VANCOUVER, BC, Oct. 12,
2023 /CNW/ - Kootenay Silver Inc.
(TSXV: KTN) ("Kootenay" or the "Company") is pleased to
announce an updated mineral resource estimate at
the Promontorio-La Negra Project in Sonora Mexico. The resource estimate is an
update of the Promontorio deposit and a maiden mineral resource
estimate for the La Negra deposit 7km to the north. The two
deposits are part of the Promontorio Mineral Belt and are
considered a single project.
The mineral resource estimates ("MRE") have been prepared by
Sue Bird, M Sc., P.Eng., Geological
and Mining Engineer of by Moose Mountain Technical Services
("MMTS") in accordance with NI 43-101 standards (May 9, 2016), CIM Definition Standards
(May 19, 2014) with guidance from CIM
Best Practice Guidelines (November 29,
2019).
Highlights from the 2023 Mineral Resource Estimate
include:
- Increased Grades of the Promontorio deposit of 24% for Ag, 21%
for Au and 22% and 21% for Pb and Zn respectively (see Table
1).
- A resulting 68% increase in Measured and Indicated ("M+I") Ag
Equivalent ("AgEq") Metal content at the Promontorio deposit (see
Table 1).
- Promontorio M+I mineral resources of 140.8 million ounces
("Moz") AgEq contained in 42.1 million metric tonnes ("Mt")
averaging 104 grams per tonne ("g/t"),
- Promontorio Inferred mineral resources of 39.8 Moz contained in
14.6 Mt averaging 84.9 g/t. These results are calculated using 25
g/t AgEq cut off and are contained within a potentially
economically mineable pit shell. (see Table 2)
- La Negra Indicated mineral resources of 22.0 Moz AgEq contained
in 5.3 Mt averaging 129 g/t.
- La Negra Inferred mineral resources of 4.6 Moz contained in 1.2
Mt averaging 115 g/t These results are calculated using 40 g/t AgEq
cut off and are contained within a potentially economically
mineable pit shell (see Table 3 and 4).
Kootenay's President & CEO, James
McDonald states, "We are pleased to see a significant
increase in metal content on the Promontorio-La Negra property that
includes the La Negra discovery for the first time. Between the two
deposits we see an exciting increase in grade and contained silver
ounces.
On a silver equivalent basis, the project is now estimated to
host 162.8 million ounces M+I and 44.4 million ounces inferred. On
a silver only basis, the M+I resource for silver are estimated to
total 68.2 million ounces with another 17.6 million ounces
inferred.
The first ever resource estimate for La Negra Silver Deposit
returned excellent overall grades, averaging 129 g/t silver
equivalent in the Indicated Category and 115 g/t silver equivalent
in the Inferred Category. At a cutoff of 50 g/t silver equivalent
these grades increase to 146 g/t and 133 g/t silver equivalent
respectively with only a modest drop in contained silver
ounces.
I would like to point out our expanded resource base, on a
silver equivalent basis, the estimated totals for Promontorio-La
Negra plus La Cigarra are 214.2 million silver equivalent ounces in
the M+I along with 54.9 million silver equivalent ounces
inferred.
On a silver only basis, Kootenay's M+I silver resources are
estimated to be 120.2 million ounces and 28.2 million silver ounces
inferred for the Promontorio-La Negra and La Cigarra projects.
This work prepares the project for advancement in a stronger
metals market. Meanwhile we remain focused on drilling Columba with
the aim of defining a new high-grade resource there and will be
reporting on results in the coming weeks."
Mr. McDonald adds, "The Company has also decided to proceed with
a share consolidation at this time as detailed below, which the
Board believes is in the best interest of shareholders. It has been
an ongoing discussion point with various investors and shareholders
encouraging us to proceed with the consolidation, which could lead
to increased investor interest by raising the Company profile with
a lower number of outstanding shares, a higher stock price and
better position the Company to obtain financing to further advance
its properties."
*La Cigarra resource
estimate table can be found
here https://kootenaysilver.com/projects/la-cigarra
|
The following two tables summarize the Promontorio comparison and
the Mineral Resource estimate ("MRE") for Promontorio. The
effective date of the Promontorio-La Negra resource estimates
is August 27, 2023.
Table
1:
2023 Promontorio Resource Compared to 2013 Pit Resource
Year
|
Class
|
kt
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Pb
(%)
|
Zn
(%)
|
AgEq
(koz)
|
Ag
(koz)
|
Au
(koz)
|
Pb
(klb)
|
Zn
(klb)
|
2023
MMTS
150% Pit
|
Measured
|
12,451
|
111.7
|
37.03
|
0.46
|
0.53
|
0.61
|
44,718
|
14,823
|
183
|
146,033
|
166,620
|
Indicated
|
29,664
|
100.7
|
33.50
|
0.41
|
0.47
|
0.55
|
96,072
|
31,950
|
393
|
306,716
|
360,996
|
Meas+Ind
|
42,115
|
104.0
|
34.54
|
0.43
|
0.49
|
0.57
|
140,790
|
46,773
|
575
|
452,748
|
527,616
|
Inferred
|
14,575
|
84.9
|
27.89
|
0.35
|
0.42
|
0.45
|
39,782
|
13,069
|
163
|
136,241
|
143,632
|
2013
SRK Pit
|
Measured
|
10,289
|
67.9
|
32.69
|
0.40
|
0.46
|
0.55
|
22,470
|
10,814
|
134
|
105,328
|
123,715
|
Indicated
|
34,215
|
56.0
|
26.30
|
0.34
|
0.38
|
0.45
|
61,572
|
28,926
|
373
|
287,579
|
335,904
|
Meas+Ind
|
44,504
|
58.7
|
27.77
|
0.35
|
0.40
|
0.47
|
84,042
|
39,740
|
506
|
392,907
|
459,619
|
Inferred
|
14,564
|
46.3
|
24.95
|
0.28
|
0.28
|
0.31
|
21,700
|
11,683
|
132
|
89,430
|
98,462
|
Difference
=
(2023-
2013)/2013
|
Measured
|
21 %
|
64 %
|
13 %
|
14 %
|
16 %
|
10 %
|
99 %
|
37 %
|
36 %
|
39 %
|
35 %
|
Indicated
|
-13 %
|
80 %
|
27 %
|
21 %
|
23 %
|
23 %
|
56 %
|
10 %
|
5 %
|
7 %
|
7 %
|
Meas+Ind
|
-5 %
|
77 %
|
24 %
|
21 %
|
22 %
|
21 %
|
68 %
|
18 %
|
14 %
|
15 %
|
15 %
|
Inferred
|
0 %
|
83 %
|
12 %
|
24 %
|
51 %
|
44 %
|
83 %
|
12 %
|
24 %
|
52 %
|
46 %
|
Table
2:
2023 Resource Statement for the Promontorio Deposit
Class
|
Cutoff
|
In situ Tonnage,
Grade and Metal Content
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Tonnage
(kt)
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Pb
(%)
|
Zn
(%)
|
AgEq
Metal
(kOz)
|
AG
Metal
(kOz)
|
Au
Metal
(kOz)
|
Pb
(klb)
|
Zn
(klb)
|
Measured
|
15
|
13,538
|
104.3
|
34.5
|
0.428
|
0.49
|
0.57
|
45,419
|
15,012
|
186
|
147,440
|
168,631
|
20
|
13,011
|
107.9
|
35.7
|
0.441
|
0.51
|
0.59
|
45,122
|
14,934
|
184
|
146,864
|
167,803
|
25
|
12,451
|
111.7
|
37.0
|
0.456
|
0.53
|
0.61
|
44,718
|
14,823
|
183
|
146,033
|
166,620
|
30
|
11,903
|
115.6
|
38.4
|
0.470
|
0.55
|
0.63
|
44,233
|
14,691
|
180
|
144,854
|
164,797
|
40
|
10,793
|
123.9
|
41.3
|
0.500
|
0.59
|
0.68
|
42,984
|
14,324
|
174
|
141,339
|
160,851
|
50
|
9,710
|
132.7
|
44.4
|
0.532
|
0.64
|
0.73
|
41,423
|
13,848
|
166
|
136,790
|
155,200
|
Indicated
|
15
|
32,225
|
94.3
|
31.3
|
0.387
|
0.44
|
0.52
|
97,728
|
32,439
|
401
|
311,172
|
366,586
|
20
|
30,993
|
97.4
|
32.4
|
0.399
|
0.45
|
0.53
|
97,033
|
32,235
|
398
|
309,525
|
364,187
|
25
|
29,664
|
100.7
|
33.5
|
0.412
|
0.47
|
0.55
|
96,072
|
31,950
|
393
|
306,716
|
360,996
|
30
|
28,179
|
104.6
|
34.8
|
0.426
|
0.49
|
0.57
|
94,756
|
31,564
|
386
|
302,544
|
355,970
|
40
|
24,961
|
113.6
|
37.9
|
0.461
|
0.53
|
0.62
|
91,133
|
30,447
|
370
|
291,656
|
342,834
|
50
|
21,907
|
123.1
|
41.3
|
0.497
|
0.58
|
0.68
|
86,721
|
29,089
|
350
|
278,188
|
326,002
|
Measured +
Indicated
|
15
|
45,763
|
97.3
|
32.3
|
0.399
|
0.45
|
0.53
|
143,147
|
47,451
|
587
|
458,612
|
535,217
|
20
|
44,004
|
100.5
|
33.3
|
0.411
|
0.47
|
0.55
|
142,155
|
47,169
|
582
|
456,389
|
531,990
|
25
|
42,115
|
104.0
|
34.5
|
0.425
|
0.49
|
0.57
|
140,790
|
46,773
|
575
|
452,748
|
527,616
|
30
|
40,082
|
107.9
|
35.9
|
0.439
|
0.51
|
0.59
|
138,989
|
46,256
|
566
|
447,397
|
520,768
|
40
|
35,754
|
116.7
|
38.9
|
0.473
|
0.55
|
0.64
|
134,117
|
44,772
|
543
|
432,996
|
503,684
|
50
|
31,617
|
126.1
|
42.2
|
0.508
|
0.60
|
0.69
|
128,144
|
42,937
|
516
|
414,978
|
481,202
|
Inferred
|
15
|
16,637
|
76.8
|
25.1
|
0.319
|
0.38
|
0.40
|
41,072
|
13,415
|
171
|
139,011
|
147,447
|
20
|
15,433
|
81.4
|
26.7
|
0.335
|
0.41
|
0.43
|
40,401
|
13,238
|
166
|
137,797
|
145,622
|
25
|
14,575
|
84.9
|
27.9
|
0.348
|
0.42
|
0.45
|
39,782
|
13,069
|
163
|
136,241
|
143,632
|
30
|
13,671
|
88.7
|
29.2
|
0.362
|
0.44
|
0.47
|
38,980
|
12,830
|
159
|
133,819
|
141,052
|
40
|
11,778
|
97.3
|
32.1
|
0.395
|
0.49
|
0.51
|
36,847
|
12,152
|
150
|
127,493
|
133,206
|
50
|
9,980
|
106.8
|
35.3
|
0.432
|
0.54
|
0.56
|
34,256
|
11,327
|
139
|
119,031
|
123,652
|
Notes to the 2023
Promontorio Resource Table:
|
1.
|
Resources are reported
using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards and were estimated using
the 2019 CIM Best Practices Guidelines, as required by
NI43-101
|
2.
|
The base case Mineral
Resource has been confined by "reasonable prospects of eventual
economic extraction" shape using the following
assumptions:
|
|
•
|
Metal prices of
US$22/oz Silver, US$1800/oz Gold, US$0.95/lb Lead and US$1.25/lb
Zinc. Metallurgical recovery of 74% Silver, 70% Gold, 81% Lead and
88% Zinc
|
|
•
|
Payable metal of 95%
Silver, 99% Gold in dore 95% Au in Pb concentrate, 95% Lead
and 85% Zinc. Lead payable assumes a concentrate grade of 65% Pb
and a 3% unit deduction. Zinc payable assumes a concentrate grade
of 52% Pb and an 8% unit deduction. Offsite costs (transport,
smelter treatment and refining) of US$1.5/oz Silver and gold in the
Pb concentrate, US$10 oz Gold, US$ 0.15/lb Lead and US$0.31/ lb
Zinc. Lead offsite costs assume 100 $US/dmt transport, 100 $US/ dmt
treatment. Zinc offsite costs assume 100 $US/dmt transport, 200
$US/ dmt treatment.
|
|
•
|
Processing, General,
and Administrative ("G&A") costs of US$ 12/ tonne milled.
Mining cost of US$2.00 / tonne
|
|
•
|
50 degree pit slopes
with the 150% price case pit shell is used for the confining
shape
|
3.
|
The resulting NSR =
Ag*US$0.63/g*74% + Au*US$56.71/g*70% + 22.0462*(Pb*US$0.77/lb*81% +
Zn*US$ 0.80/lb*88%)
|
4.
|
The specific gravity of
the resource averages 2.79 and is calculated from the Lead and Zinc
content. Non-mineralized material is assigned an SG of
2.73.
|
5.
|
Numbers may not add due
to rounding.
|
At Promontorio the increase in M+I metal content is considered to
be due primarily to the following:
- Additional drilling of 89 holes (23,220
m) in 2012-2013, that were not included in the previous
resource estimate.
- Modelling of both high grade constrained mineralized shells and
a lower grade mineralized halo to better limit the data used for
the interpolations.
- Changes to the metal prices (particularly Ag and Au) with lower
Ag price and higher Au price to conform to 3-year trailing averages
which caused a large increase in AgEq grade.
The following two tables summarize the La Negra total resource
estimate, and the La Negra resource by Oxidation zone,
respectively. La Negra is assumed to produce dore, with only Au and
Ag recovered. The cutoff grades of 40 g/t AgEq more than
covers the assumed cost of Processing + G&A.
Table
3:
2023 Resource Statement for the La Negra Deposit
ZONE
|
CLASS
|
Cutoff
|
In Situ Grades and
Metal Content
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Tonnage
(kt)
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
AgEq
Metal
(kOz)
|
Ag
Metal
(kOz)
|
Au
Metal
(kOz)
|
Total
|
Indicated
|
25
|
7,282
|
102.5
|
99.8
|
0.061
|
24,000
|
23,370
|
14.2
|
30
|
6,463
|
112.0
|
109.2
|
0.063
|
23,280
|
22,690
|
13.2
|
35
|
5,821
|
120.8
|
117.9
|
0.065
|
22,610
|
22,060
|
12.2
|
40
|
5,285
|
129.3
|
126.3
|
0.067
|
21,970
|
21,450
|
11.4
|
45
|
4,821
|
137.6
|
134.5
|
0.069
|
21,330
|
20,850
|
10.7
|
50
|
4,425
|
145.7
|
142.5
|
0.071
|
20,730
|
20,280
|
10.0
|
Inferred
|
25
|
1,831
|
88.8
|
86.5
|
0.055
|
5,230
|
5,090
|
3.2
|
30
|
1,607
|
97.3
|
94.9
|
0.057
|
5,030
|
4,900
|
3.0
|
35
|
1,415
|
106.1
|
103.7
|
0.059
|
4,830
|
4,720
|
2.7
|
40
|
1,257
|
114.8
|
112.2
|
0.060
|
4,640
|
4,540
|
2.4
|
45
|
1,111
|
124.2
|
121.6
|
0.061
|
4,440
|
4,340
|
2.2
|
50
|
993
|
133.5
|
130.8
|
0.061
|
4,260
|
4,180
|
2.0
|
Table
4:
2023 Resource Statement for the La Negra Deposit by Zone
ZONE
|
CLASS
|
Cutoff
|
In Situ Grades and
Metal Content
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Tonnage
(kt)
|
AgEq
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
AgEq
Metal
(kOz)
|
AG
Metal
(kOz)
|
Au
Metal
(kOz)
|
OXIDE
|
Indicated
|
25
|
2,383
|
98.8
|
95.1
|
0.049
|
7,570
|
7,280
|
3.7
|
30
|
2,157
|
106.3
|
102.4
|
0.051
|
7,370
|
7,100
|
3.5
|
35
|
1,964
|
113.6
|
109.5
|
0.053
|
7,170
|
6,910
|
3.3
|
40
|
1,798
|
120.6
|
116.4
|
0.054
|
6,970
|
6,730
|
3.1
|
45
|
1,661
|
127.0
|
122.7
|
0.056
|
6,780
|
6,550
|
3.0
|
50
|
1,524
|
134.2
|
129.8
|
0.057
|
6,580
|
6,360
|
2.8
|
Inferred
|
25
|
622
|
93.6
|
90.6
|
0.039
|
1,870
|
1,810
|
0.8
|
30
|
567
|
100.0
|
96.9
|
0.040
|
1,820
|
1,770
|
0.7
|
35
|
512
|
107.3
|
104.1
|
0.042
|
1,770
|
1,710
|
0.7
|
40
|
465
|
114.3
|
111.0
|
0.043
|
1,710
|
1,660
|
0.6
|
45
|
429
|
120.4
|
117.0
|
0.044
|
1,660
|
1,610
|
0.6
|
50
|
389
|
128.0
|
124.6
|
0.045
|
1,600
|
1,560
|
0.6
|
MIXED
|
Indicated
|
25
|
732
|
78.6
|
75.4
|
0.045
|
1,850
|
1,770
|
1.0
|
30
|
617
|
88.0
|
84.6
|
0.048
|
1,750
|
1,680
|
1.0
|
35
|
526
|
97.6
|
94.1
|
0.050
|
1,650
|
1,590
|
0.9
|
40
|
454
|
107.3
|
103.5
|
0.053
|
1,570
|
1,510
|
0.8
|
45
|
394
|
117.0
|
113.1
|
0.055
|
1,480
|
1,430
|
0.7
|
50
|
350
|
125.9
|
121.9
|
0.057
|
1,420
|
1,370
|
0.6
|
Inferred
|
25
|
105
|
89.9
|
88.5
|
0.020
|
300
|
300
|
0.1
|
30
|
83
|
106.3
|
104.7
|
0.022
|
280
|
280
|
0.1
|
35
|
71
|
119.0
|
117.4
|
0.023
|
270
|
270
|
0.1
|
40
|
61
|
132.6
|
130.9
|
0.023
|
260
|
260
|
0.0
|
45
|
51
|
149.2
|
147.6
|
0.024
|
240
|
240
|
0.0
|
50
|
47
|
158.1
|
156.4
|
0.024
|
240
|
240
|
0.0
|
SULFIDE
|
Indicated
|
25
|
4,167
|
108.8
|
106.8
|
0.071
|
14,580
|
14,310
|
9.5
|
30
|
3,689
|
119.4
|
117.3
|
0.073
|
14,160
|
13,910
|
8.7
|
35
|
3,331
|
128.7
|
126.6
|
0.075
|
13,790
|
13,560
|
8.1
|
40
|
3,033
|
137.7
|
135.5
|
0.077
|
13,430
|
13,210
|
7.5
|
45
|
2,766
|
146.9
|
144.7
|
0.079
|
13,060
|
12,870
|
7.0
|
50
|
2,551
|
155.3
|
153.0
|
0.080
|
12,740
|
12,550
|
6.6
|
Inferred
|
25
|
1,104
|
86.0
|
84.1
|
0.067
|
3,050
|
2,980
|
2.4
|
30
|
957
|
94.9
|
92.9
|
0.070
|
2,920
|
2,860
|
2.2
|
35
|
832
|
104.3
|
102.2
|
0.072
|
2,790
|
2,730
|
1.9
|
40
|
731
|
113.6
|
111.5
|
0.074
|
2,670
|
2,620
|
1.7
|
45
|
631
|
124.8
|
122.7
|
0.076
|
2,530
|
2,490
|
1.5
|
50
|
557
|
135.2
|
133.0
|
0.076
|
2,420
|
2,380
|
1.4
|
Notes to the 2023 La
Negra Resource Tables:
|
1.
|
Resources are reported
using the 2014 CIM Definition Standards and were estimated using
the 2019 CIM Best Practices Guidelines, as required by
NI43-101
|
2.
|
The base case Mineral
Resource has been confined by "reasonable prospects of eventual
economic extraction" shape using the following
assumptions:
|
|
•
|
Metal prices of
US$22/oz Silver, US$1800/oz Gold
|
|
•
|
Recovery is assumed to
be as for dore. Metallurgical recovery of 82% Silver and 77%
Gold in the Oxide zone, 85% Silver and 73% Gold in the Mixed zone,
and 90% Silver and 31% Gold in the Sulfide zone.
|
|
•
|
Payable metal of 99%
for Silver and Gold. Offsite costs (transport, smelter treatment
and refining) of US$0.25/oz Silver and US$10/oz gold.
|
|
•
|
Processing, General,
and Administrative (G&A) costs of US$ 12/ tonne milled.
Mining cost of US$2.00/tonne
|
|
•
|
50 degree pit slopes
with the 150% price case pit shell is used for the confining
shape
|
3.
|
The resulting NSR =
Ag*US$0.69/g*Zone Ag Recovery% + Au*US$56.97/g*Zone Au
Recovery%
|
4.
|
Silver Equivalent
(AgEq) = NSR / (US$0.69/g* Ag Recovery%)
|
5.
|
The specific gravity is
assigned by rock type as 2.52 in Oxides, 2.59 in Mixes and 2.61 in
Sulfides
|
6.
|
Numbers may not add due
to rounding.
|
Resource Estimate Uncertainty
Areas of uncertainty that may materially impact the mineral
resource estimates include changes to: long-term metal price
assumptions; interpretations of mineralization geometry, fault
geometry and continuity of mineralized zones; net smelter return
used to constrain the estimates; metallurgical recovery
assumptions; input assumptions used to derive the conceptual open
pit outlines used to constrain the estimate; variations in
geotechnical, hydrogeological and mining assumptions and
environmental, permitting and social license assumptions.
There are no other known environmental, legal, title, taxation,
socioeconomic, marketing, political or other relevant factors that
would materially affect the estimation of mineral resources that
are not discussed in this news release.
Mineral Resource Estimate Methodology
Data
The Promontorio MRE uses 59,149 assays from 311 drill holes
based on drilling up to an including 2013. The La Negra MRE
uses 9,311 assays in 94 drill holes from drilling completed between
2014 and 2017.
Mineralization Envelopes
Confining shapes for the interpolations have been made using the
geologic modeling shapes provided by Kootenay, the logged lithology
and the metal grades. The shapes of the main mineralized zones
target the breccias and a value of approximately US$15/tonne Net Smelter Return (NSR). Dilution of
lower grade intercepts has been added as necessary to produce
smooth shapes.
At Promontorio there are six domains modeled, as well as a
low-grade halo surrounding and connecting the 2 major areas. The
shapes are illustrated in Figure 1.
At La Negra one domain has been modeled and it has been split
into three oxidation zones based on logging data. The shapes are
illustrated in Figure 2.
Grade Capping
The grade distributions within the mineralized domains are
mainly lognormal except at very high grades where outliers are
evident and therefore capping of assays has been done as summarized
in the following tables. For clarity, also summarized in the tables
are the Outlier Restrictions which has been applied to the
composites during interpolation at Promontorio. For composite
grades above the Outlier value provided, and at distances
greater than 5m from the data, the
value is essentially capped to the outlier.
At both deposits 2m has been used
for the base length when compositing, which is longer than the vast
majority of the assays. The compositing also honored the domain
boundaries. Assay intervals less than 1
m have been added to the previous composite to limit the
number of small assay intervals.
Table
5:
Capping of Assays and Outlier Restriction of Composites by Domain -
Promontorio
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Pb
(%)
|
Zn
(%)
|
|
Cap
|
Outlier
|
Cap
|
Outlier
|
Cap
|
Outlier
|
Cap
|
Outlier
|
Low
Grade
|
1,600
|
500
|
4
|
2
|
9
|
3
|
10
|
3
|
Domain
1
|
1,600
|
500
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
3
|
10
|
3
|
Domain
2
|
1,600
|
500
|
9
|
2
|
9
|
3
|
10
|
8
|
Domain
3
|
600
|
500
|
6
|
6
|
4
|
4
|
7
|
5
|
Domain
4
|
500
|
1,000
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
5
|
6
|
5
|
Domain
5
|
1,000
|
600
|
3
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
6
|
5
|
Domain
6
|
100
|
60
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Table
6 :
Capping of Assays by Oxidation Zone - La Negra
|
Oxidation
Zone
|
Cap,
g/t
|
Ag
|
Oxide
|
3000
|
Mixed
|
1500
|
Sulfide
|
3000
|
Au
|
Oxide
|
0.5
|
Mixed
|
0.5
|
Sulfide
|
1
|
Variography
At Promontorio variograms have been made on each axis for each
metal in Domain 1 and 2, which are the largest domains. The
strongest correlations are steeply dipping down the major axis of
the mineralization with ranges from 100m to 130m.
At La Negra the strongest correlation is at azimuth 255 dipping
15 degrees with a range of approximately 55m. The variograms have been used to aid in
determining the search parameters for the interpolations, as well
as distances for Classification to Measured and Indicated.
Specific Gravity
The Promontorio drilling database contains 4,510 specific
gravity ("SG") measurements in total and the SG is estimated based
on the interpolated Pb and Zn grade using a regression formula.
The SG at La Negra is based on 1,541 measurements within the
deposit area and has been assigned based on the mean grade within
each of the oxidation zones.
Interpolations and Classification.
Interpolations have been done in 5 passes using composites coded
with the domain shapes for model-composite domain matching.
Searches are oriented along the major axis of each domain. Inverse
Distance squared (ID2) is used at Promontorio and Ordinary Kriging
at La Negra.
Classification methodology at the two deposits is similar, the
primary difference being the search distances used, which are based
on the variography.
Classification at Promontorio is based on the distance between
drillholes using the following process:
- All interpolated blocks are initially classified as
Inferred.
- Block are upgraded to Indicated if the if the average distance
to the 2 nearest drillholes is <= 50m and if the distance to the furthest of those
drillhole is <=70m, and the
drillholes must be in at least two quadrants (directions).
- Blocks are further upgraded to Measured if the if the average
distance to the 3 nearest drillholes is <= 30m and if the distance to the furthest of those
drillhole is <=50m, and the
drillholes must be in three quadrants (directions).
- The low grade halo is classified as Inferred
Classification at La Negra uses the following process:
- All interpolated blocks are initially classified as
Inferred.
- Block are upgraded to Indicated if the average distance to the
2 nearest drillholes is <= 30m,
and the distance to the furthest of those drillhole is
<=50m, and the drillholes must be
in two quadrants (directions).
At both deposits additional manual checking and smoothing of the
results has been done to ensure continuous shapes of Classification
are produced.
Metallurgy
G&T Metallurgical Services Ltd, Kamloops, BC, Canada completed preliminary metallurgical
programs on drill core composites from the Promontorio property for
Kootenay in 2009, 2012 and 2013. The metallurgical program
investigated a standard polymetallic sequential flotation flowsheet
that includes crushing, grinding, lead flotation, zinc flotation
and pyrite/arsenopyrite flotation. Pressure oxidation (POX) of the
pyrite/arsenopyrite concentrate is required to extract the
contained gold by cyanidation to produce dore. Promontorio will
also produce lead concentrate, zinc concentrate. The metallurgical
recovery assumptions are listed with Table 1. Overall gold recovery
is estimated at 70% and is based on 65% gold recovery into the
pyrite flotation concentrate followed by 94% cyanidation gold
extraction from the pyrite concentrate after pressure oxidation,
plus an average 9% gold recovery into the lead flotation
concentrate.
Metallurgical testing on La Negra samples has been conducted by
Kappes, Cassiday & Associates of Reno
Nevada in 2015 and McClelland Laboratories of Sparks Nevada in 2018. The work in 2015 did
initial comparisons of flotation to cyanide leaching recovery
methods on 7 composites. Silver extractions from leaching ranged
from 70% to 90% based on calculated heads which ranged from 61.71
to 242.64 grams per metric tonne and did not seem influenced by
sulfide sulfur content. Follow-up in 2018 tested 10 composites
representing material from four oxidation zones. The composites
were all amenable to whole ore milling/cyanidation treatment with
respect to silver recovery, but gold recoveries varied
significantly.
La Negra is expected to produce silver and gold dore. The
metallurgical recovery assumptions are listed with Table 2 and are
based on the average results for each oxidation type tested in the
2018 test program.
Resource Pit Limits
Lerch Grossman ("LG") pit
optimization tools have been used to select a pit shape for
limiting the resource. The LG pit targets Net Smelter Return (NSR)
calculated in each block using interpolation results and the
economic, metallurgical, and mining parameters shown with the
resource tables 1 through 4.
Cut off Grade
The COG was selected using AgEq to cover, as a minimum, the
processing and G&A costs and to account for the metallurgical
recovery and smelter terms. For both deposits 25g/t AgEq will
covers the assumed cost of US$12/tonne; however, a higher cutoff has been
used for the base case for La Negra.
Block Model Validation
Several validation techniques have been utilised to ensure that
the estimates are reasonable. The global grades of the model with
the de-clustered composites have been compared to ensure no bias
was introduced. In addition, the total metal content for each metal
at various cutoff have been compared to ensure that the total metal
compares well to that of data. Grade-tonnage curves have been
created to ensure that the appropriate smoothing of modelled grades
has been accomplished with no over-prediction of metal throughout
the grade distributions. Swath plots comparing the de-clustered
composite grade to the ID2 modelled estimate in Easting,
Northing and Elevation were completed to ensure the model is
spatially predicting grade correctly. Visual comparisons on section
and plan were also done to ensure the model compares well to the
assay grades.
Qualified Persons
Ms. Sue Bird – P. Eng., (resource
estimate) of MMTS is the Qualified Person ("QP") who prepared the
mineral resource estimate, and compiled and reviewed the resource
estimate disclosed in this news release. Ms. Bird, as the Qualified
Person, has approved the scientific and technical content of this
news release. Dale Brittliffe, BSc. P. Geol., Vice President,
Exploration of Kootenay Silver, is the Company's nominated
Qualified Person pursuant to National Instrument 43-101, Standards
for Disclosure for Mineral Projects, has reviewed the scientific
and technical information disclosed in this news release. Mr.
Brittliffe is not independent of Kootenay Silver.
Cautionary Note to Investors
While the terms "indicated (mineral) resource"
and "inferred (mineral) resource" are recognized and required by
National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects, investors are cautioned that except for that portion
of mineral resources classified as mineral reserves, mineral
resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. Investors
are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or
indicated mineral resources will ever be upgraded into mineral
reserves. Additionally, investors are cautioned that inferred
mineral resources have a high degree of uncertainty as to their
existence, as to whether they can be economically or legally mined,
or will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
United States investors are
advised that current Mineral Resources are not current Mineral
Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
Share Consolidation
The Company is pleased to announce that its board of directors
(the "Board") has approved a consolidation (the "Consolidation") of
the common shares (the "Shares") of the Company on a ten-to-one
(10:1) basis. The Company currently has 457,669,033 Shares
outstanding and if completed, the Consolidation would reduce the
issued and outstanding Shares to approximately 45,766,903 Shares,
subject to rounding. No fractional post-Consolidation Shares will
be issued pursuant to the Consolidation. Any fractional Shares
equal to or greater than one-half resulting from the Consolidation
will be rounded up to the next whole number of Shares, and any
fractional Shares less than one-half resulting from the
Consolidation will be rounded down to the nearest whole number.
Along with all outstanding Shares, the Company's equity
incentive plan will be adjusted accordingly. The Consolidation will
also affect the issued and outstanding common share purchase
warrants (each, a "Warrant") of the Company, as the number of
Shares issuable upon the exercise of each Warrant will be reduced
and the exercise price will increase, all in accordance with the
terms of the certificates governing the Warrants.
The Consolidation is subject to TSX Venture Exchange ("TSXV")
approval. At the Company's annual general and special meeting of
its shareholders (the "Shareholders") held on March 15, 2023, the Shareholders approved the
replacement of the Company's articles of incorporation in their
entirety with a new form of articles of incorporation (the "New
Articles"). Under the New Articles, a consolidation may be
implemented by the Board without shareholder approval. As such, the
Consolidation is not subject to shareholder approval. The Company
will announce the effective date of the Consolidation, as well as
the new CUSIP/ISIN numbers for the post-Consolidation Shares
by way of a future news release. The post-Consolidation Shares will
continue to trade on the TSXV under the Company's existing name and
trading symbol.
The Consolidation will not materially affect the percentage
ownership in the Company of Shareholders even though such ownership
will be represented by a smaller number of Shares. The
Consolidation will merely proportionally reduce the number of
Shares held by Shareholders.
Shareholders who have deposited their Shares into brokerage
accounts are not required to take any action to effect an exchange
of their Shares.
Shareholders with physical certificates will receive a letter of
transmittal from Computershare Investor Services Inc., the
Company's transfer agent. The letter of transmittal will contain
instructions on how registered Shareholders can exchange their
share certificates representing pre-Consolidation Shares for new
certificates representing post-Consolidation Shares. Until
surrendered, each share certificate representing pre-Consolidation
shares will represent the number of whole post-Consolidation shares
to which the holder is entitled as a result of the
consolidation.
About Kootenay Silver
Kootenay Silver Inc. is an exploration company actively
engaged in the discovery and development of mineral projects in the
Sierra Madre Region of Mexico.
Supported by one of the largest junior portfolios of silver assets
in Mexico, Kootenay continues to
provide its shareholders with significant leverage to silver
prices. The Company remains focused on the expansion of its current
silver resources, new discoveries and the near-term economic
development of its priority silver projects located in prolific
mining districts in Sonora, State
and Chihuahua, State, Mexico,
respectively.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This news release contains "forward-looking information" within
the meaning of the Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking
information is generally identifiable by use of the words
"believes," "may," "plans," "will," "anticipates," "intends,"
"budgets", "could", "estimates", "expects", "forecasts", "projects"
and similar expressions, and the negative of such expressions.
Forward-looking information in this news release include statements
about the mineral resource estimate for the Promontorio-La Negra
project; the completion and filing of a National Instrument 43-101
technical report related to the Promontorio-La Negra mineral
resource estimate; potential existence and size of mineralization
within the Promontorio-La Negra project; and geological
interpretations and potential mineral recovery processes.
Information concerning mineral resource estimates also may be
deemed to be forward-looking information in that it reflects a
prediction of the mineralization that would be encountered if
a mineral deposit were developed and mined.
In connection with the forward-looking information contained in
this news release, Kootenay Silver and its subsidiaries have
made numerous assumptions, regarding, among other things: the
geological, metallurgical, engineering, financial and economic
advice that Kootenay Silver has received is reliable and is based
upon practices and methodologies which are consistent with industry
standards. While Kootenay Silver considers these assumptions to be
reasonable, these assumptions are inherently subject to significant
uncertainties and contingencies.
Such forward-looking information and statements are based on
numerous assumptions, including among others, that the Company will
receive approval from the TSXV and complete the Consolidation in
the timeframe and on the terms as anticipated by management.
Although the assumptions made by the Company in providing
forward-looking information or making forward-looking statements
are considered reasonable by management at the time, there can be
no assurance that such assumptions will prove to be accurate and
actual results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements.
Additionally, there are known and unknown risk factors which
could cause Kootenay Silver's actual results, performance, or
achievements to be materially different from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by the
forward-looking information contained herein. Known risk factors
include, among others: the actual mineralization in the
Promontorio–La Negra deposit may not be as favorable as suggested
by the resource estimate; the NI 43-101 technical report that
includes the resource estimate may not be filed within the
anticipated timeframe, or at all; fluctuations in copper and other
commodity prices and currency exchange rates; uncertainties
relating to interpretation of drill results and the geology,
continuity and grade of mineral deposits; uncertainty of estimates
of capital and operating costs, and recovery rates; the need to
obtain additional financing to develop properties and uncertainty
as to the availability and terms of future financing; the
possibility of delay in exploration or development programs or in
construction projects and uncertainty of meeting anticipated
program milestones; uncertainty as to timely availability of
permits and other governmental approvals.
A more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties facing
Kootenay Silver is disclosed in Kootenay Silver's continuous
disclosure filings with Canadian securities regulatory authorities
at www.sedar.com. All forward-looking information herein is
qualified in its entirety by this cautionary statement, and
Kootenay Silver disclaims any obligation to revise or update
any such forward-looking information or to publicly announce the
result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking information
contained herein to reflect future results, events, or
developments, except as required by law.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kootenay-silver-announces-updated-promontoriomaiden-la-negra-resource-estimate-and-intention-of-share-consolidation-301954680.html
SOURCE Kootenay Silver Inc.