$2.3 billion
After-Tax NPV (8%) at Base Case metal prices
After-Tax
IRR 18.1% at Base Case metal prices
Cashflow over the
first four years of $951 million per
year at Base Case metal prices
Base Case development contemplates 27-year
mine life
Base Case metal prices: Cu: US$3.60/lb, Au: US$1,700/oz, Ag: US$22/oz, Mo: US$14/lb
VANCOUVER, BC, June 28,
2022 /PRNewswire/ - Western Copper and Gold
Corporation ("Western" or the "Company") (TSX: WRN) (NYSE: WRN) is
pleased to release the results of its Feasibility Study (the
"Study") on its wholly-owned Casino copper-gold-molybdenum deposit
in the Yukon, Canada ("Casino" or
the "Project"). The Study considered the Project being
constructed as an open pit mine, with a concentrator processing
120,000 tonnes per day (t/d) to recover copper, gold, molybdenum
and silver, as well as a 25,000 t/d oxide heap leach facility to
recover gold, silver and copper.
The Study supersedes all previous studies and incorporates an
updated mineral resource and mineral reserve with an effective date
of April 29, 2022. The Study
examines the development of the Casino Project, which comprises the
processing of 1.43 billion tonnes of Mineral Reserve for both the
mill and heap leach, with deposition of mill tailings and mine
waste in the Tailings Management Facility ("TMF") consistent with
the design concepts considered during the Best Available Tailings
Technology ("BATT") Study as a base case development.
"The results from the Feasibility Study confirm the project's
robustness and ability to withstand inflationary pressures.", said
Paul West-Sells, President &
Chief Executive Officer. "This Study reaffirms Casino as one of the
very few long-life copper-gold projects with robust economics in a
top mining district, the Yukon. We are continuing to
collaborate with our strategic investor, Rio Tinto, and continue to
engage with First Nations and community stakeholders to advance
this project toward the submission of Casino's Environmental and
Socio-Economic statement in mid-2023."
In this news release, unless otherwise indicated, all references
to "$" are to Canadian dollars and references to "US$" are to
United States dollars.
HIGHLIGHTS
|
Base
Case*
|
Payback period,
years
|
3.3
|
|
|
NPV pre-tax (8%
discount)
|
$3.47
billion
|
NPV after-tax (8%
discount)
|
$2.33
billion
|
|
|
LOM pre-tax free
cash flow
|
$13.71
billion
|
LOM after-tax free
cash flow
|
$10.02
billion
|
|
|
IRR pre-tax (100%
equity)
|
21.2 %
|
IRR after-tax (100%
equity)
|
18.1 %
|
|
|
Initial Capital
Investment
|
$3.62
billion
|
Total
Reserve
|
1.4 billion
tonnes
|
Mill
Reserve
|
1.2 billion
tonnes
|
Heap leach
Reserve
|
210 million
tonnes
|
|
|
Mill
operation
|
27 years
|
Heap leach
operation
|
24 years
|
LOM strip
ratio
|
0.43:1
|
Base Case metal prices: Cu: US$3.60/lb, Au: US$1,700/oz, Ag: US$22/oz, Mo: US$14/lb.
KEY CHANGES FROM PRELIMINARY
ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT
The Study in general took the design from the 2021 Preliminary
Economic Assessment ("PEA") and brought the engineering to a
Feasibility Study level; however, there are some notable changes
from the PEA.
Heap Leach Operation
Metallurgical results obtained in 2021 indicated that gold
recovery from the heap leach could be increased from 70% as
outlined in the PEA to 80% by crushing the ore going to the heap
leach to a p80 of 16 mm. This updated gold recovery and crush
size have been incorporated in the Feasibility Study along with
additional capital for the crushing circuit.
This change, along with minor changes in grades and tonnage
reporting to the heap leach pad, resulted in 20% greater gold
predicted to be recovered through the heap leach circuit.
Milling Operation
Minor changes to the grades in tonnage treated through the mill
resulted in 4.4% greater metal production predicted to be recovered
through the heap leach circuit as compared to the PEA.
Cost Escalation
Due to inflation over the past 12 months since the PEA was
issued, there were cost increases to certain capital and operating
cost inputs. Items of particular note were diesel price,
which saw a price increase of 40.3%, and steel, reflected by a
price increase in grinding media of 33.2%.
FINANCIAL RESULTS
The Study indicates that the potential economic returns from the
Project justify its further development and securing of the
required permits and licenses for operation.
The financial results of the Study were developed under
commodity prices that were based on analyst projections of
long-term metal prices and a CAN$:US$ exchange rate of 0.80 ("Base
Case" prices).
The following table summarizes the financial results:
|
Base
Case
|
Copper
(US$/lb)
|
3.60
|
Gold
(US$/oz)
|
1,700
|
Molybdenum
(US$/lb)
|
14.00
|
Silver
(US$/oz)
|
22.00
|
Exchange Rate
(C$:US$)
|
0.80
|
|
|
NPV pre-tax (5%
discount, $millions)
|
5,768
|
NPV pre-tax (8%
discount, $millions)
|
3,473
|
IRR pre-tax
(100% equity)
|
21.2
|
|
|
NPV after-tax
(5% discount, $millions)
|
4,059
|
NPV after-tax
(8% discount, $millions)
|
2,334
|
IRR after-tax
(100% equity)
|
18.1
|
|
|
LOM pre-tax free
cash flow ($millions)
|
13,713
|
LOM after-tax free
cash flow ($millions)
|
10,019
|
|
|
Payback period
(years)
|
3.3
|
Net Smelter
Return ($/t milled)
|
29.08
|
|
|
Copper Cash Cost
(net of by-product credits) ($/lb)
|
(1.00)
|
Copper Cash Cost
(co-product basis) ($/lb)
|
1.92
|
Gold Cash Cost
(co-product basis) ($/oz)
|
908.53
|
The financial results of the Study are significantly influenced
by copper and gold prices, as is shown in the tables below:
Copper Price
(US$/lb)*
|
$3.00
|
$3.50
|
$3.60
|
$4.00
|
$4.50
|
$5.00
|
NPV pre-tax (8%)
($M)
|
2,547
|
3,318
|
3,473
|
4,090
|
4,862
|
5,634
|
NPV after-tax (8%)
($M)
|
1,655
|
2,221
|
2,334
|
2,786
|
3,351
|
3,917
|
IRR pre-tax
|
18.2 %
|
20.7 %
|
21.2 %
|
23.0 %
|
25.3 %
|
27.4 %
|
IRR
after-tax
|
15.5 %
|
17.7 %
|
18.1 %
|
19.7 %
|
21.6 %
|
23.5 %
|
Payback
(years)
|
3.8
|
3.4
|
3.3
|
3.0
|
2.8
|
2.6
|
Gold Price
(US$/oz)*
|
$1,300
|
$1,500
|
$1,700
|
$1,850
|
$2,050
|
$2,200
|
NPV pre-tax (8%)
($M)
|
2,412
|
2,943
|
3,473
|
3,871
|
4,402
|
4,800
|
NPV after-tax (8%)
($M)
|
1,551
|
1,944
|
2,334
|
2,627
|
3,017
|
3,310
|
IRR pre-tax
|
17.5 %
|
19.4 %
|
21.2 %
|
22.5 %
|
24.2 %
|
25.5 %
|
IRR
after-tax
|
14.9 %
|
16.5 %
|
18.1 %
|
19.2 %
|
20.7 %
|
21.8 %
|
Payback
(years)
|
4.0
|
3.6
|
3.3
|
3.1
|
2.9
|
2.8
|
*All other metal prices except those noted are the same as the
Base Case.
Higher grade material is fed to the concentrator during the
first four years of the concentrator operation. This factor,
combined with the concurrent heap leach facility operation, results
in higher yearly cash flows and other metrics during this period
and contributes significantly to the Project's financial
performance.
|
Years
1-4
|
Life of
Mine
|
Average Annual Pre-tax
Cash Flow ($millions)
|
1,033
|
662
|
Average Annual
After-tax Cash Flow ($millions)
|
951
|
517
|
Average Net Smelter
Return (NSR) ($/t ore milled)
|
43.15
|
29.08
|
% of Revenue -
Copper
|
48.5
|
46.8
|
% of Revenue -
Gold
|
38.8
|
36.0
|
% of Revenue -
Silver
|
2.1
|
2.4
|
% of Revenue -
Molybdenum
|
10.6
|
14.8
|
CAPITAL COSTS
Total initial capital investment in the Project is estimated to
be $3.62 billion, which represents
the total direct and indirect cost for the complete development of
the Project, including associated infrastructure and power
plant. The following table shows how the initial capital is
distributed between the various components.
Cost
Item
|
Total
($M)
|
Process Plant and
Infrastructure
|
|
Project Directs including freight
|
2,116
|
Project Indirects
|
431
|
Contingency
|
369
|
Subtotal
|
2,916
|
Mining
|
|
Mine Equipment
|
433
|
Mine Preproduction
|
228
|
Subtotal
|
661
|
Owner's Costs
|
41
|
Total Initial
Capital Costs
|
3,618
|
Sustaining Capital
|
751
|
Total Life of Mine
Capital Costs
|
4,369
|
OPERATING COSTS
Operating costs for the milling operation were calculated per
tonne of material processed through the mill over the life of
mine:
|
LOM
|
|
($/tonne)
|
Milling
|
$6.42
|
General &
Administrative
|
$0.46
|
Total
|
$6.88
|
Heap leach operating costs were calculated per tonne of material
processed through the heap leach over the life of the heap
leach.
|
LOM
|
|
($/tonne)
|
Heap Leach
Operation
|
$1.93
|
ADR/SART
|
$4.80
|
Total
|
$6.73
|
Mining costs were calculated to average $2.30 per tonne of material moved and
$3.65 per tonne of mineralized
material.
|
($/tonne)
|
Cost per tonne material
(material moved)
|
$2.30
|
Cost per tonne mill
feed (mill + heap leach material)
|
$3.65
|
Cost per tonne mill
feed
|
$4.28
|
The combined mining and milling costs are $11.16 per tonne material milled for the life of
mine, which compares favorably to the life-of-mine net smelter
return of $29.08 per tonne at Base
Case metal prices.
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Study evaluates the development of the Casino deposit as a
conventional open pit mine, concentrator complex, and heap leach
operation. The initial production will focus on the deposit's oxide
cap as a heap leach operation to recover gold and silver in doré
form. The main sulphide deposit will be processed using a
conventional concentrator to produce copper-gold-silver and
molybdenum concentrates. Key metrics of the processing plant
are shown below:
|
Years
1-4
|
Life of
Mine
|
Strip
ratio
|
0.26
|
0.43
|
Nominal
Throughput
|
|
|
Mill (t/d)
|
120,000
|
120,000
|
Heap (t/d)
|
25,000
|
25,000
|
Average Annual Metal
Production
|
|
|
Copper
(Mlbs)
|
241
|
163
|
Gold (kozs)
|
333
|
211
|
Silver
(kozs)
|
1,596
|
1,277
|
Molybdenum
(Mlbs)
|
15.5
|
15.1
|
Average Annual Mill
Feed Grade
|
|
|
Copper (%)
|
0.300
|
0.189
|
Gold (g/t)
|
0.352
|
0.217
|
Silver (g/t)
|
2.054
|
1.659
|
Molybdenum
(%)
|
0.025
|
0.021
|
Average Annual Heap
Leach Grade*
|
|
|
Gold (g/t)
|
0.366
|
0.265
|
Silver (g/t)
|
2.356
|
1.95
|
Copper (%t)
|
0.042
|
0.036
|
Recovery
(Mill)
|
|
|
Copper (%)
|
83.9
|
86.5
|
Gold (%)
|
67.7
|
67.1
|
Silver (%)
|
55.6
|
53.1
|
Molybdenum
(%)
|
64.1
|
71.2
|
Recovery
(Heap)
|
|
|
Gold (%)
|
80.0
|
80.0
|
Copper (%)
|
18.0
|
18.0
|
Silver (%)
|
26.0
|
26.0
|
Annual Concentrate
Production
|
|
|
Cu (dry kt)
|
390
|
264
|
Mo (dry kt)
|
13
|
12
|
Average Concentrate
Grade
|
|
|
Copper Concentrate
|
|
|
Cu (%)
|
28.0
|
28.0
|
Au (g/t)
|
26.5
|
24.9
|
Ag (g/t)
|
127.2
|
150.7
|
Molybdenum Concentrate
|
|
|
Mo (%)
|
56.0
|
56.0
|
*Heap leach first four years grades taken from the start of the
heap leach.
UPDATED MINERAL RESOURCE
The Mineral Resource has been updated for this Study, based on
an updated resource block model developed during December
2021. The updated model incorporated 2020 drilling and
updated geologic models that were not available for previous
studies. The Mineral Resource includes Mineral Resources
amenable to milling and flotation concentration methods ("Mill
Material") and Mineral Resources amenable to heap leach recovery
methods ("Leach Material"). Mill Material includes the
supergene oxide ("SOX"), supergene sulphide ("SUS") and hypogene
sulphide ("HYP") mineral zones.
Leach material is oxide dominant leach cap ("LC")
mineralization. The emphasis of leaching is the recovery of
gold in the leach cap.
The first two following tables present the Mineral Resource for
mill and leach material. The third table presents the Mineral
Resource for combined Mill and Leach Material for copper, gold, and
silver. The Mineral Resource for molybdenum is as shown with
Mill Material since it will not be recovered for leach
material. The Mineral Resource is inclusive of the Mineral
Reserve.
Mineral Resource for Mill Material at C$6.11 NSR Cutoff
Resource
Category
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
NSR
(C$/t)
|
Copper
(%)
|
Gold
(g/t)
|
Moly
(%)
|
Silver
(g/t)
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Copper
(Mlbs)
|
Gold
(Moz)
|
Moly
(Mlbs)
|
Silver
(Moz)
|
Measured
|
144.9
|
40.09
|
0.30
|
0.38
|
0.024
|
2.1
|
0.64
|
953
|
1.8
|
75.2
|
9.6
|
Indicated
|
2,114.2
|
20.34
|
0.14
|
0.16
|
0.015
|
1.4
|
0.29
|
6,493
|
11.1
|
716.0
|
93.5
|
M+I
|
2,259.0
|
21.60
|
0.15
|
0.18
|
0.016
|
1.4
|
0.31
|
7,446
|
12.9
|
791.2
|
103.1
|
Inferred
|
1,371.5
|
15.41
|
0.10
|
0.14
|
0.009
|
1.1
|
0.21
|
3,029
|
6.1
|
286.0
|
50.5
|
Mineral Resource for Leach material at C$6.61 NSR Cutoff
Resource
Category
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
NSR
(C$/t)
|
Copper
(%)
|
Gold
(g/t)
|
Silver
(g/t)
|
AuEq
(g/t)
|
Copper
(Mlbs)
|
Gold
(Moz)
|
Silver
(Moz)
|
Measured
|
43.3
|
23.79
|
0.05
|
0.44
|
2.7
|
0.47
|
51.5
|
0.62
|
3.7
|
Indicated
|
188.4
|
11.47
|
0.04
|
0.21
|
1.7
|
0.23
|
145.4
|
1.27
|
10.4
|
M+I
|
231.7
|
13.77
|
0.04
|
0.25
|
1.9
|
0.27
|
196.9
|
1.88
|
14.1
|
Inferred
|
40.9
|
11.33
|
0.05
|
0.20
|
1.4
|
0.22
|
46.9
|
0.27
|
1.9
|
Mineral Resource for Copper, Gold, and Silver (Mill and
Leach)
Resource
Category
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
NSR
(C$/t)
|
Copper
(%)
|
Gold
(g/t)
|
Silver
(g/t)
|
Copper
(Mlbs)
|
Gold
(Moz)
|
Silver
(Moz)
|
Measured
|
188.2
|
36.34
|
0.24
|
0.40
|
2.2
|
1,005.0
|
2.4
|
13.3
|
Indicated
|
2,302.6
|
19.61
|
0.13
|
0.17
|
1.4
|
6,638.1
|
12.4
|
103.9
|
M+I
|
2,490.7
|
20.88
|
0.14
|
0.18
|
1.5
|
7,643.1
|
14.8
|
117.2
|
Inferred
|
1,412.5
|
15.30
|
0.10
|
0.14
|
1.2
|
3,075.5
|
6.3
|
52.3
|
Notes:
|
1. The Mineral
Resources have an effective date of 29 April 2022 and the estimate
was prepared using the definitions in CIM Definition Standards (10
May 2014).
|
2. All figures are
rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate and
therefore numbers may not appear to add precisely.
|
3. Mineral Resources
that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
4. Mineral Resources
for leach material are based on prices of US$3.50/lb copper,
US$1650/oz gold and US$22/oz silver.
|
5. Mineral Resources
for mill material are based on prices of US$3.50/lb copper,
US$1650/oz gold, US$22/oz silver, and US$12.00/lb
molybdenum.
|
6. Mineral Resources
are based on NSR Cutoff of C$6.61/t for leach material and C$6.11/t
for mill material.
|
7. NSR value for leach
material is NSR (C$/t) = $15.21 x copper (%) + $50.51 x gold (g/t)
+ $0.210 x silver (g/t), based on copper recovery of 18%, gold
recovery of 80% and silver recovery of 26%.
|
8 NSR value for
hypogene sulphide mill material is NSR (C$/t) = $73.81 x copper (%)
+ $41.16 x gold (g/t) + $213.78 x moly (%) + $0.386 x silver (g/t),
based on recoveries of 92.2% copper, 66% gold, 50% silver and 78.6%
molybdenum.
|
9. NSR value for
supergene (SOX and SUS) mill material is NSR (C$/t) = $80.06 x
recoverable copper (%) + $43.03 x gold (g/t) + $142.11 x moly (%) +
$0.464 x silver (g/t), based on recoveries of 69% gold, 60% silver
and 52.3% molybdenum. Recoverable copper = 0.94 x (total
copper – soluble copper).
|
10. Mineral Resources
are reported in relation to a conceptual constraining pit shell in
order to demonstrate reasonable prospects for eventual economic
extraction, as required by the definition of Mineral Resource in NI
43-101; mineralization lying outside of the pit shell is excluded
from the Mineral Resource.
|
11. AuEq and CuEq
values are based on prices of US$3.50/lb copper, US$1650/oz gold,
US$22/oz silver, and US$12.00/lb moly, and account for all metal
recoveries and smelting/refining charges.
|
12. The NSR
calculations also account for smelting and refining charges and
payables.
|
MINERAL RESERVES
The Mineral Reserve estimate is based on an updated open pit
mine plan and mine production schedule using commodity prices of
US$3.25 per pound copper,
US$1,550 per ounce gold, US$12.00 per pound molybdenum and US$22.00 per ounce silver.
All of the mineralization comprised in the Mineral Reserve
estimate with respect to the Casino Project is contained on mineral
titles controlled by Western Copper and Gold. The following
table presents the Mineral Reserve that is the basis for this
Study.
Mineral Reserve
|
|
Tonnes
|
NSR
|
Cu
|
Au
|
Mo
|
Ag
|
CuEq
|
Cu
|
Au
|
Mo
|
Ag
|
Mill Ore
Reserve:
|
(Mt)
|
($/t)
|
( %)
|
(g/t)
|
( %)
|
(g/t)
|
( %)
|
(Mlbs)
|
(Moz)
|
(Mlbs)
|
(Moz)
|
Proven Mineral
Reserve
|
140.1
|
38.50
|
0.31
|
0.39
|
0.024
|
2.1
|
0.67
|
944
|
1.8
|
74.9
|
9.4
|
Probable Mineral
Reserve
|
1,076.9
|
23.68
|
0.17
|
0.19
|
0.021
|
1.6
|
0.36
|
4,135
|
6.7
|
497.1
|
55.5
|
Proven/Probable
Reserve
|
1,217.1
|
25.38
|
0.19
|
0.22
|
0.021
|
1.7
|
0.40
|
5,079
|
8.5
|
571.9
|
64.9
|
|
|
Tonnes
|
NSR
|
Au
|
Cu
|
Mo
|
Ag
|
AuEq
|
Au
|
Cu
|
Mo
|
Ag
|
Heap Leach
Reserve:
|
(Mt)
|
($/t)
|
(g/t)
|
( %)
|
( %)
|
(g/t)
|
(g/t)
|
(Moz)
|
(Mlbs)
|
(Mlbs)
|
(Moz)
|
Proven Mineral
Reserve
|
42.9
|
22.52
|
0.45
|
0.055
|
N/A
|
2.7
|
0.47
|
0.62
|
51.8
|
N/A
|
3.7
|
Probable Mineral
Reserve
|
166.8
|
11.14
|
0.22
|
0.031
|
N/A
|
1.8
|
0.23
|
1.17
|
113.5
|
N/A
|
9.4
|
Proven/Probable
Reserve
|
209.6
|
13.47
|
0.26
|
0.036
|
N/A
|
1.9
|
0.28
|
1.78
|
165.3
|
N/A
|
13.1
|
Notes:
|
1. The Mineral Reserve
estimate has an effective date of June 13, 2022 and was prepared
using the CIM Definition Standards (10 May 2014).
|
2. Columns may not sum
exactly due to rounding.
|
3. Mineral Reserves are
based on commodity prices of US$3.25/lb Cu, US$1550/oz Au,
US$12.00/lb Mo, and US$22.00/oz Ag.
|
4. Mineral Reserves
amenable to milling are based on NSR cutoffs that vary by time
period to balance mine and plant production capacities. They
range from a low of $6.11/t to a high of $25.00/t.
|
5. NSR value for
supergene (SOX and SUS) mill material is NSR (C$/t) = $73.63 x
recoverable copper (%) + $40.41 x gold (g/t) + $142.11 x moly (%) +
0.464 x silver (g/t), based on recoveries of 69% gold, 52.3%
molybdenum and 60% silver. Recoverable copper = 0.94 x (total
copper – soluble copper).
|
6. NSR value for
hypogene (HYP) mill material is NSR (C$/t) = $67.88 x copper (%) +
$38.66 x gold (g/t) + $213.78 x moly (%) + $0.386 x silver (g/t),
based on recoveries of 92.2% copper, 66% gold, 78.6% molybdenum and
50% silver.
|
7. Mineral Reserves
amenable to heap leaching are based on an NSR cutoff of
$6.61/t.
|
8. NSR value for leach
material is NSR (C$/t) = $14.05 x copper (%) + $47.44 x gold (g/t)
+ $0.210 x silver (g/t), based on recoveries of 18% copper, 80%
gold and 26% silver.
|
9. AuEq and CuEq values
are based on prices of US$ 3.25/lb Cu, US$ 1550/oz Au, US$ 12.00/lb
Mo, and US$ 22.00/oz Ag, and account for all metal recoveries and
smelting/refining charges.
|
10. The NSR
calculations also account for smelter/refinery treatment charges
and payables.
|
INFRASTRUCTURE
A new 132-km all-weather access road will be developed,
extending from the end of the existing Freegold Road and generally
following the alignment of the existing "Casino Trail" to the mine
site. The Study assumed that concentrates will be transported,
stored and loaded on ships via upgraded facilities provided by the
Port of Skagway, Alaska. The
Project operating cost estimate includes the anticipated
concentrate handling service charges based on use of the upgraded
facilities.
ENVIRONMENT, FIRST NATIONS AND
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
The Project is located within the traditional territory of
Selkirk First Nation. Aspects of the Project impact the traditional
territories of the Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, Tr'ondëk
Hwëch'in, Kluane First Nation and
White River First Nation. The nearest communities are
Pelly Crossing and the
Village of Carmacks.
Western is committed to developing and operating the Project in
a safe, ethical and socially responsible manner. Western has been
consulting extensively on the Project since 2008, and First Nations
and their technical advisors have participated directly in the
refinement of the tailings and mine waste strategy at the Project,
as reflected in the design presented in the Study.
Since 2006, Western has worked with over 50 different
Yukon and First Nations joint
venture companies during the development of the project. Western is
active in the local community, with longstanding support and
sponsorship of many local organizations and charities.
LOOKING FORWARD
Building on over ten years of baseline and analysis, the Company
has assembled a team of best-in-class technical experts to design
and lead the Environmental Assessment through the Yukon
Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board ("YESAB") panel
process. Western continues to collaborate with First Nations and
communities on valued environmental and socio-economic components
and project design. As the Project is further refined, Western will
continue to seek feedback from and partnerships with local First
Nations and communities and is committed to developing the Project
with First Nations' and local community input.
CONFERENCE CALL
Western will hold a conference call on Tuesday, June 28, 2022 at 8
am Pacific Time (11 am Eastern
Time) to discuss the Study.
Telephone access:
Vancouver local and
International 1-604-638-5340
Toll Free North America:
1-800-319-4610
An archived recording of the conference call will be available
by dialing 1-604-638-9010 or 1-800-319-6413 within North America, passcode is 7194. The
call will be archived on the Company's website
www.westerncopperandgold.com.
TECHNICAL REPORT & QUALIFIED
PERSONS
M3 Engineering & Technology Corporation ("M3"), a
full-service Engineering, Procurement, Construction &
Management firm, is recognized for its experience in copper
processing and capabilities in the development and construction of
mines and mineral processing plants. A technical report
prepared in accordance to National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101")
by the following Qualified Persons will be posted on the Company's
website (www.westerncopperandgold.com) as well as on SEDAR
(www.sedar.com), and on EDGAR within 45 days:
- Daniel Roth, P.Eng., of M3 –
Project infrastructure, capital costs, and economic analysis.
- Laurie Tahija, MMSA-QP, of M3 –
Metallurgy, recovery methods, and process operating costs.
- Patrick Dugan, P.E., of M3 – Power plant and associated
infrastructure.
- Michael G. Hester, F Aus IMM, of
Independent Mining Consultants – Mineral Resources.
- John Marek, P.Eng., of
Independent Mining Consultants – Mineral Reserves, mining methods
and mining costs.
- Carl Schulze, P.Geo., of Aurora
Geosciences – History, geology, exploration, drilling, sampling,
and data verification.
- Daniel Friedman, P.Eng., of
Knight Piésold Ltd. – Tailings and heap leach facilities.
- Scott Weston, P.Geo., of Hemmera
– Environmental.
The Qualified Persons have reviewed and approved the scientific,
technical, and economic information contained in this news release.
Readers are encouraged to read the technical report in its
entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions and exclusions
that relate to the details summarized in this news release. The
technical report is intended to be read as a whole, and sections
should not be read or relied upon out of context.
ABOUT WESTERN COPPER AND GOLD
CORPORATION
Western Copper and Gold Corporation is developing the Casino
Project, Canada's premier
copper-gold mine in the Yukon
Territory and one of the most economic greenfield
copper-gold mining projects in the world.
The Company is committed to working collaboratively with our
First Nations and local communities to progress the Casino project,
using internationally recognized responsible mining technologies
and practices.
For more information,
visit www.westerncopperandgold.com.
On behalf of the board,
"Paul West-Sells"
Dr. Paul
West-Sells
President and CEO
Western Copper and Gold Corporation
Cautionary Disclaimer Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
and Information
This news release contains certain forward-looking statements
concerning anticipated developments in Western's operations in
future periods. Statements that are not historical fact are
"forward-looking statements" as that term is defined in
the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward-looking
information" as that term is defined in National Instrument 51-102
("NI 51-102") of the Canadian Securities Administrators
(collectively, "forward-looking statements"). Certain
forward-looking information should also be considered
future-oriented financial information ("FOFI") as that term is
defined in NI 51-102. The purpose of disclosing FOFI is to provide
a general overview of management's expectations regarding the
anticipated results of operations and capital expenditures and
readers are cautioned that FOFI may not be appropriate for other
purposes. Forward-looking statements are frequently, but not
always, identified by words such as "expects", "anticipates",
"believes", "intends", "estimates", "potential", "possible" and
similar expressions, or statements that events, conditions or
results "will", "may", "could" or "should" occur or be achieved.
These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited
to, statements regarding: mineral resource and reserve estimation;
mine plan and operations; internal rate of return; sensitivities;
net present value; potential recoveries; design parameters;
economic potential; processing mineralized material; the potential
of robust economics at Casino; advancing the Project through
additional engineering and towards the next step in permitting and
submission of an environmental and socio-economic effects
statement; key changes to the TMF design; increases to the gold
recovery in the heap leach; potential economic returns from the
Project; estimated initial capital investment costs; estimated
operating costs; estimated mining costs; development of the
airstrip and all weather access road; anticipated concentrate
handling service charges; developing and operating the Project in a
safe, ethical and socially-responsible manner; plans for further
development and securing the required permits and licenses for
further studies to consider operation; market price of precious and
base metals; or other statements that are not statement of fact.
The material factors or assumptions used to develop forward-looking
statements include prevailing and projected market prices and
foreign exchange rates, exploration estimates and results,
continued availability of capital and financing, construction and
operations, the Company not experiencing unforeseen delays,
unexpected geological or other effects, equipment failures,
permitting delays, and general economic, market or business
conditions and as more specifically disclosed throughout this
document, and in the AIF and Form 40-F.
Forward-looking statements are statements about the future
and are inherently uncertain, and actual results, performance or
achievements of Western and its subsidiaries may differ materially
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or
implied by the forward-looking statements due to a variety of
risks, uncertainties and other factors. Such risks and other
factors include, among others, risks involved in fluctuations in
gold, copper and other commodity prices and currency exchange
rates; uncertainties relating to interpretation of drill results
and the geology, continuity and grade of mineral deposits;
uncertainty of estimates of capital and operating costs, recovery
rates, production estimates and estimated economic return; risks
related to joint venture operations; risks related to cooperation
of government agencies and First Nations in the development of the
property and the issuance of required permits; risks related to the
need to obtain additional financing to develop the property and
uncertainty as to the availability and terms of future financing;
the possibility of delay in construction projects and uncertainty
of meeting anticipated program milestones; uncertainty as to timely
availability of permits and other governmental approvals; and other
risks and uncertainties disclosed in Western's AIF and Form 40-F,
and other information released by Western and filed with the
applicable regulatory agencies.
Western's forward-looking statements are based on the
beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the
statements are made, and Western does not assume, and expressly
disclaims, any intention or obligation to update or revise any
forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by
applicable securities legislation. For the reasons set forth above,
investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/western-copper-and-gold-announces-positive-feasibility-on-casino-301576649.html
SOURCE Western Copper and Gold Corporation