was $3,083,559 and $2,738,379, respectively, which represents an increase
of $345,180 or 12.6% from the previous period. Revenue increased as a result of the Company’s continued expansion into the
retail grocery market and its continued growth of other business verticals.
Discounts
and allowances
. Discounts and allowances for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 were $355,560 and $156,952,
respectively, which represents an increase of $198,608 or 127% from the previous period. Discounts and allowances increased
as a result of the corresponding increase in sales.
Net
revenue
. Net revenue for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 was $2,727,999 and $2,581,427, respectively, which
represents an increase of $146,572 or 5.7% from the previous period.
Total
cost of sales
. Total cost of sales for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 was $1,786,870 and $1,784,812, respectively,
which represents an increase of $2,058 from the previous period. The increase in total cost of sales was mainly the result of
the increased sales offset by a reduction in cost of goods compared to the prior year.
Gross
Profit
. Gross Profit was $941,129 and $796,615, respectively, for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, which represents
an increase of $144,514 or 18%. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales was 34.5% and 30.9% for the three months ended April
30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Gross profit increased as a result of better managing our costs.
Compensation
and benefits
expenses
. Compensation and benefits expenses were $970,703 and $972,806, respectively, for the three
months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, which represents a decrease of $2,103. Compensation and benefits expenses decreased as a
result of decreased staff and more efficient operations.
Selling
and marketing
expenses
. Selling and marketing expenses for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 was
$600,709 and $521,116, respectively, which represents an increase of $79,593 or 15.3% from the previous period. Selling and marketing
expenses increased as a result of selling and brokerage expenses of $262,156 for new placement in grocery stores during the first
quarter offset by a decrease of $187,702 in advertising campaigns in new markets in the current period. We anticipate experiencing
marketing expenses relative to our cash flow availabilities throughout fiscal 2017 as we will seek to expand our customer base
even more and build out the Company brand.
General
and administrative
expenses
. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended April 30, 2016
and 2015 was $771,303 and $492,824, respectively, which represents an increase of $278,479 or 56% from the previous period.
The Company has accrued $700,000 for estimated settlement expense in the first quarter, which is offset by a $400,000
insurance settlement which was received in May 2016.
Total
operating expenses
. Total operating expenses for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 was $2,342,715 and $1,986,746,
respectively, which represents an increase of $355,969 or 17.9% from the previous period. Total operating expenses increased as
a result of the increases in legal fees and general and administrative expenses described above.
Other
expense
. Other expense for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 was $7,650 and $-0-, respectively. Other expense
increased as a result of the financing expenses associated with our current liabilities, offset by the sale of fixed assets.
Interest
expense
. Interest expense for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015 was $516,753 and $7,105, respectively, which
represents an increase of $509,648 from the previous period. Interest expense increased as a result of our short term financing
agreements incurred in the quarter, as described in greater detail in Note 5 to the financial statements included herein.
Change
in Derivative liability.
The change in fair value of derivative liability was $75,914 and $-0-,
respectively, for the
three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, which represents an increase of $75,914 or 100%.
Gain
and Extinguishment of debt
. We had $362,506 of gain on extinguishment of debt for three months ended April 30, 2016, compared
to no gain on extinguishment of debt for the three months ended April 20, 2015.
Net
Loss
. Net Loss was $1,487,569 and $1,197,236, respectively, for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, which
represents an increase of $290,333 or 24%. Net Loss increased as a result of the reasons described above, primarily due to
the $700,00 settlement with the SEC which was offset by a $400,000 insurance settlement.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Since
our inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the issuance of our common stock and debt agreements.
The
following table presents details of our working capital deficit and cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
April
30, 2016
|
|
January
31, 2016
|
|
Increase
/ (Decrease)
|
Working
Capital
|
|
$
|
(4,644,234
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,232,446
|
)
|
|
$
|
(411,788
|
)
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
193,002
|
|
|
$
|
231,021
|
|
|
$
|
(38,019
|
)
|
At
April 30, 2016, we had total assets of $2,389,776 and total liabilities of $6,533,836. Our current sources of liquidity include
our existing cash and cash equivalents and borrowings under convertible promissory notes and other loans.
For the three months ended April 30, 2016, we generated gross sales of $3,083,559 and we had a net loss of $1,487,569.
Total
current assets of $1,639,239 as of April 30, 2016 included cash of $193,002, accounts receivable of $1,436,015 (which included
$463,906 due from Mother Parkers), other current assets of $3,840 and $6,382 of prepaid expenses.
We
had total assets as of April 30, 2016 of $2,389,776 which included the total current assets of $1,639,239, $148,307 of property
and equipment, net, $578,663 of intangible assets and $23,567 of other assets.
We
had total liabilities of $6,533,836 as of April 30, 2016, of which $6,283,473 were current liabilities,
including, $3,635,442 of accounts payable (which included $2,232,088 of accounts payable to Mother Parkers, $297,324
royalty – related party relating to amounts accrued in connection with the 56 Hope Road License Agreement (described
above)), $936,457 of accrued expenses, and $928,971 of notes payable, net of discount, in connection with short term
financing agreements and a capital lease we entered into, as described in greater detail in Notes 5 and 8 to the financial
statements included herein, and $782,603 conversion feature – derivative liability. Long term liabilities included
convertible notes payable, net of discount, of $250,363.
We
source coffee that we sell to our roaster, Mother Parkers, a related party and shareholder of the Company, who in turn sells it
to its own customers. This is especially the case with Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee secured by us. At April 30, 2016, we are
owed $463,906 by Mother Parkers. We also utilize the services of Mother Parkers, to roast coffee to our specifications for
sale to the Company’s customers. As a result, at April 30, 2016, we owe $2,232,088 to Mother Parkers for roasting services.
As
of the filing of this report, we believe that our cash position, funds we may raise through offerings and sales of
convertible notes, the line of credit described below, and the revenues we generate will be sufficient to meet our working
capital needs for approximately the next twelve months based on our projections.
Although
our sales and revenues have increased significantly on an annual basis, the Company incurred a net loss of $5,201,917 and $10,280,985
for the years ended January 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively and had an accumulated deficit of $29,245,750 at January 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss of $1,487,569 and $1,197,236 for the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and an accumulated
deficit of $30,733,319 as of April 30, 2016.
In addition, the Company has a history of losses and has not generated
net income from operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. The operations of the Company have primarily been funded by the sale of common stock and debt financing. The Company’s
ability to meet its obligations in the ordinary course of business is dependent upon its ability to sell its products directly
to end-users and through distributors, establish profitable operations through increased sales and decreased expenses, and obtain
additional funds when needed. We may not be able to increase sales or reduce expenses to a level necessary to meet our current
obligations or continue as a going concern. As a result, the opinion the Company received from its independent registered public
accounting firm on its January 31, 2016 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph stating that there is substantial
doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we become unable to continue as a going concern,
we may have to liquidate our assets, and may realize significantly less than the values at which they are carried on our financial
statements, and stockholders may lose all or part of their investment in our common stock. The accompanying financial statements
do not contain any adjustments for this uncertainty.
Cash
Flows
|
|
Three
months ending April 30,
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2015
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(267,361
|
)
|
|
$
|
(614,583
|
)
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(55,523
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
$
|
229,342
|
|
|
$
|
439,026
|
|
Operating
Activities
Compared
to the corresponding period in 2015, net cash used in operating activities decreased by $347,222 for the three months ended
April 30, 2016. Net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended April 30, 2016 was primarily due to
$1,487,569 of net loss and $439,026 of increase in accrued expenses, offset by $75,914 change in fair value of derivative
liability and share-based employee compensation of $771,225.
Investing
Activities
We
had no net cash used for investing activities for the three months ended April 30, 2016. Net cash used in investing
activities for the three months ended April 30, 2015, was solely due to the purchase and disposal of property
and equipment.
Financing
Activities
Compared
to the corresponding period in fiscal 2015, net cash provided by financing activities decreased by approximately $69,600 for the
three months ended April 30, 2016 due to increased repayments on debt.
From
time to time, we may attempt to raise capital through either equity or debt offerings. Our capital requirements will depend on
many factors, including, among other things, the rate at which our business grows, with corresponding demands for working capital
and expansion capacity. We could be required, or may elect, to seek additional funding through public or private equity, debt
financing or bank financing.
Funding
and Financing Agreements
Mother
Parker’s Investment
On
April 24, 2014, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee Inc. (“
Mother
Parkers
” and the “
Subscription
”). Pursuant to the Subscription, Mother Parkers purchased 7,333,529
units from the Company, each consisting of (a) one share of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the
“
Shares
”); and (b) one (1) warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock (the “
Warrants
”
and collectively with the Shares, the ”
Units
”) at a price per Unit equal to the fifty day weighted-average
price per share of the Company’s common stock on the OTCQB market, for the fifty trading days ending March 7, 2014 (the
date the parties first discussed the transactions contemplated by the Subscription), which was $0.3409 (the “
Per Unit
Price
”). The total purchase price paid for the Units was $2,500,000.
Pursuant
to the Subscription, we provided Mother Parkers a right of first refusal for a period of two (2) years following the Subscription
(which has now expired), to purchase up to 10% of any securities (common stock, options or warrants exercisable for common stock)
we propose to offer and sell in a public or private equity offering (the “
ROFO Securities
”), exercisable for
48 hours from the time we provide Mother Parkers notice of such proposed sale of ROFO Securities (subject where applicable to
Mother Parkers meeting any prerequisites to participation in the offering). The right of first refusal does not apply to the issuance
of (a) shares of common stock or options to employees, officers, directors or consultants of the Company in consideration for
services, (b) securities exercisable or exchangeable for or convertible into shares of common stock issued and outstanding on
the date of the Subscription, (c) securities issued pursuant to acquisitions or strategic transactions approved by the directors
of the Company, provided that any such issuance shall provide the Company additional benefits in addition to the investment of
funds, but shall not include a transaction in which the Company is issuing securities primarily for the purpose of raising capital,
and (d) any debt securities (other than any debt securities exchangeable for or convertible into shares of common stock).
The
Warrants have an exercise price equal to 150% of the Per Unit Price ($0.51135 per share), a term of three years and prohibit Mother
Parkers from exercising such Warrants to the extent such exercise would result in the beneficial ownership of more than 9.99%
of the Company’s common stock, subject to Mother Parkers’ right to waive such limitation with 61 days prior written
notice.
As
described above, we also had $463,906 of accounts receivable due from, and $2,232,088 of accounts payable owed to, Mother Parkers,
as of April 30, 2016.
Line
of Credit
The
Company entered into an unsecured Revolving Line of Credit Agreement with Colorado Medical Finance Services, LLC, dba Gold Gross
Capital LLC on June 9, 2015, with an effective date of February 16, 2015. The line of credit allows the Company the right to borrow
up to $500,000 from the lender from time to time. On March 26, 2015, the lender advanced $250,000 to us under the terms of the
line of credit. Amounts owed under the line of credit are to be memorialized by revolving credit notes in the form attached to
the line of credit, provided that no formal note has been entered into to advance amounts borrowed to date. Amounts borrowed under
the line of credit accrue interest at the rate of 17.5% per annum and can be repaid at any time without penalty. A total of 10%
of the interest rate is payable in cash and the other 7.5% of the interest rate is payable in cash, or at the option of the lender
and with our consent, or by a reduction in amounts owed to us by the lender in connection with the sale of coffee or other promotional
activities. The line of credit expires, and all amounts are due under the line of credit on September 26, 2016. The line of credit
contains customary events of default, and upon the occurrence of an event of default the lender can suspend further advances and
require the Company to declare the entire amount then owed immediately due, subject to a 10 day period pursuant to which we have
the right to cure any default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default the amounts owed under the line of credit bear interest
at the rate of 20% per annum. Proceeds from the line of credit can be solely used for working capital purposes. The lender has
no relationship with the Company or its affiliates. The balance due on the Line of Credit was $123,548 as of April 30, 2016.
Convertible
Promissory Notes
As
described in greater detail in Note 5 to the financial statements included herein and under “Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” – “Liquidity and Capital Resources”
- “Funding and Financing Agreements” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2016, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 6, 2016, we have sold various convertible notes to date, which allow the holders
thereof, subject to the terms thereof, to convert the amount owed into shares of our common stock at a discount to the then trading
prices of our common stock. The total amount of the Convertible Promissory Notes is $1.63 Million as of April 30, 2016.
Third
Party Loan
In
October 2015, we borrowed $150,000 from a third-party lender. The October 2015 loan has a seven-month term, a total payback
amount of $202,500 and is payable by way of 147 daily payments of $1,378.
In
November 2015, we borrowed $65,000 from the same lender. The November 2015 loan has a term of six months, a total payable
amount of $89,700 and is payable by way of 126 daily payments of $712. In January 2016, we borrowed $220,000 from the same
lender (of which $91,887.70 was new lending and $128,112.30 was used to repay the balance on the October 2015 loan). The
January 2016 loan has a term of ten months, a total payback amount of $290,400 and is payable by way of 210 daily payments of
$1,383. There was $215,173 outstanding as of January 31, 2016. In February 2016, we borrowed $100,000 from the same lender
which has a six-month term, a total payback amount of $130,000 and is payable by way of 126 daily payments of $1,032. In
April 2016, we borrowed $115,000 from the same lender (of which $90,000 was new lending and the remainder was used to pay
back the balance on the November 2015 loan). The April 2016 loan has a term of eight months, a total payable amount of
$158,700 and is payable by way of 168 daily payments of $945. The loans are secured by a security interest in all of our
accounts, equipment, inventory and investment property. We have the right to repay the loans within the first 30 days after
the effective date of each loan at the rate of 85% of the applicable repayment amount and between 31 and 90 days after the
effective date of each loan at the rate of 90% of the applicable repayment amount. The interest rate on these loans range
from 30-38% per annum. As of April 30, 2016, $259,907 is payable under the outstanding loans.
Factoring
Agreement
In
June 2016, we received $310,000 from a third-party lender as part of a factoring arrangement, where the third party purchased
$418,500 of our receivables.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As
part of our on-going business, we have not participated in transactions that generate material relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities (“
SPEs
”),
which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow
or limited purposes. As of April 30, 2016, we are not involved in any unconsolidated SPEs.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements, which have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements
requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We
base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe
the following critical accounting policies affect our most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our financial
statements.
Stock-Based
Compensation.
On January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718 which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee service.
We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of employee stock based compensation at the date
of grant, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including expected volatility and expected life. Changes
in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our share-based compensation. These
assumptions are subjective and generally require significant analysis and judgment to develop. When estimating fair value, some
of the assumptions will be based on, or determined from, external data and other assumptions may be derived from our historical
experience with stock-based payment arrangements. The appropriate weight to place on historical experience is a matter of judgment,
based on relevant facts and circumstances.
We
estimated volatility by considering historical stock volatility. We have opted to use the simplified method for estimating the
expected term of stock options equal to the midpoint between the vesting period and the contractual term.
Revenue
Recognition.
All revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service or sale is complete,
the price is fixed or determinable and ability to collect is reasonably assured. Revenue is derived from the sale of coffee products
and is recognized on a gross basis upon shipment. The Company utilizes a third party for the production and fulfillment of orders
placed by customers. Customers order directly from the Company and accordingly, the Company acts as a principal, takes title to
the products, and has the risks and rewards of ownership, such as the risk of loss for collection, delivery and returns.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
. Long-lived assets include a license agreement that was recorded at the estimated cost to acquire
the asset (See Note 4 to the financial statements included in this report). The license agreement is reviewed for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability
is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In
the event that such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the assets, the assets are
written down to their estimated fair values. Management evaluated the carrying value of the license and determined that no impairment
existed at April 30, 2016 or 2015.
Accounts
Receivable allowance
.
A provision for doubtful accounts is provided based on a combination of historical experience,
specific identification and customer credit risk where there are indications that a specific customer may be experiencing financial
difficulties.
Inventory
Reserves.
We estimate any required write-downs for inventory obsolescence by examining our inventories on a quarterly
basis to determine if there are indicators that the carrying values could exceed net realizable value. Indicators that could result
in additional inventory write-downs include age of inventory, damaged inventory, slow moving products and products at the end
of their life cycles. While significant judgment is involved in determining the net realizable value of inventory, we believe
that inventory is appropriately stated at the lower of cost or market.
Deferred
Tax Asset Valuation Allowance.
We follow the provisions of ASC 740 relating to uncertain tax provisions and have commenced
analyzing filing positions in all of the federal and state jurisdictions where we are required to file income tax returns, as
well as all open tax years in these jurisdictions. As a result of adoption, no additional tax liabilities have been recorded.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in certain state jurisdictions. The Company has not
been subjected to tax examinations for any year and the statute of limitations has not expired. The Company recognizes deferred
tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax benefits or consequences of temporary differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities, and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered
or settled. Judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes and related accruals, deferred tax assets and liabilities.
These include establishing a valuation allowance related to the ability to realize certain deferred tax assets. To the extent
future taxable income against which these assets may be applied is not sufficient, some portion or all of our recorded deferred
tax assets would not be realizable.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
For
the three months ended April 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no accounting standards or interpretations adopted, and management
is still evaluating if adoption of the new accounting standards shown below are expected to have a material impact on our
financial position, operations or cash flows.
Financial
Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Update, or ASU 2016-02
“
Leases (Topic 842)
”
- In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, which will require lessees to recognize almost all leases on their balance sheet
as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases
to be classified as either operating or finance. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied
in current lease accounting, but without explicit bright lines. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model, but updated
to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. This ASU is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 18, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the potential
impact this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
ASB
ASU 2014-09
“
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),
”
or ASU 2014-09 - In May 2014, the FASB
issued ASU 2014-09, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements of Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, Topic
605 “
Revenue Recognition.
” This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2017, with the option to adopt as early as December 15, 2017. We are currently assessing the impact of adoption of this ASU on
our consolidated results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
In
June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12,
Compensation – Stock Compensation: Accounting for Share-Based Payments
When the Terms of an Award Provide that a Performance Target Could be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period
(“
ASU
2014-12
”). The guidance requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after
the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. The guidance will be effective for the Company in the
fiscal year beginning January 1, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
this guidance, if any, on its financial statements.
Management
is evaluating the significance of the recent accounting pronouncement ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements –
Going Concern (subtopic 205-40); disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going
Concern, and has not yet concluded whether the pronouncement will have a significant effect on the Company’s future
financial statements. Such standard is effective for the Company for the fiscal year beginning February 1, 2017.