BLS Bellsouth Cp

A Los Angeles court has ruled that AT&T Wireless Welcome Guide, the brochure contained in mobile telephone boxes provided to customers after the purchase of wireless service, which contains an arbitration clause, is not a part of the contract with consumers. Defendant AT&T Wireless brought a petition to compel arbitration of the claims of named plaintiffs, arguing that their allegations of false advertising should not be heard in Los Angeles Superior Court but should be sent to a private arbitrator. In denying defendant AT&T Wireless's motion to compel arbitration, a judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court's complex department held that AT&T Wireless customers could not be bound by the terms of a document that was provided after the customer purchased his or her phone. Citing long-standing California precedent, the Court ruled that a consumer cannot be bound by proposed contract terms located in a document that they had no reason to know was contractual in nature. Because AT&T Wireless's Welcome Guide discusses the features of mobile phones, such as voicemail, long before disclosing to customers that they are waiving important legal rights, the document could not be considered a part of a consumer's contract with AT&T Wireless. "This represents an important victory for all consumers in refusing to allow a business to impose terms on a consumer without allowing the consumer a meaningful chance to object," said Reed R. Kathrein, the Lerach Coughlin partner who leads the case against AT&T Wireless. "In ruling that AT&T Wireless cannot force consumers to waive their right to litigate in court by hiding an arbitration clause in a box, the Court has vindicated the rights of all consumers." Defendants brought the petition to compel consumers to arbitration on the eve of trial, arguing that the Court no longer had jurisdiction over plaintiffs' claims. The trial on whether the coverage maps of AT&T Wireless (now Cingular) are deceptive will now go forward. Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP filed the class action suit in Superior Court for Los Angeles County against LA Cellular, AT&T Wireless, and BellSouth Cellular on behalf of customers who are victims of the cell phone companies' deceptive practices in 1998. The case alleges false and misleading advertising based on the wireless companies' promises of seamless wireless coverage throughout the four-county Los Angeles region. Each of the four named plaintiffs allege they were misled by defendants' promises that they would receive wireless coverage in areas near their homes, places of employment, and other well-traveled areas. AT&T Wireless was recently acquired by Cingular Wireless, creating one of the nation's largest wireless carriers. Both defendants joined in the petition to compel the plaintiffs' claims to arbitration. Cingular is a joint venture between the domestic wireless divisions of SBC (NYSE:SBC) and BellSouth (NYSE:BLS). SBC owns 60 percent of the company and BellSouth owns 40 percent, based on the value of the assets both contributed to the venture. AT&T Wireless is wholly owned by Cingular. Press and Consumer Contact Information: If you are press or a resident in the Los Angeles region who has been deceived by AT&T Wireless or Cingular's coverage maps and/or advertising or are otherwise interested in speaking to an attorney regarding this case, please contact Reed Kathrein at Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP at 415-288-4545 or visit our website at www.lerachlaw.com or email coveragemaps@lerachlaw.com.