NEW YORK, March 9, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Glazer
Capital, LLC, a manager of investment funds and separate accounts
that collectively beneficially own over 13,800,000 shares, or
approximately 5.7% of the outstanding shares, of QEP Resources,
Inc. (NYSE: QEP) ("QEP") common stock, issued an open letter today
to fellow shareholders of QEP detailing its rationale for rejecting
the proposed acquisition of QEP by Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(Nasdaq: FANG) ("Diamondback") at the special meeting of QEP
stockholders scheduled to be held on March
16, 2021 (the "Special Meeting").
The letter states, in part:
"If QEP shareholders were to support the Diamondback Acquisition,
we believe that QEP shareholders would forfeit substantial value in
return for grossly inadequate consideration. We intend to vote
AGAINST the Diamondback Acquisition at the Special Meeting of QEP
stockholders next week on March 16,
2021 and we encourage other QEP shareholders to do
likewise."
The letter further details Glazer Capital's beliefs that:
(i) The merger consideration of 0.05 shares of Diamondback per
QEP share is materially inadequate and the proposed acquisition
(the "Diamondback Acquisition") would prevent shareholders of QEP
from realizing the benefits of the recent surge in small cap
exploration and production ("E&P") company valuations,
(ii) The best means available for QEP shareholders to achieve
full and fair value for their QEP shares is to reject the
Diamondback Acquisition at the upcoming Special Meeting,
(iii) Using traditional comparative valuation methodologies
similar to those utilized by Evercore, QEP's financial advisor, in
its fairness opinion results in a standalone valuation range of
$5.74 - $6.34 per QEP share today – a value for QEP
shares far in excess of the value offered by the current terms of
the Diamondback Acquisition, and
(iv) Evercore would no longer be able to re-render its fairness
opinion today based on current comparable company valuations.
In light of these reasons, and the material surge in comparable
company valuations since ISS conducted its original analysis,
Glazer Capital believes that ISS should rescind its recommendation
of the proposed Diamondback Acquisition.
The letter further states:
"Utilizing the same peer group as Evercore and employing a
virtually identical public company trading multiple methodology, we
believe there is considerably more upside potential in QEP shares
today as a standalone company than the value offered to QEP
shareholders under the current terms of the Diamondback
Acquisition. It appears easily observable that current trading
multiples of E&P companies similar to QEP are highly supportive
of significant upside for QEP's stock and they reinforce our
contention that the current terms of the Diamondback Acquisition
are value destructive to QEP shareholders."
The full text of the letter follows below:
March 8, 2021
Dear Fellow QEP Shareholders:
On December 21, 2020, QEP
Resources announced1 that it had entered into
a definitive agreement to be acquired by Diamondback Energy, Inc.
("Diamondback") in an all-stock transaction (the "Diamondback
Acquisition"), in which stockholders of QEP will receive 0.05
shares of Diamondback common stock (the "current terms"), then
valued at $2.29 per QEP share and
representing a 1% discount to QEP's closing share price on
December 18, 2020, in exchange for
each share of QEP common stock.
Since the announcement of the Diamondback Acquisition,
valuations and share prices of exploration and production
("E&P") companies have surged, rendering inadequate the current
terms of the Diamondback Acquisition. If QEP shareholders were to
support the Diamondback Acquisition, we believe that QEP
shareholders would forfeit substantial value in return for grossly
inadequate consideration. As a significant QEP shareholder, we
intend to vote AGAINST the Diamondback Acquisition at the Special
Meeting of QEP stockholders next week on March 16, 2021 and we encourage other QEP
shareholders to do likewise. We further urge Institutional
Shareholder Services ("ISS") to rescind its previously issued
recommendation in favor of the Diamondback Acquisition. The
overwhelming evidence presented below supports our assertion that
the current terms of the Diamondback Acquisition shortchanges QEP
shareholders due to the change in circumstances.
Glazer Capital, LLC ("we" or "Glazer Capital"), on behalf of
investment funds and separate accounts that it manages, is the
beneficial owner of over 13,800,000 shares, or
approximately 5.7% of the outstanding shares, of QEP common
stock. We write to convey to our fellow QEP shareholders the
reasons that we believe the current terms of the Diamondback
Acquisition materially undervalue QEP shares today and we endeavor
to ensure that we and our fellow QEP shareholders receive the full
and fair value for our investment in QEP shares. It is clear to us
that: (1) QEP's shares, anchored by the 0.05 merger consideration
ratio, have materially lagged its peers' shares since both
December 1 and December 18, 2020, and (2) re-running the
valuation methodology utilized by QEP's financial adviser, Evercore
Group, as laid out in QEP's proxy2, would
result in a standalone value for QEP shares far in excess of the
value offered by the current terms of the Diamondback Acquisition.
We urge our fellow shareholders to vote against the merger and
retain the value embedded in QEP shares on a standalone basis.
I. Share Prices of Comparable Companies Have Surged
The terms of the Diamondback Acquisition currently value QEP
shares at $4.263 per share (as of
March 5, 2021). Since the Diamondback
Acquisition was announced last December, the global economic
outlook has improved dramatically, the price of oil has rebounded,
and share prices of E&P companies have appreciated materially.
In particular, share prices of small cap E&P companies with a
relatively higher percentage of debt to equity capital than mid cap
and large cap E&P companies have experienced a breathtaking
surge, buoyed by upward revisions to profitability estimates,
expanding multiples, and upwardly revised sell-side price targets.
Despite the fact that QEP shares have risen (a) 171% since
December 1, 2020 (the "Unaffected
Date" utilized by ISS in its voting recommendation published on
February 26, 2021) and (b) 85% since
December 18, 2020 (the last trading
date prior to the announcement of the Diamondback Acquisition),
these figures pale in comparison to the 329% and 191% increases
(since the same two dates, respectively) in the average of the
group of small cap E&P companies utilized by Evercore in its
fairness opinion4 (the "Small Cap E&P
Peers").
If QEP's share price were to have appreciated since December 1, 2021 in line with the average of its
Small Cap E&P Peers, QEP's share price would presently be
$6.77, or 59% higher than the current
terms of the Diamondback Acquisition.
Table 1: Share
Price of QEP's Small Cap E&P Peers Since Unaffected
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evercore's
Selected Comparable Small Cap Companies
|
12/1/2020*
|
3/5/2021
|
%
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CALLON
PETROLEUM
|
$9.54
|
$38.23
|
301%
|
|
CENTENNIAL
RESOURCE
|
$1.11
|
$5.00
|
350%
|
|
SM ENERGY
|
$4.12
|
$17.90
|
334%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average:
|
329%
|
|
|
|
Median:
|
334%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QEP RESOURCES -
Actual
|
$1.58
|
$4.28
|
171%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QEP RESOURCES -
Projected Based on Small Cap E&P Peers Average
|
$6.77
|
329%
|
|
*Unaffected date
utilized by ISS in its report dated 2/26/2021
Source: Bloomberg,
Refinitiv
|
|
|
|
|
QEP's share price has lagged its Small Cap E&P Peers by
almost 50% since December 1, 2021. We
believe that QEP's underperformance resulted from the fact that its
shares have been tethered to the share price of Diamondback, a much
larger E&P company than QEP, with a far lower debt to equity
ratio than QEP. Accordingly, shareholders of QEP should demand that
Diamondback pay a fair price for their QEP shares. QEP's share
price has been anchored at a value reflecting 0.05 of a Diamondback
share per QEP share. The current terms of the Diamondback
Acquisition value QEP shares at $4.26, a 37% discount to the illustrative
$6.77 share price suggested by QEP's
Small Cap E&P Peers.
II. Public Company Trading Multiples Support Significantly
Higher Valuation
Pages 86 and 87 of QEP's definitive proxy
statement5, dated February 10, 2021, outline a "Selected Public
Company Trading Analysis for QEP on a Standalone Basis"
conducted by QEP's financial advisor, Evercore. Evercore selected
an EV / EBITDAX multiple "Reference Range" with which to value QEP
that bracketed the mean and median of two groups of comparable
companies that it curated. Reproduced in the table below is
Evercore's analysis.
Table 2:
Evercore's Selected Public Company Trading Analysis
|
Consensus Dec 18,
2020
|
Enterprise Value
/
EBITDAX
|
|
|
|
|
2021E
|
2022E
|
Selected Mid Cap
Companies
|
|
|
Cimarex Energy
Co.
|
5.0x
|
4.3x
|
Matador Resources
Co.
|
5.7x
|
5.1x
|
PDC Energy,
Inc.
|
3.7x
|
3.4x
|
Median
|
5.0x
|
4.3x
|
Mean
|
4.8x
|
4.3x
|
|
|
|
Selected Small Cap
Companies
|
|
|
Callon Petroleum
Company
|
4.6x
|
4.1x
|
Centennial Resource
Development, Inc.
|
4.2x
|
3.8x
|
SM Energy
Company
|
3.4x
|
2.8x
|
Median
|
4.2x
|
3.8x
|
Mean
|
4.1x
|
3.6x
|
|
|
|
QEP - Analyst
Estimates
|
4.2x
|
3.6x
|
QEP-
Forecasts
|
4.0x
|
3.2x
|
"Reference Range"
Selected By Evercore
|
3.5x -
4.5x
|
3.0x -
4.0x
|
Source: QEP's Definitive Proxy
Statement, dated 2/10/2021
|
|
|
If one were to recalculate current TEV / EBITDAX valuation
metrics today for the comparable companies curated by Evercore,
utilizing current TEV figures and consensus estimates of EBITDAX
available on Bloomberg and Refinitiv, the results would suggest a
standalone share price range for QEP of $5.74 to $6.34.
Table 3: Updated
Public Company Trading Analysis
|
|
Consensus March 5,
2021
|
Enterprise Value
/
EBITDAX
|
|
|
|
|
2021E
|
2022E
|
Selected Mid Cap
Companies
|
|
|
Cimarex Energy
Co.
|
6.3x
|
5.7x
|
Matador Resources
Co.
|
7.0x
|
6.1x
|
PDC Energy,
Inc.
|
4.9x
|
4.6x
|
Median
|
6.3x
|
5.7x
|
Mean
|
6.1x
|
5.5x
|
|
|
|
Selected Small Cap
Companies
|
|
|
Callon Petroleum
Company
|
6.2x
|
5.0x
|
Centennial Resource
Development, Inc.
|
5.9x
|
5.0x
|
SM Energy
Company
|
4.8x
|
3.6x
|
Median
|
5.9x
|
5.0x
|
Mean
|
5.6x
|
4.6x
|
|
|
|
Average Multiple
Expansion Since Fairness Opinion
|
|
Selected Mid Cap
Companies
|
+1.3x
|
+1.2x
|
Selected Small Cap
Companies
|
+1.6x
|
+1.0x
|
|
|
|
QEP Adjusted
Standalone Multiple (Reflecting Peer Multiple
Expansion)
|
vs. Selected Mid Cap
Companies
|
5.5x
|
4.8x
|
vs. Selected Small
Cap Companies
|
5.8x
|
4.6x
|
|
|
|
QEP Adjusted
Standalone Price (Reflecting Peer Multiple
Expansion)
|
vs. Selected Mid Cap
Companies
|
$5.74
|
$6.26
|
vs. Selected Small
Cap Companies
|
$6.34
|
$5.75
|
|
|
|
QEP Upside vs.
Current Price
|
|
|
vs. Selected Mid Cap
Companies
|
34%
|
46%
|
vs. Selected Small
Cap Companies
|
48%
|
34%
|
Source: Bloomberg,
Refinitiv
|
|
|
Utilizing the same peer group as Evercore and employing a
virtually identical public company trading multiple methodology, we
believe there is considerably more upside potential in QEP shares
today as a standalone company than the value offered to QEP
shareholders under the current terms of the Diamondback
Acquisition. It appears easily observable that current trading
multiples of E&P companies similar to QEP are supportive of
significant upside for QEP's stock and they reinforce our
contention that the current terms of the Diamondback Acquisition
are value destructive to QEP shareholders.
III. A Path Forward
We believe that 2020 marked a pivotal period for QEP. Prior to
the merger, QEP's management adopted a revised operating plan that
focused on cash flow generation and liability management. QEP also
implemented a reduction in its capital budget and suspended its
quarterly dividend.
QEP's FY 2020 10-K6 highlights the
reduction that it achieved in cost per barrel:
"During the year ended
December 31, 2020, LOE decreased
$1.01 per Boe, or 18%, compared to
the year ended December 31, 2019,
primarily due to continuing efforts to reduce operating expenses,
despite decreased production in the Permian and Williston
basins."
Source: QEP's 2020 10k
In November 2018, QEP announced a
definitive agreement to sell its Williston Basin assets to Vantage
Energy Acquisition Corp. for upwards of $1.65 billion7. The
transaction terminated in Feb 2019,
when WTI traded at approximately $55
per barrel. Today WTI trades in excess of $60. The background section of the definitive
proxy8 discusses inbound inquiries from
parties interested in acquiring QEP's Williston Basin assets. Now
is the time for QEP to reengage potential buyers of its Williston
Basin assets, utilize the proceeds to pay down debt, and finally
achieve its years-long quest to transform into a pure play Permian
operator.
We believe that QEP's Permian assets, wrapped in a more modestly
indebted corporate entity (sans the Williston assets), represents
an attractive acquisition target or merger partner. QEP's ability
to generate cash flow and drive efficiency will create a highly
attractive pure-play Permian operator. We urge shareholders to not
leave meaningful value on the table.
IV. Conclusion
Diamondback contacted QEP on November 30,
2020, with an interest in making an offer for QEP. Only
three weeks later, a merger agreement was
signed9. In hindsight, the shotgun wedding
seems entirely unnecessary, and fortunately QEP shareholders still
have the ability to prevent that from consummating.
In just the past week, OPEC announced an agreement to extend oil
output cuts and Saudi Arabia
agreed to extend its voluntary cut of 1 million barrels per
day10. Goldman Sachs raised its Brent
forecast to $75 per barrel for Q2
2021 and $80 per barrel in for Q3
202111.
With the rebound in E&P valuations, historically strong
interest by multiple parties in QEP's assets, and QEP's success in
its own standalone plan, there appears to be no rationale for QEP
shareholders to forfeit significant upside to Diamondback at the
current terms of the Diamondback Acquisition.
Table 4: Summary of QEP Standalone Share Price
Analyses
|
Illustrative
Price
|
Potential
Upside
|
|
|
|
Share Price
Performance of Comparable Companies
|
$6.77
|
59%
|
|
|
|
Evercore's Selected
Public Company Trading Analysis
|
$5.74 -
$6.34
|
34% - 48%
|
|
|
|
Average
|
$6.25 -
$6.55
|
46% -
53%
|
Although the board of QEP is compelled by the merger agreement
that it signed with Diamondback to maintain its recommendation in
favor of the Diamondback Acquisition, we and fellow shareholders
can and should vote to reject the merger on its current terms. If
QEP shareholders support the Diamondback Acquisition at the Special
Meeting next week, they will collectively facilitate a substantial
transfer of value from QEP shareholders to existing Diamondback
shareholders for grossly inadequate consideration.
In light of this, we believe ISS should rescind its
recommendation in support of the Diamondback Acquisition.
We recognize that the preponderance of merger and acquisition
transactions involving public company E&P targets during the
past year have provided little to no premium to existing
shareholders. We grasp that consolidation has been necessary in
order to shore up balance sheets and create operators with the
scale and financial strength to survive the next decade. But a 50%
discount to fair value is ludicrous and a massive disservice to QEP
shareholders. We do not see any downside to voting against the
Diamondback Acquisition; on the contrary, we see incredible
upside.
Accordingly, we intend to vote AGAINST the value destructive
Diamondback Acquisition at the upcoming Special Meeting on
March 16, 2021 and we believe that it
is in the best interests of all QEP shareholders to do
likewise.
Sincerely,
Mark Ort
Portfolio Manager
Glazer Capital, LLC
About Glazer Capital, LLC
Founded by Paul J. Glazer in 1998, Glazer Capital LLC is a
New York City based investment
management firm specializing in investment strategies that are
intended to be non-directional, market neutral, and liquid. Glazer
Capital aims to achieve uncorrelated absolute returns in all market
environments through its disciplined investment approach and
research-driven methodology. The firm had assets under management
of $2.4 billion as of March 1, 2021.
Media Contacts
Zach
Kouwe
Dukas Linden Public Relations
646-808-3665
glazercapital@dlpr.com
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained in this letter, and the documents
referred to in this letter, are "forward-looking statements" and
are prospective. These statements may be identified by their use of
forward-looking terminology such as the words "expects",
"projects", "believes", "anticipates", "intends" or other similar
words. Forward-looking statements are not based on historical
facts, but rather on current expectations and projections about
future events, and are therefore subject to risks and uncertainties
which could cause actual results to differ materially from the
future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. These statements are subject to inherent risks and
uncertainties surrounding future expectations. Important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
expectations set forth in this letter include, among other things,
the factors identified under the section entitled "Risk Factors" of
QEP's proxy statement/prospectus for the special meeting and other
risk factors contained in QEP's filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Such forward-looking statements should
therefore be construed in light of such factors, and Glazer Capital
is under no obligation and expressly disclaims any intention or
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise,
except as required by law.
1 Transaction Announcement Press Release:
http://ir.qepres.com/news-releases/news-release-details/diamondback-energy-inc-acquire-qep-resources-all-stock
2 Page 87 of the Proxy Statement lays out the selected
comparable group:
http://ir.qepres.com/static-files/a7a0aba0-293d-4d74-a493-414ed779ecf4
3 All figures presented or referred to herein as
current, presently, or today reflect data observed as of the close
of business on March 5, 2021
4 Selected by Evercore Group, consisting of Callon
Petroleum (CPE), Centennial Resources (CDEV), and SM Energy (SM),
as presented on page 87 of QEP's Proxy Statement
5 QEP's Definitive Proxy Statement, dated
2/10/2021,
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001108827/000119312521036492/d16880ddefm14a.htm
6 QEP FY 2020 10K
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1108827/000110882721000012/qep-20201231.htm
7 Vantage Energy press release, 11/7/2018,
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/11/07/1646757/0/en/Vantage-Energy-Acquisition-Corp-Announces-1-65-Billion-Acquisition-of-Williston-Basin-Assets-from-QEP-Resources-to-Form-Publicly-Traded-Vantage-Energy-Inc.html
8 QEP's Definitive Proxy Statement, dated
2/10/2021,
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001108827/000119312521036492/d16880ddefm14a.htm#toc16880_55
9 Excerpt from Page 71 of the Proxy: "On
November 30, 2020, Mr. Stice
contacted Mr. Cutt to inform him that Diamondback would be
interested in making an offer to acquire QEP. Mr. Cutt responded
that management of QEP and the QEP board would be willing to
consider an offer."
http://ir.qepres.com/static-files/a7a0aba0-293d-4d74-a493-414ed779ecf4
10 OPEC+ extends most oil output cuts into April, Saudi
keeps voluntary curb
https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN2AW0WA
11 Goldman hikes Brent forecast, says 'shale discipline'
behind OPEC strategy
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-global-oil-research-goldman/goldman-hikes-brent-forecast-says-shale-discipline-behind-opec-strategy-idUSKBN2AX0O5
View original content to download
multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/glazer-capital-issues-open-letter-to-shareholders-of-qep-resources-strongly-urges-vote-against-the-acquisition-of-qep-by-diamondback-301242806.html
SOURCE Glazer Capital, LLC