UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2008
 
OR
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Transition Period From  _________ to_________              
 
Commission File Number:   001-32623
CONVERSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 
 
Delaware
20-0101495
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
100 Eagle Rock Avenue, East Hanover, New Jersey
07936
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
 
(973) 560-9400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x      No   o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer   o     Accelerated filer   o        Non-accelerated filer   o Smaller Reporting Company   x  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   o      No   x
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
 
Outstanding at
May 8, 2008
 
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
   
114,857,189 shares
 


 
CONVERSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 
FORM 10-Q
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2008
 
INDEX

 
      
 
Page
Part I.
Financial Information
  1
 
   
 
 
 
  Item 1.
Financial Statements
1
 
   
 
 
 
      
a)   Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and December 31, 2007 (unaudited)
  1
 
   
 
 
 
      
b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and 2007 (unaudited)
  2
 
   
 
 
 
      
c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and 2007 (unaudited)
    3
 
   
 
 
 
      
d) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
    5
 
   
 
 
 
  Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of  Operations
  10
 
   
 
 
 
  Item 4T.
Controls and Procedures
18
 
 
 
 
Part II.  
   Other Information  
19
 
   
 
 
 
  Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
19
 
  Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
19
 
  Item 5.
Other Information   19
 
  Item 6.
Exhibits
20
 
 
   
Signature
   
21



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements

CONVERSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

   
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
   
2008
 
2007
 
ASSETS
             
CURRENT ASSETS
             
Cash
 
$
526,522
 
$
1,506,866
 
Accounts receivable, net
   
2,413,895
   
3,077,847
 
Accounts receivable from related parties, net
   
421,377
   
315,503
 
Prepaid expenses
   
165,382
   
199,635
 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
   
3,527,176
   
5,099,851
 
               
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, at cost, net
   
172,212
   
182,868
 
               
OTHER ASSETS
             
Goodwill
   
6,135,125
   
6,135,125
 
Intangible assets, net
   
741,219
   
778,470
 
Deferred financing costs, net
   
20,000
   
-
 
Discount on debt issued, net
   
368,413
   
447,361
 
Equity investments
   
90,183
   
82,253
 
Other assets
   
85,445
   
85,445
 
                 
Total Assets
 
$
11,139,773
 
$
12,811,373
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
             
CURRENT LIABILITIES
             
Line of credit
 
$
983,596
 
$
2,056,341
 
Current portion of long-term debt
   
5,667
   
10,819
 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
   
1,653,868
   
1,356,425
 
Deferred revenue
   
173,204
   
59,350
 
Related party note payable
   
106,352
   
107,833
 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
   
2,922,687
   
3,590,768
 
               
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion
   
988,751
   
1,533,126
 
DEFERRED TAXES
   
363,400
   
363,400
 
Total Liabilities
   
4,274,838
   
5,487,294
 
               
Convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value, $100 stated value, 20,000,000 shares authorized.
             
               
Series A convertible preferred stock, 19,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively;
   
823,332
   
728,333
 
               
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
   
-
   
-
 
               
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
             
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized;
             
  115,977,079 and 111,289,844 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
   
115,977
   
111,290
 
Series B convertible preferred stock, 20,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively;
   
1,352,883
   
1,352,883
 
Additional paid in capital
   
67,928,491
   
66,742,898
 
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,145,382 shares in treasury as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively
   
(423,869
)
 
(423,869
)
Accumulated deficit
   
(62,931,879
)
 
(61,187,456
)
Total Stockholders' Equity
   
6,041,603
   
6,595,746
 
               
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
 
$
11,139,773
 
$
12,811,373
 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
 
1

 
CONVERSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
(Unaudited)

   
2008
 
2007
 
           
REVENUE:
             
Services
 
$
3,959,588
 
$
4,823,590
 
Related party services
   
591,869
   
569,131
 
Reimbursable expenses
   
138,971
   
253,086
 
Other
   
15,033
   
2,131
 
     
4,705,461
   
5,647,938
 
COST OF REVENUE:
             
Services
   
2,896,423
   
3,685,480
 
Related party services
   
555,367
   
537,698
 
Consultant expenses
   
221,703
   
250,519
 
     
3,673,493
   
4,473,697
 
GROSS PROFIT
   
1,031,968
   
1,174,241
 
               
OPERATING EXPENSES
             
Selling and marketing
   
914,428
   
860,315
 
General and administrative
   
1,074,749
   
1,300,703
 
Lease impairment
   
-
   
210,765
 
Depreciation and amortization
   
91,024
   
190,750
 
     
2,080,201
   
2,562,533
 
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
   
(1,048,233
)
 
(1,388,292
)
               
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
             
Equity in earnings (loss) from investments
   
7,929
   
(2,513
)
Gain on financial instruments
   
-
   
19,329
 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
   
(553,846
)
 
(288,060
)
Interest income (expense), net
   
(150,273
)
 
(990,767
)
     
(696,190
)
 
(1,262,011
)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
   
(1,744,423
)
 
(2,650,303
)
INCOME TAXES
   
-
   
-
 
                 
NET LOSS
   
(1,744,423
)
 
(2,650,303
)
Accretion of issuance costs associated with convertible preferred stock
   
(95,000
)
 
(147,038
)
Dividends on convertible preferred stock
   
(59,705
)
 
(67,846
)
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS
 
$
(1,899,128
)
$
(2,865,187
)
               
Basic and diluted loss per common share
 
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.05
)
Basic and diluted loss per common share attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.05
)
               
Weighted average shares used to compute net loss per common share:
             
Basic and diluted
   
110,213,822
   
56,600,982
 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

2


CONVERSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
(Unaudited)

   
2008
 
2007
 
           
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
             
Net loss
 
$
(1,744,423
)
$
(2,650,303
)
               
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
             
  Depreciation of property and equipment and amortization of leasehold improvements
   
28,773
   
32,376
 
  Amortizaton of intangible assets
   
37,251
   
144,027
 
  Amortization of debt discounts
   
78,948
   
101,873
 
  Amortization of relative fair value of warrants issued
   
20,625
   
662,500
 
  Amortization of deferred financing costs
   
-
   
14,347
 
  Loss on sale of equity investment
   
-
   
25,569
 
  Stock based compensation
   
190,185
   
76,098
 
  Gain on change in fair value of financial instruments
   
-
   
(19,329
)
  Loss on early extinguishment of debt
   
553,846
   
288,060
 
  Increase in allowance for doubtful accounts
   
21,681
   
80,633
 
  (Income) loss from equity investments
   
(7,929
)
 
2,513
 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
             
  Decrease in accounts receivable
   
638,733
   
658,319
 
  Increase in accounts receivable from related parties
   
(102,337
)
 
(28,377
)
  Decrease (Increase) in prepaid expenses
   
34,254
   
(32,727
)
  Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
   
275,838
   
362,091
 
  Increase in deferred revenue
   
113,854
   
280,467
 
  Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
   
139,299
   
(1,863
)
               
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
             
  Acquisition of property and equipment
   
(18,117
)
 
-
 
  Net cash used in investing activities
   
(18,117
)
 
-
 
               
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
             
Net repayments under line of credit
   
(1,072,745
)
 
(3,684,701
)
Proceeds from issuance of short-term note payable
   
-
   
4,250,000
 
Deferred financing costs
   
(20,000
)
 
-
 
Principal payments on short-term debt
   
-
   
(1,195,455
)
Issuance of Company common stock and stock options
   
-
   
120,758
 
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
   
(5,152
)
 
(15,578
)
Principal payments on related party notes
   
(3,629
)
 
(32,888
)
  Net cash used in financing activities
   
(1,101,526
)
 
(557,864
)
               
NET DECREASE IN CASH
   
(980,344
)
 
(559,727
)
CASH, beginning of period
   
1,506,866
   
668,006
 
               
CASH, end of period
 
$
526,522
 
$
108,279
 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3


CONVERSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
(Unaudited)

   
2008
 
2007
 
           
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
             
Cash paid for interest
 
$
37,286
 
$
140,868
 
               
               
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:
             
Common stock purchase warrant issued in settlement of Laurus debt
   
-
   
500,000
 
Common stock issued in conversion of long-term debt to equity
   
600,000
   
-
 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


CONVERSION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Accounting Policies
 
Organization and Business
 
Conversion Services International, Inc. (“CSI” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware and has been conducting business since 1990. CSI and its wholly owned subsidiaries (together the “Company”) are principally engaged in the information technology services industry in the following areas: strategic consulting, business intelligence/data warehousing and data management, on credit, to its customers principally located in the northeastern United States.

CSI was formerly known as LCS Group, Inc. (“LCS”). In January 2004, CSI merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of LCS. In connection with this transaction, among other things, LCS changed its name to “Conversion Services International, Inc.”

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company and are unaudited. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or for the full fiscal year. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments unless otherwise indicated) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at March 31, 2008, and for all periods presented, have been made. Footnote disclosure has been condensed or omitted as permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission rules over interim financial statements.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the annual audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, DeLeeuw Associates, Inc. and CSI Sub Corp. (DE). All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the consolidation. Investments in business entities in which the Company does not have control, but has the ability to exercise significant influence (generally 20-50% ownership), are accounted for by the equity method.

Revenue recognition

Revenue from consulting and professional services is recognized at the time the services are performed on a project by project basis. For projects charged on a time and materials basis, revenue is recognized based on the number of hours worked by consultants at an agreed-upon rate per hour. For large services projects where costs to complete the contract could reasonably be estimated, the Company undertakes projects on a fixed-fee basis and recognizes revenue on the percentage of completion method of accounting based on the evaluation of actual costs incurred to date compared to total estimated costs. Revenue recognized in excess of billings is recorded as cost in excess of billings. Billings in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue until revenue recognition criteria are met. Reimbursements, including those relating to travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, are included in revenue, and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses are included in cost of services.

Extinguishment of debt

In March 2007, the Company restructured its financing with both Laurus and three affiliates of Laidlaw Ltd. (formerly known as Sands Brothers) (“Sands”). As a result of these restructurings, the convertible notes which existed under the prior Sands transaction were extinguished and replaced with a non-convertible note and the Overadvance Side Letter with Laurus was also extinguished. A loss of $288,060 on the Sands and Laurus transactions was recorded as an early extinguishment of debt.

In March 2008, the Company and TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. executed a Note Conversion Agreement whereby certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. converted debt due to them under an Unsecured Convertible Line of Credit Note dated June 7, 2004 into Company Common Stock. A loss of $553,846 on this transaction was recorded as an early extinguishment of debt.

5


Concentrations of credit risk

Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are cash and accounts receivable arising from its normal business activities. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers, based upon factors surrounding their credit risk, establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts, and as a consequence believes that its accounts receivable credit risk exposure beyond such allowances is limited. At March 31, 2008, receivables related to services performed for Bank of America comprised approximately 21.6% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance. This is comprised of receivables directly from Bank of America (3.4%) and receivables from two vendor management companies that are issued invoices for the Company’s work at Bank of America, Sapphire Technologies (11.3%) and ZeroChaos (6.9%). Also, receivables from LEC, a related party, comprised 14.4% of the accounts receivable balance.

The Company maintains its cash with a high credit quality financial institution. Each account is secured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100,000.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes, in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “ Accounting for Income Taxes ” (“SFAS 109”) and related interpretations, under an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, the Company generally considers all expected future events other than enactments of changes in the tax laws or rates.

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The Company’s current valuation allowance primarily relates to benefits from the Company’s net operating losses.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 financial statement presentation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 2 -   Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. 
 
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 159, “ The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 ” (FAS 159).   FAS 159, which becomes effective for the company on January 1, 2008, permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses in earnings. Such accounting is optional and is generally to be applied instrument by instrument. Election of this fair-value option did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures. 

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157 (“FAS 157”), “ Fair Value Measurements ”, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this standard has not had a material affect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “ Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 ” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 160 on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

6


Note 3 - Line of credit

The Company’s line of credit with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. expired on December 31, 2007 and, in exchange for a $25,000 fee and a reduction of the maximum amount available under the line of credit to $3,000,000, the maturity date was extended until March 31, 2008.

The Company executed a replacement revolving line of credit agreement in March 2008 with Access Capital, Inc. The Access Capital line of credit provides for borrowing up to a maximum of $3,500,000, based upon collateral availability, a 90% advance rate against eligible accounts receivable, has a three year term, and an interest rate of prime (which was 5.25% as of March 31, 2008) plus 2.75%. The Company must comply with a minimum working capital covenant which requires the Company to maintain minimum monthly working capital of $400,000. The Company is in compliance with this covenant as of March 31, 2008. Additionally, during the first year of the three year term the Company must maintain an average minimum monthly borrowing of $2,000,000 which increases the $2,250,000 in the second year and to $2,500,000 in the third year. The Company must also pay an annual facility fee equal to 1% of the maximum available under the facility and a $1,750 per month collateral management fee. Further debt incurred by the Company may need to be subordinated to Access Capital, Inc.

Note 4 - Stock Based Compensation  

The 2003 Incentive Plan (“2003 Plan”) authorizes the issuance of up to 10,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance upon exercise of options. It also authorizes the issuance of stock appreciation rights. The options granted may be a combination of both incentive and nonstatutory options, generally vest over a three year period from the date of grant, and expire ten years from the date of grant.
 
To the extent that CSI derives a tax benefit from options exercised by employees, such benefit will be credited to additional paid-in capital when realized on the Company’s income tax return. There were no tax benefits realized by the Company during the three months ended March 31, 2008 or during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 or 2005.

The following summarizes the stock option transactions under the 2003 Plan during 2008:

   
Shares
 
Weighted average exercise price
 
           
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007
   
5,888,828
 
$
0.75
 
Options granted
   
-
   
-
 
Options exercised
   
-
   
-
 
Options canceled
   
(147,998
)
 
0.75
 
Options outstanding at March 31, 2008
   
5,740,830
 
$
0.75
 


The following table summarizes information concerning outstanding and exercisable Company common stock options at March 31, 2008:  

Range of exercise prices
 
Options outstanding
 
Weighted average exercise price
 
Weighted average remaining contractual life
 
Options exercisable
 
Weighted average exercise price
 
                       
$0.250
   
1,976,666
 
$
0.250
   
8.5
   
669,982
 
$
0.250
 
$0.30-0.70
   
1,705,000
   
0.430
   
8.2
   
1,103,333
   
0.460
 
$0.825-0.83
   
1,364,833
   
0.830
   
6.7
   
997,651
   
0.830
 
$2.475-3.45
   
694,331
   
2.780
   
6.1
   
694,331
   
2.780
 
     
5,740,830
               
3,465,297
       

In accordance with SFAS 123(R), the Company recorded approximately $190,200 and $76,000 of expense related to stock options which vested during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

7

 
 
Basic loss per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the effect of outstanding stock options using the “treasury stock” method and the effect of convertible debt instruments as if they had been converted at the beginning of each period presented.
 
Basic and diluted loss per share was determined as follows:

   
For the three months ended March 31,
 
   
2008
 
2007
 
           
Net loss before income taxes (A)
 
$
(1,744,423
)
$
(2,650,303
)
Net loss (B)
 
$
(1,744,423
)
$
(2,650,303
)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders (C)
 
$
(1,899,128
)
$
(2,865,187
)
Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock (D)
   
110,213,822
   
56,600,982
 
               
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share:
             
Before income taxes (A/D)
 
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.05
)
Net loss per common share (B/D)
 
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.05
)
Net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders (C/D)
 
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.05
)

For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, 5,740,830 and 6,543,447 shares attributable to outstanding stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share because the effect was antidilutive, respectively. Additionally, the effect of warrants to purchase 19,584,922 shares of common stock which were issued between June 7, 2004 and March 31, 2007, and outstanding as of March 31, 2008, were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2007, and the effect of 62,042,241 warrants which were issued between June 7, 2004 and March 31, 2008, and were outstanding as of March 31, 2008, were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2008 because the effect was antidilutive. Also excluded from the calculation of loss per share because their effect was antidilutive were 1,269,841 shares of common stock underlying the $2,000,000 convertible line of credit note to Taurus as of March 31, 2007 and 666,667 shares of common stock underlying the same note whose outstanding balance had been reduced to $1,050,000 as of March 31, 2008, 7,800,000 shares underlying the Series A and Series B convertible preferred stock, and options to purchase 1,500,000 and 36,596 shares of common stock outstanding to Laurus as of March 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively.

Note 6 – Common Stock and Warrants

In March 2008, the Company and TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. executed a Note Conversion Agreement whereby certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. converted $600,000 of debt due to them under an Unsecured Convertible Line of Credit Note dated June 7, 2004 into Company common stock. The Company issued 4,615,385 shares of common stock to the investors. The number of shares acquired was based on the $0.13 per share closing price of the Company’s common stock on the American Stock Exchange on the date of conversion. Warrants to purchase 4,615,385 shares of Company common stock were provided to the investors as an inducement to convert. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.143 per share, and are exercisable for five years.

Using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, the Company calculated the relative fair value of the warrants to purchase 4,615,385 shares of Company common stock to be approximately $553,846. This relative fair value was recorded as a charge to the loss on extinguishment of debt and an addition to additional paid-in capital. The assumptions used in the relative fair value calculation are as follows: Company closing stock price on March 26, 2008 of $0.13 per share; exercise price of the warrants of $0.143 per share; five year term; volatility of 158.6%; annual rate of dividends of 0%; and a risk free interest rate of 1.35%.

Note 7 - Major Customers

During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company had sales relating to two major customers, Bank of America and LEC, a related party, comprising 18.3% and 12.6% of revenues, and totaling approximately $862,219 and $591,869, respectively. Amounts due from services provided to these customers included in accounts receivable was approximately $1,019,888 at March 31, 2008. As of March 31, 2008, receivables related to services performed for Bank of America and LEC accounted for approximately 21.6% and 14.4% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance, respectively.  

During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company had sales relating to two major customers, Bank of America and LEC, a related party, comprising 18.4% and 10.1% of revenues, and totaling approximately $1,041,600 and $569,131, respectively. Amounts due from services provided to these customers included in accounts receivable was approximately $1,081,828 at March 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2007, receivables related to services provided to Bank of America and LEC accounted for approximately 20.4% and 10.2% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance, respectively.  

8


Note 8 - Commitments and Contingencies

  Legal Proceedings

In March 2007, CSI commenced an action in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Morris County Chancery Division, for breach of contract, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets and related claims against two former CSI employees and their start-up business.  In the spring of 2007, the court granted CSI’s request for a temporary restraining order based upon violation of a restrictive covenant.  The lawsuit is presently in the discovery phase, and CSI intends to litigate its claims aggressively in order to preserve its business from unfair competition and its confidential information from misappropriation. The defendants to the lawsuit have filed in response a counterclaim against CSI alleging tortious interference with economic advantage, abuse of process and breach of contract.  Although CSI is unable to predict the outcome of this litigation matter, management has been advised that based upon the discovery exchanged to date, the likelihood of a materially adverse outcome on the counterclaim against the Company is remote.

Lease Commitments  
 
Years Ending March 31
 
Office
 
Sublease
 
Net
 
               
2009
 
$
362,404
 
$
107,310
 
$
255,094
 
2010
   
360,404
   
116,252
   
244,152
 
2011
   
280,366
   
107,310
   
173,056
 
Thereafter
   
-
   
-
   
-
 
   
$
1,003,174
 
$
330,872
 
$
672,302
 

Effective February 2007, the Company subleased a portion of its East Hanover, New Jersey corporate office space for the remainder of the lease term. 7,154 square feet of the Company’s 16,604 square feet of rented office space were subleased from February 15, 2007 to December 31, 2010. The sublease provides for three months of free rent to the sublessee, monthly rent equal to $5,962 per month from May 15, 2007 to December 31, 2007, $8,942 per month from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009, and $11,923 per month from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. Additionally, the Company will receive a fixed rental for electric of $10,731 per annum payable in equal monthly installments throughout the term of the lease.

The Company has recorded a lease impairment resulting from this sublease in the amount of $210,765 during the three months ended March 31, 2007. This impairment charge reflects the unreimbursed costs relating to the subleased space which will be incurred by the Company during the remaining term of the lease. These costs include the differential between the Company’s rental rate for the subleased space and the amount being paid by the sublessee, and unreimbursed common area fees and real estate taxes.

Note 9 - Related Party Transactions
 
Refer to footnote 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the related party transaction disclosure as a major customer.

As of March 31, 2008, Scott Newman, our President and Chief Executive Officer, had no outstanding loan balance to the Company. The balance outstanding with respect to the loan from Glenn Peipert, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, to the Company was approximately $0.1 million, which accrues interest at a simple rate of 8% per annum.
 
Note 10 - Subsequent Events

On April 28, 2008, Milbank Roy & Co., LLC (“Milbank”) submitted a Demand for Arbitration and Statement of Claim with the American Arbitration Association. Through an agreement with Milbank, Milbank had a limited exclusive right to obtain certain bridge financing and equity financing on behalf of the Company during 2007 from certain potential investors that were identified on certain schedules. Milbank alleges that it is owed a fee of $105,000 relating to the Company’s completion of a revolving line of credit transaction with Access Capital, Inc. in March 2008. Management believes that this revolving line of credit transaction is not included in the scope of the engagement for which Milbank was hired and it intends to vigorously defend this claim. As of the date of this filing, there have been no developments with respect to this claim.

On May 5, 2008, we received a letter from the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) stating that the Company has resolved the continued listing deficiencies referenced in the AMEX letter dated June 29, 2006. As is the case with all listed issuers, the Company’s continued listing eligibility will continue to be assessed on an ongoing basis. Additionally, the AMEX has notified the Company that it has become subject to the provisions of Section 1009(h) of the AMEX Company Guide. Under Section 1009(h) of the AMEX Company Guide, if within 12 months, AMEX again determines that the Company is below continued listing standards, the AMEX staff will examine the relationship between the two incidents of falling below continued listing standards and re-evaluate the Company's method of financial recovery from the first incident before taking appropriate action.

9

 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements
 
Certain statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”), other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview of our Business

Conversion Services International, Inc. provides professional services to the Global 2000, as well as mid-market clientele relating to strategic consulting, business intelligence/data warehousing and data management and, through strategic partners, the sale of software. The Company’s services based clients are primarily in the financial services, pharmaceutical, healthcare and telecommunications industries, although it has clients in other industries as well. The Company’s clients are primarily located in the northeastern United States.

The Company began operations in 1990. Its services were originally focused on e-business solutions and data warehousing. In the late 1990s, the Company strategically repositioned itself to capitalize on its data warehousing expertise in the fast growing business intelligence/data warehousing space. The Company became a public company via its merger with a wholly owned subsidiary of LCS Group, Inc., effective January 30, 2004.

The Company’s core strategy includes capitalizing on the already established in-house business intelligence/data warehousing (“BI/DW”) technical expertise and its strategic consulting division. This is expected to result in organic growth through the addition of new customers. In addition, this foundation will be leveraged as the Company pursues targeted strategic acquisitions.
 
The Company derives a majority of its revenue from professional services engagements. Its revenue depends on the Company’s ability to generate new business, in addition to preserving present client engagements. The general domestic economic conditions in the industries the Company serves, the pace of technological change, and the business requirements and practices of its clients and potential clients directly affect our ability to accomplish these goals. When economic conditions decline, companies generally decrease their technology budgets and reduce the amount of spending on the type of information technology (IT) consulting provided by the Company. The Company’s revenue is also impacted by the rate per hour it is able to charge for its services and by the size and chargeability, or utilization rate, of its professional workforce. If the Company is unable to maintain its billing rates or sustain appropriate utilization rates for its professionals, its overall profitability may decline. Several large clients have changed their business practices with respect to consulting services. Such clients now require that we contract with their vendor management organizations in order to continue to perform services. These organizations charge fees generally based upon the hourly rates being charged to the end client. Our revenues and gross margins are being negatively affected by this practice.

The Company will continue to focus on a variety of growth initiatives in order to improve its market share and increase revenue. Moreover, as the Company endeavors to achieve top line growth, through entry on new approved vendor lists, penetrating new vertical markets, and expanding its time and material business, the Company will concentrate its efforts on improving margins and driving earnings to the bottom line.
 
In addition to the conditions described above for growing the Company’s current business, the Company expects to continue to grow through acquisitions.  One of the Company’s objectives is to make acquisitions of companies offering services complementary to the Company’s lines of business. This is expected to accelerate the Company’s business plan at lower costs than it would generate internally and also improve its competitive positioning and expand the Company’s offerings in a larger geographic area. The service industry is very fragmented, with a handful of large international firms having data warehousing and/or business intelligence divisions, and hundreds of regional boutiques throughout the United States.  These smaller firms do not have the financial wherewithal to scale their businesses or compete with the larger players.  The Company has completed acquisitions of the following companies since 2004:
 
·   In March 2004, the Company acquired DeLeeuw Associates, a management consulting firm in the information technology sector with core competency in delivering Change Management Consulting, including both Six Sigma and Lean domain expertise to enhance service delivery, with proven process methodologies resulting in time to market improvements within the financial services and banking industries. Historically, the DeLeeuw Associates business was involved in the operational integration of mergers and acquisitions, and would prescribe the systems integration work necessary. DeLeeuw Associates has now begun to sell the expanded suite of services offered by the Company, from operational integration to systems integration.

10


·   In May 2004, the Company acquired 49% of all issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Leading Edge Communications Corporation (“LEC”). LEC provides enterprise software and services solutions for technology infrastructure management.

·   In June 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed substantially all of the liabilities of Evoke Software Corporation, which designed, developed, marketed and supported software programs for data analysis, data profiling and database migration applications and provides related support and consulting services. In July 2005, the Company divested substantially all of the assets of Evoke Software Corporation. The market for software has changed, and the Company determined that data profiling should no longer be a standalone product and needed to be part of a suite of tools. This is evidenced by the subsequent acquisition of the Evoke software product by Similarity Systems in July 2005 and then Informatica in January 2006.

·   In July 2005, the Company acquired McKnight Associates, Inc. Since inception, McKnight Associates has focused on successfully designing, developing and implementing data warehousing and business intelligence solutions for its clients in numerous industries. Mr. William McKnight, the founder of McKnight Associates who joined the Company as Senior Vice President - Data Warehousing, is a well-known industry leader, frequently speaks at national trade shows and contributes to major data management trade publications.

·   In July 2005, the Company acquired Integrated Strategies, Inc. (“ISI”). ISI is a professional services firm with a solutions-oriented approach to complex business and technical challenges. Similar to our wholly owned subsidiary, DeLeeuw Associates, which is best known for its large-scale merger integration management and business process change programs for the financial services markets, ISI also counts industry leaders in this sector among its customers. Because of this shared focus, the operations of ISI were merged into DeLeeuw Associates.

 The Company’s most significant costs are personnel expenses, which consist of consultant fees, benefits and payroll-related expenses.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth selected financial data for the periods indicated:  

   
Selected Statement of Operations Data for the three
 
   
months ended March 31, 
 
   
2008
 
2007
 
           
Net revenue
 
$
4,705,461
 
$
5,647,938
 
Gross profit
   
1,031,968
   
1,174,241
 
Net loss
   
(1,744,423
)
 
(2,650,303
)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
   
(1,899,128
)
 
(2,865,187
)
Basic and diluted loss per common share:
             
Net loss per common share
 
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.05
)
Net loss per common share attributable to common stockholders
 
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.05
)

   
Selected Statement of Financial Position Data as of
 
   
March 31, 2008
 
December 31, 2007
 
           
Working capital
 
$
604,489
 
$
1,509,083
 
Total assets
   
11,139,773
   
12,811,373
 
Long-term debt
   
988,751
   
1,533,126
 
Total stockholders' equity
   
6,041,603
   
6,595,746
 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007  

Revenue

The Company’s revenue are primarily comprised of billings to clients for consulting hours worked on client projects. Revenue of $4.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 decreased by $0.9 million, or 16.7%, as compared to revenue of $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Revenue for the Company are categorized by strategic consulting, business intelligence, data warehousing and data management. The chart below reflects revenue by line of business for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:


   
For the three months ended March 31,
 
   
2008
 
2007
 
   
  $
 
% of total revenues
 
  $
 
% of total revenues
 
                   
Strategic Consulting
 
$
1,129,715
   
24.0
%
$
2,356,852
   
41.7
%
Business Intelligence / Data Warehousing
   
2,829,873
   
60.1
%
 
2,466,738
   
43.7
%
Data Management
   
591,869
   
12.6
%
 
569,131
   
10.1
%
Reimbursable expenses
   
138,971
   
3.0
%
 
253,086
   
4.5
%
Other
   
15,033
   
0.3
%
 
2,131
   
0.0
%
   
$
4,705,461
   
100.0
%
$
5,647,938
   
100.0
%

Strategic consulting

The strategic consulting line of business includes work related to planning and assessing both process and technology for clients, performing gap analysis, making recommendations regarding technology and business process improvements to assist clients to realize their business goals and maximize their investments in both people and technology. The Company performs strategic consulting work through its DeLeeuw Associates subsidiary (which includes the Integrated Strategies division).

Strategic consulting revenue of $1.1 million, or 24.0% of total revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 decreased by $1.3 million, or 52.1%, as compared to revenue of $2.4 million, or 41.7% of total revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2007. This decrease is primarily due to a $0.7 million reduction in revenue due to the completion of the ING project during 2007, a continued decline in the Integrated Strategies revenue of $0.3 million as compared to the prior year, and a $0.2 million decline in revenue from Bank of America due to a reduction in consultant headcount at this client during the first quarter of 2007. While this client has been rehiring our consultants, revenue has not yet returned to prior year levels. In the strategic consulting line of business, there was a 25% decline in consultant headcount, resulting in a 48.9% reduction in billable hours as compared to the prior year period.
 
Business intelligence / Data warehousing

The business intelligence line of business includes work performed with various applications and technologies for gathering, storing, analyzing and providing clients with access to data in order to allow enterprise users to make better and quicker business decisions. The data warehousing line of business includes work performed for client companies to provide a consolidated view of high quality enterprise information. CSI provides services in the data warehouse and data mart design, development and implementation, prepares proof of concepts, implements data warehouse solutions and integrates enterprise information. Since the business intelligence and data warehousing work overlap and the Company has performed engagements which include both business intelligence and data warehousing components, the Company tracks this work as a single line of business and reports the results as a single line of business.

Business intelligence/data warehousing (“BI/DW”) revenue of $2.8 million, or 60.1% of total revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 increased by $0.3 million, or 14.7%, as compared to revenue of $2.5 million, or 43.7% of total revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The increase in BI/DW revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008 is primarily due to $1.6 million of current quarter revenue relating to new projects, partially offset by $1.3 million of prior period revenue relating to projects that were completed in the prior year. Overall, the BI/DW line of business had an 11.2% increase in consultant headcount, resulting in a 12.9% increase in billable hours as compared to the prior year period.

Data management  

The data management line of business includes such activities as Enterprise Information Architecture, Metadata Management, Data Quality/Cleansing/ Profiling. The Company performs these activities through its exclusive subcontractor agreement with its related party, LEC.

Data management revenues were $0.6 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
 
Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue includes payroll and benefit and other direct costs for the Company’s consultants. Cost of revenue was $3.7 million, or 78.1% of revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $0.8 million, or 17.9%, as compared to $4.5 million, or 79.2% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Cost of services was $2.9 million, or 73.1% of services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $0.8 million, or 21.4%, as compared to $3.7 million, or 76.4% of services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007.   Cost of services declined during the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year due to an overall 8.0% decline in the number of consultants on billing. The Company had an average of 103 consultants in the current period and 112 in the prior year period. This decline in headcount is consistent with the decrease in services revenue during the current period as compared to the prior year period. The 3.3% decline in cost of services as a percentage of services revenue is primarily due to a $0.1 million decrease in stock compensation and health insurance expense.

 
Cost of related party services was $0.6 million, or 93.8% of related party services revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2008, representing an increase of $18,000, or 3.3%, as compared to $0.5 million, or 94.5% of related party services revenue, for the three months ended March 31, 2007. Cost of related party services increased for the three month period due to an increase in related party consulting revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year.

Gross profit

Gross profit was $1.0 million, or 21.9% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008, representing a decrease of $0.2 million, or 12.1%, as compared to $1.2 million, or 20.8% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007.
 
Gross profit from services was $1.1 million, or 26.9% of services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008, which is unchanged from the prior years gross profit from services of $1.1 million, or 23.6% of services revenue. The increase in the gross profit from services as a percentage of services revenue has been outlined previously in the revenue and cost of revenue discussions.

Gross profit from related party services was $37,000, or 6.2% of related party services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008, remaining consistent with the prior year’s gross profit of $31,000, or 5.5% of related party services revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Selling and marketing

Selling and marketing expenses include payroll, employee benefits and other headcount-related costs associated with sales and marketing personnel and advertising, promotions, tradeshows, seminars and other programs. Selling and marketing expenses were $0.9 million, or 19.4% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $0.9 million, or 15.2% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Selling and marketing expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 increased by $54,000 as compared to the prior year, and increased as a percentage of total revenue by 4.2% points. The increase in expense is primarily due to a $0.1 million increase in stock option expense in the current period as compared to the prior year. The increase in the current year as a percentage of total revenue is primarily due to the reduction in revenue in the current period while the sales and marketing expense remained constant.

General and administrative

General and administrative costs include payroll, employee benefits and other headcount-related costs associated with the finance, legal, facilities, certain human resources and other administrative headcount, and legal and other professional and administrative fees. General and administrative costs were $1.1 million, or 22.8% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2008, compared to $1.3 million, or 23.0% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

The $0.2 million decrease in general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the prior year is primarily due to a $0.1 million reduction in payroll expense due to a reduction in headcount and reductions in the salaries of several executives during the third quarter of 2007 and a reduction of $0.2 million related to various expenses including rent, bad debt expense, accounting and legal fees, stock exchange listing fees, and business taxes. These expense reductions were partially offset by a $0.1 million increase in stock option expense in the current period as compared to the prior year.

Lease impairment

Effective February 2007, the Company subleased a portion of its East Hanover, New Jersey corporate office space for the remainder of the lease term. 7,154 square feet of the Company’s 16,604 square feet of rented office space were subleased from February 15, 2007 to December 31, 2010. The sublease provides for three months of free rent to the sublessee, monthly rent equal to $5,962 per month from May 15, 2007 to December 31, 2007, $8,942 per month from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2009, and $11,923 per month from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. Additionally, the Company will receive a fixed rental for electric of $10,731 per annum payable in equal monthly installments throughout the term of the lease.

During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recorded a lease impairment resulting from this sublease in the amount of $210,765. This impairment charge reflects the unreimbursed costs relating to the subleased space which will be incurred by the Company during the remaining term of the lease. These costs include the differential between the Company’s rental rate for the subleased space and the amount being paid by the sublessee, and unreimbursed common area fees and real estate taxes.

13

 
Depreciation and amortization

Depreciation expense is recorded on the Company’s property and equipment which is generally depreciated over a period between three to seven years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is taken over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease. The Company amortizes deferred financing costs utilizing the effective interest method over the term of the related debt instrument. Acquired software is amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of three years. Acquired contracts are amortized over a period of time that approximates the estimated life of the contracts, based upon the estimated annual cash flows obtained from those contracts, generally five to six years. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 representing a $0.1 million decline from $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007.

Other income (expense)
 
In March 2007, the Company restructured its debt with Laurus and Sands. Gains or losses on these extinguishments were recorded as a gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt. As a result, a $0.3 million combined loss was recorded on the extinguishment of the Laurus overadvance and the Sands settlement. In March 2008, the Company restructured its debt with TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. and issued Company common stock in repayment of $0.6 million of the Unsecured Convertible Note dated June 7, 2004. A $0.6 million loss on the extinguishment of this debt was recorded in March 2008.

14


During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recognized a gain on the revaluation of its freestanding derivative financial instruments relating to its warrants of approximately $19,000. There was no gain or loss recorded in 2008 with respect to financial instruments.

Interest expense, which includes amortization of the discount on debt of $0.1 million and $0.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, was $0.2 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in interest expense in the current period, as compared to the prior year, was primarily due to a $0.7 million reduction in interest expense on short and long-term notes due to TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. that were converted to equity and a $0.1 million reduction in interest expense related to the Company’s line of credit due to reduced balances outstanding under the line in the current period.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of March 31, 2008, the Company had a cash balance of approximately $0.5 million and working capital of $0.6 million.

The Company has experienced continued losses from 2004 through March 31, 2008. The Company has addressed the resulting liquidity issue by entering into various debt and equity instruments between August 2004 and March 2008 and, as of March 31, 2008 had approximately $4.3 million of liabilities and debt outstanding in addition to an aggregate of $3.9 million of Series A and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which was issued in 2006.

The Company’s working capital is $0.6 million as of March 31, 2008 compared to $1.5 million as of December 31, 2007, representing a $0.9 million decrease. The primary reason for the decrease in working capital is a $0.6 million reduction in accounts receivable due to a decline in revenues, a $0.3 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses primarily due to the timing of payments and a $0.1 million increase in deferred revenue partially offset by $0.1 million of various smaller increases in working capital.

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2008 was approximately $0.1 million compared to ($1,863) for the three months ended March 31, 2007. The improvement in cash provided by (used in) operations was primarily the result of the Company’s effort to reduce operating and interest expense. The Company recorded a $1.7 million loss for the three months ended March 31, 2008, however, this loss included $0.9 million of non-cash charges for items including depreciation, amortization, stock based compensation and early extinguishment of debt. Additionally, changes in operating assets and liabilities reflect $0.9 million of cash provided by operations primarily due to the following; accounts receivable declined by $0.5 million, accounts payable and accrued expenses increased by $0.3 million, and deferred revenue increased by $0.1 million due to a prepayment received for a project being performed by the Company.

Cash used in investing activities was $18,000 in the current period compared to zero during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The Company purchased computer equipment during the current period, but had no investing expenditures during the comparable prior year period.

Cash used in financing activities was $1.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2008 and $0.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2007. The cash used in financing activities during the current period was primarily the result of the Company’s effort to reduce the balance outstanding under its line of credit arrangement. The cash used in financing activities during the prior period was the result of the settlement of $4.9 million of debt, partially offset by $4.25 million of financing received during that quarter.

The Company’s line of credit with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd. expired on December 31, 2007 and, in exchange for a $25,000 fee and a reduction of the maximum amount available under the line of credit to $3,000,000, the maturity date was extended until March 31, 2008.

The Company executed a replacement revolving line of credit agreement in March 2008 with Access Capital, Inc. The Access Capital line of credit provides for borrowing up to a maximum of $3,500,000, based upon collateral availability, a 90% advance rate against eligible accounts receivable, has a three year term, and an interest rate of prime (which was 5.25% as of March 31, 2008) plus 2.75%. The Company must comply with a minimum working capital covenant which requires the Company to maintain minimum monthly working capital of $400,000. Additionally, during the first year of the three year term the Company must maintain an average minimum monthly borrowing of $2,000,000 which increases the $2,250,000 in the second year and to $2,500,000 in the third year. The Company must also pay an annual facility fee equal to 1% of the maximum available under the facility and a $1,750 per month collateral management fee. Further debt incurred by the Company may need to be subordinated to Access Capital, Inc.

On June 29, 2006, we received a letter from the American Stock Exchange (the “AMEX”) indicating that we are below certain of the AMEX’s continued listing standards as set forth in Sections 1003(a)(i), 1003(a)(ii) and 1003(a)(iv) of the AMEX Company Guide. We were afforded the opportunity to submit a plan of compliance to the AMEX by July 31, 2006 that demonstrates our ability to regain compliance with Section 1003 of the AMEX Company Guide within 18 months. We submitted our plan to the AMEX on July 31, 2006, and the AMEX accepted our plan on September 26, 2006. We were granted an extension until December 28, 2007 to regain compliance with the continued listing standards. We are subject to periodic review by the AMEX Staff during the extension period. Failure to make progress consistent with the plan or to regain compliance with the continued listing standards by the end of the extension period could result in the Company being delisted from the AMEX.

15


On January 29, 2007, the Company announced that it received notice from the Staff of the AMEX indicating that the Company no longer complied with the Exchange's continued listing standards due to the Company's inability to maintain compliance with certain AMEX continued listing requirements, as set forth in Sections 1003(a)(i), 1003(a)(ii) and 1003(a)(iv) of the AMEX Company Guide and its plan of compliance submitted in July 2006, and that its securities are subject to be delisted from the Exchange.
 
In April 2007, the Company announced that it had been notified by the Hearings Department of the AMEX that the Company’s hearing had been cancelled. The Hearings Department indicated that the AMEX Listing Qualifications Staff recommended cancellation of the Company’s hearing after a review of the Company’s submission dated April 11, 2007, and other publicly available information.

On May 5, 2008, we received a letter from the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) stating that the Company has resolved the continued listing deficiencies referenced in the AMEX letter dated June 29, 2006. As is the case with all listed issuers, the Company’s continued listing eligibility will continue to be assessed on an ongoing basis. Additionally, the AMEX has notified the Company that it has become subject to the provisions of Section 1009(h) of the AMEX Company Guide. Under Section 1009(h) of the AMEX Company Guide, if within 12 months, AMEX again determines that the Company is below continued listing standards, the AMEX staff will examine the relationship between the two incidents of falling below continued listing standards and re-evaluate the Company's method of financial recovery from the first incident before taking appropriate action.
 
There are currently no material commitments for capital expenditures.

As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had accounts receivable due from LEC of approximately $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively. There are no known collection problems with respect to LEC.
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, we invoiced LEC $0.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for the services of consultants subcontracted to LEC by us. The majority of its billing is derived from Fortune 100 clients.

The following is a summary of the debt instruments outstanding as of March 31, 2008:

Lender
 
Type of facility    
 
Outstanding as of March
31, 2008 (not including
interest) (all numbers
approximate)
 
Remaining 
Availability (if 
applicable)    
 
Access Capital, Inc.
   
Line of Credit
 
$
983,596
 
$
743,000
 
Taurus Advisory Group, LLC / TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. Investors
   
Convertible Promissory Note
 
$
1,050,000
 
$
-
 
Glenn Peipert
   
Promissory Note
 
$
106,000
 
$
-
 
Larry and Adam Hock
   
Settlement agreement
 
$
67,000
 
$
-
 
TOTAL
     
$
2,206,596
 
$
743,000
 

Additionally, the Company has two series of preferred stock outstanding as follows:

Holder
 
Type of Instrument
 
Principal amount
outstanding as of 
March 31, 2007
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taurus Advisory Group, LLC Investors
   
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
 
$
1,900,000
 
Matthew J. Szulik
   
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
 
$
2,000,000
 
TOTAL
     
$
3,900,000
 

16


The Company believes existing cash plus funds provided by operations and borrowing capacity under the line of credit should be sufficient to fund operations through March 31, 2009. Additional financing may be required to fund targeted acquisition candidates. Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and various short and long term financings. We plan to continue to strive to increase revenues and to continue to execute on our expense reduction program which began in 2006 in order to reduce, or eliminate, the operating losses. Additionally, we will continue to seek equity financing in order to enable us to continue to meet our financial obligations until we achieve profitability. Any decision or ability to obtain financing through debt or equity investment will depend on various factors, including, among others, financial and market conditions, strategic acquisition and investment opportunities, and developments in the Company’s markets. The sale of additional equity securities or future conversion of any convertible debt would result in additional dilution to the Company’s stockholders. There can be no assurance that any such funding will be available to us on favorable terms, or at all. Failure to obtain sufficient equity financing would have substantial negative ramifications to the Company.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “ Business Combinations ” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. 
 
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 159, “ The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 ” (FAS 159).   FAS 159, which becomes effective for the company on January 1, 2008, permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses in earnings. Such accounting is optional and is generally to be applied instrument by instrument. Election of this fair-value option did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures. 

In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157 (“FAS 157”), “ Fair Value Measurements ”, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting pronouncements. FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this standard has not had a material affect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
 
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “ Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 ” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 160 on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

17

 
  Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue recognition

Our revenue recognition policy is significant because revenues are a key component of our results from operations. In addition, revenue recognition determines the timing of certain expenses, such as incentive compensation. We follow very specific and detailed guidelines in measuring revenue; however, certain judgments and estimates affect the application of the revenue policy. Revenue results are difficult to predict and any shortfall in revenue or delay in recognizing revenue could cause operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter and could result in future operating losses or reduced net income.

Revenue from consulting and professional services is recognized at the time the services are performed on a project by project basis. For projects charged on a time and materials basis, revenue is recognized based on the number of hours worked by consultants at an agreed-upon rate per hour. For large services projects where costs to complete the contract could reasonably be estimated, the Company undertakes projects on a fixed-fee basis and recognizes revenue on the percentage of completion method of accounting based on the evaluation of actual costs incurred to date compared to total estimated costs. Revenue recognized in excess of billings is recorded as cost in excess of billings. Billings in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue until revenue recognition criteria are met. Reimbursements, including those relating to travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, are included in revenue, and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses are included in cost of services.

Impairment of Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate our identifiable goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable based on expected undiscounted cash flows attributable to that asset. Future impairment evaluations could result in impairment charges, which would result in an expense in the period of impairment and a reduction in the carrying value of these assets. The Company performed its annual impairment analysis as of December 31, 2007.

Deferred Income Taxes

Determining the consolidated provision for income tax expense, income tax liabilities and deferred tax assets and liabilities involves judgment.  We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount of future tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in determining the need for a valuation allowance. A valuation allowance is maintained by the Company due to the impact of the current years net operating loss (NOL). In the event that we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to net income in the period such determination is made. Likewise, if we later determine that it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets would be realized, the previously provided valuation allowance would be reversed. Our current valuation allowance relates predominately to benefits derived from the utilization of our NOL’s.

  Item 4T. Controls and Procedures
 
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
 
Our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)
 
Internal control over financial reporting is promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our CEO and CFO and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:

•    Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
 
•    Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
 
•    Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

18

 
Readers are cautioned that internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even effective internal control over financial reporting can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to the financial statement preparation and presentation.
 
Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) as of the end of the period covered by this Report based upon the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on such evaluation, our management has made an assessment that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective as of March 31, 2008.
 
We did not maintain effective financial reporting processes due to lack of documentation of certain review and approval functions. We have implemented policies and procedures whereby all review and approval functions are to be appropriately documented.
 
There is a lack of segregation of duties at the Company due to the small number of employees dealing with general administrative and financial matters and general controls over information technology security and user access. This constitutes a weakness in financial reporting. Furthermore, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer is the only person with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training in the selection, application and implementation of generally accepted accounting principles as it relates to complex transactions and financial reporting requirements. Management will continue to evaluate the segregation of duties issues considering the cost involved to remediate them.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

No significant changes were made in our internal control over financial reporting during the Company’s first quarter of 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
In March 2007, CSI commenced an action in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Morris County Chancery Division, for breach of contract, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets and related claims against two former CSI employees and their start-up business.  In the spring of 2007, the court granted CSI’s request for a temporary restraining order based upon violation of a restrictive covenant.  The lawsuit is presently in the discovery phase, and CSI intends to litigate its claims aggressively in order to preserve its business from unfair competition and its confidential information from misappropriation. The defendants to the lawsuit have filed in response a counterclaim against CSI alleging tortious interference with economic advantage, abuse of process and breach of contract.  Although CSI is unable to predict the outcome of this litigation matter, management has been advised that based upon the discovery exchanged to date, the likelihood of a materially adverse outcome on the counterclaim against the Company is remote.

On April 28, 2008, Milbank Roy & Co., LLC (“Milbank”) submitted a Demand for Arbitration and Statement of Claim with the American Arbitration Association. Through an agreement with Milbank, Milbank had a limited exclusive right to obtain certain bridge financing and equity financing on behalf of the Company during 2007 from certain potential investors that were identified on certain schedules. Milbank alleges that it is owed a fee of $105,000 relating to the Company’s completion of a revolving line of credit transaction with Access Capital, Inc. in March 2008. Management believes that this revolving line of credit transaction is not included in the scope of the engagement for which Milbank was hired and it intends to vigorously defend the Company. As of the date of this filing, there have been no developments with respect to this claim.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

In March 2008, the Company and TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. executed a Note Conversion Agreement whereby certain investors represented by TAG Virgin Islands, Inc. converted $600,000 of debt due to them under an Unsecured Convertible Line of Credit Note dated June 7, 2004 into Company common stock. The Company issued 4,615,385 shares of common stock to the investors. The number of shares acquired was based on the $0.13 per share closing price of the Company’s common stock on the American Stock Exchange on the date of conversion. Warrants to purchase 4,615,385 shares of Company common stock were provided to the investors as an inducement to convert. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.143 per share, and are exercisable for five years.

Item 5. Other Information.

On May 5, 2008, we received a letter from the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) stating that the Company has resolved the continued listing deficiencies referenced in the AMEX letter dated June 29, 2006. As is the case with all listed issuers, the Company’s continued listing eligibility will continue to be assessed on an ongoing basis. Additionally, the AMEX has notified the Company that it has become subject to the provisions of Section 1009(h) of the AMEX Company Guide. Under Section 1009(h) of the AMEX Company Guide, if within 12 months, AMEX again determines that the Company is below continued listing standards, the AMEX staff will examine the relationship between the two incidents of falling below continued listing standards and re-evaluate the Company's method of financial recovery from the first incident before taking appropriate action.

19

 
  Item 6. Exhibits

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)/15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

20


SIGNATURE
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
Conversion Services International, Inc.
   
         
Date: May 9, 2008
By:  
/s/    Scott Newman
 
 
Scott Newman
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman

21

 
Conversion Services (AMEX:CVN)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Nov 2024 à Déc 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse Conversion Services
Conversion Services (AMEX:CVN)
Graphique Historique de l'Action
De Déc 2023 à Déc 2024 Plus de graphiques de la Bourse Conversion Services